THEBLUEPRINTS
NAOMI ROSSER
THE BLUE PRINTS
NAOMI ROSSER MA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, UNIVERSITY OF GREENWICH SEPTEMBER 2015
THE BLUE PRINTS
NAOMI ROSSER MA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, UNIVERSITY OF GREENWICH SEPTEMBER 2015
6
THEBLUEPRINTS
EXISTING CONDITIONS CONTENTS:
DESIGN PROCESS
INTRODUCTION 6 EXISTING CONDITIONS 15 DESIGN PROCESS 31 THE BLUE PRINTS MASTERPLAN
THE BLUE PRINTS
41
BLUE SPACES 49 BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 67 LANDSCAPE 75
WATER SPACES
CONCLUSION 95
BUILT ENVIRONMENT
LANDSCAPE CONCLUSION THEBLUEPRINTS
7
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
8
THEBLUEPRINTS
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
The Blue Prints project seeks to challenge the way waterfronts are developed in cities. Specifically, the project aims to act as a flagship proposal, injecting creative and innovative design guidelines to provide possible solutions to issues relating to water management and the existing trends in riverfront developments. Postcodes adjacent to the River Thames have some of the highest growing rates of value in the capital. In the last 4 years prices of housing with river views has grown 30-40%. Profiting from this are developers, clearing away left over industrial wharfs along the Thames to make way for luxury waterfront residences. The number of people living close to the river is increasing at a rate of 22% per year. (London Loves Business) These kinds of developments obviously bring a huge economic advantage to some, however to the majority of city residents these luxury private developments create more barriers, increasing the gap between social and economic classes. The result is private and closed off developments which discourage use of the riverfront to the public, disconnecting the city from its riverfront. Parallel to this, research into the health benefits of accessibility to green and blue spaces proves that positive proximity may be greater within communities of socio-economic deprivation. (White et al., 2013). These conflicting factors bid the question of whether there is an alternative, more inclusive way to develop urban waterfronts, fulfilling the needs of multiple user groups. This document aims to provide a solution to some of these issues, in the aim of developing a masterplan where profitability is not at the forefront of design decisions.
THEBLUEPRINTS
9
Canada Water
10
THEBLUEPRINTS
INTRODUCTION
River Lee
Excel Centre
Royal Victoria Docks
Canary Wharf O2 Arena
Emirates Air Line
North Greenwich Station
THE BLUE PRINTS PROJECT SITE
Greenwich Gas Cylinder
Morden Wharf
Enderby's Wharf
Greenwich Power Station Greenwich Royal Naval College THEBLUEPRINTS
11
The Blue Prints project is situated within the Thames Basin, a complex network of rivers and tributaries which flow towards London. At this point, the River Thames has been infiltrated with many smaller rivers, streams and groundwater flows. The levels are sustained by surrounding aquifers, which maintain flows in drier months. London depends greatly upon these sources for water, with a large population and reasonably low annual rainfall, water is a limited resource. Annual rainfall in the capital is relatively low in comparison to other capital cities. Increasing pressure upon water supplies is being caused by rises in population and rises in the average use of water per person. As it stands, the current demand for water is unsustainable and poses a significant challenge. (Mayor of London, 2011)
BLUE PRINTS SITE
Proximity to large water bodies poses threats. Swelling rivers, and unpredictable rainfall can lead to flooding. Urban areas along the River Thames are particularly vulnerable to the damaging effects of flooding due to the amount of hard, impermeable surfaces and Victorian drainage systems reaching capacity. Across the length of the River Thames in London, major defences have been implemented to stop flooding, however the current approach seems to be harsh - concrete walls and barriers act against the river’s natural cycles.
Aquifer Clay Groundwater Abstraction Rivers
HOW CAN THE PROJECT BECOME FLEXIBLE TO COPE WITH ONGOING CHANGES IN THE SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT WHILST FUNCTIONING AS A COMMUNITY?
Greater London Boundary Teddington
Image 1
12
THEBLUEPRINTS
THAMES BASIN
0
Precipitation (mm)
Image 2
December
0 November
20
October
5
September
40
August
10
July
60
June
15
May
80
April
20
March
100
February
25
January
Average Rainfall (days)
INTRODUCTION
120
Average Rainfall (days)
Precipitation (mm)
30
In addition to the surrounding processes relating to flooding the area poses many other challenges, creating a complex site with many influencing factors. The site has undergone a heavily industrial past, the scars of which can be seen within the landscape. A hard, angular and concrete wasteland has been left along the length of the river. The sites industrial heritage means that the area has not established a community in the past, and is therefore sightly isolated and disconnected within the wider local area. Existing developments, and proposals have been implemented across the peninsular, adding to the challenge to link what is existing together whilst creating new links and destinations for the site. The project aims to challenge what has already been proposed for the site, in the aim of creating a set of guidelines to set out a different future for the site. The complex combination of surrounding processes, the industrial landscape and disconnect posses a highly challenging project brief.
HOW CAN THE PROJECT SEEK TO INCORPORATE SURROUNDING PROCESSES AND COMMUNITIES AS WELL AS ESTABLISHING ITSELF AS A DESTINATION?
AVERAGE RAINFALL LONDON
THEBLUEPRINTS
13
14
THEBLUEPRINTS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
15 THEBLUEPRINTS
16
THEBLUEPRINTS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
THEBLUEPRINTS
17
PAST CONDITIONS
In order to gage a wider understanding of the existing site conditions, it was necessary to analyse the historical changes which have influenced the site. Through the initial analysis stages various facts and conclusions are drawn, opening up ideas and questions needed to be explored further. The peninsular has undergone a dramatic transformation, in the last 400 or so years. Overlaying of historic maps onto the existing base plan revealed how the shape and use of this area of land has changed dramatically. The Blue Prints site has had a fascinating relationship with the River Thames and water. It it only in the recent past that the area was suitable for inhabitance. The peninsular has been constantly modified by humans, morphing and being reshaped according to the needs of adjacent landowners. Just 300 years ago the area was still a marsh land named ‘Greenwich Marsh’. Before the sea walls were built the peninsular was managed through as series of sluices, which drained the land, allowing space for pasture and farming. This significant piece of history highlighted the fragile balance the land on the peninsular holds with water and the river Thames. It becomes more evident throughout the exploration of other eras that there has been a constant battle with the river to keep the water off the land.
18
THEBLUEPRINTS
DITCHES & SLUICES
EXISTING CONDITIONS
This constant need to maintain the use of the land lead to rules and legislations for the surrounding landowners. Throughout the 17th Century landowners were made to pay taxes in order to maintain the ‘sea wall’, named as so as the engineering needed was on the same scale as those needed for coastal sea defences. It was a very expensive defence to maintain, and needed its own council to determine how money was spent and raised. The drawing to the left displays the network of ditches and sluices which covered the peninsular. It is difficult to imagine how the peninsular would have looked during this time, but it is certain there would have been much more of a physical and visual connection with water.
