Letters to the editor can be sent by: Regular mail Police Journal, PO Box 6032, Halifax St, Adelaide SA 5000 Email editor@pasa.asn.au Internal dispatch Police Journal 168
L LETTERS
Backing Police Association on APY Lands Being a past member, from some 20 years back, I took some interest in the president’s editorial Abandon the model, not the APY Lands (Police Journal, February 2021). I was a selected member to participate in the beginning of the police aide scheme at the end of 1986. Other members were Linc Gore, Mark Weaver and David Butt (deceased). If my memory serves me correctly, the organizer/selector was Sergeant “Twiggy” Phillips. My position in the scheme was to man Fregon (Aprawattaja) police station and my aide was Munti Smith, a very capable, initiated gentleman. My wife, Julie, and our two young daughters occupied a police-supplied home, which was near the site of a yet-to-be-constructed police station and cell. Any, or all, of the members on that first experience would be willing to back up and even add to the argument on the position that the association is taking. It has been a long time, but it was one of the most cherished positions I held, and the view is also that of my wife, who was employed in the community, and my now-grown-up daughters. The memory of Munti and his family are still very precious in our minds and tears come easily when I remember Munti, a dear family friend, and our times together. Munti passed away several years after I was transferred out, as were the other members. We met with the hierarchy of the police department to try to convince them that the scheme should go on and that we were all prepared to stay on. But the response was that “we have run out of money” and that was the dominating factor in closing the scheme as it was. A very bad move for everybody. If I can assist in your endeavour, please contact me. Yours faithfully Reimer “Bruno” Andt
24
Police Journal
P PRESIDENT Mark Carroll
Hindley Street
Abandon the model, not the APY Lands T
he proposed SAPOL APY Lands model is a lose-lose for police and the remote indigenous communities with which they have worked hard to build significant relationships. The model relies on State Tactical Response Group members flying in and out to police communities on the lands. It is a proposal which not only disadvantages the indigenous communities on the lands but will also become an industrial issue for Police Association members. It situates these Adelaide-based members away from their homes and families for around 60 per cent of their total shifts. By occupying permanent positions on the lands, police have always been able to gain critical knowledge of local communities, such as their family structures and the welfare issues indigenous people face in the area. It is a system which has worked for many years and is critical for gaining trust with the local community members. It is folly to underestimate the relationships police form with local communities. They provide the necessary trust for victims of crime to come forward and make reports. 10
The proposed FIFO model simply facilitates the abandonment of longestablished customs of community policing. In fact, the Australian Law Reform Commission Inquiry into Indigenous Incarceration Rates highlighted that: “… poor relations influence how often Aboriginal and Torres Straight Island people interact with police… poor police relations can contribute to disproportionate arrest, police custody and incarceration rates.” The association is firm in its position that SAPOL should: • Maintain permanent officers on the APY Lands. • Undertake meaningful discussions with the association regarding any difficulties with the current model. • Actively work to fill long-standing vacant community constable positions. • Create permanent relief positions and train appropriate voluntary discrete personnel to relieve permanent members when absent from the APY Lands. SAPOL should not proceed with its new model. I have written to Commissioner Grant Stevens and informed the government of our position.
The SAPOL district policing model has not only abandoned Hindley St police officers but also put the community at risk. The area has a colourful history and a reputation for trouble. But one thing partygoers in the precinct could count on was permanent foot patrols in Hindley St, Rundle St, Rundle Mall and the surrounding areas. That kept these highly charged areas safe, especially during the peak periods on Friday and Saturday nights. And the sight of uniformed officers on foot patrol provided a strong deterrent for those who sought to create trouble. But under the district policing model, this staple of Adelaide policing is now a thing of the past. Eastern District members, who service the area, tell me that at times there is not a single officer on foot patrol in Hindley St or the surrounding areas. Under the current model, Hindley St Particularly members can actually be called to jobs anywhere in the district. That meansimportant they might have to respond to jobs as far is that we away as Unley or Parkside. It’s hard to believe that SAPOL could have not sold implement a policing model devoid of off any of permanent foot patrols in Hindley St. The result is that the area and its our existing surrounds are now an unsafe, out-of-control conditions and haven for anti-social behaviour, criminal activity and alcohol-fuelled violence. entitlements SAPOL must take responsibility, and be held accountable, for the abject failure to of achieve its model insofar as it relates to the the outcome. entertainment precinct. It must: • Review the DPM model as it pertains to the Eastern District. • Provide permanent foot patrols in these high-risk city areas — across the full spectrum of shifts. • Increase the size of response patrol teams in the Eastern District and return them to the staffing levels that existed before the Stage 2 DPM rollout in March 2020.
Police Journal
The public will simply not continue to accept the extreme Hindley St violence
we see on our nightly news bulletins. SAPOL must act in the interests of frontline police and the public they serve.
Enterprise Agreeem ent
Police Association member s recently voted to accept the new enterprise agreement. It was an overwhelming endorsement — a 94 per cent “yes” vote — which confirmed my view that this was a strong agreement for our member s. We obviously negotiate d the agreement in an extremely challeng ing economic climate. Despite this, we have emerged with a package that benefits our members financially and provides them with improved working condition s. Particularly importa nt is that we have not sold off any of our existing conditions and entitlem ents to achieve the outcome. This is actually a very significant — and often overlooked — aspect of enterprise bargaining. Amid the difficul t econom ic circumstances, the government also negotiated in good faith and offered a package that provides greater flexibility arrangements for member s. I acknowledge the signific ant contributions of associat ion delegates and the committee of management in achieving this outcome . And, during the entire enterprise bargain ing process, the efforts of Police Association assistant secretar y Steve Whetton were outstanding.
EDITOR’S NOTE: At press time, SAPOL informed Police Associat ion president Mark Carroll that it intends to provide a “permanent foot patrol presence” in Hindley and Rundle streets, Rundle Mall and “surrounding environs ”.
February 2021
APY Lands model wrong for prosecution service I share Police Association president Mark Carroll’s concerns around the proposed APY Lands operational model and respectfully add that prosecutorial aspects, such as the ability to provide timely, satisfactory PD90 responses and witness contact, should be considered. The Lands FVIS does a wonderful job but I can envisage work outside of its crucial role being asked of it in the absence of in situ investigating officers. APY prosecutions are presently being managed from PHQ. While proofing in person is preferable, the ability to consult and proof victims via AVL will be compromised without permanent operational positions on the Lands. Should this model be implemented on the Lands and locations like Coober Pedy, Ceduna and Yalata, I believe our prosecution service delivery to these communities will be adversely affected. Kind regards Liz Corbett Whyalla Prosecution Unit
11
