PERRY LOW MSc (Arch), B.Arch Sci
The Vertical Neighbourhood
Graduation Project at TU Delft
Synergetic Sound
Experimentation in motion controlled sound
Nieuw Gebouwschil
Design proposal for a building facade system
Variable Surfaces
One detail for a varying tessallated surface
Econtinuum
Proposal for a multi-level building with continuous circulation paths
Continous Variation Workshop in robotic fabrication
The Ghana Project
Building a kindergarten in Africa
Renovation 2050
Building an energy efficient home in Canada
Prototyping
Digital fabrication experiments
Selected Professional Works Professional work in a residential firm
Perry Low Jeng Jin
perry.low06@gmail.com :: 5195 :: perry.low06@gmail.com 621 S Spring St, 804 :: Los Angeles, ::CA, United States :: 213 268 Education Technische Universiteit Delft :: 2013 - 2015
Delft, Netherlands
Master of Science - Architecture, Urbanism and the Built Environment (MSc-BK)
Ryerson University :: 2007 - 2011
Toronto, Canada
Bachelor of Architectural Science (BArch Sci)
Temasek Polytechnic, School of Design :: 2001 - 2004 Diploma in Interior Architecture and Design (Dip IAD)
Work Experience Intermediate Designer Rivers and Christian :: 2016- Present • • • •
• • • • •
• •
Toronto, Canada
Assisted project architect in preparing site plan approval for several projects within the Greater Toronto Area (25 Ontario Street and 3220 Sheppard Ave East) Designed and drafted plans, elevations and sections for highrise residential developments (1058 Bayview and Mon Sheong Markham) Coordinated with consultants and planners to inform projects for site plan approval by the city of toronto Worked with project architect to design 200,000 sq. ft highrise low-income housing (1345 Danforth Ave) Created 3D models for marketing purposes (Fuse Condos) Assisted in shop drawings for construction (Parklawn Condos)
Voluntary Activity Design + Build Specialist Ghana Project: Ryerson University :: 2009 •
Los Angeles, United States
Assisted in the planning and execution of the project design booklet for proposed APM cores at LAX Terminal 6 and Tom Bradley International Terminal Coordinated and worked directly with our client on the San Diego Airport Cargo Facility design competition that eventually led to our team being awarded the design build project Played a critical role in the creation of a physical model for a public outreach presentation conductted by Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) for a proposed Airport Police Facility as part of the Northside planning proposal Researched and designed a bullet resistant checkpoint for use by the Airport Police at the entrance of LAX
Junior Designer Burka Architects Inc. :: 2011- 2013 •
Singapore
Kpedze Todze , Ghana
Effectively collaborated with a multidisciplinary team of 25 students to establish a preschool/kindergarten facility in the Volta Region of Ghana Managed on-site design and construction within the team and pro-actively utilized local materials to improve the education facilities Assisted in the construction of compost toilets designed to be integrated within the building
Awards Ted Libfeld Bild Scholarship
2010
Canadian Institute of Steel Construction :: Ontario Region Scholarship
2009
2nd Annual Architectural Student Charrette, IIDEX/NeoCon
2009
RU Green ::The Green Heart (Student/Alumni Design Competition Ryerson University)
2009
The Federation of Chinese Canadian Professionals (Ontario) :: Education Foundation Award
2009
Air India Flight 182 Memorial
2009
•
• • • •
•
Awarded for outstanding student with overall academic excellence and with a career objective in the Housing Industry Awarded for excellence in the area of Structural Design in a Collaborative Exercise design team. Team awarded first place for the design charrette at the annual convention.
Team was awarded 1st place for innovation in sustainable design and revitalization of university campus life.
Awarded to RU Green winning team who developed and submitted exemplary urban design competition package. Team was awarded for design excellence and selected as the popular choice award.
The Vertical Neighbourhood "...redefining the tower typology through reuse..." Marconitorens :: Marconiplein, Rotterdam :: Netherlands MSc. Semester 3 - 4 :: 2014 - 2015
The vacant office tower has been a growing problem in many urban centres around the world, being especially true in the Netherlands. This vacancy eventually leads to urban decay and depreciation of the value of the surrounding context. Reuse of these often large scale buildings are limited in the current practice of conversion to residential towers, renovation into updated office space, or demolition. Another issue with towers is the lack of public spaces that may exist within a vertical typology. Connectivity to the ground level and therefore the street can be a major attractor to social life and by extension, the revitalisation and growth of older towers and their surrounding areas. By extending the horizontal surface into the vertical, this project aims to show how the continuous circulation of a main public street can be extended into an existing tower thereby changing the tower typology as well as sustainably revitalising older office towers.
North section
Tertiary ramp (spaces) Secondary ramp (private street)
Connecting the tower
Primary ramp (public street)
North South section
South section
Ground level
1st level
2nd level
3rd level
4th level
5th level
- Auditorium
- Gastronomy
- Retail
- Work space
- Gardens
- Manufacturing
Synergetic Sound
"...social interaction through cooperative movement..." Protospace :: Boukunde City, Delft :: Netherlands MSc. Semester 2 :: 2014
In an age where digital technology has invaded almost every aspect of our daily lives, social interaction between strangers has been greatly reduced. Commonly seen activities in public spaces involve individual people in close proximity interacting with their mobile devices but not with each other. Furthermore, physical movement is kept to a minimum as the user is engrossed with the screen and is left less aware of their surroundings. Instead of denying the existence of the digital realm, the synergetic sound environment aims to use the digital platform in order to invoke proactive interaction. Through the use of sound as a medium, users are able to manipulate the pitch, tempo, and volume through physical movement. The musical composition is enriched when additional users enter the space, and thereby encourages social interaction.
EXISTING COMPOSITION USER 1 Control A1 tempo
Control B1 pitch
SOUND 1
USER 2 Control A2 tempo
Control B2 pitch
SOUND 2
USER 3 Control A3 tempo
Control B3 pitch
SOUND 3
User Proximity Control C volume
SOUND 4
NEW COMPOSITION Information flow
Speaker
Still
Concept
Movement
Separate Sounds
Interactivity
Synergy
Kinect sensor
Speaker
Laptop
Speaker
Overhead projector
Speaker
Speaker
Plan view of environment
Performance
Overhead projector A
Overhead projector B
Overhead projector C
Kinect sensor
Detection zone
Front view with projectors
Nieuw Gebouwschil
"...reducing energy consumption through updates..." PathĂŠ Cinema :: Schouwburgplein, Rotterdam :: Netherlands MSc. Semester 1 :: 2013
Over the years, The PathĂŠ Cinema at Schouwburgplein in Rotterdam has experienced high level of energy consumption of cooling and heating due to the building's ineffective envelope system. Problems that had been identified include a lack of proper insulation, insufficient openings for natural ventilation, and poor accessibility for general maintenance. The objective of the project was to improve these deficiencies while creating a more visually appealing exterior presence. Exterior View of selected area
Glazing unit
Metal panel
ETFE
Operable
Air vent
Exploded Axonometric
EFIS wall component Bolted connection for EFIS to structure +20650 - TOP OF ROOF
Extruded polystyrene insulated roofing (150mm)
Existing roof slab
Detail B
Shelf angle bolted to existing slab (3m length)
Steel truss structure
Chalking with backer rod
ETFE rain-screen
Detail B Insulated glazing units Operable window ETFE with printed shading pattern (interior wall)
+15820 - UPPER FLOOR Insulated metal panel Maintainence plateform ETFE with shaded print
ETFE air supply pipe Steel member
Steel truss structure
(150mm diameter)
Operable window
Detail A Insulated glazing units +550 - GROUND FLOOR 0 - ESTABLISHED GRADE Air intake vent
Wall Section
Detail C
Structural Frame
Exploded Detail Assembly
Envelope Assembly
Detail A
Plan View A Detail C
B
B
A
Exterior Elevation
Cavity Section B
Variable Surfaces "...one component, multiple sizes..." Merkelpark :: TU Delft :: Netherlands MSc. Semester 2 :: 2014
In this project, a component was conceptualized, detailed, and physically prototyped with the objective to create a single tile that embodies variations in physical adaptations. Designed as a singular unit with the ability to change its size and proportions, the tile can be used on any surface and is able to account for continuous variations in tessellation. This component allows for a 'breathable' structure that could expand and contract depending on the need for varying degrees of light and ventilation.
- Compressed
- Expanded
Variable Structural Frame (Laser cut in plywood or metal sheets)
Pivot Joint (3D print in ABS Plastic) Shading Fins (Laser cut in rigid PVC sheets)
Variable frame for shading fins (Laser cut in plywood) Secondary socket (3D print in ABS Plastic) Primary Socket (Laser cut in plywood, possible to 3D print)
Cluster contracted
Cluster expanded
1300mm
1780mm
Plan view maximum contraction & expansion
Prototypes of primary socket (Initial & final)
Testing the telescopic frame member
Prototype of complete module
Econtinuum
"...uninterrupted movement through space..." 2628 :: TU Delft :: Netherlands MSc. Semester 1 :: 2013
Many buildings that exist in the urban environment are defined by walls and floors that divide spaces between each other. In this way, there is always a clear demarcation of what is considered inside and out. They serve as constant reminders to the visitor that they have now entered another space and therefore functions have changed. By removing traditional connotations of floor, wall, and ceiling and simply blending surfaces into one another, the visitor becomes less aware that they have now transitioned onto a different floor or have entered a new space.
Group 1 connects at G Group 2 connects at G / -1
Group 5 connects at +1
Connection to neighbours
Internal circulation
Persepective looking north (main entrance)
1st Floor
Ground Level
Lower Level
Retail
1st Floor
Dance floor
Ground Level Lower atrium
Lower Level Grocery store Bicycle parking
Building section
Window
Exterior frame Glazing Glazing frame Steel frame
Solar panel
Steel frame Rubber seal
Rubber seal
Illumination
Walking surface
Tile modules
Openings and Access
Diffuser
Insulation
Ventilation
Light base Plaster board Steel frame Rubber seal
Floor surface Hot water pipes Insulated base Steel frame Rubber seal Acoustic barrier
Solar panel
Exterior frame Ventilation grill Ventilation duct Steel frame Rubber seal Insulation
Piezoelectric surface Glass floor Intergrated energy adapter Rubber seal Insulation
2nd level food court/ dance floor Perspective looking east (secondary entrance)
Continous Variation
"...scalable porosity through robotic fabrication..." Protospace :: Boukunde City, Delft :: Netherlands MSc. Semester 3 :: 2014
The Continuous Variation is a series of workshops conducted at Hyperbody TU Delft. The objective of this research is to integrate different modes and methods of robotic fabrication into computational design processes in order to explore porosity and multi-materiality in architectural building systems. This particular workshop focuses on developing design to production methods for the introduction of porosity at different scales and levels that range from the micro level of material systems, to the macro level of spatial, structural and architectural configurations. My involvement in the project was predominately focused on the experimentation of the materials that led to the fabrication of the final prototypes.
Experimentation on different compositions of printable clay
Light experiment 1 (defining robotic printing path)
Light experiment 2 (identifying structural path)
The Ghana Project
"...on-site construction in a rural village..." Kpedze-Todze :: Ho :: Republic of Ghana Barch Sci. Semester 4 :: 2009
Led by Ryerson’s Department of Architectural Science, a multi-disciplinary team of 25 undergraduate students, three professors and two recent Ryerson alumni travelled to the village of Kpedze Todze in Ghana for one month to establish a pre-school/kindergarten facility for approximately 50 local children. The Ryerson group, with training in architecture, interior design, early childhood education, fashion and image arts, assessed the existing educational site and building, and designed, constructed and furnished a new facility. The Ghana Project is intended to be the first phase in a series of small buildings in an academic village for Kpedze Todze, a Voltaregion village located not far from the regional centre of Ho. The plan was to conceive a two-classroom facility (including latrines), for approximately 50 children, 4-5 years of age, two teachers and two assistants. Photograph of Built School
Plan View
Aerial View
Classroom side elevation
Classroom back elevation
Construction process
Renovation 2050
"...constructing an energy efficient home in downtown Toronto..." 27 Withrow Ave :: Toronto :: Canada Barch Sci. Semester 6 :: 2010
As an ongoing field study research project, Renovation 2050 will quantify the theoretical and practical issues associated with designing and constructing a sustainable whole building retrofit in the urban setting of Toronto, Canada. Although several single family dwellings have been successfully designed and constructed with optimal sustainability as the goal, a key difference between the current projects and Renovation2050 is the access to published data and analysis. It is anticipated the data presented from Renovation2050 will be used to direct future efforts to establish protocol on the design and construction of sustainable urban renovation projects.
Axonometric of house Š RRCL 2011
Construction process (all images Š RRCL 2011)
Prototyping
"...digital tools as a means of rapid experimentation..." Design Lab :: Toronto :: Canada Barch Sci. Semester 8 :: 2011
25 Ontario Street
"...21 storey mixed used development..." 25 Ontario St :: Toronto, Ontario :: Canada Burka Architects Inc. :: 2011 - 2013 Strong
duced t
Project Architect : Andre Brochu
10 stor
brought
Client
: Euromart
Floor area
: 19,990 m2
Transitio
Type
: Mixed use development
the
Involvement
: Design development & Site plan approval
Adelaid
elemen
he
building
Tower e
brick po
this elem
4800 E-MAIL WEBSITE
4800 E-MAIL WEBSITE
D U F F E R I N S T, S U I T E 2 0 1, T O R O N T O , O N T A R I O , M 3 H 5 S 8 MAILBOX@BURKA.NET WWW.BURKA.NET
TELEPHONE FACSIMILE
416.665.0722 416.665.3724
4800 E-MAIL WEBSITE
D U F F E R I N S T, S U I T E 2 0 1, T O R O N T O , O N T A R I O , M 3 H 5 S 8 MAILBOX@BURKA.NET WWW.BURKA.NET
TELEPHONE FACSIMILE
416.665.0722 416.665.3724
D U F F E R I N S T, S U I T E 2 0 1, T O R O N T O , O N T A R I O , M 3 H 5 S 8 MAILBOX@BURKA.NET WWW.BURKA.NET
TELEPHONE FACSIMILE
416.665.0722 416.665.3724
4800 E-MAIL WEBSITE
D U F F E R I N S T, S U I T E 2 0 1, T O R O N T O , O N T A R I O , M 3 H 5 S 8 MAILBOX@BURKA.NET WWW.BURKA.NET
TELEPHONE FACSIMILE
416.665.0722 416.665.3724
3220 Sheppard Avenue East "...20 storey residential development..." 3220 Sheppard Ave. East :: Scarborough, Ontario :: Canada Burka Architects Inc. :: 2011 - 2013
Project Architect : Paul Icke Client
: Parsa Realty Corporation
Floor area
: 20,645 m2
Type
: Residential
Involvement
: Design development & Site plan approval
Danforth Village Estates
"...highrise residential development for low-income families..." 1340 - 1360 Danforth Rd. :: Scarborough, Ontario :: Canada Burka Architects Inc. :: 2011 - 2013
Project Architect : Paul Icke Client
: Heintzman Co-operative Housing Development Inc.
Floor area
: 86,289 m2
Type
: Residential
Involvement
: Design development, Site plan approval,
Suite layout & marketing drawings
LAX Century Blvd Checkpoint Concept "...concept development for permernant Police stop checkpoint..." Los Angeles Airport :: Los Angeles, California :: United States Rivers and Christian :: 2017
LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS, CENTURY BLVD VEHICLE CHECKPOINTS 1 & 2
Project Manager : Austin Rivers Client
: Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA)
Floor area
: 100 ft2
Type
: Checkpoint Stop
CHECKPOINT 1 BACK
CHECKPOINT 1 FRONT
CHECKPOINT 1 SWING ARM BARRIER
ION OF
DIRECT
SWING ARM BARRIER
UPPER WORLD
VEL LAR TRA
VEHICU
CHECKPOINT 1 INSPECTION AREA
WAY
CHASE CAR LAWA PROPERTY LINE
Involvement
: Concept Development
Status
: On-hold
CHECKPOINT 2 INSPECTION AREA CHECKPOINT 2 FRONT CHECKPOINT 2 SWING ARM BARRIER CHECKPOINT 2 BACK
LD
OR
RW
WE
WAY D
LO
CE
YB
UR
NT
W
R VA
LE
OU
SCALE 1” = 32” 0’
20’
40’
80’
160’ N
SITE PLAN CHECKPOINT PROTOTYPE DESIGN
LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS, CENTURY BLVD VEHICLE CHECKPOINTS 1 & 2
LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS, CENTURY BLVD VEHICLE CHECKPOINTS 1 & 2
DESIGN AND COLOR TO COMPLY WITH AND APPROVED BY LAWA DESIGN GUIDELINES LEVEL 8 UL 752 RATED GLAZING AND FRAMING SYSTEM - SILL TO BE ATTACHED TO CONCRETE BARRIER, HEADER TO BE ATTACHED TO PREFABRICATED BUS SHELTER ROOF
FROSTED GLASS TO ALLOW NATURAL ILLUMINATION UNDER THE SHELTER
E SLOP
E LOP
S
STORAGE BOX
PRE-FABRICATED BUS SHELTER SECONDARY ENTRANCE/ EXIT
7’ 6”
7’ 6”
OPAQUE METAL BACKING TO OBSTRUCT VISION
2’ 0”
4’ 0”
LEVEL 8 UL 752 RATED CONCRETE WALL. WALL IS ALSO TO BE RATED FOR K12 ANTI-VEHICLE IMPACT.
2’ 0”
10’ 0”
BULLET PROOF COMPONENT
6’ 0”
FOUNDATION FOOTINGS 8” DEPTH (TO BE CONFIRMED FROM SOIL REPORT) 20’ 0”
PRIMARY ENTRANCE/EXIT
DIREC
TION OF
DIRECT
ION OF
VEHICU
LAR TRA VEL
CONCRETE BARRIER TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF BULLET PROOF GLASS AND OVERALL COST - THICKNESS TO PREVENT VEHICLE RAMMING
8’ 0”
VEHICU
LAR TRA VEL
SECONDARY CHECKPOINT PROTOTYPE DESIGN
SECONDARY SHELTER DESIGN OPTION 1
LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS, CENTURY BLVD VEHICLE CHECKPOINTS 1 & 2
LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS, CENTURY BLVD VEHICLE CHECKPOINTS 1 & 2
DESIGN AND COLOR TO COMPLY WITH AND APPROVED BY LAWA DESIGN GUIDELINES LEVEL 8 UL 752 RATED GLAZING AND FRAMING SYSTEM - SILL TO BE ATTACHED TO CONCRETE BARRIER, HEADER TO BE ATTACHED TO PREFABRICATED BUS SHELTER ROOF
FROSTED GLASS TO ALLOW NATURAL ILLUMINATION UNDER THE SHELTER
E SLOP
PE
SLO
PRE-FABRICATED BUS SHELTER
7’ 6”
SECONDARY ENTRANCE/ EXIT
7’ 6”
LEVEL 8 UL 752 RATED CONCRETE WALL. WALL IS ALSO TO BE RATED FOR K12 ANTI-VEHICLE IMPACT. CAN BE USED AS A PLANTER
OPAQUE METAL BACKING TO OBSTRUCT VISION
W RY
TU
EN
C
2’ 0”
4’ 0”
BULLET PROOF COMPONENT 10’ 0”
20’ 0” 8’ 0”
PRIMARY ENTRANCE/EXIT
6’ 0”
FOUNDATION FOOTINGS 8” DEPTH (TO BE CONFIRMED FROM SOIL REPORT) DIRECT
ION OF
DIREC
TION OF
Design Option 1
PRIMARY CHECKPOINT DESIGN OPTION 1
VEHICU
LAR TRA VEL
CONCRETE BARRIER TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF BULLET PROOF GLASS AND OVERALL COST - THICKNESS TO PREVENT VEHICLE RAMMING
VEHICU
LAR TRA VEL
Design Option 2
PRIMARY CHECKPOINT PROTOTYPE DESIGN
VD BL
LEVEL 8 UL 752 RATED CONCRETE WALL. WALL IS ALSO TO BE RATED FOR K12 ANTI-VEHICLE IMPACT.
San Diego Air Cargo Facility Development "...new cargo facility development to improve existing carrier operations..." San Diego International Airport. :: San Diego, California :: United States Rivers and Christian :: 2017
Project Architect : Steven Rivers Client
: Sundt Construction
Floor area
: 120,000 ft2
Type
: Cargo Facility
Involvement
: Design development competition
Status
: Competition awarded to office, awaiting
final contract
03
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, CARGO FACILITY
PROJECT ORIENTATION (PROJECT NORTH)
16o
NORTH
DIRECT SOUTHERN EXPOSURE (GOOD FOR PV PANELS)
SPAN
CLEAR
101’-4”
INDIRECT NORTHERN EXPOSURE (GOOD FOR AMBIENT NATURAL LIGHT INTO SPACE)
OPTION ADVANTAGES: - BANDS HELP TO BREAK UP THE MONOLITHIC NATURE OF THE CARGO FACILITY -ANGLED ROOF MAXIMISES SOUTHERN EXPOSURE FOR THE OPTIMISATION OF PV PANELS AND ENERGY GENERATION -HIGH ROOF HELPS TO ELEVIATE HEAT GAIN WITHIN THE SPACE
10 DEGREE SLOPE MINIMAL FOR PV ANGLE 4’-0”
46’-0” 115’-0” CLEAR SPAN 21’-0”
4’-0”
TRUCK DOCK WITH CANOPY OVERHANG
Alternative Design Option 1 FACADE DESIGN OPTION 2 02
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, CARGO FACILITY
16
o
PROJECT ORIENTATION (PROJECT NORTH)
NORTH
OPTION ADVANTAGES: - BANDS HELP TO BREAK UP THE MONOLITHIC NATURE OF THE CARGO FACILITY
DIRECT SOUTHERN EXPOSURE (GOOD FOR PV PANELS)
122’-5” CLEAR
INDIRECT NORTHERN EXPOSURE (GOOD FOR AMBIENT NATURAL LIGHT INTO SPACE)
SPAN
INNER ROOF
5 DEGREE SLOPE MINIMAL FOR PV ANGLE
4’-0”
115’-0” CLEAR SPAN 21’-0”
FACADE DESIGN OPTION 1
- LOWER ANGLE ALLOWS FOR A GREATER SURFACE AREA TO ACCOMEDATE MORE PV PANELS - OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT IS LOWER -PV PANELS CAN BE HIDDEN WITHIN THE INNER ROOF SO THEY DO NOT APPEAR AS ‘ADD-ONS’ TO THE ROOF FINISH
31’-4”
4’-0”
TRUCK DOCK WITH CANOPY OVERHANG
Alternative Design Option 2
-ANGLED ROOF MAXIMISES SOUTHERN EXPOSURE FOR THE OPTIMISATION OF PV PANELS AND ENERGY GENERATION
-PV PANELS MUST BE ROTATED 5 DEGREES IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE OPTIMAL 10 DEGREES -INNER ROOF CAN BE USED AS A RAIN SCREEN WITH LEAVING WATER STAINS ON THE OUTER FACADE
Site Plan
4
5 24' - 0"
6 24' - 0"
7 24' - 0"
8 24' - 0"
9 24' - 0"
10 24' - 0"
11 24' - 0"
12 24' - 0"
13 24' - 0"
14 24' - 0"
15 24' - 0"
16 24' - 0"
17 24' - 0"
18 24' - 0"
19 24' - 0"
20 24' - 0"
21 24' - 0"
1
3
2
DA - A.7
DA - A.7
DA - A.7
22 24' - 0"
23 24' - 0"
24 24' - 0"
25 24' - 0"
26 24' - 0"
27 24' - 0"
28 24' - 0"
29 24' - 0"
30 24' - 0"
31 24' - 0"
32 24' - 0"
33 24' - 0"
34 24' - 0"
35 24' - 0"
NOTE: LAYOUT WITHIN TENANT OFFICE SPACES IS SHOWN FOR CONCEPT ONLY AND WILL BE COORDINATED WITH AIR CARGO CARRIERS DURING THE DESIGN PROCESS.
36 24' - 0"
37 24' - 0"
38 24' - 0"
39 24' - 0"
40 24' - 0"
41 24' - 0"
42 24' - 0"
25' - 0"
DHL OFFICE 1,385 ft²
H
4' - 0"
UPS OFFICE 1,385 ft²
FedEx OFFICE 4,160 ft²
12 TRUCK DOCKS
4' - 0"
25' - 0"
100' - 0"
4' - 0"
I
4' - 0"
25' - 0"
J
19 TRUCK DOCKS
5 TRUCK DOCKS
4' - 0"
4' - 0"
MOPE 15’ x 15’
24' - 5"
25' - 0"
G AOA SECURITY FENCE
AOA SECURITY FENCE
25' - 0"
F GSE 6,281ft²
25' - 0"
E
GSE 2,299ft²
GSE 2,299ft²
32' - 0"
32' - 2"
AIRCRAFT LINE MAINTENANCE 12,046 ft²
86' - 0"
AIRCRAFT LINE MAINTENANCE 4,214 ft²
AIRCRAFT LINE MAINTENANCE 4,214 ft²
35' - 0"
35' - 0"
DHL CARGO FACILITY 12,416 ft²
UPS CARGO FACILITY 12,416 ft²
FedEx CARGO FACILITY 37,226 ft²
POTENTIAL TENANT 10,052 ft²
50' - 0"
25' - 0"
D
25' - 0"
C B 32' - 3"
98' - 4"
MAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM 15’ x 20’ TRANSFORMER
MAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM 15’ x 20’ 906' - 6"
TRANSFORMER
A
1
Ground Floor Plan 01 Ground Floor Plan
C:\Users\perry_low\Documents\180-01 San Diego Cargo Facility CENTRAL FILE_perry_low.rvt
SCALE: 1" = 30’−0"
NORTH
Design Development REVISION SCHEDULE
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Revision
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY
Description
KEY PLAN
Date
SHEET NUMBER
AIR CARGO FLOOR PLAN
AIR CARGO FACILITY DEVELOPMENT
DA - A.4
DRIVEWAY OFFICE GSE
OFFICE
OFFICE
PROJECT NO:
180-01 ALM
UPS
DHL
FedEx
DATE:
SCALE:
1" = 30'-0" 7/27/2017 2:08:04 PM
42
41
40
39
38
37
2
3
1
DA - A.7
DA - A.7
DA - A.7
36
35
34
33
32
5
31
30
29
28
27
26
5
25
24
23
22
21
1
MORIN MATRIX SERIES MX 1.0
2
MORIN CORP MONOLITH SERIES MS-24H/ M-30H WALL PANEL
3
MORIN CORP ROOF C-29 EXPOSED FASTENER
4
MORIN CORP ROOF MR-36 FASTENER ROOF PANELS
5
EXTECH LIGHTWELL 3100LS
6
DOUBLE GLAZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM
7
AOA CHAINLINK FENCE
8
CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE 8"
5
03 ROOF 28' - 0"
10' - 0"
02 LEVEL 14' - 0"
4' - 0"
01 GROUND LEVEL 0' - 0"
16
8
8
6
8
North Elevation Cargo Facility
1
SCALE: 1" = 20’−0"
J
I
H
G
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
3
I
5
J
2
2 1" / 1'-0"
5' - 4"
03 ROOF 28' - 0" 02 LEVEL 14' - 0"
19' - 4"
6
03 ROOF 28' - 0" 02 LEVEL 14' - 0"
1
01 GROUND LEVEL 0' - 0"
01 GROUND LEVEL 0' - 0"
West Elevation Large Office
2
3
East Elevation Enlarged SCALE: 1" = 20’−0"
Building Elevations Design Development REVISION SCHEDULE
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Revision
AIRPORT AUTHORITY J SAN DIEGOICOUNTY REGIONAL H G F
4 DA - A.7
E
D
C
J
AIR CARGO FACILITY DEVELOPMENT
36' - 11"
I
REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS
SHEET NUMBER
H
G
01 GROUND LEVEL 0' - 0"
115' - 0"
E
GSE
ALM
D
UPS
OFFICE
DHL
DA - A.6.1
C
OFFICE
FedEx
115’ x 21’ CLEAR SPAN
14' - 0"
02 LEVEL 14' - 0" AOA CHAINLINK FENCE
F
OFFICE
B
PROJECT NO:
SCALE:
1" = 20'-0"
180-01
7/27/2017 2:08:08 PM
DATE:
REFER TO MECHANICAL DRAWINGS
26' - 0"
10' - 0"
KEY PLAN
Date DRIVEWAY
B
EXTECH 3100LS
4' - 0" 14' - 0"
Description
ENLARGED ELEVATIONS
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
02 LEVEL 14' - 0"
21' - 0"
C:\Users\perry_low\Documents\180-01 San Diego Cargo Facility CENTRAL FILE_perry_low.rvt
SCALE: 1" = 20’−0"
01 GROUND LEVEL 0' - 0"
115' - 0"
SECURITY GUARD SAFETY AREA (REFER TO 10/ DA−A.2)
1
Section A
3
SCALE: 1" = 20’−0"
Section C SCALE: 1" = 20’−0"
G
G
F
E
D
C
B
5 DA - A.7
METAL STANDING SEAM INSULATED ROOF ASSEMBLY
EXTECH LIGHTWELL 3100LS
EXTECH LIGHTWELL 3100LS
13' - 7"
H
13' - 7"
I
METAL STANDING SEAM INSULATED ROOF ASSEMBLY
11' - 7"
J
G
7' - 1"
MAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM
ROOF GUTTER
115' - 0"
10' - 0"
AOA CHAINLINK FENCE
10" INSULATED WALL ASSEMBLY
2' - 0"
10" INSULATED WALL ASSEMBLY
16' - 5"
21' - 0"
02 LEVEL 14' - 0"
DOWNSPOUT
01 GROUND LEVEL 0' - 0"
METAL PANEL WALL ASSEMBLY
9' - 4"
SECURITY GUARD SAFETY AREA (REFER TO 10/ DA−A.2)
OVERHEAD DOOR RAIL
4' - 0"
2
OVERHEAD DOOR RAIL
02 LEVEL 14' - 0"
02 LEVEL 14' - 0"
4' - 0"
Section B 10’ x 9’ DOCK DOOR
10’ x 9’ DOCK DOOR
DOCK LIGHT SIGNAGE
DOCK LIGHT SIGNAGE
14' - 0"
14' - 0"
SCALE: 1" = 20’−0"
EXTERIOR DOCK LIGHT 10' - 0"
10' - 0"
EXTERIOR DOCK LIGHT 4’ HIGH STEEL GUARD RAIL (REFER TO 12/ DA−A.2)
4’ HIGH STEEL GUARD RAIL (REFER TO 12/ DA−A.2)
DOCK BUMPERS
01 GROUND LEVEL 0' - 0"
4' - 0"
C:\Users\perry_low\Documents\180-01 San Diego Cargo Facility CENTRAL FILE_perry_low.rvt
01 GROUND LEVEL 0' - 0"
FLOOR DRAIN
4
Dock leveler Section
5
SCALE: 1/4" = 1’−0"
On Grade Dock SCALE: 1/4" = 1’−0"
Building Sections Design Development REVISION SCHEDULE
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Revision
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY
Description
KEY PLAN
Date
SHEET NUMBER
AIR CARGO SECTIONS
AIR CARGO FACILITY DEVELOPMENT
DA - A.7
DRIVEWAY OFFICE GSE
ALM
UPS
DHL
OFFICE FedEx
OFFICE
PROJECT NO:
SCALE:
180-01
As indicated
DATE:
7/27/2017 2:08:10 PM
LAX Tom Bradley International Terminal PDB "...production of Project Definition Booklet to guide design-build development..." Los Angeles Airport Tom Bradley International Terminal :: Los Angeles, California :: United States Rivers and Christian :: 2016-2017
Project Manager : Austin Rivers Client
: Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA)
Floor area
: 100,000 ft2
Type
: Airport Terminal
Involvement
: Creation of Project Definition Booklet
Status
: Complete
Approach at Departures Level
PROPOSED
EXISTING PROPOSED ROOF 180’ 3” (85’ 3”)
EXISTING TBIT ROOF 180’ 3” (85’ 3”)
BRIDGE LEVEL (TO WEST PROCESSOR) 144’ 0” (49’ 0”) 20 ft CLEARENCE TICKETING LEVEL 127’ 6” (32’ 6”) UPPER WORLD WAY MEETERS & GREETERS 103’ 0” (8’ 0”) LOWER WORLD WAY
MEETERS & GREETERS
MEETERS & GREETERS
EXISITING CONDITION AT TBIT
PROPOSED CONNECTION AT TBIT EXISTING ROOF LINE
PROPOSED ROOF 180’ 3” (85’ 3”)
BRIDGE CONNECTION
TBIT CONNECTION UPPER WORLD WAY
LOWER BRIDGE LEVEL (TO WEST PROCESSOR) 144’ 0” (49’ 0”)
TICKETING
TICKETING LEVEL 127’ 6” (32’ 6”) LOWER WORLD WAY
MEETERS & GREETERS