1600 1800 THEBLUEPRINTS 1600
19
Ordanance Wharf
Works
Resevoir
Wharf
Resevoir
Ordanance Wharf Tar Works
Delta Works
Delta Wharf (Metals)
Wharf
Wharf
Wharf
Wharf
Wood Paving Works
Wood Paving Works
Sussex Wharf
Sussex Wharf
Imperial Wharf
Imperial Wharf
Delta Wharf
Wharf
Ordanance Wharf
1870
1920
1938
1955
1965
1981 Resevoir
Wharf
Ordanance Wharf
Blakeley Ordanance Company’s Works
DELTA WHARF
Greenwich Greenwich Linoleum Works Linoleum Works
Sussex Wharf
Brick Field
Chemical Works Chemical Works
VICTORIA DEEP WATER TERMINAL Victoria Deep Water Terminal
Victoria Wharf
Bay Wharf
Bay Wharf
Morden Wharf
Morden Wharf
Morden Wharf Hollicks Wharf
Works Glucose Refinery
Jetty
Jetty
Causeway
Causeway
Slipway Piper’s Wharf
Granite Wharf
Lovell’s Wharf
Lovell’s Wharf Wharves
Wharf
Thames Soap & Candel Works
Thames Soap Works
Submarine Cable Enderby’s Wharf Enderby’s Wharf Works
Boiler House Piper’s Wharf
Granite Wharf
Wharf
Piper Wharf
Telegraph Works Pipers Wharf
Granite Wharf
Dolphin
Granite Wharf
Stone Yard
Port of London Wharf
Union Wharf
Dolphin Crowley’s Wharf Jetty
Trinity Hostpital Wharf
THEBLUEPRINTS
1920
1938
Wharf
1955
1965
1981
Foundary
Greenwich Wharf Greenwich Wharf
Almbouses
20
ENDERBY’S WHARF
PIPERS WHARF
Brick Field
Jetty
Electricity Works Electricity Works Electricity Works
Wharf
MORDEN WHARF
Old Concrete Works
Anchor Iron Works
Wharf
Electric Telegraph Works
Portland Cement Hollick’s Wharf Hollick’s Wharf Works Iron Works
Jetty
Warehouse Providence Wharf Badcock’s Badcock’s Wharves Wharves Granite Wharf
Wharf
Landind Stage
Enderby’s Wharf Enderby’s Wharf Enderby’s Wharf
Wharves
Iron Boat Building Yard
Bay Wharf Ship Building
Iron Works
Piper’s Wharf
Wharf
Molassine Meal Works
Works
Primrose Wharf Primrose Wharf
Pier
Wharf
1870
Works
Victoria Wharf
London Steel and Iron Works
GRANITE WHARF
Lovell’s Wharf
EXISTING CONDITIONS
INDUSTRIAL INFLUENCES
For the last 150 years this stretch of the peninsular has been dominated by large wharfs and heavy industry. The industries have shaped and morphed the edge of the river to become functional for boats, leaving behind an angular and irregular edge. Large jetties protrude towards deeper parts of the river for tug boats and cargo ships exporting and importing freight. The shape of the rivers edge has changed dramatically though natural and human interventions. Clues of the past can still be seen in the shapes along the river edge, such as the breach of the sea wall which can still be seen near Morden Wharf. This morphing and re-shaping of the river wall lead to questions about how it could be moulded to influence the functions of the new masterplan, and whether the river edge could become a more useful shape for the design.
1870
1920
1938
1955
1965
1981 THEBLUEPRINTS
21
22
THEBLUEPRINTS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
23 THEBLUEPRINTS
2358
LEE RIVER
MILLWALL OUTER DOCK
EAST INDIA DOCK BASIN
VICTORIA DOCKS
POPLAR DOCK
BLACKWALL BASIN
WEST INDIA DOCKS
MILLWALL INNER DOCK
MILLWALL OUTER DOCK
24
0616 0746 0846 0936 1123 1243 1343 1423 1543 1643 1748 1848 1908 2008 2228
0646 0806 .... 0958 1143 1303 1403 1443 1603 1708 1808
.... 0826 0906 1023 1203 1323 .... 1503 1623 1728 1828
0646 0806 .... 0958 1143 1303 1403 1443 1603 1708 1808
.... 0904 1004 1120 1305 1425 1545 1705 1745 1910 2030 2150
0734 .... .... 1145 1325 1445 1605 1725 1805 1930 2050 2250
.... 0826 0906 1023 1203 1323 .... 1503 1623 1728 1828
0638 0758 0858 1045 1215 1335 1435 1555 1720 1820 1940 2120
.... 0818 0928 1115 1235 1355 1455 1615 .... 1840 2000 2220
0708 0838 0950 1135 1255 .... 1515 1635 1740 1900
.... 0912 1012 1128 1313 1433 1553 1713 1838 1958 2118 2358
0742 .... .... 1153 1333 1453 1613 1733 1858 2018 2138
0812 0932 1032 1223 1353 1513 1633 1753 1918 2038 2158
0842 0952 1110 1253 1413 1533 1653 1813 1938 2058 2258
0716 1053 1223 1523 ....
High Residual Flood Risk Shingle Beach Mud Beach BATHYMETRIC DATA -0/-1.5m 1.5/-3m -3/-4.5m -4.5/-6m -6/-7.5m -7.5/-9m
1928 1948 2028 2128 0804 0924 1024 1215 1345 1505 1625
0834 0944 1102 1245 1405 1525 1645
1830 1850 1950 2010 2110 2130 2350
* ALL DATA IS 3.25 m BELOW ORDANACE SURVEY DATA
0716 1053 1223 1523 ....
1928 1948 2028 2128
THEBLUEPRINTS
0616 0746 0846 0936 1123 1243 1343 1423 1543 1643 1748 1848 1908 2008 2228
0608 0738 .... 1015 1155 1315 1415 1535 1700 1800 1920 2020
.... 0734 0804 0834 0904 .... 0924 0944
High Residual Flood Risk Shingle Beach Mud Beach BATHYMETRIC DATA
EXISTING CONDITIONS
HYDROLOGICAL INFLUENCES
Dominating in presence, the River Thames the most potent influencing factor to the site. It was imperative to understand how the river is naturally flowing and trying to change the edge of the site. Bathymetric data shows the depths of the river along this edge, revealing the practical reasons for past wharfs to be situated along here. The darkest shaded areas are the deepest parts of the river bed, which were ideal for large freight ships to moor. The proposal for the London Cruise Liner terminal at Enderby’s Wharf makes use of this area of deep water and the lack of low bridges down stream. Although the peninsular is surrounded by large concrete sea walls keeping the river in place, there is still a constant threat to flooding across large expanses of the area. The area of high residual flood risk shows the extent of the risk. This is a highly important influencing factor for any development within the area, there is a constant threat that the existing defences will fail, therefore more needs to be done at site level to reduce this risk. The foreshore surrounding the peninsular starts to show the natural processes of the river. River deposits and sediment are pushed into the bends of the river where flows are strongest. Mud and shingle make up the foreshore along the edge of the project site. The beach areas are a reminder of the dangerous tidal conditions surrounding the site.
THEBLUEPRINTS
25
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The existing state of the site is very distinguished. A walk from the O2 Arena along the Thames Footpath towards Greenwich reveals the complex layers of materials which form the site. The area feels remote and cut off from the busy tourist attractions in Greenwich, as well as the dense towers of Canary Wharf, which are in constant view. There is evidence of past industries, with abandoned piers and jetties protruding into the river, overgrown with weeds and locked off to the public. These structures are a stark contrast to the developments across the river, the whole site feels imbalanced, with the juxtaposition of industrial wasteland and the natural river processes battling against it. Looking back inland the O2 Arena is an almost constant view, yet when standing from the Thames Footpath it accentuates the disconnect the site has from the hub surrounding the dome. As the footpath continues further south the site starts to feel less isolated, with various new luxury waterfront developments being built towards the Greenwich power station. The following montages attempt to portray the contrasting elements of the site, capturing the materiality and characteristics at points along the route.
26
THEBLUEPRINTS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
27 THEBLUEPRINTS
28
THEBLUEPRINTS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
29 THEBLUEPRINTS
1
PROCESSES
0608 0738 .... 1015 1155 1315 1415 1535 1700 1800 1920 2020
0638 0758 0858 1045 1215 1335 1435 1555 1720 1820 1940 2120
.... 0818 0928 1115 1235 1355 1455 1615 .... 1840 2000 2220
0708 0838 0950 1135 1255 .... 1515 1635 1740 1900
.... 0912 1012 1128 1313 1433 1553 1713 1838 1958 2118 2358
0742 .... .... 1153 1333 1453 1613 1733 1858 2018 2138
0812 0932 1032 1223 1353 1513 1633 1753 1918 2038 2158
0842 0952 1110 1253 1413 1533 1653 1813 1938 2058 2258
BOAT JOURNEYS IN 24 hrs PORT OF LONDON AUTHORITY DATA CARGO OTHER
PASSANGER/PLEASURE PILOTS AND TUGS
Elements which cannot be seen through site visits have been collected separately, which when mapped reveal layers of moving and changing processes. Mapping various transport routes starts to show the existing connections the site has within the micro and macro urban scales. The Jubilee line shown in grey connects the peninsular with Canary Wharf and central London, as well as Stratford to the north. As well as the obvious train and tube network the river itself is a constantly vein of boat traffic. From water taxis, cargo ships and private boats, the Thames is a busy water way. The drawing to the right reveals the route these different boats have taken over 24 hours. Adding to the lines carved out by transport and waterways, the invisible Meridian line cuts straight though the northern part of the project site. This line emphasises the importance of understanding connections to the wider site scale.
