ПОР ТФ ОЛИО АРХИТЕКТОР НАДЕЖДА КИСЕЛЁВА
СОДЕРЖАНИЕ
00 РЕЗЮМЕ 01 ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ / ДИПЛОМНАЯ РАБОТА ФАКТОР ВРЕМЕНИ И АРХИТЕКТУРА СОЦИАЛЬНОГО ЖИЛИЩА 02 МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЙ КОНКУРС BLOCK CITY A 101 / ФАКТОР ВРЕМЕНИ / 03 ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ КАК ОСУЩЕСТВЛЯЕТСЯ «ЗАПОЛНЕНИЕ» В КВАРТИРАХ СО СВОБОДНЫМИ ПЛАНИРОВКАМИ 04 УЧЁБА КОММУНАЛЬНОЕ ЖИЛИЩЕ 05 РАБОТА ЖИЛИЩЕ / MINI APARTMENTS 06 РАБОТА РЕКОНСТРУКЦИЯ «СТАЛЬНОГО» ДОМА 07 МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЙ КОНКУРС «НОВАЯ МОСКВА» VS-КОД В РАЗВИТИЕ БОЛЬШОЙ МОСКВЫ 08 РАБОТА РЕКОНСТРУКЦИЯ СТАДИОНА «ЛОКОМОТИВ» 09 РАБОТА ДОМ В Г.СУРГУТ // MINI/MIDI/MAXI 010 РАБОТА / ГОРОДСКАЯ ИНИЦИАТИВА «АКТИВАЦИЯ» 011 ВОРКШОП / AA VISITING SCHOOL LOCIMAKE / THE WEATHER HOUSE
РЕЗЮМЕ ПЕРСОНАЛЬНАЯ ИНФОРМАЦИЯ Имя/Фамилия НАДЕЖДА КИСЕЛЁВА Национальность: Российская Федерация Дата рождения: 23/11/1986 Контакты: Россия, 162602, Череповец, ул. Карла - Либкхнехта 38-27 e-mail: privetprivetprivet@yandex.ru skype: n.kompotova tel: +79217182203
СФЕРА ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ Архитектор ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ Квалификация: Архитектор Даты: 01/09/2004 - 25/06/2010 Название учреждения: кафедра «Архитектуры и градостроительства» Вологодский Государственный Технический Университет
ОПЫТ РАБОТЫ Позиция: Архитектор Даты: 01/06/2012 - по настоящее время Род деятельности: Архитектура жилища, интерьеры Наименование учреждения: Ипотечная Строительная Компания «XXI Век» «Северсталь Стальные Решения», Череповец
Позиция: Архитектор-дизайнер Даты: 01/09/2008 - по настоящее время Род деятельности: Интерьеры публичных пространств Наименование учреждения: Фриланс
Позиция: Архитектор Даты: 22/03/2011 - 18/05/2012 Род деятельности: Архитектура жилых и общественных зданий, генпланирование, общественные пространства Наименование учреждения: Проектное Бюро Леховой, Вологда
Позиция: Архитектор-дизайнер Даты: 01/07/2008 01/08/2008 Род деятельности: Индивидуальные жилые дома Наименование учреждения: Архитектурная студия А. Новикова, Санкт - Петербург
Позиция: Преподаватель, внештата Даты: 01/02/2012 - 01/04/2012 10/09/2011 - 10/11/2011 10/09/2010 - 10/11/2010 Род деятельности: Курсовой проект Архитектура жилых зданий 4 курс - Социальное жилище 3 курс - Жилой дом средней этажности Наименование учреждения:
кафедра «Архитектуры и градостроительства» Вологодский Государственный Технический Университет
КОМПЬЮТЕРНЫЕ ПРОГРАММЫ AutoCAD, REVIT Architecture, Corel DRAW, Photoshop, 3dsMAX Microsoft World
ПУБЛИКАЦИИ И НАГРАДЫ 18 International conference on Open Building Implementation «Long Lasting Building in Urban Transformation», Beijin, China, 2012 18 международная конференция по внедрению Открытого Строительства, Пекин, Китай, 2012 Участник. Доклад. Публикация в книге «Долгоживущие здания в трансформациях города» «ФАКТОР ВРЕМЕНИ И АРХИТЕКТУРА СОЦИАЛЬНОГО ЖИЛИЩА»
Международная конференция по архитектуре “Жизнь и смерть социальных факторов”, University Californifornia,Berkeley, CA, USA, 2011. Участник
Международный смотр конкурс лучших дипломных работ по архитектуре, МООСАО, Воронеж, 2010 1 место, грамота Союза Архитекторов России
Международная конференция по архитектуре «Актуальные проблемы архитектуры и дизайна», Екатеринбург, 2010 1 место, публикация в «Архитектон» ВАК http://archvuz.ru/2010_2/5 «КОНЦЕПЦИЯ АДАПТИВНЫХ СТРУКТУР В АРХИТЕКТУРЕ ЖИЛИЩА»
Международный архитектурный конкурс «квартал А101", Мосвка, 2010 Участие в выставке работ на выставке в луизиане, Дания, shortlist.
