HOUSTON VISIONING 2040 FALL 2014
|
CENTER FOR COMMUNITY STUDIES
|
HAMMONS SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE
|
DRURY UNIVERSITY
INTRODUCTION
6
TA B L E O F C O N T E N T S INTRODUCTION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS PREFACE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
7 9 10
COMMUNITY RESEARCH HISTORY POINTS OF INTEREST DEMOGRAPHICS
20 24 28
INTRODUCTION
COMMUNITY MEETINGS PRELIMINARY MEETING MEETING ONE MEETING TWO HIGH SCHOOL MEETING MEETING THREE MEETING FOUR
36 38 57 80 82 108
PROPOSALS PHYSICAL MODEL PROFESSIONAL EDUCATIONAL RESIDENTIAL NATURAL IMPLEMENTATION
112 114 138 156 178 200
RESOURCES REFERENCES
206
7
AC K N OW L E D G M E N T S COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIPS
COMMUNITY MEMBERS
Houston Visioning Committee Houston City Council Drury University University of Missouri Extension
We would like to give a special thanks to the community members who actively participated in the visioning process. Your support and criticism was crucial to both the educational experience and the success of the entire project. We thank you for your commitment and enthusiasm throughout this collaboration.
CITY COUNCIL Don Tottingham Larry Sutton Elaine Campbell David Arthur Mary Barnes Joe Honeycutt Don Romines Sheila Walker Chalky Wells
Mayor City Administrator Director of Development Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member
VISIONING COMMITTEE Mandy Adey Caleb Adkison Caleb Arthur Adam Bruns Taylor Bryson Elexis Calhoun Alison Clayton Benny Cook Jeremy Dillon Joleen Durham Abby Gaither Samantha Garrett Vera Gladden Rock Gremillion Cassie Gunter
Chandra Hobbs Dara Jackson David Keeney Carl Lange Chuck Manier Sheena Painter Jason Pounds Rachel Pursifull Tyler Romines Michael Roy Amanda Starr Krista Thomas Mike Tottingham Elisa Williamson
DRURY UNIVERSITY Project Facilitator/Administrator: Jay G. Garrott Professor and Director Center for Community Studies (CCS) Hammons School of Architecture David Beach Assistant Professor of Architecture Hammons School of Architecture
INTRODUCTION
table of contents acknowledgments preface executive summary COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS RESOURCES
CCS Team: Nick Alexander Kanna Matsuo Jacob Nentrup Nicole Shaul Olivia Snell Kevin Still Trevor Wellman Brandon White
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI EXTENSION Jeff Barber, LEED AP, Architect State Housing and Environmental Design Specialist
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
INTRODUCTION
8
P R E FAC E Houston is a small town located in south central Missouri. It is the seat of Texas County, where it is the second largest city after Cabool. The town’s population as of the 2010 census, is 2,081, which is a small growth from its census data in 2000, which was a population of 1,992. Houston is located approximately 85 miles east of Springfield, 50 miles south of Rolla, and 35 miles southeast of Fort Leonard Wood. The main roadway connecting Houston to the rest of Missouri is U.S. Route 63. Houston’s economy has always been developed primarily around agriculture and secondarily around manufacturing. In recent years with the economic slump and increasing occurrences of rural flight, Houston’s growth has slowed to a near halt. Two of the biggest employers in Houston closed and laid off over 600 workers. This crippling blow to Houston’s economy drove a large number of its residents to relocate in search of work. With an ever decreasing availability of job opportunities and skilled labor force, Houston has nearly stopped developing altogether. Several progressive members of Houston’s community created an initiative for future improvements and development strategies. The Center for Community Studies (CCS) at Drury University volunteered the time and services of eight fourthyear architecture students and the knowledge and professional experience of two architects to aid in the development of such an initiative. This book is the product of hundreds of hours of community analysis and research, design work, and production. It contains work from every community presentation from the very first meeting on August 23rd to the final presentation on December 8th. Using this book as a guide to solving problems, both existing and unforeseen, Houston can once again become a staple of Texas County and the State of Missouri.
9 INTRODUCTION
table of contents acknowledgments preface executive summary
COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
10
E X E C U T I V E S U M M A RY INTRODUCTION The Executive Summary outlines what we, the Center for Community Studies, consider the most relevant issues and concerns facing the community of Houston, MO. It is the culmination of a semester spent studying, researching and analyzing the city. The following issues are what we consider the principal factors influencing the development and implementation of the overall project. The concerns expand on the problematic aspects of the issue, while the recommendations outline actions that could be taken to resolve each particular concern.
ISSUE: PHYSICAL
INTRODUCTION
CONCERN: BUILDING CODES Houston does not have a unified building code for construction. Though the city is not legally required to implement them, codes protect the health, safety, and welfare of owners, users, and the community. Without proper codes, buildings can fall into dangerous disrepair and it may be difficult to enforce standards desired by the city and its residents. The issue is most prevalent in the vacant buildings and few rental properties the city has to offer.
RECOMMENDATION Adopting a building code such as the International Building Code (IBC) will help resolve this concern.
Using a specific time-line and providing incentives such as tax breaks could encourage owners to bring their buildings up to code. Penalties should also be considered for units that fail to meet the building standards. Using the IBC as a standard, the city can leverage specific additions or modifications to make key elements contextually relevant to Houston, MO.
CONCERN: WATER MANAGEMENT There are many locations in Houston that have major drainage problems. The run-off is not properly handled and is allowed to flood potentially valuable land. These problem areas include Emmett Kelly Park, the parking lot between the school and the storm shelter, the lot to the south of the football stadium running along Hill Street, and the area to the north of Rutherford Park.
RECOMMENDATION Moving the water underground in pipes and creating strategically placed retention ponds could help with this problem. A detailed plan for the parking lot between the school and the storm shelter can be found in the Proposals section.
CONCERN: WALKABILITY Though Houston is expanding the sidewalk network, a majority of the streets in Houston still do not have safe pedestrian paths. Because of the lack of walkable areas, many citizens choose
11 to drive instead. Without quality sidewalks, people will continue to drive to locations that they could easily walk or bike to. Walkable cities decrease environmental damage, improve the appeal, and improve the overall health of the community.
RECOMMENDATION Building a complete network of pedestrian paths will encourage the community to walk or bike. Consolidating parking in certain areas will also encourage citizens to get out of their cars and walk in the downtown district. In place of two or three parking spaces outside of key buildings in the downtown, outdoor gathering areas and green space will begin to take shape. This contributes to the social environment of Houston and creates a more friendly and lively atmosphere. Additionally, a lower dependence on vehicles decreases environmentally damaging emissions and a higher amount of walking or biking increases overall health and wellness in the community.
ISSUE: ECONOMIC CONCERN: JOBS + CAREERS One of the first needs the Houston community expressed was more jobs. Though Houston’s unemployment rate is below the Missouri average (3.8% vs. 6.3%), the community recognized the necessity of more jobs to encourage population growth and attempt to reverse rural drain. Houston also needs to create and develop careers to attract the younger generation.
RECOMMENDATION Many of the proposals outlined later in this book introduce new jobs or encourage entrepreneurship in Houston. Additionally, addressing housing needs will create careers in Houston. A large percentage of employees at the hospital, one of Houston’s biggest employers, commute from surrounding towns because Houston lacks appropriate housing for young professionals. By providing housing geared towards this demographic, density and diversity (both social and economic) can be brought to the downtown district. Increasing the density and diversity of the downtown has the potential to support new businesses and expand economic growth.
INTRODUCTION
table of contents preface acknowledgments executive summary COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
12 CONCERN: LOCAL BUSINESS
CONCERN: COMMERCIAL BUSINESS
Houston is heavily dependent on goods and services imported from other communities. Besides the Farmers’ Market, almost all food is shipped in from elsewhere. While Houston does have a few business in the industrial park that export goods, overall exports are still very low.
As US-63 transitions into a five lane highway, traffic through Houston will undoubtedly increase. This increased traffic will likely attract commercial businesses seeking economic opportunities. National commercial businesses may take customers from local businesses, and could seek less involvement with the community of Houston. These businesses developing along the US-63 corridor could contribute to the sprawl of the city. This type of sprawl often encourages travelers to continue driving rather than stopping and getting out of their cars.
INTRODUCTION
RECOMMENDATION Developing local businesses that raise exportation and slow the importation of goods should be a priority for Houston. One way to accomplish this is to grow small businesses. According to statistics from the Small Business Association, 50 percent of small businesses fail within the first five years. To help developing businesses, the City of Houston should offer incentives and opportunities to entrepreneurs starting small businesses. Classes on starting and running small businesses should be provided for the community. A small business incubator, like the one proposed on US63, is a good way to grow small businesses until they are able to afford a larger space. Additionally, forming partnerships between the school and local businesses encourage the development of an entrepreneurial spirit in students resulting in a generation of people interested in running and supporting local business.
RECOMMENDATION Controlling commercial growth is important as US-63 increases in size. Houston should consider developing areas of “Smart Growth.” These areas attempt to get people out of their cars and into walkable areas of business. Developing an area of Smart Growth along US-63 using recognizable commercial businesses to draw travelers off the highway will begin to create a populated area along US-63 near the downtown, which is the first step to reinvigorating downtown Houston.
CONCERN: FARMERS’ MARKET The Farmers’ Market in Houston, while successful, is limited. It is only open two or three times a week and not at all during the winter. Additionally, more marketing is needed to promote,
13 educate, and communicate the mission of the Farmers’ Market. With a few updates and some new programs, Houston’s Farmers’ Market could be a major economic power in the city.
RECOMMENDATION The Farmers’ Market should develop and use social media websites such as Facebook and Twitter, as well as traditional signage, to advertise hours of operation and products. The proposed Indoor Farmers Market and Culinary Kitchen will widen the operating months and the available products of the Farmers’ Market. Beginning a Co-op program that travels to other communities’ markets will allow the Farmers’ Market to expand its customer base and also begin the process of exporting goods.
CONCERN: FUNDING A major concern expressed by the community is how to fund the projects proposed. Houston is small town with limited budget for community betterment projects. Funding is the first step toward realizing any of the projects proposed by CCS, or any project for that matter.
RECOMMENDATION The first way to raise funds is through applying for grants. Hiring a professional grant writer is probably the best option, unless someone in the community with experience is willing to write pro bono. Seeking out particular foundations that are tailored to the specific project requiring funds is also an option. The city should also try to expand the tax base by attempting to increase the amount of businesses, houses, and residents contributing to the taxes. Another option is to ask for donations, both from the current community and past residents that still have an interest in Houston.
INTRODUCTION
table of contents preface acknowledgments executive summary COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS RESOURCES
Additionally, many projects will need to leverage involvement as well as finances. The city should make every effort to engage and connect with the community. Developing a network of volunteers will offset cost, improve civic involvement, and lead to improved pride in the community. All these options are realistic ways to fund projects and should be pursued by the city or the specific committee working on the project.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
14 CONCERN: TOURISM Houston is not taking advantage of opportunities to increase tourism. There are many locations in Houston’s surrounding area that draw people from across the region; the city needs to increase efforts to pull these visitors in. Floating on the Current River, Piney River Brewing Company, and the Mark Twain National Forest are just a few examples of tourist destinations. One of the most underrated assets of Houston is US-76, the coast to coast bike route that passes through Houston. Currently, the route is not integrated into the city’s layout. Visiting transcontinental cyclists are not prompted to the communities assets.
INTRODUCTION
RECOMMENDATION Advertising these near-by attractions, creating physical links between assets, and building an identity of the city that reflects the values of a Heritage Tourism destination will help increase tourism. Capitalizing on the Mark Twain National Forest and integrating the natural environment into downtown Houston also creates a good environment for Heritage tourism. Building a unique identity for Houston, and correctly leveraging the traffic along US-63 begins to increase density while developing festivals and other events could increase tourism immensely. Providing more lodging options in anticipation of these visitors is also necessary.
Developing facilities for cyclists and clear signage directing the cyclists to camp sites, food, and other necessities is a very simple way to present a friendly, helpful appearance. Integrating and acknowledging the transcontinental route into the parks system will allow both residents and tourist to see the pathways through the city as an asset. Additional proposals are addressed in the West Side Park proposal.
I S S U E : S OCI AL CONCERN: ONLINE PRESENCE Houston’s current online presence is limited and not integrated with Heritage tourism attractions and amenities.
RECOMMENDATION Redesigning the main website in a clean and simple style with resources for potential tourists and residents is a high priority. Houston’s Facebook page should be revised as a tool for community outreach and activation. Certain Houston assets, like the Farmers’ Market, should also consider utilizing social media. Facebook and Twitter are easy ways to convey information to large amounts of people. Partnering with the school to create these updated online tools is a good way to involve students in the community.
15 CONCERN: NEW COMMUNITY ASSETS Lately, growth in Houston has been very slow. According to the last census report, Houston has only grown by approximately 100 people in the last 10 years. Without intervention, the population could begin to slowly decline as the younger generation moves away to larger communities that have more to offer.
RECOMMENDATIONS To get ahead of the eventual decline, Houston should take measures to integrate new community assets into the urban context. A few potential community assets CCS proposes are a Library and Regional Art Center, a Fabrication Lab, and a Community Center.
CONCERN: ACTIVITY ALONG GRAND While Houston has several successful local businesses, Grand Avenue has a high number of vacant buildings. Retailers and restaurants in the downtown area are suffering from the lack of business traffic.
RECOMMENDATION Incentives should be provided for the
creation of local businesses in the downtown area. The city should advocate for the renovation of second stories of downtown businesses into lofts. Providing living space is the best way to insure that people will utilize the downtown area.
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT Houston engages the city primarily through involvement with education and high school sports. The school acts as a hub for social activity, but it needs to do a better job of inter-generational connections by integrating students into the community. Additional opportunities need to be developed to expand engagement and decrease apathy toward the city.
INTRODUCTION
table of contents preface acknowledgments executive summary COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS RESOURCES
RECOMMENDATION Developing community events that students can take part in will increase overall community involvement and pride. Locating these events in or near the downtown when possible would also be beneficial to local businesses in that area. Possible events include reviving old festivals and starting new festivals or fairs. Encouraging student involvement in these community events could give students a higher appreciation of their town and might even begin to reverse rural drain.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
16 CONCERN: EDUCATIONAL CAMPUS The high school is currently undergoing construction, though there are still concerning aspects of the high school and middle school campus. The complex lacks a cohesive central space and also doesn’t have any fine arts facilities.
INTRODUCTION
RECOMMENDATION High schools and middle schools are very social environments, which need central social spaces. Closing off Pine Street to create a courtyard or quad-type space is one option. Turing the condemned fine arts building on the campus into a new fine arts facilities and connecting the high school and middle school with a student lounge is another way to develop the campus. Appropriate development of the educational campuses will also increase safety by managing traffic around the schools.
CONCERN: PINE STREET SOCIAL LINE Very early in the process, CCS identified Pine Street as a potential social corridor. With the proper development, Pine Street could become an important artery of Houston.
RECOMMENDATION Building the correct end-points to Pine Street is the first step towards creating an important social corridor. The two proposed social end-points, a courtyard at
the west end of Pine Street and the Community Center and Outdoor Theatre in Emmett Kelly Park at the east end, create points of social gathering spaces. Along the corridor, social centers such as the Library and Arts building, the Fab Lab and Farmers’ Market are proposed. These proposals along with renovating the street design could help Pine Street become the main social hub of Houston.
CONCERN: LIBRARY AND ART CENTER The current library in Houston is undersized and unable to expand any further where it is located. Many programs which could benefit the community are unavailable due to the lack of space. The city of Houston is also lacking a center for art, which the community could utilize.
RECOMMENDATION To resolve these two concerns, a combined Library and Regional Art Center is proposed on top of the current storm shelter. This dual function building will create unique social spaces like the roof-top terrace that over looks the Farmers Market. Gallery space, both interior and exterior, give the citizens of Houston a professional space to display and sell artwork. Multipurpose rooms could be used by the Library (as community meeting rooms), the Art Center (as a classroom for drawing or painting classes) and the school system.
17 CONCERN: ACTIVATING & CONNECTING PARKS The three main parks in Houston, while wellmaintained, are underutilized by the community. The most active of the three, West Side Park, contains the community pool. Rutherford Park is newly developed while Emmett Kelly Park has a great location with plenty of visual connection to the travelers along US-63. Additionally, the parks lack a unifying connection. Another underdeveloped Houston asset is the Brushy Creek Trail. The trail is currently less than a mile long, the starting point is somewhat hidden, and the trail dead-ends at the creek.
RECOMMENDATION To increase the number of visitors, people need a reason to visit the parks. A welcome and recreation center will take advantage of Emmett Kelly’s location, while a safe-skate park and enlarged sports complex will transform Rutherford Park into complex for revenue-earning soccer tournaments. These options could increase park traffic from both the local community and from visitors to Houston. Expanding the trail system in relation to the parks should be a priority. Connecting the trail to the Emmett Kelly and the proposed
linear park network is the most logical way to expand the trail. An expanded and well developed trail network is also a safer way for children to travel across the city.
INTRODUCTION
table of contents preface acknowledgments executive summary
I S S U E : E N V I RO N ME N TA L CONCERN: SUSTAINABILITY Sustainable development, as defined by CCS, is any development that finds a balance between environmental, social, and financial considerations. Currently, Houston largely lacks a sustainable outlook and image.
COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS RESOURCES
RECOMMENDATION The LED street lights on US-63 are a good starting point and the community should continue to strive for sustainable design in buildings and infrastructure. This, along with sustainable community guidelines would make the city more progressive, economically stable, efficient, and appealing to potential residents. Implementing LEED certification into construction, renovating streets and parking lots using low impact designs, and integrating recycling bins into community spaces are all good ways to promote sustainability within Houston.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
COMMUNITY RESEARCH
20
H I S T O RY O F H O U S T O N GENERAL HISTORY
COMMUNITY RESEARCH
As seen in Fig 1.1.1, Houston is located in the center of Texas county in lower central Missouri. Texas county was once home to several Native American tribes such as the Shawnee, Delaware, Paola, and Piankashaw. The first white settler was Edward Jennings from North Carolina in 1770. Most early settlers came from Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, and North and South Carolina, though some came from Indiana, Illinois, Ohio, and even Germany. Originally, timber brought people to the area due to the number of oaks and pines in the region. In 1816 people began to establish mills along the many rivers in the area (Fig. 1.1.2). While many of the farmers had small crops, they mostly depended on the wild fruits, berries, turkey, and deer for their food.
Houston, Missouri
Fig. 1.1.1 - Context Map - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Houston,_Missouri
In 1843 the population had grown enough to demand the need for a separate county. The area was named Ashley County. In 1845, Ashley County was renamed Texas County, after the largest state at the time. Houston was founded by men in the surrounding counties who were placed in charge of choosing where the county seat of Texas County should be.
Fig. 1.1.2 - Alley Spring Mill - http://images.fineartamerica.com/images-medium-large-5/alley-spring-mill-gregory-ballos.jpg
county justice center on North Grand Avenue in Houston. Open houses and tours are also planned at the justice center, the 21 county jail, as well as the Texa INTRODUCTION County Administrative Center which recently underwent majo COMMUNITY RESEARCH renovations. At 1 p.m. the battle of Texa County, history a Civil War reenactment begins of at the Houston Area Cham points interest ber of Commerce on North U.S. 63 demographics Activities are planned for two days A special section appears in thi COMMUNITY MEETINGS week’s Herald. Dedication of the Texas County PROPOSALS Law Enforcement Memorial is Sat
CIVIL WAR HISTORY At the start of the Civil War there were very few slave owners in Texas county. The county was split between the Confederacy and the Union. About one third of the population wanted to join the Confederacy, but the majority could not bring themselves to leave the Union. Due to the prime location between Rolla and Springfield, the Union set up in the Houston Courthouse. This caused some smaller skirmishes and brought about the burning of the majority of Houston, including the Courthouse. In one of these smaller skirmishes the union troops captured over one hundred men in Houston. The Tweed house (Fig. 1.1.3), is the last house still standing from the Civil War Era.
RESOURCES Fig. 1.1.3 - Tweed House - http://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/houstonherald.com/content/tncms/ The Tweed House is the only structure surviving the Civil War in assets/v3/editorial/6/8a/68ac0aa4-d6de-11df-9cbe-001cc4c03286/4cb5cfee948cc.pdf.pdf Houston. It is situated near Hawthorn Avenue and Airport Road.
Much like the rest of the south, Texas County nearly became a ghost of its former self due to the destruction of nearly every town in the county. But out of the ashes several new towns such as Cabool, Plato and Summerville were founded and join Houston to make up Texas County.
Activities begin at noon Saturda sealed to be opened in 100 year
AN,FATHER returns HO US TO M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 1.1.4 - Texas County Court House - http://www.ozarkscivilwar.org/regions/texas
from military serv to surprise his daughter at Hous
22 EMMETT KELLY
COMMUNITY RESEARCH
Emmett Kelly was born in Sedan, KS in 1898 and later moved to Houston, Missouri, his boyhood town. He eventually became “America’s Favorite Clown.” After he rose to fame, Houston was quick to claim Emmett Kelly as their own, and even named a park after him in 1975. Houston started hosting the Emmett Kelly Clown Festival every year in the park, but recently the festival has been put on hold. For a while, Emmett Kelly’s grandson, Joey Kelly, returned to Houston for every festival to reprise his grandfather’s role. With new proposals for the park containing a visitors and community center, Houston could honor Emmett Kelly by more than just naming the park after him. Following the lead of Sedan, Houston could build either a sculpture or gallery with some historical pieces. Emmett Kelly days could also make another appearance, but hold more of a broad theme. Rather than just clowns, Houston could host a general festival to attract more visitors.
Fig. 1.2.5 - Photograph of Emmett Kelly in the 1950’s http://masters964.rssing.com/chan-20365312/latest.php
Fig. 1.2.6 - Photograph of What Emmett Kelly Park Looks Like Today - http://www.houstonmo.org/parks.html
23 INTRODUCTION
MELBA THEATRE
COMMUNITY RESEARCH
Melba Theatre has been a very important part of social culture in Houston since it opened in 1938. Even in the late 1890’s, Houston was a center for what were once called “Nickelodeons” (movies that cost one nickel). It showed its last movie in 1980, and has been used for storage ever since.
history points of interest demographics
COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS RESOURCES
The excitement surrounding the Melba Theatre in the 50’s, 60’s and 70’s could easily be brought back to Houston if it were to be reopened. Currently, the Melba Theatre is on track to be renovated and reopened, once again becoming a social hub for downtown Houston. This presents a huge opportunity for Houston, and downtown specifically, to bring the Melba Theatre back as more socially engaging and educational than just a movie theater. The new theater could host programs for all ages of students, play movies, hold practice for performing arts, and many other activities. Being known for more than movies would also make Melba Theatre, and thus Houston, a destination for surrounding towns as well.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 1.2.7 - Image of the Melba Theater in the 1950’s - http://www. melbaperformingartscenter.com/portfolio/melba-opens-in-1938/
Fig. 1.2.8 - Image of a Page from the Houston Herald in 1938 - http://www.melbaperformingartscenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Melba-
series.pdf
24
POINTS OF INTEREST 1 AIRPORT The Houston Memorial Airport is located on the northwest side of Houston. It serves mostly small passenger planes and agricultural aircraft.
2 R-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT
2
10,000
2
3 4 5
The school community is one of the biggest and most important communities of Houston. Parents feel comfortable and happy to raise their kids in Houston and take pride in the school system. The school system also creates opportunities for employment. The schools of Houston play the important role of developing the community of Houston.
Fig. 1.3.2 - School Logo- http://www.houston.k12.mo.us/
0
COMMUNITY RESEARCH
1
Houston has the largest school district in the county with an enrollment of about 1,100 students. The Houston R-1 school district has been accredited with distinction by the state of Missouri for nine years in a row. The campuses, located on Pine Street and Ozark Street near downtown Houston, consist of middle school, high school, and elementary school. They have a variety of organizations and clubs that encourage students to be involved.
Fig. 1.3.1 - Points of Interest Map 1
25 3 FARMERS’ MARKET AND THE LONE STAR PLAZA The Lone Star Plaza and the Farmers’ Market are located on the corner of Grand Avenue and Pine Street. The plaza, which is named for the mill where Houston’s first electricity was generated, is used for performances and outdoor activities, as well as the Farmers’ Market. A copper canopy was added to The Lone Star Plaza in December 2011 to provide a covered space for the market. The Houston Farmers’ Market at The Lone Star Plaza is held on Tuesday, Fridays and some Saturdays. The market is made up of member-vendors from Texas County and adjacent counties not-to-exceed 50 miles from Houston in south central Missouri. Several members now have green houses, high tunnels, and plans to grow and sell produce year-round. The Farmers’ Market for this community should be further developed for growth in Houston. This would help their economy as well as their quality of life. The Lone Star Plaza and the Farmers’ Market could become social hubs of Houston’s downtown space.
4 FORBES Forbes Pharmacy, on the corner of Pine Street and Grand Avenue, is run by Walgreens. It has soda fountains and a pharmacy, which attract kids and make it a unique social venue for the downtown.
Fig. 1.3.5 - Forbes Pharmacy
5 MELBA THEATER
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH
history points of interest demographics
COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS RESOURCES
The Melba Theater is on Grand Avenue in the historic downtown district of Houston. It was opened in 1938 and has been vacant since 1980. There is a project for the restoration of the Melba Theatre as a center piece of the historic district. The restored Melba Theatre should function as multi-use theatre for performance and as a movie theatre. It should build opportunities for the school and the community. This project will promote the development of the downtown as well as the economy, culture, and identity of Houston. It will also bring people back to the downtown area.
FIg. 1.3.3 - Farmers Market-
http://farmersmarkettown.com/HoustonMissouriFarmersMarket
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 1.3.4 - Lone Star Plaza-
https://houstonherald.wordpress.com/tag/bobby-amburn/
Fig. 1.3.6 - Melba Theater-
http://www.melbaperformingartscenter.com/
26 6 EMMET KELLY PARK
Emmet Kelly Park, located along US-63, has picnic and playground areas for community activities. This park was dedicated to Emmett Kelly Sr., known as “Weary Willie,” the world famous clown, who was raised on a farm east of Houston. Emmet Kelly Park is in a valley between Houston’s downtown and US-63. The park is the most public and visitor-friendly park for Houston citizens.
10,000
6
8
9 10 8 11
Fig. 1.3.8 - Emmet Kelly Parkhttp://www.houstonmo.org/parks.html
7 BRUSHY CREEK TRAIL Brushy Creek Trail was improved for walking and hiking, and is about a quarter mile long. This trail begins at the Houston visitors center and runs parallel to Brushy Creek.
0
COMMUNITY RESEARCH
7
Fig. 1.37 - Points of Interest Map 2
Fig. 1.3.9 - Brushy Creek Trail http://www.houstonmo.org/parks.html
27 8 TEXAS COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL Texas Country Memorial Hospital (TCMH), located along US-63, provides for the healthcare needs of Texas County and surrounding areas as a county owned, non-profit hospital. The hospital is recognized as a leader in cutting-edge medical technology in Houston and the surrounding area. The hospital also provides job opportunities and is one of the primary employers for Texas County. It works as a social place as well. This hospital gives citizen the sense of safety and security while living in Houston.
9 FRANCHISE STORES The franchise stores in Houston are primarily located on US-63. The franchise restaurants are frequently used by citizens as well as visitors because of reasonable prices and easy-quick meals. Today, these locations are also social places.
Fig. 1.3.12 - Pizza Hut Logo - http://logos.wikia.com/
Fig. 1.3.13 - Mc Donald’s
FIg. 1.3.14 - Sonic Logo -
Fig. 1.3.15 - Hardee’s Logo -
wiki/izza_Hut
Fig. 1.3.10 - Texas County Memorial Hospital-
http://www.ozarkareanetwork.com/localnews/tcmh-to-acceptapplications-for-youth-ambassador-program/
10 WALMART Walmart, located along US-63, is the biggest store in Houston. It is the primary source for resources like food, clothing, and household items. It is one of the most frequently visited places for citizens of the city. Walmart acts as the center of Houston based solely on frequency of use and density of the population.
Fig. 1.3.11 - Walmart Logo -
https://img.grouponcdn.com/coupons/ svWS786jtP7X3Y2JHsBTRQ/walmart_com-500x500
http://www.responselabs.com/ portfolio/sonic-drive-in/
11 US-63/US-17
http://imgarcade.com/1/mcdonalds2014-logo/
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH
history points of interest demographics
COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS RESOURCES
http://www.grayflannelsuit.net/blog/ the-evolution-of-fast-food-logos-burgerchains
US-63, running from Louisiana to Wisconsin, is a major thoroughfare in Houston. US-17, from Eldon, Missouri to Arkansas, is the other major highway running from west to southeast through Houston. More than 16,000 vehicles pass through the intersection of the two major highways daily. US-63 is increasing to five lanes in near future. The two roads have the most commercial development. While there is density in vehicle circulation, there is relatively no path. These two roads are key pathways to bring visitors into Houston as well as lead to downtown area.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
28
DEMOGRAPHICS
COMMUNITY RESEARCH
POPULATION
AGE
DENSITY
Fig. 1.4.3 - Density - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri. html#b
Fig. 1.4.2 - Age - http://www.city-data.com/
Fig. 1.4.1 - Population - http://www.
city/Houston-Missouri.html#b
city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b
ANCESTRY
Fig. 1.4.4 - Ancestry - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b
RELATIONSHIPS
Fig. 1.4.5 - Relationships - http://www.city-data.com/city/
Houston-Missouri.html#b
29 EDUCATION
CHURCH AFFILIATIONS
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH
history points of interest demographics
COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS RESOURCES
Fig. 1.4.6 - Education - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b
ETHNICITIES
Fig. 1.4.7 - Church Affiliations - http://www.city-data.
com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b
MOST COMMON LAST NAMES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 1.4.8 - Ethnicities - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b
Fig. 1.4.9 - Most Common Last Names - http://www.city-data.
com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b
30 GROWTH RATES
Fig. 1.4.10 - Growth Rates in Houston from 2010-2019 - http://www.city-data.com/city/Hous-
COMMUNITY RESEARCH
ton-Missouri.html#b
MOST COMMON FEMALE OCCUPATIONS
Fig. 1.4.11 - Most Common Occupations for Women in Houston - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri. html#b
As seen by the following statistics, Houston has been experiencing a decline in growth rates for population, households, and families. Predictions for growth from 2014-2019 are significantly lower than growth from the 2010-2014 period. The most common industries vary from male to female, but healthcare and retail are present in both categories. Our goal is to increase job opportunities for Houston and inspire the growth of the community.
31 MOST COMMON MALE INDUSTRIES
MOST COMMON FEMALE INDUSTRIES
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH
Fig. 1.4.12 - Most Common Industries for Men in Houston - http://www. city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b
Fig. 1.4.13 - Most Common Industries for Women in Houston http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b
MOST COMMON MALE OCCUPATIONS
history points of interest demographics
COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 1.4.14 - Most Common Occupations for Men in Houston - http://www.city-data.com/
city/Houston-Missouri.html#b
32 HOUSING
HOUSEHOLDS Total Households
956 Family Households
COMMUNITY RESEARCH
564 Average Household Size
2.13 Average Family Size
3 Fig. 1.4.16 - Houston Household Statistics - http://www.city-da-
ta.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b
Fig. 1.4.15 - Houston Housing Units Percentages - http://
www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b
The demographics above further emphasize the need to address housing in our design proposals. Owner occupied housing units are more common than rental, but the amount of vacant housing units is alarming for a town of Houston’s size. While the average household size is 2.13, the average family is three members, leading to another issue that should be addressed in our proposals.
33 COST OF LIVING INDEX
INTRODUCTION
INCOME
COMMUNITY RESEARCH
Houston Average
85
50
history points of interest demographics
COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS RESOURCES
National Average
Fig. 1.4.17 - National vs. Houston Cost of Living Averages - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b
Both the average income and cost of living for Houston are significantly lower than the national averages. As a result, our design proposals seek to create more job and career possibilities and improve existing opportunities. We seek to improve the economy in Houston through both commercial and local businesses. In turn, more jobs will be created and the opportunity to raise yearly income will increase. Fig. 1.4.18 - National vs. State vs. Houston Income Values ta.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b
http://www.city-da-
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
36
P R E L I M I N A RY V I S I T
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
We had our first site visit to Houston, Missouri from August 22nd to the 24th. The main purpose for this visit was to develop our understanding of the context, natural environment, and tourism potential of the area as well as the community of Houston, including their needs and wants. OVERVIEW OF PRELIMINARY VISIT • Houston Football Game • Houston Bus Tour • First Community Meeting • Piney River Brewing Company • Float Trip on the Current River During the high school football game on the first day, we got to observe the strong school community as well as enjoy a performance by the high school marching band. The Houston bus tour took us to major places, such as the Houston Memorial Airport, R-1school district, Justice Center, Brushy Creek Trail, residential areas, and the downtown area. Also, we visited Texas County Memorial Hospital for a tour and discussion of their role in the community.