0616 0746 .... 1023 1203 1323 1423 1543 1708 1808 1908 2028
0646 0806 0906 1053 1223 1343 1443 1603 1728 1828 1928 2128
.... 0826 0936 1123 1243 1403 1503 1623 .... 1848 1948 2228
0716 0846 0958 1143 1303 .... 1523 1643 1748
.... 0904 1004 1120 1305 1425 1545 1705 1745 1910 2030 2150
0734 .... .... 1145 1325 1445 1605 1725 1805 1930 2050 2250
0804 0924 1024 1215 1345 1505 1625
0834 0944 1102 1245 1405 1525 1645
1830 1950 2110 2350
1850 2010 2130
2008
MERIDIAN LINE
To help to understand and answer questions about the existing conditions of the site, things can be learnt from the existing plans for the future. Part of this process lead to the discovery of the proposed masterplan in surrounding areas and on the site, which explained why some areas along the have been cleared and cordoned off.
30
THEBLUEPRINTS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
VIEWS & VISTAS
Photographs capture the diversity at different points along the river’s edge. This photographic survey method allows for specific snap shots of an area, showing 360° views and vistas from a specific point. The wide river body opens up the area, giving vast and undisrupted views across to the other bank. This gives the illusion of a vast expansive site. At the same time, the river increases the feeling of seclusion at the site, the scale of the river against the high rise buildings at Canary Wharf makes the human scale feel very disproportioned. The drawing to the right seeks to expose the complexity scales along the river’s edge.
THEBLUEPRINTS
31
LANDMARKS
The vast expanses and views across the river, along with the flat nature of the site, leads the eye towards many landmark structures and buildings. These features allow pedestrians to gage rough distances and senses of scale when walking along the edge of the river. The landmarks tell a story of how the area has undergone change historically. From the World Heritage site of maritime Greenwich, to Morden Wharf and the Gas Cylinder and the O2 arena, these landmark features add to the unique nature of the site. It was important to understand how the site was seen from both sides of the river to envision of how the project will change this view. Equally important were the views from the site towards the Isle of Dog are iconic, showing the whole of Canary Wharf, and new towers at Wood Wharf. This helped to imagine how these views will be framed in the future.
32
THEBLUEPRINTS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
33 THEBLUEPRINTS
34
THEBLUEPRINTS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
35 THEBLUEPRINTS
36
THEBLUEPRINTS
THEBLUEPRINTS
DESIGN PROCESS
DESIGN PROCESS
37
Image 3
EXISTING PROPOSALS
Part of the design process was to develop an understanding of how the site has been designed in existing proposals. Currently the site is being developed by the group Knight Dragon. The eastern edge of the peninsular has already been developed, into medium density apartments, built upon a rigid grid system. The proposals for the site appear to follow the same trend, a grid layout, with large towers towards the front of the river banks. The Blue Prints project aims to mesh with the existing layout on the western edge of the peninsular, however the project seeks to break up the rigid grid proposed for the site, approaching the site in a much more creative way, reducing the hierarchy at the rivers edge, and spreading the charm of waterfront living throughout the site. Initial design stages explored ways of breaking up the grid, and feeding activity from the riverside back inland, linking the site towards the hub at the O2 whilst creating stronger routes north to south.
38
THEBLUEPRINTS
BATHYMETRY
INITIAL DESIGN STAGE
BLUE PRINTS MASTERPLAN
THEBLUEPRINTS
39
40
THEBLUEPRINTS
BATHYMETRY
CONCEPT DESIGN
BLUE PRINTS MASTERPLAN
The initial design exploration established a need for new links between the river edge and the centre of the peninsular, whilst creating a strong north-south axis. This was eventually refined into the basic concept for the project; to establish new routes and connections through the introduction of water bodies, feeding into the site. The concept was inspired by the network of sluices which once controlled water across the site. Naturally, the peninsular is a marsh, a low-lying stretch of land which is highly susceptible to flooding. Introducing new water channels would not only increase connectivity throughout the site, but could also act as some sort of solution to the constant threat of flooding in the area. The importance of innovative approaches to sustainable urban design is highlighted in the Mayor of London’s water strategy documents. Vision. The Mayor of London’s vision is that a more creative approach is adopted to managing flood risk from rainfall in London, taking opportunities to slow the progress of water from ‘rain to drain’ and using rainwater for non-potable uses to reduce demand for treated mains water. (Mayor of London, 2011) Likewise Dreiseitl explains the need for a new approach to urban planning. “The networking of city structure as an interactive infrastructure, publicly visible and also aesthetically attractive is needed” (Dreisitl, 2009). These ideas were a constant reference whilst designing the site.
THEBLUEPRINTS
41
MASTERPLAN DEVELOPMENT
42
THEBLUEPRINTS
BATHYMETRY
BLUE PRINTS MASTERPLAN
THEBLUEPRINTS
43
CASE STUDY: Royal Neighbour ADEPT & Mandaworks 2035 Stockholm, Sweden
THE MASTERPLAN: Situated on Stockholm’s Royal Seaport the site was formally a gasworks. A masterplan for the 180000.0sqm site has been established to introduce a new neighbourhood to the area. The masterplan introduces distinct neighbourhood areas, with highly aesthetic architectural and landscape elements to create a unique and colourful community. The project focusses on commercial and transportation functions, through the establishment of offices, shopping centres, hotels and multiple transport infrastructures. Cycle and pedestrian ways work alongside the major transit systems, in the hope of attracting a sustainable and environmental aware yet diverse community. As well as establishing a neighbourhood, the project aims to reinforce the relationship between the urban form, the waterfront and the water itself.
KEY PROJECT FEATURES: • • • • • •
44
A canal establishes a connection between old and new areas The canal acts as the core of the new urban development Integrating a wide typology of buildings and spaces Creating a diverse transportation network with focus on pedestrian and cycle routes Establishing and reinforcing connections between the land and the water. Attracting a diverse yet environmentally aware community
THEBLUEPRINTS
Images 4-6
CASE STUDY: Cloudburst Concretization Masterplan Atelier Dreiseitl 2013 Copenhagen, Denmark
BATHYMETRY THE MASTERPLAN:
Images 7-9
BLUE PRINTS MASTERPLAN
The city of Copenhagen is leading the way for innovative and sustainable urban design, with a vision to be carbon neutral by 2025. After large areas of Copenhagen was flooded in 2011, this, combined with increasingly heavy rain events has lead to a surge in strategic designs and masterplans to address some of the issues relating to flood management and water quality. The project proposes a ‘tool box’ of urban interventions such as boulevards, parks and plazas, providing the template for a multifunctional and sustainable neighbourhood. The new infrastructure provides essential city services,
KEY PROJECT FEATURES • •
A neighbourhood which addresses environmental issues as well as creating a dynamic and functional development A strategy which is broken down into individual elements to explain how each part works within
THEBLUEPRINTS
45
46
THEBLUEPRINTS
BATHYMETRY
BLUE PRINTS MASTERPLAN
MASTERPLAN
THEBLUEPRINTS
47
THE BLUE PRINTS MASTERPLAN
Re-capturing, harnessing and controlling water along the river edge, the ‘Blue Prints’ project challenges the way waterfronts are developed in urban areas, creating a captivating and diverse new landscape. Water bodies infiltrate the western side of the peninsular, from the rivers edge-inland, weaving activities throughout the site. Through innovative design, these new landscapes create a web of dynamic spaces, linking architectural developments to create an energetic and unique community.
48
THEBLUEPRINTS
Hotel Clipper Pier O2 Arena
Marina
BATHYMETRY
Terraced Gardens Winter Garden & Food Court
Swimming Pool Gallery Space & Clipper Pier BLUE PRINTS MASTERPLAN
Boating Loop
Wave Garden Surf Lagoon Greenwich Gas Cylinder Brackish Wetland and Wildlife Protection Zone Park Bird Island Bird Watching & Thames Habitat Educational Centre Morden Wharf Swimming & Fishing Pools
Enderby’s Wharf Development
London Cruise Liner Terminal
THEBLUEPRINTS
49
NORTH GREENWICH STATION & BUS TERMINAL
WINTER GARDEN
SWIMMING POOL
KAYAK CENTRE
GALLERY & CLIPPER STOP
HOTEL NORTH GREENWICH PIER
SURF LAGOON
O2 ARENA
GREENWICH GAS CYLINDER
MARINA
< TO CANARY WHARF & WOOD WHARF
WETLAND NORTH GREENWICH STATION & BUS TERMINAL
WINTER GARDEN
ACTIVITY HUBS & ROUTES
BIRD ISLAND SWIMMING POOL
BIRD WATCHING AND WETLAND CENTRE GALLERY & CLIPPER STOP
SWIMMING POOL FISHING CHANNEL
KAYAK CENTRE
SURF LAGOON GREENWICH GAS CYLINDER
LONDON CRUISE TERMINAL WETLAND
ENDERBY'S WHARF
BIRD ISLAND BIRD WATCHING AND WETLAND CENTRE
SWIMMING POOL FISHING CHANNEL
A key aim of the project is to increase links between the existing activity nodes on the peninsular and the proposed activities within the Blue Prints project. The site is surrounded by transport, leisure and community facilities which are disconnected with the existing site, the proposed new hubs will have clear links and routes, allowing users easy access across the peninsular, and along the waters edge. ACTIVITY NODES: Transport Hub Water Activity Changeable Event Space Constant Attraction
LONDON CRUISE TERMINAL ENDERBY'S WHARF
Existing Attraction
KEY PEDESTRIAN LINKS
50
THEBLUEPRINTS
PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE LINKING GREENWICH PENINSULA WITH CANARY WHARF
HOTEL
BATHYMETRY
O2 ARENA NORTH GREENWICH PIER
PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE LINKING GREENWICH PENINSULA WITH CANARY WHARF
CONNECTIVE & TRANSPORT ROUTES
BLUE PRINTS MASTERPLAN
ENDERBY’S WHARF
As well as creating stronger pedestrian routes the proposal aims to improve public transport and vehicular access along the stretch of the river, as well as inland. The existing proposal for the London Cruise Terminal will bring a great opportunity to encourage passengers to explore around the terminal. The Blue Prints project proposes a boat link between this terminal and a new dock to the north of the peninsular, allowing quick access towards the O2 Arena and the Hotel. In addition to this the project aims to become a destination as well as a community. This will be supported by a new Thames Clipper service dock in the centre of the project, providing convenient access for between Central London for both visitors and residents of the peninsular.
ENDERBY’S WHARF
Key Pedestrian Links Thames Clipper Route Thames Clipper Stops Proposed Water Taxi Route Existing Roads Proposed Roads Jubilee Line Bus and Train Station
THEBLUEPRINTS
51
LANDUSE
The landuse plan shows the distinct design areas which form the masterplan. These areas will be explained further within the document, and broken up further. The landuse plan starts to show the ratios of key features within the Blue Prints project.
River Front Plazas Water Edge Pedestrian offset (6m minimum) Open Green Spaces/Parkland Public Realm Roads Water Bodies Buildings /Architectural Forms
52
THEBLUEPRINTS
BATHYMETRY 8 4
10
4
4
8 6
4
10
8
8
6
10
8
6
4 4
4
10
6
4
DESIGN CODE AREAS
8
4
4
10
108
6 8
4
108
6 8
4
4
6
6
6
10 10
8 8
4
8 8
4
8
BLUE PRINTS MASTERPLAN
4
6
10
8
10 8
4
10
4
8 10
4 4
4
The areas shown here portray elements which are subject to the design guidelines in the following pages.
8
6 8 6
10
4
8 4
4
6 6
8
Waterfront Plazas Event Plazas Watersports Centre Water Bodies Waterfront Boulevards Multi-Use Development Waterfront Plazas Pedestrian Bridges Event Plazas Sluice Gate Bridges Watersports Centre Vehicular Bridges Water Bodies Waterfront Boulevards Multi-Use Development Pedestrian Bridges Sluice Gate Bridges Vehicular Bridges
THEBLUEPRINTS
53
54
THEBLUEPRINTS
THEBLUEPRINTS
WATER
WATER
55
WATER BODY NETWORK
56
THEBLUEPRINTS
RETENTION CHANNELS & SLUICE GATES
RETENTION CHANNELS & SLUICE GATES
PRIMARY FORMAL WATER BODY
PRIMARY FORMAL WATER BODY
WAVE GARDEN SURF LAGOON
KAYAK & CANOE LOOP
FISHING CANAL MARINA
MORDEN WHARF SWIMMING CENTRE
WATER
FAMILY SMIMMING POOL TIDAL WETLAND HABITAT & BIRD ISLAND
SECONDARY FORMAL WATER BODY
SECONDARY FORMAL WATER BODY
THEBLUEPRINTS
57
WATER BODY DESIGN CODE 01. Water bodies are for the use and enjoyment of the pubic for multiple activities 02. The various water centres and pavilions provide equipment and information for users 03. The water activities may be taken over by private companies, who must ensure the highest standard of safety and facilities 04. All water sports must have fully qualified life guards, and instructors present during opening hours 05. Private companies must ensure water quality is high, and are responsible for filter systems, safety lighting, and reporting water levels. 06. The companies must not dramatically reduce water levels through use of sluice gates without consulting other water body managers 07. Private companies must seek to encourage all users; fees may be applied for activities, and profits must be used to upkeep the highest possible standard 08. Water sports companies must provide free use to children under 6. They are also encouraged to promote discounted prices to local residents and children through engagement in local community groups and schools.
58
THEBLUEPRINTS
WATER BODY NETWORK At the forefront of the design are the water bodies. This network of water weaves throughout site to create a unique neighbourhood. The bodies link different spaces within the project together, combining to create an dynamic yet unified site. The existing site conditions have left an area which is disconnected and flat. The web of water bodies will re-link the spaces from land to river, celebrating the sites unique historical relationship with the river and sluice gates, whilst establishing a new and distinguished identity for the area. From an aesthetic and functional perspective the water has a role to play; forming hubs of water based activities and spaces for leisurely enjoyment, whilst working as part of a wider plan for sustainable water management for the project. The project will enable new residents to become conscious of urban issues relating to sustainable water use, whilst having the full benefits of living close to the water and being able to enjoy its full potential. The majority of water bodies are controlled through a sluice gate and lock system. The exception to this is the Wave Garden Surfing Lagoon, Fishing Canal and Morden Wharf Swimming Centre, none of which are connected to the Thames river water. Water volumes can be adjusted and controlled according to the desired function of each water body, allowing for flexibility and possible changes to needs in the future. During periods of high water and rainfall retention channels and connecting sluice channels can be used as over flows to incorporate surface run off. The network can be used to evenly distribute and manage water across the site.
MARINA The Marina is situated at the most northerly part of the site, adjacent to the O2 Arena, new hotel and close to the North Greenwich Station. This area was chosen for the marina because of its proximity to popular destinations, creating a vibrant hub, connecting the various surrounding nodes together. The marina allows small and medium sized boats to dock, for users of the surrounding attractions, or residents from local communities. In order to create a facility for a wide spectrum of users, the marina will have space for boats for sailing and boat clubs, encouraging people from surrounding communities to learn about sailing.
PRIMARY WATER BODY Primary water bodies form part of the wider network of interlinking water ways. These primary channels are situated within main thoroughfares, and therefore will be less secluded and community based than the secondary bodies. Although the water ways form part of the wider SUDS strategy, these particular typologies provide a mostly aesthetic function. WATER
SECONDARY WATER BODY The secondary water bodies are situated within more secluded areas within the project, further away from main routes and hubs. These smaller bodies will provide more community based uses, encouraging surrounding residents to interact. These bodies allow surrounding residents a more private space to enjoy and interact with the water.
THEBLUEPRINTS
59
RETENTION CHANNELS The retention channels will be relatively unnoticeable, however these features form and imperative part of the wider SUDS network. As explained in previous diagrams, the channels can be activated during times of excess overflow within other connecting bodies, allowing the operator to control levels of water through a sluice gate system.
KAYAK LOOP The Kayak loop has been designed to create a unique water body, with bends and different widths, the loop allows an exciting and challenging course for kayak or canoe users. The loop allows a full journey and aim for kayaks, starting at the kayak centre and deck, allowing users to meander through the site.
SWIMMING POOL The outdoor swimming pools allow users to experience the full benefits of living within the project site. A large, expanse of water, the water body allows for swimmers of different levels to use the facilities. A deck boarders one edge of the pool, providing loungers and seating for spectators, the deck acts as the main access point into the pool with d
60
THEBLUEPRINTS
TIDAL WETLAND The wetland accentuates the existing historical breach in the sea wall. In contradiction to the other highly controlled sluice systems, the tidal wetland creates a natural water space, which changes throughout the day, revealing different wetland levels as the tide draws out. This area is predominantly inaccessible to the public, in the aim of establishing a wildlife habitat without human interaction.
WAVE GARDEN SURF LAGOON The surf lagoon has been positioned centrally within the project, with the aim of creating a centre for this kind artificial wave surfing in this part of the UK. The wave garden technology creates the perfect wave condition for surfers of different levels, depending on where in the lagoon the surfer is. An artificial beach will create a unique space for spectators and users to enjoy views across the lagoon towards the river. WATER
MORDEN WHARF Situated underneath the skeletal structures of the Morden Wharf building, these water bodes form part of a unique experience. The water bodies provide an alternative setting to the more urban water bodies, as they are surrounded by parkland, creating a more tranquil setting for water activities.
THEBLUEPRINTS
61
SWIMMING POOL
62
THEBLUEPRINTS
WATER
THEBLUEPRINTS
63
WETLAND & SURF LAGOON
64
THEBLUEPRINTS
WATER
THEBLUEPRINTS
65
Wood Wharf Dock
Coldharbour 66
THEBLUEPRINTS
River Lee Lock
South Dock, Canary Wharf
Victoria Docks
South Dock, Canary Wharf
SLUICE GATES & LOCKS
SLUICE GATE & LOCK DESIGN CODE 01. The majority of water bodies are connected to the River Thames through a series of sluice gates and retention channels
Inspired by the sluice system which controlled water levels on the peninsular pre 1800â&#x20AC;&#x2122;s, this network of waterways will help to control the levels of water within the various channels and pools, working as part of a wider water management strategy for this project.
02. Sluice systems may be used to mitigate flooding risk, and control water heights in other water bodies within the overall system
WATER
The various sluice gate and lock systems have been determined based on a study of sluice gates in the surrounding dockland areas. Different types of sluice systems are used depending on the function of that gate, for example; gates where boats pass through are flap style sluice gates in the majority, these types of gates are often used at locks and smaller interconnecting water bodies within a system. Vertical rising sluice gates are used where there is no boat traffic, along small channels and streams to control water levels.
03. Sluice gates with bridges over open underneath the bridge, as a flap gate system, allowing the bridge to be a fixed and constant connection 04. The retention channels connected to the Thames should be used in accordance with tide times; and when in use must close the use of the foreshore 05. The only water bodies which are disconnected to the River Thames are the Wave Garden Surf Lagoon, an d the swimming and fishing pools at Morden wharf, water may be pumped through underground pipes to reach these areas, depending on what requirements there are
THEBLUEPRINTS
67
Mean High Tide Mean Low Tide River
Retention Channel Water Cleansing/ Retention Channel
Main Water Body
RIVER - WATER BODY SLUICE SYSTEM
Flap Sluice Gate under Pedestrian Bridge Vertical Rising Sluice Optional 3rd Sluice Gate Gate Mean High Tide
RIVER - WATER BODY SLUICE SYSTEM
Mean Low Tide River
Retention Channel Water Cleansing/ Retention Channel
Main Water Body
RIVER - WATER BODY SLUICE SYSTEM
Mean High Tide Mean Low Tide River
RIVER - MARINA LOCK SYSTEM
Flap Sluice Gate
Marina Gate and Bascule Pedestrian Bridge
Main Marina Docks
RIVER - MARINA LOCK SYSTEM
Mean High Tide Mean Low Tide
River
Flap Sluice Gate
Marina Gate and Bascule Pedestrian Bridge
Main Marina Docks
RIVER - MARINA LOCK SYSTEM
Mean High Tide Mean Low Tide River
Flap Sluice Gate
Main Marina Docks Marina Gate and Bascule Pedestrian Bridge Vertical Rising Sluice Gate 1 Vertical Rising Sluice Gate 2
RIVER - MARINA LOCK SYSTEM
RETENTION CHANNEL SYSTEM Vertical Rising Sluice Gate 1 Water Body 1
Vertical Rising Sluice Gate 2
Over Flow Channel
Water Body 2
ADJOINING WATER BODIES SLUICE SYSTEM
68
THEBLUEPRINTS
Water Body 1
Over Flow Channel
Vertical Rising Sluice Gate 1
Water Body 2
WATER
THEBLUEPRINTS
69
NET RUN OFF: 11,353 x 0.6 = 6811.8 litres
EVAPORATION: 180m
REFILL FROM HARD SURFACES
600mm RETENTI
FLUCTUATING WATER LEVEL 3.1%
OVERFLOW
3m NORMAL LEV
12.14 % 3.7%
30.14%
Green Roof 24.6%
GREEN ROOFS & SUSTAINABLE URBAN DRAINAGE APPROACH 21.72%
Part of the intention of the project is to reduce the risk of flooding in the area through the incorporation of a sustainable urban drainage plan at early stages of design. The approach to urban drainage has been considered since the initial analysis of the existing site conditions. Delving into historical maps revealed how water was managed on site hundreds of years ago. This sparked the idea to bring water back to the site, yet in a way which was functional as well as aesthetically pleasing. The sluice system allows for a controlled drainage approach, where water can be stored and released based on the existing or forecast conditions. The wider approach is based on a system of both green roofs and water bodies, where sustainable urban drainage starts from the rainfall stage. The calculation to the right suggests the amount of water which needs to be sustainably absorbed into the system. The masterplan is creating an environment where water is at the forefront of the community, in the hope that though education, a greater understanding of water will be gained by surrounding communities. Dreisitl emphasises that long-term planning approach to city design free from â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;currentâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; trends is needed in order to overcome many of the issues seen in urban environments. (Dreisitl, 2009) Greater awareness through design will help communities understand the fragility of water within cities, and the need to attenuate and re-use as well as enjoy it.
70
THEBLUEPRINTS
Terraced Gardens
Road
4.57%
Waterfront Boulevard Water Body
Permeable & Impermeable surfaces on site
Green roof network, with 2m offset from building edge
Green Roof
Terraced Gardens
Road
Waterfront Boulevard Water Body
Movement of water from rain to drain
AVERAGE RAINFALL: 600mm PER YEAR (600l per m2)
AVERAGE EVAPORATION RATE: 180mm PER YEAR
TOTAL HARD ROOFS ON SITE:11,353m2
TOTAL GREEN ROOFS ON SITE: 36946.58m2
Inevitably some water which hits the roof will become run off, where water falls onto the hard surfaces on the roof. This water will then have to be incorporated within the drainage systems at ground level, either into the water bodies, or into an underground drainage system which distributes water into the retention channels.
