ADS5 Housing Report

Page 1

CARBON COPIES HOUSES TOWERS COMPLEX SHAPES MID-RISE AIRPORTS HOSPITALS/LABS BRIDGES

Andrew Reynolds Ching Yuet Ma Chloe Shang Daniah Basil Abdulazeez Al Mounajim Dario Biscaro Grant Donaldson Hayden Mills Janice Lo Lee Hei Yin Luca Luci Miles Elliott Mir Jetha Xinyi Shen Zhiting Jin Groupwork Royal College of Art



ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION Purpose of research Thornbury Green Site location Site images Masterplan Typologies Focus typologies

HOUSES

2.0 EXISTING CONDITION Existing condition summary Menu of components Structural solution Construction methedology Internal fit-out

10 12 14 16 18 20

24 26 28 30 32

Drawings Plans Section/Elevation

34 36

Detail Drawings Foundation External wall Eave Internal structural wall Internal partition wall

38 40 42 44 46

Images Taylor Wimpey images

48

Embodied carbon calculation Cost analysis

50 51

Existing condition findings

54

3.0 CARBON COPY Alternative proposals summary Menu of components Structural solutions Foundations Insulation types Stone rainscreen Timber windows Stone roof tiles Internal partitions Internal floor finishes

4

8

58 60 62 84 86 92 106 108 110 112


114 116

Detail Drawings Foundation External wall Eave Internal structural wall Internal partition wall

118 120 122 124 126

Images Carbon copy image comparisons

128

Embodied carbon calculation Cost analysis

134 133

Carbon copy comparitive findings

136

140

Internal stone External stone Timber piles

142 146 150

5.0 FINDINGS Final comparitive findings

6.0 CATALOGUE OF MATERIAL COMPONENTS Component Catalogue

HOUSES

4.0 WHAT IF? What if? summary

ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

Drawings Plans Section/Elevation

156

158

5


6 HOUSES

1.0 INTRODUCTION

ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

7


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

1.0 INTRODUCTION

HOUSES

PURPOSE OF RESEARCH

8

Figure 1.1 Typical suburban house construction


We are in a climate emergency. The construction industry contributes an estimated 40% of total carbon emissions in the UK annually. The UK also has targets to build 300,000 new homes per year by 2025. With these two facts in mind, this research investigates the methods and envirionmental impact of the most commonly built housing typology in the UK: the suburban house. Through a detailed analysis of the existing condition, we propose alternative solutions that are both econimcally viable and radically better for the environment.

ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

SUBURBAN HOUSE TYPOLOGY

Taylor Wimpey is the UK’s largest house building company, expecting to complete 14,000 homes by the end of 2021. This project uses a typical Taylor Wimpey housing development in the village of Eynsham, Oxfordshire as a research site. Through this research, we have concluded that by changing materials and construction methedology it is possible to build a carbon copy development of that proposed by Taylor Wimpey that is faster. cheaper. greener. HOUSES

COST COMPARISON

150000 100000 50000 0

0

Existing Condition

Stone + Timber Frame

-50000

Stone + CLT

Existing Condition

Stone + CLT

Stone + Timber Frame

-100000

-20000

Large stone

-40000

kgCO2e/m3

20000

40000

Cost per house/£

200000

EMBODIED CARBON COMPARISON

9


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

1.0 INTRODUCTION

THORNBURY GREEN

TAYLOR WIMPEY Taylor Wimpey are the largest house builder in the UK, expecting to complete 14,000 homes in 2021. It is therefore pertinent to investigate how they are building these homes, how carbon intensive they are, how comfortable they are and if they can be built better. WHY THORNBURY GREEN

HOUSES

Thornbury Green is a typical Taylor Wimpey estate, in truth we could have picked any site anywhere in the country as the exact same houses are built from Penzance to Newcastle.

LOCATION Thornbury Green is located on a greenfield site in the village of Eynsham, five miles north west of Oxford. Eynsham is a commuter village for Oxford.

DATE OF CONSTRUCTION Thornbury Green is due for completion in 2021 with half of the homes already built.

CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL/METHODOLOGY

10

The houses all share a common logic no matter the typology. Perimeter concrete blockwork supports softwood timber joists and rafters that span between to make the floors and roof.


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5 HOUSES

Figure 1.2 Thornbury Green housing development

11


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

1.0 INTRODUCTION

SITE LOCATION

EYNSHAM

HOUSES

The site is a greenfield site on the western edge of the village of Eynsham in Oxfordshire, five miles north west of Oxford. The village has a population of 4648.

Figure 1.3 Satellite image of Eynsham clearly marking the Thornbury Green on the western edge

12

Figure 1.4 OS Map


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

Eynsham

HOUSES

Oxford

13


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

1.0 INTRODUCTION

SITE IMAGES

THORNBURY GREEN

14

HOUSES

The site is a greenfield site on the western edge of the village of Eynsham in Oxfordshire, five miles north west of Oxford. The village has a population of 4648.


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5 HOUSES

Figure 1.5 Thornbury Green housing development

15


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

1.0 INTRODUCTION

MASTERPLAN

SITE INFORMATION Developer Taylor Wimpey Total Homes 160 80 (Phase 1)

HOUSES

Site Area 0.074km2

MASTERPLAN KEY 2 Bedroom: 10

3 Bedroom: 44

4 Bedroom: 86

16

5 Bedroom: 20

Total GIA 20 662.30m2 10 331.15m2 (Phase 1) Total NIA 16 872.94m2 8 436.47m2 (Phase 1)


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5 HOUSES

Figure 1.6 Thornbury Green masterplan

17


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

1.0 INTRODUCTION

TYPOLOGIES 2 BED

Name: The Canford Total Units: 5 GIA: 64.01m2/Unit 320.05m2/Total NIA: 48.26m2/Unit 241.30m2/Total

HOUSES

3 BED

Name: The Gosford Total Units: 4 GIA: 80.45m2/Unit 321.80m2/Total NIA: 61.77m2/Unit 247.08m2/Total

Name: The Alton G Total Units: 10 GIA: 100.80m2/Unit 1008.00m2 NIA: 79.96m2/Unit 799.60m2/T