Fig. 2.1.1 - A Visit to Downtown
A visit to the Piney River Brewing company and a float trip on the Current River were great experiences to get to know the assets of the area. The main event for this preliminary visit was our first community meeting with the members of the Visioning Committee, city officials, and other community members. It was an great opportunity to hear citizens’ thoughts and perspectives for Houston, as well as introducing our design team. THE 1ST COMMUNITY MEETING • Cookie Punch Social • Map Exercise • Assets and Challenge Exercise • Introduction
Fig. 2.1.3 - High School Football Game
At the Cookie Punch Social, we asked several questions of the people in this meeting, including their employment and the reason they settled in Houston. For the Map exercises, we asked the community to draw a map of Houston. This allowed our design team the opportunity to understand how they recognize Houston.
Fig. 2.1.4 - High School Football Game
Fig. 2.1.2 - Piney River Brewing Company -
Fig. 2.1.5 - Float Trip on the Current River
http://kcbeerscouts.com/bar-hunting/a-pint-in-a-barn-at-piney-riverbrewing/
37 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
The Assets and Challenges Exercise asked participants to consider what they felt was positive and negative about Houston. The results are shown in Figures 2.1.6 and 2.1.8 below. Through this entire visit, we were able to communicate with many people from Houston, and in turn, learn about Houston and its community. We used this information as a resource for our project. The active participants and honest opinions helped us consider and analyze Houston’s problems and helped guide us in the right direction for this project.
Fig. 2.1.7 - The First Community Meeting
ASSETS
ASSETS
NITY AND PEOPLE
SUPPORTIVE COMMUNITY AND PEOPLE
URE RECREATION
NATURE RECREATION
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
MORIAL HOSPITAL
TEXAS COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
SIRE TO IMPROVE
DESIRE TO IMPROVE
TY GOVERNMENT
CITY GOVERNMENT
LOCATION
LOCATION
MORIAL AIRPORT
HOUSTON MEMORIAL AIRPORT
AS COUNTY SEAT
TEXAS COUNTY SEAT
INFRASTRCTURE
INFRASTRCTURE
OW COST LIVING
LOWER TAXES/ LOW COST LIVING
US-63 AND US-17
US-63 AND US-17
BER AVAILABILITY
LUMBER AVAILABILITY
LOCAL STORE
LOCAL STORE
RICULTURE LAND
AGRICULTURE LAND
FAST FOOD
FAST FOOD
ARMERS MARKET
FARMERS MARKET
F ORGANIZATION
VARIETY OF ORGANIZATION
ORGANIZATION
ACTIVE CIVIC ORGANIZATION
ECTIVE OFFICALS
ELECTIVE OFFICALS
IZEN PROGRAMS
SENIOR ZITIZEN PROGRAMS
JAIL
JAIL
LIBRARY
LIBRARY
0
2
4
6
8
10
12 0 14 2 16 4
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
CHALLENGES
CHALLENGES
JOB / EMPLOYMENT JOB / EMPLOYMENT HOUSING HOUSING SHOP/ SMALL BUSINESS SHOP/ SMALL BUSINESS EDUCATION EDUCATION ECONOMY ECONOMY HEALTH CARE HEALTH CARE POPULATION POPULATION CLOSED MIND/ INABILITY TO MAKE A DECISION CLOSED MIND/ INABILITY TO MAKE A DECISION MAINTAINANCE OF CUREENT OLD BUILDINGSMAINTAINANCE OF CUREENT OLD BUILDINGS FINE ART SUPPORT FINE ART SUPPORT POOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT POOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT LACK OF PROGRESSIVE THOUGHT LACK OF PROGRESSIVE THOUGHT FESTIVAL FESTIVAL ACTIVITIES FOR YOUNG PEOPLE ACTIVITIES FOR YOUNG PEOPLE ENTERTAINMENT ENTERTAINMENT NEW SCHOOL BUILDING NEW SCHOOL BUILDING EDUCATION FOR ADULTS EDUCATION FOR ADULTS ASSISTED LIVING ASSISTED LIVING TECHNICAL TRAINING TECHNICAL TRAINING TECHONLOGY TECHONLOGY SMALL BUS SMALL BUS DRIVING TRAFFIC DRIVING TRAFFIC HIGHWAY HIGHWAY ACCESSIBILITY ACCESSIBILITY POVERTY LEVEL POVERTY LEVEL REASON TO STAY IN HOUSTON REASON TO STAY IN HOUSTON LACK OF VISION LACK OF VISION NO UNIQUE IDENTITY NO UNIQUE IDENTITY REVITALIZATION OF DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION OF DOWNTOWN WHITE CLOTH DINING WHITE CLOTH DINING MEAT MARKET MEAT MARKET WISE USE OF MONEY WISE USE OF MONEY LIMITED WINTER ACTIVITIES LIMITED WINTER ACTIVITIES ADULT RECREATION ADULT RECREATION AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM COMMUNITY COLLEGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE COMMUNITY BUILDING COMMUNITY BUILDING LOW INCOME LOW INCOME NEEDS OF INDUSTRIAL NEEDS OF INDUSTRIAL
WORK ENVIRONMENT
K ENVIRONMENT
6
8
10
12
14
Fig. 2.1.6 - Assets -Results from Asset and Challenge Exercise
16
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
0
2
4
6
8
10
12 0 14 2 16 4 18 6
Fig. 2.1.8 - Challenges - Result from Asset and Challenge Exercise
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 8
10
12
2 0164 018 V I S I O N I N G
14
AREA 5%
WALMART 40%
SCHOOL 25%
IDENTITY WORKSHOP
PARK 5%
The goal for this workshop in meeting two was to develop the culture and identity of Houston by giving the community an opportunity to build empathy as a citizen, family member, and community member. We had three different sessions with five to six people each. We asked six questions focusing on how the citizens think and recognize Houston among themselves as well as from other people outside Houston. Fig 2.2.3 shows the total data from each of these questions, which are used for the analysis on the map. The square points indicate each of the places that were answers to these questions, and the colored areas indicate the areas relating to active places. Fig 2.2.1 consists of results from Questions 1, 4, and 6 and shows the observations of the people of Houston. Fig 2.2.2 consists of the results from Questions 1, 2, and 5 and explains the citizens’ observations of the active areas for the people from
outside of Houston.
MC DONALD 2FORBES 5 6%% PINEY RIVER BREWING COMPANY 6%
SCHOOL 5%
MILLER’S GRILL 6%
HOSPITAL 5%
OUTDOOR RECREATION 3 5E % FA R M RS MARKET 21%
COMMUNITY 4%
FA R M E R S MARKET 11%
WALMART 42%
What we learned from Fig 2.2.1: • The activated areas for the citizens are focused around the school, downtown, and Walmart. MILLER’S GRILL • They are most proud of the area around 21% Farmers’ Market and the school • Emmet Kelly Park is their daily socializing place. CHURCH 11%
Q1.What do you like the most in Houston?
FARMERS MARKET 5% DOWNTOWNSCHOOL PARK 5% AREA 5% 5%
What we learned from Fig 2.2.2: • The active space for the people from outside of Q2. What single WALMART SCHOOL Houston is along to US-63. %A Rdo place W A4 L0 M T most 25% 42% • The darkest area could be the most influential people picture when they think of area if it is developed. HOSPITAL 5%
FA R M E R S MARKET 11%
CHURCH 11%
M CM D I LOL N E RA ’LSD 2 G 5R % ILL 21%
Houston?
What we learned from Figures 2.2.1 and 2.2.2: • The active area for the people from the outside of Houston and the active area for the citizens F A R M E R S MARKET are adjacent, and only slightly overlap. 21%
H O S P IS TC A H OL O L 1 2 % 8% COURT HOE U SME M E T 8%
COURT HOUSE 8%
FARMERS MARKET 5%
Q4. Where do the citizens of Houston gather to socialize?
DOWNTOWN AREA 5%
WALMART C4I T0 Y%
FA I T H B A S E D
SC OC MHMOU NOI TLY % 2 153 %
H O S P I TA L 12%
EMMET K E L LY PA R K 13%
10,000
10,000
COMMUNITY 4%
COURT HOUSE 8% JUSTICE CENTER 8% FA I T H B A S E D COMMUNITY 13%
Q5.Where do you see people from outside of Houston?
FA R M E R S MARKET 21%
H O S P I TA L 12%
MILLA GRIL 11%
CITY HALL 13%
EMMET K E L LY PA R K 13%
FORBES 6%
PINEY RIVER BREWING COMPANY 6%
MILLER’S GRILL 6%
OUTDOOR RECREATION 35%
H O S P I TA L 12% EMMET KELLY PA R K 18%
DRIVE-IN THEATER 5%
WALMART 17%
FAIR GROUND 5%
PA R K 3%
FORBES DRUG STORE 11%
SCHOOL 42%
MILLAR’S GRILL 11%
CHURCH 21% PARK 5%
SCHOOL 5%
MILLE GR 6%
HOSPITAL 5% SCHOOL PARK 5% 5%
MILLER
F HOSPITAL ARMERS M A5% RKET 11%
SCHOOL 8%
FORBE DRUG ST 11%
WALMART H O S P I TA L 17% 12%
FA I T H B A S E D COMMUNITY 13%
HALL 13%
MC DONALD 25%
PA R 3%
KELLY
J U S T I CPE A R K C E N T E R1 8 % 8%
COMMUNITY 4%
SCHOOL 8%
JUSTICE CENTER 8%
FAIR GROUND FA R SC H 5% CM H EURRDRIVE-IN THEATER M A R 1K 1E % T 5%
1 1P A%R K 3%
H OGRIL SP 6%2 1
WALMART 42%
HOSP 12
WALMART 42%
C H U R C HM
ILLER’S GRILL 21% SCHOOL MILLER’S 42% MILLAR’S G R I L L GRILL 21%
E
FO ES 1 R1B% DRUG STORE 11%
11%
EMMET K E L LY PA R K 13%
CITY HALL 13%
Q6. Where is the “center“ of Houston?
CHURCH 21% FARMERS MARKET 5% DOWNTOWN AREA 5% FARMERS MARKET 5% DOWNTOWN AREA 5%
SCHOOL 25%
WALMART 40%
WALMART 40%
SCHOOL 25%
MC DONALD 25%
0
0
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
38
Fig. 2.2.1 - The Observation of the People of Houston
Fig. 2.2.2 - The Citizens Observation of Visitors
MC DONALD
25% Fig. 2.2.3 - Results of Workshop
COMMUNITY 4%
SCHOOL 8%
P
FA R M E R S
MARKET COURT COMMUNITY 21% HOUSE 4% 8S%C H O O L 8% F A RMERS JUSTICE M A RH KOES TP I T A CCEONUTRE TR 8% 2 1 %1 2 % HO USE 8%
FOR DRUG P1A 3
L
MIL FOR GR
39 Fig 2.2.4 consists of the results of Question 3 and the citizens’ opinions in the discussion. It indicates the areas and places that they seek to develop, and shows possibilities that could be characteristics of Houston. • •
Natural recreational activities, like rivers and parks, are listed as attractions for visitors as well as citizens of Houston. They hope that downtown, not Walmart or McDonald’s could become the center of Houston.
Walmart is needed by people from outside of Houston as well as people from Houston, therefore shifting the current center of Houston will be a difficult but important process.
All of these three different areas are important areas to develop the future identity and culture of Houston. Some assets or thresholds might help to convey a sense of Houston through one’s experience at the entrance to the city. This workshop developed our understandings of the citizens’ needs, attentions, preferences, and habits both objectively and subjectively. A possible problem might be how to direct visitors to the assets of Houston, and how to both use and develop the under-developed areas.
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
10,000
10,000
Fig 2.2.5 shows the most influential and develop-able areas, which includes the space between Walmart and the Downtown area. The three different areas include the influential, supportive, and leading areas. Introducing the
main social community spaces as well as new programs into the influential areas will help to develop not only the city itself, but also restore their identity. A supportive area works as a social community space by taking initiatives from their supportive Christian community. Leading areas will be areas that provide some experiences of the identity of Houston and lead to the downtown area.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 0
0
2040 VISIONING
Fig. 2.2.4 - Seek of Development
Fig. 2.2.5 - Influential Map
40
H E R I TA G E T O U R I S M W O R K S H O P
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
WHY HERITAGE TOURISM? •
Heritage tourism focuses on cultural heritage.
•
It involves traveling to new places to experience the artifacts and activities that represent the stories of the past.
•
Heritage tourism can include cultural, historic, and natural resources.
•
It is the fastest growing sector of the tourism industry because there has been an increase in the amount of tourists who seek adventure, culture, history, and interaction with local people.
•
The overall purpose is to gain an appreciation of the past while experiencing local people and local culture.
•
Profits from heritage tourism include: •
A positive social, environmental, and economic impact
•
Establishing and enforcing identity
•
Facilitating harmony and understanding among people
•
Supporting culture and renewing tourism Fig. 2.3.1 - Components of Heritage Tourism and Their Impact
THE BENEFITS Cultural heritage tourism can have a tremendous economic impact on local economies. A wellmanaged tourism program improves the quality of life as residents take advantage of the services and attractions tourism adds. It promotes community pride, which grows as people work together to develop a thriving tourist industry. An area that develops its potential for cultural heritage tourism creates new opportunities for tourists to gain an understanding of an unfamiliar place, people, or time. With the arrival of visitors, comes new opportunities for preservation. Well-interpreted sites teach visitors of their importance, and by extension,
the importance of preserving other such sites elsewhere.
increased tourism does not destroy the very qualities that attract visitors in the first place.
Perhaps the biggest benefit of cultural heritage tourism is the increase in opportunities for diversified economies. The community prospers economically while holding on to the characteristics that make it special.
Because tourism is a highly sophisticated, fastchanging industry, it presents its own challenges. Challenges result not only from visitor impact on infrastructure–roads, airports, water supplies, and other public services–but also from visitor expectations of products and services.
THE CHALLENGES When a community’s heritage is the substance of what it offers visitors, protecting that heritage is essential. So a major challenge in cultural heritage tourism programs is ensuring that
Tourism is essentially a service industry, which means it depends on the competence of people in many different jobs and locations. Tourism, while not a solution, is an attractive form of economic development.
41 WORKSHOP For the first exercise, community members were asked to look at a list of activities offered in or near Houston. These activities included anything from outdoor recreation, such as float trips, state parks, and wildlife, to local businesses, such as the Melba Theatre or the Texas County Memorial Hospital. Those participating in the workshop were asked to consider each opportunity as a social, environmental, or economic effect on Houston. Some activities could easily be classified into more than one category. Wineries and breweries, for example, could be viewed as both a valuable social and economic impact. Each group was given one “score card,” and asked to discuss options as a group. As a result, great group discussions took place, and notes were taken to document the conversation.
The second exercise involved looking at the same list of activities and directly applying them to Houston. Participants were asked to consider each activity as either a strength or opportunity of Houston. Strengths are the areas of Houston that are already successful. Opportunities are the areas that could be further developed. If a certain activity was classified as an opportunity, participants were asked to consider what assets Houston has in order to move forward in that area. Once again, each group was given one “score card.” Out of the three different groups to attend the workshop, the last group ran out of time to complete the last activity. However, several points were brought up in the overall discussion that matched the views of the previous two groups.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 2.3.2 - Activity 1 Score Card
Fig. 2.3.3 - Activity 2 Score Card
42 RESULTS
The images to the left are categorized by color to show the intensity of the participants’ votes. Activities voted low for their possible social, environmental, and economic impact on Houston are shown in dark red. Activities voted high for their possible impact are shown in a light pink.
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
Below is a list of the activities organized into four general categories: local business, traditions, commercial business, and the natural environment. There are three totals listed: the level of impact (whether social, environmental, or economic), and the amount of strength votes and opportunity votes. All of three groups’ votes were compiled into one overall total. LOCAL BUSINESS Impact: 33 Strength: Downtown Melba Theatre Breweries
5
Opportunity: 11 Local food Bed & breakfasts Farmers market
TRADITIONS Impact: 10 Strength: 0 Festivals Town history COMMERCIAL BUSINESS Impact: 15 Strength: 5 Motels Interstate 63 County Hospital
Opportunity: 4 Fig. 2.3.4 - Impact Totals from Activity 1
Most groups were short on time for the strengths versus opportunities exercise and therefore did not list many assets next to the activities. However, several thoughts came forth in the discussions.
Opportunity: 4
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Impact: 93 Strength: 15 Opportunity: 22 Rivers Float trips Bike routes State forests Campgrounds Fishing Hunting Hiking trails Wildlife Walking trails Springs Agriculture State parks Town gardens
The third group didn’t have time to start this activity, so the totals only include votes from groups 1 and 2. As with the first chart, the darker or more intense the color, the more critical attention needed, or the less votes given. Fig. 2.3.5 - Strengths/Opportunities Totals from Activity 2
43 DISCUSSION NOTES Below are the notes taken during the discussions of each group. Most groups seemed to come to the same conclusions. For example, minimal signage and lodging opportunities for bikers, or lack of recognition for local outdoor activities. Only three groups participated in the workshop, but afterwards, several members contributed their views towards heritage tourism. The notes from those conversations are listed under group 4.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
GROUP 1 • Need for campgrounds • Downtown improvements • “No hiking trails” comments • Used to have signage to welcome bikers • How to better welcome hunters – meal specials?
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
GROUP 2 • Bikers love the pool - opportunities to cool off/take showers • Opportunity for a campground near Dogs Bluff • Family trips to the springs • Emmett Kelly Festival – no longer in operation • Don’t realize state forests • 63 – “Is it going to stay here?” • Didn’t know about the expansion • Love the LED lit highway - good feeling when entering Houston GROUP 3 • Bikers camp out at the pool’s pavilion - need campgrounds for them • Shooting range attraction • Outsiders recognize the springs more than the locals • Montauk is most recognized (*as a whole*) • The Narrows natural area • “The Narrows is awesome.” “Where is it?” • Town history – first opportunity mentioned • Outdoor activities aren’t capitalized here, we send people out GROUP 4 (POST-WORKSHOP DISCUSSIONS) • First Annual Piney River Days festival • “Buddy of mine is building lodging for bikers”
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
Fig. 2.3.6 - Totals in Categories from Activity 1 and Activity 2
Above is a breakdown of the totals for the four categories. The first diagram represents the various levels of impact (social, environmental, or economic), and the second represents the levels of strengths and opportunities per category.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
44
U R B A N S PAC E W O R K S H O P This introductory workshop with the community focused on urban space and how it functions within central Houston. Rather than presenting on boards, a model showed this area and the community members were asked to think about possible proposals and which locations would be most beneficial to Houston. Some groups used string on the model to connect and show existing spaces and how they relate to new proposals, or even other existing spaces. These proposal options included: downtown corporate business, art gallery, retail, housing, meat market, new parks, annual festival,
art walk, high school events, charity run, adult social events, downtown local business, recreational center, and continuing education. Some of these new proposals are physical spaces while others are social activities, but both are feasible assets that could be brought to Houston. This workshop took those options and went a step beyond theoretical possibilities by applying them to a model. This allowed community members to picture the possibilities within the broader urban context of Houston.
Fig. 2.4.3 - Second Group to Utilize the Workshop
The two cards to the left are what the community members used to pick 3-5 opportunities that they would like to see for Houston.
Fig. 2.4.1 - Front of “Opportunity” Cards Used in Workshop
Fig. 2.4.2 - Back of “Opportunity” Cards Used in Workshop
45 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
Figure 2.4.4 represents what the model for this workshop showed the design team. The red circles symbolize existing locations deemed important to connect to new proposals, or even other existing spaces that need to be connected. The three larger circles represent the high school, Texas County Memorial Hospital, and Grand Avenue (downtown). These three areas were discussed in all three groups that participated in the workshop. The three smaller circles represent topics that were only discussed or brought up briefly in one or two groups, and include the assisted living center, US Bike Route 76, and City Hall. The workshop produced many discussions about new opportunities for Houston and their possible locations within Houston. The first group discussed the assisted living center and it’s access to groceries and medications, and more specifically, Walmart. According to the first group, any new housing proposals should be located near US63 to be easily accessible to necessary amenities. The second group mainly focused on the high school and its access to sports centers and complexes. Houston sports teams have to travel to other towns and cities if they want to participate in tournaments and games. The current high school track is not regulation size, so a sports complex was important to this group, especially one in close proximity to the school district. The third and final group dealt with housing and what should be the best solution to a very complicated problem. Pros and cons were given to locating the new housing district near downtown and closer to the current residential district. The other topic discussed was the missed asset along US Bike Route 76. This transcontinental bike trail goes straight through Houston, and the conversation dealt with how Houston could utilize the 1000-1500 cyclists that travel through every year.
Fig. 2.4.4 - Representation of First Physical Model and Compilation of Data from Workshop
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
Common themes were present in all three groups that participated in the workshop. What was discussed between all of the community members was the idea that proposals should not simply add a new component to the urban fabric, but rather work in conjunction with existing spaces: a new sports complex should allow for students to stay in town for practice and tournaments, but also be available for residents to enjoy on the weekends when games or practices are not scheduled. This is just one example, but the basic idea was common throughout the entire workshop, from an artistic and educational component to downtown, to the connectivity of any assisted living housing.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
46
CONNECTIONS WORKSHOP
0’
After this introduction, we handed out tabs to place on questions designed to generate discussion. Their task was to place these tabs along the line with the two antonyms of how they saw Houston. After the tabs we placed, we had short discussions with each group to understand how to proceed in the design process. These
results helped us decide the main areas of focus for future meetings and proposals. The results are on the next page and are tabulated from 25 answers for each line. They are broken into three separate lines: one with all the answers represented through circles that darken and get larger as more people placed tabs in the same spot, one with the average of all the answers, and one with the ideal place the public would like to see in Houston. This data was used for later meetings to understand what should be done to achieve the “ideal” place the public wanted to see Houston in the future. Some of the following chapters further explain how these are used.
10,000’
Fig. 2.5.1 - Map of Points of Interest and Major Roads
0’
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
10,000’
The Connections Workshop at the first community meeting sought to understand the community’s priorities and the relationships between districts in Houston. Figure 2.5.1 showed the main points of interest as described through the maps drawn by the Visioning Committee during the preliminary meeting. Figure 2.5.2 displays the main districts mentioned during the bus tour and also during the preliminary meeting.
Fig. 2.5.2 - Map of Major Districts
Fig. 2.5.3 - Connections Exercise
Fig. 2.5.4 - Connections Exercise
47 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
CONNECTION WORKSHOP RESULTS THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT IS: The figures shown on this page and the next show the results of the workshop in three different ways. The first line compiles all of the votes and separates them into density with the larger, darker circles being the most voted. The second line is the average answer for all of the answers. The third line is where the public would like to see the district improved in the future. The first group that visited the Connections Workshop discussed how they would like to improve the downtown district for future proposals. They explained how they would like to see an equal number of retail stores and services offered, improvements of the appeal of the streets through street scape design and human interaction, and how they would like to see life put back into the downtown district like it once was many years ago,
Fig. 2.5.6 - Downtown District Results Diagram
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
THE DOWNTOWN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT IS: Many mentioned the lack of residential options near the downtown area. This resulted in answers of location from centrally located to distant. While there are some options near the downtown, they are in need of improvement and often out of the price range of potential buyers. They also mentioned how they would like to see an even age range within the neighborhoods, encouraging young professionals to reside in town rather than on the outskirts. Many of the groups also expressed concern about the safety of the streets. Although Houston has an extensive sidewalk system, there are not many in the residential areas, placing reliance on vehicular transportation.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 2.5.7 - Downtown Residential District Results Diagram
48 THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT IS:
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
The Commercial District was seen by many as a nuisance rather than a blessing. Many people mentioned that they try to avoid US-63 at all costs. Making this corridor more appealing in future proposals will help remedy this problem. They wanted this area to be safer as well. They mentioned how dangerous the road is for pedestrians and that there were only a few people that walk along it every day. They would love to see the US-63 corridor expand with local businesses rather than corporate. This will create an identity for Houston rather than just being another town along the highway.
Fig. 2.5.8 - Commercial District Results Diagram
THE GROWING SUBURBS DISTRICT IS: Although new neighborhoods are being built along the outskirts of the city, many still view this as being close to town. A reason for this is the high dependency on vehicle transportation. US63 is the only way to get from one end of town to the other, making it nearly impassible for people on foot and bike. They would like to see this situation improved, and figure out ways to get people across town in an efficient manner. This situation should also be viewed in conjunction with the US-76 bike route, making it safer for pedestrians and cyclists to get through town, even in times of high traffic.
Fig. 2.5.9 - Growing Suburbs Results Diagram
49
RURAL FLIGHT WORKSHOP
These results conclude that the community of Houston has as many of these desirable attributes as they lack. This gives them something to build upon and something to strive towards. If utilized properly, future growth and development in Houston is a very reasonable and approachable goal.
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
Many Different Jobs
Shops/Services
Arts/Culture
Diversity
Adventure Sports
Sense of Community
Gathering Places
Concern For Environment
Public Schools
Malls/Shopping Centers
Public Transportation
People My Age
Near Friends/Family
Walkable Streets
Concern for Environment
Fig. 2.6.1 Rural Flight Workshop Results
Scenic Beauty
Low Taxes
Trails and Parks
Place for Family
Public Schools
Low Traffic
Affordable
Safe Streets
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
The workshop participants were each given nine stickers; three green, three yellow, and three red. They were then asked to place green stickers next to any attributes they thought currently applied to Houston, yellow stickers next to attributes that Houston needed to improve upon, and red stickers next to attributes they believed weren’t necessary to Houston.
As can be seen in the results (Fig. 2.6.1) attributes that the workshop participants felt Houston currently featured included Safe Streets, Affordable (Cost of Living), Low Traffic, etc. However, attributes that the participants believed Houston needed to improve upon included Many Different Jobs (Career Variety), Shops/Services, Art/Culture, and Diversity.
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
This workshop presented a list of resulting attributes from a survey conducted with young professionals regarding what they found desirable in a city. As prioritized by young professionals through the survey, the list of attributes was presented to the visioning committee as an interactive way to build ideas for urban development.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
50
RURAL DRAIN WORKSHOP CAUSES OF RURAL DRAIN
NATIONAL TRENDS
• •
Lack of careers in Urban America Attractions of Urban Centers
LEARNING THROUGH TECHNOLOGY
• •
Cutting edge technology in Urban centers Better performing schools in Urban America
•
Intellectual assets in Urban cities
Integrating technology in classrooms is a recent growing trend. Technology enables us to understand how individuals learn, give real-time feedback to parents, and harnesses the fascination with games into learning.
CAREER DEVELOPMENT Career development is a growing trend in grade schools due to the lack of guidance towards specific careers and interests for individuals. This trend gives individuals a place to explore their interests.
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
PREVENTIONS FOR RURAL DRAIN • •
Gain pride and feeling ownership in your community Creating Assets within the city
• •
Create a self sustaining city Create an up-to-date technological infrastructure to connect people globally
•
Re-develop the learning system in the educational system
FREE CHOICE LEARNING Most people gain the majority of their STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) knowledge from hobbies (www.eric.ed.gov).
RURAL SOURCING Businesses have started sending their work to rural domestic America due to the lower operating expenses compared to urban areas. This is an alternative for companies that want to avoid the negative aspects of offshoring (www. sourcingmag.com).
EDUCATION COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
CAREERS
EDUCATION
PREPARE
BUSINESS INCUBATOR Business incubators are a place for new business owners to get guidance from experienced owners before opening their own shop. Business incubators have a success rate of 87% in the first two years, where as new businesses in the general public have a success rate of 66%.
LOAN FORGIVENESS Loan forgiveness is a trend to bring recent college graduates to rural America. The rural city pays for a portion of the student’s loans in return for the student living and working in the town for a certain period of time.-
CITIZENS
EXPORTING
ATTRACTING BUSINESSES
Fig. 2.7.1 - Diagram of steps for how to remedy Rural Drain
E-COMMERCE Electric commerce is economic activity that occurs online. This trend can be harnessed to connect people to careers globally from one’s home.
51 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
RURAL DRAIN WORKSHOP The Rural Drain workshop was an information building activity with the community to discuss ways to prevent future “Brain Drain.” The beginning of the workshop we explained the causes and preventions of Rural Drain and the current national trends that begin to solve this issue. We later explained the interactive workshop we were to be performing that allowed the residents to build solutions for this issue in their community. We proceeded to lay out cards for the residents to place on the map of their city to begin to combat Rural Drain themselves. Through this workshop we began to see commonalities in how the residents viewed their city and the assets that are needed to engage and retain youth and young professionals. At the end of the workshop we gave out informative cards for the residents to take home that explained in more depth some of the top National trends for preventing Rural Drain.
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
E-COMMERCE
0’
10000’
INFORMATIVE CARDS At the end of the workshop we distributed 4 informative cards (Fig 2.7.2 is one of them) in order to actively involve the residents in the process we were undergoing. The cards covered the five top National trends that we saw to be most beneficial for Houston. They were as follows, E-commerce, active learning, career development and personalized education.
Fig. 2.7.3 - Houston workshop map results
E-COMMERCE ARE COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS CONDUCTED ELECTRONICALLY ON THE INTERNET. E-COMMERCE GIVES POTENTIAL TO RURAL AREAS TO: CONNECT TO JOBS IN OTHER CITIES SELL THEIR OWN GOODS TO ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD BEGIN TO TAP INTO URBAN CITY ASSETS E-COMMERCE COMPANIES WITH NO PAID EMPLOYEES
80%
E-COMMERCE’S INDUSTRY VALUE HAS INCREASED TO:
1 TRILLION DOLLARS Fig. 2.7.2 - Informative card example
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
FORBES.COM
WORKSHOP RESULTS After analyzing the results of the first community workshop, we found that the Houston residents desired to reestablish the downtown as the cultural center of Houston. The Houston residents also wished to emphasize the community’s identity at the entrance of Houston.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
52
HOUSING WORKSHOP
Fig 2.8.1 maps out the housing available in Houston, MO as of September 2014 according to Zillow.
In the workshop, the participants were asked to look through a set of 32 cards and choose two red cards for each housing type. The participants were also asked to choose one blue card for each housing type. The blue cards list the social aspects of housing, like good neighborhood and community activities, while the red cards focus mostly on desirable physical qualities, like open floor plan and enclosed garage. The cards generated discussion as the group tried to determine which qualities were most desirable for each type of housing. Once the group came to a consensus, the card was stuck to the board in the proper category.
10,000’
Though the available housing seems to be somewhat concentrated in the downtown area, the dots are dispersed fairly evenly around Houston. Additionally, there are not any rental properties or apartments available online as of September 2014.
0’
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
The three housing types explored in the workshop are Assisted Living, Tenant Housing, and Young Professional Housing. Under the Assisted Living category we also include retirement housing. Tenant housing, or rental housing, would serve those who might not want to buy a house just yet, but still want to live in the area. Young Professional Housing would mostly serve mid-twenties to midthirties and could also serve young professionals with families.
Fig. 2.8.1 - Map of Available Housing
53 RESULTS
Some groups really got into the exercise, choosing two or three extra cards for each category. Other groups preferred to just talk about housing issues in Houston. One issue mentioned by community members was that some downtown business owners are reluctant to sell or lease second story space to be turned into lofts. Also a lot known as the Forbe’s lot was mentioned as a potential site for new housing. Fig. 2.8.2 - Wordle of Assisted Living Results
ASSISTED LIVING
The most consistent qualities for this type of housing were convenient location and community activities (Fig 2.8.2). This leads to a very community centered housing style located within a walkable distance of things like grocery stores, churches, and retail.
