Siqi Lyu
Portfolio 2015-2018
This portfolio only represents Siqi Lyu’s academic projects in school More professional projects are listed in her resume Illustration projects on her website: www.siqilyu.com
Siqi Lyu siqi.lyu@hotmail.com siqi1114@gmail.com (+1) 647-937-0215
- 01 Way to Solitude
Applying MAGIC REALISM in Landscape, Bogota, Colombia
- 02 Winnipeg PSB Regeneration Experimenting Post-sustainability, Winnipeg, Canada
Education
University of Toronto
Master of Landscape Architecture 2015.9-2018.6
Zhejiang University
Bachelor of Landscape Architecture 2011.9-2015.6
- 03 Ryerson Centre for Urban Innovation Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada
- 04 Corridor
Humber Bay Park Rehabilization, Toronto, Canada
Professional Experience
DTAH Architects
- 05 Gradience
Toronto, Canada Designer | 2018.11-2020.06
Frontways and Deck Park Renovation, Toronto, Canada
PLANT Architect Inc.
- 06 Don Landing Restoration
Toronto, Canada Intern & Part-time | 2016.5-2018.4 Landscape Designer | 2018.9-2018.11
Freelance Experience Freelance Illustrator & Graphic Designer | 2019.6-present Works on www.siqilyu.com
Software Adobe Suite, Rhinoceros Sketchup, Vray, Vectorworks, AutoCAD, ArcGIS Language English, Mandarin
Toronto, Canada
- 07 Space Enclosure Analysis
Bahen Plaza, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- 08 Transition 4000 Lawrence Avenue East Tower Renewal, Scarborough, Canada
- 09 Shifting Joy Block 31 Playground Design, Toronto, Canda
- 10 Other Works
- 01 Way to Solitude Applying MAGIC REALISM in Landscape Architecture
Landscape Architecture Thesis Advisor Elise Shelly
Narratives have been used extensively in our discipline as a means for landscape architects to consolidate concepts and tell a coherent story. Through the interaction between the users and landscape elements, one narrative has the ability to manifest itself to the senses of the users. My proposed thesis is to take this even further by suggesting that a landscape designed with the narrative approach of magic realism has the ability to create an intensity of experience, which may not typically exist in the public realm. I’m using a site in Bogota, Colombia, to test the idea of applying magic realism in landscape, through the lens of the book One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel Garcia Marquez. The book, an exemplary work of magic realism published in 1967, tells the multi-generational story of the Buendía family in the metaphoric town of Macondo. Marquez uses magic realism as a representation of Colombian culture and the absurdity of people’s life. People in Macondo are unfazed by the supernatural elements in their daily life, so this reaction makes it easy for the readers to accept the dream-like things in Macondo’s reality. Everyone in the family was doing something to resist loneliness, but they never escaped from the inevitable fate of solitude and the repetition of history written in the scroll by Melchiades. The town was “wiped out by the wind and exiled from the memory of men” at last. The book also reveals the underlaying pattern of the true Latin American history. Márquez uses “magic realism” to depict how human beings deal with their self-created solitude. A garden designed with this narrative and the intent of conveying “magic realism” will interpret the ideas from the book.
Realistic Setting
Belivable Facts
REALISM
Contextuality
+
Fantastic Elements Accepted by Readers
MAGIC REALISM
Imaginary World
FANTASY
Narrative-based Mythical Interventions
Magic Realism was originally invented by German art critic Franz Roh in 1925 to describe modern realist paintings with mysterious or fantasy subjects. It was developed as a narrative strategy in Latin American literature, characterized by the matter-of-fact inclusion of dream-like elements into seemingly realistic fiction. In “magic real” worlds, the narrator and those subjected to the magic are never surprised by the fantastic elements surrounding them, and because of this, the reader, listener or viewer accepts them as well. Unlike fantasy, which often creates an entirely different and unacceptable world, magic realism is created with out-of place, indescribable, yet believable elements of magic. As analyzed in the diagram, magic realism is between realism and fantasy. A narrative landscape must have the “realistic setting” and the “accepted fantastic elements by viewers” in order to achieve the state of magic realism. To be specific, the design should take the current contextuality as the realistic setting for a series of narrative-based, mythical interventions. Applying magic realism to the variety of material options and flexible spatial organization of a site will create an unique landscape experience.
Regular Brick Walls
Transparent Walls
Transparent & Exaggerated
Twisted & View-blocking
Twisted & Exaggerated
Twisted & Gradual Change
Flower Garden Flower Garden
Contemplation Garden
Contemplation Garden
Cascades
Cascades
Jungle
Jungle
Collapsing Walls
Collapsing Walls
Exit Banana Garden
Exit Banana Garden Entry
Entry
0 1 2
5
10
20m
Gabriel Marquez CulturalCentre 0 1 2
5
10
20m
Gabriel Marquez CulturalCentre
- 02 Winnipeg PSB Regeneration Optional Studio Instructor Peter Sampson, Liz Wreford Individual Project
Based on the existing conditions, the north part of the site is more conserved and the south part contains more paved urbanized areas. Our proposal is trying to keep this site’s characteristic and make the north part even less connected to the urban area in order to create a more naturalized condition for animals to live. Cars can only access to and drive around the south part. The continuous habitats provide a chance for animal in the surrounding parklands to get to our site, thus promising a realm of richer biodiversity and eco-value. A major pathway is proposed in the masterplan, which allows people to pass through the site from the lookout point on the north to the mimico waterfront park. The pathway forms a loop together with the existing Lake Shore Blvd W, which provides three main accesses to the site. In the continuous route, people can have the chance to both interact with different kinds of animals and observe bird or butterfly immigration. When it passes through the areas that need to be conserved, the path will become an elevated walkway. There are two main continuous experiential routes which are interaction route and observation route. People’s experience will also be continuous along these trials as they pass through different habitats, with some key staying spots. Other than the main path, some extra platforms and extended decks are designed for co-exist spaces with animal-related programs seasonally. People are able to observe spring migration of birds and butterflies on the elevated path and pollinator meadow. At the same time, there’s opportunity to interact with mammals such as white-tailed deer and squirrels. Summer is the main fishing season. Our site provides the extended wood platform as an ideal place for fishing activities. The beach is a great spot to observe various reptiles and amphibians mating in coastal habitat. During fall, the meadow and the elevated path creates good chance to observe fall migration of birds and butterflies. The rich wetland plant species attracts more waterfowls and mammals, which improves educational value through the interaction. Most of the animals will hibernate in winter which requires the site to be more conserved. However, there’re still some wintering species that are active.
.7
4
4
96
7
.7
LEGEND 96.66 +
7
96 .8 2
EX 96.82 BOC +
96.97 TOC +
96.85 +
96.96 +
Valve and Box
+ 96.90 BOC
+ 96.90
MATCH
+ 97.11 TOC
+
2
+ 97.22 TOC
+ 97.12 TOC
+ 97.12 TOC
FH
.1 97
N73°10'35"E2%
Fire Hydrant
GV
7
2%
Gas Valve
97.22 TOC +
+
0
97 .2 6 2 .4 96
97 9 .3 96 1 .3 96 6 .2
95.94
9 .1 96 6 .0 96 7 .0 96
NORTH
0 .3 95 95
.2 2 .2 95 1 .3
95
.3
7
.4 95
95
0
6 .4 95
1
2
.1
1
8 .2
95
95
95
4 .3
3 .3
7
1:100
MATCH
3
+ 95.67 TOC
+ 95.47 TOC EX + 95.32 BOC
95 8 .4 95
GERRARD STREET FRONTAGE SITE PLAN
P.I.N. 21102-0202 (LT)
PROPERTY LINE
2 .9 95
5 .2
95
8 95
.2 8
.4 95
.4 95
95
+ 95.67 TOC
7
1 .5
9 .5
.5
+ 95.69 TOC 95.49 TOC + EX 95.34 BOC +
95
95
95
.4
.4
3
0
+ 95.69TOC
95
EX 95.36 BOC +
95
95 + 95.71 TOC 95.51 TOC +
EX + 95.41 BOC
8
1 .6
1 .6 95 + 95.71 TOC + 95.56 TOC
95
.5
4
95 9 .5 95 + 95.58 TOC EX + 95.43 BOC MATCH
.4
ON.0T 9A
MATCH
6 95
5
95.4
ARCHITECTS LISA RAPOPORT LICENSE 5181
.3
95.47 + 95.67 TOC
+ 95.67 TOC
.6
1
+ 95.55
+ 95.69 TOC
6
7 .8
95
A1
.3 96 7 .3 96
1 95 .1
6 .9 95 95.55 +
31.27
GERRARD STREET
OF
3
95 2 .1 95 1
95 .1 95.98
8 .9
8
+ 95.57 + 95.69 TOC
+ 95.71 TOC
ISSUE:
ASSOC I RIO
96 .8 6
.5 9 96 0 .5 96 7 .2 95
.0
3
30.96 N16°35'00"W
95 95 0 96 0
8
.8
.5
95
95
.6 95 2.2%
.6 5 .4 95
B
129.51
2%
2.2%
2.2%
95
5 .6 ISSUE:
5
DATE:
95 .4
ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL
42 GERRARD E
.0
MATCH
95.63 +
95.57
95
.2 8 .9
6 9 .0 95
6 .1 95 .9 95 6 .9
4 .9 3
1
9
.8
95
.5
95
95
95
.6
95
6
.6
5
7 .6
7 .6
.7 95
95
2.5%
95.58 +
N73°18'15"E
95 0 .4 95 7 .2 95
ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION R1
16-08-03
95 9 .9
95
8 .9 95 7 .8 95 0 .1 96 5
3 .9 95 95 2 .8 95
+ 95.66
95.66 +
0 .7 95 5 .6
1
17-01-27
E
1 96 .1 FF 8 .2 99 72 8. 10
1 .8
95
.0
4
.9 96
95.68 +
.2
3 7 96
95
96
.0
5
.0
96
3
7 .0 96
5 .0 96 9 .9 95 96 5 .0 96 7 .1 96 FOR REFERENCE ONLY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
r) oo Fl
d (2 n
Fl
rd
(3
FF 10 3. 6 95 5 .8 3
7
+ 95.69
+ 95.70
5
95
.2
PROPERTY LINE
95
0 .3 96 5 8 .0
7 9
oo r)
0
.1
22A FFE 95.81
2.5%
+ 95.71 TOC
A ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION R2
EX 96.
.2 96 2
.2 96
.1 5.0 ON T9A
TRUE NORT H
96 96
95.70 +
+ 95.63
.2 96
.2
9 .3 96
1 .3 96
7
96
8 .9 95 .8 95
N16°33'00"W
7 .2 .1
7 1 95 .8
1
95
95.74 +
1
95
8 .2 95
95
9 .2 96 2 .4 96 2 .3 96 1 .3
3
96
6 95
.2 7
.0
96
0 .4 96 4 .3 96 96
8 .1 96 8
.7
0 .6 95
95
FFE 95.71
.4
L13-SPA
2.5%
17-04-25
96 .8 7
97 .1 1
8 .4 0 .4 95 7 .2 95
95
PROPERTY LINE
.2
3
2 .5 96 5 .0 96
1 .5 9 .9 95
2 .3 96 8 .8 95 95
8 .4 96
Appoved By:
4
Match TOC with Existing Curb
PROPERTY LINE
40 GERRARD
B3
50 GERRARD
PLAN
Checked By:
96.02 +
A
95
PROPERTY LINE
0 .3
2 .3 2 .2 96
5
.3 0 .3
96
96
5 .2 96
96 2 .2 96
7
.7
2 .6
Drawn By:
2.0%
+ 95.93 TOC
14
+ 95.66
95.63 +
95.57
EX 96.39 + + 96.54
LOT
44 GERRARD STREET
Sheet No.:
Job No.: 16025
.3 95
9 .3 96 1 96
.3
95.84+
96 1 .3 96
3 .3 96
.6
1 .3 95
7
9 .3
96
96
5 .0
1
96
.3 96 2 .3 96 1 .3
3 .3 96
95
3 .1 95
.2 95
PART 7
1 95 .3
Scale: As Noted
REGISTERED
96
2 .0 0 96 .0 96
5 .1 96
9 .2 96
96
50.41 .5 96
95
96.12
2 .0 0 96 .0
5 .1
96
96
.2 96 .4 96
95 50.41 .5 96
5 0
.3 1
2 P.I.N. 21102-0215
.2
Toronto, Ontario Project:
Date: 16.08.03
EX BOC 95.78 +
LOT 13
Client:
LANDSCAPE GRADING PLAN
42 GERRARD
Outflow
2 .4
0 .6 96 7
OF
ARCHITECTS
.2
B
95.40
.3 96
ASSOC I RIO
Ryerson Centre For Urban Innovation
Match TOW
+ 95.81 FFE
7
.3
B
.2
96
5 .0 96
ISSUE:
Copyright (C) 2016
96.14 +
+ 96.03 TOC
95
96.12
3 .1 96 .4 96
.3 96
4 .6 96 4 .1 96
4
P.I.N. 21102-0202 (LT)
PROPERTY LINE
2 .9 95
1:100
ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL ISSUE:
Title:
ION AT
5
1
6
7 .0 96
6 .9
95
95.81+
SEE A1 FOR CONTINUATION OF DRAWING
MCGILL STREET FRONTAGE AND COURTYARD SITE PLAN
ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION R1
16-08-03
P.I.N. 21102-0201 (LT)
.2 .3 .3
6 4. 8 11
11
7 4. 8 11
2. 7
8
2 .6 96
+ 96.28
7.96
95.96
B3
50 GERRARD
1.6%
2% +95.81 FFE
ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION R2
17-01-27
95.55 + + 95.55 TOC
0.61
96.39 +
+ 96.29 TOC
17-04-25
DATE:
Do not scale drawings. The contractor shall check and verify all dimensions and report any errors or omissions to the architect before commencing or proceeding with any work. All drawings remain the property of the architect.
