Nicolette Maire Portfolio 2015 by Nicolette Womack

NICOLETTE MAIRE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PORTFOLIO

NICOLETTE MAIRE

Contact Info Telephone:435-232-3905 Address: 550 1/2 North 200 West APT #1 Logan, UT 84321 Email:

nicolette.maire@gmail.com

E D U CAT IO N

Utah State University Bachelor of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning Ornamental Horticulture Minor Expected Graduation Date: May 2016 Deans List Spring 2014-Fall 2015

Q UA L I F ICAT IO N S C O M M U N ICAT IO N

•Provide excellent customer service •Work well in both leadership and teamwork positions •Listen attentively and create solutions to adequately address the problem

TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE

•Comprehensive knowledge of woody and herbaceous plants •Experience creating construction documents and site grading plans •Skilled in digital rendering, data analysis, computer drafting, and document layout.

PROBLEM S O LV I N G

•Ability to effectively multi-task while paying attention to detail •Proven ability to prioritize and remain focused on the goal to be achieved •Ability to take into account multiple design issues and adequately address them into plausible solutions.

EXPERIENCE

G e o s p a t i a l L a b Te c h n i c i a n

Logan, UT

Christopher McGinty: Associate Director of USU RS/GIS Lab 435-797-0653

Logan, UT

David Evans: USU Professor 435-797-0508

Kohls- organized merchandise effectively and operated registers while offering great customer service. M AY 2 0 1 3 - M AY 2 0 1 4

C re w Tra i n e r

Adobe Photoshop Adobe Illustrator Adobe InDesign AutoCAD Land F/X SketchUp Pro 2013 ESRI ArcGIS Microsoft Word Microsoft Excel Microsoft Powerpoint

REFERENCES

USU RS/GIS LAB- Digitalized tree mortality within the national forest lands. Organized and Collected imagery for Alaskan Region. M AY 2 0 1 5 - P R E S E N T

Sales Associate

SOFTWARE

Franklin, MA

McDonalds- Effectively trained and lead a team of over 10 people at a time. Efficiently managed working multiple positions throughout the shift. NOV 2009-AUG 2011

Thomas Thompson: Senior Geospatial Lab Te c h n i c i a n a t U S U RS/GIS Lab 435-512-9286

Hand Graphics This graphic was created to display a design for a Community Park next to a Cemetery in North Logan, UT. Markers, pens and colored pencils were used.

This graphic was created to display a Schematic level of Hand Graphics. Markers, pens and colored pencils were used.

Illustrator The graphic to the right was created as a Land Use Analysis for a hypothetical Bioclimatic Fourplex in Boston, MA. The graphic was created through Adobe Illustrator.

CIRCULATION

PUBLIC FRONTAGE SPACE

WINDBREAK

UNIT #1

UNIT #2 UNIT #3

PRIVATE SPACE

SHADE TREES

PRIVATE SPACE

UNIT #4

PRIVATE SPACE

PUBLIC PASSIVE SPACE

PUBLIC RECREATION SPACE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE

PUBLIC PERMACULTURE

SHADE TREES

Photoshop The graphic to the left was the same site rendered in Photoshop as the final Master Plan.

GARAGE

GARAGE UNIT #2

UNIT #1

UNIT #3

PATIO PATIO

UNIT #4

PATIO PATIO

SHADE TREES PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PLAYGROUND SHADE TREES

GATHERING PAVILION

PUBLIC PERMACULTURE

12' 8' 12'

CONCRETE

4' 12'

PLAN VIEW

3/16”=1’

FLAGSTONE 12'

12'

FLAGSTONE

C.I.P. CONCRETE

STONE 1- 1/2”=1’

89' 79'

5' 5'

89' 79'

89' 5' 5'

79'

17'-1" 106'-11" 20'-1" 76'-11"

10'

70'

68'

11'-9"

UNDISTURBED SOIL OR COMPACTED SUBGRADE

UNIT 3

UNIT 2

UNIT 4

20'

26'

11'

101'-9"

6" COMPACTED AGGREGATE

20' 70'

UNIT 12

UNIT 7

5' 5'

10'10'

LAEP 3610: CONSTRUCTION II

5' 5'

20'

UNIT 6

UNIT 5

UNIT 13 UNIT 8

UNIT 10

UNIT 9

20'

STONE WITH SAND SWEPT JOINTS

25'

UNIT 1

68'-3"

26' 20' 5' 1'

UNIT 3

1- 1/2”=1’

1" SAND BED

20'

UNIT 1

GARAGE

5' 5'

79'

STONE

CONCRETE CURB

UNIT 11

100'

UNIT 2

HOME

50'

GARAGE

89'

10'

28'

COMPACTED SOIL SUBGRADE

1- 1/2”=1’

147'

NICOLETTE MAIRE

GARAGE

PROJECT ONE: SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING

54' 34'

144'

GARAGE

29'

COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE 4" MIN THICKNESS GEOTEXTILE

60'

28'

98'-3"

17'

1- 1/2”=1’

CONCRETE PAVER

20'

7'-6"

51'

COMPACTED SOIL SUBGRADE

4' 5' 1'

6'-7"

60'

GEOTEXTILE 12" WIDE

TURNED UP AGAINST CURB PERMEABLE PAVEMENT

25'

28'

56'

10'

51'

3'-5"

COMPACTED AGGREGATE UNDISTURBED SOILTHICKNESS OR BASE 4" MIN COMPACTED SUBGRADE GEOTEXTILE

15'

104' 7'-6"

1" BEDDING SAND 6" COMPACTED AGGREGATE GEOTEXTILE 12"OR WIDE UNDISTURBED SOIL TURNED SUBGRADE UP AGAINST CURB COMPACTED

STONE E 1- 1/2”=1’ STONE CONCRETE PAVER E 1-D1/2”=1’ 1- 1/2”=1’

CONCRETEAGGREGATE PAVER COMPACTED 1" 6" SAND BED 283" MIN THICKNESS

COMPACTED SOIL SUBGRADE

CONCRETE PAVER D 1- 1/2”=1’ CONCRETE PLANPAVER VIEW D 1- 1/2”=1’ A 3/16”=1’

PLAN VIEW A 3/16”=1’ PLAN VIEW A 3/16”=1’

DAVID ANDERSON & CARLOS LICON

14'

CONCRETE CURB STONE WITH SAND SWEPT JOINTS CONCRETE CONCRETE CURB CURB SET 41" BELOW TOP OF 1" SAND BED AND CONTROL STONEPAVERS WITH SAND SWEPTJOINTS JOINTSAT 15' OC

LAEP: 3120 LAND PLANNING FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

C PERMEABLE PAVEMENT

JOINTS ATCURB 15' OC CONCRETE 1 CONCRETE TOP OF SET 4" BELOWPAVER PAVERS CONTROL THICKNESS 238" MINAND JOINTS AT 15' OC 1" BEDDING SAND CONCRETE PAVER 12" WIDE " MIN THICKNESS 238GEOTEXTILE PERMEABLE PAVEMENT TURNED UP AGAINST CURB 1" BEDDING SAND COMPACTED AGGREGATE GEOTEXTILE WIDE BASE 4" MIN12" THICKNESS TURNED UP AGAINST CURB GEOTEXTILE COMPACTED AGGREGATE COMPACTED SOIL SUBGRADE BASE 4" MIN THICKNESS GEOTEXTILE

25'

14'

C PERMEABLE PAVEMENT

The graphics to the right were also created in AutoCAD as an exercise for different housing layouts at varying scales.

CONCRETE CURB SET 41" BELOW TOP OF

PAVERS AND CONTROL C.I.P. CONCRETE

15'

14'

C.I.P. CONCRETE

CONCRETE PAVER 28" MIN THICKNESS COMPACTED SUBGRADE PERFORATED PIPE1" BEDDING SAND

DAVID ANDERSON & CARLOS LICON

NE: MILY DWELLING

B HERRINGBONE BRICK

CONCRETE CURB SET 41" BELOW TOP OF PAVERS AND CONTROL JOINTS AT 15' OC

89'

64'

B 3/8”=1’ HERRINGBONE BRICK DETAIL B 3/8”=1’

12" OF 121"- 3" OPEN GRADED STONE NO FINES

ASSIGNMENT #3: PAVING DETAILS

C PERMEABLE PAVEMENT SUBGRADE PERMEABLE COMPACTED PAVEMENT PERFORATED PIPE C 1- 1/2”=1’ PERMEABLE PAVEMENT HERRINGBONE BRICK DETAIL C B 11/2”=1’ 3/8”=1’

HERRINGBONE BRICK DETAIL

NICOLETTE MAIRE

14'

