4 minute read
Site-Specific Knowledge
Site Land Use
Muddy Pond was formerly a Catholic girls’ summer camp, called Camp Mishannock or
Morningstar, owned and operated by the Sisters of Divine Providence.76 Upon consultation with
Susan Aprill, an archivist from the Kingston Public Library, it appears that around May 1962,
this camp was part of the Gurnett estate. The Plymouth Registry of Deeds shows that the Sisters
of Divine Providence bought around 600 acres called the "Clearing Farm" from Mary E. Gurnett
(1946-10-01, Book 1929, Pages 168-169). Prior to 1948 and this ownership by the Sisters, the
site was reportedly a dairy farm. In fact, during our in-person visit to Muddy Pond, we came
across a root cellar that could have been used to store dairy products. Additionally, the Jones
River Village Historical Society (JRVHS) cites that during the 1700s, the area was once used as
a sheep pasture.77
As we walked through the trails on the Muddy Pond site, Leslie provided further insight that
Indigenous ancestors most likely lived on the site in villages. She explained that the trails we
walked were naturally made hundreds of years ago. Furthermore, the NLC website states that the
90 mile long river trip known as the Wampanoag Canoe Passage was used by Wampanoag
people for thousands of years.78 Site-specific land use issues to note include contention over
fishing access in Muddy Pond and the erosion of the Pond banks due to use. Importantly, the
76 Rapid Ecological Assessment for Muddy Pond – Camp Tract. Kingston, Massachusetts. By Tim Simmons of Simmons Stewardship Ecology. September 2020. 77 2003 - an abstract of minutes of the Jones River Village Historical Society (JRVHS) 78 http://www.nativelandconservancy.org/projects.html
surrounding area of Kingston is expanding rapidly at a growth rate of almost 10% from 2010 to
2019.79
Site Ecology
The Muddy Pond conservation area is part of the Atlantic Coastal Pine Barrens Ecoregion, a
globally imperiled and rare ecosystem. It is a coastal plain pond shore habitat, which is a priority
habitat for rare species in accordance with the Massachusetts Endangered Species Act. The
Muddy Pond area is predominately kettle and kame topography, meaning it was formed
primarily through glacial recession. There are four types of wetlands on the site and there is
presence of vernal pools, which are seasonal and therefore temporary wetlands. The site is 60%
forested with oak (northern red, black, scarlet, and white oak), red maple, white pine, and pitch
pine. Non-native trees include Norway Spruce and Japanese Larch. There are also 2.5 acres of
mixed cultural and natural grasslands which are changing to ferns and milkweed. The site
includes animal species such as the New England Bluet and the Eastern Box turtle, as well as
several notable bat species. The Rapid Ecological Assessment found the site to be in
exceptionally good condition in its ratio of native to non-native species, especially when
compared with surrounding site conditions.
Tim Simmons expressed to us that the site is of particular importance due to its convergence of
geology, hydrology, and expressive flora. Most of the similar habitats present in Massachusetts
are under severe stress due to over withdrawal of groundwater, overdevelopment, declining
water quality, and invasive aquatic plants. Now there are just a handful of intact lands like this
79 Rapid Ecological Assessment for Muddy Pond – Camp Tract. Kingston, Massachusetts. By Tim Simmons of Simmons Stewardship Ecology. September 2020.
one that are under ownership of land trusts. Unfortunately, Tim noted that if one visits the other
ones, one sees that “people love them to death” through trampling and overuse. Jon Leibowitz,
Executive Director of the Northeast Wilderness Trust (NEWT) described how the NEWT-
managed surrounding Muddy Pond Wilderness Preserve experiences heavy human use, primarily
because of ATVs, mountain bikers, and hikers. NEWT monitors this use and discourages it
because of its negative ecological impact. Although the 32-acre Muddy Pond site has also
experienced ATV and foot traffic from locals, it is still relatively preserved.
Site Invasive Species
Below is a list of invasive tree, shrub, and plant species. A review of invasive species literature
(see: Literature Review), conversations with Leslie and Chuckie, maps of the site, and the site
visit formed these interim observations about the site’s present and future species management.
● Japanese knotweed: (See: Literature Review, Invasive Species Management).
● Black locust: Multiple Black Locust groves are present on the site and are slated for
removal. (See: Literature Review, Invasive Species Management).
● Norway spruce: Two groves of Norway spruce are present on the site. Preliminary
findings indicate that some of these, along with a white oak, make up a root cellar present
on the site (see: History). These groves are projected for removal to free resources for
nearby herbaceous plants and native tree stands; however, teaching team discussions of
such removal have made reference to possible bird species which, according to a recent
study (see: Literature Review), rely on Norway spruce stands as replacements for
declining Eastern hemlock. Leslie and Chuckie have discussed the possibility of
introducing white cedar to replace the removed Norway spruce. (See: Literature Review,
Invasive Species Management).
● Oriental bittersweet
● Autumn olive
● Multifloral rose
● Japanese barberry
● Gray willow
● Yellow iris
In addition, the following native species were recorded during the site visit and through
conversations with Leslie and Chuckie.
● White oak
● White cedar
● Eastern Turtle Species, including endangered Northern Red-Bellied Cooter