Meghan McAllister — Projects 2010-2018
Professional Projects 2
Acuna Master Plan + Pavilion
8
Northstar Residences
16
Salesforce Tower Offices
22
Aspen Residence
Academic Projects 24
Mayan Workshop: Universidad de Otoch
37
Musical Instrument Museum
46
New Olympic Harbor
56
CASIS Headquarters
64
Narrow Lot Prototype
70
Bi-nuclear House
76
Vlock Building Project
82
Bikini Chair
Publications + Installations 84
Reclaiming Industrial Hamburg
88
I wish our block had...
90
Better Blocks Philly
94
Perspecta 50: Urban Divides
98
Timeless Gaza
100
Mexican Social Housing: Promises Revisted
104
Portal 9: Make No Small Plans
Acuña Master Plan + Pavilion [Tatiana Bilbao Estudio] This social housing development on the U.S.-Mexico border was devasted by a tornado. A series of interventions brings new amenities and community spaces to the otherwise dilapidated neighborhood. A ‘Linear Park’ turns the existing infrastructure of the main artery into a green promenade. A winding bicycle and pedestrian path stitches other public spaces to the to the ‘Linear Park’, and integrates the more remote areas to the center. The four major public spaces include a Memorial to the 14 victims of the disaster, an area dedicated to health and food, a children’s playground, and a sport and recreation area. The Grill Pavilion creates a shaded, gathering area for a popular community event: outdoor cooking. The pavilion negotiates topographic change while addressing the street corner through two overlapping geometric grids with a hanging garden at their center. Concrete masonry units from the tornado rubble are reused to create the dynamic ground plane with built-in benches and grills. 2015 / Acuña, Mexico collaboration with M. Castillo, Y. Rangel, J.Futo, and K. Biczokowski
McAllister | 3
McAllister | 5
McAllister | 7
Northstar Residences [Bohlin Cywinski Jackson] Located on Lake Tahoe’s Northstar mountain resort, these fourteen ski-in/ski-out homes include three unique designs. As a summer intern, I collaborated with a five-person team using Revit for permitting sets and construction documents. I was responsible for the stair details, exterior deck and railing details, interior millwork, and presentation drawings. Summer 2014 / Truckee, CA Greg Mottola (Principal-in- Charge), Denis Schofield (Project Manager) Design team collaborators: R. Alt, A. Ellenbogen, K. Bouret
McAllister | 9
McAllister | 11
McAllister | 13
McAllister | 15
LIQUID GALAXY
FOCUS
FOCUS
SALESF
E
Focus / Booth
DN SP
UP
DN
E
HALF BOOTH
BOOTH
WORKSTATIONS
5
IT SERVICE CENTER
WELLNESS
SERVER
FOCUS
E
FREIGHT LOBBY
E
E
E
E
LP
JAN
E
EP *36" clearance if this is an electrical panel that needs access
SE
E.R.
TE
EP
E
MECH 1
E
COAT STORAGE
RISE PANTRY
2
PIN-WHEEL
EDGE
BAR
QUADRANT
DISPERSED
6
C
8' x 13' VIDEO WALL
4
AV RM
FOCUS
MED 6-8P
FOCUS SP
TELE 2
UP
E
C.8
D
HUDDLE
FOCUS
SERVICE STATION
FOCUS
HUDDLE
HALF BOOTH
D.8
neighborhood analysis and precedents
Octo
2
3
NEIGHBORHOOD: ORGANIZATION
OFAD
open aisles
2
teaming tables / file cabinets
3
adjacent conference cluster with service station
4
adjacent corner lounge
5
custom focus / booths
6
primary circulation
RING
Organizational Strategies CBRE SFDT Workplace360 San Francisco, CA
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson August 25, 2016
FOCUS
“PINWHEEL” ORGANIZATIONAL DIAGRAM OF CONFERENCE CLUSTERS
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson
2
2.9
2.1
3
1.1
FOCUS
HUDDLE
HUDDLE
1
HALF BOOTH
3.9
FOCUS
FOCUS
HUDDLE
D.8
HUDDLE
FOCUS
OFAD
OFAD
4
4.9
HUDDLE
GUEST PH RM
STORAGE
B
GUEST PH RM
This 32,000sf office space is a tenant improvement project on the 45th and 46th floors of the newly constructed Salesforce Tower. Utilizing a pinwheel layout, enclosed meeting rooms and work spaces become San Francisco clusters that help to define multiple “neighborhoods,” as well as unique corner lounge spaces. A wood slat wall is applied to the concrete core walls, defining the main circulation space that ties the various teams together. A related screen wall defines the edge of an open communicating stair that ties the two floors together, while offering dramatic views of the city. SERVICE STATION
A.2
STORAGE
TELE 1
E
UP
SP
DN
E
E
E
E
ELEC 1
MECH 2
UP
B.2
OPEN TO BELOW
DN
[Bohlin Cywinski Jackson]
OFAD
PRODUCTION
COMMUNICATING STAIR
Salesforce Tower Offices
Conference Cluster
3 SERVICE STATION
LOCKER AREA
ELEVATOR LOBBY
HEART / RISE LOUNGE
1
DN
EP
E.R.
TE
PANTRY STORAGE
E
MECH 1
E
UP
DN
SP
SP
TELE 2
UP
E
FOCUS
OFAD
OFAD
E
C.8
D
OFAD
OPEN TEAMING
I collaborated with a team of three on the construction documents, including coordination of mechanical, electrical, plumbing, AV and lighting drawings. Additioanlly, I was responsible for the millwork drawings and all enlarged interior elevations and plans, and assisted with the specification of finishes and furniture.
E
IDF
STORAGE
E
FREIGHT LOBBY
E
E
LP
SE
E
E
*36" clearance if this is an electrical panel that needs access
PIN-WHEEL
E
E
F
STORAGE
360
OR PLAN
TELE 1
E
E
UP
SP
DN
E
ELEC 1
E
MECH 2
E
COMMUNICATING STAIR
UP
B.2
OPEN TO ABOVE
DN
BOOTH
ELEVATOR LOBBY
FOCUS
HALF BOOTH
C
PRODUCTION RM
PANTRY
EP
E
JAN
2017-2018 / San Francisco, CA Greg Mottola (Principal-in- Charge), Chris Orsega (Project Manager) Design team collaborators: L.Shah, B.Padgett
EDG
McAllister | 17
165'-0" SLAB EDGE 10" INSIDE INTERIOR GLASS FACE TYP.
164'-2" SLAB EDGE 10" INSIDE INTERIOR GLASS FACE TYP.
UP E
IDF
SP
E
E E
E
E
E.R.