NET RUN OFF: 11,353 x 0.6 = 6811.8 litres
EVAPORATION: 180mm pa
REFILL FROM HARD SURFACES OVERFLOW
FLUCTUATING WATER LEVEL
600mm RETENTION LEVEL 3m NORMAL LEVEL
THEBLUEPRINTS
71
WATER
The rainwater management strategy envisions that all water that falls onto the green roofs which is not evaporated will be retained and reused in the system. The planting on the roof will retain some of this water, and left over water will be drained into storage tanks which could be used for watering, or filtered and used within the building system for grey water uses such as toilets.
72
THEBLUEPRINTS
BUILT FORM
BUILT FORM
THEBLUEPRINTS
73
MULTI-USE DEVELOPMENT
8
8
8
8 6
6 10
10
10
8
4
THEBLUEPRINTS
10
10
4 4
10
8
8 6
74
4
8
6 4
10
6 4
8 6
6
4
4
6
4
BUILT FORM DESIGN CODE 01. Buildings must strictly adhere to the allocated building height according to its block. 02. The building height restrictions are designed to maximise potential views across new and existing water bodies 03. Green roof and water tanks may be installed, and infiltrate into an overall SUDS strategy 04. Buildings are mixed use residential and commercial plots, with ground floor preferable for shops and cafĂŠs
One of the key purposes of the project is to challenge the way water fronts are developed in urban environments. Typically, residential waterfronts are developed to maximise profitability on properties with waterfront views, creating a wall of high rise blocks at the riverâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s edge.
06. Distance between Buildings must be at least10m apart to allow for natural light and thoroughfares BUILT FORM
An alternative method to this is to remove the hierarchy, the project aims to incorporate a fairer massing system, allowing residences further away from the Thames to have views across the river. The Blue Prints project ensures almost every single residence within the site will benefit from having an immediate view of a water body. Properties further back will also have equally close access to the water body as those closer inland, creating a fairer spread of possible profitability for each development.
05. New water bodies create desirable waterfront living for all, no real estate will increase in value based on closeness to the River Thames, as all real estate has equal opportunity for views to water bodies
07. Buildings must be offset at least 7m from centre line of roads 08. All buildings must provide sufficient parking within building plot, underground parking is preferable
THEBLUEPRINTS
75
ARCHITECTURAL HUBS
Morden Wharf
Surf Centre Kayak Centre
Marina House
Swimming Pavillion Bird Watching & Wetland Centre
Winter Garden
Exhibition Centre
76
Swimming Pavillion
THEBLUEPRINTS
HOTEL NORTH GREENWICH PIER
O2 ARENA MARINA
< TO CANARY WHARF & WOOD WHARF
WINTER GARDEN
SWIMMING PAVILIONS
BIRD WATCHING & WETLAND CENTRE
NORTH GREENWICH STATION & BUS TERMINAL
WINTER GARDEN
The Winter Garden pavilion is located within one of the most active hubs of the project site, at a busy pedestrian intersection of the Riverfront Plazas, Foot Bridge and the main route from the O2 Arena/North Greenwich Station. Projected over the river, the indoor gardens provides year-round opportunity for an immersive experience surrounded by plants.
POOL The bird watching facilitiesSWIMMING overlook the wetland and bird island which has been created. Similarly to the Winter Garden and KAYAK will CENTREbecome an iconic piece of Exhibition Centre, this building GALLERY & CLIPPER STOP architecture associated with the project. The contemporary facilities will encourage visitors to explore the importance of the River Thames as a habitat for wildlife, especially encouraging SURF LAGOON bird watching from an environment which will not directly effect GREENWICH GAS CYLINDER bird life.
Being in a key location, the pavilion building also provides opportunity for Cafe and Restaurant outlets, with spectacular views across the River Thames and towards Canary Wharf. The Winter Garden building will become a landmark feature and widely recognised piece of architecture associated with the project. HOTEL
WETLAND
SURF CENTRE BIRD ISLANDHOTEL BIRD WATCHING AND WETLAND CENTRE
MARINA
< TO CANARY WHARF & WOOD WHARF
MARINA
< TO CANARY & NORTH WHARF GREENWICH WOOD WHARF PIER
O2 ARENA
NORTH GREENWICH STATION & BUS TERMINAL
SWIMMING POOL O2 ARENA FISHING CHANNEL
NORTH GREENWICH PIER
NORTH GREENWICH STATION & BUS TERMINAL
WINTER GARDEN
WINTER GARDEN
The various water sports pavilions will be iconic in design, therefore allowing users of the site to recognise that these points provide information and facilities for the various water sports and activities. The swimming pool pavilions will provide essential facilities for swimmers such a changing rooms, lockers and small retail and refreshment outlets.
MORDEN WHARF
SWIMMING POOL LONDON CRUISE TERMINAL
Overlooking the wave garden surf lagoon, the surf centre is a large pavilion for spectators and users of the facility. Surrounding sun decks allow for outdoor food and beverage facilities, as well as space for groups to meet for lessons. The centre will become a hub for this style of artificial wave surfing not just in London but for the whole of South East England.
ENDERBY'S WHARF
EXHIBITION CENTRE GALLERY & CLIPPER STOP
KAYAK CENTRE
KAYAK CENTRE
Another landmark feature, the Exhibition Centre links directly HOTELplaza. SURF LAGOONcentre will allow to an outdoor exhibition and events The for multiple types of exhibitions and installations, as wellGREENWICH as GAS CYLINDER O2 ARENA WETLAND space for events and conventions. Overlooking the river, the MARINA < TO CANARY WHARF building will& once again allow opportunities for any retail or food WOOD WHARF and beverage outlets, adding to the array of possible leisure NORTH GREENWICH STATION & BUS BIRD ISLAND TERMINAL activities alongWINTER theGARDEN project site. BIRD WATCHING AND WETLAND CENTRE
BIRD ISLAND BIRD WATCHING AND WETLAND CENTRE
KAYAK CENTRE Similarly to the other waster sports centres, the Kayak Centre NODES: facilities for kayak and canoe users. The centre willACTIVITY provide willTransport haveHubequipment and instructors available for lessons, and Water Activity further information. Changeable Event Space Constant Attraction Existing Attraction
SWIMMING POOL FISHING CHANNEL
SWIMMING POOL
KEY PEDESTRIAN LINKS
MARINA HOUSE
FISHING CHANNEL
SWIMMING POOL
GALLERY & CLIPPER STOP
Celebrating theSTOP sites industrial past, the skeletal frames of the GALLERY & CLIPPER Morden wharf buildings will create an iconic and compelling space. Adjacent to the park, a swimming pool and fishing channel within the structures will create a completely unique SURF LAGOON experience for users of the waterways. There is opportunity for GREENWICH GAS CYLINDER the frames to become flexible and provide shelter at chosen WETLAND points, however, the frames will have a greater impact when left NORTH GREENWICH PIERas a frame like structure.
KAYAK CENTRE LONDON CRUISE TERMINAL ENDERBY'S WHARF LONDON CRUISE TERMINAL
Situated centrally within the marina area this building will become a recognised hub for boat and sailing clubs. The building could provide alternative space for maritime conventions as well as retail and refreshment outlets.
