Concluding Remarks

42 Anwar Shah with Sana Shah

Local self-financing is important for strengthening governance,efficiency, and accountability.Although most countries have opted for formula-driven fiscal transfers,the design ofthese transfers remains flawed.They do not create any incentive for setting national minimum standards or accountability for results and typically do not serve regional fiscal equity objectives either.

Local governments also typically have very limited autonomy in hiring and firing local government employees.In a number ofcountries with decentralization,such as Indonesia and Pakistan,higher government employees are simply transferred to local levels;financing is then provided to cover their wage costs.This approach limits budgetary flexibility and opportunities for efficient resource allocation at the local level.

Overall,local governments in developing countries typically follow the old model oflocal governance and simply provide a narrow range oflocal services directly.The new vision,with the local governments assuming a network facilitator role to enrich the quality oflife oflocal residents,as discussed earlier in this chapter,is yet to be realized in any developing country.

Concluding Remarks

We have presented a briefoverview ofthe conceptual and institutional literature on local governance.A synthesis ofthe conceptual literature suggests that the modern role ofa local government is to deal with market failures as well as government failures.This role requires a local government to operate as a purchaser oflocal services,a facilitator ofnetworks ofgovernment providers and entities beyond government,and a gatekeeper and overseer of state and national governments in areas ofshared rule.Local government also needs to play a mediator’s role among various entities and networks to foster greater synergy and harness the untapped energies ofthe broader community for improving the quality oflife ofresidents.Globalization and the information revolution are reinforcing those conceptual perspectives on a catalytic role for local governments.

This view is also grounded in the history ofindustrial nations and ancient civilizations in China and India.Local government was the primary form ofgovernment until wars and conquest led to the transfer oflocal government responsibilities to central and regional governments.This trend continued unabated until globalization and the information revolution highlighted the weaknesses ofcentralized rule for improving the quality of life and social outcomes.The new vision oflocal governance (table 1.9) presented here argues for a leadership role by local governments in a multicentered,multiorder,or multilevel system.This view is critical to creating