Judge Carol Amon Criminal Complaint Pro Se Funding Embezzlment $ Denial of Due Process Scam by PRAYER WARRIOR

JUDGE AMON’S RESPONSE TO HER CRIMINALLY COERCED AND CONSPIRED OMISSION OF ADJUDICATION DUITIES WHICH EFFECTUATED A CRIMINALLY COERCED DISMISSAL

POSTED AT: http://issuu.com/prayerwarriorsneeded/docs/linked_judge_carol_amon_judicial_co 21-25 35TH Avenue 5E Astoria, NY 11106 Catherine Oâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;Hagan Wolfe Clerk of Court United States Court of Appeals Thurgood Marshall, U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, NY, NY 10007

July 23, 2015

Dear Ms. Wolfe: Attached you will find the 5 page Statement of Facts with exhibits, as requested. Please let me know should further information be needed. Thank you.

Sincerely, Miriam Snyder 516 642 6007

POSTED AT: http://issuu.com/prayerwarriorsneeded/docs/linked_judge_carol_amon_judicial_co 21-25 35TH Avenue 5E Astoria, NY 11106 Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe July 23, 2015 Clerk of Court United States Court of Appeals Thurgood Marshall, U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, NY, NY 10007

RE: 5 PAGE STATEMENT OF FACTS JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT AGAINST JUDGE CAROL AMON EASTERN DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: SECTION 195.00(2) OF THE NEW YORK PENAL LAW PROVIDES THAT A PUBLIC SERVANT IS GUILTY OF OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT WHERE, TO HER BENEFIT OR TO THE INJURY OF ANOTHER PERSON, SHE KNOWINGLY FAILS TO PERFORM A DUTY EITHER "IMPOSED BY LAW OR CLEARLY INHERENT IN THE NATURE OF HER OFFICE, JUDGE CAROL AMON’S ADMINISTRATION OF TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242 DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW, JUDGE CAROL AMON’S REPEATED DERELICTION OF JUDICIAL DUTIES, OMISION OF INHERENT ADJUDICATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES THAT VIOLATE PENAL CODES AND JUDICIAL CANONS, CONDUCT OBSTRUCTING AND DENYING JUSTICE, DUE PROCESS, EQUAL ACCESS TO THE COURTS, AND THE EXPEDITIOUS ADMINISTRATION OF COURT CASES AND THE COURT, JUDICIAL PREJUDICE, LAZINESS, AND HER HISTORY OF CASE SABOTAGE AND HOSTILITIES AGAINST PRO SE LITIGANTS, COUPLED WITH HER HISTORY OF ROBOT, FACTORY LIKE AND GHOST WRITTEN, REVERSE JUSTICE, UNAUTHENTIC, DISINGENUOUS AND MISLEADING ORDERS TO HARM AND DENY DUE PROCESS TO PRO SE LITIGANTS, PARTICULARLY THE POOR, GROSS JUDICIAL CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT ROOTED IN EMBEZZLEMENT OF PRO SE FUNDS AND CRIMINAL USE OF SUCH FOR DUE PROCESS DENIALS, JUDGE AMON’S CRIMINAL USE OF THE JUDICIARY TO SILENCE CRIME REPORTING Dear Judicial Complaint Members: I write this judicial complaint regarding Judge Carol Amon’s SECTION 195.00(2) misconduct behaviors that have injured Pro Se litigants such as myself, by her knowingly failure to perform judicial duties imposed by law and her failure to perform judicial duties clearly inherent in the nature of adjudication. Please see the exhibits attached exemplifying the injuries inflicted on me because of Judge Carol Amon’s failure to perform judicial duties. Judge Carol Amon has deliberately invoked and administered prejudicial, negligent, unethical and harmful practices, behaviors and actions against Pro se litigants such as I, Miriam Snyder. In this matter, Judge Carol Amon has failed to perform judicial duties clearly inherent in the nature of adjudication as documented in the exhibits and below. Her deliberate Pro Se due process denials has effectuated violations of the below judicial canons:  Canon 1: A Judge Should Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary  Canon 2: A Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in All Activities  Canon 3: A Judge Should Perform the Duties of the Office Fairly, Impartially and Diligently

Judge Amon’s laziness and neglect has caused me additional harm in that I was forced to voluntarily dismiss my case without prejudice out of her court room because of her do nothing practices and disregard of documented crimes inflicted on me in the matter of CASE NO 15-CV-00626. Judge Carol Amon’s failure to perform any adjudicating duties clearly inherent in the nature of her office in this matter has caused me great and unnecessary injury. February 6, 2015, after filing a Notice of Intent to Sue, I filed a law suit against the CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE for relentless and life threatening organized extortion and fraud crimes inflicted on me with no proof of claim and no proof of anything. Please see the Verified Complaint posted at: http://endorganizedcrimeuniverse.com/assets/download/STAMPED_NOTARIZED_COMPLETE__LAWSUI T_CITY_OF_NY_DEPT_OF_FINANCE_LAWLESS_SEIZURES_FEB_8.pdf And or http://issuu.com/prayerwarriorsneeded/docs/complete_february_6_removed__2015_l/0 And or https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=EE5D07C41F6F9845%213693 Judge Amon secured pro se funds for the case via a case number and did nothing else. She ignored a needed restraining order request and her negligence caused the crimes to escalate. February 6, 2015 I submitted to the court the below documents that have been totally ignored by Judge Carol Amon without reason, cause, conclusion, decision, and or explanation. The documents submitted were: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE , VERIFIED COMPLAINT, VERIFICATION OF COMPLAINT, INDEX OF EXHIBITS, EXHIBITS 1-25, AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT, AND ACERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The case was initiated as an emergency case via Order to Show Cause because the City of New York Department of Finance extortion and financial crimes were becoming unbearable. The crimes began with fraudulent tax claims. The fraudulent tax claims were being used to criminally take my driver’s license away. After fighting off this tax fraud for over a year, the tax fraud claims were dismantled with prejudice. Please see exhibits 6 and 7. Immediately after the tax fraud cancellation with prejudice, the Department of Finance criminal agents created a nonexistent and non-validated debt of over $1200.00. The timing of this Department of Finance no proof of claim and no Notice fraudulent debt concoction under the disguise of a car boot, is retaliatory. Please compare the dates in exhibits 7 and 21. Over $1200.00 was extorted from me immediately after the Department of Finance Agents tax fraud case was being exterminated. I was never Noticed or informed of any alleged judgment or tickets that would allow the car boot scam. In order to get my car back, $1200.00 was extorted from me from the Department of Finance criminal agents. In my verified complaint submitted to Judge Amon, I stated that the extorted money was borrowed from my elderly mother. My elderly mother had reserved this money for needed transportation in a scooter. Judge Amon’s refusal to serve my papers on the criminals or advance this case caused my elderly and disabled mother’s money to be stolen by this scam that Judge Amon ordained by doing nothing when she could have stopped the crimes by signing the restraining order or serving the parties. Judge Amon’s dereliction of duty, disregard of the case, more specific, her willful obstruction of the judicial adjudicative responsibilities, coupled with her neglect of the need for a signed restraining order and other emergencies noted in the Order to Show Cause, her doing nothing after assigning a case number and getting Pro Se funding, epitomizes judicial misconduct, negligence and gangster conduct unbecoming of a judge. Judge Carol Amon’s 5 month neglect and disregard of this case, while securing Pro Se funds, obstructs public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary. Judge Amon has engaged in conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts and has become in this matter unable to discharge the duties of the judicial office and such has caused escalated crimes to be inflicted on me by the parties I sued. 7

Judge Carol Amon’s prejudicial, deliberate and malicious obstruction of adjudicative responsibilities scheme to defraud, coupled with the adversaries repeated heightened crimes against me, forced me to voluntarily dismiss my case from her court as Judge Amon’s dereliction of duty advanced the private interests and crimes of the opposing parties. Judge Carol Amon’s criminally complicit and conspiratorial behaviors are exemplified in her adjudicative responsibility obstructions. Prior to voluntarily dismissing the case because of Judge Amon’s criminal misconduct, I contacted the judge’s chambers on several occasions seeking the status of the above case and was told she will get to it. I, Miriam Snyder filed this case February 6, 2015. Today is June 23, 2015 and Judge Amon still has done nothing to serve the defendants, adjudicate the matter, administer justice, or due process. Her conduct of doing nothing in this matter is criminal, exemplifies laziness, is prejudicial, discriminatory, malicious and offensive. Above all, Judge Carol Amon’s knowingly failure to perform duties imposed by law and her failure to perform judicial duties clearly inherent in the nature of her office obstructed my right to be heard according to law. Judge Carol Amon violated and obstructed Section 100.3, A judge shall accord to every person who has a legal interest in a proceeding, or that person's lawyer, the right to be heard according to law. The City of New York Department of Finance agents have not been served because of Judge Amon’s ongoing disdain of law and order and dereliction of judicial duties. Judge Amon’s dereliction of judicial duties have effectuated further and unregulated damages and harassment infliction on Miriam Snyder by the criminal agents. The City of New York Department of Finance criminal agents have willfully not repaid the over $1200.00 extorted from me based on their parking boot fraud scam with no proof of service of Notice, no judgment, no real party in interest, no complaint, no summons, no anything. The City of New York Department of Finance criminal agent’s maliciously booted my car, flattened my tire and extorted over $1200.00 from me triggering the need for this law suit seeking due process and restrain of the crimes, harassment and extortion scam, embedded in created out of thin air nonexistent liabilities rooted in NO DUE Process. Since Judge Amon’s dereliction of duty and failure to do anything in this matter, the criminals I sued are now further extorting and harassing me, Miriam Snyder with repeated unregulated, unfounded, malicious and contemptuous license suspensions despite the criminal’s claims being dismantled with prejudice. Additionally, I have been subjected to monthly harassment and extortion scams by these same criminals. Please see exhibits 4,5, and 817. I have been assaulted by these criminals monthly by their non-validated camera and parking ticket concoctions, and their erroneous driver license scam effectuating escalated auto insurance billings. Please see the attached exhibits 2-33 summarizing the City of New York Department of Finance criminal agent’s ongoing and relentless assaults and financial crimes inflicted on Miriam Snyder in direct response to Judge Amon’s complicity. The City of New York Department of Finance criminal agent’s assaults and financial crimes are life threatening because their crimes are conspiracy based and criminally enjoin and pit the police and the Department of Motor vehicle against me because of the Department of Finance’s unregulated and ongoing debt creation and collection organized fraud. I dismissed this matter in Judge Amon’s court because of Judge Amon’s criminal, harmful, prejudicial, malicious, lazy, and do nothing behaviors, at the expense of the criminals’ unregulated extortion and harassment assaults on me. I filed a dismissal because Judge Carol Amon has engaged in criminal conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of justice, due process and the business of the courts by doing nothing in this matter despite having a judicial duty to adjudicate. Judge Amon’s do nothing conduct, except securing funding under pro se status, epitomizes her use of the court house as a gangster playground for free funding while doing nothing. This further illustrates her abuse and disrespect for tax payer’s money and her abuse and disrespect for Plaintiff’s right to due process. Above all, Judge Amon’s failure to administer anything, much more justice, in this matter, exemplifies her inability to discharge the duties of the judicial office and her failure to administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor. 8

Judge Amon has faithfully refused to discharge and perform any of the duties incumbent upon her under the Constitution and laws of the United States. Her corrupted and malicious practices, her long standing history of misconduct against Pro Se litigants, including her lump on a log, do nothing, lazy, judicial, disrespectful and damaging behavior effectuated my voluntary dismissal without prejudice. She is a waste of judicial resources and a liability to the judiciary. Judge Amon’s complicity in the crimes, has advanced safety risks in my life based on her continuous disregard of the criminal’s conspiracy against rights and organized fraud crimes against me, which pit the DMV and the police against me. I have suffered and am suffering further irreparable harm caused by Judge Amon’s unreasonable, lawless, and criminal do nothing misconduct behaviors for over 5 months. The criminals have escalated the crimes with no restrain. Please see exhibits 818. Judge Amon’s do nothing lazy behaviors have offended public policy as defined by statutes such as the FDCPA, ADAAA, Common Law, and otherwise. Judge Amon’s do nothing lazy behaviors were and are criminal, immoral, unethical, oppressive, and unscrupulous. Judge Amon’s do nothing lazy behaviors substantially injured me by allowing crimes to continue that were bought to her attention. The magnitude of crimes and corruption inflicted on me and bought to her attention outweighs any and all Pro Se prejudices she hase. Judge Amon was supposed to respond to my Order to Show Cause while securing funding for Pro Se status or at minimum provide an explanation for not doing anything while the crimes continue. The only means of curtailing Judge Amon’s criminal behavior and harm is by getting away from this prejudice and unsound acting judge and appealing to criminal authorities to arrest her and stop the ongoing and unregulated City of New York Department of Finance crimes against Miriam Snyder. It appears that Judge Carol Amon used artifice and psychological pressure, as well as the element of surprise, to exploit and take advantage of Miriam Snyder’s Pro Se status. By doing nothing, Judge Carol Amon has covertly, maliciously, and criminally took lead in allowing a well-documented and deadly conspiracy against rights that could have been prevented. This type of judicial misconduct, laziness, negligence and malice has no place in the judiciary and or in a civilized society. Above all, Judge Carol Amon’s pattern of doing nothing, working against and sabotaging Pro Se litigant’s cases and rights needs to be arrested. Carol Amon has a discriminatory and malicious pattern of hatred and sabotage against Pro Se litigants. She has a malicious multifaceted tendency and history of criminally demising meritorious Pro Se cases in contravention to the dictates of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 8. Please see her multitude of Pro Se case demises based on her criminal court of appeals due process denials based on income scam. Some of the cases are cited in Exhibit 1. In addition to her repeated, lazy, malicious, meritless, unauthentic, and appearing ghost written decision writing history, she uses her judicial position to bully, stab and turn the knife on poor Pro Se litigants by denying them equal access to the courts by repeatedly including in her malicious, reversed justice and lazy Orders the following denial of due process deliberate harm to the poor robot phrase: THAT ANY APPEAL FROM THIS ORDER WOULD NOT BE TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH AND THEREFORE IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS IS DENIED FOR PURPOSE OF AN APPEAL. SEE COPPEDGE V. UNITED STATES, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). She has turned the judicial decision making process into a factory where her Orders are ghost written, robot phrased, damaging, unsound, non-creative, malicious, meritless and bogus and she inflicts such on Pro Se litigants disproportionately. Judge Amon has not made any decision in this matter. Her criminal history of destroying meritorious Pro Se litigants complaints and her multifaceted criminal no due process scams is enough to cause any competent person to remove cases from her criminal domain. Her judicial practices are criminal and gangster. Judge Carol Amon is criminally using her judicial position to invoke the above noted lawless robot phrase, regardless of the merits of the Pro Se case, to minimize meritorious appeals against her by Pro Se litigants on limited incomes. Please see exhibit 1 and the link on the page showing over 500 Pro Se litigants assaulted by Judge Carol Amon’s repeated misconduct, rooted in abuse of power, prejudicial, discriminatory, meritless, robo phrased denial of equal access to the appeals courts based on income, to hide her attacks and erroneous decision making against Pro Se litigants and particularly poor people. Any reasonable person, knowing her judicial robot writing history and the relevant facts in this matter, would find that Judge Carol Amon’s history of maliciously demising 9

EXHIBIT 1 THIS EXHIBIT SHOWS HOW JUDGE CAROL AMON HAS HARMED OVER 500 PRO SE LITIGANTS BY HER PATTERNED AND PRACTICED RECKLESS AND FACTORY TYPE OF DENIAL OF EQUAL ACCESS TO THE COURTS BY USING HER GHOST WRITTEN, ABUSE OF POWER, LAZY, ROBOT DECISION WRITING, DENYING AFFORDABLE MERITIORIOUS APPEALS TO HIDE JUDGE CAROL AMON’S HATRED, MALICE, MISCONDUCT, AND ERRONEOUS DECISIONS AGAINST COMPETENT PRO SE LITIGANTS WHO MAY BE LOW INCOME. JUDGE CAROL AMON HAS USED A FINANCIAL BULLYING SCHEME TO DEFRAUD LOW INCOM E PEOPLE THEIR RIGHT TO APPEAL HER LAZY, READ NOTHING, PREJUDICE, BIAS, ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS ORDERS. SHE HAS DEMISED OVER 500 PRO SE LITIGANTS MERITORIOS CLAIMS AND DENIED THEM DUE PROCESS BASED ON THEIR INCOME BY CRIMINALLY INVOKING HER BELOW DENIAL OF EQUALL ACCESS TO THE APPEALS COURT, USING HER UNAUTHENTIC, FACTORY LIKE, GHOST/ROBOT WRITTEN ORDERS EXEMPLIFYING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT, BAD FAITH AND JUDICIAL WRITNG THAT IS DISINGENUOUS, MISLEADING AND THAT UNCONSTITUTIONALLY TARGETS AND DENIES LOW INCOME POPULATIONS EQUAL ACCESS TO THE APPEALS COURT. THAT ANY APPEAL FROM THIS ORDER WOULD NOT BE TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH AND THEREFORE IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS IS DENIED FOR PURPOSE OF AN APPEAL.

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF8#q=CAROL+AMON+DECISIONS%2C+THAT+ANY+APPEAL+FROM+THIS+ORDER+WOULD+NOT+BE+ TAKEN+IN+GOOD+FAITH+AND+THEREFORE+IN+FORMA+PAUPERIS+STATUS+IS+DENIED+FOR+PU RPOSE+OF+AN+APPEAL.

About 561 results (0.86 seconds) Search Results

1. LOVELL v. CONSOLIDATED EDISON OF NEW YORK, INC ... www.leagle.com/decision/.../LOVELL%20v.%20CONSOLIDATED%20... o

May 11, 2015 - MEMORANDUM & ORDER CAROL BAGLEY AMON, Chief District Judge. ... He has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") pursuant to... For the reasons set forth below, Lovell's application for IFP status is denied. ..... that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma ... 2. MODS - U.S. Government Printing Office www.gpo.gov/.../mods.xml United States Government Publishing Office (Amon, Carol) 0 2005-06-30 D09002ee18ae933c3 ... demonstrates that plaintiff's request for this Court to review the decision denying her naturalization is time-barred. ...1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith andtherefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. 3. 05-2997 - Cole v. U.S. Department of Justice, Immigration ... www.gpo.gov/.../USCOURTS-... United States Government Publishing Office Aug 25, 2005 - Case Type Mouse over help for Case Type says District cases can either ... 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faithand therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. So Ordered. (Ordered by Judge Carol B. Amon on 8/23/2005) C/M (Latka-Mucha, ... 4. [PDF]MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - US Case Law - Justia https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/new-york/.../1.../0.pdf o

AMON, Chief United States District Judge: ... Shehabeldin's request to proceed informa pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.c. § 1915 is granted solely for the purpose of thisorder. ... Lewis Brooks 13

stating that her security clearance had been denied due .... any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in ... 5. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The claims against Justice ... docs.justia.com › ... › Trimarco v. Data Treasury Corporation et al o

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The claims against Justice Pines and her law ... any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status isdenied for the purpose of any appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Ordered by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 7/30/2014. 6. MEMORANDUM & ORDER: More than seven years later ... docs.justia.com › ... › New York Eastern District Court › Cole v. Katz o

MEMORANDUM & ORDER: More than seven years later, plaintiff now seeks to reopen both actions. ... 1915 (a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken ingood faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of anappeal. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon, on 2/15/2012. 7. Edo v. Martini, 15-CV-202 | New York Law Journal www.newyorklawjournal.com/.../Edo-v-Martini-... o

New York Law Journal 4 days ago - District Judge Carol Bagley Amon. Read Summary of Decision ... Edo's request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915 is granted. ....§1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith andtherefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. 8. MILLER v. HOURIHANE - Casetext https://casetext.com/case/miller-v-hourihane o

Jul 17, 2008 - Majority: CAROL AMON, District Judge. Edit ... The Court grants petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ... to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith andtherefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. 9. Rodriguez v. Knapp et al - Docket Alarm https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/.../Rodriguez_v._Knapp_et_al/ 11/8/2012, Order-2, AMENDED MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER, granting Pltff's 2 Motion for ... 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith andtherefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. (Ordered by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 11/1/2012) c/m (Galeano, Sonia). 10. Barlow v. United States, USA et al - PacerMonitor www.pacermonitor.com › Courts › New York Eastern o

May 10, 2015 - Please Note: This Notice of Appeal and attachments were mistakenly... any appeal from the Court's Decision and Order would not be taken in good faith; and that in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. ... faith andtherefore in forma pauper is status is denied for purpose of an appeal.

