Instant download Refocus the films of susanne bier 1st edition missy molloy meryl shriver rice mimi
ReFocus The Films of Susanne Bier 1st Edition Missy
Molloy Meryl Shriver Rice
Mimi Nielsen
Visit to download the full and correct content document: https://textbookfull.com/product/refocus-the-films-of-susanne-bier-1st-edition-missy-m olloy-meryl-shriver-rice-mimi-nielsen/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant download maybe you interests ...
ReFocus The Films of William Castle 1st Edition Murray Leeder Editor
ReFocus is a series of contemporary methodological and theoretical approaches to the interdisciplinary analyses and interpretations of international film directors, from the celebrated to the ignored, in direct relationship to their respective culture—its myths, values, and historical precepts—and the broader parameters of international film history and theory. The series provides a forum for introducing a broad spectrum of directors, working in and establishing movements, trends, cycles and genres including those historical, currently popular, or emergent, and in need of critical assessment or reassessment. It ignores no director who created a historical space—either in or outside of the studio system—beginning with the origins of cinema and up to the present. ReFocus brings these film directors to a new audience of scholars and general readers of Film Studies.
Available or forthcoming titles
ReFocus: The Films of Susanne Bier
Edited by Missy Molloy, Mimi Nielsen, and Meryl Shriver-Rice
ReFocus: The Films of Corneliu Porumboiu
Monica Filimon
ReFocus: The Films of Francis Veber
Keith Corson
ReFocus: The Films of Andrei Tarkovsky
Sergei Toymentsev
ReFocus: The Films of Jia Zhangke
Maureen Turim and Ying Xiao
edinburghuniversitypress.com/series/refocint
ReFocus: The Films of Susanne Bier
Edited by Missy Molloy, Mimi Nielsen, and Meryl Shriver-Rice
Edinburgh University Press is one of the leading university presses in the U.K. We publish academic books and journals in our selected subject areas across the humanities and social sciences, combining cutting-edge scholarship with high editorial and production values to produce academic works of lasting importance. For more information visit our website: edinburghuniversitypress.com
The Tun—Holyrood Road 12 (2f) Jackson’s Entry Edinburgh EH8 8PJ
Typeset in 11/13 Monotype Ehrhardt by Servis Filmsetting Ltd, Stockport, Cheshire, and printed and bound in Great Britain
A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN 978 1 4744 2872 9 (hardback)
ISBN 978 1 4744 2874 3 (webready PDF)
ISBN 978 1 4744 2875 0 (epub)
The right of the contributors to be identified as authors of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 and the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003 (SI No. 2498).
List of Figures vii
Notes on Contributors x Foreword by Andrew Nestingen xiii
Missy Molloy, Mimi Nielsen, and Meryl Shriver-Rice
Part 1 Generic and Industrial Fluidity
1. Storytelling Schemes, Realism, and Ambiguity: Susanne Bier’s
Danish Dramas 19
Birger Langkjær
2. Negotiating Special Relationships: Susanne Bier’s Comedies 36
Gunhild Agger
3. Susanne Bier’s Hollywood Experiments: Things We Lost in the Fire and Serena 56
Missy Molloy
Part 2 Negotiating Identity
4. Beginning with Jewish Survival: Freud’s Leaving Home 83 Maureen Turim
5. Stories with Queer Identities 97 Anders Marklund
6. Judaism and Danish Directors: The Case of Lars von Trier vs. Susanne Bier
Pétur Valsson
7. Gender Equity in Screen Culture: On Susanne Bier, the Celluloid Ceiling, and the Growing Appeal of TV Production 134 Mette Hjort
Part
3 Authorship and Aesthetics
8. Tracing Affect in Susanne Bier’s Dramas
Mimi Nielsen
9. Vision and Ethics in A Second Chance (En chance til)
Danica van de Velde
10. The Truth is in the Eyes: Susanne Bier’s Use of Close-ups in The Night Manager
Eva Novrup Redvall
Part 4 Transnational Reach
11. Cinema of the World and Women’s Film Culture: Susanne Bier’s Transnational Cinema 211 Belinda Smaill
12. From Local to Global: The Bier/Jensen Screenwriting Collaboration
Cath Moore
13. Danish Privilege and Responsibility in the Work of Susanne Bier
with Susanne Bier conducted by Missy Molloy, Mimi
and Meryl Shriver-Rice
1.1
1.3–1.5
2.1
2.2
3.1
3.2
3.3
4.1
4.2
4.3 Arrival of the older children
4.4 Singing “Lomir Ale Eeynem”
4.5 Freud’s sexual initiation
5.1 The poster using an image from Pensionat Oskar’s ending
5.2 Absent husbands, forsaken wives in both Pensionat Oskar and Den skaldede frisør
5.3 Once In A Lifetime’s ending cuts between hope and sadness
5.4 Two persons enjoying the pleasures of water, and two men alarmed by the careless non-normative bathing
5.5 Corky poses a threat to the heterosexual hero
7.1 Jed receives an abusive phone call from her mother
7.2 Angela Burr talks to Jonathan Pine
8.1 Adrian, witness and confessor to Roshe’s scars
8.2 Welcome home dinner for Jannik
8.3 Michael avoids looking at Niels Peter
8.4 Michael screams at the Taliban camp leader
8.5 Anton floats in the sea, caressing his slapped cheek
8.6 Cæcilie desperate for contact with Joachim
9.1 Encounter and afterimage: Andreas finds Sofus
9.3 The fracture of the ideal family
9.4 Bad parents or victims?
10.3 Richard Roper and Jonathan Pine/Andrew Birch in one of their “eye duels”
10.4a The biometric eye scan is central to the plot of The Night Manager
10.4b Jonathan Pine “cheats with his eyes” in the final showdown
10.5 Jed showering and dressing up for a new day
11.1 Serena’s descent into madness is exacerbated following her miscarriage
11.2 The eerie Smokey Mountains of North Carolina
11.3 Transitions between scenes in Serena consistently return to images of the mountains
11.4 The topography of the natural environment looms
11.5 Serena begins as a story told from George’s perspective
11.6 Serena and Galloway hunt down Jacob and his mother, Rachel
12.1 The use of close-ups has become an important marker of Bier’s screen aesthetic
12.2 Jacob says goodbye to Indian orphan Pramod
12.3 A South Sudanese refugee begs Anton not to help Big Man
12.4 Jørgen reads a bedtime story to his twin boys, Martin and Morten
12.5 Bier’s framing highlights the legacy of violence between children and adults
12.6 Marianne escorts Christian to see her son Elias
13.1 White, blue-eyed Scandinavian protagonist
13.2 Clean, orderly Western space juxtaposed against Anton’s South Sudan workplace in In a Better World
13.3 A young girl cries in a dust storm in South Sudan
13.4 Jacob and Pramod meet at eye level in After the Wedding
13.5 Close-up of unseeing animal eyes on Jørgen’s walls in In a Better World
13.6 After the Wedding’s credits roll in India
Notes on Contributors
Gunhild Agger is a professor in the Department of Culture and Global Studies at Aalborg University. Her research areas include national and transnational film, television drama, history of media and genres, and she has published and edited several books, among them The Aesthetics of Television (2001), Dansk TV-drama (2005), and Mord til tiden (2013).
Mette Hjort is Professor of Film Studies at the Department of Media, Cognition and Communication, University of Copenhagen. Appointed by the Minister of Culture, she serves on the Board of the Danish Film Institute.
Birger Langkjær is Associate Professor in Film Studies at the Department of Media, Cognition and Communication, University of Copenhagen. His main research is on cognitive film theory, sound and music in film and television, and realism in Danish cinema. He has published in numerous journals, edited volumes, and he is the author of three books.
Anders Marklund is a senior lecturer in Film Studies at Lund University in Sweden and primary editor of Journal of Scandinavian Cinema (Intellect). His current research interests include history and remediation in contemporary cinema, (super-) popular national European films, international awards and circulation, migration and marginalized identities in mainstream cinema, and participatory cultures.
Missy Molloy is a lecturer in film at Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand. Her work has recently appeared in Studies in Spanish & Latin American Cinemas (2017) and the Journal of Popular Television (2017), and her
current research focuses on women’s screen authorship, transnational media theories, and crime drama.
Cath Moore is an award-winning Australian-based screenwriter. She tutors in screenwriting at the University of Melbourne and is completing a Ph.D. on Danish screenwriting practices at Deakin University.
Andrew Nestingen is a professor and chair in the Department of Scandinavian Studies at the University of Washington, Seattle. His books include The Cinema of Aki Kaurismäki: Contrarian Stories (2013) and Crime and Fantasy in Scandinavia: Fiction, Film, and Social Change (2008). He is an associate editor of the Journal of Scandinavian Cinema and a review editor of Scandinavian Studies.
Mimi Nielsen is a Ph.D. candidate in Comparative Literature at the University of Washington, Seattle. She is currently writing her dissertation, Playing the Edge: The Work of Affect in Emilie Flygare-Carlén’s Authorship and Reception.
Eva Novrup Redvall is Associate Professor of Film and Media Studies at the University of Copenhagen. She is the author of several books, chapters, and articles on Danish film and television, and has been a film critic for the daily Danish newspaper Information since 1999.
Meryl Shriver-Rice is the Director of Environmental Media at the Abess Center for Ecosystem Science & Policy at the University of Miami. She is the author of Inclusion in New Danish Cinema: Sexuality & Transnational Belonging (2015) and co-author of Screen Life & Identity: An Introduction to Media Studies (forthcoming with Hunter Vaughan). Her current media studies research focuses on digital culture and the role of visual artifacts in shaping societal values and perceptions of the environment.
Belinda Smaill is an Associate Professor in Film and Screen Studies at Monash University, Melbourne. She has published widely in the areas of women and cinema, documentary film, and Australian film and television. She is the author of The Documentary: Politics, Emotion, Culture (2010) and Regarding Life: Animals and the Documentary Moving Image (2016), and coauthor of Transnational Australian Cinema: Ethics in the Asian Diasporas (2013).
Maureen Turim, professor of Film and Media Studies in the Department of English at the University of Florida, has published three books: The Films of Oshima Nagisa: Images of a Japanese Iconoclast (1998); Flashbacks in Film:
Memory and History (1989); and Abstraction in Avant-Garde Films (1985). She has published over one hundred essays in journals and books.
Pétur Valsson is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Scandinavian Studies and the Cinema and Media Studies Graduate Program at the University of Washington, Seattle. He holds an M.A. degree in Film Studies from Columbia University and a B.A. in History and Film from the University of Iceland.
Danica van de Velde is an early career researcher at the University of Western Australia, where she completed her doctoral thesis on the cinema of Wong Kar-wai. Her work has recently been published in Home: Concepts, Constructions, Contexts (2016) and a special issue of Frontiers of Literary Studies in China (2017) focusing on women, writing, and visuality in contemporary China.
Foreword by Andrew Nestingen
Denmark’s (and for that matter Scandinavia’s) most significant contributors to cinema have been enigmatic, multifaceted, and often peripatetic artists. Carl Th. Dreyer made films in Denmark, Norway, Germany, and France. After the premiere of Day of Wrath (Vredens dag, 1943), he pitched a remake of the film, “transplanted to an American milieu,” to Louis B. Mayer of M.G.M. (see Wrigley 2015). While the remake never happened, perhaps it might be seen as one layer in the palimpsest of Lars von Trier’s Dogville (2003), which reimagines Day of Wrath’s tortured woman (Rugg 2016) through the mythology of Hollywood. While von Trier famously has not gone to Hollywood, he has made films with international casts, including Hollywood stars, and Hollywood’s myths and forms have long haunted his films. Dreyer and von Trier’s Hollywood fixations have been realized by the woman who is arguably Denmark’s most significant auteur of the twenty-first century, Susanne Bier. Yet as von Trier struggled, Bier became more prolific, made richer films, and received such recognition as an Academy Award, which she won for In a Better World (Hævnen, 2010). With Dreyer and von Trier she shares a body of work made in numerous countries, with multilingual casts and multinational financing. Moreover, she is a woman director who has made films, often focusing on traumatized, suffering men, in a male-centered industry. And despite her reputation for making melodramatic films, Bier revises and recombines genres to make films that are emotionally moving, aesthetically rich, and ethically thought-provoking. Despite her similarity to her cinematic colleagues, the many dimensions of her cinema, and her connections to and revisions of Scandinavian auteur cinema and its traditions, Bier has received scant attention from scholars.
ReFocus: The Films of Susanne Bier corrects this inattention by bringing
together a roster of film scholars that tease out the multiple and often contradictory dimensions of Bier’s films: their shifting relationship to genre, Bier’s identity as a filmmaker, her status as a film author, and the transnational character of the production and aesthetics of the films. The result is a rich introduction to her work and its contexts that will serve any reader interested in Bier’s films.
The artists whose work matters most to us are those who give us language and form for the questions that trouble us. Bier’s film career coincides with the move to a global, digitally interconnected age of people on the move, unprecedented flows of money, and complex historical interconnections. Bier’s films depict her historical moment with deft and penetrating words, comedy and drama, arresting close-ups, and contradictory scenarios. In After the Wedding (Efter brylluppet, 2006), for instance, these contrasts intersect in the collision of the saturated oranges of Jacob’s (Mads Mikkelsen) home in a Mumbai orphanage and the blues of his hotel room in Copenhagen. Each of the characters in the film has their motivations and their traumas, which launch them in conflicting trajectories. The film gives us language and image for our questions. What is my responsibility to others? Does my trauma give me license to use others to heal myself? How can we be moral in a world of criss-crossing moral systems? Engaging categories of gender, sexuality, nationality, ethnicity, race, class, and generation, Bier’s films put such questions to us in narratives and images that do not leave us.
ReFocus: The Films of Susanne Bier elaborates the history, aesthetics, and contexts of Bier’s filmmaking. In so doing it offers the first book-length consideration of Bier’s cinema, and why it matters. Bier’s multidimensional films will continue to capture viewers’ imaginations and emotions. This book provides readers and scholars interested in Bier with a rich entry into her cinema, and a smart companion in engaging the questions her films put to us.
works cited
Rugg, Linda Haverty (2016), “A Tradition of Torturing Women,” in Mette Hjort and Ursula Lindqvist, eds., A Companion to Nordic Cinema, Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 351–70. Wrigley, Nick (2015), Twitter post, February 6, 12.10 p.m., <https://twitter.com/ shittydeath/status/563791784334348288>.
Missy Molloy, Mimi Nielsen, and Meryl Shriver-Rice
The renaissance in Danish film during the last two and a half decades, which film scholars have dubbed the “New Danish Cinema,” has produced compelling works with local and transnational appeal (Hjort 2005; Shriver-Rice 2015). Susanne Bier has been at the forefront of New Danish Cinema’s international visibility since The One and Only (Den eneste ene, 1999) broke Danish box-office records and inspired an English-language remake (The One and Only, 2002). Despite critical accolades, including In a Better World’s (Hævnen, 2010) Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film and significant attention from the popular press and international audiences, Bier’s work has not often been the subject of scholarly discourse. In this volume we illustrate the ways in which Bier is a generically and industrially mobile screen author, one whose work has long been overlooked by film scholarship perhaps because it eludes easy classification (Smaill 2014).
ReFocus: The Films of Susanne Bier makes significant headway toward advancing the international scholarly conversation on Bier’s oeuvre and contributes to the broader conversation regarding women filmmakers currently forging viable commercial and artistic careers in a field historically dominated by men (see White 2015). It also addresses the phenomenon of directors from small nations successfully navigating competitive production contexts in an increasing global “age of media convergence” (see Hjort and Petrie 2007; Jenkins 2006).
This collection is motivated in part by the desire to parse Bier’s body of work because it challenges dominant rubrics of film studies assessment, namely those fundamental to genre- and auteur-based criticism, as well as newer cinematic theories based on contemporary media’s transnational dimensions. The fact that Bier, as a noted filmmaker from a small nation who is also
part of a minority of globally visible female directors, could evade the attention of film scholars for a relatively long period despite her remarkable artistic and commercial achievements became for us, the editors of this volume, an irresistible enigma. What is it about Bier’s work that inspires extraordinary public interest yet fails, barring a few exceptions, to stimulate scholarly criticism? Do standard approaches to film authorship sidestep idiosyncratic works and/or directors that threaten entrenched systems of determining cinematic value? These questions ground the many queries percolating through this volume. Meanwhile, the swell of attention to the problem of gender inequality in film has been an added stimulus—already certain that Bier’s oeuvre would be a fruitful scholarly subject, we have been inspired by the growing sense that women’s cinema, broadly yet purposefully defined, is on the cusp of unprecedented influence and expansion.
danish origins
There are few countries that can boast as many successful women filmmakers as Denmark (though this is starting to change: see Hjort in this volume), and it is a worthwhile venture to provide a quick overview of the innovative smallnation filmmaking context that has fostered equal production opportunities for Bier and other Danish women filmmakers. From a relatively monocultural national cinema of the 1980s, the 1990s produced two major changes to Danish film culture: a move towards Hollywoodization (recognizable in films such as Smilla’s Sense of Snow [1997]), and the emergence of the Dogme 95 movement. Dogme inspired socially “truthful,” realistic, and intimate storylines in direct opposition to highly marketable and ethically questionable Hollywood-style movies (Schepelern 2013) and was an effective, non-nationalist, and nonHollywood response to the rapid rise of globalization. Rather than exhibit the cultural backlash of intensified localism (which might have resulted in a plethora of new Danish heritage films), Dogme directors chose to employ new digital technologies to innovate the cinematic art form (Hjort 2003: 38). As a result, Dogme spurred significant artistic development and international visibility for the directors and writers (Lars von Trier, Anders Thomas Jensen, Susanne Bier, Lone Scherfig, Thomas Vinterberg, Åke Sandgren, Annette K. Olesen, and Paprika Steen, to name a few) who have since been recognized for their contributions to New Danish Cinema.
As a production strategy involving strict rules (hence the name “Dogme” for dogmatic), Dogme challenged directors to craft superior stories using lowbudget filmmaking practices that would allow for greater freedom in multiple areas of production (see Hjort 2010). One intention behind this strategy was to achieve greater cinematic “truth” through the use of imposed production
parameters that included low budgets, digital cameras, and a lack of props, filters, or extra lighting (Schepelern 2006: 103). Not surprisingly, many ex-Dogme directors still favor intimate narratives that are overwhelmingly focused on the psychological and social realism that the rules of Dogme cultivated (Bondebjerg 2003: 84). Even taking into account the concerted move towards mainstream filmmaking in the last decade, Dogme’s effects on New Danish Cinema are nevertheless vast, both aesthetically and philosophically (Shriver-Rice 2015).
This emphasis on story over marketability is also apparent in Danish film funding schemes. Today most Danish films are publicly funded, at least partially, through the subsidy system managed by the Danish Film Institute. The Danish system eschews solely economic evaluations of a potential film’s worth, instead selecting “artistically valuable” films, which rose in number from 14–16 films a year in 1999 to 25–27 feature films by 2009 (Hjort et al. 2010: 26). The Danish film industry also encourages extraordinary screenwriting procedures unlike those common to other national cinemas. Most film scripts are co-written by the writer and director. Eva Novrup Redvall has researched the unusually prolific collaborations between writers and directors in the Danish film industry. She argues that these collaborations cultivate an environment in which the story remains the critical focus of each film (2010: 67). This distinct approach to screenwriting resembles the collaborative dynamic often exhibited by competing Danish production companies. Hjort has interpreted this unique phenomenon as a Maussian “gift culture” of film production, and it has been heralded as the creative machinery of a cinema that is tailored to nurture artistic vision over marketability (Hjort 2005: 23).
While extraordinary, this commitment to collaboration is logical for a national culture that is known to exhibit an “unshakable commitment to egalitarianism” (Hjort 2005: 4). It is within this film industry context that women directors such as Susanne Bier, Paprika Steen, Lone Scherfig, Pernille Fischer Christensen and Hella Joof have received support for their film projects. Furthermore, much of New Danish Cinema is fashioned to produce narratives of cultural, social, political, and artistic significance (Shriver-Rice 2015). This is certainly not surprising given that many Danish directors are graduates of the notoriously “socially aware” National Film School of Denmark (Stevenson 2003: 162, 201). As many high-profile film nominations and wins over the past two decades highlight, New Danish Cinema has produced compelling works with local and transnational appeal.
bier’s distinctly transcultural and erotic brand
Bier is known for her ethically ripe, timely dramas. The most successful of these, by inviting close psychological readings of their characters’ complex reactions to extreme scenarios, exhibit qualities associated with psychological realism. The trio of films that have been most internationally recognized— Brothers (Brødre, 2004), After the Wedding (Efter brylluppet, 2006) and In a Better World—feature male protagonists responding to traumatic, life-altering events (Smaill 2014). More recently, Bier directed a television miniseries, The Night Manager (2016), which amassed viewing numbers that well surpass the successes of her theatrical releases. That BBC and AMC coproduced the John le Carré adaptation, combined with its categorization as a thriller, underscores Bier’s generic versatility and her willingness to experiment in varied production environments and media formats. Bier has also directed several popular, critically acclaimed films classified as comedies—most significantly, The One and Only and Love Is All You Need (Den skaldede frisør, 2012)—and her early successes can be best described as generic hybrids. As a primary example, her first feature film, Freud’s Leaving Home (Freud flyttar hemifrån . . ., 1991) utilizes drama and comedy to tell a Swedish-Jewish woman’s coming-of-age story.
The daughter of Jewish immigrants to Denmark, Bier was born in 1960 and raised in Copenhagen as part of a minority that did not seamlessly fit into mainstream Danish culture, the homogeneity of which, in cultural and ethnic terms, can be considered the flip side of its efficient economy. Bier initially studied religion at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and architecture at Jerusalem’s Bezalel Academy of Art and Design and then continued her studies at the Architectural Association in London (danskefilm.dk; Denmark. dk). Although her application to the National Film School of Denmark appears to depart from her previous studies, Bier regards her turn to filmmaking as a natural evolution of her interests, particularly in the relationship between set design and its psychological implications, which was a dynamic that motivated her architectural studies.1 Her application to the notoriously selective film school was accepted based on a portfolio of photographs, which Bier describes as “mini-movies,” including a love story composed of images taken at an “open-air swimming spot” near the Kastrup airport on the outskirts of Copenhagen.2 The emphasis on the impact of location on characters’ experiences is apparent across Bier’s eclectic works, as is the attention to romantic love or, as Bier phrased it in an interview in 2001, “eroticism at all possible levels” (Hjort 2003). While casting a wide net to cover Bier’s substantial filmography, we, along with the contributors, continually reiterate elements that create a portrait of Bier as a screen author compelled by coherent interests,
which are visible in the generically and industrially varied experiments that constitute her oeuvre.
Bier has been making explicitly transnational films from the start of her career, well before film studies’ “transnational turn” (Kuhn and Westwell 2012). Her first feature films—Freud’s Leaving Home and Family Matters (Det bli’r i familien, 1993)—demonstrate her interest in transnational identities and in production scenarios that complement her work’s attention to characters who construct their identities in geographies that exceed national borders. Freud’s Leaving Home is a Swedish/Danish co-production centered on a Jewish family scattered across three continents (with family members based in Israel, the United States, and Sweden), while Family Matters is a Danish/ Swedish/Portuguese co-production that deals with the protagonist’s search for his biological parents, which takes him from Denmark to Portugal. These films establish a pattern in her work that is also evident in her more prominent, twenty-first-century films, such as After the Wedding and Love Is All You Need In addition, her recent successes with international viewers—most notably via The Night Manager, which was shot in six countries and sold for broadcast in at least 188 countries—can be read as fulfilling Bier’s career-long goal to reach a large audience through stories with transnational relevance (Hjort 2001). Meanwhile, the Jennifer Lawrence/Bradley Cooper-starring, critical and commercial dead weight Serena (2014) indicates that Bier’s transnational sensibility and production preferences may not lend themselves to narratives that depend heavily on specific, local meanings that are foreign to her, or where her creative autonomy is impeded by multiple stakeholders’ varied investments (as argued in Chapter 3 of this volume).
Bier has been remarkably prolific, particularly when compared to research that suggests women directors often encounter notable career gaps and produce fewer films than their male counterparts (see Badley, Perkins, and Schreiber 2016). Bier has proven exceptional in this respect, directing fifteen feature-length films, a TV movie (Luischen, 1993), and a television series (The Night Manager) in the three decades since her graduation film, The Island of the Blessed (De saliges ø, 1986) won first prize at the Munich International Festival of Film Schools. Factoring in her work in television, Bier has averaged nearly one major work every other year, which makes her the most prolific in the small cohort of internationally visible women directors helming big-budget productions in contemporary film and television.
Her willingness to work in various industrial milieus and across genres has clearly increased her productivity. After The Island of the Blessed, which is perhaps the most classically Danish film in her oeuvre, Bier worked for several years in Sweden (on the internationally co-produced features mentioned above). Her next Danish work, the DR television drama Luischen, was part of a
series of Danish short story adaptations intended, according to Gunhild Agger, “to educate the audience” in fulfillment of “public service obligation[s].”3
Two years later, she premiered another film set in Sweden, Like It Never Was Before (Pensionat Oskar, 1995), which charts a middle-aged family man’s surprising and transformative affair with a younger man. Her next production, Credo (Sekten, 1997), set in Denmark and classified as a psychological thriller, is a career anomaly in generic terms and was, according to Bier, not entirely successful.4 She capped a busy decade with two features—one set in Denmark (The One and Only) and the other in Sweden (Once in a Lifetime [Livet är en schlager, 2000]). Both are mainstream comedies: the former a blockbuster hit considered Bier’s popular breakthrough, and the latter only moderately successful and to date Bier’s last film set in Sweden.
While The One and Only broke box-office records and won the two most prestigious Danish film awards for best Danish film in 2000 (the Bodil and the Robert awards), Bier’s next film, Open Hearts (Elsker dig for evigt, 2002), is considered her international breakthrough. This Dogme film was a major critical and commercial success that significantly increased Bier’s international profile and earned her another set of Bodil and Robert awards for best Danish film (in 2003) as well as a FIPRESCI special mention at the Toronto International Film Festival. These successes precipitated the trilogy of highprofile, Danish-language dramas focused on masculinity and crisis and coauthored with Anders Thomas Jensen—Brothers, After the Wedding, and In a Better World (the second of these was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film, and the third won the 2011 Academy Award in the same category). The success of After the Wedding caught Hollywood’s attention, and Bier was invited to direct her first Hollywood English-language film, Things We Lost in the Fire (2007). Things We Lost in the Fire was released between the second and third film of the trilogy, and despite possessing a high-profile cast that included David Duchovny, Halle Berry, and Benicio del Toro, it failed to find a significant audience. After her Oscar win, for a Danish-English-language hybrid, Bier’s Love Is All You Need (2012), which mixes Danish, English and Italian, was a modest box-office success that scored a handful of international and Danish prizes. Returning to Danish-language drama, Bier released A Second Chance (En chance til, 2014) in the same year Serena premiered; A Second Chance is undoubtedly Bier’s least successful Danish language film of the twenty-first century. Thus, 2014 represented a commercial and critical low point in Bier’s career, which was succeeded by another striking success, this time in high-budget, transnational television (The Night Manager).
Several patterns are apparent in this brief outline of Bier’s career: she has alternated with apparent ease among Swedish, Danish, and “Hollywood” productions; she is comfortable working in comic and dramatic modes (and often
blends the two); she has been able to secure financing from diverse sources and is open to directing productions set in a wide variety of locations and involving multiple languages; she maintains a high rate of productivity; she is peculiarly resistant to failure (or at least bounces back quickly from it), tending to succeed with a novel project in the wake of a less successful effort; and finally, she embraces generic and industrial risks while leaning on hard-won professional skills. This volume will continually highlight Bier’s willingness to adapt strategies that have proven successful in past productions to new generic, narrative, and industrial ends, while underscoring her consistent goal of reaching large audiences with challenging material rendered in a seductive cinematic style.
Additionally, the chapters in this volume address elements of Bier’s cinema that have not received sufficient critical attention, including Jewish and queer themes, her navigation of distinct media industries, her long-term creative collaborations—most notably with screenwriter Anders Thomas Jensen—and her early work produced in Sweden, all of which provide insights into the cinematic preoccupations that resonate in her prominent twenty-first-century films. Collectively, contributors frame this versatile director, whose work and public persona are difficult to codify, in the context of a fluid, competitive media environment that requires filmmakers to take advantage of emerging opportunities in early stages of their critical comprehension. Furthermore, the call across the field of media studies for greater attention to transnational cinematic elements affords opportunities to utilize novel critical lenses regarding the work of this idiosyncratic filmmaker, who identifies with the concerns of Jewish diasporic directors, is inspired by Hollywood more than European cinema, and has recently become a vocal advocate of women’s screen authorship despite her sustained attention to masculinity on screen and her long-standing nonchalance regarding being a woman filmmaker in a maledominated industry (Bier 2016).
Obviously, we are enthusiastic about Bier’s screen authorship, yet the analyses in this volume are as attentive to challenging as they are to seductive elements of her work. Therefore, this filmmaker’s tendency to foreground masculinity is a recurring subject of critical attention, particularly in chapters that deal directly with gender. On a related note, the sense that the term “melodrama,” despite its high frequency in discourses involving Bier, obstructs the process of critically analyzing her work was pervasive while the volume took shape. Consequently, a critical stand against the usefulness of the term melodrama as applied to Bier’s work has evolved through the process of authoring this collection. While this position is by no means relevant to every topic discussed in this volume, it nonetheless steers our editorial approach to establishing a foundation on which to build future work on Bier’s complex authorship.
bier’s multifaceted authorship
Part One traces Bier’s complicated maneuvers through independent, popular, and art cinemas, which involve ambiguous classificatory territories as she transitioned from nationally and regionally to globally targeted productions. The chapters stress that Bier’s work often challenges generic categorization as a result of its innovations; therefore, the authors collectively emphasize the distinctive features of her work that have been consistently singled out for praise and censure. Because Bier’s films are often referred to as melodramas yet are, in fact, generically diverse, the section parses the generic elements of her films and the way classification impacts her work’s visibility, reception and cultural status in Denmark and abroad.
This section grapples with relevant complexities in its treatment of films that are narratively and industrially diverse. In “Storytelling Schemes, Realism, and Ambiguity: Susanne Bier’s Danish Dramas,” Birger Langkjær connects Bier’s approach to genre with Danish cinema’s gradual shift, apparent since the 1990s, from realism and folk comedy to mainstream genres with greater international appeal. Langkjær suggests that Bier’s romantic comedies and dramas evidence this broader shift, which he locates in a preference for “tight narrative structures” observable in Danish cinema during the last several decades. In Chapter 2, “Negotiating Special Relationships: Susanne Bier’s Comedies,” Gunhild Agger highlights Bier’s directorial range by analyzing her comedies, which, Agger argues, borrow from and innovate characteristics derived from distinct romantic comedy traditions. Finally, Chapter 3, Missy Molloy’s “Susanne Bier’s Hollywood Experiments: Things We Lost in the Fire and Serena,” looks into the production contexts and results of Bier’s “Hollywood” films, stressing their capacity to illuminate the strengths and limitations of Bier’s direction.
The chapters in Part Two foreground issues related to identity on and off screen. Despite Bier’s reluctance to discuss such issues—barring the profound impact of her Jewish heritage on her worldview—her films’ receptions are nonetheless impacted by the fact that she is a Jewish woman from Denmark, a small country with a strong film culture that is known for unusual cultural perspectives on gender and sexuality. Therefore, the chapters in this part spotlight aspects of her identity that inform Bier’s approach to storytelling and address her public persona, status in Danish and international film communities, and on-screen treatments of marginalized social groups.
Chapter 4, Maureen Turim’s “Beginning with Jewish Survival: Freud’s Leaving Home,” closely analyzes the complex references to Jewish heritage in Bier’s first feature-length film and situates them in the context of contemporaneous films that feature diasporic Jewish families in cultural transition. In “Stories with Queer Identities,” Chapter 5, Anders Marklund analyzes
representations of queer characters in Like It Never Was Before, Once in a Lifetime, Love Is All You Need, and The Night Manager, concluding that Bier’s transition from modest to big-budget, mainstream filmmaking has resulted in less nuanced, more stereotypical queer characters. In Chapter 6, Pétur Valsson’s “The Case of Lars von Trier vs. Susanne Bier,” von Trier’s controversial remarks about Judaism and Bier motivate Valsson’s comparison of the directors’ divergent cinematic approaches to Jewish characters and culture in their films. Finally, Mette Hjort’s “Gender Equity in Screen Culture: On Susanne Bier, the Celluloid Ceiling, and the Growing Appeal of TV Production” reflects on Bier’s shifting responses to the challenges posed by both her gender and nationality and connects them to broader conversations in film and television studies.
Part Three examines issues of aesthetics and agency within Bier’s oeuvre. The Historical Dictionary of Scandinavian Cinema’s entry on Bier reads: “She is known for emotional dramas ‘with a visual rawness’ and for her ability to bring out strong and sensitive performances from her actors” (see Sundholm et al. 2012: 78). Leaning heavily on frequent, tightly framed close-ups, Bier’s aesthetic utilizes the camera’s gaze to explore subtle components of her characters’ experiences. Her ability to incite empathy for characters in extreme situations facilitates readings of her films’ complex ethics, which this section fleshes out in close readings of particular films as well as in broader discussions of the narrative and stylistic gestures that cohere her works. Thus, contributors pinpoint Bier’s signature visual and narrative tendencies, while additionally foregrounding the affective dimensions of Bier’s aesthetic and its stylistic anomalies.
Mimi Nielsen’s “Tracing Affect in Susanna Bier’s Dramas,” Chapter 8, straddles questions of genre and classification, as found in this anthology’s first chapters, and those pertaining to aesthetics and authorship. Nielsen, in support of her dual argument that Bier’s films evidence a preoccupation with “affect-as-intensity,” as it moves “across and through bodies, especially male bodies,” draws from four feature films that span much of Bier’s directorial career. In Chapter 9, “Vision and Ethics in A Second Chance (En chance til),” Danica van de Velde establishes A Second Chance as a particularly poignant example of how Bier’s work forefronts the “intertwining of image and psychology.” Van de Velde suggests that Bier’s approach functions as “a visual strategy that, among other things, highlights the dynamic between spectatorship and ethics,” thereby evoking a critical stance that questions the reliability of the image. The final chapter in the third section, Eva Novrup Redvall’s “The Truth is in the Eyes: Susanne Bier’s Use of Close-ups in The Night Manager,” analyzes Bier’s recent and extremely successful foray into serial television drama, taking extensive note of Bier’s use of close-ups as a means to “explore character depth and the spaces between utterances.” Redvall applies
theoretical discourses on the close-up and studies of Bier’s stylistic traits in previous work, as she reflects on the “remarkable array” of eyes and the closeups of objects in The Night Manager.
The fourth and final part of this collection features the global nature and transnational reach of Bier’s film practices and reception. Bier’s work outlines useful strategies for circumventing limitations related to gender and nationality, and demonstrates opportunities for screen authors willing to take risks in competitive, global media environments in states of flux. This section investigates Bier’s work and its industrial connotations through various theoretical frames related to scale. In Chapter 11, Belinda Smaill employs a feminist lens to situate women filmmakers within a wider “world cinema” context in which women’s cinema illustrates distinct views on resources, space, and mobility. Smaill focuses on Serena to comment on Bier’s unique position in transnational women’s cinema. In Chapter 12, “From Local to Global: The Bier/Jensen Screenwriting Collaboration,” Cath Moore draws attention to the unique Danish co-writing process that most Danish directors employ in which a director and screenwriter collaborate on scripts and share writing credit. Bier’s most successful films have been co-written with Anders Thomas Jensen; with a focus on the Bier/Jensen trilogy, Moore delineates the creative divergences between Bier’s solo work and Jensen’s dark satirical and absurdist self-written and directed films. In the final chapter of this collection, “Danish Privilege and Responsibility in the Work of Susanne Bier,” Meryl ShriverRice situates the Bier/Jensen trilogy within a wider trend of contemporary Scandinavian narratives of guilt, examining postcolonial criticism to argue that the trilogy stresses the failures of employing universal moral systems in different socio-cultural contexts.
Our interview with Susanne Bier in November 2016 functions as the volume’s postscript; it foregrounds the topics covered in the volume and touches on provocative readings of her films advanced by contributors. Because of the timing of the interview, contributors—other than the editors—did not have access to it as they wrote their chapters. Therefore, Bier’s responses provide material for future discussion, particularly in the overlaps they reveal between contributors’ interests and Bier’s. Finally, and crucially, the interview includes Bier’s thoughts on many issues addressed in the volume, thus inviting the director to collaborate on this first major push to lay down a critical foundation for understanding her as a significant screen author who, we predict, will inspire substantial critical attention in the future perhaps in response to interpretive threads the analyses included herein no doubt leave hanging.
notes
1. Bier suggested as much in our interview with her in November 2016, which functions as the final chapter of this volume.
2. This statement is based on the same interview.
3. Gunhild Agger provided her recollections regarding Luischen via email on June 7, 2017.
4. This statement is also based on a comment Bier made during our interview with her in Copenhagen in November 2016.
bibliography
Badley, Linda, Claire Perkins, and Michele Schreiber, eds. (2016), Indie Reframed: Women’s Filmmaking and Contemporary American Independent Cinema, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Bier, Susanne (2017), “TV is opening the door to female directors—film needs to catch up,” <https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/mar/05/tv-film-female-directorssusanne-bier-the-night-manager-le-carre> (accessed November 14, 2017).
Bondebjerg, Ib (2003), “Dogme 95 and the New Danish Cinema,” in Mette Hjort and Scott Mackenzie (eds.), Purity and Provocation: Dogme 95, London: British Film Institute, pp. 70–85.
Hjort, Mette (2003), “Dogme 95: A Small Nation’s Response to Globalization,” in Mette Hjort and Scott Mackenzie (eds.), Purity and Provocation: Dogme 95, London: British Film Institute, pp. 31–47.
Hjort, Mette (2005), Small Nation, Global Cinema: The New Danish Cinema, vol. 15, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hjort, Mette (2011), Lone Scherfig’s Italian for Beginners, Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Hjort, Mette, and Ib Bondebjerg, eds. (2003), The Danish Directors: Dialogues on a Contemporary National Cinema, Bristol and Chicago: Intellect Books.
Hjort, Mette, and Duncan Petrie, eds. (2007), Cinema of Small Nations, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Kuhn, Annette, and Guy Westwell (2012), A Dictionary of Film Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Redvall, Eva Novrup (2010), “Teaching Screenwriting in a Time of Storytelling Blindness: The Meeting of the Auteur and the Screenwriting Tradition in Danish Film-making,’ Journal of Screenwriting vol. 1, no. 1: 59–81.
Schepelern, Peter (2006), “The American Connection: Inspiration and Ambition in the New Danish Cinema,” in Højbjerg, Lennard and Henrik Søndergaard (eds.), European Film and Media Culture, Vol. 4, Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
Shriver-Rice, Meryl (2015), Inclusion in New Danish Cinema: Sexuality and Transnational Belonging, Bristol and Chicago: Intellect Books.
Smaill, Belinda (2014), “The Male Sojourner, the Female Director, and Popular European Cinema: The Worlds of Susanne Bier,” Camera Obscura vol. 29, no. 1, 85: 5–31.
Stevenson, Jack, (2003), Dogme Uncut: Lars Von Trier, Thomas Vinterberg, and the Gang That Took on Hollywood, Santa Monica: Santa Monica Press.
Sundholm, John, et al. (2012), “Historical Dictionary of Scandinavian Cinema,” Historical Dictionaries of Literature and the Arts, Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
Sundholm, J., I. Thorsen, L. G. Andersson, O. Hedling, G. Iversen, and B. T. Møller (2012), Historical Dictionary of Scandinavian Cinema, Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
“Susanne Bier,” Denmark.DK: The Official Website of Denmark <http://denmark.dk/en/ meet-the-danes/great-danes/film-makers/susanne-bier> (accessed November 14, 2017).
“Susanne Bier,” Danskefilm.dk. <https://danskefilm.dk/skuespiller.php?id=11587> (accessed November 14, 2017).
Generic and Industrial Fluidity
Another random document with no related content on Scribd:
“Just as we opened fire the enemy comes charging from out the poplars. Only a few steps they run, and then, as if thunder-stricken, the whole line of red breeches sinks to the earth. Our aim was good. How quiet the fallen Frenchmen lie! But soon the hellish racket begins again. In front of us a machine gun goes ‘tap, tap, tap.’ Whizzing and whirring, the bullets fly about us.
“Through an opening the men swarm through to the left! The bravest hurry on in advance. Five or six hang back till their leader roughly grabs them and kicks them through the hedge opening. There must have been 800 rifles or more! A withering fire tells us that the enemy has discovered our movements. But we return his fire as we run. Many of our men fall. But, lo! presently the enemy’s fire begins to dwindle and soon dies down almost completely. There, what is that? In the midst of the enemy’s line of fire a tremendous pillar of smoke.
We saw how the French were blown yards high. A terrible thunderclap reaches our ears. Hurrah! Our artillery!
“Shell after shell buries itself, as if measured with extraordinary exactitude in the very midst of the French infantry lines. We follow this up with our own fast rifle fire.
“Now we charge forward to where we can plainly see their faces. The panic of the enemy was indescribable. Our fellows mow them down. And now a new hail of shrapnel beats down upon them. Again the red breeches surge back in wild flight. We fire on the retreating enemy in a cornfield beyond. Many Frenchmen can be seen falling in the gold cornfield beyond, never to rise again.”
Works Sixty Years on Propeller.
At the age of seventy-four years, James Henry Miller, of Albany, Ore., believes that the ambition of a lifetime is about to be realized. Sixty years ago, when he first saw a river boat with a stern propeller, Miller made up his mind to construct a propeller which would not strike the water with such resistance. He says that his invention, now virtually completed, will revolutionize river and ocean navigation throughout the world.
The propeller has eight blades, each six feet long and twelve inches wide, and each working on ratchets, so that the edge of the blade strikes the water as it enters, falls into propelling position while in deepest water, and continues to adjust itself as the wheel turns, so that it emerges from the water edge first. The flat side of the blade never strikes the water. As the wheel turns, the blades enter and leave the water with as little resistance as a feathered oar.
New Farming in South.
One Southern landowner has a plan for diversification of crops that might be followed by many others. He has divided his land into tracts that rent for $100 a year each. This is about equivalent to two bales of cotton under the old tenant system. But hereafter no cotton will be accepted as rent for these tracts. Instead, it will be required in food crops, according to this schedule:
50 bushels of corn
$50
15 bushels of wheat 15
3 bushels of peas 5
100 pounds of meat 15
15 bushels of potatoes 15
Total rent
$100
The landowner in question, realizing the novelty of his plan, proposes to cooperate with his tenants in getting selected seed. If the scheme is successful, it will merit a bulletin by the department of agriculture, to be widely distributed.
Florida Sharks That Nurse Their Young.
The curious piglike habits of the nurse sharks of Florida have been brought to the notice of the North Carolina Academy of Science by E. W. Gudger. A third of the circumference of Boca Grande Cay, a small coral sand island twenty miles west of Key West, is bounded by a gently sloping rock bottom, on which the water half a mile from the shore is not more than four or five feet deep.
On this bottom great numbers of the sharks gather in the sun, play, and possibly feed. With seldom less than a dozen visible, as many as thirty-three have been in view at one time.
They are broad, sluggish, so little afraid that a boat may touch their fins before they will move, and they lie piled together in a confused herd, like well-fed pigs in a barnyard. Sometimes three or four swim aimlessly about.
They are harmless, with small mouths filled with small pointed teeth, and, though they are vegetarians to some degree, their chief food seems to be the young oysters, clams, crabs, and various other crustaceans.
Ostrich Farming as a Business.
James H. Reece, of Joplin, Mo., who has been in California studying the “ins and outs” of the Pasadena ostrich farm, with a view of giving the business a try-out in this vicinity, has returned, and has considerable to say on the subject of the profitable raising of the big birds.
“Unless you have money to start with,” said he, “you shouldn’t attempt to go into ostrich farming in the United States for profit. Still, there are a number of ostrich farms in this country, and not all are failures. The first ostriches were brought here in 1862 from South Africa, and between that date and 1886, 120 birds were imported. We have now about 10,000 ostriches with us, nearly all of them American bred.”
“And,” he continued, “Arizona is the leading ostrich-farming section, though there are farms in California—the one at Pasadena being probably the best known of all of them—Texas, Arkansas, and Florida. Something like two millions of dollars is invested in the industry, not counting the value of the land. The business pays if the climate is all right and the birds receive proper care, for the ostrich, though tough, must be looked after carefully.
“An acre of alfalfa will support four ostriches with no other food than gravel and ground bone. A cow will require the same amount of alfalfa, but at the end of five years she is worth forty or fifty dollars, while the four five-
year-old ostriches are worth a thousand dollars. A bird will yield a hundred dollars’ worth of feathers a year, besides the eggs, which, even if they are not productive of little ostriches, bring a good price as curios.
“Ostrich plumes vary in price, from ten to one hundred and fifty dollars a pound, so you see it is worth money to the ostrich farmer, not only to have good birds, but to keep them in the best condition, for the better the bird the better the product.
“It costs about ten dollars a year to keep a bird; that is, to feed it. The ostrich farm at Pasadena is one of the show places there, and thousands of tourists visit it every year. Another good feature of the ostrich is that he lasts so long. None in this country has died of old age yet, and it is supposed that they will live seventy-five years.”
French Story of Bravery.
A French battalion occupied Mezieres in order to guard the bridges over the Meuse River. One detachment had hardly arrived at the railroad bridge when its officer, Lieutenant de Lupel, was informed that a German patrol was hidden in the station. The French at once attacked and drove the Germans here and there among the heaps of coal and the buildings. The French officer followed the German officer into the roundhouse, revolver in hand, and caught sight of him crouching behind a tender. The two men looked at each other. Mutual respect and a tacit understanding sprang up. With fifteen paces between them, each took up a dueling position. “Kindly fire,” cried the Frenchman, just as his ancestors had cried at Fontenoy under similar circumstances. The German fired and missed. Then the Frenchman slowly raised his arm and fired, killing his opponent.
He returned to his men, aided them to overcome the Germans’ last stand, and walked away coolly at the head of his battalion.
Nail Snaps from Box to Eye.
Joseph R. Henderson, proprietor of an Egg Harbor, N. J., poultry plant, was opening a box when a nail snapped from the box and entered the eyeball. He was taken to the Atlantic City Hospital. At this time it is not known whether he will lose the sight of the eye.
Woman’s Throw Hits Mark.
Mrs. Dervin Shumaker, of Jackson township, Pa., noticed a large hawk feasting on her chickens. Picking up a stone, the woman threw it at the intruder. The stone struck the hawk on the head, killing the bird. She took the hawk to a justice of the peace and received forty cents bounty.
Man and Dogs Fight Rattler.
The biggest snake ever encountered near Watonga, Okla., was killed by Jeff Saunders seven miles north of that town. Mr. Saunders was hunting coyotes in the cañons when his dogs ran on to the snake, and started the fight which lasted an hour. After the battle, in which one dog was killed, the snake was hacked to pieces. Mr. Saunders gathered up the rattles which had been torn off. There were thirty-six of them.
The snake showed a disposition to ignore the dogs and fight Mr. Saunders, and several times he barely escaped being bitten. Mr. Saunders brought one piece of the snake home with him which measured 6 feet 9 inches in length, and there were several smaller pieces left on the battle ground.
Honoring the Hero of Peace.
Sixty-nine acts of heroism have just been given recognition by the Carnegie Hero Fund Commission, at its annual meeting, through the distribution of medals and pensions. The commission has awarded silver medals in fifteen cases and bronze medals in fifty-four cases. Thirteen of the heroes lost their lives.
Among the number receiving silver medals is Miss Phoebe Briggs, of Sacramento, Cal., a student at Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, N. Y. Miss Briggs saved four girls from drowning. She was walking across the campus at the college when a toboggan carrying five of her fellow students coasted onto the ice on Vassar Lake and broke through. One of the girls came up under the ice and was drowned, but the others grasped the edge of the ice. Miss Briggs crawled toward the hole, pushing a small sled ahead of her. Two of the girls in turn grasped the sled and were pulled to safety. Miss Briggs went toward the hole a third time, but the ice broke and she fell into water nine feet deep. She pushed the sled down, and it remained in a perpendicular position, resting on the bottom. She then got her feet on the sled and supported the other girls several minutes until a man took them all to safety.
A silver medal has been awarded to the father of Henry West, a negro, of Chapel Hill, N. C. West, aged thirty-four, a crossing watchman, died saving Judson A. Haviland, aged nine, and Charles W. Jones, aged eleven, from being run over by a train at Asbury Park, N. J. The boys were driving a pony toward a track on which a passenger train was approaching. West, who had only one arm, waved a warning to them and then ran across the track and grabbed the harness beneath the pony’s head. The pony turned aside and West lost his hold, falling. A step of the engine struck him, causing injuries from which he died. Neither of the boys was injured.
A bronze medal has been given to the father of Henry L. Wyman, of Moorestown, N. J. Wyman, aged twenty-four, a painter, died attempting to save G. Allen Seltzer, aged twenty-five, from drowning in Rancocas Creek, at Boughter, N. J. Wyman waded and swam thirty-five feet to the distressed man and caught him under the armpits. Wyman kept Seltzer’s head above water for a time, but both men sank and were drowned.
To the dependents of three heroes the commission granted pensions aggregating $1,980 a year and the dependents of seven others who lost their lives were granted sums totaling $4,700, to be applied in various ways. Besides the money grants, in twelve cases sums aggregating $21,000 were appropriated for educational purposes, payments to be made as needed and approved. In forty-one cases awards aggregating $41,000 were made, to be applied toward the purchase of homes and to other worthy purposes.
Big Turtle Attacks Southern Fisherman.
Henry Simmons, of New Orleans, went fishing in Bayou Bienvenue, Miss., and had the unusual experience of being attacked by and afterward killing, in terrific battle, a large water turtle. He was fishing from a pirogue in ten feet of water, and the monster, a hundred-pounder, caught his line.
It came to the surface, and bit at the boat, tearing away a large piece of the prow. It continued to bite at the small craft until it almost turned over.
Simmons then reached for his shotgun and shot the monster’s head off. He carried it to New Orleans, where, with the bitten boat, it is now on exhibition.
Just before he shot it, the turtle had raised a heavy paw to strike him. The experience of having such a vicious monster suddenly rise to the surface and
peer into one’s eyes with such evident determination to fight to the death, is an awful one, says Simmons.
Can a Pup Inherit a Kink in His Tail?
Deciding that a pup could inherit a kink in its tail from a similar peculiarity attached to its father, no matter if the wagger did happen to receive its twist through an accident after the “dad” had reached his majority, District Court Judge Frank Smathers, after most careful consideration of the unique problem, awarded Elmer D. Sooy, of Atlantic City, N. J., a rabbithound pup, to which both Sooy and Thomas Hudson, of Pleasantville, claim ownership.
During the hearing of the case, Sooy trotted in a putative papa hound, which had an odd curl in its wagger. Under cross-examination he testified that the peculiar kink was there because a third-rail trolley had run over it. The pup happened to have a similar Marcel to its tail.
Hudson, on the other hand, led in another supposed pop hound, which had blotches on its flanks identical to those that marked the pup, and said it was this dog’s offspring.
It was too much for the court to decide in one sitting, but the next day, after his honor had spent his evening at home, pondering over canine spots and tails, Sooy got the pup.
The animal is worth fifty dollars, but the two men have spent more than three times that amount in their dispute over it, and Hudson says he will appeal and spend as much more, if necessary, to win.
Gypsies Travel in Auto.
Nomads of the old days would probably have refused to believe their eyes if they had seen a gypsy caravan which has just arrived at Worcester, Mass., from Denver, Col. Instead of traveling in the familiar wagons, drawn by worn horses, the tribe mounted the wagon tops on big automobile trucks. On the top, sides, and rear of the two wagons were the tents, pots, and others things inseparable to gypsy camps, and the dogs followed as best they could. Needless to say, the journey was made in record time.
Mother’s Appeal Granted.
Mrs. Mathilda Zoll, of Washington, D. C., is happy in the thought that when she dies, her final resting place will be beside the body of her son in a soldier grave in Arlington National Cemetery. Her earnest plea that permission to this effect be given was granted by Secretary Garrison, although it is a rule that only the widows of army men may be buried in Arlington. Mrs. Zoll’s son died a few weeks ago and was laid at rest in the national cemetery.
When Mrs. Zoll first made her request, it was refused, but her friends told Secretary Garrison she did not ask that her name be placed on the headstone, but would be satisfied to have her body cremated and the ashes placed in an urn in her son’s grave. The secretary then issued the necessary orders.
Devil Worm Has Eight Horns.
Mrs. J. B. Lamb brought to the Leader office, at Fulton, Ky., a formidable-looking worm which she captured on a tree in the back yard of her home on Carr Street. This monster worm is nearly six inches in length and longer when in motion. It has eight horns on its head, curving backward, and is a scary-looking object. It is more than one and one-half inches in circumference, and is green in color. A little boy called it a “devil worm,” and, for the lack of a better name, we will let it go at that.
Rancher Bags Bird Maimed in June.
While mowing hay last June, Abe Bruger, a Cathcart, Wash., rancher, surprised a mother pheasant and her brood in the tall grass. One of the flock was overtaken by the mower, which amputated both of its legs. It escaped to an alder thicket.
While hunting recently, Bruger winged a pheasant. When he recovered the bird, both of its legs were missing, a fact which recalled the accident of the early summer. The bird had become full grown, was in perfect condition, plump, and, in fact, larger than the average of this year’s birds taken in the locality.
The wounds had completely healed, and, nature, in the process of healing, had developed a substitute for claws in the form of hard scales at the extremities.
Off Year for Peace Prize.
A report from Christiania says that the managers of the Nobel Institute have decided to give this year’s peace prize, which amounts to about $40,000, to the Netherlands government, to be applied toward the support of Belgian refugees in Holland.
Stallings a Brick Mason.
The Waycross, Ga., Herald is authority for the statement that George Stallings, the “Miracle Man” of baseball, used to be a brick mason, and a mighty good one, at Thomasville. Hence, it is not so hard to understand his remarkable ability to “build up” a team.
Missourian’s Strange Pet.
There are many strange pets in the world, but the one belonging to John Barnes, of Maysville, Mo., is perhaps as strange as any. It is a giant blue racer, five feet long, and as large in the middle as an average man’s arm. Mr. Barnes keeps the snake for the purpose of freeing the place of mice and other pests. It never molests any one and seems perfectly tame.
War Correspondents’ Troubles.
Who wants to be a war correspondent? Two American correspondents arrived at Rouen, France. They had been shifted around the country for days. They had hay in their hair and sleep in their eyes, and they hadn’t eaten for years, it seemed to them. Every hotel and boarding house and joint in Rouen was filled to overflowing. They found their way to headquarters and placed their journalistic cards on the table.
“Thank goodness, we’re here at last!” they said. “Tell us——”
But the major wouldn’t tell them. He wouldn’t even listen to them.
“For your impertinence in coming here,” he said severely, “you shall sleep in jail to-night.”
The correspondents smiled happily and shook hands with each other.
“It began to look as though we’d sleep under a bridge,” they said to the major. So he found out about their plight.
“That being the case,” said he sternly, “you shall not sleep in jail to-night. You shall take the train for the coast. There are no places left in the train, but that makes no difference. You shall take it, just the same.”
When they got back to London they went to a Turkish bath and slept for twenty hours before reporting at the office.
You can conquer it easily in 8 days, improve your health, prolong your life. No more stomach trouble, no foul breath, no heart weakness. Regain manly vigor, calm nerves, clear eyes & superior mental strength. Whether you chew; or smoke pipe, cigarettes, cigars, get my interesting Tobacco Book. Worth its weight in gold. Mailed free.
E. J. WOODS, 534 Sixth Av. 230 C, New York, N.Y.
The Nick Carter Stories
ISSUED EVERY SATURDAY BEAUTIFUL COLORED COVERS
When it comes to detective stories worth while, the Nick Carter Stories contain the only ones that should be considered. They are not overdrawn tales of bloodshed. They rather show the working of one of the finest minds ever conceived by a writer. The name of Nick Carter is familiar all over the world, for the stories of his adventures may be read in twenty languages. No other stories have withstood the severe test of time so well as those contained in the Nick Carter Stories. It proves conclusively that they are the best. We give herewith a list of some of the back numbers in print. You can have your news dealer order them, or they will be sent direct by the publishers to any address upon receipt of the price in money or postage stamps.
