207 orderonmotiontostrike kroger

Page 1

Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 207 Filed: 08/09/13 1 of 1 PageID #: 1301

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI

ABERDEEN DIVISION

PLAINTIFF

KMART CORPORATION

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11~CV-00103-GHD-DAS

v.

THE KROGER CO.; E & A SOUTHEAST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; FULTON IMPROVEMENTS, LLC; KANSAS CITY RAILWAY COMPANY; and CITY OF CORINTH

DEFENDANTS

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND

GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE

Pursuant to an opinion issued this day, it is HEREBY ORDERED that

(1) Kroger's motion for judgment on the pleadings [66] is GRANTED only insofar as it pertains to the specific allegations by Kmart that the LOMR was "improperly granted" and "improperly allowed the Kroger store to remain in the floodway";

(2) Kroger's motion for judgment on the pleadings [66] is otherwise DENIED; (3) Kmart's claims that Kroger negligently remained in the floodway and otherwise failed to exercise reasonable care to prevent harm to the Corinth Kmart store from flooding survive this Rule 12(c) motion; (4) Kroger's motion to strike [88] is GRANTED; and

(5) Exhibit 1 [77-1] to Kmart's response [77] to the Rule 12(c) motion and any references in the response to said exhibit are stricken from Kmart's response to the motion for judgment on the pleadings.

It is SO ORDERED, this, the

;CJv

Lda~us~,OD~ SENIOR JUDGE


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.