E
TCC SPACE 1,870 SF
E
E
E
E
JAN
E
SE UP
STORAGE
DN
E
PANTRY
PRODUCTION
STORAGE FREIGHT LOBBY
DN
UP
E.R. UP
DN
JAN
E
E
JAN
LP E
SE 1 MECH
EP UP
E
SE
TELE 1
EP
FREIGHT LOBBY FREIGHT LOBBY
E
E
LP
HUDDLE HUDDLE
OFAD
OFAD
E
E
ELEC 1
E
FOCUS
LOCKER AREA LOCKER AREA
FOCUS
FOCUS
E
UP
FOCUS
DN
UP
DN
SP
2.1 E
2
SP
SP
OFAD
TELE 1
OPEN (DEPT) TEAMING
2
E
2
NN SALESFORCE TEST FIT - 45th AND 46TH FLOOR PLAN OPTION 1
OFAD
SALESFORCE TEST TEST FIT FIT -- 45th 45th AND AND 46TH 46TH FLOOR FLOOR PLAN PLAN SALESFORCE OPTION 1
STORAGE
35'-2"
STORAGE
HUDDLE
SERVICE STATION
CBRE SFDT SFDT Workplace Workplace 360 360 CBRE San Francisco, Francisco, California California San
2'-7"
SE
EP
E
1.1
35'-2" SE
SE
FOCUS
EP UP
EP E
E
LP E
E
LP E
DN
FOCUS AV RM FOCUS
E
MECH 1
MECH 1
FOCUS FOCUS
Huddle
Open Team
provided requested
provided requested
provided requested
Occupier, FCG:
28 (28)
0 (0)
7 (8)
1 (2)
2 (2)
.5 (.5)
GWS, PJM, Workplace Data Centers, Leadership:
32 (32)
2 (2)
2 (2)
2 (2)
2 (2)
.5 (.5)
Agency, Retail, IP:
36 (36)
3 (3)
4 (4)
0 (0)
3 (3)
.5 (.5)
Marketing, Research:
12 (10)
0 (0)
2 (2)
2 (2)
1 (1)
1 (1)
DSF, Multi Fam, Ho-
34 (34)
3 (3)
4 (4)
2 (2)
1 (1)
1 (0)
142 (140)
8 (8)
19 (20)
7 (8)
9 (9)
3.5 (2.5)
MED 6-8P
2.1 2
MED 6-8P
2.1
2.1
2
2
OPEN LIQUID (CLIENT) GALAXY TEAMING
LIQUID GALAXY
BOOTH OPEN (CLIENT) TEAMING
BOOTH
FOCUS HALF BOOTH HALF BOOTH
10'-2"
HUDDLE
5'-7 3/8"
10'-2"
1.1
5'-7 3/8"
CORE / MECH / ELEC
1.1
1.1
46th FLOOR AMENITIES / RESTROOMS / PANTRIES PROGRAM DISTRIBUTION by floor:
Focus Booths
3
AV RM
BOOTH
FOCUS
3
MED 6-8P
DN FOCUS
UP
E
1.1
provided requested
35'-2"
5'-7 3/8" FOCUS
JAN MECH 1
45th FLOOR
Focus Rms
5'-7 3/8" 3'-7"
FOCUS
E.R. DN
JAN
E
LP
FREIGHT LOBBY FREIGHT LOBBY
2.9
5'-11 3/4"
OFADs
10'-2"
3'-7" UP
E
E
E
2.9
SP
E.R.
FOCUS
SERVICE STATION
HUDDLE
provided requested
TOTAL: Headcount (156)
CBRE SFDT Workplace 360 San Francisco San Francisco, California
WELLNESS E IT SERVICE IT CENTER FREIGHT SERVICE LOBBY CENTER
HALF BOOTH
1.1
provided requested
3'-0"
3'-0"
OFAD
SERVICE STATION OFAD
PROGRAM DISTRIBUTION by department: Workstations
E
E
HUDDLE
10'-2"
E
SP
E
LIQUID AV RM GALAXY E
OFAD
5'-11 3/4"
N
JAN
WELLNESS
3
2.9
FOCUS
STORAGE
HUDDLE
HALF BOOTH
E
E
E
35'-2" 2'-7" 10'-2"
10'-2"
IT SERVICE CENTER
OPEN (DEPT) TEAMING
TENANT SPACE 6,775 SF
FOCUS
SP
E
E.R.
E
TELE 1
2.1
2.1
FOCUS E
E
E
FOCUS
HALF BOOTH
UP E
WELLNESS
E
DN
E
FOCUS
FOCUS
UP
DN
E
FOCUS UP
FOCUS
HALF BOOTH
E
E
OFAD
E
DN
E
E
LOCKER AREA
HUDDLE
FOCUS
FOCUS E
SERVER
E
FOCUS
UP
SERVER
E
FOCUS
HUDDLE
SP
4
3.9
HUDDLE
SP
E
ELEC 1
E
HUDDLE
TELE 2
TE
SERVER
4 3.9
E
TELE 2
FOCUS
ELEVATOR LOBBY ELEVATOR LOBBY
E
MECH 1
TELE 1
EP
*36" clearance if this is an electrical panel that needs access
DN
MECH 2
TELE 1
MECH 1
RISE PANTRY
ELEC 1MECH 2
OFAD
E
EP STORAGE TE
*36" clearance if this is an electrical panel that needs access
ELEVATOR LOBBY
E
OFAD
DN
3'-7"
STORAGE
TELE 1
SP
COAT STORAGE COAT
RISE PANTRY
E
LP E
E
SP
DN
UP
E
SEP
3
STORAGE
44'-4"
E
SP
EP
E
E
3
2.9
SP
E.R.
3'-7"
HUDDLE
2.9
SP
E
44'-4"
STORAGE
DN
5'-5" TYP
E
E
TCC SPACE TCC 1,870 SF SPACE 1,870 SF
E
E
E
UP
E
HUDDLE
3
2.9
E
MECH 2
OFAD
44'-4"
35'-2"
35'-2"
5'-11 3/4"
5'-11 3/4" 3'-7"
3'-7"
UP
E
DN
HUDDLE
STORAGE
4
165'-0" SLAB EDGE 10" INSIDE INTERIOR GLASS FACE TYP.
DN
E
IDF E
HUDDLE
HUDDLE
HALF BOOTH
TE
VIDEO WALL
OFAD
HUDDLE
3.9
HUDDLE
44'-4"
E
10'-2"
OPEN TEAMING OPEN TEAMING
E
HUDDLE
35'-2"
E
FOCUS
UP
*36" clearance if this is an electrical 8' panel x 13'that needs access
TELE 2
3'-0"
ELEC 1 E
SP
DN
HUDDLE HUDDLE
EP
165'-0" SLAB EDGE 10" INSIDE INTERIOR GLASS 44'-4" FACE TYP.
ELEC 1
IDF
OPEN TEAMING
OFAD OFAD
4
3.9
COAT STORAGE
RISE PANTRY
1'-10"
ELEVATOR LOBBY ELEVATOR LOBBY
E
SP
TE
4 3.9
FOCUS HUDDLE
TELE 2
E
COMMUNICATING STAIR COMMUNICATING STAIR
GUEST PH RM
LARGE 12-14P
RISE LOUNGE
GUEST PH RM
DN
44'-4"
MECHE2
OFAD TELE 2 OFAD OFAD
HEART / RISE LOUNGE
DN
3'-7"
ELEC 12 MECH
LARGE 12-14P LARGE 12-14P
EP
*36" clearance if this is an electrical panel that needs access
HUDDLE
E
EP STORAGE TE
*36" clearance if this is an
PANTRY electrical panel that needs access
GUEST PH RM STORAGE
UP
OPEN TO BELOW
3.9
FOCUS
SPE
PANTRY STORAGE PANTRY
PANTRY
HUDDLE HUDDLE
COMMUNICATING OPEN TO STAIR BELOW
GUEST PH RM
3'-7"
ELEVATOR LOBBY
E
HUDDLE
OFAD
TE
BOOTH
MECH 2
OFAD OFAD
TELE 2
HEART LOUNGE
LARGE 12-14P
4
4.9
4.9
GUEST PH RM
RISE LOUNGE
35'-2"
LARGE 12-14P
EP
*36" clearance if this is an electrical panel that needs access
PRODUCTION RM
HUDDLE
HUDDLE
PANTRY STORAGE
PANTRY
PRODUCTION PRODUCTION RM RM
HUDDLE
E
BOOTH
COMMUNICATING STAIR
MED HUDDLE CONF MED CONF
FOCUS OFAD
DN
COMMUNICATING STAIR MED HUDDLE CONF MED CONF
FOCUS
DN
SERVICE STATION
UP
OPEN TO ABOVE
UP OPEN TO BELOW DN
44'-4"
FOCUS BOOTH
STAIR MED CONF
HEART LOUNGE
10'-2"
FOCUS SERVICE STATION
MED CONF
4.9
GUEST PH RM
4.9
DN
OPEN TO ABOVE COMMUNICATING
6"
3'-0"
HALF BOOTH
4.9
C.86'-4"
CONCIERGE
OPEN LIBRARY
HALF BOOTH
D.8 3'-0"
C.8
B.2
UP
D.8 35'-2"
1'-10"
6'-4"
C.8 6'-4"
FOCUS
3'-0"
D
44'-4"
B.2
CONCIERGE
+36" LANDING
OPEN TO UP ABOVE
C
44'-4"
4.9
UP
OPEN LIBRARY
B
35'-2"
D
6'-4"
SERVICE STATION SERVICE STATION
+36" LANDING
C
4'-0" MIN
B.2
35'-2"
C.8
HALF BOOTH
3'-0"A.2
2'-7"
6'-4"
44'-4"
D.8
C.8
B
SERVICE STATION
44'-4" B.2
D
6'-4"
20'-0" VIDEO WALL
35'-2"
C
A.2
D.8
20'-0" VIDEO WALL
B
35'-2"
B.2
D
6'-4"
D.8
D
C
C.8
C
165'-0" 44'-4" SLAB EDGE 10" INSIDE INTERIOR GLASS FACE TYP.
44'-4"
PRODUCTION
2'-7"A.2
35'-2"
35'-2"
SERVICE STATION
B.2
B 6'-4"
3'-0"
SERVICE STATION SERVICE STATION
44'-4"
35'-2"
B
A.2
D.8
PRODUCTION PRODUCTION
164'-2" 44'-4" SLAB EDGE 10" INSIDE INTERIOR GLASS FACE TYP.
164'-2" SLAB EDGE 10" INSIDE INTERIOR GLASS FACE TYP.
PROGRAM: SUMMARY A.2
D
C
2'-7"
B
44'-4" 164'-2" SLAB EDGE 10" INSIDE INTERIOR GLASS FACE TYP.
A.2
2'-7"
Heart: Rise: Pantry: Board Rm: Large Mtg: Med Mtg: Liquid Galaxy: Library:
1 (46) 1 (46) .5 (45) 1 (46) 1 1 (45) 1 (46) 2 (45) 1 (46) 1 (46) 1 (45)
COLLABORATION / LOUNGE / ASSEMBLY
Workstations: Focus Rms: Booths: OFAD: Huddle: Open Teaming: Files: Lockers:
46 (45) 96 (46) 6 (45) 13 (46) 4 (45) 3 (46) 3 (45) 5 (46) 4 (45) 7 (46) 2 (45) 2 (46)
201 (183 min 223 max) 202 (183 min 223 max)
PROPOSED TCC PROGRAM: Receptions: Pantry: Production: Storage:
2 (2) chairs 1 (1) 1 (1) 1 (1)
Workstations: Huddle: Files:
Production: Storage: Coat Closet: Service Station: Server Rm: IT Service: IDF: Wellness: AV Room: Guest Ph Rms:
.5 (45) 1 (46) 1 (45) 2 (46) 1 (45) 1 (45) 3 (46) 1 (46) 1 (46) 1 (45) 1 (46) 1 (46) 2 (46)
OPEN OFFICE CORE / MECH / ELEC CONFERENCE CORE / MECH / ELEC AMENITIES / RESTROOMS / PANTRIES VERTICAL CIRULATION AMENITIES / RESTROOMS COLLABORATION / LOUNGE/ /PANTRIES ASSEMBLY POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL CORE AREA FOR USE COLLABORATION / LOUNGE / ASSEMBLY OPEN OFFICE NOT IN SCOPE OPEN OFFICE CONFERENCE
CONFERENCE VERTICAL CIRULATION VERTICAL CIRULATION POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL CORE AREA FOR USE POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL CORE AREA FOR USE NOT IN SCOPE NOT IN SCOPE
12 (10) 2 (2) 60 (60)
SALESFORCE Bohlin Cywinski Jackson October 27, 2016
SALESFORCE SALESFORCE October27, 27,2016 2016 October
McAllister | 19
OWNER
101 California Street, 44th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Architect
49 Geary Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94108 v: 415.989.2100 f: 415.989.2101 www.bcj.com Acoustics | Charles M. Salter & Associates 130 Sutter St., Ste 500 San Francisco, CA 94104 415.397.0454
LINE OF WALL PROVIDE CONT WALL STRAPPING AT LOCATIONS REQ'D FOR MOUNTING OF CABINETS, TYP; SEE SPECS FOR DETAILS
3/4" MDF OR PLYWD W/ FINISH ON ALL EXPOSED SURFACES, SEE ELEVS FOR FINISH
AV Integrator | CCS 3331 Jack Northrop Ave Hawthorne, CA 90250 424.675.2600 Life Safety | The Fire Consultants 1981 N. Broadway, Ste. 400 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 925.979.9993 Lighting | Niteo 62 Kissling Street San Francisco, CA 94103 415.416.8498
3/4" MDF OR PLYWD W/ FINISH ON ALL EXPOSED SURFACES, SEE ELEVS FOR FINISH
MEP | Amit Wadhwa & Associates 870 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94102 415.788.9999
1 A722
POWER RECEPTACLE WHERE OCCURS
SEE ELEVS FOR COUNTER AND BACKSPLASH FINISHES
BACKSPLASH WHERE OCCURS TO MATCH COUNTER SURFACE, REFER TO ELEVATIONS
4"
REFER TO ELEVATIONS
SEE ELEVS FOR COUNTER AND BACKSPLASH FINISHES
Key Plan
MISSION STREET SUGATSUNE PULL, TYP
EQ
N
Seal
SEE ELEVS FOR BASE FINISH
4"
4"
EQ
3/4" MDF OR PLYWD W/ FINISH ON ALL EXPOSED SURFACES, SEE ELEVS FOR FINISH
EQ
REFER TO ELEVATIONS
3/4" MDF ADJUSTABLE SHELVES
REFER TO ELEVATIONS
REFER TO ELEVATIONS
5' - 1 1/16"
SEE ELEVS FOR COUNTER AND BACKSPLASH FINISHES
SUGATSUNE PULL, TYP
SEE ELEVS FOR BASE FINISH
General Contractor | BCCI Construction Laith Assaf, Project Manager 1160 Battery Street, Suite 250 San Francisco, CA 94111 415.817.5100
BACKSPLASH WHERE OCCURS TO MATCH COUNTER SURFACE, REFER TO ELEVATIONS
1ST STREET
BASE CABINET BELOW
Structural | Eckersley O'Callaghan & Partners 450 Geary Street, Suite 500 San Francisco, CA 94102 415.691.1671
SEE ELEVS FOR WALL FINISH POWER RECEPTACLE WHERE OCCURS
POWER RECEPTACLE WHERE OCCURS
1 1/2"
BASE CABINET BELOW
SEE ELEVS FOR WALL FINISH
EQ
SEE ELEVS FOR WALL FINISH
SEE ELEVS FOR WALL FINISH
8"
SEE ELEVS FOR WALL FINISH
REFER TO PLANS
REFER TO PLANS
REFER TO PLANS
4"
CONTINUOUS LIGHT FIXTURE MOUNTED TO SHELF. LOCATE DRIVER REMOTELY IN CLOSED CABINETS, SED
8"
CONTINUOUS LIGHT FIXTURE MOUNTED TO SHELF. LOCATE DRIVER REMOTELY IN CLOSED CABINETS, SED
8"
1 A722
Low-Voltage & Security Syska Hennessy Group, Inc. 800 Corporate Pointe, Ste 200 Culver City, CA 90230 310.312.0200
FREMONT STREET
REFER TO ELEVATIONS
LINE OF WALL PROVIDE CONT WALL STRAPPING AT LOCATIONS REQ'D FOR MOUNTING OF CABINETS, TYP; SEE SPECS FOR DETAILS
SEE ELEVS FOR BASE FINISH
SECTION THRU TYP CASEWORK TYPE F
2' - 9 1/4"
3/4" MDF OR PLYWD W/ FINISH ON ALL EXPOSED SURFACES, SEE ELEVS FOR FINISH
INSULATION AT WASTE AND SUPPLY LINES, TYP
2 1/4"
EQ
SECTION THRU TYP CASEWORK TYPE C 2 A720 SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" / BANQUETTE
WD-1 AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF COUNTER
3 A704
EQ
8 A720
3' - 1 1/2"
SECTION THRU TYP CASEWORK TYPE A2 (RISE BAR)
1 A720
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"
SECTION THRU TYP CASEWORK TYPE A SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" RISE BAR COUNTER - NORTH ELEVATION 7 A704
415.416.8498
SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"
A720
Low-Voltage & Security Syska Hennessy Group, Inc. 800 Corporate Pointe, Ste 200 Culver City, CA 90230 310.312.0200
MEP | Amit Wadhwa & Associates 870 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94102 415.788.9999
1' - 3"
2 1/4"
Structural | Eckersley O'Callaghan & Partners 450 Geary Street, Suite 500 San Francisco, CA 94102 415.691.1671 WD-1 AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF COUNTER AND END SURROUND
POWER/DATA OUTLET MOUNTED FLUSH W/ FACE OF MILLWORK
WD-1 AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF COUNTER AND END SURROUND 4 A704
PL-3
PL-3
3' - 0"
3' - 6"
2 1/4"
8 A704
General Contractor | BCCI Construction Laith Assaf, Project Manager 1160 Battery Street, Suite 250 San Francisco, CA 94111 415.817.5100
Key Plan
WD-1 WITH 2" PLANKS ALONG VERTICAL SURFACES AT UNDERSIDE OF COUNTER
3' - 2"
EQ
3' - 1 7/16"
FREMONT STREET
1ST STREET
1/4"
3' - 0"
3' - 0"
3' - 6"
MISSION STREET
1/4"
J-BOX IN RAISED ACCESS FLOOR
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
TYPICAL CASEWORK SECTIONS
EQ
SECTION THRU TYP CASEWORK TYPE B 9 A720 SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" RISE COUNTER/BANQUETTE - NORTHEAST ELEVATION
CBRE
101 California Street, 44th Floor SALESFORCE San Francisco, CA 94111 TOWER 415 MISSION STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 Architect
49 Geary Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94108 v: 415.989.2100 f: 415.989.2101 www.bcj.com INSULATION AT WASTE Acoustics | Charles M. Salter & Associates AND SUPPLY LINES, 130 Sutter St., Ste 500 TYP San Francisco, CA 94104 415.397.0454 TOE KICK AV Integrator | CCS INTEGRATED INTO 3331 Jack Northrop Ave CABINET DOOR TO Hawthorne, CA 90250 ALLOW FOR ADA 424.675.2600 Scale 1 1/2" = 1'-0" CLEARANCE Life Safety Date | The Fire Consultants OCTOBER 6, 2017 1981 N. Broadway, Ste. 400 WalnutBCJ Creek, CANumber 94596 Project 16517A 925.979.9993 Drawn by LS Lighting | Niteo 62 Kissling Street Checked by CGO San Francisco, CA 94103
8" MIN
6"
1/4"
1/4"
J-BOX IN RAISED ACCESS FLOOR SECTION THRU TYP CASEWORK TYPE D 5 A720 SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" SECTION DETAIL AT RISE COUNTER 4 A704 SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
Date
OWNER
ACCESSIBLE CLR SPACE UNDER LAV
8 A704
TOE KICK INTEGRATED INTO CABINET DOOR TO ALLOW FOR ADA CLEARANCE
9" MIN
SEE ELEVS FOR BASE FINISH
PL-3 8" MIN
ACCESSIBLE CLR SPACE UNDER LAV
FULLY UPHOLSTERED SEAT AND BACK CUSHIONS, U-7
SUGATSUNE PULL, TYP
4"
WD-1
SCHEDULED EQUIPMENT
3/4" MDF OR PLYWD W/ FINISH ON ALL EXPOSED SURFACES, SEE ELEVS FOR FINISH WD-1 AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF COUNTER AND END SURROUND
SUGATSUNE PULL, TYP
SEE ELEVS FOR BASE FINISH
4"
1' - 3"
SEE ELEVS FOR BASE FINISH
3' - 6"
1' - 11"
3 1/2"
3/4" MDF OR PLYWD W/ FINISH ON ALL EXPOSED SURFACES, SEE ELEVS FOR FINISH WD-1 AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES,
8" MIN
3/4" MDF ADJUSTABLE 4 SHELVES A704
PL-3
REFER TO ELEVATIONS
3"
2' - 10"
1' - 8" 3/4" MDF OR PLYWD W/ FINISH ON ALL EXPOSED SURFACES, SEE ELEVS FOR FINISH
1' - 9"
SUGATSUNE PULL, TYP
Description
ADA ACCESSIBLE SINK AND FAUCET WHERE OCCURS, SPD SEE ELEVS FOR COUNTER AND BACKSPLASH FINISHES
SEE ELEVS FOR COUNTER AND BACKSPLASH FINISHES
SEE ELEVS FOR COUNTER AND BACKSPLASH FINISHES
SEE ELEVS FOR COUNTER AND WD-1 AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES BACKSPLASH OF END SURROUND FINISHES
SUGATSUNE PULL, TYP
2"
BACKSPLASH WHERE WD-1 AT ALL OCCURS TO MATCH EXPOSED EDGES OF COUNTER SURFACE, COUNTER REFER TO ELEVATIONS
Revisions No.
BACKSPLASH WHERE OCCURS TO MATCH COUNTER SURFACE , REFER TO ELEVATIONS
REFER TO PLANS
TILE BACKSPLASH
2' - 10"
1' - 3"
8"
2 1/4"
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
ADA ACCESSIBLE SINK AND FAUCET WHERE OCCURS, SPD
EQ
BACKSPLASH WHERE OCCURS TO MATCH COUNTER SURFACE, REFER TO ELEVATIONS
4"
2"
2' - 0"
TRC RECEPTACLE, REFER TO ELEVATIONS
5 1/2" 1 1/2"
4"
8"
SEE ELEVS FOR COUNTER AND BACKSPLASH FINISHES
FULLY UPHOLSTERED SEAT AND BACK CUSHIONS, U-7
8"
OUTLET MOUNTED FLUSH W/ FACE OF MILLWORK
EQ
POWER RECEPTACLE WHERE OCCURS
SECTION THRU TYP CASEWORK TYPE E
4 A720
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
REFER TO PLANS
SEE ELEVS FOR WALL FINISH
POWER RECEPTACLE WHERE OCCURS
4"
BACKSPLASH WHERE OCCURS TO MATCH COUNTER SURFACE, REFER TO ELEVATIONS
12/5/2017 11:22:52 PM
3 A720
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
SEE ELEVS FOR WALL FINISH
POWER RECEPTACLE WHERE OCCURS
OUTLET MOUNTED FLUSH W/ FACE OF MILLWORK
SECTION THRU TYP CASEWORK TYPE G
REFER TO PLANS SEE ELEVS FOR WALL FINISH
WD-1 AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES
7 A720
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
4"
REFER TO PLANS
SECTION THRU TYP CASEWORK TYPE H
2' - 10"
6 A720
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
9" MIN
SECTION THRU TYP CASEWORK TYPE I
2' - 10"
10 A720
N
EQ Seal
8 A704
SECTION DETAIL AT RISE COUNTER SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
6 A704
RISE COUNTER - SOUTH ELEVATION
2 A704
SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"
8 A704
6' - 9 3/4"
RISE COUNTER - SOUTH EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"
A704 7
Revisions No.
145.00 째
째 .00 90
Description
Date
A704
3' - 6"
3
17 ' - 0"
215.00 째
4 A704
9' - 7 1/2"
CBRE
6
SALESFORCE TOWER
A704
415 MISSION STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
2
14 ' - 0"
9 1/ 2"
A704
Date
1' -
3" 5 1/ 4"
RISE TABLE MILLWORK DETAILS Scale
1' -
1' -
0째 45.0
As indicated OCTOBER 6, 2017
BCJ Project Number
12/5/2017 11:22:17 PM
5 A704
RISE COUNTER AXON SCALE:
1 A704
LEVEL 46 ENLARGED PLAN AT RISE COUNTER SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"
16517A LS
Drawn by
CGO
Checked by
A704
McAllister | 21
Aspen Residence [Bohlin Cywinski Jackson] Tucked into a hillside, this private residence is a series of volumes strung along a glass enclosed walkway. In an effort to meet the strict zoning guidelines regarding the preservation of views, the house utilizes the topography to appear as merely a scattering of small pavilions from the road. Further down the hillside, the volumes open up to great views. Retaining walls clad in stone cut into the hillside, providing a grounding element for the otherwise airy, transparent rooms. I collaborated on this project with a team of four, and was responsible for general coordination and drafting of the elevations and sections, as well as material specification. 2016 / Aspen, CO Karl Backus (Principal-in- Charge), Chris Moore (Project Manager) Design team collaborators: D. Yoder, N. Backal
McAllister | 23
Mayan Workshop: Universidad de Otoch In Cancún, social housing developments are challenged by the seasonal economic swings and the perpetual migration of residents to and from their more rural indigenous communities. To combat these issues, as well as a general lack of identity and sense of local culture in Cancún, we propose building a new kind of school: a university devoted to indigenous culture that is distributed in small, formerly abandoned sites throughout the neighborhood of Villas Otoch. In Mayan, “otoch” means home, and Universidad de Otoch envisions a university rising out of the home and empowering residents with a means to pass on and sustain indigenous knowledge. We began our design process with an investigation of the existing houses, both in Villas Otoch and in older Yucatan villages where many of the residents originate. We found simple ways to renovate the Cancun houses to increase liveable, shaded, communal outdoor space to better support and foster community traditions. The protypes also scale up to accomodate classrooms, and other university facilities, such as teaching kitchens, a business incubator, pop-up corner stores, and craft studios. Spring 2015 / Mexico / Critic: Tatiana Bilbao collaboration with Meghan Lewis
McAllister | 25
VILLAS OTOCH / URBAN CONTEXT
VILLAS OTOCH
20
10 km
Thousand
Population
1.12 km2
CANCUN
Size
6,562 Dwellings
Villas Otoch
58.41
Dwellings per Hectare
Density
23% of Dwellings
Vacancy
CANCUN HOTEL ZONE
ABOVE: SITE ANALYSIS, EXISTING CONDITIONS RIGHT: MASTER PLAN, PROPOSED
McAllister | 27
LIVE/ WORK / TEACH HOUSING
NEW PEDESTRIAN NET WORK
INDIGENOUS UNIVERSIT Y PROGRAM
EXISTING URBAN FABRIC
EMBEDDED CULTURAL KNOWLEDGE
CONCEPT MODEL
McAllister | 29
MIGRANT HOMETOWNS BLOCK Vallidolid T/YPICAL IzamalTypical Block
2x
More Yard
2x MORE OUTDOOR SPACE
VILLAS OTOCH T YPICAL BLOCK
Villas Otoch - Typical Block
2.5x More Pave 2.5 x MORE PAVEMENT
Top: Chichimila, Yucatan, Mexico; uncovering earth oven during rain ceremony. Photo by MacDuff Everton, c. 1975. Bottom: Preparing food for a Mayan wedding in an unfinished house in Cancun. Photo by MacDuff Everton, 2005.
Vallidolid / Izamal- Typical Block
2x
More Yard
EXISTING UNIT
ADAPTATION A
ADAPTATION B
9 m2
20 m2
22 m2
60 m2
OUTDOOR SPACE
OUTDOOR SPACE
OUTDOOR SPACE
OUTDOOR SPACE
ADAPTATION C
+ STORE AND CLASSROOM
McAllister | 31
TYPICAL BLOCK: AS PLANNED BY DEVELOPER
TYPICAL BLOCK: ACTUAL CONDITIONS (gray = vacancy)
TYPICAL BLOCK: PROPOSED
McAllister | 33
McAllister | 35
McAllister | 37
McAllister | 39
Musical Instrument Museum The tension between musical instruments as beautiful objects for display versus machines for producing sound comes alive in this new museum for Yale’s Collection of Musical Instruments. Two circulation systems with different speeds and lighting conditions allow brighter performance spaces to be threaded between more dimly -lit exhibit rooms. At the urban scale, the new museum is porous at ground-level, acting as a new gateway where the cross-campus green interfaces with the city. New Haven, CT / Fall 2014 / Critic: John Patkau
McAllister | 41
McAllister | 43
4
Level 2
5
3
A B
C D
Music Campus Master Plan
A. Graduate Student Housing B. Practice and Study Rooms C. Musical Instrument Museum D. Museum Support/ Loading
McAllister | 45
McAllister | 47
Olympic Harbor While creating housing for the 2024 Olympic Games in the short term, this New Olympic Harbor will also provide Boston with a smaller scale, working waterfront- an alternative to the new high-rises in the adjacent Seaport District. Strips of unique housing typologies modulate scales between the convention center to the water and from South Boston to the Seaport District. The western two blocks are raised on podiums, which allows for a coexistence of two public surfaces- a commercial zone at grade and an upper level public green network that can be kept secure during the Olympic Games. A series of canals and pedestrian greenways tie all of the blocks together offering dynamic views of the waterfront. A linear recreational park along 1st St offers amenities for South Boston, and restores an axial connection to Pleasure Bay. Spring 2014 / Boston / Critic: Alan Plattus collaboration with PJ Nakamura
McAllister | 49
McAllister | 51
McAllister | 53
McAllister | 55
McAllister | 57
CASIS Headquarters (Center for Advancement of Science in Space) A diagonal urban pathway draws pedestrians from the water taxi terminal through the building and toward downtown Manhattan. This path essentially divides the building into two: an administrative building and a conference center. Articulated as a ribbon, the public sequence ties the two buildings back together. Beginning with a theater in the conference center, the public ribbon guides visitors past the payload control center, and then delivers them to a rooftop gallery where they can watch scientists working on the suspended space capsule with a view back to the park and river just beyond. Fall 2013 / New York, NY / Critic: Joel Sanders
McAllister | 59
McAllister | 61
EAST RIVER
FDR DRIVE
1ST AVENUE
WATER TAXI TERMINAL
38TH ST
McAllister | 63
PAYLOAD CONTROL
OFFICES GALLERY
LOBBY
LECTURE HALLS
EVENT SPACE
McAllister | 65
Narrow Lot Prototype This prototype for a single-family residence used the topography of the site to create a split-level house. The public spaces flow continuously on the ground level with the slope of the site. Two upper level ribbons contain bedrooms and bathrooms and can be offset further vertically or horizontally depending on programmatic needs, zoning, and the given site topography. The ribbons interlock around a central light well, which brings light down the kitchen, which is conceived as the symbolic and programmatic center of the home. Spring 2013 / New Haven / Critic: Joeb Moore
McAllister | 67
Left page: Precedent Study :MVRDV Borneo-Sporenborg Right: Concept Axon and model
McAllister | 69
McAllister | 71
Bi-Nuclear House This bi-nuclear design encloses the private program, bedrooms and bathrooms, into two volumes that float within a continuous communal space. A two-story light well brings daylight through the center of the house. The private volumes each contain their own bathroom, which increases privacy and flexibility for the bedroom configuration. When replicated as a prototype, these volumes could also increase in length to accommodate additional rooms. The zoning code allows for the public space to flow into a partial third floor play space on top of the rear bedrooms. Spring 2013 / New Haven / collaboration with K. Bizycowski, B. Hancock, M. Cohen, J. Lee, J. Okai
McAllister | 73
McAllister | 75
McAllister | 77
Vlock Building Project After the house design was selected, I collaborated with a small team to design the envelope details, including siding, window, trim and soffit specifications. Over the summer, I worked as one of fourteen interns that completed the construction of the house. I was involved with the framing, siding, flooring, and tiling, as well as installing the trim and soffits. Summer 2013 / New Haven / advisor: Adam Hopfner Envelope detail partners: J. Penniman, M.H. Lee, A. Su
construction + fabrication | 79
The Chair My chair project explored the lyrical figure of the contiuous line. After a series of wire study models, I made a full-scale mockup for the mid-review. The frame is constructed out of 3/4� diameter steel tube on a tube bender using a 3� radius die. The leather is then dyed and riveted to the steel frame. Overall, the chair is lightweight and produces little material waste. Spring 2015 / Instructor: Timothy Newton
Reclaiming Industrial Hamburg In conjunction with HafenCity’s University of the Neighborhood Project, we indentified a series of sites that could be reclaimed through recreation in a postindustrial and largely immigrant neighborhood. We took each site and “re - designed” the game of soccer to fit each circumstance. Soccer then became a way to bring the community together, cross language barriers, and gain new agency over the spaces of the neighborhood. We designed graphics to explain the new rules, and organized a soccer tournament in which a wide variety of community members participated.
2010 / Hamburg / collaboration with: L. Grellmann, A. Courtot, I. Hurducas, M.Lendzinski, H. Vollmer
McAllister | 85
McAllister | 87
I wish our block had... As one of the Community Engagement Coordinators for the Yale Building Project, I organized and ran an event to bring the community together on the block where we were planning to build. The purpose of the event was to brainstorm and understand the block through a mapping project. Multiple stations allowed residents to tag largescale maps with their ideas, memories, interpretations of the block. The project brought community members together to visually discuss initiatives to reclaim vacant/ abandoned spaces in Newhallville. Additionally, it allowed students to better understand the socio-spatial dynamic of the neighborhood and site. Spring 2013 / New Haven / collaboration with Hiba Bhatty
McAllister | 89
Community Pool
Marion Anderson Recreation Center
Catharine Street
pop-up stores
Better Blocks Philly Better Blocks Philly was a community-driven design demonstration project that took place during Design Philadelphia in 2011. The project engaged residents, artists and designers in creating a living/functioning exhibit of “Complete Street� concepts, with temporary traffic calming and streetscape installations, as well as pop-up shops and community events.
mid-block crossing
parklet
bumpouts chicane
Webster Street
I collaborated with the designers at Brown & Keener Urban Design, WRT and the South of South Neighborhood Association to develop the design, coordinate material donations, produce website content, and install the Christian Street interventions.
1801
1701
Wallace Roberts & Todd ( WRT ) Brown & Keener Urban Design
YMCA Annex
YMCA
S. 17th Street
South of South Neighborhood Association
S. 18th Street
2011 / Philadelphia / collaboration with:
Edwin M. Stanton School
McAllister | 91
Perspecta 50 As income inequality and urbanization reach record levels, our cities are increasingly divided. Often materialized through architecture, boundaries define communities for social, cultural, geo-political and economic purposes. Typically visualized as walls, fences, and security infrastructure, this condition is familiar and often understood as linear and binary: separating one entity from the other. However, Perspecta 50 seeks to investigate divides as a wider mechanism of global urbanism, and one that is more spatially and socially complex. As co-editor of this 50th issue of the Yale Architecture Journal, I coordinated the publication from the initial topic proposal through production. This included soliciting authors, editing twenty-four essays, and collaborating with graphic designers on both a website and the book layout. 2014-2017 / Published by MIT Press co - edited with Mahdi Sabbagh
McAllister | 93
Device: security checkpoint Location: New York City
Photograph by Craig Rosman
Sections of Wall Street are secured using automatic traffic barriers.
Device: security checkpoint Location: Nicosia
Photograph by Gérard Janot
From this security barrier and platform on the Greek Cypriot side of Nicosia, pedestrians can look beyond the UN-administered Green Line.
Type: enclave Device: ornament Location: Buzescu
Photograph by Andreea Cojocaru
In this Romanian town, gypsy communities employ architectural motifs of extravagance to symbolize and assert their identity and newfound wealth.
