Melissa Ewart Landscape Architecture & Urban Planning Portfolio 2022

Page 1

2022

MELISSA EWART LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN


HELLO! I am a passionate and driven Master of Urban Planning and Design student graduating from the University of Georgia in August 2022. My Bachelor’s Degree is in Landscape Architecture, also from UGA. I strive to create joyful places where all people and creatures feel welcome. I am in love with the design process, especially when I have the opportunity to engage with clients or the public. I believe that everyone is an expert in something, and that we should always look at life (and work) with fresh eyes. I bring humor and light with me everywhere I go, which is an attitude that encompasses my work. Thank you for checking out my portfolio, I am excited to get to know you!

Melissa Ewart 214. 790. 9363 Melissa.Ewart@uga.edu LinkedIn


EXPERIENCE Studio Instructor, University of Georgia Athens, Georgia - January 2022-present • Sole instructor of a first-year landscape architecture studio • Responsible for course planning, project design, lecturing, grading, & all other instruction duties

Landscape Designer, Perry Planning

Athens, Georgia - March 2021-August 2021 • Lead designer for residential projects • Responsible for all site modeling and rendering (hand + digital) • Website design and social media coordinator

Landscape Architecture Intern, Smith Planning Group

Watkinsville, Georgia - June 2020-August 2020 • Created a masterplan for Harris Shoals Park • Lead community meetings • Conducted site inventory and analysis

Front of House, Chick-fil-a Downtown Athens, Georgia - 2018-2021

Camp Counselor, YMCA Camp on the Lake

Highland Village, Texas - 2017-2019


URBAN PLANNING & D Pages 1-8

LANDS

Professional Wor Pages 21-28


DESIGN

SCAPE ARCHITECTURE

rk

Pages 9-20


URBAN PLANNING & World Happiness Report

1


& DESIGN Off-Street Parking Requirements: Unfortunately Legal

GIS Tools -Join tabular data to spatial data: allows for spatial analysis

-Symbolize data

Analysis The Happiest countries in rank order are: Denmark, Switzerland, Iceland, Norway, 0

500'

5000'

Finland, Canada, Netherlands, New Zealand, Australia, Sweden, Israel, Austria, United States, Costa Rica, Germany, Brazil, Belgium, Ireland, Luxembourg, Mexico

Olmsted Scholar Essay & Nomination

The Least Happy Country is: Burundi Overall average happiness score: 5.51

Sources 1. Home, 20 Mar. 2020, worldhappiness.report/. 4. Esri

To The Moon: A Plan


St. Augustine, Florida: STORM SURGE IMPACT & MITIGATION STRATEGIES

A W BE

WATER FILTRATION Wetlands can improve

water quality by removing pollutants from surface waters. Three pollutant removal processes provided by wetlands are particularly important: sediment trapping, nutrient removal and chemical detoxification.

ARTIFICIAL WETLAND BENEFITS

STORM SURGE MITIGATION

A one acre wetland, one foot deep, can hold approximately 330,000 gallons of water. With proper grading, wetlands could prevent most flood damage in St. Augustine during a category one storm, even if the flood wall is compromised.

PARKS AND RECREATION

Wetlands are an endangered ecosystem that hundreds of plant and animal species are dependent on. Transforming St. Augustine into the Wetland Capital of the World would be distinctly marketable for recreation and ecotourism industries. Embracing regular flooding will create a unique draw to the city.

St. Augustine has historically relied on coastal armoring (seawalls) to control WETLAND TOURISM sea-level rise and storm surge. Based on our research, we recommended that the city move to floating and floodable development strategies.

DESIG FLOATING BOAR

DESIGNED WETLANDS

ARCHITECTURAL FLOOD MITIGATION

1” = 1000’

Land uses affected by 3 feet of storm surge

DESIGNED WETLANDS


TORM SURGE IMPACT AND MITIGATION STRATEGIES

elissa Ewart, Cemre Nural

blanca Inn On The Bay, The artini Bar and Nero’s Waterfront Cafe

Milagro 0n 12 Latin Kitchen

BASICcanIMROVEMENTS Simple, low-impact WATER FILTRATION Wetlands improve

strategies can be applied to almost all properties and are water quality by removing pollutants from surfacethat waters. Three relatively easy pollutant removal processes provided by wetlands areand inexpensive to complete. Basic improvements on theirand own can reduce the impact of flooding particularly important: sediment trapping, nutrient removal and facilitate recovery. chemical detoxification.

https://www.visitstaugustine.com/

w.tripadvisor.com/

ARTIFICIAL n St. Augustine Historic ront WETLAND ENEFITS

BUILDING ELEVATION STORM SURGE MITIGATION

Raising a building A one so deep, the lowest habitable floor and building acre wetland, one foot can hold approximately 330,000systems are located above the grading, Base Flood Elevation (BFE). Although all buildings gallons of water. With proper wetlands could can be elevated, it is typically easier and less costly to elevate prevent most flood damage in St. Augustine during a category a wood-framed building than a masonry or concrete building. one storm, even if the flood wall is compromised.

