Chapter 4 Supreme Audit Institutions’ input into policy evaluation and oversight

from OECD Public Governance Reviews Supreme Audit Institutions And Good Governance

References

3 – SUPREME AUDIT INSTITUTIONS’ INPUT INTO POLICY IMPLEMENTATION – 119

Riksrevisionen (2005), Case studies, Riksrevisionen, Sweden, www.riksrevisionen.se/Pag eFiles/945/RiR_2005_22.pdf. Schick, A. (2003), “The Role of Fiscal Rules in Budgeting”, OECD Journal on

Budgeting, ISSN 1608-7143, Vol. 3, No. 3, OECD Publishing, Paris, www.oecd .org/gov/budgeting/43494591.pdf. Schaechter, A., T. Kinda, N. Budina, and A. Weber (2012), “Fiscal Rules in Response to the Crisis—Toward the ‘Next-Generation’ Rules. A New Dataset”, IMF Working

Paper, WP/12/187. TCU (2014), Evaluation of internal controls of Roraima’s municipalities, Judgement 568/2014, Tribunal de Contas da União, Brasilia, www.tcu.gov.br/Consultas/Juris/Doc s/judoc/Acord/20140314/AC_0568_07_14_P.doc. TCU (2013a), Performance Audit. Infrastructure Regulatory Agencies: Regulatory governance review, Tribunal de Contas da União, Brasilia, www.tcu.gov.br/Consultas/

Juris/Docs/judoc/Acord/20150304/AC_0240_05_15_P.doc. TCU (2013b), Evaluation of internal control of bidding and contract area of university hospitals, Judgement 1610/2013, Tribunal de Contas da União, Brasilia, www.tcu.gov.br/Consultas/Juris/Docs/judoc/Acord/20130627/AC_1610_23_13_P.doc TCU (2010), Performance Audit: assessment of performance of regulatory agencies providing phone services to citizens, Judgement 2799/2010, Tribunal de Contas da

União, Brasilia, www.tcu.gov.br/Consultas/Juris/Docs/judoc/Acord/20101026/AC_27 99_39_10_P.doc. TCU (2009), National Regional Development Policy, Judgment 2919/2009-TCU-Plenary, www.tcu.gov.br/Consultas/Juris/Docs/judoc/Acord/20091204/013-705-2009-6-MIN-

JJ.rtf. TCU (2008), Performance Audit. Infrastructure Regulatory Agencies: Regulatory governance review, Tribunal de Contas da União, Brasilia, www.tcu.gov.br/Consultas/

Juris/Docs/judoc/Acord/20101026/AC_2799_39_10_P.doc. UKDPC (2010), Characteristics of good governance for drug policy: findings from an expert consultation, UK Drug Policy Commission, www.ukdpc.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/characteristics-of-good-governance-for-drug-policy-findings-from-anexpert-consultation.pdf.

Chapter 4 Supreme Audit Institutions’ input into policy evaluation and oversight

Next Article

References

More articles from this publication:

References

Notes

in EU agencies

4.7. The SAI of Brazil – audit for national development policy

4.6. The SAI of South Africa – auditing for accountability and inclusivity

4.5. The SAI of the Netherlands – auditing for accountability and inclusivity

4.4. The SAI of Korea – auditing for accountability and inclusivity

4.3. The SAI of Canada – auditing for accountability and inclusivity

systems (iSA-Gov

This article is from:

OECD Public Governance Reviews Supreme Audit Institutions And Good Governance