arch itec ture port folio
1
a r c h i t e c t u r e p o rtfolio . oswald jenewein
2
ua
e
04 20 28 40 48 gn
n
io
si
de
at
rv
te
ua
ad
se
ob
gr
gn
io
n
io
it
et
rm
ia
fo
mb
mp
co
e
r
we ud
to
st
io
us
ud
ho
st
ed
fi
si
de
d
ga
an
er
ap
io
ud
cr
ys
st
sk
er
al
ri
nt
te
ce
ma
gn
si
de
di
co
te
ua
ad
gr
th
gr nha ad t
ma
e
o:
di
nc
ma
st u
or
s
ie
al
om
is
es
an
th
n
t te an
gn
si
rf
pe
de
er
ba
st
ur
ma
ideas
concepts
projects
contents
designs drawings
maps renderings models
ts
ec
ns
io
it
ch
ar
i ga za t
ne
ts
n
io
it
et
mp
co
ki
in
ls
he
g
in
tt
ne
n
io
it
g
in
us
ec
ho
mp
co
io
ud
st
et
gn
al
ci
so
es
si
it
de
it
ch
ar
k
oc
de sua ma l
vi
ga
ne
bl
ll
ma
de
si
im
he
en
AB
nL
gg
ba
ur
gu
te
d
an
is
ad ra ua s
de n rg pa r
ba
ur
un
al
es
th
ur
ct
or
el
ru
ch
st
ba
student projects architectural practice
58 68 74 80 86
3
urban anomalies project Urban Anomalies - Evolving Public Space in Downtown Houston, Texas site Houston, Texas school University of Innsbruck (AT) and University of Texas at Arlington (US) visiting school Bartlett School of Architecture (UK) instructors Gabriela Seifert-Kavan, Bijan Youssefzadeh jury Bart Lootsma, Marcos Cruz project by Oswald Jenewein
houston
4
5
01 urban anomalies
URBAN ANOMALIES Urban Anomalies, the title of this master’s thesis, relates to three particular building typologies of downtown Houston, Texas: Skybridges, underground tunnels and abovestreet building extensions. Some downtown blocks in Houston are connected by skybridges and gigantic underground tunnels to a three-dimensional pedestrian zone in private ownership and some buildings have been expanded above downtown streets to connect multiple lots. These anomalies form a spatial network of private and public space. The method of this master’s thesis is to extract these three typologies out of the body of Houston, analyze them and apply this system of three-dimensional public space to an architectural and urban design proposal.
00 CONNECTED BY STR
EET AND SIDEWALK
01 01
00 00
PROBLEM
03
CO CONNECTED BY SKY CONNECTED BY SKYBRDGE BRDGE
ANALYSIS The city of Houston shows how single investments evolve into a three dimensional spatial network that contains both private and public space.
02
02 02
Based on the analysis of Houston the problem to solve is how to design buildings and NNECT ED of urban spaceCO as theirD environment, STREET CO NNpart SID ALK ECTEDBY BY STREETAN AND SIDEW EWALK interconnected to Houston’s existing spatial network of private and public space.
CONNECTED BY TUN CONNECTED BY TUNNEL NEL
THESIS The future development of downtown Houston requires not only to increase privately owned individual space but also commonly used public space. If cities grow vertically, public space may not stick to the street level, but has to unfold itself into a dense spatial network. Collective and individual urban spaces need to be developed simultaneously.
6
03 03 CONNECTED BY EXT CONNECTED BY EXTENDING ON MULTIPLE LOT ENDING ON MULTIP S LE LOTS
ENDLESS OPEN SPA CE
LIMITED OPEN SPACE HOUSTON, TEXAS
LIMITED OPEN SPA CE
ENDLESS OPEN SPA CE
HOUSTON TYPOLOGIES skyscraper
DIAGRAMS
HOUSTON TYPOLOGIES AS RECIPE
LIMITED OPEN SPA CE
Houston developed three systems of linking buildings: the skybridge, the tunnel and the building on multiple lots. All of these four ideas will be applied in the following project to create a spatial interconnection between objects. The skyscraper is the ideal type of building for a city center, offering lots of possibilities in both spatial and functional terms. The parking garage reflects the idea of continuously extending the street three dimensionally. Each level can be seen as an open public space. The answer of how many Americans want to live is traditionally given by the suburbs. The typology of the suburban home that offers privacy but also designs the commonly used space around it, becomes an important model for the following project. Given that, the recipe for the following project falls into place: in addition to the typologies of Houston’s spatial network the skyscraper, the parking garage and the suburban home will be part of the project. GRAPHIC © oswald jenewein 2014
parking garage
+
suburban house
GRAPHIC © oswald jenewein 2014
7
urban anomalies
the site The project site in downtown Houston is chosen based on the location. The rectangular grid offers many opportunities to design the same object on several locations. But any site is different depending on its orientation and surroundings. As American grid cities offer prototypical field conditions as Stan Allen explained, the following project will contain three Houston blocks to show the object’s field qualities.
The site is located in southern downtown, directly at Main Street and Bell Street. These three blocks are empty and no projects are planned at this time. The location is close to the underground tunnel system, the skybridges, the sports and event district and commuter train stops. Facing south allows a lot of sunlight because of the low buildings in this part of downtown.
de
str
ac pe cess de to str ian
pe
tun ne co ls mm t Sh o c u o Ma pp ity c ter t ll ing en rain ter
FLOW OF WALKABLE CO
a ian cce tun ss to ne ls
DA L
LA
PO
LK
SS t
St
CL
AY St
BE St
LE AV IS
St
EL
PE
AS
8
NS t
JEF
NI
St TO AC IN NJ
MA I
FA N SA
co to mm su ute bu r t rb rai s n
fam ac ily tiv an ity d ce nte
r
N
St
TR
MI LA M
LO UIS I
AN AS t
LL
FE
RS
ON
ES t
St
St sp
AN
D
St
or
ts
an d fac even ilit t ies
100 m
250 m
500 m
1000 m
328 ft
820 ft
1640 ft
3280 ft
100 m
250 m
500 m
1000 m
100 m
250 m
500 m
1000 m
328 ft
820 ft
1640 ft
3280 ft
328 ft
820 ft
1640 ft
3280 ft
9
urban anomalies
10
WI SOL
D WIN
D WIN
CE RFA T SU TAC N O C LESS
E FAC SUR ACT T N E CO MOR
STRE
D TCHE
TED ROTA D
UDE
EXTR
11
urban anomalies
EVOLVING PUBLIC SPACE Tunnels and skybridges are horizontal connectors. To provide an open commonly used vertical connection between each level a continuous ramp rotates along the tower’s core. The proposed towers are no gated community, but an open urban space from bottom to top. Seven elevators in each tower make the way up or down easy and comfortable. The ramps make all levels accessible for bicycles or scooters alternatively to the elevators.
12
The ramp becomes an extension of the streets or sidewalks. The core forms the center of each tower. On the one hand, it is a structural element, on the other hand it contains technical and transportation functions. Seven elevators and two emergency staircases allow a comfortable and secure use of the building. Large installation shafts supply the units with energy and water. The core also carries a three meter or 10 feet wide ramp that continuously connects all levels from theRAMP bottomAND to theBRIDGES top. AS
13
urban anomalies
SUBURB
individual space
backyard
house
collective space
frontyard
street
individual space
frontyard
house
backyard
UNIT SIZE
01 PRIMARILy RESIDENTIAL USE
02 PRIMARILy OFFICE USE
Unit with frontyard and backyard 30 sqm - 100 sqm
Unit with frontyard, no backyard 50 sqm - 130 sqm
FRONTYARD
FRONTYARD
INDOOR AREA INDOOR AREA
BACKYARD
GRAPH Š oswald jenewe 20
14
THE FRONTYARD AS EXTENDED PUBLIC SPACE In the concept of American suburbs the privately owned space of the frontyard shapes the commonly owned and used streets. This means that the landlord has the power to influence the shape of the public space as his or her own individualized expression. These open frontyards expand the feeling of wide streets. The lateral design of the street space is an agglomeration of the individual design of all the separate frontyards along a neighborhood street. Different trees, bushes, grass and stone, colors, flags or little pieces of art all separated from each other create the assembled face of the street. The frontyard becomes an extended public space, individually designed and maintained. The standardized house is the zone of privacy but offers limited possibilities to customize it. The fenced backyard becomes the outdoorprivacy area depending on the hight of the fence. Anyhow, the relationship between collective and individual spaces allows to blur the boarders between private and public ownership. The individual person or family becomes the designer of the commonly used zone of the neighborhood.
15
UNIT urban anomalies
01 RESIDENTIAL UNIT
02 OFFICE UNIT
2 bedrooms, 1 bathroom 75 sqm - 807 sqft
9 working spaces, 1 meeting room 100 sqm - 1076 sqft
U HORIZONTAL AND HORIZONTAL VERTICAL CONNEC AND VER 01 DOWNSTAIRS
01 DOWNSTAIRS
02 UPSTAIRS
2 bedrooms, 1 bathroom 2 bedrooms, 1 bathroom 70 sqm - 753 sqft 70 sqm - 753 sqft
TOTAL
2 bedrooms, 1 bathroom 2 bedrooms, 1 bathroom 35 sqm - 376sqft 35 sqm - 376sqft
TOTAL
4 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms 4 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms 95 sqm - 1022 sqft 95 sqm - 1022 sqft
16
02 UPSTAIRS
ELEVATION SOUTH
THE UNITS
LEVEL +38 SKYDECK TOWER A
Inside the units almost endless variates of floor plans offer the opportunity to design individual layouts as needed. Everything is possible, whether if one prefers a classical floorplan with separate rooms or an open studio floorplan for the housing units. The same pertains to units of other functions such as offices.
LEVEL +30 SKYDECK TOWER B LEVEL +27 SKYDECK TOWER C
LEVEL +06 SKYBRIDGE + UNITS
LEVEL 00 PLAZA
LEVEL -01 PEDESTRIAN TUNNELS
LEVEL -03 PARKING
GRAPHIC © oswald jenewein 2015
ELEVATION NORTH
connectivity of units
LEVEL +38 = + 209.00 m = + 685 ft SKYDECK TOWER A, TECHNICAL EQUIPMENT
The proposed connection between units is a simple bridge for horizontal connections and a staircase for vertical connections. Bridges and staircases can be added or removed at any time to provide flexible clusters for different demands.
LEVEL +30 = + 165.00 m = + 541 ft SKYDECK TOWER B, TECHNICAL EQUIPMENT LEVEL +27 = + 148,50 m = + 487 ft SKYDECK TOWER C, TECHNICAL EQUIPMENT
LEVEL +06 SKYBRIDGE + UNITS
LEVEL 00 PLAZA
LEVEL -01 PEDESTRIAN TUNNELS
LEVEL -03 PARKING
GRAPHIC © oswald jenewein 2015
UNIT STRU D
R
PIPES
FLOO
S WALL
ETE
L COMP
SKIN STRUC
TURE
17
urban anomalies
18
19
yarambamba (GM)
project Culture and Performance Center site Yarambamba, Banjul (GM) school University of Innsbruck (AT) School of Architecture visiting school University of Plymouth (UK) instructors Clemens Plank, Martin Rauch, Bob Brown project by Oswald Jenewein, Andrea Perle
culture and performance center gambia
20
21
culture and performance center gambia
matter matters The main parameter for this project was the predetermined material - mud. The attributes of mud have many positive impacts on a building, especially in terms of the indoor climate and the environmental foodprint of the building, as it is a totally natural material. Formally speaking, there are some rules mud requires as consequence of its physical characteristics. The most important rule for constructing a mud building is to extrud walls vertical, no angular walls. design principals The formal idea of this project was to create volumes out of a line network. Each of these lines is intersecting with at least two other lines. The rooms and spaces are defined by these lines. what this project is about The main issue of this project is, how people walk through this object, including the building itself and the 200 sqm courtyard. People can walk through the building, follow a threedimensional way, passing by all levels, and leave the building without going any meter twice. By following this path, one will have many different oppurtunities to switch between interior and exterior spaces. The way even should work as a connector between the culture center and the existing environment. People can have a look into the indoor and outdoot eventspace without walking inside the building.
