Stadium Street Front

Page 1

Stadium Street Front Integrating a sports arena into urban landscape


ii


Abstract Sports play an important part of our daily lives physically, economically, politically and above all, socially. The cathedral of sport has always been a place capable of bringing a community together and regenerating or enhancing neighborhoods. Part of the struggle is effectively integrating these stadiums into our cities, and not just displacing them in suburbs surrounded with parking lots. This thesis will explore methods to successfully integrate a stadium into a dense city, to enhance a new urban development, at different scales. The urban master plan scale, the city block scale, and most importantly the street front scale will be researched and designed as a model that cities can use to help bring sports closer to where we live.

i


ii


Acknowledgments I would like to thank everyone that directly or indirectly helped me through my education at Wentworth Institute of Technology, and to help put this thesis together. Thanks to my Thesis Prep advisor, Linda Weld, for guiding me towards such an interesting topic and for pushing the idea. Thanks to my primary thesis advisor, Aaron Weinert, for believing in me to do what was necessary to accomplish my goals. Thanks to my secondary thesis advisor, Margarita Iglesia for offering ideas and expertise in the topic at hand. Thanks to the professors in the Architecture department at Wentworth, for helping me to become the designer I am today. Thanks to my family, for financial support to make this education a reality, and for just being there. Above all, thanks to my colleagues and studio mates. My close friends who constantly offered their thoughts on the project. For even the ones I never spoke to, having their work around me in studios, crit rooms and classrooms was an inspiration.

iii



Contents Abstract i Acknowledgments iii Part I: Research 3 Thesis Topics 5 Sports 7 Stadiums 9 City Integration 11 Boston 2024 Olympics 13 New England Revolution 15 Precedents 17 Fenway Park 19 TD Garden 27 Estadio Nacional de Brasilia 31 London 2012 Legacy 33 Thesis Proposal 35 Part II: Design 37 Design Process 39 Proposed Site 41 Urban Master Plan Scale 45 Process 47 Urban Connections 55 Olympic Master Plan 57 Post-Olympic Master Plan 59 City Block Scale 61 Process 63 The Entertainment District 73 Street Front Scale 77 Thesis Probe 79 Process 81 Stadium Boulevard 85 Conclusion 89 Bibliography 91

1


2


Part I:

Research

3


4


Thesis Topics The next few pages will talk a little bit about each section of inspiration and key elements of the thesis. It is essential to understand these topics and to see how they are related, to easily grasp the idea of the thesis project. • • • • •

Sports Stadiums City Integration Boston 2024 Olympics New England Revolution

5


“Sports inspire passion. Pride. Spirit. They give us something to root for as individuals and unite us as a community...”

6

– stantec.com


Sports Sports are an important part of life. If you don’t play a sport yourself, chances are a family member or friend probably does, whether it is professionally, or as a pass time. We make some of our closest friends through sports, from childhood through puberty and adulthood to old age. Whether we meet friends through an elementary school soccer team, or start talking to the football fan next to us at the local bar, sports can bring us all closer together. Sports are for everyone, male or female, black or white, healthy or disabled, young or old. Not only do sports have an impact on our social life, but they affect our community, city, country and world economically and politically. A soccer field brings the community together in Rio de Janeiro

The Boston Marathon

Handicapped Badminton in Sri Lanka

“Sport can reach parts politicians can’t reach. It can help in bringing divided conflicts together in a way nothing else can.” -Tony Blair When the Ivory Coast national soccer team qualified for the 2006 World cup, the Civil War was put on a temporary truce as the players begged to see the country united again. The government and the rebels put their differences aside in 2007 as the city of Bouake hosted an African Nations Cup qualifier, a match that symbolized the reunification of the two sides of the country. The captain of the team, Didier Drogba said in an interview: “I knew that we could bring a lot of people together. More than politicians. The country is divided because of politicians; we are playing football, we are running behind a ball, and we managed to bring people together.” 7


“Buildings for sport and leisure, and the happiness and sense of community they generate, touch all aspects of our lives, economic, political and social.”

8

– Rod Sheard, Sports Architecture


Stadiums

The Colosseum is perhaps the most popular historic stadium

Arthur Ashe Stadium, New York

Camp Nou in Barcelona is the biggest stadium in Europe with a capacity of 98,787

The modern stadium is a remarkable piece of architecture. It allows us to travel into the TV set to be part of the live spectacle of sport. It is where the individual becomes one in a million, a water droplet in the Atlantic Ocean, a tree in the Amazon rainforest. Yet for each of us the thrill of traveling to a stadium is different, the experience of a stadium is an individual memory. Stadiums are the pride and joy of a city and country. As sports become a more and more important industry in the world, stadiums will follow. Though they are extremely expensive to build, they have the ability to generate large sums of money on an event day. Stadiums take the shape of its purpose. In most sports there are standard sized fields, courts and tracks that cannot be changed. A baseball stadium is quite different from a horseracing stadium, which is different to a racecar or football stadium. Due to the regulations of FIFA (International Federation of Association Football) for stadium seating, many soccer stadiums look very similar on the interior. Therefore the major differences come in the exterior facade and the roof. In his book, “Sports Architecture� Rod Sheard compares the modern stadium to airports, both places where people spend two to four hours. This time evolves into money being spent, and the layout of airports has changed, and so too, will stadiums start to become commercialized.

9


10

Kauffman Stadium and Arrowhead Stadium are situated in a field of parking in a suburb outside of Kansas City


City Integration

Urban Planning Scale: Colosseum Site Plan, Rome 1748

City Block Scale : Sven Verbruggen, “New Stadium Typology”

Street Front Scale : Ryan D. Birkey “Thinking outside the Bowl : The Stadium as an Active Urban Amenity”

Why is it so important that we integrate these structures into our cities? Stadiums generate a sense of community, one that is essential to a thriving city. One can argue there is the experience of driving to the game, but there is also an experience of taking the train, seeing the fans slowly fill up the train car at every stop until you can barely breathe. If you weren’t going to the game, you definitely know there is a game going on. Although they are not affecting a skyline, they are tourist attractions. The Olympic Stadium is the second most popular tourist attraction in Munich, while Camp Nou in Barcelona sees more tourists than the Picasso Museum. Stadiums give people reasons to come into cities, even on non game days. Another reason stadiums should be in cities is the ease of access. Kansas City’s two main stadiums, Kauffman Stadium (baseball) and Arrowhead Stadium (football) are in the same area outside of the city, surrounded by a sea of parking lots. There are different scales of integrating such a structure into urban contexts. There is the urban planning scale; an issue of where a stadium is placed within a city and how accessible it is. There is the city block scale; the feeling the stadium generates around the neighborhood and the program of the surrounding buildings. Then there is the immediate street front scale; the facades of the stadium and how it can help fit into the immediate context. These facades have the potential to be permeable and open up even when there is not a game, adding energy to the community. 11


“We don’t see a separate Olympic park as they have done in some cities, we think of Boston as the Olympic park.”

12

– Dan O’Connell, President of the Boston 2024 Partnership


Boston 2024 Olympics

The scale of a Boston Olympics : Special Commission Relative to the Feasibility of Hosting the Summer Olympics.

Boston could host the most compact and sustainable games yet.

Harvard Stadium has the potential to be an Olympic venue.

The inspiration for this thesis is partly driven by Boston’s bid for the Olympics in 2024. Many believe that it wouldn’t be a success because there is no space for an Olympic park in Boston. But the idea could be that Boston is the Olympic park. It would mean that the stadiums and sports facilities would need to be integrated into the city. Instead of having a concentrated district of an Olympic Park, the events would be spread out over the greater Boston area, and the city has the public transportation foundation to allow for that. There are around 100 colleges and universities in the area, and Boston will use their facilities to support the games. Harvard Stadium would host field hockey, as it has hosted other Olympic sports in the past such as the group stages of the 1984 Olympic Soccer, and Track and Field tryouts for the United States team. The International Olympic Committee is favoring venues that are temporary, that will be re-used or that can be downgraded. The venues that would be built in Boston could be handed over to individual schools for their use of athletics. Not to mention the Boston area is in need of affordable housing, which is a requirement of the Olympic host city. Housing could be built and easily re-used as dorms or apartments. The city is promoting a sustainable, walkable event that would keep the games affordable and compact.

13


“You’re targeting young professionals — the ones who grew up playing soccer and now want to watch, drink beer, and sing songs, those are the passionate fans you want.”

14

– Victor Matheson, sports economist, former MLS referee


New England Revolution

Gillette Stadium in the Foxborough suburb is mostly empty for New England Revolution’s soccer games

Seattle Sounders FC has an energetic crowd of young fans

A possible new home for the New England Revolution at a site in South Boston - The Boston Globe

The New England Revolution soccer team is looking to build a new soccer- specific stadium. Gillette Stadium is too big for the soccer team’s fan base; it is scarcely populated on the Revolution’s game days. The average attendance is about 16,000 fans, not even a quarter the capacity of their current stadium. The emptiness is a turnoff for fans, as part of the live stadium experience is being part of a packed exciting crowd. They are one of the few Major League Soccer teams not playing in a soccer specific stadium, and one of the few not in the heart of a city. An ideal stadium in Boston would seat about 20,000 fans. However an article on GoLocalProv spoke about bringing the team base to Providence. There the Revolution would be the only top professional sports team, and would receive more attention than Boston. Boston is already home to the Red Sox, Bruins, Celtics, Patriots and a number of college sports; the TV ratings for the Revolution are non-existent. I believe this would change if the stadium came to Boston; a town full of energetic young middle aged sports enthusiasts. “An MLS match loses 260 potential fans for every mile the stadium is located outside its nearest urban core,” according to Mark S. Nagel, a sport and entertainment management professor at the University of South Carolina. Soccer specific stadiums were built in the suburbs in the last decade, but now the resurge of Major League Soccer is coming from a younger age group from cities. 15


16


Precedents The following are precedents that have been analyzed for different reasons. They are all interesting in their own way and attention will be paid towards how they are set in context, their facades, or just have a unique idea that applies to the proposal. • • • •

Fenway Park TD Garden Estadio Nacional de Brasilia London 2012 Legacy

17


18

Fenway Park is Major League Baseball’s oldest ball park. Photo courtesy. http://philip.greenspun.com


Fenway Park

Fenway Park is embedded in the urban Fenway context

The surrounding context includes shopping, bars and restaurants

Fenway Park is usually filled to capacity at every Boston Red Sox home game - www.bluechipphotography.com

Fenway Park is home to the Boston Red Sox and is Major League Baseball’s oldest ballpark. It was opened on April 20th 1912, and since then has gone under many renovations and makeovers. The surrounding context has slowly developed around the stadium since then making Fenway one of the liveliest neighborhoods in the greater Boston area. It is an urban stadium that is rooted in the area’s culture and identity. The stadium facades consist of brick that show the building’s age while fitting right into its context of Boston and the popular red brick structures. There are parking lots along the stadium’s façade which at times can be a bit bland, with no sense of interaction and permeability. However there are a couple of bars at street level that are embedded in the stadium. Surrounding buildings across the street consist of bars and restaurants that give the area exciting nightlife, especially on game day. Yawkey way closes off on game day and creates an incredible atmosphere where fans can buy food and souvenirs before entering the stadium. The street is gated off and only fans with tickets have access to the street before the game. There is a sense of connection to the city and surroundings from inside the stadium where there are some open areas, concession stands and circulation paths that allow for views out to the street. There is more of an interior to exterior relationship, than an exterior to interior one. 19


“I came to love Fenway. It was a place that rejuvenated me after a road trip; the fans right on top of you, the nutty angles. And the Wall. That was my baby, the left-field wall, the Green Monster.”

20

– Carl Yastrzemski, Red Sox Hall of Famer


Fenway Park The Green Monster

The stadium typology extends to the exterior along the street

The Green Monster overhangs Lansdowne Street by 17.5 feet

Essentially a single wall separates the playing field from the street

The Green monster first started as a simple wooden fence in the stadium’s early years. In 1934 a concrete wall was built and within a few years it was painted green “to match the grass” and advertisement boards were added. 269 Green Monster seats were added in 2003 and are the stadium’s most expensive seats that offer a great view from left field. It overhangs Lansdowne Street by 17.5 feet and gives the street a sense of character. The overhang allows people to know there is a stadium there, as you look up and see the underside of the concrete stepped seating. There is a single wall that separates the playing field from exterior of the stadium, which does not happen in other stadiums. Usually there are rings of concourse areas, restrooms, and ticketing areas that separate the exterior to the action area of the stadium. I think the green monster is a unique design feature that has potential and can produce many ideas. Since it overhangs the street it is one way to fit more people in an urban stadium, that may not have much space to play with. The actual wall could be an interesting element as well. It leads me to some interesting design questions such as: what if that wall could be transparent to allow for spectators on the street to catch a glimpse of the game? Would there be a fee to charge for entering that area on Lansdowne Street? The following pages show an analysis at street level of Fenway Park. The pictures were taken on a Sunday at around midday. 21


22


23


24


25


26

TD Garden acts as a billboard for Bruins and Celtics advertisements.


TD Garden

TD Garden seats 17,565 for hockey and 18,624 for basketball

The height of TD Garden blends well with the surrounding buildings.

The arena sits at a point of entry into to the city from the north.

TD Garden was completed in 1995 after 2 years of construction. It was built to replace the old Boston Garden, which is now the big empty lot south of TD Garden along Causeway Street. The Arena has a maximum seating capacity of 19,580 and is home to the Boston Celtics (basketball), the Boston Bruins (ice hockey) and hosts many different events and concerts. It is located in Boston’s north end, near the Charles River Dam. Underneath it is North Station, where the orange and green lines run as well as the commuter rail. This brings thousands of commuters through TD Garden everyday, and provides easy public transportation for the fans on a game day. If we were to switch TD Garden with Fenway Park, the Garden wouldn’t be much of a success in the Fenway area. It is part of the identity of the North End. Though the walls are overwhelming, they are not as obstructive because of the empty lot in between the street and the arena, which acts as a buffer zone. However this empty lot prohibits any interaction with the façade of the building. The only point of permeability is North station and the main entrance into the arena. With that in mind, it can be seen as a point of entry into Boston from the North. With big Bruins and Celtics posters on its façade, the blank walls act as an advertising board for traffic along the Zakim Bridge. It is a reminder that you are entering, or leaving Boston. The following pages consist of stills from a video created documenting the process of getting to a Boston Celtics game at TD Garden on November 7th 2014. 27


1. The orange line gets more crowded as it approaches North Station

2. The crowd heading off the train towards TD Garden

3. Following the crowd exiting North Station

28

5. About 100 feet separate North Station and TD Garden

6. Fans show their tickets to enter the arena

4. The first glimpse of TD Garden


7. Going up the escalator to the upper concourse

8. Fans get food and drinks before the start of the game

9. Concourses start to fill up with Celtics green before the game

10. Heading towards the appropriate section into the arena

11. Through the tunnel catching the first glimpse of the arena

12. The view from the seat, ready for the game

29


30

The Estadio Nacional sits in the heart of the capital of Brazil


Estadio Nacional de Brasilia

The stadium seats about 72,000 fans

The facade consists of a field of columns that allow natural ventilation

A section of the stadium shows the open feel of the facade leading into the concourse and tiers of seating.

The Estadio Nacional de Brasilia is located in the heart of Brasilia, the capital of Brazil. The stadium was completed in 2013 and seats about 72,000 making it the second largest stadium in South America. The stadium is pursuing to be the world’s highest rated LEED Platinum certified stadium, and the first net-zero energy stadium as well. Though Brasilia is known for its urban sprawl, the stadium is within a two-mile radius of most hotels, it is in the city center, and very easy to reach by public transportation. The esplanade that runs around the stadium acts as a circulation ring that is supported by slender reinforced concrete pillars. It fits in well with the context of Brasilia, while creating a welcoming feeling to the stadium. Brasilia is very warm, but also dry. The architects designed a breathable façade consisting of a field of columns that provide natural ventilation to flow into the arena bowl and concourse, reducing the amount of air conditioning needed to cool the building. There are a total of 288 columns ranging from 1.2 to 1.5 meters in diameter, 46 meters tall. The façade is what is most interesting to me and relevant for this thesis. The openness the columns bring to the stadium has potential to push the design ideas even further in a different setting. It is a very permeable façade. It leads me to some design questions: What if these columns held up the tiers of seating as well as the roof? What if there were layers of activity along this arcade of columns? 31


32

London Olympic Park 2012

London Olympic Park 2030


London 2012 Legacy

The Olympic park encourages green transportation via many cycle routes.

A permanent lower tier and a temporary upper tier make the stadium able to downsize post-Olympics.

The Olympic stadium capacity was 80,000 but after downsizing it will seat 25,000.

It is believed London won the bid because of their promise to make these the greenest games in the history of the Olympics. The site was the city’s dock and ship building area for many years. It also consisted of an old rail yard and engine factory nearby Stratford Station, which had not been used in decades. The area was considered Europe’s most toxic brown-field site, 202 hectares of wasteland. After the 2004 and 2008 games in Athens and Beijing respectively, both countries saw themselves left in economic crisis, not to mention massive infrastructure left unused. London had their own goals, it was about building responsibly and having a solid economic plan for after the games. The Olympic Stadium had a capacity to hold 80,000 spectators during the games, and after renovations and downsizing, it will hold 25,000. This was achieved by designing a permanent bottom tier, with 55,000 temporary seats above. By 2015 the park will double in size. The Regeneration Phase of the park will inspire sustainable lifestyles for residents, employees and visitors. This phase is scheduled for completion in 2030 and will include 8,000 homes, 3 schools, 9 nurseries, 7 community spaces and 3 health centers. One can look at it as though London was building a new development on the East End, that just happened to host the Olympics, rather than a development that came about because of the games. The legacy left behind is as important as the games themselves. 33


34


Thesis Proposal

Integration at the Urban Planning scale

Integration at the Street Front scale

Integration at the City Block scale

With the understanding of the topics mentioned and the precedents studied, the proposal for the thesis is a stadium. As mentioned, for a stadium to be integrated into an urban landscape, there must be some kind of dense surrounding. A design for a small community around the stadium will therefore be required, but will not be the main emphasis. The main emphasis will be on the stadium’s street facades and how it can work on game days and kept energized on non-game days. The ideal condition would be that the stadium is built for the Olympics, which would have the required capacity of about 80,000 and then downsized after the games. The stadium would then be dedicated as a new home to the New England Revolution soccer team. It will not focus on the specifics of stadium design, which one can easily get lost in all of the technical requirements such as sight lines, views, code requirements and required support spaces. Instead I will allow myself some freedom to design around the typical stadium typology, effectively implementing my ideas. It will be about the exterior of the stadium and the concourse rings rather than the interior.

35


36


Part II:

Design

37


38


Detail

Design Process

ity

C

n

ba

Ur

January

t

ck

n ro tF

Time allocation: The plan was to take a step by step, designing first at the urban scale for less than a month. Then after a review to overlap into the City block scale for a month, and spend the majority of the time designing at the street front architectural scale, with most detail.

e

o

Bl

Objectives: • Understand ways a stadium may be integrated at different scales. • Blur the amount of energy and activity between game days and non-game days. • Come up with a model that stadiums can look to for better integration.

re St

February

March

April

t Fro n

Ur b

an

St re et

Detail

Predicted Design Process

lock

Re v al Fi n

April

ie

w

2 ie Re v id M

M Actual Design Process

March

w

w ie Re v

February

id

January

Pr ob

e

1

City B

That did not go according to plan during the semester. There was constant overlap between the three scales, sometimes there was more focus than others but none really went away. The thesis probe was built for the middle of January and after that the major challenge was the urban scale. This took quite some time to get to a design that was developed and integrated enough to move on. The City Block scale was always thought about but never as much as the other two. The street front details started to develop later on towards the final presentation.

39


40

Figure Ground map of Boston showing the train routes. Fenway Park (left) and TD Garden (right) are highlighted


Proposed Site

The area is a hole in the dense city off of Interstate 93.

The area is currently home to the food wholesale industry.

Widett Circle is being considered as a site for the Olympic Stadium and a New England Revolution Stadium

The site is a strip of city-owned land off of Interstate 93. Boston has a large yard on the site for towed cars and public works. Widett Circle is about 20 acres and is currently home to the New Boston Food Market, a group of meat and seafood wholesalers that supply the restaurant industry in Boston. The South Boston property offers easy access from major highways and is near the MBTA’s Red Line as well as rail lines at nearby South Station. Nearby shopping malls and institutions could be used for associated parking where necessary. The site is currently a hole in the city of Boston. It could provide for more of a connection from the South End to South Boston. The challenge is that Interstate 93 runs along the sites west edge while rail yards and multiple train tracks run through the entire site.

41


42

The entire district can be seen as a hole in the city of Boston, between the South End and South Boston neighborhoods.


The site boundaries cover approximately 130 acres.

43


44


Scale:

Urban Master Plan

45


46


Process The process for the urban scale took much longer than expected. It was rushed and changes had to be continually made. The main issue was not integrating the stadium to the surrounding buildings, but integrating those surrounding buildings to the context and neighborhoods around. Initially the idea was to fill the whole site with buildings, but it was thought the time was not enough, so a smaller area was focused on . After reviews and much thought, it was agreed that developing the entire area would help to integrate the stadium and the city on a larger scale. From there, labeling districts such as residential and commercial and only developing the entertainment district was worked on, but it made it hard to believe, so building shapes were added on the entire district of intervention. They still somehow lacked connection to the existing urban fabric, so a digram was created which analyzed the surrounding street grids and connections, and pulling arteries through the site to connect back to the city.

Initial conceptual method of intervention: A simple urban grid over the site.

47


One of the first schemes: to fill the entire neighborhood with buildings. It was thought this was a bit too much to handle for a one semester project.

48

Area of intervention was made smaller; only to north side. Stadium located on site Boston 2024 is considering.


Stadium moved to a central area that could have more buildings and opportunity around it. Still focusing on only part of the entire neighborhood.

To tie back into the city, the rest of the site was left to develop. Two other districts were labeled as commercial/ residential.

49


Some connections to existing fabric starting to be developed. Still not enough. Ideas about certain areas within neigborhood to be mixed use buildings.

50

Diagram showing connecting arteries coming from existing fabric around and continuing through site.


Urban grid somewhat established over entire area showing green spaces buffering unwanted areas.

Building forms established on grid. Open space near Broadway station not integrated to full potential.

51


Added building near Broadway makes green corridor more approachable from Dorchester. Residential District buildings made bigger in size to be able to build on platform over rail yard.

52


Working back in time: Adaptation for Olympics. More parking around and practice fields included.

53


54

Site Connections/Arteries: one major north/south artery through site from I93 up to Fort Point Channel


Urban Master Plan Urban Connections

Not only is it important to connect the stadium to the immediately surrounding buildings, but it is as important to connect those buildings to the existing urban fabric around them. This will push the integration of the stadium to be more successful in the larger sense. How can this be done? Zooming out further and examining existing arteries through the two adjacent neighborhoods (South Boston & the South End) was an important step in the process. These arteries were then brought into and through the site in different categories: green space connections, public transportation, vehicular transportation and pedestrian routes. Landscaped areas were used as park spaces, as well as buffer zones for unwanted areas such as neighboring industrial buildings to the east and the interstate highway to the west.

55


56

Olympic Master Plan: The immediate areas around the stadium were left open for pedestrian circulation. Beyond that are areas of parking and athlete spaces.


