3 1920 F
301
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
FALL 2019-2020
METU ARCHITECTURE
ÇETİN ERTAN YAVUZATMACA
ARCH
log book
ARCH 301 TEAM INSTRUCTORS: HASAN OKAN ÇETIN SEREN ERTAN MERCAN YAVUZATMACA
STUDENTS: ABDULLAH ZAMIR AKTEKİN TOZUN ARİF EREN YILDIRIM ASRIN ONAT ŞENGÜL AYŞENUR GÖKHAN BERFE NAZ HAŞEMOĞLU BUSENUR GÜNGÖR BÜŞRA AŞCI BÜŞRA BALLI BÜŞRA KARAGÖZLÜ DAVUT BALCİ DİLARA GÜNEY EKİN MANSUROĞLU ELİF GÜNGÖR EMEL UÇAK FURKAN TÜRKER GAZİ CAN ŞAHİN İBRAHİM HALİL KELLECİ İZGESU GÜVEN MAHMUT EMRE KARCI NADINE YOUSIF NİHAN MUTLU ONURCAN MIZRAK PINAR TALAŞ RECEP SELİM YARBAŞI ŞEYMA SEZEN UMUTKAĞAN DURĞUT ZEYNEP ERİŞTİ
ARCH
301
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
log book
FALL 2019-2020
1
2
course outline
01
230919 / M.A
3
tutors
objectives
Hasan Okan Çetin > (hocetin@metu.edu.tr) Office No: 404 Seren Ertan > (serenertan@hotmail.com) Office No: 317 Mercan Yavuzatmaca > (mercany@metu.edu.tr) Office No: 315 Design of buildings in relation to their particularly historical urban context is emphasized. Issues of settlement dwelling relationships, buildings of functional complexity and spatial variety and architectonic interpretations of structural systems are analyzed and designed. (Arch 301-302 METU Catalog- 2015-2017) New version: Analysis and design of buildings in relation to their urban context and structural form. Term projects include large-scale housing settlements, new buildings in historical environments and large span structures, with emphasis on programmatic complexity and diversity, spatial variety and architectonic expression. Knowledge • Building up of culture and repertoire for the analysis and design of housing with mixed-use schemes, innovative structures and multifunctional public buildings. • Develop critical thinking, and knowledge about problems of architecture within an environmental context (historical, traditional, urban), Skills • Improvement of skills in architectural planning, construction and presentation techniques; advanced proficiency in oral, visual and written mediums for communication of design ideas. Attitudes • Awareness development for the cultural heritage and sites of natural and historical significance; acquaintance with the legal and ethical aspects of working in such contexts.
outcomes
The following outcomes are common to Arch 301 and 302 studios, which can be given in either of the terms (depending on the organization of studio trips). By the end of two consecutive courses, the student will be able to: Knowledge • identify, discuss and interpret prominent cases from world literature on relevant works of pioneering features; • carry out, critically, analysis of design problems in relation to environmental, social and urban aspects; • pursue and use reliable knowledge in sustainable design, building tectonics, and design of new buildings in historical context; • propose a building program based on social and cultural scenarios, with the guidance of sample briefs provided in class; • create alternative concept designs and work out master plan ideas at neighborhood scales;
4
• explore and apply intermediary and advanced technologies in giving structural form to spaces. Skills • accurately produce base maps, site plans and sectionelevations, with correct representation of the proposed design and its environmental context; • demonstrate dexterity in presentation techniques, using advanced computer programs skillfully; using both manual and computer aided drawings and models. • articulate the structural and tectonic form of buildings with precision and expressive quality; • work out coherent transitions between multiple scales (from 1/5000 to 1/50), with demonstrated skill in full expression of each scale; • prepare reports in mature language on proposed program and design ideas. Attitudes • develop maturity in managing teamwork, demonstrating individual responsibility and commitment to collective achievement; • develop consiousness on poetics of space and structure; • demonstrate adoption of values concerning natural and cultural diversity, with utmost care for heritage sites and buildings; • demonstrate evidence of professional ethics to resist and challenge real life procedures of practice. Panel and table critiques, lectures and group discussions. Diversification in subject matter and working habits throughout term projects, each being planned to expose the students to different learning experiences. Students’ regular and timely attendance to the studio is important yet this does not ensure their progress and contribution to the educational milieu. The regular and sustainable intellectual development of each student will be observed by means of group and individual production via panel and individual critics, sketch problems, home-works, preliminary juries etc.
course conduct
attendance
An attendance less than 80% during the semester means failing the course. Students with such poor attendance will not be allowed to submit their work for the final jury. For any project given, even though the student may have been physically present in class during the semester, if the studio critics have not seen adequate work of the student in progress, submission for the jury of that particular project will not be accepted. The exact measure of ‘adequate work’ may vary in each studio group. Students are required to get feedback each week regularly. 5
evaluation
Students of architecture are expected to be on time in submitting project, since this is demanded from them as prospective professional architects. In order to develop the necessary virtue of being punctual, the studio project submissions will be required to be strictly on time. Late submission or partial submission of the missing items will cause half or one grade deduction from the final jury grade decided during the final jury period. Grade deduction will be in comparable amount to the missing work. If there is no valid excuse (such as a medical report), the extra time given for the late submission cannot be more than one additional day. Failing to submit the final jury project may result in NA, a failing grade. Grading percentages of studio works can vary in different groups depending upon the work schedule, workload and processing of the different types of studies. Besides the grades received from term projects and assignments (preliminary and final juries, sketch problems, site studies, case studies), opinion based on observations of student conduct in the studio (attendance and participation, performance in panel and table critiques, and demonstration of progress) will have a role in the determination of the final grades. For the improvement of the grades received from assignments and juries, the instructors may request (or permit) additional work. An improved grade is not guaranteed simply because additional work is done. Group work is a part of the academic and professional life of architects. Students are to create positive social and physical atmosphere and act in union with the group members, share information, effort, and work load.
grading
10% Term Studies (Assignments / Case Studies / Site Analysis / Sketch Problem etc.) 20% Preliminary Jury 1 20% Preliminary Jury 2 10% Preliminary Jury 3 40% Final Jury
reminders
Students must be aware of the University’s policies regarding academic integrity, honesty, and plagiarism; they are advised to read the following regulations and take them seriously: Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Öğrenciler için Akademik Dürüstlük Kılavuzu (http://oidb.metu.edu.tr/sites/oidb.metu.edu. tr/files/ODTUAkademikDurustluk-Kilavuzu-7.3.2016.son_.pdf) Middle East Technical University, Academic Integrity Guide for Students (http://oidb.metu.edu.tr/en/system/files/Academic%20 Integrity%20Guide%20for%20Students.pdf) • Carefully read the documents concerning academic integrity
6
which have been issued to you and the related regulations on the University’s website. Learn in detail which situations fall into the scope of plagiarism in academic studies from relevant resources (e.g. ODTÜ UEAM website). • If any distrust about authorship occurs, students can be examined on the basis of their design project documents produced during the semester. • In cases of plagiarism, excuses such as “I wasn’t aware that what I’ve done is within the scope of plagiarism” are unacceptable. Be informed that the responsibility for such behavior is entirely yours. • Use your own ideas in all of your work such a piece of homework, project etc. Indicate the source of any thought, idea, text, document or finding which does not belong to you. • Prepare all your homework, projects, reports etc. by referring to the accessible original (primary) sources. • During examinations/evaluations, abide by the rules in the “Middle East Technical University Guide for Rules To Be Followed in an Examination Environment” as well as the rules determined by the instructor of the course are used. • The conduct of the studio requires mutual understanding and respect. • The studio environment must be kept tidy and clean and maintained in silence. • Personal belongings must be kept in individual care and responsibility. • Use of harmful adhesive bonding material like Pattex is strictly forbidden. • Studios are not places for having meals. • Mobile phones must be in silent mode and out of sight during lectures and discussions. • Students with special needs or disabilities should inform the studio tutors at the beginning of the semester in order to provide appropriate arrangements in the class.
7
academic integrity guide for students
Middle East Technical University aims to access knowledge and produce, apply and disseminate it for the social, cultural, economic, scientific and technological development of both our society and humanity by carrying out activities of education, research and community services at universal standards, and to educate individuals who are equipped with this knowledge and at the same time who respect knowledge and the rights of others. In accordance with this aim, all members and students of our university adopt the following METU Code of Honor: “As reliable, responsible and honorable individuals, all members of Middle East Technical University embrace only the success and recognition they deserve, and act with integrity in the use, evaluation and presentation of facts, data and documents.”
What is academic integrity? Academic Integrity entails carrying out original work and sharing ideas and findings of others provided that the source is cited.
What are infringements of academic integrity? 1. Plagiarism, 2. Cheating, 3. Presenting or submitting in different courses the whole or part of a personal study, homework or project done previously with a different purpose without citing the source, 4. Indicating sources that do not actually exist as references or creating a false data set, 5. Conducting academic work on behalf of other students, 6. Behaving in a manner so as to obtain an unfair advantage (obtaining false medical reports, declaring false excuses for period extensions and make-ups, transferring or obtaining the right of enrollment to a course in exchange for a personal gain, etc.), 7. Producing or making use of fraudulent documents (reference letters, medical reports, proficiency documents/scores, transcripts, etc.) 8. Impersonating someone else in an exam; having someone else impersonate oneself.
Plagiarism: “Plagiarism is intentionally or unintentionally acquiring and using someone else’s ideas and opinions and presenting them as if one’s own without making a reference to or citing the source.” (ODTÜ UEAM) 8
Detailed information on the types of plagiarism can be found at the address http://ueam.metu.edu.tr/intihal.
Cheating: Cheating is described as any attempt or action involving the use of disallowed sources secretly while answering exam questions. Each item below is within the scope of cheating: 1. Peeking at another student’s paper during an exam, 2. Peeking at another student’s paper during an exam and copying the answers onto one’s own paper, 3. Talking to other students during the exam, 4. Any kind of sharing of information and sources during an exam (exchanging notes, etc.) 5. Taking exam questions and/or answers out of the exam hall without permission by writing them down or photographing them, 6. Transmitting exam questions to someone else or obtaining answers through cellular phones or any other electronic gadget during the exam, 7. Writing notes concerning the content of the exam on desks and accessories used during the exam, or on one’s body or elsewhere, 8. Having someone else do the academic work; doing work to be done individually with other students, 9. Submitting to the course instructor reports/documents such as homework or projects prepared by others as if one’s own work. Disciplinary action to be taken against cheating is arranged by the Rules and Regulations Governing Student Disciplinary Actions in Institutions of Higher Education, which can be found at the address http://oidb.metu.edu.tr/yonetmelikler.
9
10
timetable
01
230919 / M.A
11
Arch 301_Architectural Design III_Fall 2019-20_ÇETİN.YAVUZATMACA.ERTAN_Studio Timetable (tentative)