2%
8
6 .0 96 2 .1 95 1 95 .1
42 GERRARD EX 96.14 +
(LT)
96 96
.5 96
Outflow
2.4%
95.50 +
1 95 .1
40 GERRARD
98
14
PART 7 1 .4 96
0 .3 2%
3
50.41
96
.1
PROPERTY LINE
4
1 .4
9
Match TOW
LOT 12
Provide Slope to Outflow
N73°34'05"E
N17°25'00"W
LOT
95.84+
NORTH
LOT 11
95.85
2%
96
2%
+ 95.69
+ 95.75
P.I.N. 21102-0215
PART 6
(LT) 6 .3 96
0 .6 7 .3 96
95.40
95.81 FFE
7
.3 96
5 .0
P.I.N. 21102-0214 8 .2 97
3 .3 96
.9
96
96
96
+ 96.28
2
2 .9
0 .6 96 7 .3 96
2 .9 95
96
63R-1399
N16°24'40"W
PART 4
N15°31'00"W
4.79 1 97 .1 5
4
.1
96
.3
96
11
11
4 .6 96 4 .1 96
4
P.I.N. 21102-0202 (LT)
PART 3
7.59 97
97
P.I.N. 21102-0202 (LT) .09 6
97 7 3.5 11 6 4.8
8 2.7
7 4.8 11
7 .0 96
95.55 + + 95.55 TOC
LISA RAPOPORT LICENSE 5181
+ 97.30 TOW
0
56
LOT
+ 95.81 FFE
95.55+ + 95.55 TOC
95.45 +
2%
57
95.81+
SEE B3 FOR CONTINUATION OF DRAWING
95.50 +
0.61
96.30 +
SEE A1 FOR CONTINUATION OF DRAWING
3
97
4
.2 97 .2
7
2 .3
2 3.5
5 .3 97
10
97
.5
8 97 .35 .5 6
6
11
11
4 3.5 11
0 .8 96 2 .6 96
95
PROPERTY LINE
+ 95.20 TOC
+ 95.77
96
Provide Slope to Outflow
+ 95.81 FFE
95.84+
95
(LT)
7 .4
PART 6 95
MATCH
97
6
.3
95.85
95
8 .2
95 6
95.47
.3 95
(LT)
8
95
95
8
P.I.N. 21102-0214
PART 3 PART 4
95.81+
C
+ 95.67 TOC
3
95
96
5 .9
95.69 +
96
95.69 + + 97.30 TOW
+ 95.72
+ 97.30 TOW 95.55+ + 95.55 TOC
2%
N73°34'05"E
Finished Floor Elevation
2
1
1.6%
+ 95.47 TOC
EX + 95.32 BOC
3
0 .3 97 .3
2 4.7
97
6
3 .5 97
7 .8 96 0 .3 96 6 .0 96
2 .1
95
PART 5
1:100
2%
3.24
95.45 + 2%
+ 95.69
+95.81 FFE
MCGILL STREET FRONTAGE AND COURTYARD SITE PLAN
Bottom of Stair
EX 96.42 + + 96.57 TOC
.2
R O O FL
97
.4
4
6 .4 97
6
8 3.4 11
.5 97
7 .5 96
6 .7 96
9 .1 96
3 .0 95 1 95 .1
Top of Stair
95.69 +
2%
3.24
97 .1
+ 95.72
96
.8
11
0
96 3
PROPERTY LINE
FL D O N SE C
2 .4 97
FIR ST
2 .5 97
3.05
97.60
3 .3 96
7 .3 96
9
.0
95 6 .1 95
30.96 N16°35'00"W .9
6
Bottom of Wall
TOS
4.3%
C
EX+ 97.28
95.69 + + 97.30 TOW
96.39 +
+ 96.29 TOC
N73°35'30"E
N71°13'00"E 7.99
56
LOT
1 95 .1 95.98
8 .9 95
BOW
5
EX+ 97.28
7
.3
3. 5
0
96.55 + 2%
.0
N16°18'00"W
O
O
R
N16°28'50"W
3 9 .3 96
1 .3 96
6 .2
7 95 0 .0 96 8 .5
129.51
2%
95.4
.4
1 .5 95
6 3 R - 195.23 9 9
4
7.59
.3 95 7
4.79
0 .4 95
57
96
9 .1 96
.1 95
+ 95.72 + 95.72
42 GERRARD EX 96.14 +
Top of Wall
+ 95.67 TOC
+ 95.67 TOC
9 .0
11
96.55 + 2%
NOTES: 1) For existing tree information and tree protection and removals, refer to arborist report and drawing, prepared by Bruce Tee Expert Co. Ltd, dated July 8. 2016. 2) In the event of any conflicting information, the grading plan prepared by A.M. Candaras Associates will apply.
MATCH
95.57
55
N73°35'30"E
N71°13'00"E 7.99
97
3. 5
4
.8 96 6
95
8 .9 95 .8 95 0 .1 96 5 .9 95
6 .9
4 .9
PART 2 0 .8 95
.6
95
N16°24'40"W
4 .5 95
8 .5 95
97
5 .3 97
95 N15°31'00"W .3
2 .3
2 3. 5 11
95 .4 6
8 97 .35 .5 6
10
7
95
3
1
5 9
.6
.8
.5
95
95
4
PROPERTY.6LINE 6
95 3 .3 95
7 .2 97
2 .3 97
6 4. 7 11
6 .5
97
.5 .7
.2 97
0 .5 96 7
.2
95
7 .0 5
96
.0 96
3 .9 95 95 2 95
10
.2 97 9 .5
95
95
.4
.5 97
95 .4
GERRARD STREET + 97.30 TOW
7
1:100
7
EX 96.30 + + 96.45 TOC
LOT
95.98
3
95
7 .7 96
9 .9 95 8
.8
8.7
2
N16°18'00"W
1 95
0 .4
EX+ 97.30
BOS 96.12 +
GERRARD STREET FRONTAGE SITE PLAN
2.2%
EX+ 97.30
+ 97.30 TOW
+ 95.75
Bottom of Curb
FFE
95.63 +
+ 95.67 TOC
6 R DN.
96.10 +
+ 96.16
C
+ 95.55
.6 95
1 .6
1
3
.4 95
995
3
6
8
.5
3. 4 11 8
97
P.I.N. 21102-0213 (LT)
nd (2
8 .2 99
5
3
3.6
.8
10
95
1 .8
95 7 95
.6 95
0 .3 97 9 .5
.6
95
7.4.5 44
9.475 .4
95
95
96.13 +
+ 96.10
5%
96 .3
9 .0
LOT + 95.69 TOC
95.49 TOC +
1
95
+ 95.66
+ 95.69 TOC
EX 95.34 BOC +
BOS 96.12 +
+ 96.16
+ 96.16
22A
6 R DN.
96.10 + BOS 96.12 +
REGISTERE
95.94
6
FFE 95.81
95.55 +
31.27
+ 95.69TOC
+ 97.30 TOW + 96.13
96
7 .8
2.2%
+ 96.1695.51 TOC +96.16 +
7
3.05
97.60
96
.3
3
95
95
A1
40 GERRARD
B3
2.2%
EX 95.36 BOC +
22.45
P.I.N. 21102-0049 (LT) N73°18'50"E
5.01
14 Top of Curb
TOW
+ 95.66
0.02
+ 95.57
+ 95.71 TOC
FFE
EX + 95.41 BOC
MATCH
25.51
Existing
BOS 50 GERRARD
95.66 +
+ 95.69 TOC
+ 95.71 TOC
95
EX + 95.43 BOC
6 9 .3 96 1 .3 96 .2
6
95
3
.6
7
1 .7 95
R O O FL
95 FIR .6 S 8 T
2 .4
5 .6 95
0 .5 96 7 .2 95 6 .2
PROPERTY LINE
2%
95.58 +
2%
96.56 +
8
2.5%
+ 96.10
Finished Floor Elevation
95.96
7.96
N17°25'00"W
96.65 +
.9
95.68 +
2.5%
N73°18'15"E
+ 95.71 TOC 96.31 + 95.56+TOC
+ 95.58 TOC
Water Valve
BOC
63 MCGILL
61 MCGILL
N73°33'30"E + 95.69
+ 95.70
2.5%
+ 95.71 TOC
+ 96.60
EX 96.35 + + 96.50 TOC
FF
rd (3 FF
.1 96 7 .9
4
95
.0 96
FL D
2.4%
A
N73°18'50"E
Parking Meter
WV
.1 )
or 0
8
.7 95 R
95.70 +
+ 95.63
EX 96.39 + + 96.54 TOC
59 MCGILL
PLAN
96.28 +
O
O
95.74 +
N O C SE
95
97
97
0 .7
2 .5
3 .2 97
PROPERTY LINE
Flo
) or Flo
2
.6
95
0 .6 95 1 .8 95
N16°28'50"W
2
+ 95.77
44 GERRARD STREET
95
6 .1 97 7
.1 96
7 .3 97 96.55 +
.4 96
FFE 95.71
+ 96.28
PART 1, 63R-1399
17.11
97
96
0
.3
97
N16°26'30"W
1 .2
8 .1
97
0
.3
97
2 .3 97 9 .5
96.02 +
25.51
5%
LOT
PM
LOT TOC
95.94
96
2.0%
+ 95.93 TOC
5.01
D
1 97 .1
96
9 .3
.8
3 .6 96
EX BOC 95.78 +
Match TOC with Existing Curb
96.56 + EX 96.35 + + 96.50 TOC
BOS 96.12 +
+ 96.16
P.I.N. 21102-0049 (LT) N73°18'50"E
Bottom of Stair
FFE
ION AT
42 GERRARD
44 GERRARD STREET
REGISTERED
2%
30.96 N16°35'00"W
.0
.1
1 4 .3 96 7 .2
N16°33'00"W
8 .8 95
24.65 6
96
7
.7
95
7 .3 97 6 .2 97 6
.6
96
203
P.I.N. 21102-0201 (LT) 5%
96.65 +
2%
EX 96.30 + + 96.45 TOC
Hydro Pole
EX
LOT 13
3.01
21.67
96
PLAN
96.88 +
Gas Valve
HP
95.96
96
+ 97.30 TOW
+ 97.30 TOW
7.96
+ 99.27 FFE
P.I.N. 21102-0048 (LT)
96.80 +
LOT 12
96.14 +
+ 96.03 TOC
+ 97.07
Fire Hydrant
GV
7
97 96
97
6.4.
997
96.85 +
96.13 +
N17°25'00"W
13 R DN. 2%
B
EX 96.42 + + 96.57 TOC
95
96 5 .0 96
1 .7
2 .1 97
5 .1
206
+ 96.85
96.80 +
LOT 11
REGISTERED 4.3%
.2
5 96 7 .1 96
97
97 2
97
96
.2
6
22.51
.9
6
+ 97.13 FFE
EX 96.66 +
95
.2
1 .3 96
0 6
.4
BOS 97.07 +
.3
96
6.6%
96
.1
9 .1 97
.8
7
97 .1
1
+ 97.12 TOC
Existing Catch Basin
FH
2 .2
.9
1 .5 96
8 .2 97
97.12TOC +
97.46
97.22 + 97.12 TOC+
96.16 +
+ 96.13
BOS
7.96
+ 96.97
+ 96.16
Top of Stair
N17°25'00"W
2%
7
96
95.81 FFE
25.52
+ 97.13
EX 96.87 +
3
.5
2
96
96.30 +
CB
22.45
+ 96.60
Valve and Box
2 .1 97
.1
7
96
.0
5
.3
+ 97.12 TOC
N73°10'35"E2%
2%
PROPERTY LINE
96
.9 95
+ 97.11 TOC
+ 95.20 TOC
97 MATCH
+ 96.90 BOC
+ 96.90
.3
+ 96.95
+ 97.22 TOC
+ 97.12 TOC
7
+ 97.12 TOC
96
97 .1
7
97.22 TOC +
+ 97.22 TOC
+ 96.97 BOC
2
97.01 BOC +
+ 97.02 BOC 97.22 TOC +
Existing Storm MH
.2
PROPERTY LINE
.6 96 .3
MATCH
Proposed Storm MH
MH
.2
5
9 .3 96
0
96
96
96
.8 96
Flush
96
.7
9.67 .38 2
5
.3
1
96
96
3
4
0
.5
.9
96
96
2%
95.84+
+ 96.31 FFE
N73°18'50"E
EX 96.39 + + 96.54 TOC
MH
6
2 96
4
.6
.6
50.41
9
PROPERTY LINE
6 .7 .3
7
96
+ 96.79 TOC
2%
6
.4
0 .6 96
EX + 96.64 BOC
+ 96.84 TOC
.9 96
MATCH
2%
1:500
Bottom of Wall
TOS
6.6%
EX 96.66 +
55
LOT
KEY PLAN
D1
Proposed Grade
95
9 .2 96
4 .1 96
EX + 96.69 BOC
+ 96.90 TOC
96
6
EX + 96.75 BOC
+ 96.92 TOC
Flush
+ 95.81 FFE
SEE B3 FOR CONTINUATION OF DRAWING
EX + 96.77 BOC
.9
4
96
96
.9
.9
5
4 .9 96
Flush
P.I.N. 21102-0202 (LT)
.8 + 96.95 TOC
96
96
96
.8
2
0
2 .8 96
8 .8 96 8 .9 96
96.96 +
EX + 96.80 BOC
+ 96.96 TOC
95.81+
7.96
EX + 96.81 BOC
96.97 TOC +
96.66 +
N17°25'00"W
EX 96.82 BOC +
0.02
BOW
EX 96.87 +
NOTES: 1) For existing tree information and tree protection and removals, refer to arborist report and drawing, prepared by Bruce Tee Expert Co. Ltd, dated July 8. 2016. 2) In the event of any conflicting information, the grading plan prepared by A.M. Candaras Associates will apply.
N73°33'30"E
GERRARD STREET
LEGEND
MCGILL STREET C
96.28 +
Top of Wall
63 MCGILL
61 MCGILL
PART 5
7 .3 97 2 2 .4 96
96 .7 4
96 .7 7
96 .8 0
96 .8 5
96 .9 1
96 .9 4
4
+ 96.28
96.55 +
2%
96.85 +
R
42 GERRARD
97 9 .5 EX 96.42 + + 96.57 TOC
3
EX 96.82 CB +
G
40 GERRARD
96
P.I.N. 21102-0149 (LT) 2
59 MCGILL
44 GERRARD STREET
.3
1:500
50 GERRARD
PART 2
.1
.6 96
KEY PLAN
D1
PART 1, 63R-1399
6
Main Floor
P.I.N. 21102-0213 (LT)
17.11
1 .2 97
203
5%
97
97
N16°26'30"W
21.67
0
.3
0
.3
97
PLAN
96.88 +
3
4.3%
Bottom of Curb
TOW
97 .3 2
1 9 97
.3
.8 96
REGISTERED
GERRARD STREET
97 .1
24.65
P.I.N. 21102-0048 (LT)
6
96
.6
6
EX 96.66 +
BOC
96 .6 6
.2
42 GERRARD
PROPERTY LINE
96 .9 6
GERRARD STREET FRONTAGE AND COURTYARD SITE PLAN
97 40 GERRARD
Top of Curb
96 .6 3
44 GERRARD
13 R DN.
+ 99.27 FFE
+ 97.07
Existing
TOC
1 .7
2
7 .3
3.01
6
50 GERRARD
R
Water Valve
EX
Project Role A1 Working on SPA set according to redline markups
96.80 + + 97.30 TOW
97 Main Floor
G
WV
96.85 +
96.80 +
96
97
97
5 .1
6
+ 96.85
Parking Meter
.3
6 .9
97
97
.2
6
22.51
97
+ 97.12 TOC + 97.13 FFE
MATCH
D
Hydro Pole
PM
96
6
.1
97.46
97.22 + 97.12 TOC+
6.6%
.2
EX 96.87 +
A1
.4
7 .8 96
+ 97.13
HP
Designed by PLANT ARCHITECT INC.
BOS 97.07 +
97
1 GERRARD STREET FRONTAGE AND COURTYARD SITE PLAN
.1 + 96.97
D
97.12TOC +
97 .1 44 GERRARD
97
25.52
97
PROPERTY LINE
.1
97
9
.2
8
D
96
.9
2%
EX 96.82 CB +
96 .9 4
B3
97
7 .1 97
+ 97.12 TOC
+ 96.95
+ 96.97 BOC
97.22 TOC +
+ 97.22 TOC
Existing Catch Basin
97 .1 7
97.01 BOC +
+ 97.02 BOC 97.22 TOC +
MATCH
Existing Storm MH
CB
.6
96
7
.7 96
MCGILL STREET FRONTAGE AND COURTYARD SITE PLAN
96 .9 6
5
8
.7 96
96
MATCH
.1
96
MATCH
MH
5
4
.6
61 63 MCGILL MCGILL
.7
3 96
Flush
.9
2%
Proposed Storm MH
+ 96.79 TOC
.8
.9
96
Flush
59 MCGILL
EX + 96.64 BOC
+ 96.84 TOC Second Floor
0
6 .9
4 .9 2%
6
EX + 96.69 BOC
96
+ 96.90 TOC
96
.9 96
96
Flush
9 EX + 96.75 BOC
+ 96.92 TOC
5
4 .9
8
96.96 +
96
96
EX + 96.77 BOC
+ 96.95 TOC
96
EX + 96.80 BOC
+ 96.96 TOC
96.97 TOC +
.9 96
B3
.6
.7
0 .8
2 .8
EX + 96.81 BOC
96
EX 96.82 BOC +
96.85 +
MCGILL STREET FRONTAGE AND COURTYARD SITE PLAN
96
61 63 MCGILL MCGILL
6
2 .8 96
8 .8
EX 96.82 CB +
96 59 MCGILL Second Floor
Proposed Grade
MH
96 .8 8
96
MCGILL STREET
MCGILL STREET MCGILL STREET
96 .9 8
.8
96
0
5 96
96
.8
.9
4 .9 96
2
- 03 Ryerson University for Urban Innovation
3 1
2
96 .9 4
1 P.I.N. 21102-0149 (LT) 1
MCGILL STREET FRONTA 1:100
40 GERRARD
ba 41
Ra
al 34
B
42 GERRARD
08
Dl
Dl 33
10
Cc
06
dc
Ra 03
Rb 2
50
02 Ra 02 ba 40
dc 16
44 GERRARD STREET
42 GERRARD
SEE A1 FOR CONTINUATION OF DRAWING 2
1
50 GERRARD P.I.N. 21102-0149 (LT)
B3
3
4 .7
LEGEND
MCGILL STREET 96.66 +
MCGILL STREET
97.01 BOC +
+ 96.97 BOC
97.22 TOC +
+ 97.22 TOC
5
4
.6
.6
.6
QR
96
96
5
7
8
.7
.7 96
96
96
.7
3 + 96.90
97
MATCH
Evergreen Trees PG
7
0 97 1
am 04
96.80 +
Rb
N16°26'30"W
97
R O O
0
.3
tc
Drought tolerant; Native
93
30cm
Drought tolerant; Native
40cm
Native
44 Panicum virgatum 'Prairie Winds®' Cheyenne Skyremovals, Switch Grass refer to 1 gal tree protection and (Cheyenne Sky) arborist report and drawing, prepared 162 Deschampia caespitosa Tufted Hair Grass 1 gal
50cm
Drought tolerant; Salt tolerant
60cm
Drought tolerant; Native
50cm
Drought tolerant; Native
NOTES: 1) For existing tree information and by Bruce Tee Expert Co. Ltd, dated Common Wood Sedge 1 gal July 8. 2016. 2) In the event of any conflicting information, the grading plan prepared by A.M. Candaras Associates will apply.
(LT)
27
3
23
8
8
.2
1
97
.4 96
97 .1
6
.3
.3 0 .3 96
9 .3 96
5 .6
0 .4 95
1
.2
95
7
.3
17-04-25
.2 3
B
ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION R1
16-08-03
ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL ISSUE:
ac 38
95
7 .0
95
.8
7
95
.9
8
96
5 .0 96
ba 17
5.0 ON T9A
9
9
.9 95
ASSOC I RIO OF
ARCHITECTS
tc 17
LISA RAPOPORT LICENSE 5181
Cc 02
al 50
40 GERRARD NORTH
08
Do not scale drawings. The contractor shall check and verify all dimensions and report any errors or omissions to the architect before commencing or proceeding with any work. All drawings remain the property of the architect.
Dl 10
ba 40
3 .1 95
.2 95 .2
2
Ryerson Centre For Urban Innovation
95
Title:
LANDSCAPE GRADING PLAN
1
95 .3
7
95 .3
95
.4
0
95 .4 6
tc 13
Ma 03
Scale: As Noted
ba 09
Job No.: 16025
Rb 2
28
dc 30
1 ba
ac
2
tc 11
38
Checked By:
dc
50 GERRARD B3
Symbol
1:100
Quan
4 Quercus rubra
Red Oak
3 Gleditsia tricanthos
Honey Locust
LT
2 Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip tree
AR
2 Acer rubrum
Red Maple
4 Picea glauca
White Spruce
3 Fagus sylvatica 'Dawyk Creek'
Dawyk Creek Beech
Evergreen Trees PG
ba
Hedge Planting Fs
cb
ac
tc
cb
ac
cb
ac
13
19
10
10
12
12
ba 09
Deciduous Shrubs
Dl 13
08
is 04
05
am
am 11
is
tc 17
18
44 Fothergilla gardenii
Dwarf Fothergilla
Ra
74 Rhus aromatica 'Gro-Low'
Fragrant Sumac
Dl Rb
am 04
02 pv
Fg
11 Ra
A
06
17-04-25
ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION R2
17-01-27
ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION R1
16-08-03
ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL
Fg pv
50 GERRARD
B
13
is 14
16
ISSUE:
GT 03
ISSUE:
GERRARD STREET
Ma
ONT A
OF
ION AT
ASSOC I RIO
LISA RAPOPORT LICENSE 5181
PLANT SCHEDULE RUCUI – PLANT SCHEDULE Symbol
Quan
Latin Name
Common Name
Size
Spacing
Comments
Red Oak
70mm cal
-
Specimen; Drought tolerant; Native
Deciduous Trees QR
4 Quercus rubra
GT
3 Gleditsia tricanthos
Honey Locust
70mm cal
-
Specimen; Drought tolerant; Native
LT
2 Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip tree
70mm cal
-
Specimen; Drought tolerant; Native
AR
2 Acer rubrum
Red Maple
70mm cal
-
Specimen; Drought tolerant; Native
4 Picea glauca
White Spruce
275cm WB
-
Specimen; Drought tolerant; Native
3 Fagus sylvatica 'Dawyk Creek'
Dawyk Creek Beech
80mm WB
-
Specimen
Evergreen Trees PG
NORTH Fs
TRUE NORT H
Hedge Planting
Deciduous Shrubs Fg
44 Fothergilla gardenii
Dwarf Fothergilla
50cm
50cm
Salt tolerant
Ra
74 Rhus aromatica 'Gro-Low'
Fragrant Sumac
2 gal
150cm
Drought tolerant
Do not scale drawings. The contractor shall check and verify all dimensions and report any errors or omissions to the architect before commencing or
Smooth Wild Rose
Oregon Grape
3 Hedera helix 'Baltica'
Baltic Ivy
Pq
2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia
Virginia Creeper
Hh Pq
A1
GERRARD STREET FRONTAGE SITE PLAN 1:100
1
12 Hedera helix 'Baltica' 2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia
Baltic Ivy Virginia Creeper
am
38 Achillea millefolium
Common Yarrow
is
36 Iris sibirica 'White Swirl'
Siberian Iris
al
420 Aster laevis
Smooth Aster
ba
669 Baptisia australis
False Indigo
ac
327 Aquilegia canadensis
Wild Columbine
tc
265 Tiarella cordifolia
Foamflower
cb
50 GERRARD
ARCHITECTS
Eastern Red Bud
Hh
dc
MCGILL STREET FRONTAGE AND COURTYARD SITE PLAN
57 Mahonia aquifolium
Ornamental Grasses
SEE A1 FOR CONTINUATION OF DRAWING
1:100
Bush Honeysuckle
Broadleaf Evergreens
pv
B3
11 Rosa blanda
Perennials
Fg 16
DATE:
7 Cercis canadensis
Vine Wall
08
Dl 33
170 Diervilla lonicera
Vines
27
42 GERRARD
dc
Fg
Cc
Cc
40 GERRARD
Common Name
QR GT
17 13
Latin Name
Deciduous Trees
4
pv
is
MCGILL STREET FRONTAG
PLANT SCHEDULE RUCUI – PLANT SCHEDULE
04
Fs 03
79
L13-SPA
Drawn By:
Appoved By:
Dl 05
3
Sheet No.:
Date: 16.08.03
1:100
tc
A
44 GERRARD STREET
Dl 10
FOR REFERENCE ONLY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
0 .3 95
1
8
.4 95
8 95 .4
tc 10
Dl 33
Copyright (C) 2016 Client:
al 42
Ma 05
42 GERRARD
dc
Ra 03
06 Ma 06
dc 30
ISSUE:
.2
PROPERTY LINE
0 .3 96 5 .2 96
2 .2 96
ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION R2
17-01-27
DATE:
95
1
95
96.12
2 .0 0 96
.0
5 .1 96
96
.4 96 9 .2
96
Dl 15
7
dc 17
06 PG 02
6
2%
3 .1 96 1
6 .3 96
09
Outflow
.3 96 1 .3 96
3 .3 96
tc
dc
Ra
96 2 .3
4 .5 96
14
95
96
96
.9
96
5
11
96
3
.4
1
dc
SEE B3 FOR CONTINUATION OF DRAWING
Match TOW
Rb 2
GERRARD STREET FRONTAGE SITE PLAN
4
bc
1
Project:
Ra
A1
PG 02
C
42 GERRARD
GERRARD STREET
PG 02
20
dc
95.40
ba 51
dc
04
09
dc
42
+ 95.81 FFE
95.84+
16 MATCH
Dl
dc
AR 02
95.55 + + 95.55 TOC
2 .4 96
50.41 7 .3 96
95.81+
AR 02
.3 96
5 .0
6 95
.3
95.47
Drought tolerant; Native
30cm
1 gal
PART 6
(LT)
63R-1399
N16°24'40"W
9 .0 97 7 3.5 11 6 4.8
8 2.7 11
0 .6 96
dc 11
7 95
.4
8 .4 95
30cm
Toronto, Ontario
.2 95
95
1 gal 1 gal Floor Elevation
TRUE NORT H
0
8
.8
.5
95
95
3 .6 95 4
4 .3
3 95
Drought tolerant; Salt tolerant; Native
45cm
of Stair
False Indigo Finished
Ra 02
+ 95.67 TOC
+ 95.47 TOC EX + 95.32 BOC
50cm
1 gal
Top of Stair
SiberianBottom Iris
C
.5 95
+ 95.67 TOC
1 gal
21
Provide Slope to Outflow
02
5
1 .5
95
8 .5 95
+ 95.69 TOC
Stake + Attach to Cabling
95.85
+ 96.28
Cc
95.4
95.49 TOC +
Stake + Attach to Cabling
45cm
+ 97.30 TOW
2%
Ra 04
al 34
B
+ 95.67 TOC
+ 95.67 TOC
EX 95.34 BOC +
.3
.4 95
P.I.N. 21102-0214
4.79
97
PART 4
2 .3
2 3.5
5
6 .5
.3 97
10
97
8 97 .35 .5 6
11
11
4 3.5 11 7 4.8 11
4 .6 96 4 .1 96 96
.8 95 5
1
9
.6
.8
.5
95
95
95
6
.6 95 9 .5 95
95 0
+ 95.69TOC
PART 3
7 .2 97
.3
2 4.7
97
6
3 .5 97
7 .8 96 0 .8 96 2 .6 96
P.I.N. 21102-0202 (LT)
PROPERTY LINE
2
2
2 8.7 10
1 .6
1
EX 95.36 BOC +
3
7.59
4 .4 97
97
6
8 3.4 11
.5 97
7 .5 96
6 .7 6 .0 7 .0 96 .9 .2
95
8 .2
FF 8 .2 99
95 9 .5
.6
95
+ 95.71 TOC 95.51 TOC +
EX + 95.41 BOC
.4
95
95 + 95.71 TOC + 95.56 TOC
+ 95.69 TOC
45cm
2 gal
1 gal
95.55+ + 95.55 TOC
0.61
1.6%
95
nd (2
Flo rd (3 FF 5
1
Dl 05
2 gal
of Wall
Foamflower
129.51
+ 95.55
7
tc 15
31.27
+ 95.69 TOC
+ 95.71 TOC
+ 95.58 TOC MATCH
95
5 .4
5 .4 95 tc
95.55 +
.6
N73°18'15"E
EX + 95.43 BOC
A
14
42
3
3.6
10 1
8 .6
.6
+ 95.57
Staked Staked; Drought Tolerant; Native
04
95.50 +
+ 95.69
Rb 2 2%
50cm 50cm
Ra
N73°34'05"E
95.63 +
2.2%
2 gal 2 gal
ba 41
MATCH
95.57
2.2%
2.2%
2.5%
95.58 +
95 ac 26 dc
+ 95.66
dc 12
Baltic Ivy
Virginia Creeper
Wild Columbine
Rb 2
+ 95.66
95
+ 95.71 TOC
5
04
.8
95 7 tc 14
+ 95.63
2%
SEE A1 FOR CONTINUATION OF DRAWING
95
1:100
Cc 03
3.24
95.45 +
LT 02
95.66 +
ac 20
2.5%
2.5%
0 .7 95 PROPERTY LINE
Ra
22A
95.68 +
cb 20
95
.6 95
95 2.4%
+ 95.69
+ 95.70
.6
7
1 .7
FIR
tc 12
Rb 3
+95.81 FFE
FFE 95.81
95
7 .9
4
95
.0 96
R O O ST
FL
95.70 +
95.69 +
.8
R
O
O FL D N O C SE
95.74 +
95.69 + + 97.30 TOW
+ 95.72
al 63
2%
5
)
or Flo
) or 0
96
95
FFE 95.71
+ 95.77
09
PLAN
.1
0 .6 95 .8 95
Ma 09
50 GERRARD
Ma
95.94
27
23
96.02 +
Match TOC with Existing Curb
1
ac
bc
2.0%
+ 95.93 TOC
.7
8
EX BOC 95.78 +
+ 95.72
dc 05
96.39 +
+ 96.29 TOC
MCGILL STREET FRONTAGE AND COURTYARD SITE PLAN
7 .1 96
2 .6
95
REGISTERED
PG 02
44 GERRARD STREET
Drought tolerant; Native
ION AT
42 GERRARD ac 20
27
Drought tolerant; Native
100cm
265 Tiarella cordifolia
EX+ 97.28
56
LOT
96 2
63 MCGILL
61 MCGILL
150cm
50cm
96
0 .3 96
57
.1
6
P.I.N. 21102-0201 (LT) 59 MCGILL
B3
dc
N15°31'00"W
3.05
97.60
3 .3 96 9 .1
3 .0 95 1 95 .1
95.98
.9 95 .9 95 0 .0 96
8 .1 96
tc
09
20
50cm
327 Aquilegia canadensis
42 Carex blanda
N73°35'30"E
N71°13'00"E 7.99
5%
96.55 +
1 .1 96
42 GERRARD EX 96.14 +
Dl 05
44 GERRARD STREET
dc
EX+ 97.30
+ 97.30 TOW
+ 95.75
8 7
ac 12
96
.2
N16°33'00"W
.8 95
cb 12
Smooth Water Wild RoseValve
Smooth Aster
55
1 95 .1
.4 96 4 .3 96
40 GERRARD
Drought tolerant; Native
Common Yarrow
BOS FFE
Ornamental Grasses
7.96
8
14
LOT
95.96
AR 02
LOT 13
96.14 +
+ 96.03 TOC
tc 93
.4
6 9 .3 96 1 .3 96 96
6 .1 95 5 .9 95
95
7 .1 0
96
2 .3 96 7
.7
95
2%
B
Ma 07
LOT 12
Salt tolerant; Drought tolerant; Native
-
Top of Wall
TOS
669 Baptisia australis
N17°25'00"W
LOT 11
+ 96.16
2%
Soil Volume = 76.6 cu m.
21
tc
6 R DN.
96.10 + BOS 96.12 +
7 .3 96
9 .0 95
EX 96.30 + + 96.45 TOC
LOT
95
.9
.9
4
6
5 .0 96
12
Dl
96.13 + BOS 96.12 +
+ 96.10
C
95
07
dc
30.96 N16°35'00"W
05
ac
LOT
0 7 0 96
.1 Ma
25.51
Drought tolerant
100cm
225cm WB
Virginia Creeper Bottom
420 Aster laevis 63 MCGILL
ba
4 .2 97
97
0.02
.5 6 .2 95
8 .9 95 .8 95
9 .9 95
3 .9 95
Ma
5.01
Salt tolerant
150cm
50cm
Eastern Red Bud
Baltic Ivy
36 Iris sibirica 'White Swirl'
al
pv
+ 97.30 TOW + 96.13
+ 96.16
2%
96.56 + EX 96.35 + + 96.50 TOC
50cm
2 gal
Bush Honeysuckle
Bottom of Curb
BOC
38 Achillea millefolium
is
cb
96.16 +
2
22.45
P.I.N. 21102-0049 (LT) N73°18'50"E
ba 12
50cm
Fragrant Sumac
TOW
am
61 MCGILL
96 .2 6
7 .0 5
96
.0 96 06
96.65 +
D
Dwarf Fothergilla
Top of Curb
2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia BOW
dc
5 96 8
tc 23
Ma
D
.0
.1 96
1 96
7
tc 07
96
48
95.81 FFE
10
+ 96.16
+ 96.60
.2
1 2 .2 96
20
.5
tc 17
Ma ac 43
3
95
0 .3 96
.3 96 3
.3
.3
96
96 2 .5
ba
96
09
tc
ba
13
Cc 03
.2
PROPERTY LINE
9 .3 96
1 .3 96 2
4 .5 96 7
96
96
96.30 +
ba
ba 12
dc 17
.3
+ 95.20 TOC
.0
5
31
.2
96
50.41
PROPERTY LINE
7 .3
95.84+
N73°18'50"E
EX 96.39 + + 96.54 TOC
95
2 .4
0 .6 96 96
.9 95
ba
02
Existing
12 Hedera helix 'Baltica'
2%
+ 96.31 FFE
95
9 .2 96
4 .1 96
2
11
32 Ma 17
QR 01
P.I.N. 21102-0215
FL
1:500
3 Hedera helix 'Baltica'
2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia
Perennials
N73°33'30"E PROPERTY LINE
FL D O N SE C
2 .4 97
97
FIR ST
2 .5
3 .2 97
N16°18'00"W
O
O
R
N16°28'50"W
2 .4 96
96.28 +
KEY PLAN
D1
Hh
Pq
PART 2
97 2 .3 97 9 .5
GERRARD STREET + 96.28
PART 1, 63R-1399
7 .3
59 MCGILL
P.I.N. 21102-0213 (LT)
1 .2 97 6
17.11
21.67
0
.3
97
3
R
42 GERRARD
7
P.I.N. 21102-0202 (LT)
1 + 95.81 FFE
7.96
ac
02 QR 01
N17°25'00"W
Ra
Specimen
Oregon Grape
Pq
Hh
50 GERRARD
1:100
ac
Ra
-
TOC
Vine Wall
Main Floor
203
5%
40 GERRARD
A1
Vines
1
PLAN
.1
9 .3 97
0
.3
97
97 .1
24.65 96
13
.6
96
GERRARD STREET FRONTAGE SITE PLAN
25
Specimen; Drought tolerant; Native
80mm WB
Dl Fg
44 GERRARD STREET
96.55 +
2%
MCGILL STREET
09
-
EX
GERRARD STREET FRONTAGE Ma SITE PLAN57 Mahonia aquifolium AND COURTYARD
3.01
PART 7
7 .3 97 6 .2 6 .8
96.88 +
GERRARD STREET EX 96.42 + + 96.57 TOC
4
08
Specimen; Drought tolerant; Native
275cm WB
Parking Meter
WV
11 Rosa blanda
Broadleaf Evergreens
44 GERRARD
97 6
.6 96
+ 99.27 FFE
is 14
G
1:500
03
-
96.85 +
P.I.N. 21102-0048 (LT)
