Product Market Regulation Country Note: Finland

Page 1

OECD Product Market Regulation (PMR) Indicators: How does Finland compare? ___________________________________________________________________________________ Competitive product markets foster economic growth and can improve the living standards of citizens. OECD’s Product Market Regulation Indicators assess the alignment of a country’s regulatory framework with internationally accepted best practices. The Economywide Indicator measures the distortions to competition that can be induced through the involvement of the State in the economy, as well as the barriers to entry and expansion faced by domestic and foreign firms in different sectors of the economy. This indicator is complemented by a set of Sector Indicators that measures regulatory barriers to competition at the level of specific network and service sectors.

Overall PMR Indicator Index scale 0 to 6

Finland

1.37

OECD average

1.38

5 Most competitionfriendly countries 5 Least competitionfriendly countries

1.00 1.82 0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

Economy-wide PMR Indicators: a breakdown by major components Index scale 0 to 6 from most to least competition-friendly regulation

6

Finland

OECD average

5 Most competition-friendly countries

5 Least competition-friendly countries

5 4 3 2 1 0 Public Ownership

Involvement in Business Operations

Simplification and Evaluation of Regulations

Admin. Burden on Start-ups

Barriers in Service Barriers to Trade & Network sectors and Investment

Note: All the averages include only OECD countries. Information refers to laws and regulation in force on 1 January 2018. Source: OECD 2018 PMR database.


ECONOMY-WIDE HIGHLIGHTS Overall product market regulation in Finland is very close to the OECD average. Barriers to entry for domestic and foreign firms are generally low, in particular the administrative burden on new firms. However, there is scope to reduce the distortions to competition due to the involvement of the state in the economy. Public ownership is more extensive than in many other OECD countries, but this is partially compensated by the fact that the governance of SOEs in Finland is aligned with most key OECD best practices. There are no rules ensuring transparency in the interaction between interest groups and policymakers, and no cooling off period is required when public officials leave their post. In addition, the public procurement rules could be improved in order to facilitate business participation in public tenders.

Economy-wide PMR indicators: a breakdown by sub-components Index scale 0 to 6 from most to least competition-friendly regulation Distortions Induced by State Involvement Simplification and Evaluation of Regulations

Complexity of Regulatory Procedures

6 5 4 3 2 1 0

Interaction with Interest Groups

Involvement in Business Operations

5 Least competition-friendly countries

Assessment of Impact on Competition

6 5 4 3 2 1 0

Price controls

Governance of SOEs

Direct Control

Scope of SOEs

Gov’t Involv. in Network Sectors

Public Ownership

6 5 4 3 2 1 0

5 Most competition-friendly countries

Public procurement

OECD average

Command & control regulation

Finland

Barriers to Domestic and Foreign Entry

Barriers to Trade Facilitation

Barriers to Trade and Investment

Treatment of Foreign Suppliers

6 5 4 3 2 1 0

Tariff Barriers

Barriers in Service & Network sectors

5 Least competition-friendly countries

Barriers to FDI

6 5 4 3 2 1 0

5 Most competition-friendly countries

Barriers in Network sectors

Licenses and Permits

Admin. Burden on Start-ups

Admin. Requirements for Lim. Liab. Companies and Pers.Owned Enterp.

6 5 4 3 2 1 0

OECD average

Barriers in Services sectors

Finland

Note: All the averages include only OECD countries. Information refers to laws and regulation in force on 1 January 2018. If the blue bar does not appear on the chart for a specific indicator, it means that its value is 0. Source: OECD 2018 PMR database.


SECTOR-SPECIFIC HIGHLIGHTS While the regulatory set-up in some professional services and e-communications is among the most competitionfriendly among OECD countries, regulations in gas, road transport and rail transport are not in line with international best practices. Retail distribution and the retail sale of medicines are characterised by relatively high regulatory barriers to competition.

Regulation in network and service sectors PMR Indicators for network sectors Index scale 0 to 6 from most to least competition-friendly regulation Finland 5 Most competition-friendly countries

6

OECD average 5 Least competition-friendly countries

5 4 3 2 1 0 Electricity

Gas

Rail

Air

Energy

Road

Water

Fixed

Transport

Mobile

E-Communications

PMR Indicators for professional services* and retail distribution Index scale 0 to 6 from most to least competition-friendly regulation 6

Finland

OECD average

5 most competition-friendly countries

5 Least competition-friendly countries

5 4 3 2

1 0 Lawyers

Accountants

Architects

Civil engineers

Professional services

Real estate agents

Retail distribution

Retail sale of Medicines

Retail trade

* When comparing the indicators across countries, it should be kept in mind that the activities undertaken by specific professions may vary between countries. Note: All the averages include only OECD countries. Information refers to laws and regulation in force on 1 January 2018. If the blue bar does not appear on the chart for a specific indicator, it means that its value is 0. Source: OECD 2018 PMR database.


OVERALL ASSESSMENT

Regulatory barriers to competition in Finland are limited, but there is still scope for improving product market regulation in some sectors and domains.

Strengths

Challenges

In the area of simplification and evaluation of regulations, Finland has one of the best set of rules for assessing potential distortions of competition arising from new regulations, and for ensuring the involvement of stakeholders during the regulatory process. In addition, the legal regime is transparent, with an online searchable database that includes all laws and regulations, and a clear regulatory agenda.

Professions in Finland are subject to limited regulatory constraints. Barriers to entry and conduct restrictions faced by accountants, architects, civil engineers and estate agents are among the lowest in the OECD. Only lawyers encounter some constraints on their conduct even though the profession is characterised by a more competition-friendly regulatory set-up than in many OECD countries. In particular, there are rigid rules on ownership and voting rights in law firms as well as limits to lawyers’ rights to advertise their services.

Regulation of the natural gas sector is not in line with international best practices. There is neither a liberalised wholesale market, nor a competitive retail market. The government has considerable participation in the capital of the largest operators in the import, storage and retail supply segments, and a legislative action would be necessary to sell these shares. In addition, the regulated retail tariffs are not based on the costs or tariffs of the most efficient supplier.

Public ownership of firms is more extensive in Finland than in most other OECD countries. However, the potentially adverse impact on competition is mitigated by the fact that the governance of state-owned enterprises is in line with many key OECD best practices.

The regulatory framework for some transport sectors, in particular rail and road, is not competition-friendly. The government owns firms in both sectors, entry in the road freight transport sector is still based on an authorisation system, and there is no competition in the market for rail passenger transport.

The rules regulating retail online sales create some obstacles in setting up e-retail outlets. In addition, the retail sale of pharmaceutical products is subject to numerous regulatory constraints, including on the number and the ownership of pharmacies, as well as on where non-prescription medicines can be sold.

Regulation of transport by water in Finland is among the most competition-friendly in the OECD.

Further information 

“What are the 2018 OECD PMR indicators?” PowerPoint presentation on OECD PMR website

Vitale, C., et al. (2020), " The 2018 Edition of the OECD PMR Indicators and Database – Methodological Improvements and Policy Insights", OECD Economics Department Working Papers

Please visit our website : http://oe.cd/pmr Contact us at: PMR2018@oecd.org


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.