SPA-M
SPA-M
Acknowledgements The past semester has been an extremely rewarding one in terms of learning and growing architecturally. It was also a very challenging period, what with the pandemic and the challenges that came with studying from home, but the college and the faculty have been extremely supportive during these trying times. We would like to thank them for their patience and persistence with us during online discussions and reviews, but more importantly their commitment to help us in spite of our inability to attend college. We would especially like to thank Asst. Prof. Srikanth K S (Class Co-Ordinator), Prof. Pramod M G (M.Arch Co-Ordinator), Director Prof. Dr. Chidambaraswamy sir and Ar. Naveen Mahantesh for all their guidance and help in completing this project.
SPA-M
SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
A SHWETHASHREE | PRIYANKA V KHADI | SHASHANK P S
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
A FUTURE READY AIRPORT CENTRIC INTEGRATED TOWNSHIP
SPA-M
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M
Mysore is one of the progressive Tier 2 cities of India where development is happening rapidly. According to a number of surveys being released by professional organizations across the country. Mysore regularly features in top 10 best cities to live in India. Shedding its image as a languid city renowned for being a pensioners paradise, the city has tripled its population over the past two decades. Mysore's proximity to the IT capital of India(Bangalore) has resulted in some of the latter's glow rubbing off on it. The other factors that have gone in favor of Mysore are the absence of oppressive traffic snarls, high quality of life at an affordable rate and near zero pollution. The city enjoys a status of a garden city and has a number of large parks, green features and lakes within the historic core as well as around the areas developed in the mid-80's. While CO2 of the city currently has manageable emissions at 0.94 tons/capita, the situation could be impacted if the city responds to the major developments haphazardly without a systematic and carbon critical approach towards the new development. Mysore Urban Development Authority(MUDA) is one of the largest supplier of infrastructure ready plots in Mysore. A number of such projects are designed in the past, and many more around the periphery are being implemented. MUDA identifies a site for development and plans and implements the infrastructure ready plotted neighborhoods like Vijay Nagar, R T Nagar etc.,.
SPA-M
“Aerotropolis occupies a very particular interstitial place outside the city that is both sprawling and super-secure, high-tech and suburban, a virtual police state and yet also a curiously open public space” SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Chapter 2 – Introduction to site 2.1 Contextual study of growth of Mysore city 2.2 Delineation of site boundary and site area 2.3 Proximity and regional context 2.4 Site features and SWOT Analysis 2.5 Imageability 2.6 Land use 2.7 Airport development control regulations
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Chapter 3 – Site analysis 3.1 Morphology 3.2 Land use and land cover 3.3 Mobility and transit 3.4 Hydrology 3.5 Blue and Green network 3.6 Economy and Commerce 3.7 Public Infrastructure 3.8 Site as layers
29 31 32 34 35 36 37 38
Chapter 4 – Design development 4.1 Edges as Delineators 4.2 Design geometry 4.3 Masterplan 1.0 4.4 Masterplan 2.0 4.5 Masterplan 3.0 4.6 Masterplan development process 4.7 Masterplan comparison
41 42 43 44 45 46 47
Chapter 5- Bye laws and Regulations 5.1 DCR Zones 5.2 Land use categories 5.3 Permitted land uses 5.4 Developmental control regulations 5.5 FAR Zones 5.6 Building height limits 5.7 Street design guidelines SPA-M 5.8 Street typologies and design factors 5.9 Design factors vs street typologies 5.10 Parking guidelines 5.11 Street elements guidelines 5.12 Public space guidelines
53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64
Chapter 6 – layers and Urban design moments 6.1 Land use 6.2 Sectors 6.3 UD Moment - Block design 6.4 Gateways and Corridors 6.5 UD Moment – Activated Urban Voids 6.6 Streets 6.7 UD Moment – Boulevards 6.8 Urban and Commercial centres 6.9 UD Moment – Plaza in commercial core 6.10 Green spaces 6.11 UD Moment – Stream green buffers 6.12 Mobility modes and Routes 6.13 Alternate Mobility modes and routes
SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
75 78 79 81 82 87 90 91 92 93 95 98 99
CONTENTS
DETAILS AND CONTENTS
Chapter 1 –Comparative case studies 1.1 City introduction – Memphis and Irving 1.2 Location w.r.t the city 1.3 Concepts and thrust areas 1.4 City w.r.t the Airport 1.5 Gateways and Corridors 1.6 Land use 1.7 Urban centers 1.8 Commercial centers 1.9 Transit modes and Paths 1.10 Alternate Transit modes and Paths 1.11 Green Infrastructure 1.12 Public Infrastructure 1.13 Important Takeaways 1.14 Sector Comparison – Chandigarh, Gandhinagar and Naya Raipur
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SPA-M
SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIES
SPA-M
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SPA-M
MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY
CITY OF IRVING
SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
CITY IINTRODUCTION
CITY OF IRVING COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED
MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY
SPA-M
Irving is a principal city in the U.S. state of Texas. Located in Dallas County, it is also an inner ring suburb of Dallas. The city of Irving is part of the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex. The city’s proximity to Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) International Airport ties Irving to the world’s major commercial centers, and makes it very attractive to international businesses and investors.
SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 03
Located at the nexus of population and transportation in the U.S., the Memphis region boasts distinct geographical advantages that support aerotropolis development. These advantages are highlighted by a leading air cargo hub capable of reaching a global market, as well as a central position along the nation’s inland waterway system, and its highway and rail networks.
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
LOCATION W.R.T THE CITY
CITY OF IRVING
COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED
MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY
SPA-M
The planning area is comprised of an approximately 50 square mile target zone surrounding MEM. Commonly referred to as “Airport City,” this is the core of Memphis Aerotropolis and the desired focus of aviation-related enterprises. The airport is situated in the southern portion of the city and is abutted by the city on the east, north and the west.
Irving’s location at the center of the DallasFort Worth Metroplex and adjacent to the DFW Airport is one of the city’s greatest assets. Irving is surrounded by adjacent jurisdictions, with little or no area left to expand its physical boundary. The city borders the DFW Airport, and the cities of Dallas, Grand Prairie, Fort Worth, Farmers Branch, Carrollton, and Coppell.
PAGE 04
The airport is situated to the western portion of the city and is abutted by the city on the North west.
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
COMMUNITY
CONNECTIONS
CONCEPTS AND THRUST AREAS COMPETITIVENESS
CENTERS
COLLABARATION
CITY OF IRVING
CONNECTIONS
THRUST AREAS SAFETY AND SECURITY
NEIGHBORHOOD LIVABILITY
WORKFORCE EDUCATION AND TRAINING
MOBILITY CORRIDORS OPEN SPACE LINKAGES
REINFORCE AND MARKET BRAND
BUSINESS NICHES AND SUPPLY CHAINS COMMERCIAL REDEVEOPMENT
CORRIDORS THRUST AREAS
The vision is to create regional jobs through the sustained economic and community development of Airport City. It recommends investment in liveable neighbourhoods, efficient infrastructure, targeted redevelopment, and a lead organizational entity. The hallmarks of success are the Four “C’s”: Community, Connection, Competitiveness, and Collaboration.
Our vision for Irving is a city with… 1. Centres, Corridors and Connections 2. A Focus on International Development 3. High-Quality Places to Live, Work and Play 4. Nature and Sustainability Are Integrated into All Areas of Life 5. A Strong Foundation of Health and Education 6. Opportunities for Future Generations to Thrive 7. A Robust, Innovative Business Environment 8. Diverse Cultures to Celebrate and Build On
In total, ten development principles are structured to achieve the four hallmarks of success – community, connections, competitiveness, and collaboration, and most of all, the vision of jobs for Memphians. These principles take into account a realistic assessment of existing conditions, an SPA-M analysis of development opportunities and constraints, and a full appreciation of local and regional assets. Most importantly, they are derived from extensive stakeholder and community input.
COMMUNITY
TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
HOUSING
COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED
MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY
EQUITY AND OPPORTUNITY
ENVIRONMENT, OPEN SPACES AND PARKS
ECONOMY
GREEN ECONOMY
SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 05
ORGANISATIONAL EFFICIENCY
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
CITY W.R.T THE AIRPORT
CITY OF IRVING
COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED
MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY
SPA-M
PAGE 06
The airport is situated in the heart of the Airport city signifying increased interaction between the two entities
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
The airport is situated in on the outer edge of the city signifying interaction limited to the western edge of the city
SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
GATEWAYS AND CORRIDORS
CITY OF IRVING COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED
MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY
Like in most American cities, the streets are aligned with the cardinal directions except when in conflict with natural features. SPA-M Both cities use the ideas of controlled access through use of gateways and dedicated corridors.
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 07
SPA-M
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
LAND USE
COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED
MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY
CITY OF IRVING
Land Use
Parks and Flood plain 4%
Water 3%
Vacant 28%
Infrastructur e 27%
Industrial 4% Institution al 3% Commercial
9%
Single family residential
17% Multi family residential
5%
SPA-M
PAGE 08
In terms of land use. Both cities follow similar concepts of locating commercial and institutional areas towards nodes. While residential is relegated away from High traffic streets.
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
URBAN CENTERS
CITY OF IRVING COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED
MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY
SPA-M
The main Urban centers are located at the intersection of important streets or modes of transport. Bellying the relationship between land use and transit. While in Memphis, the important urban corridors are bifurcated by the airport, In Irving SPA-M it becomes beneficial that the airport is outside the main mass of the city.
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 09
Examples of Urban centers from Memphis and Irving. While in Memphis it is dense and linear in nature, owing to the importance given to the road network, In Irving the pattern is more suburban in nature and spread out.
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
COMMERCIAL CENTERS
CITY OF IRVING
COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED
MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY
SPA-M
PAGE 10
Both cities follow a typology based classification of commercial areas with different areas catering to specific sectors. Proximity of certain sectors to the Airport becomes an important design consideration.
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
TRANSIT MODES AND PATHS
CITY OF IRVING COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED
MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY
The road pattern in Irving has a more pronounced suburban nature, while in Memphis it’s predominantly Grid Iron. The transit networks in both cities make use of multiple modes and paths enabling utmost coverage in terms of last mile connectivity. Irving has an increased level of proliferation in terms of Rail transit compared to Memphis. The anchor points for transit in both cities is none SPA-M the less the Airport.
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 11
SPA-M
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
ALTERNATIVE TRANSIT MODES AND PATHS
CITY OF IRVING
COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED
MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY
SPA-M
PAGE 12
Both cities have plans of expanding their bicycle route networks. While in Irving, trail paths are predominantly only in Greenspaces, In Memphis they permeate throughout the city connecting different parts of the city with each other.
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
CITY OF IRVING COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED
MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY
SPA-M
SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 13
Both cities have a stream network functioning as a border while also doubling as a Green corridor. Irving has a lesser percentage of Public open spaces when compared to Private open spaces and this might be due to it’s suburban nature. Memphis has a better network of green spaces which function as a connector or corridor as the city does not have any private gated communities within. It also has a larger percentage of conservation area in comparison with Irving.
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE
CITY OF IRVING
COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED
MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY
PAGE 14
SPA-M
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
The public infrastructure in Memphis is spread out evenly, while it is concentrated towards the south in Irving due to differences in population density. Irving has a more pronounced variation between a downtown and suburbs within itself compared to Memphis which has mostly uniform density and character.
SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED
IMPORTANT TAKEAWAYS
SPA-M
In terms of physical planning, the combination of Grid Iron and organic street networks from Irving, but not the suburban land use model. The use of Green corridor in conjunction with waterbodies to link different parts of the city, which could be seen in both cities. The physical proximity between the Airport and the city needs to be Subtly disjointed in the sense that the city should try to have an identity of it’s own not in cognizance with the airport like in Irving. 4. Bicycle path networks can help reduce carbon emissions while also decongesting city streets. 5. The use of Rail transit for better and efficient connectivity as in the case of Irving. 6. Land use zoning based on traffic patterns, proximity to services and needs of residents. 7. Use of dedicated freight and movement corridors to help prevent flow of traffic into suburban areas. 8. Use of water based Urbanism where the public spaces are designed around water places like in the case of Irving. 9. Sectoral classification of commercial areas and zoning based on it’s need for proximity to the airport. 10. Situating Industrial areas in direct connection with the airport so as to increase efficiency.
SPA-M
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 15
1. 2. 3.
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
NAYA RAIPUR
GANDHINAGAR
COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED
COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED
CHANDIGARH
PAGE 16
•
Sector size - 800m x 1200 m determined by maximum 10 minute walking distance from facilities
•
Introvert planning with sealing walls along main roads so as not to be disturbed by the fast vehicular traffic outside
•
Emphasis on family life and community living Schools along green belts safe for children, dispensaries, shopping, community centers, centrally located in 10 minutes walk and bus stops on main road within walking distance.
•
Parks within 300m
•
Meandering profile of the V4/V5 to enable slow carriageways Comfortable vehicular and pedestrian access right to the doorstep of the house Inter-sectoral connectivity along NS green belts.
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
•
•
•
The Regular pattern of main roads divides the city into rectangular sectors measuring one kilometer by 0.75 kilometers with an area of 75 hectares (190 acres). Each of these sectors will accommodate, on an average, a residential community of about 7000 persons with the necessary facilities like schools, shopping, playgrounds, parks, etc. Larger open spaces and playgrounds are available and accessible to the people within walking distance. Major facilities like primary and secondary schools, shopping center, health and community center, etc. are grouped along this cycle-pedestrian way, making them easily accessible to all without having to cross main vehicular SPA-M roads.
•
Pedestrians trails connect the nodal shopping educational and health facilities in the neighborhood.
•
MEGA BLOCK GRID SYSTEM - 800m X 800m SECTORS (21 NOS)
•
Inside all the residential sectors, large and geometrically irregular central open spaces are proposed to serve the neighborhood and connect them to the main entry points of the corresponding sector in 4 directions
•
An open space landscape system is proposed thus, with the formation of recreational green corridors within the neighborhood along drainage channels.
SECTOR COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY
PAGE 15
SPA-M
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
INTRODUCTION TO SITE
SPA-M
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SPA-M
INTRODUCTION TO SITE
MYSURU Contextual study of growth of Mysore cityDelineation of site boundary and site areaProximity and regional contextSite features and SWOT AnalysisImageabilityLand useAirport development control regulations-
SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
DIRECTIONS OF GROWTH
INTRODUCTION TO SITE
EXTENT OF GROWTH
Mysuru city
Mysuru Nanjangud LPA boundary MYSORE IN 1990
MYSORE IN 1990
NH 766 connecting Mysore and Nanjangud
SPA-M MYSORE IN 2000
MYSORE IN 2010
OBSERVATIONS 1. Over the last 3 decades the city has grown in all directions except the south towards Nanjangud road 2. Main impetus pushing directional growth is the location of Highways / Corridors 3. Main factor for lack of growth towards the south is the presence of Varuna canal and large tracts of fertile agricultural lands
Aeropolis Mysore, midway between Mysuru and Nanjangud
MYSORE IN 2000
Nanjangud Town
MYSORE IN 2010
Kms MYSORE IN 2020
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M
MYSORE IN 2020
CONTEXTUAL STUDY OF GROWTH OF MYSORE CITY
PAGE 19
LOCATION OF THE SELECTED SITE WITHIN THE LPA BOUNDARY OF MYSURU-NANJANGUD REGION
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
INTRODUCTION TO SITE
Aeropolis influence area Circle of diameter 10km Area – 7855 Hectares
Aeropolis site study area Perimeter – 28.5 km Area – 3500 Hectares
Mysore Airport Existing area – 178 hectares Proposed Area – 179 hectares Total – 358 hectares
SPA-M VARUNA CANAL NH 766
HADINARU ROAD
UDBUR ROAD
PAGE 20
VARUNA CANAL
SINDHUVALLI ROAD
STREAM
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
DEVALAPURA ROAD
SPA-M
VILLAGE ROADS
STREAMS
Stream network – 5.5 km long
Roads – 20.5 km long Varuna canal – 2.6 km long
DELINEATION OF SITE BOUNDARY AND SITE AREA A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
REGIONAL CONTEXT INTRODUCTION TO SITE
PROXIMITY
INFOSYS YELWALA COLUMBIA ASIA HINKAL
PALACE
BANNUR ROAD
TN PURA ROAD
H D KOTE ROAD
SPA-M DARIPURA KADAKOLA
THANDAVAPURA
Conurbation Area Rural Area
Site boundary Influence Area
NANJANGUD
SPA-M Kms
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
Kms
PAGE 21
Airport Area
PROXIMITY AND REGIONAL CONTEXT A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
INTRODUCTION TO SITE
STRENGTHS
WEAKNESS
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
1. 2. 3.
Presence of abundant undeveloped land for the Township Close Proximity to Airport Relatively flat topography Presence of many lakes and streams Close proximity to Physical infrastructure services such as STPs and Sub stations
Usage of Prime agricultural land for development Excessive building regulations due to Proximity to Airport Noise pollution from various Transportation modes
SPA-M
Site boundary Ring road NH 766 Varuna canal Railway line Water bodies Industrial area APMC Sewage Treatment plant SITE FEATURES
PAGE 22
OPPORTUNITIES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Confluence of different modes of transit such as Rail, road and Air traffic Location at midway between Mysore and Nanjangud city Presence of several Industrial areas in close vicinity to the Site Passage of important transportation corridors Presence of picturesque natural surroundings will help in promoting tourism
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
THREATS 1. 2. 3. SPA-M 4.
Increased traffic Congestion due to confluence of transit modes Creation of unregulated Urban villages which are chaotic and inequitable The Highway as a edge dividing the site into two separate parts Adverse impact on local ecology
SITE FEATURES AND SWOT ANALYSIS A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SITE BOUNDARY
PATHS
EDGES
EDGES
LANDMARKS NODES DISTRICTS
RAILWAY TRACK AND VARUNA CANAL
MYSORE AIRPORT
INTRODUCTION TO SITE
DISTRCTS
PATHS
RING ROAD
KADAKOLA INDUSTRIAL AREA NH 766
SPA-M
NODES
APMC MARKET
LANDMARKS
BANDIPALYA CIRCLE
NANJANGUD TOLL GATE
SPA-M KADAKOLA TEMPLE
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
HD KOTE ROAD CIRCLE HOSAHUNDI ROAD CIRCLE
IMAGEABILIT Y
PAGE 23
KADAKOLA JUNCTION
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
INTRODUCTION TO SITE
RESIDENTIAL AREAS IN KUPPALUR
EXTENSION OF AIRPORT RESIDENTIAL AREAS IN HOASHUNDI AND LALITHADRIPURA
ENLARGEMENT OF SEWAGE PLANT AT RAYANAKERE
SPA-M
CONVENTION CENTER
EXISTING LAND USE
PROPOSED LAND USE 2031
PAGE 24
FILM CITY
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M MAJOR CHANGES IN LAND USE
NEW RESIDENTIAL LAYOUTS
KADAKOLA INDUSTRIAL AREA
LAND USE A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
INTRODUCTION TO SITE
SECTION THROUGH AA’
APPROACH FUNNEL INNER HORIZONTAL SURFACE RUNWAY
TAKEOFF FUNNEL
A
AERODOME OBSTACLE LIMITATION SURFACES
SPA-M 9 8 7 6 5 4 3
2
1
A’
RING 03
RING 03
HEIGHT
RING 02
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
RING 01
RING 01
DISTANCE FROM AIRPORT
PAGE 25
AIRPORT
SPA-M HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS SURROUNDING DOMESTIC AIRPORTS IN INDIA
RING 02
AIRPORT DEVELOPMENTAL CONTROL REGULATIONS A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SPA-M
“Aerotropolis not only leads to development of an ecosystem but also connects buisnessess, civilizations and regions.” SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SITE ANALYSIS
SPA-M
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SPA-M
SPA-M
SITE ANALYSIS MorphologyLand use and land coverMobility and transitHydrologyBlue and Green networkEconomy and CommercePublic InfrastructureSite as layersA SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SITE ANALYSIS
SPA-M 0
01
03
MORPHOLOGY URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 29
SPA-M
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
INTRODUCTION TO SITE PAGE 30
SPA-M
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M MORPHOLOGY A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
layouts water bodies 4% 3% Airport 5%
SITE ANALYSIS
Land cover and Land use Commercial Village Roads and Industrial settlements Streams and 2% Physical 2% canals 2% Infrastructur 1% e 0% Residential Farmland 42%
Natural vegetation 6%
Uncultivated 12%
SPA-M
Plantation 21% CULTIVATED FARMLAND – 1477.5 HECTARES CULTIVATED PLANTATIONS – 758 HECTARES UNCULTIVATED LAND – 429 HECTARES NATURAL VEGETATION – 201 HECTARES EXISTING AIRPORT – 188 HECTARES RESIDENTIAL LAYOUTS – 130 HECTARES
WATER BODIES – 103 HETARES COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL – 67 HECTARES VILLAGE SETTLEMENTS – 66 HECATRES ROADS – 61.6 HECTARES STREAMS AND CANALS – 24.5 HECTARES
0
01
SPA-M
03
KMS
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
TOTAL SITE AREA – 3508.8 HECTARES
PAGE 31
PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE – 3.2 HECTARES
LAND USE AND LAND COVER A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
INTRODUCTION TO SITE
Toll plaza on Nanjangud road
Varuna canal & railway track crossing NH 766
SPA-M
PAGE 32
Nanjangud road at Kadakola town
0
01
SPA-M
03
KMS
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
MOBILITY & TRANSIT A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SITE ANALYSIS
SPA-M
The railway line that passes through the site connects Mysore and Chamarajnagar cities The Kadakola and Nanjangudu towns have various Industrial areas and employment centers which can make the site a daily stop for commuters travelling from Mysore as well as Chamarajanagar The industries in the Kadakola, Thandavapura and Nanjangud industrial areas also utilize the railway line to transport raw materials for their plants and finished products from their factories.
SPA-M MOBILITY AND TRANSIT URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 33
Railway lines that Mysore to Chmarajanagara and Mangalore are unelectrified and of single track. Currently there are 6 trains which connect Mysore to Chamarajnagar on daily basis. 5 of these are passenger trains, while one is an express train.
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
INTRODUCTION TO SITE
Yennehole lake
SPA-M Dalvoy lake
Varuna canal Aqueduct crossing NH 766
PAGE 34
Three important stream networks which run towards south to join Kabini 0
01
SPA-M
03
KMS
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
There are 24 unique catchment basins within the 78 Sqkm study area
HYDROLOGY A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SITE ANALYSIS Varuna canal
SPA-M
Irrigation mini canals
0
01
SPA-M
03
KMS
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
Chamundi Hill reserve forest
PAGE 35
Stream side greenery
BLUE GREEN NETWORK A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
INTRODUCTION TO SITE
Kadakola Industrial area
SPA-M APMC, Mysore
PAGE 36
Shops on Mysore – Nanjangud road
0
01
SPA-M
03
KMS
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
TVS Factory at Kadakola
ECONOMY & COMMERCE A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SITE ANALYSIS Lakshmi devi temple, Koodanahalli
SPA-M
Capitol fuels on NH 766
0
01
SPA-M
03
KMS
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
Primary Health center at Marse
PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE
PAGE 37
Govt HP School, Someshwarapura
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
INTRODUCTION TO SITE PAGE 38
SPA-M
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M SITE AS LAYERS A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
SPA-M
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SPA-M
Design development
SPA-M
Edges as DelineatorsDesign geometryMasterplan 1.0Masterplan 2.0Masterplan 3.0Masterplan development processMasterplan comparison-
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
HORIZONTAL AXES
OUTER RING ROAD NH 766
MYSORE HADINARU ROAD
RING ROAD DADADAHALLI ROAD
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
VERTICAL AXES
SPA-M
SPA-M
SPA-M
PROPOSED PERIPHERAL RING ROAD
CONCENTRIC RINGS
COMBINATORIAL GEOMETRY USING AXES AND RINGS
SPA-M
SPA-M USE OF EDGES AS DELINEATORS URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 41
SPA-M
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
STEP 01 – IMPORTANT ROUTES AND EDGES NETWORK
STEP 02 – CONCENTRIX RING NETWORK THROUGH AIPRORT DCR
SPA-M SPA-M
SPA-M
PAGE 42
STEP 03 – LOCAL ROADS AND STREAM NETWORK
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
STEP 04 – PROBABLE CITY GEOMETRY AS A COMBINATION OF ROADS, DCR RINGS AND STREAM NETWORKS
SPA-M DESIGN GEOMETRY A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
AEROPOLIS MYSORE 1.0 Green cover
Airport
18%
20%
SPA-M
Fintech SEZ 11%
Residential 27%
AIRPORT TRANSIT CITY
Transit city 4% 7%
INTER MODAL TRANSIT
SPA-M
Logistics Hub 6%
Inter modal transit hub 7%
GREEN BUFFER
SPA-M
Commercial
LOGISTICS HUB AIRPORT – 372 LOGISTICS HUB – 120 TRANSIT HUB - 76 INTER MODAL TRANSIT – 136 GREEN COVER – 335 FINTECH SEZ – 207 COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL – 121 RESIDENTIAL – 508
RESIDENTIAL EAST
RESIDENTIAL WEST
9
FINTECH SEZ
TOTAL – 1875 HECTARES
6 5 4 3
2
1
0
01
03
PROPOSED MASTERPLANSPA-M 1.0
MASTERPLAN 1.0 URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 43
COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
AEROPOLIS MYSORE 2.0 Green Buffer 13%
Airport 19%
Fintech SEZ 8% Residential 37% Commercial 6%
AIRPORT TRANSIT CENTER
Transit Center 4%
SPA-M
GREEN BUFFER
LOGISTICS HUB
Inter modal transit hub 6%
SPA-M Logistics Hub 7%
INTER MODAL TRANSIT AIRPORT – 372 LOGISTICS HUB – 136 TRANSIT HUB - 76 INTER MODAL TRANSIT – 120 GREEN COVER – 255 FINTECH SEZ – 156 COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL – 117 RESIDENTIAL – 720 TOTAL – 1952 HECTARES
RESIDENTIAL WEST
VILLAGES TO BE RETAINED AS REGULATED URBAN VILLAGES
RESIDENTIAL EAST
VILLAGES TO BE ACQUIRED THROUGH LAND POOLING AND ACQUISITION
3
PAGE 44
FINTECH SEZ
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
2
1
COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL
PROPOSED MASTERPLAN 2.0 SPA-M
MASTERPLAN 2.0 A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
AEROPOLIS MYSORE 2.0 Roads
Physical Infra 1%
Green Buffer 13%
10%
AGRICULTURAL ZONE AGRICULTURAL ZONE
Airport 18%
Residential 33%
Fintech SEZ 7%
TRANSIT CENTER TRANSIT CENTER
Transit Center 3%
SPA-M LOGISTICS HUB LOGISTICS HUB
Commercial 4%
CENTRAL PARK CENTRAL PARK
SPA-M
Inter modal transit hub 5%
AIRPORT AIRPORT
Logistics Hub 6%
AIRPORT – 372 LOGISTICS HUB – 128 TRANSIT HUB - 63 INTER MODAL TRANSIT – 108 GREEN COVER – 266 FINTECH SEZ – 148 COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL – 70 RESIDENTIAL – 673 PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE – 22 ROADS - 200
RESIDENTIAL EAST RESIDENTIAL EAST
INTER MODAL INTER MODAL TRANSIT TRANSIT
YENNEHOLE LAKE YENNEHOLEPRESERVE LAKE ECOLOGICAL ECOLOGICAL PRESERVE
TOTAL – 2050 HECTARES RESIDENTIAL WEST RESIDENTIAL WEST
URBAN VILLAGES
SPA-M 0
01
03
SPA-M
FINTECH SEZ FINTECH SEZ
MASTERPLAN 3.0 URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 45
COMMERCIAL AND COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL INSTITUTIONAL
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
SPA-M SPA-M
SPA-M SPA-M MASTERPLAN 1.0
Main Design characteristics
PAGE 46
1. Use of edges as delineators of site boundary 2. Use of Concentric rings, a continuation of the Airport DCR 3. Use of Green belts dividing the concentric rings 4. A green space in the centre to act as a physical and social buffer between the city and the airport 5. Location of residential areas away from the NH 766
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
MASTERPLAN 2.0
MASTERPLAN 3.0
Main Design characteristics in addition to iteration 1.0 1.
Use of rigid man made geometry for edge delineation 2. Increasing the width of the green buffers between rings 3. Changing the location of Inter modal transit hub to be next to the Highway 4. Conversion of undeveloped area into Agricultural and Ecological preservation zones
Main Design characteristics in addition to iteration 2.0 1. Use of streets and canals as edge delineators 2. Creation of Urban villages to help them grow at their own pace 3. Green buffers along streams and Canals apart from concentric rings 4. Street geometry created by using existing streets or by following contour 5. Organic nature of city geometry indicating a development which has grown with nature
SPA-M MASTERPLAN DEVEOPMENT PROCESS A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
IRVING, TEXAS
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
AGRICULTURAL ZONE
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
MEMPHIS AEROCITY
TRANSIT CENTER CENTRAL PARK
LOGISTICS HUB
RESIDENTIAL EAST
AIRPORT INTER MODAL TRANSIT
RESIDENTIAL WEST
SPA-M
COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL
FINTECH SEZ
Water 3%
Physical Infra 1%
Roads
Green Buffer 13%
10% Vacant 28%
Airport 27%
Airport 18%
Residential 33%
SPA-M Institutional 3%
Single family residential
17%
Commercial 9% Industrial SPA-MMulti family residential… 4%
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
Transit Center 3%
Fintech SEZ 7% Commercial 4%
Inter modal transit hub 5%
Logistics Hub 6%
MASTERPLAN COMPARISON
PAGE 47
Parks and Flood plain 4%
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SPA-M
SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
AEROPOLIS MYSORE FORM BASED CODES
LAYER WISE ANALYSIS
URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
CO-ORDINATED BUILT FORM
LAND USE
RESIDENTIAL BLOCK DESIGN
STREET DESIGN
GATEWAYS AND CORRIDORS
URBAN VOIDS
PUBLIC SPACES
GREEN AND BLUE NETWORK
STREAM GREEN BUFFERS
MOBILITY MANAGEMENT
URBAN AND COMMERCIAL NODES
PLAZAS AND PUBLIC SPACES
MOBILITY MODES AND ROUTES
BOULEVARDS
PUBLIC TRANSIT
BUS STOPS
ALTERNATE MOBILITY NETWORKS
BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN NETWORKS
SPA-M
SPA-M FLOW CHART OF PRESENTATION PORTION OF AEROPOLIS MYSORE URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SPA-M
SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
BYE-LAWS AND REGULATIONS
SPA-M
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SPA-M
B Y E L AW S A N D R E G U L A T I O N
SPA-M
DCR ZonesLand use categoriesPermitted land usesDevelopmental control regulationsFAR ZonesBuilding height limitsStreet design guidelinesStreet typologies and design factorsDesign factors vs street typologiesParking guidelinesStreet elements guidelinesPublic space guidelines-
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
SPA-M
Zone 01
Airport Within Zone 01
Zone 02
Zone 03
0
01
03
KMS
SPA-M
Urban Villages Within all Zones
DCR ZONES URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 53
Zone 04
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
AR - AIRPORT LH – LOGISTICS HUB IM – INTER MODAL TRANSIT
SPA-M
AE – AEROCITY CP – CENTRAL PARK GB – GREEN BUFFER R1 – SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R2 – MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL C1 - COMMERCIAL C2 - COMMERCIAL C3 - COMMERCIAL M – MIXED USE COMMERCIAL P – PUBLIC/ SEMI PUBLIC
R2 – PLOTS ABOVE 1000SQM
U – URBAN VILLAGES
C1 – PLOTS NOT EXCEEDING 500 SQM
PAGE 54
S - SEZ
0
01
03
KMS
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M
R1 – PLOTS OF SIZE 12M X 18M 15M X 24M AND 24M X 30M
WB – WATER BODIES
C2 – PLOTS BETWEEN 500 AND 2000 SQM
PU – PUBLIC UTILITIES
C3 – PLOTS EXCEEDING 2000SQM
LAND USE CATEGORIESA SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
IM – INTERMODAL TRANSIT
AE - AEROCITY
1.
