Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253 Filed: 10/07/13 1 of 9 PageID #: 2250
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION KMART CORPORATION VS.
PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-103-GHD-DAS
THE KROGER CO., E&A SOUTHEAST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; FULTON IMPROVEMENTS LLC; THE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY; CITY OF CORINTH; THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JOHN DOE; AND ABC CORPORATION
DEFENDANTS
______________________________________________________________________________ DEFENDANT THE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ______________________________________________________________________________ COMES NOW Defendant The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (“KCSR”), by and through counsel, and moves this Court pursuant Fed. R. Civ. P 56 for summary judgment on all of Plaintiff’s claims against it and would show unto the Court the following: INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Kmart Corporation (“Plaintiff” or “Kmart”) brought this action on May 2, 2011, alleging that negligent acts and/or omissions by Defendants proximately caused the flooding damages Plaintiff sustained at its Kmart Store #4883 in Corinth, Mississippi, on May 2, 2010. With regard to KCSR, Kmart alleges that KCSR negligently allowed excessive debris to collect under its railroad bridge over Elam Creek, and that, blockage resulting from such alleged debris caused the level of water in the Kmart store, located some 2100 feet upstream, to be higher than it would have been otherwise. Plaintiff bears the burden to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, duty, breach of duty, proximate cause and damages. McKee v. Bowers Window & Door Co., Inc., 64 So. 3d 926, 1
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253 Filed: 10/07/13 2 of 9 PageID #: 2251
939-40 (Miss. 2011). The undisputed material facts show that Plaintiff cannot carry this burden on breach of duty or proximate causation; and KCS is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. GROUNDS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT I. PLAINTIFF CANNOT SHOW THAT KCSR BREACHED ANY DUTY TO REASONABLY MAINTAIN THE AREA BENEATH ITS ELAM CREEK BRIDGE FREE OF EXCESSIVE DEBRIS. 1.
Plaintiff, whose Kmart Store #4883 is located upstream of KCSR’s bridge over
Elam Creek, has the burden to establish that acts and/or omissions by KCSR constituted negligence. See Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Watkins, 671 So. 2d 59, 61 (Miss. 1996) (upper riparian landowner seeking damages for obstruction of water flow by lower riparian landowner has burden to establish the requisite elements of any negligence claim). 2.
Plaintiff offers, and can offer, no admissible evidence that KCSR failed to
adequately inspect and maintain its bridge with regard to debris under the bridge, or otherwise failed, in any material way, to maintain its bridge. The only evidence in the record is that KCSR did inspect and maintain the bridge in this action in a reasonable manner in accordance with all of its internal policies and with Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) regulations and industry standards. II.
PLAINTIFF OFFERS NO EVIDENCE OF EXCESSIVE DEBRIS UNDER KCSR’S BRIDGE AT THE TIME OF THE MAY 2, 2010 FLOOD.
3.
It is undisputed in this litigation that Plaintiff has no evidence that there was any
amount of debris beneath KCSR’s railroad bridge at the time of the May 2, 2010 flood event.
2
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253 Filed: 10/07/13 3 of 9 PageID #: 2252
4.
Thus, for this reason also, Plaintiff has failed to make a showing on KCSR’s
alleged breach of its duty to maintain its railroad underpass free of excessive debris sufficient to send this flood case to a jury. See Braswell v. Illinois Cent. R. R. Co., 250 F.3d 738 (5th Cir. 2001) (plaintiff’s lack of eyewitness testimony and reliance only on post-flood photographs showing debris near railroad, entitled defendant to judgment in its favor as a matter of law). 5.
The only evidence Plaintiff relies upon to establish the presence of excessive
debris as of May 2, 2010 is the testimony of Kmart’s retained expert John R. Krewson. As set forth fully in Defendant KCSR’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of John R. Krewson [Doc 240] and Memorandum in Support [Doc 241], Krewson’s testimony that excessive debris beneath KCSR’s bridge contributed to flooding at the Kmart store is inadmissible because Krewson has no reliable basis for assuming the presence of any excessive debris under KCSR’s bridge, much less any reliable basis for his assumption of a twenty-five percent (25%) blockage. 6.