4 BED

Name: The Midford Total Units: 8 GIA: 108.70m2/Unit 869.60m2/Totall NIA: 79.25m2/Unit 634.00m2/Total

Name: The Marford Total Units: 28 GIA: 145.30m2/Unit 4068.40m2 NIA: 119.15m2/Unit 3336.20m2

5 BED

18

Name: The Wayford Total Units: 7 GIA: 172.33m2/Unit 1206.31m2/Total NIA: 137.87m2/Unit 965.09m2/Total

Name: The Templeton Total Units: 3 GIA: 223.62m2/Unit 670.86m2/T NIA: 172.32m2/Unit 516.96m2/T


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

/Total /Total

2

2

HOUSES

/Total Total

2

Name: The Charlbury Total Units: 8 GIA: 120.68m2/Unit 965.44m2/Total NIA: 90.47m2/Unit 723.26m2/Total

Name: The Manford Total Units: 7 GIA: 128.67m2/Unit 900.69m2/Total NIA: 104.40m2/Unit 730.80m2/Total

Total Total

19


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

1.0 INTRODUCTION

FOCUS TYPOLOGIES

HOUSES

In order to focus the study, we have selected the two most frequent typologies in the development to analyse in further depth. These include a three bedroom semi-detached house and a four bedroom detached house.

Figure 1.7 The Alton G

3 BED: THE ALTON G

Total units 10

Bedrooms 3

GIA 100.80m2/Unit

Envelope Single skin brick/ Recon stone lintels/ Triple glazing

20

NIA 79.96m2/Unit

Glazed area 7.80m2/Unit


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5 HOUSES

Figure 1.8 The Marford

4 BED: THE MARFORD

Total units 28

Bedrooms 4

GIA 128.67m2/Unit

Envelope Stone veneer / Recon stone lintels/ Triple glazing

NIA 104.40m2/Unit

Glazed area 7.80m2/Unit 21


22 HOUSES

2.0 EXISTING CONDITION

ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

23


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

2.0 EXISTING CONDITION

SUMMARY

SIMPLE BUILDINGS WITH STANDARD DETAILS Taylor Wimpey’s business model means they buy designs of houses much like you would buy a car or a jumper, they buy the rights and then they can build them wherever they like. What this means in practice is they have a set of standard details which are used all over the country that do not respond to local conditions and are completely devoid of any true character or ambition.

We have analysed the standard details to see what we can learn from how Taylow Wimpey build, where the most embodied carbon is and how we can do it better.

COST/HOUSE

Cost per house/£

0

20000 0

kgCO2e/m3

40000

100000

EMBODIED CARBON/HOUSE

Existing Condition

24

50000

HOUSES

Thornbury Green is a new build development on green build site that is a net carbon emitter so not only is the creation of these homes adding carbon to our atmosphere, they are reducing biodiversity. Secondly they are poorly insulated meaning that they are expensive to run and cost further carbon byway of heating and cooling them.

Existing Condition


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5 HOUSES

Figure 2.1 Thornbury Green housing development

25


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

2.0 EXISTING CONDITION

MENU OF COMPONENTS

FOCUS ON WALL TYPE We have focussed our analysis primarily on wall type because in such simple buildings as these, this is where carbon can be reduced most effectively.

HOUSES

C

B

A

D

Figure 2.2 3 Bedroom semi-detached house

A

D

Foundation

Internal partition wall

B

E

Wall-floor connection

Internal structural wall

C

26

Eave/Dormer


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5 HOUSES

C

B

A

E

Figure 2.3 4 Bedroom detatched house

27


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

2.0 EXISTING CONDITION

STRUCTURAL SOLUTION

SAME STRATEGY NO MATTER THE TYPOLOGY

HOUSES

All houses share a common structural strategy no matter the typology, this includes: poured reinforced concrete foundations, perimeter aircrete blockwork, concrete beam and block slab and internal softwood timber joists and rafters. The timber joists span perpendicular to the front elevation in the 3 bed house and parallel to it in the 4 bed house with an additional internal structural wall.

28

Figure 1.1 Thornbury Green housing development


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3 BED

HOUSES

4 BED

29

Softwood timber Concrete block/Reinforced concrete


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

2.0 EXISTING CONDITION

CONSTRUCTION METHODOLOGY

ON SITE LABOUR INTENSIVE None of the elements used are prefabricated off site. Footings, foundations, blockwork, the timber joists and roofing slates are all constructed on site by hand; this means that the time spent on site is long and busy. An average Taylor Wimpey site, such as Thornbury Green, has one hundred people working on it at a time.

FOOTINGS

HOUSES

Footings are 150mm reinforced concrete poured in situ.

FOUNDATIONS Foundations are constructed as a twin layer of aircrete blockwork with 100mm insulation in between.

SLAB

30

The slab is quickly constructed as a concrete beam and block floor. This sits on the foundation at 150mm above the ground with a void in between.


Structural walls are made with external aircrete blockwork.

ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

STRUCTURAL WALLS

RAINSCREEN

HOUSES

The rainscreens are either a single skin of self supporting brick or stone slates which are glued to a second layer of aircrete blockwork. The choice of rainscreen is typology dependant.

TIMBER JOISTS Softwood timber joists are cut and secured together with nail plates on site.

INSULATION Glass mineral wool is sprayed into the cavity after the walls are built. This method is quick but can result in an uneven result.

31


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

2.0 EXISTING CONDITION

INTERNAL FIT-OUT

FINISH HEAVY

32

HOUSES

The basic construction components mean that many layers of finish are required in order to make the homes comfortably habitable. This includes the use of plasterboard and paint, wallpaper or tiles on walls, plasterboard and paint on soffits and carpet or porcelain tiles on floors. All of these finishes are areas to target to reduce the overall embodied carbon of each house.


