Landscape Architecture Portfolio: June 2018

Page 1

NEAL HEIDT

Landscape Architecture Portfolio | June 2018


SELECTED WORK


SELECTED WORK

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE By chronological order

04 | The Star in Frisco

Studio Outside

08 | Crowdus Street 2.0 2nd Place, Crowdus Street 2.0 Design Competition Extra-professional

10 | Visualization

Studio Outside

12 | True Drilling Headquarters

Russell + Mills Studios

16 | University Hill Alleys Master Plan

Russell + Mills Studios

18 | Cavalier Apartments

Freelance Contract with Meldrum Properties

ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE 22 | Jardine Trail Study and Design

Master’s Project + Report, Kansas State University

Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt

03


The Star in Frisco Corporate & retail district

Studio Outside Client | Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Ltd. Location | Frisco, TX Roles | January 2016 - July 2016 Visualization, construction documentation

The world’s most valuable sports franchise (according to Forbes Media, LLC) opened its state-of-the-art headquarters in 2016. Its design was an effort to revive the brand’s identity as “America’s Team:” a 96-acre tourism destination that invites the public into the Cowboys’ folkloric history and intricate daily operations.

Above: Design development rendering of front side of a typical fountain; SketchUp model and Photoshop water by Neal Heidt; Photoshop vegetation, entourage, and buildings by Charlie Pruitt and others Right: Construction vignette of front corner of a typical fountain; SketchUp model and AutoCAD labels by Neal Heidt

04

Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt


3D Modeling & Rendering In my first professional project, I modeled fountains for an entry landmark in SketchUp. The end result was a series of rendered design development perspectives

and annotated construction vignettes. Although the fountains had been designed by a principal, he wanted a grasp on the detail composition: joint conditions and stone block and panel sizing.

Above: Design development rendering of back side of a typical fountain; SketchUp model and Photoshop water by Neal Heidt; Photoshop vegetation, entourage, and buildings by Charlie Pruitt and others Right: Construction vignette of back corner of a typical fountain; SketchUp model and AutoCAD labels by Neal Heidt

Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt

05


During construction, the client decided to reevaluate the design of a promenade at the main entrance of the team’s offices. Due to the client’s inexperience with construction documents, my principal determined that the most effective way to communicate the new design alternatives was through renderings. I developed the renderings on this page and the next from a single SketchUp model, altering layer settings as I exported graphics; I rendered the vegetation in Photoshop using clone stamps and brushes in combination with layer style settings.

Construction Documentation In addition, I spent several months updating site and planting construction documents as the need arose. I was fortunate to walk the site during construction with my project manager and my principal, observing constructed design details and learning contractors’ methods.

Right: Perspectives of office entry plaza alternatives, as used in RFI submissions; SketchUp planters and Photoshop perennials by Neal Heidt; SketchUp base model by Gensler and others

06

Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt


Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt

07


Crowdus Street 2.0 Urban public space International design competition

Extra-professional

| 5-person team of Studio Outside employees

Client | Design Future Dallas Stakeholder | Deep Ellum Foundation Location | Dallas, TX Roles | February 2016 - April 2016

Deep Ellum – a burgeoning, youthful, post-industrial mixeduse district near downtown Dallas – lacks adequate public space. Following the success of a pop-up park event, the Deep Ellum Foundation proposed a design competition to gather ideas for transforming an underutilized street into usable public space at the heart of the neighborhood. 2nd Place in the Crowdus Street 2.0 design competition

Project management, visualization

Perspective of proposed improvements on Crowdus Street; SketchUp model and Photoshop rendering by Neal Heidt; color touch-ups and vegetation by Cindy Tong

Design Approach Drawing from our experiences as residents and patrons of Deep Ellum, my team concluded that the neighborhood’s needs would best be addressed using a linear park. Through conversational charrette, we designed one block of the street and conceptualized a master plan for the rest. Our focus was to put pedestrians at the forefront to draw users from throughout the entire Dallas-Fort Worth region.

08

This master plan is separated into five zones that enhance the social and economic sustainability of the neighborhood. Each zone does this in its own unique way by pulling existing retail, residential, and arts programming into adjacent outdoor spaces, taking into account both permanent and event-based design configurations. To soften the harsh urban landscape of the neighborhood, native vegetation, street trees, and permeable paving are also implemented.

Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt


Production Focus I designed several spaces within the overall park plan, but much of my focus on this project went into producing the flagship rendering (previous page) and the SketchUp model. I also coordinated the presentation board layout for my team.

Competition Outcomes My team placed 2nd among nearly twenty entries from around the world, receiving acclaim from the competition jury as the “best suited proposal to successfully address the neighborhood’s needs.” Inspired by the creativity and momentum of the competition, the Deep Ellum Foundation sought and obtained funding from the City of Dallas to construct a multi-block month-long pop-up park event: Reimagine Crowdus. Due to the success of my team and two others, the Foundation contracted our employers (Studio Outside and Gensler) for Reimagine Crowdus’s design development and construction administration.

Above: Users entering the Reimagine Crowdus event upon its opening; photo by Charlie Pruitt and Raylen Worthington Right: Conceptual master plan of Crowdus Street; drafted and rendered by Cindy Tong

Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt

09


Visualization Retail (various projects) | Professional experience while at Studio Outside Landscape Architects

STOCKYARDS RODEO

LIVESTOCK EXCHANGE

MAIN STREET

MARINE CREEK

FUTURE RESTAURANTS

HORSE & MULE BARNS

HYATT PLACE

STOCKYARDS STATION

FUTURE PARKING GARAGE

FUTURE HOTEL

FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY FUTURE MULTIFAMILY

FUTURE PARK

NORTH

1” = 50’

NE 23RD STREET

Above: Conceptual master plan for the Stockyards mixed-use district in Fort Worth, TX; rendered in AutoCAD and Photoshop by Neal Heidt; image overlay from Google Earth Right: Vignette of a custom shade structure; rendered in SketchUp by Neal Heidt; SketchUp buildings and site by Charlie Pruitt and others

FUTURE RESTAURANT

Fort Worth Stockyards | Fort Worth, TX

Crowdus

Majestic Realty is transforming a twentieth-century livestock trading post and industrial district into a destination retail hub. I produced several SketchUp models and renderings, and I updated redlined construction documents.

Several co outside o for Deep space. I d focused p

Above: Conceptual master plan for the Marine Creek District. Rendering by Neal Heidt. Aerial imagery from Google Earth.

Top right: P Street, take by Neal He

Right: Front view of proposed sawtooth shade structure, located between the west Horse & Mule Barns in the Marine Creek District. Section by Neal Heidt. Building elevations by Bennett Benner Partners.

Middle righ Ceremony.

A

10

Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt


Marketing rendering for an outdoor mall in Wheaton, IL; fireplace details, SketchUp model, and Photoshop rendering by Neal Heidt; color touch-ups by Raylen Worthington

Vignette of a cactus-themed plaza gateway in McAllen, TX; metal screen designed in Illustrator and rendered in SketchUp by Neal Heidt

Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt

11


True Drilling Headquarters Corporate campus

An underutilized memorial courtyard precedes the main entrance of a large office building. With a functionally and aesthetically intentional redesign, the client intends to build its brand as a timeless, high-quality oil drilling corporation.

Russell + Mills Studios Client | True Drilling LLC Location | Casper, WY Roles | October 2017 - March 2018

Planting design, construction documents

35’ flag pole

30’ flag pole

25’ flag pole

Existing tree, typ.

Ornamental tree

Existing wall

Wind screen

Ornamental tree

Proposed light, typ.

Existing entry

ADAcompliant railing, typ.

Memorial Garden ramp (ADAcompliant)

Main entrance

Memorial Garden stairs (ADAcompliant)

Existing seat wall and planter (behind path)

SECTION B-B1

ADAcompliant slope

Existing monument

Uplights, typ.

Concrete cheek wall

Shrub bed, typ.

Schematic section through proposed courtyard promenade; rendered in Photoshop by Neal Heidt from AutoCAD linework by Neal Heidt 2017.10.31

Planting Design While site layout and grading were designed mostly by a principal, I selected and arranged plants for the design. I composed a plant palette based on ecological performance, color, and year-round interest, mindful that the courtyard’s return on investment would be a direct result of the social and mental stimulation it provides for lunch breaks and client visits. The project’s setting posed several challenges to species selection. The courtyard’s location on the north side of the building creates a shade-heavy

12

Existing lawn, typ.

Existing ground plane, typ.

0

2’

5’

10’

½” = 1’-0” 0

2

4

8’

True Companies Headquarters Renovations Revised Concept

environment. Due to the unpredictability of central Wyoming’s climate, the selected species needed to have a proven track record in the region. Casper’s isolation from metropolitan areas meant that the selected species also needed to be easily available for transport to the site. Lemon-colored ninebark, steely blue globe spruce, and wispy native feather grass contrast the flat brown brick of the building and pavers to provide visual and textural interest. Heavy use of shrubs in the design also reduces maintenance needs.

Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt


Seasonal color schedule for prominent species used in the design; developed using Illustrator

Planting layout and schedule produced for bid set using AutoCAD

Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt

13


Custom handrail detail produced for bid set using AutoCAD

Construction Documentation & Detailing I developed and assembled the construction document set, including several custom details. I designed the

railings (below) to mimic the immutable yet elegant railings recently built elsewhere on the campus. I also assembled a cost estimate for this project.

Custom guardrail and handrail details produced for bid set using AutoCAD

14

Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt


Section showing relationships between grade, planting, and seat wall; produced for bid set using AutoCAD

Project Status As of March 2018, the 100% construction document set has been submitted. The project is scheduled to be built in the summer of 2018.

Right: Ramp section detail produced for bid set using AutoCAD

Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt

15


University Hill Alleys Master Plan Commercial district master plan

Russell + Mills Studios Client | University Hill General Improvement District (UHGID)

A bohemian-style commercial district sits in aesthetic disrepair and lacks ergonomic efficiencies. This master plan proposes solutions to these problems and attempts to enhance back-of-house programming.

Location | Boulder, CO Roles | July 2017 - March 2018

Report layout & writing, visualization

Sample waste enclosure design (described on next page); produced in Photoshop and InDesign by Neal Heidt using AutoCAD linework by Neal Heidt; custom perforated metal pattern developed in Illustrator by Neal Heidt

Project Components As of March 2018, the master plan document contained the following chapters: ·· Introduction (project timeline and context, goals and objectives) ·· Assessment of Existing Conditions and Opportunities ·· Waste Storage and Collection Strategy ·· Conceptualization and Visualization of Enhancements ·· Prioritization and Phasing of Enhancements ·· Cost Estimation

Production Role On this project, I designed the document layout, diagrammed information about the site, outlined several of the chapters, and wrote the document’s body content. Most of the research and calculations for the project were conducted by an associate. The following page contains an excerpt of the Waste Storage and Collection Strategy chapter, which I wrote the body for. This excerpt describes the methods used to quantify existing waste storage in the alleys and provides design and construction standard for consolidating and concealing that waste.

16

Diagram documenting the amount of visual clutter caused by power lines; produced in InDesign by Neal Heidt; data collected by Neal Heidt in Google Earth and from consultants’ AutoCAD base linework

Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt


WRITING SAMPLE: QUANTIFYING & DESIGNING WASTE STORAGE Approach

City-constructed Enclosures

This chapter sets forth a strategy to consolidate alley-scale waste patterns without the loss of existing alley amenities. To accomplish this, feasible locations were determined for consolidated waste. Existing waste volumes were calculated per alley and volumes were redistributed throughout the alley in the form of “alternative” locations. The alternatives were then designed as enclosures which facilitate an improved aesthetic; a sense of security; and improved daily functions of the alley, users, owners, and disposal companies.

If the City-constructed method is chosen, a proposed UHGID maintenance district will be established to oversee maintenance of the enclosure(s).

Location Alternatives

All enclosures are designed to adhere to City of Boulder Municipal Code. Once construction is completed, code compliance and related fines become the responsibility of the party assigned to maintain the enclosure...

Alternative locations for enclosures were determined based on several parameters: ·· Convenience of proximity to users ·· Preservation of existing vehicular parking quantities ·· Conflict with existing utilities ·· Conflict with existing amenities ·· Preferred physical dimensions of the enclosure – based on waste volumes, operating apparatus, and municipal code ·· Expressed interests of property owners

Enclosure Sizing Existing container volumes and pickup frequencies were provided by the respective disposal companies. Collection was then standardized to 3-yard containers. To achieve minimum waste volume with a minimum pickup frequency, a 6-day pickup frequency was established for all containers. Each volume type measured – trash, recycling, and compost – was individually converted to this 6-day frequency then summed per alley to calculate alley-scale volume. Based on the location alternative parameters, enclosures were designed to accommodate the necessary waste volumes...

Options for Enclosure Construction The responsibility of each enclosure’s construction will be either that of the property owner or that of the City.

City-constructed Enclosures In this option, the City obtains either an access easement or a lease on the portion of a property where an enclosure is to be built. Construction of the enclosure is the sole responsibility of the City.

Owner-constructed Enclosures In this option, property owners willingly agree to participate in the construction of enclosures. The City may consider expediting the entitlement process for enclosure-related applications to incentivize enclosure construction.

Enclosure Maintenance Maintenance of an enclosure is the sole responsibility of the party that constructs it.

Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt

If an enclosure is constructed under a lease agreement, the property owner reserves the right to revoke the lease at any time. In such instances, maintenance becomes the sole responsibility of the property owner.

Code Compliance

Recycling and Composting Recyclables and compost must be placed within the appropriate containers. Per code 6-3, the enclosure maintenance party and any tenants of the property are required to be held accountable for responsible waste education and disposal. For users’ convenience, a minimum of one container for each waste type is allotted for each alley. For alleys with multiple enclosures, the enclosure that these containers are located in is to be determined by the programs of the surrounding properties. For example, compost containers should be placed nearer to restaurants.

Safety Issues Fire Rating Per code 10-8, fire rating standards must be strictly adhered to. Enclosures must be at least 6 feet from buildings on any dimension and be made entirely of noncombustible materials.

Sight Triangles and Vehicular Movement Enclosures are designed to allow for effective vehicular operation. No part of an enclosure is to exist within the sight triangles prescribed in code 9-9-7. Additionally, no part of any enclosure is to exist within minimum turning radii for waste collection vehicles.

Waivers The City may consider providing waivers to those constructing and maintaining enclosures and to waste disposal companies. These waivers would address the following items: ·· Setbacks and easements (9-7 and 9-9-10) ·· Floor-area ratio (FAR) compliance (9-8-2) ·· Landscaping and screening standards (9-9-12 through 9-9-14) ·· Vehicular gates opening into rights of way (8-5, 9-9-10)

17


Cavalier Apartments Multifamily campus Design-build

Freelance | Contracted by client Client | Meldrum Properties Location | Fort Collins, CO Roles | March 2018 - Present

The owner of a mid-century apartment building wishes to modernize the building’s entry and courtyard. To do this, several challenges must be addressed: an identity-less aesthetic, intense shade coverage, maintenance limitations, the perpetual noise of air conditioning units, and a lack of usable outdoor space for residents.

Schematic design, project management

Contract The site’s owner had no prior experience working with a landscape designer. He therefore also had no concept of the necessary deliverables to request. The initial contract was a lump sum for a concept proposal. This proposal included renderings, design narratives, and a flowchart which described my recommended next steps for the project (at right). Upon the owner’s approval of these deliverables and request for additional services, I renegotiated my contract with him to an hourly rate.

Site Design The project scope included two areas of the site: an interior courtyard and an entry sequence. I designed the courtyard based on a grid and a free-flowing datum. Using this grid, I developed a series of hierarchical voids which connected the thresholds of the garden level to a central, usable relaxation space. The owner initially requested no social space in the interior courtyard for fear of losing the property’s reputation as a “quiet” community in a college-aged neighborhood; however, once he saw the need for usable outdoor space on site, he bought into the idea of providing residents with movable seating in the courtyard. Right: Flowchart describing the recommended design-build process, as described in concept proposal; produced in InDesign; on the same page in the proposal, I provided a list of recommended deliverables for the schematic design phase; process and terms were modified from a typical landscape architecture format to fit the needs of the project

Interior courtyard layout process, from left to right: setting up a grid and primary datum based on thresholds, anchoring the primary datum with ornamental trees, and massing the remainder of the courtyard with swaths of vegetation; produced in Illustrator