2" OF 14"- 38" OPEN GRADED STONE 4" OF 34"- 1" OPEN GRADED STONE NO FINES

79'

16'

COMPACTED SUBGRADE PERFORATED PIPE

12'

16' 64' 64'

12'

C.I.P. CONCRETE

12'

12" OF 121"- 3" OPEN GRADED STONE NO FINES

E STONE

PERMEABLE PAVER

89'

12'

FLAGSTONE

CONCRETE CURB

79'

GRANITE

2" OF 14"- 38" OPEN GRADED STONE 4" OF 34"- 1" 3 OPEN STONE 2" OF 14"- GRADED 8" NO FINES OPEN GRADED STONE 4" OF 34"- 1" OPEN GRADED STONE NO FINES 12" OF 121"- 3" OPEN GRADED STONE NO FINES

1- 1/2”=1’

LAEP: 3120 LAND PLANNING FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

PERMEABLE PAVER CONCRETE CURB HERRINGBONE BRICK SANDSWEPT PERMEABLE PAVER

HERRINGBONE BRICK SANDSWEPT

79'

D CONCRETE PAVER 10'

The details to GRANITE the right were GRANITE created to display a p a v i n g p a t t eE STONE rn d e s i g n f o r a E STONE Demonstration Garden planned for Utah State University. The a c c o m p a n y i n gB HERRINGBONE BRICK d e t a i l s w e r e B HERRINGBONE BRICK created as construction sections of the FLAGSTONE pavement.

12'

10'

D CONCRETE PAVER

PERMEABL

3/8”=1’

CONCRETE CURB

16'

10'

HERRINGBONE BRICK SANDSWEPT

HERRINGBONE BRICK DETAIL

B HERRINGBONE BRICK

D CONCRETE PAVER

5' NICOLETTE MAIRE

CONCRETE

98'-3" 108'-3"

5' 5'

98'-9" 108'-9"

104'

PHILPHIL WAITE WAITE

ASSIGNMENT #3:#3: PAVING DETAILS 3610: CONSTRUCTION II II ASSIGNMENT PAVING DETAILS LAEPLAEP 3610: CONSTRUCTION

64'

NICOLETTE MAIRE NICOLETTE MAIRE

AutoCAD Details

CONCRETE

5' 5'

81'-1" 106'-1"

20'

Land F/X Planting P l a n The details to the left were created to display a planting plan for a Climate Adapted design for a hypothetical Glass Company in Logan, UT. The bottom left chart displays the methods used to choose plants based on specific characteristics. The bottom right chart displays a Plant Schedule for the site.

3D Modeling SketchUp These models was created to display a design for an Arts Entrance Plaza at Utah State University.

These models were created to display a design for a community park in North Logan, UT.

ArcGIS The objective of this project was to analyze the common belief that there is a strong correlation between elevation and economic class level in Cache County, UT. Data was collected and then reclassified into elevation interval. Class level was then defined and attributes were selected to match accordingly. The Reclassified Elevation DEM was clipped to the defined class level boundaries. The average Elevation within census blocks was then calculated and compared between each class level.

MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS IN CACHE COUNTY UT

CLASSIFIED DEM OF ELEVATIONS IN CACHE COUNTY UT

LOW CLASS

MEDIAN VALUE OF OWNEROCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS IN CACHE COUNTY UT

Legend Cache County Boundary

Legend

20,391 - 30,000 30,001 - 80,000 80,001 - 112,679 Roads

Cache County Boundary

Elevation (m)

Median Household Income in the Past 12 Months (dollars)

Legend

Roads

Elevation DEM

Cache County Boundary

2,000

Median Value of Owner-Occupied Housing Units

2,250

(dollars)

1,500 1,750

2,500 2,750

3,000

20 Miles

3,250 3,500

69,400 - 125,000

20 Miles

125,001 200,000 200,001 390,500 Roads

20 Miles

Legend Cache County Boundary Low Income and Medium Value Medium Income and Low Value

CLASS AND ELEVATION SYNTHESIS

Roads

20 Miles

MIDDLE CLASS

Legend Cache County Boundary Roads Medium Income Medium Value

20 Miles

UPPER CLASS

Legend Cache County Boundary Upper Class Middle Class Low Class

Elevation DEM Elevation (m) 1,500 1,750 2,000 2,250 2,500 2,750 3,000 3,250 3,500

20 Miles

Legend Cache County Boundary High Income and High Value High Income and Medium Value Medium Income and High Value Roads

20 Miles