STATE CHAMPS ROUND-UP

STATE CHAMPIONSHIPS ROUNDUP

Victoria - Barambogie North, 11 September

Blair Trewin reports on recent State Championship events.

Queensland - Flagstone West, 27-28 August

Eric Morris and Wendy Read got the spring season off to a successful start with wins in the Queensland Championships. Morris, one of the few interstate visitors, took a narrow lead over Lorenzo Calabro on the short first day. There was a real contest for most of the second day, as Calabro took a narrow lead early and held it through most of the first half. Morris got back on top after that, but the issue was not finally settled until he pulled away over the last 2km. Read set up her win with a twoand-a-half minute lead on the first day. The second day proved to be a fluctuating contest with big time swings on several legs. Julia Davies had an excellent first half and led Read by seven minutes on the day – and five overall – with four controls to go, but significant time losses on two of them let Read back into the contest and she held on by 38 seconds overall. Ainsley Cavanagh was never far away, but had to settle for a close third.

NSW - Bigga, 3-4 September

NSW, for the first time, ran their Middle-distance Championships on the Saturday, followed by the Longdistance on the Sunday. The elite winners were the same in both races. Eric Morris continued his string of wins with a narrow victory on Saturday followed by a more substantial one on Sunday, whilst Danielle Winslow did the same. On a day which had more green than most were expecting, Morris took a lead through the early controls and held it the rest of the way, winning by about a minute. His closest challenger was Ben Rattray, running into some good lateseason form, with Rob Preston in third place. Sunday had a similar, but not identical, look. This time Morris pulled away steadily through a long, tough race to finish five minutes clear, Preston was second, and a different Rattray – Kerrin this time – completed the minor placings. W21 was a very close affair on Saturday. Winslow looked as if she might have lost her chance with a three-minute mistake at 14, but was able to recover to get across the line by 11 seconds from Nicki Taws. Briohny Davey, in the first of what would be a series of good races through the spring, was a close third, whilst early leader Jenni Adams crashed out with a 16-minute mistake at 11. On Sunday, Winslow was never seriously challenged and emerged with almost five minutes in hand, with Taws again second, and Adams recovering from her Saturday misadventure to finish third.

After 18 years of trying, Blair Trewin broke through to win his home state’s M21 title for the first time in his best result for several years. It was a close and fluctuating contest with Bruce Arthur for most of the way, once early leader Kerrin Rattray had dropped out, but the minute gained on a long climb at the start of the second loop proved decisive. Rune Olsen was slower than his normal self but still managed to hold third. Danielle Winslow backed up from her win the previous weekend to again score comfortably, six minutes ahead of the field. Behind that there was a great contest with four within 92 seconds. Emma Prime was an unexpected winner last year. She couldn’t quite repeat it this year but still ran a solid second, whilst another former JWOC representative who went unsighted for some years, Kirsten Blair Trewin won his home state’s Fairfax, completed the placings in M21 title for the first time this year. her first major elite race for some years.

WA - Umuna, 17-18 September

An excellent W21 race was the highlight of the WA Championships. In a meeting of multiple generations, only five minutes covered the top six on the first day with Cath Chalmers holding a narrow lead, but Erin Post produced the goods on the second day and ended up three minutes ahead of the field. Anthea Feaver just held off Rachel West for second, Chalmers was a close fourth, and another performance to note for future reference was the close fifth of first-year W18 Sarah Dunnage. M21 was more predictable. Craig Dufty took a four-minute lead over John Toomey on the first day, and trebled it on the second. Rhys Challen looked as if he could provide a challenge to the usual suspects with a third place on the first day, but he failed to finish the second, leaving Terry Farrell to end up in third place.

ACT - Ballinafad Creek, 18 September

Eric Morris won his third State Championship in four weeks with a very impressive run as ACT orienteering returned to the Captains Flat area for the first time since the early 1990’s. The placings were the same as they had been at Bigga two weeks previously, but this time Morris’s margin was even more impressive, five-and-a-half minutes clear of Rob Preston on a shorter course than that of the NSW Championships. As he did at Bigga, Preston just saw off Kerrin Rattray for second place. In what turned out to be her only run of the championship season, Jo Allison had a comfortable win in a small but high-standard W21 field. She was a surprisingly large seven minutes ahead of fellow WOC team member Tracy Bluett, whilst Nicki Taws completed the placings.

THE GROWING PAINS OF BECOMING A GLOBAL SPORT

International decision-makers must quickly learn to assess issues on a global basis, or run the risk of damaging the sport’s long-term prospects, argues Rob

Crawford*

POLITICIANS, including sporting politicians, must always guard against the natural temptation of preserving selfinterest at the expense of unity. The latest decision by the IOF to include MicroO in next year’s WOC has motivated me to write the following article. (Ed – IOF decision now reversed – see NEWS)

Allow me to indulge in the sharing of personal experience. Those who competed at a World Cup race in Leuk, Switzerland in 1996 will never forget the day. A sudden thunderstorm struck during the men’s mass-start race, eventually washing away a temporary bridge over a ravine used to get from the last control to the finish. The last third of the men’s field, including myself, was stopped at the last control and directed to the finish using a road bridge 1km away.

Some hours later, the official results were published and the last third of the field could not be ranked. A little puzzled, a visit to the event centre to find out why resulted in a lively discussion with the IOF Controller. I can still clearly remember being told by this person that, because the top 45 could be ranked (for World Cup points), the rest of the results “did not matter”.

Puzzlement quickly turned into rage, as I tried (and failed) to politely point out that I had not given up my employment, and spent thousands of dollars of my own money, to come and participate in an international race to be told that my result “did not matter”. My point was lost on him.

At times, I wonder whether such arrogance still exists in the orienteering world. Some readers may not care, but there is one word to explain why you should – “Olympics”. Orienteering has the Olympic dream. Personally I think the dream is too far away, and I will be very surprised if this happens in my lifetime. If it does, I will be very happy to be wrong, and eat my slice of “humble pie”.

Many decisions are based around the Olympic dream. We must make our sport more visible, attract sponsors and media, to move our sport closer to the dream. Annual world championships, professional arena production, and now Micr-O are all needed for this “progress”. I can see, and understand, this. But do the decisionmakers understand the cumulative effect that all these choices have on the less-developed orienteering nations?

Why is this so important? To answer, let me refer you to the IOC report that assessed our bid for Ski-orienteering to be included in the winter Olympics. They state: “concerns were expressed over the low participation in ski orienteering of countries outside Europe”. Have we learned the lesson this report gave us? International issues must be decided with more balance. It is not acceptable to continually make choices that benefit the strong orienteering nations which at the same time damages the ability of other nations to continue their own development. Another Olympic report published this year, relating to the evaluation of summer sports, listed 33 criteria that sports were evaluated on. It may come as a surprise, but it is not nearly enough just to have 75 affiliated nations and the sport on TV to become an Olympic sport. Under the heading of “universality”, here are some of the criteria sports were evaluated on: • Results of World Championships • Number of affiliated national federations • Participation by national federations in World

Championships • Participation by national federations in Junior World

Championships

Even the simplest analysis of this report can see that no matter if Orienteering has 100 affiliated nations; if only 40 countries are participating at World Championships and medals are won by the same 6 countries, the Olympic dream is no closer to reality.

Therefore the argument, in simple language, of “let us make the strong nations stronger and then worry about the rest” will not work. You may find, in 20 or 30 years time, “the rest” may be in such a bad state of affairs that the years of neglect will not easily be reversed.

The major decision affecting countries such as my own is of course the move to annual world championships. That has been a bullet to our ability to develop a high performance programme. I am sure our nation is not alone. Regular participation at World Championships is just as difficult now as when we commenced in 1976. The politicians will tell you that there were 37 nations at the recent WOC held in Japan. That may be true, but is only a simple analysis. Of more relevance is the number of nations competing in the relay, which indicates a significant presence at the event. In 2003: 37 men and 30 women; in 2004: 33 men and 24 women; in 2005: 27 men and 22 women. The alarm bells should be ringing. Will the New Zealand women’s team, 9th in 2005, be at the start line in 2006? The answer is not 100% yes.

The move to annual world championships is not the only example. Last year for WOC, we had an athlete available for the relay only. Unfortunately, our Federation could not pay the entry fees and the athlete understandably refused to pay the full entry fee (because the entry fee is a “package fee”). The organisers would not accommodate our request for a reduced entry fee for the athlete. Correspondence from the IOF stated, in part, “you will be happy to know that Council has decided to propose that the rules for all disciplines be harmonised with the new Ski-O Rules” (2 June 2004). Bulletin 2 for WOC 2006 has just been published and the entry fee is still a package fee; the rules have not changed.

Yes, this is only a small matter, but may I be excused for wondering how the IOF can make a major decision to include Micr-O in WOC in about 6 weeks, yet to change one line in the Competition Rules has taken more than 15 months (and counting)? Is this a symptom of the attitude first experienced in 1996?

The EPG report made the worthwhile suggestion that every 4 years the World Championships should be held outside of Europe. This idea is not new; it has been suggested before. Yet even if I believe there is the willpower within the orienteering world to make this happen (which I don’t), has anyone stopped to think how the increasing demands on WOC organisers (professional arena production, maybe MicrO?) will affect this laudable aim?

This article should be viewed as an early warning. There will always be decisions on international issues where conflicts arise. The key to managing such conflict is to achieve a balance. Too many decisions that benefit one section of the international orienteering community at the expense of another will divide, rather than unify, our sport. If Orienteering truly wishes to become a global sport and reach the Olympic stage, self-interest must be put aside, a greater effort made to understand the needs and aspirations of all affiliated members, and balanced decision-making that provides incentives for achievement by all, as opposed to a select few.

*Rob Crawford is President of the New Zealand Orienteering Federation and an associate member of the IOF Foot-O Committee. (Article first published in Orienteering Today 05/2005)