Casa Maya Café

and Avilés Restaurant & Lounge

FLOOD MITIGATION OPTIONS

WET FLOODPROOFING PARKS AND RECREATION

Measures applied to a Wetlands are an building that allows floodwater to enter a building and rise at the endangered ecosystem that hundreds of plant and animal species same rate and to the same level as floodwater outside of a are dependent on. Transforming St. Augustine into the Wetland Best Western Bayfront building. Wet floodproofing can be applied to masonry or Capital of the World would be distinctly marketable for recreconcrete buildings and may be the best option for residential and ation and ecotourism industries. Embracing regular flooding will non-residential buildings that are difficult to elevate. create a unique draw to the city. https://www.visitstaugustine.com/

https://www.tripadvisor.in/

rior Real Estate Services,

https://www.booking.com/hotel/us/

WETLAND TOURISM https://www.google.com/maps

y's Seafood, Bar & Grille

Harbor View Café

GNED WETLANDS RDWALKS

https://www.visitstaugustine.com/

https://www.weddingmapper.com/

Meehan's Irish Pub & Seafood House ARCHITECTURAL FLOOD MITIGATION

Reina Taqueria & Tequila

https://www.visitstaugustine.com/

MOAT TOURISM

https://casareinastaug.com/about/

BASIC IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING ELEVATION FLOATING BOARDWALKS -Regular maintenance The majority of 19th and 20th -Relocation of critical systems & equipment century historic residences are wood -Back flow prevention framed, lending themselves to building -Installation of secondary power sources elevation as the most effective flood -Use of flood damage-resistant materials in mitigation option. DESIGNED WETLANDS flood-prone locations The St. Augustine City Code -Barriers and shields at door and window identifies the maximum allowable openings building height, currently established as -Landscape improvements 35-feet measured from the DFE. To the extent possible, proposed MOAT TOURISM

alterations to historic buildings should retain: •The overall building proportions, appropriate to typology and style; •Historic access and orientation; •The composition of character-defining building elements; •Historic building features, including appendages such as porches, bays, and chimneys; and

BUILDING ELEVATION CASE STUDIES WET FLOODPROOFING Wet floodproofing allows floodwaters to enter an enclosed area of a building and rise at the same rate, and to the same levels, as floodwater outside of the building. Most new residential construction tends to be wet floodproofed. Potential lower level modifications: -Allow floodwater to freely enter and leave the building -Modify lower level window and door openings Potential first floor modifications: -Raise the floor -Limit first floor use https://www.fema.gov/pdf/rebuild/mat/sec6.pdf

D


Could Common Good be the

The purpose of this GIS analysis project is to study the relationship between goodness and happiness at the scale of individu contributed to the happiness of the country’s citizens, or if happy citizens make a good country. No direct relationship was fo Good Country Index

Good Country Index

Ethnic Diversity

Ethnic Diversity

GIS Tools

GIS Tools:

-Join tabular data to spatial data: allows for spatial analysis

-Join tabular data to spatial data: allows for spatial analysis Analysis -Classify Data: allows for more digestible view of data by ranges rather than individual rankings Sources -Classify Data: allows for more digestible view

of data by ranges rather than individual rankings

-The most ethnically diverse country is Uganda -The least ethnically diverse country is the Northern Mariana Islands.

Analysis:

3. Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly,

W. et al. Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth 8, 155–194 (2003). https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1024471506938

4. Esri

-The most ethnically diverse country is Uganda

GDP

GDP

GIS Tools

Good Country Index:

Good Country Index: Top 20 Highest Ranked Countries Each Cate Top 20in by Cat

GIS Tools:

-Join tabular data to spatial data: allows for spatial analysis

-Symbolize data -Select by attribute Analysis The-Add countries with the highest GDP per field, calculate capita are: geometry -Symbolize data -Select by attribute -Add field, calculate geometry

Qatar, Luxembourg, Singapore, Kuwait, Norway, United Arab Emirates, Switzerland, United States, Saudi Arabia, Ireland, Netherlands, Sweden, Austria, Germany, Australia, Denmark, Bahrain, Canada, Iceland, Belgium

Climate

Peace

Culture

Health and Wellbeing

Analysis:

The 20 countries with the highest GDP per capita have an average Sources 1. happiness score of 6.99 4. Their average happiness score is: 6.99

The average size of the top 5 countries is: 8309025.04 acres

Home, 20 Mar. 2020, worldhappiness.report/. Esri

Countries within 200 miles of the World’s “Goodest” Countries

Good Country Index: Countries within 200 miles of the world

Healthy Life Expectancy

Healthy Life Expectancy

GIS Tools

Analysis:

-Join tabular data to spatial data: allows for spatial analysis

The 20 countries with the highest L.E. have an average happiness score of 6.81

-Symbolize data -Select by attribute

Analysis

The countries with the highest healthy life expectancy are: Singapore, Japan, South Korea, Spain, Iceland, Switzerland, Australia, Italy, Israel, Cyprus, Luxembourg, Sweden, France, New Zealand, Canada, Belgium, Chile, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands Their average happiness score is: 6.81

Sources

5

1. Home, 20 Mar. 2020, worldhappiness.report/. 4. Esri


key to Individual Happiness?

ual countries compared in a global context. The goal was to determine whether or not being a morally good country ound in this study. Further research on the cultural context of happiness and goodness is needed. World Happiness Report GIS Tools

GIS Tools:

World Happiness Report GIS Tools

Analysis:

-Join tabular data to spatial data: allows

-Join tabular data to spatial data: allows

-Symbolize data: visualizes the difference between GCI Analysis rankings of countries -The “Goodest” Countries in rank order

for spatial analysis

for spatial analysis

-The Happiest countries in rank order are: The Happiest countries in rank order are: Denmark, Switzerland, Iceland, Norway, Finland The Least Happy Country is: Burundi -The Least Happy Overall average happiness score: 5.51 Country is: Burundi -Top 20 average happiness score: 5.51 Sources

-Symbolize data: visualizes the difference between GCI rankings of countries

-Symbolize data

Analysis

Denmark, Switzerland, Iceland, Norway, Finland, Canada, Netherlands, New Zealand, Australia, Sweden, Israel, Austria, United States, Costa Rica, Germany, Brazil, Belgium, Ireland, Luxembourg, Mexico

Analysis:

are: Finland, Netherlands, Ireland, Sweden,

Germany, Denmark, Switzerland, Norway, France, Spain, Canada, Bulgaria, Belgium, Estonia, United Kingdom, Luxembourg, New Zealand, Austria, Italy, Australia

-The “Goodest” Countries in rank order are: Finland, Netherlands, Ireland, Sweden, Germany -The least Good country is: Sources 2. Iraq -The least Good country is: Iraq

Anholt, Simon. Good Country, www.

1. Home, 20 Mar. 2020, worldhappiness.report/. 4. Esri

goodcountry.org/.

4. Esri

egory tegory

GIS Tools:

GIS Tools

World Happiness Report:

Top 20inby Category World Happiness Report: Top 20 Highest Ranked Countries Each Category

Analysis:

GIS Tools

-Data extraction: select by attribute and export to a new layer

-Data extraction: select by attribute and export to a new layer: individual layers for each top 20

-Data extraction: select by attribute and export to a new layer -Add field, calculate geometry

makes analysis easier for these specific groups

-Average overall happiness score of top 20 Freedom to Make Life Choices countries: 6.77 -Average overall happiness score of top 20 Generosity countries: 6.21 -Average overall happiness score of top 20 Social Support countries: 6.85 -Average overall happiness score of top 20 Perception of Sources 1. Corruption countries: 6.74 4.

-Add field, calculate geometry:

Analysis

Analysis

-Average overall happiness score of top 20 Freedom to Make Life Choices countries: 6.77 -Average size of top 20 Freedom to Make Life Choices countries is: 857877765.49 -Average overall happiness score of top 20 Generosity countries: 6.21 -Average size of top 20 Generosity countries is: 1176334388.17 -Average overall happiness score of top 20 Social Support countries: 6.85 -Average size of top 20 Social Support countries is: 976188067.95 -Average overall happiness score of top 20 Perception of Corruption countries: 6.74 -Average size of top 20 Perception of Corruption countries is: 888198482.44

calculates size of countries in acres

Analysis:

-Average overall rank of top 20 climate countries: 24.24 -Average size of top 20 climate countries: 735403062.65 acres -Average size of top 20 climate countries (excluding Canada): 139652235.52 acres -Average overall rank of top 20 Peace countries: 41.39 -Average size of top 20 peace countries: 129325228.34 acres -Average overall rank of top 20 Culture countries: 16.21 -Average size of top 20 Culture countries: 109693488.13 acres

-Average overall rank of top 20 climate countries: 24.24 -Average overall rank of top 20 Peace countries: 41.39 Sources -Average overall rank of top 20 Culture countries: 16.21

Freedom to Make Life Choices

Generosity

-Social Support is the greatest indicator of overall happiness amongst the top 20 countries

2. Anholt, Simon. Good Country, www. goodcountry.org/.

4. Esri

Social Support

Perception of Corruption

Home, 20 Mar. 2020, worldhappiness. report/. Esri

d’s “Goodest” Countries GIS Tools

GIS Tools:

-Select by proximity: 200 feet from top 20 good countries: shows which countries

-Select by proximity: 200 feet -Export data: -Erase: from top 20 good countries

are nearest to the good countries

creates layer for buffer countries

shows just buffer countries without the good countries

Analysis:

Analysis

-The average overall rank of countries within a 200 -The average overall rank for the top mile countries buffer of the “Goodest” 20 “Goodest” is 10.48 -Countries with the closest proximity to countries is: 49.33 the “Goodest”countries are ranked on -The average overall rank of countries within a 200 mile buffer of the “Goodest” countries is: 49.33

average 38.85 points lower than other countries

Sources

1. Home, 20 Mar. 2020, worldhappiness.report/. 4. Esri

Countries within 200within miles World Happiness Report: Countries 200 of miles the of the world’s happiest countries World’s Happiest Countries

GIS Tools

Analysis:

-Select by proximity: 200 feet from top 20 good countries -Export data -Erase

-The average happiness score of the 20 happiest countries Analysis -the average happiness score of the 20 is: 7.21 happiest countries is: 7.21 -The average happiness score of countries within a 200 mi buffer of the happiest countries is: 4.34

-The average happiness score of countries within a 200 mi buffer of the happiest countries is: 4.34

-Countries within a 200 mi buffer of the happiest countries rank on average 2.87 points lower than the happiest countries

Sources 1. Home, 20 Mar. 2020, worldhappiness.report/. 4. Esri


The World’s HAPPIEST City:

The for in effic the h distr hexa for a land has distr enco ¼m or ci tran cent trail sust treat prot limit

Delhi, India

ine

Land Use Roads Public/semipublic facili�es Airport Transporta�on hub Local park/monument Agriculture/green belt Government land Regional park Commercial Industrial Wholesale/Warehouse/cold/oil Government office/estate River Unplanned development

7

Primarily Residential Area A4

Percent

Roads

Primarily residential Area A3

ss & S Cen ervice ter C1

2.7 2.4 0.3 1.6 5.0 13.0 3.0 0.1 0.9 1.6 0.4 0.9 0.5 59.2

Facil ities Airp ort ub

Bus

Primarily Residential Area A2

nH

l A1

29.3 3.7 15.6 15.0 11.6 1.9 1.7 1.4 0.9 11.9 7.1

rtati o

Primarily Residentia

Percent

Lo Mo cal nu Par me k/ nt

a

Port intenan ce Suomen lina

semip ublic

l&M

Land Use Green space Business and service center C1 Primarily residen�al area A4 Primarily residen�al area A3 Primarily residen�al area A2 Primarily residen�al area A1 Suomenlina Port Technical and maintenance area City center Seaside recrea�on and tourism

spo

nica

Green Space

Public/

City Center Tec h

Tra n

de Seasi ion at Recre ism ur and To

Helsinki, Finland

The ideal city is a happy city. Happy cities are comprised of all the other elements needed for a successful and fundamentally good society. These things fit neatly into the framework created for sustainable societies, which calls for economic, ecological, and social sustainability.

Agriculture/ Green Belt

Unplanned Development

Government

Re

sid

en

tia

l

Land Regio Commnal Park ercial Indu stria l Wh Go olesale Riv vernm /Ware er ent h Off ouse/C ice old/O /Es il tate

A case study approach was taken to determine the land use hierarchy and structure of the Happy City. The World Happiness Report’s global ranking of cities was used to determine the happiest and the least happy city. Helsinki, Finland has been the happiest city for several years in a row. Delhi, India is the least happy city that is not impoverished or in an active war. An analysis of the land use distributions of these cities was performed to determine the most and least ideal urban forms with regards to societal happiness. From this analysis it was determined that access to ample green space, variation in density, and nesting city centers are the key constituents for happy city planning. Land use percentages in the Happy City meet or exceed those of Helsinki and are the inverse of those of Delhi wherever possible.


Town Center/Comm Mixed-Use

STUDIO II

A Design Guide

Solar Energy/Pollina

Melissa Ewart

Lake/Waste Water Tr Public Open Space Camping

Medical/Health

Parks and Common Areas Tourism Town Center/Commercial Agriculture

Happy City’s design is modular and tessellated, allowing nfinite combinations and adjustments. Influenced by the ciency of beehives, the basic unit of the Happy Society is hexagon. Each city unit is made up of smaller hexagonal ricts which each have their own societal purpose. Each agonal unit at any scale includes every land use necessary a complete local economy, with additional focus on the d use designated as its specialty. For example, every district a grocery store, but only the food production/grocery ricts have specialty grocery stores. This nesting structure ourages micromobility, where residents walk within their mile radius districts and take public transit to other districts ities. Public transit is further encouraged by the location of nsit stops within city centers and exclusion of streets within ters. The Happy City is also entirely navigable by greenway ls. Specific design elements are included for ecological tainability. Each city center is accompanied by a wastewater tment area, ecological corridors are contiguous and tected from sprawl by dense city centers, and micromobility ts energy usage. Land Use