1.
1.
1. 2. 3.
2. 3.
AIRPORT TERMINAL ATC TOWER HANGERS & ALLIED
2. 3. 4.
WAREHOU SES COLD STORAGES TRUCK TERMICALS LOGISTICS COMPANY OFFICES
2. 3.
4.
BUS TERMINAL RAILWAY STATION TRANSPOR T INFRASTRU CTURE OFFICES
4.
R1 – SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONE 02 ZONE 03
2.
3. NOT PERMITTED
RESIDENTIA L PLOTTED DEVELOPM ENTS VILLAS, SEMI DETACHED HOUSES
1. 2. 3.
APARTMEN T BLOCKS HOSTELS GROUP HOUSING PROJECTS
1.
2.
4.
NOT PERMITTED
C3 COMMERCIAL
M – MIXED USE COMMERCIAL
P – PUBLIC / SEMI PUBLIC
S - SEZ
CP, GB – GREEN SPACES
PU – PUBLIC UTILITIES
1. 2.
1. 2. 3.
3.
3.
NOT PERMITTED
C2 COMMERCIAL
NOT PERMITTED
2. WAREHOU SES SMALL SCALE PROCESSI NG AND PACKAGIN G INDUSTRIES RECYCLIN G FACILITIES
C1 COMMERCIAL
HOTELS MALLS CONVENTI ON CENTERS EXHIBITION CENTERS
1.
1.
R2 – MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
5.
ZONE 04
6.
7.
8.
EATERIES AND RESTAURA NTS GYMS, ORPHANA GES, OLD AGE HOMES, CLINICS RETAIL SHOPS , HARDWAR E SHOPS MUTTON AND POULTRY STALLS. CYBER CAFÉ& INTERNET BROWSIN G USES FOR SMALL REPAIR CENTERSELECTRONI C, MECHANIC AL , AUTOMOBI LE, ETC PATHOLO GICAL LABS PHOTO STUDIO
1. 2.
3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
SPA-M 9.
10. 11. 12. 13.
COMMERCIAL AND CORPORATE OFFICES RETAIL SHOPPING COMPLEXES, COMPUTER TRAINING INSTITUTES RESTAURANTS AND HOTELS, DARSHINIS CONVENTION CENTERS AND BANQUET HALLS FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS CINEMA AND MULTIPLEXES PLACES OF ASSEMBLY, EXHIBITIONS CENTERS ENTERTAINMENT AND AMUSEMENT CENTERS INSURANCE AND CONSULTING AND BUSINESS OFFICES NURSING HOMES AND POLY CLINICS/ DISPENSARIES /LABS HOSPITALS AND SPECIALTY HOSPITALS FUEL STATIONS AND PUMPS, LPG STORAGE KALYANA MANTAPAS
1.
SUB OFFICES OF UTILITIES 2. POLICE STATIONS, POST OFFICES 3. NURSERY CRÈCHES 4. GOVERNM ENT DISPENSAR IES 5. FIRE STATIONS 6. BILL COLLECTIO N CENTERS 7. PUBLIC LIBRARY 8. PLACES OF WORSHIP 9. COMMERCI AL COMPLEXE S 10. MULTI STOREY CAR PARKS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOLS, INTEGRATE D RESIDENTIA L SCHOOLS. HEALTH CENTERS AND HOSPITAL. RESEARCH INSTITUTIO NS GOVERNM ENT BUILDINGS , AUDITORIU MS, CULTURAL COMPLEXE S, EDUCATIO NAL INSTITUTIO NS , COLLEGES
1.
OFFICE SPACE FOR FINTECH, IT AND BT INDUSTRIES
4. 5. 6.
PARKS HORTICULT URAL AND FLORICULT URAL GARDENS BURIAL GROUNDS AND CREMETARI A SPORT STADIUMS PLAYGROU NDS SWIMMIN G POOLS
4.
5. 6. 7.
8.
ENERGY WATER TELECOMM UNICATIO N SUB STATIONS GAS AND GAS LINE TRANSFOR MERS MICROWA VE TOWERS SOLID WASTE MANAGEM ENT FACILITIES SUCH AS LAND FILL SITES.
SPA-M PERMITTED LAND USES URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
LH – LOGISTICS HUB
PAGE 55
ZONE 01
AR - AIRPORT
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS PAGE 56
SPA-M
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M DEVELOPMENTAL CONTROL REGULATIONS
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
SPA-M
Airport
1.5
2
2.25
2.5
3
3.5
4
0
01
03
KMS
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M
6
PAGE 57
5
FAR ZONES A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
SPA-M
Airport
6M
9M
12M
18M
24M
PAGE 58
36M 0
01
03
KMS
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M BUILDING HEIGHT LIMITS A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
SPA-M STREET DESIGN GUIDELINES URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 59
SPA-M
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
Street typologies are determined based on the width, intensity of use and the nature of activities in adjacent parcels and in the area.
P R O P O S E D
G U I D E L I N E S
G U I D E L I N E S
Road Hierarchy Map
F B C
BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
STREET TYPOLOGIES
D E S I G N FAC T O R S
FBC GUIDELINES
P RO P O S E D ROA D S E C T I O N S LANDSCAPE
LANDSCAPE SERVICE ROAD
SPA-M
LANDSCAPE SERVICE ROAD
CARRIAGE WAY
CARRIAGE WAY
PAGE 60
LANDSCAPE
BICYCLE LANE
FOOTPATH
CARRIAGE WAY
LANDSCAPE
EXAMPLE 1
BICYCLE LANE FOOTPATH
CONCENTRIC RING ROAD
SPA-M EXAMPLE 2
RADIAL CONNECTOR ROADS
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
STREET TYPOLOGIES AND DESIGN FACTORS A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
Road Hierarchy/Regulat ion
Row (Width)
Carriage Way (Width)
Median(s)
Speed Limit
Bicycle Lanes
Footpath
On Street Parking
Landscape -each side (excluding ROW)
Arterial By-pass
45m
24m
3m
50-70 kmph
1.5m
1.5m
-
9m
State Highway
30m
24m
2m
40-60 kmph
1.5m
-
9m
Concentric Collector
30m
24m
1.5m
-
15m
Radial Connector Roads
24m
18m
-
30-40 kmph
1.5m
3m on each sides
6m
National Highway
24m
18m
2m
30-50 kmph
1.5m
-
12m
Sector Main Road
18m
12m
-
20-40 kmph
1.5m
-
-
Block Main Roads
15m
9m
-
20-30 kmph
3m
-
-
30-50 kmph
1.5m
1.5m
BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
D E S I G N FAC T O R S V S R OA D T Y P O L O G Y
SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
1.5m
1.5m
1.5m 3m
PAGE 61
SPA-M
DESIGN FACTORS VS STREET TYPOLOGY A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
PA R K I N G G U I D E L I N E S The amount of on-street and off-street parking should be calculated based on the city’s zonal regulations. This can be adapted to the FBCs based on the extent of parking required.
ON STREET PARKING
OFF STREET PARKING
BI CYCLE PARKING
AUTO PARKING
The on-street parking is designated as a part of street design
The off street or the building level parking is defined within the private
Retail uses require a greater
Retail uses require a greater
guidelines.
property
proportion of short-term bicycle
proportion of short-term bicycle
parking near building entrances.
parking near building entrances.
Residential areas require long-term,
Residential areas require long-term,
secure parking.
secure parking.
Designated parking to be provided wherever possible in neighbourhoods no parking on 6m, one-side parking on 9 and
Number of parking spaces to be allotted
12m roads Two-side parking streets to be either shared surfaces or one-way
Typical off-street parking standards include:
Offices require a mix of both short-
Offices require a mix of both short-
streets for calmer traffic.
•
Area for parking
term and long-term bicycle parking.
term and long-term bicycle parking.
No parking at intersections.
•
Desired setbacks
Bicycle parking can be placed between the main walkway and
•
Size of parking spaces
the kerb.
•
Adjoining landscape.
SPA-M
CROSSWALKS Crosswalks should be designed to offer as much comfort and protection to pedestrians as possible. Intersection crossings should be kept as compact as possible, facilitating eye contact by moving pedestrians directly into the driver’s field of vision.
VISIBILITY/SIGHT DISTANCE
PAGE 62
Intersections with insufficient visibility should be reconstructed to be more compact. Compact intersections place more activity within the sight triangle, giving all users better view of potential conflicts.
LEADING PEDESTRIAN INTERVAL A Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) typically gives pedestrians a 3–7 second head start when entering an intersection with a corresponding green signal in the same direction of travel. LPIs enhance the visibility of pedestrians in the intersection and reinforce their right-of-way over turning vehicles CORNER RADII SPA-M Corner radii directly impact vehicle turning speeds and pedestrian crossing distances. Minimizing the size of a corner radius is critical to creating compact intersections with safe turning speeds. While standard curb radii are 10–15 feet, many cities use corner radii as small as 2 feet. PARKING GUIDELINES
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
S A F E
S T R E E T S
BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
STREET ELEMENTS GUIDELINES There are many elements that need to come together to make streets that are welcoming, safe and inclusive of young children and their caregivers. These have been sub-divided on the basis of the five objectives for a healthy ITC neighbourhood.
ACTIVE FACADE ALONG ROUTING
SPA-M
LIGHTING
PRIVATE-PUBLIC INTERFACE
CROSSINGS
PROTECTIVE ELEMENTS FROM TRAFFIC
SPA-M
SOURCE: FBC Plicy Workbook World Resource Institute, India Design guidelines- BDP Delhi NACTO-National Association of City Transportation Officials/Intersection Design Elements
STREET ELEMENTS GUIDELINES URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 63
ITC WAYFINDING
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS PAGE 64
SPA-M
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M PUBLIC SPACE GUIDELINES A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
This essentially includes open spaces or public areas which exist at different scales (city, neighborhood and street) and are accessible to all. This may include parks, playgrounds, squares, plazas, neighborhood parks etc. The streets on the other hand are also considered as linear public spaces of the city.
Interconnected hierarchy of public spaces
PROPOSED GUIDELINES
FBC GUIDELINES
AC C E S S I B L E P U B L I C S PAC E S
SPA-M
ECO SENSITIVE ZONE
CITY
CIVIC GREEN
URBAN GREEN WAY
H I E R A RC H Y O F P U B L I C S PAC E S
NEIGHBORHOOD
-
STREET
SPA-M
NEIGHBORHOOD GREEN TEMPORARY/INTERIM PARK RECREATIONAL PARKLET POCKET GREEN
PUBLIC SPACE GUIDELINES URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 65
-
PLAZA
NEIGHBORHOOD
CITY
STREET & UNIT
-
RECREATIONAL PARK
PROPOSED GUIDELINES
FBC GUIDELINES
Public spaces (Based on Scale)
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
CONTEXT • PRESENT CONDITION The natural conditions and the habitat of the place should be retained for maximum preservation of the area • ADJECENCIES The adjacent areas to public spaces should comprehend to the Adjacent and neighboring’s condition both man made and natural features • PLANNED CONDITION The space should respond to the future developments adjoining the area
PLACE • IDENTITY Incorporate the existing natural features of the place for design
• FEATURES Design features that will attract people to the public space and make it a destination, or community focal point. All features should be designed as an integrated system with clear circulation connecting to defined spaces Provide a design solution that balances both recreation space and habitat restoration/conservation.
FUNCTIONS
MAIN PROGRAMME
COMFORT • SAFETY Provide visibility and active uses to encourage human interaction and promote a sense of personal safety. • ENCLOSURE Frame spaces and/or pathways within parks with landscape, trees to define the spaces, create edges or to establish a transition from space to space. • DESIGN AND LOCATION OF AMENITIES Amenities should be located in places that maximize use. Features should all support the overall park or open space concept and design.
SPA-M
KEY FEATURES
FLEXIBILITY • DIVERSE USES Spaces should be designed to be flexible to accommodate multiple types of programs and events. In parks and open spaces large and small, consider events such as food festivals, markets, games, movies, concerts, art shows and/or sports etc. can be accommodated simultaneously when desired. Which would increase community interaction. Design spaces that allow a diversity of programs in public spaces.
CONNECTIVITY • ACCESS: Encourage pedestrian movement, plan the areas accordingly Integrate universal access into site design. Consider children, seniors and individuals with disabilities. • MULTIPLE CHOICES Locate public spaces in proximity and accessible to transportation options and connected to a network of streets and sidewalks. • WAYFINDING Provide clear and creative wayfinding to connect different spaces.
Encourage Place making
SITE PLACEMENT
SIZE
• Focus on social gathering • Conservation of the local ecology
• Place for relaxation
• Regional destination
• Informal gathering
• SERVICE AREA – City and surrounding areas
• Unstructured recreation
PAGE 66
• Promote tourism activities in accordance to maintain the ecology and promote economy
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
• Sustainable tourism options – Nature trials
• Areas with abundance of natural flora and fauna – (YENNEHOLE LAKE)
Bird watching
• Open and covered seating areas
• Site and the surrounding area for 100m is a no construction zone to conserve the area
• Abundance of natural flora and fauna – Min ½ acre of area • Interventional area should not be more than 5 % of the total area
• Use of only sustainable materials for the design interventions
SPA-M PUBLIC SPACE GUIDELINES A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
MAIN PROGRAMME
KEY FEATURES
SITE PLACEMENT
SIZE
• Central Lawn area • Focus on social gathering • Walking paths • Community Gathering
• Place for relaxation
• Regional destination
• Informal gathering
• Open air theatre • SERVICE – City and the surrounding areas
• Unstructured recreation • Large Community gatherings
FUNCTIONS
MAIN PROGRAMME
• Network connector • Regional destination
• Serves sector plan areas • Open spaces network connector: linear and Continuous parks and open spaces
• Abundance of seating areas – Covered and open
• There should be a soft edge differentiating the park and the adjoining areas • Ideally four streets surrounded by activating uses • Should not be located behind uses • Must never be located in residual/surplus/left-over space
• Greater than 30 Acres
• Existing stream network incorporated in the plan
KEY FEATURES
SPA-M
SITE PLACEMENT
BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
FUNCTIONS
SIZE
• Trails with walkways and bikeways • Active programming and exposure to nature along wide landscaped walkways and bikeways, commuting, recreational travel (biking, walking, jogging, etc.) • Could act as neighborhood parks for the sectors.
• Lined by vegetative ground cover and trees • Good wayfinding signage with clear entries to trailheads
• Connector to other public spaces and natural areas
• May follow natural resources & recreational areas along road R.O.W.s
• Width – Minimum of 50 m • Buffer vegetation • Activities depending on the size and requirements
• Play areas
SPA-M PUBLIC SPACE GUIDELINES URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 67
• Accommodates local daily uses
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
FUNCTIONS • Focus on active play • Regional destination • Serves sector plan areas • Accommodates local daily uses • Accommodates larger group recreation (team sports)
MAIN PROGRAMME
KEY FEATURES • Playing courts and fields
• Primarily recreational program focused on active recreation • Supported by contemplative setting and social gathering spaces • Activities to accommodate all age groups
• Mix of hardscape and grassy open spaces • Mix of reserved and unreserved recreation spaces
• Multi-functional structures, including park furniture
SITE PLACEMENT
SIZE
• Placement facing adjacent community-oriented uses: recreation centers, libraries, etc. • Building entrances facing the park visually and physically accessible
• Varies based on the community served
• Connected by two or more roads surrounding the area
PAGE 68
SPA-M
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M PUBLIC SPACE GUIDELINES A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
MAIN PROGRAMME
KEY FEATURES
SITE PLACEMENT
SIZE
• Clear delineation between the public space and adjacent private realm
• Community gathering place • Regional destination • Serves areas in high pedestrian traffic zones • Accommodates local daily uses
• Focus on social gathering • Flexible program • Informal gathering • Unstructured recreation • Large community gatherings
• Large central hardscape as focal point • Abundance of seating options (sunny and shaded options) • Public art: explore interactive installations • Visitor amenities
• Maximize building entrances and windows facing onto the park: storefronts, multiple townhouse or apartment stoops and porches, primary building entrances • Seamless between the park and the street sidewalk
• Minimum of ½ acre • Ideal area of 1 to 1 ½ acre
BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
FUNCTIONS
• Surrounded by minimum of two streets, ideally four streets • Surrounded by activating uses • Should not be located behind uses
SPA-M PUBLIC SPACE GUIDELINES URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 69
SPA-M
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
FUNCTIONS
MAIN PROGRAMME
KEY FEATURES
• Mix of social gathering, active recreation & contemplative areas
• Neighborhood gathering place • Local destination • Serves neighborhood/district
• Flexible program
• Lawn area surrounded by complementary uses
• Informal gathering
• Shaded seating and sunny areas
• Places for quiet contemplation
• Flexible play areas
• Unstructured recreation
• Consider public art
SITE PLACEMENT
SIZE
• Placement facing adjacent community-oriented uses: recreation centers, libraries, etc. • Building entrances facing the park visually and physically accessible
• ½ Acre
• The area should be accessible by minimum two streets
• Local community gatherings
SPA-M
FUNCTIONS
MAIN PROGRAMME
KEY FEATURES
SITE PLACEMENT
SIZE
• Varies • Experimental place • Regional & local destination
• Engage with the community in creative ways to deliver places for social gathering, active and contemplative recreation while building a sense of community and belonging.
PAGE 70
• Defined in collaboration with the community
• Flexible program based on type of space
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
• Pilot activities for future park/public space
• Mixed use Facilities • High pedestrian flow
• Activities/structures inclusive and easy to participate
• Varies based on requirement
• Should be placed in a visible location
SPA-M PUBLIC SPACE GUIDELINES A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
MAIN PROGRAMME
KEY FEATURES
SITE PLACEMENT
SIZE
• Playing courts and fields • Place focus on active play • Local destination • Serves neighborhood/district • Connected to public spaces network • Accommodates smaller groups/ individual recreation
• Primarily recreational program focused on active recreation • Supported by contemplative setting and social gathering spaces • Activities to accommodate all age groups
• Mix of hardscape and grassy open spaces • Mix of reserved and unreserved recreation spaces • Consider central lawn as the focal point with sunny and shaded areas and surrounded by activating uses
• Placement facing adjacent community-oriented uses: recreation centers, libraries, etc. • Building entrances facing the park visually and physically accessible
• Maximum area – 1/4th acre
• Face major sidewalk alongside storefronts
BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
FUNCTIONS
• Multi-functional structures, including park furniture
SPA-M
FUNCTIONS
• Place for pause
•
Local destination
• Serves Unit or a group of houses
MAIN PROGRAMME • Contemplative areas supported by social gathering and active recreation in smaller scale
• Flexible program • Places for quiet contemplation
KEY FEATURES
SITE PLACEMENT
SIZE
• Sunlit small gathering areas with a mix of shaded and sunny seating • Small scale green areas
• Maximize sun exposure in locations in-between tall buildings
• Maximum area – 1/4th acre
• Small play areas
SPA-M PUBLIC SPACE GUIDELINES URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 71
• Contact with nature
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SPA-M
SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
LAYERS & URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
SPA-M
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SPA-M
Layers and Urban design moments
SPA-M
Land useSectorsUD Moment - Block designGateways and CorridorsUD Moment – Activated Urban VoidsStreetsUD Moment – BoulevardsUrban and Commercial centresUD Moment – Plaza in commercial coreGreen spacesUD Moment – Stream green buffersMobility modes and RoutesAlternate Mobility modes and routes-
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
KEYPLAN
AGRICULTURAL ZONE
SPA-M
TRANSIT CENTER
LOGISTICS HUB
CENTRAL PARK
SPA-M
INTER MODAL TRANSIT
STREAM GREEN SPACE
AEROPOLIS PHASE 1 SELECTED SITE FOR AEROPOLIS
URBAN VILLAGE
RESIDENTIAL WEST
INSTITUTIONAL
COMMERCIAL FINTECH SEZ 0
01
03
SPA-M
3508 HECTARES
AEROPOLIS PHASE 1 AREA
2160 HECTARES
AGRICULTURAL ZONE
1348 HECTARES
AIRPORT
372 HECTARES
In phase 01, only 2160 out of the 3508 hectares have been developed with the remaining 1348 hectares being earmarked for development in the future. The presence and in large percentages of land being used by logistics hub, Transit centre and Fin tech SEZ showcase the Airport centric approach that the design has taken. The Main institutional and core commercial areas are located in the centre so as to be easily accessible by all
KMS
LAND USE URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 75
RESIDENTIAL EAST
URBAN VILLAGE
TOTAL SITE AREA
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
Land cover and Land use Public / Semi public 2%
Commercial 3% Transit zone 3% Mixed used zones 3%
SPA-M
Urban voids 1% Physical Infrastructur e 1%
Urban villages 4% Fintech SEZ 4%
SPA-M
Residential 18%
Green spaces 17%
Inter modal transit hub 5%
Roads 11%
PAGE 76
Logistics / Industrial 11%
0
01
03
KMS
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M
Airport 17%
Residential
Green spaces
Airport
Logistics / Industrial
Roads
Inter modal transit hub
Fintech SEZ
Urban villages
Mixed used zones
Commercial
Transit zone
Public / Semi public
Urban voids
Physical Infrastructure
LAND USE A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
R1 Single family residential 47%
R2 Multi family residential 53%
SPA-M
R1 Single family residential R2 Multi family residential
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
Residential Typology
Commercial Typology
SPA-M
C3 Commercial 41%
C1 Commercial 14%
C2 Commercial 45% C1 Commercial
C2 Commercial
C3 Commercial
R1 – PLOTS OF SIZE 12M X 18M 15M X 24M AND 24M X 30M R2 – PLOTS ABOVE 1000SQM C1 – PLOTS NOT EXCEEDING 500 SQM C2 – PLOTS BETWEEN 500 AND 2000 SQM
C1 COMMERCIAL
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
C2 COMMERCIAL
C3 COMMERCIALSPA-M
0
R2 RESIDENTIAL 01
C3 – PLOTS EXCEEDING 2000SQM 02
KMS
RESIDENTIAL AND COMERCIAL TYPOLOGIES
PAGE 77
R1 RESIDENTIAL
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
SPA-M
SPA-M
SPA-M RESIDENTIAL TYPOLOGY
22
02 03 11 10
05 08
06
09
12
17 14
PAGE 78
0
01
16
30
36 33 35
18
34
KMS
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
Multi Family residential
26
27
Sectors have been created by using Roads and Stream networks as Edge delineators
28
Six sectors are predominantly commercial in nature along the NH 766, while residential sectors also have Mixed use commercial zones.
29
31 32
Fintech SEZ comprises of 5 sectors while institutional areas are located in 2 sectors.