TENANT HOUSING
Fig. 2.8.3 - Wordle of Tenant Housing Results
The most consistent qualities for this type of housing were affordable and multi-family housing (Fig 2.8.3). These attributes could be found in townhouses, small apartments, and a variety of other housing styles. One topic that came up relating to this housing was the lack of building codes in Houston. This lack of codes allows tenant housing to be poorly maintained and often unsafe. One group mentioned that instituting a building code for safety would force the property owners to bring their housing up to code eliminating some of the main issues with tenant housing.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
YOUNG PROFESSIONAL HOUSING
Fig. 2.8.4 - Wordle of Young Professional Housing Results
The most consistent qualities for this type of housing were high resale value, open floor plan, loft, and newer (Fig 2.8.4). Building more lofts in the downtown area is one potential way to meet these desires. Increased downtown activity resulting from residential units will make downtown a more desirable place to live, increasing property value.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
54
AGRICULTURE WORKSHOP The design team decided to survey agricultural assets with in the community of Houston. In order to do this we created a map showing all of the agriculture, land and business in and around Houston. Figure 2.9.1 is the map we created. The red represents pasture land, pink represents agriculture business, and blue represents crop land. This map reveals that most of the agricultural industries are outside of the city limits, other than the community gardens. This builds the opportunity to expand both the type of agricultural businesses (such as increased hydroponics), and space within the city for profitable crops.
PRECEDENTS 10,000’
Since all of the forms of agriculture in Houston are traditional, we decided to show some examples of what new types of agriculture are occurring in larger cities. The first precedent we looked at was of Urban Roots Farms located in the downtown of Springfield Missouri (Fig 2.9.3). Urban Roots Farm is a 1.5 acre micro farm. The goal of this farm is to expose people to where their food comes from as well as provide healthy alternatives the community. They also want to teach people that even a small city farm can produce enough of food to feed a large amount of people. This farm is a prime example of something that Houston could implement in their town by either growing their community garden or by implementing a micro farm.
0’
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
AGRICULTURE IN HOUSTON
Fig. 2.9.1 - Agriculture Land Use Map
55 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
PRECEDENTS CONTINUED The second precedent we looked at was The Plant located in Chicago. The Plant is a net zero urban farm facility built inside an old meat packing plant. The farm uses aquaponics to grow fish and plants, then uses a anaerobic digest to create gas to run a turbine which heats and powers the facility. It also has a brewery and uses the spent grain to feed the fish. The electricity produced by the turbine powers the grow lights. This system is designed so that everything needs the other in order to work properly (Fig 2.9.2). It was partially funded by a 1.5 million dollar grant from the state of Illinois. The Plant is expected to produce 125 jobs as well as consume up to 10,000 pounds of food waste from land fills in and around the Chicago area. While this project is currently too large for Houston, it might be possible to scale down. This example also allows us to see what the future might hold in agriculture.
Fig. 2.9.3 - Urban Roots Farm - http://www.springfielduac.org/urban-roots-farm-csa-is-
now-open/
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 2.9.2 - The Plant Diagram - http://www.plantchicago.com/about/
Fig. 2.9.3 - The Plant Hydroponics Bed - http://www.rsvlts.com/2012/05/01/a-meat-
packing-plant-transformed-into-a-vertical-farm-9-photos/
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
56
INTRODUCTION TO US-63 PROPOSALS The second presentation with the community members of Houston included two proposals: US-63 Pine Street Corridor The focus for the 63 proposal was to form Houston as a destination along the highway. This would be done by connecting the downtown district to the highway and reestablishing downtown as the cultural and identifiable center. Our emphasis was defined by the ‘triangle’ within US-63, Grand Avenue and Main Street. Through careful design of the specific paths between the intersections, the commercial development in Houston along US-63, Grand Avenue and Main Street was viewed as an extension of downtown and its character. As a result, we sought the future support of local business and its role in a stronger community, while also acknowledging the responsibility of corporate entities. This revitalization of Houston’s economic district will promote entrepreneurship, the emerging creative class, build infrastructure for young professionals and strengthen the presence of local identity.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
1000’
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
0
The community members really latched onto the idea of the “Triangle” and how the design team wanted to revitalize the area within it. They agreed that attracting business from US-63 was something that Houston needed to grow as a community, but also emphasized the importance of making a great place for the residents that have already decided to make Houston their home. From that, the design team has to balance attracting new users with accommodating existing community members.
57
Fig. 2.10.1 - Diagram of the “Triangle” and Assets of Houston
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
DISTRICT+THRESHOLD
EDUCATIONAL DISTRICT
To further development in Houston socially and culturally, we proposed that the triangle, an area formed by Main Street US-63, and Grand Avenue, and surroundings areas be organized into districts. We also introduced the idea of thresholds at significant intersections to bring the downtown atmosphere to the entire area, attract visitors, and make citizens feel more comfortable and lively.
DISTRICT PROPOSAL
GOVENMENT DISTRICT
58
FAMILY HOUSING DISTRICT
SOCIAL DISTRICT
CULTURAL DISTRICT
HISTORY
ECONOMY
AGRICULTURE
GOVERNMENT EDUCATION
NATURE
Fig. 2.11.1 - Relationship Diagram
Fig. 2.11.2 - District Map of the Triangle Area
BUSIN E DISTR SS ICT
NATURE DISTRICT
YOUNG PROFESSIONALS HOUSING DISTRICT
CULTURAL DISTRICT
FAMILY HOUSING DISTRICT
ART LOCAL BUSINESS
GOVENMENT DISTRICT
COMMUNITY
SOCIAL DISTRICT
1000
Both Pine Street and Grand Avenue are a part of this district, which promotes the development of the Houston community and serves to express the strength and character of Houston. We consider Grand Avenue to be the center of the cultural district and Pine Street to be the center of the social district. The social district consists of community, economy, government, education and local business. The cultural district consists of art, history, agriculture, nature, and local business. Currently, the intersection of the social (Pine Street) and cultural district (Grand Avenue) is home to many local businesses including Forbes Pharmacy and the Lone Star Plaza, which hosts the Farmers Market. This intersection is the perfect location to develop as the heart of the community.
0
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
SOCIAL/ CULTURAL DISTRICT
59 GOVERNMENT DISTRICT
The government district, located on the edges of the cultural district, provides support for cultural development and also welcomes visitors to the original downtown of Houston.
EDUCATIONAL DISTRICT
This district—the school and its immediate surroundings— should have a connection with family housing and the social district to develop community interaction and engagement with the school.
FAMILY HOUSING DISTRICT
The family housing district is located outside of the triangle because, though family housing requires strong connections with all of the districts, education in particular, it also requires large amounts of land. We also proposed pocket neighborhoods, which are apartments with a shared open space, pedestrian streets, and joined backyards. This housing style accommodates all users and encourages multigenerational neighborhoods. A mixture of assisted living, young professional, and family housing strengthens Houston’s biggest asset— the community.
BUSINESS DISTRICT
The business district will be a new development for the area, but it is important to invigorate this area with a lively downtown atmosphere.
RESPONSE
The community focused mostly on the housing needs for assisted living and rental housing. Some residents saw the pocket housing as a good way to for several generations to coexist and strengthen Houston’s community. Some community members were concerned with privacy, parking, and the upkeep of the shared central courtyard. Also, one of the sticky notes proposed limiting the number of pocket neighborhoods otherwise people might begin favoring the courtyards in their neighborhoods over the city parks.
YOUNG PROFESSIONAL HOUSING DISTRICT
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
It is placed within walking distance of the social and cultural, natural, and government districts to promote involvement in the community.
NATURE DISTRICT
In the Emmett Kelly Park section of the nature district, there should be social activities, such as festivals, that could potentially continue along Pine Street.
Fig. 2.11.4 - Precedent of Pocket Neighborhood - Conover Commons Redmond, Denver- http://www.planetizen.com/node/56611
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 2.11.3 - A Perspective Rendering of Pocket Neighborhood - http://www.pocket-neighborhoods.net/
60
THRESHOLDS
MAIN ST
C
B
1,000
US
-63
GRAND AVE.
4TH AVE.
PINE ST
A
PROPOSAL We used university campuses as a model because they must welcome many different people while also expressing the identity and character of the university. College campuses specialize in making individual spaces that feel independent but are actually still very much a part of the campus. A university campus is also highly social and promotes cultural development. INTERSECTION A We proposed a gateway to give a sense of entrance to the center of Houston. After considering the height and width limitations set by US-63 becoming a five lane highway, we proposed tall independent columns. These catch peoples’ eye but fit with the surroundings. The columns would be placed on both sides of streets at the intersections of Grand Avenue and US-63 (Fig 2.11.6), and Main Street and US-63. INTERSECTION B The intersection of Main Street and Grand Avenue has the ability to become a destination rather than just an entrance or exit. We proposed a clock tower that attracts people to gather and visit. It could become an icon of Houston, and continue to develop Houston’s identity. The city block bordered by Grand Avenue, Main Street, 1st Street, and Pine Street is the most suitable space to place the clock tower because it would be visible from all high traffic streets downtown. Additionally, the Farmers Market, a successful cultural and social center, is within walking distance. The block is also accessible from the school and Emmett Kelly Park. INTERSECTION C At the intersection of 4th Street and Pine Street, we proposed a gate to give a sense of entrance to the Emmett Kelly Park and the downtown. This is an important threshold because Emmett Kelly Park is one of the prides of the Houston community. This gate should be at a smaller scale because the street is only two lanes, sidewalks, and a bike lane.
RESPONSE
500
A
0
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
The points of the triangle, formed by Main Street, US-63, and Grand Avenue, and the intersection of Emmett Kelly Park and Pine Street have the potential to be entrances to the center of Houston. Placing built elements, such as a gate, at these intersections helps to create an overall welcoming atmosphere.
Fig. 2.11.5 - Threshold Map
The community’s response was very positive towards this proposal. Their questions include concern over funding, replacing the clock tower with a statue or flag, and placing a clock tower at the intersection of US-63 and Grand Avenue or US-63 and Main Street. This approach is accomplishable in a relatively short time as long as they are able to raise the funds. The challenge will be designing these elements to fit the city but still stand out enough to attract people and express the unique identity of Houston.
100
GR
AN
D S T.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS -6
3
50
US
0
INTERSECTION A
61
Fig. 2.11.6 - Plan - Intersection of US-63 and Grand Ave.
Fig. 2.11.7 - Precedent Study - Entrance Gate at University of Toronto - Toronto, Canada - http://jamiesarner.com/toronto-life/2013/05/
50
100
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
0
INTERSECTION B
university-of-toronto-photos/
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
Fig. 2.11.8 - Plan - Intersection of Pine St. and 4th Ave.
Fig. 2.11.9 - Precedent Study - Old Crescent at Indiana University - Bloomington, Indiana - http://www.iub.edu/about/tour/photos-
G R A N D S T.
100 50
M A I N S T.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 0
INTERSECTION C
by-album.shtml
Fig. 2.11.9 - Plan - Intersection of Main St. and Grand Ave.
Fig. 2.11.10 - Precedent Study - Clock Tower at the Coxhall Gardens - Carmel, Indiana - http://carmel-photos.funcityfinder. com/2014/02/28/clock-tower-coxhall-gardens-carmel-indiana/
2040 VISIONING
62
HOLD
ENTRANCE
PINE STREET
500’
WALKING PATH
EMMETT KELLY
DOWNTOWN ATMOSPHERE
TRANSITION
0’
DOWNTOWN ATMOSPHERE
SHO
LD
250’
ENTRANCE
0’
EMMETT KELLY
GRAND AVENUE
PINE STREET
Fig. 2.12.2 - US - 63 to Downtown Detail diagram
US-63 DEVELOPMENT This proposal develops two existing areas on the East side of US-63 in order to attract people off of the highway. The main concept is to reflect the atmosphere of the downtown area at this portion of US-63. We believe that this portion of US-63 will then begin to emphasize the identity of Houston at the entrance to the community.
250’
The proposed development that will act as the transition into the downtown will emphasize W Mill Street and Pine Street as the main circulation paths. These two streets, Mill and Pine, are proposed to be extended through Emmett Kelly Park and attach to the developments East of US63 as pedestrian pathways. We believe that by creating these two pedestrian pathways and by developing along them it will begin to attract travelers off of US-63 and into the downtown area.
0’
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
WALKABLE
THRE
EMMETT KELLY
THRES
GRAND AVENUE
TRANSITION
PINE STREET
BRUSHY CREEK
GRAND AVENUE
US-63 TO DOWNTOWN
Fig. 2.12.1 - Proposal 2 site plan
63 US-63 CORRIDOR ATMOSPHERE
DOWNTOWN ATMOSPHERE
EMMETT KELLY PARK PRESERVATION EMMETT KELLY
PINE STREET
GRAND AVENUE
BRUSHY CREEK
After we presented this proposal to the Houston Residents they extended their feedback to us. One piece that they felt very strongly about was the idea of developing this part of the US-63 corridor with the same atmosphere and attributes as the downtown region. The Houston residents found that this could potentially begin to emphasize the identity at the entrance of Houston as well as begin to make more people stop at this section of US-63.
DOWNTOWN ATMOSPHERE
This section of the US-63 corridor is proposed to reflect in the building density as the downtown as well as the flow of pedestrians. By creating this we believe that it will catch the traveler’s eye and attract them to stop and walk around. Once the traveler begins to walk around we then believe that with future development the traveler can later be influenced to continue on to the downtown.
EMMETT KELLY PARK
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
During the community feedback we found that Emmett Kelly Park was a strong piece that the community members felt attached to. The preservation of Emmett Kelly Park became a large topic in the discussion. This is as area of pride for Houston and is tied to one of the leading names in Houston’s past.
0’
250’
Emmett Kelly was a clown that worked at Barnum and Bailey Circus and was placed in the clown hall of fame. For his childhood he lived in the outskirts of town in Houston, Missouri. When the piece of land that the park resides on was cleaned up of old houses and trash the town named the area The Emmett Kelly Park.
Fig. 2.12.3 - Proposal 2 results diagram
The Houston residents want to make sure that Emmett Kelly Park is emphasized through the new development. The Houston residents want the land that is part of The Emmett Kelly Park to stay as a park and if anything be extended.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
ENTRANCE
500’
WALKING PATH
HOLD
GRAND AVENUE
DOWNTOWN ATMOSPHERE
THRES
BRUSHY CREEK
TRANSITION
EMMETT KELLY
PINE STREET
GRAND AVENUE
64
HAWTHORNE STREET EXTENDED
BIKE ROUTE
0’
BIKE SHOP
RE TH
S HO
LD
100’ 0’
EMMETT KELLY
GRAND AVENUE
PINE STREET
Fig. 2.12.5 Downtown detail diagram
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT This proposal begins to develop the Grand Avenue entrance to the downtown. We are proposing development at the Grand Avenue entrance comprised of a few buildings facilitating start-up businesses and a bicycle rental shop on the West side. We are also proposing a roundabout at the US-63 and Grand Avenue intersection in order to make the entrance to Grand Avenue safer and to create a threshold into to this portion of US-63.
250’
We believe that Hawthorne Street next to the proposed bicycle rental shop should be extended to Grand Avenue because we found it to be a main corridor to the Houston residential area. Our aim by doing this is to make the bicycle rental business located in an area that provides easiest accessibility to any part of Houston.
0’
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
SECONDARY ENTRANCE
Fig. 2.12.4 Proposal 2 site plan
65 MODERN ROUNDABOUT
Fig. 2.12.6 - Roundabout rendering - http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http%3A
In place of a stop light, the roundabout is becoming a more common solution that improves traffic flow and safety through intersections. The modern roundabout is a circular intersection that promotes safe and efficient traffic flow. The modern day roundabout was first developed in Europe in the 1960’s and is now widely used throughout the world. The modern roundabout first appeared in the United States in the 90’s and the US currently has 572 roundabouts (NCHRP). France is currently leading the world with a total of 30,000 roundabouts. Roundabouts are meant to force the driver to be aware of their surroundings by making them slow down and maneuver through.
MODERN DAY ROUNDABOUT STATISTICS Roundabouts reduce car crashes by 39 percent and injury crashes by 76 percent (IIHS).
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
Roundabouts reduce fatal and incapacitating injury crashes by 90 percent and reduce pedestrian crashes by 75 percent (IIHS). Roundabouts automatically establish right-of-way and reduce conflict points from 32 to 8 (fig xx and xx) (FHWA). Roundabouts reduce vehicle speed and minimize vehicle weaving (FHWA).
Fig. 2.12.7 - Roundabout points of contact. - http://azdot.gov/about/transportation
Replacing lights and stop signs with roundabouts can reduce harmful emissions by more than 30 percent (NYTIMES). Roundabouts reduce 10 to 32 percent in the number of vehicle crashes causing only property damage (NACTO). The cost initially to build a roundabout is generally higher than a stop light intersection but its maintenance is cheaper and the service life of a roundabout is 25 years compared to 10 years with a typical (IIHS) signal.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 2.12.8 - Intersection points of contact. - http://azdot.gov/about/transportation
66
EMMETT KELLY PARK EMMETT KELLY PARK
PARK PROGRAM The new plan for Emmett Kelly would provide a variety of spaces and activities. It would hold permanent structures such as the visitors center and festival space, as well as provide recreational opportunities to help it remain a park.
500’
PARKING Parking would be available on both the north and south sides, providing easy access to the park, visitors center, and festival area.
SCULPTURE PARK An addition to the private park would be a sculpture park. This would further increase the artistic spirit of Houston while establishing another landmark along US-63. LINEAR PARK On the west side of US-63, the two current commercial areas would continue to be developed. Linking the two developments would be a pedestrian-friendly linear park. This park would be a zone for local businesses, supporting start-up businesses and food trucks.
0’
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
An important link to consider between downtown Houston and US-63 is Pine Street. Pine leads directly into crucial areas downtown such as the Farmers’ Market and the storm shelter. It also has the potential to run directly through Emmett Kelly Park and intersect with US-63. By establishing this connection, Emmett Kelly can welcome visitors to Houston. Two proposals to strengthen this connection are a visitors center and a multipurpose festival space for Emmett Kelly Park.
Fig. 2.13.1 - Emmett Kelly Park Site Plan + Diagram
67 FESTIVAL SPACE One proposal for Emmett Kelly Park is the creation of a multipurpose festival space. This space would be located on the opposite side of Pine from the visitors center, providing a purpose for the south side of the park. Creating a multipurpose space in Emmett Kelly will give it a more significant and defined purpose in Houston, and also encourage activity within the park. As a result, visitors passing Houston on US-63 would see an activated space in Emmett Kelly. This attraction could lead to an increase in tourism and cultural identity.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
PROGRAM The festival space will be able to host larger special events with addtional support, and provide space for smaller events throughout the year.
100’
PARKING Just as with the visitors center, parking would be available from 4th Street, which is accessible from Pine Street.
0’
PRIVATE PARK The south side of Emmett Kelly would also be a park. This part of the park would contain small pavilions, various pathways, and a playground. It would stay true to the current program of Emmett Kelly Park. Fig. 2.13.5 - Emmett Kelly Festival Space Site Plan + Diagram
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
68 VISITORS CENTER
The Brushy Creek trail-head exists north of Emmett Kelly, just west of the existing visitors center. Moving the trail-head south into the park will not only provide another purpose to the visitors center, but it will encourage more pedestrians to visit Brushy Creek and provide easier access.
PROGRAM
100’
The goal of visitors center is to be multipurpose. The visitors center could host community meetings, as well as hold the trail-head to Brushy Creek and provide a bicycle rental station. PARKING Parking would be available just off of 4th Street, which intersects Pine. Visitors could take Pine Street from downtown into the park, or take Pine Street from US-63.
0’
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
Another proposal for Emmett Kelly Park is the relocation of the current visitors center. The current visitors center is located north of Emmett Kelly on Walnut Street, practically hidden from US-63. By relocating the site of the visitors center to Emmett Kelly, Houston will be more noticeable to visitors, and both visitors and citizens will be encouraged to visit Emmett Kelly Park.
RECREATION In addition to the visitors center, the north side of the park would also provide opportunities for recreation. One possibility could be to include a small basketball court, just to the west of the visitors center. Fig. 2.13.4 - Emmett Kelly Visitors Center Site Plan + Diagram
69 COMMUNITY RESPONSE Overall, the responses from the community towards the Emmett Kelly Park proposal were very positive. After the presentation of the design, community members were asked to place Post-it notes on the boards expressing their thoughts, both positive and negative. By the end of the discussion, each board was nearly full of feedback. Pictures were taken at the meeting to show the amount of Post-its left on each board (Figs 2.13.2 and 2.13.3). The majority of Houston citizens at the meeting liked the idea of a bridge through Emmett Kelly. They particularly favored the idea of walking trails under the bridge, and the chance to display art underneath. Citizens also responded positively to idea of a festival space because it could provide both
movies and music in the park. Other general comments were made, such as the need for more functional spaces in Emmett Kelly Park, a more accessible visitors center, and the connection with Brushy Creek. The few criticisms that were mentioned expressed very practical concerns. A few citizens mentioned that the bridge would be too big of a structure for Emmett Kelly. The park is already fairly small, a bridge connecting Pine and US-63 would make it even smaller. Another concern was the overall cost of the proposal. Funding is limited and must be used wisely, therefore it might not be practical build an expensive bridge or to recreate a new visitors center when one already exists in Houston.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 2.13.2 - Post-it Note Responses From Community Members
Fig. 2.13.3 - Post-it Note Responses from Community Members
PINE STREET CORRIDOR The workshop exercises helped us see Houston from the community’s point of view and how they would like to see it improved over the next 20 to 25 years. From this data, we have prepared options that focus on personal interaction and concern for the environment.
development of community involvement. Forbes Pharmacy will remain the same business on all the options, but has different levels of interaction including the addition of vertical vegetation and a wider pedestrian sidewalk.
We wanted to better incorporate the school with the downtown area, by improving the parking situations and overall traffic flow. The Farmers’ Market is one point of interest due to high community involvement. Because of its proximity to this important point of interest, the storm shelter becomes a good location for proposals. Many of the solutions incorporate some type of community service proposal to be built on top of the shelter, allowing for a greater sense of importance to the building as well as greater
Emmett Kelly Park and US-63 are key components to encourage residents and visitors to venture toward and explore what the downtown area has to offer. Currently, many of the citizens agree that there is not a clear entrance into Emmett Kelly Park or the downtown area. Improving this entry will encourage future growth in these two areas. Public response has helped us generate the following proposals and improvements that could be implemented over the next 20 to 25 years.
100’
GREEN SPACE CONNECTION
0’
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
70
Fig. 2.14.1 - Overall Pine Street Plan
This proposal is based on the use of green space to connect the school to Emmett Kelly Park. In addition to introducing a more organic street design, several small parks have been added along the corridor (Fig 2.14.1). The space above the storm shelter will serve as the location for the new library and technology center. The farmers market expands to include more green space and a children’s play area (Fig 2.14.2). Elmore’s will become the Regional Arts building (Fig 2.14.3). Finally, the entrance to Emmett Kelly Park will be marked by a gateway; a pedestrian path connects Pine to US-63 (Fig 2.14.4). Fig. 2.14.2 - Farmers Market
Fig. 2.14.3 - Regional Arts Proposal
Fig. 2.14.4 - Emmett Kelly Entrance
71
PINE TO US-63 CONNECTION This proposal focuses on the idea of directly connecting Pine Street to US-63. This will provide a direct means of access to the downtown district of Houston. To help maintain a small town feel, a few changes have been made to Pine Street including a median with trees, bike lanes, and an extensive sidewalk system with additional trees to divide vehicle and pedestrian pathways (Fig. 2.15.4). In addition to these changes, paving materials throughout Pine Street change to encourage a pedestrian friendly environment and slow traffic in populated areas.
traffic flows through the downtown district. Trees and other vegetation surrounding the sidewalk areas help reinforce a sense of security for pedestrians and make a transitional area between interior and exterior spaces. In Fig 2.15.2, the addition of a bridge to the east end of Pine Street provides a pleasant vehicular connection to U.S.-63, and a pedestrian walkway to the 63 corridor. This bridge will be open underneath (Fig. 2.15.3) to allow access from the new visitors center and outdoor exhibition spaces in the eastern half of Emmett Kelly Park.
As seen in Fig. 2.15.1, the sidewalk along Pine Street will be widened in order to accommodate moderate pedestrian
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
Fig. 2.15.2 - Pine Street Bridge Perspective
Fig. 2.15.3 - Pine Street Bridge Concept
100’
Fig. 2.15.1 - Pine Street Daytime Perspective
Pine Street Bridge
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 0’
2040 VISIONING
Fig. 2.15.4 - East Pine Street Site Plan
72 FARMERS’ MARKET CONNECTION
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
After studying the city of Houston, we discovered that Pine Street was a very important street for the city. It ties the school, downtown, Farmers’ Market, and Emmett Kelley Park together to form a social hub. It is because of this importance that we decided to look at Pine Street and create a proposal that strengthens the connection of Emmett Kelly Park to the Farmers’ Market and
Fig. 2.16.1 - Farmers Market Perspective
Fig. 2.16.4 - Site Plan
downtown. This is accomplished by creating a series of parks along a pedestrian pathway. The path from the Regional Arts building (the current storm shelter) passes through the Farmers’ Market and connects to Emmett Kelly Park. In order to successfully create this pathway we closed 1st street between Pine and Main. This emphasizes the connection between the
Fig. 2.16.2 - Interior Farmers Market Perspective
Regional Art Center and the Farmers’ Market, and creates a park atmosphere. By closing 1st Street and creating this park atmosphere we are also creating a destination anchoring the west end of the new corridor.
Fig. 2.16.3 - Exterior Farmers Market Perspective
73
C O M M U N I T Y F E E D BAC K GREEN SPACE CONNECTION
PINE/US-63 CONNECTION
FARMERS MARKET CONNECTION
Exciting ideas!
Exciting ideas!
Very doable
2 story mosaic
More parking?
Exciting idea!
Excited to hear more ideas about community gathering spots, outdoor theatre
Sculptures by art minded people of all ages
Public Bathrooms
Love this idea of expanding green space around farmers market
Love the median. Need more bike lanes and bike parking downtown
Like the idea of a small park play area downtown around farmers market
I like the varied surfaces on the Pine Street Corridor - maybe not speed bumps, but rough cross strips
What about expanding E.K. Park to include the area all the way over to Walnut? Get rid of recycling place!
What if we parked our cars and walked to businesses downtown? Create community and it’s healthy!
Overall, the community feed back was very positive for the Pine Street Corridor Proposals. The elements most favored from the green space connection were the addition of a Regional Arts Building and attached sculpture garden, the construction of a new Library on top of the storm shelter, and the green spaces and vegetation introduced along the street. The Pine/US-63 Connection proposal has the most major changes of the three. The bridge through Emmett Kelly Park connecting Pine Street to US-63 and the addition of medians along the entire street were very popular. One concern the community had with the bridge was the expense. The community considered the Farmers’ Market expansion the most possible of the three. They liked the closing of
Cool idea! Need better parking around farmers market area Really like the idea of adding more multipurpose meeting spaces. Like outdoor theatre and bike paths, actually in downtown We have several great artists in the area. Might attract more if we had a place for them to collaborate and show their work.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
1st street because as students are released from school, the street becomes very dangerous. Middle schoolers often cross the street walking downtown to Forbe’s Pharmacy while high schoolers speed down the street after leaving the parking lot. They liked that the proposal creates a safe walking path for students. General concerns included not enough street parking, lack of public bathrooms, and more involvement for the arts. Moving forward, the Pine Street design will contain the community’s favorite elements from each proposal in a cohesive design that allows the street to function as a social line through Houston, MO. The bridge portion will be dropped to provide more realistic designs for the Houston community.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
74
S E C O N D P R E S E N TAT I O N S U RV E Y A brief survey was conducted at the introduction and conclusion of our second presentation to Houston. The following questions dealt with demographics and introduced proposed ideas for initial input. Other questions were asked after the presentation and dealt with the evaluation of the proposals.
Question 1: What is your gender?
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
The first few questions during our second survey were demographic based so that we could get a foundation of who was answering our questions. We believe the results of these questions are an accurate representation of Houston as a whole.
Question 2: What is your age range?
Question 3: Which residential status applies to you?
75 Question 4: Where is the location of your residence?
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
Question 5: What is your family status?
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
Question 6: How often do you visit the area known as the ‘triangle’ (area within Grand, Main & 63)? This question was to reassure that we were headed in the right direction when working with the community. Our focus ended up within the area we called the “triangle.” After the data showing that 60% of the community members live outside of city limits, the fact that 40% of them visit this area ‘a couple times a week’ told the design team that the “triangle” was definitely the area to place our focus and attention.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
76 Question 7: How often do you visit Emmett Kelly Park?
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
Emmett Kelly Park is a centrally located green space within the area of the “triangle.” This question was included because we wanted to see how often it was visited due to its proximity to downtown and US-63. The design team felt the results would be much higher with the park’s relationship to residential, educational and professional districts. The low visitation shows that the park does not provide for the community by either containing certain spaces for various activities or functioning programmatically. This confirmed our focus in making Emmett Kelly Park a destination for residents and visitors to Houston.
Question 8: What ideal speed limit would you like to see along US-63 between Grand and Main? This question seems irrelevant, but what it tells us is how important downtown is to the community of Houston, and how they think visitors should view the “triangle.” The results show that downtown should be something that gets people to stop along 63 and go out of their way into the historic district.
Question 9: On a scale of 1-5, 1 being the least, how comfortable would you feel if roundabouts were placed at the intersection of Grand & 63, and Main & 63? This question deals with a very specific proposal: introducing roundabouts along 63. This was something discussed amongst the design studio and input from the community was needed to either pursue or end the proposal.
77 Question 10: On a scale of 1-5, 1 being the least, how comfortable would you feel if Pine St. continued from 4th St, through Emmett Kelly Park and connected to 63? This question also deals with a very specific proposal: continuing Pine Street through Emmett Kelly Park. The results of this showed a mixed number of people for and against the idea, which brought up various concerns of the size of the park, and what the continuation would do to the parks functionality.
Question 11: Which types of development could you see being implemented into Emmett Kelly Park? (pick 3) Asking more of a broad question helped us to see the focus of the community. By seeing themes in the survey results, we were able to put some of those main ideas into entire proposals on their own. For example, “tourism” and “general park” has been addressed in one proposal for Emmett Kelly Park.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
Question 12: On a scale of 1-5, 1 being the least, how important do you Pine St. is to the identity of Houston? This questions also reassured us of our focus on Pine Street. We placed a heavy emphasis on the revitalization of Pine Street as a gateway into downtown, but also a social hub, and the results of this questions confirmed the significance of our design.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
78 Question 13: On a scale of 1-5, 1 being the least, how well do the Pine St. corridor options help connect Houston’s greatest assets?
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
A few of the questions dealt with how the community felt the proposals we presented were either successful or not. This helps to eliminate options in order to combine design and result in one, comprehensive recommendation.
Question 14: On a scale of 1-5, 1 being the least, how important is it to you that Emmett Kelly Park be connected to the High School? This question dealt with the Pine Street proposals and importance of connecting Emmett Kelly Park to the High School. These results, in combination with question ten, led us to focus more on making Pine street a more socially engaging corridor between two important nodes rather than just connecting the High School and the park. This kept the design leaning towards a multi-use space for all members of the community in the park instead of a social hang-out for the students.
Question 15: Which Pine St. corridor proposals best connects Emmett Kelly Park to the High School?
79 Question 16: Considering Pine St. as an entry into downtown Houston, which of the following themes should it be centered around? (pick 3) In conjunction with the previous question, these results revealed where we should focus our designs for Pine Street. From this, the Farmers’ Market has its own design proposal and plan.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
(PICK 2)Question 17: Which amenities should be provided to cyclists traveling through Houston along US Bike Route 76? (pick 2) Bike route 76 (same as HWY 17) brings roughly 1000-1500 cyclists per year through Houston, and we felt it was a missed asset for Houston. This results of this questions told us that the community saw potential importance in getting cyclists to spend time in Houston.
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
80
H I G H S C H O O L P R E S E N TAT I O N
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
Shortly after the second community presentation, we returned to Houston where we conducted a series of presentations with the high school students. We started with brief presentations in the classrooms with students from a variety of education levels. During these presentations we encouraged the students to be honest with what they wanted from the city of Houston and what they would like it to become. The students came forward and we engaged them in conversations pertaining to what types of spaces and places they would like to see develop in Houston. Ideas flowed and a pattern started to emerge from the chaos of various suggestions. Common ideas ranged from various restaurants and stores to skate parks and after-school hangouts such as recreation facilities and youth centers.
Fig. 2.17.1 - Pine Street Corridor Presentation Boards
After our classroom presentations we relocated the presentations to the cafeteria shared by both the high school and the middle school. With the cafeteria being under construction, room was limited, but we were able to display our boards on a make-shift wall in the rear of the room. The cafeteria, being shared, had a split lunch schedule with high school students first, then middle school students, and then high school students again. This was ideal as we wanted to gain some insight from the youth of Houston. As the lunch period passed by, high school students came up to the boards and started placing sticky notes on them with suggestions and ideas for different things they would like to see in their community. These varied in scale from a race track to an after-school youth program and dual-enrollment facility.
Overall, what we took away from our interactive presentations with the students of Houston was that they wanted more variety of choices in their everyday activities. They wanted places to go after school so they didn’t have to immediately go home. They wanted a variety of restaurants and shops to frequent. They wanted outdoor spaces and facilities to accommodate a variety of alternative sports, exercise and activities. They want a city that grows and develops as they do. They want a reason to come back when they graduate. What the students of Houston wanted the most was change.
Fig. 2.17.2 - Downtown/63 Presentation Boards
81 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
Fig. 2.17.3 - Downtown/63 Presentation Boards
Fig. 2.17.4 - Downtown/63 Presentation Boards
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 2.17.5 - Pine Street Corridor Presentation Boards
Fig. 2.17.6 - Various - Presentation Boards
82
INTRO | DISTRICTS
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
This proposal introduces the idea of arranging urban spaces to be efficient, economic, and interactive. Within individual districts we still consider the triangle, formed by Main Street, US-63, and Grand Avenue, to be the best area to develop as the center of Houston. Identifying and clarifying of districts helps not only organizing programs but also developing characteristics and codes for each areas, which also become relevant to the overall design.
--- COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
--- RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
--- LOCAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
--- CIVIC DISTRICT
This district currently contains necessary existing commercial businesses, such as Walmart and McDonald’s. Also included in the Business District are areas where we expect to see commercial growth in the downtown area and along US-63.
This district is made up of local businesses that emphasize the triangle and revitalize the downtown. The existing locally-owned businesses and the Farmers’ Market should guide the development of local businesses in the future.
--- EDUCATIONAL DISTRICT
This district includes family housing, young professional housing, and assisted living. The three housing types will fill space between districts to more efficiently use valuable land and reinforce connections other individual districts.
This district encompasses the justice center, city hall, the airport, and the hospital. It supports the citizens’ lives and also acts as the civic face of Houston. Therefore, placing points of the civic district on both ends of Grand Avenue adds formality, and if developed carefully will welcome visitors.
--- AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
This district, adhering to the current school area, has the potential to help develop Pine Street as a social hub. We believe that building the collaboration between the school systems and the downtown will help this district develop. The addition of the Library and Regional Arts Center on top of the storm shelter is one way to foster this collaboration.
The Agricultural district encompasses the existing community garden and a location that we think would work well as an extension of the community garden. Also included in this district is a lot on the northwest side of town that we see as a good place for the high school and school sponsored clubs like FFA to develop an agricultural business within a learning environment.
--- NATURAL DISTRICT
--- INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
This district includes Brushy Creek Trail, the three parks—Emmett Kelly, West Side, and Rutherford—and proposed green space in the downtown area. Integrating Brushy Creek Trail into the park system and establishing distinct uses for each park helps to create a lively and active atmosphere.
This district contains an engineering community college, a vocational school, an industrial park, and an anticipated industrial park. This district collaborates with the agricultural district, the educational district, and the local business district.
83 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
5,000
10,000
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 0
2040 VISIONING
Fig. 2.18.1 - District Map (Legend on the right)
84
US-63 CORRIDOR MA
ST
RE
ET
US-63 CORRIDOR This proposal builds an immersive experience when entering this section of the US-63 corridor in order to attract traveler to stop near the downtown. The two existing commercial developments on the east side of US-63 are further developed as walkable commercial and market style developments. A business incubator type market as well as linear parks are proposed, on the East side, in order to connect the two commercial developments and further emphasize Emmett Kelly Park through its proximity.
FIGURE 2.19.2
EMMETT KELLY PARK
100’
Fig. 2.19.2 - Business Incubator perspective
FIGURE 2.19.3
0’
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
IN
Fig. 2.19.1 - Site Plan
Fig. 2.19.3 - South development perspective
85 US-63 STREETSCAPING + REDESIGN This portion of US-63 should be redesigned in a way to better engage the traveler as well as increase the chance that they will stop along this section. We are proposing to decrease the width of the streets from thirteen feet to ten feet in order to slow the traffic down and increase the awareness. We propose a fourteen foot wide green median with street lights and Houston banners. A raised and shared bicycle and shoulder lane of eight inches and eight feet wide are recommended on the outside of both the north and south street. We believe this will increase the safeness of bicycling through Houston as well as celebrate it.
FIGURE 2.19.6
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
0’
100’
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
Fig. 2.19.4 - Site Plan
Fig. 2.19.5 - Street section
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 2.19.6 - Street perspective
0’
Fig. 2.19.7 - Site Plan
Fig. 2.19.8 - Market Section
50’
Fig. 2.19.9 - Market plan
0’
100’
Proposed along the East side of US-63 adjacent from Emmett Kelly Park, we are proposing a business incubator type market. This market is intended to foster Houston entrepreneurs and allows for Houston residents to attempt low risk self-managed businesses. We are proposing an open style market with a canopy implemented along with the market. The canopy is one option of a modular designed piece that is implemented throughout the development that we recommend is designed and built by Houston’s High school build club. By engaging the Houston’s youth in the redesign of Houston, we believe this will promote a sense of ownership in the town. This sense of ownership we believe is one step in attracting the youth to stay in the community later on in life.
25’
US-63 INCUBATOR
0’
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
86
Fig. 2.19.10 - Roof
87 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
COMMUNITY FEEDBACK After the meeting three presentation, the community members were encouraged to evaluate our proposals and give feedback about what they saw as strengths and weaknesses of the individual proposals. When discussing the evaluations with the community members, we found that a group of people were worried about how close the proposed Market development was to US-63. The main concern was that the speed of the traffic would be traveling fast enough to not be able to feel comfortable within the Market development.
0’
100’
The main strength that a lot of the community members agreed upon was that the redevelopment was going to beautify this section of the US-63 corridor. They found that this beautifying of the corridor could potentially encourage travelers to slow down around this area as well as become more engaged with their surroundings. Fig. 2.19.11 - Results
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
88
FA R M E R S ’ M A R K E T + C U L I N A RY C L A S S R O O M FARMERS’ MARKET This proposal shows how the Farmers’ Market can expand and grow. In the plan, three permanent structures (1-3 in Fig 2.20.4) are booths that vendors can pull their trucks into. This allows easy access and setup for vendor booths. A centrally located playground allows parents to shop while still keeping an eye on their children. The pavilion provides a space for larger activities such as hosting concerts, movies, and other events to support the Farmers Market.
INDOOR MARKET/KITCHEN Fig. 2.20.1 - Culinary Kitchen Precedent - http://www.archdaily.
The Indoor Market and Culinary Kitchen (Fig 2.20.2) are located in the buildings between the chiropractors office and the Houston Herald (buildings A&B in Fig 2.20.4). The Culinary Kitchen will be similar to a class room with one cook top (Fig 2.20.1) in the front where the remaining cook tops can observe and learn. Setting up the Commercial Kitchen creates an opportunity for community learning and expanded school curriculum. The kitchen can also be used for production of items to be sold in the Farmers’ Market. This building will also contain storage and garage for the co-op truck (which would go to neighboring Farmers’ Markets to sell Houston goods). The indoor Farmers’ Market will be similar to a European market with small booths located inside a bigger space (Fig 2.20.3).
Main Street
A
B
Fig. 2.20.2 - Culinary Kitchen Precedent - http://www.decoist. com/2011-03-29/modern-cooking-school-the-culinary-art-school-in-tijuanamexico/
2
100’
3 Pine Street
Fig. 2.20.3 - Indoor Farmers Market Precedent - http://
visitbudapest.travel/articles/budapest-markets/
Fig. 2.20.4 - Site Plan
Grand Avenue
1
0’
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
com/100778/culinary-art-school-gracia-studio/
89
ADAPTIVE REUSE OPTIONS Ross Lumber Co. Walnut & Grand ≈ 33,000 SQ. FT.
0
200
This location acts as the existing threshold for downtown Houston on the north side. This space could be utilized for an outdoor space or park that acts as a symbol of Houston and a new center for culture. Fig 2.21.3 shows a green space within a downtown center that acts as a cultural landmark for the city as well as a threshold into the historic area. Fig. 2.21.1 - Map of North Downtown Houston Showing Ross Lumber Co. and Old Lee Factory
Lee Factory Spruce & Grand ≈ 43,000 SQ. FT.
Because of it’s location along Grand, we recommend renovations to the exterior of th Ross Lumber building to further the character and identity of downtown that is being proposed. Even simple additions, subtractions and touch-ups to the structure will allow for growing business and attention in the area, without leading visitor away from certain areas.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
Warehouses and factories are perfect for reuse into office, retail and apartment space. The location of the old Lee factory is a perfect location: close to the High School and just a block from Downtown Houston. Fig 2.21.2 shows an adaptive reuse example of an old factory being turned into space for offices and retail shops.
Fig. 2.21.3 - Center City Park Pergolas & Pavilion - Greensboro, NC. - http://www.archdaily.com/151171/center-city-park-pergolas-pavilion-touloukian-
touloukian-inc/
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 2.21.2 - Gryphon Building - Joplin, MO. Old Warehouse, Adapted into Office and Retail Space - http://adaptivereuse.info/portfolio/gryphon-building/
90
L I B R A RY + R E G I O N A L A R T C E N T E R
SCHOOL
REGIONAL ART+ LIBRARY CENTER
100 50 0
The three story library, connected to the north edge of the existing storm shelter, would house all of the usual spaces: book storage, reading space, checkout desk, and reference room. The single story art center, located directly on top of the storm shelter, would include a gallery and event space, studios, and a class room. Connecting the two would be shared common spaces: offices, bathrooms, meeting rooms, a computer lab, storage, and vertical circulation such as stairs and elevators.
Fig. 2.22.2 - Site Diagram
FARMERS MARKET
100 200
FAB LAB
0
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
The Library and Regional Art Center is located on the corner of 1st Avenue and Pine Street, on top of the existing storm shelter. The main goal of the center is to connect to the school, Farmers’ Market, and Fab Lab. These connections would allow Houston’s unique culture to thrive, stimulating the downtown.
Fig. 2.22.1 - Spatial Relationship Diagram
LIBRARY
Book Storage Reading Space Checkout Desk Reference Room
COMMON SPACE Offices Bathroom Meeting Room Computer Lab Stairs/Elevators
Fig. 2.22.3 - Form Diagram
REGIONAL ART CENTER STORM SHELTER Gallery Event Space Studio Classroom
Storm Shelter Classroom
91 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
Fig. 2.22.5 - Circulation Diagram
Examples of Material Use
Fig. 2.22.4 - Perspective Sketch
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
Fig. 2.22.6 - Helsinki University Main Library - Helsinki, Finland. - https://
www.behance.net/gallery/Finnish-architectureHelsinki-University-Library/8184673
Each of the two sections of the building has its own individual entrance. The entrance to the Regional Art Center is located on the east side of the building and is directly connected to the proposed Farmers’ Market expansion. The library entrance is located on the south side of the proposed library, near the northwest corner of the storm shelter. Vertical circulation, allowing access to other floors of the library and art center, would be located directly inside this entrance. This configuration places the Library closer to the school and gives the gallery space of the Regional Art Center the necessary street traffic. There is the social potential of placing arts with Farmers’ Market. Therefore, the building should stand out as a cuttingedge design in the community defining a new social space while also fitting into the context of Houston. The proposed building uses brick in combination with concrete and glass. The inclusion of solar panels gives the building a sustainable quality that is currently undeveloped in Houston.
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
Fig. 2.22.9 - Block a Noordstrook-Amsterdam, Netherlands- http://www.
archdaily.com/167540/block-anoordstrook-dick-van-gamerenarchitecten/
Fig. 2.22.7 - Building of Construction Engineering Disciplinary Organization - Quazvin, Iran- http:// www.archdaily.com/541480/building-ofconstruction-engineering-disciplinary-organizationdayastudio-nextoffice/
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I Fig. 2.22.8 -UBA Office- Berlin, Germany- http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/
en/press/pressinformation/uba-moves-into-thefederal-governments-first-zero
Fig. 2.22.10 - Bassett Road House- London, UKhttp://www.simplicitylove. com/2013/06/bassett-road-houselondon-paulo.html
2040 VISIONING
92
E D U C AT I O N D I S T R I C T This proposal (Fig 2.23.2) is designed to create a safer environment for students in and around school grounds. Pine Street is disconnected from Ozark Street and transforms into a green campus for the high school and middle school complex. This redirects traffic away from the school, creating a safer environment for children waiting to be picked up after school. Additionally, a new Fine Arts building and student center is proposed in the space between the middle school and gymnasium. This provides much needed space for fine arts classes and a space for students to spend their free time between classes. As for the elementary school (Fig 2.23.3), a revised procedure for parent pickup and bus loading areas would also contribute towards a safer traffic solution for the overall education district (Fig 2.23.4).
100’
The response to this proposal was good. The community responded positively to the idea of removing the connection between Pine Street and Ozark Street and the implementation of a green campus in its place. The community agreed that it would make the area much safer for children and pedestrians as well as make a more efficient system for the parents to drop off and pick up their children at the school complex.
0’
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
COMMUNITY RESPONSE
Fig. 2.23.1 - High School/Middle School Existing Site Plan
This, in combination with the introduction of a Fab Lab on the corner of Pine Street and Grand Street will make for a more walkable Pine Street experience for students who partake in classes off campus. The community also agreed that the parking, bus loading, and parent pick up areas needed to be reevaluated and possibly redesigned in order to make for a more safer and efficient
experience at both the elementary school as well as the high school and middle school complex. A temporary solution was proposed to help with this problem by using a series of road cones and designating certain areas for these events to occur for a trial period and see how the community reacts to a variety of configurations for traffic flow in these areas.
93
Performing Arts Building
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
Gymnasium
Student Center
Middle School
Hill Street
100’
Pine Street
High School
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
0’
Ozark Street
High School
Middle School
Fig. 2.23.2 - High School/Middle School Proposed Site Plan
King Street
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
Fig. 2.23.3 - Elementary School Site Plan
Mill Street
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
0’
0’
Chestnut Street
100’
Elementary School
Bryan Street
100’
Elementary School
Bryan Street
Ozark Street
Fig. 2.23.4 - Houston Education District Site Plan
Elmore’s is still in business, however the owner is planning to retire and close his store. The location of this building is south of Lone Star Plaza, and is a perfect location for an educational extension like a Fab Lab. The location is easily accessible from the high school, Emmett Kelly Park, and the rest of Downtown. In conjunction with the proposals for a new Farmers’ Market and the Melba Theater, the Fab Lab would create an “Entrepreneurial Campus,” fostering students and other residents to explore topics they normally wouldn’t get to experience.
100’
FAB LAB (ELMORE’S)
0’
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
94
Fig. 2.24.1 - Diagram of Connections to Proposed Fab Lab
MIT first coined the term “Fab Lab,” which refers to a digital fabrication workshop. One of the main goals is to facilitate an educational environment that encourages entrepreneurship, inventiveness, and creative expression. Houston can house an official “Fab Lab,” as long as the facility followed the four qualifications that MIT has put in place: “be open to the public, support the Fab Lab charter, share a common set of tools and processes, and participate in the larger global Fab Lab network.” This public workshop would encourage relationships between generations and facilitate a new perspective on education and technology in Houston.
Fig. 2.24.2 - Fab Lab Logo - http://fab.cba.mit.edu/about/
logos/index.html
Fig. 2.24.3 - Sant Joan Fab Lab Workshop at the Institute for Advanced Architecture of Catalonia - http://www.iaacblog. com/blog/2011/fab-lab-sant-joan/
95 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
Fig. 2.24.6 - Fab Lab Exterior Night Rendering
16 0
0
16
Figures 2.24.4 and 2.24.5 shows the first attempt at a floor plan for a Fab Lab at this location. The plan changed for the final proposal and will be explained in the later chapter.
Fig. 2.24.4 - Preliminary First Floor Plan for the Fab Lab
Fig. 2.24.5 - Preliminary Second Floor Plan for the Fab Lab
Most of the community members at the third presentation had never heard of a Fab Lab, let alone how it could benefit Houston. One of the main points that made this proposal so attractive to the community was its unique function and ability to make Houston a destination for innovative education and entrepreneurship. The fact that a Fab Lab could be used by anyone of any age has kept a it in the final proposals. We heard from the members that this space needs to be as multiuse as possible to appeal to all groups as well as provide a variety of jobs.
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
96
GRAND AVENUE RESTORATION + HOUSING GRAND AVENUE | INTRODUCTION
That said, it is a priority provide you proposals about how to restore this area from abandoned and empty, to lively and beautiful like it once was. Many of the basic components are already there, but they need development and determination to complete their renovation. Available spaces could become retail, restaurants, entertaining, and education to compliment thrift and pawn stores will liven up the overall street life.
Fig. 2.25.2 - Coffee Shop Perspective
GRAND AVENUE | PHASE 1
The Melba theater is set to start renovation soon and remains at the top of the priority list, receiving a face lift as well as a partial reprogramming to engage the downtown and encourage more community growth. Feedback from the first phase encourages us to create something more with the spaces: possibly turning the pawn store into another education-based retail store and placing dual-functions to many of the proposed buildings. Houston’s strong desire to improve its community is apparent, allowing us to take bold steps to improving the overall look of the downtown. Fig. 2.25.4 - House Restoration Perspective
100’
Fig. 2.25.3 - Diner Perspective
The proposals in this meeting were separated into three different phases. The first phase is represented through the color red on the overall map. These locations include: The Melba Theater, a coffee shop, a new diner, and a local historic house.
0’
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
Fig. 2.25.1 - Melba Theater Perspective
In the last meeting, we presented three options which included: expansion of the Farmers’ Market, addition of a median and extension of Pine Street to US-63, and the addition of green spaces along the Pine Street corridor. While Pine Street remains an essential component of downtown, Grand Avenue is one of the original primary streets.
Fig. 2.25.5 - Grand Avenue Diagram
97 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
GRAND AVENUE | PHASE 2 The proposals in the second phase are restorations that will add a significant improvement of appearance to the overall look of the downtown area. Some of these projects include: renovations of a floral shop, introduction of lofts for young professionals, and a new entry gateway into the downtown area.
100’ 0’
While some of the buildings have a second story, they are often boarded up and not functional. Houston needs to attract more young professionals into the town, this can be done through the introduction of lofts and live-work housing. Getting the buildings up to code for this to happen becomes one of the main challenges. Currently the entry to the downtown has buildings out of character and context with the downtown district. Improving buildings or offering a park-like setting with a large “Welcome to Downtown” sign will encourage more drivers to stop, and improve Grand Avenue’s density.
Fig. 2.25.6 - Floral Shop Perspective
Fig. 2.25.7 - Grand Avenue and Highway 63
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
0’ 100’
While Ross Lumber Yard is in such a great location, renovating it to something that can have another function will be a great option for Houston. A clock tower and a water feature with many functions may encourage people to sit and stay downtown while giving drivers a new landmark at the end of the street. Pocket neighborhoods are a great way encourages additional community growth, welcoming new professionals into town.
Fig. 2.25.8 - Clock Tower Site Plan
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
0’
The proposals in the third phase are options that will most likely not be able to be started or completed in a short period of time and will need years of planning and fundraising, but are still achievable. Some of these proposals include: renovations to Ross Lumber Yard, addition of a clock tower ending Grand Avenue, and pocket-neighborhoods close to downtown for single families and young professionals.
100’
GRAND AVENUE | PHASE 3
Fig. 2.25.9 - Pocket Neighborhood Site Plan
98
PARKS + GREEN SPACE
10,000’
In the following proposals, Emmett Kelly Park is redesigned to greet visitors and increase tourism. West Side Park is designed to be more welcoming to cyclists traveling along the US-76 Bike Route. Rutherford Park will become a new sports complex for Houston. The trail system incorporates each park into the existing Brushy Creek Trail.
0’
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
The overall parks and green space scheme for Houston has three primary goals: activate the existing parks, transform the trail system into a network of linear parks, and introduce green space into downtown Houston. To achieve this, we focused on Emmett Kelly Park, West Side Park, Rutherford Park, and the Pine Street Corridor.
Fig. 2.26.1 - Overall Parks, Trails, and Greenery Plan for Houston
The Pine Street Corridor has been redesigned to exemplify the incorporation of green space into the street scape. Planting certain vegetation will also add a sustainable element to the design. Existing parking is redesigned as sustainable pixelated parking, and an outdoor sculpture garden serving the Regional Art Center is proposed.
99 EMMETT KELLY PARK The new scheme for Emmett Kelly Park introduces a community center for Houston. This center would have the ability to host a variety of activities, such as a visitors center and recreation center. Ultimately it would provide a space for Houston citizens to connect and interact with each other, but it would also be a way to welcome visitors to the city and introduce them to Houston. The amphitheater space just outside of the community center would be used to host special events and could provide an outdoor space for musical performances related to the school. It would also act as an important anchor to the end of Pine Street.
0’
100’
Brushy Creek Trail would be extended into the park, and the trail-head would be located within the new community center. Brushy Creek would also experience other trail additions, such as a path leading to the pond located just northeast of Emmett Kelly. By locating the main trail-head in the community center, Brushy Creek Trail will experience more traffic from Houston and its visitors, therefore also creating a more defined purpose for Emmett Kelly Park.
Fig. 2.26.2 - Emmett Kelly Park Site Plan + Diagram
COMMUNITY RESPONSE Both the visitors center and amphitheater received positive feedback from the community. Community members were also welcoming towards the addition of Brushy Creek into the park, acknowledging the need to further expand the trail.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
PARK AMENITIES VISITORS CENTER COMMUNITY CENTER REC CENTER AMPHITHEATER BRUSHY CREEK TRAIL TRAIL ADDITIONS RELOCATION OF TRAIL-HEAD
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
100 WEST SIDE PARK
Bike signage will be created on the corner of King Street and Ozark Street to greet cyclists. A bicycle hub will be on the opposite corner, offering bike repair services, storage opportunities, and a showerhouse. The rest of West Side will remain true to its original program with general improvements.
COMMUNITY RESPONSE Overall the community was welcoming to the idea of incorporating cyclists into West Side. However, one suggestion offered directing cyclists to Rutherford Park instead. This decision would further disconnect them from the rest of the community, and discourage them from entering downtown Houston.
100’
PARK AMENITIES
0’
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
The new plan for West Side Park incorporates the presence of cyclists traveling through Houston along the US-76 Bicycle Route. Several residents notice their presence at the community pool, where cyclists often stop for a shower or place to stay overnight. The new park plan will acknowledge these factors and provide accommodations for the cyclists.
Fig. 2.26.3 - West Side Park Site Plan + Diagram
BIKE TRAIL SIGNAGE BIKE STORAGE SHOWERHOUSE CYCLIST SHOP PLAYGROUND TENNIS VOLLEYBALL COURT CONCESSIONS RESTROOMS OUTDOOR POOL
101 COMMUNITY RESPONSE The community was very excited about the possibility of a sports complex. They acknowledged the need for concessions and restroom facilities. Concerns were mentioned of expanding north due to drainage problems on the site. Options were discussed about expanding south and keeping the existing soccer fields as U-8 regulated rather than upgrading to U-10
0’
100’
PARK AMENITIES
Fig. 2.26.4 - Rutherford Park Site Plan + Diagram
SOCCER FIELDS CONCESSIONS RESTROOMS PLAYGROUND SKATE PARK BASKETBALL COURTS VARIETY FIELD
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
RUTHERFORD PARK Embracing the existing plan for two U-8 soccer fields, the new concept for Rutherford Park is a sports complex. By developing Rutherford into a sports complex, entertainment and exercise will be promoted in Houston. There will also be opportunities to host tournaments which will bring visitors into Houston, increase revenue, and develop tourism. The existing U-8 fields would be upgraded to U-10 fields to allow a wider variety of athletes to participate in future tournaments. A pavilion would be added between each field that would hold concessions, restrooms, and other similar
accommodations. A large variety field and two basketball courts would also be included to provide more opportunities for other forms of recreation. A unique addition to Rutherford Park would be a “safe skate spot.” This area would not be a defined skate park, but rather a specific area dedicated to skating safely. Sidewalks would be curved, curbs sloped, and railings added. This park would an attraction to the youth of Houston, as well as children of families who attend a tournament at the park, but won’t participate in the tournament themselves.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
102 PINE STREET DESIGN
In response to positive community feedback to the addition of a median to Pine Street at the previous meeting, medians along the street have been included in the newest design (Fig 2.26.5). The medians and green curbs (Fig 2.26.6) are designed with curb cuts to allow rain water into the vegetated area, which then filters out the toxins before the run off reaches the watershed storage. These new sustainable features give Houston a more environmentally friendly appearance and could resolve storm water management and contribute to Heritage Tourism.
50’
For vegetation along Pine Street, fruit and nut trees should be planted. The produce can be harvested by community garden members and sold at the Farmers’ Market for a profit. Trees that are native to Missouri are ideal to insure proper growth; Apple, peach, plum, cherry, pear, walnut, and pecan trees are all possibilities.
0’
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
The green curbs recede in front of certain places like the Farmers’ Market to allow extra street parking. Additionally, changing pavement materials for street, sidewalk, and crosswalk will slow traffic and create a more pedestrian friendly street scape.
Fig. 2.26.5 - Detail of Pine Street Design
Fig. 2.26.6 - Street with Green Curbs - http://www.asla.org/sustainablelandscapes/green-
street.html
103 PIXELATED PARKING
0’
100’
This proposal is a redesign of the existing parking lot between the school and the storm shelter. Currently, the lot is used as overflow parking for the school. With the new Library and Regional Art Center, the lot will serve both the school and the new additions. While adding more green space, we also want to replace the existing asphalt, which is in disrepair, with permeable concrete. In order to resolve the drainage issues, the lot should be leveled out and drainage should be placed underneath. This will direct the rainwater underground and into a retention pond located just to the north in the proposed sculpture garden.
100’
Fig. 2.26.7 - Parking Lot Plan
SCULPTURE GARDEN The proposed sculpture garden is an extension of the Regional Art Center. It is located to the north of the proposed library in what is currently an empty lot. A retention pond holds the rainwater runoff from the parking lot. A walking path through the sculpture garden leads the visitors to the exhibits. The sculptures would be rotated seasonally as an outdoor gallery for the Art Center. At certain points along the path, mosaicked retaining walls are added to resolve extreme elevation changes. The retaining walls will have built in benches and the mosaics should be designed and placed along the wall by the community.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
COMMUNITY RESPONSE
0’
The community responded positively to the parking and sculpture garden. They especially liked the pond in the garden and even suggested stocking it with fish to provide a fishing location inside city limits. Fig. 2.26.8 - Sculpture Garden Plan
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
104
T H I R D P R E S E N TAT I O N S U RV E Y Another brief survey was conducted at the conclusion of our third presentation with Houston. This time, the questions were more focused on general proposals that were previously discussed, but never really brought to fruition to show during a community meeting. These questions can almost be summarized as the ‘side-projects’ compared to the main proposals of the design.
Question 1: Which new activity could you see within the old HoneyCutt Building?
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
The results of these two questions show that Houston’s focus is on education, jobs and activity spaces that all ages can enjoy. Questions 1 and 2 pertain to the Honeycutt building and the old Lee Factory in Houston, both once in business and now sitting vacant. Each played a role in the process of creating the visioning tool kit, however, proposals that were programmed within the buildings found other locations that would benefit the community more effectively. Although ideas for adaptive reuse never made it into the final stages of design, they should still remain active within the future discussions in the community. Buildings already constructed in the urban fabric eliminate a very large factor in the fruition of a new revitalized Houston. The community members of Houston should always be looking towards Question 2: Which continuing the urban layout that the design team has proposed, and any opportunities to accomplish that layout through the use of either of these two buildings should be highly considered and valued.
new activity could you see within the old Lee factory?
105 Question 3: What location do you think is most feasible for a recreational center? The data from this survey question suggests that the community members were very focused on budget and existing conditions. Rather than looking at the big picture of how a recreational center could function in Houston, we realized the community focused on how it could be seen through the easiest. Our proposal for a recreational center ended up in Emmett Kelly park, in contrast to the data we received here.
Question 4: If the old community pool were to be re-opened, as a pool or other activity, how often would you use it? This question was based on a site visit that half of the design team attended. An old community pool was visited and thought to be owned by the city, but is actually privately owned. After knowing that, this question is irrelevant.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
Question 5: Roughly 1500-2000 cyclists pass through Houston every year. Do you think these cyclists are a missed asset to Houston? Based on previous proposals and discussions, we felt that Houston should build upon opportunities provided from the bike route that goes right through town. This helped the design team realize that this problem is something we should still provide a proposal for.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
106 Question 6: What accommodations should be made available to the passing cyclists on Bike Route 76?
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
If Houston was still interested in the possible revenue and tourism from passing cyclists, we wanted to know what amenities should be made available. This answer shows that Houston is possibly interested in getting the cyclists to stay in Houston for long periods of time, which acts as a starting point for the community to the introduction of heritage tourism.
Question 7: The youth of Houston have shown interest in a skate park within city limits. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being the least, how comfortable would you feel about a skate park in Houston? After a site visit and presentation with the high school students, it was gathered that a large majority of students would find it exciting if Houston had a skate park. That sort of activity and place sometimes sits bad with the older generations of residents, so the design team wanted the feedback on first impressions of a skate park, and they generally took the idea very well.
Question 8: Which of the following youth-oriented activities would be best utilized in Houston? After introducing the idea for a skate park, we wanted to see what other youth-oriented spaces or places the older generations thought that the students would utilize in town. Even after asking to focus just on the youth, a majority of community members still chose an activity or space that they could also use. This reinforced the idea that what the community needs is a variety of multi-use spaces that appeal to all generations and demographics.
107 Question 9: To attract young professionals, which of the following housing types do you feel will be most successful? 85% of the community members who took this survey answered in a way that told the design team that housing should exist in conjunction with other proposals. Lofts function above other social spaces downtown, and mixed use housing functions with a combination of programs in one location. Both of these types of housing come hand in hand with our other design areas.
Question 10: Which of the following housing types would be most economic and beneficial to the families of Houston? The data from questions 10 and 11 both reflect answers for housing that currently exist in Houston: single family housing and assisted living facilities, however, the notion of a pocket neighborhood is new and relevant to the design teams urban layout, creating more social spaces and engaging opportunities in the community.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
Question 11: In terms of the retired population of Houston, which following housing types would be most beneficial?
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
108
COMMUNITY MEETING FOUR INTRODUCTION
HOUS TON, MISSOURI
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
2040 VISIONING
Fig. 2.27.1 - Kanna presenting
COMMUNITY MEETINGS
DESIGN PROPOSALS
Throughout these meetings we have built proposals in collaboration with the Houston residents. The first meeting included our first visit to Houston and conversations with the community members. The second visit we displayed our beginning thoughts on the project to find out, through the Houston residents, the best approach to the project. For the following two meetings we developed our ideas through the feedback we received from the community members.
Over the past four months we developed proposals through collaboration with Houston community members. The beginning proposals focused on the future connections between US63 and the downtown and how Pine Street can potentially transform into a social corridor, linking the schools to the Farmers’ Market and Emmett Kelly Park. We later began focusing on the potential housing opportunities, the development of the parks, the Grand Avenue development, the high school area, the US-63 connection to downtown, and the Pine Street corridor.
Fig. 2.27.2 - Olivia presenting
Fig. 2.27.4 - The Houston model
Fig. 2.27.3 - Final meeting community members
109 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS
COMMUNITY MEETING FOUR The final meeting was a gallery style presentation. There were seven different “exhibits” displayed at the meeting. The community members began by viewing the projection map (Fig. 2.27.4). It included perspectives and proposal plans that were projected onto the physical model. The Houston community members were then encouraged to rotate as they pleased through the next six presentations. For this presentation we, focused on smaller key developments that we found crucial to the future success of Houston. The presentations were comprised of the following: the Farmers’ Market, Grand Avenue development and housing, parks, school campuses, Library and Regional Arts Center, and the US-63 to downtown connection. The meeting included presentation boards, projection mapping on the Houston model, power point presentations and two virtual reality simulations diving into the Farmers’ Market development and the US-63 to downtown development.