692—Doctor Quartz Again.
693—The Famous Case of Doctor Quartz.
694—The Chemical Clue.
695—The Prison Cipher.
696—A Pupil of Doctor Quartz.
697—The Midnight Visitor.
698—The Master Crook’s Match.
699—The Man Who Vanished.
700—The Garnet Gauntlet.
701—The Silver Hair Mystery.
702—The Cloak of Guilt.
703—A Battle for a Million.
704—Written in Red.
707—Rogues of the Air.
709—The Bolt from the Blue.
710—The Stockbridge Affair.
711—A Secret from the Past.
712—Playing the Last Hand.
713—A Slick Article.
714—The Taxicab Riddle.
715—The Knife Thrower.
717—The Master Rogue’s Alibi.
719—The Dead Letter.
720—The Allerton Millions.
728—The Mummy’s Head.
729—The Statue Clue.
730—The Torn Card.
731—Under Desperation’s Spur.
732—The Connecting Link.
733—The Abduction Syndicate.
736—The Toils of a Siren.
737—The Mark of a Circle.
738—A Plot Within a Plot.
739—The Dead Accomplice.
741—The Green Scarab.
743—A Shot in the Dark.
746—The Secret Entrance.
747—The Cavern Mystery.
748—The Disappearing Fortune.
749—A Voice from the Past.
752—The Spider’s Web.
753—The Man With a Crutch.
754—The Rajah’s Regalia.
755—Saved from Death.
756—The Man Inside.
757—Out for Vengeance.
758—The Poisons of Exili.
759—The Antique Vial.
760—The House of Slumber.
761—A Double Identity.
762—“The Mocker’s” Stratagem.
763—The Man that Came Back.
764—The Tracks in the Snow.
765—The Babbington Case.
766—The Masters of Millions.
767—The Blue Stain.
768—The Lost Clew.
770—The Turn of a Card.
771—A Message in the Dust.
772—A Royal Flush.
773—The Metal Casket Mystery.
774—The Great Buddha Beryl.
775—The Vanishing Heiress.
776—The Unfinished Letter.
777—A Difficult Trail.
778—A Six-word Puzzle.
782—A Woman’s Stratagem.
783—The Cliff Castle Affair.
784—A Prisoner of the Tomb.
785—A Resourceful Foe.
786—The Heir of Dr. Quartz.
787—Dr. Quartz, the Second.
788—Dr. Quartz II. at Bay.
789—The Great Hotel Tragedies.
790—Zanoni, the Witch.
791—A Vengeful Sorceress.
792—The Prison Demon.
793—Doctor Quartz on Earth Again.
794—Doctor Quartz’s Last Play.
795—Zanoni, the Transfigured.
796—The Lure of Gold.
797—The Man With a Chest.
798—A Shadowed Life.
799—The Secret Agent.
800—A Plot for a Crown.
801—The Red Button.
802—Up Against It.
803—The Gold Certificate.
804—Jack Wise’s Hurry Call.
805—Nick Carter’s Ocean Chase.
806—Nick Carter and the Broken Dagger.
807—Nick Carter’s Advertisement.
808—The Kregoff Necklace.
809—The Footprints on the Rug.
810—The Copper Cylinder.
811—Nick Carter and the Nihilists.
812—Nick Carter and the Convict Gang.
813—Nick Carter and the Guilty Governor.
814—The Triangled Coin.
815—Ninety-nine—and One.
816—Coin Number 77.
817—In the Canadian Wilds.
818—The Niagara Smugglers.
819—The Man Hunt.
NEW SERIES
NICK CARTER STORIES
1—The Man from Nowhere.
2—The Face at the Window.
3—A Fight for a Million.
4—Nick Carter’s Land Office.
5—Nick Carter and the Professor.
6—Nick Carter as a Mill Hand.
7—A Single Clew.
8—The Emerald Snake.
9—The Currie Outfit.
10—Nick Carter and the Kidnapped Heiress.
11—Nick Carter Strikes Oil.
12—Nick Carter’s Hunt for a Treasure.
13—A Mystery of the Highway.
14—The Silent Passenger.
15—Jack Dreen’s Secret.
16—Nick Carter’s Pipe Line Case.
17—Nick Carter and the Gold Thieves.
18—Nick Carter’s Auto Chase.
19—The Corrigan Inheritance.
20—The Keen Eye of Denton.
21—The Spider’s Parlor.
22—Nick Carter’s Quick Guess.
23—Nick Carter and the Murderess.
24—Nick Carter and the Pay Car.
25—The Stolen Antique.
26—The Crook League.
27—An English Cracksman.
28—Nick Carter’s Still Hunt.
29—Nick Carter’s Electric Shock.
30—Nick Carter and the Stolen Duchess.
31—The Purple Spot.
32—The Stolen Groom.
33—The Inverted Cross.
34—Nick Carter and Keno McCall.
35—Nick Carter’s Death Trap.
36—Nick Carter’s Siamese Puzzle.
37—The Man Outside.
38—The Death Chamber.
39—The Wind and the Wire.
40—Nick Carter’s Three Cornered Chase.
41—Dazaar, the Arch-Fiend.
42—The Queen of the Seven.
43—Crossed Wires.
44—A Crimson Clew.
45—The Third Man.
46—The Sign of the Dagger.
47—The Devil Worshipers.
48—The Cross of Daggers.
49—At Risk of Life.
50—The Deeper Game.
51—The Code Message.
52—The Last of the Seven.
53—Ten-Ichi, the Wonderful.
54—The Secret Order of Associated Crooks.
55—The Golden Hair Clew.
56—Back From the Dead.
57—Through Dark Ways.
58—When Aces Were Trumps.
59—The Gambler’s Last Hand.
60—The Murder at Linden Fells.
61—A Game for Millions.
62—Under Cover.
63—The Last Call.
64—Mercedes Danton’s Double.
65—The Millionaire’s Nemesis.
66—A Princess of the Underworld.
67—The Crook’s Blind.
68—The Fatal Hour.
69—Blood Money.
70—A Queen of Her Kind.
71—Isabel Benton’s Trump Card.
72—A Princess of Hades.
73—A Prince of Plotters.
74—The Crook’s Double.
75—For Life and Honor.
76—A Compact With Dazaar.
77—In the Shadow of Dazaar.
78—The Crime of a Money King.
79—Birds of Prey.
80—The Unknown Dead.
81—The Severed Hand.
82—The Terrible Game of Millions.
83—A Dead Man’s Power.
84—The Secrets of an Old House.
85—The Wolf Within.
86—The Yellow Coupon.
87—In the Toils.
88—The Stolen Radium.
89—A Crime in Paradise.
90—Behind Prison Bars.
91—The Blind Man’s Daughter.
92—On the Brink of Ruin.
93—Letter of Fire.
94—The $100,000 Kiss.
95—Outlaws of the Militia.
96—The Opium-Runners.
97—In Record Time.
98—The Wag-Nuk Clew.
99—The Middle Link.
100—The Crystal Maze.
101—A New Serpent in Eden.
102—The Auburn Sensation.
103—A Dying Chance.
104—The Gargoni Girdle.
105—Twice in Jeopardy.
106—The Ghost Launch.
107—Up in the Air.
108—The Girl Prisoner.
109—The Red Plague.
110—The Arson Trust.
111—The King of the Firebugs.
112—“Lifter’s” of the Lofts.
Dated Nov. 7th, 1914.
113—French Jimmie and His Forty Thieves.
Dated Nov. 14th, 1914.
114—The Death Plot.
Dated Nov. 21st, 1914.
115—The Evil Formula.
Dated Nov. 28th, 1914.
116—The Blue Button.
PRICE, FIVE CENTS PER COPY. If you want any back numbers of our weeklies and cannot procure them from your news dealer, they can be obtained direct from this office. Postage stamps taken the same as money.
STREET & SMITH, Publishers, 79-89 Seventh Ave., NEW YORK CITY
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK NICK CARTER STORIES NO. 120, DECEMBER 26, 1914: AN UNCANNY REVENGE; OR, NICK CARTER AND THE MIND MURDERER ***
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will be renamed.
Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.
