Moseley Kings Heath_LE_Ward_Profile

Page 1

Life Expectancy Ward Analysis Ward Profile: Moseley & Kings Heath Tackling Health Inequalities: Life Expectancy

VERSION CONTROL AND DOCUMENT GOVERNANCE Version

2

Date

June 2009

Status

Green

File location (public) Filename and path to locate this document


All maps produced with permission of Dotted Eyes & Ordance Survey Š Crown copyright 2008 licence number 100019918

PHIT - Moseley & Kings Heath.doc

2


Introduction Life expectancy is one of the main indicators for health inequalities. It has been set as the overarching work stream for tackling health inequalities in Birmingham by the Health and Wellbeing Partnership (BHWP). This Ward Profile series aims to: •

Provide a detailed ward level picture of local health inequality context

Describe life expectancy trend in each target ward

Investigate into leading conditions that cause deaths locally to provide local focus for each target ward and

Suggest future area/ factors for extended research

Authors

Jeanette Davis (Public Health Information Analyst) Chris Stephen (Public Health Information Analyst) Mohan Singh (Public Health Database Administrator/ Analyst) Iris Fermin (Head of Information and Intelligence) Jim McManus (Joint Director of Public Health)

Any further Telephone 0121 465 2995 / 2999 or Information Email : PHIT@benpct.nhs.uk

PHIT - Moseley & Kings Heath.doc

3


Summary •

Electoral ward Moseley & Kings Heath is in the boundary of NHS South Birmingham

Moseley & Kings Heath accounted for 2.35% of Birmingham’s population in 2006

One of the largest sections of the population are children and young people [0 – 19] at 24.11%

Black and Minority Ethnicity (BME) group split (31.2%) is higher than national average (11.3%) overall but lower than Birmingham (32.7%). This group accounted for 0.75% of the total population of Birmingham in 2001.

Moseley & Kings Heath is the 28th (out of 40) most deprived ward in Birmingham

The latest extraction for 2005/07 reflects: o Life expectancy in Moseley & Kings Heath is at 74.2 for men, 81.3 for women in the year 2005/07 o Male life expectancy has increased by 5.2%. The gap between Moseley & Kings Heath and England has shortened by 20% (0.8 years) from 95/97 to 05/07. o Female life expectancy has increased by 6.8%. The gap between Moseley & Kings Heath and England has shortened by 86% (3.1 years) from 95/97 to 05/07. o Infant Mortality Rates have dropped by 54.6% since 99/01, in comparison the rate for the most deprived wards has dropped o Circulatory diseases (34.27%), Cancers (25.23%) and Coronary Heart Diseases (16.2%) are the leading conditions that cause deaths in the ward.

PHIT - Moseley & Kings Heath.doc

4


1

Local context: demographics and deprivation

This section describes population demographics and deprivation in Longbridge to provide a local context for life expectancy inequalities. Comparisons are made with Birmingham and England.

1.1 Age and sex distribution The population of Moseley and Kings Heath is estimated to be 23,767. This represents 2.35% of the population of Birmingham. Approximately 49.8% (11,758) are male and 50.2% are female (12,009). These estimations are based on ONS mid-year population 2006. The population pyramid (Figure 1.1) shows the age and sex distributions. Population By Age Group and Gender 2006 Estimates by Ward Source: Office of National Statistics

281

158

80+ 232

75-79 70-74

315

376

65-69

Females

389 473

410

60-64 514

55-59 50-54

Males

403

322

656 700

702 725

45-49

762 857

899

40-44 1020

35-39 30-34

932 995

1094

1217

1284

25-29

963

20-24

937

15-19

714

723

10-14

727

712 612

744

5-9

776

0-4 1500

1000

722 500

0

500

1000

1500

Data source: ONS 2006 mid year population estimates

Figure 1.1 Population by age group and gender, Moseley & Kings Heath 2006

Figure 1.1 illustrates: •

Children under school leaving age (i.e. age 0 - 19) represent 24.11% (5,730) of the Moseley and Kings Heath population. Persons of retirement age (age 65+) account for 12.19% (2,897).

•

The age structure shows that the ward has 2.06 percentage points more people below 19 than the city and 1.55 percentage points more over 65s.

