MEGAN SUAU // work samples
MEGAN SUAU // work samples www.megansuau.com mlsuau@gmail.com
This work seeks challenging contexts and aims to react with radical appropriateness through rigorous research, iterative critique, and an expansive view of architectural practice.
Megan Suau
Autodesk Architectural Desktop / Revit Adobe Photoshop / Illustrator / InDesign Rhino / SketchUp Vray / Maxwell / Podium Ecotect / TAS Drafting / Modeling Sketching / Painting
711 Elsom St Charlottesville VA 22903
www.megansuau.com mlsuau@gmail.com (941) 882 2280
EDUCATION
WORK EXPERIENCE
PUBLICATIONS
2011.09 - 2013.05
2013. August - Present
2015. July
Master’s of Architecture University of Virginia, Charlottesville (3.6 GPA)
Lecturer and Associate Director, Initiative reCOVER University of Virginia School of Architecture
Re-Centering Delhi
Spring 2013, 2014
Graduate Admissions Committee University of Virginia School of Architecture Review and selected the incoming graduate classes of 2016 and 2017. 2005.08 - 2009.05
Bachelor’s of Design with a Major in Architecture Art History Minor University of Florida, Gainesville Summa Cum Laude (3.8 GPA) 2005.05 - 2005.06
Paris Research Center University of Florida Study Abroad, Paris, France 2008.05 - 2008.07
East Asia Summer Program University of Florida Study Abroad, Hong Kong & Xi’an, China
Inaki Alday, Chair, Department of Architecture 434.924.2540, ina3h@virginia.edu
Instructor of research and foundation studios, research seminars, and independent thesis student advising. • ARCH 3010/4010 Research Studio: Time Over Crisis - Zaatari • ARCH 1030: Foundation Studio I • ARCH 3/4/7/8010 Research Studio: Re-Centering Delhi • ARCH 5906 Research Seminar: India Re-Entrant • ARCH 5999 Integrated Project Delivery Methods Associate director of a school-wide research project focusing on design-build work in developing and post-disaster contexts.
2013-2014. August - August.
Designer VMDO Architects, Charlottesville VA Dina Sorinsen, Project Designer 434.924.7057, agc9a@virginia.edu
Projects include a new school for Quantico Military Base, a residential hall for Virginia Polytechnic University, and an international ideas competition for the role of food in the work place. Responsibilities include BIM modeling, all phases of documentation, 3d visualizations, and graphic research data vizualizations.
Actar, Co-editor For “Re-Centering Delhi Studio”
2015. January
Catalyst II
Actar Interview and work from “Time Over Crisis Studio”
2014 April
ACSA 102 Annual Meeting: Globalizing Architecture for “Architectural Education and Building Resilient Practices in Developing Countries”
2013 September
Catalyst
Actar for “BIM: Unplugged,” “reCOVER,” and “Architectural ContingencyCorps”
2013 May
LUNCH8
for “Deconstructing Danville” with Andrew Brown, Liz Kneller, and Parker Sutton
2013 April
Reclaim + Remake Symposium
at The Catholic University of America for “Deconstructing Danville” with Andrew Brown, Liz Kneller, and Parker Sutton
2013. January - July. 2012. January - July
Project Manager + Graduate Research Assistant Initiative reCOVER, Charlottesville VA
Anselmo Canfora, Associate Professor of Architecture, UVA 434.924.7057, agc9a@virginia.edu Worked as a project manager for two prototypical, flat-packed, disaster recovery housing units in San Marc, Haiti and Charlottesville, VA and for a primary school in Uganda in association with NGO Building Tomorrow. Responsibilities on the projects include design, documentation, delivery, coordination, representation, and management. House 1 was completed June 2012; House 2 was completed in January 2013; the school is slated to finish construction in October 2014.
2011-2013.
Teaching Assistant University of Virginia School of Architecture
2013 April
Paper Matters
for “Mukondeni Pottery Cooperative” with Initiative reCOVER Studio
2009 July
Beyond Media 2009: Visions
“Spot on Schools” Exhibition for “University Dormitory” and “Multiuse Furniture”
AWARDS + HONORS 2013
2012. January
Alpha Rho Chi Medal Henry Adams Certificate Thesis Prize
Externship Ennead Architects, New York, NY
2013
2011 January - July 2009 May - November
Jefferson Public Citizens Grantee School Design and Travel in Uganda, Summer 2013
• ARCH 1030: Foundation Studio I • ARCH 2020: Foundation Studio II
Architect Intern Sweet Sparkman Architects, Sarasota, FL
Jerry Sparkman, AIA, Principal 941.952.0084, jsparkman@sweetsparkman.com Worked in a small practice specializing in residential and public works projects. Responsibilities included as-built drawings and construction documents; physical and 3D digital modeling and rendering; preparation of marketing materials and proposals; and significant participation in public design charettes and client meetings.
2010. January - December
Architect & Construction Management Intern Engineering Ministries International, Kampala & Jinja, Uganda
John Sauder, Country Director, john@emiea.org Steve Hoyt, Construction Manager, steve@emiea.org Worked as a volunteer in an design/build A/E firm serving the region of East Africa. Projects included housing, education, and health care facilities for rural communities. Responsibilities included design, construction documents, marketing materials, project reports, and daily on-site construction management of 4-10 skilled and unskilled Ugandan workers.
University of Virginia School of Architecture
with Initiative reCOVER
2012
Masters Thesis Traveling Research Grantee University of Virginia School of Architecture
2012 May - August
Virginia Tobacco Indemnification Commission Grantee Transitional Disaster Recovery Housing with Initiative reCOVER
2012 January - April
National Science Foundation Grantee Transitional Disaster Recovery Housing with Initiative reCOVER
2011 - 2013
Academic Scholarship
University of Virginia School of Architecture
VA
er for ow. ry, eted ated
R
d
ari
s n
2013 April
Paper Matters
for “Mukondeni Pottery Cooperative” Autodesk Architectural Desktop / Revit with Initiative reCOVER Studio
Adobe Photoshop / Illustrator / InDesign Rhino / SketchUp Vray / Maxwell / Podium Beyond Media 2009: Visions Ecotect / TAS “Spot on Schools” Exhibition for “University Dormitory” and “Multiuse Furniture” Drafting / Modeling Sketching / Painting 2009 July
AWARDS + HONORS PUBLICATIONS 2013 2015. July
Alpha Rho Chi Delhi Medal Re-Centering Co-editor Henry Actar, Adams Certificate For “Re-Centering Delhi Studio” Thesis Prize
2015.University January of Virginia School of Architecture
Catalyst II
2013 Actar
Interview and work from “Time Over Crisis Studio” Jefferson Public Citizens Grantee School Design and Travel in Uganda, Summer 2013
2014 April with Initiative reCOVER
ACSA 102 Annual Meeting: Globalizing Architecture for “Architectural Education and Building Resilient Practices in
2012 Developing Countries”
Masters Thesis Traveling Research Grantee 2013 September University of Virginia School of Architecture
Catalyst
Actar for “BIM: Unplugged,” “reCOVER,” and “Architectural ContingencyCorps”
2012 May - August
Virginia Tobacco Indemnification Commission Grantee 2013 May Disaster Recovery Housing Transitional with Initiative reCOVER LUNCH8 for “Deconstructing Danville” with Andrew Brown, Liz Kneller, and Parker Sutton
al
s,
VA
ter for ow. ery, eted slated
s n
2012 January - April 2013 AprilScience National
Foundation Grantee Reclaim + Disaster Remake Recovery Symposium Transitional Housing
at The Catholic University of America with Initiative reCOVER for “Deconstructing Danville” with Andrew Brown, Liz Kneller, and Parker Sutton
2011 - 2013
Academic 2013 April Scholarship of Virginia School of Architecture PaperUniversity Matters for “Mukondeni Pottery Cooperative” with Initiative reCOVER Studio
2009 July
Beyond Media 2009: Visions
“Spot on Schools” Exhibition for “University Dormitory” and “Multiuse Furniture”
AWARDS + HONORS 2013
Alpha Rho Chi Medal Henry Adams Certificate Thesis Prize
University of Virginia School of Architecture
2013
Jefferson Public Citizens Grantee School Design and Travel in Uganda, Summer 2013 with Initiative reCOVER
2012
Masters Thesis Traveling Research Grantee University of Virginia School of Architecture
2012 May - August
Virginia Tobacco Indemnification Commission Grantee Transitional Disaster Recovery Housing with Initiative reCOVER
2012 January - April
National Science Foundation Grantee Transitional Disaster Recovery Housing with Initiative reCOVER
2011 - 2013
Academic Scholarship
University of Virginia School of Architecture
reconnaissance field manual what you ask
research primer what you find
pocket CM manual what you need to know
BIM UNPLUGGED // uganda critic: completed: recipient of:
BIM Unplugged is a framework which questions traditional modes of architectural practice in a content where no framework currently exists. It is a comprehensive system of tools which aims to close the loop between Western design teams and onthe-ground construction workers.
safety workers during construction occupants after construction
safety
safety workers during construction occupants after construction
safety workers during construction occupants after construction
security
workers during construction occupants after construction
security
comfort
workers during construction occupants after construction
occupants after construction
comfort
asthetics
workers during construction occupants after construction
occupants after construction
comfort
asthetics
workers during construction occupants after construction
workers during construction occupants after construction
occupants after construction
craft during construction maintenance after construction
security
comfort
asthetics
occupants after construction
craft during construction maintenance after construction
management innovation
asthetics
management innovation
security
safety
workers during construction occupants after construction
comfort occupants after construction
asthetics craft during construction maintenance after construction
craft during construction maintenance after construction
security
workers during construction occupants after construction
The thesis created a design and construction toolkit for NGOs and nonprofits conducting built operations in East Africa. Through partnerships both academic (UVA) and on-the-ground (Building Tomorrow Uganda), the thesis materials were tested through a series of construction training seminars held in Uganda in March 2013 and throughout the construction of a BT school during Summer 2013.
craft during construction maintenance after construction
management innovation information during construction
information during construction
TThough specific to emergent global humanitarian practice, the issues address larger questions of integrated project delivery and the evolving role of architects in the built process.
economy
information during construction
management innovation
Anselmo Canfora Spring 2013 UVA School of Architecture Thesis Award UVA School of Architecture Traveling Fellowship
economy
speed
speed
craft
information during construction
AW G IN
m m
craft
changes
speed
craft
changes
questions
craft
changes
questions
IL TA
speed
9
economy
DE
(x)
ll wa al e pic urs ty gs o r a er c enin d p t fo S a r o le TE w po h he sib NO S do up os in RO l s wit rk tp ) P na rw ed en wo al (p ditio r us rm s fo cem fo er pic r Ad tte ty fo rn te in Be re co an e) re nc n an r th iv co io le ete 100mm ta ens r C s vis or nc ta er m exp Co ac d up n an ore ol s Ca NS ks (m ntr CO bric on co e ucti lity or M nstr ua g s q in co ed ain Ne d tr an
questions
375mm
changes
9
craft
(1) unskilled Ugandan
25
Western Management + Ugandan Labor
information during construction
(1) Western Construction Manager (1) skilled Ugandan speed economy
DR
etc
economy
Str
TEAM 1
r Pie e m ar m qu 54 00 9 rS ~ 0-4 PE he 10 mm ² 25 HT / 1m TIG cks idth th Bri ll W Wid a W rtar o M ols To
TY
management innovation
1
field tests
changes
RECIPE Cquestions ARDS
Consulted in order to change the design Re-created own drawings in-the-field
2
questions
recipe cards
film + interviews
m mixes
icks an
na
moves br
y
DA TIO NW AL LS
PADS
ge
villa
PH AS ES
WATER SYST
DE TA ILS
hire
d to
Fin ish ing
EMS
MS +
WA CO LU MN S
to a
ip adersh site le
oted prom ssis tant
ter carpen
e carp
when
Installin g
man
age
con
stru
ctio
na
nd
train
wor
ker
s
AT IVE S
S
S
BE A
is ill
ruction
pr
completes roof const
checks
ng
plubs
uares
awings
sign dr
/ levels / sq
read de
changes design of windows
double
r detaili plans fo
foreman
tr ter to
f
E CH
given
r materials by
windo ws
trained to read construction drawings
d s and
ains ca rpen
an
T
EN
EM
trained to orde
traine t door
ote sc
win dow s
pro m
doors +
to cons truc
an
cons truc ts
for em
NA RR
�
� � � �
EN TR
FO UN
rien o site
ES TRENCH
U FO
S ION AT ND
sili enc
ote site
for em
o the field s sent t illiate n af se ter W
�
d exca vated soils
promoted to
for material clears site
excava
to man s fore assist tatio
n+
c poli
y
start
tes t
tio unda set fo
dat oun w ling emb s ass
tions
initial material procurement
force ork
is e erv sup
sf
gets final permit approval finds a place to live close to the site
ed con
of a
the
hired as site construction manager
lain exp ors
rum
ct in
roje
on p
stru cti
meets with village elders
nda plans for fou
rter
UNSK ILLED LABO RER S
l re
dt o
arp ent er to
Info rma tion
ura
ng Installi
ult
Se ttin g
g ttin Se
ros s-c
� �� �� ��
fc
pro m
moves to next project site
rom
eo
Pouring
ng
CROSSTRAINING
g ttin Se
urv
S
DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION INTENTIONS
gc
E SS
REALITIES ON-THE-GROUND
nin
U TR
�
ating Excav
ear
ROOF
�
al
� � � �
�
a po
What tools are needed for resiliency?
c Ba
closed-loop kit of parts
SKILLED LABORERS
What needs to be communicated to Nationals?
What needs to be communicated to Westerners?
d as
to Wes tern affili ates
hire
d sen t back
AG
AN
M
AF
CR
qu
ali
T
qu
ali
T
R FO
M
CO
ntr
ol
dim e con nsion tro l
ntr
ol
dim
TY
cross
ens
TY
the
RI
CU
ft p
ion
-train
con
ing
tro
l furn itu built re / -ins
oli
cy
TIO
NS
SE
co
co
RI
CU
SE
ty
ty
qu
NT
EN
ali
ty
co
landscaped drainage
SIG
NI
ntr
ol
rainw
DE
ater ha
joinery alternatives
rvestin
g
dim
solar panels
ens
ion
co
ntr
ol
pow
ols
ND
EC
ISI
ON
S
er to
TIO
pit latrin
natives
CO
NS
TR
UC
e alter
P� E�
EN
T/
PE
RS
ON
NE
L
P�
T��
E�
P�
E�
MA
TE
RIA
LS
/T
OO
LS
/E
QU
IPM
P�
P�
T�
T��
E�
T��
E�
M��
E�
E�
M��
E�
T��
T��
T�
P�
T�
M��
P�
T�
M��
P�
T�
M��
P�
T��
T��
T��
M��
T��
M�
P�
T��
T��
T��
P�
M��
M��
T�
P�
M�
M��
T�
T��
M�
M��
T�
T��
T��
M��
T�
E� M��
M��
T�
T��
T��
T��
M��
E�
E�
/ le v che cks
plu
bs ble dou
T��
T��
E�
E�
E�
P�
ou nu
P�
nti
P�
co
tives
alterna
M��
M�
n
sig
de
n sulatio
T�
in
M�
ss
tru
M�
cs
acousti
rd
ts
ha
M��
P�
T��
T��
�
E�
T��
P�
M�� T�
E� P�
M�� T��
T��
M�� T��
M�� T��
M�� M��
T��
T��
� M� T�� T�� T�� T��
M��
E�
T��
�
E�
M��
T��
T��
M�
P�
T�
�
E�
M��
T�
M�
T��
P�
M��
�
T�
M�
T��
E�
M�� T��
T��
M�
�
T�
T��
P�
E�
M�
�
P�
T��
E�
T�
P�
T��
T�
E�
T��
T�
E�
M��
T��
T�
M��
T�
T��
T�
ha
M�
purlin
co n co cre nn teec wo tio od ns
M��
P�
M��
pre co cast nn m ec eta tio l ns
cle
g
tin
gh
yli
da
E�
exp ose d re bar s sb eam
y urit ec ys tor res
s
ern
att
gp
ilin
na
T��
vary ing str grid uctura l s
ar reb
od wo s te- n re tio nc nec co con
s
late
mp
g te
ilin
M��
M�� T��
T��
T��
pla
tes
T�
T�
T�
T�
T�
alte ra bea tive lo ring ad syst ems
T�
es
na
M��
M��
M�
M�
M��
M��
M��
M�
M�
brick bonding ISSB
n ntratio
uar
es
mor ta r gaug es
/ sq
uss
aperture security
natural ven tilation
alternative brick patterns
thermal mass
mortar gauges
on-site kilns
ater pe
vels
rainw
/ le
ct
f tr
lubs
tem
roo
ar
for
ks p
stac k effe
hec
pe co rcas nn t m ec eta tio ns l
ns
roof
mockup
le c
ve lea on en wh rge cha in ter pen ca r ves lea s ter uare pen r / sq car nte vels ists arpe es s / le r ass by c truss plub ente e t carp ecks r to ram rrec le ch eepe to f d to e doub orek ed e tes st r train train romo ente pla
, and
s
man dou b
lumns
wall
fore
ams, co
exp ose d
from
s
for be
reb
crete
e
wall-mock-up
T��
assi
holi day ion lect
nal e
atio
con
overse
plans
T��
form
build
rs to
P�
ed to
demostrates
must re
worke
E�
sets inital wall coursings
P�
Po uri
train
am of
E�
mixes concrete
ly and
all te
T��
Setting
a sm
P�
crete
pour con
P�
Pouring
given
o thick
E�
ur
uous po
contin
double checks slab level
ortar to
T��
E�
nates
trained to lay brick from mason
lays m
T��
es
e coordi
learns to
te finish
g illin ckf
S
eft
r th
er fo
work
ncret
our co
concre
fires
s to p
ALLS
T��
bility
dou
ion
osit
omp
on c
pacti
com
ks chec
es e finish concret
ble
r
elde
lage
r vil
ral fo
fune
learn
SLAB
crete con ation rdin coo
ls f
kfil
bac
alls
nw
atio
d oun
design
prototype + manufacture
build
BREATHE HOUSE // san marc, haiti director: Anselmo Canfora position: Research Assistant completed: Fall 2011 - Summer 2013 with: Sarah Harper The Breathe House is the first prototype for Initiative reCOVER’s Transitional Disaster Prototype Housing (TDRH). It is an adaptable, deployable, demountable unit created through interdisciplinary research, manufacturing partnerships, and marketing campaigns. The robust design incorporates the constraints of containerization, affordability, easy in-the-field assembly, and customizable detailing for regional adaptability. The panelized house was pre-fabricated and shipped to Haiti in Summer 2011, and was built in 5 days with no mechanical or electrical assistance. It was the winner of the ARCHive Institute’s 2010 housing competition. Primary interest in the project was visualization of complex processes of project delivery and site construction. Other responsibilities included design, documentation, detailing, and construction administration. PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
SCALE: 1'-0":1-0"'
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA
CONSULTANTS
ARCHITECTURE University of Virginia School of Architecture Initiative reCOVER Campbell Hall P.O. Box 400122 Charlottesville VA 22904-4122, USA + 1 434 924 7057
DRAWING TITLE
RECORD
SHEET NUMBER
PORCH CORNER CONNECTION WORKING DETAILS: 2'-0" PANELS
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER The ARUP Cause 13 Fitzroy Street London W1T 4BQ United Kingdom + 44 0 20 7636 1531
NO.
DATE
DESCRIPTION
A7.06
PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA ARCHITECTURE
University of Virginia School of Architecture Initiative reCOVER Campbell Hall P.O. Box 400122 Charlottesville VA 22904-4122, USA + 1 434 924 7057
CONSULTANTS
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER The ARUP Cause 13 Fitzroy Street London W1T 4BQ United Kingdom + 44 0 20 7636 1531
SCALE: 1'-0":1-0"'
SHEET NUMBER
DRAWING TITLE
TRANSITIONAL DISASTER RECOVERY HOUSING: PROTOTYPE 2
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
site assembly connections
TRANSITIONAL DISASTER RECOVERY HOUSING: PROTOTYPE 2
1
SCALE: 1'-0":1-0"'
RECORD NO.
TYP. CORNER CONNECTION WORKING DETAILS: MODIFIED I-SEAM 1 DATE
DESCRIPTION
A7.05
PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION
TRANSITIONAL DISASTER RECOVERY HOUSING: RECORD CONSULTANTS PROTOTYPE 2
ARCHITECTURE University of Virginia School of Architecture Initiative reCOVER Campbell Hall P.O. Box 400122 Charlottesville VA 22904-4122, USA + 1 434 924 7057
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER The ARUP Cause 13 Fitzroy Street London W1T 4BQ United Kingdom + 44 0 20 7636 1531
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
1
PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
℄
1
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
3
NO.
DATE
DESCRIPTION
DRAWING TITLE
SHEET NUMBER
A7.06
T-CORNER CONNECTION PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION WORKING DETAILS: TRANSITIONAL DISASTER RECOVERY HOUSING: MODIFIED I-SEAM 2
PROTOTYPE 2
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA
DRAWING TITLE
TYP. WALL CONNECTION WORKING DETAILS: I-SEAM
SHEET NUMBER
A7.04
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
manufacturing // packaging // assembly
camper units
ARCHITECTURAL CONTINGENCY CORPS critic: Charlie Menefee completed: Fall 2012 with: Andrew Brown published: Reuse/Recover Symposium, April 2013 Catalyst, Fall 2013 The ACC is a deployable, modular, temporary housing community servicing deconstruction field operations for shrinking cities along the Norfolk Rail Line. The pilot The facilities support construction crews living in communities with blighted, condemned, and foreclosed structures and are made entirely from the harvested and re-purposed materials from the sites where they are deployed. The design is comprehensive in scale - from system to detail.
camper units
material harvest + scalability
norfolk southern rail line
single family home harvest
city housing vacancies
PRODUCED BY A
ONAL PRODUCT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
DETAIL
32 31
AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
30
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
31
34
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
28 28
35 32
34
ROOF DETAIL 1 1 1/2” : 1’-0”
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIO
g w/12mm rebar
w/12mm rebar cage
ade
am w/12mm rebar
WINDOW DETAIL 1 1/2” : 1’-0”
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
ROOF DETAIL 2 1 1/2” : 1’-0”
27 26
lted to concrete beam
d to concrete beam, beyond
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
r, beyond
or plate, beyond
sum board 19
sheething 18 17
sheething
metal roof
23 5 22 21 20
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
m finish plate
w frame
16 15
10
m finish plate,
ething
g
m corner plate 25 24 PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
34 13 12 11
9
6 4
2 4
5
7
8
5
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
3
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
WALL DETAIL 1 1/2” : 1’-0”
1
FOUNDATION DETAIL 1 1/2” : 1’-0”
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
arch
20
10
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
West Wall 1043 lux South Wall 630 lux CLIMATE ZONE South Window 881 lux North Wall 607 lux (less glare, adequate daylighting)
CLIMATE DATA
b1 Fenestration Thermal Properties + Elevations
West Wall 1371 South Wall 775 South Window 3517 North Wall 481 (glare is a major issue)
4
DAYLIGHTING ANALYSIS
d Heat Gains + Losses
c Calculations
110
lux lux lux lux
1.08 x ventilation rate (1.08) x (372)
100
ROOF
SOUTH
EAST
NORTH
VENTILATION LOSS
WEST
401.7 BTU
90
+
ASSEMBLY LOSS 4295 ft²
OPAQUE AREA
80 34.2 % WWR
0% WWR
21.1 % WWR
33.9 % WWR
5.14 % WWR
0% WFR
39.8 % WFR
21.3 % WFR
7.5 % WFR
580 ft² opaque
1252 ft² opaque
500 ft² opaque
1640 ft² opaque
0 ft² glazing
478.5 ft² glazing
256 ft² glazing
FLOOR PLAN
25.5 % WFR
70
90 ft² glazing
306 ft² glazing
60
28.8 %
MULTI-USE SURF AREA 5742 ft²
1130.5 ft² GROSS GLAZING
VOLUME 34,480 ft³
3930.5 ft² GROSS WALL AREA
30 OCCUPANTS
THIS
30
90
80
70
/CONDUCTIVITY* /1.61 /1.0 /1.07 /1.1 /1.6 /1.0 /2.22
=R-VALUE =1.61 =0.75 =0.93 =8.25 =.62 =1.5 =.25 =.68 =13.8
/CONDUCTIVITY* /1.61
=R-VALUE =1.61 =2.36 =0.93 =22.0 =.62 =2.18 =.25 =.68 =29.8
10
CAVITY ASSEMBLY Standing-seam Air Space Plywood Batt Insulation Plywood Air Space Gypsum Inside Air
THICKNESS 5mm 3/4" 3/4" 7 1/2" 1/2" 1 1/2" 1/2"
/1.07 /.045 /1.6 /1.0 /2.22
January
U-VALUE - FRAME 1/13.8
60
50
February
March
April
+
.02904
May
June
U-VALUE GLASS
.28
U-VALUE
Low-E Clear
.28 .28
* ASHRAE Appendix B
June
July
August
September
October
SOUTH
EAST
390**
.81***
.93***
November
NORTH
0.5
1.0
1.0
478.5 ft2
825.0 ft2
90.0 ft²
May
June
July
0% WFR
August
21.3 % October WFR
November
597 ft² opaque
1547 ft² opaque
FOOTPRINT
1200 ft²
AIR RATE/AREA
.06*
OCCUPANCY
30
ROOF
50
SOUTH
+ 40 + Elevations
FOOTPRINT 1200 ft²
VOLUME 34,480 ft³
4439 ft² GROSS WALL AREA
30 OCCUPANTS
February
0% WFR
39.8 % WFR
580 ft² opaque
1252 ft² opaque
0 ft² glazing
478.5 ft² glazing
34.2 % WWR FLOOR
PLAN
25.5 % WFR
21.3 % WFR
7.5 % WFR
500 ft² opaque
1640 ft² opaque
100
535 ft² opaque
0 ft² glazing
478.5 ft² glazing
256 ft² glazing
90 ft² glazing
90
306 ft² glazing
VOLUME 34,480 ft³
21.1 % WWR
January
WEST
39.8 % WFR
OCCUPANT LOAD
13.6 kW
LIGHTING LOAD
3.4 kW
PLUG LOAD
1.08 x ventilation rate (1.08) x (372)
4439 ft²
(opaque A) x (opaque U-value) (4439 sf ) x (.038 BTU/sf )
.038
GLAZING AREA
618 ft²
RAD. RETAINED
(glass A) x (glass U-value) (618 sf ) x (.280 BTU/sf )
.28
1252 ft² opaque
R PLAN
S
E/W
N
.27*
.27*
.27*
1000**
790**
390**
.77***
.81***
.93***
0.5
1.0
1.0
NORTH
183.0 ft2
370.0 ft2
CAVITY ASSEMBLY Standing-seam Air Space
Plywood Air Space Gypsum Inside Air
3/4"
THICKNESS 5mm 3/4"
90 80
1/2" 1 1/2" 1/2"
VOLUME 34,480 ft³
3930.5 ft² GROSS WALL AREA
30 OCCUPANTS
/CONDUCTIVITY* /1.61
60 U-VALUE - FRAME
34.2 % WWR
500 ft² opaque
1640 ft² opaque
256 ft² glazing
90 ft² glazing
GLAZING AREA
1393 ft²
GLASS U-VALUE**
.28
TOTAL FT² 1360 ft²
WWR
Net Heat Transfer
kBTU kBTU 4295 ft² kBTU BTU .038 BTU
SURF AREA 5742 ft²
1130.5 ft² GROSS GLAZING
FOOTPRINT 1200 ft²
VOLUME 34,480 ft³ BUILDING
3930.5 ft² GROSS WALL AREA
are no skylights 30** there OCCUPANTS
.00864
.033 x 88% (@ 24" O.C.)
embly + U-Values
April
BUILDING ASHRAE DESIGN
STANDARDS
FRAME ASSEMBLY Standing-seam Batten Plywood Heavy Timber Purlin Plywood Batten Gypsum Inside Air
THICKNESS 5mm 3/4" 3/4" 7 1/2" 1/2" 1 1/2" 1/2"
CAVITY ASSEMBLY Standing-seam Air Space Plywood Batt Insulation Plywood Air Space Gypsum Inside Air
THICKNESS 5mm 3/4" 3/4" 7 1/2" 1/2" 1 1/2" 1/2"
May
.02904
79.5 201.0 163.2 177.8 BTU 553.3 401.0
Solar Gain (opaque A) x (opaque U-value)
Internal Gain Assembly Loss Ventilation Loss
(4295 sf ) x (.038 BTU/sf )
4295 ft² West Wall 1371 lux x (opaque U-value) 10 kBTU (opaque A) e5 Wall South 775 lux ) (4295 sf ) x (.038 BTU/sf .038 South Window 3517 lux 481 lux GLAZING AREANorth Wall 1393 ft² (glass A) x (glass U-value) 401.7 BTU (glare is a major issue) ventilation loss +(1393 assembly sf )loss x (.280 BTU/sf ) OPAQUE AREA
1.08 x ventilation rate
+
kBTU kBTU kBTU BTU BTU
* the U-value of the opaque wall and roof are the same ** there are no skylights
S
E/W
N
.27*
.27*
.27*
790**
390**
.77***
.81***
.93***
UNOBSTRUCTED
0.5
GLASS AREA
478.5 ft2
1.0
x
FOOTPRINT * the U-value of the 1200 opaqueft² wall /CONDUCTIVITY*and roof =R-VALUE are the same ** there =1.61 are no skylights /1.61 .06* AIR RATE/AREA =2.36 /1.07 =0.93 /.045 =22.0 /1.6 OCCUPANCY =.62 30 /1.0 =2.18 /2.22 =.25 =.68 10* AIR RATE/PERSON=29.8
April
May
S
E/W
390**
RAD..033 RETAINED
.77***
.81***
.93***
.038
PLUG LOAD*** .25 W/ft² window/floor ratios
June
0.5
+x1.8 x x
478.5 ft2
July
ASSEMBLY
U-VALUE
Low-E Clear
.28 AIR .28
x
c3
1.0 OCCUPANT LOAD
35.1 kW
SOUTH
EAST
/1.07 /.045 /1.6 /1.0 /2.22
=R-VALUE =1.61 =2.36 =0.93 =22.0 =.62 =2.18 =.25 =.68 =29.8
100
1/13.8
70
825.0 ft2
13.6 kW
90.0 ft²
PLUG LOAD
x
August
DATA
x
September
1200 ft²
Comfort Zone 68˚F - 78˚F Max Interior Temp 90.5˚F Min Interior Temp 46.3˚F Max BTU Heating Day 36 kBTU/hour Max BTU Cooling Day 20 kBTU/hour (area) x( air rate / area)
U-VALUE - CAVITY 1/29.8
0% WWR
10.6 % WWR
21.0 % WWR
.033 x 88%3.8 % (@ 24" O.C.) WWR
0% WFR
39.8 % WFR
21.3 % WFR
7.5 % WFR
80
580 ft² opaque
1547 ft² opaque
597 ft² opaque
1665 ft² opaque
0 ft² glazing
183 ft² glazing
159 ft² glazing
65 ft² glazing
.02904
20
10 U-VALUE WALL
.038
U-VALUE GLASS
(4439 sf ) x (.038 BTU/sf )
30
618 ft² AIR RATE/PERSON
.033 50
30
(opaque A) x (opaque U-value)
GLAZING AREA
100 90
40 .00864
4439 ft²
+
25.1 % WWR
60
17.5 % WFR
50 630 ft²
opaque
40
211 ft²
glazing January
(30) x (10)
SHGC
SOUTH
+ + February
EAST
E/W
.27*
.27*
NORTH
CLIMATE DATA
30
WEST METABOLIC RATE* 1000** IRRADIATION
90
RAD. RETAINEDTOTAL
80
65790** W/m²
.77*** SQFT
UNOBSTRUCTED
0.5
GLASS AREA June
183.0 ft2
.81*** 1360 ft² 1.0
1.0 W/ft²
MAX LPD**
March
April
May
July
370.0 ft2
30 kBTU
20 kBTU
+ Losses e Heat Gains OCCUPANCY 30
DecemberLPD**
ASSEMBLY LOSS
390** .93*** 1.0
65.0 ft² August
201.0 kBTU
13.6 kW
x x
OCCUPANT L
LIGHTING LO
+
INTERNAL GAIN3.4 kW
+ +
+
ventilation loss + assembly loss
occupants + lighting + plug load (401.7 BTU) + (341.7 BTU)
(35.1 kW) + (13.6 kW) + (3.4 kW)
BHLC 50 kBTU743.4 BTU
∑(A x U)
ASSEMBLY LOSS
300 CFM
d2
(168.7) + (178.0)
173.0 BTU
c3
x
4439 40 ft² kBTU
OPAQUE AREA
∆T(opaque (°F) A) x (opaque U-value)
OPAQUE U-VALUE* e1
(4439 20°F
.038
sf ) x (.038 BTU/sf )
GLAZING AREA
(19.1) + (63.9) + (6.4)
OCCUPANT LOAD
DB outdoor 618 ft²mean T indoor - mean (glass A) x (glass U-value)
63.9
6.4 kBTU
LIGHTING LOAD +BUILDING
DESIGN
3.4 kW September PLUG LOAD October
+
(618 sf ) x (.280 BTU/sf )
.28
e3
10 kBTU
* the U-value of the opaque wall and roof are the same
SOLAR**GAIN there are no skylights 89.4 kBTU
GAIN December November INTERNAL
1 B
20 kBTU Gains + Losses e Heat
kBTU
13.6 kW kBTU
1 B
30 kBTU (64°F) - (44°F)
35.1 kW 19.1
PLUG LOA
.25 W/ft² 52.1 kWh / 177.8 kBTU
341.7 BTU
GLASS U-VALUE**
x x
35.1 kW
1.0 W/ft²
(1.08) x (372)
∑(SHGC x GVI x SRR x 1/U x AREA)
x1.8
x1.8 SOLAR GAIN
1360 ft²
1.08 x ventilationMAX rate
N
.27*
(49.7) + (142) + (8.8)
10 kBTU 65 W/m²
TOTAL SQFT
November
9.5.1 *** ASHRAE Journal, May 2011
c5 S
100 OCCUPANCY
300
(30) x (10)
∑(SHGC x GVI x SRR x 1/U x AREA)
ASHRAE standard, Table 401.7**BTU
72 CFM
* ASHRAE 62.1-2007
BUILDING DESIGN
(occupancy) x (air rate / person)
VENTILATION LOSS * ASHRAE standard
168.7 BTU
* the U-value of the opaque wall and roof are the same ** there are no skylights
70 ROOF
(618 sf ) x (.280 BTU/sf )
72
d1
30
PLUG LOAD***
(occupancy) x (air rate / person)
10* A) x (glass U-value) (glass
.28
GLASS U-VALUE**
(201.
(1200) x (.06)
10*40 kBTU
METABOLIC RATE*
c2
x
(area) x( air rate / area)
50 kBTU
HEATING + COOLING ANALYSIS
(1200) x (.06)
.06*
OCCUPANCY OPAQUE U-VALUE* .038
WEST
October
k
sol
(35.1 kW) + (13.6 kW) + (3.4 kW)
+CLIMATE
LIGHTING LOAD
3.4 kW
+
x
(141.2) + (390.0) + (22.0) + (0.0)
* ASHRAE 62.1-2007
8.8 kBTU
+
∑(A x U)
.06*
OCCUPANCY
c4
* ASHRAE Appendix B
.072
60
.072 x 12% (@ 24" O.C.)
OPAQUE AREA
90 80
U-VALUENORTH - FRAME
ASHRAE STANDARDS
c1
k
1.0 90.0 ft²
553.25 BTU
10 kBTU
1200 ft²
occupants + lighting + plug load AIR RATE/AREA
49.7 kBTU 142 kBTU
1.0
GLASS
RATE/AREA
+
52.1 kWh / December 177.8 kBTU
d2
790**
1360 ft²
INTERNAL GAIN
AIR RATE/PERSON
1000**
GLASS AREA .02904
November
300 CFM
(30) x (10)
.28
.28 .28
+
N
(occupancy) x (air rate / person)
*** ASHRAE Journal, May 2011 Comfort Zone 68˚F - 78˚F Max Interior Temp 84.2˚F Min Interior Temp 48.1˚F Max BTU Heating Day 52 kBTU/hour GLASS* Max BTU Cooling Day 32 kBTU/hour FOOTPRINT
U-VALUE
72 CFM
(1200) x (.06)
.072 IRRADIATION
* ASHRAE standard U-VALUE ** ASHRAE standard, Table 9.5.1
=R-VALUE =1.61 =0.75GLASS* =0.93ASSEMBLY =8.25 =.62 Low-E Clear =1.5 =.25 =.68 =13.8
ASHRAE STANDARDS
.27*
65 W/m²
390.0 October BTU
x
FOOTPRINT
(area) x( air rate / area)
.27*
** climate data *** floor reflectance based on U-VALUE WALL
March
(glass A) x (glass U-value)
.27*
MAX LPD** 1.0 W/ft² * fenestration properties
February
x
August September (1393 sf ) x (.280 BTU/sf )
201.0 kBTU
.93***
20 kBTU ASSEMBLY LOSS
SOLAR GAIN
+
d3825.0 ft2
478.5 ft2
* fenestration properties ** climate data *** floor reflectance based on window/floor ratios
163.2 BTU
.81***
(64°F) - (44°F)
VENTILATION LOSS
0.5 30 kBTU 1.0 401.7 BTU
(49.7) + (142) + (8.8)
c2
SHGC
TOTAL SQFT
.038
x
.28
.77***
∑(SHGC x GVI x SRR x 1/U x AREA)
(4295 sf ) x (.038 BTU/sf )
1393 ft²
July
4 k
390**
40 kBTU mean T indoor - mean DB outdoor
GLASS AREA
+
kBTU
90.0 ft²
.038
N
.27*
(1.08) x (372) 790**
1000**
UNOBSTRUCTED
49.7 kBTU 142 kBTU
E/W
∆T (°F) .27* 50 kBTU .27* 1.08 x ventilation rate 20°F
8.8 U-value) (opaque A) x (opaque
825.0 ft2
June
.033 x 88% (@ 24" O.C.)
BHLC
955.0 BTU
d1 IRRADIATION
1.0
4295 ft²
OPAQUE U-VALUE*
/CONDUCTIVITY* =R-VALUE * fenestration properties /1.61 =1.61 ** climate data /1.0 =0.75 *** floor reflectance based on /1.07 =0.93 window/floor ratios GLAZING AREA /1.1 =8.25 /1.6 =.62 /1.0 =1.5 /2.22 =.25 GLASS =.68 U-VALUE** =13.8
3 B
(401.7 BTU) + (553.3 BTU)
S
RAD. RETAINED
1000**
.28
d Heat Gains + Losses x
∑(A x U)
390.0 BTU
(1393 sf ) x (.280 BTU/sf )
IRRADIATION
METABOLIC RATE*
CLIMATE DATA
+
553.25 BTU
c1
OCCUPANCY 30 .072 x 12% .00864 UNOBSTRUCTED (@ 24" O.C.)
U-VALUE GLASS
/CONDUCTIVITY* /1.61
1 B
(1.08) x (372)
* ASHRAE Appendix B
ROOF
Heat Gains + Losses
SHGC
U-VALUE WALL
.28 January
THICKNESS 5mm 3/4" 3/4" 7 1/2" 1/2" 1 1/2" 1/2"
+89.6 kBTU/ 20 kBTU day
(141.2) + (390.0) + (22.0) + (0.0)
(glass A) x (glass U-value)
RAD. RETAINED
U-VALUE - CAVITY 1/29.8
20 10
/CONDUCTIVITY* /1.61 /1.0 /1.07 /1.1 /1.6 /1.0 /2.22
DAYLIGHTI
30 kBTU
NET HEAT TRANSFER
solar gains + internal gains
(89.4 kBTU) + (177.8 kBTU)
* the U-value of the opaque wall and roof are the same
U-VALUE - FRAME 1/13.8* ASHRAE 62.1-2007
.033
.072 x 12% (@ 24" O.C.)