Ceramic tiling Carpet Paint Wallpaper Softwood radiator cover Softwood skirting

KITCHENS

ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HALLWAYS

Ceramic tiling Paint Chipboard/melamine surfaces Softwood skirtings Curtains

LIVING SPACES HOUSES

Carpet Paint Wallpaper Softwood skirting

BEDROOMS Carpet Paint Wallpaper Softwood skirting Curtains

BATHROOM Ceramic tiling Paint Plastic bathrub Porcelain loo and sink

33


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

2.0 EXISTING CONDITION

PLAN

HOUSES

3 BED

4 BED

34

0m

1

2


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

35


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

2.0 EXISTING CONDITION

SECTION/ELEVATION

HOUSES

3 BED

36

0m

1

2


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

37


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

2.0 EXISTING CONDITION

FOUNDATION DETAIL 3 BED

2

1

HOUSES

3

5 4

VOID

6

1

38

2

Wall Brick 100mm glass mineral wool insulation Wall cavity tie Concrete blockwork DPM Wall finish 12mm plasterboard

3

Paint 12x100mm softwood skirting

4

Slab Concrete beam and block floor system

Floor finish Carpet Underlay 75mm concrete screed 75mm rigid insulation DPM

5

Foundation wall Concrete block 100mm EPS insulation

6

Footing 150mm reinforced concrete


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

4 BED

2

1

3

HOUSES

5 4

VOID

6

1

2

Wall Limestone veneer Concrete blockwork 100mm glass mineral wool insulation Wall cavity tie DPM Wall finish 12mm plasterboard

3

Paint 12x100mm softwood skirting

4

Slab Concrete beam and block floor system

Floor finish Carpet Underlay 75mm concrete screed 75mm rigid insulation DPM

5

Foundation wall Concrete block 100mm EPS insulation

6

Footing 150mm reinforced concrete

39


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

2.0 EXISTING CONDITION

EXTERNAL WALL DETAIL 3 BED

HOUSES

1

2

3

4

1

40

2

Wall finish 12mm plasterboard Paint 12x100mm softwood skirting Floor finish Carpet Underlay 75mm concrete screed

75mm rigid insulation DPM 3

Slab Concrete beam and block floor system

4

Wall 100mm concrete block 100mm glass mineral

wool insulation Wall cavity ties 5

Footing 150mm reinforced concrete


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

4 BED

1

HOUSES

2

3

4

1

2

Wall finish 12mm plasterboard Paint 12x100mm softwood skirting Floor finish Carpet Underlay 75mm concrete screed

75mm rigid insulation DPM 3

Slab Concrete beam and block floor system

4

Wall 100mm concrete block 100mm glass mineral

wool insulation Wall cavity ties 5

Footing 150mm reinforced concrete

41


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

2.0 EXISTING CONDITION

EAVE DETAIL 3 BED AND 4 BED

HOUSES

1

2 4

3

5

1

42

2

Roof build-up Cement fibre tiles Softwood timber batten Waterproof membrane Softwood timber rafters Mineral wool insulation Gutter Plastic gutter Underlay

3

Fascia Plastic fascia board Softwood timber batten

4

Wall 100mm concrete block 12mm plasterboard Paint

5

Soffit 100mm glass mineral wool insulation 12mm plasterboard Paint

6

Window uPVC triple glazed window Steel lintel angle


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

43


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

2.0 EXISTING CONDITION

INTERNAL STRUCTURAL WALL DETAIL 3 BED (PARTY WALL)

1

HOUSES

2

VOID

VOID

3 4

5

1

44

2

Wall finish 12mm plasterboard Paint 12x100mm softwood skirting Floor finish Carpet Underlay 75mm concrete screed

75mm rigid insulation DPM 3

Slab Concrete beam and block floor system

4

Wall 100mm concrete block 100mm glass mineral

wool insulation Wall cavity ties 5

Footing 150mm reinforced concrete


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

4 BED

1

2

HOUSES

VOID

VOID

3 4

5

1

2

Wall finish 12mm plasterboard Paint 12x100mm softwood skirting Floor finish Carpet Underlay 75mm concrete screed

75mm rigid insulation DPM 3

Slab Concrete beam and block floor system

4

Wall 100mm concrete block 100mm glass mineral

wool insulation Wall cavity ties 5

Footing 150mm reinforced concrete

45


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

2.0 EXISTING CONDITION

INTERNAL PARTITION WALL DETAIL 3 BED AND 4 BED

1

HOUSES

2

VOID

3

1

46

2

Wall 90mm metsec frame 12mm plasterboard Paint 12x100mm softwood skirting Floor finish Carpet Underlay

75mm rigid insulation DPM 3

Slab Concrete beam and block floor system


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

47


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

2.0 EXISTING CONDITION

IMAGES

48

HOUSES

3 BED


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

4 BED

HOUSES

49


HOUSES

ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

2.0 EXISTING CONDITION

EMBODIED CARBON

MATERIAL

ELEMENT

VOLUME M3

EMBODIED CARBON KGCO2E

Concrete

Strip foundation

3

1597

Blockwork

Walls

45

12,799

Limestone

Veneer

7

1298

Softwood

Stud partitions

2

-1,139

Softwood

Floor joists

n/a

-351

Concrete

Beam and block floor

11

3119

Concrete

Screed

2

1832

Plywood

Floor

2

-622

Plasterboard

Internal lining

6

1567

Fibre cement

Roof tiles

3

949

Softwood

Roof trusses

4

-2291

Mineral wool

Insulation

47

698

Glass

Windows

<1

380

Limestone

Sills and lintels

<1

74

50

TOTAL/HOUSE

19,737


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

COST ANALYSIS

ELEMENT

QUANTITY M2

COST £

Concrete

Strip foundation

3

239

Blockwork

Walls

45

24,352

Limestone

Veneer

7

2061

Softwood

Stud partitions

2

2840

Softwood

Floor joists

176

1753

Concrete

Beam and block floor

11

8765

Concrete

Screed

2

509

Plywood

Floor

2

1525

Plasterboard

Internal lining

6

9194

Fibre cement

Roof tiles

3

216

Softwood

Roof trusses

4

1028

Mineral wool

Insulation

47

17,317

Glass

Windows

<1

6750

Limestone

Sills and lintels

<1

117

TOTAL/HOUSE

HOUSES

MATERIAL

76,665

51


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

2.0 EXISTING CONDITION

FINDINGS

CARBON INTENSIVE SIMPLE BUILDINGS The analysis of the existing condition has showed us that while these are incredibly simple buildings they are very carbon intensive. The homes are cheap to build but expensive to run because their insulation is so poor. Finally they are not site specific and therefore do not take into account local geology meaning that the standard Taylor Wimpey details may not be sufficient - again putting the onus on repair and maitenance by the home owner over due dilligance and quality from the start.

COST/HOUSE

Cost per house/£

0

20000 0

kgCO2e/m3

Existing Condition

52

50000

100000

EMBODIED CARBON/HOUSE 40000

HOUSES

The foundations, structure and many layers of finish are the three principal components we must focus on to propose a carbon negative carbon copy.

Existing Condition


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

53


54 HOUSES

3.0 CARBON COPY

ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

55


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

SUMMARY

GREENER, CHEAPER, FASTER In order to reduce the overall emboided carbon, we bagan by changing the most carbon intensive elements of the existing structural solution - the reinforced concrete and concrete blocks. Why use concrete when you can use the inherient strength of stone in a carbon negative and more efficient process?

Our investigations show that with extended thinking about material qualities, construction methods and flow chains that it is possible to build carbon copies of the Taylor Wimpey design that are both economically viable and provably better for the environment. COST COMPARISON

-40000

56

150000 100000 50000 0

0

Existing Condition

Large stone

-50000

-20000

kgCO2e/m3

20000

40000

Cost per house/£

40000

40000

200000

EMBODIED CARBON COMPARISON

Existing Condition

Stone + CLT

Stone + Timber Frame

-100000

HOUSES

Above the foundations, we have investigated two all timber options, one timber frame and one CLT to assess which method is the greenest, fastest and cheapest. Timber has been selected as the structural solution due to the truly renewable quality of trees. Within our assessment we have looked equally at material sourcing, processing, transportation, construction, cost and resultant occupant comfort for both options in order to come to a valid conclusion of which method is best: stone with a timber frame.

Stone + CLT

Stone + Timber Frame


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5 HOUSES

Figure 3.1 4 Bedroom carbon copy

168%

24%

EMBODIED CARBON

PROJECT COST

57


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

MENU OF COMPONENTS

CARBON COPY COMPONENTS All the components analysed in the existing condition have been redrawn according to our research to show how our carbon copy how that is cheaper, greener and faster can be built.

HOUSES

C

B

A

D

Figure 3.2 3 Bedroom carbon copy

A

D

Foundation

Internal partition wall

B

E

Wall-floor connection

Internal structural wall

C

58

Eave/Dormer


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5 HOUSES

C

B

A

E Figure 3.3 4 Bedroom carbon copy

59


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

STRUCTURAL SOLUTION A - TIMBER FRAME

TIMBER I-JOISTS External timber I-joist frame. The internal plan is kept structurally free to allow for future flexibility. This method can be built by hand using similar construction methods as Taylor Wimpey’s current model. Time on site is longer than CLT but overall material quantity is far less. EMBODIED CARBON

HOUSES

-703kgCO2e/m3

60

Figure 3.4 Timber I-joist structural iso


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5 HOUSES

Figure 3.5 Timber I-joist construction

61


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

FABRICATION A - TIMBER FRAME

TIMBER I-JOISTS

HOUSES

Traditional timber framing uses simple softwood studs to form the structural frame. We are using the timber frame system used in passivhaus buildings where timber I-joists comprised of two small softwood timber sections connected and stiffened by a 12mm OSB sheet. This allows us to create a deep insulation cavity and achieve a low u-value with the most minimal amount of material possible. OSB must undergo a secondary process which of course increases its carbon footprint but it is still predominately carbon sequestering timber and makes use of waste material so is inherintly sustainable. The largest manufacturer of timber I-joists in Europe is located in Scotland. Joists are manufactured and cut to length in the factory therefore reducing waste and time spent on site.

62

Figure 3.6 Timber I-joist fabrication at James Jones in Scotland


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

FABRICATION PROCESS

HOUSES

COMPONENTS Softwood timber - 100% OSB - softwood timber strands 95% - resin and wax 5%

Figure 3.7 Timber I-joist

63


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

TRANSPORTATION A - TIMBER FRAME

EFFICIENT STACKING Transporting timber I beams is incredibly efficient; in each lorry, enough timber for three houses can fit in. This efficiency coupled with the short transport distance from Scotland means the embodied carbon on bringing it to site is very low - nearly seven times as less than CLT.

HOUSES

n.b. Embodied carbon has been calculated assuming lorries are fully loaded on delivery to site and empty upon return.

64

Figure 3.8 Timber I-joist transportation


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

600 KM

HOUSES

Figure 3,9 Option A transport route

3 BUILDINGS/LORRY

48 JOURNEYS 59.6 TONNES CO2E Figure 3.10 Option A transport analysis

65


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

CONSTRUCTION A - TIMBER FRAME

RELATIVELY LONG ON SITE COMPARED TO CLT Constructing a timber frame house is not dificult nor is it long in comparison to the masonry walls of the existing condition. Members come precut from the factory so there is no on site cutting required. Pieces are nail gunned together before being panelled and filled with insulation.

HOUSES

In comparison to CLT, this is a labour intensive and time consuming method.

66

Figure 3.11 Timber I-joist construction


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

67


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

FINISH A - TIMBER FRAME

TIMBER PANELLING REQUIRED

HOUSES

Timber panels must be fixed to the inside of the insulated timber frame to make the walls of the homes, this of course is an extra source of material and cost associated with this method. Instead of using the current system of plasterboard and paint or wallpaper however, veneered plywood panelling can be used with the higher cost compared to plasterboard offset by the lack of final finishes. Time on site and labour costs are reduced by not requiring extra decoration.

68

Figure 3.13 Veneered plywood wall panelling


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

1

2

HOUSES

Figure 3.14 Timber I-joist component iso

1

Limestone wall 75mm limestone Waterproof membrane 15mm Plywood 300mm insulation

2

Timber frame 300mm Timber I-joist 12mm veneered plywood panelling

69


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

STRUCTURAL SOLUTION B - CLT

PREFABRICATION External CLT frame. The internal plan is kept structurally free to allow for future flexibility. This method is prefabricated off-site and brought to site flat pack therefore minimising on-site time and transportation emissions. This is quick and simple to construct but overall the material quanitity is higher than a timber frame as is the required timber quality.

EMBODIED CARBON

HOUSES

-841kgCO2e/m3

70

Figure 3.15 CLT structural iso


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

Figure 3.16 CLT construction

71


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

FABRICATION B - CLT

FINISH READY IN THE FACTORY

HOUSES

CLT is comprised of timber lengths being glued together into panels. This process increases the strength of the timber and means that wall panels can be made to the exact dimensions required with all openings precut in the factory. Machine precision means that time reduces waste and time on site. The massive nature of CLT panels means that technically a lot of carbon is sequestered per house houwever the amount of material used is far greater than in timber frame. From an environmental and cost perspective therefore, CLT is less appropriate for this typology.

72

Figure 3.17 CLT fabrication in the factory


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

FABRICATION PROCESS

HOUSES

COMPONENTS CLT - Softwood timber >99% - Adhesive <1%

Figure 3.18 CLT

73


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

TRANSPORTATION B - CLT

FLAT PACK CLT panels are transported as individual flat pack panels to site for assembly. Transporting panels over completed homes saves carbon because the amount of wasted space on each truck is reduced dramatically so less lorry loads are required. Even so, each building (single detached house or two semi-detached houses) will require its own lorry to transport. Currently there are no CLT manufactures in the UK so all panels will have to come from Austria meaning transporting CLT uses nearly seven times as much carbon compared to timber frame.

HOUSES

n.b. Embodied carbon has been calculated assuming lorries are fully loaded on delivery to site and empty upon return.

74

Figure 3.19 CLT transportation


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

1520 KM

HOUSES

Figure 3.20 Option B transport route

1 BUILDING/LORRY

142 JOURNEYS 404.7 TONNES CO2E Figure 3.21 Option B transport analysis

75


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

CONSTRUCTION B - CLT

QUICK CONSTRUCTION

HOUSES

There are 42 pieces per house, all of which come precut and drilled so simply need to be craned into postion when they arrive on site. A house can be erected in more or less a day.

76

Figure 3.22 CLT construction


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

77


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

FINISH B - CLT

NO EXTRA FINISHES

HOUSES

CLT panels require not supplementary finishes such as paint or wallpaper because of the natural beauty of the timber. Not only is this better for the environment and cost but it is also better for occupant health with scientific studies proving the wellbeing benefits of living in timber homes.

78

Figure 3.24 Barrett’s Grove, Groupwork


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

1

2

HOUSES

Figure 3.25 CLT component iso

1

Limestone wall 75mm limestone Waterproof membrane 15mm Plywood 300mm insulation

2

CLT 100mm CLT fire coated panel

79


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

STRUCTURAL FINDINGS

OPTION A - TIMBER FRAME Timber frame is the best option for these houses. Technically they do not have such a high negative embodied carbon as CLT but this is because the material needed is so much less. The most sustainable thing is to leaves trees in the ground so following embodied carbon figures alone is misguided - timber frame is still negative. Secondly the cost of timber frame is dramatically cheaper as is the embodied carbon of transporting it to site. Time on site may be slightly longer than CLT but any costs associated with this are fully offset by the material price.

150000

Timber Frame

80

100000 75000 25000 0

Cost per house/£

-20000 -50000 -60000

-40000

-30000

kgCO2e/m3

-10000

125000

0

CLT

COST COMPARISON

50000

HOUSES

EMBODIED CARBON COMPARISON

CLT

Timber Frame


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5 HOUSES

Figure 3.26 Timber I-joist construction iso

81


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

FOUNDATIONS

CLAY SOIL The site sits on clay soil. Clay is succeptible to heaving and settling, this is where the ground water content chanegs and the earth can increase by 150mm (heave) or decrease by 150mm (settle), both are detrimental to the structure of a building. In order to limit it’s effects, deep pads are more appropriate than the existing condition of shallow strip foundation. The void between the earth and the underside of the floor must also increase to 300mm to withstand the potential +/-150mm differential.

HOUSES

2m deep limestone pad foundation limit the potential damage from the soil and also drastically reduce embodied carbon. The large cost increase could be thought to be offset over the lifespan of each building as it is less likely to require maintenence.

EYNSHAM

Figure 3.27 Geology map showing the clay soils of the Cotswolds

Clay soil

COST COMPARISON

1200 400 0

0

Concrete strip

82

800

Cost per house/£

800 400

kgCO2e/m3

1200

1600

1600

EMBODIED CARBON COMPARISON

Limestone pads

Concrete strip

Limestone pads


150 750

312x35000x150mm reinforced concrete

ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

EXISTING CONCRETE STRIP

PROPOSED STONE PADS HOUSES

2000

300

600x600x300mm limestone

2700

2700

2700

HEAVING

SETTLING

Increase in soil water level +150mm

Decrease in soil water level -150mm

83


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

INSULATION TYPES

SAME STRATEGY NO MATTER THE TYPOLOGY

HOUSES

The current Taylor Wimpey standard wall build-up achieves a u-value of 0.25W/m2K, using 100mm of blown glass mineral wool insulation. Not only does this mean the houses are not sufficiently warm on their own and therefore rely on expensive, usually carbon intensive heating but the embodied carbon on the material itself is incredibly high at +1.86kgCO2e/ kg. We have investigated several alternative insulation materials, assessing their thermal conductivity, embodied carbon and u-value achievement at different thicknesses using different wall build-ups. We are aiming to improve the u-value of these homes to passivhaus standard 0.15W/m2K while simulataneously reducing the environmental impact of constructing with our chosen insulation. Passivhaus standard has been chosen as a target because its performance can be quantifiably proved excellent and will not result in excessively thick walls. Hemp Batts provide a good thermal conductivity and are carbon negative. EXISTING