10:40 - 12:30
13:40 - 17:30
M
September 23
-
General Introduction
T
September 26
Discussions on the Assignment 01 : The ONE (G)
Discussions on the Assignment 02: The PEEK (P)
M
September 30
SITE TRIP
SITE TRIP
T
October 03
Reading Presentations (G) (4)
Presentation : Olgu Çalışkan,Urban Space Morphologies Discussions on Site Analysis & Project Program (Digital) (G)
M
October 07
Discussions on Case Studies / Literature (Digital) (G)
Discussions on Case Studies / Literature (Digital) (G)
T
October 10
Presentation : Nuray Bayraktar, Ankara Konut Envanteri
Workshop : Brainstorming / Conceptual Background (G)
M
October 14
Case Trip: Dormitories, ODTÜ Case
Presentation : Elif Düzel, InfoGraphics Discussions on Case Studies / after Brainstorming (Digital) (G)
T
October 17
Presentation : Gizem Nur Aydemir, Observations on 100.YIL
FIRST PROPOSALS by using DIAGRAMS
M
October 21
Presentation : Neris Parlak, Housing Typologies
PANEL CRITICS (1/2) PANEL CRITICS (2/2)
T
October 24
Presentation : Lale Özgenel, ODTÜ DORM Experiences
PANEL CRITICS (1/2) PANEL CRITICS (2/2)
M
October 28
REPUBLIC DAY
REPUBLIC DAY
T
October 31
PANEL CRITICS (1/2)
PANEL CRITICS (2/2)
M
November 04
PRELIMINARY JURY 01
PRELIMINARY JURY 01
T
November 07
Presentation : ..., from 2D to PRESENTATION (PHOTOSHOP) Presentation : ..., from 2D to PRESENTATION (CAD, AI, ID)
Presentation : Revit Techniques for 2D presentation Discussions on Assignment 10 (Presentation Techniques)
M
November 11
PANEL CRITICS (1/2)
PANEL CRITICS (1/2)
T
November 14
PANEL CRITICS (1/2)
PANEL CRITICS (2/2)
M
November 18
PANEL CRITICS (1/2)
PANEL CRITICS (1/2)
T
November 21
PANEL CRITICS (1/2)
PANEL CRITICS (2/2)
M
November 25
PRELIMINARY JURY 02
PRELIMINARY JURY 01
T
November 28
Presentation : ... , from 3D to RENDERING (LUMION) Presentation : ... , from 3D to RENDERING (CORONA)
Presentation : Revit Techniques for 3D presentation Discussions on Assignment 11 (Presentation Techniques)
M
December 02
PANEL CRITICS (1/2)
PANEL CRITICS (2/2)
T
December 05
PANEL CRITICS (1/2)
PANEL CRITICS (2/2)
M
December 09
PANEL CRITICS (1/2)
PANEL CRITICS (1/2)
T
December 12
PANEL CRITICS (1/2)
PANEL CRITICS (2/2)
M
December 16
PRELIMINARY JURY 03 (Presentation) (Rehearsal)
PRELIMINARY JURY 01 (Presentation) ((Rehearsal)
T
December 19
RECITATION - LAST CHECK
RECITATION - LAST CHECK
M
December 23
FINAL JURY WEEK
FINAL JURY WEEK
T
December 26
FINAL JURY WEEK
FINAL JURY WEEK
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
12
Arch 301_Architectural Design III_Fall 2019-20_ÇETİN.YAVUZATMACA.ERTAN_Studio Timetable (tentative)
ASSIGNMENT
SUBMISSION
NOTES
01 : The ONE (G) 02 : The PEEK (P) 03 : Reading List (G) Project Program (in general)
Assignment 01 - 02 (digital)
04: Site Analysis (G) 05: Site Documentation & Model (Digital&Physical) 06 : Case Studies / LITERATURE
Assignment 04 (digital)
07 : Brainstorming / Conceptual Background
Assignment 06 (digital)
08 : Case Studies / after BRAINSTORMING
Assignment 05
09 : on The WAY on ANALYSIS (MyBest on Diagramatic PT)
Assignment 08
Site Analysis and Decisions
Project Program (in detail)
Assignment 09
Site Analysis and Decisions 1/500 decisions
PJ01 - Requirement List
1/500 decisions
Last discussisons on 1/500 decisions HOC > jury member for HZ Group 10 : on The WAY on 2D PRESENTATON (MyBest on 2D PT)
PJ01 - RL Assignment 10 first steps for 1/200 decisions and solutions 1/200 decisions and solutions 1/200 decisions and solutions
PJ02 - Requirement List 11 : on The WAY on 3D PRESENTATION (MyBest on 3D PT)
1/200 decisions and solutions PJ02 - RL Assignment 11
HOC > jury member for HZ Group through the final jury through the final jury through the final jury
PJ03 - Requirement List (Presentation)
through the final jury PJ03 - RL
13
14
You are asked to present one of the favorite housing projects of a well-known architect considering the total construction area around 15.000 m2.
assignment
01
the ONE
01
260919 / T.M
You will be worked in groups of 2 and the presentations will be in PECHA KUCHA style. PECHA KUCHA style: 20 slides, 20 seconds for each. Slide transitions should be automatic. Submission: 26.09.2019 Thursday at 10:40 15
Büşra Aşçı - Selim Yarbaşı busra ascı r. selim yarbasi
‘the one’ aranya low cost housing
16
A01
The ONE 23.09.2019
Büşra Ballı - Uğur Durğut Ballı B. Durğut U.
ROMERO #114
METU ARCHITECTURE ARCH 301 Hasan Okan Çetin . Mercan Yavuzatmaca . Seren Ertan
17
Busenur Güngör - İzgesu Güven - Şeyma Sezen
18
A01
The ONE 23.09.2019
Emel Uçak
co-Housing Bahçelievler Hybrid Elevated Street - Inside Out
EMEL UÇAK
A
e project - co-Housing in Bahçelievler - includes 6 individual part and 1 communal part where all 6 parts builds physical relationship and also social and communal. What the street life offers in a popular site, is tried to be further elaborated by carrying its characteristics to the most upper oor. at’s why Elevated Street became the essential of the project. Indıvial part of mine, on the other hand, carries the boundaries and traces of Elevated street both pyshially and functional. e service spaces of communal space also becomes the private service spaces. Other than self sufficient individual units, each of them encourages collective living by offering spaces with diferent spatial and functional qualities.
A’
Ground Floor Plan
B’
B
First Floor Plan
BAZAAR
Second Floor Plan
TRANSITIVITY CONTRAST POROSITY
DIALECTIC ird Floor Plan
INTEGRATION LIGHTWEIGHT
Forth Floor Plan
Scale: 1/100
19
Elif Güngör - Nihan Mutlu
20
A01
The ONE 23.09.2019
Nadine Yousif - Zeynep EriĹ&#x;ti
21
Onurcan Mızrak - Ayşenur Gökhan
onurcan mızrak ayşenur gökhan PECHA KUCHA
22
A01
The ONE 23.09.2019
Dilara Güney - M. Emre Karcı
23
Pınar Talaş - Ekin Mansuroğlu
24
A01
The ONE 23.09.2019
Asrın Onat Şengül - Arif Eren Yıldırım
25
Furkan Türker - Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu
26
A01
The ONE 23.09.2019
Abdullah Zamir - Gazi Can Şahin
THE ONE MIT BAKER HOUSE ALVAR AALTO ABDULLAH ZAMIR - GAZİ CAN ŞAHİN
27
28
You are asked to present your ARCH202 project in one A1 poster. Selections and the presentation techniques are totally among you.