Международный конкурс по развитию территории «Технопарк» в инновационном центре Сколоково, Мосвка, 2011 Участник.
«Большая Москва» и форум «Архитектура и Природа» (Городская агломирация) участник, презентация АрхМосква 2012, Москва 2012 Участник. Диплом Союза Московских Архитекторов.
Международный воркшоп «LociMAKE», AA visiting school, Dorset, Hook Park, UK, 2012 Участник
01
DATE: December, 2012 - nowadays ADVISER: Konstantin Kiyanenko PLACE: Vologda // Amsterdam / Copenhagen / INDEPENDENT EXPERTS: Social Housing, Adaptive structures
RESEARCH / GRADUATE THESIS WORK TIME FACTOR AND ARCHITECTURE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING
SOCIAL, POLITICAL, ECONOMIC PROCESSES
AIM The study stems from theoretical and practical aspects of adaptive structure design. The goal of this study is to develop a new method for affordable housing and urban residential environment design through the study of adaptable structures. Created method opens up an opportunity to determine new potentials for use of residential space. Taking into account the dynamism and variety of residential living, the method helps to forecast the possible adaptations of dwelling during its lifetime and therefore prolong its service life. Today in Russian architecture qualities of adaptability, flexibility, changeability and transformation are often perceived as a privilege of public buildings and expensive commercial housing. The hypothesis of the research is that they are most needed in affordable housing. This idea stems from the fact that inhabitants of subsidized sector usually have no chances for removal into a new housing unit each time when dynamics of life leads them to a conflict with their current living conditions. The aim of the research is to consider social factors and adaptable spatial structures in scenario planning as an instrument to accommodate time-based transformations into the architecture of affordable housing. The goals of the research also are: analysis of the basic concepts and techniques of 'adaptability', 'adaptive structures' and their close analogs; architectural programming for architectural design of an adaptive living environment and its use in the project of an experimental neighborhood in the city of Vologda.
dynamics of crisis
2000..
TIME CYCLES
MINI
ELASTICITY changes DAY_WEEK_MONTHE
DAY_NIGHT _SEASON _GUEST
DAY_WEEK_MONTHE
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1 2
DAY_NIGHT
PRIVAT SPACE DREAM
DAYLY_WEEKEND
Major demographic, cultural and economic process and their time cycles are identified and studied as a precondition and ground for adaptation. 'Mini cycle' is a change of events within days, weeks and months. 'Midi cycle' is one to ten years long period (changes in family composition, lifestyle, income and social status etc.). 'Maxi cycle' is a longer than ten years period (changes in building codes, financial and building industry cycles, 'aging' of population, processes of modernization and globalization in society, culture and economics, etc.).
1970..
2000 2010
1970
MO
TU
WN
годы
FR
SA
SU
WORK
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
MO
GUEST
YEARS [1-10 ]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
REST SUMMER SPACE
USING RESERVES
REST
SEQUENCE changes
MAXI
DECADE 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
HOUSING <VACANT>
GENERAL SPACES [LIVING ROOM] WATERY SPACES BATHROOM. KITCHEN] WORK [OFFICE. MASTERROOM]
SOCIAL HOUSING COMMERCIAL HOUSING
PEOPLE IN ‘TIME-BASED ARCHITECTURE’
SUBLEASE WINTER SPACE
COMBINATION SPACES
CARDINAL changes NO HOUSING
BEDROOMS BUFFER ZONE [CORRIDOR.STAIRCASES]
In the aspect of stated problem the author considers theoretical and design approaches of Wright, Le Corbusier, Hertzberger, Priemus, Cache, Lynch, Schroeder, and also concepts of two-level development of space of Habraken, Kendall, Brand, Laugier, Semper, Duffy, Leupen, Heijne, van Zwol, be considered. The aim of the research is the consideration of spatial structures as the main source for adaptation in the architecture of affordable housing. The key stages of the research are: 1. a study and review of basic concepts and techniques in the sphere of “adaptability” and “adaptive structures”; 2. architectural programming for adaptive residential environment design; 3. design conceptual project of housing block for experimental neighborhood in the city of Vologda The research methods are: -analysis of social problems and observation of different residential life models; -consideration of the latest theoretical and design approaches in architecture of adaptive housing; -survey and interviewing of residents of several well-known adaptive social housing complexes in Denmark and Netherlands; -application of considered approaches into the affordable housing model development.
REST
SEASON WORK
MIDI
TH
TRANSIT SPACE
OPEN SPACE
HAVE A DINER
METHODOLOGY
In the foreign practice of designing adaptable housing its a long and repeatedly tested thing. The author decided to use this fact to find out how the residents rate the quality of similar houses of adaptability and how it is recently claimed. It was necessary to establish the direction of transformation and to ensure the viability of the concept. To do this, the author conducted interviews with the residents in the complexes of the Netherlands and Denmark, recognized model "Time-based architecture"
PEOPLE IN TIME-BASED ARCHITECTURE
HOUSING DEVELOPERS FREEDOM. 2005. AMSTERDAM. HOLLAND
DIAGOON YOUSING. 1971. DELFT. HOLLAND
HOUSING. KVITSGARD. DENMARK HOUSING FORTRESS ON THE SOUND. 2001. MALMO. SWEDEN
FLEXIBO. 1972. GREVE. DENMARK.
AMERICA PLADS. 1971. COPENHAGEN. DENMARK
GROWTH HOMES. 2002. ALMERE. HOLLAND
HOUSING AUSTRALIA-BOSTON. 2002. AMSTERDAM. HOLLAND
MIXED-USED UNIT BUILDING. 2003. AMSTERDAM. HOLLAND
THE CONCEPTS OF ADAPTABILITY IN RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURE OPEN BUILDING
CASCO
OPEN PLAN DIRECTORY
LOFT
GROWTH HOMES
POLYVALENT SPACE
CONCEPTS OF ADAPTIVE STRUCTURE
MARK AN. LAUGIER
PERMANENT
XIIX FRANCE
ПРИМЕР МОДЕЛИРОВАНИЯ АДАПТИВНОЙ АРХИТЕКТУРЫ
LEAVES
GOTTFRIED SEMPER
BRANCHES
CHANGEABLE
SHELL
HEARTH
EARTHWORK
FRANSIC DUFFY
XIX GERMANY ROOFWORK
B. Leupen
SENERY
SERVIECES
STUARD BRAND
1990 ENGLAND COCOON
1990 USA
STRUCTURE
SKIN
SENERY
SERVIECES
STUFF
STRUCTURE
SKIN
SENERY
SERVIECES
ACCESS
EARTH
BERNARD LEUPEN
1 2 3 4 5
THE PROGRAM FOR DESIGN ADAPTIVE RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT
HOLLAND
1 SCENARIO PLANING AND LAYERS 2 PERMANENT STRUCTURE AND CHANGEABLE SPACES 3 INTERFACE AND CONTROL
INTERPOLATION CONCEPTS OF LAYERS TO THE TERRITORY
PUBLIC SPACE INFRASTRUCTURE
ECO
ATRIUM
URBAN SCREEN
ACTIVE
PARKING URBAN FURNITUR
Among basic concepts of “time-based architecture” are 'support and infill', 'open building', 'loft', 'growing house', 'sound housing', 'open plan', 'directing', 'casco', 'polyvalent space' etc. The most prospective one for adaptable architecture of affordable housing seems to be the concept of 'layers' developed by Steward Brand and Bernard Leupen. Using it as a framework the author developed a model of adaptable residential area, where elements of the outdoor living space, ranging from infrastructure to urban furniture, are subject to the logic of 'permanent' vs 'changeable' structures. As opposed to the traditional standpoint, the concept of architectural design of adaptable buildings as a permanent scenario planning of upcoming social and spatial changes has been advanced. For this concept to be realized 'resident architect' living in the project is implied as well as special written 'operation manuals' for residents in order to assist them to use a whole range of strategies for adaptations.
O P E N BUILDING
LOFT
OPEN PLAN DIRECTORY
B. Leupen
B. Leupen
POLYVALENT SPACE
CASCO
GROWTH HOMES
GROWING HOUSE
PERMANENT
CHANGE
B. Leupen
PERMANENT
=
ADAPTATION THROUGH TRANSFORMATION
ADAPTATION THROUGH USING
CHANGE
PERMANENT
B. Leupen
CHANGE SEMIPERMANENT LAYER
ADAPTATION THROUGH TRANSFORMATION OF USING
ADAPTATION THROUGH TRANSFORMATION OF USING ADAPTATION THROUGH USING
OPEN LIVING CELL
POLIVALENCE LIVING CELL FUNCTION STRUCTURE
ENTERENCE
STAIRCASE
KITCHEN
KITCHEN DINNING ROOM
WC
MODUL
ADAPTATION THROUGH TRANSFORMATION
UTILITY ROOM 3300 ACCESS 1800 FUNCTIONAL CORE 2400 INTERNAL ACCESS 1800 POLIVALECE SPACES 3300 BALCONY 1500
WORK
EGO
VACANT
ECO
ACCESS
NORTH
Ground floor plan
NO
RH
T
BEDROOM
NORTH
POLIVALENCE LIVING CELL / GROWS CORE
CONCEPTUAL PROJECT OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN EXPERIMENTAL NEIGHBORHOOD [IN THE CITY OF VOLOGDA. RUSSIA]
02 COMPETITION BLOCK CITY A 101 / TIME FACTOR /
The call of the A101 Block City competition to address the issue of standardization in is a rather difficult but very inspiring endeavour.
The exhibition LIVING Frontiers of Architecture in the Louisiana Art Museum near Copenhagen
“The A101 Block City competition, organized for the Masshtab corporation in Moscow, envisioned the creation of a new city of 200.000 inhabitants near Moscow. The masterplan brief demanded that 80% of blocks have standard sizes. An open competition for the design of the blocks was organized. 210 architects from 20 countries took part – 147 projects are shown in this exhibition. They are presented here in the form of a catalogue from which and endless number of different cities can be built by simple replacing blocks with others”. Bart Goldhoorn
The exhibition Block City A101 Moscow city, museum of Architecture
DATE: December, 2010 PROGRAM: Housing, Neighborhood, Block City PLACE: Moscow / Copenhagen / RESULT: Shortlist
The exhibition Block City A101 Moscow city, museum of Architecture
The exhibition Block City A101 Moscow city, museum of Architecture
TBA123 B2
For concept of Block City the method of adaptive structure is best solution. Standard of permanent structure provides a lot scenario of using. For this project the results of previous research as design method and plans of cell were used. PROGRAM
ADAPTATION THROUGH TRANSFORMATION
ADAPTATION THROUGH USING
ADAPTATION THROUGH TRANSFORMATION OF USING
7500
7500
7500
7500
7500
7500
7500
7500
7500
office space
office space
dinner room
room kitchen
7500
7500
room
office space
7500
working area
working area
7500
7500
dinner room working room area enterence room
room dinner room
office space
7500
7500
7500
room
7500
bathroom
7500
bathroom
7500
bathroom
7500
bathroom
7500
room
enterence
working area
dinner room
bathroom
7500
7500
office space
GREENroom
kitchen
7500
7500
enterence working area
room
office space
bathroom
7500
7500
living room
office space
enterence
bathroom
7500
ENTERENCE
“VACANCY”
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
KITCHEN BEDROOM
working dinner living area room room
kitchen
bathroom
KITCHEN
kitchen
bathroom
kitchen kitchen bathroom bathroom living living dinner room room dinner room room room room room
ENTERENCE
bathroom kitchen working area
enter kitchen
kitchen
working area working working area area
bathroom enterence
kitchen
kitchen
bathroom
enterence
kitchen
enterence
enterence
kitchen
bathroom kitchen
room
WORKING
“VACANCY”
BEDROOM
“VACANCY”
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
ENTERENCE
SANITERING
WORKING
“SELFISH”
KITCHEN
ENTERENCE
SANITERING
WORKING
“SELFISH”
KITCHEN
ENTERENCE
ENTERENCE
ENTERENCE “VACANCY”
“VACANCY”
6600 bathroom
bathroom
kitchen
working area
dinner room
WORKING
“VACANCY”
working area
bathroom enterence
bathroom
bathroom kitchen
6600 6600 6600
“SELFISH”
dinner room
working area
WORKING
ENTERENCE
6600
6600
kitchen
WORKING
ENTERENCE
“VACANCY”
bathroom
SANITERING
room kitchen
“SELFISH”
KITCHEN
“SELFISH”
KITCHEN
6600
KITCHEN ENTERENCE ENTERENC TO PARKING FOR 160 CAR ONLY UNDERGRAUND
ENTERENCE
WORKING
room
room
WORKING
KITCHEN
SANITERING
roomdinner
working area
KITCHEN
WORKING
KITCHEN
“SELFISH”
room
working area
6600
KITCHEN
working area
room room
6600
6600
BEDROOM
dinner room
working area
dinner room
FACADE 1
living room
kitchen
bathroom
kitchen
bathroom
kitchen
bathroom
living room
living room
dinner room
room
room room
bathroom
bathroom
kitchen dinner room
bathroom
kitchen
working area
working area
enterence
kitchen
kitchen working area
working area
working area
FACADE 2
WORKING
WORKING
dinner room
“SELFISH”
KITCHEN
“SELFISH”
BEDROOM
enterence
bathroom
kitchen
bathroom kitchen
KITCHEN
room
kitchen
working area
6600
dinner room
roomdinner room
working area
working area
room
kitchen
room working area
room
room
room
6600
bathroom
bathroom enterence
kitchen
working area
room
“VACANCY”
6600
dinner room
working area
6600
6600
room kitchenbathroom
kitchen bathroom
6600 6600
6600
6600
working area
WORKING
6600
dinner working room area
7500
ENTERENC TO PARKING FOR 160 CAR ONLY UNDERGRAUND
7500
7500
7500
7500
working area
FACADE 1
FACADE 2
0
5
10
15
TBA123
TIME AFTER
03 RESEARCH HOW DOES THE INFILL HAPPEN IN RUSSIAN ‘FREE PLAN’ APARTMENT
AIM
DATE: December, 2012 - nowadays ADVISER: Stephen Kendall (US) PLACE: Moscow PROGRAM: Free plan apartment, Russian housing stock
HYPOTHESIS
WHAT IS OPEN BUILDING ?