Krewson’s testimony is speculative, and therefore, inadmissible because he relies
only upon the existence of excessive debris beneath KCSR’s bridge after the flood event, which was just as likely debris deposited as a result of the flood rather than an indication of conditions at the time of the flood. This post-flood evidence is not sufficient to create an issue of material fact regarding the existence of debris beneath KCSR’s bridge at the time of the flood. See Ramsey v. Henderson, 286 F.3d 264, 269 (5th Cir. 2002). 7.
Because of this critical lack of evidence on the existence of debris beneath
KCSR’s bridge at the time of the flood – much less evidence of a twenty-five percent (25%) blockage caused by excessive debris – summary judgment should be granted. Boudreaux v. Swift Transp. Co., 402 F.3d 536, 540 (5th Cir. 2005). 3
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253 Filed: 10/07/13 4 of 9 PageID #: 2253
8.
Under Mississippi law, only when a plaintiff makes a prima facie showing of a
defendant’s duty and breach thereof is it possible to even proceed to whether such breach of duty proximately caused the plaintiff’s damages. May v. V.F.W. Post No. 2539, 577 So. 2d 372, 375 (Miss. 1991). Because Plaintiff has failed to make any showing that Defendant KCSR breached any duty to Plaintiff, KCSR is entitled to summary judgment on this basis alone. III.
EVEN ASSUMING ARGUENDO THAT KCSR BREACHED ITS DUTY TO MAINTAIN ITS RAILROAD UNDERPASS FREE OF EXCESSIVE DEBRIS, SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS APPROPRIATE BECAUSE THE UNDISPUTED EVIDENCE SHOWS THAT NO ALLEGED ACT OR OMISSION BY KCSR WAS THE PROXIMATE CAUSE OF PLAINTIFF’S DAMAGES.
9. In order to prevail on the causation prong of its negligence claim against KCSR, Plaintiff must establish not only that its injury would not have occurred but for the existence of alleged excessive debris beneath KCSR’s bridge at the time of the flood, but also that Plaintiff’s damages were a reasonably foreseeable consequence of KCSR’s negligent failure to maintain its railroad underpass free of excessive debris. Comer v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc., 839 F.Supp. 2d 849 (S.D. Miss. 2012). 10. Plaintiff’s only witness, its expert Krewson, can offer no opinion that any act or omission by KCSR contributed to Plaintiff’s damages in this case because Krewson never modeled the KCSR bridge or debris beneath the bridge. Krewson himself has admitted that his “models do not tell anything about backup [of flood waters] at Kmart with regard to blockage that [he] attribute[s] to KCS.” 11.Since Kmart has acknowledged it relies solely on Krewson to establish the causal link between alleged debris beneath KCSR’s bridge at the time of the flood and Plaintiff’s flood damages, and because Krewson has admitted his models tell one nothing about whether alleged 4
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253 Filed: 10/07/13 5 of 9 PageID #: 2254
debris caused flooding at the Kmart store, Plaintiff is without any admissible causation testimony to establish the proximate cause element of its negligence claim against KCSR. 12. Based on the undisputed testimony of hydrologist Blake Mendrop, who did model the KCSR bridge and the assumed 25% blockage beneath it, even assuming arguendo a twentyfive percent (25%) blockage caused by debris beneath KCSR’s bridge at the time of the flood, such blockage would have had no impact on the water level at the Kmart store. 13. Plaintiff has no evidence to rebut Mendrop’s testimony, so it is undisputed in the record that any alleged blockage at the KCSR bridge was not a substantial factor in bringing about flooding at the Kmart store. See New Albany v. Barkley, 510 So. 2d 805 (Miss. 1987). 14. Because the undisputed evidence in this case demonstrates that even assuming arguendo a 25% blockage at the KCSR bridge, such blockage would have made no impact on flooding at Kmart Store #4883, Plaintiff fails to make a sufficient showing of but-for causation that can survive summary judgment. 15. Further, even assuming arguendo that Plaintiff can carry its burden to establish but for causation in this case, which it cannot, Plaintiff’s negligence claim against KCSR fails because it cannot make a showing of legal cause sufficient to survive summary judgment. 16. It is undisputed that the rainfall amount in Corinth, Mississippi, on May 2, 2010, was extraordinary and exceeded the 100-year flood event, which no one – including Kmart and KCSR – could reasonably foresee. See City of Pascagoula v. Rayburn, 320 So. 2d 378 (Miss. 1975). 17. Thus, even assuming arguendo that Plaintiff could establish but-for causation in this case, it cannot make a sufficient showing of legal cause and KCSR has no liability for Plaintiff’s damages which could not be guarded against by KCSR’s exercise of reasonable care. 5
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253 Filed: 10/07/13 6 of 9 PageID #: 2255
18. KCSR adopts and incorporates herein by reference the arguments and authorities set forth in its Memorandum of Authorities in Support of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, being filed contemporaneously herewith. 19. On the basis of the grounds asserted herein, Plaintiff fails to make a prima facie showing sufficient to establish that KCSR breached any duty to Plaintiff or, even assuming arguendo a breach, that such breach proximately caused or contributed to damages sustained by Plaintiff. Thus, the Court should grant summary judgment in KCSR’s favor on Plaintiff’s negligence claim against it. 20.