CAVITY ASSEMBLY Standing-seam Air Space Plywood Batt Insulation Plywood Air Space Gypsum Inside Air
HEAT GAIN
50 kBTU lux lux lux 40 kBTU heat loss - heat gain lux 356.8 kBTU - 267.2 kBTU
GLASS U-VALUE**
535 ft² Net Heat Transfer opaque 89.6 OPAQUE AREA Solar Gain 89.4 306 ft² Internal Gain 177.8 glazing OPAQUE U-VALUE* Assembly Loss 341.7 Ventilation Loss 401.0
.072
1/13.8
30
VENTILATION STUDY
(64°F) - (44°F)
INTERNAL GAIN
25.5 % WFR
March
=R-VALUE =1.61 =2.36 =0.93 =22.0 =.62 =2.18 =.25 =.68 =29.8
/1.07 /.045 /1.6 /1.0 /2.22
40
76.5
February
+ +
50U-VALUE - CAVITY
THICKNESS 5mm 3/4" 3/4" 7 1/2" 1/2" 1 1/2" 1/2"
65.0 ft²
SHGC
=0.75 =0.93 =8.25 =.62 =1.5 =.25 =.68 =13.8
1/29.8
FRAME ASSEMBLY Standing-seam Batten Plywood Heavy Timber Purlin Plywood Batten Gypsum Inside Air
mean T indoor - mean DB outdoor
89.4 kBTU
6.4 kBTU
7.5 % WFR
MULTI-USE
+ +
=R-VALUE January =1.61
FOOTPRINT 1200 ft² 70
5’-0” 3’-0” 78.8˚F 66.5˚F
20°F
267.2 mBTU
kBTU
OPAQUE AREA
/CONDUCTIVITY* /1.61 /1.0 /1.07 /1.1 /1.6 /1.0 /2.22
1130.5 ft² GROSS GLAZING
Opening Inlet Opening Outlet Max Interior Temp Min Interior Temp
(bhlc) x (∆T) x (24) (743.4) x (20) x (24)
West Wall 1371 LOSS SouthHEAT Wall 775 356.8 kBTU South Window 3517 North Wall 481 (glare is a major issue)
∆T (°F)
SOLAR GAIN
63.9 WEST
5.14 % WWR
10
SURF AREA 5742 ft²
78.8
x
West Wall 1043 lux e1 South Wall 630 lux South Window 881 lux North Wall 607 lux ∑(SHGC x GVI x SRR x 1/U x AREA) (less glare, adequate daylighting) (19.1) + (63.9) + (6.4)
52.1 kWh / 177.8 kBTU
30 OCCUPANTS
Plywood 3/4" TOTAL FT² 1360 ft² Batt Insulation 7 1/2"
WWR
743.4 BTU
(168.7) + (178.0)
19.1 kBTU
33.9 % WWR
DESIGN
306 ft² glazing 100
28.8 %
MULTI-USE
c Calculations
∑(A x U)
ASSEMBLY LOSS
The success of passive design strategies is dependent on e3 user design input and understanding of building systems after + construction. + d
a50 Assembly + U-Values
7 1/2" 535 ft² 1/2" 1 1/2" opaque 1/2"
90 ft² glazing
(401.7 BTU) + (341.7 BTU)
BHLC
+
c5
FOOTPRINT 1200 ft²
THICKNESS 25.5 % 5mm WFR 3/4"
1640 ft² opaque
256 ft² glazing
478.5 ft² glazing
FRAME ASSEMBLY Standing-seam Batten Plywood Heavy Timber Purlin Plywood Batten Gypsum Inside Air
ventilation loss + assembly loss
70
34.2 % WWR
5.14 % WWR
+
341.7 BTU
173.0 BTU
21.3 % WFR
20
7.5 % WFR
401.7 BTU
ASSEMBLY LOSS
168.7 BTU
60
3930.5 ft² GROSS WALL AREA
West Wall South Wall South Window North Wall (less glare, adequate d
c4
30
39.8 % WFR
e Heat Gains + Losses
+
TOTAL FT² 1360 ft²
WWR 1130.5 ft² GROSS GLAZING WEST
a Assembly + U-Values 33.9 % WWR Opening Inlet 10’-0” Opening Outlet 21.3 %3’-0” Max Interior TempWFR 79˚F Min Interior Temp500 ft²68˚F opaque
d2
December
35.1 kW
40
21.1 % WWR
(35.1 kW) + (13.6 kW) + (3.4 kW)
+
c6 Inx thisx study, x data visualization is used West Wallto communicate 1043 lux the South Wall 630 effects of design development decisions for a Type IV lux heavy e4 South Window 881 lux e2 North Wall 607 lux LOSS timber literate audience. Issues August March May house Juneto a non-design July September April October December NovemberVENTILATION (less glare, adequate daylighting) considered are cost, comfort, daylighting, ventilation, and ASSEMBLY LOSS + intended energy targets.+ BUILDING HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS + DESIGN c Calculations 28.8 %
80
28.8 %
MULTI-USE
d5
occupants + lighting + plug load 72 CFM
occupants + lighting + plug load
1252 ft² opaque
SURF AREA 5742 ft²
d4
THAT
OPAQUE U-VALUE*
5.14 % WWR
77 74 71 68 NORTH
+ 79.5 kBTU/ day
(35.1 kW) + (13.6 kW) + (3.4 kW)
0% WFR
EAST 79
.25 W/ft²
OPAQUE U-VALUE*
GLASS AREA
20
580 ft² opaque
FLOOR PLAN
x x
c Calculations
10
nestration Thermal Properties + Elevations
SOUTH
(201.1 kBTU) + (177.8 kBTU)
* fenestration properties ** climate data *** floor reflectance based on window/floor ratios
SURF AREA 5742 ft²
33.9 % WWR
+
INTERNAL GAIN
300 CFM
November
x1.8
1.0 W/ft²
UNOBSTRUCTED
30
TOTAL FT² 1360 ft²
618 ft² GROSS GLAZING
21.1 % WWR
EAST
211 ft² glazing
15.7 % GROSS WWR
SOUTH EAST b2 Fenestration Thermal Properties +NORTH Elevations
0% WWR
OR
solar gains + internal gains
c3 30
MAX LPD**
IRRADIATION
17.5 % WFR
0% WWR ROOF
x
(30) x (10)
October
1360 ft²
SHGC
MULTI-USE
TE DATA
378.9 kBTU
201.0 kBTU
c2
(area) x( air rate / area)
10*
65 W/m²
* the U-value of the opaque wall and roof are the same ** there are no skylights
BUILDING DESIGN
630 ft² opaque
65 ft² glazing
NET HEAT TRANSFER
HEAT GAIN SOLAR GAIN
(1200) x (.06)
TOTAL SQFT
GLASS U-VALUE**
60
7.5December % WFR 1665 ft² opaque
159 ft² glazing
183 ft² glazing
FLOOR PLAN
(49.7) + (142) + (8.8)
(occupancy) x (air rate / person)
METABOLIC RATE*
OPAQUE AREA
25.1 % WWR
b1 Fenestration Thermal Properties + 0 ft² glazing
x
heat loss - heat gain 458.4 kBTU - 378.9 kBTU
∑(SHGC x GVI x SRR x 1/U x AREA)
8.8 kBTU
critic: Gwen Murray completed: Spring 2013 b1 Fenestration Thermal Properties + Elevations December
80
39.8September % WFR
580 ft² opaque
x
-
d3
+
142 kBTU
GLASS AREA
70 April
49.7 kBTU
VENTILATION LOSS
90
3.8 % WWR
21.0 % WWR
10.6 % WWR
.27*
WEST
CLIMATE DATA 0% WWR
.27*
UNOBSTRUCTED
PLUG LOAD***
100 ROOF
790**
.77***
* ASHRAE standard ** ASHRAE standard, Table 9.5.1 *** ASHRAE Journal, May 2011
GLASS* ASSEMBLY
10
May
.27* 1000**
PASSIVE ARGUEMENTS // charlottesville, virginia
CLIMATE DATA April
SHGC
AugustAIR RATE/PERSON September
July
CLIMATE DATA
.038
March
458.4 kBTU mean T indoor - mean DB outdoor
IRRADIATION
OCCUPANCY
U-VALUE WALL
February
d1
N
* ASHRAE 62.1-2007
40
January
HEAT LOSS
52.1 kWh / 177.8 kBTU
ASHRAE STANDARDS
.00864
.033 x 88% (@ 24" O.C.)