U-VALUE 0.25W/m2K

PROPOSED

84

TARGET U-VALUE 0.15W/m2K


Mineral

Image: Knauf Insulation

0.034 W/mK Embodied Carbon: Embodied Carbon: +1.12 kgCO2e/kg +0.63 kgCO2e/kg Embodied Carbon: Thermal Conductivity: GLASS MINERAL WOOL kgCO2e/kg Embodied carbon +1.86 Thermal Conductivity: +1.86kgCO e/kg 0.035-0.038 W/mK Embodied Carbon: 0.038 W/mK Thermal conductivity Thermal Conductivity: +0.98 kgCO2e/kg 0.034W/m k Embodied Carbon: Carbon: 0.034 W/mK +0.63 kgCO2e/kg kgCO2e/kg +1.12 MINERAL WOOL Embodied carbon Thermal Conductivity: +1.12kgCO e/kg Thermal conductivity 0.037 W/mK Conductivity: Thermal Conductivity:

al edWool Mineral paper

Wood al Wool led paper

2

2

0.035W/m2k

Image: Knauf Insulation

2

2

Image: STEICO Protect Dry Image: Image:Architects RockwoolJournal

2

2

2

Image: STEICO Protect Dry Image: Wynnes Image: Architects Journal Image: Rockwool

2

2

Image: Celtic Sustainables Image: Wynnes Image: STEICO Protect Dry

2

Image: Architects Journal

2

2

Image: Celtic Sustainables Image: Black Mountain Image: Wynnes Image: STEICO Protect Dry

2

2

0.039 W/mK Thermal Conductivity: Conductivity: Embodied Carbon: Thermal 0.039W/mK W/mK Unknown 0.18

Image: Black Mountain Image: Celtic Sustainables

Image: Wynnes

85

Batts ps tedWool Lime r Batts

Image: Rockwool Image: Architects Journal

HOUSES

ps tedWool Lime Bales r

Image: Knauf Insulation

2

0.038 W/mK W/mK 0.035-0.038 Embodied Carbon: Embodied Carbon: RIGID WOOD FIBRE Embodied carbon +0.98 kgCO2e/kg +0.98kgCO e/kg +0.01 kgCO2e/kg Embodied Carbon: Carbon: Thermal conductivity Embodied 0.037W/m k +0.63 kgCO2e/kg kgCO2e/kg Thermal Conductivity: +1.12 Thermal Conductivity: 0.037 W/mK Embodied Carbon: 0.048 W/mK INSULATED LIME PLASTER Conductivity: Embodied carbon Thermal Thermal Conductivity: +0.78 kgCO2e/kg +0.78kgCO e/kg Embodied Carbon: Embodied Carbon: 0.038 W/mK Thermal conductivity 0.035-0.038 W/mK +0.01 kgCO2e/kg kgCO2e/kg 0.018W/m k +0.98 Embodied Carbon: Thermal Conductivity: +0.63 kgCO2e/kg 0.18 W/mK Thermal Conductivity: Thermal Conductivity: RECYCLED NEWSPAPER 0.048 W/mK W/mK Embodied carbon 0.037 +0.63kgCO e/kg Embodied Carbon: Thermal Conductivity: Embodied Carbon: Thermal conductivity +0.78W/mK kgCO2e/kg 0.038W/m k 0.038 -1.28 kgCO2e/kg Embodied Carbon: Carbon: Embodied STRAW BALES Embodied carbon +0.01 kgCO2e/kg kgCO2e/kg Thermal Conductivity: +0.98 +0.01kgCO e/kg Thermal Conductivity: Thermal conductivity 0.18 W/mK 0.048W/m k 0.039 W/mK Thermal Conductivity: Thermal Conductivity: Embodied Carbon: Embodied Carbon: 0.048 W/mK 0.037 W/mK -1.28 kgCO2e/kg SHEEP’S WOOL+0.78 kgCO2e/kg Embodied carbon +0.07kgCO e/kg Embodied Carbon: Thermal conductivity Thermal Conductivity: +0.01 kgCO2e/kg 0.039W/m k Thermal Conductivity: 0.039 W/mK 0.18 W/mK Thermal Conductivity: HEMP BATTS Embodied Carbon: Embodied carbon -0.63kgCO e/kg 0.048 W/mK Unknown Thermal conductivity Embodied Carbon: Carbon: Embodied 0.039W/m k -1.28 kgCO2e/kg +0.78 kgCO2e/kg Thermal Conductivity:

Wood Bales led al Wool paper ted Lime Wood rBales ed paper ted Lime s Wool rBales Wood

Image: Rockwool

ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

n Types

+1.12 kgCO2e/kg Embodied Carbon: +1.86 kgCO2e/kg Thermal Conductivity: 0.035-0.038 W/mK Thermal Conductivity:


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

WALL THICKNESS STUDIES TARGET: 0.15W/M2K (PASSIVHAUS) Investigating how thick wall build-ups will be with specific insulation thicknesses and the u-values that can be achieved. Numbers in red are equal to or less than the required 0.15W/M2K Passivhaus standard. 312

312

MATERIAL

HOUSES

TW STANDARD

312

312

312

387

387

387

175MM 387

387

231

306

306

231

231

306

306

Glass mineral wool Recycled newspaper Mineral wool Wood fibre Sheep’s wool Hemp231 Straw bale

0.25 0.27 0.27 0.26 0.27 0.27 0.31

Glass mineral wool 0.16 Recycled newspaper 0.17 Mineral wool 0.16 Wood fibre 0.16 Sheep’s wool 0.17 306 Hemp 306 0.18 Straw bale 0.21

350

350

425

425

350

350

425

425

302

350

Glass mineral wool Recycled newspaper Mineral wool Wood fibre Sheep’s wool Hemp 302 Straw bale

0.29 0.32 0.32 0.31 0.32 0.32 0.38

425

425

Glass mineral wool Recycled newspaper Mineral wool Wood fibre Sheep’s wool Hemp 377 Straw bale

0.18 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.20 377 0.20 0.24

302

302

377

377

302

302

377

377

Glass mineral wool Recycled newspaper Mineral wool Wood fibre Sheep’s wool Hemp Straw bale

86

387

231

350

STONE + TIMBER FRAME

INSULATION THICKNESS 100MM (TW STANDARD)

231

STONE + CLT

312

0.31 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.41

Glass mineral wool Recycled newspaper Mineral wool Wood fibre Sheep’s wool Hemp Straw bale

0.20 0.22 0.20 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.26


462

462

537

537

537

612

612

612

462

462

462

537

537

537

612

612

612

250MM 387

387

325MM

462

462

400MM

462

537

537

537

612

381

381

381

457

457

457

531

531

531

381

381

381

457

457

457

531

531

531

0.12 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.16

Glass mineral wool Recycled newspaper Mineral wool Wood fibre Sheep’s wool 381 381 Hemp Straw bale