SHARE RESPONSIBILITY AND CONTROL BASE BUILDING and FIT-OUT DESIGN DECISION MAKER PARTICIPATION DESIGN IS A PROCESS LEVEL OF INTERVENTION INTERFACE BETWEEN SYSTEM BUILD ENVIRONMENT IS A PRODUCT OF ONGOING, NEVER ENDING PROCESS
SUBJECT - HOUSING WITH FREE PLAN APARTMANT
FREE PLAN IN RUSSIA
TPO RESERVE / arch. V.PLOTKIN
free plan apartment renovation
INFILL SYSTEM
CUBLESTUD
MATRIX TILE
Source: www.infillsystemus.com
Source: www.infillsystemus.com
Source: www.infillsystemus.com
implementation
current
AUSTRALIA-BOSTON
GESPLATEN HENDRIK ARABIANRANTRA
economics
ARABIANRANTRA
development
ZAANDAM - INVERDAN
exploitation
NEXT 21
O P E N BUILDING
MOLENVLIET
METHODOLOGY
SOLID
WORLD EXPERIENCE OF IMPLEMENTATION Open Building
04 STUDY COMMUNITY HOUSING
THE CONCEPT:
The idea was creating a model of COMMUNITY housing unit. With human friendly environment for all types of residence. All types of community was represented in different variety of apartments. Almost all apartments are for rent, with a high level of flexibility and interaction between residence. 1. Bigger apartment - less rental cost. 2. Community studios for common benefit. 3. Deferent variety of transformations. Through all building the line of different PUBLIC SPACES going from the begining of building to the end. All types of public spaces are different.
DATE: February-March, 2009 POSITION: Student PLACE: Department of Architecture and Urban design, VSTU, Vologda PROGRAM: Mixed use, Public space, Urban structure, Community
TYPOLOGY OF APARTMENTS:
1Level of community
2Level of community
3Level of community
05 WORK HOUSING / MINI APARTMENTS
The tendency of high demand for small apartment is arise in Russia last time. The concept of design of this housing was developing units as one and two room apartments. Convenient and semipublic courtyard has good space for rest and children plays.
DATE: Autumn, 2012 POSITION: Architect PLACE: 21 century company, Cherepovets PROGRAM: Small apartment, Mid-rise, Friendly environmental
GROUND FLOUR PLAN:
living area - 3432 sq.m. (including 906 sq.m. - social apartments 26%) commercial area - 1415 sq.m. underground garage - 1610 sq.m. 73 car places (including 7 car places for invalid)
0
10
20
VOLUME-FUNCTIONAL MODEL
TYPOLOGY OF APARTMENTS:
TYPE TYPE
А
TYPE
Б
TYPE
В
А
MINI LOFT
30,2 sq.m. SOCIAL 30 APERTMANTS
TYPE
Б
1 ROOM APARTMENT
41 sq.m. COMMERCIAL 30 APARTMENT
TYPE
В
2 ROOM APARTMENT
54 sq.m. COMMERCIAL 24 APARTMENT
COMMERCIAL S P A C E S
UNDERGROUND G A R A G E 0
1
3
PLAN OF TYPAL STORE
0 1
3
MAIN FACADE / KARLA-LIBKNEHTA STREET
0 1
6
16
BACK FACADE / KOMMUNISTOV STREET
0 1
6
16
SIDELONG FACADE / DZERZINSKOGO STREET
0 1
6
16
SIDELONG FACADE / SOVETSKI STREET
0 1
6
16
ISOMENTY. URBAN STRUCTURE
3D
06 WORK
RECONSTRUCTION OF STEEL HOUSE
DATE: 2012 POSITION: Architect PLACE: Severstal Steel Solution, Cherepovets PROGRAM: Reconstruction, Steel Housing, Sustainable design
INITIAL DATA This house was design by Australian architects group Peter Stutchbury Architecture. And realized by Severstal Steel Solution in Cherepovets city. There is particular ‘climate’ to understand new ideas. In Vologda Region is very complexity to do c o n t e m p o r a r y architecture. This house has been reconstractiving by reasons of bad quality of building and local cultural preferences
PeterStutchburyArchitecture
PeterStutchburyArchitecture
LIVING STEEL organized third competition to design steel house and an energy-efficient single-family home in 2008 year. In order to encourage the open sharing of ideas on sustainable design among the competition finalists. More than 1200 expressions of interest, from architects in 75 countries, were received for the third competition based in Cherepovets, Russia. The Selection Committee selected 247 submissions for further evaluation, arriving at a shortlist of 12 competition finalists. The winner of the third competition was Peter Stutchbury Architecture of Australia, whose entry explored the role of steel in the conservation of energy in a cold climate. The building is composed of simple, largely prefabricated elements to optimize available energy and minimize waste. The architects describe their buildings as a 'model of restraint and function' CONCEPT 'Systems have been kept simple – direct and largely passive. The life of the building is interactive with the energy it demands. Maintenance accompanies complexity; the repetition of elements and systems expands upon a knowledge accessibly analysed, therefore system failure can be easily identified. Our building systems are deliberately simple and of low energy demand. Such adesign in already established built environments could be questioned; but if economic, social and environmental issues are effectively embraced and controlled by this proposal then its repetitiowould instill awareness and contribute to the layering of historic references. We initiated the idea that a centralised THERMAL WALL would provide much of the heating requirements. This wall would be made of sheet steel for its 'radiator' qualities and would contain as much as possible the energy based services for the building.' peterstutchburyarchitecture
PeterStutchburyArchitecture
Aiming to save culture of minimalism and clearness architectural spaces we decide to use simple materials. For hide all buildings mistakes and save esthetic of metal we use perforated steel panel and wood for contrast and distinguish steel. This approach was apply in exterior and interior decisions.
INTERIOR DESIGN / PLAN
INTERIOR DESIGN
07 COMPETITION / NEW MOSCOW VS-CODE IN “THE BIG MOSCOW” PROGRAM DEVELOPING
DATE: Spring, 2012 POSITION: Partisipant PLACE: Moscow PROGRAM: Urban development, agglomiration
2. HYPOTHESIS OF DEVELOPMENT NEW TERRITORY
1. KEY ISSUES OF STRATEGY OF DEVELOPMENT ‘NEW MOSCOW’
?
1
WHO WILL BE LIVE HERE? WHAT WILL THEY DO?
2
HOW TO DEVELOP THE TERRITORY AND DO NOT DESTROY EXISTING LANDSCAPE?
3
MOSCOW
IN ORDER TO NOT REPEAT THE SAME PROBLEMS OF MOSCOW URBANISM WE SHOULD NOT USE EXISTING PRINCIPLES
?
WHAT PRINCIPLES TO BE BASE FOR STRATEGY?
>
NEW TERRITORY MUST BE AS LIFT FOR OLD MOSCOW AS NEW STANDARD FOR STRATEGY URBAN DEVELOPMENT
NEW MOSCOW
3. CONCEPT OF OPPOSITION (VERSUS) IN THE ‘BIG MOSCOW’ PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT MOSCOW
MOSCOW
VS
NEW MOSCOW
>
URBAN PRINCIPLES OF MOSCOW |COMMERCIAL|, |GLOBALIZATION|, |TRANSPORT AGGRESSION|, |CONSUMPTION|
NEW MOSCOW
VS
URBAN PRINCIPLES OF NEW MOSCOW |HUMAN DESIGN|, |ECOLOGICAL|, |SUSTAINABILITY|, |IDENTITY|, |CREATION|
PRIORITY FOR NEW PRINCIPLES
4. INTEGRATION VS - CODE TO THE PROGRAM OF DEVELOPMENT ‘NEW MOSCOW’
INITIAL DATA
ATTRIBUTECONSTANTS
+
RULES DOMINANT
+
VS CODE
CENTER
VS
PERIPHERALS
CONSUMPTION
VS
CREATION
INITIAL DATA IN SOCIAL, NATURAL LAND, INDUSTRIAL, CULTURES, HISTORICAL AND OTHER RESOURCES OF TERRITORY
MODERN DESIGN STANDARDS AND BUILDING CODE IN CONTEXT OF SAFETY, ECOLOGICAL, SUSTAINABILITY AND ERGONOMICS
DESIGN
VS
SELF MANAGEMENT
TRANSPORT
VS
GLODALIZATION
VS
PEDESTRIANS
IDENTITY
MONO FUNCTIONALLY
SEGREGATION
CITY
GYBRIDIZATION
INTEGRATION
VS
VS
VS COUNTRYSIDE
PRINCIPLES OF OPPOSITION CAN BE USE AS DOMINANT CODE IN ‘BIG MOSCOW’ PROGRAM STRATEGY
VS-CODE
KEY OPPOSITION
CENTRALISATION AND URBANIZATION CRESTES A PROBLEMS OF SHRINKING CITIES AND VILLAGES, DEGRADATION OF PERIPHERY
CENTER
CENTER
VS
VS
PERIPHERIALS
PERIPHERIALS
MONOCENTRIC IS PROVIDE PROBLEMS WITH TRANSPORT ACCESSIBILITY
CENTER
VS
GENERATION OF NEW CREATIVE COMMUNITY WHO FORMED NEW TYPE OF ACTIVITIES
PERIPHERALS
NEW MOSCOW HAVE NOT TO BE ONE MORE SUBURB OF OLD MOSCOW
TOTAL PLANNING AS FORMING SOLID SYSTEM OF DEVELOPMENT CITY
CREATION NEW CENTERS OF ATTRACTION
AUTONOMY AND SUFFICIENCY
DESIGN
DESIGN
VS
VS
SELF MANAGEMENT
SELF MANAGEMENT
UNADDRESSED DESIGN UNIVERSAL MODEL OF USER OF BUILT ENVIRONMENT
DESIGN
VS
SUPPORT SYSTEM AS RESOURSE FOR CHANGING SPACES, PROGRAMMING ADAPTIVE STRUCTURES
FLEXIBILITY AS MAIN CONDITION FOR STRATEGY OF DEVELOPMANT
SALF MANAGEMENT
$
$
PARTICIPATION DECISION MAKING POWER
DYNAMIC DEMAND OF INHABITANTS AVOGROUP.ORG
AVOGROUP.ORG
AVOGROUP.ORG
CLOSED SYSTEM OF TRANSPORT IN THE CITY /ARTERIAL/
TRANSPORT
TRANSPORT
VS
VS
PEDESTRIANS
PEDESTRIANS
MAJORITY FOR PRIVATE TRANSPORT
TRASPORT
VS
PLANNING FRAMEWORK SCATTERED TRAFFIC CAPILLARY SYSTEM
CREATION SYSTEMS OF CORRIDORS FOR MOVING, AND FOR DIFFERENT MODES OF TRANSPORT
PEDESTRIANS
AGGRESSIVE ENVIRONMENT IN RELATION TO PEDISTRIANS AND ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORT
PRIORITY OF PEDESTRIANS! ALTERNATIVE AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT
AVOGROUP.ORG
AVOGROUP.ORG
EXTENSIVE GLOBALIZATION DEVELOPMENT AREAS VS WITHOUT REGARD TO LOCAL IDENTITY LIFESTYLE
AVOGROUP.ORG
GLOBALIZATION
VS
UNIQUE BUILD ENVIRONMENTAL
IDENTITY
IRREGULARLY ORGANIZATION OF OPPORTUNITIES IN BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT GLOBALIZATION
VS
DEFINITION SYMBOLS OF PLACES
IDENTITY
AVOGROUP.ORG
CONVERSION AND DEVELOPMENT OF CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT
THREAT TO CONSERVATION OF CULTURAL HISTORICAL CONTEXT AVOGROUP.ORG
AVOGROUP.ORG
VS-CODE
KEY OPPOSITION
ARCHITECTURE AS INSTRUMENT FOR EXCESS PROFIT
CONSUMPTION
INVESTMENT FUNDS FOR RESALE AND RENT
$
CONSUMPTION
VS
VS
CREATION
CREATION
CONSUMPTION
VS
INCREASE COMPETITION OF THE CITY BY PRODUCTION NEW KNOWLEDGE AND CULTURE
CREATION
FALSELY INCREASE OF DEMAND ON THE MARKET REAL ESTATE
MONO-FUNCTIONALLY PLANNING PROVIDES TO COMMUTING MIGRATION
MONOFUNCTIONALLY
MONOFUNCIONALLY
VS
VS
$
GIBRIDIZATION
GYBRIDIZATION
CYCLICITY OF EXTINCTION OF ACTIVITY IN THE CENTR AND PERIPHERALS IN THE CITY
MONOFUNCTIONALLY
VS
GYBRIDIZATION
$
SEGREGATION
SEGREGATION
VS
VS
INTEGRATION
INTEGRATION
MONOSOCIAL SYSTEM OF SETTLEMENT
SEGREGATION
VS
CONVERSION INDUSTRY SPACES TO CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL CENTERS
“OPEN BORDRES” OF COMMUNICATION
MULTISOCIAL SYSTEM OF SETTLEMENT
INTEGRATION
NEW PUBLIC SPACES FOR COMMUNICATION
ATETENUATION OF SOCIAL RELATIONSHIP AND PRIORITY OF WEB NETWORK AVOGROUP.ORG
AVOGROUP.ORG
TENDENCY OF HIGHT DENSITY BUILDING OF THE CITY AND DESTRUCTION OF ECOLOGICAL CONTEXT
AVOGROUP.ORG
CITY
CITY
VS
VS
COUNTRYSIDE
COUNRYSIDE
SHORTAGE OF ECOLOGICAL NATURAL SPACES
CITY
VS
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT RECOVERY, REUSE OF NATURAL RESOURCES
CITY AND RURAL LIFESTYLE
COUNTRYSIDE
INHABITANTS OF THE CITY ESCAPE TO COUNTRY PLACE FOR THE WEEKEND
AVOGROUP.ORG
NEW CONCEPT OF SPACES FOR WORKING [COWORKING]
MIXED-USED: SHOPS, OFFICES, MUSEUMS, HOUSING
MONOTONY OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROVIDES TO CRIMINALITY
“CLOSED BORDERS” OF COMMUNICATION
ЧЕЛОВЕКОРИЕНТИРОВАННОЕ ПРОЕКТИРОВАНИЕ
AVOGROUP.ORG
STRATEGY IN ORDER TO SAVE AND COMPENSATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES INTEGRATION GREEN SPACES TO ALL LEVEL ARCHITECTURAL ENVIRONMENTAL
AVOGROUP.ORG
08 WORK
RECONSTRUCTIVE OF STADIUM ‘LOСOMOTIVE’
MASTERPLAN OF ‘LOCOMOTIVE’ TERRITORY
DATE: Summer, 2011 POSITION: Architect PLACE: Design office by Lehova, Vologda PROGRAM: Sport complex, shooting range
Abandoned stadium Lokomotiv in Vologda city would be as one of main sport complex in North-West region. I developed masterplan, closed shooting range for distance 100 m, track for speed skaters, tribune for 1500 places, locker rooms for 200 sportsmens. The design was from sketchers to detail drawings.
SHOOTING RANGE / PLAN OF 1ST FLOUR
SHOOTING RANGE / PLAN OF 2ST FLOUR
0
5
10
15
TRIBUNE FOR 1500 PLACES / LOCKER ROOMS FOR 200 PEOPLES
09 WORK
HOUSES FOR SURGUT CITY // MINI/MIDI/MAXI
DATE: Summer, 2008 POSITION: Architect PLACE: Design office by Alexei Novikov, Saint Peterburg PROGRAM: House, Traditional Russian and modern styles
MASTERPLAN OF NEW NEIGHBORHOOD Design houses for Surgut city (North of Russia). There are three type of house: mini, midi and maxi, separated by size. The concept of exterior design is develop house as compound contemporary style and traditional Russian house with national wood drawing, related to north Russian real estate.
MAXI - 252 SQ.M.
MIDI - 236.5 SQ.M.
MINI - 225 SQ.M.
MINI - 225 SQ.M.
MIDI - 236.5 SQ.M.
MAXI - 252 SQ.M.
10 WORKSHOP / AA VISITING SCHOOL
LOCIMAKE / THE WEATHER HOUSE
DATE: September, 2012 PROGRAMME DIRECTOR: L. Olsen, P. Southall, J. Tory, G. Mallinson PLACE: Hook Park, Dorset, UK PROGRAM: Steam-bend, Timber, Flexible, Frame work
Foto: Miguel Falci
010 WORK / WORKSHOP ACTIVATION
MAXI - 252 SQ.M. MISSION Vologda is traditional small Russian town. There are a lot churches, old wooden houses, but public spaces is not comfortable. Urban environment is degraded, tiresome, boring and no place for activities. I am and my friends-architects come together and decide to do experimental social project for Vologda urban environment. We start from organizing workshop and did research of urban place with students, then chosen 5 public spaces and made projects. Funding for realize all public spaces was from commercial donations. We found financial by self. Many citizens help us to constrictive. This project became proud for the city and get Russian and international honors. Citizens thank us and use these public spaces for urban activities.
DATE: November - June, 2012 POSITION: Architect - Expert - Assitant PLACE: Vologda PROGRAM: Urban, Public Space, Social project, Workshop
P O RT F O L I O ARCHITECT NADYA KISELEVA