EXHIBIT 2 JUDGE CAROL AMON JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT CRIMES INFLICTED ON MIRIAM SNYDER JUDGE CAROL AMON’S PRO SE FUNDING EMBEZZLEMENT SCAM. SHE SECURED PRO SE FUNDING FOR THIS CASE AND THAN DENIED ME DUE PROCESS. SINCE FEBRUARY 6, 2015 JUDGE AMON HAS DONE NOTHING TO MEET HER JUDICIAL DUTIES TO ADJUDICATE THIS MATTER. JUDGE CAROL AMON’S CRIMINAAL CONDUCT INCLUDES: 

DELIBERATE, KNOWING, AND MALICIOUS OMISSION OF INHERENT JUDICIAL ADJUDICATORY DUTIES  ONGOING OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT, NEW YORK PENAL LAW 195.00  ONGOING OBSTRUCTING GOVERNMENTAL ADMINISTRATION IN THE SECOND DEGREE, NEW YORK PENAL LAW 195.05.  18 U.S. CODE § 241 – JUDICIAL HIT MAN AND CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS  215.10 TAMPERING WITH A WITNESS IN THE FOURTH DEGREE  PRO SE LITIGANT EMBEZZLEMENT OF FUNDS AND DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS TO PRO SE LITIGANTS PURSUANT TO: N.Y. CON. LAWS ANN. § 155.42.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------X MIRIAM SNYDER, PRO SE PLAINTIFF

POSTED AT: http://issuu.com/prayerwarriorsneeded/docs/complete_february_6_removed__2015_l/0 AND OR https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=EE5D07C41F6F9845%213693

CASE NO. 15-CV-00626 TABLE OF CONTENTS -VDIANA BEINART, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND GENERAL COUNSELOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, DAISY M. ALVERIO, ATTORNEY FOR THE NYC DEPT OF FINANCE LEGAL AFFAIRS DIVISION PARKING ENFORCEMENT UNIT, THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE PARKING AND VEHICLES DIVISION, THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE PARKING VIOLATIONS DIVISION, THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND THE NYC DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE DEFENDANTS/DEBT COLLECTORS/FICTITIOUS CREDITORS

--------------------------------------------------------------------X SECTION

PAGE

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

VERIFIED COMPLAINT

VERIFICATION OF COMPLAINT

INDEX OF EXHIBITS

EXHIBITS 1-25

47D

AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

EXHIBIT 3 SOME OF THE JUDGE CAROL AMON ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT CRIMES INFLICTED ON MIRIAM SNYDER

 195.00 Official misconduct. Judge Carol Amon with intent to get Pro Se monies and deny me due process obstructed her inherent adjudicative responsibilities and duties by doing nothing in this matter after securing Pro Se funds. She obtained Pro Se funding and then denied me due process. She knowingly refrained from performing judicial duties which are imposed upon her by law and she has refused to adjudicate this matter which is clearly one of the inherent duties in the nature of her judicial office.  Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law Judge Carol Amon acting under color of law willfully deprived and cause to be deprived from me rights, privileges, and immunities secured and protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.  Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 Conspiracy Against Rights Judge Amon, The City of New York Department of Finance criminal agents, NYS DMV criminal agents, Eugenicist and Chief Criminal Judge Jonathan Lippman, Regional Killer and Eugenicist Boyden Gray conspired to injure, oppress, threaten, and intimidate me as evidenced in the attached exhibits. They collectively and conspiratorially obstructed my due process rights and privileges secured by the Constitution and the laws of the United States,  TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PART I – CRIMES CHAPTER 47 - FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS Judge Carol Amon falsified, concealed, and covered up by trick, Pro Se monies to make it appear as if such money would be used for me as a Pro Se litigant, when after 5 months, she stole the money and has done nothing to adjudicate the case. She used fraudulent Pro Se entries while she denied me due process. She denied me all due process rights and did so under the false pretense of a Pro Se litigant.  215.10 Tampering with a witness in the fourth degree. Judge Carol Amon tampered with me as a witness, knowing that my case was the forum for me to testify and witness to the crimes in this matter that were inflicted on me. She denied me all due process which wrongfully, maliciously and criminally forced and induced me to absent myself from this case via voluntary dismissal because of her crimes. Carol Amon used her obstruction of justice and due process denial crimes to avoid or seek to avoid me from appearing or testifying in this matter. She knowingly got Pro Se funding under the false pretense of due process and did so with intent to creating a hostile environment which forced me to dismiss my case away from her crimes.

EXHIBIT 4 JUDGE CAROL AMON’S DERELICTION OF DUTY HAS EFFECTUATED THE BELOW HARM TO ME. PLEASE NOTE I SOUGHT A RESTRAINING ORDER AGAINST THE BELOW NYC DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE CRIMINALS TO PREVENT THE CURRENT CRIMES. THIS EXHIBIT IS 10 PAGES.

June 19, 2015 Amy, License Examiner Gregory J. Kline, Deputy Commissioner of Motor Vehicles DMV Correction and Improvement Records Department of Motor Vehicles 6 Empire State Plaza Albany, NY 12228 FAX NUMBER: 1518 474 6208 Dear DMV Representative Amy: Attached you will find the: 1. The erroneous DMV suspension record causing me harm, unwarranted expense and damage without validation, reason or cause and incontravention to the below, 2. Signed Tax Appeal Judge’s Order Discontinuing all of the NYS Tax fraud WITH PREJUDICE from November 2013 up to present, 3. Two State of New York Department of Taxation and Finance documents dated January 2015 appealing for the DISCONTINUANCE OF ALL TAX FRAUD commencing November 2013 up to present. 4. Proof of service U.S. mail receipt showing that I mailed copies of the above NYS TAX DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE documents to the DMV Commissioner Kline on June 1, 2015 located at the below address: Gregory J. Kline, Deputy Commissioner of Motor Vehicles Department of Motor Vehicles 6 Empire State Plaza Albany, NY 12228 In closing, the erroneous newly errupted one day suspension published on my driving record for one day from 1/29/14 to 1/30/14 is in deliberate bad faith, is vexatious, wanton and was published for oppressive reasons embedded in causing unnecessary expenses, including malicious auto insurance escalation. Again, please note that this one day suspension was not on my driver record abstract December 2014/January 2014 when I walked out of a car dealership with a new car and spic and span low cost auto insurance. There was no mentioning of any driver suspension whatsoever. I ask that you read the attached documents carefully and stop the ongoing needless assaults, harassment and retaliation on my driver record while no such reason for this exists. To this end, please remove the malicious, fraudulent, and unwarranted one day suspension that did not exist previously off my record. Please send me a copy of the corrected DMV Driver abstract record ASAP, by fax please at: 866-244-9823 or email at mirisni@aol.com. This needs to be sent to my insurance agent immediately, as this can prevent further harm and harassment. My phone number for this purpose is 516 642 6007. Your professional assistance is greatly needed. Thank you.

_________________________________ Miriam Snyder 17

EXHIBIT 5 THE BELOW IS AN EXAMPLE OF JUDGE AMON COMPLICITY IN THE ORGANIZED FRAUD. BECAUSE JUDGE AMON DELIBERATELY DENIED ME DUE PROCESS, ORGANIZED FRAUD DAMAGING DOCUMENTS SUCH AS THE BELOW WAS CREATED. THE BELOW IS A LAWLESS AND UNRESTRAINED LICENSE SUSPENSION CONSPIRED BETWEEN THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, DMV AND JUDGE CAROL AMON. THIS IS PURE ORGANIZED FRAUD, THIS ERRONEOUS SUSPENSION WAS NOT ON MY DRIVING RECORD PRIOR TO THE BELOW DECISION. IT WAS PUT ON MY RECORD IN RETALITIATION TO HONORABLE JUDGE GALLIHER’S TAX FRAUD DISMANTLING WITH PREJUDICE. COMPARE THIS WITH EXHIBITS 6.

EXHIBIT 6 THIS IS HONORABLE JUDGE GALLIHER’S DECISION DISMANTLING THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE CRIMINAL AGENTS TAX FRAUD AND EXTORTION CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE

EXHIBIT 7 THIS IS THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE’S INITIATED NO PROOF OF SERVICE OF NOTICE AND NO PROOF OF CLAIM DISMISSAL PROPOSAL EFFECTUATING HONORABLE JUDGE GALLIHER’S TAX FRAUD DISMANTLING WITH PREJUDICE

EXHIBIT 8 THIS IS THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE’S DOCUMENTED RETAILIATION AND RESJUDICATA, COUPLED WITH ADDITIONAL UNREGULATED, UNRESTRAINED, ONGOING, RELENTLESS, AGGRAVATED EXTORTION, HARASSMENT, AND CONTEMPT DOCUMENTS DATED APRIL 2015. THESE EXTORTION AND LICENSE SUSPENSION CONTEMPT OF COURT DOCUMENTS ARE IN CONTRAVENTION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE GALLIHER’S TAX FRAUD DISMANTLING WITH PREJUDICE. THE FRAUD AND EXTORTION CRIMES ARE BEING REPLICATED BECAUSE OF JUDGE CAROL AMON’S COMPLICITY IN THE CRIMES, DERELICTON OF JUDICIAL DUTIES, MALICIOUS REFUSAL AND FAILURE TO SIGN A NEEDED RESTRAINING ORDER SUMMARIZING THESE ANTICIPATED AND PREVENTABLE CRIMES. JUDGE AMON IS A LIABILITY TO THE JUDICIARY AND HER JUDICIAL BOND NEEDS TO BE DETAINED.

EXHIBIT 9 THIS IS THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE’S DOCUMENTED RETAILIATION AND RESJUDICATA, COUPLED WITH ADDITIONAL UNREGULATED, UNRESTRAINED, ONGOING, RELENTLESS, AGGRAVATED EXTORTION, HARASSMENT, AND CONTEMPT DOCUMENTS DATED APRIL 2015. THESE EXTORTION AND LICENSE SUSPENSION CONTEMPT OF COURT DOCUMENTS ARE IN CONTRAVENTION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE GALLIHER’S TAX FRAUD DISMANTLING WITH PREJUDICE. THE FRAUD AND EXTORTION CRIMES ARE BEING REPLICATED BECAUSE OF JUDGE CAROL AMON’S COMPLICITY IN THE CRIMES, DERELICTON OF JUDICIAL DUTIES, MALICIOUS REFUSAL AND FAILURE TO SIGN A NEEDED RESTRAINING ORDER SUMMARIZING THESE ANTICIPATED AND PREVENTABLE CRIMES. JUDGE AMON IS A LIABILITY TO THE JUDICIARY AND HER JUDICIAL BOND NEEDS TO BE DETAINED.

. 22

EXHIBIT 10 THIS IS THE FIRST PAGE OF MY ADDITIONAL TIME CONSUMING DEFENSE AGAINST THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE UNRESTRAINED, UNREGULATED, CRIMINAL AND HARRASSING EXTORTION AND ORGANIZED FRAUD CRIMES THAT JUDGE CAROL AMON IS WILLFULLY, CRIMINALLY, AND MALICIOUSLY DISREGARDING

Posted at: http://issuu.com/prayerwarriorsneeded/docs/cor_mailed_final_nys_tax_and_dept_o

SUPERVISING ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE STATE OF NEW YORK DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS AGENCY BUILDING 1 EMPIRE STATE PLAZA ALBANY, NY 12223 MIRIAM SNYDER,

DTA# 826108 EMERGENCY TAX APPEAL PETITION AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST RESPONDENTS FOR ONGOING AND CONTINUOUS AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT, OBSTRUCTION OF RESJUDICATA PRICIPLES, UNREGULATED AND INFINITE ORGANIZED FRAUD, ABUSE OF AUTHORITY AND REPLICATED ATTORNEY DECEIT

PRO SE PETITIONER NOTICE OF NYS DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE COLLECTIONS AND CIVIL ENFORCEMENT DIVISION CONTEMPT, HARASSMENT AND DISREGARD OF DISMISAL OF ALL CLAIMS STIPULATION WITH PREJUDICE NOTICE OF RESPONDENT NEWLY CONCOCTED CONTEMPT EXTORTION DOCUMENTS DATED APRIL 15, 2015 AND REPEATED CRIMINAL THREAT OF DRIVER LICENSE SUSPENSION FOR DEADLY AND IMPROPER PURPOSES EMBEDDED IN A DOCUMENTED CONSPIRCY TO COVERTLY MURDER, PIT AND ENJOIN THE POICE, HARASS AND CAUSE UNNECESSARY EXPENSE, NOTICE OF COVERT MURDER PLAN AND PROGRAMMING CRIMINALLY ENJOINING AND USING THE NYS DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, NYS DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, AND THE NYC POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR VEXATIOUS AND RETALITORY PREMEDITATED CONTEMPTIVE AND MALICIOUS LICENSE REVOCATION TO CRIMINALLY PIT POLICE OFFICERS AFTER AND AGAINST PETITIONER TO COVERTLY KILL, HARASS AND CAUSE UNNECESSARY EXPENSE MOTION FOR AGENCY SANCTIONS AND RESTRAINING ORDER VS. AMANDA HILLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND COUNSELOR STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE, MICHELE W. MILAVEC INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SENIOR ATTORNEY STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE, KEVIN ID # 5470 INIVIDUALLY AND AS MEMBER OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE AND THE STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE, FICTITIOUS RESPONDENTS, ATTORNEYS ACTING AS WITNESSES AND MALICIOUS DEBT COLLECTORS __________________________________________________________________________________________

EXHIBIT 11 THIS EXHIBIT IS THE US MAIL RECEIPT FOR SENDING THE ATTACHED ADDITIONAL EXPENSE EMERGENCY TAX APPEAL PETITION AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE CRIMINAL AGENTS FOR ONGOING AND CONTINUOUS AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT, EXTORTION, OBSTRUCTION OF RESJUDICATA PRINCIPLES, UNREGULATED AND INFINITE ORGANIZED FRAUD, ABUSE OF AUTHORITY AND REPLICATED ATTORNEY DECEIT

EXHIBIT 12 June 20, 2015 Amy, License Examiner Gregory J. Kline, Deputy Commissioner of Motor Vehicles DMV Correction and Improvement Records Department of Motor Vehicles 6 Empire State Plaza Albany, NY 12228 FAX NUMBER: 1518 474 6208 Dear DMV Representative Amy: PLEASE ADD THE TWO EXHIBITS ATTACHED TO YOUR FILES DOCUMENTING THE ORGANIZED FRAUD INFLICTED ON ME TO HARASS AND CAUSE UNDUE, UNWARRANTED, AND BURDENSOME EXPENSES.

EXHIBIT 13 NO DRIVER SUSPENSION ON MY RECORD FROM 12/1/2014 TO 06/2015

EXHIBIT 14 JUNE 2015 NEWLY ERRUPTED, LAWLESS, UNAUTHORIZED, MALICIOUS AND RETALITORY ONE DAY SUSPENSION RAMIFICATIONS BECAUSE OF JUDGE CAROL AMON’S DISREGARD OF A NEEDED RESTRAINING ORDER

EXHIBIT 15 THE ABOVE AUTO INSURANCE CANCELLATION AND INCREASE IN INSURANCE COST WAS CRIMINALLY AND JUDICIALLY CONSPIRED AND ADMINISTERED DUE TO JUDGE CAROL AMON’S OMISSION OF INHERENT JUDICIAL ADJUDICATORY DUTIES IN VIOLATION OF OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT, NEW YORK PENAL LAW 195.00 AND OBSTRUCTING GOVERNMENTAL ADMINISTRATION IN THE SECOND DEGREE, NEW YORK PENAL LAW 195.05. THE RAMIFICATIONS OF HER OMISSION AND DISREGARD CRIMES MENTORED DOWN TO THE CRIMINAL DISREGARD OF THE BELOW SAFTEY CERTIFICATE IN ALL INSURANCE RECORDS DUE TO HER COMPLICITY IN ORGANIZED FRAUD BETWEEN THE NYS DMV AND THE CITY OF NY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

EXHIBIT 16 THE NYC DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE CRIMINAL AGENTS ADDITIONAL HIT MAN TACTICS AND EXTORTION FOR A NON VALIDATED DEBT WITH THREAT OF AN ADDITIONAL BOOT. I DISPUTED THIS FRAUD AND WAS DENIED VALIDATION, DESPITE NO PAKING SIGNS ON THE STREET AND NO REAL PARTY IN INTEREST. I LET THIS GO AND THE NEXT MONTH ADDITIONAL NYC DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE CRIMINALS ASSAULTD ME AGAIN WITH MORE FRAUD BECAUSE OF JUDGE CAROL AMON’S DERELICTION OF JUDICIAL DUTIES AND REFUSAL TO SIGN A NEEDED RESTRAINING ORDER

EXHIBIT 17 THIS IS PART OF THE NYC DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE MONTHLY, UNREGULATED AND ONGOING, PATCHED, UP FRAUD, EXTORTION AND HARASSMENT DUE TO JUDGE CAROL AMON’S MALICIOUS, ABUSIVE, NEGLIGENT, DO NOTHING BEHAVIOR DISREGARDING A NEEDED AND MERITORIOUS RESTRAINING ORDER AGAINST THESE NYC DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE CRIMINALS

EXHIBIT 18

 

  



 



THE EXTORTION WILL BE STOPPED. THE BELOW INFORMATION IS FOR A FORTHCOMING MOTION TO DISMANTLE THIS REPLICATED CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE UNRESTRAINED ORGANIZED FRAUD, EXTORTION AND HARASSMENT DUE TO JUDGE CAROL AMON’S COMPLICITY. THE MOTION WILL BE FILED PURSUANT TO: 4th Amendment: The cameras scan the license plate and run the MVD data (personal information) of every motorist in NYS that passes by them, tracking people like cattle. This is an unwarranted search. 5th Amendment: Photo tickets demand a fine be paid, or you face the seizure of capital and possessions without offering due process. It’s simply a rubber stamp by an employee of the company who is collecting the fine. 6th Amendment: There is no way to exercise your right to face your accuser, when the accuser is an unmanned machine. 7th Amendment: There is no option for a trial because they’ve taken that right away from you with photo tickets, 14th Amendment: Two sets of standards have been created for the same offenses. Red light and speed camera tickets are treated completely differently by the courts, which is a clear violation of your right to equal protection under the laws. There is no certifiable witness to the alleged violation. A picture may be worth a thousand words, but it may also take a thousand words to explain what the picture really means. Even in those rare instances where a law enforcement officer is overseeing a ticket camera, it is highly unlikely that the officer would recall the supposed violation. For all practical purposes, there is no "accuser" for motorists to confront, which is a constitutional right. There is no one that can personally testify to the circumstances of the alleged violation, and just because a camera unit was operating properly when it was set up does not mean it was operating properly when the picture was taken of any given vehicle. And no machine can replace a sworn peace officer conducting traffic stops. The NMA opposes the use of photographic devices to issue tickets. With properly posted speed limits and properly installed traffic-control devices, there is no need for ticket cameras. They can actually make our roads less safe. 1) Ticket cameras do not improve safety. Despite the claims of companies that sell ticket cameras and provide related services, there is no independent verification that photo enforcement devices improve highway safety, reduce overall accidents, or improve traffic flow. Believing the claims of companies that sell photo enforcement equipment or municipalities that use this equipment is like believing any commercial produced by a company that is trying to sell you something. 2) There is no certifiable witness to the alleged violation. A picture may be worth a thousand words, but it may also take a thousand words to explain what the picture really means. Even in those rare instances where a law enforcement officer is overseeing a ticket camera, it is highly unlikely that the officer would recall the supposed violation. For all practical purposes, there is no "accuser" for motorists to confront, which is a constitutional right. There is no one that can personally testify to the circumstances of the alleged violation, and just because a camera unit was operating properly when it was set up does not mean it was operating properly when the picture was taken of any given vehicle. 3) Ticket recipients are not adequately notified. Most governments using ticket cameras send out tickets via first class mail. There is no guarantee that the accused motorists will even receive the ticket, let alone understands it and know how to respond. However, the government makes the assumption that the ticket was received. If motorists fail to pay, it is assumed that they did so on purpose, and a warrant may be issued for their arrest. 4) The driver of the vehicle is not positively identified. Typically, the photos taken by these cameras do not identify the driver of the offending vehicle. The owner of the vehicle is mailed the ticket, even if the owner was not driving the vehicle and may not know who was 31



