Middle Templar 2020

Page 44

THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE PENDING BREXIT

GEORGINA REA

Business as Usual at the European Court of Justice Pending Brexit Georgie Rea received the Middle Temple Young Barristers Association Overseas Internship Award and The Hon Sir Peter Bristow Scholarship to support her placement in the Cabinet of Judge Christopher Vajda at the ECJ last summer. Since returning from Luxembourg, Georgie has secured pupillage at Garden Court Chambers to commence October 2021.

A resounding theme ran through the cases which coloured my traineeship at the European Court of Justice (ECJ): the EU’s relationship with the international legal order. In its early years, the Court strove to cement the principles of autonomy, consistency and uniformity of EU law across its Member States. The relationship between domestic courts and the ECJ established through the preliminary ruling system became the lifeblood of this internal autonomy. However, having soothed the Member States’ teething pains brought about by the creation of this new legal order, in its adulthood the Court is also tasked with preserving the identity of the EU in the face of globalisation and rapidly developing norms of international law. During my traineeship, I encountered three cases in particular which truly impressed upon me the challenges this evolution presents to the CJEU. Opinion 1/17 of The Court on the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) On Tuesday 30 April 2019 the Court held, in Opinion 1/17, that the mechanism for the resolution of disputes between investors and States provided for by the EuroCanadian free trade agreement (CETA) is compatible with EU law. In light of this opinion, a roundtable event was hosted by the Max Planck Institute of Luxembourg, which brought together members of the European institutions and academics to discuss questions raised by the creation of a CETA Tribunal and Appellate Tribunal, as well as

42

the eventual establishment of an ‘Investment Court System’ (ICS). The issue at the centre of the discussion was the external autonomy of the EU legal order. Many of the questions directed at the panel concerned the decision in Achmea, C-284/16, where the Court held that international arbitration between Member States under bilateral investment treaties would not be compatible with EU law. Opinion 1/17 makes a clear distinction between the intra-state arbitration in Achmea and dispute resolution under CETA, as the latter represents an agreement between the EU and a third state. This harks back to the idea that internal legal autonomy is a battle the Court considers it has already won. In order to make a finding of compatibility, the opinion defines the jurisdiction of the Tribunal as narrowly as possible, stressing that the Tribunal would not interpret, apply or make binding interpretations of EU law (other than the provisions of CETA), but merely examine it as a matter of fact. Several panellists felt that the Court’s hands were tied in this matter by the active role assumed by the Union in creating such treaties. The political realities of EU external relations, particularly in respect of investment treaties, has forced the Court to move away from excessive formalism, protecting only the most fundamental features of autonomy. Slovenia v Croatia Case C-457/18 My largest research task during the placement concerned infringement proceedings, brought by Slovenia

2020 Middle Templar

against Croatia on Friday 13 July 2018. Slovenia sought a declaration that Croatia had failed to fulfil its obligations under EU law by not complying with an arbitration agreement between the two States intended to resolve their border dispute. Croatia submitted that, as the alleged infringements arose from a border dispute, which is a matter of international law, the ECJ lacked competence to hear the case. The Court addressed the question of admissibility in a separate hearing on Monday 8 July 2019 under Article 151 of the Rules of Procedure. In the months between the hearing of the case and the release of Advocate General Priit Pikamäe’s opinion, I conducted research alongside the Cabinet’s référendaires into the question of admissibility. In the judgment published in January of this year, the Court stressed its lack of jurisdiction to give a ruling on the interpretation of an international agreement concluded by Member States whose subject matter falls outside the areas of EU competence. The Court held that the infringements of EU law pleaded were merely ancillary to the alleged failure by Croatia to comply with the obligations arising from the arbitration agreement and award at issue. The Court rejected the submission that the arbitration agreement formed an integral part of EU law, thereby protecting the Court’s exclusive jurisdiction and the autonomy of the EU legal order. However, whilst noting that competence in respect of border demarcation is a reserved competence, the Court reached a compromise by requiring the two Member States in question to strive sincerely to bring about a definitive legal solution to the dispute consistent with international law under Article 4(3) TEU, thereby demonstrating its commitment to the strict observance of international law under Article 3(5) TEU.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Temple Church Weddings

0
page 145

New Masters of the Bench 2019-20

9min
pages 127-129

Middle Temple Students' Association

4min
page 126

Middle Temple Young Barristers' Association

7min
pages 124-125

Hall Committee

4min
page 123

The COIC Pupillage Matched Funded Scheme

3min
page 122

What Have the Bar Council and the Inn Ever Done for Me?

