NCA 2009 President’s Award Recipient
IN THIS ISSUE 3
Riding for the NCA Brand
9
NCA Roundup
10
Eye on the Outside
12
Checkoff News
14
In the Mind of a Millennial
15
NRRC Update
16
Nevada Cattlewomen
18
Master Stockman Consulting
20
NDA News
21 Amodei Public Lands Bill Passes House, Heads to Senate 22
NSRM Western Mining and the Importance of Reclamation
24
WGA Implementing Grazing
26
Sage Grouse Initiative
28
The Monkey Story
30
WSRRA
32
Anaplasmosis
36
NV Farm Bureau News
42
HWCWMA: Jointed Goatgrass
44
USDA News
46
USDA News
47
NDF
The Progressive Rancher Owner/Editor/Publisher – Leana Litten Carey progressiverancher@elko.net
Graphic Design/Layout – Shania Brown cocobrowngraphics@gmail.com
Cover Photo “Trish 012” taken by Jessica Olson WGA's 2017 Year in Review: Top 10 Policy Wins, Resolutions, Reports, and Initiative WGA News: Wyoming's eclipse bonanza, new workforce video, wildfire webinar WGA News: California mudslide toll rises, Governors deliver State of the State Addresses, comments submitted to Fish and Wildlife Service
Published 8 times each year, The Progressive Rancher is mailed to more than 7,000 approved addresses, and has digital and print readership reaching more than 30,000. The views and opinions expressed by writers of articles appearing in this publication are not necessarily those of the editor. Letters of opinion are welcomed by The Progressive Rancher. Rates for advertising are available upon request. Advertising in The Progressive Rancher does not necessarily imply editorial endorsement. Liability for any errors or omissions in advertisements shall not exceed the cost of the space occupied by the error or omission. The Progressive Rancher is free to people working and active in the livestock industry. The Progressive Rancher is donated to the agricultural industry. If you are not currently receiving this magazine on a regular basis and would like to be a part of The Progressive Rancher family, contact us by e-mail at progressiverancher@elko.net today, so we can include you on our mailing list. If you have moved or changed addresses, please notify us by e-mail so we can keep you informed. All requests for the magazine must be made by e-mail. © The Progressive Rancher Magazine. All rights reserved.
Leana Litten Carey, Owner/Editor
1188 Court St., #81, Elko, NV 89801 (208) 358-2487 • progressiverancher@elko.net
WWW.PROGRESSIVERANCHER.COM Ads sent to or built by The Progressive Rancher become property of this magazine.
2 February 2018
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
from the desk of your nca president By Sam Mori, NCA President
H
ello to All, It gives me a great deal of pleasure to say hello to you as your President of the Nevada Cattlemen’s Association. I can tell you I am very humbled to be able to serve you in this capacity. I am vividly reminded of the great people that have done a wonderful job of leading our organization in the past. I extend a thank you to Davy Stix, our immediate past President, for the excellent job he did. Davy, you gave so much to all of us and we appreciate you very much.
Sam Mori
Until Next Time, Sam www.progressiverancher.com
IRT-7557B-A
For those of you who don't know me, I am fortunate to live on our family’s ranches in Tuscarora and Lovelock, NV. My wife Tracy, my brother Pete and his wife Tammy, and our parents Nelo and Ida May are blessed to have our sons and daughters and a growing herd of grandchildren involved in this challenging and rewarding industry. I want to share with you a vision we have of how your Association is going to operate and serve you as members and associates. I say WE because the leadership of your Association is going to be performed by a team that I am very thankful to be surrounded by. Your officer team consists of myself, Tom Barnes – President Elect, Jon Griggs 1st Vice-President and Hanes Holman 2nd Vice-President. Our daily Half Page Program(5.5”x4.25”) office operations are in the very capable hands of Kaley (Sproul) Chapin – Executive Director and Sharon McKnight – our do everything well specialist. Thank you ladies, you are very much appreciated. Our goal is to listen to the needs and concerns of our membership and represent you in a positive and constructive way. We feel that the ability to communicate the issues that are important to our Timing counts when it comes industry is in a positive atmosphere at this time and we intend on doing so. to your social security benefit As we move into a new year let us be thankful Social Security can be one of your most valuable for the way we are able to make our living. We are so retirement assets. The decision of when you start very fortunate to be part of an industry that does so taking your benefit impacts how much you’ll receive. much more than feed the world. It is such a blessing to be able to raise families, raise animals, and provide a Call or visit today, and learn how your decision home for countless species all in a cathedral that most impacts your overall retirement income strategy. people only see in pictures. Our industry is made up of individuals that are of true character, true grit, and the qualities that made this beautiful free country we Final decisions about Social Security filing strategies always rest with you and should always be based on your specific needs are fortunate to live in. It is a reminder to us all not to and health considerations. For more information, visit the Social forget what our knees were made for. Security Administration website at www.socialsecurity.gov. We are about to set sail on a responsibility that will take us all around our state and nation. As we do Jason B Land, AAMS® so let me say thank you to our families and business www.edwardjones.com Financial Advisor associates for helping carry our load while we are away. . Member SIPC We look forward to serving you and seeing many of you 2213 North 5th Street in the coming year. Here’s to clear sailing!
Suite A Elko, NV 89801 775-738-8811
The Progressive Rancher
February 2018
3
4 February 2018
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
Raising Top Quality Polled Hereford Cattle with the range rancher in mind
www.progressiverancher.com
The Progressive Rancher
February 2018
5
6 February 2018
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
Saturday & Sunday March 10-11, 2018 Can a ranch provide a young family a sustainable income and retirement? Get answers at our annual seminar and social
165 Osborne Ln. Yerington, NV 89447 Office 775-463-2677 Lucy 775-790-0801 FUNDED IN PART BY GRANTS FROM THE YERINGTON AND LYON COUNTY ROOM TAX BOARDS www.progressiverancher.com
The Progressive Rancher
February 2018
7
OUR Best b snyDers
5 Angus Long-Yearlings of the Same Quality as Our 2016 Snyder Bull Test Overall and 2017 Angus Calving-Ease Champion Sell March 11, in Yerington, NV. Don’t miss our bulls sired by Deer Valley All In, WHS Limelight 64V and Silveiras Inspiration 3096. Preview Snyder Livestock’s Bulls for the 21st Century Sale Book online at www.slcnv.com.
ID 8027: RJR Echo all in 608 DOB: 9-2-2016 Sire: Deer Valley All In Dam’s Sire: PF 3164 Midland 5024
Test ADG 4.29 RFI ADG 4.23 Test RFI 4.83 BW +.6
35%
WW YW MILK +66 +114 +24 10%
10%
45%
MARB +.42 65%
REA $W $B +.51 +62.19 +131.52 45%
15%
30%
4 Flying RJ bulls b fallon Also selling 4 bulls (2 are calving-ease) sired by Silveiras Inspiration 3096 and RJR Echo Consensus 359 at the 52nd Fallon All-Breeds Bull Sale, Sat., Feb. 17, at Fallon Livestock LLC, in Fallon, NV. Sale book online: www.nevadacattlemen.org.
THD ©
Rick & Jerrie Libby 530-218-1841
Email: rlibby@syix.com Post Office Box 128 Live Oak, California 95953
8 February 2018
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
52nd Annual Fallon All Breeds Bull Sale By Kaley Sproul Chapin, NCA Executive Director
Nevada Cattlemen's Association 52nd Annual Fallon All Breeds Bull Sale
W
e are getting closer to the 52nd Annual Fallon All Breeds Bul Sale! Our Kaley Sproul, sale will be held February NCA Executive Director 17, 2018 at the Fallon Livestock, LLC. at 11:00 a.m. We have an abundant amount of bulls this year totaling 163 bulls! All bull entries are subjected to be sifted and graded Friday, February 16, 2018 at 7:30 a.m. Please contact the office if you have questions regarding the health requirements for the sale.
Angus Bulls For Sale AI Sons of Comrade / Resource / Thunder
Potter’s Emmett Valley Ranch Emmett, ID 208/365-3621 cattleandsheep.com
For the past 52 years, producers from Nevada and the surrounding states have worked hard to bring the best quality range ready bulls to the sale to provide our buyers with quality and selection. Bulls range from yearlings to two-year olds of different breeds and are bought and sold at the annual sale. The NCA invites not only the breeders and the buyers but the participation of all. We are accepting applications for Trade Show Exhibits, information and can be found online at http://www.nevadacattlemen.org or at the NCA office. Friday, February 16, 2018 will feature the Fallon All Breeds Bull Sale Stock Dog Trial at the Fallon Livestock Exchange beginning at 8:00 a.m. All are welcome to enjoy the Fallon Bull Sale Dinner and Dance hosted by the Churchill County Cowbelles Friday evening. During the sale the next day will be a Stock Dog Auction of 4 dogs that were shown during the trials on Friday. All proceeds from the Stock Dog Trial are donated to benefit families in need of help in the livestock industry. The Nevada Cattlemen’s Association would like to thank the many dedicated cosigners and buyers that participate in the sale each year. We would also like to thank the dedicated sponsors and people that support the sale and the association. Without all of their help this sale would not be possible. We look forward to seeing you there! If you have questions regarding the sale or would like a copy of the sale catalog please contact the sale office at 1-775-738-9214 or email the sale secretary at nca@nevadabeef.org. The catalog is also be posted on the Nevada Cattlemen’s Association web page www.nevadacattlemen.org.
www.progressiverancher.com
You are invited to
You are invited to
COWBOY CHURCH!
COWBOY CHURCH!
Bible Study Fri @ 9 am
Sunday @ 11am services
4275 Solias Rd Fallon, NV
Bible Study Wed @ 6 pm
Are you having a Rodeo or Livestock event? GIVE US A CALL. We would love to come to your event or ranch and host Cowboy Church for you.
Harmony Ranch Ministry 3767 Keyes Way Fallon, NV 89406
The Progressive Rancher
Tom J. Gonzalez | Diana J. Gonzalez, Pastor threecrossls@cccomm.net
(775) 240-8870 Cell (775) 867-3100
February 2018
9
By Joseph Guild
T
o start the new year here’s some thoughts about the irrationality of people who criticize public lands grazing. It always amazes me how much hyperbole accompanies the statements of the critics who do not think the public domain should be used for livestock grazing because they have their own pet beliefs on how these lands should be used. Their concentration on a very narrow focus prevents them from seeing the big picture. An example is their desire to save the sage grouse at the expense of livestock grazing which is the best tool to help save sage grouse habitat. There is the standard criticism that the ranges are overgrazed and being destroyed by the very people whose livelihood depends on a productive vibrant resource to produce forage for grazing animals. This criticism is illogical and irrational. This criticism ignores the scientific conclusions that the ranges are in good and improving, if not excellent shape. But the old canards are trooped out and the empirical evidence is conveniently ignored or even lied about to make the case for removing all livestock off the ranges. What is also amazing is the same people who worry about increasing fire events across the west and who claim to want to protect the sage grouse ecosystem ignore the use of the best tool out there for protecting endangered species and reducing fine fuel loads- grazing animals. Wild horse advocates are in the same category of uninformed people who blame the wrong entities and refuse to endorse legal and science based solutions to solve a critical and growing problem. Unimpeded, overuse of these ranges by horses has the potential to ultimately destroy the exact resource the horses need for their survival. This is the sure result of opposition by these advocates to sensible management of a wild horse population. This population essentially has had no recent management because of lawsuits by wild horse advocate groups who want to block the BLM from doing its job. Their actions will result in dead horses. Some people think this is nature running its course and thus endorse leaving the solution in the hands of mother earth. But the reality is these folks are harming the very animals they want to protect. The frustrating thing for
me to swallow is many of these advocates for horses or advocates for more protections of federal land know their tactics are counter-productive. They do not care, they just want their view of things to be imposed on others. Think of it this way. Many ranchers and longtime residents of rural towns have lived and worked in the same place for their whole lives along with their ancestors, sometimes for many decades. They are used to certain customs and practices. New folks come to live or visit the neighborhood and decide to ignore the mores of the area and have everyone in the neighborhood conform to their view of a way to use the land or live a lifestyle. They start dictating to everyone else how things should be done without input from long term residents. Often this is also done by people with good intentions but who live hundreds or thousands of miles away. These people also ignore governing principles such as the multiple use doctrine, the permit system created by the US Forest Service Organic Act and the Taylor Grazing Act, which legalizes the ranchers right to graze animals on public lands. Furthermore, they ignore the provisions of the Wild Horse and Burro Act which gives significant management authority to the Secretary of the Interior including euthanizing horses who cannot survive on the ranges and removal of horses to achieve a thriving ecological balance in wild horse herd management areas. All this complaining through ignorance is done sometimes in a hysterical, rude and loud manner calculated to get the most attention paid to the least credible claims. This brings me to the latest example of this kind of behavior. I am thinking about the hysterical reaction over the decision by the President based upon the recommendation of the Secretary of the Interior to reduce the size of some National Monuments. By now you know that the Grand Staircase Escalante and Bears Ears Monuments in Utah were reduced by about a million acres apiece. This still means that they will be about one million acres and 300,000 acres in size respectively.
"Their actions will result in dead horses."
10 February 2018
The Progressive Rancher
But the news reported opponents of the reduction as saying the US lost over two million acres of public land to developers. Another advocate for keeping the monuments intact stated the President had stolen the land. A New Jersey who had never been west of the 100th meridian could easily conclude the President’s action was depriving them of something precious by believing this shrill criticism. However, the land is still public and still subject to a myriad of regulations and federal land management agency oversight and control. The notion that oil and gas production or mining can immediately occur on these non- monument lands is just simply false and any one stating that or even implying it is simply lying. As far as grazing is concerned, it has declined by about 40% since the Grand Staircase was designated a National Monument even though existing grazing was supposedly grandfathered in by President Clinton’s establishing order. This brings up another point the advocates for more control of public land always conveniently forget to mention when defending National Monument designations of such unbelievable acreages. The Antiquities Act was established in 1906. The original intent was to give the president authority to protect native artifacts and significant geologic areas with fossils or places such as Devil’s Post pile in Californa and “the smallest area compatible with the protection of objects.” I am all for preserving petroglyphs or Basque sheepherder tree carvings for that matter but a 100 or even a 1,000 acre petroglyph site does not need 1.3 million acres of protection around it to ensure preservation. Let me try and create some perspective on what kind of space we are discussing here on the off chance that someone from New Jersey might read this column. 1.3 million acres is a little larger than the whole state of Rhode Island. We should always keep in mind these areas were protected by federal law before and are still protected by federal laws, regulations and management. In fact, the proclamations reducing the size of both monuments recognizes this protection: “A host of laws enacted after the Antiquities Act provide specific protection for archaeological, historic, cultural, paleontological, and plant and animal resources and give authority to the BLM and the USFS to condition permitted activities on federal lands, whether within or outside a monument. Stolen by the President and Secretary Zinke, I think not. Get over your hysteria and engage in meaningful discussion people. I’ll see you soon. www.progressiverancher.com
Jack Payne
Cell: 775-217-9273 Alt: 775-225-8889
OFFICE: 775-423-7760
Full-Service Cattle Sales & Marketing - serving Fallon, Nevada and the Outlying Areas.
California is getting rain and the grass is turning green. Calf prices are up! It’s a good time to start putting together your grass calves. The last few sales have seen high quality calves.
Next Feeder Sales February 1, 2018 Starting at 11:30 am
Nevada Livestock Vet Supply, LLC “Where the Ranchers Shop”
131 Industrial Way Fallon, NV 89406 Monica is there to assist with all of your animals health needs. 775-624-4996
Consign Early - Call Jack Payne 775-225-8889
Feeder Sale Results: January 17th and 18th, 2018 Thank you to all of our consigners and buyers. STEERS
STEERS
# of HD
Desc.
Weight
Price CWT
20
BLK
389
$227.00
10
MIX
407
$222.50
15
MIX
409
$215.00
8
BLK
458
24
MIX
11
February 15, 2018 Starting at 11:30 am
HEIFERS # of HD
Desc.
Weight
Price CWT
2
BLK
337
$178.00
10
BLK
421
$173.50
# of HD
Desc.
Weight
Price CWT
10
BLK
409
$172.00
9
MIX
511
$172.75
20
MIX
432
$171.00
49
BLK
564
$172.00
6
BLK
425
$170.00
28
MIX
545
$172.00
35
BLK
462
$168.00
$209.50
34
MIX
455
$170.00
12
MIX
443
$166.50
425
$207.50
1
BLK
365
$170.00
2
CH
420
$163.00
BLK
422
$204.00
13
BLK
555
$168.00
19
BLK
418
$161.00
5
BLK
461
$202.00
37
BLK
599
$166.75
30
BLK
443
$160.75
4
BLK
340
$199.00
7
MIX
553
$165.50
21
BLK
483
$160.00
BLK
597
$164.25
6
MIX
337
$199.00
28
4
BLK
578
$160.00
20
MIX
465
$198.00
2
MIX
413
$164.00
9
BLK
484
$159.50
8
MIX
484
$193.00
6
BLK
610
$163.00
2
CH
483
$159.50
MIX
631
$160.50
36
BLK
451
$193.00
18
39
BLK
488
$158.00
15
MIX
413
$191.00
1
MIX
623
$157.00
2
MIX
378
$154.00
8
MIX
491
$185.00
36
MIX
671
$153.00
31
BLK
501
$154.00
3
MIX
427
$184.00
34
BLK
691
$150.50
25
MIX
478
$149.50
BLK
537
$150.00
12
MIX
507
$180.50
3
21
MIX
441
$149.50
5
MIX
367
$180.00
1
BLK
685
$147.00
20
MIX
548
$146.00
34
BLK
525
$179.25
11
BLK
799
$145.75
1
BLK
588
$145.50
RED
694
$145.00
80
BLK
530
$178.00
9
11
BLK
543
$142.50
1
MIX
516
$178.00
2
BBF
528
$141.00
5
BLK
592
$140.00
18
MIX
507
$177.50
4
MIX
581
$135.00
10
MIX
472
$135.00
6
BLK
517
$177.00
2
RED
955
$130.00
5
MIX
698
$135.00
$174.00
2
BBF
975
$108.00
5
BLK
686
$132.00
10
MIX
436
www.progressiverancher.com
The Progressive Rancher
February 2018
11
CHECKOFF NEWS: Checking on the Checkoff By Nevada Beef Council staff
"Beef. It's What's For Dinner." Relaunch Reaches Millions of Consumers
A
new generation of consumers is getting to know beef through the new checkoff-funded Beef. It's What's For Dinner. campaign, launched last October. The iconic brand was refreshed in 2017, celebrating the 25th anniversary of its first introduction to consumers. At the center of the brand relaunch was a series of videos showcasing ranchers from around the country, including a “Rethink the Ranch” anthem video touting the care and innovation that go into beef production today. Since the relaunch last fall, more than 20 million consumers have been reached or engaged through various online efforts. The videos themselves have generated more than 765,000 video views nationally, and reached more than 3.5 million consumers. Additionally, more than 2 million people visited Beef ItsWhatsForDinner.com during that time frame. The campaign has also successfully driven web traffic to the “Raising Beef ” section of the updated website to encourage visitors to view the videos, with almost 400,000 page views since the launch. Those people stayed on website pages 42 percent longer (compared to 2016), and the Raising Beef section - core content for the relaunch campaign - became the second top viewed section of the site, right after beef recipes.
Retailers, food service operators and other beef marketers have also been engaged and encouraged to learn more about beef and feature it more often through one-on-one outreach and through a LinkedIn campaign, which targeted business decision-makers. Major media outreach has resulted in more than 30 million impressions for the Beef. It's What's For Dinner. relaunch, including a major story in the Wall Street Journal online and print editions.
The effort is also reaching out to food and health inf luencers, such as registered dietitians, bloggers and doctors, to share the positive information about the brand and website. More than 36,000 health professionals have been reached through outlets such as Nutrition 411, a popular e-newsletter for dietitians. If you haven’t had a chance to see the new and improved Beef ItsWhatsForDinner.com yourself, be sure to check it out today!
Successful Content Partnerships in 2017
The beef checkoff and Nevada Beef Council continuously look for creative, effective ways to reach consumers with positive beef messaging. As one example of that, partnerships with popular third-party websites can provide an effective platform to reach a large number of consumers and amplify the beef industry’s “Courtesy of Beef. It’s What’s For Dinner.” messages. In late 2017, the checkoff-funded Beef. It's What's For Dinner. brand completed two such content partnerships with the food and healthy lifestyle websites PureWow (w w w.purewow.com) and Greatist (w w w.greatest.com) to create and execute eye-catching, inspiring content about beef. These partners captured consumers through a variety of videos and articles, resulting in millions of consumers hearing about beef from these inf luential websites. The content provided on each of the popular sites provided tasty beef recipes, while also providing helpful cooking tips and nutrition information, such as the following information featured on Greatest: “When you’re craving a meaty meal, the first food that comes to mind is probably a big, juicy burger, because any other beef cuts that come to mind (filet mignon, top sirloin, etc.) just sound too complicated. But we've got good news, folks. These beef dinners are way easier to cook at home than you think, and we're sharing the best beef recipes that you can start adding to your weekly dinner routine, like now. Did we mention these can all be a part of that healthy eating plan too? The beef cuts used below contain protein, iron, and B vitamins; some even have less than 10 grams of fat and 4 1/2 grams of saturated fat per 3-ounce serving (which is how the USDA defines the word lean). All of that plus 10 essential nutrients with an average of 25 grams of protein? We'll take it. It's no wonder a recent study found that including lean beef in your diet may actually help lower cholesterol. So step outside of your comfort zone and give one of these healthy beef dinners a try.” Overall, the campaign garnered more than 85 million impressions, 4.1 million video views and nearly 50k social engagements across both the PureWow and Greatist digital ecosystems. These numbers surpassed standard benchmark for both partners, proving that consumers are hungry for educational beef content. New Transportation Training Available for Producers The checkoff-funded Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) program has launched a new training and certification program for cattle transportation.
For more about the Nevada Beef Council or the Beef Checkoff, visit www.nevadabeef.org or www.mybeefcheckoff.org. 12 February 2018
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
The program, known as Beef Quality Assurance Transportation (BQAT), provides cattle producers and haulers with comprehensive training based on their roles in the cattle industry. Online training is now available at w w w. bqa.org, and in-person training opportunities will begin soon throughout the country. The BQA program was first funded by the beef checkoff in the early 1990s and developed its first guidance on transportation in 2006. Today, the program offers training and certification programs for all sectors of the industry: cow-calf, stocker and feedyard. This is the first time a nationally recognized certification has been offered for the transportation segment of the industry.
Online training for BQAT will be offered in two different modules: Farmer/Rancher and Professional. Farmer/Rancher modules will focus on the use of stock trailers and smaller loads of cattle that beef and dairy cattle producers might typically haul themselves. The Professional modules focus on the use of tractor-trailers and larger loads that are typically hauled further distances. To begin training or learn more, visit w w w.bqa.org. Learn more about your Nevada Beef Council at www.nevadabeef.org, or your beef checkoff at www.mybeefcheckoff.org.
Szechuan Beef Stir Fry This easy to prepare, nutrient-packed dish is sure to help your body get strong with beef this new year! Keep your health on track with this lean, protein-rich, delicious meal that can be prepared into several portions for your busy week ahead. Beef is full of protein to help repair the muscles that you’ve just torched in the gym (or on the ranch), along with B vitamins to help your body utilize the energy from carbohydrates in the fluffy bed of rice, and iron to help circulate oxygen and deliver these nutrients throughout the body to keep you going full speed ahead. The bell peppers in this dish are an excellent source of vitamin C which will assist in iron absorption, and is crucial for the formation of connective tissue which can help keep joints healthy. For more fiber, simply substitute brown rice. Consistency is key when it comes to maintaining health and wellness. Convenient, tasty, and nutrient-dense meals such as this are great selections to ensure success. Makes 4 servings INGREDIENTS • 2 beef Ranch Steaks, cut 3/4 inch thick (about 8 ounces each) • 1 package (10 ounces) fresh vegetable stir-fry blend • 3 tablespoons water • 1 clove garlic, minced • 1/2 cup prepared sesame-ginger stir-fry sauce • 1/4 teaspoon crushed red pepper • 2 cups hot cooked rice or brown rice, prepared without butter or salt • 1/4 cup dry roasted peanuts INSTRUCTIONS 1. Combine vegetables and water in large nonstick skillet; cover and cook over medium-high heat 4 minutes or until crisp-tender. Remove and drain vegetables. Set aside. 2. Meanwhile, cut beef steaks into 1/4-inch thick strips. 3. Heat same skillet over medium-high heat until hot. Add 1/2 of beef and 1/2 of garlic; stir-fry 1 to 2 minutes or until outside surface of beef is no longer pink. Remove from skillet; keep warm. Repeat with remaining beef and garlic. 4. Return all beef and vegetables to skillet. Add stir-fry sauce and red pepper; cook and stir 1 to 2 minutes or until heated through. Spoon over rice. Sprinkle with peanuts. 5. Recipe as seen in The Healthy Beef Cookbook, published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Find more ideas for main dishes and leftovers at www.beefitswhatsfordinner.com.
www.progressiverancher.com
The Progressive Rancher
February 2018
13
In the Mind of a Millennial By Jill Scofield, Director of Producer Relations, California & Nevada Beef Council
I
A Little More on the Consumer Beef Index
t's hard to believe we’re already into February, when it seems like we just got through the holidays. If you made resolutions this year, I hope you are still going strong in keeping to them. And if you didn’t (like me), I hope you’re still going strong in general. Last month in this column, I shared a bit from the latest Consumer Beef Index (CBI), offering some insight about current consumer perceptions about beef. The CBI is just one of many checkoff-funded research tools that helps guide program development. It was initially developed in 2006 and has been used by the beef checkoff to track changes in consumers’ perceptions of and demand for beef relative to other proteins, such as chicken. As I shared last month, the CBI also assesses the impact of beef industry communications on consumer attitudes, measures the extent to which consumers consider the positive aspects of beef to outweigh the negatives, monitor areas of strength and potential vulnerability for beef, and more. In short, it’s a great tool for measuring where beef sits with consumers in terms of their attitudes and behavior, as well as a tool for informing how the industry should move forward in terms of its communication with consumers. I already noted some of the results from the last CBI, conducted in late summer 2017 involving a survey of over 1,000 consumers nation-wide. The findings were largely encouraging, showing that the general market equity indicators for beef remain favorable, with the proportion of U.S. consumers who have beef at least once a month strong and stable, at 92 percent. Remember, too, some of the other encouraging tidbits: beef continues to be a preferred meal choice for 78 percent of consumers, and those who feel the positives of beef outweigh the negatives outnumber those who feel negatives outweigh positives by a ratio of four to one. Because this column is intended to provide insight into the mindsets of millennial consumer s— a key demographic for the beef industry – I would be remiss in not mentioning at least one aspect specific to this audience. (While the CBI places a focus on older millennial parents in this important research, consumers in other age ranges are also included to better track generational differences.) In general, older millennial parents continue to have favorable attitudes about beef, and consume it at a higher rate than other consumers. Nearly one-quarter (23%) in this category feel that beef is better than chicken at appealing to everyone in their families, versus only 14% for consumers in general. But beyond general perceptions about beef, one important factor that the CBI addresses is why consumers might be willing to consume more beef.
Notably, the factors “quick and easy meal” and “great prices at stores” represent a significant change in the longer-term trend, with a 15-point gain and 17-point gain in importance to consumers over the last four years. Better understanding factors such as these help identify for checkoff-funded programs and state beef councils such as the NBC what tactics best resonate with consumer preferences. Understanding, for example, that the fact that beef offers a quick and easy meal, and that the taste is preferred over other proteins as key drivers in some consumers’ desire to consume more beef is important information for future efforts and campaigns. Research such as this, funded by your beef checkoff, is another valuable tool for all of us in the industry to better serve, communicate with and engage the consumers who are buying our product. After all, without fully understanding their perceptions and preferences, how can we adequately meet their needs t the meat case? You can learn more about this important work, or other beef checkoff-funded research, at www.beefresearch.com, or www.beefboard.com.
The 2017 CBI shows that, of those consumers who plan to eat more beef, the most important factors that impact that decision include: • Quick and easy meal (77 percent of respondents finding this extremely or very important) • Prefer the taste of beef (76 percent) • The right choice for more occasions (73 percent) • Learned new ways to prepare beef (73 percent) • Better availability of cuts (72 percent) • Adding protein to your diet (72 percent) • More of a family favorite (71 percent) • Great prices at stores (71) 14 February 2018
The Progressive Rancher
Jill Scofield is the Director of Producer Relations for the California and Nevada Beef Councils. She grew up on a cow-calf ranch in Northwestern Nevada. www.progressiverancher.com
NRRC Accepting Proposals and Setting Priorities at Upcoming Meeting Each year the Nevada Rangeland Resource Commission (NRRC) meets and sets their budget priorities for the upcoming year. This year the Commission will meet March 2, 2018 in Winnemucca and listen to proposals relating to projects on marketing, advertising, and/or communication of public land ranching. The application for funding includes a brief description, a proposed budget, timeline, and who the targeted audience will be. The applications for funding are available on the NRRC’s website and are due by February 16th. The NRRC is governed by a commission of nine voting members. These members are nominated through each of the grazing boards, Nevada Cattlemen’s Association, Share Nevada Woolgrowers and0 the 0Farm Bureau; then appointed by the Governor. The Receive Updates Enter Email Address NRRC has one part-time staff person. Please if you would like to make a proposal, e-mail us for an application for funding at NRRC08@yahoo.com. or get it from our website at www.nevadarangelands.org. Go
Assistance Available to Agricultural Producers through the Conservation Stewardship Program USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service sent this bulletin at 01/19/2018 11:14 AM EST Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.
For Immediate Release January 19, 2018 Contact: Heather Emmons, State Public Affairs Officer Phone: (775) 857-8500 ext. 105 Email: heather.emmons@nv.usda.gov Assistance Available to Agricultural Producers through the Conservation Stewardship Program WASHINGTON, Jan. 19, 2018 – Agricultural producers wanting to enhance current conservation efforts are encouraged to apply for the Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP). Through CSP, USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) helps private landowners build their business while implementing conservation practices that help ensure the sustainability of their entire operation. NRCS plans to enroll up to 10 million acres in CSP in 2018. While applications for CSP are accepted year round, applications must be received by March 2, 2018 to be considered for this funding period.
Through CSP, agricultural producers and forest landowners earn payments for actively managing, maintaining, and expanding conservation activities like cover crops, ecologically-based pest management, buffer strips, and pollinator and beneficial insect habitat– all while maintaining active agriculture production on their land. CSP also encourages the adoption of cutting-edge technologies and new management techniques such as precision agriculture applications, on-site carbon storage and planting for high carbon sequestration rate, and new soil amendments to improve water quality. Some of these benefits of CSP include: Improved cattle gains per acre; Increased crop yields; Decreased inputs; Wildlife population improvements; and Better resilience to weather extremes. NRCS recently made several updates to the program to help producers better evaluate their conservation options and the benefits to their operations and natural resources. New methods and software for evaluating applications help producers see up front why they are or are not meeting stewardship thresholds, and allow them to pick practices and enhancements that work for their conservation objectives. These tools also enable producers to see potential payment scenarios for conservation early in the process. Producers interested in CSP are recommended to contact their local USDA service center or visit www.nrcs.usda.gov/GetStarted. # USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
www.progressiverancher.com
The Progressive Rancher
February 2018
15
Old UNCE Study on Consumer Preferences for Meat Attributes
D
uring this issue, I would like to discuss an older study that was done on consumer preference in consuming meat products in Nevada. There are so many diets out there that cut out different things like gluten, meat, or sugar. I am also part of a Veggies for Kids program that is based on the federal dietary recommendations of what should be consumed daily. Who is right? Or, who even cares what is right because everyone is different and eats what they want to or what makes them feel better. Knowing that everyone is different, what are consumers in Nevada buying? According to the United States Department of Agriculture the total U.S. beef consumption Staci Emm in 2015 was 24.8 billion pounds (USDA, ERS, 2017). Americans’ diets are also out of balance with federal recommendations. Consumers are eating more fruits and vegetables and consuming more meat, eggs and nuts than recommended on the federal MyPlate (federal guidelines for nutrition). I was working with Dr. Kynda Curtis on Risk Management projects in 2006-2008 and she had her staff working on a research study assessing consumer preferences for meat attributes. A mail survey of 542 households in Nevada sought to gain residents’ preferences for meat products and their willingness to pay for different products. This study was done as part of the grow-local movement and to assist local producers in entering into niche markets. The study wanted to document what consumers were looking for in their meat products The respondents represented all regions of Nevada, but a slight majority were from Southern Nevada. There were 56% from southern Nevada (Las Vegas, Henderson, etc.), 40% Northern, Nevada (Reno, Carson City, etc); 2% from Eastern Nevada (Elko, Winnemucca, etc.); and 2% did not specify. There were 77% of survey respondents that directly bought their beef from the grocery store. The cut type that was eaten most during the month was tri-tip followed by beef roast and ground beef. The “extremely important” and “very important” meat attributes were documented and tell us that freshness and taste/flavor is extremely important. It was interesting to note that humane treatment and environmentally friendly were high on the very important list. This study also went on to estimate how much more consumers would pay for the meat product if it met their specific meat attributes. The survey respondents were presented with a New York Steak and ground beef. It was found respondents were willing to pay an average premium of 42% (over the $5.90/lb. price) for a locally grown New York Steak and only a premium of 2% (over the average base price of $2.73/lb.) for the ground beef. The study also used pork chops and leg of lamb in this specific analysis
16 February 2018
It would be great if we could redo this small study over ten years later to see if this information is still the same or if our consumers in Nevada have changed. I personally would like to include some different questions regarding overall consumption of meat products. Maybe in the near future, we can find researchers that will be interested on working on this again. The Nevada Beef Council also does similar studies. If you want to read the fact sheet on this particular study, it can be accessed at https://www. unce.unr.edu/publications/files/ag/2008/fs0811.pdf
Extremely Important Meat Attributes • Freshness • Taste/Flavor • Safety • Tenderness • Leanness • Price
The Progressive Rancher
Very Important Meat Attributes • Cut type • Humane treatment • Environmentally friendly • Marbling • Naturally raised • Feed type
www.progressiverancher.com
Melinda Sarmon, Vice President of Nevada Cattlewomen, Inc. and Elko County Cattlewomen President
M
elinda Sarmon was born in Reno to parents Ted and Judy Britton. She grew up in Gardnerville, Nevada attending Douglas County schools. She was very active in 4-H and FFA when growing up.
Melinda Sarmon
www.progressiverancher.com
After highs school, she attended the University of Nevada, Reno and graduated with a B.S. in Animal Science. She would take her first job right out of college working for the University of Nevada Cooperative Extension in Elko County as the 4-H Coordinator. She met and married her husband Mike Sarmon and became part of a family cow-calf operation first in Gardnerville and later in Elko out in Pleasant Valley.
Mike and Melinda have three children and custody of a fourth child. Their names are Katlin, Leanna, Wade and Trent. Katin is in college and will graduate this spring from UNR. Leanna is at Spring Creek High School, and Wade and Trent attend Spring Creek Middle School. Melinda has been a member of Elko Cattlewomen for the last five to six years. She is currently the President of Elko County Cattlewomen as well as Vick President of Nevada Cattlewomen, Inc. “I am very proud to be in an industry that supports hard work and strong family ethics,” said Melinda while adding, “My volunteer time with Cattlewomen around the state gives me an amazing opportunity to meet outstanding women in and out of the livestock industry and I am thankful for this opportunity.” In addition to her volunteer work with Cattlewomen across the state, she is still very active in Elko County. Melinda is a beef leader for a local 4-H club and she is in the booster club for Silver Sage FFA. This is all in addition to supporting her husband and children in their endeavors.
The Progressive Rancher
February 2018
17
Avoid Common Mistakes in Marketing Cattle
I
n researching for his book, Extraordinary Tennis for Ordinary Tennis Players, Simon Ramo found that professional tennis players tend to earn around 80% of the points, and only lose around 20% because of mistakes. Ramo found that amateur tennis was exactly the opposite. Amateurs tend to lose around 80% of their points due to mistakes and only earn around 20%. When it comes to marketing cattle, it is very difficult if not impossible for even the very best producers to sell at the top of the market every year. However, just by avoiding a few common mistakes producers can significantly increase their annual receipts. Unfortunately, the lure of attempting to hit the top of the market every year is a trap for many producers. I attended a grain marketing seminar a while ago where Dr. Edward Usset listed five common mistakes in grain marketing. As a cattle guy, I decided to apply the same criteria to cattle producers and come up with five common mistakes in cattle marketing. Here is what I came up with; 1. failure to critically sort cattle, 2. getting in a marketing rut, 3. paying little attention to culls and other “out” cattle, 4. not taking advantage of risk management tools, and 5. being a passive marketer.
Sort Cattle with a Critical Eye Often times producers attempt to “sneak” in a few extra head that they know should have been sorted off from a set of cattle. This is usually done for convenience, or with the thought that those cattle really weren’t that bad and should go with the main load. If you are marketing 200 steers, weighing 500 pounds, 5 of which should have been sorted off, what does it cost you? Let’s assume that because of the 5 head we receive a price of $155.00 per cwt. for all 200 head. If we sorted the 5 head off, we receive a price of $157.00 per cwt. on 195 head and $137.00 per cwt. on 5 head. Looking at this very realistic scenario we would make $1500 more by sorting the cattle. Year after year $1500 does add up.
Be Cautious of a Marketing Rut Market conditions change from year to year. Although market timing cycles can be somewhat similar, often taking advantage of slight differences can add $2-3 per cwt. Just because you have always sold cattle the first week in October does not mean that is the best time to sell cattle. Additionally, each year there can be regional differences in market price. This means the best auction barn to sell your cattle at last year may not be the best barn to sell cattle at this year. Often times the price difference between auction barns is even greater than the differences in freight and shrink.
Pay Attention to Culls and Other “Out” Cattle Cull cow sales are approximately 15% of annual income for a cow/calf enterprise. Yet, cull cows are often overlooked when considering a marketing plan or strategy for the ranch. The cull cow market is one of the more predictable markets for cow/calf producers. If producers are willing to make some management changes significant gains can be made from cull cow sales. Dr. Dillon Feuz authored a useful bulletin titled “Marketing and Feeding Cull Cows”. It can be found at cattlemarketanalysis. org/downloads and click on the marketing cull cows option.
18 February 2018
Even if a producer is not willing to make management changes to take advantage of cull cow prices, carefully watching the market can also add significant value. As I watched one of our Wyoming markets last fall I consistently saw an every other week pattern on cull cows. This every other week pattern would often lead to price differences of $5 - $10 per cwt. On ten 1200 pound cull cows that could be as much as $1200 just by watching the market and waiting one week to take your culls.
Consider Using a Risk Management Tool Often times we think of risk management tools such as the futures and options market or insurance products, as tools to help us in downward trending markets. However, as I watch producers I am convinced these tools can help as much in strong markets as well. Cow/calf producers have a lot of capital and labor, as well as blood, sweat and tears, tied up in each calf crop. Because of this significant investment in each calf crop, producers are extremely motivated to sell and often are willing to take the first reasonable price offer. One strategy to improve bargaining position could be to purchase Livestock Risk Protection Insurance (LRP). A producer using this strategy would purchase LRP Insurance essentially establishing a floor price for their calves. That floor price would be the (insured coverage price – the insurance premium). Using this strategy takes much of the stress of marketing cattle away from the negotiation. No longer is a producer compelled to take that first reasonable offer, but they are in a position to be able to focus on getting a quality price. The knowledge that they are assured of a minimum acceptable price through LRP insurance gives the producer a good bargaining advantage.
Do Not Passively Market Cattle This last of Feuz’s 5 common mistakes in marketing cattle really encompasses all of the above mistakes. Producers often devote significant time and energy into managing things like genetics, range, pasture, nutrition and etc. These things are important and can lead to profitability and success. However, these same producers often market cattle based on tradition, convenience or habit. After putting all of the effort into producing cattle a passive marketing strategy can cost producers and reduce overall profitability. Even if it takes you out of your comfort zone, spend as much time and energy on your marketing plan as your range plan and you will reap the benefits. Actively market cattle by seeking out market data, trends and niche opportunities to capitalize on the efforts that went into production. Bridger Feuz – Owner Master Stockman Consulting University of Wyoming Livestock Marketing Specialist Hudson Hill – Master Stockman Consulting University of Wyoming Area Educator Barton Stam – Master Stockman Consulting University of Wyoming Area Educator
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
SHORT ON WATER ? Two Alfalfas in One Plant If Your Pivot Only Pumps 400gal/
Plant On Dryland On the Market for 29 years
(and still unbeatable)
Greenway
360-D
We are a non-GMO seed house! Never a positive hit for GMO
Alfalfa
port Never a Re ill of Winter K
d
ylan ing Dr Plant ays use When lw aa Alfalf ed seed! coat e it!) s prov (Let u
This Alfalfa has been called a tetraploid anomaly by alfalfa breeders. On the market for 25 years, and being improved twice, It remains the highest yeilding, low water alfalfa on the market! HERE’S WHAT GROWERS ARE SAYING: "We plant 360-D every year, and we now have over 1000 acres. We took a second cutting when many other growers in our area only cut once." Bruce Davenport - Goldendale, WA
"We We planted 360-D in an irrigated field that was very short on water. Side by side was field with normal water. The 360-D yielded with the well irrigated adjacent field! No difference in yield! yield!" Ryan Telford - Richfield, ID
Alan Greenway Seedsman
Over 40 Years Experiance
Greenway Seeds Caldwell, ID Alan Greenway 208-250-0159 (cell) 208-454-8342 (message)
www.progressiverancher.com
√ √ √ √ √ √ √
Will produce AT LEAST 80% of crop with 50% of water Will produce a subsequent cutting after water is gone Plant on dryland/ guaranteed to out yield Ranger or Ladak Plant under pivots that only pump 400 gal/ Plant on fields that have only early season creek water Plant under end guns on pivots Plant in the late fall with your dormant seeded grasses
w w w. g r e e n w a y s e e d a n d i n d u s t r i e s . c o m We have sold out by March 1st each of the last 3 years. Order early!
The Progressive Rancher
February 2018
19
NDA Announces New Plant Industry Division Administrator
S
PARKS, Nev. – The Nevada Department of Agriculture (NDA) recently announced Jennifer Ott as its new Plant Industry division administrator. Ott comes to the NDA from the University of Nevada, Reno (UNR), where she served as operations director for the Desert Farming Initiative for four years.
Jennifer Ott
The Nevada Department of Agriculture (NDA) promotes a business climate that is fair, economically viable and encourages a sustainable environment that serves to protect food, fiber and human health and safety through effective service and education. NDA includes the divisions of Administration, Animal Industry, Consumer Equitability, Food and Nutrition and Plant Industry.
Prior to her service at UNR, Ott was a consultant with the Nevada Small Business Development Center and began her career in a laboratory setting, first as a chemist and later as a director.
“Jennifer’s background in agriculture and contacts within the industry are an invaluable asset to our mission of protecting food, fiber and human health and safety,” NDA Director Jim Barbee said. “We are happy to add her experience in diverse areas of agriculture to our Plant Industry team.” Ott also serves on the Nevada Small Farm Conference planning committee and has served as vice president of the NevadaGrown Board of Directors. She holds a master’s degree in business administration from UNR and a bachelor’s degree in chemistry from the University of Texas at Austin.
Genetic Excellence bull Sale Jerry Baker > 208.739.3449 Samuel Mahler > 208.739.0475 2175 Bench Rd. > Vale, OR 97918 Email > baker.baker@fmtc.com
SatuRday, fEBRuaRy 24, 2018
>>
ValE, OREgOn
>>
1 p.M.
SELLING 150 ANGUS BULLS, 16 TO 17 MONTHS OLD WITH i50K ENHANCED EPDS the traits on these Sale Bulls in the top 35% or Better are noted in yellow...