0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 457 0.09 0.13

Glass mineral wool Recycled newspaper Mineral wool Wood fibre Sheep’s wool457 Hemp Straw bale

0.08 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.09 457 0.09 0.11

531

500

500

500

575

575

575

650

650

650

500

500

500

575

575

575

650

650

650

425

452

452

425

452

377

500

Glass mineral wool Recycled newspaper Mineral wool Wood fibre Sheep’s wool 452 452 Hemp Straw bale

377

0.13 0.14 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.17

452

527

452

Glass mineral wool Recycled newspaper Mineral wool Wood fibre Sheep’s wool Hemp Straw bale

500

452

0.17 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.14 0.20

500

Glass mineral wool Recycled newspaper Mineral wool Wood fibre Sheep’s wool 527Hemp 527 Straw bale

527

452

Glass mineral wool Recycled newspaper Mineral wool Wood fibre Sheep’s wool Hemp Straw bale

575

0.10 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.11 527 0.11 0.14

527

527

0.14 0.11 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.16

575

Glass mineral wool Recycled newspaper Mineral wool Wood fibre Sheep’s wool 602 Hemp Straw bale

0.08 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.11

575

602

527

Glass mineral wool Recycled newspaper Mineral wool Wood fibre Sheep’s wool Hemp Straw bale

527

612

HOUSES

306

Glass mineral wool Recycled newspaper Mineral wool Wood fibre Sheep’s wool 306 381 Hemp Straw bale

ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

462

650

602

602

602

602

531

650

602

602

0.11 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.13

87


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

WALL THICKNESS NEIGHBOURHOOD STUDY

EXTEND BACKWARDS, NOT SIDEWAYS Our insulation studies have shown that we must increase the overall wall build-up to a minimum of 452mm. Using a timber frame reduces the overall build-up by 48mm compared to CLT for equivalent u-values.

HOUSES

Increasing wall build-up will of course impinge on NIA, therefore we have studied whether it is possible to expand out in all directions or if we must keep the same external width as is currently planned and increase the depth of the buildings. It has been concluded that house width cannot be increased with the existing masterplan (which we are keeping the same) but there is space to extend back into the large private garden of each house. Therefore we are elongating the plan of each house in order to accomdate the increase in wall build-up without reducing NIA.

88

Figure 3.28 Each house has a large private garden that can be utilised slightly to accept the improved thicker wallls


9450

ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

EXISTING CONDITION

NIA 3B: 79.96m2 NIA 4B: 119.15m2

OFFSETTING EQUALLY OUT - TOO TIGHT FOR DRIVEWAYS

HOUSES

9750

NIA 3B: 79.96m2 NIA 4B: 119.15m2

EXTENDING BACK

100050

NIA 3B: 79.96m2 NIA 4B: 119.15m2

89


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

STONE RAINSCREEN

WHY STONE?

HOUSES

Oolitic limestone is vernacular to the Cotswolds region, it has been quarried and built with for centuries. Not only is limestone a contextual choice but also a clear environmental choice as stone has 35% of the carbon emissions of brick. Stone is quarried, minimally processed and brought to site. Concrete blocks or bricks must be quarried, crushed, mixed, fired and then only after all that brought to site. The following investigation outlines how we detail the stone and what effects this has on appearance and construction metheodology as well as carbon emissions.

90

Figure 3.29 Tyoical Cotswolds cottage


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

800

STONE QUARRYING

400 200

CONCRETE BLOCK MAKING

Stone

Brick

Concrete block

Figure 3.30 Comparitive embodied carbon of different rainscreen materials

HOUSES

0

kgCO2e/m3

600

BRICK FIRING

Figure 3.31 Geology map showing the band of oolitic limestone that runs through the Cotswolds

91


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

HAND LIFTABLE STONES

SAME CONSTRUCTION METHEDOLOGY AS EXISTING Currently Taylor Wimpey use bricks or stone slips constructed by hand to form their rainscreen facades in front of the structural concrete block walls which are also built by bricklayers. This test explores keeping the same construction methedology but replacing brick/concrete blocks with self supporting limetstone blocks. Limestone has a density of 2400kg/m3. We have used this to get the dimensions of a limestone block that weighs no more than 19kg and is 125mm deep.

HOUSES

EXISTING CONDITION

BRICK

CONCRETE BLOCK

112.5x215x65mm 2.75kg

440x215x100mm 19kg

LIMESTONE

LIMESTONE BLOCK

92

400x200x125mm 19.2kg


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

EMBODIED CARBON/HOUSE Stone thickness: 125mm Stone volume: 25.6m3 Carbon: 4663kg

HOUSES

Figure 3.32 Liftable stone facade

93


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

SAFE STONE BANDING

EXPRESSION WITHIN THE FACADE The Health and Safety England guidance on safe lifiting limits in the workplace shows the amount of weight a person can lift by hand at which height they can lift it. Using this, we can size stones accordingly in bands and express the mode of construction through the facade so the simple stone wall starts to tell a tale.

410

HOUSES

410 410

94

410

19.2kg

9.6kg

200x200x125mm

400x200x125mm

500x200x125mm

2090

410

9.6kg


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

EMBODIED CARBON/HOUSE Stone thickness: 125mm Stone volume: 25.6m3 Carbon: 4663kg

HOUSES

Figure 3.33 Liftable stone banding facade

95


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

LARGE STONES

40% LESS STONE REQUIRED If a crane is used, the stone facade be made of large sections that act as rainscreen and lintel all in one. Large stones retain the innate structural stability of the stone therefore the thickness of stones slim from 125mm to just 75mm, reducing the material quantity and cost by 40%. The speed of construction compared to a hand built facade will reduce time on site further reducing costs.

HOUSES

Large stones are sized at a maximum of 1000x2000mm so they are not too brittle in transit. This means that they can still be used efficiently to create window openings so extra lintels are not required - further reducing material, cost and carbon.

