2 minute read

THE ROLE OF WOMEN IN ANCIENT GREECE AND ROME

By Anna

Advertisement

Unlike modern-day society, women had a very limited role to play in the ancient civilisations. In Ancient Greece, for example, women were expected to manage the household and raise children. They had limited rights and were usually not allowed to participate in public events and politics. In Sparta, however, women were trained in athletics and could inherit property, which was unusual in Ancient Greece. Unlike Sparta, women in Athens were not allowed to own or inherit property or participate in government. But, in some religious festivals and rituals, they were allowed to participate. In turn, this enabled women to feel part of a cultural and social community outside home. Women were usually married off at young ages to men who were selected by their fathers.

In Ancient Rome, the situation was still the same in terms of legal rights. Women were not allowed to vote or hold political office, and they were expected to prioritize their husband’s needs over their own. However, upper-class women would be encouraged to be involved in events, both social and cultural events. Some even became involved in poetry and art. They could also be educated in literature and music, unlike the lower-class women, who had to stick to domestic skills such as weaving and cooking. Women were also allowed to own businesses and own property (their finances were still managed by male relatives).

Overall, women in both Ancient Greece and Rome were generally excluded from public life and confined to the domestic sphere. However, Rome had more freedom in terms of control over properties and opportunities for women than Ancient Greece.

In Ancient Greece, the basic political unit was the city state or "polis " City-states were usually ruled by a single monarch or a democratic assembly of citizens, and each state had unique rules and forms of government. For example, Athens had a direct democracy in which adult male citizens could vote and participate in decisionmaking, while Sparta was ruled by a dual monarchy consisting of two kings with great power. Although Sparta also had a council of elders and other assemblies, these had limited influence compared to the kings. In contrast, Rome was a republic, which means it was governed by elected officials rather than a single ruler. The highest-ranking elected official was the consul, who served for one year and had significant power over both military and civil affairs. Two consuls were elected each year, and they were required to share power and act as a check on each other's authority. In addition to the consuls, Rome had other elected officials who played equally important roles, such as praetors and aediles. The praetors acted as judges and oversaw legal proceedings, whilst the aediles were in charge of public events and works.

One of the key features of the Roman republic was its system of checks and balances. This system was designed to prevent any one person or group from gaining too much power and potentially becoming a dictator. For example, the consuls were required to consult with other officials and institutions, such as the senate and the popular assembly, before making important decisions. This helped to ensure that decisions were made in the best interests of the people as a whole, rather than just benefiting the consuls or a small group of elites.

Overall, the political systems of Ancient Greece and Rome were quite different. While Greek city-states were often ruled by monarchs or democratic assemblies with limited power, the Roman republic was characterised by elected officials and a system of checks and balances designed to prevent the abuse of power. The legacy of these political systems has had a lasting impact on Western political thought and institutions. How do you think they impact us today?

This article is from: