2 minute read

Money Matters

Next Article
Delicious Dish

Delicious Dish

Aerial & Satellites

Digital Aerial Installations Upgrades andRepairs 10% off

Advertisement

with this advert Mark Hawkes Tel: 01684 325024

ELWOOD COMPUTER SERVICES Your Local IT Specialist

IT Support for home and small businesses problems ~ repairs solutions ~ upgrades Jon Elwood

01242 906587 07525 691311 www.elwoodcs.com

Keep up to date onsocial media!

@thelocalanswer

ARE YOU PAYING TOO MUCH FOR YOUR MORTGAGE?

We provide initial fee free, no obligation mortgage reviews to help reduce the time, effort and stress from the mortgage process. We can access a wide range of lenders to help with a variety of mortgage requirements including: Purchases Re-mortgages Product transfers First time buyers Help to buy Later life lending Buy to let Bridging finance Self build mortgages Arrange an appointment to see how we can help: neil@kentishmortgagesolutions.com 07776 819308 www.kentishmortgagesolutions.com

Money Matters

with Roger Downes of Andorran

Paying your fair share

Whilst Money Matters was being a little critical in last month’s article of Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s handling of the economy in his latest ‘Budget’, his wife was creating a series of headlines of her own. Apparently she hasn’t been paying tax on all her income in a way that the Chancellor would expect of the rest of us.

It’s all done through claiming that she is not domiciled in the UK, an outdated tax status that probably has no place in a modern taxation system. Instead of paying tax on all her income, her ‘non-dom’ status entitled her to pay a flat fee instead of a percentage of her total income to the Treasury. OK, it was probably £30,000 a year (in certain circumstances it could be £60,000), which is more than the majority of the population pay in tax during a full year. And it was almost certainly legal.

An option only available to the rich

But is it fair? Money Matters says no. ‘Nondoms’ can choose whether to pay tax on their income in the normal way or the flat fee. Clearly only those people who would have a massive tax liability would consider the flat fee option, as is the case of the Chancellor’s wife. It’s therefore only an option that is available to the very rich and that doesn’t seem at all fair to me.

The lady in question has stated that she has agreed to pay tax on all her income rather than just the flat fee. She doesn’t have to, as her husband has failed to outlaw the practice, but it’s clearly the correct move for the couple politically and it will, at least, put a few more millions into the Treasury’s coffers every year. But there is nothing that can be done about previous years and she could quietly go back to her old practices once the matter disappears back below this radar.

It’s not illegal but it is immoral

There are others, notably Premier League footballers and entertainers, who use the same or similar loopholes to avoid paying their fair share to the tax man. None of it is illegal but it’s definitely immoral and needs to be addressed by the Chancellor sooner rather than later.

This article is from: