8 minute read

POWER LINES

Carbon-free by 2035?

Over the last few months, Ohio Cooperative Living has taken a look at why we still need coal — an analysis of cost and reliability factors of different generation resources; a review of the sources of electricity used to power Ohio’s co-op member homes and businesses; an explanation of the significant investments the co-ops have made that have resulted in the Cardinal Plant becoming one of the cleanest coal-burning plants in the world; and a preview of a coming program to introduce more renewable generation into the electricity mix. President Joe Biden has announced a goal for the United States to decarbonize its electricity grid by 2035. Unless there are major technology breakthroughs, however, it would mean eliminating the use of coal and natural gas to produce electricity within the next 15 years — a tall order, considering fossil fuels currently produce more than 60% of the nation’s electricity, and even more than that here in Ohio. This month, we take a brief look at some of the challenges that must be overcome in order to decarbonize the grid.

ADDING TRANSMISSION

Hundreds of billions of dollars will be needed to build and upgrade the transmission system to carry more electricity from wind and solar. An MIT study found transmission capacity will need to be doubled, and recent transmission projects have taken as long as 17 to 20 years to complete.

HAVING ELECTRICITY AT ALL TIMES

Wind and solar can produce electricity only when the wind is blowing and the sun is shining. Lack of solar power when the sun goes down contributed to California’s power blackouts and emergency measures last summer. Conventional electricity sources, like coal, will be needed for the foreseeable future to back up wind and solar.

ALLOWING TIME FOR TECHNOLOGY

The gap between electricity demand and wind and solar output must be filled by other sources of electricity. The cost of battery storage is dropping, but it is still expensive. Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) would allow fossil fuel-fired degeneration to continue, but while it shows promise, it is risky to assume it can be both cost-effective and widely deployed within 15 years without significant investment and incentives from the federal government.

CHANGING ELECTRICITY MARKETS

The nation’s existing power markets were not designed to handle large amounts of renewable power. New systems will need to be developed to operate carbonfree power markets.

AVOIDING STRANDED COSTS

More than 30% of U.S. electric generating capacity is less than 20 years old — including much of the scrubber equipment that makes the Cardinal Plant, owned by Ohio’s electric cooperatives, one of the cleanest coalfired plants in the world. Those sources of generation still need to be paid for whether they’re being used or not.

MAINTAINING FUEL SECURITY AND FUEL DIVERSITY

The electricity grid will become less fuel secure and less fuel diverse as the power sector is decarbonized. Both attributes help the grid to maintain its reliability and resilience.

PROTECTING JOBS

More than 185,000 jobs nationwide are supported by coal-fired electric power generation. All would be at risk, as would some of the 686,000 jobs supported by the natural gas industry.

These and other challenges will have to be overcome to decarbonize the grid while maintaining reliable, resilient, and affordable supplies of electricity.

INDUSTRY LEADERS

“We need to be careful not to let aspirational goals like “carbon free by 2035” impose arbitrary limits on our ability to maintain a reliable and affordable supply of electricity.”

– Patrick O’Loughlin | President and CEO

Ohio’s Electric Cooperatives

“What concerns the industry as a whole is 2035, and what you’re hearing from the industry is a recognition that we need to get it right. We can’t compromise reliability.”

– Lisa Barton | Executive vice president and COO

American Electric Power Co.

TRADE ASSOCIATIONS

“Where’s the technology today that can allow that to happen? What are going to be the commercially viable, always-available, and affordable carbon-free technologies to provide electricity? People can set goal X, Y, or Z, but are the lights going to go on whenever consumers flip the switch? And will they be able to afford it?”

– Jim Matheson | CEO

National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (NRECA)

“It’s not something we can do in a very short period of time, and it’s going to come at considerable costs.”

– Desmarie Waterhouse | Vice president of government relations

American Public Power Association (APPA) ENERGY ANALYSTS

“The key threat is that too much investment too fast would raise customer bills more than customers might be willing to spend.”

– Travis Miller | Equity strategist Morningstar Research Services

“The pace of wind and solar isn’t going fast enough to meet the 2035 target. But even if it was, there would also have to be contributions from new technologies like batteries, carbon capture and storage, nuclear, or hydrogen.”

– Tom Rowlands-Rees | Head of North American research

BloombergNEF

LABOR UNIONS

“We support the transition to renewable energy but disagree with arbitrary numbers that don’t take into account our current energy mix and energy needs. 2050 is certainly better than 2035.”

– Yvette Pena O’Sullivan | Executive director

Laborers’ International Union of North America

“We will not support policies that accelerate the closure of coal plants. The closures are already happening more rapidly than communities can deal with and are leaving economic devastation behind them.”

– Lee Anderson | Director of government affairs

Utility Workers Union of America

GRID OPERATORS

“When we start looking at what 2040 looks like, you look at the performance of existing assets and the storage capabilities of existing battery technologies. All our models suggest there are just enough days when the wind doesn’t blow and the sun is shielded, and not enough battery storage to fill those gaps.”

– Richard Dewey | CEO

New York Independent System Operator (NYISO)

“In transmission terms, 2035 is like tomorrow. It feels challenging to me.”

– Jennifer Curran | Vice president of system planning

Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) ELECTED OFFICIALS

“I think that we can do [the clean energy transition] and move forward, but we’re not going to eliminate. You can’t just say we’re going to eliminate using all fossil and coal’s going to be out, oil’s going to be out, everything else, gas is going to be out of it.”

– Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV)

Over 2 carats of Verdant Peridot in precious .925 sterling silver ONLY $39

Save $260!

“Known as ‘the Evening Emerald’ because its sparkling green hue looks brilliant any time of day.”

— The American Gem Society (AGS)

Ooh and Ahh Without the Ouch

Spoil her (and your wallet) with sparkling Verdant Peridot for just $39

A.

Going over the top on jewelry doesn’t have to mean going overboard on the cost. We’re in the business of oohs and ahhs without the ouch, which is why we can bring you an e ervescent verdant peridot ring for a price that simply can’t be beat. Its vivid and unique color makes verdant peridot unlike any other green gemstone. If you are looking to mark a milestone or make any occasion special, the Verdant Peridot Ring is all you need. is elegant ring features 2 1/3 carats of captivating verdant peridot in three perfectly-faceted cushion cut gemstones. And, the .925 sterling silver setting is nished in tarnish-resistant rhodium for added durability and superior shine. You could easily spend $400 on a sterling silver ring set with peridot stones. But, with Stauer in your corner, the sky’s the limit for a ording the extraordinary. Priced at just $39, you can treat her to the Verdant Peridot Ring set in .925 sterling silver and save your money and your love life all at the same time. Satisfaction guaranteed or your money back. Indulge in the Verdant Peridot Ring for 30 days. If you aren’t perfectly happy, send it back for a full refund of the item price. Limited Reserves. Don’t let this gorgeous ring slip through your ngers. Call today!

“Found in lava, meteorites, and deep in the earth’s mantle, yellow-green peridot is the extreme gem”

— Gemological Institute of America’s Gem Encyclopedia

PRAISE FOR STAUER PERIDOT JEWELRY “...absolutely beautiful. The picture does not do it justice. It is a real stunner.” – S. C., Berkeley, CA

Verdant Peridot Ring (2 ¹⁄2 ctw) $299† $39 +S&P Save $260 You must use the insider offer code to get our special price.

1-800-333-2045

Your Insider Offer Code: TPR210-02

Please use this code when you order to receive your discount.

† Special price only for customers using the offer code versus the price on Stauer.com without your offer code. Stauer ®

14101 Southcross Drive W., Ste 155, Dept. TPR210-02, Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 www.stauer.com

Rating of A+

• 2 ¹⁄3 ctw Verdant Peridot • White zircon accents • Rhodium-finished .925 sterling silver setting • Whole sizes 5-10

This article is from: