Aaron Tjelmeland - Herbicides in the Prairie Restoration Process

Page 1

Herbicides in the Restoration Process


Introduction •  Herbicides can be powerful tools •  Historic system processes and func5oning are o7en disrupted – Invasives – Disturbance (Soil chemistry, Overgrazing, etc.) – Fire suppression

•  Can result in steady-­‐states of altered communi5es vs. successional reset •  It takes energy to push these areas back to func5onal natural systems (i.e. restora5on)


Plan •  Set goal

– Site prep, restore ecol. proc., promote na5ve abundance/ diversity, protect na5ve diversity and func5oning (e.g. limit invasives) – Climax na5ve grassland community

•  Set target – Specie(s)

•  Choose/ evaluate appropriate tool – Mechanical – Natural (fire) – Chemical – Combina5on – Other?


Plan •  What’s your target? •  How bad is it? – How extensive is it? – ScaOered plants and popula5ons or monoculture? – Brush is too dense to carry fire – Brush is too big, dense to shred

•  What are you trying to save? •  How much 5me do you have?





Choosing the Tool •  Available Resources – Time – Money – Equipment – Seed bank

•  Cost/ Benefit – $/ Acre – Acres/ day – How many applica5ons? – Collateral damage – Hazards – Liabili5es


Choosing the Tool •  Mechanical – Shredding – Hydro-­‐ax

•  Biological – Fire – Grazing

•  Chemical – Herbicide


Herbicides •  Not all herbicides are the same – Different modes of ac5on – Different effects – Different hazards – Different restric5ons – Different residuals – Different costs



Choose the Herbicide •  What herbicide will give you the best results for your target? •  Timing is key –  Rule of thumb: for herbaceous plants-­‐ green and ac5vely growing –  For vines, shrubs, and trees-­‐ soil temp. high, before seeds set or a7er seeds drop. –  Some vines-­‐ at least a year a7er mechanical disturbance

•  Resources –  Internet –  Manufacturer technical representa5ve (DOW, BASF) –  Local extension agent –  Other prac55oners


Mode of Action •  Foliar •  Soil (root, preemergent) •  Combina5on •  Residual


Choose the Method •  Individual Plant Treatment (IPT) – Spot spray – Wick – Cut stump – Hack and Squirt

•  Most focused •  Time-­‐intensive


IPT Case Study #1 •  8-­‐Acre area at TCPP

– Mixed na5ves and deeprooted sedge

•  Applica5on 1-­‐ June 16 2014 – 17 gallons of solu5on, 5 hours

•  Applica5on 2-­‐ August 1 2014 – 9 gallons of solu5on, 3 hours

•  Applica5on 3-­‐ August 11 2014 – 1 gallon solu5on, 1 hour

•  Applica5on 4-­‐ October 15 2014 – 1 gallon solu5on, 0.5 hour

•  Done for 2014, follow up in 2015






IPT Case Study #2 •  Southern boundary road of Nash Prairie – Large stands of Johnsongrass in 2012

•  Started regular herbicide regiment in 2013 – 5 applica5ons throughout 2013, 21.5 gallons of solu5on – 4 applica5ons throughout 2014, 21 gallons of solu5on – Appears to be in maintenance stage – Monitor in 2015






Choose the Method •  Broadcast – Ground boom – Aerial

•  Lowest cost/ Acre •  Least target-­‐specific •  Aerial can target taller trees


Boom Spray Case Study #1 •  TCPP, Unit 2A ~85 acres – Eastern baccharis forest in SE corner – Dense baccharis across unit – Limited perennial forb abundance and diversity

•  Burned in late winter 2013 •  Shredded in late June – early July 2013 •  Boom sprayed regrowth October 2013 •  Brownseed paspalum flush late spring 2014 •  Community recovery-­‐ October 2014






Boom Spray Case Study #2 •  TCPP Unit 3B, ~125 acres

– Dense bacharris – Limited fine fuel load – Bacharris too tall for TCPP boom

•  Shredded in May 2014 except for tallow moOes •  Planned spray in fall 2014 •  Na5ve plant community responded •  Changed plan, limited applica5on area to ~40 acres (25 aerial, 15 tractor boom) •  Saved 5me, money, forb community •  Monitor, manage in 2015






Choose the Method •  Hybrid – ATV Booms – Switch between wand and boom



Surfactant (Adjuvant) •  For foliar applica5ons – Helps bind chemical to leaf surface

•  Nonionic surfactant •  Methylated seed oil •  Mixed according to total volume


Implementing • READ LABELS!!!!!!! •  Safety is your responsibility •  Contractors – Hire someone with references – Don’t trust recommenda5ons, if given – Supply them directly with herbicides to be used

•  IPT – Make sure applicator can ID and dis5nguish target


Legalities •  Restricted Use – Find out if your county has restric5on excep5ons

•  State Limited-­‐Use •  Regulated by Texas Department of Agriculture •  See TDA website for more info


Licensing •  Regulated herbicide require an Applicator’s License to purchase and apply •  Requires records, permits, CEUs •  Contractors will have commercial license •  See TDA website for more info. – hOp://www.texasagriculture.gov/ RegulatoryPrograms/Pes5cides.aspx

•  Contact your county extension agent for 5mes and loca5ons of classes and tes5ng – hOp://galveston.agrilife.org/


Conclusions •  Herbicides can be an effec5ve tool if applied correctly •  Goal of herbicides in restora5on should be to minimize the use of herbicides (restore func5oning) •  Do your homework beforehand

• READ LABELS!!!!!!!!!!



Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.