GUEST CONSIGNOR Mahler Cattle Co., Vale, Oregon auctioneer: Rick Machado, 805.301.3210
SALE MANAGER Matt MaCfaRlanE MaRkEting Matt Macfarlane: 916.803.3113 www.m3cattlemarketing.com BakER authEntiC 4503
8-28-16 Ef authentic 0829 x S a V Resource 1441 Weaning Wt Ratio 111 • Yearling Wt Ratio 111
CEd BW WW yW Milk MaRB RE $W $B +9 +1.4 +80 +137 +25 +.68 +.87 +83.45 +146.72
BakER ChiSuM 4635
9-21-16 S Chisum 6175 x Carter Onward 104 Weaning Wt Ratio 99 • Yearling Wt Ratio 105
CEd BW WW yW +4 +2.7 +68 +121
Milk MaRB RE $W $B +17 +.65 +.47 +58.52 +148.04
BakER dOuBlE ViSiOn 4572 9-5-16 Rathbun double Vision B629 x Connealy Mentor 7374 Weaning Wt Ratio 108 • Yearling Wt Ratio 108 CEd +11
BW WW yW +.9 +70 +124
Milk MaRB RE $W $B +36 +.30 +.87 +80.89 +171.73
WATCH AND BID LIVE THD ©
alSO SElling a SElECt gROup Of 60 tO 70 puREBREd COMMERCial REplaCEMEntS & BREd hEifERS 20 February 2018
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
Amodei Public Lands Bill Passes House, Heads to Senate
W
ASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Mark Amodei (NV-02) today released the following statement after the House unanimously passed H.R. 1107, the Pershing County Economic Development and Conservation Act, a bipartisan piece of legislation he reintroduced on February 16, 2017: “This bill represents a decade of grassroots efforts driven by Pershing County officials, residents, ranchers, miners, and conservationists to resolve the County’s land issues that are hamstringing opportunities for growth. As a result of this exhaustive public process, the reforms included in this legislation will increase economic development while ensuring long-term preservation of the County’s rural character through the disposal of appropriate federal lands. This legislation is a win-win for Nevadans, both in terms of economic prosperity and conservation, and I’m pleased to see it backed by the entire Nevada congressional delegation. “However, there may be some confusion at the Department of the Interior regarding the merits of this legislation. It would indeed be curious for Secretary Zinke to perhaps oppose a bill that is supported by the entire Nevada delegation, the Friends of Nevada Wilderness, all of the local mining companies, and Pershing County itself. I certainly hope the rumors about the Interior’s opposition to this bill in the Senate are unfounded, because I know I am certainly underwhelmed when someone from Washington ignores a unanimous congressional agreement. Perhaps somebody ought to review the language in the bill that allows the Secretary pretty extensive jurisdiction in identifying checkboard exchange lands. I look forward to visiting with the President and Vice President to discuss the wisdom of the Secretary’s counsel on these matters if that becomes necessary.” Background on the Pershing County Economic Development and Conservation Act (H.R. 1107): Seventy-five percent of Pershing County is owned by the federal government, with much of this ownership being a checkerboard pattern of lands, hindering the community’s ability to expand opportunities for growth. By resolving areas designated as suitable for transfer, checkerboard lands along I-80, and areas with wilderness characteristics within Pershing County, H.R. 1107 will increase opportunities for economic development. Proceeds from the sale of these federal lands will be shared between the State, Pershing County, and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for the benefit of the State of Nevada’s general public education, wildfire pre-suppression and restoration, habitat conservation and restoration for the greater sage-hen, and projects to address drought and other needs. The bill includes several important measures such as: • Disposing and conveying BLM lands in the County for economic and public purposes; • Designating certain wilderness areas on BLM land in the County; and • Releasing selected wilderness study areas back into multiple-use. Companion legislation (S.414) has been introduced by U.S. Senator Dean Heller (R-NV). Logan Paige Ramsey Communications Director Congressman Mark Amodei (NV-02) Phone: 202-225-6155 Amodei.house.gov www.progressiverancher.com
UPCOMING SALES
March 2nd Cottonwood, CA
Consignment Deadline: February 22nd
April 11th Catalog Deadline: March 26th
WATCH & LISTEN TO THE SALE on the Web at:
For details call (530) 347-3793 or the representative nearest you:
Gary Nolan
Mark Venturacci
Steve Lucas
Elko, NV
Fallon, NV
Paradise Valley, NV
(775) 934-5678
(775) 427-8713
(775) 761-7575
Brad Peek— (916) 802-7335 or email us at wvm@wvmcattle.com Look for the catalog and video on our website www.wvmcattle.com
Market your cattle with the professionals!
The Progressive Rancher
February 2018
21
Western Mining and the Importance of Reclamation Mariel Boldis - University of Nevada Reno, Undergraduate in Rangeland Management
W
hat comes What comes to mind when you hear the words “mine” or “mining?” It would not be surprising to have a variety of mixed emotions from very negative to very positive, but the fact that the average yearly consumption of minerals in the United States is about 40,641 pounds per individual, increases credence to the importance of mining. While many may understand our nation’s dependency of resource extraction and praise the economic benefits of the mining industry, many others also criticize it. Between the spectrums of opinion, we fi nd a lack of public knowledge and understanding of mine reclamation and its importance within the complete life cycle of a mine. A far cry since the General Mining Law of 1872, modern day resource extraction remains to be the most heavily regulated industry in the world. Grasping the lack of understanding of how mine reclamation promotes environmental sustainability, this extends the opportunity for outreach and education to the public to increase awareness of what reclamation is, when it occurs, its importance within the agricultural industry, and the successes and challenges faced in the process.
So What is Mine Reclamation?
Each state defines mine reclamation based on current laws on resources; and while they may vary state by state, according to the Nevada State Legislation, NRS 519A.160, it defines reclamation
as “actions performed during or after an exploration project or mining operation… to return it to a safe, stable condition consistent with the establishment of a productive post mining use of the land… which ensures public safety, as well as the encouragement of techniques which minimize the adverse visual effects.” In other words, mine reclamation is the process of rehabilitating land that has been mined to return it to a visually appealing, environmentally sustainable, and economically productive use. Nearly three million acres in the U.S. have been reclaimed and released by mine regulatory authority since 1975. According to records provided by the Bureau of Mining Regulation and Reclamation, over 13,000 acres in the state of Nevada have been reclaimed since 1996, and over 10,000 of those acres were reclaimed on public lands. From these statistics, the scale of importance of the reclamation stage in the mining cycle can be felt by all who utilize and recreate on public lands.
The Life Cycle of a Mine
Although media outlets and environmental organizations readily pounce on impacts and disasters caused by mines, it’s important to reframe our focus and first understand what’s occurring over the complete life cycle of a mine. We are informed of select mining activities and current environmental impacts during the development and extraction stage; however, very little information is disseminated and understood over what happens after mine closure in modern day mining. In the following, we will explore western mine reclamation and how this stage in the life cycle of a mine affect those who live, work, and recreate around these areas to better understand how we can improve future reclamation practices developed through long-term research and planning to provide sustainable range management. This is especially important in Nevada where according to the Department of Agriculture, range livestock production on public lands is the most important industry in agriculture.
Figure 1a. Coal mine in Wyoming during reclamation efforts in which the mine received a fall drill seeding treatment. 22 February 2018
The Progressive Rancher
Surface and Underground Mining
The type of resources we mine affect the methods of extraction, whether on the surface or underground, which then in turn affect how lands are reclaimed. Surface mining can be broken down into subcategories: strip mining, open pit mining, and mountaintop removal. See Figure 2 for illustration on these types of mining methods. Prior to setting boots on the ground, mining companies must comply with federal laws such as the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, the National Environmental Policy Act of 1970, and state laws such as those provided by the Reclamation Branch of the State of Nevada Division of Environmental Protection. Mines are also subject to additional guidelines provided by regional and national agencies included within the U.S. Department of the Interior.
Reclamation and its Importance
The ultimate goal of reclamation is to restore ecological integrity of the watershed, protect the Waters of the State, cater to public safety, and provide a productive use of the area by stabilizing the landscape for the regeneration of plant communities adjacent to native habitats. Successful site remediation will vary based on the needs and goals of the community, and in rural areas of the west, ranches, farms, and wildlife, are all important to consider. In Wyoming for example, shrub densities must meet a minimum 1 shrub per m2 on 20% of the affected area. In Nevada under NRS 519A.160, land may be returned to its pre-mining level of productivity if the land was a beneficial form of use. In all mining states, agreements between landowners and mining companies for conservation or rehabilitation treatments of adjacent properties are often implemented to maintain the integrity of an ecosystem and promote economic viability of existing ranching and farming communities. In a study published in Arid Land Research and Management, scientists researched how plant communities could be manipulated in reclamation to promote stable landscapes. They took a look at how topsoil replacement between the depths of 0, 20, 40 and 60 centimeters exhibited different plant community characteristics. With soil nitrogen, organic carbon, and infiltration, depths of 40 and 60 centimeters provided the best nutrient and water storage potential for reclamation. In an Ohio study, mulching with industry byproducts have also shown potential benefits such as reducing soil erosion, increasing water holding capacity, and providing nutrients to acidic soils. www.progressiverancher.com
for successful reclamation differ due to methods of mining (strip mining versus open pit mining) and other extrinsic factors (i.e. climate, soil chemistry, topography), we see mind boggling and astounding success. Their reclaim efforts show how well mines have been able to accommodate economic demands through resource extraction, while also catering to longterm environmental sustainability (Figure 2). Overtime, mining companies and reclamation managers have increased their understanding of what works and what doesn’t, and by keeping the mining industry accountable, we can begin to open our eyes to possibilities through the Figure 1b. The same site just 3 years later. support of scientific research. The Successes in Reclamation United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Over the years, reclamation successes have been Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Great Basin recorded to demonstrate water quality and habitat Rangelands Research Unit in Reno, Nevada, is currently regeneration based on ecological and productive potential focused on projects related to rehabilitation of degraded of the environment. Successful remediation is witnessed rangelands. With this research, could we possibly in Agrium, Idaho at the Dry Valley Mine which is provide additional tools to improve reclamation efforts now used for recreation and grazing. Former sand and in arid climates? gravel mining operation, CalPortland in Steilacoom, Washington has now become the Chambers Bay Golf Improving Reclamation in the Great Course where it hosted the 2015 U.S. Open. Places in Basin the south such as the former phosphate South Pasture In a cooperative agreement with USDA-ARS Mine in Hardee County, Florida has now become a in Burns, Oregon, USDA-ARS in Reno, Nevada, complex wet prairie and mixed hardwood community University of Nevada Reno, and Newmont Mining, which provides high quality habitat for wildlife. In the they are researching how fall grazing can be utilized Great Basin, successful reclamation is found in areas in reducing cheatgrass fuel loads. This research has such as the former Bootstrap/Tara/Captstone Waste the potential to be applied in mine reclamation where Rock Disposal Facility in Eureka County, Nevada, sites have been noted to be adjacent to invasive grass where wildlife such as mule deer, chukar, antelope, and monocultures which may potentially encroach reclaimed the greater sage grouse populate the area. In recent visits habitats if the site isn’t ecological stabile. Improving to a coal mine in Wyoming, and two mineral mines management strategies and implementing new ones that in Nevada, I was able to witness reclamation efforts control and reduce invasive grasses may be beneficial for from its early seral stages up to 20 years post-seeding long term success, especially in areas where top soil is (Figure 1a and 1b). Although these mines’ approaches re-used. In another cooperative agreement, the USDAARS in Reno, Nevada, The Desert Research Institute, and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) are researching how measuring soil erosion and runoff from western rangelands may improve our understanding of the impact rainfall has on moving soil and minerals across terrain. Results of this research may create new tools to improve reclamation practices that mitigate soil erosion, and improve water quality. If we combine hydrologic research investigated in arid regions, with research focused on vegetation Figure 2. Coal mine site 20 years following reclamation/seeding treatment. www.progressiverancher.com
The Progressive Rancher
and soils in reclamation, and account for climatic variability such as the seasonality and timing of rainfall; reclamation managers can better identify the most effective strategies for success. We can also take this a step further and use the results of this research to apply it to the Rangeland Hydrology Erosion Model (RHEM), which is used to assess high risk sites prone to soil erosion across a wide range of soil textures, vegetation cover, and topography utilizing readily available data from NRCS National Resources Inventory (NRI). Adding RHEM to the reclamation toolbox would be an opportunity for application in areas of reclaim difficulty where cause of failure is unknown due to insufficient support of hydrological data. RHEM can be coupled with The BLM Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring (AIMS) program which provides strategies for monitoring the status of BLM rangelands in a variety of scenarios. According to research in New Mexico, this combination may provide Mine Reclamation Managers an effective new tool for improving reclamation practices in the arid west.
Reclamation Methods to Improve Water Use Efficiency
In western rangelands where water is the resourcelimiting commodity, it’s crucial to consider reclamation methods that may improve water use efficiency by reusing wastewater; as well as, improving water catchment and redistribution on the landscape. Currently, Great Basin Research Institute, Reno, NV is partnering with USDA-ARS in Reno, NV, evaluating practices that would condition rehabilitated hills to reduce runoff and store more water by applying techniques such as crevices where water and nutrients are captured during rainfall. Utilizing these strategies for reclamation would be beneficial for improving plant establishment and increasing water storage in soils on various slopes. More plants would not only stabilize top soil and absorb more water, they would also provide more cover and forage for wildlife and livestock.
One Step Closer
Emphasizing the importance of mine reclamation propagates a better understanding of what it means on a larger scale— economically and environmentally. Harnessing ourselves with the knowledge necessary to improve reclamation practices can move an industry towards greater sustainability that works in cooperation with other industries such as agriculture, recreation, and other small businesses. Whether you live in rural communities or urban ones, post-mining practices affect everyone. Although our opinions over mining may differ, we all share the common goal of reaching more sustainable solutions. Strengthening our reclamation methods will allow family owned cow-calf operations to continue working in future generations; it will allow a hunter and his son to continue their annual hunting traditions; and it will allow backpackers the opportunity to recreate in areas long forgotten of a mine. However it may be, reclaiming our shared public lands and improving the methods of how we go about it is the future we should continue to foster within our western mining culture. February 2018
23
Implementing Grazing Management Collaboratively Across All Lands
L
ivestock grazing on western rangelands, like management for a variety of other resources (e.g. fish and wildlife, recreation, open space, energy development), is dependent on a network of ownerships (state, federal, tribal and private) across the landscape. In an effort to create a coordinated grazing management plan that benefits habitat conditions across all lands, key nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and livestock producers need to be involved collaboratively with federal, tribal and state land managers in developing grazing management alternatives. These alternatives will meet the diverse needs of the economic, social, and ecological aspects of this Western landscape and its associated human and natural resources. Livestock grazing is often recognized as the dominant use of rangelands for economic benefit and rural community stability. According to the National Agricultural Statistics Service in 2015, gross cattle sales were nearly two billion dollars in Idaho.
producer/landowner/permittee is critical to the process of developing solutions that fit their operation and improve the ecological benefit and wildlife habitat conditions across the landscape. Grazing periods and facilitating practices, planned and applied, will be supported by monitoring. This will allow for adjustment in timing and intensity of grazing as well as provide adequate rest and recovery periods across the entire range. This collaboration will be supported at the local, state, tribal and federal levels to guarantee sustainable outcomes.
"Grazing is also influential because it affects wildlife, recreation, open space and wildland fire. "
Grazing is also influential because it affects wildlife, recreation, open space and wildland fire. There is a need to ensure the sustainability of these large intact landscapes and the critical forage resources and habitat that people and wildlife depend upon. Throughout the year, livestock producers rely on a network of ecologically complex state, federal and privately managed lands that currently are administered under various missions, administrative plans, and grazing systems that may not be responsive to annual changes in weather, plant phenology, wildland fire or market conditions. Livestock producers depend on federal permits and state leases for a large portion of their annual forage balance, yet often have a limited amount of flexibility to change season of use or to provide adequate rest and recovery during critical periods. This can result in decreased rangeland condition, soil health, and less productive ecosystems that the people and wildlife depend on. ln arid landscapes, private lands often produce the most forage and provide critical water resources for wildlife and livestock. Across Idaho, grazing permittees and public land managers alike have identified a need for the development of grazing management plans to allow more flexible use across ownership boundaries (all lands) that will improve the landscape ecosystem in its entirety. Grazing practices that utilize these lands in a cohesive manner are far more likely to achieve desired outcomes than managing within the limits of individual jurisdictional units. We propose the assembling of a diverse group of local stakeholders who will inform the process of resource inventory, grazing management alternatives, and monitoring development that encompasses all lands utilized throughout the year by individuals or groups of permittees. Buy-in on the part of the livestock
24 February 2018
While maintaining compliance with governing laws and statute, this approach will require collaboration across a d m i n i s t r a t i ve /ow ne r s h ip boundaries and will likely deviate from the traditional planning, inventory and alternative development process for grazing management on the associated federal permits and state leases. As a result, this collaborative process offers opportunities for adaptive management and will produce results that achieve desired ecological, aesthetic, economic, and social outcomes. Decisions made during the process should focus on the long term goals and objectives of the landscape being managed, in combination with the informed consent and benefit of local stakeholder group(s). This white paper, “Implementing Grazing Management Collaboratively Across All Lands,� is signed by: Curtis Elke, Idaho State Conservationist, USDA - Natural Resource Conservation Service Celia Gould, Director, Idaho Department of Agriculture Gregory Hughes, Idaho State Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Gretchen Hyde, Idaho Rangeland Resource Commission Karen Launchbaugh, University of Idaho Rangeland Center Dustin Miller, Idaho Governor’s Office of Species Conservation Virgil Moore, Director, Idaho Department of Fish and Game Tim Murphy, Idaho State Director, Bureau of Land Management Stanley Speaks, Bureau of Indian Affairs Tom Shultz, Director, Idaho Department of Lands Kit Tillotson, President, Idaho Association of Soil Conservation Districts
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
FEED YOUR COWS SOME OF THIS!! Cover Crops are Hot!
Annual Clovers Fix 100lbs of Nitrogen/acre
CUT BEFORE BLOOM and get a second grazing for free!
One of our annual, No Bloat Clovers
MIX THIS WITH YOUR OATS OR TRITICALE Cut planting rate of triticale and/or oats Plug up every other drop tube in your grain drill If you plant trit. or oats on March 1, wait till April 1, to broadcast your clover For additional details, go to website.
Why would you plant straight oats or triticale @ 11% protein when you can average 19-20% protein by adding this high yielding and very nutritious cover crop?
BOOK YOUR SEED NOW FOR SPRING DELIVERY Alan Greenway Seedsman Over 40yrs Experience
www.progressiverancher.com
GREENWAY SEEDS
Caldwell, Idaho Alan cell: (208) 250-0159 msg: (208) 454-8342 www.greenwayseedandindustries.com
The Progressive Rancher
February 2018
25
Sage Grouse Initiative Webinar: Effects of Livestock Grazing on Sage Grouse Nesting Ecology When: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 | 10:00 – 11:00 am PST Host: NRCS West National Technology Support Center Presenter: Dr. Joe Smith, University of Montana Description: Livestock grazing has been suggested as a contributing factor to sage-grouse habitat degradation, primarily since grazing can directly reduce vegetation cover believed to be important for concealing the birds’ nests. Consequently, identifying ways to manage livestock that promotes high-quality nesting cover for sage-grouse has been a priority across the range. Yet, until recently, little research existed that tested these hypothesized relationships between grazing and sage-grouse. In 2011, University of Montana (UM), Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and other partners initiated a 10-year field study in central Montana to evaluate outcomes of rotational grazing systems designed to improve habitat for sage-grouse. The goal of the study was to inform decision-making for conservation practices that benefit the bird and the herd. In this webinar, Joe Smith, a post-doctoral researcher at UM who helped run the field study during its inaugural years and analyzed nesting data for his dissertation, will present a summary of the study’s findings to date regarding sage-grouse nesting
26 February 2018
ecology and effects of rest-rotation grazing on grouse and range vegetation. Dr. Smith will also present results of a broader analysis comprising >800 sage-grouse nests from three independent studies across the West evaluating the relationship between grass height and nest survival. Findings provide important insights and considerations for future research and management, and help put the role of grazing management in perspective when compared to other environmental factors and threats.
New research will be presented that puts the role of grazing management in perspective when compared to other environmental factors and threats. Photo by Joe Smith (webinar presenter)
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
Grazing Management in Perspective: A Compatible Tool for Sage Grouse Conservation New research shows that — done right — livestock grazing may help conserve sage grouse habitat by keeping working ranches profitable and sustainable Photos by Joe Smith
I
mproper livestock grazing has been proposed as a contributing factor to habitat degradation since overgrazing can reduce concealing cover provided by vegetation around the birds’ nests. Consequently, identifying ways to manage livestock that maintain high-quality habitat for sage grouse is a priority across the range. New research from a team led by Joe Smith from the University of Montana is beginning to answer the question of whether rotational grazing systems and resting pastures benefit sage grouse. A study conducted by scientists from Montana Fish Wildlife & Parks, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and USDA’s Conservation Effects Assessment Project evaluated the effects of livestock grazing on sage grouse nest survival suggests that a variety of locally-appropriate range management strategies support grouse populations.
This Montana study comparing effects of specialized grazing systems on ranches enrolled in the NRCS-led Sage Grouse Initiative to ranches not enrolled in SGI grazing programs found no difference in nest survival: in both cases, long-term nest success (40-49%) was consistent with the rangewide survival rates of a stable sage grouse population. Smith’s team cautions not to interpret their findings as diminishing the importance of good grazing management. Rather, grazing in sage grouse habitat should continue to focus on fundamental rangeland management principles. Although the effects of SGI grazing systems were negligible in Montana, studies should be replicated in other geographies across the range to account for ecological context. The biggest takeaway message from Smith’s research is to not sweat the small stuff: done right, grazing is a land use that is highly compatible with healthy sage grouse populations. Alternately, converting sagebrush grazing lands to more intensive land uses such as cultivation, housing, or energy development typically spells the demise of sage grouse. Most importantly, properly managed grazing — regardless of the specific management system — keeps mixed land ownerships stitched together across the West. Farm Bill-funded assistance provided by SGI through the NRCS to enhance grazing practices can help conserve sage grouse habitat by keeping working lands profitable and sustainable.
SGI researcher Joe Smith studied the impacts of local grazing practices on sage grouse nest survival in Montana. www.progressiverancher.com
By promoting robust, diverse, native plant communities, managers can ensure that rangelands remain resistant and resilient so that severe threats such as drought, exotic annual grass invasion, and fire have less chance of making an impact on the birds.
The Progressive Rancher
February 2018
27
PCC Update Cowboy Logic: "Never argue with an idiot, because people watching may not be able to tell the difference."
The Monkey Story By Kit Pharo
T
his is a story I used to share in several of my presentations. It makes a point that most cattlemen need to hear.
First, you start with a cage containing five monkeys. Inside the cage, hang a banana on a string and place a set of stairs under it. Before long, a monkey will go to the stairs and start to climb towards the banana. As soon as he touches the stairs, spray all of the monkeys with cold water. After a while, another monkey makes an attempt with the same result – all the monkeys are sprayed with cold water. Pretty soon, when another monkey tries to climb the stairs, the other monkeys will try to prevent it. Now, put the cold water away… Remove one monkey from the cage and replace it with a new one. The new monkey sees the banana and wants to climb the stairs. To his surprise and horror, all the other monkeys attack him. After another attempt and attack, he knows that if he tries to climb the stairs he will be assaulted.
29
TH
annual
Next, remove another of the original five monkeys and replace it with a new one. The newcomer goes to the stairs and is attacked – and the previous newcomer takes part in the punishment with enthusiasm! Likewise, replace a third original monkey, then a fourth, and then the fifth. Every time the newest monkey takes to the stairs, he is attacked. All of the monkeys that are beating him have no idea why they were not permitted to climb the stairs or why they are participating in the beating of the newest monkey. After replacing all of the original monkeys, none of the remaining monkeys have ever been sprayed with cold water. Nevertheless, no monkey will ever again approach the stairs to try for the banana. Why not? Because as far as they know, that’s the way it’s always been done around here. And that, my dear friends… is how many ranch traditions get started.
Mark your calendars for our
29th annual event
WinnemuccA February 28 - march 4, 2018 RHR Ranch Hand Rodeo Weekend
Ranch, Rope & Performance
Horse Sale
2017 Top Ten Average ~ $9,820 High Selling Horse Tequila~ $15,000
Winnemucca RHR Barrel Bash
Open 4D, Youth, and Senior Races
ADDED MONEY!!
March 2-4, 2018
Join us at the Winnemucca Events Complex to experience Nevada’s largest & most exciting Ranch Hand Rodeo and Horse Sale! Over 30 teams compete for prizes and bragging rights!
Tentative Schedule Wed & Thurs, Feb. 28 - March 1, 2018 Cow Dog Trial and Finals
Friday, March 2, 2018 Stock Horse Challenge & Horse Sale Preview Winnemucca RHR Barrel Bash
Saturday, March 3, 2018 Ranch Hand Rodeo Winnemucca RHR Barrel Bash Ranch, Rope & Performance Horse Sale
Sunday, March 4, 2018 Ranch Hand Rodeo Winnemucca RHR Barrel Bash
2017 Ranch Hand Rodeo Winning Team
The Owyhee Guys - Beowawe, NV
For More Information: (775) 623-5071 or www.RanchRodeoNV.com 28 February 2018
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
SHAW CATTLE CO.
Annual Bull Sale
Wednes day, February 2 1 , 2 0 1 8 MST,
at th e ran ch n ear Caldwell, ID
Hereford sires–Boom Town, Leader, Tested, El Dorado, Hometown, Domino 955, Fort Payne and On Target 936.
Th eB
ull
Bu
sines
s
4 5 0 Hereford, An g u s & Red An g u s Bu lls • 1 2 n oon
Angus sires–Payweight 1682, Powerball, Black Granite, Solution, Comrade, Innovation and Dominance.
Since 1946
Red Angus sires–Merlin, Nightcalver and Redemption.
! First Breeding Season Guarantee
C ON TA C T U S TO REC EIVE A SA LE B OOK !
SHAW CATTLE CO. 22993 Howe Road, Caldwell, ID 83607 greg@shawcattle.com www.shawcattle.com HEREFORD | ANGUS | RED ANGUS
Greg Shaw Sam Shaw Tucker Shaw Ron Shurtz
(208) 459-3029 (208) 880-9044 (208) 899-0455 (208) 431-3311
“2016 B IF SEED STOC K PROD U C ER OF TH E YEA R”
! Sight-unseen Purchases Fully Guaranteed ! Family Owned and Operated for 70 Years February 2018
29
8th Annual Western States Ranch Rodeo Association National Finals
T
By Naomi Loomis, WSRRA Representative
he eighth-annual Western States Ranch Rodeo Association National Finals was held November 2 - November 5 at the Winnemucca Events Complex in Winnemucca, Nevada. The Western States Ranch Rodeo Association (WSRRA) continues to experience solid support in thirteen states and Canada with teams coming from as far away as Nebraska and Wyoming plus, four teams from Canada. Established in 2010, the WSRRA has experienced incredible growth, each year growing in number of events and members. The association currently has more than 700 members. Throughout 2017, WSRRA sanctioned more than 49 open ranch rodeos, 20 women’s ranch rodeos, 25 women's steer stoppings and over 100 ranch bronc riding events. The top open and women’s teams from each of the ranch rodeos, and the top 15 women’s steer stoppers, and top 15 ranch bronc riders competed for cash and prizes at the National Finals. Prizes included Gist buckles, Yeti coolers, custom made gear made by Ricardo’s Saddlery and John Mincer, halters, stirrups, and custom made hats donated by Chaz Mitchell Hatz. The 2017 WSRRA Cowboy Crisis silent auction recipients were Clay Ashurst and Toby Vineyard. The silent auction was very successful and the live auction for a Chaz Mitchel Custom Hat was sold twice. The Nationals Finals kicked off Thursday with the women's long go working ranch horse, followed by women’s team roping, trailer loading, tiedown steer roping, sort & rope doctoring, and team branding. A huge variety of vendors participated in the Christmas Buckaroo Trade Show and the WSRRA Cowboy Crisis silent auction began. Jackpot roping events finished the action for the day. The jackpot team roping winners were Quirt Boyles and Tim Maher in the Big Loop, Raymond Plant and Gordy Nichols in the team roping and Monel Shelly in the women’s steer stopping. Friday, November 3, one member of each open team started the day showing off their highly skilled ranch horses. Then the teams competed in long go events of load & tie and team roping. The evening’s performance featured a "Tough 30 February 2018
Enough to Wear Pink" theme. Grand Marshall and 1st Annual Nelo Mori Heritage of Ranching Award, Nelo Mori from Nevada, made an exciting grand entrance in a refurbished horse drawn stagecoach. If that wasn’t enough, the first two rounds of the Professional Wild Horse Racers Association (PWHRA) national finals got everyone’s blood pumping! Rodeo clown, Tuffy Gessling entertained the crowd with his rope tricks and laughs. In between specialty acts, WSRRA ranch bronc riders and open and women’s teams showed their talents in featured performances. Saturday morning started with two rounds of Women's Steer Stopping rounds 1 & 2, followed by open team long go’s of sort & rope doctoring, and team branding. Later in the day WSRRA National Sponsor, the Boot Barn, sponsored a dummy roping contest and a stick horse barrel race for the kids. Gist Buckles were given as prizes. The second annual Great Basin Gathering; music, poetry and trading gear was a spotlighted event. Afternoon rodeo action featured jackpot family branding won by Will Knight, Jessica Kelly, Junior Kelly and Garrett Brown. As the sun was going down, the second evening performance started. This performance was full of Wild West action and western traditions. Featured performances of more of the open and
2017 WSRRA World Champion Women's Team: Miller Livestock Solutions Members Carmen Buckingham, Bailey Bachman, Katie McFarlane, Kayla Tiegs The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
women’s teams, along with two rounds each of PWHRA and WSRRA ranch bronc riding kept the arena dust stirred up and the crowd’s excitement high! Performances by Tuffy Gessling livened up the evening’s fun. Saturday ended with year-end and long go awards at The Winners at Winners WSRRA awards party, followed by dancing to music by the Jeff Palmer Band, both hosted by the Winners Inn & Casino. Sunday, November 5th, WSRRA held a well-attended Cowboy Church with Bo and Kathy Lowe. After Cowboy Church, WSRRA held the short go of the national finals for the open and women's divisions and the final rounds of PWHRA wild horse racing, women’s steer stopping and WSRRA ranch bronc riding. At the end of the afternoon, champions were crowned with Gist Silver buckles, Yeti coolers, homemade headstalls by Ricardo’s Saddlery with Mincer Silversmith WSRRA conchos, and silver stirrups by Weber Stirrups. Congratulations to all the contestants not just the winners. First time visitors to the event were totally impressed with the quality of the competition and the stock. A huge thank you to all the office help, chute help, announcers, judges, vendors and stock contractors. The WSRRA wouldn’t be around without 2017 WSRRA World Champions Open Ranch Rodeo Anipro the help of our sponsors and major supporters which Members: Teo Maestrejuan, Richard Eiguren, Shawn Lequerica, include: Winnemucca WVCA Board, Ram Trucks/Ram Brian Grenke. Photo Credit Amana Dilworth Rodeo, Boot Barn, Performix Nutrition, Les Schwab Tires, 8 Seconds Whisky, Twisted X Boots, Gouveia Ranches, Working Ranch Magazine, Mary Williams • PICK UP MEN OF THE YEAR: Kurtis Koeppen Hyde/Buckaroo Country, Rodeo News, Yeti, Big Bend Trailers and Chaz Mitchell • HIGH AVERAGE CONTRACTOR OF THE YEAR (Based on top 5 Hatz, Yeti and host hotels, Winnemucca Inn and Winners Inn Casino. Horses): Gene King, King Rodeo • Highest Scoring Ranch Bronc of the Finals: “Ryan” of the King Rodeo • Shelli Newman and Mountain Rodeo Association, Squaw Valley, CA The 2017 Western States Ranch Rodeo World Champions are as follows: • WSRRA PRODUCER OF THE YEAR: Shelli Newman and Mountain • World Champion Women’s Steer Stopper: Chelsea Hoff Rodeo Association, Squaw Valley, CA • Rookie Women’s Steer Stopper of the Finals: Kayann Smith
• WSRRA Year End Champion: Michelle Rutan • Rookie Women’s Steer Stopper of the Year: Kayann Smith • World Champion Open Ranch Rodeo Team: Anipro from Oregon Members: Teo Maestrejuan, Richard Eiguren, Shawn Lequerica, Brian Grenke • World Champion Women’s Ranch Rodeo Team: Miller Livestock from Idaho Members: Carmen Buckingham, Katie McFarlane, Kayla Tiegs and Bailey Bachman • World Champion Ranch Bronc Rider: Aaron Mercer • WSRRA Bronc Rider Average Champion: Barry O’Leary • WSRRA ROOKIE Ranch Bronc Rider of the Finals: Paul Padilla • WSRRA Year End Champion: Justin Quint • WSRRA ROOKIE Ranch Bronc Rider of the YEAR: Jesse Lee Callahan • WSRRA Scholarship Ranch Bronc Rider Champion: Noah Mort • WSRRA Steer Riding Champion: T. Catches • Stick Horse Champion sponsored by Boot Barn: Royce Musick • 7-12 Dummy Roping sponsored by Boot Barn: Sloan McDFarlane • 0-6 Dummy Roping sponsored by Boot Barn: Layton Musick • ALL AROUND COWGIRL: Katie Cavasin • ALL AROUND COWBOY: Barry O’Leary • TOP HAND COWGIRL: Carmen Buckingham • TOP HAND COWBOY: Richard Eiguren • ALL AROUND RANCH HORSE – OPEN: • Richard Eiguren from the Anipro • ALL AROUND RANCH HORSE – WOMENS: Justine Munns from the ShoeBox • STOCK CONTRACTOR OF THE YEAR: Gene King, King Rodeo • BRONC OF THE YEAR SELECTED BY JUDGES: “Ryan” owned by Gene King, King Rodeo www.progressiverancher.com
Make plans to attend a sanctioned WSRRA Ranch Rodeo in 2018!!
2017 WSRRA World Champion Ranch Bronc Rider- Aaron Mercer from Canada. Photo Credit to Amanda Dilworth
The Progressive Rancher
February 2018
31
Anaplasmosis: A Re-emerging Cattle Disease in California
M
ore than 150 people recently attended the 2nd Annual Beef Improvement and Low Stress Cattle Handling Seminar at UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine. The goal of the seminar is to support the beef ranching community in California by providing information on how to improve cattle handling and welfare, and to give an overview of current beef industry related issues that occur in the state. The seminar was a collaborative effort between the UC Davis Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital – Livestock Medicine and Surgery Service, the Food Animal and Reproduction (FARM) Club and the Behavior Medicine Club. Veterinary students, the UC Davis Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital and the UC Cooperative Extension all provided support. From the Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital – Livestock Medicine and Surgery Service, Dr. Anita Varga gave a presentation on lameness in beef cattle and the economic impact of lameness on cattle productivity. Dr. Jeffrey Stott, a professor at the UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, provided recent updates on the organism that causes foothill abortion – a bacteria carried in the Pajaroello tick. When the tick spreads the disease to a heifer or cow, the infection will lead to late term abortions and delivery of weak calves. Lynn Locatelli, '94 was the key speaker of the seminar and held two talks on low stress cattle handling tips and techniques. As a veterinarian, Locatelli has developed low stress cattle handling as a career and trains personnel all over the country in how to move and handle cattle within their operations. At the end of the all-day event, Dr. John Maas with Veterinary Medicine Extension and UC Cooperative Extension, provided an overview of Anaplasmosis in beef cattle. Maas gave a couple of challenging case examples, which led to an active discussion and gave participants an even better understanding of the current recommendations regarding treatment, testing, and vaccination of cattle that have been infected, or are at risk of being infected. For individuals unable to attend, Maas has provided a review of this cattle disease and what steps can be taken to prevent losses to a herd.
What is Anaplasmosis?
This is a cattle disease caused by an organism called Anaplasma marginale. This organism is a rickettsia—halfway between the viruses and the bacteria. It cannot grow without living cells (like a virus) but is susceptible to tetracyclines (like the bacteria). The disease, anaplasmosis, is caused when the infected cattle react to the agent and remove their own infected red blood cells. This reaction causes a severe anemia and often death.
What breeds are susceptible?
All cattle are susceptible to infection by A. marginale. Also, deer, elk, and other wild ruminants are susceptible to becoming infected and can act as natural reservoirs of the agent. Cattle of any age can become infected; however, young cattle do not become ill, as will be explained later.
How do cattle become infected?
A number of ruminants such as cattle, deer, and elk can be carriers of the anaplasmosis agent. These species can carry the agent all or most of their lives and serve as a reservoir for infection of other animals. The transfer of the agent from a carrier animal to a susceptible animal can occur by a number of routes. One of the most common ways is via ticks. In California, we have a number of ticks that transmit the anaplasmosis agent and are extremely effective at passing the agent to new, susceptible hosts. Additionally, transmission of a small amount of blood from a carrier animal to a susceptible animal can transmit anaplasmosis. So insects such as horse flies are capable of transmission. Even larger culprits in this type of transmission are humans. Ear-tagging instruments, tattoo tools, needles, ear implant tools, castrating instruments, dehorning instruments, etc., can all easily transmit the agent. So we can also be important in the spread of this disease. 32 February 2018
What happens when an animal becomes infected? If the animal is a calf under the age of 12 months, virtually nothing is noticed. The calf undergoes an incubation period of about 45 to 90 days, has a very mild illness, which is rarely noticed, and becomes a carrier for life. Cattle that become infected between 1 and 2 years of age become ill after the incubation period, with severity increasing with age. Cattle over 2 years of age become very ill and approximately 50 percent die unless treated. The older the animal and the better shape they are in--the sicker they get! Usually, once the cattle become infected, and if they survive, they stay infected for life. They are "immune carriers"-they do not get sick; but, act a reservoir for other susceptible animals. Therefore, being an infected carrier protects the animal from becoming sick if re-infected by ticks or other means.
What determines if a herd will have problems with anaplasmosis?
The location of the herd is important in determining whether or not problems will occur. The cattle and deer that might be reservoirs and the ticks that naturally transmit the disease are the primary factors. For example, herds raised in the central valley of California on permanent pasture, with no ticks, no deer, and no carrier cattle have essentially no risk of anaplasmosis. These cattle are free of the disease, have no immunity (unless vaccinated), and are totally susceptible to infection and disease. If these cattle are introduced to oak foothill pastures, especially during a bad tick year, they will become infected, get sick, and 50 percent will die if not treated. When cattle are raised in the coastal foothills, Sierra foothills, and many mountain areas of California, they become infected early in life, have no clinical disease when infected (because they are young), and are “immune carriers.” If new, susceptible cattle come into these areas, they are at risk. If these carrier cattle go to the valley pastures, they may act as sources of infection, especially via blood transfer (dehorning instruments, ear taggers, horse fly transmission, etc.). Many cattle herds are between these two extremes and it is common for a percentage of the adult animals to become infected and sick every year. These are herds that need routine vaccination to prevent losses. It is common for bulls that come from anaplasmosis-free areas to be very susceptible when introduced into areas where anaplasmosis is common. Remember, when bulls become infected and are successfully treated (do not die) they are often sterile for many months.
Has the disease picture changed over the past years?
Yes, it has. As the mountain lions have decimated the black-tailed deer and mule deer populations or driven the deer into the valleys where they might be safer, the anaplasmosis “picture” has changed. These deer are important reservoirs of anaplasmosis and as they have been forced out of certain areas the chance for young cattle to become naturally infected has lessened and herds in these areas are experiencing more clinical cases of anaplasmosis in older cattle. Likewise, as deer (infected with anaplasmosis) are moving into valley areas, more cattle in these herds are getting sick with anaplasmosis.
What can ranchers do to prevent anaplasmosis in their herd?
This depends on the risk of anaplasmosis in your operation. For those “valley” herds, the only real risk is introduction of carrier cattle and transfer of blood (horse flies, dehorners, tattoo instruments, castration instruments, etc.) from the new cattle to your native, susceptible animals. For foothill or mountain herds, you have to be sure incoming cattle (cows, heifers or bulls) are from anaplasmosis areas or have been vaccinated. For herds intermediate in risk, you will want to review your vaccination program with your veterinarian.
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
The live vaccine, Anavac® is available through Poultry Health Laboratories, in Davis, California. It must be shipped on dry ice or in liquid nitrogen. Their phone number is (530) 753-5881. The killed vaccine is available through California Cattlemen’s Association, at (916) 444-0845. This vaccine can be shipped via normal refrigeration.
Risk Management Agency
For more information about the insurance products available, sales closing dates, and a listing of agents, see the Crop and Livestock insurance guide at the link below.
Or Call (775) 945-3444, ext. 1033, for an Insurance Guide.
http://www.unce.unr.edu/cropandlivestockguide/
Wheat: October 31, 2017 Whole Farm Revenue Protection: March 15, 2018
Forage Production: October 31, 2017 Pasture, Rangeland and Forage: November 15, 2017
Alfalfa Seed: October 31, 2017
Much of this material was previously published by Dr. John Maas in California Cattlemen’s Magazine in June 2011. Additional information about the seminar was provided by Dr. Anita Varga.
2018 CROP & LIVESTOCK YEAR
HAVE YOU SEEN...
Are you aware of recent insurance programs to protect your crop, forage and livestock for the 2018 year? Insurance can be a great way to mitigate risk in your agricultural operation. Insurance Products Sales Closing Date start in October for the 2018 crop year. See guide for a listing of all closing dates. Below are some specific insurance product closing dates.
Anaplasmosis is a very complicated disease and the need to vaccinate will vary from herd to herd. Particularly important is the protection of susceptible cattle coming into an “anaplasmosis area.” Make sure that when you buy bulls or replacement heifers they are protected. Either they are raised in anaplasmosis areas or they have been vaccinated and are protected. This is doubly important for bulls, because if they get sick and don’t die, they can be sterile. Spend some time with your veterinarian to prevent this disease from affecting your herd.
NEVADA PRODUCERS
A killed vaccine is also available in California from the California Cattlemen’s Association. When cattle are vaccinated with this killed product (2 doses are needed initially), they develop enough immunity to prevent illness when they become infected. This vaccine does not prevent against infection by the anaplasma organism. When the vaccinated cattle are infected by the Anaplasma marginale organism under field conditions, they go through a normal incubation period of about 45-90 days, have a slight drop in their red blood cell count, and remain normal in appearance. These vaccinated cattle do not become ill; but, they do carry the field strain Anaplasma organism after they become infected. Most infected cattle then carry the organism for their entire life. They are "immune carriers". That is to say, they are "immune" to becoming sick from the agent; but, are carriers of the agent. If you were to take a small amount of blood from one of these "immune carriers" and put it into a susceptible cow, that cow would become infected and sick. These two vaccines are very important. If you purchase bulls or heifers for replacements, be sure these cattle are protected. If the cattle were vaccinated with the live vaccine (Anavac®) as calves and not fed tetracyclines in the feedlot, they will be immune carriers and safe from getting sick. If they were fed tetracyclines (a common procedure for bulls being grown in a feedlot), they will lose they immunity after 1-2 years if they do not become re-infected and therefore could become susceptible again. If the cattle are over a year of age, be sure they were vaccinated with two doses of the killed investigational vaccine. They should be protected against becoming ill when naturally infected on your ranch.
Where can ranchers get these vaccines?
Crop, Forage and Livestock Insurance Options for Nevada Producers
What vaccines are available?
In California we had two vaccine options. The first is a live vaccine available from Poultry Health Laboratories and is called Anavac®. It is safe and effective when given to young cattle (4 to 11 months of age). The cattle become infected with the vaccine strain of Anaplasma and are “immune carriers.” This method of preventing disease is basically a controlled infection. If this vaccine (Anavac®) is given to older cattle, they will become sick and could die, just as with the natural disease. Vaccination of mature bulls with Anavac® can cause death loss or infertility.
www.progressiverancher.com
The Progressive Rancher
February 2018
33
Genetic Edge Bull Sale Please Join us at the ranch near Idaho Falls, Idaho
Saturday •
March 10, 2018
• 11 a.m.
90 Sons Selling by the Carcass Leader Rito 4P26
Rito 4P26
Reg# 17892063
Riverbend Bull Advantage Average of the 2018 Bull Offering
CARCASS DATA ON 59 STEERS KILLED 7/20/17
WW YW Marb RE $W $B
-
Top Top Top Top Top Top
20% in the breed 20% in the breed 20% in the breed 15% in the breed 10% in the breed 5% in the breed
• 45% PRIME THE BALANCE WERE CHOICE • 97% YIELD GRADE 3 • 86% CAB
The Riverbend Ranch Advantage
Selling Sons of these Breed Leading Sires!
BACKED BY THE BEST GUARANTEE IN THE BUSINESS!
Brigham C662, Jennings Z064, Rampage 0A36, Index 3282,
Your satisfaction is 100% guaranteed! If you’re not happy with your bull purchase at anytime for any reason, we’ll give you full credit.
WE INVEST IN OUR CUSTOMERS!
In the last five years we have purchased over 65,000 head of cattle. Putting millions back into our customer’s pockets. Put our customer investment program to work for your operation.