Type: enclave Device: mural Location: Belfast
Photograph by Meghan McAllister
Device: security checkpoint Location: Berlin
Public domain
Security infrastructure at Checkpoint Charlie is preserved to memorialize the historic divide.
Type: enclave Device: gate, ornament Location: San Francisco
Photograph by Meghan McAllister
An ornamented gate celebrates the threshold to Chinatown in San Francisco.
Type: enclave Device: signage Location: New York City
Photograph by Mahdi Sabbagh
Once ostracized, the Italian immigrants in this enclave now use symbols of their cultural heritage to assert their identity and to attract tourists.
Device: mural Location: Detroit
Photograph by Meghan Lewis
Type: upscale housing Location: New York City
Photograph by Mahdi Sabbagh
Like other luxury buildings in Manhattan, the Plaza Hotel boasts a driveway, awning and doormen, reinforcing its exclusivity.
Device: poor door Location: London
Public domain
This London apartment building is designed with two entrances, one for the wealthy residents and one for the tenants of affordable units.
Type: affordable housing Device: infrastructure Location: New York City
Photograph by Mahdi Sabbagh
A public housing project in Manhattanville abuts an elevated rail line and the new campus expansion of Columbia University.
Device: wall Location: Nogales
Photograph by Peggy Deamer
Type: affordable housing, enclave Device: gate, ornament Location: San Francisco
Photograph by Meghan McAllister
With an ornamental gate at its center, the Ping Yuen public housing complex in Chinatown uses distinct architectural ornamentation to identify with its projected population.
Device: gate Location: Dheisheh refugee camp
Photograph by Mahdi Sabbagh
A former gate to the camp is preserved as a memorial to its fenced past when the turnstile acted as the camp’s sole entry.
Type: informal settlement Device: topography, infrastructure Location: Jakarta
Photograph by Andy Sternad
Threatened by rising sea levels, informal settlements cluster along the water, while wealthier neighborhoods seek higher ground.
Device: railway, park Location: New York
Photograph by Mahdi Sabbagh
Images from co-edited, crowdsourced photo An inner-city enclave asserts its ethno-political association in a mural, rendering others unwelcome.
A neighborhood in Detroit paints a mural to create identity and community in hopes of breathing life back into the dilapidated area.
A metal wall marks the U.S.-Mexican border, regardless of natural topographic conditions.
The Highline, an iconic railroad-turned-park, still cuts through Manhattan, but now leaves wealth and gentrification along its path.
essay, “Evidence: Visualizing Urban Divides,” and corresponding installation in San Francisco, Feb 2018.
McAllister | 95
Container Gaza
Railways and Airways
Timeless Gaza In Gaza, the inevitable processes of urbanism, such as growth and expansion as well as depopulation and decay, do not follow a linear timeline. Gaza is “developing” in a container that fluctuates based on artificially imposed variations in border control, siege, war and ceasefire.Yet, Gaza was once at the center of many networks. This study proposes a temporal collapsing of Gaza’s past connectedness with its future potential. Through a cartographic illustration of the trade and commerce routes that have shaped Gaza historically, we suggest a different reading of the enclave, one that helps imagine a new spatial configuration and economy that might inform Gaza’s future liberation. 2018 / forthcoming in Open Gaza, published by Terreform, ed. V. Rao, D. Sharp, M. Sorkin / co - authored with Mahdi Sabbagh
Roads and unpaved paths
Waterways
McAllister | 97
Mexican Social Housing: Promises Revisited This book is a compilation of the projects developed at the Yale School of Architecture in Tatiana Bilbao’s advanced studio on social housing in Mexico. The book was developed in conjunction with the INFONAVIT (Institute of the National Fund for Worker’s Housing). In response to the aggravating abandonment rates in Mexican social housing complexes, the studio aimed to address this issue as well as the housing deficit. The studio’s focal point was to understand the specific environmental conditions each of the chosen case study housing complexes, and to cast a proposal that could architecturally reintegrate these spaces and transform them into a positive catalyst for its surroundings. The book features a general introduction of the problem and thematic of the studio, and a chapter for each of the projects: Monterrey, Tijuana, Ciudad Juarez, Guadalajara, and Cancun. During my internship with Tatiana Bilbao Estudio, I worked the text and diagrams for the introductory chapter. I also collaborated on adapting the studio projects into legible narratives for a book format, while coordinating with outside graphic designers.
Mexican Social Housing: Promises Revisited
I. Introduction
Background on Social Housing in México by Tatiana Bilbao Estudio
collaboration with Tatiana Bilbao Estudio
profit. They were essentially guaranteed to sell the houses because so many first-time home buyers were entering the market with their INFONAVIT credits, and they could not yet comprehend the consequences of living in these remote locations. Additionally, NAFTA enabled foreign investment banks to lend large sums of
Pani-designed project, Nonoalco-Tlatelolco, was built, and it was over ten times the size, with 11,960 units in total. Despite the growing size of these projects, the percentage of housing built with state support was notably low. In the 1960s, the total housing stock increased by 18 percent, but only 0.42 percent received state support.7
money to Mexican construction companies, a move which helped to expedite the rate of construction. Thus, both the supply and demand for these new and inexpensive homes began to skyrocket. These new neighborhoods are typically all single-family houses, but, nevertheless, they can reach the capacities of some of the high-rise complexes built a few decades earlier. For example, San Buenaventura, built in 1995, has more than 20,000 single-family homes.
In the 1960s, the constant demand for low-income housing caused a large amount of poor families to build their own homes on an incremental, ad hoc basis. These private interventions led to significant growth in the suburbs, many of which had no services, particularly in the periphery of México City. Beginning in the 1960s, the federal government gave assistance to these self-built neighborhoods by providing urban planning and infrastructure. Located on the northeastern edge of México City in the State of México, the municipality of Nezahualcóyotl, or Neza, is an example of these self-built neighborhoods that began urbanizing in late 1950s. Now its own municipality of 1.1 million, Neza had been for decades notorious for its subpar community services.
“To encounter these developments by land, by air, or even via satellite imagery, evokes a rare sensation. These are not the neighborhoods of a “Home Sweet Home” dream fulfilled, but are ubiquitous grids of ecological and social intervention on a scale and of consequences that are difficult to grasp. In these places, urbanization is reduced to the mere construction of housing.” Livia Corona Benjamin, Two Million Houses, 2014.1
how can new developments learn from more successful social housing of the past? Social housing policy in México has a long and complex history. When México’s first constitution was written, in 1917, it included a clause that required companies that employed more than one hundred workers to provide “comfortable and hygienic living.”5 But as a young, modernizing nation, very few companies in Mexico had the means to fulfill this requirement.
There are more than 35.6 million homes in México, and an estimated 4.9 million are vacant.2 Yet, nine million households still need adequate housing.3 How is this possible? Over the past two decades, politicians have pledged to build millions of homes, assured that the free market would work to solve the housing deficit. Developers rapidly built affordable single-family homes to meet market demand. At first, it seemed to succeed—at least numerically: 2,350,000 houses were built between 2001 and 2006.4 However, these new housing developments suffered from severe problems in terms of location, infrastructure, access to employment, community services, social identity, and architectural quality. Consequently, many residents have left these developments in search of better housing opportunities, and, currently, nearly 14 percent lie abandoned. How did such an impressive story of social housing construction turn out to be such an urban and social failure? How can these developments be improved, and
In 1932, one of the first worker housing developments, Colonia Balbuena, designed by architect Juan Legarreta, was completed. Of the 108 units constructed, most were single-family houses. However, the development also included some duplexes, with commercial space on the ground floor. From 1940 to 1950, México began transitioning from a largely rural society to an urban society. This transition, combined with the creation, in 1943, of the iMSS, or the Mexican Social Security Institute, led to a boom in the construction of social housing in urban areas. Architects such as Juan O’Gorman, Mario Pani, and Pedro Vazquez designed Modernist projects that embraced ideas of construction standardization, simple form, open space, and ample light.