assignment
02
the PEAK
01
260919 / T.A
The base organization for poster design will be given to you in INDESIGN format. You will be worked individually and the presentations will be in DIGITAL format. Submission: 26.09.2019 Thursday at 13:40 29
Abdullah Zamir
30
A02
The PEAK 23.09.2019
Arif Eren Yıldırım
31
Asrın Onat Şengül
32
A02
The PEAK 23.09.2019
Ayşegül Gökhan
33
Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu
34
A02
The PEAK 23.09.2019
Busenur Güngör
35
Büşra Aşçı
36
A02
The PEAK 23.09.2019
Büşra Ballı
37
Büşra Karagözlü
38
A02
The PEAK 23.09.2019
Davut Balcı
39
Dilara Güney
40
A02
The PEAK 23.09.2019
Ekin MansuroÄ&#x;lu
41
Elif Güngör
42
A02
The PEAK 23.09.2019
Emel Uรงak
43
Furkan TĂźrker
44
A02
The PEAK 23.09.2019
Gazi Can Åžahin
45
İzgesu Güven
46
A02
The PEAK 23.09.2019
M. Emre Karcı
47
Nadine Yousif
48
A02
The PEAK 23.09.2019
Nihan Mutlu
49
Onurcan Mızrak
50
A02
The PEAK 23.09.2019
Pınar Talaş
51
R. Selim Yarbaşı
52
A02
The PEAK 23.09.2019
Åžeyma Sezen
53
UmutkaÄ&#x;an Durgut
54
A02
The PEAK 23.09.2019
Zeynep Erişti
55
56
site trip
02
300919 / M.MA
57
58
• Ece Kumkale_Turkiyede Yeni Konut Egilimleri.docx • Floor Plan Atlas.pdf • Ilker Teker_100.Yil Worker’s Houses Neighborhood.pdf • KONUT_SPO2015.pdf • Reyner Benham_a home is not a house.pdf • Roger Sherwood_Modern Housing Prototypes.pdf • TMMOB ANK_DOSYA20_kent ve konut.pdf • Ugur Tanyeli_Grameri Bozuk Toplumda Mimarlik.pdf • VCMD-konut-yapilari-kitap-5.pdf
assignment
• Ali Cengizkan_kultur nesnesi olarak konut.docx
03
READING LIST
02
031019 / T.M
• Zerrin Ezgi Kahraman_Konut Memnuniyeti Arastirmasi.pdf • Esra Alkim Karaagac_From Shelter to Product_100.YIL Housing.pdf • IKSV_Design Chronology of Turkey_Housing.pdf • Sibel Bozdogan_TURKEY_modern architectures in history.pdf 59
GROUP 03
60
A03
READING list 03.10.2019
Gökhan . Güngör . Güven . Mutlu . Mızrak . Sezen . Erişti
61
GROUP 01
62
A03
READING list 03.10.2019
Zamir . Tozun . Güngör . Karagözlü . Balci . Uçak . Şahin
63
GROUP 04
64
A03
READING list 03.10.2019
Ballı . Güney . Karcı
65
66
presentation
01
Urban Space Morphologies
Olgu Çalışkan
02 031019 / T.A
67
68
Landscape, Greenery X 1 - Parks, green areas, gardens, playgrounds in and around the site - Location of trees and vegetation in the site. Mobility, Traffic Circulation X 1 - Road analysis - Bus, taxi stops - Parking areas/lots in and around the site - Density of pedestrian and vehicular circulation Elevations X 1 - Pay attention to the sizes and proportions - Take photos for every street around the site. Produce panoramic street views from those photos. - Draw continuous street elevations Sections X 1 - Draw continuous site sections which include the neighboring buildings and streets. You should draw at least two sections for each direction (2 longitudinal sections, 2 transverse sections) - Pay attention to the sizes and proportions Landmarks, Vistas, Street Furniture X 1 - Document landmarks and vistas in and around the site with photos and sketches ...................................................................................................... Base Documentation and Modeling • Documentation (2D CAD . Base Drawings) • Physical Model (Topography Modification & Physical Model) • Digital Model (Digital Model & Conversion)
04.05
Landuse Pattern, Functional Typologies X 1 -Existing building typologies and landuse pattern -Indicate whether the surrounding buildings are used for commercial, cultural, administrative, residential etc. purposes - Day/night usage
assignment
Urban Focus X 1 - The main characteristics of Eskişehir - Konya Road and Malazgirt Boulevard - The functional characteristic of the site within these main roads - The urban decisions related with settlement and green strategies
site analysis
03
in detail at the project information page
031019 / T.A
69
70
03
071019 / M.MA
You are asked to analyze the housing projects in terms of the following criteria: • The total capacity of the facility (how many residents?)
• Vertical and horizontal circulation. (Pedestrian and vehicular movements) • Open spaces. (Common and/or private gardens/courtyards) • Public spaces and auxiliary functions of the housing. (Garages, health/gym facilities, shopping facilities, cultural facilities (cinema, theater, etc.), offices, religious buildings, educational buildings (kindergarten, school, etc.), etc. • Relations with the site. Orientation to view and cardinal directions. • Mass, façade and roof articulation
You are asked to analyze the dormitory projects in terms of the following criteria: • The total capacity of the facility (how many students?) • How are students living (Rooms, large halls apartments?) • Is there a difference for the freshmen, sophomores, juniors, and seniors? Are there facilities for the couples? • Size of the rooms • Interior organization of the rooms. (Provide the plans and sections in 1/200 and 1/500. Color the plans and sections in terms of the functions. Study areas
06
• Interior organization of the units. (Provide the plans and sections in 1/200 and 1/500.
assignment
• Variety of housing units (Number of different types of units, their sizes and locations)
CASE STUDIES
• The category of the housing project. (Is it perimeter block, point block, slab block, cluster housing, linear scheme, low rise-high density or terrace housing?)
• The location of wet places (wc, shower etc.) • Cooking facilities (central, individual) • Laundry • Physical exercise facilities • Open spaces, gardens, terraces 71
HOUSING STUDIES
PROJECT NAME
ARCHITECT
LOCATION
YEAR
Lakeshore Drive Apts.
Mies van der Rohe
Chicago
1951
Unite d’Habitation
Le Corbusier
Marseille
1952
Pedrogulho Estate
A. Eduardo Reidy
Rio de Janerio
1952
Price Tower
Frank Llyod Wright
Bartlesville
1956
Cinnah 19
Nejat Ersin
Ankara
1957
Marina City
Bertrand Goldberg
Chicago
1964
Habitat 67
Moshe Safdie
Montreal
1967
Walden 7
Ricardo Bofill
Barcelona
1974
Alexandria Road
Neave Brown
London
1978
Rokko (Stage 1 & 2)
Tadao Ando
Kobe
1983
Cubuswoningen
Piet Blom
Rotterdam
1984
Nemausus
Jean Nouvel
Nimes
1988
Aranya Low Cost Housing
Balkrishna Doshi
Indore , India
1989
Teras Evler
M.& N. Karaaslan / M. Günday
Ankara
1990
Nexus Housing
Rem Koolhaas
Fukuoka
1991
Dikmen Bridge and Housing
Doruk Pamir
Ankara
1996
Wozoko Apartments
MVRDV
Amsterdam
1997
The Whale
de Architekten Cie.
Amsterdam
2000
Mirador
MVRDV & Lleo
Madrid
2005
Levent Loft
Tabanlıoğlu Architects
İstanbul
2007
Mountain Dwellings
BIG Architects
Copenhagen
2009
35. Cadde
Teğet Mimarlık
İzmir
2010
House 8
BIG Architects
Copenhagen
2010
Elemental
Alejandro Aravena
Chile
2010
New Academic Lodgements
CAG Mimarlık
Ankara
2013
40 Housing Units
LAN Architecture
Paris
2014
Romero 114
HGR Arquitectos
Ciudad De México
2017
Competitions on HOUSING in Turkey
72
DORMITORY STUDIES
PROJECT NAME
ARCHITECT
LOCATION
YEAR
Swiss Pavillion
Le Corbusier
France
1931
MIT Baker House Dorm.
Alvar Aalto
USA
1948
Brazil Pavillion
Le Corbusier
France
1959
St. Andrew Dorm.
James Stirling
Scotland
1964
Tandoğan Dorm.
Şevki Vanlı/Ersen Gömleksizoğlu
Ankara
1967
MIT Simmons Hall
Steven Holl Architects
USA
2002
Tietgen Dorm.
Lundgaard&Tranberg Architects
Denmark
2005
Student Residence in Paris
LAN Architecture
France
2007
METU NCC Dorm. (2nd Stage)
Tektonika (Semra Teber)
N. Cyprus
2007
Student Housing in Epinay
ECDM
France
2008
Student Dorm.
Nickl & Partner Architekten
Germany
2009
Student Housing in Bordeaux
Lanoire & Courrian
France
2009
METU NCC Dorm (3rd Stage)
TECE Mimarlık (T. Hadi / C. İlhan)
N. Cyprus
2009
ROC Mondriaan Laak II
LIAG
Netherlands
2011
METU Undergraduate Dorm.
URBAR (Ali Kural)
Ankara
2011
METU Graduate Dorm.
Uygur Mimarlık
Ankara
2011
West Campus Student Housing
Mahlum
USA
2012
Uni. of S. Denmark Student Hou.
C.F. Møller Architects
Denmark
2012
Student Apartments in Luzern
Durisch + Nolli Architetti
Switzerland
2013
Boeselburg Council Student Housing
Kresings GmbH
Germany
2014
Carlaw Park Student Accom.
Warren and Mahoney
New Zealand
2014
Stüdyo Santral Yurtları
Erginoğlu-Çalışlar Mimarlık
İstanbul
2014
Republika Academic Aparts
Gökhan Avcıoğlu
İstanbul
2014
Murat Karamancı Student Center
Alataş Architecture And Consulting
İstanbul
2016
Competitions on Social Centers (for Youth&Elders) in Turkey
73
Housing . Villa Verde Elif Güngör . Nihan Mutlu . Onurcan Mızrak
74
A06
CASE STUDIES 07.10.19
Dormitory . St. Andrews Dormitory Elif Güngör . Nihan Mutlu . Onurcan Mızrak
75
Housing . Unite D’Habitation Furkan Türker . Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu
76
A06
CASE STUDIES 07.10.19
Dormitory . Student Residence in Paris Furkan Türker . Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu
77
Housing . Aranya Low Cost Housing R. Selim Yarbaşı . Büşra Aşçı
78
A06
CASE STUDIES 07.10.19
Dormitory . METU Graduate Dormitory R. Selim Yarbaşı . Büşra Aşçı
79
Housing . Nemausus Ayşenur Gökhan . Zeynep Erişti
80
A06
CASE STUDIES 07.10.19
Dormitory . METU NCC Dorm (3rd Stage) Ayşenur Gökhan . Zeynep Erişti
81
Housing . The Whale Abdullah Zamir . Gazi Can Ĺžahin
82
A06
CASE STUDIES 07.10.19
Dormitory . Uni. of S. Denmark Student Hou. Abdullah Zamir . Gazi Can Åžahin
83
Housing . Teras Evler Şeyma Sezen . İzgesu Güven
84
A06
CASE STUDIES
Dormitory . MIT Baker House Dorm
07.10.19
Şeyma Sezen . İzgesu Güven
MIT BAKER HOUSE DORMITORY Şeyma SEZEN
İzgesu GÜVEN
PRIVATE ROOMS COMMON AREAS WET SPACES
CIRCULATION
The dormitory houses 318 undergraduates in single, double, triple, and quadruple rooms. smallest room: 105-120 square feet. largest room: 395-445 square feet.
ROOM TYPES Single: 60 % Double: 18% Triples: 10% Quads: 6% Dining halls in common areas.
85
Competitions on HOUSING in Turkey M. Emre Karcı . Dilara Güney
86
A06
CASE STUDIES 07.10.19
Competitions on HOUSING in Turkey M. Emre Karcı . Dilara Güney
87
Housing . Pedrogulho Estate Pınar Talaş . Ekin Mansuroğlu
88
A06
CASE STUDIES 07.10.19
Dormitory . Tietgen Dorm Pınar Talaş . Ekin Mansuroğlu
89
Housing . Mountain Dwellings / Dormitory . Swiss Pavillion Büşra Karagözlü . Aktekin Tozun
90
A06
CASE STUDIES 07.10.19
Dormitory . MIT Simmons Hall / Housing . Cinnah 19 Emel Uรงak . Davut Balci
91
Housing . Price Tower Busenur GĂźngĂśr . Nadine Yousif
92
A06
CASE STUDIES 07.10.19
Dormitory . Brazil Pavillion Busenur Güngör . Nadine Yousif
93
Housing . Romero 114 Büşra Ballı . Umutkağan Durgut
94
A06
CASE STUDIES 07.10.19
Dormitory . METU NCC Dorm. (2nd Stage) Büşra Ballı . Umutkağan Durgut
95
Competitions on Social Centers (for Youth&Elders) in Turkey Arif Eren Yıldırım . Asrın Onat Şengül
96
A06
CASE STUDIES 07.10.19
Competitions on Social Centers (for Youth&Elders) in Turkey Arif Eren Yıldırım . Asrın Onat Şengül
97
98
presentation
02
Ankara Konut Envanteri
Nuray Bayraktar
03 101019 / T.M
99
100
assignment
07
Workshop : Brainstorming
Conceptual Background
03 101019 / T.A
101
102
case trip
Dormitories
METU Case
04 141019 / M.M
103
104
presentation
03
InfoGraphics
Elif DĂźzel
04 141019 / M.A
105
106
assignment
08
CASE STUDIES
DIAGRAMS
04 141019 / M.A
107
Dilara Güney . Emre Karcı
108
A08
CASE STUDIES / DIAGRAMS 10.10.19
R. Selim Yarbaşı . Büşra Aşçı
109
Aktekin Tozun . Büşra Karagözlü
110
A08
CASE STUDIES / DIAGRAMS 10.10.19
Aktekin Tozun . Büşra Karagözlü
111
Arif Eren Yıldırım
112
A08
CASE STUDIES / DIAGRAMS 10.10.19
Asrın Onat Şengül
113
Busenur Güngör . Nadine Yousif
MAISON DU BRESIL
ARCH301 CASE STUDIES
LE CORBUSIER
THEATRE
HALL
HALL
ENTRANCE
Busenur Güngör – Nadine Yousif
CAFETRIA
HALL
ADMIN.
MANAGER
PLANS COMBINED
DOUBLE RM.
GROUND FLOOR PLAN
SINGLE RM.
Location in paris
STAIRCASE
COMMON KIT.
CORRIDOR
HALL
SINGLE RM.
