JSNA-SmokingPrevalenceSurvey2009

Page 1

Public Health Information Team

Smoking Prevalence Survey 2009 Jeanette Davis


1. NEMS Smoking Prevalence Summary 2009 The NEMS Smoking Prevalence report gives a detailed breakdown of smoking prevalence across Birmingham based on answers provided to a questionnaire given to 6,043 people. Detailed below are some of the key facts:

Smoking Prevalence

South Birmingham

Heart of Birmingham tPCT

Birmingham East & North

Birmingham

England

24.9 %

24.0 %

26.3 %

25.2 %

22.0 %

This clearly shows that there is a higher prevalence across all of Birmingham in comparison to the national average. The report shows Heart of Birmingham TPCT giving the best prevalence; although this is still 2% higher than the national average. Prevalence can be broken down by gender and ethnicity:

South Birmingham

Heart of Birmingham tPCT

Birmingham East & North

Birmingham

England

Male

28.1 %

31.3 %

29.8 %

29.8 %

23 %

Female

23.2 %

18.0 %

24.6 %

22.1 %

21 %

It is noticeable that whilst the English prevalence indicates that men are more likely to smoke than women – the gender split in Birmingham does not reflect this trend. It should be noted that the above has not been weighted like the attached report, so the numbers are based on raw data. The two above tables have a RAG included to highlight the differences between nation and local percentages

PHIT - Smoking Prevalence Survey 2009.doc

2


The attached table gives a breakdown of the percentage across the groups that took part in the survey

Ethnicity groups

South Birmingham

Birmingham East & North

Heart of Birmingham tPCT

Birmingham

NEMS 2008

ONS 2001

NEMS 2008

ONS 2001

NEMS 2008

ONS 2001

NEMS 2008

ONS 2001

White

86.4 %

85.1 %

78.6 %

77.8 %

43.2 %

35.7 %

72.1 %

67.3 %

Asian or Asian British

6.7 %

7.6 %

15.6 %

15.4 %

39.0 %

41.3 %

18.5 %

20.7 %

Black or Black British

3.1 %

3.3 %

4.0 %

3.8 %

13.1 %

13.3 %

6.2 %

6.7 %

Mixed

2.6 %

2.7 %

1.4 %

2.4 %

3.2 %

3.9 %

2.1 %

3.2 %

Chinese or other

0.3 %

1.3 %

0.1 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

1.8 %

0.4 %

2.3 %

Refused

1.0 %

n/a

0.5 %

n/a

1.8 %

n/a

1.0 %

n/a

As you can see the NEMS report asked an ethnic split very close to the split identified in the ONS Census of 2001, which if you take into account those who refused to answer and that the NEMS data was weighted, gives a good spread of the ethnic makeup of the city at large. Further analysis will be conducted in the forthcoming months to identify how many smokers of each group we have. In the meantime, please read the attached report for a more detailed breakdown of percentage prevalence within each group.

PHIT - Smoking Prevalence Survey 2009.doc

3


The following graph shows the ethnic split more clearly across the PCTs Ethnic Breakdown of Groups questioned during the NEMS Prevalence Report 2009 by City and PCT

Refused

Chinese

Mixed

Black or Black British

Asian or Asian British

White

0

10

20

30

40 Bham

50 BEN

60 HOB

70

80

90

100

South

The report also looked at whether social economic factors influenced smoking habits. Below is a graph showing clearly that the poorer you are the more likely you have a smoking habit. Summary by Social Economic of those questioned in NEMS Smoking prevalence Report 2009 by City, PCT

Refused

DE

C2

CI

AB

0

5

10

15 Bham

PHIT - Smoking Prevalence Survey 2009.doc

20 BEN

25 HOB

30

35

40

45

South

4


For a definition of the socioeconomic groups please see Appendix 1. Age also appeared to have relevance when denoting smokers from non-smokers:

Summary of Age Breakdown of NEMS Smoking Prevalence Report 2009 25.0

20.0

15.0

10.0

5.0

0.0 16 to 24

25 to 34

35 to 44 Bham

PHIT - Smoking Prevalence Survey 2009.doc

45 to 54 BEN

HOB

55 to 64

65 to 74

75 and over

South

5


High Ethnicity (50% or more) Medium Ethnicity (25% to 49%)

PHIT - Smoking Prevalence Survey 2009.doc

6


Appendix 1: Socioeconomic Definitions

Group

Definitions 

These are professional people, very senior managers in business or commerce or top-level civil servants. Retired people, previously grade A, and their widows.

Middle management executives in large organisations with appropriate qualifications. Principal Officers in local government and civil service. Top management or owners of small business concerns, educational and service establishments. Retired people, previously grade B, and their widows. Please note these are all non manual

A

B

    

C1

  

C2

  

D - Manual

 

E

 

Junior management, owners of small establishments and all other in non manual positions. Jobs in this group have very varied responsibilities and educational requirements. Retired people previously grade C1, and their widows. All skilled and manual workers and those manual workers with responsibility for other people. Retired people, previously Grade C2, with pensions from their job. Widows, if receiving a pension from late husband’s job. All semi-skilled and unskilled manual workers, and apprentices and trainees to skilled workers. Retired people, previously grade D, with pensions from late husband’s job. All those entirely dependant on the state long-term, through sickness, unemployment, old age or other reasons, Those unemployed for a period exceeding six months (otherwise classify on previous occupation). Casual workers and those without a regular income. Only households without a Chief Wage Earner will be coded in this group.

Please note for the benefit of the report A and B were linked as was D and E.

PHIT - Smoking Prevalence Survey 2009.doc

7


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.