2020-2021 Issue 8 (March 26, 2021)

Page 7

opinion Panther Prowler • March 26, 2021

7

The British monarchy needs to be dissolved Anna Johnson Entertainment Editor

Carter Castillo Features Editor On March 7, Oprah Winfrey interviewed the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Prince Harry Windsor and Meghan Markle. In the interview, Markle revealed the trauma she endured as a member of the royal family and the lack of support she faced from the institution. She revealed the royal family’s struggles with her race, her declining mental health and Harry even made connections to his mother, Diana, Princess of Wales. To the public, this interview made one thing clear: the monarchy is an outdated institution that needs to either bend with the winds of change or break. One of the most astonishing accusations was that there were discussions of the skin color of Markle’s child from multiple high ranking members of the royal family. This is only the tip of the iceberg of the royal family’s racism. For one external example, the British press has demonstrated a favoritism towards Kate, the Duchess of Cambridge. When comparing headlines on similar topics, it’s clear that the media paints Kate in a positive light while Markle is portrayed in a negative light. One can only come to the conclusion that race played at least some role in Markle’s character assasination in the British tabloids and also her treatment, or lack thereof, within the royal family. Although the notion of their family having concerns over their child’s race is horrible, it comes as no shock that the institution that colonized most of the world and introduced racist laws to the world is treating their member of color unjustly. They have decided to not accept Markle for who she is, an asset

to them that would have earned them a considerable amount of respect in a time where many are contemplating the real need for the monarchy. Them not doing so, in a very public way, is another catalyst online for people to consider the relevance of a monarchy in this modern era. With the constant attack of the media online, Markle was told to stay at home most of her days to avoid further conflict with the press. Obviously, with constant harassment combined with isolation combined with a lack of protection from the press, it is no wonder Meghan sank into such a dismal mental state that she was contemplating suicide. Even when she and her husband begged for support from the institution to receive therapy, they were denied as it would make the royal family look bad. One might have hoped that the royals might have learned from Diana that mental struggles need to be treated, but they did not, forcing Markle to experience similar struggles. The royal family is a de facto puppet head of state that merely serves as an overpaid group of mascots representing decades of oppression and colonialism that suck millions of dollars out of taxpayers annually. Despite all of this, one would hope that they would at least be capable of protecting their own, but it seems that history is doomed to repeat itself and people will learn nothing once again.

Carter Castillo/Prowler

Stop shaming women in the media Abby Gorman Editorial Editor On Feb. 12, 2007, the front cover of “Newsweek” featured the faces of Britney Spears and Paris Hilton with a striking headline: “The Girls Gone Wild Effect: Out-of-control celebs and online sleaze fuel a new debate over kids and values.” The story includes testimonies from several concerned parents about the possible effects that the “lifestyle choices” of these young women will have on their children. Yet, interestingly enough, the influence of male celebrities is not mentioned once in the entire piece. Young women in the media are held to significantly higher standards of behavior, expected to maintain an image that is appealing to all in a way that their male counterparts will never face. While Miley Cyrus was harassed relentlessly and deemed a bad influence for her “Wrecking Ball” music video, Justin Bieber was arrested on account of multiple charges, including a DUI, during the peak of his career and it barely made a dent. The discrepancy in the tolerance for “mistakes” between men and women with media attention is irrefutable and completely overlooks the nuance to these situations. Many of these female celebrities rose to stardom as teenagers, living out their coming-of-age with millions of eyes watching. Everyone makes poor decisions during this time of their life, but most teenagers are not given the unfair expectation to maintain a perfect image as all of their actions are analyzed and judged by strangers. This is not to say that many celebrities lead unhealthy lifestyles that should not be admired. But, it raises an important question: why are the self-destructive plights of celebrities in the media being sensationalized in the first place? While Lindsay Lohan battled alcohol and drug addiction leading to multiple stints in rehab, the coverage was not about her mental health, and most definitely did not promote recovery or ways to seek help. Instead, the cover of the New York Post featured an image of Lohan passed

out in the passenger seat of a car, plastered with the headline “Smashed: Lights out for Lohan 48 hours after DUI bust.” It is clear that addiction is painted in a manner meant to entertain, especially when these young women can be vilified for breaking the “role model” expectations they are expected to uphold. It would be nice to be able to dismiss instances like these as a flaw within the media and the way the plights of celebrities are portrayed. But in reality, the “lifestyle choices” these young women have made are not the reason why they face much harsher criticism than their male counterparts; it is simply an excuse to belittle and dismiss women who challenge expectations and break the image people want them to have. It doesn’t matter what clothes they wear or what decisions they makewomen are constantly vilified for speaking out on issues outside of their career, dismissed as “just an actress” or “just a singer.” While it may be disguised through different phrasing, many are wishing these young women would learn to just “sit still and look pretty.” Ultimately, if parents are concerned about the content their children are consuming, it is their responsibility to monitor it. Young women celebrities living their lives should not be expected to filter what they say and do because of their primary demographic. Recognize the inherent flaws within the media’s sensationalization of unhealthy behaviors as a whole, but take notice of the distinctively different criticism women face. Best said in the words of Spears herself, “These parents, they think I’m a role model for their kids, that their kids look at me as some sort of idol. But it’s the parents who should be teaching their kids how to behave. That’s not my responsibility. I’m not responsible for your kid.” Carter Castillo/Prowler


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.