OPINIONS & COMMENTARY Close The Curtain On AMC Seating Price Policy

Sometimes you just have to scratch your head and wonder how the folks who come up with marketing plans dream up the policies that they implement.

Case in point, the recently announced plan by AMC Theaters to price movie tickets based on where you sit.

Remember, this is coming at a time when theater owners are begging people to come back to their theaters, buy their expensive popcorn, candy and soft drinks and skip staying at home and watching films that come out fairly soon, on streaming services.

I’m one of those people who loves seeing films (most but not all) in movie theaters. I loved being at the now closed AMC at the Seacourt Pavilion in Toms River during the pandemic when theaters were just starting to reopen.

One cold Friday night I was watching Milla Jo-

Guidelines For Prescribing Opioids Will Save Lives

I am encouraged that the new CDC guidelines recommend medical practitioners have a conversation with patients to warn about the risks of vovich blowing up monsters with grenades in the film “Monster Hunter.” I was the only person in that theater and at the time, I still kept my mask on inside but it was a film that was big screen worthy in my opinion.

I can recite the entire narration of actress Nicole Kidman’s walk from a rainy night into a darkened theater as she talks about how “heart break feels good here” and how “the magic is powerful here.”

I swear it gets my heart going because I believe she’s right, seeing movies in theaters does have a bit of spectacle and magic but AMC is killing that magic with this bonehead move.

AMC Theaters, the nation’s largest movie theater chain announced plans to change the way that it prices tickets. The new initiative called “Sightline at AMC” will eliminate the one-price-fitsall approach to selling tickets and under this new model will divide up an auditori- um’s seats into “standard sightline” “value sightline” and “preferred sightline” tiers.

The standard seats which the movie chain identifies as the most “common” will be available for the normal price of the ticket which these days average to about $12 although senior prices and matinee/first screening prices vary. Value seating is in the front row and will be sold at a lower price than normal. Those are the ones you might get a neck cramp from but at least you still have the comfy chair to lounge around in.

Now we come to those coveted medium row seats, the preferred sightline upcharge which AMC describes as a slight premium price. A seating map will show the price differences when customers are purchasing their tickets. Wow, I have enough of a problem just figuring out where my seat is.

AMC Chief Marketing Offi- cer Eliot Hamlisch described this move as bringing movie theaters in line with other entertainment venues where ticket prices range in price depending where you sit. Hey Eliot, those venues feature live shows, sporting events and concerts - not films.

Sightline pricing thankfully won’t apply to matinee showtimes before 4 p.m. and those customers who pay for AMC Stubs A-List memberships will be exempt from all this nonsense.

This is a time when theater owners should perhaps consider adding some extras to get folks inside their establishments, like bringing back short features (even cartoons) that we can’t get elsewhere. By all means keep Maria Menounos’s movie trivia quizzes (by the way did she always have that weird laugh during those segments?) and how about some special value movie nights?

Letters To The Editor

How about a live guest introduction to some of those classic films that run during the month even if it is by a member of the staff? Make going to a theater a truly fun experience.

I understand that everything is going up. Heck, when my wife sent me a honey-do message to pick up a carton of eggs on my way home from work the other day, I messaged her back and asked if I should make the purchase through our savings account or to cash a bond.

I greatly sympathize with those in the movie theater business who have experienced a major hit during the pandemic and are not yet back to where they once were.

This move, however, is not what the industry needs. I still have many friends who were devoted movie goers and who are now quite comfortable waiting to see a film when it hits the small screen through a streaming service or even later when it comes out to the library system. At most they’ll only venture out for an Avatar, Star Wars, Marvel or DC big screen extravaganza.

Now you will be competing for cheaper seats, navigating your online purchases of seats and giving us the same product including overpriced candy, popcorn and beverages. AMC, I think you are doing a disservice to your audience and ticking off those loyal theater goers who remember the magic that Nicole Kidman is talking about.

There isn’t enough free refill soda and buttered popcorn available to make this move (that will hit NJ AMC theaters by the end of the year) easy to swallow.

Bob Vosseller Assistant News Editor

dependence and addiction; and, to discuss the use of non-opioid pain relief alternatives before prescribing an opioid painkiller. These guidelines underscore the importance of these conversations and will save lives.

Beginning in New Jersey, with the advocacy of the

We Welcome Letters To The Editor!

The Jackson Times welcomes all points of view for publication and provides this page as an open forum for residents to express themselves regarding politics, government, current events and local concerns.

All letters are printed as space allows unless deemed offensive by the editorial staff, and provided they are signed and include address & phone number for verification. Letters may not be printed if we cannot verify them. Names will not be withheld from publication. While most letters are printed as submitted, we reserve the right to edit or reject letters.

The weekly deadline is 5 p.m. Thursday. Mail typed letters to: PO Box 521, Lakehurst, NJ 08733, fax 732-657-7388 or e-mail news@jerseyshoreonline.com. Letters may be limited to one per month per writer at the editor’s discretion. The opinions expressed in the Letters To The Editor section do not necessarily reflect those of the staff, management or sponsors of Micromedia Publications/Jersey Shore Online. Letters to the Editor are the OPINION of the writer and the content is not checked for accuracy.

Partnership for a DrugFree NJ, Prevent Opioid Abuse has led the fight across the country to allow all patients and parents of patients to receive this important and lifesaving information – and, has won adoption of this common-sense measure in 18 states. We know these conversations are making a difference by raising awareness of the risks of opioids, and the need to be aware of the signs and symptoms of dependency and addiction, driving down the number of new opioid prescriptions and saving lives.

A Brandeis University study conducted in New Jersey, the first state to adopt the requirement of conversation with patients regarding risk and sponsored by the Partnership for a Drug Free New Jersey demonstrates the effectiveness of these conversations between doctors and other medical practitioners and their patients.

Elaine Pozycki Chair, Partnership for a Drug-Free NJ

Hospital’s Indignity To Seniors

As a lifetime citizen of Dover Township/Toms River I have a comment on our local hospital. Ever since the early days of our local hospital we have watched it develop and grow on a footprint facing Route 37 E. The growth changed it from an open to all hospital to a more directed baby delivery and senior facility. Everyone could arrive and be treated but service over the years were perceived to change for the worst. In these days we see smaller staff, nurse shortages, doctors dedicated to the facility instead of having your own physician come to treat patients.

Now we have something that is very dramatic happening. Not sure if it’s an economical or treatment change however adult diapers are not found in this facility. Now this sounds like a minor change, with absorbing sheets placed under the patient which has not been thought out to the degree it should have. Providing a wee puppy training pad for seniors who have bladder problems, and the other category of human waste is a horrible choice. There is no pad which will absorb fecal matter and/ or allow a senior to have some semblance of pride or eliminate personal humiliation.

Seems like a small topic but when you consider this results in numerous situations where seniors lay in waste for an extended period of time while two nurses or assistants have to change an entire bed’s dressings because of this change. The puppy pad for seniors is not cheaper, they still are made of the same materials, but are far more disruptive to floor nursing and services and sure do make a senior in Community Hospital absolutely humiliated. Maybe someone should think of the pride and personal cleanliness before whatever made this change!

George Lobman Toms River