Fig. 2.27.6 - Brandon presenting the projection mapping
preliminary meeting meeting one meeting two high school meeting meeting three meeting four
PROPOSALS RESOURCES
By the end of the meeting we received a substantial amount of feedback, a few nauseous people that used the virtual reality simulation, and what seemed to be a group of very happy community members. Fig. 2.27.7 - Final meeting collaboration
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 2.27.5 - Group picture
Fig. 2.27.8 - Kevin presenting
PROPOSALS
112
PHYSICAL MODEL
0
Fig.3.1.1 - Map of the Extent of the Physical Model
PROPOSALS
The very first model was made for a workshop during our first community presentation with Houston and was left with the community for the time between our first and second presentation. Once we arrived back in Houston, the model had been utilized by 200+ community members and high school students. It showed the design team what the community recognizes as important attributes of their town. It also made it very clear to us that downtown Houston is suffering because of the popularity and practicality of business along US-63.
1000
Alongside all of the proposals and recommendations made for the community of Houston, a physical model was created to provide a visual tool to facilitate discussion and the formulation of ideas from community members.
Fig. 3.1.2 - First Physical Model After Being Used and Marked by Community Members
Fig. 3.1.3 - Image of the Second Physical Model in Final Form
113 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
professional educational residential natural implementation Fig.3.1.4 - Extent of the Model with Topography and Roads Represented
The second and final model was used for much more than just a single workshop. It acted as the blank canvas for the introduction to the final proposal presentation with the community. The major roads and streets within central Houston were much easier to see and understand, and with the new addition of 3D buildings, the urban space of downtown Houston was more realized. This final model was present during the third presentation, although just in the form seen in Figure 3.1.3. For the final proposal presentation however, the model took another form as a projection model presentation. Roughly 20 images were animated and projected on the model, illustrating images such as Fig 3.1.4. This projection model also illustrated all of the areas for final proposal. Community members were able to see all 11 areas of design on one 3D map which formed a great tool for discussion and interpretation.
Illustrations such as topography, Google maps, proposal site locations and phasing steps were projected onto the model. With a model sitting in front of the community members instead of a piece of paper, they were able to fully visualize the intent of the proposals from the design team. The model allows for the comprehension of an overall factor that drives all of the designs and proposals, because the combination of all of the proposals is more that just the sum of the parts. This model was also left in Houston after its presentation with the hope that the community members that were present at the meeting will set up the projection map and show the rest of the community. Workshops and discussions can continue to occur with this model as the tool. Exercises which combine and compare different proposals can help the community see which proposals best fit their needs and accomplish their goal of improving the urban fabric and it identity.
RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
114
FA B L A B - D I G I TA L FA B R I C AT I O N S H O P The proposal for a Fab Lab in Houston initially occupied Elmore’s and the floor directly above. After discussions with the community during the third presentation, we learned another 2,200 square feet adjacent to Elmore’s is available. The space used to be a bed and breakfast, so the space was detailed very nicely and is still in fairly good condition. This extra space allowed the proposal for a Fab Lab to further realize the goals it has set from its first rendition.
PROPOSALS
Elmore’s is currently still running as a business, but the owner has said he plans to retire and move out within a year. This location would be ideal for a creative and entrepreneurial center for not
only the students of the high school and middle school, but also for the residents in Houston. The extra space that was revealed after the third presentation allows for two classrooms, two administrative offices and a rent-able space big enough for four to eight people. The location downtown on the corner of Grand Avenue and Pine Street is at the center of current and future activity, including the Melba Theater, Farmers’ Market and high school. The Fab Lab proposal builds on the goals and objectives of the downtown district. Allowing the space for creative and inventive exploration while also
extending the educational experience would create new opportunities in Houston. All of these spaces allow for multiple programs. The classrooms could be filled with high school students or rather, an extension from a university in the region such as MU, Rolla S&T, Drury or MSU. The work spaces could be rented out by a private inventor, or even a group of students from a nearby robotics team from a high school or university level program.
Fig. 3.2.1 - Site Location of Proposed Fab Lab (Red Building in Center)
Fig. 3.2.2 - Faulhaber Fab Lab at the GWIZ Science Museum in Sarasota, FL - http://flate-mif.blogspot.com/2012/02/ fab-lab-in-sarasota-serves-as.html
115 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
professional tech/business farmers market educational residential natural implementation RESOURCES
Fig.3.2.3 - Final Exterior Night Rendering of Proposed Fab Lab
The Fab Lab in vicinity with the school district and proposed social hub along Grand Avenue and Pine Street would act as a unique landmark for visitors and residents. The design would be easily recognizable as a center for technology and entrepreneurship.
Being located so close to the high school, an entrance was added along the north facade to allow for safe entry for the students. For users entering from Grand Avenue, an entry was added on the east facade.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
116
16
A majority of that space is taken by the work shop and tech lab, both needing around 1000 sq. ft. each. This proposal also contains a single occupancy restroom on each level and an elevator for handicapped users. A garage door was added to the work shop, because depending on the various projects that might be worked on and completed within the Fab Lab, some materials and projects might not fit through the regular entry door. One classroom has typical seats and desks while the other is a computer lab classroom. Both of these could accommodate any type of lesson, from technology to entrepreneurship.
0 2
16 0 2
PROPOSALS
A typical digital fabrication workshop is a about 3,5005,000 sq. ft. With the added space on the second story from the third community presentation, the Houston Fab Lab could be around 5,500 sq. ft.
Fig. 3.2.4 - First Floor plan of The Final Proposal for the Fab Lab
Fig. 3.2.5 - Second Floor Plan of the Final Proposal for the Fab Lab
117 To become officially labeled as a ‘Fab Lab,’ Houston would have to make sure the facility followed MIT’s four guidelines to become certified: “be open to the public, support the Fab Lab charter, share a common set of tools and processes, and participate in the larger global Fab Lab network.” This facility doesn’t necessarily need to be certified by MIT to be a successful digital fabrication shop, but following those guidelines would ensure the facility be as effective as possible. Of those, being open to the public is the most important for Houston because it would allow for inter-generational relationships to form and candid educational opportunities to arise.
Fig. 3.2.6 - Interior Rendering of Fab Lab Entry
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
professional tech/business farmers market educational residential natural implementation RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.2.7 - Interior Rendering of the Tech Space of Fab Lab Proposal
118
H O U S TO N M I S S O U R I A N A LY S I S HOUSTON MISSOURI Houston, Missouri is a town of around 2,000 people and contains a historic downtown with numerous vacant stores. At one time the downtown was the center of activity and commerce and many Houston businesses were developed around the downtown like the Melba Theater and The Brown Shoe Store. The historic Emmett Kelly Park was established to the East of the downtown and the high, middle and elementary school to the west. Very early on, the Houston residents emphasized their desire to reestablish the downtown as the cultural and economic center of their community.
Downtown 2000’
1000’
0’
Corporate businesses
0’
PROPOSALS
HOUSTON CIRCULATION
Fig. 3.3.1 - Houston analysis map
Houston, MO
Fig. 3.3.2 - Houston circulation diagram
US-63 is the major circulation corridor inside of Houston and stretches as far as Little Rock, Arkansas and north to St. Louis. Currently the majority of Houston businesses have located themselves outside of the downtown along the US-63 corridor in order to attract the state-wide travelers. This migration of Houston’s businesses has dismantled the downtown as the route passes to the east. The majority of Houston’s larger businesses like Walmart, developed in the southern portion of town where land was cheaper and they were closer to the highway. These inexpensive stores began to drive Houston local business out of the downtown. These large businesses were designed for the automobiles traveling along US-63 and began to create a modern day sprawl, driving people away from the downtown and walkable environments.
119 US-63 PROPOSAL
ENTRY ROAD PARK
HOUSTON ENTRANCE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
DOWNTOWN
To begin to draw US-63 travelers into the downtown we believe that new commercial growth should be densely concentrated along the US-63 corridor near the downtown. Early on we discovered what we call the “Triangle,” which is the area from Grand Avenue to Main Street and connecting to the other side of Grand Avenue. This area contains some of Houston’s greatest assets, including Emmett Kelly Park, the Farmers’ Market, Melba Theater and the downtown. We believe that by analyzing this area, future development can be developed to work in tandem with it.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
professional tech/business farmers market educational residential natural implementation RESOURCES
ENTRY ROAD EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
North Development
Downtown
South Development
2000’
100’
ENTRY ROAD
0’
0’
Corporate businesses
Fig. 3.3.3 - Downtown asset analysis
Houston, MO
Fig. 3.3.4 - circulation diagram
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
120
US-63 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL PROPOSAL POSITIONING
0’
10,000’
Fig 3.3.5
PHASE 3 NORTH DEVELOPMENT
PHASE 2 MARKET
PHASE 1
250’
Fig. 3.3.8
0’
PROPOSALS
SOUTH DEVELOPMENT
Fig. 3.3.5 - Proposal 4 plan with phasing
When deciding the position for the proposed development, our research suggested that focusing effort between Chestnut Street and Main Street would provide the most assets to attract people to the downtown from the proposed development. We believe that the most valuable areas for future development are the two pre-existing developments adjacent to Emmett Kelly Park. We believe that development at these locations would bring in the quickest return due to their location directly off of US-63. We believe that travelers would automatically be attracted to businesses at this development because of the accessibility from the highway. We decided against development on the West side of US-63, between Chestnut Street and Main Street, because of the inability to easily get to the business from US-63. Future development on the west side of US-63, between Chestnut and Main Street, will attract travelers to the downtown after the initial east side development.
PROPOSAL PHASING The phasing of the proposal starts with the south development; this will act as an extension to Emmett Kelly Park and will be closer to the heart of downtown. The market should follow after the integration of the south development. The market will act as an inexpensive means to boost the economic fidelity and provide business start-ups in Houston. The third phase in the development is at the intersection of US-63 and Main Street. This area should be phased in conjunction with the development of a meaningful entrance to Houston and the development along Main Street.
121 DOWNTOWN ATMOSPHERE
0’
500’
Fig 3.3.8
MARKET AREA
Fig 3.3.7
Fig. 3.3.6 - Figure callout diagram
ENTRY
DOWNTOWN ATMOSPHERE
PARK ATMOSPHERE
DOWNTOWN
NORTH NODE
DEVELOPMENT’S SPACES
BICYCLE ENTRANCE
TRANSITION AREA
MAIN AREA
SOUTH NODE PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE
0’
0’
500’
50’
ENTRY AREA
Fig. 3.3.7 - Spatial diagram
The proposed developments are recommended to be dependent among the relationship between the surrounding contexts in order to create the best design tailored to Houston. In order to begin attracting people to the downtown, we believe, through community collaboration, that this portions of the US-63 corridor should reflect the atmosphere of the downtown. We propose to do this by creating smart density and walkable developments along this section of US63. We believe that by creating an atmosphere that engages travelers enough to slow down, a walkable and potentially mixed-use development can occur. Our purpose in doing so is to create a seamless transition between Emmett Kelly Park and the proposed development along the east side of 63. By creating this transition, it is our belief that this area can become a destination for vehicular traffic that is also pedestrian and bicycle friendly.
PARKING LOT TO PLAZA ENTRANCE
Fig. 3.3.8 - South development
Within the south proposal and market (Fig 3.3.8), we designed the development around how the spaces work in conjunction with each other. We created a small gathering area at the south end to act as the main entrance. To the north of this is the main area where we attempted to reflect a lively gathering and relaxing area. To the north is the transition area that is meant to be very open to the street and park, counteracting the main area that is set back from everything. The transition area’s purpose is to be the gateway to the market and the upper level park. The market is meant to be a very open and active space with transactions and collaborations.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
professional tech/business farmers market educational residential natural implementation RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
50’
Fig. 3.3.9 - Proposal 4 overview perspective
0’
PROPOSALS
122
Fig. 3.3.10 - Perspective callout
The proposed area is to be a small smart growth development that engages people with Houston and their downtown area. We believe that the current development along US-63 south of downtown will continue and could be leveraged to improve the existing commercial districts in Houston. We are proposing to get ahead of this market and begin smart growth along this section to build new opportunities within Houston. The concept behind this development is to act as a rest stop area where people can find the fresh local produce being sold at the Farmers’ Market. As an extension of Emmett Kelly Park, this proposal becomes a walkable and potentially livable plaza. This plaza is meant to reflect the downtown atmosphere through its density and walkability. This improvement will in turn lead to emphasizing the identity of Houston at the entrance to the community as requested during the initial Houston visioning meetings. The main entrance into this development from the community will be from the south side of Emmett Kelly. We are proposing to level out the southern edge in order to make a seamless transition from Emmett Kelly Park to the development entrance. This development contains three portions, the south plaza, the Market area and a park above and to the east of the Market. The park area was implemented because of the open land on the east side of the Market and its proximity to the Emmett Kelly Park.
123 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
professional tech/business farmers market educational residential natural implementation RESOURCES The first entry into the plaza is from the parking lot and it is located on the southern-most edge in order to require the occupant to walk by all of the plaza’s stores to get to the market. This will give the stores the greatest opportunity to make a sale (due to increased pedestrian traffic). The second and main entry is just a bit to the north of the first entry. This entry is for the pedestrians coming from Emmett Kelly Park and is meant to be the most prominent of all of the pathways entering directly into the opening of the plaza. The third and final entry into the plaza is the bicyclist entry on the northern-most tip of the south development. This entry allows for the greatest flexibility of preferred path in a means to celebrate the bicycle riders. This entry opens up into the transition space inside the plaza and allows the occupant to enter the south development, the Market area, and the upper park area in the fastest amount of time. The canopy structure implemented throughout the development is one option of a modular canopy system we recommend be implemented throughout the development of this area. This modular canopy system we recommend be designed (with possible collaboration with Drury University) and built by the building trades program at the high school. We believe this collaboration with the youth of Houston will help them feel ownership over Houston, combating Rural Drain.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.3.11 - Pedestrian entrance perspective
50’
PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE
0’
PROPOSALS
124
Figure 3.3.12 - Perspective callout
The main entrance to the plaza attaches Emmett Kelly Park to the entry space through a crosswalk (Fig 3.3.11). Throughout the community meetings there was discussion regarding the transition from Emmett Kelly Park to the Plaza. The options included a pedestrian bridge, a tunnel, and lastly, a crosswalk. The main concerns from the Houston residents about the crosswalk was the speed of the cars because the road around this section will be widened to a five-lane highway prior to the arrival of the city limits of Houston. We propose a crosswalk for the ease of implementation with stop lights on either side in order to make an official intersection to make it as safe as possible for the pedestrians. This will be combined with the reduction of speed to 35 miles per hour, and the addition of a median between the north and south bound lanes. The entry space in the plaza is comprised of a few different segments more easily visible on figure 3.3.9. At the main pedestrian entrance is a large tree for shade and attractiveness. On the Southern portion is a green space where kids can play and people can sit and picnic. In the center of the entry space are two slender green spaces with benches placed on the outsides for sitting and relaxing. In the center of these two green spaces is a canopy structure to shade the benches and people that are able to sit underneath.
125 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
professional tech/business farmers market educational residential natural implementation RESOURCES Fig. 3.3.13 - Entrance from parking lot perspective
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
0’
The entry space from the parking lot is meant to act as an area for gathering and transition before entering into the plaza. The entire gathering space is set two feet into the ground, emphasizing the importance of the plaza as well as setting it apart from the gathering area. There are three entries into the gathering space from the parking lot. This is in order to make every parking occupant feel close to the entry no matter where they parked. Landscaping is implemented throughout the edges of the parking lot in order to improve the appearance as well as drainage of the area. When entering the gathering space, there are small linear green patches with native wild grass to lead the occupant to the center of the gathering space and make the occupant feel closer to nature. A tree and two tall slender lights are placed in the gathering space to break up the space and to provide light within. Sculptures are recommended to be placed throughout the gathering area in order to raise the interest around the space when people are transitioning from the parking lot into the plaza.
50’
ENTRANCE FROM PARKING LOT
Figure 3.3.14 Perspective callout
Fig. 3.3.15 - Bicycle entrance perspective
BICYCLE ENTRANCE
50’
The bicycle entry at the north of the plaza is the secondary entrance into the development. This entry is connected to the bicycle lane on the East side of US-63 and enters into the transition space from the plaza to the Market. There are bicycle racks on either side of the entry and with a large welcoming canopy with a seating area underneath it. When entering, the cyclists travel through a green barrier that separates the highway from the plaza. This barrier contains small two foot tall shrubs next to smaller shrubs (Fig 3.3.15) located throughout the area. The cyclist entry was positioned at this point in order to make the easiest transition for the cyclists into the plaza, market or upper level Park depending on their wish. We did this in order to celebrate the residents biking, and attempt to persuade more residents to do the same by making this entry the most efficient as far as getting the person to where they desire to go and doing so quickly. The bicycle lane along US-63 is an eight foot wide strip and is raised eight inches off of the eleven foot wide street in order to best increase the bicyclists safety.
0’
PROPOSALS
126
Figure 3.3.16 - Perspective callout
127 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
professional tech/business farmers market educational residential natural implementation RESOURCES
Fig. 3.3.17 - Business Incubator Perspective
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
0’
The Market development can be more specifically categorized as a business incubator. This proposed incubator would require the removal of twenty five feet of the rock wall between Chestnut Street and Main Street to allow for additional space along the highway. Extending the space east of US-63 will also improve the connection with Emmett Kelly Park. Our idea for this space would be to create a walkable linear market with ten feet on the East side for vendors, twelve feet in the center for circulation and a three foot green barrier next to the road. A large canopy system is recommended in order to shade the area throughout the day as well as positively increase the appearance when driving by this market. This business incubator would allow for Houston’s entrepreneurs to test out their business ideas in a low risk atmosphere before possibly opening up their own independent shop. This incubator has the potential ability for fostering Houston’s youth in an entrepreneurial spirit, allowing them to create small businesses selling fresh caught fish and arts and crafts as well as a number of others.
50’
BUSINESS INCUBATOR
Figure 3.3.18 Perspective callout
Fig. 3.3.19 - Plaza interior perspective
PLAZA INTERIOR
50’
In the interior of the plaza, the transition space (Fig 3.3.19) is meant to be a relaxing outdoor space that connects the rest of the plaza to the market area. This area is laid out in an attempt to be the most versatile of all of the spaces for the occupants, allowing people to shop, walk up the stairs to the upper level park, sit down to relax, listen to performances and to skip the area altogether in a means to get to the market. This space contains numerous shops and dining options, stairs on the northeast corner to transition to the upper level park, a small relaxing seating area at the opening of the market, and a small raised versatile stage. This stage can be used for performances, gatherings, lectures, and a number of other possibilities. Scattered around the stage are a number of large stone benches for occupants to listen and watch performances, relax from shopping and to watch the traffic go by. Landscaping is integrated with this space in an attempt to further connect the development to Emmett Kelly Park as well as to make the space more lively. A few tall slender lights are also placed throughout the space in order to build a space that can have an exciting night life.
0’
PROPOSALS
128
Figure 3.3.20 - Perspective callout
129 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
professional tech/business farmers market educational residential natural implementation RESOURCES
Fig. 3.3.21 - Plaza interior perspective
PLAZA INTERIOR
50’
The proposed plaza main space (Fig 3.3.21) is meant to be the liveliest of all of the plaza spaces. This area is lowered two feet from the rest of the plaza in order to disconnect it from the US-63 as much as possible. We propose this area to contain numerous eateries with potential dining on the outside of the restaurants. A large center space is implemented for circulation as well as a gathering space. The large stone benches scattered around the center are placed as a means to help promote the possibility of gatherings. On the west side is a linear path that is level with the rest of the plaza containing shops and a stairway leading to the main space. This path is on a different level in order to add interest to the area by creating a multi-level zone. The landscaping barrier located between the upper level and the main space is placed in order to add emphasis and interest to the multi-level space. The landscaping allows for each area to act independently as well as in conjunction with each other.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I
0’
2040 VISIONING
Figure 3.3.22 Perspective callout
FA R M E R S ’ M A R K E T S A N D C U L I N A RY C L A S S R O O M
PROPOSALS
130
Fig. 3.4.1 - Farmers’ Market Birds Eye Perspective
131 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
1000’
professional tech/business farmers market educational residential natural implementation RESOURCES
0’
Fig. 3.4.2 - Farmers’ Market Context Map
The expanded Farmers’ Market (highlighted in red) is located on the corner of Grand Avenue and Pine Street in the Lone Star Plaza. (Fig 3.4.2) It is made up of three components: the outdoor market, the indoor market and the culinary classroom. All three of these components are part of a larger vision of a art, education, and social
engagement. In the following pages we explain how each of these components work and how they can play a role in the social life of Houston’s downtown by bringing together the schools, the Library and Regional Art Center, the Fab Lab, the Farmers’ Market, and Emmett Kelly Park.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
132 OUTDOOR FARMERS’ MARKET
Fig. 3.4.3 - Farmers’ Market Perspective
A proposed outdoor Farmers’ Market is the center of activity on Pine Street. When designing the outdoor market, the main goal was to create a space that works well for the Farmers’ Market and can be used for other events or as a park. Features used to expand the Farmers’ Market include a playground, new vendor stalls which have covered parking for the vendor trucks. You can see the new stalls in Figure 3.4.5 highlighted in red. These stalls are designed in such a way that they can pull their truck or van into the stall and quickly set up their table of produce. Since their vehicle is nearby, it provides an extra bit of security and efficiency. It’s more efficient because when they run out of something they don’t have to walk back to their vehicle and carry the produce back to their stall. This eliminates leaving produce alone where it has the possibility of being stolen.
PROPOSALS
The playground located in the center of the Farmers’ Market is a great way to allow children of the Farmers’ Market patrons to have fun while their parents shop. Due to the central placement, parents can leave their child at the playground, yet still keep an eye on them from all of the stalls. The playground adds to the sense of a park and increases the flexibility of Lone Star Plaza. The design includes the original Farmers’ Market pavilion to be used for an assortment of possibilities such as live bands during the Farmers’ Market, movies in the park, and concerts. We believe these features will contribute to an atmosphere for a social and educational environment.
Fig. 3.4.4 - Farmers’ Market Perspective
133 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
Main Street
physical model Indoor Market/ Culinary Classroom
Vendor Stalls
professional tech/business farmers market educational residential natural implementation RESOURCES
100’
Playground
Vendor Stalls
Pine Street
0’
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.4.5 - Site Plan
134 INDOOR FARMERS’ MARKET The Indoor Farmers’ Market is designed to meet the growing demand for a year round, all weather market. The design is based on a Co-op grocery store approach which allows for setting up bins with a variety of produce. Different shelves can hold dry goods that are sold through the market such as bread, jams and cookies. The layout of the building uses multiple entrances to the Outdoor Farmers’ Market and Main Street. There is a second entrance to the Culinary Kitchen directly to the outdoor market. The Kitchen also has access to the Indoor market and Co-op Truck.
PROPOSALS
Fig. 3.4.6 - Exterior Perspective
Fig. 3.4.7 - Interior Perspective
135 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
Kitchen
professional tech/business farmers market educational residential natural implementation
Market
50’
Women’s RR
Men’s RR
RESOURCES Co-Op/ Storage
Farmers Market
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 0’
2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.4.8 - Indoor Farmers’ Market
136 CULINARY CLASSROOM
Fig. 3.4.9 - Interior Perspective
The Culinary Classroom proposal was developed as a response to the community’s need for a commercial kitchen. It would be used to prepare food for sale at the Farmers’ Market. Keeping in line with the goal to create a social and educational campus, we designed the space to also function as a Culinary Classroom. The Culinary Classroom is set up with one cook top turned to face the remaining work spaces to see the instructor. The design for the cooking classes allows for both community, high school, and middle school classes to be taught in this location. The Culinary Classroom still has the capability for four people to come in and prepare jams, canned food, breads, and other goods for the Farmers’ Market. An added variety in merchandise will result from having the kitchen associated with the Farmers’ Market, which will expand the potential pool of vendors
PROPOSALS
Another feature of this building is a storage area that houses the Co-Op truck and extra produce and inventory of the Farmers’ Market. Much like in the earlier proposals this Co-Op truck would make runs to nearby markets as a way of exporting local goods out of Houston creating jobs and revenue for the city.
Fig. 3.4.10 - Exterior Night Perspective
137 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
50’
professional tech/business farmers market educational residential natural implementation RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 0’
2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.4.11- Culinary Classroom
138
E D U C AT I O N D I S T R I C T HIGH SCHOOL/MIDDLE SCHOOL This proposal (Fig 3.5.5) focuses on rerouting traffic in separate directions. By removing the connection between Pine Street and Ozark Street, any traffic is redirected away from the front of the school campus. The bus loading zone stays in the same area, but it will be redesigned to better accommodate the many buses that serve the school district, including a designated parking area. The parent loading zone is relocated to a new area adjacent to
0’
100’ 0’
100’
Fig. 3.5.2 - Parent Loading Zones/Parking and Traffic
0’
0’
100’
Fig. 3.5.1 - Bus Loading Zones/Parking and Traffic
PROPOSALS
the east side of the gymnasium, and includes a turn-around for vehicles to exit on Pine Street. The student parking will be relocated to a redesigned parking lot to the north of the gymnasium with access from Main Street. This will remove the student vehicle element from the parent and bus loading zones and traffic routes, especially in the area immediately adjacent to the elementary school to the southwest.
100’
Houston’s educational district is not conducive to the heavy demands as the school let out. In the diagrams below (Figures 3.5.1 - 3.5.4) it becomes apparent that the vehicular traffic routes and loading zones created by buses, parents, and students start to overlap. This creates an unsafe environment for children during the day, especially at the start and end of school days.
Fig. 3.5.3 - Student Parking and Traffic
Fig. 3.5.4 - Bus, Parent, and Student Loading Zones/Parking and Traffic
139 STUDENT CENTER & PERFORMING ARTS
Performing Arts Building
Gymnasium
Student Center
Middle School Pine Street
Hill Street
100’
High School
0’
Ozark Street
The high school and middle school lack an appropriate facility to practice their performing arts programs and a student center for students to spend their spare time outside of class. A proposal for such facilities can be seen in the perspectives (Figures 3.5.6 and 3.5.7) and site plan (Fig 3.5.5) The Performing Arts building will house spaces such as a black box theater and band rehearsal room. The student center will have furniture for students to be productive or relax, it should have technology services such as Wi-Fi, work stations with computers, printers and scanners, as well as study rooms for a more quiet, less distracting environment.
Fig. 3.5.5 - High/Middle School Campus Site Plan
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
professional educational schools parking art and library sculpture garden residential natural implementation RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.5.6 - High/MIddle School Eye-Level Perspective
Fig. 3.5.7 - High/Middle School Birds-Eye Perspective
140 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
King Street
Bryan Street
Ozark Street
This proposal (Fig 3.5.8) helps define a clear route of traffic for parents and buses that serve the elementary school. By redesigning the south lot of the school for the bus loading zone it removes the necessity for buses to turn around and also provides a clear area for children to board buses without having to worry about through traffic. The lot to the northwest of the school becomes the parent loading zone and houses the visitor parking lot. This lot is only accessible from King Street, which becomes a one-way street during the drop-off and pick-up hours of school days.
Elementary School
100’
These new routes, working in collaboration with the new routes from the high school and middle school will provide a safer environment for children as well as reduce the traffic in the educational district of Houston.
Mill Street
Chestnut Street 0’
PROPOSALS
Houston’s elementary school also suffers from the same traffic issues (Figures 3.5.9 to 3.5.12) as the high school and middle school campus. Currently, parents can drive on and off of the school campus from any direction and any entrance. While there is a designated parent loading zone, it is cluttered and doubles as a parking lot for visitors and faculty alike. The buses come from the high school and middle school and only have one entrance to the campus and must turn around in a small space and exit via the same entrance.
Fig. 3.5.8 - Elementary School Campus Site Plan
141 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
Fig. 3.5.9 - Bus Loading Zones/Parking and Traffic
0’
0’
100’
100’
physical model
Fig. 3.5.10 - Parent Loading Zones/Parking and Traffic
professional educational schools parking art and library sculpture garden residential natural implementation RESOURCES
100’
100’
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
0’
0’
Fig. 3.5.11 - Student Parking and Traffic
Fig. 3.5.12 - Bus, Parent, and Student Loading Zones/ Parking and Traffic
142
S U S TA I N A B L E PA R K I N G
0’
To promote sustainable approaches to infrastructure design, we propose a redesign to the east parking lot at the middle and high school. The particular lot redesigned in this proposals is located on Pine Street between the school gymnasium and what is currently the storm shelter. We chose this lot because it has major drainage problems and is also in a key location in relation to other proposals.
100’
DESIGN
Fig. 3.6.2 - Parking Lot Section
100’
The parking lot design and sustainable elements are influenced by the parking garden and pixelated parking designs (Fig 3.6.1 and Fig 3.6.4 respectively). The precedent comes from the book Low Impact Development which is a great reference for future design considerations related to sustainability.
0’
PROPOSALS
With the Library and Regional Art Center being proposed on top of the existing storm the shelter, the need for more parking arises. Combining the storm shelter parking lot and the overflow high school parking creates one cohesive, functional lot. This lot will mainly serve the Library and Regional Art Center.
Fig. 3.6.1 - Parking Lot Precedent Low Impact Development
Fig. 3.6.3 - Parking Lot Plan
143 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
SUSTAINABLE ELEMENTS Green parking medians (Fig 3.6.5), similar to green street medians, are both visually appealing and functional. This particular design has no curb so rainwater can easy flow into the vegetation. The plants then filter out the toxins and the water soaks down into the earth where it collects in permeable pipes. During heavy rains, the water is able to flow into a retention pond designed to hold large amounts of excess water. The use of permeable pavement in the parking lot is a key part of the design. Because the lot is in flood plane, the more ways water can soak into the earth, the better. In combining the overflow lot and the storm shelter lot changes in elevation are resolved. The parking lot is built up with soil and other materials outlined in Fig 3.6.7. It slopes downward from the Library and Regional Art Center until it ends in a retaining wall at the school as seen in the section drawing (Fig 3.6.2).
physical model
Fig. 3.6.5 - Green Parking Medians
professional educational schools parking art and library sculpture garden residential natural implementation RESOURCES
Fig. 3.6.6 - Permeable Pavement Detail - http://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/rehabil-
itation/guidelines/site-features.htm
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.6.4 - Parking Lot Precedent - Low Impact Development
Fig. 3.6.7 - Permeable Pavement Detail - http://www.vwrrc.vt.edu/swc/NonPBMP-
SpecsMarch11/VASWMBMPSpec7PERMEABLEPAVEMENT.html
144
PINE STREET CORRIDOR The Pine Street Corridor is an exceptionally important asset to the Houston community, and serves as a primary connection between the social, educational, and commercial districts of downtown Houston. Pine Street, although fairly short, is full of potential for development and growth. At the west end there is a proposal for a redesign of the high/middle school campus and the addition of a new Student Center and Fine Arts Building. At the east end, there is a proposal for the redesign of Emmett Kelley Park. Along Pine Street, between these two points, there are a number of other proposals including a new Fab Lab, a new Library and Regional Arts facility atop the existing storm shelter, a Sculpture Garden, and a newly redesigned and re-imagined Farmers’ Market located in the Lone Star Plaza. These connections and the potential of new and existing programs on Pine Street will help to build a sense of community and a social hub which includes a community center in Emmet Kelly Park. Fig. 3.7.1 - Picture of Pine Street
100
S T .
FAB LAB
50 0
PROPOSALS
P I N E
FARMERS MARKET
Fig. 3.7.2 - Site Spatial Relationship Diagram
A V E .
SCHOOL
REGIONAL ART+ LIBRARY CENTER
G R A N D
SCULPTURE GARDEN
L I B R A RY A N D R E G I O N A L A R T C E N T E R
145 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
WHAT IS THE POTENTIAL OF THIS SITE?
Regional Art Center + Library
Storm Shelter Area
Library Area
7,735 sq. ft. 4,830 sq. ft.
3
physical model
professional educational education parking art and library sculpture garden residential natural implementation RESOURCES
51,333 sq. ft. 7,735 sq. ft.
Regional Art Area
11,775 sq. ft. 4,609 sq. ft.
Collaboration Area
27,214 sq. ft.
100
Existing Library
-6 1 S T AV E .
Fig. 3.7.3 - Existing Storm Shelter
SQUARE FOOTAGE Existing Storm Shelter
US
1,000
GR AN D AV E
To utilize this site promotes activities in the storm shelter to activate the site, and also give opportunities to make Pine Street lively. Further more, the regional art and library center will work as an extended educational place for any generations beyond elementary, and middle/high school educational system.
PIN E ST
0
The proposed site for a new Library and Regional Art Center is currently occupied by the storm shelter. It has a potential as a physical location to connect school and community. However, the storm shelter is underutilized on daily basis. The currents layout also built a divide due to the big parking lot, and hilled landscape disconnects the school from the downtown.
(Others)
0
P I N E S T. Fig. 3.7.4 - Site Plan - Regional Art and Library Center
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
146 WHY THE LIBRARY AND REGIONAL ART CENTER? We think the most suitable and effective programs for this building is the combination of a library and regional art center to connect the school and community. This combination of a regional art center and library provides a new and unique collaboration. In addition, the storm shelter will be a new asset of Houston that creates connections, provides job opportunities, builds entrepreneurship, offers opportunities to experience art, and also develops the culture and identity of the community.
100
SCHOOL
Fig. 3.7.5 - Site Circulation Diagram
SC G ULP A RD TU EN RE REG I LIB ONAL RA AR RY CEN T & TER
FARME RS MARKE T
HO
OL
The relationship to the sculpture garden not only promotes inspiration to the arts, but also expands art educational aspects to the outdoors by extending green space. The extended green space also will be beneficial to the overall nature of Houston and its relationship to the natural environment. The relationship to the Fab Lab invents possibilities for art with new technology and education. The building and its programs will build opportunities to interact the school with the community over generations, and create jobs for artists, students, senior citizens, young professionals, as well as visitors.
SC
PROPOSALS
The relationship to the Farmers’ Market promotes family time/ events on weekends. The relationship to the school brings students into the library and art center after school to study, gain resources, have meetings, play, and wait for their parents.
FARMERS MARKET
PARKING GARDEN
0
The location connects adjacent assets, including the development of the school system, Farmers’ Market, and introduction of a Fab Lab and sculpture garden. As physical connections, there is also easy access from the school and its parking lots, the sculpture garden, the Farmers’ Market, and the Fab Lab, creating circulation to the school with experiences of art and education.
SCULPTURE GARDEN
FA
Fig. 3.7.6 - Connection Diagram - Entrance
B
LA
B
147 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
professional educational education parking art and library sculpture garden residential natural implementation
Fig. 3.7.7 - Entrance from Sculpture Garden
RESOURCES Fig. 3.7.9 - Entrance from Farmers Market
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.7.8 - Main Entrance
148 LIBRARY AND REGIONAL ART CENTER DETAILS
SECTION
L I B R A RY
A RT C EN TER STO R M S H ELTER
L I B R A RY
A RT C EN TER S TO R M S H ELTER
C O LLA BO R ATI O N A R EA
PLAN ART C EN TER STO R M S H ELTER
L I B R A RY
R EG I O N A L A RT + LI BR A RY C EN TER
FORM This design proposal works efficiently and is sustainable with the existing storm shelter. Our first focus is to use the existing storm shelter, and place the art center on top, and combine another tall square mass on the north side rotating towards to the sculpture garden. The placement provides an entrance and view to the sculpture garden, defines green space, and establishes the circulation to the parking lots.
Fig. 3.7.10 - Form Diagram
PROPOSALS
INTERIOR ORGANIZATION
Fig. 3.7.11 - Circulation Diagram
The library space will consists of a circulation desk, a reference desk, a magazine archive, a book archive, and a study and reading area. The art space consists of a gallery and event space, art studios, and an art supply store. To merge the programs of art center and library, we created collaboration areas by using common spaces for both or art center and library. Computer lab, offices, restrooms, meeting rooms, roof terrace, lobby, entrance, and storage will belong to the collaboration space used by building both of functions. Circulation areas (elevators and stairs) can be decorated by art and expressed art for educational purposes. Incorporating these new spaces creates additional purpose with the storm shelter space. A children’s play area, drawing class, work shop, and so on could be introduced too.
149 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
L I B R A RY
- BOOK ARCHIVE - MAGAZINE ARCHIVE - STUDY/READING SPACE - CHECK-OUT/ RETURN DESK - REFERENCE DESK
REST ROOM
STUDY /READ
ING AREA
BOOK ARCH
IVE GREEN TERACE
STAIRS
MAGAZINE ARC
HIVE
CIRCULATION DESK
- GALLERY/EVENT SPACE - STUDIO/ CLASS ROOM - ART SUPPLY STORE
- STORM SHELTER - ART CLASS ROOM
S ER RM ET FA RK A M
B
ART CENTER
OFFICES
LOBBY/ ENTRANCE REST RO CONFERENCE OM SUPPLY STORE MEETING ROO / ART M GALLERY STUDIO EVENT SPAC
COMPUTER LA
STORM SHELTER
Level 3
E
STAIRS
ELEVATOR
- LOBBY ENTRANCE - COMPUTER ROOM - OFFICES - BATHROOM - CONFERENCE/MEETING ROOM - STORAGE - MECH. ROOM - GREEN TERRACE
physical model
ELEVATOR
C O L L A B O R AT I O N AREA
STORAGE/ MEC H
Level 2
professional educational education parking art and library sculpture garden residential natural implementation RESOURCES
. ROOM
REST ROOM
LOBBY/ ENTRANCE
STORM SHELTE R
C I RC U L AT I O N - STAIRS - ELEVATOR
NG
KI
R PA
Level 1 TS LO
Fig. 3.7.13 - Plan Space Diagram
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
150 SOCIAL EDUCATIONAL SPACE Along with building the urban context, the Library and Regional Art Center aims to be a social place to develop education and multi-generational collaboration. The activities in both spaces should be both of educational and entertaining. This will motivate and attract people to engage in the programs for students and adults.
PROPOSALS
FIg. 3.7.13 - Art Class Room - 2nd Floor
FIg. 3.7.14 - Gallery - 2nd Floor
151 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
Fig. 3.7.15 - Library - 3rd Floor
professional educational education parking art and library sculpture garden residential natural implementation RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.7.16 - Collaboration Space/ Circulation Desk - 2nd Floor
152 EXTERIOR- MATERIALITY
Precedents Study: Material Use - Block a Noordstrook (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
The library uses bricks to fit into the context of historical downtown, with a modern approach introducing other materials like concrete and steel. Block a Noordstrook at Amsterdam in Netherlands, introduces a use of bricks as decoration and contributes to new possibilities to use local bricks, which naturally belong to Houston. In this way, the building can blend with the rest of downtown, but still stand out as a new design for Houston. Fig. 3.7.17, Fig. 3.7.18, Fig. 3.7.19 - Precedents Study - Block a Noordstrook - Amsterdam, Netherlands -
PROPOSALS
http://www.archdaily.com/167540/block-a-noordstrook-dick-van-gameren-architecten/
Fig. 3.7.20 - Exterior/ Main Entrance
153 SUSTAINABILITY Building a sustainable Library and Regional Art Center is necessary for the city of Houston for the next decade. Site sustainability like efficient use of natural light, considerations of sun directions, and utilizing sustainable materials and systems should be considered. For this regional art and library center, green roof garden can be one method of a unique sustainable approach. The roof garden gives extra spaces to read books and exhibit arts with an overlook to the Farmers’ Market. The Library at TU Delft University by Mecanoo Architects is a good example as an introduction of sustainable systems and technologies. The first sustainable feature is a use of rain water for heating and cooling systems for the buildings. This library has a sloped plane roof with extension of the grass from the ground to the top edge of the roof. The roof provides thermal effects as well as cooling and heating control systems of the campus by running off water from green roof. The second feature is high-performance glazed facades. The high performance glazing system is suitable to the regional art library center by maximizing natural light and providing views with visual connections to the city. Through more natural site sustainability, the southern sun exposure should be considered by adding sun shading devices. This could be achieved by steel poles crossing each other as a sun-shading device, which create shade but also keep visibility from outside to inside. The building should promote sustainable thinking and become an example of sustainable buildings for other new buildings in Houston.
Precedents Study: Sustainable Approach Library at TU Delft University (Delft, Netherlands)
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
FIg. 3.7.21 - Precedents Study- Library at TU Delft University - Delft, Netherlands - http://inhabitat.com/mecanoos-tu-delft-library-crowned-with-a-massive-
green-roof/
professional educational education parking art and library sculpture garden residential natural implementation RESOURCES
FIg. 3.7.22 - Precedents Study- Library at TU Delft University - Delft, Netherlands - http://www.mecanoo.nl/Projects/project/27/Library-Delft-University-ofTechnology/t/0
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
154
SCULPTURE GARDEN
Fig. 3.8.2 - Sculpture Garden Plan
PROPOSALS
One key element of the design is the retention pond. Because the garden is directly north of the proposed sustainable parking lot, it is an ideal location for excess water storage. The placement of the pond considers existing contours of the site. The pond is both highly functional for retention purposes and gives the garden a more nature-oriented atmosphere. The bridge over the pond (Fig. 3.8.3) adds a picturesque quality to the garden.
0’
The sculpture garden will serve as an outdoor gallery for the Regional Art Center. The sculptures will be dispersed evenly throughout the park and will be bolted to concrete platforms (if possible) to ensure safety, much like those in Fig. 3.8.1. The sculptures (represented in black on Fig. 3.8.2) will rotate seasonally or as sold. All of the trees on the east side of the main retaining wall (represented in purple in Fig. 3.8.2) are original to the site.
100’
DESIGN
Fig. 3.8.1 - UCLA Murphy Sculpture Garden Precedent - http://maps.ucla.edu/ campus/?locid=65054
Fig. 3.8.3 - Sculpture Garden Bridge
155 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
MOSAIC WALL At the second presentation in Houston a community member mentioned the idea of a two-story mosaic being designed and built on a building downtown. The mosaic style is great because many community members are able to contribute to the building process whereas, with a mural, there is little room for community contribution. As the overall green space design developed, we decided that the best way to integrate this idea into a proposal would be as a series of retaining walls within the sculpture garden. The mosaic would be designed and built as a collaborative effort by community members of all ages. This collaboration on behalf on the community will create a beautiful and unique piece of Houston that multiple generations can take pride in.
physical model
Additional details will add functional aspects to the wall. Stairs built into the wall will allow access to another level of the garden with additional sculptures (Fig 3.8.4). Recessed, built-in benches will create unique seating for the garden (Fig 3.8.6). Fig. 3.8.5 - Mosaic Wall
professional educational schools parking art and library sculpture garden residential natural implementation RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.8.4 - Stair Detail
Fig. 3.8.6 - Bench Detail
156
HOUSING CURRENT HOMES FOR SALE
0’
100’
Current homes in Houston, Missouri range from $60K to $250K. Homes around the lower end are deteriorating and need desperate help. The homes on the upper end range from good to poor condition. Currently, many of the homes that are for sale do not offer the adequate quality assurance to first-time home buyers. While there are options for them to purchase, the amount of work to get the home to a comfortable, livable condition is a concern. A lower average income for young professionals discourages renovation and leads many to move to larger cities and suburbs, earn sufficient income, and possibly move back to Houston to retire. However, post professional housing options need improvement as the population continues to age. Fig. 3.9.1 - Homes Available for Sale - http://www.zillow.com/houston-mo/for_sale/
100’
While young professionals desire returning to their hometown after college, the current rental situation does not allow for this to happen. There are not nearly enough homes (if any) for the incoming population to rent, and the homes that are available for rent do not follow a uniform building code. The city does not enforce codes for rental. The first step to this process is supplying future landlords with a specific set of codes designed to protect the health, safety, and welfare of tenants. After this step, developers can begin to move into town and build neighborhoods such as those presented in the following pages. This is one of the first steps in the multi-phase process. Businesses will not thrive unless residents are in the city, adjacent to the business district.
0’
PROPOSALS
CURRENT HOMES FOR RENT
Fig. 3.9.2 - Homes Available for Rent - http://www.zillow.com/homes/Houston-MO_rb/
157 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
COMMUNITY DISCUSSION Through discussion in previous meetings with the Visioning Committee, we have learned that there is a large shortage in both young professional and post-professional housing options in the city. During the first meeting we created a beginning understanding of what the residents needed for the housing proposals to be successful. Later renditions of proposals touched on needs for both young professionals and post-professionals. Public response from these meetings helped us refine the needs of the two demographics. These have been collected and compacted into four main needs of each demographic. While both have similar needs, different programs should be installed for each.
physical model Fig. 3.9.3 - Example Seen in Future Pages of a Proposal for Young Professionals
professional educational residential housing natural implementation RESOURCES
WHAT YOUNG PROFESSIONALS NEED • • • •
Affordable Housing Convenient Location Sense of Community Age-in-Place Housing
WHAT POST-PROFESSIONALS NEED • • • •
Convenient Location Sense of Community Graduated Housing Access to In-home Care
Fig. 3.9.4 - Example Seen in Future Pages of a Proposal for Post-professional Residents
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
158 POCKET NEIGHBORHOOD PRECEDENT STUDY
PROPOSALS
Fig. 3.9.5- The Overall Site Plan - http://pocket-neighborhoods.net/patterns/clusters.html
Fig. 3.9.6 - Shared Garden Spaces - http://tinyhouseblog.com/book-review/pocket-neighborhoods-book-review/
The pocket neighborhood is the main area of study for use of young professionals and seniors. It offers a new perspective for the traditional neighborhood, creating a small community within a larger existing community that acts together for the betterment of the overall town or city. They usually consist of detached single-family houses, a main common house, shared garage spaces, and a large green space that can double as event space. Pocket neighborhoods also try to blend in with the context of adjacent neighborhoods. While it may be tempting to design something totally out of the ordinary, pocket neighborhoods must start small to appeal to a variety of people and not just one. Once the idea of the pocket neighborhood has become more widely accepted, the designs can be elaborated. . One of the common goals for almost all pocket neighborhoods is to better the community and promote sustainable practices. With energy and food prices increasing over the past few years, the growth of solar energy and garden space has increased dramatically. Putting these practices into work as well as water conservation and waste disposal systems will set a great example for the rest of the community. The whole idea of the pocket neighborhood is to create a place where residents can group together and work for the common good of society, increase socialization, and create a community that cares for and trusts each other. Through the use of these sustainable practices, they can save money in the long run and offer more amenities and landscaping for future and current residents of the neighborhood.
159 Pocket neighborhoods are redefining what it means to live next to neighbors. Not only are you living in your house from a day-to-day basis, but you are forming bonds and friendships with neighbors in order to create a small community within a community. This reduces the likelihood of crimes and creates an excellent support system through times of difficulty. Often, these small neighborhoods are placed in historic context and attract both young and old residents, creating a multigenerational neighborhood. This multi-generational aspect means that older generations can teach younger generations what they know, and younger generations can help older generations continue to live happier, healthier lives. Since many of the spaces are considered common areas, residents are encouraged to socialize with each other and help out when needed.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model Fig. 3.9.7 - Direct Connection to Common Spaces - http://tinyhouseblog.com/ book-review/pocket-neighborhoods-book-review/
professional educational residential housing natural implementation RESOURCES
The socialization aspect stretches farther than just the neighborhood. Due to the pocket neighborhood’s focus on the greater well-being of the community, events are encouraged to be developed throughout the year. Not only are residents encouraged to volunteer within the neighborhood, but they are encouraged to form teams and volunteer in the community as well. With the community garden space, food can be collected and turned into meals for the less fortunate. Flowers can be cut and made into bouquets for those who are sick. The green space can host several community events throughout the year that shine light on the pocket neighborhood. This not only improves the livelihood of the neighborhood, but the entire community as well. All in all, pocket neighborhoods are a new breed of neighborhood that focuses both on the individual and the greater good of the entire community.
Fig. 3.9.8 - Porches for Neighbors to Sit and Gather - http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2011-03-30-pocket30_ST_N.htm
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.9.9 - Abundant Landscaping - http://provocationutah.wordpress. com/2012/01/04/pocket-neighborhoods/
160 COHOUSING PRECEDENT STUDY
Fig. 3.9.10 - Sketch of Wild Sage Common House - http://www.houzz.com/photos/2220983/Wild-Sage-Cohousing-modern-rendering-denver
Cohousing neighborhoods are similar to pocket neighborhoods, but are usually larger in scale and focus on fitting more residents onto a smaller piece of land. This not only increases the amount of housing offered, but tightens the relationships people can form with one another. This type of model places people with more common spaces and almost forces at least some kind of daily socialization. Since the campuses are usually larger, the common houses have to provide enough space and amenities for a greater amount of people. A common green space is still placed for events and social games, but the common house acts as the main social hub. Cohousing is becoming more popular as time progresses with over 100 projects throughout the world.
PROPOSALS
While this may be a small number to some, it is a great number for a system that started in the 1990s in European countries. These cohousing communities are also a little harder to put into place than pocket neighborhoods because they usually start with a group of citizens that design how they would like their neighborhood to be built and work together to design it. Projects are usually completed 3-5 years after they form their group. Groups for these neighborhoods usually consist of anywhere from 20-60 families. Usually extra units and room for expansion are left open for future families who would like to join. Since the planning is done through as a democracy, housing is usually worked through a month-to-month basis to offer some leniency if situations arise. Fig. 3.9.11 - Abundant Landscaping - http://jlogan.com/wild_sage1.html
161 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
Cohousing neighborhoods act as multi-generational facilities that work together to maintain the land. While some spaces are private and allow for customization, much of the space is common and needs to be taken care of together by all the residents. This creates a subordinate goal for the campus and places responsibility on all of the residents. Because of this system, the entire neighborhood feels ownership for the land and will have a greater desire to keep it alive and well. A common house as mentioned on the previous page is used for neighborhood events, meetings, and weekly dinners. It usually consists of a large multi-purpose space, play rooms for children, and a guest suite. The common house is a vital component to this model, bringing the residents closer together.
physical model Fig. 3.9.12 - Common House Interior - http://vrc.colorado.edu/index.php?mode=ImageDetail&v0=Date&IMAGEID=133803&OBJECTID=989221&FILENAME=193935.jpg
professional educational residential housing natural implementation RESOURCES
Due to the shared guest suite in the common house, the apartments and houses can be made smaller to allow for more units to be built. Units in cohousing complexes range anywhere from studios for single residents to three bedrooms for families with children. All units have their own private kitchen and living areas like in a normal house or apartment. The entry and back patio are some of the main focuses. Being a community based on social events, the entries to the home need to be appealing. These spaces also allow for customization, making the units unique rather than a repetitive series of homes. Landscaping is also used to separate the homes from each other. With so many homes in proximity to one another, people need some type of barrier and sound isolator. Landscaping also attributes to the overall beauty of the grounds and improves the look of the community.
Fig. 3.9.13 - Wild Sage Cohousing Street View - http://vrc.colorado.edu/index.
php?mode=browse_object&v0=Date&BuildingValueID=533156
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.9.14 - Focus on Front Porches - http://www.houzz.com/photos/2220943/ Wild-Sage-Cohousing-modern-exterior-denver
162 SENIOR COHOUSING PRECEDENT The senior cohousing model is similar to the regular cohousing model, but is designed for older professionals of the community. The homes range from small to large depending on the independence of the residents. Cohousing is usually organized into a cluster of units facing each other adjacent to pedestrian pathways to add a sense of community. Front entrances usually overlook the numerous common spaces of the campuses to encourage social interaction. Landscaping and sustainable resources are some of the main focuses of these cohousing neighborhoods. One of the main reasons people group together to form these neighborhoods is to provide and promote sustainable practices to those both young and old.
PROPOSALS
Fig. 3.9.15 - Silver Sage Site Plan - https://www.flickr.com/photos/28643872@N04/2676816391/
Fig. 3.9.16 - Silver Sage Pedestrian Sketch - bouldersilversage.wordpress.com
Figure 3.9.16 is an early sketch of what the neighborhood might look like, offering natural landscaping and small, single story homes to minimize the look of a large building on a small site. Later designs, however, have changed this into a multi-story complex with terraces and hidden vehicle storage. While it may not offer the same experience as early sketches may have presumed, it still gives residents a pleasant atmosphere with abundant landscaping, use of sustainable materials, and the wide use of vertical landscaping throughout the facility. The sketch to the left suggests how residents would like to see Silver Sage in future development. The sketch on the left also shows how the use of a pedestrian pathway is the main form of connection in the neighborhood instead of a road.
163 Community garden areas are a vital components in the cohousing model as well. Like in the pocket neighborhood, it encourages residents to come together to produce food for themselves, the community, or for the Farmers’ Market. There are many opportunities in which community garden areas can be used for the betterment of the community. Being across from the younger cohousing campus, they can invite the children to come help with the gardens, creating a tighter bond between the two cohousing models and the community. This is a great option for older professionals as well, giving them social interaction that increased their health and overall well-being. Post professionals who are able to continue making their daily decisions and have the freedom to do what they want are less likely to have to move into assisted living facilities, and are happier and healthier even in old age.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model Fig. 3.9.17- Shared Garden Space - bouldersilversage.wordpress.com
professional educational residential housing natural implementation RESOURCES
Winter is inevitable in many areas throughout the country. Choosing landscaping that thrives in both summer and winter are essential pieces to creating a campus that remains beautiful and encourages more people to join all year round. While cohousing neighborhoods are usually found in suburban and rural landscapes, this year-round beauty can attract outsiders to come join their community, growing and promoting the cohousing model. Sooner rather than later, these types of communities will become more and more known and will become the standard for most neighborhoods. The idea of interaction on both a broader community and intimate neighborhood level builds density and increases the spread of sustainable practices. While not appropriate for all types of communities, small communities like Houston that focus on community interaction will greatly benefit from a cohousing models.
Fig. 3.9.18 - Winter Landscaping - http://silvertipconsultants.com/Projects/Silver_Sage/
Page_three_projects_Silver_Sage_layout.html
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.9.19 - Abundant Common Areas - http://www.cohousingco.com/projects/
silver-sage-senior-cohousing/
164 ASSISTED LIVING PRECEDENT
Fig. 3.9.20 - Covered Entry at the Quarry in Vancouver, WA - http://www.senior-care-resources.com/directory/listing/the-quar-
Assisted living community models usually offer a covered entry to improve accessibility. If done in an efficient manner, the entrance can look like a high end hotel, creating a resort-like feeling for the residents. People do not want to live in an assisted-living facility that looks too mundane, they want to be excited that this is their future home. This is done through quality design and landscaping. While newer assisted-living facilities are several stories, Houston residents only really need a single-story facility that fits in the context of the surrounding neighborhoods. Facilities like this one do a great job at mixing the materiality of the exterior, offering brick, stone, wood, and vinyl materials. Assisted living-facilities like Fig 3.9.21 also promote sustainable practices.
PROPOSALS
ry-senior-living-at-columbia-tech-center-assisted-living-facility-vancouver-washington/
Fig. 3.9.21 - Community Garden Area - http://www.columbiatechcenter.com/overview/bldg_quarry.php
These sustainable practices are shown through various parts of the building including solar energy, water conservation, and community garden areas. Although the community garden beds in Fig 3.9.21 only show an example of flowers, they can be used to grow food for the facility or used in volunteer groups to make meals for the less fortunate. The community garden areas will also give residents more ownership for the meals that the facility provides. Knowing that they grew some of the vegetables that went into the meal may encourage the residents to eat the provided meals more often. Solar energy and water conservation will also save the facility money to offer more features and better materials to the residents and encourage more seniors in need of housing to stay at the facility.
165 New facilities like this one are starting to introduce a new type of living for post-professionals. Instead of relying on a nurse for everything, residents are given their own independent apartment that is attached to the main building. This gives the residents private space while still giving them the access to 24 hour in-home care. They can either cook their own meals or go to the common dining area. Often, they have their own balcony space so they can have exterior space to themselves outdoors. The apartments also offer many conveniences that they might find in their own homes like fireplaces (decorative) and stoves, while others offer basic conveniences and no fire appliances for safety concerns depending on the level of health of the resident.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model Fig. 3.9.22 - Living Room and Dining Areas - http://www.thequarryliving.net/p/ retirement_communities/photo_gallery_8958/vancouver-wa-98683/the-quarry-senior-living-8958
professional educational residential housing natural implementation RESOURCES
These apartments are usually one bedroom with ample space to get around, have guests, or socialize with fellow residents. They meet all ADA compliances and offer residents 24 hour access to in-home care. The bedrooms are large enough for an older couple to continue to live together. The main focus of these apartments is to offer the conveniences of home without having to be away from the care the residents need. A hybrid of this and a pocket neighborhood would be an excellent option for Houston. Because many people in Houston express their independence, a graduated program will slowly move the residents to the facility as they become older. This offers a transition that is not drastic and allows them time to become acquainted with the advantages and disadvantages of living in an assisted-living facility.
Fig. 3.9.23 - Living Room and Kitchen - http://www.thequarryliving.net/p/retirement_ communities/photo_gallery_8958/vancouver-wa-98683/the-quarry-senior-living-8958
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.9.24 - Independent-Living Bedroom Example - http://www.thequarryliving.
net/p/retirement_communities/photo_gallery_8958/vancouver-wa-98683/the-quarry-senior-living-8958
166 POCKET NEIGHBORHOOD NORTH OF CITY HALL ON GRAND AVENUE This residential lot just north of the City Hall is the first impression visitors will see as they make their way to the downtown area. It is only a few blocks away from the center of the downtown corridor, making it a great location for young professionals. This will boost the economy and activity of the downtown district.
The neighborhood is modeled after a mixture of the cohousing and pocket neighborhood types. Some of the components of this model are main residential houses, abundant landscaping, common house, shared garage areas, common green spaces, and community garden spaces.
South Grand Avenue
100’
South First Street West Oak Street
0’
PROPOSALS
West Chestnut Street
Fig. 3.9.25 - Lot North of City Hall on Grand Avenue Site Plan
The neighborhood is a great way for young professionals to get involved in the community and meet new people. The compactness of neighborhood and how it is set up allow the residents to get to know each other quickly forming bonds which will help keep the neighborhood in great shape, and providing a residential anchor for the downtown district.
167 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
SMALL, STARTER HOMES The houses in this residential neighborhood are modeled after the pocket neighborhood style. They offer young professionals a two to three bedroom house with 1,000 to 1,200 square feet of living space. This a great option for young professionals looking for a starter home as they will be able to rent on a month-to-month basis, and build a support group. Moving into Houston for the first time could be difficult since the income is low compared to the state average, but his communityfocused neighborhood could offer them the resources they need to live comfortably over their first few years. This will help bring in young professionals and slow the process of rural drain.
physical model Fig. 3.9.26 - Small Two to Three Bedroom Houses
professional educational residential housing natural implementation RESOURCES
SHARED GARAGE SPACE Being a compact neighborhood, it is important not to crowd the land with garages attached to every house. A shared garage that attaches to a common space will offer ample interior neighborhood space while still giving residents enough parking spaces for their vehicles. It forces the resident to go to another building to retrieve their car, raising the probability of interaction between fellow neighbors. It encourages walking to promote a healthy lifestyle and eventually reduce dependence on a vehicle. A shared set of bicycles included in this system will help speed up this new lifestyle.
Fig. 3.9.27 - Semi-private, Yet Easy to Socialize
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.9.28 - Shared Garage Space
168 SHARED GREEN SPACE Although the houses within the neighborhood do not have their own private backyards, a large shared green space with a playground is great for children, pets, and various events throughout the year. It is easy to let your children play with friends and still be able to watch them from inside the house. The green space is attached to the community garden area, encouraging parents to tend to the vegetation and children to play on the playground. The communal aspect encourages large social interaction between neighbors, forming teams to maintain the space also encourages community development.
Fig. 3.9.29 - Shared Green Space
SENSE OF SECURITY
PROPOSALS
Pocket neighborhoods place homes within close proximity of each other, creating a centralized community space. This set-up allows for excellent neighborhood watch programs to develop. There will almost always be someone watching over the green space adding to the sense of security. This lessens the overall crime-rate of the community and improves the image of Houston. Ample lighting also plays into this sense of security. If the green space was dark during the night time, it would allow for more unknown events to occur. This is just one example of how Houston can use the model of a pocket neighborhood as a solution to the rental deficiency in the town. Fig. 3.9.30- Sense of Security
169 COHOUSING NEAR EMMETT KELLY PARK The second area of interest is a slightly larger residential block a short distance away from Emmett Kelly Park and Grand Avenue. It is just behind the Bank of Houston and has the same amenities as the residential block north of City Hall, just a little bit bigger. The lot currently has a large gravel parking lot and a few low-end houses. It doesn’t contribute to the overall beauty of Houston and could use
some help. This example is much like the other neighborhood, but offers a larger common area and a few extra houses. It is integrated with the surrounding neighborhoods and offers young professionals an option to move into a small starter home rather than buying. The location is also adjacent to the downtown district which could decrease the dependency on cars.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
professional educational residential housing natural implementation RESOURCES
0’
East Chestnut Street Fig. 3.9.31 - Lot Near Emmett Kelly Park Site Plan
South Third Street
South Second Street
100’
East Mill Street
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
170 INTEGRATION WITH CONTEXT As mentioned on the previous site plan page, this neighborhood fits in well with its surrounding context. The houses in the surrounding neighborhoods are pushed away from the street and are mainly single-story. We want the new homes to be of the same nature, but offer more features and more landscaping. We want the houses to appeal to any new young professional moving into the town. The houses will offer young professionals an excellent place to start their life in Houston, raising the community atmosphere, involvement through various organizations, and helping them through times of stress. This pocket neighborhood will raise the appeal of the neighborhood, but also raise the value of surrounding homes. Fig. 3.9.32 - Integration With Context
CAR/BIKE SHARE PROGRAMS
PROPOSALS
Like the last neighborhood mentioned, this one will also have a shared garage system. With extra spaces, the neighborhood can start an electric car share program that offers one to two cars to be used as communal cars. This system encourages car pooling and reduces dependency on multiple cars for families. The way this system works, if agreed upon, is that the developer will purchase the cars and include the use through the month-to-month rent. It will be used on a schedule system set up by the residents in weekly or monthly meetings. A bike share program of the similar manner will lessen the need for a car even more and promote a healthy lifestyle. Fig. 3.9.33 - Shared Garage Spaces with Electric Car and Bike Share Programs
171 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
HIDDEN CAR STORAGE Because the garage space is shared with fellow residents of the neighborhood, this puts the car out of view instead of on the street in front of the house. While on-street parking is still available to all residents, the optional garage storage will protect vehicles, especially at night and during winter. Offering a garage to renters increases the overall appeal of the house. This also takes the cars off the sides of the street, improving the appearance of the house and landscaping. As mentioned in the community meeting, not many people will understand this idea at first, but young professionals desire a more sustainable approach to parking and living. This takes the vehicle out of mind, making us less reliant on them.
physical model Fig. 3.9.34 - Hidden Car Storage. Peace of Mind
professional educational residential housing natural implementation RESOURCES
COMMUNITY GARDEN AREA A community garden is offered for use by all residents. The produce can be used for meals at each individual residence, communal meals throughout the months, meals for the less fortunate, or sold at the Farmers’ Market to gain revenue for maintenance and new amenities. This will encourage the neighborhood to work as a team to create an abundance of produce throughout the year and create bonds for lifelong friendships. These friendships will result in a greater sense of community within the neighborhood. Weekly and monthly events will increase the interaction and social aspects designed for the neighborhood, translating into improvement of community involvement in Houston.
Fig. 3.9.35 - Community Garden Areas
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.9.36 - Sense of Community
172 GRADUATED SENIOR HOUSING ON FORBES LOT The third neighborhood is located on the Forbes lot in a residential area. It is a large lot just south of the elementary school and would be a great opportunity for an post professional community to encourage some multi-generational interaction like in the cohousing precedents mentioned. Not only will the children be able to learn about new
processes, but the residents will be able to have outside interaction on a frequent basis. The overall campus consists of a cohousing, pocket neighborhood with more traditional assisted-living to the south of the lot. The assisted-living apartments have direct access
to the main building and to the street, allowing for interaction with other neighbors. There is a shared parking and garage space making it easy for visitors and employees to find parking, and a covered entry for use when it is raining or for executive pick-up and drop-off.
West Chestnut Street
100’ 0’
PROPOSALS
Bryan Street
South King Street Fig. 3.9.37 - Forbes Lot Graduated Housing Site Plan
173 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
GRADUATED HOUSING SYSTEM The size of the lot will allow for an opportunity to introduce a graduated-housing program in Houston. On the north part of the lot is a tighter version of a pocket neighborhood and cohousing model. These homes are small, one to two bedrooms, for post professionals starting to transition into assisted-living, but not ready to give up the freedom of having a house to themselves. To the south of the lot are smaller, one bedroom apartments that have connections to both the main building and the street. These are for seniors who need a lot of help during the day and have more health care needs. Houses are set up for both singles and couples. Residents are given freedom to make their own choices and interact with others as they please. Numerous events throughout the year are held to encourage continued social development.
physical model Fig. 3.9.38 - Small Homes for Able-Bodied Residents
professional educational residential housing natural implementation RESOURCES
COVERED ENTRY SYSTEM The entrance should be accessible to all residents, especially in inclement weather. It’s a great spot to drop someone off in the rain or the hot sun. It is connected to the main drive to activate the entry. This activation helps attract more people and encourages greater community involvement between young and old. Since post professional are the ones that use the free bus system the most, the covered entry is a great place for the bus to stop and pick up residents to take them to the hospital, downtown, or shopping. The entry is also connected to the main parking area through the use of a sidewalk with ample lighting for an added sense of security.
Fig. 3.9.39 - Small Studios for Residents Who Need In-home Care
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.9.40 - Covered Entry System
174 SHARED PARKING SPACES The shared parking is much like in the previous examples, just at a larger scale. It will be used by residents, employees, and visitors. The outside parking is mainly for temporary use by visitors and employees, people that will not be staying over night. The garage areas are for use by the able-bodied residents in the pocket neighborhood area and for nurses and staff staying overnight. An electric-car share program could work well as an identity to the facility. The nurses could have access to these to drive residents to the hospital or shopping and not have to use any fossil fuels. The building can also be connected to solar panels that connect to the chargers resulting in free energy for electric cars and some of the interior electrical. Fig. 3.9.41 - Shared Garage and Parking Space
COMMUNITY GARDEN AREA
PROPOSALS
The garden area is much like the neighborhoods in the previous proposals. This one, however will be used mainly for the communal dinners prepared by the facility. There can also be master gardeners who teach post professionals how to make sustainable gardens and processes. Another program that the facility can do throughout the year is invite children from the elementary school across the street to come and help with the produce as well as learn about various types of agriculture being used throughout Houston. This multi-generational integration could brighten the spirits of the residents and give them visitors.
Fig. 3.9.42 - Community Gardens
175 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
CONNECTED PATHWAYS The houses to the north of the lot are close together to form open hallways and pathways to give the residents a resort-like atmosphere. The pathways are all connected to a common space with some type of activity that can happen between each group of houses. They do not have direct access to the street because the design is to encourage the peace and quiet that an interior courtyard can provide. The pathways have easy access to the street, but the main focus is not put on the street. The houses are also not oriented toward the street to encourage more social interaction between the residents. As the post professionals grow older, it is vital they maintain a certain level of interaction. This not only improves overall health, but raises the level of safety by building relationships in the community.
physical model Fig. 3.9.43 - Connected Pathways
professional educational residential housing natural implementation RESOURCES
LANDSCAPING One of the main focuses throughout the campus is the landscaping. More landscaping means less grass to mow and also means less noise throughout the week. There is still ample green space for visitors and events throughout the year, but there is more vertical landscaping to provide shade and privacy for residents. This excess of landscape also encourages able-bodied residents to help and gives them something to do throughout the year. There will also be many sustainable systems used throughout the campus that focus on solar energy, water conservation, and other systems that will lessen the monthly cost to operate the facility. The abundance of landscape will not only improve the look of the campus, but raise values of nearby homes.
Fig. 3.9.44 - Landscaping
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.9.45 - Green Space
176 LOFT RESTORATION AND DOWNTOWN ACTIVATION The last area of focus, and possibly the most difficult is the downtown area. Right now a lot of the buildings are either vacant or filled with thrift and pawn stores. Many of the citizens we talked to do not like the lack of consistent quality in the downtown. Houston is focused on community involvement and it shows excellently with the
Farmers’ Market and their desire to improve it. The only problem is for the improvement to be successful, the entire downtown needs to improve both in appearance and functionality. To improve these aspects in the downtown area, we propose there to be an integration of local retail. The city should provide incentives to local businesses
especially with those that need special needs. This will encourage young professionals to want to move into lofts that can be restored in the twostory buildings. This restoration and activity can improve the overall economy and appearance of Houston.
Pine Street
100’ 0’
PROPOSALS
Second Street
Grand Avenue
First Street
Fig. 3.9.46 - Downtown Housing and Street scape Site Plan. Buildings Suitable for Lofts Highlighted in Teal.
177 The site plan on the previous page highlights the buildings that can be used for lofts. Each of these buildings can house anywhere between two and four lofts with a total of around 20 lofts downtown for young professionals to move into. The first part of this production is the introduction of specific codes and standards. Many of these buildings are in great disrepair due to vacancy and neglect. Many used to be live-work housing but have long since been abandoned and need restoration. Renovating store fronts and lofts will greatly improve the overall look of the downtown corridor and offer many new housing opportunities. It will also place the center of town back to Grand Avenue instead of outside of the city center. Once the people are in and near the downtown area, the local businesses will have additional opportunities to build within the local economy.
Local businesses need to be reintroduced into the downtown area. While thrift and pawn stores are considered local, they may not offer the quality of appeal a variety of new businesses would add. Many citizens express the desire to make this happen, and will support the business if it does. This is not the only aspect, though. It must also attract visitors from US63. As in earlier proposals, the intersection of Grand Avenue and US-63 must be reconsidered and offer visitors an incentive to drive or walk downtown. In order to improve the overall look of Grand, we have placed vertical landscaping and bioswales to break up the crowded on-street parking. It takes away the hard pavement and introduces soft texture and color. We did this in front of the Melba theatre to create an entrance that would allow for red-carpet events for play and movie premieres like in larger cities.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
Fig. 3.9.47 - Melba Theatre in the Daytime
professional educational residential housing natural implementation RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.9.48 - Melba Theatre in the Nighttime
178
PA R K S P RO P O S A L LINEAR PARK CONCEPT
Fig. 3.10.1 - Hudson Linear Park Plan by the PARC Foundation - Hudson, NY - http://www.theparcfoundation.org/news/27
WHY LINEAR PARKS?
PROPOSALS
Traditional parks are public spaces designed for passive recreation; users read, eat, and people-watch. These parks are destinations, places to go. In contrast, urban linear parks take you somewhere. They are facilities for active recreation, for walking, jogging, or biking. They combine elements of transportation with recreation. Linear parks can take on a variety of forms and provide several benefits to an urban place. By implementing a linear park system throughout Houston, specific sites such as parks, cultural features, and historic sites can be linked with each other and other populated areas. A linear park can be established along a natural corridor or any other desirable route. Benefits include promoting fitness and recreation while establishing connections through a city. Fig. 3.10.2 - Overall Parks, Trails, and Greenery Plan for Houston
179 EXAMPLES OLD RAILROAD TUNNELS “RAILS TO TRAILS” HIGHWAYS + ELECTRICAL LINES DETERIORATED INDUSTRIAL AREAS
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
CANALS, SHORELINES, STREAMS
physical model
DISUSED ELEVATED RAILWAYS
professional educational residential natural parks street design vegetation implementation
SCENIC ROADWAYS PEDESTRIAN + BICYCLE ROUTES
Fig. 3.10.3 - Hudson Linear Park Perspective by the PARC Foundation - Hudson, NY - http://www.theparcfoundation.org/news/27
BENEFITS
RESOURCES
PROVIDE RECREATION CONTRIBUTE TO PHYSICAL FITNESS LEAD TO COMMERCIAL ZONES
INCREASE RESIDENTIAL ESTATE VALUES ATTRACT NEW TENANTS + HOMEOWNERS
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.10.4 - Hudson Linear Park Perspective by the PARC Foundation - Hudson, NY - http://www.theparcfoundation.org/news/27
180 EXECUTION + LOGISTICS The main characteristic of this new public space is above all the creation of a dynamic set of connections. The linear park opens pathways to diverse neighborhoods, recreational spaces, and experiences of nature. It weaves connections between city and suburb, suburb and country, and nature and culture, and among people of different origins, ages, or sexes.
Fig. 3.10.5 - CDC’s “Urban Remix” Plan for 46th Street - Philadelphia, PA - http://www.phillyliving.com/blog/urban-remix-plan-fore-
PROPOSALS
sees-greener-46th-street-station-area.html
For a relatively small amount of money, these narrow green corridors can reconnect parts of a city, weaving themselves through it, spreading themselves democratically to reach all areas. They can be attached to streams, rivers, or shores to provide pathways for people to travel on foot or bicycle. Linear parks have the potential to re-mobilize our life in cities, encouraging pedestrian movement. There are many other positive effects of green-ways. They can foster a community of businesses along their edges, so that neighbors can once again walk, bike, or skate to the store. They are active landscapes, which can introduce open, green space to various parts of the city; intensify topographic features; offer a soft surface capable of absorbing rainwater; and let people escape the car-dominated hardscape.
Fig. 3.10.6 - CDC’s “Urban Remix” Plan for 46th Street - Philadelphia, PA - http://www.phillyliving.com/blog/urban-remix-plan-fore-
sees-greener-46th-street-station-area.html
181 PHASING + LOCATIONS The design proposal for Pine Street is the perfect opportunity for a linear park. Pine Street already has successful points of interest to guide visitors along its path. Some of these destinations include the Library and Regional Art Center, the Farmers’ Market, and Emmett Kelly Park. By adding vegetation and creating more pedestrian-friendly walkways, Pine Street can begin to be used as a linear park.
Fig. 3.10.7 - Greenwood Linear Park and Extension - Greenwood, MS - http://www.landdesign. com/work/projects/on-the-boards/Greenwodd-Linear-Park-and-Extension.aspx
Pocket parks are small parks accessible to the general public. They are frequently created on a single vacant building lot or on small, irregular pieces of land. Pocket parks can easily be used to guide pedestrians along the path of a linear park, and several options exist for linear parks in downtown Houston. One example of a pocket park included in our design proposal is the Sculpture Garden. Though not a primary park in Houston, it serves a specific purpose to the Library and Regional Arts Center, and can be incorporated into the linear park system.
Fig. 3.10.8 - Greenwood Linear Park and Extension - Greenwood, MS - http://www.landdesign. com/work/projects/on-the-boards/Greenwodd-Linear-Park-and-Extension.aspx
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
professional educational residential natural parks street design vegetation implementation RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
182 EMMETT KELLY PARK Emmett Kelly’s primary purpose will be addressing tourism while still engaging the local community. It will host a new visitors center that will not only serve guests, but also be a community center for the citizens of Houston. Brushy Creek Trail will be extended into the park, and lead to the visitors center and an amphitheater. The rest of the park will contain private walking trails, and could possibly feature a “safe skate spot.”
100’ 0’
PROPOSALS
The south end of the park will have a direct link to the commercial development on the east side of US-63. It will feature a pedestrian walkway across the highway and lead onto a level platform. A pavilion structure will greet visitors as they enter the park.
Fig. 3.10.9 - Emmett Kelly Park Site Plan
Fig. 3.10.10 - Emmett Kelly Park Diagram
183 VISITORS CENTER The new visitors center will be located just at the end of Pine Street. Unlike the current visitors center, it will be easily visible and accessible from US-63. It will serve multiple purposes beyond a visitors center, such as a community center and recreation center for Houston citizens. It will help promote tourism, recreation, and community engagement for both visitors and citizens.
Fig. 3.10.11 - Emmett Kelly Visitors Center Perspective
The center will host a variety of programs and spaces, such as meeting rooms, fitness classes, and youth recreation, as well as hold the trail-head to Brushy Creek. It will serve as an important link that connects tourists with the people of Houston.
AMPHITHEATER Emmett Kelly Park will have an amphitheater just outside of the visitors center. This space can be used for various events and performances. It will introduce art into the park as well as provide a more defined purpose for Emmett Kelly.
Fig. 3.10.12 - Emmett Kelly Amphitheatre Perspective
Several members mentioned that the steep, natural slope of Emmett Kelly is already used by citizens and their lawnchairs for certain events in the park. This amphitheater space will serve as a more permanent and successful solution. It will also encourage more activities in the park.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
professional educational residential natural parks street design vegetation implementation RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
184 RUTHERFORD PARK The new plan for Rutherford Park will better incorporate the two newly added U-8 soccer fields. Concessions and restroom facilities will be added in order to create a sports complex atmosphere. A large variety field, two basketball courts, and a “safe skate spot” will also be added to promote athletic activities and recreation within the park.
100’ 0’
PROPOSALS
Unlike previous proposals, the park will be expanded to the south due to poor drainage problems on the north end of the site. Expanding south allows for possible future connections to a natural pond.
Fig. 3.10.13 - Rutherford Park Site Plan
Fig. 3.10.14 - Rutherford Park Diagram
185 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
ATHLETIC FIELDS The main purpose of Rutherford Park is to be a sports complex. With the addition of concessions, restrooms, and other fields and courts, Rutherford will be able to host local tournaments. These tournaments will lead to increases in both revenue and tourism for Houston. The primary activity at the sports complex will be soccer, however a large variety field will also be included. This field will be large enough for football games or even U-14 soccer, whereas the two current fields are U-8 regulated.
physical model Fig. 3.10.16 - Lafyette Skate Spot - Los Angles, CA - http://california
skateparks.com/2009/03/lafyette-skate-spot-is-open/
SAFE SKATE SPOT A unique addition to Rutherford is a “safe skate spot.” Rather than introduce a full-scale skate park, this spot will be a smaller, less aggressive solution. It will provide a space to entertain the youth of Houston and children of families who attend athletic tournaments.
professional educational residential natural parks street design vegetation implementation RESOURCES
Fig. 3.10.15 - Rutherford Soccer Fields Perspective
Another possibility for a “safe skate spot” exists in Emmett Kelly Park. While Rutherford is dedicated to sports and recreation, Emmett Kelly will be easily accessible to children after school. It also has unique opportunities due to the natural slope of the land.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I Fig. 3.10.17 - Rutherford Safe Skate Spot Perspective
2040 VISIONING
186 WEST SIDE PARK West Side Park’s goal is to better accommodate for the cyclists who arrive in Houston from the US-76 Bicycle Route. In order to better greet and inform cyclists, signage will be included on the corner of King Street and Ozark Street. Upon entering the park, cyclists will have access to a bicycle hub, as well as a place to camp.
100’ 0’
PROPOSALS
Though intended for the cyclists, all of these amenities will still benefit the people of Houston. They will provide opportunities for new social interaction and improve the general flow through the park. By situating them in West Side, cyclists will have easy access to the businesses of downtown Houston, improving the local economy.
Fig. 3.10.18 - West Side Park Site Plan
Fig. 3.10.19 - West Side Park Diagram
187 BICYCLE SIGNAGE Once they have arrived in Houston from the US-76 Bicycle Route, cyclists typically travel to West Side Park via Hamrick Street and Ozark Street. Here they would be greeted by new signs encouraging them to travel to other places in Houston. These signs would be inspired by those of other well known cyclist routes, such as the Katy Trail. They would include information regarding the history of Houston, as well as maps of the town and useful points of interest. Fig. 3.10.20 - West Side Cyclists’ Campground Perspective
CAMPGROUND After exploring town, cyclists could return to West Side Park. Here they would find various amenities in a bicycle hub, such as a repair shop, showerhouse, and storage.
Fig. 3.10.21 - West Side Cyclists’ Campground Perspective
If planning an overnight stay, cyclists would be welcome to camp within the park. They would be encouraged to set up in the grassy, open part of the park, which is near the showerhouse and storage/repair facility. This campground would be primarily softscape and surrounded by vegetation for privacy.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
professional educational residential natural parks street design vegetation implementation RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
188
S U S TA I N A B L E P I N E S T R E E T D E S I G N Because we consider Pine Street a major social line in Houston, we propose a sustainable, pedestrian-friendly design that incorporates more of the natural environment surrounding the city into the urban context. Though this proposal focuses on Pine Street, we have included designs that could be introduced into many other streets in Houston. Our hope is that the sustainable ideas outlined in this proposal will inspire a more sustainable attitude towards street design both in renovations and new street construction. A green median is added along most of the street as shown in the street section (Fig 3.11.1) and the overall street plan (Fig 3.11.2). Where the median disappears, green curbs (Fig 3.11.3) run along at least one side of the street.
Designed into both the green medians and the green curbs are curb cuts like the one shown in Figure 3.11.4. These curb cuts allow rain water to flow into the vegetated areas where toxins, such as oil, are filtered out before the runoff reaches the watershed storage. This filtration method is more sustainable and reduces street flooding issues in a visually appealing way. Additional changes include extending Pine Street down to 4th Street, expanding side walks, and eliminating street parking. The decision to remove street parking forces people out of their cars and onto the sidewalk. Street crossing is significantly safer as pedestrians won’t be popping out between parallel parked cars.
0’ 100’
Fig. 3.11.1- Pine Street Section
0’
PROPOSALS
25’
Fig. 3.11.3 - Green Curb Perspective
Fig. 3.11.2 - Overall Pine Street Plan
Fig. 3.11.4 - Curb Cut Detail - http://www.semcog.org/Trust_Fund.aspx
189 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
Fig. 3.11.5 - Green Median in the Spring - http://depts.washington.edu/hhwb/ Thm_SafeStreets.html
Fig. 3.11.6 - Green Median in the Summer - http://depts.washington.edu/hhwb/
Thm_SafeStreets.html
professional educational residential natural parks street design vegetation implementation RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.11.7 - Green Median in the Fall - http://depts.washington.edu/hhwb/ Thm_SafeStreets.html
Fig. 3.11.8 - Green Median in the Winter - http://depts.washington.edu/hhwb/
Thm_SafeStreets.html
PROPOSALS
190
191
V E G E TAT I O N The vegetation for Houston is split into four parts: trees, grasses, shrubs, and flowers. The vegetation outlined is mainly for use in parks and downtown green space. Many of the trees we detail in the following pages produce fruit or nuts. Because Houston has such a strong agricultural interest with the Farmers’ Market and Community Garden, we believe these trees will be successful. Any produce can be harvested and sold at the Houston Farmers’ Market or exported to other nearby Farmers’ Markets. Many different sizes of trees allow the city to pick the best fit for different area, so smaller trees could be placed in medians while
larger trees might be placed in a more open landscape, like a park. The grasses, shrubs and flowers included are best suited for use in green medians and green curbs because they grow best in wetter soil, but they are suitable for use in parks as well. The plant hardiness (Fig 3.12.1) data is used to determine where certain plants are able to grow. Houston, Mo is in Zone 5. All plants listed on the following pages are suited to Houston’s climate and will thrive if properly cared for.
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
professional educational residential natural parks street design vegetation implementation RESOURCES
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.12.1 - US Hardiness Map - http://tjsgarden.com/2012/07/19/plant-hardiness-zone-growing-climate-zone/
192 TREES
PROPOSALS
PEACH
NECTARINE
DOGWOOD
HEIGHT:
15’
HEIGHT:
15’
HEIGHT:
15-20’
SPREAD:
15’
SPREAD:
15’
SPREAD:
15-20’
HARDINESS ZONE:
5-8
HARDINESS ZONE:
5-9
HARDINESS ZONE:
CULTIVARS:
TangOs Redhaven Contender Blushingstar Blazing Star
CULTIVARS:
Hardired Mericrest Nectacrest Royal Giant
YIELD:
150-250 lbs
YIELD:
150-250 lbs
Fig. 3.12.2 - Peach Tree - http://fineartamerica.com/featured/
peach-tree-anonymous.html
Fig. 3.12.3 - Nectarine Tree - http://naturalsketchbookexchange. blogspot.com
CULTIVARS:
5-8 Cloud 9 First Lady Purple Glory Apple Blossom Fragrant Cloud
Fig. 3.12.4 - Dogwood Tree - lindayoungwatercolors.blogspot.com
/2011/05/dogwood-tree-en-plein-air
193 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
professional educational residential natural parks street design vegetation implementation
PEAR
APPLE
RESOURCES
HEIGHT:
20’
HEIGHT:
20’
SPREAD:
15’
SPREAD:
15’
HARDINESS ZONE:
4-8
HARDINESS ZONE:
4-9
CULTIVARS:
Liberty Enterprise Arkansas Black September Wonder Fuji
YIELD:
50-150 lbs
CULTIVARS:
YIELD:
Seckel Honeysweet Olympic Giant Harrow Delight Starking Delicious 400-650 lbs
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.12.5 - Apple Tree - http://lrtorres02.wordpress.
com/2011/06/13/el-arbol-de-manzanas
Fig. 3.12.6 - Pear Tree - http://lrtorres02.wordpress.com/2011/06/13/
el-arbol-de-manzanas
194
PROPOSALS
PLUM
RED MAPLE
SOUR CHERRY
HEIGHT:
25’
HEIGHT:
30’
HEIGHT:
40’
SPREAD:
25’
SPREAD:
25’
SPREAD:
25’
HARDINESS ZONE:
5-8
HARDINESS ZONE:
5-8
HARDINESS ZONE:
5-9
CULTIVARS:
YIELD:
Shiro Redheart Ozark Premier
40-120 lbs
Fig. 3.12.7 - Plum Tree - news.wikinut.com/Guerilla- GraftersMake-Ornamental-Trees-Fruit-Bearing
CULTIVARS:
YIELD:
Balaton North Star Montmorency
Bonfire Red Sunset Pacific Sunset Autumn Blaze October Glory
40-120 lbs
Fig. 3.12.8 - Cherry Tree - cherry-blossom-tree.blogspot. com/2012/03/cherry-blossom-tree-drawing
CULTIVARS:
Fig. 3.12.9 - Red Maple Tree - formfonts.com/2D-Model/ 1/15608/1/life-forms/h30-plants/ffv042-config
195 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
WALNUT
professional educational residential natural parks street design vegetation implementation
PECAN
RESOURCES
HEIGHT:
50’
HEIGHT:
50’
SPREAD:
30’
SPREAD:
40’
HARDINESS ZONE:
4-8
HARDINESS ZONE:
5-9
CULTIVARS:
YIELD:
Rita Franquette Broadview
100-200 lbs
CULTIVARS:
YIELD:
Colby Sheppard
100-200 lbs
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
Fig. 3.12.10 - Walnut Tree - http://quizlet.com/21638959/forest-
ry-cde-tree-identification-flash-cards
Fig. 3.12.11 - Pecan Tree - http://texastreeplanting.tamu.edu/ViewAllTrees.aspx
196 GRASSES
Fig. 3.12.12 - Little Bluestem - http://mobile.gardenheights.com/
PROPOSALS
grow-native
Fig. 3.12.13 - Tussock Sedge - http://mobile.gardenheights.com/ grow-native
Fig. 3.12.14 - Blue Wood Sedge - http://mobile.gardenheights.com/
grow-native
LITTLE BLUESTEM
TUSSOCK SEDGE
BLUE WOOD SEDGE
All information on grasses comes from Gardenheights.com. The little bluestem is an ornamental, clump-forming grass with foliage that forms very dense mounds of blue-green leaves that turn a nice reddish orange in the fall. It grows up to 24” tall by 1’ wide. The fluffy silver seed heads appear on 3’ stalks and provide winter interest. For best growth, this grass should be planted in full sunlight.
This grass has dense mounds of rich, green foliage. It grows well in a wide range of soil and shade conditions. It is a useful grass around the edge of ponds, streams or in moist soil as a ground cover. This sedge grows only 12 to 18 inches tall and will spread 18 to 30 inches
This native Missouri grass is a beautiful groundcover with striking blue foliage. It is a lowmaintenance, easy to grow plant. The spring flowers are slender and form interesting seed heads. This grass species grow in evergreen clumps that are 6-10” tall. It has bluish, 1/2” wide leaves and will spread to 1’ tall. This sedge is adaptable to a wide range of soils and.
197 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
SHRUBS
physical model
Fig. 3.12.15 - Boxwood - http://www.missouribotanicalgarden.org/gardens-gardening/ your-garden/help-for-the-home-gardener/advice-tips-resources/visual-guides/best-shrubs.aspx
Fig. 3.12.16 - Azalea - http://www.missouribotanicalgarden.org/gardens-gardening/ your-garden/help-for-the-home-gardener/advice-tips-resources/visual-guides/best-shrubs.aspx
professional educational residential natural parks street design vegetation implementation RESOURCES
BOXWOOD
AZALEA
All the information on shrubs comes from Missouribotanticalgarden.org. The boxwood is a slowgrowing, globe-shaped form with deep green foliage. It is easy to prune and to maintain. It is an excellent shrub that can be used as a hedge and or as a single plant. It is deer resistant and does well in most soil conditions.
The beautiful brick red adds a nice pop of color to any landscape. The foliage is dark green in summer and turns wine-red in winter. This azalea performs well in the Midwest winters.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
198 FLOWERS
Fig. 3.12.17 - Rose Verbena - http://mobile.gardenheights.com/
Fig. 3.12.18 - Black Eyed Susan - http://mobile.gardenheights.
Fig. 3.12.19 - Marsh Milkweed - http://mobile.gardenheights.com/
ROSE VERBENA
BLACK EYED SUSAN
MARSH MILKWEED
All information on flowers comes from Gardenheights.com. The rose verbena is a Missouri native has flat-topped clusters of 5-petaled, flowers that appear in late spring to late summer. They grow best in average, medium moisture soils in full sun. In optimum growing conditions, it will self-seed. It grows 6 to 18” tall and spreads 1 to 2’.
This is a beautiful plant that grows 2 to 3’ tall and wide and blooms from June to September. It tolerates heat, drought, and a wide range of soil conditions. This is an old, familiar, cherished wildflower for naturalized areas.
The plant has sweetly scented clusters of rosepink flowers that bloom in summer. Butterflies and hummingbirds find the faint vanilla fragrance irresistible. The plant grows naturally in swamps and wet meadows. It will grow 36 to 48” tall and spread 24 to 36” wide.
PROPOSALS
grow-native
com/grow-native
grow-native
199 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model
Fig. 3.12.20 - Rose Mallow - http://mobile.gardenheights.com/grow-native
Fig. 3.12.21 - Purple Poppy - http://mobile.gardenheights.com/grow-native
professional educational residential natural parks street design vegetation implementation RESOURCES
ROSE MALLOW
PURPLE POPPY MALLOW
This plant has white or pink flowers with red centers that grow 4 to 5” across. The shrub-like form gives the rose mallow a substantial bulk in the landscape. These flowers grow well along the edge of ponds and streams and could grow up to 60” inches tall by 36” wide.
These cup-shaped, red-violet flowers bloom from June until the first frost. The flower makes an excellent ground cover. It does well in most soil conditions and full sunlight.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
200
I M P L E M E N TAT I O N Throughout this process, CCS has proposed many projects to the community of Houston. To develop an understanding of the projects and their context, we have developed three separate phases for completing the projects. Phase one includes the projects we consider most important to the success and growth of Houston. Phase two includes general betterment that will be beneficial to the community of Houston. Phase three includes large projects that, while important to the growth of Houston, will take much longer to fund and construct.
1,000’ 0’
PROPOSALS
PHASE ONE
Fig. 3.13.1 - Phase One Map
201 A WEST SIDE PARK The low-cost, easy updates to this park recommended by CCS makes it an easy to accomplish piece of phase one. Better signage and conditions for cyclist traveling on route 76 are the key goals for this park.
B HOUSING The housing proposals are included in phase one because Houston is in immediate need of rental and young professional housing. The city must have the proper type of residences available to support the desired population and job growth. The housing proposals mainly focus on units and neighborhoods geared towards young professionals. Cohousing, pocket neighborhoods, and lofts will attract the younger generation to Houston. Additionally, introducing a building code will bring Houston’s rental homes up to par with the surrounding area.
C LIBRARY + REGIONAL ART Houston’s current library is undersized and unable to expand in its current location making a new library imperative to Houston. We placed this proposal in phase one because with more space, the library will be able to offer services and classes that benefit community members of every age in Houston. Within the project, the building itself and the parking lot should be the priority. The sculpture garden is a secondary element that, though not vital to the function of the building, will create an overall successful complex. Because a new library was previously proposed and partially funded, receiving additional funding will be easier than with other projects.
D FARMERS’ MARKET With the success of the Farmers’ Market, expansion is the natural next step. In addition to providing more variety and a year-round operation times, the proposal attempts to create the opportunity for exporting product to other communities. Taking this economic step is vital for Houston’s economy. It is placed in phase one due to its importance. Because of the market’s popularity, it could be easier to achieve than other projects in this phase.
E FAB LAB The Fab Lab is included in phase one because it will help Houston get up-to-date in technology. With the technology to invent and create products, Houston can begin to produce unique local good that could be sold in local businesses and exported from the community. As the first facility of its kind in the area, it will also draw people from outside Houston. Additionally, many grants for Fab Labs are available, especially in neighborhoods with a lower average income levels
F MELBA THEATRE
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model professional
educational residential natural implementation phase one phase two phase three RESOURCES
The Melba Theatre is included in phase one because it is currently in the process of receiving funding for renovations. With the renovation, Houston will have a venue for the performing arts.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
202
0’
PROPOSALS
1,000’
PHASE TWO
Fig. 3.13.2 - Phase Two Map
A SCHOOL CAMPUSES This proposal updates the parking and loading zones of each school and introduces the idea of creating more of a social middle and high school campus. It is included in phase two because the school is currently undergoing renovations and it will take time to generate funding for the new projects.
B PINE STREET The Pine Street project is listed in phase two because, while it could influence and effect Heritage tourism, it would not be directly responsible for generating growth in Houston.
C GRAND AVENUE Though Grand Avenue is an important corridor to develop, it will take time to establish the successful local business that will bring the lively downtown atmosphere back to this area.
203
PHASE THREE
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS
physical model professional 1,000’
educational residential natural implementation phase one
phase two phase three RESOURCES
0’
Fig. 3.13.3 - Phase Three Map
A EMMETT KELLY PARK The project proposed in Emmett Kelly Park is expensive and will also require more development than other projects proposed in this book. The amphitheater and recreation center are sited but still need to be designed. It is also very important for the image of Houston. With the recreation center doubling as a visitors center, it is important that the project develops appropriately. For these reasons, it is included in phase three.
B US-63 MARKET The goal of this market, to concentrate businesses near downtown, is an important one, but it will take a while to build up this concentration. Additionally, the project is expensive due to the major site modifications that are necessary.
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
RESOURCES
206
REFERENCES COMMUNITY RESEARCH HISTORY
Fig. I.1.1 - Context map - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Houston,_Missouri Fig. I.1.2 - Alley Spring MIll - http://images.fineartamerica.com/images-medium-large-5/alley-spring-mill-gregory-ballos.jpg Fig. 1.1.3 - Tweed House - http://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/houstonherald.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/6/8a/68ac0aa4-d6de-11df-9cbe-001cc4c03286/4cb5cfee948cc.pdf.pdf Fig. I.1.4 - Texas County Court house - http://www.ozarkscivilwar.org/regions/texas Fig. 1.2.5 - Photograph of Emmett Kelly in the 1950’s - http://masters964.rssing.com/chan-20365312/latest.php Fig. 1.2.6 - Photograph of what Emmett Kelly Park looks like today - http://www.houstonmo.org/parks.html Fig. 1.2.7 - Image of the Melba Theater in the 1950’s - http://www.melbaperformingartscenter.com/portfolio/melba-opens-in-1938/ Fig. 1.2.8 - Image of a page from the Houston Herald in 1938 - http://www.melbaperformingartscenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Melba-series.pdf
POINTS OF INTEREST
RESOURCE
Fig. 1.3.1 - Points of Interest Map Fig. 1.3.2 - School Logo - http://www.houston.k12.mo.us/ Fig. 1.3.3 - Farmers Market - http://farmersmarkettown.com/HoustonMissouriFarmersMarket Fig. 1.3.4 - Lone Star Plaza - https://houstonherald.wordpress.com/tag/bobby-amburn/ Fig. 1.3.5 - Forbes Pharmacy Fig. 1.3.6 - Melba Theater - http://www.melbaperformingartscenter.com/ Fig. 1.3.7 - Location Map 2 Fig. 1.3.8 - Emmet Kelly Park - http://www.houstonmo.org/parks.html Fig. 1.3.9 - Brushy Creek Trail - http://www.houstonmo.org/parks.html Fig. 1.3.10 - Texas County Memorial Hospital - http://www.ozarkareanetwork.com/localnews/tcmh-to-accept-applications-for-youth-ambassador-program/ Fig. 1.3.11 - Walmart Logo - https://img.grouponcdn.com/coupons/svWS786jtP7X3Y2JHsBTRQ/walmart_com-500x500 Fig. 1.3.12 - Pizza Hut Logo - http://logos.wikia.com/wiki/Pizza_Hut Fig. 1.3.13 - Mc Donald’s - http://imgarcade.com/1/mcdonalds-2014-logo/ Fig. 1.3.14 - Sonic Logo - http://www.responselabs.com/portfolio/sonic-drive-in/ Fig. 1.3.15 - Hardee’s Logo - http://www.grayflannelsuit.net/blog/the-evolution-of-fast-food-logos-burger-chains
DEMOGRAPHICS Fig. 1.4.1 - Population - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b
Fig. 1.4.2 - Age - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b Fig. 1.4.3 - Density - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b Fig. 1.4.4 - Ancestry - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b Fig. 1.4.5 - Relationships - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b Fig. 1.4.6 - Education - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b Fig. 1.4.7 - Church Affiliations - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b Fig. 1.4.8 - Ethnicities - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b Fig. 1.4.9 - Most Common Last Names - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b Fig. 1.4.10 - Growth Rates in Houston from 2010-2019 - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b Fig. 1.4.11 - Most Common Occupations for Women in Houston - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b Fig. 1.4.12 - Most Common Industries for Men in Houston - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b
207 DEMOGRAPHICS CONT. Fig. 1.4.13 - Most Common Industries for Women in Houston - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b
Fig. 1.4.14 - Most Common Occupations for Men in Houston - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b Fig. 1.4.15 - Houston Housing Units Rercentages - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b Fig. 1.4.16 - Houston Household Statistics - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b Fig. 1.4.17 - National vs. Houston sost of Living Averages - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b Fig. 1.4.18 - National vs. State vs. Houston Income Values - http://www.city-data.com/city/Houston-Missouri.html#b
COMMUNITY MEETINGS PRELIMINARY MEETING Fig. 2.1.1 - A Visit to Downtown
Fig. 2.1.2 - Piney River Brewing Company - http://kcbeerscouts.com/bar-hunting/a-pint-in-a-barn-at-piney-river-brewing/ Fig. 2.1.3 - High School Foot Ball Game 1 Fig. 2.1.4 - High School Foot Ball Game 2 Fig. 2.1.5 - Float Trip on the Current River Fig. 2.1.6 - Assets -Results from Asset and Challenge Exercise Fig. 2.1.7 - The First Community Meeting Fig. 2.1.8 - Challenges - Result from Asset and Challenge Exercise
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS RESOURCES
references
MEETING ONE IDENTITY WORKSHOP Fig. 2.2.1 - The Observation of the People of Houston
Fig. 2.2.2 - The Citizens Observation of Visitors Fig. 2.2.3 - Results of Workshop Fig. 2.2.4 - Seek of Development Fig. 2.2.5 - Influential Map
HERITAGE TOURISM WORKSHOP
Fig. 2.3.1 - Components of Heritage Tourism and Their Impact Fig. 2.3.2 - Activity 1 Score Card Fig. 2.3.3 - Activity 2 Score Card Fig. 2.3.4 - Impact Totals from Activity 1 Fig. 2.3.5 - Strengths/Opportunities Totals from Activity 2 Fig. 2.3.6 - Totals in Categories From Activity 1 and Activity 2
URBAN SPACE WORKSHOP
Fig. 2.4.1 - Front of “Opportunity” Cards Used in Workshop Fig. 2.4.2 - Back of “Opportunity” Cards Used in Workshop Fig. 2.4.3 - Second Group to Utilize the Workshop Fig. 2.4.4 - Representation of First Physical Model and Compilation of Data from Workshop
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
208 CONNECTIONS WORKSHOP
Fig. 2.5.1 - Map of Points of Interest and Major Roads Fig. 2.5.2 - Map of Major Districts Fig. 2.5.3 - Connections Exercise Fig. 2.5.4 - Connections Exercise Fig. 2.5.6 - Downtown District Results Diagram Fig. 2.5.7 - Downtown Residential District Results Diagram Fig. 2.5.8 - Commercial District Results Diagram Fig. 2.5.9 - Growing Suburbs Results Diagram
YOUTH RETENTION WORKSHOP
Fig. 2.6.1 Rural Flight Workshop Results
RURAL DRAIN WORKSHOP
Fig. 2.7.1 - Diagram of steps for how to remedy Rural Drain Fig. 2.7.2 - Informative card example Fig. 2.7.3 - Houston workshop map results
HOUSING WORKSHOP
Fig. 2.8.1 - Map of Available Housing Fig. 2.8.2 - Wordle of Assisted Living Results Fig. 2.8.3 - Wordle of Tenant Housing Results Fig. 2.8.4 - Wordle of Young Professional Housing Results
AGRICULTURE WORKSHOP
RESOURCE
Fig. 2.9.1 - Agriculture Land use Map Fig. 2.9.2 - The Plant Diagram - http://www.plantchicago.com/about/ Fig. 2.9.3 - Urban Roots Farm - http://www.springfielduac.org/urban-roots-farm-csa-is-now-open/ Fig. 2.9.3 - The Plant Hydroponics bed - http://www.rsvlts.com/2012/05/01/a-meatpacking-plant-transformed-into-a-vertical-farm-9-photos/
MEETING TWO TRIANGLE INTRO Fig. 2.10.1 - Diagram of the “Triangle” and Assets of Houston DISTRICTS + THRESHOLDS
Fig. 2.11.1 - Relationship Diagram Fig. 2.11.2 - District Map of the Triangle Area Fig. 2.11.3 - A Perspective Rendering of Pocket Neighborhood - http://www.pocket-neighborhoods.net/ Fig. 2.11.4 - Precedent of Pocket Neighborhood- Conover Commons - Redmond, Denver- http://www.planetizen.com/node/56611 Fig. 2.11.5 - Threshold Map
209 DISTRICTS + THRESHOLDS
Fig. 2.11.6 - Site Plan - An Intersection of US-63 and Grand Ave. Fig. 2.11.7 - Precedent Study - Entrance Gate at University of Toronto - Toronto, Canada - http://jamiesarner.com/toronto-life/2013/05/university-of
Fig. 2.11.8 - Site Plan - An Intersection of Pine St. and 4th Ave. Fig. 2.11.9 - Precedent Study - Old Crescent at Indiana University - Bloomington, Indiana - http://www.iub.edu/about/tour/photos-by-album.shtml Fig. 2.11.9 - Site Plan - An Intersection of Main St. and Grand Ave. Fig. 2.11.10 - Precedent Study - Clock Tower at the Coxhall Gardens - Carmel, Indiana - http://carmel-photos.funcityfinder.com/2014/02/28/clock-tower
-toronto-photos/
-coxhall-gardens-carmel-indiana/
US-63 TO DOWNTOWN + DOWNTOWN ENTRY
Fig. 2.12.1 - Proposal 2 site plan Fig. 2.12.2 - US - 63 to Downtown Detail diagram Fig. 2.12.3 - Proposal 2 results diagram Fig. 2.12.4 Proposal 2 site plan Fig. 2.12.5 Downtown detail diagram Fig. 2.12.6 - Roundabout rendering - http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http%3A Fig. 2.12.7 - Roundabout points of contact. - http://azdot.gov/about/transportation Fig. 2.12.8 - Intersection points of contact. - http://azdot.gov/about/transportation
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS RESOURCES
references
EMMETT KELLY PARK
Fig. 2.13.1 - Emmett Kelly Park Site Plan + Diagram Fig. 2.13.2 - Post-it Note Responses From Community Members Fig. 2.13.3 - Post-it Note Responses From Community Members Fig. 2.13.4 - Emmett Kelly Visitors Center Site Plan + Diagram Fig. 2.13.5 - Emmett Kelly Festival Space Site Plan + Diagram
PINE STREET GREEN SPACE CONNECTION
Fig. 2.14.1 - Overall Pine Street Plan Fig. 2.14.2 - Farmers Market Fig. 2.14.3 - Regional Arts Proposal Fig. 2.14.4 - Emmett Kelly Entrance
US-63 CONNECTION
Fig. 2.15.1 - Pine St. Daytime Perspective Fig. 2.15.2 - Pine St. Bridge Perspective Fig. 2.15.3 - Pine St. Bridge Concept Fig. 2.15.4 - East Pine St. Site Plan
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
210 FARMERS MARKET CONNECTION
Fig. 2.16.1 - Farmers Market Perspective Fig. 2.16.2 - Interior Farmers Market Perspective Fig. 2.16.3 - Exterior Farmers Market Perspective Fig. 2.16.4 - Site Plan
HIGH SCHOOL Fig. 2.17.1 - Pine Street Corridor Presentation Boards
Fig. 2.17.2 - Downtown/63 Presentation Boards Fig. 2.17.3 - Downtown/63 Presentation Boards Fig. 2.17.4 - Downtown/63 Presentation Boards Fig. 2.17.5 - Pine Street Corridor Presentation Boards Fig. 2.17.6 - Various - Presentation Boards
MEETING THREE INTRO | DISTRICTS Fig. 2.18.1 - District Map US-63
RESOURCE
Fig. 2.19.1 - Site Plan Fig. 2.19.2 - Business Incubator perspective Fig. 2.19.3 - South development perspective Fig. 2.19.4 - Site Plan Fig. 2.19.5 - Street section Fig. 2.19.6 - Street perspective Fig. 2.19.7 - Site Plan Fig. 2.19.8 - Market Section Fig. 2.19.9 - Market plan Fig. 2.19.10 - Roof Fig. 2.19.11 - Results
FARMERS MARKET + CULINARY CLASSROOM
Fig. 2.20.1 - Culinary kitchen precedent - http://www.archdaily.com/100778/culinary-art-school-gracia-studio/ Fig. 2.20.2 - Culinary kitchen precedent - http://www.decoist.com/2011-03-29/modern-cooking-school-the-culinary-art-school-in-tijuana-mexico/ Fig. 2.20.3 - Indoor Farmers Market precedent - http://visitbudapest.travel/articles/budapest-markets/ Fig. 2.20.4 - Site Plan
ADAPTIVE REUSE
Fig. 2.21.1 - Map of North Downtown Houston Showing Ross Lumber Co. and Old Lee Factory Fig. 2.21.2 - Gryphon Building - Joplin, MO. Old Warehouse, Adapted Into Office and Retail Space - http://adaptivereuse.info/portfolio/gryphon-building/ Fig. 2.21.3 - Center City Park Pergolas & Pavilion - Greensboro, NC. - http://www.archdaily.com/151171/center-city-park-pergolas-pavilion-touloukian-touloukian-inc/
211 LIBRARY AND REGIONAL ART CENTER
Fig. 2.22.1 - Spatial Relationship Diagram Fig. 2.22.2 - Site Diagram Fig. 2.22.3 - Form Diagram Fig. 2.22.4 - Perspective Sketch Fig. 2.22.5 - Circulation Diagram Fig. 2.22.6 - Helsinki University Main Library - Helsinki, Finland - https://www.behance.net/gallery/Finnish-architecture-Helsinki-University-Library/8184673 Fig. 2.22.7 - Building of Construction Engineering Disciplinary Organization - Quazvin, Iran- http://www.archdaily.com/541480/building-of-construction
-engineering-disciplinary-organization-dayastudio-nextoffice/
Fig. 2.22.8 -UBA Office- Berlin, Germany - http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/press/pressinformation/uba-moves-into-the-federal-governments-first-zero Fig. 2.22.9 - Block a Noordstrook-Amsterdam, Netherlands - http://www.archdaily.com/167540/block-a-noordstrook-dick-van-gameren-architecten/ Fig. 2.22.10 - Bassett Road House- London, UK - http://www.simplicitylove.com/2013/06/bassett-road-house-london-paulo.html
EDUCATION DISTRICT
Fig. 2.23.1 - High School/Middle School Existing Site Plan Fig. 2.23.2 - High School/Middle School Proposed Site Plan Fig. 2.23.3 - Elementary School Site Plan Fig. 2.23.4 - Houston Education District Site Plan
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS RESOURCES
references
FAB LAB (ELMORE’S)
Fig. 2.24.1 - Diagram of Connections to Proposed Fab Lab Fig. 2.24.2 - Fab Lab Logo - http://fab.cba.mit.edu/about/logos/index.html Fig. 2.24.3 - Sant Joan Fab Lab Workshop at the Institute for Advanced Architecture of Catalonia - http://www.iaacblog.com/blog/2011/fab- lab-
sant-joan/
Fig. 2.24.4 - Preliminary First Floor Plan for the Fab Lab Fig. 2.24.5 - Preliminary Second Floor Plan for the Fab Lab Fig. 2.24.6 - Fab Lab Exterior Night Rendering
GRAND AVENUE RESTORATION + HOUSING
Fig. 2.25.1 - Melba Theater Perspective Fig. 2.25.2 - Coffee Shop Perspective Fig. 2.25.3 - Diner Perspective Fig. 2.25.4 - House Restoration Perspective Fig. 2.25.5 - Grand Avenue Diagram Fig. 2.25.6 - Floral Shop Perspective Fig. 2.25.7 - Grand Avenue and Highway 63 Fig. 2.25.8 - Clock Tower Site Plan Fig. 2.25.9 - Pocket Neighborhood Site Plan
OVERALL PARKS + GREEN SPACE SCHEME
Fig. 2.26.1 - Overall Parks, Trails, and Greenery Plan for Houston Fig. 2.26.2 - Emmett Kelly Park Site Plan + Diagram Fig. 2.26.3 - West Side Park Site Plan + Diagram Fig. 2.26.4 - Rutherford Park Site Plan + Diagram
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
212
OVERALL PARKS + GREEN SPACE SCHEME CONT.
Fig. 2.26.5 - Detail of Pine Street Design Fig. 2.26.6 - Street with Green Curbs - http://www.asla.org/sustainablelandscapes/greenstreet.html Fig. 2.26.7 - Parking Lot Plan Fig. 2.26.8 - Sculpture Garden Plan
MEETING FOUR
Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig.
2.27.1 2.27.2 2.27.3 2.27.4 2.27.5 2.27.6 2.27.7 2.27.8
-
Kanna presenting Olivia presenting The Houston model Final meeting community members Group picture Brandon presenting the projection mapping Final meeting collaboratation Kevin presenting
PROPOSALS MODEL
Fig. 3.1.1 - Map of the Extent of the Physical Model Fig. 3.1.2 - First Physical Model After Being Used and Marked by Community Members Fig. 3.1.3 - Image of the Second Physical Model in Final Form Fig. 3.1.4 - Extent of the Model with Topography and Roads Represented
RESOURCE
PROFESSIONAL TECH/ BUSSINESS FAB LAB
Fig. 3.2.1 - Site Location of Proposed Fab Lab (Red Building in Center) Fig. 3.2.2 - Faulhaber Fab Lab at the GWIZ Science Museum in Sarasota, FL - http://flate-mif.blogspot.com/2012/02/fab-lab-in-sarasota-serves-as.html Fig. 3.2.3 - Final Exterior Night Rendering of Proposed Fab Lab Fig. 3.2.4 - First Floor Plan of the Final Proposal for the Fab Lab Fig. 3.2.5 - Second Floor Plan of the Final Proposal for the Fab Lab Fig. 3.2.6 - Interior Rendering of Fab Lab Entry Fig. 3.2.7 - Interior Rendering of the Tech Space of Fab Lab Proposal
US-63 DEVELOPMENT
Fig. 3.3.1 - Houston analysis map Fig. 3.3.2 - Houston circulation diagram Fig. 3.3.3 - Downtown asset analysis Fig. 3.3.4 - circulation diagram Fig. 3.3.5 - Proposal 4 plan with phasing Fig. 3.3.6 - Figure callout diagram Fig. 3.3.7 - Spatial diagram Fig. 3.3.8 - South development spatial diagram Fig. 3.3.9 - Proposal 4 overview perspective Fig. 3.3.10 - Perspective callout
213
US-63 DEVELOPMENT CONT.
Fig. 3.3.11 - Pedestrian entrance perspective Fig. 3.3.12 - Perspective callout Fig. 3.3.13 - Entrance from parking lot perspective Fig. 3.3.14 - Perspective callout Fig. 3.3.15 - Bicycle entrance perspective Fig. 3.3.16 - Perspective callout Fig. 3.3.17 - Business Incubator Perspective Fig. 3.3.18 - Perspective callout Fig. 3.3.19 - Plaza interior perspective Fig. 3.3.20 - Perspective callout Fig. 3.3.21 - Plaza interior perspective Fig. 3.3.22 - Perspective callout
FARMERS MARKET
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS RESOURCES
references
Fig. 3.4.1 - Farmers Market Birds Eye Perspective Fig. 3.4.2 - Farmers Market Contex Map Fig. 3.4.3 - Farmers Market Perspective Fig. 3.4.4 - Farmers Market Perspective Fig. 3.4.5 - Site Plan Fig. 3.4.6 - Exterior Perspective Fig. 3.4.7 - Interior Perspective Fig. 3.4.8 - Site Plan Fig. 3.4.9 - Interior Perspective Fig. 3.4.10 - Exterior Night Perspective Fig. 3.4.11- Site Plan
EDUCATIONAL SCHOOLS
Fig. 3.5.1 - Bus Loading Zones/Parking and Traffic Fig. 3.5.2 - Parent Loading Zones/Parking and Traffic Fig. 3.5.3 - Student Parking and Traffic Fig. 3.5.4 - Bus, Parent, and Student Loading Zones/Parking and Traffic Fig. 3.5.5 - High/Middle School Campus Site Plan Fig. 3.5.6 - High/MIddle School Eye-Level Perspective Fig. 3.5.7 - High/Middle School Birds-Eye Perspective Fig. 3.5.8 - Elementary School Campus Site Plan Fig. 3.5.9 - Bus Loading Zones/Parking and Traffic Fig. 3.5.10 - Parent Loading Zones/Parking and Traffic Fig. 3.5.11 - Student Parking and Traffic Fig. 3.5.12 - Bus, Parent, and Student Loading Zones/Parking and Traffic
PARKING
Fig. 3.6.1 - Parking Lot Precedent - Low Impact Development Fig. 3.6.2 - Parking Lot Section Fig. 3.6.3 - Parking Lot Plan Fig. 3.6.4 - Parking Lot Precedent - Low Impact Development
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
214
RESOURCE
PARKING CONT.
Fig. 3.6.5 - Green Parking Medians Fig. 3.6.6 - Permeable Pavement Detail - http://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/rehabilitation/guidelines/site-features.htm Fig. 3.6.7 - Permeable Pavement Detail - http://www.vwrrc.vt.edu/swc/NonPBMPSpecsMarch11/VASWMBMPSpec7PERMEABLEPAVEMENT.html
ART AND LIBRARY
SCULPTURE GARDEN
Fig. 3.8.1 - Sculpture Garden Plan Fig. 3.8.2 - UCLA Murphy Sculpture Garden Precedent - http://maps.ucla.edu/campus/?locid=65054 Fig. 3.8.3 - Sculpture Garden Bridge Fig. 3.8.4 - Stair Detail Fig. 3.8.5 - Mosaic Wall Fig. 3.8.6 - Bench Detail
RESIDENTIAL HOUSING
Fig. 3.7.1 - Picture of Pine Street Fig. 3.7.2 - Site Spatial Relationship Diagram Fig. 3.7.3 - Existing Storm Shelter Fig. 3.7.4 - Site Plan - Regional Art and Library Center Fig. 3.7.5 - Site Circulation Diagram Fig. 3.7.6 - Connection Diagram - Entrance Fig. 3.7.7 - Entrance from Sculpture Garden Fig. 3.7.8 - Main Entrance Fig. 3.7.9 - Entrance from Farmers Market Fig. 3.7.10 - Form Diagram Fig. 3.7.11 - Circulation Diagram Fig. 3.7.12 - Plan Space Diagram FIg. 3.7.13 - Art Class Room - 2nd Floor FIg. 3.7.14 - Gallery - 2nd Floor Fig. 3.7.15 - Library - 3rd Floor Fig. 3.7.16 - Collaboration Space/ Circulation Desk - 2nd Floor Fig. 3.7.17 - Precedents Study - Block a Noordstrook - Amsterdam, Netherlands - http://www.archdaily.com/167540/block-a-noordstrook-dick-van-gameren-architecten/ Fig. 3.7.18 - Precedents Study - Block a Noordstrook - Amsterdam, Netherlands - http://www.archdaily.com/167540/block-a-noordstrook-dick-van-gameren-architecten/ Fig. 3.7.19 - Precedents Study - Block a Noordstrook - Amsterdam, Netherlands - http://www.archdaily.com/167540/block-a-noordstrook-dick-van-gameren-architecten/ Fig. 3.7.20 - Exterior/ Main Entrance FIg. 3.7.21 - Precedents Study- Library at TU Delft University - Delft, Netherlands - http://inhabitat.com/mecanoos-tu-delft-library-crowned-with-a-massive-green-roof/ FIg. 3.7.22 - Precedents Study- Library at TU Delft University - Delft, Netherlands - http://www.mecanoo.nl/Projects/project/27/Library-Delft-University-of-Technology/t/0
Fig. 3.9.1 - Homes Available for Sale - http://www.zillow.com/houston-mo/for_sale/ Fig. 3.9.2 - Homes Available for Rent - http://www.zillow.com/homes/Houston-MO_rb/ Fig. 3.9.3 - Example Seen in Future Pages of a Proposal for Young Professionals Fig. 3.9.4 - Example Seen in Future Pages of a Proposal for Post-professional Residents Fig. 3.9.5 - The Overall Site Plan - http://pocket-neighborhoods.net/patterns/clusters.html
215
HOUSING CONT.
Fig. 3.9.6 - Shared Garden Spaces - http://tinyhouseblog.com/book-review/pocket-neighborhoods-book-review/ Fig. 3.9.7 - Direct Connection to Common Spaces - http://tinyhouseblog.com/book-review/pocket-neighborhoods-book-review/ Fig. 3.9.8 - Porches for Neighbors to Sit and Gather - http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2011-03-30-pocket30_ST_N.htm Fig. 3.9.9 - Abundant Landscaping - http://provocationutah.wordpress.com/2012/01/04/pocket-neighborhoods/ Fig. 3.9.10 - Sketch of Wild Sage Common House - http://www.houzz.com/photos/2220983/Wild-Sage-Cohousing-modern-rendering-denver Fig. 3.9.11 - Abundant Landscaping - http://jlogan.com/wild_sage1.html Fig. 3.9.12 - Common House Interior - http://vrc.colorado.edu/index.php?mode=ImageDetail&v0=Date&IMAGEID=133803&OBJECID=989221&FILENAME=193935.jpg Fig. 3.9.13 - Wild Sage Cohousing Street View - http://vrc.colorado.edu/index.php?mode=browse_object&v0=Date&BuildingValueID=533156 Fig. 3.9.14 - Focus on Front Porches - http://www.houzz.com/photos/2220943/Wild-Sage-Cohousing-modern-exterior-denver Fig. 3.9.15 - Silver Sage Site Plan - https://www.flickr.com/photos/28643872@N04/2676816391/ Fig. 3.9.16 - Silver Sage Pedestrian Sketch - bouldersilversage.wordpress.com Fig. 3.9.17- Shared Garden Space - bouldersilversage.wordpress.com Fig. 3.9.18 - Winter Landscaping - http://silvertipconsultants.com/Projects/Silver_Sage/Page_three_projects_Silver_Sage_layout.html Fig. 3.9.19 - Abundant Common Areas - http://www.cohousingco.com/projects/silver-sage-senior-cohousing/ Fig. 3.9.20 - Covered Entry at the Quarry in Vancouver, WA - http://www.senior-care-resources.com/directory/listing/the-quarry-senior-living-at-columbia-tech-cen
ter-assisted-living-facility-vancouver-washington/
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS RESOURCES
references
Fig. 3.9.21 - Community Garden Area - http://www.columbiatechcenter.com/overview/bldg_quarry.php Fig. 3.9.22 - Living Room and Dining Areas - http://www.thequarryliving.net/p/retirement_communities/photo_gallery_8958/vancouver-wa-98683/the-quarry-senior-liv
ing-8958
Fig. 3.9.23 - Living Room and Kitchen - http://www.thequarryliving.net/p/retirement_communities/photo_gallery_8958/vancouver-wa-98683/the-quarry-senior-livi
ng-8958
Fig. 3.9.24 - Independent-Living Bedroom Example - http://www.thequarryliving.net/p/retirement_communities/photo_gallery_8958/vancouver-wa-98683/the-
quarry-senior-living-8958
Fig. 3.9.25 - Lot North of City Hall on Grand Avenue Site Plan Fig. 3.9.26 - Small Two to Three Bedroom Houses Fig. 3.9.27 - Semi-private, Yet Easy to Socialize Fig. 3.9.28 - Shared Garage Space Fig. 3.9.29 - Shared Green Space Fig. 3.9.30- Sense of Security Fig. 3.9.31 - Lot Near Emmett Kelly Park Site Plan Fig. 3.9.32 - Integration With Context Fig. 3.9.33 - Shared Garage Spaces with Electric Car and Bike Share Programs Fig. 3.9.34 - Hidden Car Storage. Peace of Mind Fig. 3.9.35 - Community Garden Areas Fig. 3.9.36 - Sense of Community Fig. 3.9.37 - Forbes Lot Graduated Housing Site Plan Fig. 3.9.38 - Small Homes for Able-Bodied Residents Fig. 3.9.39 - Small Studios for Residents Who Need In-home Care Fig. 3.9.40 - Covered Entry System Fig. 3.9.41 - Shared Garage and Parking Space Fig. 3.9.42 - Community Gardens Fig. 3.9.43 - Connected Pathways Fig. 3.9.44 - Landscaping
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
216
HOUSING CONT.
Fig. 3.9.45 - Green Space Fig. 3.9.46 - Downtown Housing and Street Scape Site Plan. Buildings Suitable for Lofts Highlighted in Teal Fig. 3.9.47 - Melba Theatre in the Daytime Fig. 3.9.48 - Melba Theatre in the Nighttime
NATURAL PARKS
RESOURCE
Fig. 3.10.1 - Hudson Linear Park Plan by the PARC Foundation - Hudson, NY - http://www.theparcfoundation.org/news/27 Fig. 3.10.2 - Overall Parks, Trails, and Greenery Plan for Houston Fig. 3.10.3 - Hudson Linear Park Perspective by the PARC Foundation - Hudson, NY - http://www.theparcfoundation.org/news/27 Fig. 3.10.4 - Hudson Linear Park Perspective by the PARC Foundation - Hudson, NY - http://www.theparcfoundation.org/news/27 Fig. 3.10.5 - CDC’s “Urban Remix” Plan for 46th Street - Philadelphia, PA - http://www.phillyliving.com/blog/urban-remix-plan-foresees-greener-46th-street-station-area.l Fig. 3.10.6 - CDC’s “Urban Remix” Plan for 46th Street - Philadelphia, PA - http://www.phillyliving.com/blog/urban-remix-plan-foresees-greener-46th-Street-station-area. Fig. 3.10.7 - Greenwood Linear Park and Extension - Greenwood, MS - http://www.landdesign.com/work/projects/on-the-boards/Greenwodd-Linear-Park-and-Extension.x Fig. 3.10.8 - Greenwood Linear Park and Extension - Greenwood, MS - http://www.landdesign.com/work/projects/on-the-boards/Greenwodd-Linear-Park-and-Extensi-a Fig. 3.10.9 - Emmett Kelly Park Site Plan Fig. 3.10.10 - Emmett Kelly Park Diagram Fig. 3.10.11 - Emmett Kelly Visitors Center Perspective Fig. 3.10.12 - Emmett Kelly Amphitheatre Perspective Fig. 3.10.13 - Rutherford Park Site Plan Fig. 3.10.14 - Rutherford Park Diagram Fig. 3.10.15 - Rutherford Soccer Fields Perspective Fig. 3.10.16 - Lafyette Skate Spot - Los Angles, CA - http://californiaskateparks.com/2009/03/lafyette-skate-spot-is-open/ Fig. 3.10.17 - Rutherford Safe Skate Spot Perspective Fig. 3.10.18 - West Side Park Site Plan Fig. 3.10.19 - West Side Park Diagram Fig. 3.10.20 - West Side Cyclists’ Campground Perspective Fig. 3.10.21 - West Side Cyclists’ Campground Perspective
STREET DESIGN
Fig. 3.11.1 - Pine Street Section Fig. 3.11.2 - Overall Pine Street Plan Fig. 3.11.3 - Green Curb Perspective Fig. 3.11.4 - Curb Cut Detail - http://www.semcog.org/Trust_Fund.aspx Fig. 3.11.5 - Green Median in the Spring - http://depts.washington.edu/hhwb/Thm_SafeStreets.html Fig. 3.11.6 - Green Median in the Summer - http://depts.washington.edu/hhwb/Thm_SafeStreets.html Fig. 3.11.7 - Green Median in the Fall - http://depts.washington.edu/hhwb/Thm_SafeStreets.html Fig. 3.11.8 - Green Median in the Winter - http://depts.washington.edu/hhwb/Thm_SafeStreets.html
VEGETATION
Fig. 3.12.1 - US Hardiness Map - http://tjsgarden.com/2012/07/19/plant-hardiness-zone-growing-climate-zone/ Fig. 3.12.2 - Peach Tree - http://fineartamerica.com/featured/peach-tree-anonymous.html
217 VEGETATION CONT.
Fig. 3.12.3 - Nectarine Tree - http://naturalsketchbookexchange.blogspot.com Fig. 3.12.4 - Dogwood Tree - lindayoungwatercolors.blogspot.com /2011/05/dogwood-tree-en-plein-air Fig. 3.12.5 - Apple Tree - http://lrtorres02.wordpress.com/2011/06/13/el-arbol-de-manzanas Fig. 3.12.6 - Pear Tree - http://lrtorres02.wordpress.com/2011/06/13/el-arbol-de-manzanas Fig. 3.12.7 - Plum Tree - news.wikinut.com/Guerilla- Grafters- Make-Ornamental-Trees-Fruit-Bearing Fig. 3.12.8 - Cherry Tree - cherry-blossom-tree.blogspot.com/2012/03/cherry-blossom-tree-drawing Fig. 3.12.9 - Red Maple Tree - formfonts.com/2D-Model/1/15608/1/life-forms/h30-plants/ffv042-config Fig. 3.12.10 - Walnut Tree - http://quizlet.com/21638959/forestry-cde-tree-identification-flash-cards Fig. 3.12.11 - Pecan Tree - http://texastreeplanting.tamu.edu/ViewAllTrees.aspx Fig. 3.12.12 - Little Bluestem - http://mobile.gardenheights.com/grow-native Fig. 3.12.13 - Tussock Sedge - http://mobile.gardenheights.com/grow-native Fig. 3.12.14 - Blue Wood Sedge - http://mobile.gardenheights.com/grow-native Fig. 3.12.15 - Boxwood - http://www.missouribotanicalgarden.org/gardens-gardening/your-garden/help-for-the-home-gardener/advice-tips-resources/visual-guides/best-
Fig. 3.12.16 - Azalea - http://www.missouribotanicalgarden.org/gardens-gardening/your-garden/help-for-the-home-gardener/advice-tips-resources/visual-guides/best-shrubs.
Fig. 3.12.17 - Rose Verbena - http://mobile.gardenheights.com/grow-native Fig. 3.12.18 - Black Eyed Susan - http://mobile.gardenheights.com/grow-native Fig. 3.12.19 - Marsh Milkweed - http://mobile.gardenheights.com/grow-native Fig. 3.12.20 - Rose Mallow - http://mobile.gardenheights.com/grow-native Fig. 3.12.21 - Purple Poppy - http://mobile.gardenheights.com/grow-native
shrubs.aspx aspx
INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY RESEARCH COMMUNITY MEETINGS PROPOSALS RESOURCES
references
IMPLEMENTATION
Fig. 3.13.1 - Phase one map Fig. 3.13.2 - Phase two map Fig. 3.13.3 - Phase three map
HO US TO N, M I S S O UR I 2040 VISIONING
For more information about Houston Visioning 2040 or other Center for Community Studies services, please contact:
Mr. Jay G. Garrott, Architect Professor and Director Center for Community Studies Hammons School of Architecture Drury University 900 N. Benton Avenue Springfield, MO 65802 (417) 873-7371 (O) (417) 818-8289 (C) jgarrott@drury.edu www.drury.edu/du/architecture/Center-for-Community-Studies/ www.facebook.com/groups/ccshsa