The Party of Lincoln???

By Dr. E. Faye Williams, Esq. (Ret.) (TRICEEDNEYWIRE.COM)

There are many memories of my first years in school which remain etched in my mind. I remember learning the “Pledge of Allegiance” and the national anthem. Since I have always liked history, there are numerous persons and events that are in my memory cells.

Like most students of that period, the first two presidents I learned about were George Washington and Abraham Lincoln – the first and the sixteenth presidents, respectively.

George Washington ‘chopped down a cherry tree,’ led the Continental Army against the British, and became the new nation’s first, but the reluctant president. For me, Lincoln was a little more interesting. He was a country kid, born into what can only be called poverty, reportedly was a hard worker, held a variety of – both laborious and sedentary – jobs, became a country lawyer, honed his debating skills, became the first candidate elected to be president as a Republican, ‘freed the slaves,’ and was shot dead at the Ford’s Theater.

Chief among his accomplishments is that he remains known as “Honest Abe” and his legacy is circumscribed by his veracity in addition to having his name ascribed to the Republican Party as its founder. Among African-Americans, his party, the party of the Great Emancipator, was the only political party worthy of their votes (those who could vote). Although there are fewer African-Americans who retain this loyalty, many still vote without question for The Party of Lincoln. Unfortunately, if he were alive today, I am sure that he would attempt to reform them or completely disavow the deviants and devilments of “his” party.

The biography and resume of George Santos, the newly elected Republican

Congressman from New York, belies the ethic of truthfulness. He is the antithesis of Honest Abe! Santos has admitted to embellishing his biography with stories that are more akin to myths and fables than simple embellishments. His lies wind through a trail of life events that serve to endear him with the voters but have no remote connection to his personal experiences. He has fabricated so much of his resume that there is some speculation that his real name may not really be George Santos. He has used at least one other name. see Lincoln, page 6A