30
(bhlc) x (∆T) x (24) (955.0) x (20) x (24)
.033
.072 x 12% (@ 24" O.C.)
20
E/W
RAD. RETAINED
* fenestration properties ** climate data *** floor reflectance based on window/floor ratios
.072
U-VALUE - CAVITY 1/29.8
20°F
c1 S
CLIMATE ZONE 4
FOOTPRINT 1200 ft²
20
x ∆T (°F)
(64°F) - (44°F)
50
FRAME ASSEMBLY THICKNESS Standing-seam 5mm Batten 3/4" Plywood 3/4" Heavy Timber Purlin 7 1/2" Plywood 1/2" Batten 1 1/2" Gypsum 1/2" Inside Air
955.0 BTU
∑(A x U) (141.2) + (390.0) + (22.0) + (0.0)
390.0 BTU
(1393 sf ) x (.280 BTU/sf )
.28
BHLC
+
(glass A) x (glass U-value)
* the U-value of the opaque wall and roof are the same ** there are no skylights
BUILDING DESIGN
40 CLIMATE ZONE 4
100
1393 ft²
TOTAL FT² 1360 ft²
WWR
a Assembly + U-Values
110
GLAZING AREA
GLASS U-VALUE**
+ +
535 ft² opaque
.038
(401.7 BTU) + (553.3 BTU)
163.2 BTU
(4295 sf ) x (.038 BTU/sf )
OPAQUE U-VALUE*
ventilation loss + assembly loss
553.25 BTU
(opaque A) x (opaque U-value)
+
S
E/W
N
sol
(89.4
b1 Fenestration Thermal Properties + Elevations
c Calculations
net transfers
ROOF
SOUTH
EAST
NORTH
WEST
OPAQUE AREA
0% WWR
21.1 % WWR
33.9 % WWR
5.14 % WWR
34.2 % WWR
0% WFR
39.8 % WFR
21.3 % WFR
7.5 % WFR
25.5 % WFR
580 ft² opaque
1252 ft² opaque
500 ft² opaque
1640 ft² opaque
535 ft² opaque
0 ft² glazing
478.5 ft² glazing
256 ft² glazing
90 ft² glazing
306 ft² glazing
FLOOR PLAN
MULTI-USE
28.8 %
+ +
BUILDING DESIGN
.038
GLAZING AREA
1393 ft²
GLASS U-VALUE**
.28
* the U-value of the opaque wall and roof are the same ** there are no skylights
S
TOTAL FT² 1360 ft²
WWR
SURF AREA 5742 ft²
1130.5 ft² GROSS GLAZING
FOOTPRINT 1200 ft²
VOLUME 34,480 ft³
3930.5 ft² GROSS WALL AREA
30 OCCUPANTS
a Assembly + U-Values
SHGC
.27*
IRRADIATION
1000**
RAD. RETAINED
.77***
UNOBSTRUCTED
0.5
GLASS AREA
478.5 ft2
* fenestration properties ** climate data *** floor reflectance based on window/floor ratios FRAME ASSEMBLY Standing-seam Batten Plywood Heavy Timber Purlin Plywood Batten Gypsum Inside Air
CAVITY ASSEMBLY Standing-seam Air Space Plywood Batt Insulation Plywood Air Space Gypsum Inside Air
THICKNESS 5mm 3/4" 3/4" 7 1/2" 1/2" 1 1/2" 1/2"
THICKNESS 5mm 3/4" 3/4" 7 1/2" 1/2" 1 1/2" 1/2"
/CONDUCTIVITY* /1.61 /1.0 /1.07 /1.1 /1.6 /1.0 /2.22
=R-VALUE =1.61 =0.75 =0.93 =8.25 =.62 =1.5 =.25 =.68 =13.8
/CONDUCTIVITY* /1.61
ASHRAE STANDARDS
=R-VALUE =1.61 =2.36 =0.93 =22.0 =.62 =2.18 =.25 =.68 =29.8
/1.07 /.045 /1.6 /1.0 /2.22
U-VALUE - FRAME 1/13.8
.072
U-VALUE - CAVITY 1/29.8
.033
.072 x 12% (@ 24" O.C.)
.00864
.033 x 88% (@ 24" O.C.)
.02904
4295 ft²
OPAQUE U-VALUE*
x
FOOTPRINT
1200 ft²
AIR RATE/AREA
.06*
OCCUPANCY
30
AIR RATE/PERSON
10*
* ASHRAE 62.1-2007
+ CLIMATE DATA
OCCUPANCY
30
METABOLIC RATE*
65 W/m²
TOTAL SQFT
1360 ft²
MAX LPD**
1.0 W/ft²
PLUG LOAD***
.25 W/ft²
U-VALUE WALL
.038
U-VALUE GLASS
.28
* ASHRAE standard ** ASHRAE standard, Table 9.5.1 *** ASHRAE Journal, May 2011
GLASS* ASSEMBLY
U-VALUE
Low-E Clear
.28 .28
* ASHRAE Appendix B
OPAQUE AREA
ROOF
SOUTH
EAST
NORTH
10.6 % WWR
21.0 % WWR
3.8 % WWR
25.1 % WWR
0% WFR
39.8 % WFR
21.3 % WFR
7.5 % WFR
17.5 % WFR
580 ft² opaque
1547 ft² opaque
597 ft² opaque
1665 ft² opaque
630 ft² opaque
0 ft² glazing
183 ft² glazing
159 ft² glazing
65 ft² glazing
211 ft² glazing
FLOOR PLAN
.038
GLAZING AREA
618 ft²
GLASS U-VALUE**
.28
WEST
BUILDING DESIGN
0% WWR
4439 ft²
OPAQUE U-VALUE*
MULTI-USE
15.7 % GROSS WWR
TOTAL FT² 1360 ft²
SURF AREA 5742 ft²
618 ft² GROSS GLAZING
FOOTPRINT 1200 ft²
VOLUME 34,480 ft³
4439 ft² GROSS WALL AREA
30 OCCUPANTS
b2 Fenestration Thermal Properties + Elevations
+ +
* the U-value of the opaque wall and roof are the same ** there are no skylights
S
SHGC
.27*
IRRADIATION
1000**
RAD. RETAINED
.77***
UNOBSTRUCTED
0.5
GLASS AREA
183.0 ft2
* fenestration properties ** climate data *** floor reflectance based on window/floor ratios
x
d Heat Gains + Losses 1.08 x ventilation rate (1.08) x (372)
VENTILATION LOSS 401.7 BTU
ASSEMBLY LOSS
+
ventilation loss + assembly loss (401.7 BTU) + (553.3 BTU)
553.25 BTU
(opaque A) x (opaque U-value)
163.2 BTU
(4295 sf ) x (.038 BTU/sf )
BHLC
+
(glass A) x (glass U-value)
955.0 BTU
∑(A x U)
x
(141.2) + (390.0) + (22.0) + (0.0)
390.0 BTU
(1393 sf ) x (.280 BTU/sf )
(bhlc) x (∆T) x (24) (955.0) x (20) x (24)
∆T (°F)
c1
20°F
HEAT LOSS
d1
458.4 kBTU mean T indoor - mean DB outdoor
E/W
N
.27*
.27*
790**
390**
.81***
.93***
1.0
1.0
825.0 ft2
90.0 ft²
x
x
(64°F) - (44°F)
49.7 kBTU 142 kBTU
-
d3
+
∑(SHGC x GVI x SRR x 1/U x AREA) (49.7) + (142) + (8.8)
NET HEAT TRANSFER
HEAT GAIN
8.8 kBTU
378.9 kBTU
SOLAR GAIN
c2
heat loss - heat gain 458.4 kBTU - 378.9 kBTU
201.0 kBTU
INTERNAL GAIN
+
(201.1 kBTU) + (177.8 kBTU)
+ 79.5 kBTU/ day
d4
d5
solar gains + internal gains
52.1 kWh / 177.8 kBTU
occupants + lighting + plug load
(area) x( air rate / area)
72 CFM
(1200) x (.06)
(35.1 kW) + (13.6 kW) + (3.4 kW)
+
(occupancy) x (air rate / person)
d2
300 CFM
(30) x (10)
c3 x1.8
x x
35.1 kW
OCCUPANT LOAD
13.6 kW
LIGHTING LOAD
3.4 kW
PLUG LOAD
e Heat Gains + Losses + 1.08 x ventilation rate (1.08) x (372)
c4 VENTILATION LOSS 401.7 BTU
ASSEMBLY LOSS
+
ventilation loss + assembly loss (401.7 BTU) + (341.7 BTU)
341.7 BTU (opaque A) x (opaque U-value) (4439 sf ) x (.038 BTU/sf )
(glass A) x (glass U-value) (618 sf ) x (.280 BTU/sf )
BHLC
168.7 BTU
+
ASSEMBLY LOSS
x
(168.7) + (178.0)
173.0 BTU
(bhlc) x (∆T) x (24) (743.4) x (20) x (24)
∆T (°F)
c5 E/W
743.4 BTU
∑(A x U)
e1
20°F
HEAT LOSS 356.8 kBTU
mean T indoor - mean DB outdoor
N
-
(64°F) - (44°F) ∑(SHGC x GVI x SRR x 1/U x AREA)
.27*
.27*
790**
390**
.81***
.93***
1.0
1.0
370.0 ft2
65.0 ft²
(19.1) + (63.9) + (6.4)
e3
19.1 kBTU
HEAT GAIN 267.2 mBTU
63.9 kBTU
+
6.4 kBTU
SOLAR GAIN 89.4 kBTU
INTERNAL GAIN
+
solar gains + internal gains
heat loss - heat gain 356.8 kBTU - 267.2 kBTU
NET HEAT TRANSFER
(89.4 kBTU) + (177.8 kBTU)
+89.6 kBTU/ day
e4
e5
52.1 kWh / 177.8 kBTU
x
x
c6 occupants + lighting + plug load (35.1 kW) + (13.6 kW) + (3.4 kW)
e2
student engagement charrette
QUANTIC0 MIDDLE HIGH SCHOOL // virginia firm: architects: responsibilities:
VMDO Architects Kelly Calahan, AIA and Dina Sorensen Design / Documentation / Representation Interior learning landscapes for a Middle/High School at Quantico Marine Corps Headquarters. Worked with a distinguished and award-winning K-12 design team.