96
4.3%
95.81+
70mm cal
Hydro Pole
PM
7 Cercis canadensis
PART 5
+ 96.85
13 R DN.
+ 97.07
REGISTERED GT 03
SEE B3 FOR CONTINUATION OF DRAWING
Specimen; Drought tolerant; Native Specimen; Drought tolerant; Native
Red Maple
Dawyk Creek GasBeech Valve
74 Rhus aromatica 'Gro-Low' 170 Diervilla lonicera
Cc
.7
2 .1 97
96
Fg
16
GERRARD STREET
KEY PLAN
dc
Specimen; Drought tolerant; Native
-
Fire Hydrant
HP
44 Fothergilla gardenii
Dl
+ 97.30 TOW
Fg
16
dc
Comments
-
70mm cal
White Spruce
3 Fagus sylvatica 'Dawyk Creek' GV
Ra
27
R
pv
Ra
Spacing
70mm cal 70mm cal
Existing Catch Basin
4 Picea glauca
Fg
97
97
5 .1
6 .2 97
97
.2
6
22.51
96.80 +
EX 96.66 +
QR
CB
Deciduous Shrubs
.1 6
is 04
BOS 97.07 +
.9
6
+ 97.13 FFE
A
dc 11
Size
Valve and Box
Fs
97 + 97.12 TOC
97.22 + 97.12 TOC+
42 GERRARD
C
Storm MH
Storm MH
Honey Locust Tulip tree
.9 9 .1 97
7
.8
96
97.46
50 GERRARD
A1
2 Acer rubrum
+ 96.90 BOC
+ 96.97
97.12TOC +
.4
1 97 .1
EX 96.87 +
A1
3
AR
+ 97.11 TOC
96
8 .2 97
05 + 97.13
11
2
Red OakExisting
Hedge Planting
2%
25.52 D
pv
18
6.6%
D1
MH
B3
2 Liriodendron tulipifera
FH
N73°10'35"E2%
am
pv
G
4 Quercus rubra
LT
.1
+ 97.12 TOC
2%
PROPERTY LINE
am 11
is 08
Main Floor
Proposed Common Name
97
7
+ 97.12 TOC
+ 96.95
.1
97
+ 97.12 TOC
MATCH
GERRARD STREET FRONTAGE AND COURTYARD SITE PLAN
Flush
MH
MCGILL STREET GT FRONTAGE 3 Gleditsia tricanthos AND COURTYARD SITE PLAN
2
+ 97.02 BOC + 97.22 TOC
.1
7
97.22 TOC +
ba 09
44 GERRARD
96
2%
Latin Name
Quan
Deciduous Trees
+ 96.79 TOC
.8
.9 96
96
Flush
Symbol
EX + 96.64 BOC
+ 96.84 TOC
0
6 .9
4 .9 2%
61 63 MCGILL MCGILL
.9 MATCH
D
Second Floor EX + 96.69 BOC
96
96
+ 96.90 TOC
96
EX + 96.75 BOC
+ 96.92 TOC
96
96
Flush
9
.7
0 .8
2 .8 96
EX + 96.77 BOC
+ 96.95 TOC
5
4 .9 96
96.96 +
EX + 96.80 BOC
+ 96.96 TOC
6
04
EX + 96.81 BOC
96.97 TOC +
8
dc
B3
6
2 .8 96
.8 96
EX 96.82 BOC +
96.85 +
96
MCGILL STREET FRONTAGE AND COURTYARD SITE PLAN
EX 96.82 CB +
.9
Dl 05
59 MCGILL
.9
61 63 MCGILL MCGILL
96
59 MCGILL
8
Rb 2 Second Floor
Proposed Grade
PLANT SCHEDULE RUCUI – PLANT SCHEDULE
ba 09
40 GERRARD
1:100
4
96
7 .7
.8
96
0
5 .8 96
96
.9 96
10
MCGILL STREET
.9
4
Dl
1
2
al 42
96
Rb 2
1
MCGILL STREET FRONTAGE AND COURTYARD SITE PLAN
2
44 Panicum virgatum 'Prairie Winds®' (Cheyenne Sky) 162 Deschampia caespitosa 42 Carex blanda
Cheyenne Sky Switch G Tufted Hair Grass Common Wood Sedge
1
2
3
Soffit Lights - See Electrical Face of Building Beyond Property Line Outline of Gate Beyond Light Bollard Beyond SS Railing Beyond Granite Curb Beyond 99.27
Face of Building Face of Building Beyond Existing Curb Beyond
D
Bike Racks
Property Line Flush Curb Raised Concrete Curb Beyond
Bench
440
97.07
400 GRANITE THRESHOLD
MCGILL ST 95.69
600 BUFFER
2100 CLEARWAY
OPEN PERENNIAL BED BEYOND
400 GRANITE THRESHOLD
STEPS; SEE ARCHITECTURAL
STEPS; SEE ARCHITECTURAL
RAISED PLANTING BEYOND
95.50
95.50
690
44 GERRARD
97.07
96.70
Existing THES Conduit; See Civil
Existing THES Conduit; See Civil
95.69
99.27
Existing THES Cable; See Civil
Face of Building Property Line Flush Curb Raised Concrete Curb
Existing 150mm Watermain; See Civil Existing Bell Canada Conduit; See Civil ± 2575
2100 CLEARWAY
2600
600 BUFFER
44 GERRARD
GERRARD ST
± 2575
2100 CLEARWAY
2600
Outline of Gate Behind
600 BUFFER
GERRARD ST
Proposed 150mm Storm Service; See Civil Silva Cell Location - See L16 L31
Proposed 200mm RVS SDR-18 Water Service; See Civil
D1
1
2
GERRARD ST SECTION 1
D2
1:100
GERRARD ST SECTION 2
D3
1:100
3
MCGILL ST SECTION 1
D4
1:100
MCGILL ST SECTION 2 1:100
Face of Building Beyond Property Line Beyond
4 Face of New Building Beyond
44 GERRARD
Property Line Beyond
Face of Building Card Reader Lock Light Bollard See Electrical
Top of gate beyond
C 99.27
99.27
Light; Both Sides of Gate
CIP CONCRETE BASE
ALIGN
4020 OPEN PERENNIAL BED
2270
9365 RAISED PLANTING
3000
6720 RAISED PLANTING
3 SLOPED
SS Edge; Flush to Grade
25
GRANULAR 'A', AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
CONCRETE UNIT PAVER TYPES 1 + 2 ON CONCRETE SLAB; SEE D2
C1
MCGILL ST ELEVATION 1:100
GRANULAR 'A' AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
SUBGRADE
97.22
Gate/Fence beyond; Powder Coated Metal Mesh on Two Sides of Steel Frame
TOP OF GRANITE CURB BEYOND
100 µm PLASTIC VAPOUR BARRIER
150 150
GEOTEXTILE
3000
Granite Curb Stainless Steel Top Rail
102
97.41
97.22
13 Vertical Bike Racks
2505
38
CONCRETELIGHTSANDBLAST FINISH
Top of grade beyond
Granite Curb 97.41
3mm SAWCUT AT 2000mm O.C. TYP.
150
SETTING BED
125
D
100
GRANULAR 'A' AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
CONCRETE UNIT PAVER TYPES 1 + 2 OR GRANITE PAVER TYPE 4 THRESHOLD 100mm DEPTH
25
25
SETTING BED
150
100
CONCRETE UNIT PAVER TYPES 1 + 2 100mm DEPTH
150
3mm JOINT SPACING
Light Bollard - See Electrical Stainless Steel Top Rail
Light Bollard - See Electrical Stainless Steel Top Rail Granite Curb
97.30
97.11
3mm JOINT SPACING
Bike Shelter Canopy
Steps Beyond
C3
PLANTING BED
D
BIKE AREA SECTION 1:100
FOLDED STAINLESS STEEL EDGE BOLTED TO CONCRETE CURB CIP CONCRETE BASE OVER SILVA CELLS
GEOTEXTILE
SUBGRADE
ANCHOR 300
SUBGRADE
REINFORCED CONCRETE SUPPORT CURB 150
100
D1
CONCRETE UNIT PAVING
CONCRETE UNIT PAVING ON CONCRETE SLAB
D2
1:10
D3
1:10
CONCRETE PAVING
D4a D4
1:10
3-15M CONTINUOUS REINFORCEMENT
400
FLUSH STEEL EDGE
D4b
1:10
D5
PRECAST PAVING ON PRECAST SLAB OVER VOID / AREAWAY 1:10
150
B
LIGHT BOLLARD ;SEE ELECTRICAL 38mm x 6mm STAINLESS STEEL BAR TOP RAIL
609
56
76
56
38
BASE PLATE; WELDED TO STEEL EDGE
PLANTING BED
CONCRETE CURB
Residence Beyond
Wood Fence Beyond, Height in Accordance with Municipal Bylaws Steel Bike Shelter Canopy
Light Bollard
Vertical wall mounted bike rack
C
Existing Grade Beyond Gate Existing Electric Meter and Gas Meter Existing Gas Line Attached to Neighbour’s Wall
Existing neighbouring fence beyond
CONDUIT; SEE ELECTRICAL FIRMLY COMPACTED SAUCER [USE TOPSOIL]
Retaining wall transitions to curb and extends to sidewalk
CONCRETE UNIT PAVER TYPES 1 + 2 ON CONCRETE SLAB; SEE D2
300 SUBGRADE
Vine Cables - See Architectural for Details; See Planting Plan for Plant List
HEIGHT VARIES; 98-148mm
225 450
Varies, 400mm min.
VARIES : 400mm min.
PLANTING MEDIUM
MOUNTING PLATE AND J-BOLTS [INCLUDED WITH FIXTURE] CAST INTO CONRETE CURB
PLANTING MEDIUM
Line of Vine Wall on North Face of 44 Gerrard Beyond
GRASS FOLDED STAINLESS STEEL EDGE BOLTED TO CONCRETE CURB TOP AND SIDE
50mm MULCH 50mm MULCH
150 GALVANIZED STEEL CHANNEL PROVIDED BY DIV. 16. FINISH TO SUIT ARCHITECT REQUIREMENTS
38 x 6mm STAINLESS STEEL BAR PICKET; WELDED TO BASE PLATE
190
4 x 0.39 DIA. BOLT AT EACH LIGHT BOLLARD BASE PLATE TOP OF GRANITE CURB BEYOND
102
ALIGN SHRUB BASE WITH TOP OF FINISHED GRADE OR SET SLIGHTLY HIGHER TO ALLOW FOR SETTLEMENT
REFER TO PLANT SCHEDULE FOR SPACING
PERENNIAL PLANTING REFER TO PLANTING LIST
Wood Fence on Property Line. Height in Accordance with Municipal Bylaws. Existing retaining wall and block wall at 59 McGill to remain behind new fence
New double gate to maintain existing access from 59 McGill
Concrete Planter Retaining Wall
Face of New Building
Existing Gate behind to be removed
Property Line
Metal Handrail, Both Sides
300 DIAMETER
CONCRETE BASE. Recessed Wall Lights; See Electrical
UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE
600
C
WEATHERPROOF FS TYPE BOX COMPLETE WITH DUPLEX RECEPTACLE.
450
Property Line
TOP RAIL BEYOND REFER TO PLANT SCHEDULE FOR SPACING
Existing THES Cable; See Civil
97.30 97.11
100
150
400
NOTE : REMOVE SHRUB FROM POT; ENSURE ROOTS ARE NOT SELF CONSTRICTING
3-15M CONTINUOUS REINFORCEMENT
Wood Fence; Boards Two Sides
A
REINFORCED CONCRETE SUPPORT CURB
eq.
Existing 150mm Watermain; See Civil Existing Bell Cnada Conduit; See Civil
150
1:10
C2
SHRUB PLANTING
C3
1:10
STEEL EDGE WITH RAIL AT PLANTER
C4
1:10
SLOPED CONCRETE CURB WITH STEEL EDGE
6270
2000
2600
SLOPED WALKWAY
C5
RAISED PLANTING BED
A2
2
TYPICAL GRANITE CURB JOINT BUTT JOINT TIGHT
HEIGHT VARIES; 200-250mm
38mm x 6mm STAINLES STEEL BAR TOP RAIL ABOVE SLOPE PER GRADING DRAWING
BASE PLATE BOLTED TO GRANITE CURB CHAMFERED EDGE 400mm GRANITE CURB
17-04-25
EQ.
305
STAINLESS STEEL EDGE, CONTINUOUS OVER END OF GRANITE CURB; CUT PROFILE TO SUIT GRANITE PROFILE
ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION R1
16-11-16
ISSUED FOR 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
DATE:
ISSUE:
150
ISSUE:
REINFORCED CONCRETE SUPPORT CURB
EQ.
±305 typ.
±305 typ.
eq.
eq.
150
GRANITE PAVER TYPE 4 THRESHOLD BELOW, ENGRAVED AT MCGILL ENTRY WALK
B4 L17
50
B4 L17
300
30
30
25mm SETTING BED
ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION R2
17-01-27
SETTING BED
25
50
125
GRANITE TYPE 4 THRESHOLD PAVERS ON CONCRETE SLAB; SEE D2
MIN.
400
400
305
GRANITE TYPE 4 THRESHOLD PAVERS ON CONCRETE SLAB; SEE D2
305
405
SLOPE PER GRADING DRAWING
38 x 6mm STAINLESS STEEL BAR PICKET AND BASE PLATE, BEYOND FOLDED STEEL EDGE DOTTED BEHIND STAINLESS STEEL EDGE, CONTINUOUS OVER END OF GRANITE CURB
150
400
3-15M CONTINUOUS REINFORCEMENT
ONT A
ASSOC I RIO OF
ION AT
CHAMFERED FRONT EDGE OF CURB
ARCHITECTS
1:10
B2a
PLAN ABOVE TOP RAIL 1:10
B2b
PLAN BELOW TOP RAIL - CUT THROUGH PICKET 1:10
B4
SECTION THROUGH STEEL EDGE AT END OF GRANITE CURB 1:10
B5
HOLD 1:10
LISA RAPOPORT LICENSE 5181
NORTH RUE ORTH
GRANITE CURB WITH RAILING
BIKE AREA NORTH BUILDING ELEVA 1:100
3
38mm x 6mm STAINLES STEEL BAR TOP RAIL BEHIND PICKET 38 x 6mm STAINLESS STEEL BAR PICKET
VARIES
±305 typ.
STAINLESS STEEL BASE PLATE, BOLTED TO CURB 38 x 6mm STAINLESS STEEL BAR PICKET; 400mm GRANITE CURB WITH SECURED TO 38 x 4 x 60mm BASECHAMFERED PLATE FRONT EDGE 30°
38mm x 6mm STAINLES STEEL BAR TOP RAIL BEHIND
INTERIOR OF 44 GERRARD
1:10
1:100
200-250
38 x 6mm STAINLESS STEEL BAR PICKET AND 38 x 4 x 60mm STAINLESS STEEL BASE PLATE BELOW 38mm x 6mm STAINLES STEEL BAR TOP RAIL
±305 typ.