MEETERS & GREETERS 103’ 0” (8’ 0”)
EXISTING ROOF LINE
BRIDGE LEVEL (TO WEST PROCESSOR) 144’ 0” (49’ 0”)
BRIDGE LEVEL 144’ 0” (49’ 0”)
PROPOSED CONNECTION AT TBIT
UPPER WORLD WAY
TICKETING LEVEL 127’ 6” (32’ 6”)
LOWER WORLD WAY
MEETERS & GREETERS 103’ 0” (8’ 0”)
44
45
26' - 0"
46
47
26' - 0"
48
26' - 0"
26' - 0"
30' - 0"
N5
N6
30' - 0"
49
50
52' - 0"
51 26' - 0"
52 26' - 0"
53 26' - 0"
54
55
56
57
18 ft CANTILEVER OVER SIDEWALK 26' - 0"
52' - 0"
26' - 0"
58 26' - 0"
25' - 7" 8' - 9"
UP
41 26' - 0"
42 26' - 0"
43
30' - 0"
44
45
52' - 0"
26' - 0"
DN DN
N5
N4
44' - 0"
48
TO M/G
NC
N6
30' - 0"
49
26' - 0"
64' - 0"
50
51
52' - 0"
26' - 0"
52 26' - 0"
53
54
26' - 0"
55
26' - 0"
56
57
52' - 0"
26' - 0"
58 26' - 0"
59 26' - 0"
LINE OF BUIDING ABOVE NA
DN 40' - 0"
TO BRIDGE DN
DN
DN UP
714 SF
DN UP
DN
TO M/G TO BRIDGE
TO M/G TO BRIDGE
DN
TODN BRIDGE
DN UP
DN
DN
TO M/G
UP
PROPOSED SLAB
UP
RESTROOM
144
EXISTING CANOPY BELOW
UP
143
1280 SF
PROPOSED SLAB
146
1032 SF
DN
UP DN
1' - 6"
PROPOSED SLAB
135
1317 SF
20' - 9"
40' - 0"
145
102
1317 SF
19' - 11"
NB2
PROPOSED SLAB
RESTROOM
DN
1281 SF
1036 SF
DN
UP
DN UP
19' - 11"
20' - 9"
NB1 B
32' - 6"
C 46' - 6"
EXISTING CANOPY BELOW
47 26' - 0"
DN
DN
UP
104
713 SF
46 26' - 0"
30' - 6"
NB2
RESTROOM
79' - 10"
103
40 26' - 0"
B
167 6477 SF
RESTROOM
DN
39
PHASE 1
NB1
DN
PROPOSED SLAB
DN UP
N3
64' - 0"
TO TICKETING
TO TICKETING
DN
UP DN
N2
N1
NA
UP
PROPOSED CIRCULATION CORE IN TBIT
59 26' - 0"
24' - 10"
43
52' - 0"
PHASE 1
30' - 0"
42
26' - 0"
5' - 7"
41
48' - 0"
N4 44' - 0"
BRIDGE CONNECTION
26' - 0"
5' - 3"
N3 30' - 0"
40 26' - 0"
18' - 0"
N2
N1
39
NC C
1' - 6"
32' - 6"
EXISTING RAMP & CANOPY
43 52' - 0"
44
45 26' - 0"
46
47
26' - 0"
26' - 0"
N4 44' - 0"
48 26' - 0"
49 52' - 0"
48' - 0"
N5
N6
30' - 0"
50
51 26' - 0"
52 26' - 0"
53
54
26' - 0"
55
26' - 0"
56
52' - 0"
57 26' - 0"
58 26' - 0"
59 26' - 0"
N2
UP 65' - 6"
DN
UP DN
DN
RESTROOM
B UP DN
79' - 10"
RESTROOM
103
UP 65' - 6"
NB2
DN DN
UP
104
713 SF
714 SF
39
40 26' - 0"
42 26' - 0"
43
45 26' - 0"
46
47
26' - 0"
44' - 0"
48
26' - 0"
DN UP
N5
N4
30' - 0"
44
52' - 0"
N6
30' - 0"
49
26' - 0"
64' - 0"
50
51
52' - 0"
26' - 0"
52 26' - 0"
53
54
26' - 0"
55
26' - 0"
56
52' - 0"
57 26' - 0"
58 26' - 0"
59 26' - 0"
30' - 6"
DN
265
TO BRIDGE DN 32' - 6"
TO M/G
75' - 1"
NA
DN
DN
DN
PROPOSED SLAB 1925 SF
NC
DN UP
DN
TO M/G TO BRIDGE
TO M/G TO BRIDGE
TODN BRIDGE
DN UP
DN SLAB PROPOSED
32' - 6"
267 DN
DN
1936 SF
TO M/G
NB1 B
C 46' - 6"
41 26' - 0"
5' - 3"
DN
167 26609 SF
PHASE 2
NB1
73' - 6"
5' - 0"
73' - 7"
TO TICKETING PROPOSED SLAB
23' - 9"
8' - 9"
UP DN
55' - 7"
DN
UP
18' - 0"
21' - 11"
TO TICKETING
N3
64' - 0"
NA
43' - 7"
41' - 9"
21' - 11"
18' - 0"
N1
LINE OF BUILDING BELOW
6' - 0"
42 26' - 0"
24' - 10"
41 26' - 0"
UP
UP
UP DN
UP
UP
PROPOSED SLAB
RESTROOM
PROPOSED SLAB
PROPOSED SLAB
RESTROOM
PROPOSED SLAB
144
143
146
135
102
145
1317 SF
1036 SF
UP
1280 SF
DN
1032 SF
1317 SF
DN
1' - 6"
20' - 9"
32' - 6"
1281 SF
DN
DN
19' - 11"
40' - 0"
19' - 11"
20' - 9"
1' - 6"
NB2 DN
UP
DN UP
PHASE 2
30' - 0"
N3 30' - 0"
40 26' - 0"
EXISTING RAMP & CANOPY
5' - 7"
N2
N1
39
PROPOSED RAMP
NC C
32' - 6"
PROPOSED RAMP
Level 04 APU Connection
TBIT FLOOR PLAN OPTION 2 PHASES
Level 03 Departures
FLOOR PLAN OPTION 2 BRIDGETBIT LEVEL
TICKETING
Terminal 5.5 PDB
"...production of Project Definition Booklet to guide design-build development..." Los Angeles Airport Terminal 6 West :: Los Angeles, California :: United States AIRPORTS, 5.5 CORE LOS ANGELES WORLD Rivers and Christian :: 2016-2017
Project Manager : Austin Rivers Client
: Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA)
Floor area
: 40,000 ft2
UPPER WORLD WAY
Type
: Airport Terminal
LOWER WORLD WAY
5.5 CORE SITE TERMINAL 6
Involvement : Creation of Project Definition5.5 Booklet LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS, Core Status
SA PATCH AND REPAIR
: Complete
TERMINAL 5
EXISTING PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE PARKING STRUCTURE 6
FIG. 40 DIAGRAM OF EXISTING BRIDGE AT TERMINAL 6
F.7 PROPOSED ROOF 165.00’
C
B
FIG. 41 ELE
A PROPOSED WALKWAY ENVELOPE FROM APM STATION
5.5 CORE BUILD AREA
TOP OF WALKWAY 159.88’
PROPOSED WALKWAY LEVEL 141.50’
LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS, 5.5 Core EXISTING TUG ROUTE
APRON 118.68’ ± (116.26’)
OFFICE
INBOUND/ OUTBOUND BAGGAGE
WALKWAY FINISH FLOOR 141.50’
15’
EXISTING ROOF
EXISTING BAG DROP
TICKETING
123.04’ ± (121.0’)
DEPARTURES FL 1016 123.69’ (121.27’)
UPPER WORLD WAY
INTERSTITIAL
OFFICE
ARRIVALS FL1050 105.69’ (103.27’)
BOTTOM OF WALKWAY 138.04’
15’ MIN CLR
104.88’ ± (102.0’)
BAG CLAIM
LOWER WORLD WAY
FIG. 44 EXISTING PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
FIG. 45 UNDERSIDE OF EXISTING BRIDGE
Interface Study Section A
FIG. 46 EXISTING BRIDGE PARKING S
LEGEND AREA OF WORK PROPOSED WALKWAY SURVEY DATA POINT
F.7 PROPOSED ROOF 165.00’
C
ARCHIVAL DATA UPDATED DATA
PROPOSED WALKWAY LEVEL 141.50’ CONCOURSE/ SSCP T6 133.80’ (131.38’)
APRON
100.01’
ADJUSTED ARCHIVAL DATA
100.01’
PROPOSED NEW
EXISTING PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE BEYOND (TO BE DEMO’D)
TO CONCOURSE LEVEL TERMINAL 6
EXISTING ROOF
TICKETING
15’
EXISTING ESCALATOR
123.04’ ± (121.0’) UPPER WORLD WAY
EXISTING TUG ROUTE INTERSTITIAL
118.68’ ± (116.26’) ARRIVALS FL1050 105.69’ (103.27’)
LAWA SURVEY (Rev.2 March 13, 2017)
(100.01’) ARCHIVAL DATA
FL 1000 101.01’(99.01’)
A
5.5 CORE BUILD AREA
EXISTING SECTION A
100.01’
DEVELOPMENT AREA EXISTING PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
B
OFFICE
DEPARTURES FL 1016 123.69’ (121.27’) 104.88’ ± (102.0’)
BAG CLAIM
LOWER WORLD WAY
LEGEND AREA OF WORK 100.01’
LAWA SURVEY (Rev.2 March 13, 2017)
(100.01’) ARCHIVAL DATA SURVEY DATA POINT FL 1000 101.01’(99.01’) ARCHIVAL DATA
Interface Study Section B EXISTING SECTION A
SB
UPDATED DATA
100.01’
ADJUSTED ARCHIVAL DATA
100.01’
PROPOSED NEW
06
LOS05ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS, 5.5 Core
LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS, 5.5 Core
1959
T 6-1 1959 - ARRIVALS 1982 - TICKETING & ROOF
1967-69 1985-86
2010-15
TERMINAL 5
24R
5.5 CORE
5.5 CORE
1996 2012
T 6-2 1959 - ARRIVALS 1982 - TICKETING & ROOF
T 6-3 1959 - ARRIVALS 1982 - TICKETING & ROOF
2R
TERMINAL 6
15L T 5-6 1959 - ARRIVALS 1967 - DEPARTURES 1986 - MEZZANINE & ROOF 2015 - MAJOR SEISMIC STRENGTHENING
T 5-10 1985 - BRIDGE 4R
PARKING 5 LAX
1982
T 6-0 1985 - BRIDGE 16R
PARKING 6 LAX
1959
1985
1999
9L
17L
T 5-7 T 5-2 2010 - BAGGAGE SORTATION 1959 - ARRIVALS 1967 - DEPARTURES 1986 - MEZZANINE & ROOF 2015 - MAJOR SEISMIC STRENGTHENING T 5-3 1959 - ARRIVALS & APRON 1986 - CONCOURSE & ROOF
13R
T 6-4 1959 - ARRIVALS 1982 - TICKETING & ROOF T 6-7 1996 - BRIDGE
TERMINAL 7 T 6-7 2012 - APRON, CONCOURSE & ROOF T 6-6 1959 - ARRIVALS & APRON 1987 - CONCOURSE & ROOF
18R T 5-9 1986 - TBD
T 6-5 2012 - APRON, CONCOURSE, TICKETING & ROOF
T 5-4 1959 - ORIGINAL TERMINAL
T 6-8 1959 - ORIGINAL TERMINAL
T 5-8 1999 - TBD T 5-1 1969 - TBD
Existing Terminal 5 LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS, 5.5 Core DEVELOPMENT OF TERMINAL 5
Existing Terminal 6
01
DEVELOPMENT OF TERMINAL 6
DEPARTURES LEVEL
ELEVATOR CORE
WALKWAY LEVEL
PROPOSED WALKWAY (APM PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY) CONNECTION TO CONCOURSE 141.05’
15’ 0” MIN
ELEVATOR CORE
18’ 15’ 0” MIN
DEPARTURES LEVEL (TICKETING) 123.69’ (121.27’)
LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS, 5.5 Core
15’ 0” MIN
15’ 0” MIN
DEPARTURES LEVEL
02
18’
ARRIVALS LEVEL 105.69’ (103.27’) ELEVATOR CORE
LEGEND 15’ 0” MIN
15’ 0” MIN
100.01’
CURRENT SURVEY
(100.01’) ARCHIVAL DATA
Proposed Circulation Core Study
100.01’
ADJUSTED ARCHIVAL
100.01’
PROPOSED NEW
ARRIVALS LEVEL
PARKING 6 LAX
EXISTING PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE LOWER WORLD WAY BELOW
EXISTING BAG DROP TO BE REMOVED
UPPER WORLD WAY 24R
STANDARD VERTICAL CORE
TERMINAL 5
TERMINAL 6
16R
STAIR TO EXISTING PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
LAWA OFFICES
EXISTING ESCALATOR A
TICKETING
TICKETING
TICKETING COUNTER
TICKETING
RESTROOM
TICKETING COUNTER
OFFICES
RESTROOMS
BAGGAGE SERVICES
TERMINAL 5
SERVICE ROAD TERMINAL 6
5.5 CORE BUILD AREA SAS JETBLUE
BHS T5
SPIRIT FRONTIER
BAGGAGE SCREENING AREA F.7
LEGEND AREA OF WORK
BAGGAGE HANDLING SYSTEM (BHS)
PASSENGER CIRCULATION RESTROOMS OFFICES
AIRFIELD
VERTICAL CIRCULATION BAGGAGE BAGGAGE MAKE UP
BAGGAGE MAKE UP
MECHANICAL CONCESSIONS STORAGE EMPLOYEE CIRCULATION TICKETING
EXISTING FLOOR PLANS 02 DEPARTURE
Airport Police Building
"...proof of concept for new airport police building westside development..." Playa Del Rey :: Los Angeles, California :: United States Rivers and Christian :: 2017
Project Manager : Austin Rivers Client
: Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA)
Floor area
: 300,000 ft2
Type
: Airport Police Headquarters
Involvement
: Proof of concept
Status
: Complete
00
LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS, APF
40ft
AREA 2 14,421 ft2
40ft
75ft
LA
YO LO VA
ULE
BO
75ft
15ft
STER
WAY PARK
AREA OF PASEO TO INFILL 45,300 ft3 (1,678 yd3)
RD
TCHE
WES
AREA OF SITE TO INFILL 74,986 ft3 (2,777 yd3)
38ft
EARTH TO BE REMOVED 2,364,882 ft3 (87,588 yd3)
LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS, APF
EARTH TO BE REMOVED PASEO AREA 197,452 ft3 (7,313 yd3)
SITE AREA:
TOTAL STATISTICS:
TOTAL SITE AREA: 523,036 ft2
ELEVATION OF CUT: 130’
PASEO AREA: 43,685 ft2
EARTH TO BE REMOVED: 2,562,334 ft3 (94,901 yd3)
AREA WITHOUT PASEO: 479,351 ft2
EARTH TO INFILL: 120,286 ft3 (4,455 yd3)
AREA WITH 75’/ 40’ SETBACK: 349,061 ft2
01
00
LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS, APF
SURPLUS: 2,442,048 ft3 (90,446 yd3) PERCENTAGE LOST: 95%
PART 77 (1:7 SLOPE) FUTURE RUNWAY 24R VERTICAL 60’ CLEARENCE
PASEO AREA 120’ 0”
APF EARTH VOLUMES - LEVELED WITH PASEO GRADING
500’
40ft
260’
AREA 2 14,421 ft2
40ft
49’ 1”
134’ 4” 194’ 0”
134’ 0”
75ft
60’
75’ 134’ 4”
75’
LA
YO LO
40’
15ft
VA
ULE
BO
75ft
STER
WAY PARK
RD
TCHE
WES
EARTH TO BE REMOVED 854,250 ft3 (31,639 yd3)
LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS, APF
EARTH TO BE REMOVED PASEO AREA 197,452 ft3 (7,313 yd3)
R
TE
R PA
ES
H TC
ES
W
SITE AREA:
TOTAL STATISTICS:
TOTAL SITE AREA: 523,036 ft2
ELEVATION OF CUT: 131’ 3”
PASEO AREA: 43,685 ft2
EARTH TO BE REMOVED: 1,057,702 ft3 (38,952 yd3)
APF BUILDING AREA:
02
GROUND LEVEL: 349,072 ft2
AREA WITHOUT PASEO: 479,351 ft2
EARTH TO INFILL: 333,980 ft3 (12,370 yd3)
2ND LEVEL: 349,072 ft2
AREA WITH 75’/ 40’ SETBACK: 349,061 ft2
SURPLUS: 723,722 ft3 (26,582 yd3)
3RD LEVEL: 252,723 ft2
PERCENTAGE LOST: 68%
TOTAL: 950,867 ft2
LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS, AIRPORT POLICE FACILITY
APF EARTH VOLUMES - AVERAGE ELEVATION ACROSS SITE 40ft
AY KW
VARD
AREA OF SITE TO INFILL 288,680 ft3 (10,692 yd3)
38ft
49’ 1” 38’
15’
LOYOLA BOULE
AREA OF PASEO TO INFILL 45,300 ft3 (1,678 yd3)
APF PART 77 - HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS
AREA 2 14,421 ft2
40ft
38 FOOT SETBACK PARKWAYS FOR P ROAD PER NORTHS 75ft
15 FOOT SET BACK BOULEVARD GRADI NORTHSIDE PLANN
LA YO LO TER
VA
ULE
BO
75ft
15ft
RD
ES STCH
WAY PARK
D
AREA OF PASEO TO INFILL 45,300 ft3 (1,678 yd3)
WE
75 FOOT SAFETY ST FOOT SETBACK) AL PARKWAY AND LOYO AIRPORT POLICE FA
ER
AREA OF SITE TO INFILL 1,048,170 ft3 (38,821 yd3)
38ft
AR EV
UL
O AB
LA
TIJ
20’
SURPLUS: -706,115 ft3 (-26,153 yd3)
20’
75’
K
BUILDABLE SITE AREA
BUILDING SHALL BE INTO NEIGHBORING PLANNING GUIDE
20’ 20’
RD
AREA 2 14,421 ft2
65% BUILDING SQU WESTCHESTER PAR PLANNING GUIDE
AC
LEVA LOYOLA BOU
APF EARTH VOLUMES - HIGHEST ELEVATION ACROSS SITE
40ft
BUILD AREA LIMITE 4 STORIES PER NOR
TB
PERCENTAGE GAIN: +182%
40ft
40 FOOT SETBACK PROPERTY LINES P FEET SETBACK REQ PLANNING GUIDE)
AY HW
EARTH TO INFILL: 1,093,470 ft3 (40,499 yd3)
AREA WITH 75’/ 40’ SETBACK: 349,061 ft2
OP
SE
AREA WITHOUT PASEO: 479,351 ft2
PE
CA
DS
N LA
UN
RT
PO
03
HIG
EARTH TO BE REMOVED: 387,355 ft3 (14,346 yd3)
T AS
ELEVATION OF CUT: 136’ 2”
CO
TOTAL STATISTICS:
TOTAL SITE AREA: 523,036 ft2
IC
SITE AREA:
PASEO AREA: 43,685 ft2
IF
EARTH TO BE REMOVED PASEO AREA 197,452 ft3 (7,313 yd3)
C PA
EARTH TO BE REMOVED 189,903 ft3 (7,033 yd3)
LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS, APF
ITY
T EE
R
15’
TH
38’
75’
Y OPPORTUNIT LANDSCAPE PASEO
94
ST
EO
FUTURE PAS Y ER PARKWA
WESTCHEST
75ft YO LO
EO
VA
ULE
BO
N GEORGETOW AVENUE
LA
FUTURE PAS 75ft
15ft
STER
WAY PARK
AREA OF PASEO TO INFILL 45,300 ft3 (1,678 yd3)
RD
TCHE
WES
AREA OF SITE TO INFILL 540,229 ft3 (20,008 yd3)
38ft
LEGEND
PASE
FUTU
LAND
SETB EARTH TO BE REMOVED 458,548 ft3 (16,983 yd3)
EARTH TO BE REMOVED PASEO AREA 197,452 ft3 (7,313 yd3)
SITE AREA:
TOTAL STATISTICS:
TOTAL SITE AREA: 523,036 ft2
ELEVATION OF CUT: 134’ 6”
PASEO AREA: 43,685 ft2 AREA WITHOUT PASEO: 479,351 ft2 AREA WITH 75’/ 40’ SETBACK: 349,061 ft2
EARTH TO BE REMOVED: 656,000 ft3 (24,296 yd3) EARTH TO INFILL: 585,529 ft3 (21,686 yd3)
SCALE 1:200 100
25 0
50
400 200
SURPLUS: 70,471 ft3 (2,610 yd3) PERCENTAGE LOST: 10.75%
LAX NORTHSIDE CAMPUS AREA 3 - SETBACK REQUIREMENT APF EARTH VOLUMES - OPTIMAL EARTH DISPLACMENT