Work Sample / 2014

Page 1

MEGAN SUAU // work samples



MEGAN SUAU // work samples www.megansuau.com mlsuau@gmail.com

This work seeks challenging contexts and aims to react with radical appropriateness through rigorous research, iterative critique, and an expansive view of architectural practice.


Megan Suau

Autodesk Architectural Desktop / Revit Adobe Photoshop / Illustrator / InDesign Rhino / SketchUp Vray / Maxwell / Podium Ecotect / TAS Drafting / Modeling Sketching / Painting

711 Elsom St Charlottesville VA 22903

www.megansuau.com mlsuau@gmail.com (941) 882 2280

EDUCATION

WORK EXPERIENCE

PUBLICATIONS

2011.09 - 2013.05

2013. August - Present

2015. July

Master’s of Architecture University of Virginia, Charlottesville (3.6 GPA)

Lecturer and Associate Director, Initiative reCOVER University of Virginia School of Architecture

Re-Centering Delhi

Spring 2013, 2014

Graduate Admissions Committee University of Virginia School of Architecture Review and selected the incoming graduate classes of 2016 and 2017. 2005.08 - 2009.05

Bachelor’s of Design with a Major in Architecture Art History Minor University of Florida, Gainesville Summa Cum Laude (3.8 GPA) 2005.05 - 2005.06

Paris Research Center University of Florida Study Abroad, Paris, France 2008.05 - 2008.07

East Asia Summer Program University of Florida Study Abroad, Hong Kong & Xi’an, China

Inaki Alday, Chair, Department of Architecture 434.924.2540, ina3h@virginia.edu

Instructor of research and foundation studios, research seminars, and independent thesis student advising. • ARCH 3010/4010 Research Studio: Time Over Crisis - Zaatari • ARCH 1030: Foundation Studio I • ARCH 3/4/7/8010 Research Studio: Re-Centering Delhi • ARCH 5906 Research Seminar: India Re-Entrant • ARCH 5999 Integrated Project Delivery Methods Associate director of a school-wide research project focusing on design-build work in developing and post-disaster contexts.

2013-2014. August - August.

Designer VMDO Architects, Charlottesville VA Dina Sorinsen, Project Designer 434.924.7057, agc9a@virginia.edu

Projects include a new school for Quantico Military Base, a residential hall for Virginia Polytechnic University, and an international ideas competition for the role of food in the work place. Responsibilities include BIM modeling, all phases of documentation, 3d visualizations, and graphic research data vizualizations.

Actar, Co-editor For “Re-Centering Delhi Studio”

2015. January

Catalyst II

Actar Interview and work from “Time Over Crisis Studio”

2014 April

ACSA 102 Annual Meeting: Globalizing Architecture for “Architectural Education and Building Resilient Practices in Developing Countries”

2013 September

Catalyst

Actar for “BIM: Unplugged,” “reCOVER,” and “Architectural ContingencyCorps”

2013 May

LUNCH8

for “Deconstructing Danville” with Andrew Brown, Liz Kneller, and Parker Sutton

2013 April

Reclaim + Remake Symposium

at The Catholic University of America for “Deconstructing Danville” with Andrew Brown, Liz Kneller, and Parker Sutton

2013. January - July. 2012. January - July

Project Manager + Graduate Research Assistant Initiative reCOVER, Charlottesville VA

Anselmo Canfora, Associate Professor of Architecture, UVA 434.924.7057, agc9a@virginia.edu Worked as a project manager for two prototypical, flat-packed, disaster recovery housing units in San Marc, Haiti and Charlottesville, VA and for a primary school in Uganda in association with NGO Building Tomorrow. Responsibilities on the projects include design, documentation, delivery, coordination, representation, and management. House 1 was completed June 2012; House 2 was completed in January 2013; the school is slated to finish construction in October 2014.

2011-2013.

Teaching Assistant University of Virginia School of Architecture

2013 April

Paper Matters

for “Mukondeni Pottery Cooperative” with Initiative reCOVER Studio

2009 July

Beyond Media 2009: Visions

“Spot on Schools” Exhibition for “University Dormitory” and “Multiuse Furniture”

AWARDS + HONORS 2013

2012. January

Alpha Rho Chi Medal Henry Adams Certificate Thesis Prize

Externship Ennead Architects, New York, NY

2013

2011 January - July 2009 May - November

Jefferson Public Citizens Grantee School Design and Travel in Uganda, Summer 2013

• ARCH 1030: Foundation Studio I • ARCH 2020: Foundation Studio II

Architect Intern Sweet Sparkman Architects, Sarasota, FL

Jerry Sparkman, AIA, Principal 941.952.0084, jsparkman@sweetsparkman.com Worked in a small practice specializing in residential and public works projects. Responsibilities included as-built drawings and construction documents; physical and 3D digital modeling and rendering; preparation of marketing materials and proposals; and significant participation in public design charettes and client meetings.

2010. January - December

Architect & Construction Management Intern Engineering Ministries International, Kampala & Jinja, Uganda

John Sauder, Country Director, john@emiea.org Steve Hoyt, Construction Manager, steve@emiea.org Worked as a volunteer in an design/build A/E firm serving the region of East Africa. Projects included housing, education, and health care facilities for rural communities. Responsibilities included design, construction documents, marketing materials, project reports, and daily on-site construction management of 4-10 skilled and unskilled Ugandan workers.

University of Virginia School of Architecture

with Initiative reCOVER

2012

Masters Thesis Traveling Research Grantee University of Virginia School of Architecture

2012 May - August

Virginia Tobacco Indemnification Commission Grantee Transitional Disaster Recovery Housing with Initiative reCOVER

2012 January - April

National Science Foundation Grantee Transitional Disaster Recovery Housing with Initiative reCOVER

2011 - 2013

Academic Scholarship

University of Virginia School of Architecture


VA

er for ow. ry, eted ated

R

d

ari

s n

2013 April

Paper Matters

for “Mukondeni Pottery Cooperative” Autodesk Architectural Desktop / Revit with Initiative reCOVER Studio

Adobe Photoshop / Illustrator / InDesign Rhino / SketchUp Vray / Maxwell / Podium Beyond Media 2009: Visions Ecotect / TAS “Spot on Schools” Exhibition for “University Dormitory” and “Multiuse Furniture” Drafting / Modeling Sketching / Painting 2009 July

AWARDS + HONORS PUBLICATIONS 2013 2015. July

Alpha Rho Chi Delhi Medal Re-Centering Co-editor Henry Actar, Adams Certificate For “Re-Centering Delhi Studio” Thesis Prize

2015.University January of Virginia School of Architecture

Catalyst II

2013 Actar

Interview and work from “Time Over Crisis Studio” Jefferson Public Citizens Grantee School Design and Travel in Uganda, Summer 2013

2014 April with Initiative reCOVER

ACSA 102 Annual Meeting: Globalizing Architecture for “Architectural Education and Building Resilient Practices in

2012 Developing Countries”

Masters Thesis Traveling Research Grantee 2013 September University of Virginia School of Architecture

Catalyst

Actar for “BIM: Unplugged,” “reCOVER,” and “Architectural ContingencyCorps”

2012 May - August

Virginia Tobacco Indemnification Commission Grantee 2013 May Disaster Recovery Housing Transitional with Initiative reCOVER LUNCH8 for “Deconstructing Danville” with Andrew Brown, Liz Kneller, and Parker Sutton

al

s,

VA

ter for ow. ery, eted slated

s n

2012 January - April 2013 AprilScience National

Foundation Grantee Reclaim + Disaster Remake Recovery Symposium Transitional Housing

at The Catholic University of America with Initiative reCOVER for “Deconstructing Danville” with Andrew Brown, Liz Kneller, and Parker Sutton

2011 - 2013

Academic 2013 April Scholarship of Virginia School of Architecture PaperUniversity Matters for “Mukondeni Pottery Cooperative” with Initiative reCOVER Studio

2009 July

Beyond Media 2009: Visions

“Spot on Schools” Exhibition for “University Dormitory” and “Multiuse Furniture”

AWARDS + HONORS 2013

Alpha Rho Chi Medal Henry Adams Certificate Thesis Prize

University of Virginia School of Architecture

2013

Jefferson Public Citizens Grantee School Design and Travel in Uganda, Summer 2013 with Initiative reCOVER

2012

Masters Thesis Traveling Research Grantee University of Virginia School of Architecture

2012 May - August

Virginia Tobacco Indemnification Commission Grantee Transitional Disaster Recovery Housing with Initiative reCOVER

2012 January - April

National Science Foundation Grantee Transitional Disaster Recovery Housing with Initiative reCOVER

2011 - 2013

Academic Scholarship

University of Virginia School of Architecture



reconnaissance field manual what you ask

research primer what you find

pocket CM manual what you need to know

BIM UNPLUGGED // uganda critic: completed: recipient of:

BIM Unplugged is a framework which questions traditional modes of architectural practice in a content where no framework currently exists. It is a comprehensive system of tools which aims to close the loop between Western design teams and onthe-ground construction workers.

safety workers during construction occupants after construction

safety

safety workers during construction occupants after construction

safety workers during construction occupants after construction

security

workers during construction occupants after construction

security

comfort

workers during construction occupants after construction

occupants after construction

comfort

asthetics

workers during construction occupants after construction

occupants after construction

comfort

asthetics

workers during construction occupants after construction

workers during construction occupants after construction

occupants after construction

craft during construction maintenance after construction

security

comfort

asthetics

occupants after construction

craft during construction maintenance after construction

management innovation

asthetics

management innovation

security

safety

workers during construction occupants after construction

comfort occupants after construction

asthetics craft during construction maintenance after construction

craft during construction maintenance after construction

security

workers during construction occupants after construction

The thesis created a design and construction toolkit for NGOs and nonprofits conducting built operations in East Africa. Through partnerships both academic (UVA) and on-the-ground (Building Tomorrow Uganda), the thesis materials were tested through a series of construction training seminars held in Uganda in March 2013 and throughout the construction of a BT school during Summer 2013.

craft during construction maintenance after construction

management innovation information during construction

information during construction

TThough specific to emergent global humanitarian practice, the issues address larger questions of integrated project delivery and the evolving role of architects in the built process.

economy

information during construction

management innovation

Anselmo Canfora Spring 2013 UVA School of Architecture Thesis Award UVA School of Architecture Traveling Fellowship

economy

speed

speed

craft

information during construction

AW G IN

m m

craft

changes

speed

craft

changes

questions

craft

changes

questions

IL TA

speed

9

economy

DE

(x)

ll wa al e pic urs ty gs o r a er c enin d p t fo S a r o le TE w po h he sib NO S do up os in RO l s wit rk tp ) P na rw ed en wo al (p ditio r us rm s fo cem fo er pic r Ad tte ty fo rn te in Be re co an e) re nc n an r th iv co io le ete 100mm ta ens r C s vis or nc ta er m exp Co ac d up n an ore ol s Ca NS ks (m ntr CO bric on co e ucti lity or M nstr ua g s q in co ed ain Ne d tr an

questions

375mm

changes

9

craft

(1) unskilled Ugandan

25

Western Management + Ugandan Labor

information during construction

(1) Western Construction Manager (1) skilled Ugandan speed economy

DR

etc

economy

Str

TEAM 1

r Pie e m ar m qu 54 00 9 rS ~ 0-4 PE he 10 mm ² 25 HT / 1m TIG cks idth th Bri ll W Wid a W rtar o M ols To

TY

management innovation

1

field tests

changes

RECIPE Cquestions ARDS

Consulted in order to change the design Re-created own drawings in-the-field

2

questions

recipe cards

film + interviews


m mixes

icks an

na

moves br

y

DA TIO NW AL LS

PADS

ge

villa

PH AS ES

WATER SYST

DE TA ILS

hire

d to

Fin ish ing

EMS

MS +

WA CO LU MN S

to a

ip adersh site le

oted prom ssis tant

ter carpen

e carp

when

Installin g

man

age

con

stru

ctio

na

nd

train

wor

ker

s

AT IVE S

S

S

BE A

is ill

ruction

pr

completes roof const

checks

ng

plubs

uares

awings

sign dr

/ levels / sq

read de

changes design of windows

double

r detaili plans fo

foreman

tr ter to

f

E CH

given

r materials by

windo ws

trained to read construction drawings

d s and

ains ca rpen

an

T

EN

EM

trained to orde

traine t door

ote sc

win dow s

pro m

doors +

to cons truc

an

cons truc ts

for em

NA RR

� � � �

EN TR

FO UN

rien o site

ES TRENCH

U FO

S ION AT ND

sili enc

ote site

for em

o the field s sent t illiate n af se ter W

d exca vated soils

promoted to

for material clears site

excava

to man s fore assist tatio

n+

c poli

y

start

tes t

tio unda set fo

dat oun w ling emb s ass

tions

initial material procurement

force ork

is e erv sup

sf

gets final permit approval finds a place to live close to the site

ed con

of a

the

hired as site construction manager

lain exp ors

rum

ct in

roje

on p

stru cti

meets with village elders

nda plans for fou

rter

UNSK ILLED LABO RER S

l re

dt o

arp ent er to

Info rma tion

ura

ng Installi

ult

Se ttin g

g ttin Se

ros s-c

� �� �� ��

fc

pro m

moves to next project site

rom

eo

Pouring

ng

CROSSTRAINING

g ttin Se

urv

S

DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION INTENTIONS

gc

E SS

REALITIES ON-THE-GROUND

nin

U TR

ating Excav

ear

ROOF

al

� � � �

a po

What tools are needed for resiliency?

c Ba

closed-loop kit of parts

SKILLED LABORERS

What needs to be communicated to Nationals?

What needs to be communicated to Westerners?

d as

to Wes tern affili ates

hire

d sen t back

AG

AN

M

AF

CR

qu

ali

T

qu

ali

T

R FO

M

CO

ntr

ol

dim e con nsion tro l

ntr

ol

dim

TY

cross

ens

TY

the

RI

CU

ft p

ion

-train

con

ing

tro

l furn itu built re / -ins

oli

cy

TIO

NS

SE

co

co

RI

CU

SE

ty

ty

qu

NT

EN

ali

ty

co

landscaped drainage

SIG

NI

ntr

ol

rainw

DE

ater ha

joinery alternatives

rvestin

g

dim

solar panels

ens

ion

co

ntr

ol

pow

ols

ND

EC

ISI

ON

S

er to

TIO

pit latrin

natives

CO

NS

TR

UC

e alter

P� E�

EN

T/

PE

RS

ON

NE

L

P�

T��

E�

P�

E�

MA

TE

RIA

LS

/T

OO

LS

/E

QU

IPM

P�

P�

T�

T��

E�

T��

E�

M��

E�

E�

M��

E�

T��

T��

T�

P�

T�

M��

P�

T�

M��

P�

T�

M��

P�

T��

T��

T��

M��

T��

M�

P�

T��

T��

T��

P�

M��

M��

T�

P�

M�

M��

T�

T��

M�

M��

T�

T��

T��

M��

T�

E� M��

M��

T�

T��

T��

T��

M��

E�

E�


/ le v che cks

plu

bs ble dou

T��

T��

E�

E�

E�

P�

ou nu

P�

nti

P�

co

tives

alterna

M��

M�

n

sig

de

n sulatio

T�

in

M�

ss

tru

M�

cs

acousti

rd

ts

ha

M��

P�

T��

T��

E�

T��

P�

M�� T�

E� P�

M�� T��

T��

M�� T��

M�� T��

M�� M��

T��

T��

� M� T�� T�� T�� T��

M��

E�

T��

E�

M��

T��

T��

M�

P�

T�

E�

M��

T�

M�

T��

P�

M��

T�

M�

T��

E�

M�� T��

T��

M�

T�

T��

P�

E�

M�

P�

T��

E�

T�

P�

T��

T�

E�

T��

T�

E�

M��

T��

T�

M��

T�

T��

T�

ha

M�

purlin

co n co cre nn teec wo tio od ns

M��

P�

M��

pre co cast nn m ec eta tio l ns

cle

g

tin

gh

yli

da

E�

exp ose d re bar s sb eam

y urit ec ys tor res

s

ern

att

gp

ilin

na

T��

vary ing str grid uctura l s

ar reb

od wo s te- n re tio nc nec co con

s

late

mp

g te

ilin

M��

M�� T��

T��

T��

pla

tes

T�

T�

T�

T�

T�

alte ra bea tive lo ring ad syst ems

T�

es

na

M��

M��

M�

M�

M��

M��

M��

M�

M�

brick bonding ISSB

n ntratio

uar

es

mor ta r gaug es

/ sq

uss

aperture security

natural ven tilation

alternative brick patterns

thermal mass

mortar gauges

on-site kilns

ater pe

vels

rainw

/ le

ct

f tr

lubs

tem

roo

ar

for

ks p

stac k effe

hec

pe co rcas nn t m ec eta tio ns l

ns

roof

mockup

le c

ve lea on en wh rge cha in ter pen ca r ves lea s ter uare pen r / sq car nte vels ists arpe es s / le r ass by c truss plub ente e t carp ecks r to ram rrec le ch eepe to f d to e doub orek ed e tes st r train train romo ente pla