Duplex Townhouse Apartments Mixed use City centers

Greenway

Land Use

Acres

Mixed-Use

Lake/Waste Water Treatment Government Medical/Health Tourism Agriculture Manufacturing Education Government

0

Townhouse Apartments

Transportation Hub

Single Family

5000'

500'

Apartments

LAND USE PLAN

0

0

Acres DU/AC DU Popula�on 239.6824 10 2397 8892 112.906 20 2258 8378 50.42368 30 1513 5612 112.8393 20 2257 8373 91.94054 30 2758 10233

5000'

500'

Average: U.S. Persons/DU & World Persons/DU

POPULATION: 41,500

0.5(Helsinki Population / Area multiple)

LAND USE PLAN 5000'

500'

DU/AC

DU

Popula�on 8892 8378 1513 5612 2257 8373 2758 10233

secondary city centers

ents rtm

e us ho

wn to x

sin gle go fire/e vern m fa me erge mily ncy nt s man ed ervic ufa ctu ucatio es ring n

road s

t

er

linat

at

/pol

w te as

sola

r en

ergy

w en t tm

ator

re a

at er t

s rea

ter

na

Cen

mo

City

ing

com

ace

en sp

ic op

publ

mp

m

Ma

ca

n sa

park

SUBWAY

nd

lth

ismea ur h to ical/ ed

m

Main

Districts

ca

mixed-use

e

agricultur

sa

or

m

park

x

m en

ple

lth

ismea ur h to ical/ ed

e

us ho

ents

wn

to

rtm

apa

du

sin gle go fire/e vern m fa me erge mily ncy nt s man ed ervic ufa ctu ucatio es ring n

secondary city centers

e

ace

en sp

ic op

publ

tre at

5000'

POPULATION: 41,500

Average: U.S. Persons/DU & World Persons/DU apa

30 20 30

s road

50.42368 112.8393 91.94054

Transportation Hub

Black Rock City is the site of the annual Burning Man festival, which celebrates renewal and represents a new form of society. The culture and urban form of Black Rock City, with some geometric adjustments, is the basis for this design guide.

agricultur

DISTRICTS

Duplex

Townhouse

ple

500'

Single Family

Duplex

du

0

Fire/Emergency Ser

Fire/Emergency Services

Duplex 239.6824 10 2397 GREEN SPACES AND TRAILS Townhouse 112.906 20 2258 Apartments Mixed use City centers

Manufacturing

Solar Energy/Pollinator Farm Education

w

:

Parks and Common

Land Use Percent of whole 0.5(Helsinki Population / Area multiple) 40 public open space 3 camping 1 parks and common areas 3.1 Main City Center 3 mixed-use 9 solar energy/pollinator 5.3 waste water treatment 1 medical/health 0.1 tourism agriculture 14 Land Use Percent of whole manufacturing 2 40 public open spaceeduca�on 0.2 3 camping government 0.1 1 parks and common areas fire/emergency services 0.2 3.1 Main City Centersingle family 3 3 mixed-use duplex 4 9 solar energy/pollinator townhouse 3 5.3 waste water treatment apartments 2 1 medical/health roads 4 0.1 tourism secondary city centers 2 agriculture 14 manufacturing 2 educa�on 0.2 government 0.1 fire/emergency services 0.2 single family 3 duplex 4


LANDSCAPE ARCH World Happiness Report

9


HITECTURE


A Lot to Consider:the effects

The United States’ addiction to automobiles has caused planners to build cities for cars rather thanThe pedestrians. Cars sit empty in parkin United States’ addiction to automobiles has caused planners to build sit empty in parking lots. While these lots cover over 55% of the average walkability, increasing the Urban Heat Island Effect, and stealing valuable habitat from local flora and fauna. Thankfully, evolving techno increasing the Urban Heat Island Effect, and stealing valuable habitat from exciting solution. that autonomous parking will be one of the first widespread usages of these new technologies. Autonomous parking capabilities will lik The rise of Autonomous Vehicles could be as little as 10 years awa The effects of autonomous vehicles on parking and the neighborhood unit widespread usages of these new technologies. Autonomous parking cap estimate that these lots will occupy 60% less area than traditional parking methods. The excess area must be utilized to create more sus to park themselves in highly efficient, pedestrian-free lots. Most experts e

A Lot to Consider:

methods. The excess area must be utilized to create more sustainable ne

Wa lk

5M inu te

Wa lk inu te

10 M The average vehicle spends 95% of its lifetime parked.

Passengers drive car to destination

Parking takes up an average of 55% of total land in U.S. cities.