In support of its motion, KCSR submits the following: a. Exhibit “A”
Complaint
b. Exhibit “B”
Excerpts from Deposition of KCSR, August 28, 2013
c. Exhibit “C”
Affidavit of Blake Mendrop
d. Exhibit “D”
Excerpts from Deposition of David Huwe, August 26, 2013
e. Exhibit “E”
NOAA Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena
f. Exhibit “F”
Legend and Photographs of Flooding in Corinth, Mississippi, May 2, 2010
g. Exhibit “G”
Excerpts from Deposition of Kmart Corporation, July 19, 2013
h. Exhibit “H”
Excerpts from Deposition of John R. Krewson, May 22, 2013
i. Exhibit “I”
May 2, 2010 Armato Email
j. Exhibit “J”
May 3, 2010 Armato Email
k. Exhibit “K”
KCSR Responses to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories 6
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253 Filed: 10/07/13 7 of 9 PageID #: 2256
l. Exhibit “L”
KCSR Bridge Inspection Procedures
m. Exhibit “M”
KCSR Maintenance of Way (MOW) and Signal Department Rules
n. Exhibit “N”
Affidavit of Micheal Schmidt, KCSR 30(b)(6) Representative
o. Exhibit “O”
KCSR MOW-102 Rules
p. Exhibit “P”
KCSR Bridge Inspection Reports
q. Exhibit “Q”
April 26, 2013 Letter from Plaintiff’s Counsel
r. Exhibit “R”
Plaintiff’s Responses to KCSR’s Interrogatories
s. Exhibit “S”
Expert Report of John R. Krewson
t. Exhibit “T”
Excerpts from Deposition of Blake Mendrop, September 5, 2013
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant The Kansas City Southern Railway Company respectfully requests that this Court grant its Motion for Summary Judgment as to all claims by Plaintiff Kmart Corporation against it. THIS the 7th day of October, 2013. Respectfully submitted, THE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
BY:___/ s/ Linda F. Cooper__________________ CHARLES E. ROSS (MSB #5683) W. McDONALD NICHOLS (MSB #3847) LINDA F. COOPER (MSB #102901) Attorneys for Defendant KCSR
7
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253 Filed: 10/07/13 8 of 9 PageID #: 2257
OF COUNSEL WISE CARTER CHILD & CARAWAY, P.A. 600 Heritage Building 401 East Capitol Street Post Office Box 651 Jackson, Mississippi 39205-0651 Telephone: (601) 968-5500 Facsimile: (601) 968-5593
8
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253 Filed: 10/07/13 9 of 9 PageID #: 2258
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Linda F. Cooper, one of the attorneys for Defendant, The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, do hereby certify a copy of the above and foregoing has been served on all known counsel of record with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will automatically send email notification to all known counsel of record.
