Key Function 1: Strategic whole-of-government steering and planning

from OECD Public Governance Reviews Supreme Audit Institutions And Good Governance

References

36 – 1 – SUPREME AUDIT INSTITUTIONS’ INPUT INTO THE POLICY CYCLE

OECD (2014a), Centre Stage: Driving better policies from the Centre of Government,

OECD Publishing, Paris. www.oecd.org/gov/Centre-Stage-Report.pdf OECD (2014b), Chile’s Supreme Audit Institution: Enhancing strategic agility and public trust, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/1 0.1787/9789264207561-en. OECD (2012), Restoring Public Finances, 2012 Update, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264179455-en. OECD (2011), “Internal Control and Internal Audit: Ensuring Public Sector Integrity and

Accountability”, Report presented at a joint seminar between the OECD Internal Audit and the OECD Public Governance and Territorial Development Directorate, 13 April 2011, OECD, Paris, www.oecd.org/governance/47638204.pdf. OECD (2005), Modernising Government: The Way Forward, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264010505-en. Power, M. (1996), The Audit Explosion, Demos, London, www.unsceb.org/system/files/F inance%20%26%20Budget%20Network/Governance,%20Audit%20and%20Oversigh t/studGAO/02/The_Audit_Explosion_0.pdf. Humphrey, C. and D. Owen (2003), “Debating the ‘Power’ of audit”, in International

Journal of Auditing, Vol. 4/1, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1099-1123 .00302/abstract.

Mendez C. and J. Bachtler (2011), “Administrative reform and unintended consequences: an assessment of the EU cohesion policy ‘audit explosion’” in Journal of European

Public Policy, Vol. 18/5, www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13501763.2011.5868 02.

Santiso, C. (2013), “Closing the Accountability Gap: Audit Agencies as Partners and

Advisors of Parliaments in the Oversight of the Budget Process”, in Supreme Audit

Institutions; Accountability for Development, GIZ and INTOSAI. United Nations General Assembly (2014), “Promoting and fostering the efficiency, accountability, effectiveness and transparency of public administration by sregtnhening supreme audit institutions”, Resolution A/RES/69/228, www.intosai.org/ fileadmin/downloads/downloads/0_news/2014/EN_Resolution_69_228.pdf.

Key Function 1: Strategic whole-of-government steering and planning

Next Article

References

More articles from this publication:

References

Notes

in EU agencies

4.7. The SAI of Brazil – audit for national development policy

4.6. The SAI of South Africa – auditing for accountability and inclusivity

4.5. The SAI of the Netherlands – auditing for accountability and inclusivity

4.4. The SAI of Korea – auditing for accountability and inclusivity

4.3. The SAI of Canada – auditing for accountability and inclusivity

systems (iSA-Gov

This article is from:

OECD Public Governance Reviews Supreme Audit Institutions And Good Governance