Edge Hill University Carbon Management Programme

Page 1

Edge Hill University

Carbon Management Programme Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

working with



Edge Hill University

Carbon Management Programme

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

working with


Š Edge Hill University 2011 You may reproduce this material, free of charge, in any format or medium without specific permission, provided you are not reproducing it for financial or material gain. You must reproduce the material accurately and not use it in a misleading context. If you are republishing the material or issuing it to others, you must acknowledge its source, copyright status and date of publication. While great care has been taken to ensure that the information in this publication is accurate at the time of publication, we accept no responsibility for any errors or omissions. Where a specific product is referred to in this publication, no recommendation or endorsement of that product by Edge HIll University is intended, nor should it be inferred. First Published: March 2011 Further copies may be obtained from: Sustainability Durning Centre Edge Hill University St Helens Road, Ormskirk Lancashire, L39 4QP, UK


Contents Contents

List of Figures List of Tables Foreword from Pro Vice-Chancellor Steve Igoe Foreword from The Carbon Trust Management Summary 1. Introduction 2. Carbon Management Strategy 2.1 Context and Drivers for Carbon Management 2.2 Strategic Themes 2.3 Targets and Objectives 3. Emissions Baseline and Projections 3.1 Scope 3.2 Baseline 3.3 Projections and Value at Stake 4. Carbon Management Projects 4.1 Existing Projects 4.2 Planned / Funded Projects 4.3 Near Term Projects 4.4 Medium to Long Term Projects 4.5 Non-Technical Initiatives 4.6 Scope 3 Projects 4.7 Projected Achievement Towards Target 5. Carbon Management Plan Financing 5.1 Assumptions 5.2 Benefits / Savings – Quantified and Un-Quantified 5.3 Additional Resources 5.4 Financial Costs and Sources of Funding 6. Actions to Embed Carbon Management in Edge Hill University 6.1 Policy – Embedding CO2 Saving 6.2 Responsibility 6.3 Data Management 6.4 Communication and Training 6.5 Procurement – Engaging Suppliers 6.6 Monitoring and Evaluation – Keeping Track of Progress 7. Programme Management of the CM Programme 7.1 The Programme Board – Strategic Ownership and Oversight 7.2 The Carbon Management Team – Delivering the Projects 7.3 Continuity Planning for Key Roles 7.4 Ongoing Stakeholder Management 7.5 Annual Progress Review to Senior Management Team Appendix A: Carbon Management Matrix – Embedding Appendix B: Definition Of Projects Appendix C: Role Description Sustainability Champion (Graduwatt) Appendix D: Summary of Environmental Management Strategy (2010-2015)

2 2 4 5 7 10 12 12 13 13 14 14 14 16 18 19 20 20 23 23 24 24 25 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28 29 30 30 31 31 32 32 32 34 36 37 65 67

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

1


Edge Hill University

List of Figures Figure 3.1 Summary of all 2008/09 Carbon Emissions Figure 3.2 BAU vs. Target tonnes CO2 Figure 3.3 BAU vs. Target Costs Figure 3.4 Summary of Emissions and Targets from 2005 to 2020 Figure 4.1 Target and Identified Projects Set Against BAU List of Tables Table 1.1 List of notable actions undertaken at Edge Hill Table 3.1 Total emissions for all scopes in 2008/09 Table 3.2 Total emissions for scopes 1 and 2 2008/09 Table 3.3 Total emissions for scopes 1 and 2 2005/06 Table 4.1 Completed Projects Table 4.2 Funded Projects Table 4.3 Near Term Projects Table 4.4 Medium to Long Term Projects Table 4.5 Non-Technical Initiatives Table 4.6 Scope 3 Projects Table 5.1 Summary of Potential Cost and Carbon Savings Compared to 2008/09 Baseline Table 5.2 Details of Capital Costs Table 6.1 Awareness Calendar Table 7.1 Composition of the Carbon Management Board Table 7.2 Carbon Management Team Members Table 7.3 Stakeholder Management Summary

2

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

14 16 16 17 24 10 15 15 16 19 20 20 23 23 24 25 26 29 31 32 33


Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

3


Edge Hill University

Foreword from Pro Vice-Chancellor, Steve Igoe In 2010, Edge Hill University celebrated 125 years as a high quality provider of Higher Education. From its inception, in St George’s Hall, Liverpool in 1885, innovation and invention have been at the heart of what we do. More recently sustainability has taken an equally important role in the business we conduct and how we do so. As a significant provider of vocational graduates in the caring professions, our alumni are vital in creating and enhancing sustainable communities. Over recent years the success of the University has enabled it to enhance its leadership role in sustainable development, particularly in the way it addresses sustainability issues in the development of its campus infrastructure. Our Faculty of Health Building was adjudged the winner of the RICS North West Awards 2009 in the sustainability category. The University was also delighted to win the award recognising outstanding leadership through significant energy and CO2 emissions savings from business operations at the inaugural Environment Agency Awards 2010. All of this underlines the University’s commitment, drive and enthusiasm, to take a leadership role both at regional and national level in developing a truly sustainable organisation for the next decade and beyond. We are delighted to be part of the current Carbon Management Programme and look forward to capturing and disseminating the undoubted benefits that will flow from our work in this area for many years to come.

4

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

Steve Igoe Pro Vice-Chancellor (Resources) Edge Hill University


Foreword Foreword from Richard Rugg, of the Carbon Trust Cutting carbon emissions as part of the fight against climate change should be a key priority for Universities and Colleges - it's all about getting your own house in order and leading by example. The UK Government has identified the Higher Education sector as key to delivering carbon reduction across the UK in line with the Climate Change Act targets, and the HE Carbon Management Programme is designed in response to this. It assists Higher Education institutions in saving money on energy and putting it to better use elsewhere, whilst making a positive contribution to the environment by lowering carbon emissions. Edge Hill University partnered with the Carbon Trust on this ambitious programme in 2010 in order to realise substantial carbon and cost savings. This Carbon Management Plan commits the University to a target of reducing CO2 by 6% by 2013/14 in absolute terms, and 27% over a business as usual scenario. It also underpins potential financial savings to the institution of around ÂŁ235,000 per year by that date.

Richard Rugg Head of Public Sector, Carbon Trust

There are those that can and those that do. Universities can contribute significantly to reducing CO2 emissions. The Carbon Trust is very proud to support Edge Hill University in their ongoing implementation of carbon management.

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

5


Edge Hill University

6

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Summary

Edge Hill University

Management Summary

The objectives of the Higher Education Carbon Management (HECM) process are to: •

Change the current practices of the University, taking a whole-organisation approach so that, over the short to medium term, carbon reduction becomes embedded in management decision making across the full range of the University’s operations; and To undertake a series of interventions and projects that will lead directly to measurable emissions reduction.

This Carbon Management Plan (CMP) defines the steps that Edge Hill University will take to achieve these outcomes, by specifying and timetabling key actions that are credible and adequately resourced and have clear responsibilities allocated for implementation. These actions are not limited to specific technical interventions leading directly to emissions reduction but include the full range of management, policy and enabling actions that are required to embed carbon management in the strategic and operational policies and practices of the University. The CMP is intended to provide a practical and formal basis for implementing carbon emission reduction over the short to medium term. It is also intended to summarise the position Edge Hill University has reached at this stage in the carbon management process and set targets for the future. Strategic Drivers: Edge Hill University is committed to reducing its environmental impacts, and in recent years, has undertaken a number of sustainable initiatives from the implementation of an award winning Sustainable Travel Policy through to the development of the Faculty of Health building, which won the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors North West Award for Sustainability in 2009. The Carbon Management Board was established to evaluate the University’s environmental impact and to coordinate solutions aimed at reducing it. The University has recently approved an Environmental Management Strategy (2010 – 2015) that sets targets to reduce its environmental impact in ten different areas. In this plan, the University seeks to make the protection and enhancement of the environment integral in all that it does, continually improving its environmental performance wherever practicable. It is the Environmental Management Strategy that reinforces the primary goals of the Carbon Management Plan.

University Growth: Edge Hill is one of the fastest growing Universities in the UK reflected in the 44% increase in student numbers (full time equivalents (FTE)) between 2005/06 and 2009/10. In order to accommodate the necessary growth in both student accommodation and teaching space, the University’s building area has increased by 30% since 2005/06, of which 20% is since 2008/09. There are plans for this level of growth to continue until at least 2012 due to the development of the Student Hub and new sports facilities. Sustainability and carbon emission minimisation was a major consideration throughout the development process, resulting in a reduction from 550 to 501 kg CO2 per FTE between 2005/6 and 2009/10. Baseline and Target Emissions: The carbon emissions baseline data for the University has been calculated using data from the 2008/09 academic year. The baseline data covers emissions from scope 1 and scope 2 activities – that is emissions from combustion of gas and consumption of electricity on the main campus in Ormskirk, as well as from University-owned transport activities. Total carbon emissions from scopes 1 & 2 for the 2008/09 academic year were 6,566 tonnes CO2e. Efforts to reduce carbon are therefore regularly offset by the business need to increase space, equipment and campus residence. The target reductions attainable must reflect the 21% rise in emissions plus the anticipated 20% increase due to new development. Edge Hill University has therefore set challenging reduction targets against both the 2005/06 and 2008/09 baselines for scopes 1 & 2. Our contribution to the Higher Education Council for England (HECFE) reduction target is 5% to 2020 based on the 2005/06 baseline. The Carbon Management Plan target is set on the 2008/09 baseline and is 1,774 tonnes CO2e to 2013/14. This equates to a 27% reduction on the base year itself and 6% as an absolute target which includes the planned development.

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

7


Edge Hill University

2005/06 Baseline emissions (tonnes CO2℮)

5,601

BAU emissions (tonnes CO2℮) to 2013/14

7,946

2008/09 Baseline emissions (tonnes CO2℮)

RES emissions (tonnes CO2℮) to 2013/14

Cumulative saving on 2008/09 baseline (tonnes CO2℮)

6,566

6,172 5,807

Value at Stake: Using the emissions baseline, two different consumption scenarios have been projected. The Business as Usual (BAU) scenario predicts the cost of emissions if no actions are taken to reduce carbon emissions. The Reduced CO2 Emissions Scenario (RES) predicts the effect on cost and carbon emissions if emissions are reduced from the baseline. The total aggregated Value at Stake postulated from 2008/09 to 2013/14 in energy related costs is £910,000 and in carbon emissions is cumulative 5,807 tonnes of CO2e. Reduction Projects: In order to meet the target reduction in carbon emissions, a number of carbon saving projects and actions have been identified. Approximately thirty-eight potential projects for reducing scope 1 & 2 emissions have been identified. If all the projects are implemented, CO2 emissions would be reduced by 1,428 tonnes by 2013/14 compared to the BAU scenario. Identified projects currently cover 80% of the Edge Hill reduction target. Edge Hill is confident in the fact that further projects will be identified and implemented over the next 5 years that will enable achievement of the 6% carbon reduction from the 2008/09 baseline. Sources of Funding: Approximately £275,000 of funding has been committed in 2010/11. This encompasses the sub-metering programme, awareness campaigns and PV installation. The total unsecured funding from 2012 to 2014 is £537,000 with savings predicted at £235,000. This funding includes the near and medium projects with paybacks less than 5 years, to long term projects with paybacks between five and ten years. The average payback period of the projects in the plan is 3.4 years.

8

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

9


Edge Hill University

1. Introduction

Named after the district in Liverpool in which it was originally sited, Edge Hill College opened its doors on 24th January 1885. Initially offering teacher training to 41 students, Edge Hill has developed into one of the fastest growing Universities in the UK boasting a 44% increase in student numbers (full time equivalents (FTE)) between 2005/06 and 2009/10. The University has three faculties, Arts & Sciences, Education, and Health, which are situated on its main 160-acre site in Ormskirk, Lancashire. The campus now houses 1,046 residential students and 24 academic and support buildings. Sustainability has always been at the heart of the University’s ethos, not only in the role of educator and community leader but also as a major employer and consumer of resources. The University has made great efforts to reduce its carbon footprint from the award winning Green Travel Plan in 2005 to designing and building new facilities of the highest quality, that incorporate a wide range of sustainable technologies whilst ensuring minimal operational and environmental impact. Table 1.1 identifies some of the major projects undertaken. Table 1.1 List of notable actions undertaken at Edge Hill 2004

Started Sustainable Urban Drainage System (SUDS).

2005

Green Travel Plan.

2007

Faculty of Health incorporating Ground Source Heat Pumps, solar thermal and the innovative Green Wall to provide awareness.

2008

New Business School incorporating solar thermal panels.

2009

New residential accommodation incorporating mini CHP. Start of a rollout of Sun Ray 'Thin Client' Workstations commenced in Dec 2008 in the new Faculty of Health building Continued deployment of 'Thin Client' Workstations in new Business School 2009. Server consolidation and Vitalisation 2009/10 are ongoing

2010

New administration and IT building. Using heat reclaimed from the IT servers suite as a heat source for the underfloor heating system. Also includes solar photovoltaic and solar thermal panels.

Working in partnership with the Carbon Trust has been instrumental in helping achieve these aims, not least in the development of the Faculty of Health, building which won the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors North West Award for Sustainability 2009.

10

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Section 1. In order to minimise carbon emissions further, and to ensure Edge Hill plays its part in meeting the government’s requirement to reduce carbon by 34% on 1990 baseline, the University has enrolled in the Carbon Trust 2010 Higher Education Carbon Management Programme (HECMP). The HECMP process consists of five stages:

Step 1: Mobilise the organisation

Step 2: Set baseline, forecast and targets

Step 3: Identify and qualify options

Step 4: Finalise Carbon Management Plan

Step 5: Implement plan The first four steps are laid out within the HECMP programme and follow a pre-set timetable for attained objectives. Whilst the plan offers a system to identify technical projects on a holistic basis, Edge Hill has adopted a systematic approach to project identification by employing an Engineer with clearly defined role and responsibilities. This role has enabled projects to be identified on a building by building basis in order to ensure optimum project assessment. Stage five incorporates the implementation of the plan over the next five years.

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

11


Edge Hill University

2. Carbon Management Strategy

The first formal interpretation of sustainable development was introduced in the Bruntland Report in 1987. This concept of providing for today whilst ensuring a positive legacy for future generations is fundamental to Edge Hill’s culture and decision making. Using the three core elements of environmental, social and financial responsibility to direct its policies, the University strives to ensure its own legacy is positive for both the University and wider community. Carbon management is fundamental to these responsibilities. By limiting the use of fossil fuels it ensures fuel is available for future generations; reducing CO2 emissions limits the potential impacts of climate change; and the savings achieved through reduced energy bills and reduced waste will be invested into the core business of education.

2.1

Context and Drivers for Carbon Management

The UK Government is putting increasing pressure on the whole public sector to lead by example in cost saving and climate change mitigation through energy efficiency and emissions reduction. Action by the public sector will be critical to the achievement of the Government’s climate change objectives. The Climate Change Act has a long term goal to reduce CO2 emissions by 34% by 2020 and 80% by 2050 from a 1990 baseline to help the UK’s transition to a low carbon economy. This has created a number of legislative drivers: • •

• •

12

Display Energy Certificates: From the 1st of October 2008 there is a legal requirement for all public sector buildings, with a total useful floor area of over 1,000m2, to show a Display Energy Certificate (DEC) in a prominent place, clearly visible to the public. Carbon Reduction Commitment: The Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) is a mandatory emission control scheme for organisations whose total electricity consumption is greater than 6,000MWh. If an organisation falls within the CRC scheme all electricity and fuel emissions are covered. The first phase of the plan charges £12/t CO2, with all monies collected being retained for use to support public finances. If an organisation consumes between 3,000 and 6,000 MWh, an information disclosure will have to be made. Building Regulations, Part L: Building Regulations are increasingly steered toward reducing the requirement of lighting, heating and cooling for both domestic and non-domestic premises. The revised 2010 regulations require 25% less carbon emissions against Part L1A 2006 which is a 40% improvement over a dwelling build to the 2002 regulations. Capital funding for HEIs linked to carbon performance: HEFCE’s 2008 and 2009 grant letters from the Secretary of State demand the establishment of a link between performance on carbon reduction and future capital allocations, leading to the requirement for Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) to set their own carbon reduction targets for 2020 and establish carbon reduction plans. Currently HEFCE are looking for reductions on scope 1 and scope 2 emissions only (related to site usage), set against a 2005 baseline. HEFCE also propose that HEIs commit to making reductions in scope 3 (indirect emissions) with plans to set targets against these emissions when more robust protocols are developed. Corporate branding: Students are becoming increasingly aware of environmental issues. The increasing engagement with carbon management and demonstrable results will provide an additional attraction to these students. Cost mitigation: measures to increase energy efficiency will reduce annual energy costs and manage the risk of volatile and rising energy prices. Energy and fuel costs have increased significantly since 2004 and this trend is not expected to change.

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Section 2. 2.2 Strategic Themes

Health, Safety and Environmental Policy Statement (extract)

“To deliver and maximise performance improvements within safety and environmental management through creating the conditions for sustainable development” Sustainability is woven into all policies and strategies adopted by Edge Hill. However it’s the Environmental Management Strategy which reinforces the primary goals of the Carbon Management Plan. The Environmental Management Strategy (2010 – 2015) sets objectives in nine different areas that will help Edge Hill reduce its environmental impact. In addition to each objective, measurable targets and time-bound actions are also defined. An annual report on progress against targets will be submitted as part of the Institutional Health, Safety & Environment Report. The Environmental Management Strategy (2010 – 2015) sets out a requirement for:

“carbon reduction and conservation of natural resources through improved energy efficiency and the appropriate use of new technologies and practices.” The strategy supports Carbon Management in the following areas. Appendix D provides a summary of objectives and targets. • • • • • • • • •

Environmental Management Systems Energy Management Transport Waste Management Water Community Involvement Procurement Construction and Refurbishment Emissions and Discharge

2.3 Targets and Objectives

Edge Hill is one of the fastest growing Universities in the UK achieving a 44% increase in student numbers (full time equivalents (FTE)) between 2005/06 and 2009/10. Efforts to reduce carbon are therefore regularly offset by the consequential increase in space, equipment and campus residences. The campus building area has increased by 30% since 2005/06 of which 20% is since 2008/09. There are plans for this level of growth to continue until at least 2012 estimated at a further 21% rise in emissions. The target reductions attainable must reflect this growth. Therefore the 5% reduction to 2020 against the 2005 baseline for scopes 1 & 2 is challenging. Efforts to calculate scope 3 emissions have been made to be used as a guide and details of emissions are provided in section 3. Monitoring processes are currently being established but targets will not be set until robust monitoring practices have been embedded. Edge Hill will reduce the CO2 emissions from the 2005/06 baseline of 5601 tCO2 by 5%, by July 2020 for scope 1 & 2 activities. Interim milestone of 6% (1774 tCO2) reduction in emissions by July 2014 from the 2008/09 baseline of 6,566 tonnes. Scope 3 is being monitored from 2010. Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

13


Edge Hill University

3. Emissions Baseline and Projections 3.1

Scope

In order to measure savings achieved, a baseline needs to be established. Information relating to the University’s own buildings and fleet emissions is readily available (scope 1 and 2). Areas under scope 3 have not all been measured accurately in the past. In order to ensure these areas are addressed going forward estimations have been made for 2008/09. Due to the uncertainty of this data, scope 1 and 2 will be presented separately from scope 3. Targets for scope 3 will be set at a later date although projects to reduce emissions in this area will be identified within this plan. Definition of scopes: Scope 1: Scope 2: Scope 3:

Direct emissions that occur from sources that are owned or controlled by the organisation, for example emissions from combustion in owned or controlled boilers, furnaces and vehicles. Emissions from the generation of purchased electricity consumed by the organisation. All other indirect emissions which are a consequence of the activities of the organisation but occur from sources not owned or controlled by the organisation – for example, commuting, water and waste.

Figure 3.1 Summary of all 2008/09 Carbon Emissions

3.2 Baseline

The baseline 2008/09 was chosen as the base year as it represented the most current full year’s data available. The year follows the financial year August 08 to July 09. Table 3.1 provides a full breakdown of emissions. All conversion factors are as provided by the HECMP. Total cost data cannot be provided due to lack of information in some scope 3 areas.

14

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Section 3. Table 3.1 Total emissions for all scopes in 2008/09 Tonnes of CO2℮ for Base Year 2008/09 6,520 46 1,996 438 44 1,772 10,816

Building Fleet Commuting Business Travel Water Waste Total

A more detailed breakdown of scope 1 & 2 data can be found in Table 3.2. Table 3.2 Total emissions for scopes 1 and 2 2008/09 Tonnes of CO2℮ for Base Year 2008/09 Scope 1 Gas Fleet

Scope 2 Electricity Total

3,203 46

£470,123 £20,588

3,317

£465,352

6,566

£956,063

The University obtains most building emissions data through three main fiscal meters on campus, although there are a number of small external sites: Milton House, Silkhouse Court and Aintree Hospital, with adequate data, which are included within the figures. All other sites occupied by Edge Hill are charged on an unmetered basis and are therefore not included within the data. Insufficient sub metering prevents a breakdown of energy usage on an individual building basis. Sub metering is an identified project within the plan. The fleet is a mixture of six University Vehicles available for use by staff, a box van with tail lift, a truck and grounds vehicles. Most of the data is obtained from fuel cards, however for grounds vehicles using red diesel the information is taken from invoices. Scope 3 data is recorded in several ways: • • •

• • •

Water is measured via a fiscal meter; Waste information is derived from bin collection data; Business travel by car is calculated from expense claims and air travel is estimated based on travel insurance data; Consultants undertook a baseline assessment of the carbon emitted as a result of staff and student commuting by car (single-occupancy and car-sharing); Student commuting at the beginning and end of term is estimated using postcode analysis to derive driving distances; and International student commuting (air travel) is estimated using home country information provided by Academic Registry.

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

15


Edge Hill University

In order to be monitored against HEFCE targets the baseline for 2005/06 is used. Both the electricity and gas data were recalculated in order to correct estimated consumption and to include the remote sites. Table 3.3 provides a breakdown of the 2005/06 baseline. Table 3.3 Total emissions for scopes 1 and 2 2005/06 Tonnes of CO2℮ for Base Year 2005/06

Scope 1 Gas Fleet

Scope 2 Electricity Total

3.3

2902 23

£416,408 £11,535

2676

£369,043

5601

£796,986

Projections and Value at Stake

In order to fully understand the impact of reductions it is necessary to understand what the reductions are being set against. As Edge Hill is a comparatively young University it has a programme of expansion including a new Student Hub and sports developments as well as increasing onsite student accommodation. The increased accommodation will be detrimental to onsite emissions but will help reduce emissions from student travel. From 2010/11 onwards the construction and operation of the student residences and new gym are predicted to contribute approximately 172 tonnes of CO2e annually. Likewise, the new Student Hub and Sports Development are predicted to generate approximately 745 tonnes of CO2e from 2011/12. Figures 3.2 & 3.3 identify the increase in emissions and costs in the Business as Usual (BAU) scenario (red line with squares). The assumptions incorporated into the BAU scenario are that electricity and gas prices remain unchanged until 2012/13 due to a fixed price contract but then rise by 5% per annum thereafter. Emissions are assumed to increase by 0.7% per annum, from the DTI (now DBERR) figures in EP68, and by 917 tonnes CO2e due to new building expansion. In Figure 3.2, the blue line (with triangles) shows the straight-line trajectory required to meet the 2014/15 emissions target (6% reduction from 2008/09). The gap between these lines is the Value at Stake, or the ‘cost of no action’, which means an additional 5,807t CO2e during the five year period. Figure 3.3 shows the financial Value at Stake, which indicates that no action could lead to an additional £910,000 of energy costs to the University.

16

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Figure 3.2 BAU vs. Target tonnes CO2

Actual emissions, BAU increase, target predicted

Figure 3.3 BAU vs. Target costs

BAU increases and reduction target - financial

Figure 3.4 indicates the growth in emissions and potential carbon savings that could be achieved through implementation of the projects identified within the plan. During the period from 2005/6 to 2008/9, any energy efficiency measures that were implemented were masked due to the extensive building programme. The buildings constructed during that time incorporated carbon reduction measures as part of their design and operation. However, emissions still rose by 17% over this period as these reduction measures could not completely mitigate the emissions from the usage of the buildings. The reduction of 5807 tCO2 shown in figure 3.5 relates to the accumulated saving from 2008/09 to 2013/14. There are further savings of 13,624 tCO2 between 2013/14 and 2020 assuming the BAU remains constant. The combined saving equates to 19,432 tCO2 between 2008/09 and 2020. Figure 3.4 Summary of emissions and targets from 2005 to 2020

Carbon Emission to Date

Planned Reduction to 2015 (CMP)

Planned Reduction from 2005 to 2020 Construction Lines

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

17


Edge Hill University

4. Carbon Management Projects

The level of growth at the University has meant an increase in the buildings’ footprint of 32.5% since 2006 with further expansions planned over the next few years. This growth has been the result of record increases in student numbers and the associated demand for the Edge Hill University offering. All of the new buildings are designed to high carbon efficiency specifications and have won awards such as the RICS North West Award for Sustainability 2009 for the Faculty of Health building. The University has also won the Environment Agency Awards 2010 recognising outstanding leadership through significant energy and CO2 emissions savings from business operations. Efforts to mitigate against the increasing requirement for ICT equipment have been made with the introduction of Sun Ray monitors, automated system shut down and a heat reclaim system using heat generated by the new server room as a base load for the buildings’ heating requirements. In order to address the increasing carbon footprint of the University a feasibility study was undertaken to assess the potential of large scale (2 * 3MW) wind turbines to cover the total campus energy footprint. The aim was to retain the Renewable Obligation Certificates in order to allow the campus to be classed as carbon neutral. The study identified the project was both technically and financially viable. However, the report also highlighted there are areas of issue such as the local council’s planning policy and other environmental considerations. The report concluded the project was not likely to get planning approval at this time. As the holistic approach did not prove successful and in order to ensure all carbon reduction opportunities are identified, a Carbon Management Projects Manager has been appointed. Assessing each building individually, all appropriate projects have been identified and included within the plan. However the identified reductions are set against an extensive future expansion project. Identification of projects is a continuous process. Technical projects will be identified by the Carbon Management Projects Manager in consultation with representatives from other departments, and non-technical projects will be identified by the Sustainability Champions (Appendix C) and the Carbon Management Team. The quantities of energy/carbon and costs saved are the main drivers for the Finance Planning Team when considering approval of a project. Each project business case includes a section on the potential carbon and cost reduction benefits.

18

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Section 4. 4.1

Existing Projects

Table 4.1 relates to projects that have been completed or are currently in progress. No project plan has been provided as the work is nearly complete. The associated project costs were part of a wider development programme and are therefore not available as independent costs. Table 4.1 Completed Projects Annual Savings (yr 1) Lead

Fin (Gross)

tCO2

% of Planned CO2 Savings

D Oldham

14,091

86.4

6.05%

2010

M Allinson

4,535

27.4

1.92%

2010

M Allinson

3,305

20.0

1.40%

2012

Connection of solar thermal panels EHU027 in Sporting Edge to provide hot water

D Oldham

2,400

14.7

1.03%

2010

Installation of PV to generate electricity EHU040 on Durning Centre

D Oldham

2,700

16.3

1.14%

2010

Ref

Project

EHU001 to Boiler de-centralisation for Venue and EHU004 Old Gym Roll out of thin client terminals EHU007 across campus

EHU011

Totals

Implementation of server virtualisation and consolidation

27,030 164.8

Implement Year

11.54%

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

19


Edge Hill University

4.2

Planned / Funded Projects

The University has already approved the projects listed in Table 4.2 for implementation. The awareness campaign started in December 2010 and the commencement of sub metering is due before the start of 2011/12. The awareness campaigns and associated behavioural change will be evaluated using the monitoring and targeting system. This system will also be utilised to quantify the delivered savings against scope 1 and 2 projects listed and as part of the business cases for future approved projects. On-going and long term maintenance of plant and equipment and of other items such as windows, seals etc has not been listed as a separate project as this is already included in the Facilities Management departmental budget. Table 4.2 Funded projects

Annual Savings (yr 1)

Cost Ref

Project

EHU005 & Staff and student EHU006 awareness project Sub-metering with Monitoring and targeting EHU012 of consumption

Lead

Operational

Fin (Gross)

tCO2

P Brandwood

0

3,000

10,500

64.0

0

P Brandwood

121,000

0

52,988

322.6

2.3

Totals

4.3

Capital

% of Planned Pay back CO2 (yrs) Savings

121,000

3,000 52,988

322.6

Implement Year

4.48%

2011

22.59%

2011

27.07%

Near Term Projects

The projects listed in table 4.3 are short to medium term projects with less than a 5 year payback. Preliminary feasibility assessments have been done in anticipation that funding will be available once the projects have been approved. However, it is highly likely that some of the projects will require more detailed feasibility work such as small-scale trials and/or more accurate information relating to installation costs, prior to obtaining approval. Table 4.3 Near Term Projects

Annual Savings (yr 1)

Cost Ref

20

Project

Lead

Capital

Operational

Fin (Gross)

tCO2

% of Planned Pay back CO2 (yrs) Savings

Implement Year

Installation of ultra-low loss EHU008 transformers across campus

V Baichoo

0

19,350

117.0

6.5

8.19%

Replacement of part of the campus security and EHU009 exterior lighting

125,000

2012

V Baichoo

24,400

0

7,290

44.1

3.3

3.09%

2012

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Annual Savings (yr 1)

Cost Ref

Project

Implementation and enforcement of a Heating EHU010 Policy across the campus estate

Lead

Capital

Operational

Fin (Gross)

tCO2

% of Planned Pay back CO2 Savings (yrs)

Implement Year

7.60%

2012

4.5

15.39%

2012

8.8

3.6

0.62%

2011

286

1.7

0

0.12%

2011

0

175

1.1

2.6

0.07%

2011

2,730

0

1,035

6.3

2.6

0.44%

2011

V Baichoo

0

1,350

8.2

0.7

0.57%

Application of VSD controls to pump and AHU motors across EHU020 selected campus buildings

1,000

2011

V Baichoo

0

6,930

41.9

1.7

2.93%

Reduce power consumption of main chilled water circulating EHU021 pump motors in LINC building

12,000

2011

V Baichoo

0

360

2.2

2.1

0.15%

Replace MATEC classroom lighting in the MATEC building EHU022 with like for like T5 in new fittings

750

2011

V Baichoo

0

2,520

15.2

4.0

1.07%

MATEC Ground Floor Workshops lighting EHU023 replacement & PIR Installation.

10,129

2011

V Baichoo

0

171

1.0

2.7

0.07%

Replacement of main lighting in NGAS building with more EHU024 efficient T5 equivalents

470

2011

V Baichoo

19,760

0

5,350

32.3

3.7

2.26%

2011

Old gym main EHU025 lighting replacement

V Baichoo

1,300

0

1,080

6.5

1.2

0.46%

2011

V Baichoo

0

17,700

108.5

0

Replace main library and SIC lighting with EHU013 new LED fittings

0

V Baichoo

164,000

0

36,360

219.8

Top-up roof insulation EHU015 in Forest Court to 300mm

V Baichoo

De-lamping the Wilson Centre corridor EHU016 and toilets lighting

5,200

0

1,440

V Baichoo

0

0

Ground Floor T8 EHU017 lighting replacement in LINC

V Baichoo

460

Install solar film to minimise heat gain to ground floor computer rooms and middle floor offices EHU018 on south-facing faรงade

V Baichoo

Re-commission the controls, set-points, etc. EHU019 for the LINC

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

21


Edge Hill University

Annual Savings (yr 1)

Cost Ref

Lead

Capital

Operational

Fin (Gross)

tCO2

Implement Year

Replace main lighting in EHU026 Sporting Edge older gym

V Baichoo

0

1,584

9.6

2.6

0.67%

Replace 28 x 100W tungsten bulbs in Rose Theatre with EHU028 16 W GU24 CFLs

4,160

2011

V Baichoo

0

513

3.1

4.9

0.22%

Install dimming circuits to existing path and car park EHU029 lighting

2,500

2011

V Baichoo

3,060

0

698

4.2

4.4

0.30%

2011

Replace fluorescent EHU030 tube lighting in the Venue

V Baichoo

260

0

189

1.1

1.4

0.08%

2011

Replace lighting in Main EHU033 Building halls bathrooms

V Baichoo

242

0

180

1.1

1.3

0.08%

2011

Installation of controls to boilers in campus plant rooms to minimise boiler EHU034 dry cycling

V Baichoo

0

10,800

66.2

3.2

4.64%

Replace main lighting in Geography Building with EHU035 T5 equivalents

35,000

2012

V Baichoo

0

437

2.6

2.5

0.18%

Replace lighting in BioMechanics lab in the Wilson EHU037 Centre with T5 equivalents

1,090

2012

V Baichoo

0

244

1.5

2.9

0.10%

Insulation of hot water heating pipework in halls of EHU038 Main Building

700

2012

V Baichoo

0

9,000

55.2

4.8

3.86%

Replacing all air handling unit filters with energy efficient EHU039 equivalents

43,000

2011

V Baichoo

5,000

1200

4,140

25.0

1.7

1.75%

2011

Insulate pipe flanges and EHU041 valves in plant rooms

V Baichoo

9,000

0

5,910

36.2

1.5

2.54%

2011

Feasibility into MFD sleep EHU043 mode reduction

P Brandwood

0

10

5,145

31.1

0

2.18%

2011

Totals

22

Project

% of Planned Pay back CO2 Savings (yrs)

471,211

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

1,210 140,235

851.8

59.63%


4.4

Medium to Long Term Projects

The long term projects identified in Table 4.4 have paybacks between 5 and 10 years. They have been identified and formal quotes/proposals received from designated suppliers. No detailed feasibility has been undertaken yet, and funds have not been identified. However, project due diligence has been undertaken to assess the potential savings and costs involved. Indications of the potential carbon savings are provided. Table 4.4 Medium to Long Term Projects

Annual Savings (yr 1)

Cost Ref

Project

Replace combi boilers in Forest Court with EHU014 condensing models Replace lighting in EHU012 Terrace CafĂŠ

Lead

Capital

V Baichoo

V Baichoo

Totals

4.5

Implement Year

Operational

Fin (Gross)

63,000

-4,000

3,600

22.1

8.3

1.55%

2012

3,081

0

494

3.0

6.2

0.21%

2012

66,081 -4,000

4,094

tCO2

% of Planned Pay back CO2 Savings (yrs)

25.1

1.76%

Non-Technical Initiatives

The projects in sections 4.1 to 4.4 have related to mainly technical projects. In addition to these there are a number of other initiatives being considered that are designed to endorse behavioural change outlined in Table 4.5. Table 4.5 Non-Technical Initiatives

Ref

Project

EHU101

Building closure - feasibility study. The merits to this will not be identified until the sub metering is installed.

Paper reduction - feasibility study. Although the project will not reduce emissions significantly the culture of technology over EHU102 paper reinforces the concepts of sustainability. Inclusion of sustainability issues in staff handbook, induction and job descriptions. EHU103 No direct carbon savings but reinforces a low carbon culture.

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

23


Edge Hill University

4.6

Scope 3 Projects

In efforts to reduce the scope 3 emissions the following projects in Table 4.6 have been identified. A more detailed explanation can be found in Appendix B: Definition of Projects. Table 4.6 Scope 3 Projects Ref

Project

tCO2

EHU501 Priority parking for car sharers

31

EHU502 Cycle Lanes

53

EHU503 New Waste Management Contract

40-100

EHU504 Composting food waste

90

EHU505 End-of-year reuse scheme in halls of residence

30

4.7

Projected Achievement Towards Target

Figure 4.1 highlights the anticipated increase in CO2 emissions due to development identified in the BAU scenario. The development is to accommodate the major increase in student numbers. Set against this is the target reduction and the identified projects. The target represents a 6% saving in absolute terms but 21% against BAU. We have identified projects equating to 80% of the 1,774 tCO2 target reduction. The remaining 346 tCO2 of carbon savings will be identified and projects implemented over the course of the next five years. Figure 4.1 Target and identified projects set against BAU

24

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Section 5. 5. Carbon Management Plan Financing

Edge Hill has not previously applied for monies from the HEFCE/Salix Finance Revolving Green Fund, preferring instead to fund projects independently. Finances are provided on a robust spend to save scenario but additional consideration is given to environmental and social wellbeing when related to energy efficiency and carbon reduction. This is due not only to a sound sense of corporate social responsibility but also forward thinking and the acknowledgment that cost associated to energy and carbon will continue to increase. The future capital outlay for all the projects will be approximately £833,000. Timescales for expenditure will be decided in a budgetary meeting in February 2011.

5.1

Assumptions

Electricity – 7.54p/kWh Gas – 3p/kWh

Annual predicted cost increase – electricity reduced to 7p/kWh by 2010/11 in line with current contract. All other cost calculations assume a 5% increase. BAU assumes an increase of 0.7% on the previous years consumption, that is the default value from the DTI (now DBERR) figures in EP68, and a contribution due to development works of approximately 1,200 tonnes CO2e 2008 to 2014.

5.2

Benefits/Savings – Quantified and Unquantified

Table 5.1 shows the annual savings achieved on the 2008 baseline. The figures relate to the 2008 baseline and do not include the increases for BAU scenario. Table 5.1 Summary of Potential Cost and Carbon Savings Compared to 2008/09 Baseline 2008-2010

2011

2012

2013

Annual cost saving

£0

£87,213

£140,043

£234,848

Annual CO2 saving

0.00

531.49

852.63

1428.30

0%

30%

48%

81%

% of planned CO2 savings

Unquantified benefits: In addition to the financial benefits of carbon reduction there are a number of other benefits: • • • • • • •

Demonstration of community leadership in Corporate Social Responsibility University reputation Staff and student recruitment and retention Compliance with CIF2 Improved DEC ratings Mitigation against future energy price volatility Remaining below the CRC qualification threshold

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

25


Edge Hill University

5.3

Additional Resources

5.4

Financial Costs and Sources of Funding

A Carbon Management Projects Manager has been employed to undertake a carbon reduction audit on a building by building basis to identify potential carbon reduction projects. He will also project manage the funded technical projects. All projects identified will be funded internally as there is currently no intention to take on any external loans. The capital cost for the projects currently underway are part of a larger development scheme and extraction of these costs is not available. The current status is: Table 5.2 Details of Capital Costs Figures in £1000’s 2008/09 2009/10

2010/11

2011/12

2012/13

2013/14

286

57

455

35

0

4

-4

0

286

61

441

35

286

0

-11

4

275

4

445

35

-4

0

441

35

Annual costs: Total annual capital cost Total annual revenue cost Total costs Committed funding: Committed annual capital

Committed annual revenue Total funded Unallocated funding: Unallocated annual capital

Unallocated annual revenue Total unfunded

57

57

To offset some of the financial expenditure there is an anticipated yearly receipt of £11,000 as payment from the feed-in-tariffs attached to Project EHU040. The £4,000 credit identified in 2012/13 unallocated annual revenue relates to the removal of a maintenance charge under Project EHU014.

26

The financing of the projects will be presented for approval via our PVC of Resources, Steve Igoe, at the institutions’ Finance Committee in February. The Energy Manager and Carbon Management Project Manager will be responsible for project implementation. The Property Services Manager, Alan Wilson, will report on a monthly basis to Director of FM, Bill Hancox, who will take budgetary control and overall responsibility for project implementation. Financial updates will be provided to the Finance Director, Carl Gibson, on a monthly basis with an in-depth examination of projects four times a year. Project implementation will also be monitored through the Sustainability Group reporting to the PVC of Resources. Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


6. Actions to Embed Carbon Management in Edge Hill University

Section 6.

Having previously worked with the Carbon Trust on building and technical projects many of the “quick wins” have been financed and addressed. There have been a number of ad hoc efficiency campaigns and a limited amount of training but there has been no holistic long term engagement, or information distribution, to provide leadership and guidance on carbon reduction to the University as a whole. For this reason, the scores are low for all areas of the Carbon Management Matrix, detailed in Appendix A. The appointment of an Environmental and Safety Co-ordinator and a new Energy Manager has allowed all aspects of sustainability to be highlighted and policies and strategies to be updated, implemented or planned. Their appointment has conciliated the efforts currently being taken by individuals and allowed knowledge transfer to take place and positive behaviour change across the University. The creation of a network of Sustainability Champions will ensure sustainability is addressed from the bottom up. Appendix C provides details of the role and responsibilities of the Sustainability Champions and their interactions with the Carbon Management Team, Heads of Department and Deans and Directors. Predominantly working with the Sustainability Team (Environmental and Safety Co-ordinator and Energy Manager), and their appropriate Carbon Management Team member, the Champions will ensure carbon reduction is addressed throughout the University on a day to day basis. In addition to this The Students’ Union play a significant role in addressing sustainability and has signed up to the Green Impact Awards which will provide measurable outcomes.

6.1

Policy – Embedding CO2 Saving

As Edge Hill has expanded, using guidance from The Carbon Trust, it has ensured that all new buildings are thermally sound and have maximised the use of natural ventilation and renewable energy technologies. This, coupled with the diversion of over 95% of construction waste from landfill, has ensured a legacy of carbon efficiency in the capital projects environment. Carbon efficiency is also a significant driver behind the development of the new waste strategy and travel policy. The waste strategy is based on the waste hierarchy and looks to increase Edge Hill’s recycling capabilities. It is overseen by the Housekeeping Manager. The Head of FM, in partnership with the Finance Department, will develop a travel policy over the course of 2011/12, which will encourage staff to consider cycling, public transport and car sharing over single-occupancy car travel when travelling for business purposes. There is no University sustainable procurement policy/procedure. The Environmental and Safety Co-ordinator is developing a draft sustainable procurement policy for the FM department of the University. This will be piloted within the department from 2011/12. The policy will be open for consultation and rolled out across the University as appropriate. The release of the Carbon Management Plan will be notified to all personnel via the Deans and Directors. There will be instructions that, as business plans and strategies are created or revised, they must adhere to the principles of energy efficiency and carbon reduction.

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

27


Edge Hill University

6.2

Responsibility

During 2010 there were two full time members of staff dealing with carbon reduction. Outside of their specific remit there was no formal individual responsibility to sustainability. To enable shared responsibility of embedding this Carbon Management Plan, Human Resources will ensure that with effect from April 2011 all future job descriptions will include environmental awareness as a corporate responsibility. To ensure environmental corporate responsibility is disseminated amongst the existing staff profile, HR will bring this item to the Consultation and Negotiating Committees for both Support and Academic staff in the early spring of 2011 and follow this up with communication with all existing staff. Human Resources will also review how carbon reduction might be included in the performance review process. A network of Sustainability Champions is to be established by the start of the 2011/12 academic year to ensure sustainability is addressed from the bottom up. Appendix C provides a full description of the roles and responsibilities for all levels to ensure the Sustainability Champion is provided with the time and training necessary to fully perform their role. The Students’ Union signed up to the Green Impact Awards in Autumn 2010 and will demonstrate and promote environmental sustainability in accordance with the requirements of the programme. Through both the Sustainability Group and the Carbon Management Board the Sustainability Team lead the efforts of ensuring carbon reduction is addressed throughout the University reporting to PVC of Resources. These actions will improve the matrix score taking it into the “Best” category.

6.3

Data Management

Energy meter readings have historically been collected manually, however we anticipate having a new automated monitoring and targeting system installed for the academic year 2011/12. This will provide the Energy Manager with half-hour electricity, gas and water data on a next day basis allowing greater control of individual buildings. The information will be reported by the Energy Manager to the Sustainability Group and updated on the sustainability web pages on a monthly basis. The University’s waste management contract will be put out for tender during the first half of 2011. The tender will stipulate that all waste disposal data must be supplied. The exact format of the information is yet to be agreed but will be available from the start of the 2011/12 academic year. The waste data will be collected and reported to the Sustainability Group by the FM Housekeeping Manager. A new system for collecting and monitoring business travel information is being devised by the Finance Team. The information will be reported to the Sustainability Group and updated on the sustainability web pages on a monthly basis. The lack of external auditing of the data prevents the matrix score from becoming a 5.

28

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


6.4 Communication and Training

The following describes the steps that will take the University from a ‘poor communicator’ to a five-star sustainability communicator. In order to engage with all staff and students it is important to provide information on how they can help and any results of actions taken. Starting academic year 2010/11 the University and Students’ Union are working together to provide a year round campaign of events providing constant environmental awareness: Table 6.1 Awareness Calendar Month

Event

October

Sustainability stand at Freshers’ Fair & National liftShare Week

December

Christmas ‘Switch Off’ campaign

February/March

Green Week & Fairtrade Fortnight 2011

May

End-of-term student reuse event

June

World Environment Day

Environmental awareness information is also included within staff inductions and the staff handbook emphasising that “There is a requirement for all staff, student and visitors to play their part in reducing their environmental impact”. Both media direct people to the University’s sustainability web pages. The web pages provide information on what the University is doing with regards to environmental sustainability and provides information on how to reduce emissions both at work and at home. The web link is edgehill.ac.uk/sustainability. From September 2011, the carbon management pages will provide updates on the progress of the plan. Training is to be provided to the Champions through bespoke workshops designed to individual areas of work in order to ensure understanding and engagement. The workshops will be attended by sustainability champions who will then engage with people within their areas. Ideally the champions will be volunteers but managers will nominate members of staff if no volunteers come forward. Time table for training Area

When

Academics

Spring 2011

2 hour sessions per faculty (3) facilitated by external consultant

Summer 2011

Yet to be agreed

FM Staff

Support Staff

How

2 hour sessions per department Spring – Summer 2011 (6) to be facilitated in-house

The Sustainability Team will liaise with Human Resources to consider other training and opportunities, for example a module within the Stepping into Management programme. Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

29


Edge Hill University

6.5

Procurement – Engaging Suppliers

As there is no dedicated Procurement Department or policy at Edge Hill, the selection of goods and suppliers is done at a departmental level. It is therefore difficult to know the level of engagement in sustainable procurement although it is known that procurement consortia are used. The introduction of a procurement policy firstly in FM in 2011/12 then as a roll-out through the University will ensure the low matrix score rises to 4.

6.6

Monitoring and Evaluation – Keeping Track of Progress

To ensure the plan retains momentum and the targets are met there will be a continuous monitoring and evaluation process. The technical programmes will be overseen by the Carbon Management Projects Manager whose main responsibility is to identify and manage carbon reduction initiatives. The Sustainability Team will monitor progress against targets as described in section 6.3 and follow-up non-technical issues. Monthly updates will continue to be provided at the Sustainability Meeting with a full report being provided on a quarterly basis from October 2011. This report will be provided to all Deans and Directors via the CM Board and made available on the sustainability web pages. Quarterly meetings with the Carbon Management Team will provide the means of finding new projects. They will be asked to provide a short report on initiatives in their areas which will be summarised in appendices on the quarterly Sustainability Report. An annual report will be included as part of the Institutional Health, Safety & Environmental Annual Report which is provided to the Board of Governors every October. To evaluate the success of the awareness actions and departmental initiatives a question will be added to the annual survey. Evaluation of the answer will identify areas that need addressing. The report will be available through the Edge Hill website.

30

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Section 7. 7. Programme Management of the CM Programme

Providing a framework for actions the CMP underpins the principles of the University’s Environmental Management Strategy (2010 – 2015). The results and progress of the CMP will be fed through this strategy to the Heath, Safety and Environment Committee and the Board of Governors. Overseeing the CMP at both high and low level meetings allows the PVC of Resources to identify blockages and ensure successful delivery of the plan.

7.1

The Programme Board – Strategic Ownership and Oversight

The CM Board will comprise of the member identified in Table 7.1 and will meet on a twice yearly basis. Table 7.1 Composition of the Carbon Management Board Name

Position

Chair: Steve Igoe Pro Vice-Chancellor (Resources) Bill Hancox, Director of Facilities Management (Project Sponsor) Carl Gibson Director of Finance Ann Collins Director of Human Resources Mark Allinson Director of IT Services Paul Malone Students’ Union Sam Armstrong Head of Corporate Communications David Oldham Director of Capital Projects George Talbot Dean of Faculty of Arts & Science Louise May Faculty of Education Denise Boyle Associate Dean - Faculty of Health Francis Carragher Head of FM Julia Dickinson Environmental and Safety Co-ordinator (Deputy Project Leader) Pam Brandwood Energy Manager (Project Leader) Their remit is to:

• • •

Ensure energy efficiency and carbon reduction is promoted throughout their departments. Liaise with the Carbon Management Team members to ensure their full participation. Help resolve any blockages identified by the Carbon Management Team relating to their area.

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

31


Edge Hill University

7.2

The Carbon Management Team – Delivering the Projects

The Carbon Management Team will meet on a quarterly basis. Acting as the interface between the Sustainability Champions and Carbon Management Board they will perform the same duties as a Sustainability Champion but with the additional responsibilities of: • • •

Reporting actions to the Carbon Management Team; Ensuring there are adequate numbers of Champions in their area; and Ensuring the implementation of identified projects within their area

Appendix C provides a role description for a Sustainability Champion, the additional responsibilities of the Carbon Team member and the requirements to allow them to perform their task. Table 7.2 Carbon Management Team members Name Pam Brandwood (lead) Julia Dickinson David Cobb Charles Rawdings Nigel Richardson Denise Brookfield Mark Molloy David Coffey Paul Cheeseman Paul Malone

7.3

Energy Manager Environmental and Safety Co-ordinator Faculty of Health Faculty of Education Faculty of Arts and Sciences Human Resources Marketing Student Services IT Students Union

Continuity Planning for Key Roles

In order to ensure the plan is successful and remains on track, provision has been made for Francis Carragher to take over the role of Project Sponsor in the absence of Bill Hancox. The role of project leader will be undertaken by the deputy project leader should it be required.

7.4

Ongoing Stakeholder Management

The Environmental and Safety Co-ordinator and Energy Manager will be responsible for ensuring continued communication and stakeholder engagement. Table 7.3 provides information on the stakeholders, their interests and their impact on the plan.

32

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Influence

Impact

Table 7.3 Stakeholder Management Summary

Their interest or issues

Steve Igoe

H

H

Responsibility for all environmental issues.

Monthly meetings with Sustainability Team.

Bill Hancox Director of FM

H

H

Environmental reporting responsibilities.

Monthly meetings with Sustainability Team.

Carl Gibson Director of Finance

H

M

David Oldham Director of Capital Projects

H

H

Implementation of carbon projects within capital schemes. Possible redirection of funding towards reducing carbon.

Students’ Union

H

H

Partnership with sustainability initiatives.

Monthly meetings with Sustainability Team.

M

Emphasis on low energy equipment. Need to keep abreast of latest energy efficient technologies.

Twice yearly meeting with CM Board. Engagement with CM Team Member.

Sam Armstrong Head of Corporate Communications M

M

Keep abreast of sustainable actions and projects to inform future publications and general media awareness.

Twice yearly meeting with CM Board. Engagement with CM Team Member.

Ann Collins Director of HR

M

M

George Talbot Dean of Faculty of Arts & Sciences M

M

Robert Smedley Dean of Faculty of Education

M

M

Keep abreast of activities within the University. Potential involvement of students in community engagement projects.

Seth Crofts Dean of Faculty of Health

M

M

Keep abreast of activities within the University.

M

M

Greater involvement of staff relating to carbon reduction projects. Budget implications.

CM Team

H

H

Engage with carbon reduction activities and provide information and awareness. Quarterly Meetings.

Sustainability Champions

H

M

Involvement in and promotion of carbon reduction activities.

Staff

M

L

Responsibility to undertake tasks in an environmentally responsible manor.

Student

M

L

Social responsibility to reduce emissions and save fossil fuel.

Individual or Group

Mark Allinson Director of IT Services

Fran Carragher Head of FM

M

Cost / budgets. Under pressure to reduce costs. Influence and involvement in sustainable procurement.

Means of Communication

Senior budget meetings. Annual report. Monthly meetings with Sustainability Team.

Possible adjustment to staff contracts to incorporate added responsibilities/ inclusion of terms for sustainability within standard contract.

Keep abreast of activities within the University. Potential involvement of geography and media students in carbon projects.

Twice yearly meeting with CM Board. Engagement with CM Team Member. Twice yearly meeting with CM Board. Engagement with CM Team Member. Twice yearly meeting with CM Board. Engagement with CM Team Member. Twice yearly meeting with CM Board. Engagement with CM Team Member. Monthly meetings with Sustainability Team.

Termly Meetings.

Monthly updates on web pages and other electronic communications. Engagement with awareness raising activities. Monthly updates on web pages and other electronic communications. Engagement with awareness raising activities.

Influence: the level of influence on the successful outcome of the Programme - High (H), Medium (M) or Low (L) Impact: the level of impact that the Project will have on the person or group - High (H), Medium (M) or Low (L)

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

33


Edge Hill University

7.5

Annual Progress Review to Senior Management Team

A carbon management update will be provided by the Energy Manager as part of the annual Institutional Health, Safety and Environmental Report which is presented to the Board of Governors in October. It will provide data on progress against targets and detail savings achieved with a summation of each individual project. The report will be available on Edge Hill’s website.

34

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Appendices

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

35


36

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

WORST

1

2

3

4

CM is full-time responsibility of an individual CM integrated in managers, not all staff

CM is full-time responsibility of a few people CM integrated in responsibilities of senior managers VC support descriptions Part of all job descriptions END

RESPONSIBILITY

No policy No Climate Change reference

No policy Climate Change aspiration

No CM responsibility designation

CM is part-time START responsibility of an individual No departmental champions

START CM is part-time Draft policy Climate Change responsibility of a reference few people CM responsibility of department champions

SMART Targets developed but not implemented

END

SMART Targets signed off Action plan contains clear goals & regular progress reviews 5 Strategy launched BEST internally & to community

POLICY

Not compiled: - CO2 emissions Estimated billing

START No CO2 emissions data compiled Energy data compiled on a regular basis

Collation of CO2 emissions for limited scope i.e. buildings only

END Annual collation of CO2 emissions for: - Buildings - Transport - waste Data internally reviewed

Quarterly collation of CO2 emissions for all sources Data externally verified M&T in place for: - Buildings - Waste

DATA MANAGEMENT

START

No communication or training

Regular poster/ awareness campaigns Staff given ad hoc CM: - Communications

Environmental / energy group(s) give ad hoc: - Training - Communications

All staff & students given CM: - Communications CM communicated to: - External community - Key partners

END

All staff & students given formalised CM: - Induction - Training Plan - Communications CM matters regularly communicated to: - External community - Key partners

COMMUNICATION & TRAINING

No internal financing or funding for CM related projects

START Ad hoc financing for CM related projects Limited task coordination resources

Ad hoc financing for CM projects Limited task management No allocated resource

Regular financing for CM projects Some external financing Sufficient task management mechanism END

Granular & effective financing mechanisms for CM projects Finance representation on CM Team Robust task management mechanism Ring-fenced fund for carbon reduction initiatives

FINANCE & INVESTMENT

START No Green consideration No life cycle costing

Green criteria occasionally considered Products considered in isolation

Whole life costing occasionally employed Some pooling of environmental expertise

Environmental demands incorporated in tendering Familiarity with Procura+ Joint procuring between HEIs or END with LAs.

Senior purchasers consult & adhere to ICLEI’s Procura+ manual & principles Sustainability comprehensively integrated in tendering criteria Whole life costing Area-wide procurement

PROCUREMENT

START No CM monitoring

Ad hoc reviews of CM actions progress

CM team review aspects including: - Policies / Strategies - Targets - Action Plans

Core team regularly reviews CM progress: - Actions - Profile & Targets - New opportunities quantification

END

Senior management review CM process Core team regularly reviews CM progress Published externally on website Visible board level review

MONITORING & EVALUATION

Appendix A: Carbon Management Matrix – Embedding

Appendix A: Carbon Management Matrix – Embedding


Appendix B: Definition of Projects Project:

Energy Awareness Campaigns

Reference:

EHU 005 & 006

Owner (person)

Pamela Brandwood – Energy Manager

Department

FM

Description

There will be a planned energy awareness campaign engaging students, staff and visitors. Example activities will include a switch-off campaign and an inter-hall competition.

Benefits

• • • • •

Campaign costs :£3,000 Financial savings: £10,500 Payback period: 0 years (ongoing yearly campaign) CO2 Emissions reduction: 64 tonnes of CO2 4.48 % of planned CO2 emissions reduction

Funding

Met within operational budgets

Resources

Current Staff

TBA

Measuring Success

AMR data prior to and after installation

Timing

TBC

Ensuring Success

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

37


Appendix B: Definition of Projects

Project:

Replace the main electrical transformer and 3 oldest subs. with ultra-low loss transformers.

Reference:

EHU 008

Owner (person)

Vipin Baichoo – Carbon Project Manager

Department

FM

Description

Replacing these transformers with much more efficient ultra-low loss equivalents would result in decreased electrical consumption and associated loads with no detrimental impact. E.g. if electricity is supplied at above 250V to the campus site, these low loss transformers have the potential to decrease it to 220V by tapping down, resulting in potential efficiency gains of between 3 to 8 %.

Benefits

The approximate potential saving is assumed to be 5%, based on total site electrical consumption in 2009 would equate to: Cost: Indicative installation cost (labour) and equipment costs = £125,000 (indicative estimate prior to contractor survey of campus transformers)

38

• • • •

Financial savings: £ 19,350/year Payback period: 6.5 years CO2 Emissions reduction: 117 tonnes of CO2 8.19 % of planned CO2 emissions reduction

Funding

TBA

Resources

TBA

Ensuring Success

• •

Inform and engage FM team members and staff as to reasons why this is being done. Principal risks: part of the equipment on campus cannot operate at reduced voltage, for example medical equipment. This will require risk assessments.

Measuring Success

AMR data before and after full implementation

Timing

TBA

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Project:

Replace exterior campus lighting with LED

Reference:

EHU 009

Owner (person)

Vipin Baichoo – Carbon Project Manager

Department

FM

Description

The main external lighting on buildings and around the car parks comprises of high-pressure sodium fittings. These can be replaced with much more efficient LEDs fittings that can more than halve the current energy consumption of the sodium lamps.

Benefits

CARBON DIOXIDE SAVED……………………………………44.1 Tonnes ANNUAL ENERGY SAVED …………………………………. £7,290 • •

Payback period: 3.3 years (without installation costs) 2.2 % of planned CO2 emission reductions

Funding

TBC

Resources

TBA

Ensuring Success

Installation costs from contractors will need to be assessed

Measuring Success

Measure consumption prior to and after installation

Timing

TBC

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

39


Appendix B: Definition of Projects

Project:

Campus Heating Policy

Reference:

EHU 010

Owner (person)

Vipin Baichoo – Carbon Project Manager

Department

FM

Description

At the present time, there is no campus-wide heating policy in place. A heating policy is being developed and will be implemented to set the framework for measures such as: minimum heating temperatures reduced by at least 1oC to 20oC. summer boiler shutdown from June to September. turning-off heating earlier (e.g. one hour earlier than usual) programming the BMS to turn-off space heating systems for public holidays and university shut downs, so that only minimal heating will be needed. 5. space management such as moving students from older halls of residence in the Holidays to the newer halls so that gas boilers can be turned off or heating times decreased, and 6. improving controls by increasing the dead bands on heating and cooling systems from current 1.5oC to 5oC. 1. 2. 3. 4.

Benefits

• • • •

Cost: should be minimal direct costs – costs will relate to awareness training and using the M&T system analyse consumption before and after measures are implemented. Payback period: within one year after full implementation CO2 Emissions reduction: 109 tonnes of CO2 (approx.) 7.6 % of planned CO2 emissions reductions Calculations:

For example, the potential summer shut down of main boilers for only FOE, PA, MATEC, NGAS, CMIST, SPS buildings could achieve circa 50 tonnes CO2 reduction in itself.

Funding

TBA

Resources

TBA

Ensuring Success

Inform and engage FM team members and affected stakeholders (students and staff) as to reasons why this is being done Principal risks: Space – increased pressure on space may create need to use these buildings out of core hours

Measuring Success

• •

Timing

40

Metrics included sub-metered gas consumption before and after implementation of the policy Feedback from staff and students as to suitability and effectiveness of measures TBA

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Project:

Reduce power consumption of main campus servers

Reference:

EHU 011

Owner (person)

Mark Allinson – Director of IT Services

Department

IT Services

Description

Older more efficient servers are due to be replaced from 2010 onwards with virtual servers.

Benefits

• • •

Costs: N/A – allocated and already implemented CO2 Emissions reduction: 20 tonnes 1.4 % of planned CO2 savings

Funding

Already implemented and met within capital budgets

Resources

TBA

Ensuring Success

TBA

Measuring Success

AMR data prior to and after installation

Timing

TBC

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

41


Appendix B: Definition of Projects

Project:

Installation of AMR sub-metering with monitoring and targeting of consumption

Reference:

EHU 012

Owner (person)

Pamela Brandwood – Energy Manager

Department

FM

Description

Installing AMR, monitoring and targeting software is estimated to reduce total utilities consumption by 10%. The purchase and installation of AMR sub-meters, coupled with the implementation of a Monitoring and Targeting system will allow; •

• •

Quantification of accurate consumption data in real time to facilitate the analysis of consumption patterns for individual buildings - ‘you cannot manage what you cannot measure’ Review of maximum demand profiles for accuracy: This could lead to savings in the price paid for utilities as correctly forecasted maximum consumption can drastically alter the price paid per unit for utilities Automated meter readings (currently all meters are read manually) The identification of any HVAC (Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning) systems being used unnecessarily The provision of data to run awareness campaigns and offer competitions to staff and students to reduce energy consumption Benchmarking of building in terms of consumption and performance, allowing optimum utilisation Internal re-charging for high levels of utilities consumption to incentivise reduced consumption The identification of leaks in the water system The identification of poorly performing buildings which can lead to identifying and implementing improvements in the fabric identifying peculiarities in consumption. The quick identification of invoicing errors and rectify them The eradication of estimated billing and account reconciliation

TBA

• • • • • • •

Benefits Funding

Financial savings: £53,000 • • • •

Payback period: 3.2 years CO2 Emissions reduction: 323 tonnes 11% of planned CO2 savings Costs: £121,000

Resources

Approved for implementation and delivered within existing FM budget

Ensuring Success

Inform and engage FM team members and stakeholders as to reasons why this is being done Principal risks: Roll-out might run beyond schedule due to unplanned events

42

Measuring Success

Reduction in consumption in related to buildings with AMR

Timing

To start roll-out from the Spring of 2011 and aim for completion by September 2011

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Project:

Replace main library and SIC buildings lighting with LED

Reference:

EHU 013

Owner (person)

Vipin Baichoo – Carbon Project Manager

Department

FM

Description

The library lighting comprises of 18W T8’s, dual 26W CFLs and 2D fluorescents. The SIC has a majority of 70W T8s. Replacing all the fittings with ultra-efficient LED would lead to major savings in energy and carbon with increased lamp life.

Benefits

• • • • •

Financial savings: £ 36,360 Cost = £164,000 Payback period 4.5 years CO2 emissions reduction: 220 tonnes of CO2 15.4 % of planned CO2 emissions reduction

Funding

TBC

Resources

TBA

Ensuring Success

• • •

Inform and engage FM team, students and staff members as to reasons why this is being done Trial LED in specific designated areas and gauge feedback Principal risks: the upgrade would have to be phased in the summer holidays so as to enable students and staff to effectively use the buildings with minimal disruptions.

Measuring Success

• •

Measure consumption prior to and after installation Feedback from staff and students as to suitability of equipment

Timing

TBC

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

43


Appendix B: Definition of Projects

Project:

Upgrade boilers & loft insulation in Forest Court Halls of Residence

Reference:

EHU 014 and EHU 015

Owner (person)

Vipin Baichoo – Carbon Project Manager

Department

FM

Description

The combi boilers in Forest Court are more than 15 years old. These are due for replacement due to age and hence decreased efficiency and will need to be replaced by very efficient condensing boilers as part of any refurbishment. The other reason for replacing is that spares are much harder to obtain and boilers have already been replaced by condensing units due to the cost and difficulty in sourcing for older models. The current loft insulation is 15 years old and only 150mm in depth. Upgrading it to at least 300mm, and relaying the existing installation where it has been moved or disturbed, will further increase heat retention and result in a decrease in energy consumption and associated carbon emissions.

44

Benefits

• • • • •

Financial savings: £ 9,000 Payback period: 7.6 years CO2 emissions reduction: 31 tonnes Cost: £69,000 2.9% of planned CO2 savings

Funding

TBC

Resources

TBA

Ensuring Success

Principal risks: none if work is undertaken when student residents are moved to other halls during holiday periods.

Measuring Success

• •

Better heating levels for students Monitor through AMR

Timing

TBC

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Project:

Minor lighting upgrade schemes across campus buildings.

Reference:

EHU- 016, 017, 023, 025, 026, 028, 030, 033, 035, 037

Owner (person)

Vipin Baichoo – Carbon Project Manager

Department

FM

Description

Numerous Buildings across the campus have light fittings with T8 tubes that can be upgraded to more efficient T5 lamps leading to decreased electrical consumption and CO2 emissions.

Benefits

• • • • •

Costs : £11,200 Financial savings: £ 4,860 Payback period: 2.3 years CO2 emissions reduction: 29.4 tonnes 2.1 % of planned CO2 savings

Funding

TBC

Resources

TBA

Ensuring Success

Principal risks: Increased labour costs for installation

Measuring Success

• •

AMR data prior to and after implementation Feedback from staff and students as to suitability of equipment

Timing

TBC

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

45


Appendix B: Definition of Projects

46

Project:

Install solar film on south facing ground and middle floor windows

Reference:

EHU 018

Owner (person)

Vipin Baichoo – Carbon Project Manager

Department

FM

Description

The ground floor computer rooms and floor above face south and have only cotton pull-down blinds to minimise heat gain. Installing solar film is a cost-effective way to minimise heat gain, resulting in potential efficiency gains and more comfortable conditions for users of the building.

Benefits

• • • • •

Cost: £2,730 Financial savings: £1,035 Payback period: 2.6 years CO2 Emissions reduction: 6.3 tonnes 0.44% of planned CO2 savings

Funding

TBC

Resources

TBA

Ensuring Success

Principal risks: The installation must be undertaken during the Holiday period and the selected film must not detrimentally affect the building users.

Measuring Success

AMR data prior to and after implementation

Timing

TBC

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Project:

Install speed controls to motors and pumps across campus buildings and re-commission Building Management System to incorporate changes in building use.

Reference:

EHU 019, 020, 021,

Owner (person)

Vipin Baichoo – Carbon Project Manager

Department

FM

Description

There are numerous air handling units (AHUs) and pumps with large motors attached. Installing speed control will more effectively match the loads to demand and increase motor life. Some of the campus buildings BMS settings have not been re-commissioned to reflect the change in usage of the buildings. A review of the BMS controls will lead to effective management of the building systems.

Benefits

• • • • •

Cost: £13,750 Financial savings: £8,640 Payback period: 1.6 years CO2 Emissions reduction: 52 tonnes 3.7% of planned CO2 emissions reduction

Funding

TBC

Resources

TBA

Ensuring Success

Principal risks: A full survey with data logging equipment will be undertaken to verify the potential savings prior to and after implementation.

Measuring Success

Measure consumption using attached data logging equipment prior to and after installation.

Timing

TBC

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

47


Appendix B: Definition of Projects

48

Project:

MATEC Main Lighting replacement

Reference:

EHU 022

Owner (person)

Vipin Baichoo – Carbon Project Manager

Department

FM

Description

The MATEC has inefficient fittings comprising of 3 x 18W T8 tubes. Installing more efficient 14W T5s with new fittings would at best decrease the electrical consumption by 59%, reduce the associated carbon emissions.

Benefits

• • • • •

Cost: £10,129 Financial savings: £2,520/year Payback period: 4 years CO2 emissions reduction: 14 tonnes 1.1 % of planned CO2 savings

Funding

TBC

Resources

TBA

Ensuring Success

Principal risks: Cost of installation rises to make project less viable

Measuring Success

• •

AMR data prior to and after implementation Feedback from staff and students as to suitability of equipment

Timing

TBC

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Project:

NGAS main lighting replacement with new fittings and T5 lamps

Reference:

EHU 024

Owner (person)

Vipin Baichoo – Carbon Project Manager

Department

FM

Description

There are approx. over three hundred fittings in the NGAS building of 18W T8 tubes. These can be replaced by much more efficient T5 by use of new fittings. This can result decrease electrical load, 59% energy savings and reduced carbon emissions with new tubes that have a longer lifespan than the existing T8 tubes.

Benefits

• • • • •

Cost: £22,799 Total Potential Financial savings: £5,350 Payback period: 4.3 years CO2 emissions reduction: 32.3 tonnes 1.3 % of planned CO2 savings

Funding

TBC

Resources

TBA

Ensuring Success

Principal risks: Increase in installation costs make project less attractive

Measuring Success

• •

AMR data prior to and after implementation Feedback from staff and students as to suitability of equipment

Timing

TBC

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

49


Appendix B: Definition of Projects

Project:

Connection of solar thermal panels in Sporting Edge

Reference:

EHU 027

Owner (person)

Dave Oldham – Director of Capital Projects

Department

Capital Projects

Description

A large array of solar thermal panels has been installed on the roof of the Sporting Edge building in December 2010. The system will be connected in February 2011 and the output used to heat water for showers.

Benefits

• •

CO2 emissions reduction: 14.7 tonnes/year 1.03 % of planned CO2 savings

Funding

Met and installed already within planned capital budgets

Resources

N/A

Ensuring Success

TBA

Measuring Success

AMR data prior to and after installation

Timing

50

Installed

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Project:

Install dimming circuits to existing path and car park lighting

Reference:

EHU 029

Owner (person)

Vipin Baichoo – Carbon Project Manager

Department

FM

Description

There are approx. 50 single fittings from 5m to 8m in height around paths and car parks on campus. Dimming (dual –tap) circuits can be retro-fitted to these that reduce the power output by 30% from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. The lamp posts and lamps would remain but the dual-tap circuit would fit in the base of the post.

Benefits

For simplicity each fitting has been assumed to be at least rated at 150W power consumption not including ballast losses. In fact, some fittings are 250W high pressure sodium, so the potential savings would in fact be higher than those calculated here. Until an asset survey is undertaken, the potential savings are based on all the fittings being 150W. Carbon Savings = 4.2 tonnes CO2 Financial savings: £ 700/year • • • •

Cost: £3,060 Payback period: 4.4 years CO2 Emissions reduction: 4.2 tonnes 0.3 % of planned CO2 savings

Funding

TBC

Resources

TBA

Ensuring Success

• •

Inform and engage FM team members as to reasons why this is being done Principal risks: installation costs increase to limit the cost effectiveness

Measuring Success

AMR before and after installation

Timing

TBC

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

51


Appendix B: Definition of Projects

52

Project:

Insulate Heating System Pipework in the Old Halls of the Main Building

Reference:

EHU 038

Owner (person)

Vipin Baichoo –Carbon Project Manager

Department

FM

Description

None of the pipework that is exposed across the four halls is insulated. Applying insulation will reduce avoidable heat losses and decrease the associated carbon emissions.

Benefits

• • • • •

Costs: £43,000 Financial savings: £9,000 Payback period: 4.8 years CO2 Emissions reduction: 57 tonnes CO2e 3.86 % of planned CO2e savings

Funding

TBA

Resources

TBA

Ensuring Success

TBA

Measuring Success

AMR data prior to and after installation

Timing

TBC

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Project:

Replace all AHU filters with energy efficient equivalents

Reference:

EHU 039

Owner (person)

Vipin Baichoo – Carbon Project Manager

Department

FM

Description

Currently, all the air handling units (AHU’s) on campus use standard air panel and bag filters. It is possible to replace these with more efficient filters that will reduce energy and labour costs with increased filter unit life spans.

Benefits

• • • • •

Capital costs: £5,000 Financial savings: £4,140 Payback period: 1.7 years CO2 Emissions reduction: 25 tonnes/year 1.75 % of planned CO2 savings

Funding

TBC

Resources

TBA

Ensuring Success

TBA

Measuring Success

AMR data prior to and after installation

Timing

TBC

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

53


Appendix B: Definition of Projects

Project:

Install Solar PV to the Durning Centre

Reference:

EHU 040

Owner (person)

Dave Oldham – Director of Capital Projects

Department

Capital Projects

Description

Solar PV of approximately 40 kW peak capacity has been installed to the Durning Centre. The output is fed into the Low Voltage network of the University.

Benefits

• • •

Financial savings: £11,000 (at 7.81p/kWh and including Feed In Tariff ) CO2 Emissions reduction: 16.3 tonnes/year 1.14 % of planned CO2 savings

Funding

Met and installed already within planned capital budgets

Resources

N/A

Ensuring Success

TBA

Measuring Success

AMR data prior to and after installation

Timing

54

Installed

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Project:

Insulate Plant Room Flanges and Valves

Reference:

EHU 041

Owner (person)

Vipin Baichoo – Carbon Project Manager

Department

FM

Description

There are numerous un-insulated valves and flanges across the plant rooms on campus

Benefits

• • • • •

Capital costs: £9,000 Financial savings: £5,910 Payback period: 1.9 years CO2 Emissions reduction: 36.2 tonnes 2.54 % of planned savings

Funding

TBC

Resources

TBA

Ensuring Success

TBA

Measuring Success

AMR data prior to and after installation

Timing

TBC

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

55


Appendix B: Definition of Projects

Project:

Feasibility into MFD sleep mode reduction

Reference:

EHU 043

Owner (person)

Pam Brandwood – Energy Manager

Department

FM

Description

To assess the viability of putting Multi Function Devices (MFDs) into sleep mode 2 over night.

Benefits

• • • • • •

Capital costs: £0 kWh savings potential: 57163/year Financial savings: £5145 Payback period: 0 years CO2 Emissions reduction: 31.1 tonnes 2.18 % of target

Funding

None required (part of contract)

Resources

None (MFD supplier to make adjustments)

Ensuring Success

The Energy Manager will liaise with all parties during the trial and if successful will use the savings achievable as part of the efficency information.

Measuring Success

Consult with IT and MFD users to ensure there are no adverse consequences to the use of sleep mode 2.

Timing

56

Trial in FM department to take place throughout March 2011. If trial proves successful roll out across campus July 2011.

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Project:

Building Closure Feasibility Study

Reference:

EHU101

Owner (person)

Pam Brandwood – Energy Manager

Department

FM

Description

Analysis of individual building profiles to be undertaken after the installation of sub metering. The information provided accompanied by a questionnaire to ascertain current usage will highlight the feasibility of closing some buildings during the summer period.

Benefits

Potential to reduce energy and CO2

None

No additional resources required - Feasibility study will be undertaken by the Energy Manager

Ensuring Success

The progress of the project will be monitored through the Sustainability Group meetings with any delays in progress having to be reported to the group.

Measuring Success

Analysis of energy half-hour data

Funding

Resources

Timing

2012/13 (after full summers worth of half-hour data)

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

57


Appendix B: Definition of Projects

Project:

Reducing Paper: Feasibility Study

Reference:

EHU102

Owner (person)

Pam Brandwood/Mary Dean

Department

FM/NAS

Description

To assess the benefits of replacing paper with technical alternatives: A funded project is currently in progress to assess the benefits /drawbacks of replacing paper committee reports with e-readers. Consider changing the format of dissertation submission (single sided double spaced). Asses the viability of more coursework and feedback being submitted on-line. Asses the viability of more lecturing online.

Benefits

Removing the need to print out paper will reduce: • Energy Consumption • Paper and toner • Waste - paper going to recycling • Costs • Commuting – no need to travel to site to hand in essays or attend lectures It also reinforces the policy of sustainability and innovation

Funding

None

Resources

None (MFD supplier to make adjustments)

Ensuring Success

The progress of the project will be monitored through the Sustainability Group meetings with any delays in progress having to be reported to the group.

Measuring Success

Timing

58

2011/12

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Project:

Inclusion of Energy Efficiency in Staff Induction and Handbook

Reference:

EHU103

Owner (person)

Denise Brookfield/Pam Brandwood

Department

HR/FM

Description

The inclusion of a section on sustainability and carbon reduction in both the staff induction and handbook to emphasise individual responsibility.

Benefits

There are no direct costs or carbon savings attributed to this project. The project will: Reinforce awareness and ownership of carbon reduction for all staff. Inform staff of the presence of the Sustainability Team and the webpage.

Funding

Resources

Ensuring Success

None

No additional resources required – presentation and wording provided by the Sustainability Team

This action has already been undertaken. It is to be included in the 2010 staff handbook and was part of the September 2010 induction

Measuring Success

Timing

complete

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

59


Appendix B: Definition of Projects

Project:

Priority parking for car sharers

Reference:

EHU 501

Owner (person)

Julia Dickinson - Environmental and Safety Co-ordinator

Department

FM

Description

Providing priority parking for those that car share. Parking bays in prime locations will be available for use by car sharers between 8-10am, Mon-Fri. Staff and students must be registered on the Shared Wheels Scheme and apply for a priority parking badge which will enable them to use the designated spaces, providing there are at least two people in the vehicle.

Benefits

Will help reduce the number of cars coming to site with associated carbon savings. Helps congestion by reducing the number of cars attempting to park on campus. It also helps staff and students reduce travel costs as they share the burden of purchasing fuel.

Funding Resources

Ensuring Success

CO2 Emissions reduction: 31 tonnes of CO2 (assumes a 5% increase in car sharing)

£1000

• •

Marketing Traffic Assistants

Inform and engage FM Campus Support who will be responsible for managing the logistics of the scheme. Inform and engage FM Customer Services who will be responsible for processing and issuing priority parking badges to car sharers. Communicate the scheme and application process comprehensively across campus to all staff and students.

• •

Measuring Success

• • •

Timing

60

Monitor the number of priority parking badges that are issued. Calculate the number of cars utilising the car share spaces on a daily basis. Request feedback from users and also include questions in the Travel Survey.

Launch on 28th February 2011 (first day of Green Week)

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Project:

Cycle lanes

Reference:

EHU 502

Owner (person)

Julia Dickinson - Environmental and Safety Co-ordinator

Department

FM

Description

Provide cycle lanes that enable staff and students to connect with the University from Ormskirk town centre, train station and key student hubs. Where cycle lanes are not feasible install other road markings and make improvements to facilitate cycling.

Benefits

Will help encourage more staff, and particularly students, to cycle to Edge Hill thus reducing carbon emissions from alternative travel methods. Highly visible road markings and improvements will help people feel more confident about travelling to work or study by bike. It will also help reduce congestion by taking cars off the road. Furthermore, cycling offers a healthier alternative to travel by car. •

Funding

CO2 Emissions reduction: 53 tonnes of CO2 (assumes an increase in cycling of approximately 5%)

Comprehensive changes have been estimated in the region of £300,000. Changes will be prioritised and Section 106 funding may be available to subsidise implementation.

Resources

• • •

Lancashire County Council Cycling Officer West Lancs. Borough Council Planning Department Marketing

Ensuring Success

• •

Work with local councils to identify suitable cycling routes and changes. Work with local cycling groups, student societies to lobby the council where necessary. Communicate any changes to staff, students and indeed the wider community who will also benefit.

Measuring Success

Timing

Travel Survey

2011

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

61


Appendix B: Definition of Projects

Project:

Waste management contract

Reference:

EHU 503

Owner (person)

Chris Ryan – FM Housekeeping Manager

Department

FM

Description

Re-tendering and implementation of a new waste contract that will clearly stipulate the requirements for increasing reuse and recycling on campus, providing the infrastructure to support this together with appropriate awareness raising campaigns and also the provision of waste data.

Benefits

Recycling will increase as a better infrastructure is established which will make it easier for people to recycle. Carbon emissions associated with recycling are lower than those associated with landfill which will enable the University to reduce emissions from waste. Furthermore, additional waste streams will be identified and recycled allowing more waste to be diverted from landfill. CO2 Emissions reduction: Between 200 – 500 tonnes over 5 years (Assumes recycling rates increase to 50% and the total amount of waste sent to landfill does not increase significantly).

Funding

Resources

Ensuring Success

Measuring Success

Timing

62

Estimated cost of waste contract is £250,000 per year. Awareness raising: £500

FM Housekeeping and FM Campus Support Marketing •

• •

Communicate with staff and students to raise awareness of the principles of the waste hierarchy and ensure they understand how and where to recycle items. Inform and engage FM employees to help drive project forward Effective contractor control

Waste disposal data from contractor

New contract will be implemented in time for start of 2011/12 Academic Year

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Project:

Composting food waste

Reference:

EHU 504

Owner (person)

Julia Dickinson – Environmental & Safety Co-ordinator

Department

FM

Description

Collect campus food waste and turn into compost by processing on-site.

Benefits

Minimise the environmental impact of food waste disposal by reducing the carbon emissions. Will reduce the number of waste collections required which in turn will reduce collection and disposal costs. Provides a continuous supply of a useable end product and cut landscaping purchases. CO2 Emissions reduction: 90 tonnes CO2 per annum (assumes 70% of food waste from on-site catering outlets is composted) Possibility to extend food collections to halls of residence in the future.

Funding

Resources

Ensuring Success

Measuring Success

£25,000

Grounds Team Collection infrastructure • • •

Ensure FM staff are aware of the benefits and importance of segregating food waste on campus. Ensure Grounds Team are trained in the use of the composter. Educate staff and students on the benefits of composting.

• •

Monitor amount of compost produced on a weekly basis. Obtain feedback from users.

Timing

2011/12

Notes

Disposal charges and landfill taxation have doubled over the last five years and will double again over the next five. By separating food waste it can prevent contamination of other recyclables and greatly reduce smelly unhygienic waste. In the future, the government may ban certain types of rubbish, such as food waste, going to landfill.

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

63


Appendix B: Definition of Projects

Project:

End-of-term reuse scheme in halls of residence

Reference:

EHU 505

Owner (person)

Julia Dickinson – Environmental & Safety Co-ordinator

Department

FM

Description

A scheme that encourages students to donate reusable items when they move out of their halls of residence at the end-of-term, instead of disposing as waste and sending to landfill.

Benefits

Reduces waste disposal costs and carbon emissions by diverting waste from landfill. It also encourages resource efficiency and longer life-span of products as well as decreasing the resources needed to produce new items. The scheme can help to raise awareness to increase recycling and reuse activities among students. CO2 Emissions reduction: 30 tonnes CO2 per annum (approximately)

Funding

£1,000

Resources

Accommodation Team, FM Housekeeping, Students’ Union Student volunteers Local charities Marketing

Ensuring Success

• •

Multi-stakeholder approach – ensure effective communication Ensure students are well informed of the scheme and make donating as easy as possible

Measuring Success

• • •

Complete monitoring forms Get charities to weigh donations where possible Calculate total amount of items diverted and associated carbon emission savings Obtain feedback from all involved Produce a report detailing successes and outlining improvements for future years

• •

Timing

64

May – June

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Appendix C: Role Description

Sustainability Champion (Graduwatt) Main purpose of this role:

The Sustainability Champion is a staff member or student who is interested in helping to actively reduce the overall environmental impact of Edge Hill University. A key role within the development and success of the University’s sustainability strategy, the Sustainability Champion will actively support their department in meeting the University’s objectives in relation to carbon management, waste minimisation, and sustainable travel. The Sustainability Champions will contribute ideas, suggestions and initiatives for improving the environmental performance in their areas to the Carbon Management Team member in their area. Sustainability Champions will ‘lead by example’ in encouraging fellow students or members of staff in ensuring that the wider University community contributes towards reducing our environmental impacts. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Directors and Deans should ensure that: •

• •

There is appropriate representation at relevant forums i.e. Carbon Management Board and Team and network forums; Consultation takes place with the groups they represent on matters relating to the development, implementation, monitoring and review of the University’s sustainability strategy and carbon management plan; Heads of Department nominate suitable person(s) to fulfil the role of Sustainability Champions within their respective areas of responsibility.

Heads of Department should ensure that: •

Sustainability Champions are allocated time for suitable training and development so they may competently fulfil their role. We estimate that Sustainability Champions will not be required to undertake more than a couple of hours a month either attending network meetings or training, or helping to promote greener practices within their department; Sustainability Champions are provided with adequate ‘facility time’ so they may undertake relevant training and carry out their duties.

Carbon Management Team Members Acting as the interface between the Sustainability Champion and Carbon Management Team they will perform the same duties as a Sustainability Champion but with the additional responsibilities of: • • •

Reporting actions to the Carbon Management Team Ensuring there are adequate numbers of Sustainability Champions in their area Ensuring the implementation of identified projects within their area

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

65


Appendix C: Role Description

Sustainability Champions

Individual, in so far as, they are assured that all queries, comments and recommendations will be investigated fully so that they can sincerely feel that their input will have a positive influence upon the University. Sustainability Champions will form part of a cross-campus network which will allow them to network with other colleagues fulfilling the same role within other departments and share experiences and practices. It is proposed that network meetings of Sustainable Champions are held once per term (facilitated by the Sustainability Team). There is also a possibility of an Annual Awards Ceremonyhighlighting the work of the Sustainability Champions and recognising significant achievements of individuals in supporting and actively developing initiatives within their respective areas. Main duties of the role:

With appropriate support from the Sustainability Team: 1. To act as the departmental co-ordinator- a single point of contact for the Carbon Management Team - with regards to sustainability issues and developments 2. To contribute ideas regarding topics such as improvements to the recycling facilities, increased provision of Fairtrade goods, energy reduction initiatives 3. To ‘champion’ the sustainability agenda, and the wider work of the University, becoming aware of Edge Hill’s Environmental Management Strategy and associated policies 4. To actively encourage colleagues to become environmentally aware and follow sound environmental practices i.e. use available recycling facilities, consider their carbon footprint when commuting to and from work and reduce energy consumption etc. 5. To advise new staff, or staff in the surrounding working area, on environmental practices or policies relating to sustainability 6. To provide regular feedback to the Carbon Management Team on any environmental information / publications that come to light through the professional working of the Sustainability Champion to aid the full integration of sustainable development into all curricular and professional working areas of the University through all teams, staff and student groups.

66

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015


Appendix D: Summary of Environmental Management Strategy (2010-2015) Area

Objective

Objective Target

Energy Management

To reduce the environmental impact and costs arising from energy use in buildings through the better management of resources, as well as meeting the requirements of legislation.

Reduce our carbon emissions from energy use by 6% by 2013/14 from a 2008/09 baseline.

To help people travel to work and study minimising pollution, congestion and the overall environmental impact that will help the institution grow in a sustainable way.

Reduce the percentage of single occupancy car journeys made to the University by staff and students by 2012 from 70% to 55% and 37% to 20% respectively from a 2008 baseline.

Environmental Management Systems

Transport

Implement an Environmental Management System (EMS) that will provide a mechanism to systematically manage the University’s environmental impacts, its legislative compliance obligations and deliver continuous improvement.

To implement a fully operational, externally verified EMS across the University by December 2015.

Generate 10% of total energy use on-site from Low and Zero-Carbon (LZC) technologies by 2015.

To ensure 45% of all journeys made by staff to work and 80% of all journeys made by students to study are made by sustainable modes of transport. Reduce car and aviation business mileage by 5% by 2015 from a 2008/09 baseline.

Identify, measure and monitor carbon emissions related to all University business travel. Waste Management

To significantly reduce our contribution to landfill through reducing volumes of waste generated by our activities and increasing reuse, recycling and resource recovery; to manage residual waste in accordance with best practice; and to ensure that waste is considered a resource by staff and students.

To cut waste to landfill to 50% from a 2008/09 baseline by 2015.

Water

To reduce the environmental impact and costs arising from water use through the better management of resources.

To reduce water consumption by 5% from a 2008/09 baseline by 2015.

Community Involvement

To encourage and support staff, students and the wider community to make sustainable lifestyle choices; and to embed ‘Education for Sustainable Development’ within the curriculum.

Students’ Union achieve Gold standard in the Sound Impact Awards by 2015.

To reduce carbon emissions from waste management by 40% from a 2008/09 baseline by 2015.

To ensure every department and faculty have a sustainability champion by 2012.

To embed ESD within the curriculum by 2015.

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

67


Appendix D: Summary of Environnemental Management Strategy (2010-2015)

Area

Procurement

Objective

To carry out our purchasing activities in an environmentally responsible and sustainable manner.

Objective Target

To implement the government’s ‘Flexible Framework for Sustainable Procurement’ to level 3 by 2015. To achieve Fairtrade University status by 2011. Source at least 30% of ingredients from local suppliers. 75% of dishes are ‘freshly’ prepared.

Construction & Refurbishment

68

To provide fit for purpose buildings which actively support energy, water, waste, biodiversity, transport, emissions and discharges and sustainable procurement targets.

To achieve a minimum of BREEAM ‘Very Good’ for all new buildings and to aspire to achieve BREEAM ‘Excellent’.

Biodiversity

To protect and increase current levels of biodiversity on campus.

To develop a Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) for the site by 2011.

Emissions & Discharges

To monitor discharges and emissions to air, land, and water to ensure effective controls are in place to reduce emissions and manage the risk of pollution

To reduce carbon emissions by 30% by 2015 from a 2008/09 baseline.

Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

To recycle at least 90% of all construction waste.

Ensure all new fleet vehicles meet with UK Vehicle Excise Duty Band ‘A’ or ‘B’ i.e. CO2 emissions <120 g/km.


Carbon Management Plan (CMP) 2010 - 2015

69



St Helens Road, Ormksirk, Lancashire, L39 4QP UK edgehill.ac.uk


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.