18

Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt


Existing site conditions, clockwise from top left: interior courtyard, as seen from garden level (first floor); interior courtyard, as seen from third floor; existing columns at the front entry; slump of the existing grade near the front entry, and building facade from the street; photos by Neal Heidt

Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt

19


Rendering of the interior courtyard; rendered for concept proposal in Photoshop using 3D model produced in SketchUp To address the need for sound reduction in the courtyard, I designed two options for acoustic panels which can be attached to the existing guardrails. A panel with wooden louvers set at 65 degrees from the guardrail redirects the sound of any second- or

third-floor air conditioning unit into the garden level to be absorbed by vegetation. Planter panels – originally designed as thin gabions – absorb a portion of the noise using vines and succulents, while scattering or redirecting the rest.

A section-diagram featured in the concept proposal, showing the travel of sound waves into louvered panels (#6) and planted gabion panels (#7) after leaving the air conditioning units; rendered for concept proposal in Photoshop and annotated in InDesign using 3D model produced in SketchUp; photos courtesy of others

20

Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt


Rendering of the front entry sequence; rendered for concept proposal in Photoshop using 3D model produced in SketchUp I designed the entry sequence in cohesion with the courtyard. Gabion retaining walls are set at 65 degrees from primary circulation into the building. These gabions also function as identity and wayfinding monuments and seating for residents or visitors waiting to meet up with a friend.

Planting Design I devised a list of shade-tolerant plants based on the research I conducted for the True Drilling headquarters. I also conducted a shadow study in SketchUp to determine the best locations for these species. The owner requested that I select species from a local nursery to which he has a personal connection, so I revised my planting plan where necessary to accommodate this nursery’s inventory.

The time required for maintenance is of concern to the owner, regardless of the design. Male dioecious trees are specified to limit spring cleanup and invasive reseeding. The rest of the planting palette consists of shrubs, grasses, and drought-tolerant vines and succulents. This reduces fall maintenance and water needs. The shrubs and grasses are also placed at a density greater than 100 percent to choke out weeds.

Project Status I began a schematic cost estimate in May 2018. However, with other improvements needing to be addressed at the property, the owner decided to postpone the project until further notice. At my suggestion, he is also considering changes to the color scheme of the building and the aesthetic of the existing entry columns.

Excerpt from an early draft of planting schedule and planting cost estimate; images of seasonal interest were critical to the client’s understanding of the rationale behind species selection; produced in InDesign; photos courtesy of others

Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt

21


Jardine Trail Study and Design Trail design Public interest research

The City desired to improve user safety and enjoyment along this 0.3-mile town-and-gown connection. Noteworthy characteristics of the existing trail included erosion, ponding, and other maintenance issues; areas of dense overgrowth; and a severe lack of lighting.

Academic | Independent Stakeholders | City of Manhattan (KS),

Kansas State University, private landowners, various historical societies

Location | Manhattan, KS Roles | August 2016 - May 2017

Research design, stakeholder & user correspondence, site design, phasing

Research Process Based upon a foundation of urban design and environmental psychology, the focus of this project was to address usage patterns and public perceptions of the trail, along with stakeholder interests. I personally wrote, coordinated, and administered intercept surveys to 200+ trail users. I then surveyed 50+ stakeholders based on the results of the intercept survey. To document the physical aspects of the previously undocumented site, I conducted on-site inventories and corresponded with stakeholders to compile base plans for use in design.

A typical environment on the trail in 2016

SITE INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS Photodocumentation Base Drawing

LITERATURE REVIEW

ANALYSIS (Findings)

Observation and Correspondence DĂŠrives

SURVEYS Intercept 1 2 3 4 5

Stakeholder

DESIGN ALTERNATIVES

1 2 3 4 5

Research and design process; produced in Illustrator

22

Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt


Excerpt from notes taken during an intercept survey session about site features, usage patterns, and informal conversations had with users; developed using permanent marker on printed AutoCAD linework

