P OR T F O L I O
architecture
portfolio
selected works | 2014 - 2021 B.Arch - NITT 14 - 19 M.Arch - NITT 19 - 21 ProfessIonal Works
dissertation jipmer karaikal | 2019
m. arch select works sustainable residence | 2020 mixed used building | 2019
b. arch select beach resort container restaurant other
17 21
works | 2018 | 2018 works
26 33 37
competition works andc‘16 | 2016 gsen‘15 | 2015
39 40
select professional
contents
1
works
41
digital art
55
photography
56
sketching
57
resume
1
DISSERTATION | JIPMER,KARAIKAL The Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER) is a medical school in India and is an institute of national importance. The chosen project is a live project of an upcoming campus in Karaikal, Tamil Nadu, India. Karaikal is currently developing into a centre for education with the new NIT campus and the upcoming JIPMER. It will be established as a mainstream name such as Trichy in the upcoming years. The sites are not located in the crowded commercial areas of Karaikal but just outside it. The site lies towards the outskirts of Karaikal.
PLAY FIELD
BOYS HOSTEL
NRI HOSTEL GIRLS HOSTEL NURSES HOSTEL
DEAN’S BUNGALOW
AUDITORIUM
MS’S BUNGALOW
GUEST HOUSE
CANTEEN
LIBRARY
SWIMMING POOL
SPORTS COMPLEX SHOPPING COMPLEX
SERVICE BLOCK
MORTUARY
ACADEMIC BLOCK
HOSPITAL BLOCK
SITE LEVEL CONCEPT The grid planning concept is simple yet effective for campus planning. The grid plan provides multiple ‘corners’ which can be used as nodes for interaction Roads and paths were classified as: Main “spine”– connecting the major blocks. All other roads emerge from the main network. Connecting “nerves” – connecting blocks within typology such as hostel blocks.
Since there is residential facilities only for the students, nurses, dean and M.S in the academic campus, there is very less vehicular traffic inside. Hence the streets will mostly have pedestrian and bicycle users. Easy navigation and predictability of path for first time visitors with special attention given to wayfinding. Maps and signages in all points of the campus. Limited number of entrances for security concerns.
CONCEPT
2
BEHAVIOUR SENSITIVE DESIGN Key Goals: •
Crowd control – Government hospitals are prone to large crowds and the design ensures that large crowd clusters are avoided.
•
Wayfinding – Any first time user would not feel lost in a large campus.
•
Functionality – Zoning of spaces enables efficient working.
•
Access to Natural lighting & Ventilation in all spaces. Borrowed lighting and ventilation can adversely affect users’ physical and mental health.
•
Economical feasibility
•
Future considerations – a campus is always evolving and hence planning is done in such a way that it accommodates expansion.
Wayfinding – a special study: •
Building directories
•
Indoor Maps
•
Signages
•
Colour Coding
•
Floor material difference to identify change of space or function.
•
Landmarks
•
Nodes & Edges
Finding the form – considered typologies:
Street Typology:
Campus Typology:
Linked Typology:
Multi courtyard & Low-rise Typology:
Monoblock:
Flexibility, Extendibility, Segregation & Legibility. But large area needed for circulation.
Individual blocks scattered around site with or without an enclosed circulation network. Needs large area.
Linear blocks on either side of the main corridor. Monotonous building and increased walking distance.
Offers a human scale and break in the monotonous nature of large scale buildings.
Ideal for space constraints. Interstitial service floors can be incorporated. Artificial lighting ventilation will be needed. Increased mechanical loading.
Design adopted: •
A mixture of campus and multi courtyard typology adopted.
•
Campus typology on a smaller scale – clarity in design with legibility and proper segregation.
•
Multi courtyard low rise typology satisfies all the conditions required for a non air conditioned hospital with a large crowd.
•
The courtyard spaces can be used as recreation as well as waiting spaces in cases of over crowding.
•
Breaking a single block into 2 connected blocks will provide better ventilated spaces.
•
Zoning based on functionality and optimal location.
•
Breaking down into smaller blocks for lighting and ventilation. Adding courtyards and connecting the blocks. . Nodes acting as service spaces such as vertical circulation, toilets etc.
3
HOSPITAL ZONING Aerial view of hospital block depicting the levels, layout and distribution of different zones:
BLOCK E1:
BLOCK E2:
BLOCK E3:
BLOCK E4:
o 1. 2. 3.
o 1. 2. 3.
o 1. 2. 3.
o 1. 2. 3.
Sterilisation, washing General Surgery ward General Surgery ward General Surgery ward
Kitchen, Cafeteria General Med ward General Med ward General Med ward
Diagnostics Ortho ward Ortho & ENT ward Respiratory Med. ward
BLOCK D:
BLOCK B1: o 1. 2. 3.
Diagnostics Obs. & Gyn. ward Paediatric ward Dermatology & Burns ward
o Maternity Wing 1. Sample Testing & Laboratories
Emergency ward Operation Theatre (OT) Complex OT Complex with ICU wards OT Complex with ICU wards
BLOCK C3:
o OPD – Paediatrics, Obs. & Gyn. 1. OPD – Respiratory med, Derm. 2. Special Ward Rooms
BLOCK B2: o 1. 2. 3.
Staff & Students area Lecture halls & Museum Case Museum Case Museum
BLOCK C2:
o OPD – Gen. Med, Surgery 1. OPD – Cardiology, Dental 2. Special Ward Rooms
BLOCK A o Reception, Pharmacy, Admin 1. Administrative section
FRONT ELEVATION
BLOCK C1:
o OPD – Ophthalmology, Ortho 1. OPD – ENT, Psychiatry 2. Special Ward Rooms
HOSPITAL ZONING BLOCK E1:
BLOCK E2:
BLOCK E3:
BLOCK E4:
o 1. 2. 3.
o 1. 2. 3.
o 1. 2. 3.
o 1. 2. 3.
Sterilisation, washing General Surgery ward General Surgery ward General Surgery ward
Kitchen, Cafeteria General Med ward General Med ward General Med ward
Diagnostics Ortho ward Ortho & ENT ward Respiratory Med. ward
Diagnostics Obs. & Gyn. ward Paediatric ward Dermatology & Burns ward
BLOCK B1: o 1. 2. 3.
Ground floor plan depicting the layout and distribution of different zones. The number of floors for each block are marked with their function.
BLOCK D:
Emergency ward Operation (OT) Complex OT Complex with ICU wards OT Complex with ICU wards
o Maternity Wing 1. Sample Testing & Laboratories
BLOCK C3:
o OPD – Paediatrics, Obs. & Gyn. 1. OPD – Respiratory med., Dermatology 2. Special Ward Rooms
BLOCK B2: o 1. 2. 3.
Staff & Students area Lecture halls & Museum Case Museum Case Museum
BLOCK C2:
PHARMACY
RECEPTION LOBBY
o OPD - General Medicine, Surgery 1. OPD – Cardiology, Dental 2. Special Ward Rooms
BLOCK C1:
o OPD – Ophthalmology, Ortho 1. OPD – ENT, Psychiatry 2. Special Ward Rooms BLOCK A o Reception, Pharmacy, Admin 1. Administrative section
(A) E N T R A N C E L O B B Y P L A N
ENTRANCE LOBBY VIEW •
Large lobby with ample seating space.
•
Surrounded by courtyard to provide natural lighting and ventilation.
•
Colour coded directories, signages, maps and other information in the reception and lobby.
4
5
HOSPITAL ZONES
KEY PLAN
(C1) T Y P I C A L O P D
(B1 & B2) E M E R G E N C Y B L O C K
E3 & E4
B1 & B2 Dirty Corridor
C1
Clean Corridor Sterile Corridor
COURTYARD VIEW
OPD VIEW
Labelled spaces with clear view from the courtyard to control crowd and good wayfinding.
Colour coded walls at nurse stations of the OPD to draw visitors and patients.
HOSPITAL ZONES KEY PLAN E1
(E3 & E4) D I A G N O S T I C S B L O C K
E2
6
D
(D) M A T E R N I T Y B L O C K
•
This corridor connects many different blocks and spaces.
•
Colour coding on the floor matching the signage to efficiently direct the users. The colour stripes connect different blocks at their entrances / doors.
