‘17 –‘21 Design Portfolio Johnny Qiang [ʨʰi̯ ɑŋ³⁵]
Contact +8180-3757-2662 johnnyqiangarch@gmail.com 2-6-11 Takadababa, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan https://www.linkedin.com/in/johnny-qiang-0a194b139/
2
R&D Center S
Chiba, Japan August 2019 ~ Current Junior Architect | Kamiya Architect
Residence H
C O N T E N T S
Tokyo, Japan February 2020 Junior Architect | Kamiya Architect
Share Office F
Tokyo, Japan December 2019~Current Junior Architect | Kamiya Architect
Competition S
Osaka, Japan September 2020 Junior Architect | Kamiya Architect
The Anchor
Montreux, Switzerland November 2017 University of Wisconsin Milwaukee
CWPSS Compendium New York, USA September 2018 ~ January 2019 Program Support Intern | UN-Habitat
3
4
R&D CENTER S
R&D CENTER S Chiba, Japan August 2019 ~ Current Junior Architect | Kamiya Architect Responsibilities: Architecture & Interior, SD Presentation, Graphic and CG R&D Center S is a project to be designed as a new headquarter of the research department of a large-scale cooperate company. Considering the scope of this project is not only creating a new facility for the workers but also using the new architecture as a show case of their technology. Combining the company's civil engineer identity within the architecture design process is the primary strategy of this project. According to the clients, creating a new working style and environment to enhance their efficiency and productivity is also an aspiration for this project. The "Hill", which ground level of this facility, will become a natural landscape and provide a more stable research environment. The "Tube", upper level of this building is a civil engineering scale geometry as serve as the main office space for the headquarter. Eight seismic devices are connections for the "Tube" to mitigate the frequent earthquake impacts; they are also upgradeable when new technology emerges. The Interior of the"Tube" is an open working space that allows the workers to have more interaction and communication during the hours and avoid the separation and division in a typical office which hurts the productivity and efficiency of the company and employees.
R&D CENTER S
5
Design Concept
OFFICE LAB Hill
ARCHITECTURE +CIVIL ENGINEERING
PROGRAM
HILL
• •
• •
•
Showcase of Company Combination of the fields, the origins of the company.
Two Distinctive Volumes Elevating Office to Upper Level
• •
Envelope Laboratory with soil and Vegetation Temperate Underground Condition Outdoor Activities
Tube
Hill
Hill
Hill
SEISMIC DEVICE
TUBE
HUMAN SCALE WINDOW
• • •
• • •
•
Showcase of Company Technology Motion Test of Earthquake Condition Changeable and Technological Evolution
33 Precast Concrete Arches Expertise of Company Dynamic Working Interaction and Communication
• •
6
R&D CENTER S
Human Scale Windows on Bridge Like Structure Optimize Lighting and Reduce Energy Consumption Checkerboard Windows Layout
Building Layout & Circulation Material Storage Steel Structure/ 1 Story
Structural Experiment Laboratory Steel Structure/ 3 Stories
Fire Resistance Laboratory Experimental Prototype Disposal Site Structural
B
Experiment Energy Building
Management Building Steel Structure/1 Story
OFFICE (TUBE)
①
Passenger Reception Area
Cit
yP lan n th wa ing y
Hill
Environment Advancement Laboratory
Site Entries A. Main Gate B. Site Gate C. Pedestrian gate
Practice Field
(Existing Building) SMD
Parking
CP
Entrance of Building ①. Main Gate ②. West Sub Entrance ③. East Sub Entrance ④. West Passenge Entrance Main Entrance (Visitor) Move-in Entry
Office Building Steel Structure/ 3 Stories Seismic Isolation Device
ion
2nd~3rd Floor Portion
at
Structural Experiment laboratory
A
et
Acoustic Experiment Laboratory
Plaza
Ve g
Environmental Experiment Laboratory
C ion
②
at
C
et
Material Storage
Pa
Wind Tunnel Experimental Building
Biotope
③
④
Ve g
Electrical
Accomodation
laboratory
Police Office
Circulation Vehicle Circulation (Visitor) Vehicle Circulation (Construction & Workers) Pedestrain Circulation (Visitor) Human Circulation (Inside Site) Pedestrian Pathway
R&D CENTER S
7
1560 1450
590
700
719 面積
91%
97%
変更後
1700 609
変更前
0.85m2
9.6m2
89%
Main Façade Study 1)Precast Panels Structural Limitation & Steel Reinforcement(South elevation)
変更後
変更前 1700
9600
KX1
9600
KX2
9.6m2
81% 91%
590 590
700 700
97% 97%
1560 1380 1450 1270 609 609
719 719 面積
0.75m2 0.85m2
78% 89%
9600
KX3
9600
9600
KX4
KX5
7000
KX6
12200
KX7
5935
6065
KX8
KX9
KX10
1. Stress force from structural column 2. Cantilever self reinforcement 3. Part required to be solid to be structurally stable 4. Steel reinforcement cable 5. Precast Concrete Panel Joint
The opening on the facade is determined by structural mechanical restrictions of precast concrete panel and steel reinforcement location.
2)End result (South elevation)
+7.750
9600
KX1
9600
KX1
8
R&D CENTER S
9600
KX2
KX2
9600
9600
KX3
KX3
9600
9600
9600
KX4
KX4
9600
KX5
KX5
9600
7000
KX6
KX6
7000
12200
KX7
KX7
12200
5935
6065
KX8
KX8
6065
KX9
KX9
5935
KX10
KX10
KX11
185
Hill Geometry & Construction
Expansion Joint Hill will be constructed separately after building
1
370
27°
26.5°
Drainage
2 Hill used 1/2 slope to ensure its comfortability for visitor and workers to climb and rest on.
Instead of filling with solid soil, hill is constructed by a concrete structure with thin layer of vegetation.
Main Entrance Approach
Cantilever of the tube serves as the rain cover for the pedestrian walkway near main gate and passenger reception area
R&D CENTER S
9
↑ Main Elevation of the Tube ↓ Cantilever acts as the rain cover
10
R&D CENTER S
↑ Galvalume steel plate as façade material ↓ East elevation
↑ First glimpse of the facility when visitor enter the site ↓ Public space of accommodation is connected to extorter green space
R&D CENTER S
11
JX1
JX2
JX3
JX4
JX5
JX6
Interior Space Layout 690
7200
7200
7200
JX8
JX9
JX10
KX9
7200
KX11
KX12
700
7200
7200
7200
7200
7200
3655
8000
8000
動力分電盤
電灯分電盤
油圧源室 529
1.0x1.0
休憩所 計器保管庫
6800
KY10
SS
動力分電盤 地流し
6250
電灯分電盤
U
521
下部 雨水貯留槽
55㎡
試料室 535
JY3
SS
6800
20400
マシンハッチ
有効開口1.5x2.0 Structural Experiement 構造実験棟
搬入通路
反力壁
反力床
U
Material Laboratory
1,278㎡
土質実験室2 534
アムスラー置場
JY2
KY9
土質実験室1 532 土質実験室1 532
20400
SS
WC
8590
610
W5000
JY4
実験 ヤード
JX7
64800
SS
JX1
JX3
JX4
7200
7200
JX9
JX10
KX11
TU
KX12
7200
7200
7200
7200
3655
8000
KY7
8000
7200
JY2
恒温恒湿室B
513
514
45㎡
EV 15人乗り
Entry Hall
8000
郵便室
EVホール
39㎡
守衛室 KY9
5600 2000
構造実験棟
材料試験室 Material Laboratory
U
主出入口
反力壁
階段② 階段②
51a
20400
動力分電盤 電灯分電盤
控室 喫煙室 恒温恒湿室A
20400
6800
大物治具 加工場2 混練室A 521 511 157㎡ 89㎡
WWC
6200
手摺取りはずし
104㎡
MWC
HMC
KY10
4175
90 7200
6800
1285
設備スペース・倉庫
512
洗い場
BE
700
7200
PS・EPS
混練室B 洗い場
20400
7200
クレーンフック可動域
PS EPS
KY4
7200
JX8
岩盤実験室 536
JY3
21600
JX7
64800
SS
7200
D
5915
KY5
JX6
U
9 0 . 0 0
KY6
JX5
610
4280
690
JY4
JX2
521
53㎡
沈殿槽 φ3,000
試料保管庫 533
5560
6800 610
JY1
KY8
EV 喫煙室 KX9 11人乗
加工場1
HY SP GGE AC E KY8
516
JX6
JX7
養生水槽 Down
JX8
Down
JX9
6200
99㎡
78㎡ JX5
7278
分析室 58㎡ JX10
390
2000
7200
7200
7200
7200 3680
1500
KX11 7140
1000
KX12 KY7
700 7200 接続ブリッジ
テラス
7200
7200
7200
3655
8000
8000
3700
7200
64800 4280
690
KX9
Down
35 00
JX4 ※可変室将来対応
90 610
1640
4280
KY1
JX3
ゴミ置場 11㎡
KY2
JY4 KY6
恒温恒湿室D
515
口
JX2
恒温恒湿室C
クレーンフック可動域
前室 U
JX1 階段①
3400
可変室 -10～80℃
入
6800 610 7200
5560
JY1
サブ エントランス
EV 13人乗り
主 出
KY3
車寄せ
6800
KY10
システム 51b 36a 32m² 19m²
アーカイブ
PS
会議室 クレーンフック可動域 備品庫
JY3 KY4
19200
WWC
会議室
DOMA MTG
MWC
PS
マイクロバス停車スペース(1台)
40㎡
19200
クローク 14m²
8400
WWC 152 14m²
U
40㎡ 21a
BCP保管庫 222
2150
2300
EPS
MWC 152 14m²
来客用
EV② 1600
7200 6800
IT
HIL
L
備品12000
15人乗り
19200
8000
分析室
5915
KY5
1285
outline of pc unit
EPS
KX4
KX7
KX8
Office
ビッグテーブル
Open Office
211
90m²
10
7200 6800
4900
0 00
610
2300
JY1
堀ミーティング
U
ペアワーク
Structural Experiment
2000
KY8
クレーンフック可動域 2FL-300
Hori-Meeting
5100x6600
113m²
7278
グループデスク
2FL+50
D
階段①
234
Open office
(木造エリア)
作業ヤード 4000x6600
2FL+750
2FL+400
実習躯体
KY2
作業ヤード 4000x6600
Vertical Circulation
会議室
+750
実習躯体
実習躯体
5100x6600
5100x6600
上席固定席
Material Laboratory
大会議室 231
会議室 倉庫 236
キッチン
120㎡
+450
KY7
Open Office(Hygge Space)
KY5
0
1285
90
4280
KY1
KY6
370 16m²
WC ロッカー
救護室 381
PS
67m²
（社員用）
アーカイブ 倉庫 19200
吹抜
U
34m²
Office
ICT作業室
2150
EV②
19200
Office
KX5
EPS
19200
Public
12000
Communication Space
KX6
8000
KX7
KX8
KX9
KX10 KX11
WC & Storage
吹抜
(木造エリア)
集中ブース
KY3
個人ワーク席
UP
3FL±0=GL+11.70
2000
100
テラス
KX4
1200
KX3
700
KX2
1915
7200
7200
21600
KX1
Meeting Space
15人乗り
1000
KY4
Open to Below
PS
67m²
340
フレキシブルワーク席
2300
高圧電気室
機械室
シャワールーム
備品庫
1600
5915
7200
機械室 EPS
20400
展示ギャラリー
1600
975
作業ヤード
KY9
U
反力壁 Space Exhibition
オープンオフィス
EV 4000x6600 13人乗り
KX10 KX11
2FL=GL+8200
構造実験棟 管理部（10）
KX9
6200
7200 6800
7200
21600 20400
KX6
1/12
1/12 テラス
JY2 KY3
KX5
20400
KX3
6200
KX2
70 00
KX1
階段②
Machanical Room
4900
EV 13人乗り 7200
階段①
KY2
階段⑧
D
PJ室 121
モニタリングルーム
仮眠室
作業員更衣室
Accommodation
36m²
38a
吹抜
ペアワーク席
2300
PJ室 121
Open to Below
U
会議室
Circulation
140 35m²
KY1
19200
KX1
12
KX2
R&D CENTER S
KX3
19200
KX4
KX5
19200
KX6
KX7
12000
KX8
KX9
KX10 KX11
↑ 1st Floor ← 2nd Floor ↓ 3rd Floor ↗ Axometric
構造実験棟
Space Connection EXP.J
Structural Experiement Laboratory
クレーンフック可動域
Down
構造実験棟TOP=1FL+17.600
Down
Down
21600 5060
インナーテラス Connection Bridge
屋根
100
850
3700
5740
100 14
300
テラス
5060
5
6800
700
オープンオフィス 会議室①
ク ギャラリー 3FL=1FL+12.250
階段⑥
MWC
Laboratory
シール （建築工事）
免震屋根 Exp.j.C. M2215-JFPW
PS
2150
2300
倉庫
WWC 来客 備品
Experiement
EV②
タブシート(t=1.0) EPDMゴムシート
1600
WWC 152 14m²
Structural
Expansion Joint
4250
1500
3680
4280
250
5740
15人乗り
外部 Exp.j.C.芯 耐火帯 Exp.j下地 （建築工事）
Design this space as one volumn
Exp.j下地 （建築工事）
EPS
免震天井 Exp.j.C. M100-LUCW
Open Office
Open Office
免震内壁 Exp.j.C. M100-CRUW
2300
2
Connection Bridge
2FL=GL+8200 2FL=1FL+8.000
免震床 Exp.j.C. M95-CRFX
2000
管理部 320 75㎡
階段②
2000
耐火帯
免震軒天 Exp.j.C. M95-JFCW
会議室 倉庫
500
975
1RL=1FL+3.750
Creating visual connection between open office and structural experiment laboratory. 300
150
200
Connect open office to adjacent laboratory with bridge, 1F屋根スラブ=1FL+3.500 which also act as expansion joint between two building. 1FL=GL+200
50
300
525
250
カフェ・ミーティング
500
1500
500
135
3800
135
250
MWC 52 4m²
反力壁
GL 7425
5495
6200
6405
21600 2300
KY1
4900
KY2
5915
7200
KY3
KY4
1285
KY5
KY6
4280
6800
JY1
JY2
↑ Looking back toward connection bridge from the laboratory → Connection view to the laboratory
R&D CENTER S
13
Open office space at night illuminate with warm lighting to create hygge feeling for the employees.
14
R&D CENTER S
↑ Office space is design as open floor plan space ↗ East atrium is benefited from the glass facade to have sufficient sunlight ↓ Over looking the double-height space from the 3F crossing bridge ↘ Structural experiment laboratory
R&D CENTER S
15
16
RESIDENCE H
RESIDENCE H Tokyo, Japan February 2020 ~Current Junior Architect | Kamiya Architect Responsibilities: Architecture & Facade, Graphic & CG This project is an apartment building with a tenant store on the first floor. Due to the nature of an investment housing complex, it was required to create a design with additional value while ensuring the maximum volume without waste. The site is in contact with the main road and the pedestrian bridge on two front sides, making it extremely difficult to ensure privacy in the most public directions. On the second and higher floors, we create an opaque concrete-looking facade with no windows under this condition. Simultaneously, the dwelling units’ balconies are be located on the two sides of more minor roads to ensure privacy for all dwelling units. As a result of the Sun-shadow regulation, the upper part of the building will be carved out to provide sufficient natural sunlight. Therefore, the overall volume naturally becomes a solid sculptural shape due to the surrounding environmental conditions. The entrance is also sculptural to match the overall geometric rhythm. The shape that opens to the outside creates an entrance scale that is not found in ordinary apartments. In addition, the frontal look without a feeling of residence makes it a special façade for stores on the ground. Such sculptural shapes stand out as extraordinary shapes in the city because they abandon vague solutions such as openings + louvers that are usually found.
RESIDENCE H
17
Form Generation
18
1) Create a 5-stories maximun volumn
2) Applying Sun-shadow regulation to the east side
3) Carve out the north side corner based on the north side regulation
4) Open the southwest corner as the entrance for residents
5) Maximize store visibility on the main street side
6) Closing the facade near pedestrian bridge to protect residents privacy
RESIDENCE H
Site Analyisis Circulation & View Point
Character of Site Boundary
Zoning Plan
Circulation from Hatanodai Station Office Main Entrance is facing the main circulation
Road
Windows for Securing lighting and evacuation
Office
B
Drainage piping and outdoor terrace on the upper level
Residential
A C
Core (ELV&Stairs)
Residential View from Nagahara Station
SITE
Hall
E
SITE
Road
SITE
Retail E
C
B
ay
hw
m
Main façade and entry of ground-level retail
Windows for Securing lighting and evacuation
N
Closing main façade to secure privary for residents
Balcony facing direction N
View from No.7 boulevard
pe
ge
id
br
N
de Flo st w ria fr n om br id ge
n
ria
st
de
Pe
rd
7 va o. le N ou b n
ai
Housing Complex
t Pa
A. Quiet Boundary
Backside of building is closely adjacent to the residential, and difficult to get sunlight
B. Neutral Boundary
Daylighting can be secured while building facing the pathways
C. Active Boundary
Main façade, but difficult to provide privacy for the residents.
Zoning plan considering the characteristics of orientation and boundary conditions While protecting the privacy of the dwelling unit Create an impressive façade design Protecting the privacy of dwelling units while providing daylight
RESIDENCE H
19
バルコニー 3.40㎡ 室外機
X2
3413
X3
2752
X1
B'
バルコニー 2.83㎡
室外機
避難ハッチ
X2
4000
X1
X3
X2 X3
X3 X4
X5 2-3F平面図 X4
N
PROJECT NAME
DESIGN
CH2400
X4 X5
PHASE
DATE
REVISE
確定幅員 Y3
室外機
給湯
K
室外機
Y4
室外機
R
スタジオ 13.97j
室外機
室外機
給湯
A'
占有テラス 住戸14 24.43㎡
占有テラス 住戸14 24.43㎡
住戸14 35.02㎡
占有テラス 住戸14 24.43㎡
1970
EV
WIC
スタジオ 13.97j
(6.34㎡) 倉庫
5649
820
室外機
Y3
CH2400
1500 バルコニー 2.831500 ㎡
バルコニー 2.83㎡
Y6
1530
1530 2752 4000
2752 1530
X1
2752
X2
4000
X2 X6
X1
1913
X3
X2 X3 X6
X4
SCALE
1913 4000
15
Y6
1913
Y6
X3 X4 X5
X5
B'
B' X5
5F平 5F平面図 N 5F平面図
PHASE
DATE
Y5
X6
B'
REVISE PAPER SIZE
Y5
避難ハッチ
避難ハッチ
PAPER SIZE
PAPER SIZE
SCALE
SCALE
PHASE
SCALE
clo
(6.34㎡)
PS
850
UB K 1216 R
5th Floor DESIGN
EV
WC・ 洗面室 (6.34㎡)
室外機
Y5
X1
玄関
S 玄関 倉庫
1970
2000
820 室外機
住戸14 35.02㎡
バルコニー 2.83㎡
4F平面図
PAPER SIZE DESIGN
PS
避難ハッチ
B'
B' X5
2000
1970
2000
Y6
S
ロビー
W
850 倉庫
歩道
歩道
CH2400
確定幅員 確定幅員
確定幅員
確定幅員
確定幅員
確定幅員 Y6
S 玄関
給湯
住戸14 35.02㎡
3413
REVISE
RESIDENCE H
1970
4000 3413
DATE
20
Y5
Y5
WIC
スタジオ 13.97j
1500
R
Y4 室外機
R
4F平面図 4F平面図
PROJECT NAME
REVISE
3413
WIC
歩道
B'
PROJECT NAME
DATE
占有テラス 住戸12 13.50㎡
K
W clo
玄関
ロビー
階段室
Y3
UB EV A 1216
A'
K
LDK 21.69j
バルコニー 3.99㎡
2752 4000
4th Floor PHASE
避難ハッチ
バルコニー 3.99㎡ バルコニー 1500 2.83㎡
2752
X1
X4
給湯
バルコニー 2.83㎡
Y6
バルコニー 3.99㎡
2nd,3rd Floor DESIGN
Y5
PS
UB 1216
占有テラス 住戸12 13.50㎡
LDK 21.69j
玄関
850
CH2400
clo
玄関
WC・ 洗面室
S
Y4
A'洗面室 A
A
A'
ロビー
W WC・
室外機
S
W
室外機
Y4
1500
給湯
X2
4.00
4.00
X1
4000
給湯
避難ハッチ
給湯
2752
室外機
室外機
室外機 給湯
室外機
clo
R
階段室
S
占有テラス 住戸13 6.35㎡
住戸13 23.84㎡
1000
バルコニー 4.00㎡
住戸12 62.96㎡ Y4
R
K
W
Y3 Y3
階段室
LDK 21.69j
スタジオ 5.49j
避難器具
避難器具
給湯
バルコニー 2.83㎡
避難器具
室外機
玄関
CH2400
占有テラス 住戸12 13.50㎡
CH2400
スタジオ 8.21j
S
CH2400 室外機
住戸03 / 08 23.52㎡
CH2400
CH2400
clo
歩道
寝室 7.82j
住戸04 / 09 歩道 22.59㎡
住戸05 / 10 26.95㎡
室外機
Y3
Y3
K
室外機
寝室 7.82j
寝室 CH2400 7.82j
clo
W
clo
住戸12 62.96㎡
clo
室外機
K
WPS
Y2
スタジオ 7.80j
5649
歩道
clo 住戸12 62.96㎡
玄関
UB 1216 R clo 玄関
R
clo
CH2400
UB 1014 R
Y1
給湯
Y1
WC・ 洗面室
CH2400
室外機
避難ハッチ
占有テラス 住戸13 6.35㎡
1000
clo
歩道
S
A' cloK S
Y3EV
K
PS
850
PS
Y2clo
K
clo
clo
EV
R 室外機
WC・
Y2洗面室
UB 1014
室外機
住戸13 23.84 ㎡ 収納
4.00
K
clo
WC・ 洗面室
PS
K
室外機
W
clo
820
UB R 1216 936
K
UB EV Y4 A 1216
PS
WC・ clo 洗面室
K 850
ロビー
clo
室外機
収納
1010 clo
室外機
WC・ 占有テラス 13 洗面室住戸 6.35㎡
4.00
W
R
UB 1014
850
隣地 clo
玄関
5649
スタジオ 7.72j
WC・ 洗面室
R
R
ロビー clo
S clo
1000
A
UB 1216
A
clo
1010
4.00
820
clo
S
階段室
clo
WC・ 洗面室 clo
W
玄関
5649
K
R
玄関
1010 clo
W
W
S ・ WC 洗面室 clo
PS
850
玄関
Y3 Y3 ロビー
Y3 UB 1014
W
S
スタジオ 7.80j
スタジオ 7.80j
UB 1014
住戸13 23.84 PS ㎡
バルコニー 3.25㎡
給湯
給湯
収納
CH2400
1000
玄関
S
階段室
clo
WC・ 洗面室
B
室外機
避難ハッチ
室外機
避難ハッチ
スタジオ 11.09j
住戸11 36.39㎡
clo
1970
Y3
clo
W PS
スタジオ 11.09j
バルコニー 3.25㎡
バルコニー 3.25㎡
Y1
4.00
2000
EV
PS
UB 1216
clo
S
階段室 PS
W
WC・ 洗面室
740
Y2
CH2400
占有テラス 住戸12 11.98㎡
B
B
Y1
Y1
給湯
1075
PS
clo R 洗面室 Y2
占有テラス 住戸12 11.98㎡
645
WC・
UB 1216
K
WC・ 洗面室
スタジオ 11.09j
住戸11収納 36.39㎡ CH2400 UB 1216
室外機
避難ハッチ
5649
clo
800
S
WC・ 洗面室
占有テラス 住戸12 11.98㎡
1075
玄関
玄関
820
1970
Y4
S
住戸11 PS ㎡ 36.39
収納
800
2000
R
玄関
給湯
UB 1216
CH2400
ロビー Y2
W
A
K
階段室
Y3
輪場
850
W
避難ハッチ
収納
2000
PS
Y2
CH2400
WC・ 洗面室
UB 1216
住戸02 / 07 18.27㎡
給湯
5649
収納
バルコニー 3.25㎡
室外機
室外機
スタジオ 4.78j
住戸01 / 06 23.84㎡
避難ハッチ
1075 1970
バルコニー 3.25㎡
スタジオ 7.82j
バルコニー 3.25㎡
Y1
給湯
確定幅員 確定幅員
B
室外機
バルコニー 3.06㎡
B
1000
給湯
2000
具
B
645
室外機
バルコニー 3.25㎡
器
645
難
4.00
避
避難器具
B
確定幅員
確定幅員 5m45
確定幅員
区道
1000
確定幅員 5m45
Residential Level Floor Plan
PROJECT NAME
住戸12
WC・洗面室 ロビー
住戸09
WC・洗面室
WC・洗面室 ロビー
住戸04
WC・洗面室
PHASE
DATE
DATE
REVISE
REVISE
150 180 70 150 180 70
住戸04 バルコニー
300 70 400
300 70
2700
店舗
2700
B-B'
PHASE
住戸09 バルコニー
750
1250
300
店舗
ロビー
400
520 2950 70
アプローチ
2950
3470
清掃員 更衣室ロビー
70
▼1FL=GL+100 300 ▲GL±0
アプローチ
1250
750
150 180 70
ロビー 01 住戸
520 ▲GL±0
住戸12 バルコニー
2400 400
400 バルコニー
100
3470
70
▼1FL=GL+100
150 180 70
400
400 2400
2800
ロビー 06 住戸
▼2FL=GL+3570
清掃員 更衣室
150 180 70
150 180 70
ロビー
2400
UB
住戸01
住戸14 バルコニー
EV
400
400
ロビー 11 住戸
150 180 70
住戸14
3000
2400
3000
2400
EV
2400
バルコニー
住戸03
廊下
バルコニー
▼3FL=GL+6370
2800
clo
住戸06 15070
UB
▼2FL=GL+3570
DESIGN
150 180 70
400
400
ロビー
2400
2800 15070
廊下
2800
バルコニー
住戸08
▼3FL=GL+6370
750
DESIGN
バルコニー
▼4FL=GL+9170
100
店舗
住戸11
2800
150 180 70
clo
300 70 400
店舗
ロビー 13 住戸
1100
1100
150 180 70
▼4FL=GL+9170
03 04 住戸 住戸
300
▼5FL=GL+11970
K
08 09 住戸 住戸
2800
300
750
バルコニー
K
バルコニー
2400
1500
住戸13
2800
1100
1100 100
150 180 70
2400
400
150 180 70
750
▼5FL=GL+11970
玄関 clo S 廊下 WC・ 洗面室 K UB 洗面室 UB UB
2700
バルコニー
optionB1_A-A'断面図 optionB1_A-A'断面図
PROJECT NAME
▼最高高さ=GL+15070 ▲RFL=GL+14770
2800
150 180 70
400 2400
100 2400 400
150 180 70
1500
100
A-A'
1
住戸12
玄関
400
770 3470
2700 70
100
3470
▼1FL=GL+100
住戸04 WC・住戸05
▲RFL=GL+14770 1.25
玄関 WC・ clo S 廊下 洗面室 K UB 洗面室 UB UB
300 70
K
玄関 UB S
clo S
住戸09 WC・住戸10
2400
400
住戸05
▼2FL=GL+3570
100▲GL±0
400
150 180 70
玄関 UB S
770
300
400
2800
2400 400
2800
2400 400
2800
2400 15070
K
2800
UB
住戸10
2400
300
2800 2800 2800 2800
▼3FL=GL+6370
100
15070
UB
1.25
K
住戸12 UB
1
線
▼4FL=GL+9170
clo S
玄関
斜
UB
K
▼最高高さ=GL+15070
側
▼5FL=GL+11970
UB
線
UB
住戸14
斜
住戸14
側
▲RFL=GL+14770
北
▼最高高さ=GL+15070
北
070
150 180 70
Section
optionB1_B-B'断面図 optionB1_B-B'断
PAPER SIZE
PAPER SIZE
SCALE
SCALE
RESIDENCE H
21
Main façade is designed as an solid surface to embrace the concrete element.
22
RESIDENCE H
Main entrance is facing the public to create the welcoming feeling for the residents .
RESIDENCE H
23
Open north-west façade with balcony to each dwelling unit for daylighting.
24
RESIDENCE H
Full height glass storefront to maximize the visibility of retail store to the public.
RESIDENCE H
25
26
SHARE OFFICE F
SHARE OFFICE F Tokyo, Japan December 2019 ~ Current Junior Architect | Kamiya Architect Responsibilities: Architecture & Interior, SD & DD,Graphic & CG Share office F is a rental share office project located in the city of Tokyo. Providing a better working environment for the tenants is the main scope and expectation for the completion. Because it is very close to the two existing buildings, the light and sight condition is not at its best. Creating a new atmosphere within the building while mitigating the negative effect of the adjacent buildings is the priority. The design strategy of this project is to use different types of vegetation to create various moods and atmospheres for the building to serve as its best function. The individual rental office will have a planter outside of their window, provide privacy for the tenants, and provide an enjoyable present during work. The indoor and outdoor lounge located at the west end of the building offers an area for relaxation and gathering events for the tenants and serves as a member-only free address working area. The wooden louver screen is designed with an environmental engineer to give the best performance for daylighting and ventilation while maintaining privacy for lounge users. Also, it acts as an attraction for the nearby neighborhood.
SHARE OFFICE F
27
Concept Section Suprisement
Delight
Vegetation located in the outdoor lounge is a suprisement for lounge and passing by people
Exterior planter add a sense of enjoyable present for the interior working area.
Office7
Welcoming
Lounge
Vegetation is pleasant encounter when people approaching the building
West Entrance
Office 1
Office 2
Meeting Room
Peaceful
Vine type vegetation combine with rough concrete create quiet and peaceful environment
Vegetation set the atmosphere and mood for different area in the building
28
SHARE OFFICE F
Office B1
Tokyo City Landscape
Urban Resort Rooftop vegetation should blend in with the surrounding landscape of Tokyo city
Roof Top Terrace
Office 8
Office 9
Private Desk 02
Encounter Office 5
Office 6
Office 3
Office 4
Pleasant encounter when approach from the east ally way
Private Desk 01
East Approach
Gallery
Highlight Vegetation located at the end of corridor as a highlight for the visual sequence
Calm Central Stairs Lightwell
Office B2
Vegetation create calm environment to improve working concentration
SHARE OFFICE F
29
The lounge is designed as a double-height space that allows visitors to communicate and relax and for event purposes.
30
SHARE OFFICE F
The sequence from the working area to the communication space also the connection from indoor to outdoor.
SHARE OFFICE F
31
Looking up from underground level through the central stairs case lightwell to the skylight.
32
SHARE OFFICE F
Each rental share office has vegetation planted next to the window to provide a natural atmosphere for working.
SHARE OFFICE F
33
159
50
X3
250
200
1311
Plans (DD Drawing Package)
907
50
ドライエリア
250
200
890
1000*500
450
50
グレーチング
ドライエリア
1100 Y1b
3300 Y2
3600 Y3
3600
2700
Y4
2700
Y5
Y6
4000
4000
Y7
900
1200*700
1400*700
1200*700
個室2 3216
光井
1200 300
1328
1535
300
1200
1400*700
1200*700
800
875
1373
UP
1FL=GL+250
240
450
215
サイン
X0 215
100 186
1000
X1
600
100 82
Y1a
X1 1000
100
釜場
200
253
215
695
ピット
1500
X2
1535
1535
600
X1
Y1
X2
355
X2a
B1FL=1FL-3250
釜場
756
1400*700
200
PS
3216
ミーティングルーム
ギャラリーバックルーム
X2 ピット
750*3000
PS
695
UP
個室1
傘立72本
X3
159
1400*700
ギャラリー
3771
1400*700
1448
個室B2
1400*700
1400*700
1400*700
355
X2a
光井戸
287
1400*700
159
1400*700
3259
EPS
1400*700
個室B1
816
816
X3
1200*700
217
1200*700
530
1400*700
50
1000*500
585
グレーチング
Y8
1800
4300
1500
1000
1100
3300
3600
3600
2700
215
Y9
Y10
Y1
Y1a
Y1b
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y
A1
磁北 真北 7°20′
工事名称 PROJECT NAME
設計 DESIGN
フェイズ PHASE
工事名称 PROJECT NAME
実施設計
作成日 DATE
用紙サイズ PAPER SIZE
2021年7月
設計 DESIGN
フェイズ PHASE 作成日 DATE
A3
縮尺 SCALE
A-12
1:100
修正日 REVISE
159
1311
修正日 REVISE
X3
1916
1000
1100
3300
3600
3600
2700
2700
4000
400
1500
4000
300
300 300
1535
ベントキャップ Φ150適合品
450
215
300
X1
1150
X0
1800
4300
タラップ
695
X1
フォンブース
220
2250
勾配1/100
勾配1/100
215
1000
カップ式 自動販売機
400
1255
換気設備ス
X2
1535 900
1400
445
750
PS
1600
1000
863
445
1750
450
240
695
215
冷蔵庫
1891
MWC 2350
光井 分電盤
300
159
X2a
動力盤 755
室外機 スペース
300
355
1096
1200
2453
EPS
廊下
コピーコーナー
PS
1255
1135
1400 1400
1236
1738
屋上
X2
X1
378
1135
303
1400*700 1400*700
300
X3
300
1200
1400*700
300
300
1200
1400*700
UP
X2
1535
1912
1250
2242
1200*700
1400*700
1400*700
355
X2a
プライベートデスク
3616
1135
3616
1200*700
1200*700
個室8
2118
1200*700
1200*700
1400*700
光井戸
個室9
159
3216
1400*700
1200*700
1400*700
個室7
PS
2-3階プランター植栽・ 屋上メンテナンス用水栓
816
816
X3
1045
1200*700
337
1472
1200*700
1400*700
1400*700
1051
1879
3199
1992
1500
1000
1100
横引きルーフドレン ｶﾞﾙﾊﾞﾘｳﾑ製竪樋 (Φ65以上)
横引きルーフドレン ｶﾞﾙﾊﾞﾘｳﾑ製竪樋 (Φ65以上)
3300
3600
3600
2700
215
Y1
Y1a
Y1b
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y10
Y1
Y1a
Y1b
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y
A1
↑ Basement Level Plan ↓ 3rd Floor Level Plan 工事名称 PROJECT NAME
磁北 真北 7°20′
設計 DESIGN
フェイズ PHASE 作成日 DATE 修正日 REVISE
34
SHARE OFFICE F
工事名称 PROJECT NAME
実施設計 2021年7月
↑ 1st Floor Level Plan ↓ Roof Level Plan
用紙サイズ PAPER SIZE 縮尺 SCALE
1:100
設計 DESIGN
フェイズ PHASE 作成日 DATE
A3
A-15
修正日 REVISE
X3
159
1311
159
1311
365
X3
1916
1400*700
1135
1472
1135
1400
1400*700
1200*700
1200*700
プライベートデスク
3616
1912
1250
1200
1200*700
445
300
1200
2453
EPS
X2
1535
1535
1096
1400
2242
1135
1400*700
1200*700
1400*700
2118
1200*700
1200*700
1400*700 1400*700 1400*700
コワーキングラウンジ
X2
1535
1FL+250
3616
300
X2a X2
廊下
個室6
159
UP
1738
800
光井戸
1310
1368
2453
個室5
1992
キッチン
ギャラリー バックルーム
EPS
445
300
10488
X3 126
550
ハシゴ
ハシゴ 2007×169×660（2050×200×700）
1200
1200*700
1200
1236
1738
1045
3931
355
3616
PS
1236
4205
1400*700
ギャラリー
2200
1170
796
1400*700
1200*700
1200*700
1200*700
個室4
345
DS
1FL=GL-1320
1200*700
1400*700 1400*700
3616
337
816
個室3
井戸
1200*700
1400*700
1400*700
1051
1879
3199
廊下
散水栓
X2a
950
445
550
950
1400
1500
1750
1800
X1
1000
X0
1500
1000
Y1
Y1a
1100 Y1b
3300 Y2
3600
3600
Y3
2700
Y4
2700
Y5
Y6
4000
4000
Y7
Y8
1800
4300
215
Y9
Y10
1535
X2
215
80 1/
⽔勾配 1/80
215
配
400
215
215
215
X1
2FSL+55
2FSL+55
260
磁北 真北
A1
7°20′
1000
1500 Y1
Y1a
磁北 真北
240 220
A1
695
400
2FSL+0
勾 ⽔
Y10
WWC
2FSL+15
X3
1800
4300
Y9
PS
1400
0 1/8
4000 Y8
2400
1891
1100
配
4000 Y7
1150
勾 ⽔
2700
Y6
240
X0
増圧ポンプ
フォンブース
コピーコーナー 2FSL+25
450
215
504
900
1000
バックルーム・倉庫
WWC
MWC
X1
355
424
3744
ゴミストッカー DBN-106M
445
PS
1400
掃除用具 MJX-094DP
800
1891
1000
771
1400
695
X1
1450
コピーコーナー
7°20′
1100 Y1b
Y2
2階 アウトドアラウンジ
フェイズ PHASE
159
中木 H1.8内外 9本
SL+0
配 1/8 (デッキ下 0 )
⽔勾
(デッキ下)
SL+115
SL+50
⽔勾配
SL+35
SL+0
1/80
350 ⽔勾
配 1/8 (デッキ下 0 )
⽔勾
ハト小屋
X2 1800
SL+60
0 配 1/8
SL+0
X1
横引きルーフドレン ｶﾞﾙﾊﾞﾘｳﾑ製竪樋 (Φ65以上)
ハト小屋
SL+5
SL+65
横引きルーフドレン ｶﾞﾙﾊﾞﾘｳﾑ製竪樋 (Φ75以上)
⽔ 勾 配 (デ ッキ 1/8 0 下 )
693
SL+110
SL+30
シラカシ H2.5 14本
400
345
1800
4300
Y1
1000 Y1a
1100 Y1b
3300 Y2
3600 Y3
3600 Y4
2700
2700
Y5
Y6
4000 Y7
400
1500
215
300
X0 軽量擁壁（御影調） H500mm
4000 Y8
215 1800
4300
Y9
Y10
A1
215
Y6
Y7
X0
644
横引きルーフドレン ｶﾞﾙﾊﾞﾘｳﾑ製竪樋 (Φ65以上)
SL+45
345
横引きルーフドレン ｶﾞﾙﾊﾞﾘｳﾑ製竪樋 (Φ65以上)
4000
⽔勾配 1/80 (デッキ下)
215
450
220
X1
勾 配 ッキ 1/80 下 )
1500
1/8 0
835
配
SL+0
ハト小屋
4000
700
配
⽔ (デ
勾
⽔勾 配 (デ 1 ッキ /80 下)
1/80
⽔勾配
SL+60
500
2700
勾 ⽔
1/80
⽔
0 1/8
695
X1 215
1535
835
1155
1180
⽔勾 配
1535 X2
2545
SL+130
屋上
SL+60
下部 アウトドア ラウンジ
X2
ハト小屋
勾配1/100 (デッキ下)
215
110
4209
X2a
355
屋上植栽 潅水用水栓
PS
1/80
X3
⽔勾 配 1/8 0 (デッキ下 )
配 ⽔勾
771
地被混植
廊下
鋼製手摺H1100 L58800 (手摺笠木：StΦ42.7-t2.3 亜鉛メッキ 手摺子：StΦ13 亜鉛メッキ @110 手摺支柱StΦ34-t2.3 亜鉛メッキ＠660)
⽔勾配 1/80
SL+115 SL+115
大株 H0.6～1.0 9本
300
スぺ―ス 1.72㎡
X3
SL+65
SL+130
110 屋上テラス
A-14
SL+130
低木混植 H0.3～0.6
水栓
井戸
横引きルーフドレン ｶﾞﾙﾊﾞﾘｳﾑ製竪樋 (Φ65以上)
1:100 200
SL+115
有孔管（又はDOパイプ）
A3
縮尺 SCALE
X3
110 300
軽量擁壁（御影調） H300mm
用紙サイズ PAPER SIZE
2021年7月
修正日 REVISE
110
300
1311
横引きルーフドレン ｶﾞﾙﾊﾞﾘｳﾑ製竪樋 (Φ65以上)
軽量擁壁（御影調） H500mm 2-3階プランター 植栽用水栓
実施設計
作成日 DATE
A-13
215
設計 DESIGN
A3
縮尺 鋼製手摺 H1100 L58800 1:100 SCALE (手摺笠木： StΦ42.7-t2.3 亜鉛メッキ 手摺子：StΦ13 亜鉛メッキ @110 手摺支柱StΦ34-t2.3 亜鉛メッキ＠660)
⽔勾配 1/80
用紙サイズ PAPER SIZE
1255
工事名称 PROJECT NAME
実施設計 2021年7月
Y8
Y9
屋上
Y10 A1 工事名称 PROJECT NAME
磁北 真北 7°20′
FARO中目黒（仮称）
↑ 2nd Level Plan ↓ Roof Drainage Plan
設計 DESIGN
KAMIYA ARCHITECTS
フェイズ PHASE
実施設計
作成日 DATE
2021年7月
修正日 REVISE
図面名 DRAWING NAME
用紙サイズ PAPER SIZE 縮尺 SCALE
2階・屋上排水図
A3 1:100
図面番号 DRAWING No.
A-17
実施設計 2021年7月
用紙サイズ PAPER SIZE 縮尺 SCALE
A3 1:100
A-16
SHARE OFFICE F
35
Detail Sections (DD Drawing Package) 手摺:St. □-50x30x2.3t
外壁:押出成形セメント板t60 受金具 胴縁 t85 グラスウール断熱材t60
9.5 12.5
天井：強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP グラスウールｔ50
12.5 50
100
550
15 400
520 50
50 177
245
200
85
60
120 250
85
60
外壁:押出成形セメント板t60 受金具 胴縁 t85 グラスウール断熱材t60
9.5
鋼製束
300
400
12.5 50
50
耐火被覆t45
天井：強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP グラスウールｔ50
9.5
12.5
9.5 12.5
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地(断熱材）
45 50
50
9.5 グラスウールｔ50
50
9.5
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP 下地(断熱材）
WC
9.5 入巾木：AL15*30 12.5
12.5 50
50
50
指定色塗装
9.5 12.5
9.5
鋼製束
120
80
磁器質床タイルt10 合板12t + 合板12t
85
鋼製束
300
12.5 50
9.5 天井：強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP
グラスウールｔ50
100 400 50
9.5 12.5
12.5 50
50
9.5
天井：強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP グラスウールｔ50
12.5
50
35
45
耐火被覆t45
50
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地(断熱材）
520
400
520
400
PS 12.5
9.5 12.5
60
40 15
40
130
300
245
177
磁器質床タイルt10 合板12t + 合板12t
断熱材
35
100
PS
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地(断熱材）
2階廊下 12.5 50
40 15
130
34
86
69
400
12.5 50
50
外壁:押出成形セメント板t60 受金具 胴縁 t85 グラスウール断熱材t60
177
シーリング 外水切
15 300
シーリング
85
1500
1500
9.5 12.5
200 165
150
断熱材t60
350
69 80
ピット
1500
300
400
▲Slab H=8.760
断熱材
2100
フカシコンクリート 300
▼SL H=8.235
捨てコンクリートt50 ポリエチレンフイルム t0.15 砂 t30 再生クラッシャランt60
矩計図06
A-39
矩計図04
A-37
1535 X2
300
DRAWING NAME
図面名
図面番号
DRAWING No.
図面名
DRAWING NAME
図面番号
DRAWING No.
捨てコンクリートt50 ポリエチレンフイルム t0.15 砂 t30 再生クラッシャランt60
捨てコンクリートt50 ポリエチレンフイルム t0.15 砂 t30 再生クラッシャランt60
捨てコンクリートt50 ポリエチレンフイルム t0.15 砂 t30 再生クラッシャランt60
1535 X1
X2
37
30 20
50
300
シーリング
▼ H=10.470
30
230 ワイヤーメッシュ 押えコンクリート ドレイナ―パネル
▼SL H=8.235
根太
シーリング 外水切
5 15 20
シード防水 (地面に接する部分) 鋼製束
495
1500
入巾木：AL15*30 指定色塗装
60
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地
▼B1F個室CL=B1FL+2395
▼ギャラリー=1FL-1130 (H=8.990)
捨てコンクリートt50 ポリエチレンフイルム t0.15 砂 t30 再生クラッシャランt60
鋼製束
600
ギャラリーバックルーム フローリングｔ15のうえ塗装 合板t12 パネル式床暖房システムt12 合板 t12
600
親杭 H鋼200x200
200
磁器質床タイルt10 合板12t + 合板12t
PS
150
▲基礎天端=1F-235
450
350
ピット
WC
235
▲設計GL±0 (H=10.020)
A3
1500
磁器質床タイルt10 合板12t + 合板12t
EPS
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地(断熱材）
60
▼1FL=GL+100 (H=10.120) ▲平均地盤面 (H=10.106)
201
190
1:30
A3
1:30
▼ギャラリー=1FL-1130 (H=8.990)
１階廊下
9.5 12.5
150
200 165
150
20
断熱材t60
350
50 495
1226
鋼製束
縮尺 SCALE
60
520
30
34
236.02
合板t12+合板t12
20
15
201
磁器質床タイルt10
鋼製束
200
用紙サイズ PAPER SIZE
縮尺 SCALE
用紙サイズ PAPER SIZE
鋼製束
29
木調ビニル床タイルｔ5 合板12t + 合板12t
206
木調ビニル床タイルｔ5 合板12t + 合板12t
9.5 12.5
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地(断熱材） LGS下地(断熱材）
シード防水 (地面に接する部分)
450
37
鋼製束
EPS
▼1FCL=1FL+2465(東側階段2150)
（外部）
▼B1F個室CL=B1FL+2395
SHARE OFFICE F
12.5 50
69
根太
天井：強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP グラスウールｔ50
矢板
36
12.5 9.5
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地
磁器質床タイルt10 合板12t + 合板12t
天井：強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP
50
▼2FL=GL+3335
245
5
入巾木：AL15*30 指定色塗装
300
X3
60
▼ H=10.620
206
断熱材 t60
▲設計GL±0 (H=10.020) ▲基礎天端=1F-235
177
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地
29
9.5 12.5
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地(断熱材）
60
2465
200
シード防水 (地面に接する部分)
▼1FL=GL+100 (H=10.120) ▲平均地盤面 (H=10.106)
1235
１階廊下
225
900
320
20
85
実施設計
50
モルタル防水
▼ H=10.600
フローリングｔ15のうえ塗装 指定色塗装 合板t12 パネル式床暖房システムt12 合板 t12
12.5
200
2021年7月
実施設計
2021年7月
123
個室１
天井：強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP グラスウールｔ50
9.5
1226
▼1F梁天端= GL+3085
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地
（外部）
9.5 12.5
86
15
244 276
50
520
耐火被覆t45
天井：強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP ガラスウール t50
天井：強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP ガラスウール t50
1290
9.5
入巾木：AL15*30 12.5 指定色塗装
EPS
天井：強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP グラスウールｔ50
69
250 120
50
100
12.5
120
12.5 120 120
720
9.5
300
断熱材
9.5 入巾木：AL15*30 12.5
フェイズ PHASE
ブラインド
12.5 50
250
12.5 50
50
プライベートデスク
外壁:押出成形セメント板t60 受金具 胴縁 t85 グラスウール断熱材t60 作成日 DATE
120
PS
磁器質床タイルt10 合板12t + 合板12t
▼2FCL=2FL+2300
シーリング
修正日 REVISE
フェイズ PHASE
作成日 DATE
修正日 REVISE
ブラインド
シーリング
▼1FCL=1FL+2465(東側階段2150) 外水切
50
495
12.5
60
245
根太
100
280
520
400
▼1F梁天端= GL+3085
9.5 12.5
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地(断熱材）
入巾木：AL15*30 指定色塗装
断熱材
130
断熱材
根太
400
9.5 グラスウールｔ50
34
85
12.5 177 50
フローリングｔ15のうえ塗装 合板t12 パネル式床暖房システムt12 合板 t12
根太
▼2F梁天端= GL+6155
15 12 12 12
▼2FL=GL+3335
75
45
400
フローリングｔ15のうえ塗装 指定色塗装 合板t12 パネル式床暖房システムt12 合板 t12
250
200 9.5
入巾木：AL15*30 指定色塗装 フローリングｔ15のうえ塗装 合板t12 パネル式床暖房システムt12 合板 t12
20
天井：強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP
EPS
520
9.5 入巾木：AL15*30 12.5
520
192
シーリング
210
100
耐火被覆t45 50
520
KAMIYA ARCHITECTS
KAMIYA ARCHITECTS
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地
200
700
520
50
▼3FCL=3FL+2300
520
耐火被覆t45
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地 t50
159
断熱材ｔ75
470
設計 DESIGN
設計 DESIGN
230
100
断熱材ｔ75
▼3FL=GL+6405
外壁：ガルバリウム鋼板(一文字葺き） 透湿防水シート 木毛セメント板 t20 胴縁 t90 (吹付ロックウールt30,断熱材t30)
1
シーリング 断熱材ｔ75
15 5290
止水処理
300
塗膜防水
130
85 20
鋼製束
1
300
150
鋼製根太
アルミ笠木
軽量擁壁 (御影調) H400mm
10
40
550
300
85 20
シート防水t2
▼3F梁天端= GL+9225
500
420
150
塗膜防水
St. FB-16x60
⼈⼯⼟壌 エコロベースシート エコロベースマット t45
軽量擁壁 (御影調) H400mm
45
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地
50 12.5 9.5
支柱:St. FB-16x38
12.5
60
245
150 100
ECPt15 人工芝: ヨーロピアンロング 40mm
人口デッキ材
150
12.5
85
12.5 177 50
▼2FCL=2FL+2300
20
1
30
VP短管
512
130
450
9.5
コワーキングラウンジ
150
815
10
10
520
天井：強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP ガラスウール t50
200
▼2F梁天端= GL+6155
▲RFL=GL+9925
屋上
5 100 15
120
400
50
耐火被覆t45
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地 t50
外壁：ガルバリウム鋼板(一文字葺き） 透湿防水シート 木毛セメント板 t20 胴縁 t90 (吹付ロックウールt30,断熱材t30)
VP短管
15
75
45
200
192
▼最高高さ=GL+9945(H=19.965)
600
400
断熱材ｔ75
50 12.5 9.5
159
50
34
230
▼3FL=GL+6405
シーリング
FARO中目黒（仮称）
FARO中目黒（仮称）
20
PSハト⼩屋
150
ソケット付VP短管
内側シール
100
12.5
192
190
ラッキング
200
100
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地 t50 StPL4
断熱材ｔ75
200 50
50 12.5 9.5
1
塗膜防水
12.5
200
20
400
12.5 50
20
塗膜防水
点検口 450□ 設置
60
75
工事名称 PROJECT NAME
工事名称 PROJECT NAME
159
▼3FCL=3FL+2300
100
100 9.5
190
150
590
900 230
150
1
50
塗膜防水
シーリング
210
130
150
70
▼3F梁天端= GL+9225
1
150
150
50
590
210
100
1
シーリング 外壁：ガルバリウム鋼板(一文字葺き） 透湿防水シート 木毛セメント板 t20 胴縁 t90 (吹付ロックウールt30,断熱材t30)
30
1100
EPSハト⼩屋
アルミ笠木
150
アルミ笠木 ▼最高高さ=GL+9945(H=19.965) ▲RFL=GL+9925
X1
X0
矢板 190
親杭 H鋼200x200
ガルバリウム鋼板（横一文字葺き）
100
1
100
1 ガルバリウム鋼板（横一文字葺き）
25 30
根太
▼1F梁天端= GL+3085
1
300 520
520
120
▼3FCL=3FL+2300
X3
X2a
850 30
850 845
12 12 12 15
30.02
80 69
400 130
520
300
300 12.5
45
50 2215
2215
▼ H=10.370
850 30 1380
125
排水
シード防水 (地面に接する部分)
3 50 350 1675
1675
モルタル充填
蹴上み
12 12 12 15
80
30
100
80 69
250
根太
1
100
1
押えコンクリート ドレイナ―パネル
100
100
30.02
ワイヤーメッシュ
▲Slab 1F-1510(H=8.610)
捨てコンクリートt50 断熱材t25 ポリエチレンフイルム t0.15 砂 t30 再生クラッシャランt60
捨てコンクリートt50 断熱材t25
1535 X2
1380
175
165
69 520 175
支柱: St FB-25x50
錆止塗装 1
断熱材
20
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地 t65 壁用断熱排水パネルｔ50 スタイロボンドt3 入巾木：AL15*30 フローリングｔ15のうえ塗装 指定色塗装 65 合板t12 12.5 パネル式床暖房システムt12 9.5 合板 t12
845
850
鉄筋:丸鋼Ø10
20
フカシコンクリート ｔ25
355
2215
2215
451
1675
69
520 50
500 50 165
25
200
400
400
溝幅w100
250
蹴上:175 踏面:230
ワイヤーメッシュ 押えコンクリート ドレイナ―パネル
165
A-44
矩計図13
A-38
矩計図05
捨てコンクリートt50 ポリエチレンフイルム t0.15 砂 t30 再生クラッシャランt60
スリット溝蓋 VSMQ-1015+VSL-M-1015(枠) /カネソウ同等品 コンクリート金鏝押え t30 コンクリート(ﾜｲﾔｰﾒｯｼｭ筋5Φ) t100 砕石（伸縮目地材） t100
12.5
451
150
根太
150
▼ H=10.370
排水
断熱材
▼SL H=8.610
600
20 20
350
合板 t12
69
30 400
合板t12
パネル式床暖房システムt12 モルタル充填
▲Slab H=6.610
1000
コンクリート金鏝押え
シード防水 (地面に接する部分)
9.5 コンクリート 入巾木：AL15*30 305.5 t240~230 フローリングｔ15のうえ塗装 100 100 個室 ▼B1F CL=B1FL+2395 1 指定色塗装
▼ギャラリー=1FL-1130 (H=8.990)
1610
0
30
錆止塗装
18
図面名
DRAWING NAME
図面番号
400
200
125
塗膜防水
溝幅w100
手摺: St FB-25x50
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP押えコンクリート t80 LGS下地 t65ワイヤーメッシュ 壁用断熱排水パネルｔ50床用断熱排水パネルt30 スタイロボンドt3 12.5
排水溝
300
捨てコンクリートt50 断熱材t25 ポリエチレンフイルム t0.15 砂 t30 再生クラッシャランt60
255
▲基礎天端=1F-235
▼B1FL=1FL-3250
スリット溝蓋 VSMQ-1015+VSL-M-1015(枠) /カネソウ同等品 コンクリート金鏝押え t30 コンクリート(ﾜｲﾔｰﾒｯｼｭ筋5Φ) t100 砕石（伸縮目地材） t100
天井：強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP グラスウールｔ50
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地(断熱材）
▲設計GL±0 (H=10.020)
▼SL H=6.610
捨てコンクリートt50 ポリエチレンフイルム t0.15 砂 t30 再生クラッシャランt60
12.5 2215
錆止塗装
120
ギャラリー
▼1FL=GL+100 (H=10.120) ▲平均地盤面 (H=10.106)
▼ギャラリー=1FL-1130 (H=8.990)
375 DRAWING No.
図面名
DRAWING NAME
図面番号
DRAWING No.
▼SL H=6.610
手摺: St FB-25x50
155
85
2330
50 3
80
ワイヤーメッシュ
80
床用断熱排水パネル
12.5
400
206
29
30
85
（外部）
木調ビニル床タイルｔ5 合板12t + 合板12t
402.5 鋼製束
150
▲基礎天端=1F-235
縮尺 SCALE
天井：ケイカル板t9のうえVP塗装 野縁（断熱材）t30 野縁受t45
（外部）
12.5 9.5 65
9.5 12.5
矢板
▲設計GL±0 (H=10.020) H鋼 200x200
用紙サイズ PAPER SIZE
300
断熱材t60
20
断熱材
300
3595
親杭 H鋼200x200
▼1FL=GL+100 (H=10.120) ▲平均地盤面 (H=10.106)
250
実施設計 2021年7月
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地
192
900
20 200
天井：強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP
天井：ケイカル板t9のうえVP塗装 野縁（断熱材）t30 野縁受t45
400
(ひび割れ防止繊維入り) のうえ表面強化剤
指定色塗装
155
520 50
225
フェイズ PHASE 作成日 DATE 修正日 REVISE
根太
個室3
20
9.5 12.5 65 入巾木：AL15*30
設計
KAMIYA ARCHITECTS DESIGN フローリングｔ15のうえ塗装 合板 t12 パネル式床暖房システム t12 合板 t12
グラスウール
50
天井：強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP グラスウールｔ50
シーリング 外水切
▼H=10.600 モルタル充填 50
20
天井：強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP グラスウールｔ50
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP 65 LGS下地 t65 壁用断熱排水パネルｔ50 9.5 12.5 スタイロボンドt3 入巾木：AL15*30 指定色塗装
FARO中目黒（仮称）
工事名称 PROJECT NAME
130
断熱材
▼1FCL=1FL+2465(東側階段2150)
440
押えコンクリート t80
押えコンクリート ドレイナ―パネル
矩計図12
Y10
300
Z1
▼B1F個室CL=B1FL+2395
地下１階廊下
1
120 69
根太
50
50 ▼B1FL=1FL-3250
3595
5 12
120
850 195
天井：強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP グラスウールｔ50
充填モルタル
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地 t65 壁用断熱排水パネルｔ50 スタイロボンドt3
2330
850
600 600 80
120
フローリングｔ15のうえ塗装 ブラインド
120
磁器質床タイルt10
290
100
矩計図11
合板 t12 パネル式床暖房システム t12 合板 t12
Z3
300 165
150 400
800
300
150
350
320
ブラインド
3
1
捨てコンクリートt50 断熱材t25 ポリエチレンフイルム t0.15 砂 t30 再生クラッシャランt60
25
▼ギャラリー=1FL-1130 (H=8.990)
A3
40
560
竪樋Φ50
プランター
190
200
350
間接照明 120
100
合板ｔ12のうえ 木調ビニル床タイルｔ5
12.5
200
入巾木：AL15*30 指定色塗装
1:30
A3
1:30
340
290 111
192
▼1F梁天端= GL+3085
竹垣パネル
矢板 1149.5
1
12.5 9.5
根太
フカシコンクリート ｔ25
520
20
200
400
15
シード防水 (地面に接する部分)
950
折曲加工StPL t4.5 捨張り合板t12
230 600 100
300
37 34
磁器質床タイルt10 合板12t + 合板12t 鋼製束
60 9
ガルバリウム鋼板 ▼2FL=GL+3335 9t 透湿防水シート合板 野縁 t35
▼ H=10.620
235
180
200
段板：フローリングt12
▼B1F個室CL=B1FL+2395
120
15
148 1100
1235
201
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地
▲基礎天端=1F-235
シーリング 外水切 シーリング
5
縮尺 SCALE
165
▲設計GL±0 (H=10.020)
9
160
▼1FCL=1FL+2465(東側階段2150)
用紙サイズ PAPER SIZE
縮尺 SCALE
用紙サイズ PAPER SIZE
手摺壁： 木仕上材(準不燃)ｔ6
▼1FL=GL+100 (H=10.120) ▲平均地盤面 (H=10.106)
（外部）
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地
6 9.5
モルタル充填
捨てコンクリートt50 断熱材t25 ポリエチレンフイルム t0.15 砂 t30 再生クラッシャランt60
外壁：ガルバリウム鋼板(一文字葺き） 透湿防水シート 木毛セメント板 t20 胴縁 t90 (吹付ロックウールt30,断熱材t30)
合板 9t
1733
1500
▼段仕上＋750
シード防水 (地面に接する部分)
手摺壁： 木仕上材(準不燃)ｔ6 合板t9.5 LGS t50 30 胴縁 合板t9.5 手摺壁： 84 木仕上材(準不燃)ｔ6 木仕上材(準不燃)ｔ6 9.5 50 合板t9.5 LGS下地t50 6 60
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地 t65 壁用断熱排水パネルｔ50 スタイロボンドt3 入巾木：AL15*30 指定色塗装 65
フローリングｔ15のうえ塗装 合板t12 パネル式床暖房システムt12 合板 t12
165
12.5
400 86 130
120
34 520 120
1500
123
▼段仕上＋1100
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地
200
▼2FL=GL+3335
敷地北側境界線
150
20
20
蹴上み
▼1F梁天端= GL+3085
１階廊下
地下1階階段 225
▼ H=10.600
45
実施設計
（外部）
外水切 シーリング
290
St FB-25x50
個室5
耐根シート
2021年7月
実施設計
2021年7月
230
鉄筋:丸鋼Ø10
250
▲Slab 1F-1510(H=8.610)
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地
95
ガルバリウム鋼板 透湿防水シート 合板 9t 胴縁 60t 合板 9t 透湿防水シート ガルバリウム鋼板
165
100
押えコンクリート ドレイナ―パネル
▼SL H=8.610
300
150
1149.5
間接照明
20
支柱:
錆止塗装
断熱材
250
蹴上:175 踏面:230
25
ワイヤーメッシュ
溶接金網
耐火被覆t45
40
排水
350
入巾木：AL15*30 指定色塗装
根太
▼ギャラリー=1FL-1130 (H=8.990)
外壁:押出成形セメント板t60 受金具 胴縁 t85 グラスウール断熱材t60
60
天井：強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP グラスウールｔ50
防煙スクリーン
折曲加工StPL t4.5 捨張り合板t12
天井：強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP グラスウール t50
20 20
シード防水 (地面に接する部分)
9.5
フローリングｔ15のうえ塗装 合板t12 パネル式床暖房システムt12 合板 t12
1000
コンクリート金鏝
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地 t65 壁用断熱排水パネルｔ50 スタイロボンドt3 12.5 ▼B1F個室CL=B1FL+2395
120
人工土壌 透水シートC-4
フェイズ PHASE
手摺壁： 木仕上材(準不燃)ｔ6 合板t9.5 LGS下地t50
作成日 DATE
950
▼2FCL=2FL+2300
245
177
鋼製笠木 3t
修正日 REVISE
フェイズ PHASE
作成日 DATE
修正日 REVISE
165
竪樋Φ50
1610
断熱材
入巾木：AL15*30 指定色塗装
鋼製束
50
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地
ガルバリウム鋼板 透湿防水シート合板 9t 野縁 t35
錆止塗装
ワイヤーメッシュ
85
磁器質床タイルt10 合板12t + 合板12t
84
段板：フローリングt12
20
ブラインド
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地
9.5 6
180
30
200
▲基礎天端=1F-235
▼2FCL=2FL+2300
1733
手摺壁： 木仕上材(準不燃)ｔ6
290
120
80
76
520
120
60
▼段仕上＋750
9.5 12.5
1235
1100
123
9.5 6
255
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地(断熱材）
▲設計GL±0 (H=10.020)
手摺: St FB-25x50
▼ H=10.370
0
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地
290
合板 9t
ギャラリー
▼1FL=GL+100 (H=10.120) ▲平均地盤面 (H=10.106)
125
2,3階廊下
▼段仕上＋1100
230
耐根シート
1
スリット溝蓋 VSMQ-1015+VSL-M-1015(枠) /カネソウ同等品 コンクリート金鏝押え t30 コンクリート(ﾜｲﾔｰﾒｯｼｭ筋5Φ) t100 砕石（伸縮目地材） t100
溝幅w100
充填モルタル
18
手摺壁： 木仕上材(準不燃)ｔ6 合板t9.5 LGS t50 胴縁 合板t9.5 木仕上材(準不燃)ｔ6
錆止塗装
磁器質床タイルt10
合板ｔ12のうえ 木調ビニル床タイルｔ5
40
1,2階階段
▼2F梁天端= GL+6155
600 100
160
外壁：ガルバリウム鋼板(一文字葺き） 透湿防水シート 木毛セメント板 t20 胴縁 t90 (吹付ロックウールt30,断熱材t30)
192
▼2F梁天端= GL+6155
KAMIYA ARCHITECTS
KAMIYA ARCHITECTS
外壁：ガルバリウム鋼板(一文字葺き） 透湿防水シート 木毛セメント板 t20 胴縁 t90 (吹付ロックウールt30,断熱材t30)
230
耐火被覆t45
230
間接照明
165
65
100
20 40
130 75
1500
400
天井：強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP グラスウールｔ50
60 9
間接照明 120
103
9
▼3FL=GL+6405
150
強化ガラスｔ10
手摺: St FB-25x50
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地
95
ガルバリウム鋼板 透湿防水シート 合板 9t 胴縁 60t 合板 9t 透湿防水シート ガルバリウム鋼板
45
断熱材ｔ75
355
▼2FL=GL+3335 ▼3FL=GL+6405
60
設計 DESIGN
設計 DESIGN
950 1149.5
75
（外部）
25
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地 段板：フローリングt12
9.5 12.5
402.5
鋼製笠木 3t
シーリング
LGS下地t50
165
▼3FCL=3FL+2300
100
塗膜防水
145
210
15
361
手摺壁： 木仕上材(準不燃)ｔ6
1
個室8
人工土壌 透水シートC-4
シーリング
12.5 9.5 65
溶接金網
550
518
12.5
アルミ笠木
塗膜 防水
鋼製根太 鋼製束
外水切 シーリング
50 合板t9.5
外壁：ガルバリウム鋼板(一文字葺き） 透湿防水シート 木毛セメント板 t20 胴縁 t90 (吹付ロックウールt30,断熱材t30)
人口デッキ材
30
30
手摺壁： 木仕上材(準不燃)ｔ6
103
9.5 75 6
250
▼段仕上＋750
9.5 12.5
290 65
換気設備 設置スペース
180
230
塔屋
60
FARO中目黒（仮称）
FARO中目黒（仮称）
10
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地
屋上
内壁： 木仕上材(不燃)ｔ6 PBｔ9.5 LGSt75 PBt12.5
▼段仕上＋1100
▼3F梁天端= GL+9225
50
天井：強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP グラスウールｔ50 300
3階階段
▼最高高さ=GL+9945(H=19.965)
天井：強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP
天井：ケイカル板t9のうえVP塗装 野縁（断熱材）t30 野縁受t45
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP LGS下地 t65
▲RFL=GL+9925
12.5
天井：強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP グラスウールｔ50
ブラインド
12.5
強化ガラスｔ10
グラスウール
▼1FCL=1FL+2465(東側階段2150)
断熱材ｔ75
12.5
工事名称 PROJECT NAME
工事名称 PROJECT NAME
外壁：ガルバリウム鋼板(一文字葺き） 透湿防水シート 木毛セメント板 t20 胴縁 t90 (吹付ロックウールt30,断熱材t30)
400
230
50
390
120
天井： 強化PBｔ12.5のうえEP 野縁 t20 野縁受 シーリング
根太
50
▼3F梁天端= GL+9225
20 12 .5
断熱材
塗膜防水 300
100
69
69
200
520
38
フローリングｔ15のうえ塗装 合板 t12 パネル式床暖房システム t12 合板 t12
130
210
590
125
75
PBt12.5+9.5のうえEP
200
75
38 20 12.5
20
40
フローリングｔ15のうえ塗装 合板 t12 パネル式床暖房システム t12 合板 t12
シーリング ▼2FL=GL+3335
間接照明 160
アルミ笠木
▼最高高さ=GL+9945(H=19.965) ▲RFL=GL+9925
120
10 0
断熱材 t30 センチュリーボード t=25 母屋 t100
100
水切り
150
150
1
2 30 5
150
1.25
ガルバリウム鋼板（横一文字葺き）
非加硫特殊ブチルゴムテープ t=1.0 ▲塔屋CH=RFL+2300 断熱材 t30 センチュリーボード t=25 母屋 t100
1
100
30
シーリング 非加硫特殊ブチルゴムテープ t=1.0 □75x75 シーリング
100
25
非加硫特殊ブチルゴムテープ t=1.0 断熱材 t30 センチュリーボード t=25 母屋 t100 1 100
ポリエチレンフイルム t0.15 X3
Z4
砂 t30 再生クラッシャランt60
X1
矩計図11
工事名称 PROJECT NAME
FARO中目黒（仮称）
矩計図12
Y10
設計 DESIGN
KAMIYA ARCHITECTS
フェイズ PHASE 作成日 DATE 修正日 REVISE
Y10
図面名
実施設計 2021年7月
DRAWING NAME
用紙サイズ PAPER SIZE
A3
縮尺 SCALE
1:30
図面番号
DRAWING No.
矩計図11/矩計図12
A-43
SHARE OFFICE F
37
1
38
COMPETITION S
COMPETITION S Osaka, Japan September 2020 (3 days) Junior Architect | Kamiya Architect Responsibilities: Interior Design, Presentation, Graphic and CG Competition S is an interior remodeling competition held by a large-scale housing developer. The end goal of this remodeling is to create a gathering and reading space within the shopping mall for visitors to enjoy and have a memorable experience. Instead of dividing space base on its function, keeping it with a consistent atmosphere is the strategy. Therefore, we decide to use only wood as the material; this can provide a warm and welcoming feeling for the visitors. More importantly, Japan is famous for using different wood species regionally, and it can be a showcase for the local culture and traditional method. The entire space is built up by one wooden volume from the shopping mall floor level, and each functional area is a cut-out from the solid and under the elevated deck. This method can provide separation between spaces yet still maintaining the consistency of the atmosphere. Individual functional space is decided by its floor finish and capacity as well as the shape. The interior design can create a unique impression for the visitor: it looks one volume from the outside, yet each space has a specific purpose for different activities.
COMPETITION S
39
Zoning & Function Layout
C: STUDIO+EVENT
D: CHA-SHITU CAFE
E: KIDS
A: PERMANAENT
B: TEMPORARY
PERMANENT PERMANENT
スタジオ+イベント STUDIO+EVENT
本 LIBRARY
TEMPORARY TEMPORARY
KIDS KIDS
Plants 植栽
CAFE カフェ
40
COMPETITION S
Section Design Layout
Floor Built-Planter Entertainment Facility
Tunnel Space
Wall Built-in Library
Floor Built-in Book Shelves
Exhibition Space
Design Concept Combining various species of wood material from around Japan.
Carve out volume to create funtion for the space. Built-in Library
Vegetation
Living Gathering Space
Floor Embedded Bookshelf
COMPETITION S
41
↑ Studio & Event Space ↓ Exhibition Space
42
COMPETITION S
↑ Living Gathering Space ↓ Kids Playground
↑ Ocha-Café ↓ Wall & Floor Built-in Book Shelves
COMPETITION S
43
44
THE ANCHOR
THE ANCHOR Montreux, Switzerland November 2017 4th year | University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Architecture & Urban Design The anchor is a mix-used building located in Montreux, Switzerland. Due to its unique site location (the anchor point for three significant circulations). I decided to make the architecture both a inhabit place for the residents and a new circulation and public connection for the surrounding. To make this happen, I decided to form the building along the edge of the site and left the open area for the public plaza. At the same time, I would like to provide the residents with a great view of Lake Geneva. Therefore, a single loaded “V” shape building forms. To separate the private and public, I made the first two stories commercial space, and the level above will be strictly for residential. This move will open the opportunity for ground-level storefronts and solve the 10-feet elevation change. As mentioned above, I intended to create a new circulation within site. Therefore, I have two landscape architecture designs for the left-out spaces. The plaza surrounded by the building tended to be a little more private and enclosed because it is mainly for residents and retail customers. And the plaza that is between two significant circulations serves as a connection area. In the building, I also design two triple height and one double height vertical garden. Those are only meant for the resident. In the end, a “private, semi-private, public” green area forms along and within the building.
THE ANCHOR
45
Design Idea CONDITION
SITE LOCATION
POTENTIAL PUBLIC CONCENTRATION
FORM
BASIC FORM
EXCLUSION
BRIDGING
CREATING MASS BASED ON THE GEOMETRY OF SITE BOUNDARY.
TAKING OUT PART OF THE MASS TO CREATE AN OPENING.
CONNECTING TWO MASSES WITH A VERTICAL MAN MADE GREEN SPACE TO CREATE SEMI-PRIVATE AREA FOR RESIDENTS.
COMBINATION
GREENERY DISTRIBUTION
OPENING ALLOWS TWO SEPARATED PUBLIC SPACES TO CONNECT.
EXISTING CIRCULATION
46
THE ANCHOR
PENETRATION
UNITS DISTRIBUTION
OPENING BECOMES A NEW ACCESS POINT FOR CIRCULATION.
ALL RESIDENTIAL UNITS HAVE TWO MASTER BES, LIVING AND DINING ROOMS ORIENTED TO THE SOUTH WEST.
↑ View from the residents' balcony to the courtyard ← South courtyard is surrounded by the building ↓ Triple-height semi-outdoor greenery space between the two residential building ↗ Site Plan shows the main building is dividing landscape into south and north portions
THE ANCHOR
47
Elevation
48
THE ANCHOR
Section
THE ANCHOR
49
Sectional Perspective
50
THE ANCHOR
THE ANCHOR
51
52
CITY-WIDE PUBLIC SPACE STRATEGIES
CITY-WIDE PUBLIC SPACE STRATEGIES New York, NY USA September 2018 ~ January 2019 Program Support Intern | United Nations Human Settlement Program Responsibilities: Research,Graphic Design, Layout Design, Translation, Writing City-Wide Public Space Strategies: a Compendium of Inspiring Practices offers summaries and assessments of 26 such strategies from different cities in all world regions. It also proposes a new set of strategy typologies and a framework with which strategies can be evaluated. City-Wide Public Space Strategies complement this compendium: a Guidebook for City Leaders, and together, they provide city leaders, including mayors, local authorities, urban planners, and designers, with the knowledge and tools necessary to support them in developing and implementing city-wide public space strategies. During my time in the UN-Habitat New York Liaison Office, my responsibilities are to set the general graphic layout of the entire compendium from scratch according to UN graphic standards. Also, to provide and create necessary graphical information that would be part of the publication. Furthermore, I researched and studied how the selected cities were implementing their strategies and the expected outcome and timeline; Coordinated with my supervisor about the scope of the whole compendium and the specific studying boundary of each city.
CITY-WIDE PUBLIC SPACE STRATEGIES
53
Sample Pages CITY-WIDE PUBLIC SPACE STRATEGIES A COMPENDIUM OF INSPIRING PRACTICES
CLUSTER 1: SCALE AND SCOPE STRATEGY SIZE
Strategy Contiguous built-up extent of metropolitan area
Strategy and Municipality
MUNICIPALITY SIZE
Contiguous built-up extent of metropolitan area
NET UNBUILT AREA
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
with private entities. PPPs help municipalities carry out specific projects that would be otherwise difficult through traditional methods of economic development and public financing. (Corrigan, et.al., 2005). However, it is critical to continue PPPs development with public sector leadership and collaborative partnerships between the public and private.
All cities can use traditional planning tools such as zoning ordinances, land use, and building codes to incentivize public spaces. Zoning can require regulations such as active ground floor uses and building setbacks to create active streetscapes. Form-based codes regulate the physical form of the built environment, as opposed to its use and conditions. Zoning regulations and form-based codes can be supported through public private partnerships (PPPs)
Rapidly urbanizing cities can employ a ‘recover and rehabilitate’ approach to planning and protecting public spaces. This generally requires the allocation of resources their development and maintenance and may require that
developers provide public spaces themselves. Street vending activities may have to be restructured and parking lots redesigned for use as public spaces (Rink et al., 2010). Rapidly urbanizing cities should strongly consider undertaking planned city extensions, which may allocate more room for reserving, and/or restructuring public space. The dividends are mutually beneficial as indeed an adequate quantity of high-quality public space is critical to the compact, connected, and integrated urban fabric that such extensions should be aiming to achieve (UN-Habitat 2015).
Government-Led Chengdu
Wuhan
Waste containers and bins other than at public tran sit stops • TSK • • MHMP • Parks: MZO MHMP (manager: Lesy hl. m. Prahy) Trees and vegetation • Street trees: TSK • Parks: MZO MHMP (manager: Lesy hl. m. Prahy) •
Sidewal ks ger: • TSK) • MHMP (manager: TSK)
Singapore Melbourne
Cape Town
Overhead lines Tram /bus signposts • DP Praha, a. s. • Tram (Pub lic Transport): DP Praha, a. s. • Bus (Pub lic transport): DP Praha, a. s. (at stops with at least one line operated by DP Praha, a. s.) or TSK (at other stops (tempora rily before handing management over to TSK)
Strategy and Municipality
PUBLIC SPACE AS MEANS
Built-up extent
PUBLIC SPACE AS END
Contiguous built-up extent of metropolitan area
NETWORK LED
Greater Cairo’s strategy takes on both the full (nearly) built-up area and wide swaths of as yet unbuilt land in the metropolitan area but its jurisdiction is uncertain
Cape Town’s strategy aligns with municipal boundaries that encompass the entire metropolitan area, including both built-up and not yet built land
Shelters • JCDecaux • DP Praha, a. s. •
Transpo rt and technical infra structure columns and boxes • High voltage: PRE di stribuce, a. s. • Street lighting: E LTODO CITE LUM, s.r.o. light • T controllers: TSK • Tram control systems: DP Praha, a. s. – Trams • Main gas shut valves: Pra ská plynárenská, a. s. • Telephone network controllers: 02 Czech Republic, a. s.
lights T • TSK (mana ger: ELTODO, a.s.)
Prague Buenos Aires Moscow Greater Cairo Abu Dhabi
33
4. Mining Belt Corridor
Posts and poles Street lighting • Overhead line poles: • MHMP (manager: E LTODO DP Praha, a. s. • Lampposts: E LTODO CITE LUM, s.r.o.) CITE LUM, s.r.o. • Combined: DP Praha, a. s. + E LTODO CITE LUM, s.r.o.
Bogota St. Petersburg
Strategy
31
Advertising • Private ownership and management (regulated by local government)
Casablanca
Bogotá’s strategy aligns approximately with the builtup extent of the city, but declines to address the extensive unbuilt land fully within the jurisdiction of the municipality
Municipality
22
Ekurhuleni
Melbourne’s strategy corresponds exactly to its municipal boundaries but will have no impact on 95% of the functional built-up area of the metropolitan area
CLUSTER 2: ROLE AND GOVERNANCE GOVERNMENT LED
new urban extension plans. Public space strategies will generally need to take different approaches in different urban contexts.
Municipality
The mining belt is an underdeveloped area in the region characterized by informal settlements and mining dumps. Creating a green corridor along the mining belt would encourage pedestrian movement and generate a functional integration between the open space nodes. Furthermore, it would present an opportunity to link Boksburg and Germiston lakes. The corridor could be supported by the railway line, therefore providing quality public transportation.
High human High High human humanRio de Janeiro: Rio de Rio Janeiro: de Janeiro: Green, Green, Green, High human High human High humanRio de Janeiro: de Janeiro: Rio deRio Janeiro: Green, Green,Green, value: equity value:value: equity equitysource source of of sustainable sustainable sustainable and and and of source value: equity value:value: equityequitysource source sustainable of source of of sustainable sustainable and and and of opportunites of opportunites of opportunites well-being, well-being, resilientresilient city city well-being, city resilient of opportunites of opportunites of opportunites well-being, resilientresilient well-being, well-being, city resilient city city and citizenship and citizenship and citizenship and and qualityquality and quality and citizenship and citizenship and citizenship qualityquality and quality and and honorable life life honorable honorable life honorable honorable honorable life life life
Pune Edinburgh
Means
Ends
Ahmedabad Christchurch Mexico City Toronto Rio De Janeiro
Hot water mains • Pra ská teplárenská, a.s.
Barcelona Zurich
Sidewalk ca fes • Private tenants • Leased b • Leased by TSK
Boston Istanbul
Vancouver
Rai lings at stops • DP Praha, a. s. Benches ou tside shelters • DP Praha, a. s.
Street furniture • • Private entities
Sewerage and water mains • PVS (ne twork) • PVK (service – distribution)
5. The Green Street Corridor Tramway structures • DP Praha, a. s. Boarding i slands or bulbs (capes), tram platforms • Tram stop platforms: DP Praha, a. s. • Roadway managers D) (TSK
Roadways • Motorway • Selected local road networks: MHMP (manager: TSK) • (manager: TSK
Cables • Low tension: PRE distribuce, a. s. • Signalling and data: va rious administrators
Gas mains • Pra ská p lynárenská, a.s.
Prague Public Space Development Strategy
Network
• Ten cases in the category of government-led strategies as means: Bogotá, Buenos Aires, Casablanca, Cape Town, Chengdu, Edinburgh, Ekurhuleni, Pune, St. Petersburg and Wuhan • Six cases in the category of government-led strategies as ends: Melbourne, Singapore, Prague, Moscow, Greater Cairo and Abu Dhabi • Two cases in the category of network governed strategies as means: Mexico City and Rio De Janeiro.
• Eight cases in the category of network-governed strategies as ends: Ahmedabad, Christchurch, Toronto, Barcelona, Zürich, Boston, Istanbul and North Vancouver District. From this one can see a fairly strong tendency for governments to employ city-wide public space strategies as means to wider goals and for network-led strategies to employ public space as an end it itself. Strategies that have been designated as ambitious (red) are all government led. This could be a result of the desire for greater municipal control of areas driven by government ambition. 39
54
Democratic, Democratic, Competitive Competitive Competitive Governance Governance Governance Democratic, Democratic, Democratic,Competitive CompetitiveGovernance Democratic, Competitive Governance Governance integrated integrated and Innovative and Innovative and Innovative and sustainable and sustainable integrated and sustainable integrated integrated and Innovative and Innovative integrated and Innovative and sustainable and sustainable and sustainable and connected and connected city, with city, with reinvention reinvention and connected city, with reinvention and connected and connected city, with and connected city, with city, with reinvention reinvention reinvention territory territory oppportunities oppportunities of theofpublic the public territory oppportunities of the public territory territory oppportunities territory oppportunities oppportunities of the public of theof public the public administration administration administration administration administration administration
Key elements in public spaces (public space manual)
2.5 Role and Governance: Government- and Network-Led What are at both ends of a dimension are sometimes not exclusive to each other. For example, a strategy that is characterized by the participation of diverse actors in the preparation can be initially started by the municipal government and highly depends on public financing to be implemented. In this light, the typology introduced in the current section is more of a heuristic tool for appreciating the different inclinations of strategies than a strict framework for normative judgment. Nevertheless, the 26 strategies can be grouped as follows:
The principle behind the green street corridor is to ensure that pedestrians can walk without obstructions and that the streets are attractive and safe. Pedestrians have priority at junctions through the use of raised pavement crossings, and cyclists have a dedicated lane with light traffic and slow speed roads. The green street corridor is mainly for the north-western parts of the metropolitan area, which have little recreational or natural spaces.
CITY-WIDE PUBLIC SPACE STRATEGIES
TYPOLOGY Describes on a general level the various kinds of public spaces and their role in the city. It serves as the basis for defining the character of such spaces and the principles and rules for designing them
LAYOUT Focuses on the quality of public space from the perspective of organizing traffic
ELEMENTS Describes the specific rules and principles applicable to the individual components of public space that are categorized by type
15-minute walking distance from any home by revitalizing and increasing the tree density of public squares. Additionally, amenities such as water fountains, recycle and compost mini-centres and green roofs will be installed at city parks to incorporate aspects of resilience. Making mobility more resilient By incorporating the bus rapid system, light rail and bike paths the public transportation system will be optimized. Apart from promoting resilience, it will also provide an opportunity for development of green, safe and walkable urban spaces.
97
124
VISION FOR RIO DE JANEIRO EMBRACE OUR WATER Water in the rivers, lakes and beaches will be clean, fostering vibrant tourism and economic activities; it will be managed and consumed conscientiously and there will be potable water for the metropolitan region at all times. BUILD FOR OUR FUTURE The urban spaces will be safe, green, climate-smart and will promote the well-being of citizens; no Carioca will live in a high-risk area; and housing and
high-quality basic services, especially sanitation, will be available for all. EMPOWER OUR PEOPLE Cariocas will have plenty of jobs within a diversified, inclusive, low-carbon and circular economy; they will participate actively in the decisions that affect them; and will be ready to learn, prevent, mobilize and grow from the shocks and stresses that affect the city and the planet.
135
AMBITION AND PRACTICALITY
SIZE OF MUNICIPALITY (SQ KM)
TYPE 3: NONALIGNED, SMALLER THAN MUNICIPALITY
Casablanca Greater Cairo Abu Dhabi
Pune Cape Town 2,000
TYPE 2: ALIGNED
Bogota
INSET PAGE 28
4 -1⋅10
Istanbul
5,000 10,000 SIZE OF MUNICIPALITY (SQ KM)
By first comparing (1) the scale of the municipal boundary with (2) the scale of the strategy we can assess
jurisdictional alignment. There are many strategies that are larger or smaller (some extremely so) than a given municipal boundary. Sometimes this administrative misalignment suggests a more functional logic in terms of the actual built-up extent of a city region and all that it implies for infrastructure and flows of resources, goods and people (irrespective of how administrative boundaries cut across them). Strategies that are much larger than their city’s jurisdictional boundaries suggest a high degree of ambition, but one that may not be matched by practicality. Conversely, strategies
-2500
0
1,000
2500
5000
AREA OF POTENTIAL IMPACT (UNBUILT AREA INSIDE STRATEGY 4 7500 MINUS BUILT AREA OUTSIDE,1⋅10 SQ KM)
DE
CR
5000 -2500
SIN
G
Melbourne Buenos Aires TE NT IAL IM N Vancouver PA CT
2500 -5000
ME N Singapore Prague
4
-7500
-5000
-2500
0
INC
2500
SIZE OF MUNICIPALITY (SQ KM)
5000
Christchurch ) KM (SQ ITY AL ICIP
AREA OF POTENTIAL IMPACT (UNBUILT AREA INSIDE STRATEGY 4 7500 MINUS BUILT AREA OUTSIDE,1⋅10SQ KM)
UN
FM
EO
SIZ
Edinburgh
RE
-1⋅10
St Petersburg
PO
Barcelona Boston Zürich
2,000
Cape Town
Mexico City
Toronto
EA
Pune
Ekurhuleni
Rio de Janeiro
SIZE OF STRATEGY (SQ KM)
2.2 Scale and Scope: Ambition and Practicality The first cluster, scale and scope, is a three dimensional cluster. Its formulation involved mapping, for each of the 26 city strategies, the following three elements: (1) on the x-axis, the size of the area of the municipal government; (2) on the y-axis, the size of the area addressed by the strategy; and (3) on the z-axis, the net area that results when the unbuilt area within the scope of the strategy is subtracted by the builtup area outside the scope of the strategy (which can be positive or negative).
-5000
-7500
Mexico City St Petersburg Christchurch Rio de Janeiro
Singapore Toronto Prague Edinburgh Buenos Aires North Vancouver District Boston, Barcelona, Zürich Melbourne
Wuhan Ahmedabad Moscow
2500
Ekurhuleni
1,000
G RA TE
TYPE 1: NONALIGNED, LARGER THAN MUNICIPALITY
ST
SIZE OF AREA COVERED BY STRATEGY (SQ KM) 5,000 10,000
YM
UN
IC
SIZE OF AREA COVERED BY STRATEGY (SQ KM)
IPA L
IT
Y
AL
IG
SIZE OF STRATEGY (SQ KM)
NM
EN
T
5000
AL IGN
SIZE OF STRATEGY (SQ KM)
T
POTENTIAL IMPACT
Chengdu
AS
ING
PO
TE
NT
IAL
IM
PA C
T
-2500 2.3 Scale and Scope: Potential Impact
that are much smaller suggest a high degree of practicality that may not be met by ambition. Four strategies in this compendium are decidedly larger than the municipal boundaries of the city they address (Type 1 in red, listed in the figure above). It is worth noting Chengdu in the extreme upper right--a very large city with an even larger strategy--and Abu Dhabi slightly outlying the others--while its strategy is not larger than the area of the city’s jurisdiction, it covers significant areas of land outside of it. While the ambition of these four strategies is impressive, it raises the question of whether scope that
exceeds the territory controlled by a municipal government is practical. Such strategies might be said to be city-wide in the spatial but not the administrative sense. At the other extreme, several strategies in this compendium are smaller--some far smaller--than the municipal boundaries of the city that they address (type 3 in yellow, listed in the figure on the previous page). Though all of these strategies are dealing with areas larger than a single site--e.g. a neighborhood or riverfront--they are arguably citywide, and may raise the question of whether they are achieving their full potential. Nevertheless, each
constitutes a legitimate attempt to connect individual sites—whether parks, streets or facilities—to form an improved system of sites. As these are very much in the spirit of this compendium we feel they are also worth disseminating. The majority of strategies in this compendium (17 of them) are colinear with their respective municipal boundaries (type 2 in black, listed in the figure above). They can be said to be city-wide in the administrative sense. Given the match of the territory they address with that of the primary governmental decision making and enforcement entity, they may also
be the most practical and realistic. The categorization into these three types forms the basis of the structure of the body of the compendium with types 1, 2 and 3 each constituting separate sections, which are further subdivided according to the next typological group (potential impact).
34
35
Second we compare (1) the scale of public space strategies that may be the municipal boundary with (3) the city-wide in the jurisdictional sense net unbuilt area inside the strategy but not cover significant amounts (i.e. the area of as yet unbuilt land-5000 of contiguous built-up land in the inside the territory covered by the functional metropolitan area can strategy minus the built-up area be said to have a relatively low outside the strategy). Then we do the degree of potential impact over same for (2) the scale of the strategy future development. That does not with (3) the net unbuilt area. With mean, however, that their potential these we assess the potential impact to influence infill and retrofits is not of a given strategy. City-wide public significant. space strategies covering territories with significant amounts of unbuilt Often there is an extreme difference land can be said to have a relatively and mismatch between jurisdictional high degree of potential future boundaries and built-up area and impact because of the way that how well-placed the strategies are they can set the stage and rules of to deal with that. Melbourne is citythe game for land conversion that wide in the administrative sense has not yet happened. Conversely, of covering the full territory of
Melbourne municipality, but barely addresses 5% of the functional area that generally constitutes ‘Melbourne’ in wider sense that most residents identify and refer to it as. The purpose of this exercise is to encourage and incentivize planners, designers and municipal policy makers to take action beyond the individual site with the goal of creating an interconnected system across the city, and to think more broadly about ‘the city’ beyond its jurisdictional boundaries and including the entire, contiguous, functional built-up area of the metropolitan area.
The figures on the previous page illustrate the tendency for larger municipalities and larger strategies-particularly type 1 (in red) to rate at a higher level of potential impact on future spatial development given the (often, but not always) relatively high proportion of unbuilt land within their purview. Conversely, and not surprisingly, smaller municipalities and smaller strategies--particularly type 3 (in yellow) demonstrate relatively little promise for potential impact on future spatial development.
discussed on page 26, demonstrate the effects of municipalities whose jurisdictions do and do not, respectively, encompass the territory of their metropolitan areas. Several cities’ strategies (e.g. Ekurhuleni, Mexico City, Rio de Janeiro) are seen to have potentially mixed impact given their their jurisdictional boundaries encompass a significant amount of undeveloped land while simultaneously missing broad swathes of already built-up land elsewhere in the metropolitan area.
The figure above compares the 17 type 2 (‘aligned’) strategies. Cape Town and Melbourne, which are
36
37
Public Green Space Production Green Space Protection Green Space
Create a better balance between road users
Scenic Area & Forest Park Wetland Conservation Ecological Agriculture Area
A pedestrian oriented city
Other Green Space Area
• Promote traffic calming
Mountain Area Lake & River
• Promote walking
Development Boundary
• Promote public transport • Promote cycling
Public space is more than welldesigned physical places. It is an arena for social interaction and active citizenship that can spark social and economic development and drive environmental sustainability. The design, provision and maintenance of wellconnected systems of public space are integral to achieving a safe and accessible city. However, cities must move beyond typically site-specific approaches to addressing public space if sustainable and longerlasting benefits are to be achieved. Establishing and implementing a city-wide strategy that approaches a city as a multi-functional and connected urban system can ensure the best chances of proactively driving good urban development.
Create an enjoyable city
Urban Green Space Development Plan
A unique and recreational city • Promote a great waterfront • Promote attractive public spaces
INTRODUCTION
• Promote an integrated history
1.2 About This Compendium This publication summarizes 26 city-wide public space strategies from around the world and provides an analysis of their context and content, with the intention to provide mayors, local authorities, planners and other city leaders with the appropriate knowledge to develop their own city-wide public space strategy. Documented in the compendium are public space practices from around the world, that have been developed in a wide range of contexts. The compendium has a distinctly spatial focus. Issues relevant to the development of public space strategies, such as
land, governance, legislation, financing, policy and inclusion, are addressed throughout. However, these are difficult to collate in a comprehensive manner. It can be difficult to determine how directly certain factors, be they political or financial, have prevented strategies from being fully implemented. Strategies can be formed in various enabling environments, with certain conditions outside the purview of urban planning.
complements the Guide for City Leaders, a document to which it should be referred in conjunction. The guide outlines norms to follow when engaged in the development of a meaningful city-wide public space strategy.
As the culmination of research undertaken in order to provide city leaders with a full spectrum of information on city-wide public space strategies, this compendium
ulation and constructible land, 2.5 million inhabitants and 231 square kilometers according to the plan. This district will function as the hub of education, technology and economy. More importantly, the Hubei Province government will be allocated here.
cluding a continuing focus on ecological preservation and restoration, increasing the overall environmental quality, improving the sustainability of city development, forming a diverse green space system and strengthening the regulations of pollution control.
The ecological framework concerns many aspects of Wuhan and its surroundings, such as low-density construction zones, urban green space, mountain ranges, water resource, agriculture field and forest.
Improvements tot eh effectiveness of green space area and the quality of the living situation for residents are the primary goal of the planning document. To establish a three-dimensional ecological green space system, the city of Wuhan aims to expand the field of green land and improve the construction quality of landscape architecture projects, as
Wuhan city government has created several principles towards environmental conservation, in15
well as focus on large scale green space planning. By 2020, the government aim to achieve 16.8 square meters of per capita green space in the built-up area, 38% of green space, and 45% of green coverage. Therefore, enabling the city of Wuhan to achieve the national green space planning standard of half a kilometer distance to green coverage, one kilometer distance to green space and two kilometer distance to a natural water resource.
A thorough strategy offers cities an action-oriented approach encompassing not only spatial goals, but governance arrangements, implementation plans, budgetary needs and measurable indicators. It should be formulated to overcome common obstacles to the successful provision of public spaces throughout a city. With adequate political support and funding, a city-wide public space strategy can deliver a well-distributed, accessible and inclusive public space system.
City-Wide Public Space Strategies: a Compendium of Inspiring Practices offers summaries and assessments of 26 such strategies from different cities in all regions of the world. It also proposes a new set of typologies of strategies and a framework with which strategies can be evaluated. This compendium is complemented by City-Wide Public Space Strategies: a Guidebook for City Leaders and together they provide city leaders, including mayors, local authorities, urban planners and designers, with the knowledge and tools necessary to support them in developing and implementing city-wide public space strategies. Building on the Global Public Space Toolkit published by UN-Habitat in 2016, this set of publications supports the strengthening of local government capacity, providing actionable policy guidance and driving transformative change in multiple global contexts.
Create a city with a strong public life pattern
A diverse and inviting city • Promote multi-functionality • Promote a variety of activities
Strategy on Walkability and Heritage Preservation
185
209
HS Number: HS/055/19E ISBN Number (Volume): 978-92-1-132850-9 226
These are some of the sample pages extract from the compendium.
https://unhabitat.org/city-wide-public-space-strategies-a-compendium-of-inspiring-practices
CITY-WIDE PUBLIC SPACE STRATEGIES
55