Lighting types, users

Much more safe

Much more safe

Vegetation types, users

Day | Night

Much less safe

ll Bo

ard

s

to Fes

on

s I

ro n- g

un

d

erh Ov

d ea

po

le U

gh p li

tin

g

e Op

Bo

nl

n aw

n Ma

i cu

re d

e rg Ov

r ow

th

Participating stakeholders Program type, stakeholders

Lighting types, stakeholders

More of an asset

More of a liability

Much less safe

More of an asset

Campus Acres (9 total)

ll a r

ds

oo

t Fes

ns e erh Ov

ad

po

le

li Up

gh

tin

g

Middle left, middle right, and bottom left: lighting and vegetation types preferred by users and stakeholders; differences in stakeholder preference among vegetation type were insignificant; graphs produced in Illustrator from data collected and analyzed in Qualtrics Bottom right: participating stakeholders, produced in Illustrator

Findings The research methods revealed two key regions of the trail which needed immediate attention: an area of thick overgrowth (the “Tunnel”) and an area of ponding and erosion (the “Low Water Crossing”), both affectionately named by the users. The findings were synthesized into a series of level-of-intervention design alternatives which were presented to stakeholders.

Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt

Resident-homeowner 3 Residential tenant 6 City of 7 City/University Special Manhattan Projects Fund Committee (11 total) Community Development 2 Department Parks & Recreation 1 More of a liability rs ns ve r sts wn Board i usk Advisory A l a ne d ssin c atio e e d D er ntr e tim y run ic y ccethlet re e llegrsity a b o c o f n Af t B C vPlanning o e Area e se /a on t1 By Board BUrban er c rs a tho ms By een ni By tadiu twand U larg se Be Place s 3 Collegiate Villa Prime Employee By of u Kansas State 6 Housing and Dining University Administration (36 total) 9 Housing and Dining Facilities 1 Housing and Dining employee, other 14 Jardine residents 3 Landscape Services 3 Planning, Project & Space Management Riley County 1 Consolidated Law Enforcement Other 3 (unspecified)

23


Vignette of the feature slopeside parklet in the highest-intervention design alternative (includes a nature play zone [foreground], bridge crossing for a 100-year flood overflow [center], and a bioswale [back right]); rendered in Photoshop using Sketchup components and photo overlay

24

Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt


Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt

25


BOLLARD LIGHTING

REROUTE CENTERLINE TO AVOID HIDDEN CORNERS

INFILL VEGETATION

UPLIGHTING

PERGOLA W/ FESTOON LIGHTING

FORMALIZE ACCESS POINT

Excerpt from a nighttime plan rendering of the highest level-of-intervention alternative; rendered in Photoshop using linework produced in AutoCAD

From top to bottom: plan rendering montages of the minimal intervention, low intervention, moderate intervention, and high intervention design alternatives; daytime and nighttime plan renderings were produced in Photoshop from AutoCAD linework for each design alternative

Design Process Rather than simply proposing implementation of lighting and modifications to planting masses, I incorporated the predetermined preferences into environmentally holistic design alternatives. Upon stakeholder request, a phasing strategy was also produced to merge the four schemes into a single long-term development plan.

Project Status

Vignette of an overhead lighting scenario and rerouted turn in a low-visibility area; rendered in Photoshop using Sketchup components and photo overlay

26

In March 2018, the City installed overhead lighting along areas of the trail with the least nighttime visibility. In May 2018, the City began planning an intercept survey to mimic the one I wrote. This survey will serve as a post-construction evaluation. The City is also considering implementing stairs near the “Low Water Crossing� to reduce cowpath erosion.

Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt


OVERHEAD LIGHTING

FORMALIZE ACCESS POINT

REROUTE CENTERLINE TO AVOID LOW POINT

BRIDGE THE FLOOD OVERFLOW

SLOPESIDE PARKLET

BIOSWALE

NATURE PLAY / INFORMAL SEATING 0

10’

25’

50’

Above: Vignette of a highintervention trailhead identity landmark with integrated lighting (historic farmstead in background); rendered in Photoshop using Sketchup components and photo overlay Bottom left: A daytime photo taken of the trail environment in January 2017; photo by Blake Wilson Bottom right: A dusk photo taken at approximately the same location in March 2018; photo by Binglei Shao

Landscape Architecture Portfolio: Neal Heidt

27


Brighton, CO | 303 519 9453 | neheidt@gmail.com | LinkedIn.com/in/neheidt


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.