, and

s

man dou b

lumns

wall

fore

ams, co

exp ose d

from

s

for be

reb

crete

e

wall-mock-up

T��

assi

holi day ion lect

nal e

atio

con

overse

plans

T��

form

build

rs to

P�

ed to

demostrates

must re

worke

E�

sets inital wall coursings

P�

Po uri

train

am of

E�

mixes concrete

ly and

all te

T��

Setting

a sm

P�

crete

pour con

P�

Pouring

given

o thick

E�

ur

uous po

contin

double checks slab level

ortar to

T��

E�

nates

trained to lay brick from mason

lays m

T��

es

e coordi

learns to

te finish

g illin ckf

S

eft

r th

er fo

work

ncret

our co

concre

fires

s to p

ALLS

T��

bility

dou

ion

osit

omp

on c

pacti

com

ks chec

es e finish concret

ble

r

elde

lage

r vil

ral fo

fune

learn

SLAB

crete con ation rdin coo

ls f

kfil

bac

alls

nw

atio

d oun



design

prototype + manufacture

build

BREATHE HOUSE // san marc, haiti director: Anselmo Canfora position: Research Assistant completed: Fall 2011 - Summer 2013 with: Sarah Harper The Breathe House is the first prototype for Initiative reCOVER’s Transitional Disaster Prototype Housing (TDRH). It is an adaptable, deployable, demountable unit created through interdisciplinary research, manufacturing partnerships, and marketing campaigns. The robust design incorporates the constraints of containerization, affordability, easy in-the-field assembly, and customizable detailing for regional adaptability. The panelized house was pre-fabricated and shipped to Haiti in Summer 2011, and was built in 5 days with no mechanical or electrical assistance. It was the winner of the ARCHive Institute’s 2010 housing competition. Primary interest in the project was visualization of complex processes of project delivery and site construction. Other responsibilities included design, documentation, detailing, and construction administration. PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

SCALE: 1'-0":1-0"'

CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA

CONSULTANTS

ARCHITECTURE University of Virginia School of Architecture Initiative reCOVER Campbell Hall P.O. Box 400122 Charlottesville VA 22904-4122, USA + 1 434 924 7057

DRAWING TITLE

RECORD

SHEET NUMBER

PORCH CORNER CONNECTION WORKING DETAILS: 2'-0" PANELS

STRUCTURAL ENGINEER The ARUP Cause 13 Fitzroy Street London W1T 4BQ United Kingdom + 44 0 20 7636 1531

NO.

DATE

DESCRIPTION

A7.06

PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION

CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA ARCHITECTURE

University of Virginia School of Architecture Initiative reCOVER Campbell Hall P.O. Box 400122 Charlottesville VA 22904-4122, USA + 1 434 924 7057

CONSULTANTS

STRUCTURAL ENGINEER The ARUP Cause 13 Fitzroy Street London W1T 4BQ United Kingdom + 44 0 20 7636 1531

SCALE: 1'-0":1-0"'

SHEET NUMBER

DRAWING TITLE

TRANSITIONAL DISASTER RECOVERY HOUSING: PROTOTYPE 2

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

site assembly connections

TRANSITIONAL DISASTER RECOVERY HOUSING: PROTOTYPE 2

1

SCALE: 1'-0":1-0"'

RECORD NO.

TYP. CORNER CONNECTION WORKING DETAILS: MODIFIED I-SEAM 1 DATE

DESCRIPTION

A7.05

PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION

TRANSITIONAL DISASTER RECOVERY HOUSING: RECORD CONSULTANTS PROTOTYPE 2

ARCHITECTURE University of Virginia School of Architecture Initiative reCOVER Campbell Hall P.O. Box 400122 Charlottesville VA 22904-4122, USA + 1 434 924 7057

STRUCTURAL ENGINEER The ARUP Cause 13 Fitzroy Street London W1T 4BQ United Kingdom + 44 0 20 7636 1531

CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

1

PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

1

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

3

NO.

DATE

DESCRIPTION

DRAWING TITLE

SHEET NUMBER

A7.06

T-CORNER CONNECTION PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION WORKING DETAILS: TRANSITIONAL DISASTER RECOVERY HOUSING: MODIFIED I-SEAM 2

PROTOTYPE 2

CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA

DRAWING TITLE

TYP. WALL CONNECTION WORKING DETAILS: I-SEAM

SHEET NUMBER

A7.04

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT


manufacturing // packaging // assembly




camper units

ARCHITECTURAL CONTINGENCY CORPS critic: Charlie Menefee completed: Fall 2012 with: Andrew Brown published: Reuse/Recover Symposium, April 2013 Catalyst, Fall 2013 The ACC is a deployable, modular, temporary housing community servicing deconstruction field operations for shrinking cities along the Norfolk Rail Line. The pilot The facilities support construction crews living in communities with blighted, condemned, and foreclosed structures and are made entirely from the harvested and re-purposed materials from the sites where they are deployed. The design is comprehensive in scale - from system to detail.

camper units


material harvest + scalability

norfolk southern rail line

single family home harvest


city housing vacancies


PRODUCED BY A

ONAL PRODUCT

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

DETAIL

32 31

AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

30

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

31

34

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

28 28

35 32

34

ROOF DETAIL 1 1 1/2” : 1’-0”

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIO

g w/12mm rebar

w/12mm rebar cage

ade

am w/12mm rebar

WINDOW DETAIL 1 1/2” : 1’-0”

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

ROOF DETAIL 2 1 1/2” : 1’-0”

27 26

lted to concrete beam

d to concrete beam, beyond

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

r, beyond

or plate, beyond

sum board 19

sheething 18 17

sheething

metal roof

23 5 22 21 20

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

m finish plate

w frame

16 15

10

m finish plate,

ething

g

m corner plate 25 24 PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

34 13 12 11

9

6 4

2 4

5

7

8

5

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

3

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

WALL DETAIL 1 1/2” : 1’-0”

1

FOUNDATION DETAIL 1 1/2” : 1’-0”

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT


arch

20

10

January

February

March

April

May

June

July

August

September

October

November

December

West Wall 1043 lux South Wall 630 lux CLIMATE ZONE South Window 881 lux North Wall 607 lux (less glare, adequate daylighting)

CLIMATE DATA

b1 Fenestration Thermal Properties + Elevations

West Wall 1371 South Wall 775 South Window 3517 North Wall 481 (glare is a major issue)

4

DAYLIGHTING ANALYSIS

d Heat Gains + Losses

c Calculations

110

lux lux lux lux

1.08 x ventilation rate (1.08) x (372)

100

ROOF

SOUTH

EAST

NORTH

VENTILATION LOSS

WEST

401.7 BTU

90

+

ASSEMBLY LOSS 4295 ft²

OPAQUE AREA

80 34.2 % WWR

0% WWR

21.1 % WWR

33.9 % WWR

5.14 % WWR

0% WFR

39.8 % WFR

21.3 % WFR

7.5 % WFR

580 ft² opaque

1252 ft² opaque

500 ft² opaque

1640 ft² opaque

0 ft² glazing

478.5 ft² glazing

256 ft² glazing

FLOOR PLAN

25.5 % WFR

70

90 ft² glazing

306 ft² glazing

60

28.8 %

MULTI-USE SURF AREA 5742 ft²

1130.5 ft² GROSS GLAZING

VOLUME 34,480 ft³

3930.5 ft² GROSS WALL AREA

30 OCCUPANTS

THIS

30

90

80

70

/CONDUCTIVITY* /1.61 /1.0 /1.07 /1.1 /1.6 /1.0 /2.22

=R-VALUE =1.61 =0.75 =0.93 =8.25 =.62 =1.5 =.25 =.68 =13.8

/CONDUCTIVITY* /1.61

=R-VALUE =1.61 =2.36 =0.93 =22.0 =.62 =2.18 =.25 =.68 =29.8

10

CAVITY ASSEMBLY Standing-seam Air Space Plywood Batt Insulation Plywood Air Space Gypsum Inside Air

