Good Example
Extra Example
PERKINS + WILL (overall layout, well organize) http://www.perkinswill.com/
Layout: FXFOWLE (http://www.fxfowle.com)
SMITHGROUP (provide video most of projects, clean and neat) http://www.smithgroup.com/
Flash: RICHARD ROGERS (http://www.richardrogers.co.uk/rshp_home)
SCHMIDT/ HAMMER/ LASSEN ARCHITECTS (easy to navigate, provide large images) http://shl.dk/eng/#/home NBBJ (well stylize website) http://www.nbbj.com/
Video: BIG ARCHITECTURE - Danish Pavilion (http://vimeo.com/12552097)
Visual: DILLER, SCOFIDIO + RENFRO (http://www.dsrny.com) H3 HARDY COLLABORATION ARCHITECTURE (http://www.h3hc.com)
Future Website Objective iPad, iPhone Friendly Creates URL for each page (no flash)
STUDIOS (layout and interface is well organize) http://www.studiosarchitecture.com/
Upload Video (Youtube, Vimeo, Flesh, Quick Time)
Source
Bad Example
http://www.archdaily.com/23244/top-architecture-firms-ranking/ http://www.archdaily.com/34684/facebook-fan-page-top-10-websites-of-architecture-offices/
RBB ARCHITECTS (visual aspect of website is very bad) http://www.rbbinc.com/ SERA ARCHITECTS (website format is way too small too much white space around) http://www.serapdx.com/ RICHARD + BAUER (no project description, provide only pictures) http://www.richard-bauer.com/ NAC ARCHITECTURE (layout of the page is confusing) http://www.nacarchitecture.com/ RENZO PIANO (hard to navigate through website) http://www.rpbw.com/