camp self-governance
urban resettlements
wastewater treatment
social media outlets
ZAATARI REFUGE CAMP // marfraq, jordan instructed selected works:
Fall 2014 Allie Iaccarino, Sarah Holsinger, Emily Richards, Rachel Himes, Luke Escobar
The first in a sequence of undergraduate research studios, the Zaatari Refuge Studio is predicated on an architecture of urgency which can yield both radical and appropriate results. Students were asked to engage in the sensitivities of the camp while consulting both formal and informal (blogs, social media) modes of research to approach the camp as an emergent urban condition. Projects included landscapes of water and wastewater treatment; reappropriation of materials on-site as permanent structures emerge; urban housing integration strategies; and methods of relief for the host nation. 2012
JULY camp opening / 18,000
DEC cease fire / 56,000 2013
JULY escalation / 200,000
DEC continued war / 200,000+
cross-sectional time-lapse of camp growth
49 in. 1 mile
3.5%
w/ Hook 20.6%
Anomalous
35 in. 336 miles
8 ft. 20 miles Th an
ks to
the
B&
B
40 in. 1 mile
13.8%
w/ Ho
This features a membrane stretched upon
This skin demonstrates an avant-garde
slanted rod like structures. The variety in
covering method onto a well-known and often natural structures. They also have
size and angle relate to the various different types of umbrellas we have procured
utilized umbrellas in one of their past projects.
thus far.
The field of umbrellas acts as a series of shades for those who work in the
The critical element is the frame support system. It consists of a skeleton made out
This diagram shows the many different ways found to manipulate the material
building. They provide an element of
of metal beams only slightly thicker than
during the project.
movement in the facade, and are visually pleasing both when closed and when
an umbrella handle. They are inserted into a joining piece and arranged in geo-
opened.
metric formations to maximize strength.
ok
17.2%
3.5%
Not Extendable Wood
8
4-26-14
35 in. 336 miles Th
an
ks
to
M
s.
La
he
ra
in
N
J
44.
8
5-2-14
Spring Settlement ARCH Studio Suau
Not Extendable Metal
Statement
plotter paper adobe 1
coffee cup cocoon 2
4
The aluminum frame of an umbrella works well under tension
The intention of the U-Mod is
The U-Mod will have two thresholds for entry/exit, one oriented
broken umbrella tent
to deconstruct the form of an umbrella and use its parts in a
when in partner with its skin,
different way, rather than use
typically made of nylon or a form of treated polyester. Without its
6
an umbrella’s inherent structural qualities. Visually, the U-Mod will have the same geometrical
to the interior of the borough and one oriented to the retaining wall on the edge of the borough. This
8
skin the umbrella frame becomes more malleable as a structure and
provides access to more open and public spaces, while still
can be manipulated in different
essence of an umbrella and the deconstructed parts of the um-
8
maintaining a more private area
ways.
inside the structure.
brella re-envisioned as an inhabitable structure.
From these frames a vital ‘X’
The hope is that the umbrella
Umbrellas were chosen as a
linked together using zipties. The poles can be detached from the
brellas will create one big ummodule can be created and
material, due to their structural qualities and aesthetics as well as
transforms into a structure where people aren’t quite sure at first what it is they are looking at and
frame and connected together in
what one ‘material’ was chosen to construct it.
order to provide additional structural support. The poles that re-
their original intention of protecting a space from the elements of the site that could potentially
main attatched to the frame help ground the structure at it’s base.
inhibit the experience, such as rain or dew.
Precedent Frei Otto zur Zukunft des Zeltbaus
Jean-Claude and Christo’s covering the Reichtag in Berlin, Germany in 1995
The Umbrella Facade, Shanghai
by Spanish architecture firm 3GATTI
The Archinoma Modular System
ROD TY
Houko Inoue, Japan
by the CASA Project in 2006
w/ Hoo 20.6%
FOUNDATION STUDIO I / charlottesville, virginia This features a membrane stretched upon
This skin demonstrates an avant-garde
slanted rod like structures. The variety in
covering method onto a well-known and often natural structures. They also have
size and angle relate to the various different types of umbrellas we have procured
projects.
thus far.
instructed: coordinator: selected work:
utilized umbrellas in one of their past
The field of umbrellas acts as a series of shades for those who work in the
The critical element is the frame support system. It consists of a skeleton made out
This diagram shows the many different ways found to manipulate the material
building. They provide an element of
of metal beams only slightly thicker than
during the project.
movement in the facade, and are visually pleasing both when closed and when
an umbrella handle. They are inserted into a joining piece and arranged in geo-
opened.
metric formations to maximize strength.
Not Extendable Metal
Spring 2014 Anselmo Canfora Gabrielle Rashleigh, Daniel McGovern, Juwan Palmer, Nhi Nguyun, Dana Wilson, Tatiana Kalinoff, David Wilson 1
2
4
6
“Occupy Architecture” is the culminating project of Foundation Studio I at the University of Virginia. Students are asked to develop a material procurement, logic, and structure which can be inhabited for 24-hours. All “pods” are made from one primary, recycled material and one primary method of joining. Now a rite of passage among first year students, the encampment is occupied over a full day, rain or shine, ending in the student’s final review.
Public Vs. Private
Circulation
Air Flow
Movement of Shade
Public Vs. Private
4
5
3 2 1
9 7 6
research volumes 1 - 11
8
10 11
volume 10: pollution readings
volume 1: informal agricultures
volume 5: housing disparities
RE-CENTERING DELHI / yamuma river, delhi, india instructed: co-instructors: selected work:
Fall 2014 I単aki Alday, Pankaj vir Gupta Anna Cai, Jessica Baralt, Donna Ryu, Michelle Stein, Seth Salcedo Currently ongoing, research phases. Re-Centering Delhi is a 3-year research initiative at the University of Virginia and City of New Delhi for urban design strategies centering around the toxic and historically sacred Yamuna River. The work will is exhibited at the Swiss Embassy in New Delhi from November 14-28th, 2014.
volume 11: economic service systems
THANK YOU
RE-CENTERING DELHI: on the boards