•
Fire escape maps and routes at regular intervals.
CORRIDOR - E BLOCK
Clean Corridor Sterile Corridor
7
HOSPITAL ZONES
KEY PLAN
(B1) I C U & O . T
B L O C K (F L 2)
(B 1 & B2) O . T
B1
Dirty Corridor Clean Corridor
B2
Sterile Corridor
SPECIAL WARD VIEW
ICU WARD VIEW
B L O C K (F L 1)
HOSPITAL ZONES KEY PLAN
(E3 & E4) T Y P I C A L W A R D
E1
(D) L A B O R A T O R Y B L O C K
TYPICAL WARD VIEW
LABORATORY ENTRANCE
•
Colour coded walls and signage at the entrances.
•
Light strips directing to fire exits in the wards.
•
Each ward block closely connected to fire exit staircase and ramp.
E2
8 D
9
HOSPITAL C
B
B’
A
A’
C’
SECTION AA‘
SECTION BB‘
SECTION CC‘
HOSPITAL
10
11 A C A D E M I C Z O N I N G Aerial view of academic block depicting the levels, layout and distribution of different zones:
DEPT. LABORATORIES
DEPT. LABORATORIES
MULTIPURPOSE BLOCK:
MULTIPURPOSE BLOCK: o 1. 2. 3.
o 1. 2. 3.
Office & Records Examination Hall Examination Hall Examination Hall
Council & Museum Lecture Halls Lecture Halls Lecture Halls
DEPT. RESEARCH DEPT. RESEARCH
DEPT. OFFICE
DEPT. OFFICE
EAST WING – PROFESSORS’ BLOCK
WEST WING – PROFESSORS’ BLOCK ADMINISTRATIVE BLOCK
FRONT ELEVATION
ACADEMIC ZONING 12 Ground floor plan of academic plan depicting the layout and distribution of different zones.
DEPT. LABORATORIES
DEPT. LABORATORIES
MULTIPURPOSE BLOCK:
MULTIPURPOSE BLOCK: o 1. 2. 3.
o 1. 2. 3.
Office & Records Examination Hall Examination Hall Examination Hall
DEPT. RESEARCH BLOCK
Council & Museum Lecture Halls Lecture Halls Lecture Halls
DEPT. RESEARCH BLOCK DEPT. OFFICE
DEPT. OFFICE
WEST WING – PROFESSORS’ BLOCK
EAST WING – PROFESSORS’ BLOCK
EAST WING : o 1. 2. 3.
Physiology Department Biochemistry Department Pharmacology Department Community Medicine Department
ADMINISTRATIVE BLOCK o Offices 1. Examination Department 2. PG & PhD Area 3. PG & PhD Area
WEST WING: o 1. 2. 3.
Anatomy Department Pathology Department Microbiology Department Forensic Medicine Department
13 A C A D E M I C Z O N E S KEY PLAN
ADMINISTRATI VE SPACES
DEPARTMENT LIBRARY
PROFESSORS & RESEARCH BLOCK
ACADEMIC ZONES 14 TYPICAL
ACADEMIC ZONE
KEY PLAN
TYPICAL LABORATORY
P G & P H D Z O N E (FL 2 & 3)
TYPICAL LECTURE HALL
15 A C A D E M I C B L O C K B
A
REAR VIEW
A’
B’
ACADEMIC BLOCK SECTION AA‘
SECTION BB‘
FRONT VIEW
16
17 S U S T A I N A B L E R E S I D E N C E PROJECT PHASES: •
Predesign Analysis
•
Design – Phase 1
•
Thermal comfort & Load analysis of phase 1 design (Ladybug, Insight & IESVE)
•
Inferences from analysis
•
Design – Phase 2 (implementing the changes based on inferences)
•
Thermal comfort & Load analysis of phase 2 design (Ladybug, Insight & IESVE)
•
Comparison of phase 1 & phase 2 design
SELECTED ANALYSIS
ANNUAL DRY BULB
ANNUAL RELATIVE
CHARTS:
TEMPERATURE CHART (NEW DELHI)
HUMIDITY CHART
•
COVER
CHART
•
RH analysis helps determine the wet & dry periods of the year/
N-S with 0 rotation had lowest total radiation.