37 SECTORS 02 URBAN VILLAGES SPA-M
03
Single Family residential
Mixed use commercial
15
13
37
19
07
25
21 20
04
24
23
01
SECTOR MAP
Sectors are further subdivided as blocks based on the land use typology within the sector
SECTORS A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
18 X 24 M SITE 12 X 18 M SITE C A SITE 12 X 18 M SITE APARTMENTS
SPA-M
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS – RESIDENTIAL BLOCK DESIGN
BIRD EYE VIEW OF RESIDENTIAL SECTOR SPA-M SPA-M PARK
BOULEVARD
SPA-M
PARKLET PLAZA
BIRD EYE VIEW OF RESIDENTIAL SECTOR
COMMERCIAL CENTER
N
SPA-M BIRD EYE VIEW OF RESIDENTIAL SECTOR URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 79
BUS STOP
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS – RESIDENTIAL BLOCK DESIGN
SPA-M
SPA-M
PAGE 80
SPA-M
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M PARKLET
PLAZA A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
SPA-M
SPA-M Identified important gateways and Corridors passing through the Aeropolis. Main Passenger and Goods corridor is the NH766, which will be complimented by the development of parallel Light Rail Transit system Two new Freight and passenger corridors have been proposed through the city and on the southern flank to act as Bye passes avoiding the residential core of the city Existing village road axes on the peripheries to be developed into state highways for better movement of people and goods abutting the city
0
01
03
KMS
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M
NATIONAL HIGHWAY STATE HIGHWAY BYE PASS ROAD RAILWAY LINE
Main Traffic entries into the city being through the National highway and the Bye passes
GATEWAYS INTO AEROPOLIS MYSORE
GATEWAYS AND CORRIDORS
PAGE 81
Primary gateways into the city are along the national highway while the secondary ones are on the State highways abutting the city.
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
SPA-M
SPA-M
SPA-M
PAGE 82
SPA-M
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
SPA-M
SPA-M
SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 83
SPA-M
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
SPA-M
SPA-M
PAGE 84
SPA-M
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SPA-M
VIEW OF WATER BODY
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
SPA-M VIEW OF WALKWAY
SPA-M
VIEW OF GATHERING SPACE
SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 85
SPA-M
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
SECTION AT A – A’
SECTION AT B – B’ SPA-M Seating area Parking
Gathering area
Foot over bridge connecting at +6.00 m level
Walkway – at road level
B
B’
Pond Cycling track
PAGE 86
Parking
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M
Walking track
A’ A
N A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
SPA-M SPA-M STREET MORPHOLOGY Road Morphology indicates a large percentage of existing roads have been amalgamated into the newer development City geometry here is a consequence of Road geometry and stream and canal networks Street Hierarchy is designed inspired by the V7 system of road seen in Chandigarh, resulting in smaller road widths as one gets closer to home.
0
01
SPA-M
03
KMS
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
48M 45M 30M 30M 24M 18M 15M
NATIONAL HIGHWAY BY PASS ROAD STATE HIGHWAY CONCENTRIC AXIS ROADS RADIAL AXIS ROADS SECTOR ROADS BLOCK MAIN ROADS
Street geometry designed in such a way to keep out through traffic from residential areas
The national highway passing through the city will be elevated throughout.
STREETS
PAGE 87
STREET HIERARCHY
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
VEGETATION SERVICE ROAD
VEGETATION CARRIAGE WAY
VEGETATION CARRIAGE WAY
SERVICE ROAD
VEGETATION ROW- 45M
CYCLE TRACK
BY PASS ROAD
FOOTPATH
FOOTPATH CARRIAGE WAY
VEGETATION CYCLE TRACK
SPA-M SPA-M ROW- 30M
ROW- 24M CONCENTRIC AXIS ROAD RADIAL AXIS ROAD
PAGE 88
ROW- 18M
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
48M 45M 30M 30M 24M 18M 15M
NATIONAL HIGHWAY BY PASS ROAD STATE HIGHWAY CONCENTRIC AXIS ROADS RADIAL AXIS ROADS SECTOR ROADS BLOCK MAIN ROADS
SECTOR ROAD
SPA-M STREET SECTIONS A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
VEGETATION
CYCLE TRACK
VEGETATION CARRIAGE WAY
FOOTPATH
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
CYCLE TRACK
FOOTPATH
CARRIAGE WAY
CARRIAGE WAY
SPA-M
SECTOR MAIN ROAD
Buffer
NATIONAL HIGHWAY
Buffer
SECTOR MAIN ROAD
SPA-M
Buffer
Buffer
STATE HIGHWAY
SPA-M
SECTOR MAIN ROAD
Key Plan
STREET SECTIONS URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 89
SECTOR MAIN ROAD
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS - BOULEVARDS
FUNCTIONAL POSITIVES OF BOULEVARDS
AESTHETIC POSITIVES OF B0ULEVARDS
Sustain to local climate
Roads can be easily distinguished
Can sustain stresses of vehicular vibrations and pollution
Adds character to the precinct
Serve as natural fencing
Provides shade for cyclists and pedestrians
Absorbs and cleans the water that runs off the highways and other roads.
Public spaces can be part of buffer- as linear parks
Can be durable and also long lived
PAGE 90
SPA-M
SPA-M CONCENTRIC ROAD
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
RADIAL AXIS ROAD A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
SPA-M SPA-M MIXED USE COMMERCIAL ZONES WALKABILITY MAPPING Primarily two types on Commercial areas in the city, The core commercial located along the NH 766 and the Mixed use commercial zones located within residential sectors.
MIXED USE COMMERCIAL CENTERS 0
01
SPA-M
03
KMS
CENTRAL CORE COMMERCIAL CENTERS
Mixed use commercial zones have been placed in land parcels delineated by roads and streams and are blocks in essence catering to other residential blocks around them and located such that no zone is farther than 500m from any residence in the city.
URBAN & COMMERCIAL CENTERS URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 91
Core commercial areas are further divided into three categories based on plot sizes and will cater to the whole city, while Mixed use commercial zones will cater to the commercial need within the sectors.
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
SPA-M
SPA-M
PAGE 92
SPA-M
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
The central park in Aeropolis Mysore is inspired it’s namesake in New York
SPA-M
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
SPA-M
Typology based on location of dedicated green spaces,
1.
2.
3.
Central park – located in the heart of the city to act as a physical and social buffer between the Airport and the residences Stream buffer – To provide green and open spaces along stream network to up to 30m meters on either side and to act as green spaces within sectors Road buffer – 9m to 12m ranging green buffers along important roads and corridors helping create green boulevards and softening the impact of heavy traffic on the city folk Road edge green buffers 18%
CENTRAL PARK
0
01
SPA-M
03
KMS
Central park 36%
ROADSIDE GREEN BUFFERS
TYPOLOGY OF GREEN SPACES
GREEN SPACES URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 93
STREAM SIDE GREEN BUFFERS
Stream green buffers 46%
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
GREEN BUFFER Concentric central / Arterial Bypass
9m
SPA-M
Concentric Ring road
15m
SPA-M
Railway Line 10m- West 30m- East
Abutting Streams
20m
PAGE 94
INTERSECTION BETWEEN ROADS AND GREEN SPACES
0
01
03
KMS
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M GREEN SPACES A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
SPA-M
SPA-M
SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 95
SPA-M
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
SPA-M
SPA-M
PAGE 96
SPA-M
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
SPA-M
SPA-M
SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
PAGE 97
SPA-M
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
AIRPORT
SPA-M IMTH
RAILWAY LINE
NH 766
The Inter modal transit Hub is located at the junction of three different modes of transit, Air, rail and Road.
SPA-M
Important Transit routes for passenger movement out of city are the National highway and the Railway line. Local public transit within the city runs mostly on the concentric roads connecting all sectors with all bus stops being located only on the concentric roads which are 30m wide.
IMTH
SPA-M
PAGE 98
NATIONAL HIGHWAY
0
01
SPA-M
03
KMS
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
STATE HIGHWAY LOCAL TRANSIT ROUTE BUS STOPS
TRANSIT MODES AND ROUTES
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS
SPA-M
SPA-M PEDESTRIAN GREEN CORRIDOR
SPA-M
DEDICATED BICYCLE NETWORK
0
01
SPA-M
03
KMS
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III
AEROPOLIS MYSORE
BIKE SHARING CENTERS LOCATED IN CORE COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE COMMERCIAL CENTERS
ALTERNATIVE MOBILITY MODES AND ROUTES
PAGE 99
ROADS WITH DEDICATED BIKE LANES
A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE, UNIVERSITY OF MYSORE MASTERS INSPA-M URBAN DESIGN
A
SHWETHASHREE
|
PRIYANKA
V
KHADI
|
SHASHANK
P
S
2019-2021
SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S