Urban Master Plan Olympic Master Plan

The plan for the Olympics sees most of the site covered in permanent buildings, with few smaller, temporary structures. The stadium capacity would be around 60,000 with the capability to downsize post Olympics. Required practice fields along with athletes facilities and equipment storage spaces are south of the stadium. Further south is the athlete’s village, closer to the Broadway T Stop, providing easy transportation access. One stop north, Broadway, allows for spectators to access the stadium via a pedestrian friendly route. Those taking the commuter rail can get off at a new train station and walk a few steps to the stadium. Around the stadium are vastly open pedestrian areas allowing for easy spectator circulation. Beyond this is surface parking for ones driving in.

57


58

Post-Olympic Master Plan: Stadium is renovated into soccer specific and empty areas around previous Olympic Stadium filled with mixed use buildings.


Urban Master Plan Post-Olympic Master Plan

Once the Olympics are over the Stadium would be downsized to a 25,000 capacity soccer specific venue for the New England Revolution. The empty areas that were around the stadium during the Olympics would be transformed with new mixed use buildings and parks in a pedestrian friendly boulevard, that enhances the area on game days as well as non-game days. This would be a new entertainment district, and along with the residential district which was previously the athletes village, a commercial district would be at the center of the site, where the practice fields and athletes buildings once were. Most of the buildings would have a retail base of 1-2 floors. A main north-south axis brings people through the new neighborhood, from the residential to the entertainment district. This axis branches off from I93, through the site, and up towards the Fort Point Channel.

59


60


Scale:

City Block

61


62

Initial plan layout. Missing a sense of connection to Dorchester Avenue and buildings too large in scale.


Process The process for the city block scale was done both in section and in plan. Initial conceptual ideas came about in section, of building a platform over the rail yard, allowing for a lower tier to step back down into the stadium. From here a plan was developed. Initial plans did not contain much connection to existing neighborhoods. Things started to change once the conceptual drawings started to get into scale. The stadium configuration was worked out, including circulation. Interior circulation would dictate exterior circulation and the structural grid.

A plan diagram showing pedestrian circulation from Broadway, and vehicles from I93. More connection to Dorchester Avenue.

63


Conceptual section not to scale: Shows approach from Dorchest Avenue courtyard to Stadium. Platform street built over railyard. Buildings address street level change in section.

Conceptual section not to scale: connection to adjacent train station and plaza.

64


Stadium surrounded with plazas and buildings. Still lacking connection to existing neighborhoods and stadium detail.

65


66

Initial sizing of stadium intended for 30,000 capacity.


Circulation within stadium and sizing of blocks/ corridors worked out.

67


68

Stadium calculation: approx. 25,000 capacity


Stadium ground floor spaces designed. Blocks of program integrated into structural grid. On opposite side shows open to below lower concourse level.

69


Site section to scale. Buildings and plazas a bit larger than expected.

70


71


Section A-A: showing approach corridor from Dorchester Avenue to the Stadium.

72


City Block The Entertainment District

The new neighborhood is separated into three districts, the residential district to the south, the commercial district to the west, and the entertainment district to the north, which surrounds the stadium. The city block layout takes shape of the South Boston layout across from Dorchester Avenue. The buildings here would have a permeable retail ground floor and the entire area would be pedestrian friendly. The stadium’s connection with Broadway station is critical for all the pedestrians using the train for transportation to the events. A park fronting Dorchester Avenue welcomes pedestrians to a walkable green corridor that steps gently up to a new street level, on their way to the stadium. The rise in elevation allows for the existing rail yards and train tracks to remain below. A five minute walk down this corridor would bring you to the stadium, approaching at a compelling angle. To keep the stadium typology open to the street, on game days the boulevard on the north, south and west sides would be closed off, allowing access for ticket holders only.

73


74

Entertainment District Site Plan: Blocks of program show and hide the stadium along 3 facades, while one is more open


View of the stadium upon approach from Dorchester Avenue.

75


76


Scale:

Street Front

77


78


Thesis Probe The thesis probe was an artifact that was to be thought about over the break between the Fall and Spring semesters. It was built in the first three weeks of January and displayed in an exhibition along with other student’s probes. There were dimensions to stick within, but the sky was the limit for the creativity. I decided to built a section sketch I did that talked about the street front and the character of the stadium typology extending over the sidewalk. The idea came from pushing the thought behind Fenway Park’s Green Monster which hangs over Lansdowne Street. Building the thesis probe helped me realize a few things. Firstly in the manner I built it, each tier was removable, including the roof. This helped in proving that a stadium could be downsized to a smaller capacity. Another thing it helped me to understand was the stadium seating and the viewing angles. These were technical details that I did not want to get into much, but at some points I could not ignore it.

79


80

An atmosphere is created around the stadium even on non-game days.


Process Much of the process for the Street Front scale was done in section. The goal was to create eventful streets along the stadium on game days, and continuing that energy to nongame days as well. Spaces that penetrated the stadium facade, both vertically and horizontally were studied and developed.

A raised inner street allows existing rail lines to remain below while having the bottom tier seem to descend below street level.

Spaces beneath the lower tier can be programmed.

A lower level pedestrian walkway is created below street level.

81


A more developed section allows parking under adjacent buildings on the west side.

82


A more developed east side section with permeable stadium facade spaces.

83


84

View along Stadium Boulevard on a non-game day.


Street Front Stadium Boulevard

The stadium has two main street front characters, one along the main green axis that runs through the entire neighborhood, and the other that is more open along the west side. The commuter rail runs underground along the east side, bringing people directly to the stadium. There are entrance/exit points at each end of the block, as well as the main station building to the south. Beyond this would be underground space for the rail yard and maintenance tracks. This street front section would have bars, cafes and restaurants that front the street while allowing for views into the stadium on non-game days. On game days they can be used as private boxes and special rooms. On the opposite side, closer to I93, the focus would be more on vehicle access, with parking below adjacent buildings. This parking leads out onto a lower level strip of storefronts, which can also be accessed from street level. Adjacent buildings would be fronted with retail and entertainment, enhancing the area when there is not an event at the stadium.

85


Section B-B : the public transportation east side

86


Section C-C: the car parking/ pedestrian boulevard west side

87


88


Conclusion Over the past months I have learned a whole lot about architecture at different scales. Firstly I think tackling the problem at these various scales was a challenge within 4 months. I don’t think it was enough time but I believe my end product is a good conceptual design where the ideas can be taken further. As with any profession that anyone may study, they notice things a whole lot more than the average person. This is no different. As architects we constantly notice things while walking around a city. Not only will I notice stadiums and how they are integrated into a bigger context, but other buildings as well. I will notice how communities can be created with walkable streets and permeable ground levels. In terms of design, the main objective was to integrate a stadium into a city at different scales, I believe I have successfully started to do so. A personal goal for the thesis was to learn a whole lot and have fun while doing so, and that goal has been achieved.

89


90


Bibliography “2014 Brasilia National Stadium.” , accessed November 16, 2014, http://castromello. com.br/en/project/estadio-nacional-de-brasilia-2014.

“Boston’s 2024 Olympic Bid Relies Heavily on City’s Colleges.” , accessed December 3, 2014, http://college.usatoday.com/2014/11/27/bostons-2024-olympic-bidrelies-heavily-on-citys-colleges/

This article starts to go in detail about the Olympic venues, how they could

be sustainable, what happens after, public transportation upgrades. It also gives an idea of the Olympic stadium downsizing after the games for a New England Revolution soccer stadium.

“Bring the New England Revolution to Providence - we Know the Perfect Spot.”

GoLocalProv Editorial, accessed December 2, 2014, http://www.golocalprov. com/business/editorial-bring-the-new-england-revolution-to-providence-we-

Birkey, Ryan. “Thinking Outside the Bowl: The Stadium as an Active Urban Amenity.” Bachelor of Architecture, Ball State University, 2005

This is directly related to my thesis idea. The focus is about promoting an

atmosphere outside of the stadium while having open configurations. There are

a few good precedents of Camden Yards and urbanism. There are thoughts on

Interior commercial concourse, stadium massing and cladding. Plaza plans and diagrams are very useful. Sketched perspectives give the atmosphere the author

desires. He also gives some post-presentation comments at the end, talking about the critics input, use of a retractable roof and giving the stadium more character.

Bryant, Paul. “Between the Stadium and the City: An Urban Response to the Current

Trends in Stadium Design.” Master of Architecture, University of Cincinnati, 2008.

know-the-perfec

Dyckhoff, Tom and Claire Barrett. The Architecture of London 2012: Vision, Design

heart of downtown Providence, Rhode Island. There is discussion about a site

This article talks about putting the New England Revolution stadium in the

that is constantly reused and under renovations. They talk about how Providence may be a better location for the team than Boston, where the potential site is in

no-man’s land, there are not bars no restaurants and no night life on the site in

South Boston next to I-93. Boston already has many sports teams, Bruins, Celtics, Red Sox, BC College, Patriots, the New England Revolution has non existent TV ratings in Boston. Since providence doesn’t have many sports teams, a soccer

team based there would receive more attention and more fans than it would in Boston. There is also talk in the article about multi-use. Stadium Design. Cologne: DAAB GMBH, 2006. “Sustainable Stadiums and Arenas.” www.wm.com, accessed 12/2, 2014, http://www. wm.com/sustainability-services/documents/insights/Stadiums%20and%20 Arenas%20Insight.pdf

This 4-page article touches on the idea of integrating stadiums and

arenas into cities in terms of sustainability. It speaks about the importance of

a transportation system and the greenhouse gas emissions from people going

to an event. It also gives some sustainable facts and figures about modern stadiums.

and Legacy of the Olympic and Paralympic Games. Chichester: Wiley, 2012

This book gives in depth information about the planning of the 2012

Olympics. Details of the site before the Olympics are given. The fact that it

was a toxic wasteland before and today is one of the most sustainable areas is

written about. There is a section on previous Olympics and the pros and cons of their aftermath, and what kind of Olympics London wanted to have. There is information on all the major sport venues, energy stations and facilities outside

of the park. Toward the end there are a few pages about the afterlife of the park. Great Images, (some that can’t be found on the internet.) Easy reading.

Goeman, Steven. “Rotterdam 2028 Olympic Stadium Fleet: A Life Cycle Approach to

Sustainable

Olympic Architecture

:”

2012. http://resolver.tudelft.nl/

uuid:6a0dfdc9-c627-41f7-bd40-208979d5827b.

Gordon, Barclay F. Olympic Architecture: Building for the Summer Games. New York: Wiley, 1983.

Ijeh, Ike. “Brazil’s World Cup Stadiums: Estadio Nacional De Brasilia, Part 6.” , accessed November 16, 2014, http://www.building.co.uk/brazils-world-cup-stadiumsestadio-nacional-de-brasilia-part-6/5068931.article.

91


92


Bibliography Jewell, Don. Public Assembly Facilities. 2nd ed. Malabar, Fla.: Krieger, 1992.

Ross, Casey, Callum Borchers, and Mark Arsenault. “Kraft Family Looks to Build Soccer

Kirsner, Scott. “Boston, Go for the Gold with Creative Solutions.” The Boston Globe,

November 16, 2014, sec. Business.

Lonergan, Paul Joseph. “Cultural Sustainability: Means of Perserving a Neighborhood.” Master of Architecture, Wentworth Institute of Technology, 2011.

MacLeod, Finn. “Salvaged Stadium: Harvard GSD Student Yaohua Wang’s Proposal

for Post-Olympic Adaptation.” ArchDaily, accessed December 2, 2014, http:// www.archdaily.com/?p=571282

This article describes a thesis project for on Olympic stadium in China,

that can be reused after the Olympic games as a school, while still having a

capability as a stadium. It is sited in an urban context. The designer talks about the circulation spaces around the stadium bowl that are no longer needed after

the games and tries to reuse the space. He is also interested in the audience’s experience of the games. By integrating the practice field into the façade of the stadium he gives an opportunity for the audience to circulate around to perhaps

follow their favorite athlete. After renovations, half of the concourse spaces go to the school while the other half is for athletes and media. There is a fifteen minute video that basically takes you on a tour of the design.

Martorell Codina, Josep Maria. Transformación De Un Frente Marítimo: Barcelona, La Villa Olímpica, 1992 = Transformation of a Seafront : Barcelona, the Olympic Village, 1992. Barcelona: G. Gili, 1988.

Mendez, Soledad. “Mega-Event Stadiums as Vehicles for Urban Transformation: An Argument for Integration .” Master in City Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2010.

Mezher, Jad. “Evolution in the Design and Construction of Stadiums.” Master of Engineering in Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003

This thesis focuses mainly on construction materials and methods of

stadiums, comparing modern stadiums to the Colosseum in Rome.

Stadium in Boston.” The Boston Globe, November 18, 2014, sec. City and Region This article talks about bringing a stadium for New England Revolution

Soccer team into the heart of Boston. They talk about the problems of the

current stadium, Gillette Stadium which is primarily for football. The stadium is

too big and supporters are not willing to drive all the way. There is a diagram at

the bottom that explains driving distances from stadiums to city centers in the US, and the New England Revolution is one of the furthest. It also talks about

bringing young urban fans into the mix and a stadium sited near South station could help soccer become more popular in the area.

Sheard, Rod. Sports Architecture. London: Spon Press, 2001. Sheard, Rod, Robert Powell, and Patrick Bingham-Hall. The Stadium: Architecture for

the New Global Sporting Culture. Pesaro Monograph Series. Balmain, N.S.W.: Pesaro Publishing, 2005.

Siegfried, Jeremy and Sasha Truong. “Sustainable Sports Stadiums: Integrating Development into the City.”Cornell University, 2009.

Sturgis, Sam. “Why the Future of Major League Soccer is Downtown.” CityLab, accessed December 2, 2014, http://www.citylab.com/design/2014/11/why-thefuture-of-major-league-soccer-is-downtown/382942/.

Stürzebecher, Peter and Sigrid Ulrich. Architecture for Sport: New Concepts and

International Projects for Sport and Leisure [Architektur für Sport.]. Chichester, West Sussex, England: Wiley-Academy, 2002.

Varney, Martin. “Contex-Ture: The Active Edge and Asymmetrical Destabilisation.” Master of Architecture, Unitec Institute of Technology, 2010.

Verbruggen, Sven. “New Stadium Typology.” Youtube Video, 12:10. Posted January 23, 2013. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GR_6-maoL54.

Zimbalist, Andrew. “Fool’s Gold in Boston Olympics.” The Boston Globe, October 13, 2014, sec. Opinion.

93


Rahul Nebhani

Master of Architecture Thesis Wentworth Institute of Technology 2015


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.