2min
page 119

Behind the Lens

8min
pages 116-118

Temple Residents' Association

4min
page 121

Valedictory: The Rt Hon. Lord Carnwath

7min
pages 114-115

Temple Church During Lockdown

7min
pages 112-113

Lent Reader’s Feast: The Highways, Byways and Blind Alleys of International Law

11min
pages 108-110

Temple Church Choir Summer Review

2min
page 111

Becoming a Barrister

15min
pages 103-105

Autumn Reader's Feast: Current Challenges in the Criminal Justice System

8min
pages 106-107

Talk to Spot

3min
page 102

The Divorce Blame Game is Nearly Over

6min
pages 100-101

You have the Right to Remain Unidentified

7min
pages 98-99

Levelling the Playing Field

8min
pages 96-97

A Day in the Country in Lockdown

9min
pages 92-93

Confronting the Challenges Presented by the Covid-19 Pandemic

8min
pages 90-91

Impeachment of a U.S. President

8min
pages 94-95

How Middle Temple Helped Me

3min
page 88

Don’t Let Commercial Awareness be a Bar to Success

4min
page 87

Student Life at the Inn

3min
page 86

In the Shoes of an Out of London Student

4min
page 85

The Inns of Court

3min
page 84

The ICCA Bar Course

3min
page 83

Troubled Journeys on the Path to Justice

3min
page 82

Turning the Tide against Corruption in the Congo

4min
page 81

My Journey to the Bar and Becoming the First Kurdish Iraqi Barrister

3min
page 80

Qualifying Sessions

4min
page 79

The Role of an Inn of Court

3min
page 78

Five Perspectives on Sponsorship

8min
pages 76-77

Advocacy at the Inn

7min
pages 74-75

Outreach

3min
page 72

Sherrard Conversations

3min
page 73

Mock Pupillage Interviews

7min
pages 68-69

Volunteering at Call Day

2min
pages 70-71

Mooting Trip to Cherokee

9min
pages 65-67

Education Update

4min
page 64

100 Years Since Helena Normanton's First Qualifying Session

2min
page 58

MTYBA & MTSA International Women's Day

2min
page 59

Créme de la Créme Climbing Rose

2min
page 62

Celebrating a Century of Women in Law

5min
pages 56-57

Circuit Societies

15min
pages 53-55

MTYBA Dark Waters Event

3min
page 63

The Rule of Law Under Attack

7min
pages 60-61

Working in the Seychelles

4min
page 52

An Increased Use of Technology in Gibraltar's Legal System

2min
page 51

Access to Justice during the Coronavirus Pandemic: The Malaysian Experience

8min
pages 48-49

Cross Border Practice in Europe and Brexit

4min
page 46

Business as Usual at the European Court of Justice Pending Brexit

7min
pages 44-45

Reflections on a Declaration of Friendship

7min
pages 42-43

Mind the Gap: The General Adjourned Period and the Coronavirus Pandemic in Hong Kong

4min
page 47

Amity Visit to Canada

6min
pages 40-41

Book Review: Equal Justice by Frederick Wilmot-Smith

3min
page 39

Book Review: Court Number One: The Old Bailey Trials that Defined Modern Britain by Thomas Grant

4min
page 38

Book Review: Simon Brown's Memoirs by the The Rt Hon The Lord Brown

4min
page 35

The Ceremonial Plate of the Middle Temple

4min
page 32

Lord Carson of Duncairn: Barrister, Statesman and Judge

11min
pages 27-29

Unshaken & Unshakeable

7min
pages 30-31

A Personal Collection of 15th Century Documents

17min
pages 23-26

Justiciability – A Forgotten Saga

9min
pages 33-34

Readers of the Temple: From the 16th to the 19th Century

9min
pages 20-22

A Potted History of the Office of the Under Treasurer

5min
pages 18-19

Equality and Diversity at the Bar Council

4min
page 13

The Spanish Influenza Pandemic

3min
page 17

Racial Equality, Inclusion and Anti-Racism Working Group

2min
page 12

Black Lives Matter

4min
page 11

BAME and the Bar

4min
page 10

From the Treasurer

6min
pages 8-9

Speech at the Inauguration of the Middle Temple LGBTQ+ Forum

11min
pages 14-16

Under Treasurers’ Forewords

8min
pages 6-7
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.