One Man’s Opinion: Why We Need the Filibuster By Bill Crane The framers intended for our U.S. Constitution to be the upper chamber and more deliberative body. Until the 17th amendment was ratified in 1913, the two senators from each state were appointed either by their legislature or governor and not popularly elected. I would not turn that clock back, but on some more recent changes in Senate rules, I think some permanent harm has been done. With the occasional exception, before the confirmation hearings of Justice Clarence Thomas in 1991, it was not unusual to see U.S. Supreme Court nominees receive confirmation votes of 70, 80, or even 90 votes in favor, regardless of the party in power and political leanings of the nominee. It was also more customary when the vote threshold for successful confirmation was higher than the current simple majority (51 senators) to see nominations withdrawn when it became clear that any prospective nominee could not engender the support of a clear majority of the bi-partisan Senate Judiciary Committee or the Senate floor. This tended to bring about the confirmation of more centrist and apolitical judges on our highest court. During 2013, and early in the second term of President Barack Obama, then Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat from Nevada, led efforts to abolish the filibuster for the U.S. Senate confirmation of presidential Cabinet nominees and federal judges, to a simple majority of half the Senate, plus one. That threshold had been 60 votes by Senate rules. Early in his first term, President Obama had a bullet-proof 60 vote plus majority in the U.S. Senate, as well as an overwhelming majority in the U.S. House. During the devastating mid-term elections of 2010, in what was seen somewhat as a referendum on the Affordable Care Act, Obama and the Democratic Party lost their majorities in the U.S. House and Senate. Senator Reid was frustrated by Republican senators then bottling up Obama Cabinet nominees with filibusters during his second term, so he lowered the vote and debate threshold on all Cabinet nominees and federal judicial appointments to 51 votes, intending to put several Progressives eventually on the U.S. Supreme Court as well as fill the president’s Cabinet and sub-cabinet appointments during his second term. Obama would famously leave hundreds of federal judicial posts open, all to later be filled by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) when the majority changed, and now with that much lower confirmation vote threshold. Three Supreme Court Justices, anyone? Unlike the U.S. House of Representatives, which often proposes legislation based on the latest headline or public opinion poll, the U.S. Senate is intended to have more senior statesmen and women, often with lengthy prior elective office experience, serve in the U.S. House, back in their home state, and/or the Executive Branch. As stated here previously, I am pro-choice. I am not a woman, and I cannot entirely appreciate the feelings I might have if any government entity told me what I can or cannot do with my own body, but the recent decision by the Supremes did not end, nor make abortion illegal; however, it did return regulation and that authority over reproductive rights and fetal life to the states. It was a 6/3 Republican majority appointed U.S. Supreme Court that in 1973 delivered the decision creating the precedent of Roe v. Wade by a vote of 7/2. In the lesser-known Casey v. Planned Parenthood case Continued on page 21
August 2022 Our Town Gwinnett
AfterTaste BBQ+
The
SMOKEHOUSE & GRILLE
Now Open for Online Ordering, Carry Out & Delivery
Order online: www.aftertaste-atl.com 470-775-2081 www.aftertaste-atl.com 706 Grayson Highway Ste 212 | Lawrenceville
Best of Gwinnett for last 7 years
Delivery available doordash and grubhub
Order online at fratellispizza-ny.com
Full Bar
Private Room & Off-site Catering Available 1711 Athens Hwy., Grayson, GA 30017 470-375-4701 • fratellispizza-ny.com PAGE 13