driving at the time. The owner of the vehicle is then forced to prove his or her innocence, often by identifying the actual diver who may be a family member, friend or employee. 5) Ticket recipients are not notified quickly. People may not receive citations until days or sometimes weeks after the alleged violation. This makes it very difficult to defend oneself because it would be hard to remember the circumstances surrounding the supposed violation. There may have been a reason that someone would be speeding or in an intersection after the light turned red. Even if the photo was taken in error, it may be very hard to recall the day in question. 6) These devices discourage the synchronization of traffic lights. When red light cameras are used to make money for local governments, these governments are unlikely to jeopardize this income source. This includes traffic-light synchronization, which is the elimination of unneeded lights and partial deactivation of other traffic lights during periods of low traffic. When properly done, traffic-light synchronization decreases congestion, pollution, and fuel consumption. 7) Cameras do not prevent most intersection accidents. Intersection accidents are just that, accidents. Motorists do not casually drive through red lights. More likely, they do not see a given traffic light because they are distracted, impaired, or unfamiliar with their surroundings. Even the most flagrant of red light violators will not drive blithely into a crowded intersection, against the light. Putting cameras on poles and taking pictures will not stop these kinds of accidents. 8) There are better alternatives to cameras. If intersection controls are properly engineered, installed, and operated, there will be very few red light violations. From the motorists' perspective, government funds should be used on improving intersections, not on ticket cameras. Even in instances where cameras were shown to decrease certain types of accidents, they increased other accidents. Simple intersection and signal improvements can have lasting positive effects, without negative consequences. Cities can choose to make intersections safer with sound traffic engineering or make money with ticket cameras. Unfortunately, many pick money over safety. 9) Ticket camera systems are designed to inconvenience motorists. Under the guise of protecting motorist privacy, the court or private contractor that sends out tickets often refuses to send a copy of the photo to the accused vehicle owner. This is really because many of the photos do not clearly depict the driver or the driver is obviously not the vehicle owner. Typically, the vehicle owner is forced to travel to a courthouse or municipal building to even see the photograph, an obvious and deliberate inconvenience meant to discourage ticket challenges. 10) Taking dangerous drivers' pictures doesn't stop them. Photo enforcement devices do not apprehend seriously impaired, reckless or otherwise dangerous drivers. A fugitive could fly through an intersection at 100 mph and not even get his picture taken, as long as the light was green!

EXHIBIT 19 THIS IS A LIST OF THE EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO JUDGE CAROL AMON ILLUSTRATING THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE’S ONGOING AND CURTAILABLE CRIMES HAD A RESTRAINNG ORDER BEEN RENDERED. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------X MIRIAM SNYDER, PRO SE PLAINTIFF CASE NO. INDEX OF EXHIBITS -VDIANA BEINART, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND GENERAL COUNSELOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, DAISY M. ALVERIO, ATTORNEY FOR THE NYC DEPT OF FINANCE LEGAL AFFAIRS DIVISION PARKING ENFORCEMENT UNIT, THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE PARKING AND VEHICLES DIVISION, THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE PARKING VIOLATIONS DIVISION, THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND THE NYC DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE DEFENDANTS/DEBT COLLECTORS/FICTITIOUS CREDITORS -----------------------------------------------------------------X EXHIBITS DESCRIPTIONS 1. THE TWO NAMELESS RECEIPTS THAT WERE GIVEN TO PLAINTIFF FOR THE EXTORTION. THIS EXHIBIT HAS TWO ATTACHMENTS, WHICH ARE 1A AND 1B, 2. THE DEFENDNATS ILLUSION OF LEGALITY AND UNLAWFUL SIMULATION OF PROCESS JUDGMENT EXECUTION, 3. DEFENDANTS NOTICE STATING CERTAIN MONEY IS EXEMPT FROM THEIR FICTITIOUS JUDGMENT EXECUTION SCAM, 4. DEFENDNATS BRIGHT YELLOW SLANDER THAT WAS PLACED ON PLAINTIFF’S CAR TO FURTHER EMBARRASS ABOVE THE CRIMINAL BOOT ON THE CAR, 5. PLAINTIFF’S LICENSE, A DMV RECORD SHOWING NONE, MEANING NO RESTICTIONS, NO PARKING VIOLATIONS JUDGMENT ON LICENSE SINCE AUGUST 2014. 6. THE NYS DEPARTMENT OF STATE JUDGMENT AND LIEN SEARCH SHOWING NO VALID JUDGMENT ON ANY OF THE PLAINTIFF’S RECORDS, 7. THIS IS A LETTER PLAINTIFF WROTE TO THE UCC OFFICE SEEKING CLARITY TO DISMANTLE ORGANIZED FRAUD REGARDING JUDGMENT SEARCHES. 8. PICTURE OF THE DEFENDANTS CRIMINAL, MALICIOUS AND RETALITORY BOOT ON PLINTIFF’S CAR, 9. PICTURE OF THE DEFENDANTS CRIMINAL, MALICIOUS AND RETALITORY SLANDER NOTICE ON PLAINTIFF’S CAR, 10. LETTER FROM THE DEFENDNATS LAW DEPARTMENT DISCONTINUNG A TAX EXTORTION CASE AFTER ONE YEAR OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS FIGHTING OFF SIMILAR ORGANIZED FRAUD EMBEDDED IN AN INVALID, UNSEEN, NOT RECORDED ANYWHERE, CRIMINAL ALLEGED TAX WARRANT. 11. LETTER FROM THE DEFENDANTS LAW DEPARTMENT DISCONTINUNG A TAX EXTORTION CASE AFTER ONE YEAR OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS FIGHTING OFF SIMILAR ORGANIZED FRAUD EMBEDDED IN AN INVALID, UNSEEN, NOT RECORDED ANYWHERE, CRIMINAL ALLEGED TAX WARRANT. 12. THIS IS THE DEFENDANTS VOODOO KING ACTOR WHO IS LISTED AS THE DEFENDANT’S COMMISSIONER WHILE HE WORKS FULL TIME AT BLACK ENTERPRISE. 13. THIS IS THE DEFENDANTS ACTOR SCRIPT FOR THEIR INVISIBLE AND UNAVAILABLE BLACK ENTERPRISE CEO. 14. THIS IS THE DEFENDANTS POWER CHART SHOWING BEINART AS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND GENERAL COUNSELOR FOR THE AGENCY, 33

15. THIS IS THE DEFENDANT BEINART CONTACT AND NETWORK WTH HIS BOSS, THE SATANIST, EUGENICIST AND SCAM ARTIST BOYDEN GRAY WHO IS RUNNING THIS WHOLE CORRUPTION, EXTORTION AND JUDGMENT FRAUD OPERATION. PETER BEINART IS DEFENDANT DIANA BEINART’S HUSBAND. 16. THIS IS A RECORD OF DEFENDANT DIANA BEINART’S FRAUDULENT ATTORNEY REGISTRATION STATUS, WHICH STATES THAT HER REGISTRATION IS DUE ONE DAY IN THE FUTURE AND NOT TODAY OR NOW, WHILE SHE IS HOLDING A POWERFUL POSITION BASED ON THIS FRAUD, 17. THIS IS ANOTHER RECORD OF DEFENDANT DIANA BEINART’S FRAUDULENT ATTORNEY REGISTRATION STATUS, WHICH STATES THAT HER REGISTRATION IS DUE ONE DAY IN THE FUTURE AND NOT TODAY OR NOW, WHILE SHE IS HOLDING A POWERFUL POSITION BASED ON THIS FRAUD, 18. THIS IS DEFENDANT ALVERIO’S ATTORNEY REGISTRATION RECORD SHOWING HER AS A GRADUATE FROM DAKE IN 1988, BACK IN 1988, DRAKE WAS A SECRETARIAL SCHOOL. NOT A LAW SCCHOOL. PLAINTIFF SEEKS AN INVESTIGATION INTO HER LAW SCHOOL IMPERSONATION OR FRAUD LIKE DEFENDANT BEINART, 19. THIS IS PLANTIFF’S CERTIFICATION AS AN ADAAA ADVOCATE WHICH IS AUTHORITY TO ADVOCATE AGAINST INJUSTICES WITH THE PROTECTION OF NO IMMUNITY FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS WHO USE THEIR POSITION TO UNDERMINE THE LAW, 20. THIS IS THE CLAIMANT MIRIAM SNYDER’S COPY OF THE CARD’S RECEIPT USED TO PAY THE EXTORTION FEES. THIS RECEIPT SHOWS THE RESPONDENTS’ FRAUDULENT AGENCY NAME CHANGE AGAIN. THIS RECEIPT NAMES THE DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT AGENCY AS BOOT RELEASENYC 9085956900 NJ. THIS DEFENDANT FRAUDUENT AGENCY NAME BRINGS THE CRIMES TO OUT OF STATE TO NEW JERSEY, IN A MOST EXTORTIONISTIC AND CONSPIRATORIAL MANNER. SO FAR THE EXTORTIONISTS HAVE USED THE FOLLOWING FRAUDULENT AGENCY NAMES, YET NOT ONE OF THE BELOW FRAUDULENT NAMES IS ON THE RECEIPT GIVEN TO CLAIMANT ATTACHED AS EXHIBITS 1A AND 1B. BELOW ARE THE MULTIPLE FRAUDULENT AGENCY NAMES USED IN THIS EXTORTION OF EXEMPT MONEY CASE: A. BOOT RELEASENYC 9085956900, EXHIBIT 20 B. NYC DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE; FRAUDULENT NAME FOR JUDGMENT SCAM, EXHIBIT 2 C. STATE OF NEW YORK: FRAUDULENT NAME FOR JUDGMENT SCAM, EXHIBIT 2 D. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK: FRAUDULENT NAME FOR JUDGMENT SCAM, EXHIBIT 2 E. CITY OF NEW YORK: FRAUDULENT NAME FOR JUDGMENT SCAM, EXHIBIT 4 F. NO NAME, EXHIBIT 1A AND 1B. 21. RESPONDENTS’ UNCONSTITUTIONAL SEIZURE OF HER LICENSE, ABUSE OF PROCESS, HARASSMENT, CIVIL RIGHTS OBSTRUCTIONS, NO DUE PROCESS PRIOR TO SEIZURE 22. RESPONDENT AGENTS PHONE HARASSMENT 23. RESPONDENT AGENTS TCPA, TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT VIOLATIONS 24. ADDITIONAL RESPONDENT AGENT TCPA VIOLATIONS 25. NOTICE OF CLAIM FILED WITH THE NYC COMPTROLLER

EXHIBIT 20 THE FOLLOWING EXHIBISTS ARE SOME OF THE EXHIBITS SUBMITED TO JUDGE CAROL AMON SHOWING CLEAR CUT ORGANIZED FRAUD EXTORTION CRIMES. JUDGE CAROL AMON DISREGARDED THE CRIMES AT THE EXPENSE OF MY SAFETY, LIFE, LIBERTY AND HEALTH THE BELOW IS THE NO NAME $1200.00 EXTORTION RECEIPT GIVEN TO ME FOR THE $1200.00 I PAID TO GET MY CAR OUT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE LAW DEPARTMENT LED NO DUE PROCESS FRAUDULENT JUDGMENT CREATION AND ILLUSION OF LEGALITY SCAM. PLEASE NOTE ALSO, NO WHERE ON THE EXTORTION RECEIPT IS THERE ANY NAME OR MENTION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND OR THEIR CONTACT INFORMATION. THIS IS A CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE BONAFIDE PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY SCAM THAT LANDS INNOCENT PEOPLE DEAD, DEVOURED AND DESTROYED BY CRIMINAL DESIGN. PLEASE HELP DISMANTLE THIS DECEPTIVE AND CRIMINAL PROGRAMMING.

EXHIBIT 21 THE NO NAME DEFENDANTT AND PLANTIFF RECEIPT IS EXECUTED TO HIDE WHO IS GETTING THIS RACKET MONEY THE BELOW IS THE NO NAME $1200.00 EXTORTION RECEIPT GIVEN TO ME FOR THE $1200.00 I PAID TO GET MY CAR OUT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE LAW DEPARTMENT LED NO DUE PROCESS FRAUDULENT JUDGMENT CREATION AND ILLUSION OF LEGALITY SCAM. PLEASE NOTE ALSO, NO WHERE ON THE EXTORTION RECEIPT IS THERE ANY NAME OR MENTION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND OR THEIR CONTACT INFORMATION. THIS IS A CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE BONAFIDE PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY SCAM THAT LANDS INNOCENT PEOPLE DEAD, DEVOURED AND DESTROYED BY CRIMINAL DESIGN. PLEASE HELP DISMANTLE THIS DECEPTIVE AND CRIMINAL PROGRAMMING.

EXHIBIT 22 THIS IS THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE LAW DEPARTMENT LED ILLUSION OF LEGALITY INVALID, FRAUD BASED, NO DUE PROCESS, NO NOTICE, NO PROOF OF SERVICE, NO EVIDENCE, HOMEMADE CREATED VOID JUDGMENT ACTING AS AUTHORITY TO STEAL, ROB, EXORT, SEIZE, BOOT, AND MAKE PEOPLE HOMELESS. THIS FRAUD WAS USED TO STEAL OVER $1200.00 DOLLARS FROM ME, TO BOOT MY CAR, TO DEFAME ME, AND THIS TYPE OF SLAVE TREATMENT FRAUD IS BEING USED TO EXTORT AND ROB BILLIONS OF DOLLARS FROM NEW YORKERS AND IS BEING USED TO KILL INNOCENT PEOPLE. NOTE THE NAME HERE IS THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

EXHIBIT 23 THIS IS THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE DOCUMENT SHOWING THAT THE CRIMINALS KNEW PENSIONS AND OTHER FUNDS WERE EXEMPT FROM THEIR FRAUDULENT JUDGMENT, DENIAL OF ALL DUE PROCESS, AND EXTORTION SCAM. I SEEK THE IMMEDIATE RETURN OF MY EXEMPTED OVER $1200.00 .

EXHIBIT 24 THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE NAME CHANGED AGAIN, THIS TIME IT CHANGED TO THE CITY OF NEW YORK. THIS BRIGHT PAPER WAS CRIMINALLY POSTED ON MY CAR DOOR TO FURTHER HARASS, DEFAME AND EMBARRASS BASED ON THIS CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE FRAUDULENT JUDGMENT CREATION AND NO DUE PROCESS SCAM

EXHIBIT 25 THIS IS A PICTURE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE CRIMINAL BOOT ON A NEW CAR, NOT EVEN 500 MILES, I AM RENTING, BASED ON THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE NO DUE PROCESS, INVALID, NON ENFORCEABLE, NON EXISTENT, ILLUSION OF LEGALITY, FRAUD BASED, MALICIOUSLY CRAFTED, CRIMINAL JUDGMENT SIMILATION. PLEASE NOTE THESE CRIMINAL ILLUSIIONS OF LEGALITY JUDGMENT SIMILATIONS ARE BEING USED THROUGH OUT NYS TO STEAL PEOPLES MONEY, HOMES AND TO DESTROY FAMILIES.

EXHIBIT 26 THIS IS A PICTURE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE CRIMINAL BOOT ON A NEW CAR, NOT EVEN 500 MILES, I AM RENTING. THE LAWLESS BOOT WAS PLACED ON MY CAR BASED ON THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE NO DUE PROCESS, INVALID, NON ENFORCEABLE, NON EXISTENT, ILLUSION OF LEGALITY, FRAUD BASED, MALICIOUSLY CRAFTED, CRIMINAL JUDGMENT SIMILATION.

EXHIBIT 27 THIS IS THE DEFENDNATS ALLEGED HAITIAN COMMISSIONER OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE. HE WORKS FULL TIME AS CEO OF BLACK ENTERPRISE. READ THE BELOW LINK. IS HE A BLACK FRONT, TO HIDE THE FACT THAT THIS AGENCY IS DESTROYNG PEOPLE? IS THIS BOYDEN GRAY’S VOODOO KING, SENT TO COMPLIMENT DEFENDNAT BEINART SATANIC CULT? ARE NYC AGENCIES BEING PLANTED WITH SATANISTS FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF ATTEMPTING TO OVERTHROW THE GOVERNMENT VIA NO DUE PROCESS, FALSE CLAIMS, CRIMINALLY SIMULATED COURT DOCUMENTS, OPPRESSION AND DESTRUCTION, CONSISTENT WITH SATANIC TEACHNGS? IS THIS MAN SUPERMAN OR THE ONLY ALLEGED QUALIFIED MAN FOR DEFENDNATS COMMISSIONER’S JOB? YOU BE THE JUDGE http://www.blackenterprise.com/management/jacques-jiha/

THE SATANIC CULT MEMBERS SELL THEIR SOULS FOR THEIR WEALTH FOR LIFE MOTTO

DOES A JAQUES JIHA EVEN EXIST? ARE THESE CRIMINALS SENDING ACTORS WITH CONSPIRED IMPERSONATION PAPERS TO USURP AUTHORITY OVER THE GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES OF SOME OF THE NATIONS’ AND NYC HIGHEST PAID AGENCIES? THE SATANC WEALTH FOR LIFE MOTO IS PART OF THEIR SOUL EXCHANGE AND IS ACHIEVED AT THE EXPENSE OF OPPRESSING, INFESTING AND DESTROYING OTHERS CONSISTENT WITH WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO HAITI? 42

EXHIBIT 28 THE ALLEGED HAITIAN COMMISSIONER OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE WORKS FULL TIME AS CEO OF BLACK ENTERPRISE. IS HE A BLACK FRONT, TO HIDE THE FACT THAT THIS AGENCY IS DESTROYNG PEOPLE? HIS ABSENCE ALLOWS EUGENICISTS AND CULT MEMBERS INFINITE USURPATION AND CORRUPTION POWERS. http://www.blackenterprise.com/management/jacques-jiha/

EXHIBIT 29 MEET THE SATNISTS WIFE DIANA BEINART. PLEASE SEE EXHIBIT 15. THE UNAVAILABLE DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER, ALLOWS DEFENDANT BEINART TO USURP AUTHORITY SHE DOES NOT HAVE AND ALLOW DEMON FORCES TO CONTROL THE AGENCY, AS EXEMPLIFIED IN THIS MATTER. SHE IS RUNNING THE AGENCY UNDER PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY WITH INTENT TO OVERTHROW CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS TO INDUCE OPPRESSION AND DESTROY INNOCENT PEOPLE WITH HER JUDGMENT EXECUTION FRAUD AND CRIMINAL SIMULATIONS, COUPLED WITH DENIED DUE PROCESS AND EXTORTION. HER MANUFACTURED JUDGMENT SHAM IS BEING USED AS AN EXTORTION WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION REQUIRING PUBLIC SAFETY REGULATION. https://www1.nyc.gov/html/dof/downloads/pdf/org_chart/orgchart.pdf

EXHIBIT 30 DEFENDANT DIANA BEINART IS MARRIED TO SATANIST

PETER BEINART, WHO IS SATANIST BOYDEN GRAY’S HIT MAN. BOYDEN GRAY PUT THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL SEIZURE AND EXTORTION HIT ON PLAINTIFF THROUGH DIANA BEINART’S LAWLESS JOB AS UNREGISTERED GENERAL COUNSELOR.

