LETTERS & EMAILS

I also cannot express my exact frustration with the forecast proposal by Auckland Transport.

As a Grey Lynn/Ponsonby resident and homeowner, I feel we also need to factor in that Ponsonby Road has become a glorified on-and -off-ramp for the North Shore, for Mt Eden, Eden Tce, and Epsom folks and whatnot.

I strongly feel it’s time for an on-and-off-ramp at the Hopetoun bridge area of spaghetti junction to alleviate the congestion in order to prevent AT from vandalising our historic road. The proposal to divert traffic through the side streets is utter barbaric thinking.

Could you please forward my reply to John. I am happy he contacts me if he knows about some up and coming community meetings about this grave and worrying matter. Andrew Curtis, Grey Lynn

WESTERN SPRINGS FOREST - WELLBEING OF COMMUNITY On Monday 24th May, the last of the magnificent Monterey pines that have towered above the Western Springs forest for decades were needlessly felled, causing the destruction of a large portion of the mature native under storey.

Rejecting the lower cost option of maintaining these iconic trees, Council have created now a ‘site of death and destruction’, with mounds of toxic mulch. NIWA has predicted extreme weather events, these will result in mulch being washed down the hill into the Waiorea Stream probably killing the endangered eels.

It is hard to fathom how the contractor is going to return the ‘track’ back to the quality of a ‘Significant Ecological Area’ as required by the Resource Consent, ready for planting next month. I doubt they will bother to comply.

For years the local community have fought against the might of the Auckland Council, who have waged a war of misinformation, capped off last week with the circulation of two flyers that contained numerous significant ‘inaccuracies’ that set out to mislead, including claims that contradict the ‘Independent Risk Assessment’ on Council’s own website which stated only a quarter needed dead trees and branches removed; it’s called ‘maintenance’. The Council’s own ‘Independent Risk Assessment’ also proves the original ‘expert’, got it wrong when in 2006 he claimed all the 200 trees were ‘dead and dying’. That being said, this whole process has been about winning even when being proven wrong, by themselves.

Council have ignored expert advice around measuring the potential structural effects of falling trees on neighbouring homes. Residents were told by Council staff that homes without the relevant measuring equipment would not be covered by insurance. Understandably, without assurances, residents refused to vacate and stayed within the ‘two tree length no go zone’ for leverage to try and get Council to do what the court mandated.

The community made one last plea to save one of the most magnificent Monterey Pines, with a luscious crown of green needles standing sentinel on the ridge, overseeing the new forest. Experts have deemed it has another 50 years of healthy life.

Whilst awaiting a decision, a group of protectors stood under the tree, but instead of a modicum of engagement with community, Chief Executive Jim Stabback doubled down on his nonsense ‘Health and Safety’ rhetoric and refused the request. As we stood on a nearby property, chainsaws roared and with a huge creak and thud the tree fell crushing the native forest beneath. Two local police constables comforted shocked and tearful residents, at the finality of this loss. I have to admit, being hugged by constables in full body armour was not on my ‘bucket list’. Their empathy was compassionate and honourable, a credit to their uniforms.

For Auckland Council, this ‘win at all costs’ ideology, when the public question shaky rationale and unnecessary expenditure, has been characterised by a failure to engage in authentic consultation with the community. The tragic result of this bullying has been the destruction of a large section of mature native forest, at huge financial cost to ratepayers. It has placed a huge emotional strain on the community who has rallied against this madness. The actions contradict Council’s ‘Urban Ngahere Plan’ and their self-proclaimed ‘Climate Change Emergency’.

Council has the chance to regain some community support, by selecting two to five metre high natives to replace the mature natives that were both cut down to build the access road and also those that were crushed by felling pines on top of them, rather than the 20cm high PB5 seedlings proposed. Planting larger trees now will be the difference of a young native forest in our lifetime or a shrubbery. Gael Baldock, Community Advocate

THE WAITEMAT A LOCAL BOARD MEETING The big governance issue at the Waitemata Local Board meeting on Wednesday 18 May was, “Can members ask other members questions about matters NOT in their monthly reports?”. Question Time, as it is called in Parliament, is an important element of holding members to account. This issue is one that has simmered for some time starting when Member Sarah Trotman was prevented from asking Councillor Pippa Coom questions that were not in her report. On this occasion, Member Sarah Trotman was ‘shutdown’ when she asked Member Adriana Christie, who is the Portfolio Lead of Parks, questions about the Western Spring Forest and the Erebus National Memorial. The two major flashpoints in Waitemata at this time are in these parks. In the case of Western Springs there has been a recent hearing in the Environment Court and major tree removal works are occurring. In the case of Erebus, a petition with 12,500 signatures was presented to Parliament and a number of locals are sleeping in Dove-Myer Robinson Park where the memorial is to be located. Conveniently, neither Chairperson Richard Northey nor Member Adriana Christie included these items in their reports. Additionally, Chairperson Northey said that a discussion on whether members should be able to ask such questions would be covered in a workshop for resolution, which is another affront to good governance as the public can’t attend the workshop so the decision will be made “under the sheets”. Ironically, Member Alex Bonham asked a question of Member Sarah Trotman, which she hadn’t covered in her report - she said she was happy to answer the question even though she had not included it and proceeded to do so. The community voted in six City Vision so they have a clear majority and thus the power to decide whatever they wish, but they should exercise this power cautiously. If you wish to view a montage of the proceedings, please get in touch with me and I will send you the link straight away. Keith McConnell, keith@keithforwaitemata.com