•
Cloud cover helps determine the best suited months for usage of solar panels.
S façade received highest radiation
DESIGN ANALYSIS: Climate analysis for site - New Delhi (Microsoft Excel & Climate Consultant)
•
Ideal orientation analysis (Ladybug)
•
Radiation & Sun hour analysis for selected orientation (Ladybug & Insight)
•
Inferences and guidelines drawn based on analysis.
DBT analysis helps determine different comfort requirements at different times of the year. RADIATION ANALYSIS N–S
ANNUAL CLOUD
•
RADIATION ANALYSIS -ORIENATIONS
COMFORT REQUIREMENTS
S > E > W >N •
Comfort chart based on all climatic factors showing which design solution is required for which month. (Artificial Cooling, Passive Cooling, Passive Heating, Artificial Heating)
SUNHOUR ANALYSIS N–S
DESIGN EVOLUTION: Primary zoning considerations: • Privacy • Security • Occupancy schedule • Functionality • User comfort •
Insulation on walls receiving higher radiation.
•
Avoiding excess heat gain by minimising the openings on these sides.
•
Minimising openings with Double Glazed panels in E & W facing walls.
•
The main living spaces face the north and south side.
Servants’ quarters entrance
FACADE SKIN:
ROOF
W A L L T Y P E 1:
230 mm brick wall – u value 1.992 (W/ m2K)
W A L L T Y P E 2:
115 mm brick wall – u value 2.225 (W/m2K)
W A L L T Y P E 3:
230 mm brick wall + 50 mm expanded polystyrene – u value 0.518 (W/m2K )
S P E C I F I C A T I O N: 150 mm RCC roof with 30 mm expanded polystyrene - u value of 0.831 (W/m2K )
SECURITY 2.5 X 1.8 M
MAIN ENTRY (SLIDING GATES 14 M WIDE)
SUSTAINABLE RESIDENCE 18 G R O U N D F L O O R P L A N:
SECTION BB‘:
F I R S T F L O O R P L A N:
S E C O N D F L O O R P L A N:
SECTION AA‘:
19 D E S I G N F E A T U R E S :
Recycled materials for aesthetics – used G.I pipes, PVC pipes for pergolas.
Shaded buffer spaces
Internal openings for natural ventilation
Efficiently shaded south façade.
POSTDESIGN ANALYSIS 20 SELECTED ANALYSIS VISULISATIONS: ANNUAL RADIATION ANALYSIS (INSIGHT- REVIT) •
Total annual radiation per sqm (walls &windows)= 456 kWh/sqm (decreased from initial design)
•
Total annual radiation per sqm (roof)= 921 kWh/sqm (decreased from initial phase 1 design)
LOAD ANALYSIS (IESVE)
Load distribution throughout the year reveals that cooling load is the biggest contributor. Total energy consumption has significantly decreased compared to the initial phase 1 design.
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Summed total
Heating plant sensible load (kWh)
Cooling plant sensible load (kWh)
Lighting gain (kWh)
Total Load (kWh)
Solar gain (kWh)
Conduction gain - external walls (kWh)
Conduction gain - roofs (kWh)
Conduction gain - external windows (kWh)
Infiltration lat gain (kWh)
People gain (kWh)
4230.9 697.8 82.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.6 2531.9 7581.1
0 0 791 5527.1 9569.2 10890 9569.3 8525 7502.5 2735.2 20.4 0 55129.7
99.7 90.2 96.7 96.7 99.7 96.7 99.8 99.8 96.7 99.7 96.7 100 1172.4
4330.6 788 970.5 5623.8 9668.9 10986.7 9669.1 8624.8 7599.2 2834.9 154.7 2631.9 63883.2
1883.8 1813.4 2092.1 2090.8 2467.1 2363.7 2712.7 2664.4 2163.2 2095.1 2017.7 2055.2 26419.3
-2528.9 -1220 -651.8 829.3 2400.3 2882.1 1993.4 1675.9 1466.9 -115.7 -1170.8 -2010.7 3550
-1356 -527.2 -108.8 585.7 1510.6 1907.5 1700.8 1378 1195.7 186.3 -506.7 -1166 4799.9
-1883.4 -1216.8 -899.6 -45.3 579.6 756.8 -40.3 -69 -127.9 -970.9 -1475.2 -1741.2 -7133.3
-4.1 -3.2 -16.2 -3 -14.7 -0.9 159.3 112.3 100.8 -11.2 -2.1 3.1 320.1
2358.8 2127 2351.9 2276.9 2358.8 2276.9 2355.3 2355.3 2276.9 2358.8 2276.9 2351.9 27725.5
Differences between loads for initial and final design reveals that lighting load alone has increased and other loads have decreased. Heating plant sensible load (kWh)
Cooling plant sensible load (kWh)
Lighting gain (kWh)
Total Load (kWh)
Solar gain (kWh)
Conduction gain external walls (kWh)
Conduction gain roofs (kWh)
2746.8 (Increased)
-5565.1 (Decreased)
-4.6 (Decreased)
-2822.9 (Decreased)
-1764.1 (Decreased)
-7307.8 (Decreased)
-1168.9 (Decreased)
Conduction gain external windows (kWh) -3492.3 (Decreased)
Infiltration lat gain (kWh)
People gain (kWh)
-2.3 (Decreased)
0 (Constant)
21 M I X E D U S E B U I L D I N G PROJECT PHASES: •
SELECTED ANALYSIS CHARTS:
Climate Analysis
ANNUAL DRY BULB
•
Design – Phase 1
•
Thermal comfort, OTTV (ladybug, ecotect)
•
Inferences from analysis
•
Design – Phase 2 (implementing the changes based on inferences)
•
Thermal comfort, OTTV (ladybug, ecotect)
•
TEMPERATURE CHART
RAD IATION ANALYSIS - WINDOWS
•
DBT analysis helps determine different comfort requirements at different times of the year.
•
RH analysis helps determine the wet & dry periods of the year/
& Shading Analysis
ANNUAL RELATIVE
HUMIDITY CHART
& Shading Analysis ANNUAL CLOUD
COVER
CHART
Comparison of phase 1 & phase 2 design
RAD IATION ANALYSIS - BUILDING
•
Cloud cover helps determine the best suited months for usage of solar panels.
•
Comfort chart based on all climatic factors showing which design solution is required for which month. (Artificial Cooling, Passive Cooling, Passive Heating, Artificial Heating)
DESIGN ANALYSIS: •
Climate analysis for site – Tiruchirapalli (Microsoft Excel & Climate Consultant)
•
Radiation, (Ladybug)
•
Inferences & guidelines drawn based on analysis.
Sun
hour
and
OTTV
SELECTED SHADING
COMFORT REQUIREMENTS
analysis.
DESIGN CHARTS:
DESIGN EVOLUTION: •
Office buildings highest loads are lighting and cooling. Large and well shaded glazing with fins all around the building facades.
•
Fins designed in Solar Tool of Ecotect with best possible shading solutions.
•
Design solution modified and stylized for aesthetics.
MIXED USE BUILDING 22 B U I L D I N G M A T E R I A L S: WALL MATERIAL- AUTOCLAVED AERATED CONCRETE
GROUND FLOOR
RO OF MATER IAL- RCC WITH PO LYUR ETHANE
PLAN:
FOAM(40 MM)
FIRST FLOOR PLAN:
WINDOW MATERIAL- DOUBLE GLAZED LOW - E TINTED GLASS
23 M I X E D U S E B U I L D I N G SECOND FLOOR PLAN:
Solar panels mounted on the terrace completely shading the roof to cut of direct solar radiation and to produce renewable energy
Fins orienting to north which shade direct radiation without cutting of the natural lighting,
THIRD FLOOR
PLAN:
MIXED USE BUILDING 24
25 M I X E D U S E B U I L D I N G RADIATION ANALYSIS:
•
The shading devices significantly reduced the radiation through the windows.
•
The mounted solar panels shade the roof thus reducing heat transfer through the roof which receives the highest amount of radiation and contributor of heat gain.
OTTV ANALYSIS: CONVENTONAL DESIGN: MONTH
FINAL DESIGN:
HEAT TRANSFER THROUGH ENVELOPE ROOF WALLS WINDOWS
OTTV
HEAT TRANSFER THROUGH ENVELOPE ROOF WALLS WINDOWS
MONTH
OTTV
JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER
15219076 34164.35 38510.08 48044.35 37412.25 45317.19 34853.33 44574.72 45668.03 23600.35 27310.95 26693.44
7260.48 35438.24 23731.24 59176.14 38245.73 49767.41 38958.73 50673.12 47411.99 20988.36 25092.91 27033.89
-315.2 13868.81 16390.42 28052.02 17336.02 23324.02 17651.22 23640.03 21118.42 7249.61 8195.21 9140.81
18.15 27.4 26.3 32 24.45 28.16 24.7 29.03 28.46 22.21 27.49 28.02
JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER
2783.98 6233.58 7058.33 8807.99 6846.53 8296.75 6390.23 8163.25 8316.27 4308.21 4992.44 4887.96
1862.22 9065.44 9518.71 14765.76 9733.89 12638.69 9828.42 12711.59 12573.7 5548.49 6437.82 6822.89
-116.72 5135.96 6039.78 10388.66 6419.96 8637.76 6536.68 8754.48 7820.67 2684.71 3034.89 3385.06
3.59 5.87 6.3 9.05 7.7 9.44 7.81 8.29 6.67 4.91 5.04 5.33
AVERAGE
1302102.087
35314.85333
15470.94917
26.364167
AVERAGE
6423.793333
9292.301667
5726.824167
6.6666667
ABSORBPTIVITY HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT INDOOR DESIGN TEMPERATURE U VALUE SOLAR HEAT GAIN COEFFICIENT
WALLS 0.2 22.7 27 C 1.42
ROOF 0.2 22.7 27 C 2.985
WINDOWS
27 C 6.169 0.818
ABSORBPTIVITY HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT INDOOR DESIGN TEMPERATURE U VALUE SOLAR HEAT GAIN COEFFICIENT
WALLS 0.2 22.7 27 C 0.411
ROOF 0.2 22.7 27 C 0.514
WINDOWS
27 C 6.169 0.391
•
Overall Thermal Transfer Value (OTTV) is the transfer of heat per unit area. The OTTV of the final designing shading and adding insulation is 20 W/m2 lesser than the initial design.
•
This maintains constant indoor temperature throughout the year thus reducing cooling load significantly.
BEACH RESORT 26 SELECTED
1. 2. 3. 4.
BLOCKS:
Reception Luxury Rooms Information Centre Villas
Large scale resort in Puducherry with different typologies of buildings. Selected blocks are shown in detail. CONCEP T - ORGANIC
DESIGN
27 R E C E P T I O N B L O C K GROUND FLOOR PLAN:
FIRST FLOOR PLAN:
RECEPTION BLOCK 28 SECTION AA‘: •
Random rubble & bamboo available abundantly around the site which is used as a major element in the reception block as well as other blocks in the resort.
•
Form of the block surrounds a swimming pool in an organic manner.
•
Large openings providing a glimpse of the resort from the entrance as well as natural lighting and ventilation.
29 L U X U R Y R O O M S GROUND FLOOR PLAN:
FIRST FLOOR PLAN:
SECTION BB‘:
LUXURY ROOMS 30
31 I N F O R M A T I O N GROUND FLOOR PLAN:
CENTRE FIRST FLOOR PLAN:
VILLAS 32 PLAN:
SECTION AA‘:
•
Natural stone used as columns in independent suites and villas. Stones also used as paving materials and in bathroom flooring.
•
Bamboo sticks used extensively as a shading as well as screening element.
33 N O M A D - S T O P It is a small scale shipping container restaurant, shop & travel inn at Ladakh.
DESIGN
CONCEPT
Ladakh due to its harsh climate is highly prone to landslides. Due to this shops and small native owned businesses often encounter losses due to damage and constant shifting. The goal here is to design a temporary structure yet strong and economical. Hence the concept of the “3 R(s)” is applied here. Reduce, Reuse and Recycle is applied in this design to a large extent in exterior as well as interior. EXTERIOR: Standard sized Indian shipping containers Recycled steel columns INTERIOR: Reused wood (ex: from boats) furniture & flooring Milk carton lamp shades Old tyres as decorative element and lamp shade Old Steel & PVC pipe furniture
NOMAD - STOP 34
35 N O M A D - S T O P TOILETS
SHOP BILLING 2 TOILETS
A CAMP FIRE
A
SINGLE ROOMS MANAGER
SHOPPING KITCHEN
RESTAURANT WITH BAR
A’
A’ RESTAURANT BILLING
OUTDOOR DINING
SHOP BILLING 1
GROUND FLOOR
SHARED ROOMS (BUNK BEDS)
FIRST FLOOR
NOMAD - STOP 36 SECTIO N
Interior views of the restaurant zone showing the applications of the design concept. LED light strips which are economically feasible as well as energy efficient are used for lighting and ambience.
A A’
37 O T H E R W O R K S – U N D E R G R A D U A T E RESTAURANT,TIRUCHIRAPALLI | 2016 I I I rd Y E A R
SUNDAY MARKET,TIRUCHIRAPALLI | 2016 I I nd Y E A R
OTHER WORKS – UNDERGRADUATE 38 RESIDENCE,TIRUCHIRAPALLI | 2015 I I nd Y E A R
DESKTOP ORGANISER | 2014 I st Y E A R (A4 paper rolls)
39 G S E N ‘ 15 T R O P H Y - N A S A S I T E : M Y S U R U, K A R N A T A K A The brief required us to select one of the “smart cities” listed by the government of India and propose a design concept that will help establish its status as a smart city as well as be beneficial to the public. It was also required that the proposal is relevant to the site.
DESIGN
GOALS:
•
The proposed convention centre caters to both tourists and the residents of the city. It consists of various amenities and the primary purpose of Gagan Bhag is to promote interaction.
•
The tower aims to create a landmark in the city and to drawn attention of city dwellers.
TOWER
E VOLUTION:
O N S I T E F E A T U R E S:
A N D C ‘ 16 T R O P H Y - N A S A 4 0 SITE: TIRUCHIRAPALLI, TAMIL NADU The brief was based on the concept of parallel projections. Hence this concept in such a way that a space can parallelly serve another function along with its actual function. After a thorough analysis of Trichy, it was found that there is a serious inadequacy of spaces for interaction. Hence a popular flyovers from the city were selected and a modular design proposal was made.
SELF SUSTAINABILTY: The presence of billboard seating is a source of income which can be used for the maintenance of the setup. Green walls act as a separation and also reduces air and noise pollution. Pipes are connected from the roads above to and the water collected is used for the toilets and for watering the plants.
SELECTED FLYOVERS: • THENNUR
FLYOVER
• MANNARPURAM • KARUMANDAPAM • PAALAKARAI
FLYPASS FLYOVER
FLYOVER
41 P R O F E S S I O N A L W O R K S MU SIC COLLEGE,CENTRAL UNIVER SITY ,THIRUVARUR
MUSIC COLLEGE 42
43 M U S I C C O L L E G E DESIGN EVOLUTION:
Multiple courtyards for natural lighting and ventilation
Indoor amphitheatre surrounded by landscaped buffer spaces for recreation
Stylised shading devices
RCC skin surrounding a landscaped buffer space for privacy as well as aesthetics
MUSIC COLLEGE 44 GROUND FLOOR PLAN:
SECTION THROUGH AMPHITHEATRE:
FIRST FLOOR PLAN:
45 I N C O M E T A X O F F I C E Front view of Income Tax Office, Erode. Done under CPWD, Chennai
FOREIGN TECHNICIANS HOSTEL 46 Heavy Alloy Penetrator Project – Foreign Technicians, Tiruchirappalli done under CPWD, Chennai
47 F O R E I G N T E C H N I C I A N S H O S T E L Heavy Alloy Penetrator Project – Foreign Technicians, Tiruchirappalli done under CPWD, Chennai
BOYS HOSTEL 48 506 Bedded Boys Hostel, NIT Tiruchirappalli Done under CPWD, Chennai
49 N I T T R I C H Y Annexe for Production Engineering Department, NIT Trichy, done under CPWD, Chennai
NIT TRICHY 50 Annexe for Instrumentation & Control Engineering Department, NIT Trichy, done under CPWD, Chennai
51 P R O F E S S I O N A L W O R K S Quarters designs done under CPWD, Chennai.
G + 18 Type II & III Quarters for Income Tax Department at C.R Colony, Anna Nagar, Chennai. Prefabricated concrete panels for the superstructure.
G + 18 Type IV Quarters for Income Tax Department at C.R Colony, Anna Nagar, Chennai. Prefabricated concrete panels for the superstructure.
G + 19 Type V & VI Quarters for Customs and Central Excise at Nungambakkam, Chennai.
PROFESSIONAL WORKS 52 Entrance designs done under CPWD, Chennai. FLOOR PLAN
ROOF PLAN
ENTRANCE FOR CPWD INSPECTION BUNGALOW, PORTBLAIR | 2017 FLOOR PLAN
ROOF PLAN
ENTRANCE FOR CLRI CAMPUS, ADYAR, CHENNAI | 2017
53 R E S I D E N C E , C U M B U M Designed for a family Elango from Cumbum, Nadu. 3D visualisation design was done as project.
of 4 by Ar. Theni, Tamil and interior a freelance
RESIDENCE, CUMBUM 54 Some features of the residence were the random rubble masonry wall and pergolas.
GROUND FLOOR
FIRST FLOOR
55 D I G I T A L A R T
P H O TO G R A P H Y 5 6
57 S K E T C H I N G
RESUME
NUTHANA MANOHARAN ARCHITECT
PERSONAL DETAILS
SOFTWARE
PROJECTS
Age: 25
Design Software Autodesk Revit Sketchup Rhinoceros
UNDERGRADUATE
Date of Birth: 30 July 1996 Sex: Female Languages: English, Tamil & Hindi
EDUCATION Master of Architecture (Energy Efficient & Sustainable Architecture) National Institute Of Technology, Tiruchirappalli (2019 – 2021) CGPA: 9.43 (Gold Medallist) Bachelor of Architecture National Institute Of Technology, Tiruchirappalli (2014 – 2019) CGPA: 7.78 12th CBSE Board Kendriya Vidyalaya CLRI, Adyar, Chennai (2014) Percentage: 80% 10th CBSE Board Kendriya Vidyalaya CLRI, Adyar, Chennai (2012) CGPA: 9.4
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Central Public Works Department (CPWD), Chennai (June 2021 – Present) Central government projects – Institutional, Educational, Office, Residential.
Central Public Works Department (CPWD), Chennai ( Jun – Dec 2017) Central government projects – Institutional, Office, Residential, Campus, Academic, Entrances.
Engineering Software AutoCAD Visual Programming Grasshopper Building Analysis Software Insight Opaque Ladybug ENVIMET IESVE Comfen Ecotect Graphic Designing Adobe Photoshop Procreate Adobe Illustrator
Other Software Microsoft Word Microsoft PowerPoint Microsoft Excel
I Year Desktop organiser Night lamp / organiser Hostel Redesign Living room design II Year Rural Study - Konerirajapuram Residence design Market Study & Redesign
III Year Highway Restaurant Maternity Hospital Indoor Sports Complex IV Year Professional Training Township Design Shipping Container Restaurant V Year Restaurant landscape redesign NIT T Sports centre landscaping Beach Resort Dissertation – JIPMER Karaikal POSTGRADUATE
CERTIFICATIONS AutoCAD – Autodesk Certified Professional Revit – Autodesk Certified Professional
SKILLS & INTERESTS
EXTRA CURRICULAR
Building Analysis, Research, Climate Responsive Architecture, Architecture - Psychology, Architectural visualisation, Post processing, Digital Art, Photography, Video editing.
NASA GSEN Trophy – 2017 NASA ANDC – 2016 NASA GSEN Trophy – 2015
I Year Mixed use building: • Design • Energy Analysis (ladybug) • Climate Analysis (ladybug) • Material Analysis (Opaque) Post Occupancy Evaluation Adaptive Reuse Analysis II Year Residence: • Design • Energy Analysis (IESVE) • Climate Analysis (ladybug) Lighting Analysis (Honeybee) Research Paper – Outdoor thermal comfort