Diana Hartstein, Peter Beinart http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/26/style/weddings-celebrations-diana-hartstein-peter-beinart.html

1. How Peter Beinart Defends the Repulsive Views of the ...

peter-beinart-defends-the-repulsive-views-...

pjmedia.com/.../howo PJ Media

Dec 31, 2013 - According to Source Watch, it is an ad hoc group that includes C. Stephen P. Cohen, and William A. Nitze. 2. The anti-Semitic Jew Max Blumenthal, and what Peter ... www.theblogmocracy.com/.../the-anti-semitic-jew-max-blumenthal-and-...

Jan 7, 2014 - As we all know- and includes C. 3.

Boyden Gray, Charles Freeman,

Peter Beinart fails to comprehend- the new ....Watch, it is an ad hoc group that

Boyden Gray, Charles Freeman.

Peter Beinart › 2.0: The Blogmocracy

www.theblogmocracy.com/tag/

peter-beinart/

o The anti-Semitic Jew Max Blumenthal, and what

Peter Beinart thinks about his ... C.Boyden

Gray, Charles Freeman, Stephen P. Cohen, and William A. Nitze. 4. Allan Gregg in Conversation (Audio) - Apple https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/allan-gregg.../id205734182?... o o iTunes Political pundit

Peter Beinart believes a return to the historical roots of liberalism ... Ted Fishman is the author of ..... JosephBoyden

"Shock of Gray", which looks at potential global talks about his novel "Three Day Road", which tells the story of ... 5. Allan Gregg in Conversation (Video) - Apple https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/allan-gregg.../id366974778?... o iTunes Political pundit Peter Beinart believes a return to the historical roots of liberalism ... Ted Fishman is the author of "Shock of Gray", which looks at potential global ..... JosephBoyden talks about his novel "Three Day Road", which tells the story of ... 6. memeorandum: Democrats Can't Keep Playing Not to Lose ... www.memeorandum.com/141106/p71 o

Nov 6, 2014 - Peter Beinart / The Atlantic Online: ... Peter Hamby / CNN: .... By — Orrin G. Hatch And C. Boyden Gray — After the 2006 midterm elections ... 7. RealClearPolitics November 3, 2014 - November 9, 2014 ... www.realclearpolitics.com/am_update/2014/45/ o RealClearPolitics Nov 3, 2014 - Why the Blowout Is So Scary for Democrats -

Peter Beinart, The ... High Court Can End Fraudulent

Boyden Gray,

Payouts in BP Case IBD 8. Zionism, Health Care and the Illiberalism of Progressive Minds www.realclearpolitics.com/.../zionism_health_care_and_... o RealClearPolitics Apr 8, 2012 -

Boyden Gray: High Court Can End Fraudulent Payouts in BP Case ... By this measure, Peter

Beinart's new book, “The Crisis of Zionism,” which ... 9. December - Foreign Press Centers - US Department of State 2002-2009-fpc.state.gov/c24631.htm o --12/18/07 Report from Bali and The Way Forward ; C.

Boyden Gray, U.S. ... Impact on the American

Peter Beinart,

Voter; Senior Fellow for U.S. Foreign Policy, ... 10. Search results for "kirk" | Page 2 | The American Conservative www.theamericanconservative.com/.../2/?s... The American Conservative

Boyden Gray · March 12, 2014, 12:05 AM 35 Comments ...Peter Van Buren. The Conscience of a Benghazi Whistleblower ... We Can Build That. By C.

EXHIBIT 30A PLEASE TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE THAT BOYDEN GRAY IS CHIEF CRIMINAL AND JUDGE JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER EUGENICIST PARTNER. THEY WORK TOGETHER AS EUGENICISTS, SATANISTS AND KILLERS. THEY SPECIALIZE IN THE CRIMINAL USE OF EUGENICS TO KILL, INFEST REGIONAL POPULATIONS AND PEOPLE, USURP POSITIONS AND AUTHORITY THEY COULD NEVER GET ON THEIR OWN MERIT OR COMPETENCE. PLESE READ THE BELOW CRIMINAL REPORTS. FEBRUARY 12, 2015 CRIMINAL REPORT EUGENICISTS JONATHAN LIPPMAN AND BOYDEN GRAY CRIMINALLY CONSPIRED EUGENIC FUNDING SOURCES, MULTIBILLION DOLLAR AGENCY USURPATIONS, EXTERMINATION OF COMPETENT LEADERSHIP, CREATED TOP LEADERSHIP VACANCY TO SEND IN MASSACRE DEMON RULERSHIP SPIRITS, EFFECTUATING INVISIBLE EVIL LEADERSHIP, DISGUISED AS THE LAW DEPARTMENT, EMBEZZLEMENT OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS RESERVED FOR THEIR EUGENIC KILLING PROJECTS, AGENCY DYSFUNTIONALISM, OBSTRUCTED RULES, REGULATIONS, POLICIES, MONEY DIVERTED TO IMPERSONATION AGENCIES, EUGENIC KILLING PROJECT FUNDED, RANDOM MEDICAL CENTERS OPEN WITH UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER CREATED LETHAL AND INFECTIOUS INJECTIONS TO BE INJECTED IN THE TARGETED HUMAN RACE, LGBT COMMNUNITY, MINORITIES, POOR PEOPE, ETC. http://endorganizedcrimeuniverse.com/assets/download/NOTARIZED_W_LINKS___FEBRUARY_2015_REGIONAL_KILL ER_BOYDEN_GRAY_AND_JONATTHAN_LIPPMA_EUGENIC_KILLING__FUNDING_SOURCE.pdf OR http://issuu.com/prayerwarriorsneeded/docs/notarized__february_2015_regional_k CRIMINAL REPORT JANUARY 2015 UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER EUGENICISTS CONTINUED UNREGULATED DEADLY PATHOGEN ADMINISTRATION PROGRAMS UNDER THE DISGUISE OF THE LGBT MOVEMENT AND THE JUDICIARY http://endorganizedcrimeuniverse.com/assets/download/MAILED_NOTARIZED_JANUARY_5_2014_CRIMINAL_REPORT __UNIVERSITY_OF_ROCHESTER_EUGENICISTS_GARY_ENGLISH__BOYDEN_GRAY__JONATHAN_LIPPMAN.pdf JANUARY 2015 CRIMINAL REPORT UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER EUGENICISTS 2015 INJECTION MASSACRE SCHEDULED CRIMINAL REPORT JANUARY 2015 UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER CONTINUED UNREGULATED EUGENIC KILLING PROJECTS, JONATHAN LIPPMAN, BOYDEN GRAY AND GARY ENGLISH

http://issuu.com/prayerwarriorsneeded/docs/finalee_criminal_report_december_31/0 OR http://1drv.ms/1HQUDYV

OR https://www.scribd.com/doc/251605859/THE-UNIVERSITY-OF-ROCHESTER-EUGENICISTS-AND-THEIR2015-KILLING-PROJECTS-MASKED-AS-RESEARCH?secret_password=D6MWUHMhHV1h1zy1yo8e

EXHIBIT 31 DIANA BEINART’S FRAUDULENT ATTORNEY REGISTRATION STATUS AND NUMBER 2969327 http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/attorney/AttorneySearch#search_result

EXHIBIT 32 DIANA BEINART’S FRAUDULENT ATTORNEY REGISTRATION STATUS AND NUMBER 2969327

EXHIBIT 33 THIS IS DAISY ALVERIO ALLEGED ATTORNEY REGISTRATION NUMBER 2216422 HER ATTENDANCE AT DRAKE IS QUESTIONABLE DRAKE WAS A SECRETARIAL SCHOO IN 1988, NOT A LAW SHOOL. THIS REQUIRES INVESTIGATION

Exhibit 34 Posted at:http://issuu.com/prayerwarriorsneeded/docs/criminally_coerced_carol_amon_volun UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK _____________________________________________________X CASE NO 15-CV-00626

MIRIAM SNYDER,

NOTICE OF CRIMINALLY COERCED VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) AND DUE TO JUDGE CAROL AMON’S UNREGULATED DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS, JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT AND UNREGULATED AND ONGOING CRIMINALITIES

PRO SE PLAINTIFF, -VDIANA BEINART, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND GENERAL COUNSELOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, DAISY M. ALVERIO, ATTORNEY FOR THE NYC DEPT OF FINANCE LEGAL AFFAIRS DIVISION PARKING ENFORCEMENT UNIT, THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE PARKING AND VEHICLES DIVISION, THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE PARKING VIOLATIONS DIVISION, THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND THE NYC DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE DEFENDANTS/DEBT COLLECTORS/FICTITIOUS CREDITORS ________________________________________________x Now comes Miriam Snyder NOTICING THE COURT OF JUDGE CAROL AMON’S JUDICIALLY MASTERMINDED NO DUE PROCESS CRIMINALLY COERCED VOLUNTARY DISMISSALWITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Miriam Snyder hereby gives notice that the above captioned action is dismissed, WITHOUT PREJUDICE against the defendants in this court due to Judge Amon’s criminal due process scheme to defraud Pro Se funds scam, her dereliction of duty, disregard of the case, more specific, her willful disregard of the emergencies noted in the Plaintiff’s Order to Show Cause, her doing nothing after 5 months, after assigning a case number and getting Pro Se funding. Judge Amon has engaged in conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts and has become in this matter unable to discharge the duties of the judicial office. 51

Plaintiff has waited patiently and has contacted the judge’s chambers on several occasions seeking the status and adjudication of the above case and was told she will get to it. I, Miriam Snyder filed this case February 6, 2015. Today is June 23, 2015, five months later, and Judge Amon still has done nothing to adjudicate, serve defendants, administer justice, due process, and or the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts in this matter. Her conduct of doing nothing while utilizing Pro Se billing entries is criminal, exemplifies laziness, is prejudicial, discriminatory, malicious and offensive. February 6, 2015 Plaintiff submitted to the court the below documents that have been totally disregarded by Judge Carol Amon without reason, cause, and or explanation. The documents submitted were: 1. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

PAGE 1

2. VERIFIED COMPLAINT

3. VERIFICATION OF COMPLAINT

4. INDEX OF EXHIBITS

5. EXHIBITS 1-25

47D

6. AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT

7. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Due to Judge Amon’s criminal practices and willful neglect of this matter, the Defendants crimes have escalated while Judge Amon has ignored her judicial duties to adjudicate, administer any justice in this matter. There has been no decision even on serving the Defendants the complaint. The Defendants have not been served because of Judge Amon’s ongoing disdain of law and order and dereliction of judicial duties. Judge Amon’s dereliction of judicial duties has effectuated further and unregulated Defendant damage and harassment infliction on Plaintiff Miriam Snyder. Please see the attached 35 exhibits. Plaintiff is dismissing this matter in this court because of Judge Amon’s criminal misconduct, malicious denial of due process, prejudicial, lazy, and do Nothing behavior, at the expense of the Defendants unregulated assaults on Plaintiff. Plaintiff files this dismissal because Judge Carol Amon has engaged in criminal misconduct that is prejudicial to and obstructs the effective and expeditious administration of justice, due process and the business of the courts by doing nothing in this matter despite having a judicial canonical duty to adjudicate and move the case forward. Judge Amon’s do nothing conduct, except securing funding under Pro Se status, epitomizes her use of the court house as a gangster playground for free Pro Se funding while doing nothing. This further illustrates her criminal abuse and disrespect for tax payer’s money and her abuse and disrespect for Plaintiff’s right to due process. Above all, Judge Amon’s failure to administer anything, much more justice, in this matter, exemplifies her inability to discharge the duties of the judicial office and her failure to administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor . Judge Amon has faithfully refused to discharge and perform any of the duties incumbent upon her under the Constitution and laws of the United States. Her criminal behavior in this case obstructed the effective and expeditious administration of justice, due process, and the business of the courts. 52

Judge Amon’s behavior has advanced safety risks in the Plaintiff’s life based on her continuous disregard of the Defendant conspiracy against rights crimes against the Plaintiff. Judge Amon’s do nothing lazy behaviors: (1) have offended public policy as defined by statutes FDCPA, ADAAA, etc., Common Law, and otherwise; (2) were and are immoral, unethical, oppressive, and unscrupulous; and (3) substantially injures consumers. Judge Amon has willfully denied consumers such as Plaintiff equal access to the courts. Judge Carol Amon’s prejudicial and unsound judicial do nothing acts other than get Pro Se funding requires the filing of this dismissal without prejudice as Judge Amon has acted as an enemy to justice and the Plaintiff. Judge Carol Amon has deliberately invoked and administered prejudicial, negligent, unethical and harmful practices, behaviors and actions against Pro se litigants such as I, Miriam Snyder. In this matter, Judge Carol Amon has failed to perform judicial duties clearly inherent in the nature of adjudication as documented in the exhibits and below. Her deliberate Pro Se due process denials has effectuated violations of the below judicial canons:  Canon 1: A Judge Should Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary  Canon 2: A Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in All Activities  Canon 3: A Judge Should Perform the Duties of the Office Fairly, Impartially and Diligently Since Judge Amon’s dereliction of duty and failure to do anything in this matter, the criminals I sued are now further extorting and harassing me, Miriam Snyder with repeated unregulated, unfounded, malicious and contemptuous license suspensions despite the criminal’s claims being dismantled with prejudice. Additionally, I have been subjected to monthly harassment and extortion scams by these same criminals. Please see exhibits 4,5, and 8-17. I have been assaulted by these criminals monthly by their non-validated camera and parking ticket concoctions, and their erroneous driver license scam effectuating escalated auto insurance billings.

Judge Carol Amon has a malicious multifaceted tendency and history of criminally demising meritorious Pro Se cases in contravention to due process rights and the dictates of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 8. Please see her multitude of Pro Se case demises based on her criminal court of appeals due process denials based on income scam. Some of the cases are cited in Exhibit 1. In addition to her repeated, lazy, malicious, meritless, unauthentic, and appearing ghost written decision writing history, she uses her judicial position to bully, stab and turn the knife on poor Pro Se litigants by denying them equal access to the courts by repeatedly including in her malicious, reversed justice and lazy Orders the following denial of due process deliberate harm to the poor robot phrase: THAT ANY APPEAL FROM THIS ORDER WOULD NOT BE TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH AND THEREFORE IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS IS DENIED FOR PURPOSE OF AN APPEAL. SEE COPPEDGE V. UNITED STATES, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). She has turned the judicial decision making process into a factory where her Orders are ghost written, robot phrased, damaging, unsound, non-creative, malicious, meritless and bogus and she inflicts such on Pro Se litigants disproportionately. Judge Amon has not made any decision in this matter. Her criminal history of destroying meritorious Pro Se litigants complaints and her multifaceted criminal no due process scams is enough to cause any competent person to remove cases from her criminal domain. Her judicial practices are criminal and gangster.

Judge Carol Amon is criminally using her judicial position to invoke the above noted lawless robot phrase, regardless of the merits of the Pro Se case, to minimize meritorious appeals against her by Pro Se litigants on limited incomes. Please see: LOVELL v. CONSOLIDATED EDISON OF NEW YORK, INC ..., NOHA SHEHABELDIN, Plaintiff, -against UNITED STATES POSTAL INSPECTION SERVICE, and LEWIS BROOKS, Administrator ll-CV-5215 (CBA), Trimarco v. Data Treasury Corporation et al 14-CV 3213 (CBA), Cole v. Katz 04-CV 5217 (CBA), MILLER v. HOURIHANE, 08CV-2646 (CBA), ETC. Please see exhibit 1 and the link on the page showing over 500 Pro Se litigants assaulted by Judge Carol Amon’s repeated misconduct, rooted in abuse of power, prejudicial, discriminatory, meritless, robo phrased denial of equal access to the appeals courts based on income, to hide her attacks and erroneous decision making against Pro Se litigants and particularly poor people. Any reasonable person, knowing her judicial robot writing history and the relevant facts in this matter, would find that Judge Carol Amon’s history of maliciously demising meritorious Pro Se litigants cases, her do nothing behaviors effectuating her refusal to adjudicate this matter while securing Pro se Funds, renders her judicially unfit and unsound and such exemplifies judicial misconduct and disability. Judge Amon’s misconduct and repeated hateful acts toward Pro Se litigants obstructs public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary. Corrupt and incompetent judges acting as hit men and gangsters, specializing in judicial misconduct, rooted from criminal denials of due process while embezzling Pro Se funds, and using robot like, ghost written malicious decisions that further obstruct due process rights, need to be hauled off the bench in the interest of justice. For the reasons above, Plaintiff submits this Notice of this CRIMINALLY COERCEDVOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Judge Amon’s do nothing conduct has further harmed the Plaintiff, puts Plaintiff’s life and safety in unwarranted and unrestrained harm’s way via the Defendants ongoing lawlessness and criminal enjoinments of the Department of Motor vehicle, the police and Judge Carol Amon. Plaintiff can curtail the harm by getting away from this prejudice and unsound acting judge. Plaintiff submits this notice with 33 exhibits showing the Defendants escalated relentless, unwarranted, malicious, ongoing and criminal assaults on Miriam Snyder using the same extortion and scam tactics to cause Plaintiff unwarranted expenses based on computer printout fraud, non-validated claims, fictional administration, no real party in interest, and pure harassment. Judge Carol Amon’s criminal practices epitomize her complicity with the Defendants crimes Her Pro Se billing and embezzlement scam enforcement while obstructing her judicial duties to adjudicate this matter proudly show her criminal and gangster behaviors. In closing, Judge Carol Amon’s criminal conduct and denial of due process has forced and criminally coerced the Plaintiff to dismiss this case to get away from Judge Carol Amon’s criminal use of the judiciary to silence crimes and further victimize and harm crime victims. A judicial criminal complaint with the Second Circuit Court of Appeals has been filed against this criminal judge and such has been forwarded to Ministers of the Gospel of Jesus Christ across the nation, the U.S. Senate Judiciary, the NYS Governor, the NYS Attorney General, the NY FBI, police and the media.

XC: Andrew Cuomo, NYS Governor gov.cuomo@chamber.state.ny.usgovernor.andrew.cuomo@exec.ny State of New York, State Capitol FAX: 518-474-1513. Albany, NY 12224 Mr. Schneider, NYS Attorney General, nysattorneygeneral@public.govdelivery.com Fraud and Civil Rights Crimes Office of the Attorney General The Capitol Albany, NY 12224-0341 Preet Bharara United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York 86 Chambers Street, 3rd Floor New York, New York 10007 Fax: (212) 637-2750. United States Attorney's Office Eastern District of New York 271 Cadman Plaza East Brooklyn NY 11201 (718)254-7000/(718)254-7508 fax Attn: Chief, Civil Rights Unit Congressman Eliot Engle, Congressman_Engel@housemail.house.gov 3655 Johnson Avenue Bronx, NY 10463 Phone (718) 796-9700 Fax: (718)796-5134 NYC FBI, E-mail: ny1@ic.fbi.gov Fraud, Financial and Hate Crimes 26 Federal Plaza, 23rd Floor New York, NY 10278-0004 Phone: (212) 384-1000 AND Fax: (212) 384-4073 / 4074 William J. Bratton, Police Commissioner http://www.nyc.gov/html/mail/html/mailnypd.html NYC Police Department One Police Plaza NY, NY 10038 1-646-610-5000 FAXED AND EMAILED: https://democrats-oversight.house.gov/tipline Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, 2157 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 Phone: (202) 225-5074 Fax: (202) 225-3974

THE EXHIBITS ARE LOCATED AT THE BELOW LINK. UPDATED MAIL RECEIPT FOR 5 PAGE STATEMENT http://issuu.com/prayerwarriorsneeded/docs/linked_judge_carol_amon_judicial_co