This the 7th day of October, 2013. /s/Linda F. Cooper LINDA F. COOPER
9
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 1 of 28 PageID #: 2259
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 2 of 28 PageID #: 2260
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 3 of 28 PageID #: 2261
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 4 of 28 PageID #: 2262
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 5 of 28 PageID #: 2263
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 6 of 28 PageID #: 2264
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 7 of 28 PageID #: 2265
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 8 of 28 PageID #: 2266
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 9 of 28 PageID #: 2267
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 10 of 28 PageID #: 2268
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 11 of 28 PageID #: 2269
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 12 of 28 PageID #: 2270
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 13 of 28 PageID #: 2271
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 14 of 28 PageID #: 2272
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 15 of 28 PageID #: 2273
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 16 of 28 PageID #: 2274
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 17 of 28 PageID #: 2275
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 18 of 28 PageID #: 2276
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 19 of 28 PageID #: 2277
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 20 of 28 PageID #: 2278
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 21 of 28 PageID #: 2279
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 22 of 28 PageID #: 2280
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 23 of 28 PageID #: 2281
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 24 of 28 PageID #: 2282
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 25 of 28 PageID #: 2283
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 26 of 28 PageID #: 2284
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 27 of 28 PageID #: 2285
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-1 Filed: 10/07/13 28 of 28 PageID #: 2286
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 1 of 41 PageID #: 2287
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 2 of 41 PageID #: 2288
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 3 of 41 PageID #: 2289
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 4 of 41 PageID #: 2290
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 5 of 41 PageID #: 2291
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 6 of 41 PageID #: 2292
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 7 of 41 PageID #: 2293
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 8 of 41 PageID #: 2294
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 9 of 41 PageID #: 2295
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 10 of 41 PageID #: 2296
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 11 of 41 PageID #: 2297
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 12 of 41 PageID #: 2298
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 13 of 41 PageID #: 2299
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 14 of 41 PageID #: 2300
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 15 of 41 PageID #: 2301
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 16 of 41 PageID #: 2302
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 17 of 41 PageID #: 2303
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 18 of 41 PageID #: 2304
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 19 of 41 PageID #: 2305
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 20 of 41 PageID #: 2306
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 21 of 41 PageID #: 2307
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 22 of 41 PageID #: 2308
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 23 of 41 PageID #: 2309
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 24 of 41 PageID #: 2310
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 25 of 41 PageID #: 2311
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 26 of 41 PageID #: 2312
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 27 of 41 PageID #: 2313
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 28 of 41 PageID #: 2314
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 29 of 41 PageID #: 2315
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 30 of 41 PageID #: 2316
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 31 of 41 PageID #: 2317
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 32 of 41 PageID #: 2318
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 33 of 41 PageID #: 2319
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 34 of 41 PageID #: 2320
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 35 of 41 PageID #: 2321
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 36 of 41 PageID #: 2322
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 37 of 41 PageID #: 2323
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 38 of 41 PageID #: 2324
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 39 of 41 PageID #: 2325
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 40 of 41 PageID #: 2326
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-2 Filed: 10/07/13 41 of 41 PageID #: 2327
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-3 Filed: 10/07/13 1 of 7 PageID #: 2328
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-3 Filed: 10/07/13 2 of 7 PageID #: 2329
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-3 Filed: 10/07/13 3 of 7 PageID #: 2330
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-3 Filed: 10/07/13 4 of 7 PageID #: 2331
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-3 Filed: 10/07/13 5 of 7 PageID #: 2332
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-3 Filed: 10/07/13 6 of 7 PageID #: 2333
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-3 Filed: 10/07/13 7 of 7 PageID #: 2334
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-4 Filed: 10/07/13 1 of 14 PageID #: 2335
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-4 Filed: 10/07/13 2 of 14 PageID #: 2336
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-4 Filed: 10/07/13 3 of 14 PageID #: 2337
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-4 Filed: 10/07/13 4 of 14 PageID #: 2338
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-4 Filed: 10/07/13 5 of 14 PageID #: 2339
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-4 Filed: 10/07/13 6 of 14 PageID #: 2340
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-4 Filed: 10/07/13 7 of 14 PageID #: 2341
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-4 Filed: 10/07/13 8 of 14 PageID #: 2342
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-4 Filed: 10/07/13 9 of 14 PageID #: 2343
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-4 Filed: 10/07/13 10 of 14 PageID #: 2344
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-4 Filed: 10/07/13 11 of 14 PageID #: 2345
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-4 Filed: 10/07/13 12 of 14 PageID #: 2346
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-4 Filed: 10/07/13 13 of 14 PageID #: 2347
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-4 Filed: 10/07/13 14 of 14 PageID #: 2348
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-5 Filed: 10/07/13 1 of 3 PageID #: 2349
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-5 Filed: 10/07/13 2 of 3 PageID #: 2350
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-5 Filed: 10/07/13 3 of 3 PageID #: 2351
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-6 Filed: 10/07/13 1 of 17 PageID #: 2352
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-6 Filed: 10/07/13 2 of 17 PageID #: 2353
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-6 Filed: 10/07/13 3 of 17 PageID #: 2354
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-6 Filed: 10/07/13 4 of 17 PageID #: 2355
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-6 Filed: 10/07/13 5 of 17 PageID #: 2356
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-6 Filed: 10/07/13 6 of 17 PageID #: 2357
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-6 Filed: 10/07/13 7 of 17 PageID #: 2358
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-6 Filed: 10/07/13 8 of 17 PageID #: 2359
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-6 Filed: 10/07/13 9 of 17 PageID #: 2360
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-6 Filed: 10/07/13 10 of 17 PageID #: 2361
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-6 Filed: 10/07/13 11 of 17 PageID #: 2362
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-6 Filed: 10/07/13 12 of 17 PageID #: 2363
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-6 Filed: 10/07/13 13 of 17 PageID #: 2364
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-6 Filed: 10/07/13 14 of 17 PageID #: 2365
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-6 Filed: 10/07/13 15 of 17 PageID #: 2366
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-6 Filed: 10/07/13 16 of 17 PageID #: 2367
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-6 Filed: 10/07/13 17 of 17 PageID #: 2368
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-7 Filed: 10/07/13 1 of 9 PageID #: 2369
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-7 Filed: 10/07/13 2 of 9 PageID #: 2370
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-7 Filed: 10/07/13 3 of 9 PageID #: 2371
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-7 Filed: 10/07/13 4 of 9 PageID #: 2372
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-7 Filed: 10/07/13 5 of 9 PageID #: 2373
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-7 Filed: 10/07/13 6 of 9 PageID #: 2374
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-7 Filed: 10/07/13 7 of 9 PageID #: 2375
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-7 Filed: 10/07/13 8 of 9 PageID #: 2376
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-7 Filed: 10/07/13 9 of 9 PageID #: 2377
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-8 Filed: 10/07/13 1 of 19 PageID #: 2378
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-8 Filed: 10/07/13 2 of 19 PageID #: 2379
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-8 Filed: 10/07/13 3 of 19 PageID #: 2380
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-8 Filed: 10/07/13 4 of 19 PageID #: 2381
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-8 Filed: 10/07/13 5 of 19 PageID #: 2382
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-8 Filed: 10/07/13 6 of 19 PageID #: 2383
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-8 Filed: 10/07/13 7 of 19 PageID #: 2384
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-8 Filed: 10/07/13 8 of 19 PageID #: 2385
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-8 Filed: 10/07/13 9 of 19 PageID #: 2386
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-8 Filed: 10/07/13 10 of 19 PageID #: 2387
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-8 Filed: 10/07/13 11 of 19 PageID #: 2388
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-8 Filed: 10/07/13 12 of 19 PageID #: 2389
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-8 Filed: 10/07/13 13 of 19 PageID #: 2390
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-8 Filed: 10/07/13 14 of 19 PageID #: 2391
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-8 Filed: 10/07/13 15 of 19 PageID #: 2392
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-8 Filed: 10/07/13 16 of 19 PageID #: 2393
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-8 Filed: 10/07/13 17 of 19 PageID #: 2394
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-8 Filed: 10/07/13 18 of 19 PageID #: 2395
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-8 Filed: 10/07/13 19 of 19 PageID #: 2396
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-9 Filed: 10/07/13 1 of 11 PageID #: 2397
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-9 Filed: 10/07/13 2 of 11 PageID #: 2398
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-9 Filed: 10/07/13 3 of 11 PageID #: 2399
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-9 Filed: 10/07/13 4 of 11 PageID #: 2400
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-9 Filed: 10/07/13 5 of 11 PageID #: 2401
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-9 Filed: 10/07/13 6 of 11 PageID #: 2402
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-9 Filed: 10/07/13 7 of 11 PageID #: 2403
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-9 Filed: 10/07/13 8 of 11 PageID #: 2404
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-9 Filed: 10/07/13 9 of 11 PageID #: 2405
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-9 Filed: 10/07/13 10 of 11 PageID #: 2406
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-9 Filed: 10/07/13 11 of 11 PageID #: 2407
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-10 Filed: 10/07/13 1 of 3 PageID #: 2408
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-10 Filed: 10/07/13 2 of 3 PageID #: 2409
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-10 Filed: 10/07/13 3 of 3 PageID #: 2410
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-11 Filed: 10/07/13 1 of 13 PageID #: 2411
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-11 Filed: 10/07/13 2 of 13 PageID #: 2412
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-11 Filed: 10/07/13 3 of 13 PageID #: 2413
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-11 Filed: 10/07/13 4 of 13 PageID #: 2414
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-11 Filed: 10/07/13 5 of 13 PageID #: 2415
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-11 Filed: 10/07/13 6 of 13 PageID #: 2416
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-11 Filed: 10/07/13 7 of 13 PageID #: 2417
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-11 Filed: 10/07/13 8 of 13 PageID #: 2418
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-11 Filed: 10/07/13 9 of 13 PageID #: 2419
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-11 Filed: 10/07/13 10 of 13 PageID #: 2420
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-11 Filed: 10/07/13 11 of 13 PageID #: 2421
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-11 Filed: 10/07/13 12 of 13 PageID #: 2422
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-11 Filed: 10/07/13 13 of 13 PageID #: 2423
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-12 Filed: 10/07/13 1 of 2 PageID #: 2424
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-12 Filed: 10/07/13 2 of 2 PageID #: 2425
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-13 Filed: 10/07/13 1 of 2 PageID #: 2426
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-13 Filed: 10/07/13 2 of 2 PageID #: 2427
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-14 Filed: 10/07/13 1 of 2 PageID #: 2428
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-14 Filed: 10/07/13 2 of 2 PageID #: 2429
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-15 Filed: 10/07/13 1 of 2 PageID #: 2430
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-15 Filed: 10/07/13 2 of 2 PageID #: 2431
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-16 Filed: 10/07/13 1 of 18 PageID #: 2432
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-16 Filed: 10/07/13 2 of 18 PageID #: 2433
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-16 Filed: 10/07/13 3 of 18 PageID #: 2434
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-16 Filed: 10/07/13 4 of 18 PageID #: 2435
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-16 Filed: 10/07/13 5 of 18 PageID #: 2436
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-16 Filed: 10/07/13 6 of 18 PageID #: 2437
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-16 Filed: 10/07/13 7 of 18 PageID #: 2438
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-16 Filed: 10/07/13 8 of 18 PageID #: 2439
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-16 Filed: 10/07/13 9 of 18 PageID #: 2440
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-16 Filed: 10/07/13 10 of 18 PageID #: 2441
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-16 Filed: 10/07/13 11 of 18 PageID #: 2442
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-16 Filed: 10/07/13 12 of 18 PageID #: 2443
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-16 Filed: 10/07/13 13 of 18 PageID #: 2444
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-16 Filed: 10/07/13 14 of 18 PageID #: 2445
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-16 Filed: 10/07/13 15 of 18 PageID #: 2446
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-16 Filed: 10/07/13 16 of 18 PageID #: 2447
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-16 Filed: 10/07/13 17 of 18 PageID #: 2448
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-16 Filed: 10/07/13 18 of 18 PageID #: 2449
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-17 Filed: 10/07/13 1 of 2 PageID #: 2450
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-17 Filed: 10/07/13 2 of 2 PageID #: 2451
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-18 Filed: 10/07/13 1 of 19 PageID #: 2452
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-18 Filed: 10/07/13 2 of 19 PageID #: 2453
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-18 Filed: 10/07/13 3 of 19 PageID #: 2454