THICKNESS 5mm 3/4" 3/4" 7 1/2" 1/2" 1 1/2" 1/2"

/1.07 /.045 /1.6 /1.0 /2.22

January

U-VALUE - FRAME 1/13.8

60

50

February

March

April

+

.02904

May

June

U-VALUE GLASS

.28

U-VALUE

Low-E Clear

.28 .28

* ASHRAE Appendix B

June

July

August

September

October

SOUTH

EAST

390**

.81***

.93***

November

NORTH

0.5

1.0

1.0

478.5 ft2

825.0 ft2

90.0 ft²

May

June

July

0% WFR

August

21.3 % October WFR

November

597 ft² opaque

1547 ft² opaque

FOOTPRINT

1200 ft²

AIR RATE/AREA

.06*

OCCUPANCY

30

ROOF

50

SOUTH

+ 40 + Elevations

FOOTPRINT 1200 ft²

VOLUME 34,480 ft³

4439 ft² GROSS WALL AREA

30 OCCUPANTS

February

0% WFR

39.8 % WFR

580 ft² opaque

1252 ft² opaque

0 ft² glazing

478.5 ft² glazing

34.2 % WWR FLOOR

PLAN

25.5 % WFR

21.3 % WFR

7.5 % WFR

500 ft² opaque

1640 ft² opaque

100

535 ft² opaque

0 ft² glazing

478.5 ft² glazing

256 ft² glazing

90 ft² glazing

90

306 ft² glazing

VOLUME 34,480 ft³

21.1 % WWR

January

WEST

39.8 % WFR

OCCUPANT LOAD

13.6 kW

LIGHTING LOAD

3.4 kW

PLUG LOAD

1.08 x ventilation rate (1.08) x (372)

4439 ft²

(opaque A) x (opaque U-value) (4439 sf ) x (.038 BTU/sf )

.038

GLAZING AREA

618 ft²

RAD. RETAINED

(glass A) x (glass U-value) (618 sf ) x (.280 BTU/sf )

.28

1252 ft² opaque

R PLAN

S

E/W

N

.27*

.27*

.27*

1000**

790**

390**

.77***

.81***

.93***

0.5

1.0

1.0

NORTH

183.0 ft2

370.0 ft2

CAVITY ASSEMBLY Standing-seam Air Space

Plywood Air Space Gypsum Inside Air

3/4"

THICKNESS 5mm 3/4"

90 80

1/2" 1 1/2" 1/2"

VOLUME 34,480 ft³

3930.5 ft² GROSS WALL AREA

30 OCCUPANTS

/CONDUCTIVITY* /1.61

60 U-VALUE - FRAME

34.2 % WWR

500 ft² opaque

1640 ft² opaque

256 ft² glazing

90 ft² glazing

GLAZING AREA

1393 ft²

GLASS U-VALUE**

.28

TOTAL FT² 1360 ft²

WWR

Net Heat Transfer

kBTU kBTU 4295 ft² kBTU BTU .038 BTU

SURF AREA 5742 ft²

1130.5 ft² GROSS GLAZING

FOOTPRINT 1200 ft²

VOLUME 34,480 ft³ BUILDING

3930.5 ft² GROSS WALL AREA

are no skylights 30** there OCCUPANTS

.00864

.033 x 88% (@ 24" O.C.)

embly + U-Values

April

BUILDING ASHRAE DESIGN

STANDARDS

FRAME ASSEMBLY Standing-seam Batten Plywood Heavy Timber Purlin Plywood Batten Gypsum Inside Air

THICKNESS 5mm 3/4" 3/4" 7 1/2" 1/2" 1 1/2" 1/2"

CAVITY ASSEMBLY Standing-seam Air Space Plywood Batt Insulation Plywood Air Space Gypsum Inside Air

THICKNESS 5mm 3/4" 3/4" 7 1/2" 1/2" 1 1/2" 1/2"

May

.02904

79.5 201.0 163.2 177.8 BTU 553.3 401.0

Solar Gain (opaque A) x (opaque U-value)

Internal Gain Assembly Loss Ventilation Loss

(4295 sf ) x (.038 BTU/sf )

4295 ft² West Wall 1371 lux x (opaque U-value) 10 kBTU (opaque A) e5 Wall South 775 lux ) (4295 sf ) x (.038 BTU/sf .038 South Window 3517 lux 481 lux GLAZING AREANorth Wall 1393 ft² (glass A) x (glass U-value) 401.7 BTU (glare is a major issue) ventilation loss +(1393 assembly sf )loss x (.280 BTU/sf ) OPAQUE AREA

1.08 x ventilation rate

+

kBTU kBTU kBTU BTU BTU

* the U-value of the opaque wall and roof are the same ** there are no skylights

S

E/W

N

.27*

.27*

.27*

790**

390**

.77***

.81***

.93***

UNOBSTRUCTED

0.5

GLASS AREA

478.5 ft2

1.0

x

FOOTPRINT * the U-value of the 1200 opaqueft² wall /CONDUCTIVITY*and roof =R-VALUE are the same ** there =1.61 are no skylights /1.61 .06* AIR RATE/AREA =2.36 /1.07 =0.93 /.045 =22.0 /1.6 OCCUPANCY =.62 30 /1.0 =2.18 /2.22 =.25 =.68 10* AIR RATE/PERSON=29.8

April

May

S

E/W

390**

RAD..033 RETAINED

.77***

.81***

.93***

.038

PLUG LOAD*** .25 W/ft² window/floor ratios

June

0.5

+x1.8 x x

478.5 ft2

July

ASSEMBLY

U-VALUE

Low-E Clear

.28 AIR .28

x

c3

1.0 OCCUPANT LOAD

35.1 kW

SOUTH

EAST

/1.07 /.045 /1.6 /1.0 /2.22

=R-VALUE =1.61 =2.36 =0.93 =22.0 =.62 =2.18 =.25 =.68 =29.8

100

1/13.8

70

825.0 ft2

13.6 kW

90.0 ft²

PLUG LOAD

x

August

DATA

x

September

1200 ft²

Comfort Zone 68˚F - 78˚F Max Interior Temp 90.5˚F Min Interior Temp 46.3˚F Max BTU Heating Day 36 kBTU/hour Max BTU Cooling Day 20 kBTU/hour (area) x( air rate / area)

U-VALUE - CAVITY 1/29.8

0% WWR

10.6 % WWR

21.0 % WWR

.033 x 88%3.8 % (@ 24" O.C.) WWR

0% WFR

39.8 % WFR

21.3 % WFR

7.5 % WFR

80

580 ft² opaque

1547 ft² opaque

597 ft² opaque

1665 ft² opaque

0 ft² glazing

183 ft² glazing

159 ft² glazing

65 ft² glazing

.02904

20

10 U-VALUE WALL

.038

U-VALUE GLASS

(4439 sf ) x (.038 BTU/sf )

30

618 ft² AIR RATE/PERSON

.033 50

30

(opaque A) x (opaque U-value)

GLAZING AREA

100 90

40 .00864

4439 ft²

+

25.1 % WWR

60

17.5 % WFR

50 630 ft²

opaque

40

211 ft²

glazing January

(30) x (10)

SHGC

SOUTH

+ + February

EAST

E/W

.27*

.27*

NORTH

CLIMATE DATA

30

WEST METABOLIC RATE* 1000** IRRADIATION

90

RAD. RETAINEDTOTAL

80

65790** W/m²

.77*** SQFT

UNOBSTRUCTED

0.5

GLASS AREA June

183.0 ft2

.81*** 1360 ft² 1.0

1.0 W/ft²

MAX LPD**

March

April

May

July

370.0 ft2

30 kBTU

20 kBTU

+ Losses e Heat Gains OCCUPANCY 30

DecemberLPD**

ASSEMBLY LOSS

390** .93*** 1.0

65.0 ft² August

201.0 kBTU

13.6 kW

x x

OCCUPANT L

LIGHTING LO

+

INTERNAL GAIN3.4 kW

+ +

+

ventilation loss + assembly loss

occupants + lighting + plug load (401.7 BTU) + (341.7 BTU)

(35.1 kW) + (13.6 kW) + (3.4 kW)

BHLC 50 kBTU743.4 BTU

∑(A x U)

ASSEMBLY LOSS

300 CFM

d2

(168.7) + (178.0)

173.0 BTU

c3

x

4439 40 ft² kBTU

OPAQUE AREA

∆T(opaque (°F) A) x (opaque U-value)

OPAQUE U-VALUE* e1

(4439 20°F

.038

sf ) x (.038 BTU/sf )

GLAZING AREA

(19.1) + (63.9) + (6.4)

OCCUPANT LOAD

DB outdoor 618 ft²mean T indoor - mean (glass A) x (glass U-value)

63.9

6.4 kBTU

LIGHTING LOAD +BUILDING

DESIGN

3.4 kW September PLUG LOAD October

+

(618 sf ) x (.280 BTU/sf )

.28

e3

10 kBTU

* the U-value of the opaque wall and roof are the same

SOLAR**GAIN there are no skylights 89.4 kBTU

GAIN December November INTERNAL

1 B

20 kBTU Gains + Losses e Heat

kBTU

13.6 kW kBTU

1 B

30 kBTU (64°F) - (44°F)

35.1 kW 19.1

PLUG LOA

.25 W/ft² 52.1 kWh / 177.8 kBTU

341.7 BTU

GLASS U-VALUE**

x x

35.1 kW

1.0 W/ft²

(1.08) x (372)

∑(SHGC x GVI x SRR x 1/U x AREA)

x1.8

x1.8 SOLAR GAIN

1360 ft²

1.08 x ventilationMAX rate

N

.27*

(49.7) + (142) + (8.8)

10 kBTU 65 W/m²

TOTAL SQFT

November

9.5.1 *** ASHRAE Journal, May 2011

c5 S

100 OCCUPANCY

300

(30) x (10)

∑(SHGC x GVI x SRR x 1/U x AREA)

ASHRAE standard, Table 401.7**BTU

72 CFM

* ASHRAE 62.1-2007

BUILDING DESIGN

(occupancy) x (air rate / person)

VENTILATION LOSS * ASHRAE standard

168.7 BTU

* the U-value of the opaque wall and roof are the same ** there are no skylights

70 ROOF

(618 sf ) x (.280 BTU/sf )

72

d1

30

PLUG LOAD***

(occupancy) x (air rate / person)

10* A) x (glass U-value) (glass

.28

GLASS U-VALUE**

(201.

(1200) x (.06)

10*40 kBTU

METABOLIC RATE*

c2

x

(area) x( air rate / area)

50 kBTU

HEATING + COOLING ANALYSIS

(1200) x (.06)

.06*

OCCUPANCY OPAQUE U-VALUE* .038

WEST

October

k

sol

(35.1 kW) + (13.6 kW) + (3.4 kW)

+CLIMATE

LIGHTING LOAD

3.4 kW

+

x

(141.2) + (390.0) + (22.0) + (0.0)

* ASHRAE 62.1-2007

8.8 kBTU

+

∑(A x U)

.06*

OCCUPANCY

c4

* ASHRAE Appendix B

.072

60

.072 x 12% (@ 24" O.C.)

OPAQUE AREA

90 80

U-VALUENORTH - FRAME

ASHRAE STANDARDS

c1

k

1.0 90.0 ft²

553.25 BTU

10 kBTU

1200 ft²

occupants + lighting + plug load AIR RATE/AREA

49.7 kBTU 142 kBTU

1.0

GLASS

RATE/AREA

+

52.1 kWh / December 177.8 kBTU

d2

790**

1360 ft²

INTERNAL GAIN

AIR RATE/PERSON

1000**

GLASS AREA .02904

November

300 CFM

(30) x (10)

.28

.28 .28

+

N

(occupancy) x (air rate / person)

*** ASHRAE Journal, May 2011 Comfort Zone 68˚F - 78˚F Max Interior Temp 84.2˚F Min Interior Temp 48.1˚F Max BTU Heating Day 52 kBTU/hour GLASS* Max BTU Cooling Day 32 kBTU/hour FOOTPRINT

U-VALUE

72 CFM

(1200) x (.06)

.072 IRRADIATION

* ASHRAE standard U-VALUE ** ASHRAE standard, Table 9.5.1

=R-VALUE =1.61 =0.75GLASS* =0.93ASSEMBLY =8.25 =.62 Low-E Clear =1.5 =.25 =.68 =13.8

ASHRAE STANDARDS

.27*

65 W/m²

390.0 October BTU

x

FOOTPRINT

(area) x( air rate / area)

.27*

** climate data *** floor reflectance based on U-VALUE WALL

March

(glass A) x (glass U-value)

.27*

MAX LPD** 1.0 W/ft² * fenestration properties

February

x

August September (1393 sf ) x (.280 BTU/sf )

201.0 kBTU

.93***

20 kBTU ASSEMBLY LOSS

SOLAR GAIN

+

d3825.0 ft2

478.5 ft2

* fenestration properties ** climate data *** floor reflectance based on window/floor ratios

163.2 BTU

.81***

(64°F) - (44°F)

VENTILATION LOSS

0.5 30 kBTU 1.0 401.7 BTU

(49.7) + (142) + (8.8)

c2

SHGC

TOTAL SQFT

.038

x

.28

.77***

∑(SHGC x GVI x SRR x 1/U x AREA)

(4295 sf ) x (.038 BTU/sf )

1393 ft²

July

4 k

390**

40 kBTU mean T indoor - mean DB outdoor

GLASS AREA

+

kBTU

90.0 ft²

.038

N

.27*

(1.08) x (372) 790**

1000**

UNOBSTRUCTED

49.7 kBTU 142 kBTU

E/W

∆T (°F) .27* 50 kBTU .27* 1.08 x ventilation rate 20°F

8.8 U-value) (opaque A) x (opaque

825.0 ft2

June

.033 x 88% (@ 24" O.C.)

BHLC

955.0 BTU

d1 IRRADIATION

1.0

4295 ft²

OPAQUE U-VALUE*

/CONDUCTIVITY* =R-VALUE * fenestration properties /1.61 =1.61 ** climate data /1.0 =0.75 *** floor reflectance based on /1.07 =0.93 window/floor ratios GLAZING AREA /1.1 =8.25 /1.6 =.62 /1.0 =1.5 /2.22 =.25 GLASS =.68 U-VALUE** =13.8

3 B

(401.7 BTU) + (553.3 BTU)

S

RAD. RETAINED

1000**

.28

d Heat Gains + Losses x

∑(A x U)

390.0 BTU

(1393 sf ) x (.280 BTU/sf )

IRRADIATION

METABOLIC RATE*

CLIMATE DATA

+

553.25 BTU

c1

OCCUPANCY 30 .072 x 12% .00864 UNOBSTRUCTED (@ 24" O.C.)

U-VALUE GLASS

/CONDUCTIVITY* /1.61

1 B

(1.08) x (372)

* ASHRAE Appendix B

ROOF

Heat Gains + Losses

SHGC

U-VALUE WALL

.28 January

THICKNESS 5mm 3/4" 3/4" 7 1/2" 1/2" 1 1/2" 1/2"

+89.6 kBTU/ 20 kBTU day

(141.2) + (390.0) + (22.0) + (0.0)

(glass A) x (glass U-value)

RAD. RETAINED

U-VALUE - CAVITY 1/29.8

20 10

/CONDUCTIVITY* /1.61 /1.0 /1.07 /1.1 /1.6 /1.0 /2.22

DAYLIGHTI

30 kBTU

NET HEAT TRANSFER

solar gains + internal gains

(89.4 kBTU) + (177.8 kBTU)

* the U-value of the opaque wall and roof are the same

U-VALUE - FRAME 1/13.8* ASHRAE 62.1-2007

.033

.072 x 12% (@ 24" O.C.)

CAVITY ASSEMBLY Standing-seam Air Space Plywood Batt Insulation Plywood Air Space Gypsum Inside Air

HEAT GAIN

50 kBTU lux lux lux 40 kBTU heat loss - heat gain lux 356.8 kBTU - 267.2 kBTU

GLASS U-VALUE**

535 ft² Net Heat Transfer opaque 89.6 OPAQUE AREA Solar Gain 89.4 306 ft² Internal Gain 177.8 glazing OPAQUE U-VALUE* Assembly Loss 341.7 Ventilation Loss 401.0

.072

1/13.8

30

VENTILATION STUDY

(64°F) - (44°F)

INTERNAL GAIN

25.5 % WFR

March

=R-VALUE =1.61 =2.36 =0.93 =22.0 =.62 =2.18 =.25 =.68 =29.8

/1.07 /.045 /1.6 /1.0 /2.22

40

76.5

February

+ +

50U-VALUE - CAVITY

THICKNESS 5mm 3/4" 3/4" 7 1/2" 1/2" 1 1/2" 1/2"

65.0 ft²

SHGC

=0.75 =0.93 =8.25 =.62 =1.5 =.25 =.68 =13.8

1/29.8

FRAME ASSEMBLY Standing-seam Batten Plywood Heavy Timber Purlin Plywood Batten Gypsum Inside Air

mean T indoor - mean DB outdoor

89.4 kBTU

6.4 kBTU

7.5 % WFR

MULTI-USE

+ +

=R-VALUE January =1.61

FOOTPRINT 1200 ft² 70

5’-0” 3’-0” 78.8˚F 66.5˚F

20°F

267.2 mBTU

kBTU

OPAQUE AREA

/CONDUCTIVITY* /1.61 /1.0 /1.07 /1.1 /1.6 /1.0 /2.22

1130.5 ft² GROSS GLAZING

Opening Inlet Opening Outlet Max Interior Temp Min Interior Temp

(bhlc) x (∆T) x (24) (743.4) x (20) x (24)

West Wall 1371 LOSS SouthHEAT Wall 775 356.8 kBTU South Window 3517 North Wall 481 (glare is a major issue)

∆T (°F)

SOLAR GAIN

63.9 WEST

5.14 % WWR

10

SURF AREA 5742 ft²

78.8

x

West Wall 1043 lux e1 South Wall 630 lux South Window 881 lux North Wall 607 lux ∑(SHGC x GVI x SRR x 1/U x AREA) (less glare, adequate daylighting) (19.1) + (63.9) + (6.4)

52.1 kWh / 177.8 kBTU

30 OCCUPANTS

Plywood 3/4" TOTAL FT² 1360 ft² Batt Insulation 7 1/2"

WWR

743.4 BTU

(168.7) + (178.0)

19.1 kBTU

33.9 % WWR

DESIGN

306 ft² glazing 100

28.8 %

MULTI-USE

c Calculations

∑(A x U)

ASSEMBLY LOSS

The success of passive design strategies is dependent on e3 user design input and understanding of building systems after + construction. + d

a50 Assembly + U-Values

7 1/2" 535 ft² 1/2" 1 1/2" opaque 1/2"

90 ft² glazing

(401.7 BTU) + (341.7 BTU)

BHLC

+

c5

FOOTPRINT 1200 ft²

THICKNESS 25.5 % 5mm WFR 3/4"

1640 ft² opaque

256 ft² glazing

478.5 ft² glazing

FRAME ASSEMBLY Standing-seam Batten Plywood Heavy Timber Purlin Plywood Batten Gypsum Inside Air

ventilation loss + assembly loss

70

34.2 % WWR

5.14 % WWR

+

341.7 BTU

173.0 BTU

21.3 % WFR

20

7.5 % WFR

401.7 BTU

ASSEMBLY LOSS

168.7 BTU

60

3930.5 ft² GROSS WALL AREA

West Wall South Wall South Window North Wall (less glare, adequate d

c4

30

39.8 % WFR

e Heat Gains + Losses

+

TOTAL FT² 1360 ft²

WWR 1130.5 ft² GROSS GLAZING WEST

a Assembly + U-Values 33.9 % WWR Opening Inlet 10’-0” Opening Outlet 21.3 %3’-0” Max Interior TempWFR 79˚F Min Interior Temp500 ft²68˚F opaque

d2

December

35.1 kW

40

21.1 % WWR

(35.1 kW) + (13.6 kW) + (3.4 kW)

+

c6 Inx thisx study, x data visualization is used West Wallto communicate 1043 lux the South Wall 630 effects of design development decisions for a Type IV lux heavy e4 South Window 881 lux e2 North Wall 607 lux LOSS timber literate audience. Issues August March May house Juneto a non-design July September April October December NovemberVENTILATION (less glare, adequate daylighting) considered are cost, comfort, daylighting, ventilation, and ASSEMBLY LOSS + intended energy targets.+ BUILDING HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS + DESIGN c Calculations 28.8 %

80

28.8 %

MULTI-USE

d5

occupants + lighting + plug load 72 CFM

occupants + lighting + plug load

1252 ft² opaque

SURF AREA 5742 ft²

d4

THAT

OPAQUE U-VALUE*

5.14 % WWR

77 74 71 68 NORTH

+ 79.5 kBTU/ day

(35.1 kW) + (13.6 kW) + (3.4 kW)

0% WFR

EAST 79

.25 W/ft²

OPAQUE U-VALUE*

GLASS AREA

20

580 ft² opaque

FLOOR PLAN

x x

c Calculations

10

nestration Thermal Properties + Elevations

SOUTH

(201.1 kBTU) + (177.8 kBTU)

* fenestration properties ** climate data *** floor reflectance based on window/floor ratios

SURF AREA 5742 ft²

33.9 % WWR

+

INTERNAL GAIN

300 CFM

November

x1.8

1.0 W/ft²

UNOBSTRUCTED

30

TOTAL FT² 1360 ft²

618 ft² GROSS GLAZING

21.1 % WWR

EAST

211 ft² glazing

15.7 % GROSS WWR

SOUTH EAST b2 Fenestration Thermal Properties +NORTH Elevations

0% WWR

OR

solar gains + internal gains

c3 30

MAX LPD**

IRRADIATION

17.5 % WFR

0% WWR ROOF

x

(30) x (10)

October

1360 ft²

SHGC

MULTI-USE

TE DATA

378.9 kBTU

201.0 kBTU

c2

(area) x( air rate / area)

10*

65 W/m²

* the U-value of the opaque wall and roof are the same ** there are no skylights

BUILDING DESIGN

630 ft² opaque

65 ft² glazing

NET HEAT TRANSFER

HEAT GAIN SOLAR GAIN

(1200) x (.06)

TOTAL SQFT

GLASS U-VALUE**

60

7.5December % WFR 1665 ft² opaque

159 ft² glazing

183 ft² glazing

FLOOR PLAN

(49.7) + (142) + (8.8)

(occupancy) x (air rate / person)

METABOLIC RATE*

OPAQUE AREA

25.1 % WWR

b1 Fenestration Thermal Properties + 0 ft² glazing

x

heat loss - heat gain 458.4 kBTU - 378.9 kBTU

∑(SHGC x GVI x SRR x 1/U x AREA)

8.8 kBTU

critic: Gwen Murray completed: Spring 2013 b1 Fenestration Thermal Properties + Elevations December

80

39.8September % WFR

580 ft² opaque

x

-

d3

+

142 kBTU

GLASS AREA

70 April

49.7 kBTU

VENTILATION LOSS

90

3.8 % WWR

21.0 % WWR

10.6 % WWR

.27*

WEST

CLIMATE DATA 0% WWR

.27*

UNOBSTRUCTED

PLUG LOAD***

100 ROOF

790**

.77***

* ASHRAE standard ** ASHRAE standard, Table 9.5.1 *** ASHRAE Journal, May 2011

GLASS* ASSEMBLY

10

May

.27* 1000**

PASSIVE ARGUEMENTS // charlottesville, virginia

CLIMATE DATA April

SHGC

AugustAIR RATE/PERSON September

July

CLIMATE DATA

.038

March

458.4 kBTU mean T indoor - mean DB outdoor

IRRADIATION

OCCUPANCY

U-VALUE WALL

February

d1

N

* ASHRAE 62.1-2007

40

January

HEAT LOSS

52.1 kWh / 177.8 kBTU

ASHRAE STANDARDS

.00864

.033 x 88% (@ 24" O.C.)

30

(bhlc) x (∆T) x (24) (955.0) x (20) x (24)

.033

.072 x 12% (@ 24" O.C.)

20

E/W

RAD. RETAINED

* fenestration properties ** climate data *** floor reflectance based on window/floor ratios

.072

U-VALUE - CAVITY 1/29.8

20°F

c1 S

CLIMATE ZONE 4

FOOTPRINT 1200 ft²

20

x ∆T (°F)

(64°F) - (44°F)

50

FRAME ASSEMBLY THICKNESS Standing-seam 5mm Batten 3/4" Plywood 3/4" Heavy Timber Purlin 7 1/2" Plywood 1/2" Batten 1 1/2" Gypsum 1/2" Inside Air

955.0 BTU

∑(A x U) (141.2) + (390.0) + (22.0) + (0.0)

390.0 BTU

(1393 sf ) x (.280 BTU/sf )

.28

BHLC

+

(glass A) x (glass U-value)

* the U-value of the opaque wall and roof are the same ** there are no skylights

BUILDING DESIGN

40 CLIMATE ZONE 4

100

1393 ft²

TOTAL FT² 1360 ft²

WWR

a Assembly + U-Values

110

GLAZING AREA

GLASS U-VALUE**

+ +

535 ft² opaque

.038

(401.7 BTU) + (553.3 BTU)

163.2 BTU

(4295 sf ) x (.038 BTU/sf )

OPAQUE U-VALUE*

ventilation loss + assembly loss

553.25 BTU

(opaque A) x (opaque U-value)

+

S

E/W

N

sol

(89.4


b1 Fenestration Thermal Properties + Elevations

c Calculations

net transfers

ROOF

SOUTH

EAST

NORTH

WEST

OPAQUE AREA

0% WWR

21.1 % WWR

33.9 % WWR

5.14 % WWR

34.2 % WWR

0% WFR

39.8 % WFR

21.3 % WFR

7.5 % WFR

25.5 % WFR

580 ft² opaque

1252 ft² opaque

500 ft² opaque

1640 ft² opaque

535 ft² opaque

0 ft² glazing

478.5 ft² glazing

256 ft² glazing

90 ft² glazing

306 ft² glazing

FLOOR PLAN

MULTI-USE

28.8 %

+ +

BUILDING DESIGN

.038

GLAZING AREA

1393 ft²

GLASS U-VALUE**

.28

* the U-value of the opaque wall and roof are the same ** there are no skylights

S

TOTAL FT² 1360 ft²

WWR

SURF AREA 5742 ft²

1130.5 ft² GROSS GLAZING

FOOTPRINT 1200 ft²

VOLUME 34,480 ft³

3930.5 ft² GROSS WALL AREA

30 OCCUPANTS

a Assembly + U-Values

SHGC

.27*

IRRADIATION

1000**

RAD. RETAINED

.77***

UNOBSTRUCTED

0.5

GLASS AREA

478.5 ft2

* fenestration properties ** climate data *** floor reflectance based on window/floor ratios FRAME ASSEMBLY Standing-seam Batten Plywood Heavy Timber Purlin Plywood Batten Gypsum Inside Air

CAVITY ASSEMBLY Standing-seam Air Space Plywood Batt Insulation Plywood Air Space Gypsum Inside Air

THICKNESS 5mm 3/4" 3/4" 7 1/2" 1/2" 1 1/2" 1/2"

THICKNESS 5mm 3/4" 3/4" 7 1/2" 1/2" 1 1/2" 1/2"

/CONDUCTIVITY* /1.61 /1.0 /1.07 /1.1 /1.6 /1.0 /2.22

=R-VALUE =1.61 =0.75 =0.93 =8.25 =.62 =1.5 =.25 =.68 =13.8

/CONDUCTIVITY* /1.61

ASHRAE STANDARDS

=R-VALUE =1.61 =2.36 =0.93 =22.0 =.62 =2.18 =.25 =.68 =29.8

/1.07 /.045 /1.6 /1.0 /2.22

U-VALUE - FRAME 1/13.8

.072

U-VALUE - CAVITY 1/29.8

.033

.072 x 12% (@ 24" O.C.)

.00864

.033 x 88% (@ 24" O.C.)

.02904

4295 ft²

OPAQUE U-VALUE*

x

FOOTPRINT

1200 ft²

AIR RATE/AREA

.06*

OCCUPANCY

30

AIR RATE/PERSON

10*

* ASHRAE 62.1-2007

+ CLIMATE DATA

OCCUPANCY

30

METABOLIC RATE*

65 W/m²

TOTAL SQFT

1360 ft²

MAX LPD**

1.0 W/ft²

PLUG LOAD***

.25 W/ft²

U-VALUE WALL

.038

U-VALUE GLASS

.28

* ASHRAE standard ** ASHRAE standard, Table 9.5.1 *** ASHRAE Journal, May 2011

GLASS* ASSEMBLY

U-VALUE

Low-E Clear

.28 .28

* ASHRAE Appendix B

OPAQUE AREA

ROOF

SOUTH

EAST

NORTH

10.6 % WWR

21.0 % WWR

3.8 % WWR

25.1 % WWR

0% WFR

39.8 % WFR

21.3 % WFR

7.5 % WFR

17.5 % WFR

580 ft² opaque

1547 ft² opaque

597 ft² opaque

1665 ft² opaque

630 ft² opaque

0 ft² glazing

183 ft² glazing

159 ft² glazing

65 ft² glazing

211 ft² glazing

FLOOR PLAN

.038

GLAZING AREA

618 ft²

GLASS U-VALUE**

.28

WEST

BUILDING DESIGN

0% WWR

4439 ft²

OPAQUE U-VALUE*

MULTI-USE

15.7 % GROSS WWR

TOTAL FT² 1360 ft²

SURF AREA 5742 ft²

618 ft² GROSS GLAZING

FOOTPRINT 1200 ft²

VOLUME 34,480 ft³

4439 ft² GROSS WALL AREA

30 OCCUPANTS

b2 Fenestration Thermal Properties + Elevations

+ +

* the U-value of the opaque wall and roof are the same ** there are no skylights

S

SHGC

.27*

IRRADIATION

1000**

RAD. RETAINED

.77***

UNOBSTRUCTED

0.5

GLASS AREA

183.0 ft2

* fenestration properties ** climate data *** floor reflectance based on window/floor ratios

x


d Heat Gains + Losses 1.08 x ventilation rate (1.08) x (372)

VENTILATION LOSS 401.7 BTU

ASSEMBLY LOSS

+

ventilation loss + assembly loss (401.7 BTU) + (553.3 BTU)

553.25 BTU

(opaque A) x (opaque U-value)

163.2 BTU

(4295 sf ) x (.038 BTU/sf )

BHLC

+

(glass A) x (glass U-value)

955.0 BTU

∑(A x U)

x

(141.2) + (390.0) + (22.0) + (0.0)

390.0 BTU

(1393 sf ) x (.280 BTU/sf )

(bhlc) x (∆T) x (24) (955.0) x (20) x (24)

∆T (°F)

c1

20°F

HEAT LOSS

d1

458.4 kBTU mean T indoor - mean DB outdoor

E/W

N

.27*

.27*

790**

390**

.81***

.93***

1.0

1.0

825.0 ft2

90.0 ft²

x

x

(64°F) - (44°F)

49.7 kBTU 142 kBTU

-

d3

+

∑(SHGC x GVI x SRR x 1/U x AREA) (49.7) + (142) + (8.8)

NET HEAT TRANSFER

HEAT GAIN

8.8 kBTU

378.9 kBTU

SOLAR GAIN

c2

heat loss - heat gain 458.4 kBTU - 378.9 kBTU

201.0 kBTU

INTERNAL GAIN

+

(201.1 kBTU) + (177.8 kBTU)

+ 79.5 kBTU/ day

d4

d5

solar gains + internal gains

52.1 kWh / 177.8 kBTU

occupants + lighting + plug load

(area) x( air rate / area)

72 CFM

(1200) x (.06)

(35.1 kW) + (13.6 kW) + (3.4 kW)

+

(occupancy) x (air rate / person)

d2

300 CFM

(30) x (10)

c3 x1.8

x x

35.1 kW

OCCUPANT LOAD

13.6 kW

LIGHTING LOAD

3.4 kW

PLUG LOAD

e Heat Gains + Losses + 1.08 x ventilation rate (1.08) x (372)

c4 VENTILATION LOSS 401.7 BTU

ASSEMBLY LOSS

+

ventilation loss + assembly loss (401.7 BTU) + (341.7 BTU)

341.7 BTU (opaque A) x (opaque U-value) (4439 sf ) x (.038 BTU/sf )

(glass A) x (glass U-value) (618 sf ) x (.280 BTU/sf )

BHLC

168.7 BTU

+

ASSEMBLY LOSS

x

(168.7) + (178.0)

173.0 BTU

(bhlc) x (∆T) x (24) (743.4) x (20) x (24)

∆T (°F)

c5 E/W

743.4 BTU

∑(A x U)

e1

20°F

HEAT LOSS 356.8 kBTU

mean T indoor - mean DB outdoor

N

-

(64°F) - (44°F) ∑(SHGC x GVI x SRR x 1/U x AREA)

.27*

.27*

790**

390**

.81***

.93***

1.0

1.0

370.0 ft2

65.0 ft²

(19.1) + (63.9) + (6.4)

e3

19.1 kBTU

HEAT GAIN 267.2 mBTU

63.9 kBTU

+

6.4 kBTU

SOLAR GAIN 89.4 kBTU

INTERNAL GAIN

+

solar gains + internal gains

heat loss - heat gain 356.8 kBTU - 267.2 kBTU

NET HEAT TRANSFER

(89.4 kBTU) + (177.8 kBTU)

+89.6 kBTU/ day

e4

e5

52.1 kWh / 177.8 kBTU

x

x

c6 occupants + lighting + plug load (35.1 kW) + (13.6 kW) + (3.4 kW)

e2



student engagement charrette

QUANTIC0 MIDDLE HIGH SCHOOL // virginia firm: architects: responsibilities:

VMDO Architects Kelly Calahan, AIA and Dina Sorensen Design / Documentation / Representation Interior learning landscapes for a Middle/High School at Quantico Marine Corps Headquarters. Worked with a distinguished and award-winning K-12 design team.


camp self-governance


urban resettlements

wastewater treatment

social media outlets

ZAATARI REFUGE CAMP // marfraq, jordan instructed selected works:

Fall 2014 Allie Iaccarino, Sarah Holsinger, Emily Richards, Rachel Himes, Luke Escobar

The first in a sequence of undergraduate research studios, the Zaatari Refuge Studio is predicated on an architecture of urgency which can yield both radical and appropriate results. Students were asked to engage in the sensitivities of the camp while consulting both formal and informal (blogs, social media) modes of research to approach the camp as an emergent urban condition. Projects included landscapes of water and wastewater treatment; reappropriation of materials on-site as permanent structures emerge; urban housing integration strategies; and methods of relief for the host nation. 2012

JULY camp opening / 18,000

DEC cease fire / 56,000 2013

JULY escalation / 200,000

DEC continued war / 200,000+

cross-sectional time-lapse of camp growth



49 in. 1 mile

3.5%

w/ Hook 20.6%

Anomalous

35 in. 336 miles

8 ft. 20 miles Th an

ks to

the

B&

B

40 in. 1 mile

13.8%

w/ Ho

This features a membrane stretched upon

This skin demonstrates an avant-garde

slanted rod like structures. The variety in

covering method onto a well-known and often natural structures. They also have

size and angle relate to the various different types of umbrellas we have procured

utilized umbrellas in one of their past projects.

thus far.

The field of umbrellas acts as a series of shades for those who work in the

The critical element is the frame support system. It consists of a skeleton made out

This diagram shows the many different ways found to manipulate the material

building. They provide an element of

of metal beams only slightly thicker than

during the project.

movement in the facade, and are visually pleasing both when closed and when

an umbrella handle. They are inserted into a joining piece and arranged in geo-

opened.

metric formations to maximize strength.

ok

17.2%

3.5%

Not Extendable Wood

8

4-26-14

35 in. 336 miles Th

an

ks

to

M

s.

La

he

ra

in

N

J

44.

8

5-2-14

Spring Settlement ARCH Studio Suau

Not Extendable Metal

Statement

plotter paper adobe 1

coffee cup cocoon 2

4

The aluminum frame of an umbrella works well under tension

The intention of the U-Mod is

The U-Mod will have two thresholds for entry/exit, one oriented

broken umbrella tent

to deconstruct the form of an umbrella and use its parts in a

when in partner with its skin,

different way, rather than use

typically made of nylon or a form of treated polyester. Without its

6

an umbrella’s inherent structural qualities. Visually, the U-Mod will have the same geometrical

to the interior of the borough and one oriented to the retaining wall on the edge of the borough. This

8

skin the umbrella frame becomes more malleable as a structure and

provides access to more open and public spaces, while still

can be manipulated in different

essence of an umbrella and the deconstructed parts of the um-

8

maintaining a more private area

ways.

inside the structure.

brella re-envisioned as an inhabitable structure.

From these frames a vital ‘X’

The hope is that the umbrella

Umbrellas were chosen as a

linked together using zipties. The poles can be detached from the

brellas will create one big ummodule can be created and

material, due to their structural qualities and aesthetics as well as

transforms into a structure where people aren’t quite sure at first what it is they are looking at and

frame and connected together in

what one ‘material’ was chosen to construct it.

order to provide additional structural support. The poles that re-

their original intention of protecting a space from the elements of the site that could potentially

main attatched to the frame help ground the structure at it’s base.

inhibit the experience, such as rain or dew.

Precedent Frei Otto zur Zukunft des Zeltbaus

Jean-Claude and Christo’s covering the Reichtag in Berlin, Germany in 1995

The Umbrella Facade, Shanghai

by Spanish architecture firm 3GATTI

The Archinoma Modular System

ROD TY

Houko Inoue, Japan

by the CASA Project in 2006

w/ Hoo 20.6%

FOUNDATION STUDIO I / charlottesville, virginia This features a membrane stretched upon

This skin demonstrates an avant-garde

slanted rod like structures. The variety in

covering method onto a well-known and often natural structures. They also have

size and angle relate to the various different types of umbrellas we have procured

projects.

thus far.

instructed: coordinator: selected work:

utilized umbrellas in one of their past

The field of umbrellas acts as a series of shades for those who work in the

The critical element is the frame support system. It consists of a skeleton made out

This diagram shows the many different ways found to manipulate the material

building. They provide an element of

of metal beams only slightly thicker than

during the project.

movement in the facade, and are visually pleasing both when closed and when

an umbrella handle. They are inserted into a joining piece and arranged in geo-

opened.

metric formations to maximize strength.

Not Extendable Metal

Spring 2014 Anselmo Canfora Gabrielle Rashleigh, Daniel McGovern, Juwan Palmer, Nhi Nguyun, Dana Wilson, Tatiana Kalinoff, David Wilson 1

2

4

6

“Occupy Architecture” is the culminating project of Foundation Studio I at the University of Virginia. Students are asked to develop a material procurement, logic, and structure which can be inhabited for 24-hours. All “pods” are made from one primary, recycled material and one primary method of joining. Now a rite of passage among first year students, the encampment is occupied over a full day, rain or shine, ending in the student’s final review.

Public Vs. Private

Circulation

Air Flow

Movement of Shade

Public Vs. Private


4

5

3 2 1

9 7 6

research volumes 1 - 11

8

10 11


volume 10: pollution readings

volume 1: informal agricultures

volume 5: housing disparities

RE-CENTERING DELHI / yamuma river, delhi, india instructed: co-instructors: selected work:

Fall 2014 I単aki Alday, Pankaj vir Gupta Anna Cai, Jessica Baralt, Donna Ryu, Michelle Stein, Seth Salcedo Currently ongoing, research phases. Re-Centering Delhi is a 3-year research initiative at the University of Virginia and City of New Delhi for urban design strategies centering around the toxic and historically sacred Yamuna River. The work will is exhibited at the Swiss Embassy in New Delhi from November 14-28th, 2014.

volume 11: economic service systems



THANK YOU

RE-CENTERING DELHI: on the boards



Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.