There are 8 parking spaces for every car in the U.S.

55%

Parking covers approximately 6,500 square miles in the U.S., which is larger than the state of Connecticut.

Car returns to pick up passengers

Car drops off passengers at destination

Car parks in the most efficient parking area

Possible Use of Excess Parking Space Within Lots

Summer electricity generation in the Eastern United States increased by almost 4% for each degree in temperature rise.

4%

Ozone concentration in the Eastern United States during heat waves increases by at least 20% compared to the summer average.

20%

Street

60% Less Parking Area

A study in Copenhagen shows that an 18% decrease in parking resulted in a 40% increase in bycicle traffic.

40%

A typical city block generates more than 5 times more runoff than a woodland area of the same size.

5x Street

5M

alk te W inu

Home values in walkable neighborhoods are 40.5% higher than in their car-dependant counterparts.

40.5%

62 Percent of Millennials prefer living in walkable communities.

62%

Street

Building

lk Wa ute Min 10

27.1%

Street

-The Center for Watershed Protection

Only 27.1% of the average American city is covered by trees.

Building

stormwater runoff is to limit the amount of paved surfaces that are created during development.

Street

The most effective way to minimize the impacts of

Autonomous Vehicle parking design allows for a “stacked” parking system and eliminates the need for door space.


s of autonomous vehicles on parking

ng lots for 95% of their lifetimes. These lots cover over 55% of the average American city and detract from public health by inhibiting d cities for cars rather than pedestrians. For 95% of their lifetimes, cars e American city, they detract from public health by inhibiting walkability, ology could provide an exciting solution. The rise of Autonomous Vehicles could be as little as 10 years away. Many experts believe m local flora and fauna. Thankfully, evolving technology could provide an kely tothatallow vehicles communicate with each other to park themselves in highly efficient, pedestrian-free lots. Most experts ay. Manyevolve experts believe autonomous parking will be to one of the first pabilities will likely evolve to allow vehicles to communicate with each other stainable neighborhoods. estimate that these lots will occupy 60% less area than traditional parking Combined Function Automation

Function-Specific Automation

Now

Now

No Automation

Parking Lot 60% smaller Illustrative Graphic

Now

[Autonomous Vehicle Parking]

Regulatory Change Required

eighborhoods.

is estimated to save up to 60% in parking space by 2030. -Audi’s Urban Futures Initiative

Now

2025-2030+

2021-2025

Limited Self-Driving Automation

Full Self-Driving Automation (driver)

Full Self-Driving Automation (No driver)

Regular lot

View showing large portion of lot being used for new purpose

Existing lots converted to autonomous lots could utilize excess space for rain gardens or solar energy harvesting. Other options include recreation (Ex: basketball courts) or logistics fulfillment centers.

Full Parking Lot Conversion

Excess Floors of Parking Deck Converted to Mixed-Use Development

t Parking converted to Drop-off Lanes and Amenities

On-street parking could be converted to drop-off lanes, bike lanes, and more comfortable sidewalks.

60% Fewer Lots

P

Street Parking Eliminated

60% Less Parking Area

60% Fewer Lots

Traffic Decrease

Bike Lanes

Comfortable Sidewalks

Ecosystem Services

Solar Energy Collection

Storage and Logistics

Recreation

Housing

Hydroponic Farming

Vacant lots could be converted to low-income housing developments, hydroponic farming facilities, parks, and more. Careful planning is required so that valuable real estates is not wasted.


The Intersection: UGA Center

Connectivity is essential fo Intersection, a new design energy to an underutilized

Refreshing water features cool the space, provide visual interest, and screen noise from nearby vents. Waterfalls also draw users from outside the site.

13

Variation in the size of spaces, along with the several types of spaces, allows for the courtyard to be highly flexible to accommodate its usership. Some gatherings can be as large as 40 people, while normal days will likely have ten or less active users. Seat walls and a floating staircase provide seating without feeling crowded. Naturalistic plantings add interest and provide contrast to the geometric nature of the courtyard.


for Teaching and Learning

or the Center for Teaching and Learning, located in a hidden courtyard on the University of Georgia campus. The for the courtyard, will serve as a calling card for the building that surrounds it. The design will bring much- needed d space, transforming the area into a haven for interpersonal relations.

1”=10’

Joyful design is the binding force of The Intersection. The colorful courtyard is intended to spark joy and interest even before users enter the space. Colored beams extend outward from the site to form a simple mural on the two large surrounding buildings, piquing the interest of passersby. The result is a welcoming space.


How does it work?