TERRACE
FLOOR PLANS
EXPLODED DIAGRAM
Le corbusier
PROJECT AIM : building a residence for Brazilian students and teachers in Paris. CONTEXT : a five-story concrete volume that stands above the ground level, also made of concrete. Beneath this volume is an irregular first floor that hosts administrative spaces on the west, and on the east communal spaces : • the library • the theatre • the exhibition space and gathering space. “Since its creation, the House of Brazil has a series of public spaces dedicated to the diffusion of the Brazilian culture”. Theatre and its capacity is 80 to 150 seats. Large glazed hall 330m2, surrounded with greens. Meeting room for of 25 places.
SOME OF THE FIVE POINT OF ARCHITECTURE • • • •
PILOTIS FREE PLAN FREE FAÇADE STRIP WINDOWS in this case balkoies
OPENSPACES AND GREENS : making use of the ground level by lifting the building over pillars and making use of open spaces and well integration with the greens. BRUTALISM : in the use of materials, his aim was always to explore the abilities of the materials rather that covering them.
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Brazil+Ho https://en.wikiarquitectura.com/building/maison-du-bresil/ http://www.maisondubresil.org/le-batiment/visite-virtuelle/ https://www.archdaily.com/328057/ad-classics-maison-du-bresil-le-corbusier
114
A08
CASE STUDIES / DIAGRAMS 10.10.19
Busenur Güngör . Nadine Yousif
115
Büşra Ballı . Umutkağan Durgut
116
A08
CASE STUDIES / DIAGRAMS 10.10.19
Büşra Ballı . Umutkağan Durgut
117
Ayşenur Gökhan . Zeynep Erişti
118
A08
CASE STUDIES / DIAGRAMS 10.10.19
Ayşenur Gökhan . Zeynep Erişti
119
İzgesu Güven . Şeyma Sezen
120
A08
CASE STUDIES / DIAGRAMS 10.10.19
Elif Güngör . Nihan Mutlu . Onurcan Mızrak
121
Pınar Talaş . Ekin Mansuroğlu
122
A08
CASE STUDIES / DIAGRAMS 10.10.19
Emel Uรงak . Davut Balci
123
Furkan Türker . Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu
124
A08
CASE STUDIES / DIAGRAMS 10.10.19
Furkan Türker . Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu
125
Gazi Can Ĺžahin . Abdullah Zamir
126
A08
CASE STUDIES / DIAGRAMS 10.10.19
Gazi Can Åžahin . Abdullah Zamir
127
128
presentation
04
Observations on 100.YIL
Gizem Nur Aydemir
04 171019 / T.M
129
130
presentation
05
ODTÜ DORM Experiences
Lale Özgenel
05 241019 / T.M
131
132
A STUDENT HOUSING PROJECT in 100. YIL The plot is located on the opposite side of Turk-İş Blokları Primary School, between the 1427th and 1505th main roads. It forms a large rectangular plot with an approximately 25.000 m2 ground area and 25-meter level differences. At the frontal facade of the site, there exist 4 residential blocks including commercial units on the ground level. Keeping them as it is or reinterpreting them within the new complex is totally on behalf of the designers. At first, students are asked to analyze the site problems and to present some pioneer samples from Turkey and abroad in case studies. The analysis and the presentations constitute the first steps of the project and to be worked in groups. In the second stage, they are asked to produce their proposals in an approximately 25.000 m2 architectural program including residential, administrative, social, cultural and commercial facilities for both students and existing users. The complex is expected to be used by 800 students and 40 families together. The variety of the spatial organization generated on the concept of “living units” is asked to be designed according to the different life pattern proposals.
project brief
2019-2020 Fall term project consists of a student housing complex within an urban setting containing residential, commercial and social facilities in public, semi-public and private relations. It is located in the 100. Yıl district of Çankaya, Ankara that has been converted from a typical residential zone to a student-based new urban setting in the last decade. At the intersection of several universities such as METU, Çankaya University, and Ufuk University, 100. Yıl district has been developing as a multi-functional center for youths including different types of social and commercial facilities with dwelling units.
133
134
135
site analysis
136
137
Urban Focus BUSENUR GÜNGÖR EMEL UÇAK DAVUT BALCİ NADINE YOUSIF Landuse pattern, Functional Typologies ASRIN ONAT ŞENGÜL FURKAN TÜRKER ARİF EREN YILDIRIM BERFE NAZ HAŞEMOĞLU Landscape, Greenery AKTEKİN TOZUN BÜŞRA KARAGÖZLÜ GAZİ CAN ŞAHİN ABDULLAH ZAMIR Mobility, Traffic Circulation DİLARA GÜNEY MAHMUT EMRE KARCI UMUTKAĞAN DURĞUT BÜŞRA BALLI Elevations ONURCAN MIZRAK ZEYNEP ERİŞTİ ŞEYMA SEZEN İZGESU GÜVEN Sections AYŞENUR GÖKHAN NİHAN MUTLU ELİF GÜNGÖR İBRAHİM HALİL KELLECİ Landmarks, Vistas, Street Furniture PINAR TALAŞ RECEP SELİM YARBAŞI BÜŞRA AŞCI EKİN MANSUROĞLU 138
G01 ARCH 301
Urban Focus Emel Uçak . Nadine Yousif . Busenur Güngör . Davut Balci
SITE ANALYSIS - URBAN FOCUS Site survey on 100.Yil Ankara, Turkey Emel
Nadine
Busenur
Davout
MEEZO ANALYSIS
MACRO ANALYSIS
ROADS There are 3 important roads surrounding the site Malazgirt bulivard , eskisehir and konya (connected). Two of them are the surrounding roads of Ankara as it was planed by Ubaydin Yucel in master plan of Ankara in 1957. Caracteristics of those roads come from their ability of distribution such as the roads going to the centre.
DIFFENT FUNCTIONAL SPACES The site has a rich environenviron ment in terms of spaces. This gains site strategic importance. Because health institutions, public institutions, and educational area and also commercial areas are very close .
THE SCALE OF ANKARA showing the site relation with the centre of Ankara.
Social
Education
Health
Commercial & Eating
DENSITY 100.yil housing typologies and settlements show greater constructe area than others. Also the minimum living expenses is more appropriate for the lower level income groups such as students or people with minimum salaries. disIn a larger scale, the density of the dis tricts of Kizirlimak and Cukurambar is similar and less dense than 100. yil district. The reason arises from both the typology of the housing and the differences in living costs of the districts. density varies even from one plot to another es pecially the newly constructed buildings
SCALE OF CANKAYA
Kızılırmak District
Çukurambar District
SCALE OF THE DISTRICTS
Active Green
Instutıtıons
Passive Green
100. Yıl District
GREENRY The 100.yil district has a rich green environment . One is at the east side of the neighbourhod nearby yhe site there is linear and continuous green composed of 100.yill park, Fisum sayke park, Ece Ulku parkand Prof.Dr Turkan saylan park that enable people to be part of it.Also some other green spaces such as cinar park Teoman Ozturk park have green that people actively involved. On the contrary, some passive green areas such as ODTU forests, GATA 100.yil forest and TSK Ankara GarniGarni zonu and Hrita greens creates a rich green that people cannot use.