SURF LAGOON ENDERBY'S WHARF GREENWICH GAS CYLINDER WETLAND
THEBLUEPRINTS ACTIVITY NODES:
77
BUILT FORM
SWIMMING POOL
ROADS AND BRIDGES DESIGN CODE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES 01. All pedestrian bridges must be at least 5m wide to allow for cycle and pedestrian access from either side 02. All bridges, except bridges over sluice gates, must be at least 2.5m above water edge to allow for activities in water below 03. The proposed bridge to the Isle of Dogs should be open at all times to the public, and lit at night
TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE
VEHICULAR BRIDGES 04. Where a road crosses over a water body, the same rule applies as foot bridge, the bridge must be at least 2.5m above the waters edge 05. Vehicular bridges must provide adjoining pedestrian routes 2.5m wide on one side,but preferably both ROADS 06. All road lanes are offset 2.5m from the road centre line 07. Roads are 5m wide 08. Cars have secondary priority at junctions, below cyclists and pedestrians 09. Roads must have clear zebra crossings, allowing free movement of pedestrians and cyclists 10. Speed limits are restricted to 20mph to ensure safety of local residents, and users of the site 11. Street parking is minimal, but if required, must be parallel to road and not intrusive of pedestrian thoroughfares 78
THEBLUEPRINTS
The complex network of water bodies and mixed use development can only become a successful neighbourhood with a comprehensive transport and circulation network. The masterplan presumes the majority of vehicular parking will occur underground within building plots. The proposed road network of roads will provide access throughout the site, with the intention that vehicular transportation will be secondary to other transport options. The existing roads remain in the same position, however the project proposed the entrance to the Blackwall tunnel will be bought further south, allowing greater connectivity between the Blue Prints project site and east-west across the peninsular. In addition to the road system other infrastructures include multiple bridges across the water bodies, and a footbridge connecting the peninsular with Canary Wharf. This new link opens up the project site, and its surrounding attractions to the Isle of Dogs side of the river.
Existing Road Pedestrian Sluice Bridge BUILT FORM
New Boulevard
Vehicular Bridge Pedestrian Bridge
Water Taxi Pier
THEBLUEPRINTS
79
80
THEBLUEPRINTS
LANDSCAPE
LANDSCAPE
THEBLUEPRINTS
81
LANDSCAPES
Bay Wharf Park
Waterfront Boulevards Terraced Gardens
Woodland Buffer
Pocket Parks
Bird Island Tidal Wetland
Foreshore
82
THEBLUEPRINTS
TERRACED GARDENS Colourful terraces with linear strips of grasses and shrubs lead pedestrians up to the raised walkway leading to the new bridge. The terraces provide the perfect space for relaxing, and enjoying the south facing aspect and overlooking the water channels and river. The stepped design creates amphitheatre like seating, allowing users to gain height and overlook the various activities going on at water level.
POCKET PARKS Smaller parcels of landscaping creates more intimate spaces with seating, water features and colourful planting. These pocket parks are dotted throughout the site, adding to the web of different scaled spaces within the project site. These spaces are more likely to be used by local residents for more tranquil activities, away from the active river front plazas.
WATERFRONT BOULEVARDS
Water edges are spaces for pedestrian and cycle movement, yet are also wide enough to accommodate spaces for relaxation, with seating and spaces for observing water activities
Mounded landforms seeded with swathes of meadow grasses and flowers create a colourful and contrasting space from the more formal layout of the neighbourhood. The mounds are formed from left over earth cut out from the water bodies and wetland. Meandering pathways between the mounds make for secluded spaces whilst the mounds introduce a new topography to the site. The slopes provide the opportunity to gain height, accentuating the panoramic views towards the Isle of Dogs, around to the Greenwich Power Station, Gas Cylinder and O2 arena, as well as views across the wetland.
BIRD ISLAND A specially created island, inaccessible to humans creates a quiet home for nesting birds. Opportunities for bird watching from the nearby pavilion enhances awareness and the opportunity to study bird species in the area.
FORESHORE A valuable existing open space for recreational activities such as fishing, metal detecting, scavenger hunting, dog walking and exploring.
WOODLAND BUFFER Naturalistic sweeps of woodland trees provide a visual and sound buffer to adjacent motorway traffic. Woodland shelters the synthetic beach area and creates stunning seasonal backdrop to surfing lagoon.
TIDAL WETLAND Accentuating a historical breach in the river wall, the river edge has been pushed inland to create a terraced wetland habitat. Marginal and submerged plant species creates beautiful displays throughout the year, and increase opportunities for wildlife along the urban river banks. This area will be inaccessible directly to humans, to allow for natural processes to take over.
LANDSCAPE
Colourful lines of trees surrounding water bodies soften the space between water edge and surrounding buildings. The seasonal change of the trees creates a dynamic and ever changing spectacle, accentuated by trees reflection in the water bodies.
BAY WHARF PARK
THEBLUEPRINTS
83
RIVER FRONT PLAZAS
84
THEBLUEPRINTS
A series of interconnecting spaces, the river front is an active route acting as the main vein for the project. The space is an interconnecting series of squares, allowing multiple uses and activities. These flexible plazas provide the essential space to establish community hubs, as well as a vibrant and dynamic destination for visitors and tourists. Running over the water bodies, a series of pedestrian sluice gate bridges ensure connectivity from north to south as well as incorporating pedestrian traffic from other spaces around the site. The shape of the river edge allows for maximum functionality and use of the plazas, whilst at the same time allowing users to experience a unique journey as the route zigzags, the user will experience different scales of landscape, and glimpses down the different water bodies and boulevards as they are crossed. The series of spaces provide opportunity for organised events such as street food markets, exhibitions, public art and other public events, the programme will ensure seasonal interest, and attraction for surrounding residents as well as visitors. LANDSCAPE
THEBLUEPRINTS
85
Exhibitions & Art Family Events Games
Street Market
Performance Space
Cafè & Terrace Exhibtion Centre Winter Garden
86
THEBLUEPRINTS
Cycle Path
RIVERFRONT PLAZAS DESIGN CODE 01. The riverfront plazas are a series of spaces or events and activities, creating a vibrant and active waterfront 02. The plazas are multi-purpose spaces which allow for various events exhibitions and installations including: street food markets, performances, photography exhibitions, public art and sculpture, pop up shops, vintage markets, seasonal markets, ice rinks, climbing walls & music concerts 03. Programming for the plazas must be diverse and engaging, encouraging residents from nearby developments, as well as tourists, and must seek to provide for all user groups 04. Seasonal, monthly, weekly, and daily programmes should be in place to ensure an ever-changing active waterfront edge 05. Public art should be strongly encouraged, being mindful of potential consequences of art involving sound, light or anything that may be deemed a nuisance 06. Event organisers should consider the opinions and views of local people, as well as visitors, adjusting event schedules to suit environmental, and social needs. 07. Event organisers should consider perpendicular and intersecting routes and views onto the plazas when planning an event, ensuring waterfront plazas draw people in from the peninsula as well as from North to South. LANDSCAPE
08. Organisers should be considerate and respectful of local businesses, being mindful of potential conflicts of interest. 09. A clear route for cyclists must be available at all time, and under no circumstances should a clear cycle route be obstructed by an event or exhibit.
THEBLUEPRINTS
87
RIVERFRONT PLAZAS
88
THEBLUEPRINTS
LANDSCAPE
WATER BODIES
THEBLUEPRINTS
89
2
90
THEBLUEPRINTS
LANDSCAPE
THEBLUEPRINTS
91
Waterfront Boulevard TYPICAL SECTION THROUGH NEIGHBOURHOOD
Waterfront Boulevard
Pedestrian Bridg
Pedestrian Bridg
SECTION NORTH TO SOUTH
O2 Arena Pedestrian Bridge
Winter Garden
Riverfront
Pedestrian Bridge
Winter Garden
Riverfront
Marina O2 Arena
Marina 92
THEBLUEPRINTS
ge
ge
Water Body
Riverfront Plaza
Winter Garden
Sluice Bridge
Water Body
Riverfront Plaza Sluice Bridge
Green Roofs
t Plazas
Green Roofs
Mean Low Tide
Winter Garden
Mean High Tide
Mean Low Tide
LANDSCAPE
t Plazas
Mean High Tide
THEBLUEPRINTS
93
WATERFRONT BOULEVARDS
94
THEBLUEPRINTS
The waterfront boulevards include the majority of the public realm space around the site. These spaces will act as routes for pedestrians, cyclists and minimal vehicles, allowing for easy access around the site. Although set in a rough grid system, the network of boulevards is unique, with angular corners to create elements of surprise within the landscape. Upon initial approach from the main road users will not immediately see the river, yet when turning the corner will be faced with expansive views towards the riverfront plazas and views beyond. Colourful lines of trees surrounding water bodies soften the space between water edge and surrounding buildings. Seasonal change of the trees creates a dynamic and ever changing spectacle, accentuated by trees reflection in the water bodies. Water edges are spaces for pedestrian and cycle movement, yet are also wide enough to accommodate spaces for relaxation, with seating and spaces observing water activities. The boulevards will become veins of activity, with ground floors of buildings becoming shops, cafĂŠs and restaurants to help encourage people to spread amongst the site.