25
190
400mm GRANITE CURB WITH FRONT EDGE CHAMFERED 30°
CONCRETE PAVING; SEE D3
B1
FACE OF 44 GERRARD BEYOND
Below Grade Cistern; Refer to Civil Documents
GROUNDED DUPLEX RECEPTACLE MOUNTED TO POST
1 FOLDED STAINLESS STEEL EDGE BELOW
20
B
Landscape Feature : Lighting Integrated with Decorative Rockwork
CONCRETE CURB BELOW
50 SLOPED PAVING BEHIND
Landscape Feature : Lighting Integrated with Decorative Rockwork
eq.
1000
SLOPED WALKWAY SECTION
PAVER TYPES 1 + 2 WALKWAY
38 x 4 x 60mm BASE PLATE; BOLTED TO CURB
TOP OF FOLDED STEEL EDGE ATTACHED TO CONCRETE CURB BEYOND
2100 CLEARWAY
Existing THES Cable; See Civil Proposed 150mm Storm Service; See Civil
1:10
A1
38mm x 6mm STAINLES STEEL BAR TOP RAIL 38 x 6mm STAINLESS STEEL BAR PICKET; SECURED TO BASE PLATE STEEL BAR RAIL BEYOND
1000
PVC Service CONDUIT Ramp Access 600
PERENNIAL PLANTING
eq.
Stair Access
MCGILL ST
C1
Concrete Stair with Integrated Service Wheel Ramp - See Architectural
B
Fall Migration
Spring Migration
Spring Migration
Species Distribution & Acitive Time within the Territory
Mammals&Reptiles&Amphibians Movement
Birds&Butterflies&Fish Movement Existing Fishing Spots New Fishing Spots
Existing Distribution Spots New Distribution Spots
CORRIDOR
Interaction
1m-30m Raidus
Humber Loop Station
LAN 2014Y | Humber Bay Park Design Chukun (Coii) Chen & Siqi (Suki) Lu Oberservation
m 400 in 10m
80
0m
5m-200m Radius
Conservation
50m-150m Radius
Coastal Future Development
CORRIDOR CORRIDOR
Wildlife corridors are green spaces that allow wildlife to travel from The concept we’re proposing is to make each type of the habitats (coastal, one area to another. These corridors must be because LANpreserved 2014Y | Humber LAN Bay 2014Y Park Design |they Humber Bay Park Design riparian, pollinator meadow, woodland, wetland and open Chukun (Coii) Chen & Chukun Siqi (Suki) (Coii)LuChen & Siqi (Suki) Lu are essential for the survival of wildlife populations as they provide aquatic) a continuous corridor to introduce new species from the direct habitat and genetic exchange. whole territory to our site, to preserve the existing species on site and to allow people to get more involved in a natural environment of corridors are green Wildlife spaces that corridors allow are wildlife greentospaces travel from that allow wildlife The concept to travel we’re from proposingThe is to concept make each we’retype proposing of the is habitats to make each type of the habitats The existing ecological habitats within and Wildlife around the site are richer ecological value within an urbanized area as well. one area to another. These corridors one area must to another. be preserved These corridors because they must be preserved (coastal, riparian, because pollinator they (coastal, meadow,riparian, woodland, pollinator wetlandmeadow, and openwoodland, wetland and open are essential for the survivalare of essential wildlife populations for the survival as they of wildlife provide populations aquatic) as a they continuous provide corridor aquatic) to introduce a continuous new species corridor from to introduce the new species from the fragmented. The site is at the intersection of different habitat Woodland direct habitat and genetic exchange. direct habitat and genetic exchange. whole territory to our site, towhole preserve territory the existing to our site, species to preserve on site the existing species on site and to allow people to get more and to involved allow people in a natural to getenvironment more involved of in a natural environment of connections, which makes it a signicant area to explore. We aim to the We out most dense ofareathose richerthe ecological value the within richer an urbanized ecological area value as within well. areas an urbanized as well. significant animals at The existing ecological habitats The existing within and ecological around habitats site are within and mapped around site are fragmented. The site is at the fragmented. intersection The ofsite different is at the habitat intersection of different habitat the places where their two or three main habitats meet, and where make a continuous ecology system by connecting the site’s habitats connections, which makes itconnections, a signicant area which tomakes explore. it We a signicant aim to area to We explore. mapped Weout aim the tomost dense We mapped areas ofout those thesignificant most dense animals areas of atthose significant animals at make a continuous ecology system make a by continuous connecting ecology the site’s system habitats by connecting the the places site’s where habitats their two or the three places main where habitats their meet, two orand three where main habitats meet, and where with its eco-context. This will offer wildlife corridors for their season the corresponding area is largest. with its eco-context. This will with offer itswildlife eco-context. corridors Thisfor willtheir offerseason wildlife corridors the corresponding for their season habitat’shabitat’s the areacorresponding is the largest.habitat’s The animal area interacisthe the largest. The animal The interac- animal interacal movement and allow them alto movement move freely andatallow a larger them scale. to move It will freely attion, a larger observation scale. It and will conservation tion, observation areas are then and conservation analyzed. Theareas are then analyzed. The al movement and allow them to move freelyalso atincrease a larger scale. Itanimal will observation conservation areas are then the chance for also human increase and the chance to interact for human withtion, and eachanimal areas to interact of people’s with comfortable each and areas walking of people’s distance comfortable are based on walking the distance are based on theanalyzed. The other simultaneously. other simultaneously. surrounding station and residential surrounding spots. station The overlapped and residential areas spots. The overlapped areas also increase the chance for human and animal to interact with each areaswould of bepeople’s comfortable walking distance are based on the the significant locations would for be the potential significant animal-related locations for potential animal-related Analysis of wildlife distribution, Analysis active of time wildlife periods distribution, and potential active time periods programs and (observation&interaction), potential programsor(observation&interaction), locations to preserve certain or locations to preserve certain other simultaneously. surrounding and residential spots. The overlapped areas movement according to our movement proposal was according done atto the our territory proposal scale. was doneanimals. at the territorystation scale. animals. Then it becomes more specific Then when it becomes we zoommore in tospecific the sitewhen itself.we zoom in to the site itself. would be the significant locations for potential animal-related Analysis of wildlife distribution, active time periods and potential programs (observation&interaction), or locations to preserve certain movement according to our proposal was done at the territory scale. animals. Then it becomes more specific when we zoom in to the site itself. Pollinator Meadow the Humber
the Don
the Humber
High Park Mimico Creek
the Don
High Park
Mimico Creek Central Island
the Don
Fall Migration
Mimico Creek
Fall Migration
Spring Migration Fall Migration
Spring Migration
Spring Migration Central Island
Spring Migration
Interaction
The existing ecological habitats within and around the site are fragmented. The site is at the intersection of different habitat connections, which makes it a signicant area to explore. We aim to make a continuous ecology system by connecting the site’s habitats with its eco-context. This will offer wildlife corridors for their season al movement and allow them to move freely at a larger scale. It will also increase the chance for human and animal to interact with each other simultaneously. Analysis of wildlife distribution, active time periods and potential movement according to our proposal was done at the territory scale. Then it becomes more specific when we zoom in to the site itself.
Interaction
1m-30m Raidus
Existing Fishing Spots New Fishing Spots
Existing Natural Cover & Park System
The concept we’re proposing is to make each type of the habitats (coastal, riparian, pollinator meadow, woodland, wetland and open aquatic) a continuous corridor to introduce new species from the Oberservation Oberservation whole5m-200m territory to preserve the existing species on site Radiusto our site, 5m-200m Radius and to allow people to get more involved in a natural environment of richer ecological value within an urbanized area as well.
Humber Loop Station
80
Coastal
Coastal Future Development
80
m m 400 in 400 in 10m Residential Center 10m
0m
Existing Distribution Spots New Distribution Spots
Fall Migration
Fall Migration
Pollinator Meadow
Pollinator Meadow
Riparian
Riparian
Proposed Connection
Existing Natural Cover & Park System
Humber Loop Station
Spring Migration
5m-200m Radius
Wetland
High Park
0m
Spring Migration Central Island
Conservation
50m-150m Radius Proposed Connection
Birds&Butterflies&Fish Movement Existing Fishing Spots New Fishing Spots
Mammals&Reptiles&Amphibians Movement Existing Distribution Spots New Distribution Spots
0
50
100
0
50
100
500m
Coastal
500m
Open Aquatic
Significant Overlapped Significant Areas Overlapped Areas Observation & Interaction) (for Observation & Interaction) Open (for Aquatic
Future Development
Fall Migration
m 400 in 10m 80
0m
Fall Migration
Spring Migration
m 400 in Humber Loop Station 10m
m 400 in 10m 80
Wetland
Mimico Creek
Existing Natural Cover & Park System
80
0m
Existing Urbanized Area on Site
m 400 in 10m
80
0m
Design Studio Instructor Pete North, Nicolas Koff Group Members Chukun Chen Project Role Overall Strategy Development; Habitat-related diagrams, Sections, Perspectives
Comfortable Walking Distance (400m comfortable, 800m acceptable)
Based on the existing conditions, the north part of the site is more conserved and the south part contains more paved urbanized areas. Our proposal is trying to keep this site’s characteristic and make the north part even less connected to the urban area in order to create a more naturalized condition for animals to live. Cars can only access to and drive around the south part. The continuous habitats provide a chance for animal in the surrounding parklands to get to our site, thus promising a realm of richer biodiversity and eco-value.
Significant Overlapped Areas (for Observation & Interaction)
80
m m 400 in 400 in 10m Existing Urbanized 10m Area on Site 80 80 0m 0m
Mammals&Reptiles&Amphibians Movement
Existing Fishing Spots New Fishing Spots
1m-30m Raidus
Oberservation
Existing Urbanized Area on Site
Comfortable Walking Distance Comfortable Walking Distance (400m comfortable, 800m (400m acceptable) comfortable, 800m acceptable)
Birds&Butterflies&Fish Movement
Central Island
Interaction
the Don
Woodland
0m
High Park Mimico Creek
Species Distribution & Acitive TimeWewithin Territory mapped outthe the most dense areas of those significant animals at
Acitive Time within the Territory
Woodland
80
0m
the Don
the Humber
the Humber
m m 400 in 400 in 10m Future Development 10m
Spring Migration
Fall Migration
Spring Migration
Analysis of wildlife distribution, active time periods and potential movement according to our proposal was done at the territory scale. Then it becomes more specific when we zoom in to the site itself.
0m
Fall Migration
0m
the places where their two or three main habitats meet, and where the corresponding habitat’s area is the largest. The animal interaction, observation and conservation areas are then analyzed. The areas of people’s comfortable walking distance are based on the surrounding station and residential spots. The overlapped areas would be the significant locations for potential animal-related programs (observation&interaction), or locations to preserve certain animals.
80
0m
Conservation Conservation We mapped out the most dense areas of those significant animals at 50m-150m Radius 50m-150m Radius the places where their two or three main habitats meet, and where the corresponding habitat’s area is the largest. The animal interaction, observation and conservation areas are then analyzed. The areas of people’s comfortable walking distance are based on the surrounding station and residential spots. The overlapped areas would be the significant locations for potential animal-related programs (observation&interaction), or locations to preserve certain animals.
m 400 in 10m
A major pathway is proposed in the masterplan, which allows people to pass through the site from the lookout point on the north to the mimico waterfront park. The pathway forms a loop together with the existing Lake Shore Blvd W, which provides three main accesses to the site. In the continuous route, people can have the chance to both interact with different kinds of animals and observe bird or butterfly immigration. When it passes through the areas that need to be conserved, the path will become an elevated walkway.
m m 400 in 400 in 10m Humber Loop Station 10m
80
The existing ecological habitats within and around the site are fragmented. The site is at the intersection of different habitat connections, which makes it a signicant area to explore. We aim to make a continuous ecology system by connecting the site’s habitats with its eco-context. This will offer wildlife corridors for their season al movement and allow them to move freely at a larger scale. It will also increase the chance for human and animal to interact with each other simultaneously.
500m
Proposed Connection
LAN 2014Y | Humber Bay Park Design Chukun (Coii) Chen & Siqi (Suki) Lu
The concept we’re proposing is to make each type of the habitats (coastal, riparian, pollinator meadow, woodland, wetland and open aquatic) a continuous corridor to introduce new species from the whole territory to our site, to preserve the existing species on site and to allow people to get more involved in a natural environment of richer ecological value within an urbanized area as well.
100
Existing Distribution Spots Existing Distribution Spots New Distribution Spots New Distribution Spots
Residential Center
Wildlife corridors are green spaces that allow wildlife to travel from one area to another. These corridors must be preserved because they are essential for the survival of wildlife populations as they provide direct habitat and genetic exchange.
50
Mammals&Reptiles&Amphibians Mammals&Reptiles&Amphibians Movement Movement
Birds&Butterflies&Fish Birds&Butterflies&Fish Movement Movement Existing Fishing Spots New Fishing Spots
1m-30m Raidus
CORRIDOR
0
Open Aquatic
Species DistributionSpecies & Acitive Distribution Time within & Acitive the Territory Time within the Territory
Wildlife corridors are green spaces that allow wildlife to travel from one area to another. These corridors must be preserved because they are essential for the survival of wildlife populations as they provide direct habitat and genetic exchange.
Residential Center
- 04 Corridor
Proposed Connection Proposed Connection
High Park
LAN 2014Y | Humber Bay Park Design Chukun (Coii) Chen & Siqi (Suki) Lu
0m
Wetland Fall Migration
CORRIDOR
80
Riparian
Central Island
Existing Natural Cover & Park System Existing Natural Cover & Park System
the Humber
m 400 in 10m
There are two main continuous experiential routes which are interaction route and observation route. People’s experience will also be continuous along these trials as they pass through different habitats, with some key staying spots. Other than the main path, some extra platforms and extended decks are designed for co-exist spaces with animal-related programs seasonally. People are able to observe spring migration of birds and butterflies on the elevated path and pollinator meadow. At the same time, there’s opportunity to interact with mammals such as white-tailed deer and squirrels. Summer is the main fishing season. Our site provides the extended wood platform as an ideal place for fishing activities. The beach is a great spot to observe various reptiles and amphibians mating in coastal habitat. During fall, the meadow and the elevated path creates good chance to observe fall migration of birds and butterflies. The rich wetland plant species attracts more waterfowls and mammals, which improves educational value through the interaction. Most of the animals will hibernate in winter which requires the site to be more conserved. However, there’re still some wintering species that are active.
10 YEARS
20 YEARS
EXISTING SPECIES WOODLAND
WETLAND
MEADOW
COASTAL
OPEN AQUATIC
50 YEARS
INTRODUCED SPECIES
INDICATOR SPECIES
Austrian Pine
Siberian Elm
Manitoba Maples
Red Ash
Black Walnut
Red Cedar
Honey Locus
European Alder
Buckthorn
Tulip Tree
Sassafras
Peach-leaved Willow
Hard-stemmed Bulrush
Dwarf Hackberry
Burning Bush
Prickly Ash
Oakleaf Hydrangea
Pink hedge Bindweed
Emerson’s Hawthorn
Paper Birch
Russian-olive
Witch Hazel
Spicebush
Prairie Cord-grass
Staghorn Sumac
Henry Anise Tree
Juniper Species
Buttonbush
Spike Blazing-star
Southern Sugar Maple
Redbud
Service Viburnum
Chastetree
Swamp White Oak
Winterberry
Canada Bluejoint
Kentucky Coffee-tree
Big Bluestem
Foxglove Beard-tongue
Sky-blue aster
Balsam Ragwort
Bladdernut
Variegated Bulrush
Wood Sage
Chastetree
Swamp-haw
Summersweet Clethra
Green Algea
Duckweed
Curly-Leaf Pondweed
Phragmites
Water Lity
Canada Waterweed
Water Hyacinth
Variegated Bulrush
Watershield
Red Cattail
Water Soldier
Water Thyme
SECTION A-A 1:500
0
10
20
50m
SECTION B-B 1:500
0
10
20
50m
SECTION C-C 1:500
0
10
20
50m
SECTION D-D 1:500
0
10
20
50m
Black Gum
Red-winged Blackbirds - Congregate in August
Blackpoll Warblers
- Before departing in Mid-June
Black-billed Cuckoos
- Before departing in Mid-June
Chimney Swifts
- Diurnal migrants in summer
Red-winged Blackbirds
Turtles
- Congregate in August
- Laying egges on sandy soils and gravels with a southern exposure to the sun
Blackpoll Warblers
- Before departing in Mid-June
Green Frogs
- Laying egges on beach
Black-billed Cuckoos
- Before departing in Mid-June
Eastern Hognose Snake
Chimney Swifts
- Indicator Species
- Diurnal migrants in summer
Turtles Milksnakes - Laying egges on sandy soils and gravels with a&southern Greenexposure Snakesto the sun
- Hatch egges along with the turtles
Green Frogs
- Laying egges on beach
Eastern Hognose Snake - Indicator Species
Milksnakes & Green Snakes
- Hatch egges along with the turtles
Great Egret
- Post-breeding ones occur in July
Smallmouth Bass
Great Egret
Freshwater Drum
- Post-breeding ones occur in July
Common Carp White Sucker Smallmouth Bass Black Crappie
Trumpeter Swans
- Frequenters of Toronto’s waterways
Freshwater Drum Yellow Perch
Buff-breasted Sandpipers - Appears at beaches in August
Common Carp Northern Pike White Sucker Black Crappie
Trumpeter Swans
- Frequenters of Toronto’s waterways
Buff-breasted Sandpipers
Yellow Perch
- Appears at beaches in August
Northern Pike American goldfinch - Existing Bird
Grey Blue Heron
Blue Jays Chestnut
Ospery
- Fall Migration
Red-tailed Hawk
- Indicator Tree Species
Eastern Kingbird
- Fall Migration
- Fall Migration
Swamp Sparrow
American goldfinch
Grey Blue Heron Hermit Thrush
Blue Jays
- Existing Bird
Chestnut
Ospery
- Fall Migration
Red-tailed Hawk
- Indicator Tree Species
Eastern Kingbird
- Fall Migration
- Fall Migration
Swamp Sparrow Hermit Thrush
Red Admiral Cabbage White Spring Azure Red Admiral Silvery Blue Cabbage White Red Admiral
Spring Azure
- Fall Migration Butterfly
Silvery Blue Muskrat
- Existing Mammal
Red Admiral
- Fall Migration Butterfly
Canada Geese
- Wintering birds, arrives in late fall
Muskrat
- Existing Mammal
Southern Flying Squirrel - Indicator Species
White-tailed Deer
Black Swallowtails
- Existing Mammal
- Indicator Species
Raccoon
- Existing Mammal
Red Fox
Eastern Spiny Softshell Turtle - Fall Migration Butterfly
Raccoon
- Existing Mammal
Mallard
- Indicator Species - Lives in marshes and larger rivers
Black Swallowtails
- Existing Mammal
- Wintering birds, arrives in late fall
- Frequenters of Toronto’s waterways - Lives in wetlands
- Existing Mammal
White-tailed Deer
Canada Geese
Mute Swans
- Fall Migration Butterfly
Southern Flying Squirrel
- Existing Duck
Mute Swans
- Frequenters of Toronto’s waterways - Lives in wetlands
Red Fox
- Existing Mammal
Eastern Spiny Softshell Turtle
Mallard
- Indicator Species - Lives in marshes and larger rivers
- Existing Duck
Red-winged Blackbirds
Owl
- Congregate in August
- Wintering bird
Blackpoll Warblers
- Before departing in Mid-June
Black-billed Cuckoos
- Before departing in Mid-June
Chimney Swifts
- Diurnal migrants in summer
Red-winged Blackbirds
Turtles
Owl
- Congregate in August
- Laying egges on sandy soils and gravels with a southern exposure to the sun
- Wintering bird
Blackpoll Warblers
- Before departing in Mid-June
Green Frogs
- Laying egges on beach
Black-billed Cuckoos
- Before departing in Mid-June
Eastern Hognose Snake
Chimney Swifts
- Diurnal migrants in summer
- Indicator Species
Turtles - Laying egges on sandy soils and gravels Milksnakes with a southern exposure to the sun & Green Snakes
Coyote
- Winter active mammal
- Do not hibernate
Green Frogs
Purple Finch - Wintering bird
Raccoon
- Hatch egges along with the turtles
Opossum
- Do not hibernate
- Laying egges on beach
Eastern Hognose Snake - Indicator Species
Coyote
Snow Bunting
Milksnakes & Green Snakes
- Winter active mammal
- Wintering bird
Raccoon
- Hatch egges along with the turtles
- Do not hibernate
White-tailed Deer Opossum
- Do not hibernate
Great Egret
Snow Bunting
- Post-breeding ones occur in July
- Wintering bird
White-tailed Deer - Existing Mammal
Smallmouth Bass
Great Egret
- Post-breeding ones occur in July
Freshwater Drum Common Carp White Sucker Smallmouth Bass Black Crappie
Trumpeter Swans
- Frequenters of Toronto’s waterways
Freshwater Drum Yellow Perch Common Carp Northern Pike White Sucker
Buff-breasted Sandpipers - Appears at beaches in August
Black Crappie
Trumpeter Swans
- Frequenters of Toronto’s waterways
Buff-breasted Sandpipers
Yellow Perch
- Appears at beaches in August
Northern Pike American goldfinch - Existing Bird
Blue Jays Chestnut
- Fall Migration
Red-tailed Hawk
- Indicator Tree Species
Eastern Kingbird
- Fall Migration
- Fall Migration
American goldfinch - Existing Bird
Blue Jays Chestnut
- Fall Migration
Red-tailed Hawk
- Indicator Tree Species
Eastern Kingbird
- Fall Migration
- Fall Migration
Red Admiral
- Fall Migration Butterfly
Muskrat
- Existing Mammal
Red Admiral
- Fall Migration Butterfly
Canada Geese
- Wintering birds, arrives in late fall
Muskrat
- Existing Mammal
Black Swallowtails
Mute Swans
- Fall Migration Butterfly
Black Swallowtails - Fall Migration Butterfly
- Frequenters of Toronto’s waterways - Lives in wetlands
Eastern Spiny Softshell Turtle - Indicator Species - Lives in marshes and larger rivers
Mallard
- Existing Duck
Mute Swans
- Frequenters of Toronto’s waterways - Lives in wetlands
Canada Geese
- Wintering birds, arrives in late fall
Southern Flying Squirrel - Indicator Species
Southern Flying Squirrel - Indicator Species
Purple Finch - Wintering bird
- Existing Mammal
Red Fox
- Winter active mammal
Red Fox
- Winter active mammal
- 05 Gradience Superstudio Instructor Lisa Rapoport, Francesco Martire, Michael Piper Group Members Chenxuan Meng, Bradley M Dunn, Maggie MacKinnon Project Role Overall Strategy Development; Landscape Design & Related Drawings; Masterplan & Axonometric
The project site consists of six future development blocks between Wellington St and Front St as well as the futrue deck park on south of Front St, right beside City Place. We picked four constituencies for developing the deisgn strategy. They are park people, tourists, local residents and cyclists & pedestian. Based on the analysis of the four groups’ needs on the site, we brought up our “gradience“ strategy in order to balance the increasing number of tourists in toronto and the demand from the local residents to have nice and quiet spaces in their neighbourhoods. The project represents a west-east gradient from residency driven program to tourism driven program, a north-south gradient which contains the same programmatic elements. Open space also follows the gradient from regional to local. And the deck park achieves the same kind of gradience as the whole planning idea, along with the new proposed street infrastructure.
Figure Ground
Project Scope
On-Ground Open Space
Podiums
Circulation
Constituents Distribution Throughout the Site
Tourist Driven Program
Regional Open Space
Residents Driven Program
Local Open Space
the hotel does not view the park
the hotel does not connect Wellington
this allows the hotel to view the park and connect to front street
lift the hotel and housing to allow public program at grade
insert community and commercial program at grade and provide elevated green space on top
push and pull hotel and housing to provide elevated green space on top of hotel
cut a portion from the commercial podium
separate the section of podium and move it toward front street to create a courtyard
final building separates hotel and housing an provides multiple levels of green space for the building occupants
LANDFORM APPROACH
DIVIDING
As for the deck park, we tried to take one landscape element to achieve the same kind of gradient, which it landform. It’s used for dividing regional and local open space as well as providing various shared spaces for diffenrent sorts of public & community programs.
Community
Public
2 Shared Space
OVERLAPPING
Community
Public
Community
Public
3 Shared Space Elevated Path & Landform Maximize Program Use
PUBLIC ACCESS
Community
Public
4 Shared Space
SPORT COURTS
LO CA L R E SIDENTS
PUBLIC PEOPLE
S OFTS C A PE
HARDSCAPE
LA N D S C APE PROGRAMS
C OMMU N I T Y C E N T E R
COMM U N I T Y GA R D E N
C OMMU N I T Y GATHERI NG
F OR E S T
CAF E / BEVERAG E BAR
M EADO W / PI CNI C SPACE
SKAT I NG RI NK / SPL ASH PAD
BERM / CASUAL SEAT I NG
PI CNI C CANO PY
ART I ST I C ACT I O N
A M P H I TH E ATR E
- 06 Don Landing Restoration Designed by PLANT ARCHITECT INC. Project Role Conceptual Plans & Perspectives Rendering for Public Consultation
The Don Landing is an under-utilized triangle of land, bounded by the rail tracks to the West and South and the Don River to the East. It is connected, via the Bala Underpass, to the award winning Corktown Commons, and serves as a Trailhead for the Lower Don Trail, which connects South to the Waterfront Trail and North to the Lower Don Parklands. Urban Forestry is conducting a Conceptual and Detailed Design exercise to redesign the Don Landing, integrating the spaces required for the various uses of this site into a place that is safe, functional, and aesthetically pleasing. The City has identified a need for a donor recognition feature for Lower Don Valley project partners, and other stakeholder requests include space for public art, rest areas, interpretive signage and improved biodiversity of plantings.