STREET PATERNS There is an organic street pattern (distributed grid) in 100. yil neighbourhood. The strets have a free development being typical facbric of late 20th century urbanism. Organic and free development of the strets and their connections to other major strets and roads enable high accessibilty to the site and its surrounding neighborhood.
SCALE OF THE 100YIL
MICRO ANALYSIS
pedestrian circulation
roads
climate conditions
USER PROFILES
green areas
transportation 00
18
6
Blue are the workers
Red are the families, 40%.
Green are the students, 30%.
Orange are the elderly, 30%.
Purple are the sport player
12
139
Landuse pattern, Functional Typologies Arif Eren Yıldırım . Asrın Onat Şengül . Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu . Furkan Türker
140
G02
G03
Landscape, Greenery Abdullah Zamir . Aktekin Tozun . Büşra Karagözlü . Gazi Can Şahin
141
Mobility, Traffic Circulation Büşra Ballı . Uğur Durğut . Dilara Güney . Emre Karcı
142
G04
G05
Elevations İzgesu Güven . Onurcan Mızrak . Şeyma Sezen . Zeynep Erişti
143
Sections Ayşenur Gökhan . Elif Güngör . Nihan Mutlu
144
G06
G07
Landmarks, Vistas, Street Furniture Büşra Aşçı . Ekin Mansuroğlu . Pınar Talaş . Selim Yarbaşı
arch 301 site analysis
landmarks, street furniture and vistas busra ascı ekin mansuroglu pınar talas r. selim yarbası
street furnitures
vistas
145
ACCOMODATION for STUDENTS
Units for Graduate Students
* The variety of the spatial organization will be designed according to the proposed different life patterns. * At least two variations are expected for each category. * The complex will be designed for 800 students.
12.800 m2
Administration
Manager’s Room, Meeting Rooms, Secretary, Offices, Personnel Rooms, etc.
300 m2
Room Services
Cleaning Room, WC-Shower, Cooking Area, Laundry, Ironing Room, etc.
600 m2
Common Spaces
Lobby, Cafe-Canteen, TV-Hobby Room, Study Rooms, Music Room, etc.
600 m2
Service Spaces
Storage, HVAC Room, Bunker (Haven), etc. (at the basement floors)
1.200 m2
Units for Undergraduate Students
15500 m2 ACCOMODATION for EXISTING USERS Units for Family Housing
* There will be 40 family units in total. (* * At least two variations (2+1 & 3+1) are expected.
3.600 m2
3600 m2 SOCIAL & CULTURAL FACILITIES Social & Cultural Facilities
It should be interpreted by the designer.
900 m2
900 m2 COMMERCIAL FACILITIES Commercial Facilities
It should be interpreted by the designer according to the needs of the complex and existing commercial services.
600 m2
600 m2 Net Area : 20.600 m2 . %25 Circulation : 5.150 m2 . Total Area : 25.750 m2 (~E=1) AUXILARY AND OPEN SPACES AUXILARY SPACES
146
Garage (at least for 250 cars), Storage, Service Spaces, etc. Total area could be changed according to the basement solutions and organizations.
…
Outdoor Parking & Taxi Stops
…
BikeRacks
…
Green Areas
Existing trees should be taken into consideration. Green Areas are to be designed to encourage the social life in this node.
…
Sports / Recreational Facilities
Sports / recreational facilities are to be designed to enhance the social life.
…
147
program
148
01 preliminary jury
07
041119 / M.MA
149
150
A STUDENT HOUSING PROJECT Please make sure that individual site analysis and your design concept / approach / method is explicitly presented. 1/500 Site Plan; showing; •
surrounding streets and nearby buildings,
•
landscape (trees, green areas), hardscape (pavements etc.)
• entrances to the complex (main entrances, garage and service entrances) using arrows as indicators, •
stairs, ramps, level differences and retaining walls,
•
all levels with reference to a preset ±0.00 level
1/500 Site Sections; (2 sections in different directions, use the sections drawn by site analysis group); showing; •
the silhouette of nearby buildings,
•
major levels
1/500 Physical Model (to be placed on the site model) 1/500 Digital Model (optional) 1/500 Ground Floor Plan; showing; •
structural members and axes,
•
open spaces (courtyards, green areas, etc.),
•
all levels with reference to a preset ±0.00 level,
•
circulation members
1/500 Typical Room Floor Plan; showing; •
structural members and axes,
•
organizations of unit types,
•
circulation members
PJ01 requirements
Conceptual Drawings, Diagrams, Analysis
151
Abdullah Zamir
152
PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01 04.11.2019
Not Submitted
Aktekin Tozun
Not Submitted 153
Arif Eren Yıldırım
Not Submitted 154
PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01 04.11.2019
Asrın Onat Şengül
155
Ayล enur Gรถkhan
Not Submitted 156
PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01 04.11.2019
Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu
157
Busenur Güngör
Not Submitted 158
Not Submitted
PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01 04.11.2019
Büşra Aşçı
159
Büşra Ballı
Not Submitted 160
PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01 04.11.2019
Büşra Karagözlü
161
Davut Balci
Not Submitted 162
Not Submitted
PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01 04.11.2019
Dilara Güney
163
Emre MansuroÄ&#x;lu
Not Submitted 164
PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01 04.11.2019
Elif Güngör
Not Submitted 165
Emel Uรงak
166
PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01 04.11.2019
Furkan Türker
Not Submitted 167
Gazi Can Åžahin
168
PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01 04.11.2019
M. Emre Karcı
169
Nadine Yousif
Not Submitted 170
PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01 04.11.2019
Nihan Mutlu
171
Onurcan Mızrak
Not Submitted 172
PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01 04.11.2019
Pınar Talaş
Not Submitted 173
R. Selim Yarbaşı
174
PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01 04.11.2019
Not Submitted
Åžeyma Sezen
Not Submitted 175
UmutkaÄ&#x;an Durgut
176
PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01 04.11.2019
Zeynep EriÅ&#x;ti
Not Submitted 177
178
02 preliminary jury
07
041119 / M.MA
179
180
A STUDENT HOUSING PROJECT Please make sure that individual site analysis and your design concept / approach / method is explicitly presented. 1/500 Site Plan; showing; •
surrounding streets and nearby buildings,
•
landscape (trees, green areas), hardscape (pavements etc.)
• entrances to the complex (main entrances, garage and service entrances) using arrows as indicators, •
stairs, ramps, level differences and retaining walls,
•
all levels with reference to a preset ±0.00 level
1/500 Site Sections; (2 sections in different directions, use the sections drawn by site analysis group); showing; •
the silhouette of nearby buildings,
•
major levels
1/500 Physical Model (to be placed on the site model) 1/500 Digital Model (optional) 1/500 Ground Floor Plan; showing; •
structural members and axes,
•
open spaces (courtyards, green areas, etc.),
•
all levels with reference to a preset ±0.00 level,
•
circulation members
1/500 Typical Room Floor Plan; showing; •
structural members and axes,
•
organizations of unit types,
•
circulation members
PJ02 requirements
Conceptual Drawings, Diagrams, Analysis
181
Abdullah Zamir
182
PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02 25.11.2019
Aktekin Tozun
Not Submitted 183
Arif Eren Yıldırım
Not Submitted 184
Not Submitted
PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02 25.11.2019
Not Submitted
Asrın Onat Şengül
Not Submitted 185
Ayล enur Gรถkhan
186
PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02 25.11.2019
Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu
Not Submitted 187
Busenur Güngör
Not Submitted 188
PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02 25.11.2019
Büşra Aşçı
189
Büşra Ballı
Not Submitted 190
PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02 25.11.2019
Büşra Karagözlü
191
Davut Balci
192
PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02 25.11.2019
Dilara Güney
193
Ekin MansuroÄ&#x;lu
Not Submitted 194
PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02 25.11.2019
Not Submitted
Elif Güngör
Not Submitted 195
Emel Uรงak
196
PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02 25.11.2019
Furkan Türker
197
Gazi Can Åžahin
198
PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02 25.11.2019
M. Emre Karcı
199
Nadine Yousif
200
Not submitted due to technical promlems
Not submitted due to technical promlems
Not submitted due to technical promlems
Not submitted due to technical promlems
PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02 25.11.2019
Nihan Mutlu
201
Onurcan Mızrak
202
PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02 25.11.2019
Pınar Talaş
Not Submitted 203
R. Selim Yarbaşı
204
PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02 25.11.2019
Åžeyma Sezen
Not Submitted 205
UmutkaÄ&#x;an Durgut
206
PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02 25.11.2019
Zeynep EriÅ&#x;ti
Not Submitted 207
208
workshop
Visualization
Osman SĂźmer
10 281119 / M.MA
209
210
WS
Visualization Workshop 28.11.2019
211
212
WS
Visualization Workshop 28.11.2019
213
214
PJ3 presentation jury
13 191219 / M.MA
215
216
Final jury
14
261219 / M.MA
217
218
A STUDENT HOUSING PROJECT -Six A1 posters (portrait) -compulsory additional digital presentation (slide by slide) -a small booklet based on their posters -1/500 Physical Model (to be placed on the site model) -Digital Model The final jury posters and presentations should include; -Main image; A render taken from the main road that shows your project and the site. -Report; General information regarding their project (m2 of the whole project, designated m2 for student and family accommodations, designated m2 for commercial solutions, etc.) concepts and analysis. -Conceptual Drawings, Diagrams, Analysis -1/1000 Site Plan; -1/1000 Site Sections; (2 sections in different directions, use the sections drawn by site analysis group); showing; -1/500 Ground Floor and Floor Plans; -1/500 Sections; -1/200 Partial Floor Plans; -1/50 or 1/100 Typical Room Floor Plan; -3d render or image of the characteristic living units; -Additional renders;
Final requirements
For the Final jury, students are expected to prepare;
219
220
Abdullah Zamir
Aktekin Tozun
Arif Eren Yıldırım
Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu
Busenur Güngör
Büşra Aşçı
Davut Balci
Dilara Güney
Ekin Mansuroğlu
Furkan Türker
Gazi Can Şahin
M. Emre Karcı
Onurcan Mızrak
Pınar Talaş
R. Selim Yarbaşı
261219 / M.MA
Büşra Ballı
Büşra Karagözlü
Elif Güngör
Emel Uçak
Nadine Yousif
Nihan Mutlu
Umutkağan Durgut
Zeynep Erişti
A STUDENT HOUSING PROJECT
Ayşenur Gökhan
Final Jury Models
Asrın Onat Şengül
221
Abdullah Zamir
222
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Abdullah Zamir
CC+ 2.18
223
Aktekin Tozun
224
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Aktekin Tozun
CB2.33
225
Arif Eren Yıldırım
226
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Arif Eren Yıldırım
BA3.30
227
Asrın Onat Şengül
228
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Asrın Onat Şengül
CC+ 2.11
Not Submitted 229
Ayล enur Gรถkhan
230
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Ayล enur Gรถkhan
BA3.41
231
Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu
Not Submitted 232
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu
BA+ 3.66
Not Submitted
Not Submitted 233
Busenur GĂźngĂśr
234
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Busenur Güngör
BA3.30
235
Büşra Aşçı
236
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Büşra Aşçı
AA3.75
237
Büşra Ballı
238
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Büşra Ballı
CB+ 2.60
Not Submitted
Not Submitted 239
Büşra Karagözlü
240
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Büşra Karagözlü
BA3.32
Not Submitted 241
Davut Balci
242
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Davut Balci
CB+ 2.68
243
Dilara Güney
244
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Dilara Güney
AA 3.95
245
Ekin MansuroÄ&#x;lu
246
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Ekin MansuroÄ&#x;lu
BB2.84
Not Submitted
Not Submitted 247
Elif Güngör
248
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Elif Güngör
CC+ 2.14
Not Submitted
Not Submitted 249
Emel Uรงak
250
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Emel Uรงak
BA 3.55
251
Furkan TĂźrker
252
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Furkan Türker
BA 3.45
253
Gazi Can Åžahin
254
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Gazi Can Åžahin
CB 2.43
255
M. Emre Karcı
256
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
M. Emre Karcı
AA3.75
257
Nadine Yousif
258
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Nadine Yousif
CB 2.45
259
Nihan Mutlu
260
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Nihan Mutlu
BB+ 3.20
261
Onurcan Mızrak
262
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Onurcan Mızrak
BB+ 3.23
263
Pınar Talaş
264
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Pınar Talaş
BA3.32
265
R. Selim Yarbaşı
266
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
R. Selim Yarbaşı
BA+ 3.68
267
Åžeyma Sezen
Not Submitted 268
FINAL DD+ 1.16
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Åžeyma Sezen
FD+ 0.66 (Late submission)
Not Submitted
Not Submitted
Not Submitted
Not Submitted
Not Submitted
Not Submitted 269
UmutkaÄ&#x;an Durgut
270
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
UmutkaÄ&#x;an Durgut
BA3.42
271
Zeynep EriĹ&#x;ti
272
FINAL
FINAL JURY 26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Zeynep EriÅ&#x;ti
BB+ 3.16
273
274