Great Design

What is the scoring system? • Positive Metric = +1⁄3 point • Negative Metric = -1⁄3 point • Override = +/- 1 point • Starting Score: 4 (neutral)

Note: Absolute impartiality is impossible due to the nature of emotional responses. To increase accuracy, emotion scoring should be repeated by a large and diverse population of individual users.

1

2

3

Negative Response

5

4 Neutral Response

•Too exposed or too constricted •Unnatural Angles •Hazardous Materials •Lack of upkeep •Lack of Flow •Negative Override

6

en t

Tu r

nin

Pavement added for turn lane

tm

Pavement added to even grade

ar Ap

Negative Metrics:

•Obstructed Sight Lines •Lack of Accessibility (ADA) •Lack of Accessibility (general) •Perception of life-threatening hazards

4.33

Pavement added for turn lane

on

•Abundance of positive stimulation •Sense of freedom •Savannah Hypothesis •Effective Signage •Positive Override

characteristics

Potential Final Score

iti

Why emotion-based design?

•Relocate and redesign park entrance to allow for full turning land and a more traditional, head-on entrance •Repurpose and relocate existing signage

nd

•Abundance of accessible flora •Running Water •Scheduled and Programmed Activities •Transcendence •Potential for play

4.0

Emotional Return

Co

Positive Metrics:

to sites within the study area

2. Produce design solutions for sites that produce a negative emotional response

Greatest Potential Final Score

g

Project Goals

2.66

High Investment:

•Non-defensible spaces •Conflicts with positive

•Therapeutic Gardens •Meditation Gardens •Aesthetics of Joy

1. Spatially identify emotional relationships

•Expand entrance to include turning lanes •Resurface entrance with additional asphalt to flatten the grade adjacent to Mitchell Bridge Rd., This would increase visibility. •Add designed signage consistent with the park

Characteristics of:

Characteristics of:

Potential Final Score

Moderate Investment:

to measure average emotional response to sites

3. Good Health and Wellbeing

Pa

in

•Recreation and mental health

•Retain all existing road infrastructure •Move existing sign to more prominent location •Add basic guidance signs 0.2 miles away

Define metrics

Contributes to achieving the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals

Improves the Site’s Ability to Provide Ecosystem Services

Low Investment:

Design Solutions:

Why emotion-based design?

B e n B u r t o n:

Design Goal: Decrease stress associated with navig

ist

ion

Amidst global economic and health crises, green spaces have become essential refuges. It is imperative that these outdoor spaces do not add to existing stressors. Emotional responses are often difficult to integrate into the design process but affect all aspects of society. Improving a community’s mental health through environmental improvement increases economic productivity, social wellbeing, and ecological resilience. This project sets a framework for analyzing and improving emotional responses to public spaces, followed by example analyses and suggested improvements for three green spaces located in Athens, Georgia.

Ri

Ex

flood control age ulation tal and historic

Improving Emotional Respo

7

Hi ec fe

Positive Response

All maps are oriented with North facing upwards.

Not Mo and Inve leve sub stud esti

Park Guidance Sign (Approaching from North)

B i s h o p: 1” = 500’

Ben Burton Park

1” = 300’

Bishop Park

1” = 700’

West Wa

Design Goal: Increase sense of safety through com

Beech Haven

Circula

Public Art and Green Wall Screens Community road noise involvement

Unique play areas

Intimate flora interaction 0 ft.

Loca

Local Artist Mural 200 ft.

Children’s Play Wall

500 ft.

Park Entrance

Initial Score: 1.0

West Walking Path

Initial Score: 1.33

Children

40

Comm

Invasive-Lined Trail

Initial Score: 3.0

Community Recycling Art 700 ft.

Local Artis


onse to Public Spaces rk Entrance

Positives added:

gating to Ben Burton Park.

Negatives removed: •Lack of access (ADA) •Lack of upkeep •Obstructed sight line •Lack of access (general) •Too exposed or constricted •Unnatural angles •Lack of flow

•Abundance of accessible flora •Scheduled and programmed activities •Effective signage •Transcendence

Final Score:

•Potential for play •Abundance of positive stimulation •Freedom

View of Path by Dugout

•Positive override

Main Park Entrance Sign

B e e c h H a v e n:

Invasive-Lined Trail

Design Goal: Create safe opportunities for joyful interaction with healthy ecosystems and cultural artifacts.

•Community invasive plant removal •Historic Resource scavenger hunt •Ecological education groups

1

ver Crossing and Park Guidance Signs

Positives added:

te: Low, oderate, d High estment els are bjective dent imates

•Savannah Hypothesis •Effective signage •Abundance of positive stimulation •Sense of freedom

•Obstructed sight line •Lack of access (general) •Too exposed or constricted •Lack of upkeep •Lack of flow

Final Score:

alking Path

mmunity involvement and separation from roadway. Circular Windows

ar Windows

al Artist Mural

Green Wall

Community Recycling Art 100 ft.

Children’s Play Wall 300 ft.

4

Celebration of Historic resources through community builds: •Pulley system between paths •Functioning well (reminiscent of water

00 ft.

pump)

•Miniature Arts and Crafts Architecture build sites (biodegradable building blocks)

munity Mural

Scale: Height of Wall: 1⁄8” = 1’-0” 7’ - 0”

Length of Wall: 800’ - 0”

Wall replaces existing chain length fence.

st Mural 800 ft.

Initial Programming

Restored Path with Signage, Boardwalk, and Seating

(reminiscent of zipline over the creek)

n’s Play Wall

600 ft.

3

Wayfinding Cultural Resources

Features hydrologic wayfinding

Flora & Fauna

Slows traffic for safer entry

Invasive Plant Removal

Negatives removed:

Signage

ighlights cological eatures

2

Before Intervention

•Water and Land pollution cleanup

5

Final Programming

Positives added:

•Scheduled and programmed activities •Sense of freedom •Effective signage •Running water •Positive override

Negatives removed: •Lack of upkeep •Obstructed sight line •Lack of access (general) •Perception of life-threatening hazards •Too exposed or constricted •Lack of flow

Final Score:

Final Conclusions: While further exploration is needed, hypotherical average response to all three sites improved substantially through emotional design.


Perspective Park

Large stee

Radial be stress from

17

Reflectin


el arches inspired by the armillary sphere make the park an icon while also creating a sense of enclosure

enches, pavers, and seat walls allow the user to dem urban life in whichever way is most comfortable.

ng Pool invites physical and philosophical reflection.

Spherical boulders serve as a natural play area for children and adults.


Elatior Estates Inspired by the clean lines and high contrast of southern California architecture, Elatior Estates promotes a strong sense of community while also providing spaces for individual recuperation, animal habitat, and minimizing environmental impacts. Clean architecture contrasts with coarsely textured plant materials to create a modern, yet natural style. Community is central to the design, so gathering spaces strongly encourage residents to interact at every point of connection. An oversized round-about acts as the entrance, slowing down cars as they approach. Community parking cuts down on impervious surfaces while also creating a moment for people to walk from their cars to homes together. This walk takes them through the community front yard and plaza, in which the whole neighborhood can gather and recreate.

19



Professional Work

21


k


Landscape Architecture Int

My Summer 2020 internship with Smith Planing Group focused on creating a new masterplan for Harris Shoals Park in Watkin in a team with one other intern and one experienced L.A. We performed a comprehensive site inventory, created several base community input meetings, met with the architects of a nearby building that would affect the park, and created sections and recommendations for the park. I loved working with this multidisciplinary firm and grew so much as a designer during this ex

EXISTING CONDITIONS

REVITALIZED SHO

23


tern: Smith Planning Group

nsville, Georgia. I worked emaps of the park, held d perspectives of our final xperience.

OALS SECTION

TRAILS


Landscape Designer: Perry Pla

When Patrick Perry (a coworker of mine at Smith Planning Group) chose to start his own firm, he asked m his dream a reality. We worked together to build the company from the ground up. I designed the compa social media, met with several clients to discuss their project criteria, performed existing conditions of using Autocad, and created digital renderings with Sketchup, Procreate, and Photoshop. I also managed below me who has become a dear friend. perryplan.com

Sketchup model enhanced with Photoshop used to present a design proposal

25


anning

me to help make any’s website and residential sites d one employee

Procreate planting design overlayed onto existing conditions

Procreate planting & seating design overlayed onto existing conditions

Procreate stairs, seating, and planting design on existing conditions


Studio Instructor: The Univer

Teaching first-year landscape architecture studio has been such an honor and joy. I was chosen for the position as a graduat BLA program director and the MUPD program director to teach the course on my own. My class focuses on transferring two-di do this, my class creates a series of models based on different meaning devices, geometric forms, and levels of enclosure. W landform models. Next, the class will move to plant models and a final combined model. My teaching philosophy is rooted in has fostered a diligent yet playful learning environment that both my class and I enjoy.

Ezra Lewis’s model based on Beyonce’s “Mood 4 Eva”

Class sketching at the Georgia State Botanical Gardens for the beginning of our plant unit.

27


rsity of Georgia

te teaching assistant, but was trusted by both the imensional ideas into three-dimensional forms. To We have completed our music-based models and our n compassion and the joy of authentic learning, which

Julia Toro’s model based on “Dreaming” from the Coraline soundtrack

Inglish Filbern’s model based on Kate Bush’s “Babooshka”


2202

TRAWE ASSILEM ERUTCETIHCRA EPACSDNAL NGISED & GNINNALP NABRU


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.