LANDSCAPE
THEBLUEPRINTS
95
Zebra Crossing Active Frontages
Retention Channel
Pocket Park Pedestrian Boulevard
Water Body
Mixed Use Development
Road
Cycle Path
Sluice Gate
96
THEBLUEPRINTS
WATERFRONT BOULEVARD DESIGN CODE 01. Waterfront Boulevards must be a minimum of 6m wide from the edge of the water body to the road or building 02. Pedestrian boulevards should be tree lined where appropriate to provide shade, and break up the surrounding hard surfaces 03. Water offset areas must be kept to the highest standard, and landscape maintenance must ensure water-bodies are kept clear of any obstructions 04. The boulevards must have clear distinction between pedestrian, cycle and vehicular zones 05. Zebra crossings must be in place at all pedestrian junctions, giving priority to pedestrians at all times 06. Cycle storage should be made available for every 1 person living on site 07. A cycle hire scheme should be implemented, encouraging residents to cycle, and teaching basic road safety to those who wish to hire a bicycle 08. Clear signage should be in place to help pedestrians navigate the site LANDSCAPE
09. The boulevards should be named (not numbered) with names relating to the sites historical past. (i.e. Telegraph Walk or Delta Way)
THEBLUEPRINTS
97
WATERFRONT BOULEVARD
98
THEBLUEPRINTS
LANDSCAPE
THEBLUEPRINTS
99
100 THEBLUEPRINTS
THEBLUEPRINTS 101
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION
102 THEBLUEPRINTS
CONCLUSION
The document that has been presented set out to provide a solution to the existing trend in urban waterfront developments. The project aimed to proposing a masterplan which would become a fairer, more creative and innovative way to establish neighbourhoods along the River Thames as well as other cities. There are many factors which the design cannot control, such as the possible value of real estate within the project site. However, the proposed reduction of hierarchy from river front - inland development could perhaps reduce the existing trend where developers make the most profit from ‘luxury river front views’. The Blue Prints project spread the ‘luxury’ more evenly across the site, creating a situation where there is choice, and everyone has access and views to the water, creating a more inclusive neighbourhood. Parallel to this, the project has provided solutions to the existing site conditions. A site which has been left after an industrial surge, to become disconnected and isolated from the surrounding hubs of Greenwich, the O2 and Canary Wharf. The site needed to be reconnected in all directions, to bring people to the site and away from it. The project needed to incorporate innovative solutions to integrate it into the existing neighbourhoods on the peninsular, whist establishing a destination for itself. The project is a dynamic network of boulevards, plazas, pocket parks and waterbodies, all of which form to create a system which works together creating a vibrant series of spaces and landscapes.
The built form within the project has a rough set of guidelines, with the intention that this document will be provided to an architect to design appropriately the multi-use buildings, pavilions and structures around the site. This is flexible, and although the massing has already been determined, it has been difficult to envision how the site will actually look when the buildings have been specifically designed. Overall, the masterplan has addressed the issues relating to the existing site conditions as well as proposing a solution towards other agendas as discussed before. The masterplan not been able to address all of the complex issues fully, however it is hoped that the overall ethos of the project has been set out within this document. No one factor has been addressed fully, but similarly to the issues discussed above, it would be difficult to choose one factor which prioritises another. Therefore, the project as is stands can only be used as a guideline, or template. Ideally the project should be taken forward and be built upon by a team of experts; a landscape architect, architect, urban designer, road engineer, water engineer, ecologist, determining how the project could work more specifically. Unfortunately this is not the case, but it is hope that the project can act as an extremely useful tool if that next stage did exist.
CONCLUSION
Working with moving processes such as tides, rainfall and water from the design stage has lead to a project which is flexible and adaptable. The sluice and waterbody system can be used for pleasure and function as part of a wider water management plan. The systems which have created the water network are already in place around London, inspired by the docklands, and the historical systems of ditches and sluices which once controlled water across the whole peninsular. Water has been a constant factor influencing the site, and the Blue Prints masterplan aims to continue to address the issues relating the management of water on the site from a more innovative and rounded approach.
The design guidelines have been set, in the aim of influencing some of the future management and programming decisions for the site. These guidelines portray the ideal outcome of the project, however it is understood that without further design resolution it is difficult to envision whether these guidelines will eventually become the project. The project does lack an element of materiality, and further explanation of how the site will look and feel, the visualisations for the areas do not address specific details which will be needed to take the project further. Although this is never what the project set out to do, it would be beneficial to explore areas in more detail. Because of the large scale of the masterplan, it would have been hard to determine and prioritise which areas should be looked at first, especially as there is no one design feature which is more important as the other, everything works together as a whole.
THEBLUEPRINTS 103
104 THEBLUEPRINTS
CONCLUSION
THEBLUEPRINTS 105
REFERENCES
IMAGES
ADEPT. (2015) Royal Neighbour. Available at: http://landarchs.com/new-neighborhood-in-stockholm-to-foster-sustainabledevelopment/ (Accessed August 2015)
Image 1: The Thames Basin [Diagram]. Available at: http://www.london.gov.uk/ sites/default/files/water-strategy-oct11.pdf (Accessed: August 2015)
Atelier Dreiseitl (2013) Cloudburst Concretization Masterplan. Available at: http://www.dreiseitl.com/index.php?id=79&lang=en (Accessed August 2015) Dreiseitl, H.,Grau, D. (2009) Recent Waterscapes: Planning, Building and Designing with Water. Berlin: Birkhauser Verlag AG. Dreiseitl, H.,Grau, D. (2006) New Waterscapes: Planning, Building and Designing with Water. Berlin: Birkhauser Verlag AG. London Loves Business (2013) The Rise of Riverside Living: How the Thames Became London’s Most Desirable. Available at: Postcodehttp://www.londonlovesbusiness.com/property/residential-property/the-rise-of-riverside-living-how-the-thames-becamelondons-most-desirable-postcode/5681.article (accessed August 2015) Mayor of London. (2011) Securing London’s Water Future: The Mayor’s Water Strategy. Available at: http://www.london.gov.uk/ sites/default/files/water-strategy-oct11.pdf (Accessed August 2015) White MP, Alcock I, Wheeler BW, Depledge MH. (2013). Coastal proximity, health and well-being: Results from a longitudinal panel survey. Health & Place, 23, 97-103. Abstract. Author URL
Image 2: Average Rainfall London [Chart]. Available at: http://www. worldweatheronline.com/London-weather-averages/City-Of-LondonGreater-London/GB.aspx (Accessed August 2015) Image 3: Peninsula West Masterplan [Diagram]. Peninsula West Masterplan SPD DRAFT (February 2012) Lifschutz Davidson Sandilands. Images 4-6 Royal Neighbour Project {images}. Available at: http://landarchs.com/ new-neighborhood-in-stockholm-to-foster-sustainable-development/ (Accessed August 2015) Images 7-9 Concretization Masterplan [Images]. Available at: http://www.dreiseitl. com/index.php?id=79&lang=en (Accessed August 2015)