22
23
culture and performance center gambia
floorplan level 00
24
floorplan level +01
floorplan level +02
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
section a-a
25
culture and performance center gambia
26
27
new york city (US)
project Manhattan Skyscraper site Manhattan, New York school University of Texas at Arlington (US) School of Architecture visiting school Rice University, Houston (US) instructors Bijan Youssefzadeh project by Oswald Jenewein
manhattan skyscraper
28
29
manhattan skyscraper
figure/ground plan
The Urban Design component of the studio initially focused and investigated the major driving forces behind contemporary urbanism. It explored the relationship between New Yo r k C i t y, w h i c h wa s i t s p r i m a r y fo c u s , a n d o t h e r b u i l t u r b a n centers and similar contemporary conditions; comparing the recent theoretical debate on future urbanism, and historical precedents which have been instrumental in the transformation of the post-industrial city. The studio attempted to explore the physical reality of New York’s urban condition and the theoretical abstraction of current academic debate, which s e e m i n g l y h a v e b e e n m u t u a l l y e x c l u s i v e o f e a c h o t h e r. U r b a n Design was viewed as a critical exploration, investigation, and perhaps reassessment of conventional approaches regarding issues of site, program, infrastructure, form, and mass. The studio took advantage of architecture’s concerns for site specificity, spatial experience, logic of construction, eco nomics of organization, morphology and physical form, while also engaging realms of knowledge associated with disciplines such as urban ecology, urban geography, and landsca pe design. The project encouraged working from the „ground u p ,“ ra t h e r t h a n a d o p t i n g a t o p d o w n ” m a s t e r- p l a n n i n g a p p r o ach. In this sense, the project was considered experimental, exploratory, and unconventional relative to the established canons of the traditional urban design studio. The Building Design component of the studio served as an advanced design that would include and go beyond conceptual design, experimentation and formal composition although these remained important and critical issues. The focus of this portion was on the actual making of a building. It studied how to make the REAL in terms of construction, idea, and representation. Each student was expected to bring the project to a level of finish where nothing would be left to imagination. The ultimate success of a building was to be determined at all levels and phases from the development of a concept to understanding of structural and environmental systems, building envelope systems, life-safety provisions, building assemblies, and principles of sustainability. These concerns were seen not only as
30
the lower eastside The Lower Eastside: one of the oldest neighborhoods in New York City, famous for the cultural, religious and ethnic diversity. The former working-class district has become a popular place to live within the last few years. inspiriation The topic of the Architecture Biennale in Venice 2012 is “Common Ground�. There are many different possibilities to interpret this term, but in case of the Lower Eastside, the common ground as a ground of diversity fits best. the starting point The diversity of difference makes the Lower Eastside to such a special place. To argue from a sociological point of view, the diversity of difference of the various cultural, religious and ethnic groups is most interesting, but to analyze the Lower Eastside from an architectural point of view, the diversity of difference of streets, buildings and water is most interesting. To do urban design in this district architecture has to be the main focus, but parameters like the sociological characteristics are also important. The main content of the following project is a question: how to create common ground which represents this diversity of difference. As a first step, three theories of postmodern urban design constitute three ideas of designing the same place in the Lower Eastside.