Option A
Option A
Option B
Option B
- 07 Space Enclosure Analysis Visual Communication Instructor Nicolas Koff Individual Project
In this Visual Communication Course, each student is assigned a specific landscape site in Toronto. This assignment asks students to pick a theme of the their sites and analyze or discuss it through the skills of visual communication. The goal is to let students use appropriate software skills to convey their own ideas, and to select main componets for the drawings or models. The sunlight and color of leaves in the perspective indicate a scene of Bahen Plaza on a summer morning: the pool is filled with water, reflecting the trees nearby. People passing by enjoy the sun shine. Tree shades provide a cozy corner for people to have a rest and the center lawn is a good place to walk dogs. The boundary of this perspectival drawing is blurred and the windows of background buildings are collaged to emphasize the dimensions of the site space. The model is made specially to show the enclosure of bahen plaza, which is surrounded by buildings and trees. The axonometric drawing represents the streets and buildings around Bahen Plaza. The main streets are College Street, Russel Street, St. George Street and Huron Street. Pink texture is applied to highlight the block where Bahen Plaza locates. Vectors of people are put to indicate the gathering area in the plaza: the center of plaza is the most crowded place.
- 08 Transition Studio II Instructor Liat Margolis, Elise Shelly Individual Project 2 4 11
This project focuses on the development of a landscape for the site at 4000–4010 Lawrence East, Scarborough. The Northwest side of the site is softscape with the ravine while the Southeast side is hardscape with Lawrence Avenue at current. The site is isolated from its context by the clear edges. The big idea of this proposal is to make the whole site a transition zone from softscape to hardscape, in order to soften the site’s boundaries and provide an opportunity for residents to get involved in various programs. When two different areas meet, the edge can be thickened and redifined. The space inbewteen could get a combined function or another new value. Based on the ideas above, a transitional framework with a set of overlapped spaces is generated. The linear geometry paralleled with Lawrence Avenue guarantees a smooth transition to happen.
10
9
8
1 5
6
11
The strategy of transition is applied through the site, which creates a field of planters. They can be changed into playing structures or seats to provide opportunities for various programs.
7 6
5
10
The site’s water drainage is achieved by the slight slopes from both south and east side, and the slopes go down all the way into the ravine. Pervious crush stones also help with it.
4
4
0
This system creates an inherent flexibility for programmatic possibilities. The framework can be filled up with community input and is able to support population changes. The contents and forms of planters can be altered according to residents’ needs. For now the sports field is on the lawn between 4000 and 4010, the community garden is beside storefront community center. However all the programs could be relocated in terms of people’s changing demands and population structures.
3
5
20m
1. 4000 Lawrence Avenue East 2. 4010 Lawrence Avenue East 3. Storefront Community Center 4. Entrance Plaza 5. Surface Parking 6. Entrance for Underground Parking
7. Community Garden 8. Sports Court & Seating 9. Sports Field & Playing Structures 10. Day Care 11. Entrance for Residence Tower
Vehicle Circulation
A set of planters and linear pavements is created to realize the idea “transition zone from softscape to hardscape”. Softscape is mainly consisit of groundcover and hardscape is mainly paved with linear concrete pavers and crush stones. The vegetation changes from groundcover to shrub and then to trees. The planters arises from the pavements to 0.3m high and then 0.5m high which is suitable for seating. Wherever these two elements meet, the transition will happen. The planters are combined with vegetation, the amount of shrubs and trees gradually reduces as it goes more into hardscape. At the same time, the seating space on the planters gradually increases.
Pedestrian Circulation
groundcover
Existing Condition Softscape
Transition
Transition from Soft to Hard
Redifining the Edge
Generative Framework
groundcover planter with shrub(0.3m)
planter with shrub(0.5m)
planter with trees(0.5m)
planter with trees(0.5m)
planter with seating(0.5m)
planter with seating(0.5m) crush stones with trees
crush stones
paving
Variety of Planters as Approach
Hardscape
It is clear in the strategic plan that trees become denser where soft and hard surfaces meet. Linear groundcover is inserted in hard surfaces while linear concrete pavers are inserted in soft surfaces. The plan represents how the planters and pavements make the transition happen. And it also shows
Strategic Plan & Serial Sections
the reverse of both surfaces and vegetation in softscape and hardscape. The corresponding series of strategic sections is made to show the gradual change from soft surface to hard surface. It also indicates spaces with different scales for different functions.
Kitchen Garden & Cafe
Community Garden & Flower Shop
The kitchen garden would give residents the chance to plant healthy food for their community cafe at the ground floor.
In the future maybe people will have a community garden where they can plant flowers themselves for the community flower shop.
Parking
Lighting & Seating
Planters and crush stones are dividers for the parking units. The porous paving is able to absorb chemicals from cars. Crush stones are for drainage.
Linear lighting can be combined with the planters and the planters gradually change into seats near the outdoor sports court.
Indoor Gym & Outdoor Sport Courts
Open-air Movies
In the future when people tend to have a healthier life style, the planters could extend to the ground floor, change into benches for working out.
Planters could be both seats or tables for the open-air movies at a summer evening near the community center.
Community Center
1. Community Garden 2. Rubber Slopes (All Ages, Free Activities) 3. Plastic Slides (Junior, Kindergarten Kids) 4. Buffering Area 5. Natural Playing Area (Rocks, Sand, Logs, Grass) 6. Climbing Area (All Ages) 7. Child Care (Sandbox, Story Telling, Seating for Parents) 8. Gathering Area 9. Wooden Playing Structures (Kindergarten Kids, Juniors) 10. Lawn & Concrete Slopes (All Ages, Picnic, Free Activities) 11. Concrete Slopes (Skating for Juniors & Seniors) 12. Waterfall 13. Entrance Plaza
13 12
Multi-use Community Space 2
Ground Plane Gathering Space on Ground Plane
Studio I Instructor Jane Wolff, Andrea Mantin Individual Project
1
1
- 09 Shifting Joy
9 10
Slopes
11
Terraces
6
Each strip represents one possible combination of different types of landform, such as terraces of different heights, slopes with different percentages, depressions, summits or steps. When the strips are put together, a variety of spaces with different sense of enclosure could be discussed. The sense of enclosure provides chance for different scales and guarantees various experience when people are walking through or staying in the spaces.
8 4 3
1 7
Child Care Center
Programmes are able to generated from this complex of landform with various elevation changes and the distances inbetween.
2 Entrances for Neighbors Entrances for Children
5
School Offices
Route on Terraces Route on Ground
Kindergarten
2
Canopy
Site Plan
0
5
10
20m
One main feature of the site’s context is its complicated elevation change which is suitable for a variety of usages. So I took this feature to form my basic design strategy, which is to use elevation change to drive different programs for the site’s various users.
Shrubs
+85.28
+86.58
87.0
0
+86.71
TW 86.92 +
3.2%
TW 86.92 +
BW 86.62+
the Site
Railway
BW 87.09+
2.0%
Gardiner Highway
Public Plaza
+BW 86.69
Canoe Landing
86
.50
TR 86.52+ BW 86.59+
Green Space under Gardiner
8.0% TW 86.62+ +BW 86.30 TW 86.32+
landing 1.5% TS 86.00+
TW 86.30+ +BW 86.28 TW 86.02+
DI
TS 86.08+
TS 86.42+
+BS 84.76
BS 84.92+
10 risers at 0.15m
10 risers at 0.15m BS 84.50+
BS 84.58+
8.0%
84.00
+TS 86.26 TW 86.00+ TW 85.72+
TW 85.70+ +BW 84.32 TW 84.42+ TS 84.78+
+BS 84.03
0 2.0%
+BR 83.98
2.0%
0
84.0
84.5
8.0% +BR 83.90
0
TR 84.62 + TS 84.62+
+BW 84.05
5 risers at 0.15m
2.0%
+BS 83.87
DI TS 84.54+
BW 83.75+ TW 84.40+ +BW 82.40
+BW 83.70 +TW 84.25
84.0
+BS 83.95
TS 84.70+ TR 84.70 + 2.0%
BW 84.19+
5 risers at 0.15m
TW 84.40+ +BW 84.10
BW 83.11+ +TW 83.86 .00
BS 84.00+
DI 8.0%
DI
TR 82.37+
5 risers at 0.15m
TS 82.40+
TR 85.13+
+TS 83.16
+BR 84.50
BW 83.30+ TW 85.66+
TR 85.51+
+BR 84.40 +BR 84.35
terrace
9.5%
+TW 84.90 +BW 83.33
DI
TR 85.51+
TW 85.44+ BW 83.30+
8.0% 1.5%
DI
TS 84.58+
+BS 83.18 10 risers at 0.15m
8.0%
1.5%
+BS 83.17
1.5%
TS 84.57+ 1.5%
landing 1.5%
8.0%
TR 84.57+
1.5%
20 m
20m
BW 83.32+ TW 83.25+
10
1.5%
5
1.5%
TW 84.78+ BW 82.68+
TR 84.57+
1.5%
BW 84.46+ TW 84.78+
1.5%
0
10
DI
+TS 84.56
+TS 84.55
+BW 84.36
1.5%
+82.40
5
+TR 84.55
+TR 84.54
1.5%
BW 84.39+ TW 84.69+
TW 84.70+ BW 84.57+
+BW 82.60
1.5%
0
BS 83.06+
8.0%
1.5%
1.5%
TW 83.85+ BW 82.55+
Grading Plan
BS 83.05+
BW 82.82+ +TW 84.50
+TR 84.46
BW 82.81+ +TW 84.49 +TR 84.48
+TR 84.46
1.5%
8.0% +BR 82.57 +BR 82.59
DI
10 risers at 0.15m
landing 1.5%
1.5% +BW 84.32 +TW 84.62
TW 84.62+ +TW 84.62 +BW 82.65
terrace
DI
Spaces on Groundplane Enclosed by Walls
Ground Plane
terrace
+TW 83.82 +BW 82.52
BR 83.07+
BR 83.06+
5.0%
+TS 84.45
+TR 84.48 +TR 84.47
+TR 84.47
8.0% +BS 82.70
DI
1.5%
1.5%
1.5%
+BS 82.65
TW 84.75+ BW 83.29+
1.5%
+TS 84.20
10 risers at 0.15m
landing 1.5%
1.5%
5.4%
+TS 84.15
5.9%
+TS 84.44
terrace
1.5%
BW 83.25+ TW 84.75+
1.5%
DI
1.5%
+83.43
DI +BW 83.15 +TW 84.65 +TW 84.65 +BW 83.26
BR 82.96+
10 risers at 0.15m
2.0%
1.5%
BR 82.96+ BS 82.95+
BS 82.94+
1.5%
BR 82.99+
BW 82.99+ TW 84.49+
1.5%
BR 82.98+ BR 82.97+
BW 82.98+ TW 84.48+
BR 82.97+
BW 82.96+ TW 84.29+
TR 84.12+
+ HP 83.70
1.5%
1.5%
DI
1.5%
1.5%
1.5%
1.5% 83.00
+BW 82.91
Spaces on Terraces
+BW 83.35
DI
+BR 84.35
1.5%
TW 84.24+
.50
BR 83.32+
BR 83.30+
DI
83
1.5%
+BR 83.33+BR 83.34 +TW 84.90 +BW 83.31
2.0%
2.0% +TW 84.20 +BW 83.00
TR 85.51+ TR 85.51+
TW 84.90+ BW 83.48+
+TW 84.90 +BW 83.45
1.5%
terrace 2.0%
+TW 84.40 BW 82.89+ +TW 84.32
BW 83.00+ TW 84.40+
2.0%
2.0%
82.00
+BW 82.75 +TW 84.25
12.3%
terrace 12.9%
DI
TR 85.13+ 13.6%
2.0%
82.50 BW 82.55+ +TW 84.50
85.14+ +85.14 TR 85.14+TR 85.14+
+TR 83.17 +TS 83.17
TS 82.42+
1.5%
terrace
+TR 83.18
1.5%
BW 82.43+ +TW 83.18
TR 82.38+
2.0%
TW 84.22+ BW 82.02+
terrace
TR 85.21+ TR 85.21+
83
.50
+TW 84.07 +BW 82.02
TR 85.22+ TR 85.22+ 85.22+ +85.22
TS 85.22+
2.0%
TS 85.20+
0
1.5%
2.0%
82.5
Higher 84.00
19.1%
84.00
1.5%
1.5% terrace
DI
17.5%
8 risers at 0.15m BS 84.02+
83
2.0%
BW 84.15+ BW 84.05+ TW 84.90+
BR 84.01+ BR 84.02++BW 84.02 +TW 84.90 1.5% BR 83.98+ BR 83.99+ 0
84.0
+BS 83.79
1.5%
+BR 83.35 +BR 83.35
Lower
Section 1-1
Section 2-2
Storyboards | Children Experience
Storyboards | Neighbours Experience
- 10 Other Works
Teahouse & Community Park Rendering
Community Park Rendering
Spiral Spirit, Handmade Sculpture
Hexagon, Black-Plexi, 3D-printing Sculpture