PHIT - Moseley & Kings Heath.doc

5


1.2 Ethnicity Ethnicity has some influences in terms what kind of illness an individual could develop through their life. Thus, ethnicity analysis becomes a requirement in order to target health vulnerable people. Table 1.1 shows the ethnicity distribution in the Moseley and Kings Heath population, compared with Birmingham and England. •

• • Table 1.1

The % column of table 1.1 represents the percentage of the total population that fit into that ethnic group. The N* column show the quantity of people in thousands that are from each group, for the ward, City and nationally. About a third (31.2%) of the population are of non-white ethnicity (i.e. Black and Minority Ethnicity (BME) Group. Within the BME group, Pakistanis represents 13.42%, Indian 5.71% and Black Caribbean 3.78%. The BME (31.2%) is nearly the same proportion as within Birmingham (32.7%), and higher than England (11.3%). White ethnicity (68.8%) is higher than Birmingham but lower than nationally. Ethnicity groups for Moseley & Kings Heath (2001), Birmingham (2006) and England (2006) Moseley & Kings Heath % N* 68.8 16.7 21.5 5.2 5.2 1.3 3.2 0.7 1.3 0.3 100 24.2

Ethnicity groups White Asian or Asian British Black or Black British Mixed Chinese or other Total

Birmingham %

N* 67.3 20.7 6.7 3.2 2.3 100

England %

667.0 207.9 67.0 31.8 22.9 1,106.5

88.7 5.5 2.8 1.6 1.4 100

N* 45,018.1 2,786.6 1,403.0 829.5 725.7 50,762.9

*population by thousand Data source: ONS population estimates by ethnic group mid 2006 for Birmingham / England. 2001 Census data for Ward

1.3 Deprivation According to Index of Multiple Deprivations (IMD) 2007 published by ONS, Moseley & Kings Heath is the 28th most deprived electoral ward (out of 40) in Birmingham with an overall IMD score of 26.341. Figure 1.2 shows SOAs in by IMD quintile, 2007. Most of the area covered by Moseley & Kings Heath is in the second and third most deprived SOAs in Birmingham. Table 1.2 shows the area covered by the ward and population density. Ward Area 2

2

Area (KM )

Population Density (persons / km )

Population Density – Working Age 2 16-64 (persons/km )

6.529

3715

2327

1

Ward level IMD score is calculated based on IMD score 2007 for SOAs and population weighting from SOAs to Wards in Birmingham produced by Birmingham Strategic Partnership Information Sharing Group from the Birmingham City Council.

PHIT - Moseley & Kings Heath.doc

6


Figure 1.2 Super Output Areas in Moseley & Kings Heath by IMD quintile, 2007

PHIT - Moseley & Kings Heath.doc

7


2

Life expectancy trend

Life expectancy is one of the most important determinants for health inequalities across the population; and there is evidence. This section gives an overview of life expectancy at birth in terms of trend and variations in different groups and communities. Figure 2.1 shows trend of male expectancy in Moseley and Kings Heath from 1995/97 to 2005/07 on a 3-year basis, in comparison with Birmingham and England. Figure 2.1 shows evidence that male life expectancy has increased in Moseley and Kings Heath over the ten years since 1995. It is still lower than Birmingham and national totals however, so requires further investigation. Male Life Expectancy - 3 year rolling average, Moseley & Kings Heath, Birmingham & England 80.0

Life Expectancy (Age)

78.0 76.0 74.0 72.0 70.0 68.0

/0 6

/0 5

/0 7 20 05

20 04

20 03

20 02

/0 4

/0 3

/0 2

20 01

20 00

/0 0

/0 1 19 99

19 98

/9 9 19 97

/9 8 19 96

19 95

/9 7

66.0

Calendar Year England M ales

Birmingham M ales

M oseley & Kings Heath M ales

Data source: ONS

Figure 2.1 Male life expectancy for Moseley & Kings Heath, Birmingham and England, 1995/97 – 2005/07

Figure 2.2 shows trend of female expectancy in Moseley & Kings Heath from 1995/97 to 2005/07 on a 3-year basis, in comparison with Birmingham and England. Figure 2.2 shows that by 2007 female life expectancy in Moseley and Kings Heath is higher than the city level but lower than England. More strategies are needed to identify underlying causes of this issue.

PHIT - Moseley & Kings Heath.doc

8


Female Life Expectancy - 3 year rolling average, Moseley & Kings Heath, Birmingham & England 83.0 82.0 Life Expectancy (Age)

81.0 80.0 79.0 78.0 77.0 76.0 75.0 74.0

/0 6

/0 5

/0 7 20 05

20 04

/0 4 20 02

20 03

/0 3

/0 2

20 01

20 00

/0 1 19 99

/0 0

/9 9

19 98

19 97

/9 8 19 96

19 95

/9 7

73.0

Calendar Year England Females

Birmingham Females

M oseley & Kings Heath Females

Data source: ONS

Figure 2.2 Female life expectancy for Moseley & Kings Heath, Birmingham and England, 1995/97 – 2005/07

As illustrated in Figure 2.1 and Figure 2.2, life expectancy for both males and females has increased. Life expectancy in Moseley and Kings Heath is lower than City and national averages for men and below national averages for women. The gap for both male/female life expectancy between Moseley and Kings Heath and England has dropped, with the gap for men being slightly more. •

Male life expectancy has increased by 5.2% (3.68 years, from 70.6 years in 1997 to 74.2 years by 2007).

The gap of male life expectancy between Moseley and Kings Heath and England has shortened by 0.8 year from 4.0 years to 3.2 years, i.e. a decrease of 20%.

Female life expectancy has increased by 6.8% (5.2 years, from 76.1 years in 1997 to 81.3 years by 2007).

The gap of female life expectancy between Moseley and Kings Heath and England has closed by 3.1 year from 3.6 years to 0.5 years.

PHIT - Moseley & Kings Heath.doc

9


2.1 Infant mortality In areas with high infant mortality rates, the life expectancy at birth is highly sensitive to the rate of death in the first few years of life. Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) is calculated as the number of newborns dying under one year of age in every 1,000 live births during the year, excluding still births. Figure 2.3 shows trends of IMR in Moseley and Kings Heath, Birmingham, England and the most deprived quintile (i.e. 20%) Super Output Areas (SOAs) in Birmingham (based on Lower Super Output Area level IMD score 2007), from 1999 to 2007. Moseley & Kings Heath Infant Mortality Rate - 3 year rolling average 16.0 14.0

Rate per 1,000

12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 1999 / 01

2000 / 02

2001 / 03

2002 / 04

2003 / 05

2004 / 06

2005 / 07

Trend Years Birmingham M ost Deprived Quintile in Bham

England M oseley & Kings Heath

Data source: Birmingham, West Midlands and England: National Centre for Health Outcomes Development Most deprived quintile in Birmingham: PHIT

Figure 2.3 Infant mortality rates per 1,000 births in Moseley & Kings Heath Birmingham, England and the most deprived quintile in Birmingham, 19992007

As illustrated in Figure 2.3, in 05/07, the IMR is a fifth higher than that of England: whilst that in the most deprived quintile are about two folds of England. • •

From 99/01 to 05/07, the IMR has dropped by 54.8%. Birmingham’s IMR has also decreased. The gap between the most deprived quintile SOAs in Birmingham and Moseley and Kings Heath improved from 2.3 above the most deprived quintile to 3.5 below. During the same period, the IMR in England has decreased smoothly from 5.6 to 4.9 (at about 0.1 per year). The gap between Moseley and Kings Heath and England has closed from 8.3 to 1.4 (83%).

PHIT - Moseley & Kings Heath.doc

10


3

Local focus

This section investigates into the leading causes of deaths locally.

3.1 Mortality rates on selected diseases Age-specific mortality rate is used to calculate life expectancy at birth. Disease specific standardised mortality rates are investigated into in this part in order to identify leading diseases that contribute to the overall mortality rates in Moseley and Kings Heath. Table 3.1 shows directly standardized mortality rates for selected conditions in 2005-2007. Percentage of each disease’s rate out of the overall rate is also shown here. According to the figures, cancers, circulatory diseases, and coronary heart disease are the major killers. They make more than 75.7% of the overall DSR. This percentage is consistent with both city and local PCT level which vary from 72% to 82% Table 3.1

Directly Standardized Mortality Rates (DSRs) per 100,000 population for selected conditions, Moseley & Kings Heath 2005-2007 % out of all causes rate*

DSR All Causes

729.77

All Cancers

184.09

25.23%

All Circulatory Diseases

250.10

34.27%

Coronary Heart Disease

118.19

16.20%

* Percentage of rate for the specific disease out of rate for all causes Data source: National Centre for Health Outcomes Development

PHIT - Moseley & Kings Heath.doc

11


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.