31
manhattan skyscraper
00
RESEARCH_AND_STUDIES
diversity of possibilities
diversity of possibilities
01
JANE_JACOBS DEatH_AND_life_of_great_american_cities 1961
32
diversity of the
diversity of the collective
02
REM_koolhaas delirious_new_york 1978
e collective
61
diversity of the ground
diversity of the ground
03
colin_rowe collage_city 1978
33
manhattan skyscraper
level_-03 International Assembly Hall Human Rights Exhibition Auditorium Buffet
plan 1:800_meters
level_-01 accsess from the sunken plaza Amnesty International Lobby Bookstore, Gift Shop Kitchen
34
level_+10 gym relax zone sauna steam bath swimming pool locker rooms bar
plan 1:800_meters
level_000 accsess from the street level Housing Lobby Cafe/Restaurant Kitchen Atrium
35
manhattan skyscraper
north
section
36
west
south
east
UniT_FLOORPLAN
UniT_FLOORPLAN
Type D
empire state building 1,469 ft 448 m
chrysler building 1,043 ft 318 m
generali building 1,043 ft 318 m
citigroup center 912 ft 278 m
Type K
trump building 925 ft 282 m
trump world tower 859 ft 262 m
GE building 849 ft 259 m
american intl building 849 ft 259 m
amnesty tower 721 ft 220 m
37
manhattan skyscraper
38
39
the codified house project The Codified House site Austrian Alps (AT) school University of Innsbruck (AT) School of Architecture visiting school Sci-Arc, Los Angeles (US) instructors Hernan Diaz Alonso, Jose Carlos Lopez Cervantes, Peter Trummer project by Oswald Jenewein, Andrea Perle
austrian alps
40
41
the codified house
Types vs Species
This studio used the program of a house as a tool to study the shift towards a paradigm of Species as opposed to the ubiquitous platform of Types. If Types are traditionally viewed as categories of standardization, and symbolic expressions of form, then Species are malleable entities that are in constant metamorphosis; adaptation and mutation are the main characteristics from Species.
42
43
the codified house
genealogical tree
44
45
the codified house
section 1-1 view from south-east
46
elevation west view from north-west
47
observation tower competition
observation tower competition project Observation Tower for Stockerau (AT) site Stockerau (AT) school University of Innsbruck (AT) School of Architecture jury Franz Sam, Coop Himmelb(l)au instructors Thomas Mathoy project by Oswald Jenewein, Martina Hueber
stockerau (AT)
48
49
observation tower competition
Topic In the context of this course an outlook tower for the city of Stockerau should be developed. The height of the tower was predefined with 25 meters. Analysis Various existing observation towers had been analyzed before the design-process started. The structural and typological elements of three towers in Europe helped to understand what type of construction an observation tower is and to define important parameters for developing a concept. The method of analysis was to three dimensionally redraw existing observation-towers’ structures.is located under the tower like roots. The underground tunnel has two functions: firstly it acts as a sub-construction for the two wooden towers, secondly it should be used to give information to the visitors about Stockerau and the new watch tower.
50
51
observation tower competition
Concept The final tower concept provides that the form virtually drills through the earth and juts out on the opposite side of the tower. The visitor must go downstairs for reaching the observation deck. The arising connecting tunnel between the two towers displays a contrast: on one side is the platform overlooking the roofs of the town, light and fresh air, on the other side the walkway which symbolically is located under the tower like roots. The underground tunnel has two functions: firstly it acts as a sub-construction for the two wooden towers, secondly it should be used to give information to the visitors about Stockerau and the new watch tower.
52
53
observation tower competition
druck durch zugseile
stahlstange
aussichtsplattform klh-platte
kopfpunkt zugverankerung
stahlseil außenring stahl
zugseil
leimbinder
led lichtband
stahltragholm stahlmanschette
feder ok.terrain ±0,00 fußpunkt zugverankerung
fußpunkt zugverankerung
bodenplatte stahlbeton sauberkeitsschicht erdreich
pfahlgründung
54
+16,20
e5 ok.podest +13,50
e4 ok.podest +10,80
e3 ok.podest +8,10
e2 ok.podest +5,40
ok. +5,
e1 ok.podest +2,70
e0 ok.podest ±0,00
e0 ok. ±0,
ok.vorplatz ±0,00
ok.turm +24,85
e8 ok.podest +21,65
e7 ok.podest +18,30
e6 ok.podest +16,20
e5 ok.podest +13,50
e4 ok.podest +10,80
e3 ok.podest +8,10
ok.turm eingang +5,25
e2 ok.podest +5,40
e1 ok.podest +2,70
e0 ok.podest ±0,00
ok.vorplatz ±0,00
55
observation tower competition
56
57
structural and social netting project Structural and Social Netting site Gargnano (IT) school University of Innsbruck (AT) School of Architecture visiting school -instructors Margarethe Heubacher-Sentobe project by Oswald Jenewein
gargnano, lake garda (IT)
58
59
structural and social netting
Lake Garda, Italy
Arco
Riva
Torbole
Limone Malcesine
Brenzone
Gargnano Toscolano Gardone
Torri del Benaco Garda Manerba
Bardolino
Lazise Desenzano Peschiera
60
Castelnuovo del Garda
autochthonous structures Topic The title of this course is autochthonous structures. In this design studio IV solutions for a new usage of these historical structures should be developed. The aim is to deal with stock sensible and to create new forms and functions. Autochthonous structures The word “autochthon” derives from the ancient Greek. It is consisting of “auto“ which means “self” and “thon” which is a term for earth. Analogous translations describe autochthonous as „independent“, „native“ or „emerged on the spot “. Limonaia We start with the lemon gardens in Gargnano on Lake Garda, or better known as the Limonaias. Through the centuries the Limonaias have lost their original function due to the economic situation.
Nowadays you can find large lemon planation only in southern regions of Italy. The terraced insertion into the natural terrain is typical for the native structures of lemon groves at the lake. A strict grid of columns functions as a substructure for the establishment of mobile timber walls, which shade the lemons from the harshness of the winter weather. Research Previous to the draft it was intensely searched for autochthonous structures in history as fundamental research. Furthermore autochthonous structures were analysed and four causes were defined to find out why they are emerging.
61
structural and social netting
Design The structure of the Limonaia is divided into two basic elements, the three levels and a column grid which should be the basis for the draft. The planned buildings raise from the stock and are poured into the measure of the column grid. The new buildings are also emphasized vertical to borrow the vertical structure of the Limonaia for the draft as well. The arising towers have a floor area of 20 square meters. A monopitch roof, which increases towards the lake, forms the vertical ending of the towers. This roof shape can be find in the environment again and again. The shape is ideal for exposure conditions and unfettered lake view.
62
Function A tourist development concept makes sense, but a conventional concept, such as a hotel or apartments, should not emerge. Rather a new typology should be developed, which results from connection of the stock and the creative consideration. The different functions are taken in the new building and are arranged vertical. A mixture of public, half public and privately utilizable rooms should develop. The functions sleeping and washing are taken in the private units. The functions cooking, dining, and living are taken in common rooms, which should be accessible to all residents. The linkage, that is the skyway, are for all residents of the surrounding public.
structural and social netting On the one hand this means the connection between the stock and the new building. The new building are virtually dashed with the stock and entwine the existing columns. In this way the stock becomes part of the outside and interior concept. The measure of the towers emerge from the column grid of the Limonaia. On the other hand the different towers are connected by bridges, which crisscross through the stock. These connections develop the individual rooms and functions. Consequently a social linkage of private and common rooms are the odds.
63
structural and social netting
top view
1
1
tower e 3 private units 1 poolroom sunloungers
64
tower d 2 private units 1 chillout-lounge
tower f 1 private unit 1 self-check-in 1 cooking & dining
tower c 3 private units 1 sauna & relax rest area allotments tower staircase & elevator
tower a 1 private unit tower b 2 private units 1 self-check-in 1 cooking & dining 1 chillout-lounge 1 chillout-lounge
cafĂŠ
terrace wc's & storage
terrace multifunctional patio
section 1-1
e7 ok.ffb. +19,25 e6 ok.ffb. +16,50 e5 ok.ffb. +13,75 ok.asphalt +12,45
e4 ok.ffb. +11,00 e3 ok.ffb. +8,25 e2 ok.ffb. +5,50
ok.terrain +4,95
e1 ok.ffb. +2,75 e0 ok.ffb. ±0,00
see ok.wasser -0,80
ok.terrain ±0,00
65
structural and social netting
private units / floor plan
01 doublebed 01 doublebed
02 doublebed
03 three-fourbed
02 doublebed
03 three-fourbed
wohnen privat
beispielräume privat grundrisse, massstab 1:100 beschreibung Die privat zu nutzenden Einheiten variieren durch Form, Lage der Erschließung und Anzahl der intern verbundenen Stockwerke. gestaltung & funktion Hauptfunktion dieser Einheiten ist das Schlafen, deshalb steht das Bett zentral im Raum mit direktem Seeblick. balcony strukturelle verflechtung Die quadratischen Säulen des Bestandes shower sind sowohl Teil des Außen- als auchbalcony des Innenraums, damit der Bestand besser shower wahrgenommen wird.
01 02
01 zweibett
shower & wc shower & wc
02 zweibett
03 dr
sliding doors as room divider bedroom in level 2 sliding doors as room divider livingroom or bedroom for 2 more people bedroom in level 2 livingroom or bedroom for 2 more people
03
balkon dusche mit seeblick
66
dusche & wc als durchgang
schiebetüren als raumtrenner schlafen in der zweiten ebe
wohnen. optionales schlafen für 2 pe
community units / floor plan
insam insam
g
g ng
billardraum 01 01billardraum
01 poolroom 01 poolroom
kochen && essen essen 02 02kochen
& dining 02 cooking 02 cooking & dining
self-check-in 03 03self-check-in
03 self-check-in 03 self-check-in
chillout-lounge 04 04chillout-lounge
04 chillout-lounge 04 chillout-lounge
ng ang
ang ang s s s ss s
wohnen gemein
spinds spinds schrank schrank
möbel möbelbeliebig beliebigzu zupositionieren positionieren
wardrobe wardrobe
position of furniture flexible position of furniture flexible
durchgang durchgang
corridor corridor
lockers lockers
beispielräume für geimeinsame nutzung grundrisse, massstab 1:100 beschreibung Diese Einheiten werden von allen Bewohnern gemeinsam verwendet. gestaltung & funktion Die Möblierung lässt eine flexible Bespeilung der Räume zu. computer computer Einige Einheiten dienen auch als Durchgang zucomputer anderen Einheiten. check-in-automaten check-in-automaten computer verflechtung möbel beliebig zu möbelstrukturelle beliebig zupositionieren positionieren self-check-in Die quadratischen Säulen des Bestandes self-check-in sind sowohl Teil Außen- als auch des position of furnituredes flexible position of furniture Innenraums, damitflexible der Bestand besser wahrgenommen wird.
01 02
03 04
67
urban parasites project Urban Parasites site Innsbruck school University of Innsbruck (AT) School of Architecture visiting school -instructors Helmut Lanziner project by Oswald Jenewein, Nadine Reichholf
innsbruck (AT)
68
69
urban parasites
URBAN PARASITES design studio III Topic The topic of this design III is urban parasites. The aim is to develop a system for urban densification in the district of Innsbruck in Saggen. The parasites should be constructed above the existing perimeter block development of the early 20th century. Designing new housing above the city is to the fore. Research Yona Friedman wants to usher in the end of a stiff, immovable and effortful architecture by introducing his “feasible utopia” of Ville Spatiale – the spatial town – in the 60s of the 20th century. With his urban vision of mobile architecture he wants to provide the society a frame, in which people can individually create their own little empire. Friedman wants to achieve this with a spatial infrastructure in the form of multi-storied spatial framework bars.
70
example for a floor plan 5,50 meters x 11,00 meters
71
urban parasites
in & out. Every parasite can be pushed into every position of the steel construction - a drawer system.
72
Design ideas Based on Friedman’s urban vision of Ville Spatiale the theories should be converted into design III project. Project mobile.flexible.individual. The system of densification should be mobile, flexible and individual. The parasitical objects beset the existing buildings, but both parasites can be removed and increased. Mobile Every unit can be placed to any arbitrary place, where the only condition is to have a plug-in for energy supply. Flexible The system of densification offers all possibilities, like from addition of a unit to a parasitical tower. The burdens arising are supported by a steel construction, in which the individual units can be pushed in like into a drawer and can be linked. Individual The units have fixed extents. The interior features a sanitary and cooking area, everything else can be created individually by the resident. If a resident wants to move, he has the possibility to change the location or position of his parasite.
73
helsinki (FI)
project Kuin Lintu - Guggenheim Competition site Helsinki office urbanLAB / Maria Schneider Architects
guggenheim competition helsinki
74
75
guggenheim competition helsinki
Architecture The museum will be defined by four architectural elements: The free running roof carried by a single freestanding pillar in the southwest. The suspended glass skin, combined with the roof, constituting the thermal envelope. The sculptural building inside containing the museum and made of local wood. The sloping landscape surrounding the building. The exhibition rooms inside the sculpture are arranged to give art the status it deserves. The thermal clear envelope of the museum reflects the rational architecture of the environment, but the curvated roof with his freestanding mainstay and the indoor sculptural building transforms the museum into a landmark and architectural symbol of Helsinki.
Cityscape The urban design concept is based on optimum use and artistically shaped routes as well as public spaces. Several routes for pedestrians will be provided between city centre and Olympia Terminal. These footpaths lead along the east side of the Market Hall over a ramp to the museum square where the entrance is located. From the south arriving visitors will be directed to the sculpture deck either via the gate of the Terminal or the sidewalk. On deck there will be a cafe and the entrance to the conference area, underneath there is the delivery area, parking lot for staff as well as the Makasiini terminal. The tram stop will stay in place, on the eastern side are the car parks for taxis and VIP‘s.
76
Public Space Visitors Events Operations
77
guggenheim competition helsinki
VON EINEM AUTODESK-SCHULUNGSPRODUKT ERSTELLT
78
VON EINEM AUTODESK-SCHULUNGSPRODUKT ERSTELLT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTOD
LEVEL +9,70
LEVEL +1,00
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
DESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
LEVEL +13,40 LEVEL +9,70 LEVEL +6,00
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
LEVEL +1,00
STREET ±0,00
LEVEL +13,40
LEVEL +6,00 STREET ±0,00
79
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
sillblock social housing competition
project Sillblock Housing Competition site Innsbruck office Demanega Architects Innsbruck
innsbruck (AT)
80
81
sillblock social housing competition
Sillblock Housing Competition Innsbruck social housing The city of Innsbruck mandates semi-public-development companies to develop new social housing units for the citie’s community. This proposal for a social housing competition in Innsbruck accommodates 138 housing units. The units‘ size ranges from a small one-bedroom unit with 45 square meters to efficient three-bedroom units with 95 square meters. urban design concept The design-idea was to create a more open ground-floor in contrast to the existing perimeter block developments. All rooms on street level are for common use only. The courtyard becomes an element to connect to the surroundings, not a gated yard.
82
83
sillblock social housing competition
84
85
visualizations
various projects Demanega Architects Innsbruck
86
87
architectural practice: visualizations
88
89
architectural practice: visualizations
90
91
92