2016 Certified Angus Beef Seedstock Producer of the Year
34 February 2018
Payweight 1682, Rito 4P26, Fortress Y331, Peerless 0016, Ingenuity 2623, Montana 104, Journey 1X74 and Ten X 5006B
OFFERING OVER 500 HEAD 250 FALL YEARLING BULLS 250 SPRING YEARLING BULLS 2880 N 55 W • IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO 83402 • 208-528-6635 Frank and Belinda VanderSloot | Owners Rhett Jacobs | General Manager | 208-681-9841 Dale Meek | Purebred Operations Manager | 208-681-9840 Chris Howell | Director of Customer Service | 208-681-9821
SALE MANAGEMENT 517.546.6374 www.cotton-associates.com
CALL 208-528-6635 OR E-MAIL BULLS@RIVERBENDRANCH.US TO BE PLACED ON OUR MAILING LIST
www.riverbendranch.us
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
Celebrating our 50th year in the Registered Hereford Business
37th Annual Hereford & Red Angus Bull Sale, Monday, March 12th, 2018 at Spring Cove Ranch, Bliss, Idaho 1:00 pm MDT & on LiveAuctions.TV
Selling: 40- 2 yr old & spring yearling Hereford & Red Angus Bulls & 175 Spring Cove Ranch Angus Bulls and 75 Heifers
Dam of “Boom Town” /S Lady Thor 1271Y
Selling sons of: /S JBB/Al Boom Town 44608 Reg 43567160 Sire: NJW 73S W18 Hometown 10Y Dam: /S Lady Thor 1271Y CED+9.0 BW-0.1 WN+55 YW+90 SC+1.8 CEM+.5 FAT+.046 REA+.54 MARB+.31 BMI$+18 CHB$+30
JBB/AL Boom Town 7046
Selling sons of: NJW 98S R117 Ribeye 88X ET Reg 43094146 CED+6.7 BW+1.1 WN+53 YW+76 SC+.7 CEM+4.0 FAT-.014 REA+.38 MARB+.35 BMI$+29 CHB$+28
“7046” Reg 43792156 CED+4.1 BW+2.5 WN+59 YW+97 SC+1.6 CEM+1.6 FAT+.006 REA+.55 MARB+.20 BMI$+22 CHB$+31 He sells March 12th, 2018
“7019” Reg 43792162 CED+10.0 BW+.4 WN+57 YW+91 SC+1.6 CEM+4.7 FAT+.036 REA+.53 MARB+.28 BMI$+22 CHB$+29 He sells March 12th, 2018
JBB Boom Town 7019 www.progressiverancher.com
Selling sons of: Brown JYJ Redemption Y1334 CED+17 BW-4.9 WN+66 YW+116 CEM+9 MARB+.79 REA+.04
JBB/AL Herefords James & Dawn Anderson Bev Bryan Skeeter Anderson Jae Anderson 1998 S 1500 E Gooding, Idaho 83330
James: 208-280-1505 Skeeter: 208-280-1964 Dawn: 208-280-1509 jbbalherefords@hotmail.com Find us on Facebook
For Sale Catalogs call: 208–280-1505
The Progressive Rancher
February 2018
35
N EVADA FARM BUREAU NEVADA FARM BUREAU
American Farm Bureau Federation Annual Meeting
T
By: Brittney Pericoli, Director of Communications, NVFB
he 99th Annual American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) Annual Convention was held January 5th through the 10th. This year’s convention was held at the Gaylord Opryland Resort and Convention Center in Nashville, Tennessee.
The Annual Convention is a time for all state Farm Bureaus to come together and discuss agriculture issues throughout the United States and Puerto Rico. Educational Workshops are held on variety of topics to interest all attendees from: business and rural development, consumer engagement, leadership development, membership engagement, niche agriculture and marketing opportunities and public policy and advocacy. In addition to educational workshops they also had an IDEAg Trade show, which featured the latest products from top agribusiness including: Ford, Grainger, Farm Bureau Bank, CAT, John Deere and many more. Th is year Katie Combs of Clark County competed in the AFBF Young Farmers and Ranchers (YF&R) discussion meet. Each year the YF&R discussion topics are selected by the AFBF YF&R committee used throughout the competition that leads up to the AFBF Annual Meeting. Each competitor is evaluated on an exchange of ideas and information on a pre-determined question. Participants build basic discussion skills, develop a keen understanding of important agricultural issues and explore how groups can pool knowledge to reach consensus and solve problems. Combs did an exceptional job representing Nevada Farm Bureau. Congratulations Katie on job well done.
IDEAg Tradeshow
Reba speaking with AFBF President Zippy Duval 36 February 2018
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
N EVADA FARM BUREAU NEVADA FARM BUREAU Reba McEntire was the keynote speaker at this year’s annual convention. AFBF President Zippy Duvall and his wife Bonnie Duvall did an on-stage interview style Q&A with McEntire. Th rough the conversation those attending learned of her life and agriculture connections. A highlight from this year’s annual convention was President Donald Trump speaking at the general closing session. Trump is the first President to attend an AFBF annual convention since 1992 when than President George H. W. Bush attended. “Our nation was made by farmers,” said President Trump. “Farmers have always lead the way.” Trump expressed his gratitude for farmers throughout his speech and concluded his speech by signing two Executive Orders relating to Broadband expansion in rural America. Th is was part of a recommendation package that came from the Interagency Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity, chaired by Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue. The Nevada Farm Bureau was well represented this year with a total of 23 members attending the annual convention.
President Trump and AFBF President Zippy Duval
Nevada Farm Bureau President Bevan Lister on stage.
www.progressiverancher.com
The Progressive Rancher
February 2018
37
N EVADA FARM BUREAU NEVADA FARM BUREAU
Regulatory Reform – "We've only just begun..."
By: Doug Busselman, Nevada Farm Bureau
F
or too long the burden of overreaching government control has held the potentially productive American private sector in its grips with un-elected bureaucrats inventing and exercising their own power and authority for pursuing greater limitations and restrictions that they could impose. Instead of the positive driving philosophy of the Little Engine who kept moving forward with the “I think I can…” we’ve been forced to meekly accept the “Thou Shalt Not” edicts from government requirements in the name of doing to us what has been envisioned “for our own good.” A couple of years ago Regulatory Reform was included by the American Farm Bureau Federation’s (AFBF) Board of Directors as a priority issue. Activities of working with like-minded organizations and individuals throughout the country has taken many forms and addressed a number of specific areas of need. Although progress has been made, the work is far from complete and the necessity of vigilance against slippage back into the pit of government prohibitions is extremely critical. For necessary results to be achieved it requires more than just changes in who runs our government agencies – although we’ve seen very clearly the value in leadership changes and adjusted attitudes. Foundational and process changes are required to incorporate necessary safeguards to prevent the worse-case scenarios that have actually become exceedingly common. Farm Bureau advocates, working to respond with core changes, have pointed to the Administrative Procedures Act. This law, passed in 1946, governs how regulations are set and hasn’t been changed beyond small tweaks for over 70 years. It’s been noted that regardless of where you fall on the spectrum of believing in less or wishing for more government control, all Americans have an interest in a regulatory process that is transparent and fact-based. We also believe that the regulations need to respect the clearly identified intentions of elected representatives who have passed laws on which the regulations should be based. It is essential that the regulatory system observes the separation of powers provided in the Constitution (with limitations fitting prescribed authority.) Regulations need to take into account economic impacts and respect the freedoms of individual citizens. 38 February 2018
Farm Bureau’s check-list for ways to improve the federal regulatory system includes: • Use of sound science in rulemaking; • Coordination between the United States Department of Agriculture and the Environmental Protection Agency for regulations affecting agricultural matters; • Estimating the costs and benefits of regulations; • Ensuring transparency in the rulemaking process; • Vigorous Congressional oversight; • A minimum of 60-day comment period on proposed rules; • Limiting federal agencies’ ability to use social media and other propaganda tools to promote their agenda for pending rules; and, • Litigation reform. As is frequently the case, the U.S. House has taken up and passed a host of positive legislative proposals to improve the regulatory system – the U.S. Senate hasn’t. The most notable House-passed bill was HR 5 – “the Regulatory Accountability Act of 2017.”
Without a completed legislative process, regulatory reform has had to rely on the Trump Administration and Executive Orders for meaningful progress. Their activities have demonstrated results, most noteworthy in the area of the work of EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt and pulling the plug on the agency’s “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) over-reach .
A Senate proposal, S. 951, also named “the Regulatory Accountability Act of 2017” was written in a bi-partisan manner by Senators Rob Portman of Ohio and Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota. The legislation outlines some key and important changes that should be included in the governing of how regulations should be addressed: 1. Greater Transparency Early public outreach Better scientific and technical data Better use of guidance documents 2. Cost-Benefit Analysis Requiring cost-benefit analysis to be included in each appropriate step of rulemaking Selection of the most cost-effective option 3. More Thorough Process for High-Impact Rules Hearings by lawmakers for high-impact rules ($1 billion-plus per year) Substantial evidence-based review of high impact rules 4. Retrospective Review Automatic Review of Rules to evaluate their effects
The 2018 elections also offer the prospect of potential gains or loss. Candidates, especially those who seek national offices, need to be pressed for their positions on regulatory reform. Pledges of support for meaningful changes need to be sought and then further followed up with by those who gain election.
In their respective comments before those attending the AFBF’s 99th Annual Meeting in Nashville (January 8, 2017) President Trump and U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, Sonny Perdue highlighted the accomplishments of the Administration in rolling back federal regulations. Each noted that the original goal was to get rid of two regulations for every new regulation that would be created. The actual performance, over the first year, has been to toss out 22 old regulations for every new one. Against strong head-winds of extremely entrenched philosophies of government control continued pressure must be brought to focus on step-by-step progress.
Following up on his 1831 visit to America, in his classic two-volume essay “Democracy in America” Alexis de Tocqueville observed the ultimate consequences of blind acceptance of government restrictive authority – “The will of man is not shattered, but softened, bent, and guided; men are seldom forced by it to act, but they are constantly restrained from acting. Such a power does not destroy, but it prevents existence; it does not tyrannize, but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd.”
Nevada Farm Bureau members have made request of our state’s two U.S. Senators to become involved as co-sponsors of regulatory reform legislation. S. 951. At this point, neither has added their names to S. 951.
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
N EVADA FARM BUREAU NEVADA FARM BUREAU
Getting Involved Young Farmers & Ranchers
By: Brittney Pericoli, Director of Communications, NVFB
illennial farmers are a growing representation of the farming/ranching community. Young Farmers & Ranchers (YF&R) is part of the Nevada Farm Bureau for young individuals who are both agriculture producers and enthusiasts between the ages of 18 and 35 years old. One of the many focuses of YF&R is spreading agricultural literacy throughout communities by helping to educate elementary school children around Nevada. YF&R is also a big contributor to the community with projects such as Harvest for All. Harvest for All provides food for people in need throughout our community this year the Nevada state YF&R committee raised more than $3,000. Douglas/ Carson Farm Bureau collected 340 pounds of food to donate to their local community food bank. Th is year the YF&R program is expanding to get a broader group of young individuals involved in agricultural advocacy. Churchill County is establishing a County YF&R Committee and inviting all YF&R members in the area to join in activities. The focus of this committee is to engage all young members in participating and networking with others in the state. According to Bailey Kelton, the University of Nevada, Reno is establishing their first Collegiate Young Farmers & Ranchers club. With membership on the rise we hope to raise awareness on agriculture advocacy, improve leadership and speaking abilities, as well as help prepare students for a better future in their agriculture careers.
Katie Combs, who competed in the AFBF YF&R competition in Nashville, TN.
Each year YF&R holds a discussion meet at the annual meeting where individuals build basic discussion skills, develop a keen understanding of important agricultural issues and explores how groups can pool knowledge to reach consensus and solve problems. Katherine Combs competed at the American Farm Bureau Federation National Convention this January representing Nevada exceedingly well. YF&R looks forward to their first Collegiate YF&R member competing at the National Leadership Conference in February. The 2018 American Farm Bureau Federation YF&R Leadership Conference will be coming to Reno February 16th-19th. Th is will give the Young Farmers and Ranchers of Nevada an opportunity to meet with industry leaders, enjoy informational sessions, and go on local tours. It also, gives attendees an opportunity to build their network with those from across the nation with similar interests and passions. If you are interested in attending the conference, please contact Bailey Kelton at the Nevada Farm Bureau at, bailey@nvfb.org. Don’t miss out on an opportunity to attend a national conference in our home state. We look forward to seeing you in February. Feel free to follow us on our Social Media platforms: Facebook @Nevada Farm Bureau Young Farmers & Ranchers Instagram @nvyfr www.progressiverancher.com
The Progressive Rancher
February 2018
39
40 February 2018
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
BANKING MEANS GROWING From operating lines and equipment financing to livestock purchases and real estate, our agriculture specialist, John Hays, will bring his knowledge and experience to the table and find the right financial solutions* so you can plan, prepare and grow.
BRING YOUR BANKING HOME.
nsbank.com | 775.748.4416
John Hays, Agricultural Banking Specialist NMLS #838218
*Loans subject to credit approval, terms and conditions apply. ZB, N.A. NMLS# 467014
www.progressiverancher.com
The Progressive Rancher
February 2018
41
HUMBOLDT WATERSHED COOPERATIVE Weed Management Area: Jointed Goatgrass by Andi Porreca, HWCWMA Coordinator
Hello from the Humboldt Watershed CWMA! The HWCWMA was developed to address the invasive weed problem and subsequent decline in water quality within the entire 16,843 square mile watershed, which covers most of Northern Nevada. The primary function of HWCWMA has been to provide land managers, owners and weed control groups assistance in the areas of funding, agency and weed group coordination and cooperation.
features including a detailed project proposal packet that you can print, fill out and mail back to us at your convenience. We are looking to expand our project area outside of the Humboldt River and always welcome new funding opportunities.
his month we would like to introduce you to a plant that is not listed as one of Nevada’s state listed noxious weeds, but is currently being considered for listing. Jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) has shown itself to be highly invasive and is a State listed noxious weed in Arizona, Colorado, California, New Mexico, Washington, Idaho and Oregon. This highly invasive plant competes with crops for water and nutrients, thus reducing the quality and yield of wheat and other crops. It is difficult to control in wheat because jointed goatgrass and wheat are genetically related; the two species have similar growth habits and are known to cross-pollinate with each other. It is difficult to distinguish from wheat until spikes appear Jointed goatgrass is a native of southern Europe and western Asia. It grows best in cultivated fields, but it apparently can also invade grasslands. This grass is considered a nuisance in landscapes, gardens and fields. It can outcompete more desirable species reducing native plant diversity and important wildlife and pollinator habitat. Jointed goatgrass is a winter annual grass, vegetatively similar to wheat in the seed stage. The leaves are alternately arranged with auricles at their base and occasional hairs extending along the margins. The flower spike is cylindrical and distinct from wheat. Two to four flowers are arranged in each of the spikelets which form the elongate cylindrical spike. The spikelets are also jointed in appearance and each joint contains one to three seeds. The glumes on the top spikelet have long awns. The seed of jointed goatgrass ripens before winter wheat and shatters easily, they can also remain viable for up to five years. Mature plants are generally 15-30 inches tall with one to many tillers.
Additionally, the HWCWMA is collaborating with IFA in Elko on a 50/50 cost share program that will enable stakeholders with smaller projects to apply herbicide treatments at substantially lower costs. With minimal paperwork requirements, watershed land-owners/managers can purchase and apply their needed herbicide, then notify HWCWMA staff to arrange a site visit and gather some site and application method information from you, and map your project. An announcement of the details will be listed on our website soon.
T
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Andi Porreca, HWCWMA Coordinator at (775) 762-2636 or email her at aporreca@humboldtweedfree.org.
Control and Management Mowing. Mow between the flowering and seed formation stages. If done too early, new tillers will form and produce viable seeds. Rough ground and the presence of prostrate jointed goatgrass plants may limit mowing effectiveness. Biological. Although selective biological control of annual bromes and jointed goatgrass has looked promising in the laboratory, little success has been observed in the field. Chemical. Atrazine applied in late August and glyphosate will control jointed goatgrass in fallow. If jointed goatgrass seedlings are present when atrazine is applied, a contact herbicide such as glyphosate or paraquat must be added to the atrazine. The effectiveness of atrazine is reduced in dry falls when applied at low rates. As always, please notify the HWCWMA if you see jointed goatgrass growing within the Humboldt River Watershed. We have an opportunity to stop invasive species from spreading if we act quickly and our staff can provide the property owner or appropriate public agency with site-specific treatment options for these plants. The HWCWMA also maps and monitors heavily infested sites in the watershed which allows the HWCWMA the ability to provide educational and financial assistance to land owners and groups in their management efforts, ultimately improving all of the qualities of the land and water in our watershed. The HWCWMA has also developed a website to serve as a clearinghouse for information on invasive weeds in the Humboldt Watershed. Our website (http:// www.humboldtweedfree.org) contains fact sheets for state listed noxious weeds in Nevada, Board of Director’s information, funding partner’s links, and many more 42 September/October 2017
The Progressive Rancher
Jointed goatgrass
www.progressiverancher.com
39th Annual
UDY CACTHTLEMEN’S CATTLE COMPANY OICE BULL SALE THE SOURCE FOR QUALITY
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 14, 2018 LUNCH AT 12 NOON • SALE AT 1 P.M. • ROCKLAND, ID
EPDs —
EPDs —
BW 1.0 WW 51 YW 83
BW -.01 WW 68 YW 104
MM
MM
30
14
LOT 41 - UCC DEFENDER 745U
LOT 2 - UCC SENSATION 660
135 BULLS AND 50 HEIFERS Hereford, Red Angus, Black Angus 2-year-olds and yearling bulls.
HEREFORD SIRES
NJW 73S W18 Hometown 10Y ET Churchill Sensation 2122Z UCC Victor 403
RED ANGUS SIRES
EPDs —
5L Defender 560-30Z Pie The Cowboy Kind 343 LSF Saga 1040Y
BW 2.9 WW 62 YW 106
BLACK ANGUS SIRES
MM
S A V Resource 1441 Connealy Black Granite Barstow Bankroll B73
LOT 41 - UCC DEFENDER 745U
LOT 83 - UCC RESOURCE 781 Sale Broadcast on:
George 208-226-7857 • Cell 208-221-2277 James 208-221-1909 • jamesudy@hotmail.com Fax 208-226-7671
Information online at:
udycattle.com www.progressiverancher.com
23
Sale Location Sale Day Phones Nine miles south of Rockland, Idaho
The Progressive Rancher
208-221-1909 208-548-2277
September/October 2017
43
Natural Resources Conservation Service EQIP Sign-up in Support of the Nevada Conservation Credit System RCPP Project Apply by February 16
Contact: Heather Emmons, State Public Affairs Officer
R
ENO, Nev. – The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) is offering Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) financial and technical assistance to agricultural producers interested in completing conservation projects that improve and protect greater sage-grouse (GRSG) habitat through the Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP). The RCPP encourages conservation partners from across the nation to join in efforts with agricultural producers to increase the restoration and sustainable use of soil, water, wildlife and related natural resources through installation and maintenance of conservation activities in selected project areas. The Greater Outcomes for Greater Sage-Grouse RCPP effort is a joint venture of Partners for Western Conservation, The Cattleman’s Association, the states of Nevada and Colorado, among others. In Nevada, the Greater Outcomes for Greater SageGrouse RCPP effort focuses specifically on providing producers an opportunity to improve GRSG habitat by utilizing USDA financial assistance through EQIP. Producers also should have an interest in enrolling their habitat acreages into the Nevada Conservation Credit System (CCS). The Nevada CCS, a state mitigation program, is designed to offset impacts from man-made disturbances through enhancements and protections that result in a net conservation gain for GRSG habitat in Nevada. Private lands within GRSG habitat can be enhanced, restored, and/or better protected from threats, and then ultimately preserved to generate and sell credits into the CCS. Along with the sale of credits, a 30-year (or more) contract to preserve GRSG habitat is required. The Nevada CCS is the primary strategy for the State of Nevada’s contribution for GRSG protection and part of a larger effort of Western states to prevent a listing of the bird as threatened or endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Agricultural producers with interest in enhancing GRSG habitats and potentially enrolling habitat acreages into the CCS are encouraged to apply for these special EQIP funds through the NRCS’ Regional Conservation Protection Partnership (RCPP). Potential applicants will also need to complete a Credit Site Validation Checklist as authorization of credit estimates to assess CCS credit potential. This checklist can be downloaded here. Applications must be received before 4 p.m. on February 16, 2018 by NRCS to be considered in the first project funding period. Conservation practices and management actions may include, but are not limited to, sagebrush establishment, perennial grass and/ or forb seeding, riparian or meadow enhancements, cross-fencing, offstream watering for livestock and wildlife, and other potential practices, many of which are likely to be mutually beneficial to GRSG and the producer’s operation. In addition, the practices may provide landowners the opportunity to enhance and develop habitat that may qualify for the Nevada CCS.
44 February 2018
Within Nevada, this RCPP effort operates under the authority of NRCS’s Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP). EQIP is a voluntary, financial assistance program that provides funding for the implementation of conservation practices that may be used to protect and enhance sage grouse habitat, manage livestock, improve irrigation efficiency and reduce soil loss. Applicants must meet USDA program eligibility requirements for land eligibility and person eligibility. Eligibility requirements include Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) limitations for individuals and entities, with entities also required to have a DUNS number and be registered in SAMS to participate. Applicants must meet the eligibility criteria to be considered for ranking and funding decisions. Farm Bill programs have strict payment limits, and the amount of financial assistance producers can receive is limited to $450,000 per farm bill cycle. Limited resource producers, beginning farmers and ranchers, or socially disadvantaged agricultural producers may be eligible for up to 15 percent higher payments, not to exceed 90 percent of the estimated cost to install the practice. For more information concerning the Greater Incomes for Greater Sage Grouse RCPP project, contact Dan Huser at 775-684-8600, or by email: dhuser@ sagebrushco.nv.gov. To learn more, contact your local NRCS office or go online to: www.nv.nrcs. usda.gov.
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
www.progressiverancher.com
The Progressive Rancher
February 2018
45
News Release USDA Rural Development Announces Improvements to Distance Learning and Telemedicine Grant Program Contact: USDA Press (202) 720-4623
W
ASHINGTON, Jan. 16, 2018 – Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Anne Hazlett today announced a regulation improvement that will expand eligibility for and simplify the administration of the Distance Learning and Telemedicine (DLT) grant program. Under the rewritten regulation (7 CFR 1734), organizations holding USDA rural telecommunications or electric program loans are now eligible to apply for DLT grants. In addition, DLT grants can now be used to construct or improve broadband transmission facilities. A newly streamlined process also makes this important program more customer-friendly by easing access to USDA announcements of funding and solicitations of applications. With these changes, USDA will be able to more broadly market the program and provide potential customers more time to apply for federal support of their rural e-connectivity projects.
“These improvements to Rural Development’s Distance Learning and Telemedicine Grant Program carry out Secretary Perdue’s Strategic Goal #1 – an efficient and effective, customer-focused USDA,” said Anne Hazlett, Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development. “With these reforms, we’re also making progress in expanding the health and education benefits of e-connectivity for rural communities.” All program changes were effective Dec. 27, 2017. For more information in Nevada, contact General Field Representative Rocky Chenelle at (530) 379-5032, or visit USDA Rural Development's Distance Learning Telemedicine website. Regulatory reform is one of the cornerstones of USDA’s strategies for creating a culture of consistent, efficient service to customers, while reducing burdens and improving efficiency. This regulation improvement is one of 14 regulations USDA Rural Development has identified for revision or elimination since Jan. 20, 2017.
When you need to purchase livestock, we’re here to help with competitive rates, flexible terms, and service that’s second to none. Call 800.800.4865 today or visit AgLoan.com
LIVESTOCK PURCHASE? ROUND UP THE EXPERTS. 46 February 2018
The Progressive Rancher
A part of the Farm Credit System. Equal Opportunity Lender.
www.progressiverancher.com
Kacey KC appointed to lead Nevada Division of Forestry
B
radley Crowell, Director of the Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR) announced his appointment of Kacey KC as the Nevada State Forester and Firewarden. As State Forester, Ms. KC will lead the Nevada Division of Forestry (NDF) in its mission to proactively manage and protect Nevada’s forests and rangelands, and safely respond to wildland fires. Ms. KC first joined NDF in 2002, and has served as Acting State Forester since April 2017. Kacey has more than 15 years of professional experience in forest management and natural resource conservation, including her tenure as NDF Deputy Administrator and as the Program Manager of Nevada’s Sagebrush Ecosystem Program. She holds a degree in Forestry Resource and Conservation from the University of Montana. A native of Gardnerville, Nevada, KC will be the first female State Forester to head the Nevada Division of Forestry. Governor Sandoval expressed his support for the appointment, “Kacey’s skills and commitment to the enhancement, conservation and protection of our forests and rangelands will serve Nevadans well.” DCNR Director Bradley Crowell reiterated the Governor’s support. “I am proud to have Kacey take the helm at NDF as Nevada’s next State Forester. Her proven leadership and strong background in forest management will help establish NDF as a premier natural resource management and wildfire agency.” Under Ms. KC’s direction, the Nevada Division of Forestry will focus on establishing NDF as a regional leader in science-based forest management, creating resilient forest landscapes and promoting fire adapted communities throughout Nevada.
Landscape Scale Restoration and State Fire Assistance Grants Pre-proposals Sought
C
ARSON CITY, NV – The Nevada Division of Forestry (NDF) is currently soliciting pre-proposals for two competitive grant program areas – Landscape Scale Restoration and State Fire Assistance.
Nevada’s urban and rural ecosystems are continuously threatened by invasions of non-native species, vegetation diseases, development disturbances, unsustainable management, and destructive natural events such as floods and wildfires. NDF is pleased to announce a funding opportunity made available through the USDA Forest Service, which enables cooperators to identify Landscape Scale Restoration (LSR) needs and apply for funding to address the aforementioned and other natural resource management and conservation issues. Funds may be used to implement restoration treatments that improve or restore urban/rural forests, rangelands, water resources, riparian areas, and wildlife habitat. Projects that mitigate extreme wildfire behavior, noxious weed infestations, and negative ecosystem impacts are also eligible. For more information on Landscape Scale Restoration grants, contact Heather Giger at (775) 684-2552 or hdgiger@forestry.nv.gov. Additionally, NDF is seeking State Fire Assistance grant pre-proposals for the Western States Fire Managers and Hazardous Fuels-Community Protection programs. The Western States Fire Managers (WSFM) grants can be used to reduce hazardous wildfire fuel, create community wildfire protection plans, as well as perform community outreach and wildfire prevention in the wildland urban interface. The Hazardous Fuels-Community Protection (HF-CP) funds can be used to implement on-the-ground hazardous fuel reduction projects and restoration of fire adapted ecosystems that are located on private property adjacent to U.S. Forest Service lands. For more information on Western States Fire Managers and Hazardous FuelsCommunity Protection grants, contact Ryan Shane at (775) 684-2511 or rshane@ forestry.nv.gov. Proposed projects for LSR, WSFM, and HF-CP funding must be implemented on state, local government, tribal, and/or private lands located in Nevada. Projects on federal lands are not eligible. Pre-proposals for all competitive grant programs must be submitted on the approved forms available on the Nevada Division of Forestry website at http:// forestry.nv.gov/grants/. The deadline for submission of the LSR and WSFM proposals is March 2, 2018 and HF-CP proposals are due February 16, 2018. The site also contains a more detailed description of the criteria and instructions for eligibility and the scoring criteria that will be used to rank applications. Preproposals must be received by the Nevada Division of Forestry as prescribed in the grant guidance documents found at the website. Late, incomplete, or faxed pre-proposals will not be accepted. The Nevada Division of Forestry is a division within the Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. The Nevada Division of Forestry provides professional natural resource and wildland fire services to Nevada citizens and visitors to enhance, conserve and protect forest, rangeland and watershed values, endangered plants, and other native flora.
www.progressiverancher.com
The Progressive Rancher
February 2018
47
Spring Cove Ranch THE Pioneer Herd of the West
We’ve been raising registered Angus cattle at Spring Cove Ranch for nearly 100 years. Our bulls are raised outside on dry range conditions, are genetically designed to provide meat, marbling and muscle and to perform in our western environment while enhancing the durability, fertility and longevity in your cowherd and in ours.
Annual Production Sale Monday, March 12, 2018 Selling 175 Angus bulls , 75 Angus females & 40 JBB/AL Hereford & Red Angus Bulls
Spring Cove Reno 4021 Reg 17926446 Sired by: KM Broken Bow 002 MGS: CCA Emblazon 702 CED+11 BW-0.4 WW+78 YW+132 SC+1.34 Milk+32 CW+53 Marb+.80 Rib+.63 $W+88.33 $F+105.85 $B+171.68 Reno sons and daughters sell March 12, 2018
Spring Cove Crossbow 4205 Reg 17924903 Sired by : KM Broken Bow 002 MGS: CCA Emblazon 702 CED+17 BW -1.6 WW+61 YW+110 SC+.17 Milk+17 CW+54 Marb+1.01 Rib+.53 $W+55.29 $F+73.16 $B+165.93 Crossbow sons and daughters sell March 12, 2018
Basin Bonus 4345
Sitz Longevity 556Z
Sitz Longevity 556Z Reg 17179073 Sire: Connealy Final Product MGS: Woodhill Foresight CED+6 BEPD+.2 WEPD+60 YEPD+108 SC+.95 Milk+30 CW+38 Marb+.80 Rib+.34 $W+67.63 $F+79.58 $B+130.71 Longevity sons and daughters sell March 12, 2018
Basin Bonus 4345 Reg 17904142 Sire: Basin Payweight 1682 MGS: Connealy Consensus 7229 CED+9 BEPD+1.0 WEPD+75 YEPD+130 SC+.76 MEPD+38 CW+54 Marb+1.03 Rib+.54 $W+88.94 $F+98.06 $B+162.10 Bonus sons and daughters sell March 12, 2018
Spring Cove Paygrade 5064 Reg 18251392 Sired by: Basin Payweight 1682 MGS: CCA Emblazon 702 CED+12 BW-.6 WW+55 YW+92 SC+.99 Milk+26 CW+34 Marb+1.04 Rib+.23 $W+64.45 $F+50.38 $B+123.55 Paygrade sons and daughters sell March 12, 2018
S A V Resource 1411
Sitz Resource 525C Reg 18084910 Sire: S A V Resource 1411 MGS: Sitz SLS Rainmaker 6914 CED+9 BEPD+.9 WEPD+60 YEPD+113 SC+1.48 MEPD+16 CW+42 Marb+.50 Rib+.84 $W+52.22 $F+69.19 $B+131.21 525C sons and daughters sell March 12, 2018
Also Featuring 20 Sons of Basin Payweight 1682 Spring Cove Ranch
For Sale Books Call: 208-352-4332 www.springcoveranch.com
Angus since 1919 48 February 2018
Find us on Facebook The Progressive Rancher
For more information call: Art or Stacy Butler Josh Mavencamp Sarah Helmick Bliss, Idaho 208-352-4332 www.progressiverancher.com