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-18 Filed: 10/07/13 4 of 19 PageID #: 2455
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-18 Filed: 10/07/13 5 of 19 PageID #: 2456
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-18 Filed: 10/07/13 6 of 19 PageID #: 2457
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-18 Filed: 10/07/13 7 of 19 PageID #: 2458
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-18 Filed: 10/07/13 8 of 19 PageID #: 2459
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-18 Filed: 10/07/13 9 of 19 PageID #: 2460
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-18 Filed: 10/07/13 10 of 19 PageID #: 2461
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-18 Filed: 10/07/13 11 of 19 PageID #: 2462
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-18 Filed: 10/07/13 12 of 19 PageID #: 2463
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-18 Filed: 10/07/13 13 of 19 PageID #: 2464
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-18 Filed: 10/07/13 14 of 19 PageID #: 2465
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-18 Filed: 10/07/13 15 of 19 PageID #: 2466
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-18 Filed: 10/07/13 16 of 19 PageID #: 2467
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-18 Filed: 10/07/13 17 of 19 PageID #: 2468
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-18 Filed: 10/07/13 18 of 19 PageID #: 2469
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-18 Filed: 10/07/13 19 of 19 PageID #: 2470
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-19 Filed: 10/07/13 1 of 23 PageID #: 2471
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-19 Filed: 10/07/13 2 of 23 PageID #: 2472
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-19 Filed: 10/07/13 3 of 23 PageID #: 2473
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-19 Filed: 10/07/13 4 of 23 PageID #: 2474
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-19 Filed: 10/07/13 5 of 23 PageID #: 2475
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-19 Filed: 10/07/13 6 of 23 PageID #: 2476
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-19 Filed: 10/07/13 7 of 23 PageID #: 2477
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-19 Filed: 10/07/13 8 of 23 PageID #: 2478
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-19 Filed: 10/07/13 9 of 23 PageID #: 2479
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-19 Filed: 10/07/13 10 of 23 PageID #: 2480
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-19 Filed: 10/07/13 11 of 23 PageID #: 2481
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-19 Filed: 10/07/13 12 of 23 PageID #: 2482
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-19 Filed: 10/07/13 13 of 23 PageID #: 2483
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-19 Filed: 10/07/13 14 of 23 PageID #: 2484
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-19 Filed: 10/07/13 15 of 23 PageID #: 2485
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-19 Filed: 10/07/13 16 of 23 PageID #: 2486
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-19 Filed: 10/07/13 17 of 23 PageID #: 2487
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-19 Filed: 10/07/13 18 of 23 PageID #: 2488
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-19 Filed: 10/07/13 19 of 23 PageID #: 2489
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-19 Filed: 10/07/13 20 of 23 PageID #: 2490
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-19 Filed: 10/07/13 21 of 23 PageID #: 2491
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-19 Filed: 10/07/13 22 of 23 PageID #: 2492
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-19 Filed: 10/07/13 23 of 23 PageID #: 2493
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 1 of 27 PageID #: 2494
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 2 of 27 PageID #: 2495
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 3 of 27 PageID #: 2496
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 4 of 27 PageID #: 2497
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 5 of 27 PageID #: 2498
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 6 of 27 PageID #: 2499
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 7 of 27 PageID #: 2500
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 8 of 27 PageID #: 2501
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 9 of 27 PageID #: 2502
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 10 of 27 PageID #: 2503
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 11 of 27 PageID #: 2504
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 12 of 27 PageID #: 2505
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 13 of 27 PageID #: 2506
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 14 of 27 PageID #: 2507
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 15 of 27 PageID #: 2508
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 16 of 27 PageID #: 2509
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 17 of 27 PageID #: 2510
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 18 of 27 PageID #: 2511
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 19 of 27 PageID #: 2512
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 20 of 27 PageID #: 2513
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 21 of 27 PageID #: 2514
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 22 of 27 PageID #: 2515
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 23 of 27 PageID #: 2516
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 24 of 27 PageID #: 2517
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 25 of 27 PageID #: 2518
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 26 of 27 PageID #: 2519
Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 253-20 Filed: 10/07/13 27 of 27 PageID #: 2520