20
2017 / Published by Actar
The following decades saw social housing developments continually grow in size and scope. One of the first high-rise complexes, the Miguel Alemán housing project, designed by Mario Pani, was completed in 1948. Originally planned for two hundred units, it ended up including 1,008 units.8 From 1958 to 1964, another
In 2000, President Vicente Fox publicly promised to give three million credit-loans for new houses in México. He increased the funding for INFONAVIT, and 2,350,000 houses were built by the end of his term. Fox’s successor, Felipe Calderon, oversaw the issuance of three million more INFONAVIT mortgages. By 2010, however, the high abandonment rates of these neighborhoods began to become apparent.
In 1972, a law was passed to create a national housing fund and establish INFONAVIT to administer the fund. This law significantly changed the market for social housing. All employers were now required to contribute 5 percent of their workers’ salaries to the fund,8 and workers were given the opportunity to get a home loan with credits administered by INFONAVIT. This law also enabled national compliance with the original constitutional law regarding workers’ right to housing. In September 1985, a severe earthquake struck México City, and many social housing units were severely damaged. Pani’s Tlatelolco was a scene of major destruction. A few of its high-rise towers were completely destroyed, and photos documenting their collapse have become iconic. The earthquake’s impact may have contributed to a general fear in México City of highrise social housing and, along with other social and economic factors, influenced a shift in the general public to favor low-rise, single-family housing. The 1990s marked both a boom in social housing production as well as a shift in the type of developments being built. In 1992, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was signed, and President Carlos Salinas de Gortari approved a constitutional amendment allowing communally owned farmland (ejidos) to be bought and sold. Developers quickly began to buy up this land at very low prices. They were able to use the cheap land, mostly located on urban peripheries, for building social housing at a high
Top: Centro Urbano Nonoalco Tlatelolco, built in 1960’s, designed by Mario Pani Left: San Buenaventura, built in 1995, 20,000 units, unknown architect
21
McAllister | 99
Mexican Social Housing: Promises Revisited
I. Introduction
1992
1930
NAFTA is signed, and President Carlos Salinas de Gortari approves a constitutional amendment allowing ejido lands to be bought and sold. Developers quickly begin buying up this land on urban peripheries for low prices.
Former Hacienda property distributed as communally-owned land for farming, called ejidos.
1972
1932-34 Viviendas Col. Balbuena Architect: Juan Legarreta 108 units
1943
Creation of Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS)
1958-1964
Centro Urbano Nonoalco Tlatelolco Architect: Mario Pani 11,960 units
Unidad Habitacional El Rosario Architects: Pedro Ramírez Vázquez and Teodoro González de León 17, 263 units
1995
Creation of INFONAVIT
Centro Urbano San Buenaventura No architect involved 20,000 units
1985
Earthquake destroys a signifcant amount of social housing in México City.
2000-2006
President Vicente Fox promises two million new homes for México. By the end of his term 2,350,000 houses are built.
1949
Multifamiliar Presidente Miguel Alemán Architect: Mario Pani 1,080 units
1928 Narkomfin social condenser by Moisei Ginzburg 1927 Werkbundsiedlung by Mies van der Rohe
1958 Levittown, Pennsylvania planned community 1957 Interbau building exhibition 1956 Pruitt-Igoe by Minoru Yamasaki 22
1986 Bushwick Houses II
2003 Quinta Monroy by Elemental
1972 Robin Hood Gardens by Peter and Alison Smithson
1997 Verbena Heights
23
Mexican Social Housing: Promises Revisited
I. Introduction
Viviendas Col. Balbuena Juan Legarreta 1933 108 Units
Multifamiliar Presidente Miguel Alemán Mario Pani 1949 108 Units
Independencia A. Prieto Posadas and J.M. Gutiérrez 1959-1960 2,235 Units
Tlatelolco Mario Pani 1964 11,960 Units
El Rosario P. R. Vázquez and T. González de León 1972 15,515 Units
Location within México City
Location within México City
Location within México City
Location within México City
Location within México City
100m 0m
Site plan
Services on site Garden Playground Day care
100m 300m
1 km 12 minute walk
0m
Site plan
100m
1 km 12 minute walk
Services on site Swimming pool Dressing rooms and restrooms Day-care center Administrative building Post office Commercial store School for 600 students
100m 300m
300m
0m
300m
Site plan
1 km 12 minute walk
Services on site 7 educational institutions 3 shopping centers 2 theaters Movie theater Sports center Library Health clinic 24
1 km 12 minute walk
Services on site 21 schools 6 hospitals and clinics 12 office buildings 600 commercial permises 3 sport centers 3 theaters Movie theater 6 parking garages
Location within México City
100m
0m
Site plan
Centro Urbano San Buenaventura INFONAVIT 1995-Present 20,000 Units
0m
Site plan
Services on site No
100m 0m 300m
300m
1 km 12 minute walk
Site plan
1 km 12 minute walk
Services on site 3 markets 2 parks 21 schools 7 sports facilities Supermarket built in 2006
25
McAllister | 101
Portal 9: Make No Small Plans
Act of Cr
A Beirut-based publication, Portal 9 pursues stories and critical writing about the city. This essay was developed specifically for the journal as part of a series on infrastructure projects in the Middle East and the professionals (architects, planners, engineers) responsible for them. The largest engineering project ever built, Saudi Arabia’s Industrial Cities of Yanbu and Jubail are the focus of the article. Through interviews and archival texts, my co-author and I uncover the story behind the Yanbu master plan prepared by Skidmore, Owings, and Merrill, while analyzing the resulting cities today and the claims made by the local politicians and corporations. Many documents illustrate the cities as central to a national economic development plan, while also revealing it as an experiment of social engineering. Related to wellknown criticism of the “tabula rasa” masterplan, we ultimately question whether a vibrant city could ever be built from scratch - especially when the city itself was conceived merely as oil infrastructure. 2015 / forthcoming in Portal 9 published by Solidere co - authored with Jason Kurzweil
At their of of architec again work poured ov draw plans rise from t ly 8,000 m trial city,” Jubail, on to become diversified for the Kin the public connected diameter p a modern cities woul largest eng
Yanbu and Jubail are located on separate sides of the Arabian peninsula. However, they are tied together by common infrastructure and a singular mission.
The archit the signific this meant to detail. I tolerated. honed, str strument t the offend lar. Week b of mylar b layers repl to be com master pla “absolutel
MAKE NO LITTLE PLANS The forgotten ambitions of the 20th Century’s largest engineering project, Saudi Arabia’s Industrial Cities. Meghan McAllister and Jason Kurzweil
A priviledged, birds-eye view imagines two cities rising from the desert: Yanbu (top) and Jubail (bottom).
ii
1
McAllister | 103