96

Figure 3.34 Lyon Housing, Gilles Perraudin


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

EMBODIED CARBON/HOUSE Stone thickness: 75mm Stone volume: 16m3 Carbon: 2914kg

HOUSES

Figure 3.34 Large stone facade

97


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

LARGE STONES INTEGRATED LINTELS + PORCH FASTER, GREENER The existing condition homes currently have small porch canopies built from painted timber, composite concrete roof tiles and lead. Additionally, reconstituted stone lintels sit above each window.

HOUSES

Using large stones enables us to integrate lintels and a porch canopy into the facade, minimising time on site, reducing material and reducing carbon.

98

Figure 1.1 Thornbury Green housing development


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

Figure 1.1 Thornbury Green housing development

HOUSES

Figure 3.35 Integrated lintels and porch stone

99


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

STONE SLIPS

MUCH MORE CARBON INTENSIVE

HOUSES

The exisitng methedology for Taylor Wimpey stone rainscreens is to use stone slips. Taylor Wimpey glue their slips to a layer of concrete blockwork behind but as we have estabalished that a timber frame building is far less carbon intensive, we must use a secondary structure of galvanised steel for slips to hang from. Such a system has nealy 4 times the embodied carbon as liftable self supporting stone and 6.5 times the embodied carbon of large self supporting stone.

100

Figure 1.1 Thornbury Green housing development


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

EMBODIED CARBON/HOUSE Stone slip volume: 10mm Stone slip volume: 6.5m3 Stone slip carbon: 1298kg Galvanised steel secondary structure volume: 1m3 Galvanised steel secondary structure carbon: 16882kg Total carbon: 18,180kg

HOUSES

Figure 3.36 Stone slip facade

101


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

STONE RAINSCREEN FINDINGS

LARGE STONES

Figure 3,37 Comparitive rainscreen embodied carbon per house

12,000 0

4000

8000

kgCO2e/m3

16,000

HOUSES

20,000

Our studies have shown that using large stones has nearly half the embodied carbon of liftable stones and nearly six times less than stone slips with a secondary steel structure. Additionally, this methedology removes the need for lintels and porches so will further save on embodied carbon. Finally the small number of pieces per house means that construction time will be quick so labour cost can be saved.

102

Liftable stone

Large stone

Stone slips + steel structure


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

Figure 3.38 4 bedroom carbon copy

103


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

STONE ROOF TILES

LIMESTONE OR SLATE? Taylor Wimpey use cement fibre tiles which only have a lifespan of 30 years. To make a cement fibre tile, stone must be quarried, crushed, fired, mixed and set. In contrast stone can be used for roofing which has a lifespan of 80100 years and the only processing required is quarrying and cutting to size. Immediately the environmental and carbon benefits of stone are clear.

HOUSES

Vernacular roofing in the Cotswolds typically uses ‘stone slates’, these are the local limestone handcut into tiles. They are naturally rough and thick therefore require a pitch of 50-55o to allow for adequate run-off. Welsh slate is another typical roofing material in the UK. Welsh slate is naturally very smooth and can be cut thinly so the pitch and overall material quantity can be much less than Cotswolds stone slates. We are proposing to use Welsh slate to minimise material, wasted loft space and maximise long lasting environmental benefits.

0.6 0

0.4

kgCO2e/m3

0.8

1

EMBODIED CARBON COMPARISON

104

Cement tiles

Stone slates

Welsh slate


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

COTSWOLDS STONE SLATES

Figure 3.39 Cotswold stone slate requires a roof pitch of 50o

HOUSES

WELSH SLATE

Figure 3.40 Welsh slate can use the same pitch as the existing condition

105


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

TIMBER WINDOWS

VELFAC WINDOWS Plastic is one of the chief material issues plaguing our planet today. Windows can be made of recylced uPVC however, the process of dissasembling, melting and moulding them into new windows is extremely fuel intensive so far from ideal. Secondly, using plastic windows on houses designed to be environmentally friendly is antithetical to that ethos.

As a component, these windows are more expensive than the existing condition but they can be afforded through savings elsewhere. Velfac over uPVC windows also have a visual benefit that cannot be ignored.

COST COMPARISON

Cost per house/£

0

1 0

kgCO2e/kg

2

200

3

300

4

400

EMBODIED CARBON COMPARISON

100

HOUSES

Timber windows undergo far fewer processes in becoming a window but must be externally treated (with oil, wax, paint or similar) to prevent decay. Velfac windows are a composite of external aluminium and internal timber which means that they do not require much maintenance and still sequester carbon.

2

-200

1

-100

uPVC

106

uPVC

Velfac

Velfac


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

UPVC

Figure 3.41 uPVC windows

HOUSES

VELFAC

Figure 3.42 Timber velfac windows

107


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

TIMBER INTERNAL PARTITIONS

GREENER, CHEAPER

20000

EMBODIED CARBON COMPARISON

10000 5000 -5000

0

kgCO2e/m3

15000

HOUSES

The existing methedology for internal partition walls is a metsec frame with plasterboard finished with either paint or wallpaper. Metsec frames are quick to construct because they come pre-cut and drilled however a simple stud wall of softwood timber is equally easy to build, greener and cheaper. 15mm pine veneered plywood lines the partitions instead of plasterboard and an ancillary finish; this is more expensive but offset by the cheaper studwork and lack of need for extra layers of finish which not only reduce material costs but labour costs as well.

108

Metsec

Softwood Timber


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

METSEC

HOUSES

Figure 3.43 Existing condition metsec partitions and internal fit out

SOFTWOOD TIMBER

Figure 3.44 Proposed softwood timber partitions and veneered ply lining

109


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

TIMBER AND STONE FLOOR FINISHES

CARBON SEQUESTERING FLOORS Currently Taylor Wimpey use carpet or porcelain tiles throughout their houses. Carpet cannot be easily recycled and is often the first thing new owners will look to change; it also requires underlay which is equally difficult to recycle fully. Porcelain tiles require quarrying clay, firing, glazing and firing again so while cheap are very carbon intensive to fabricate.

HOUSES

Hardwood timber floors are not often replaced by new owners so not only do they sequester carbon, they reduce material wastage over the lifespan of the building. Limestone simply requires quarrying and cutting before it can be laid. Limestone should be finished with a biodegradable wax layer to protect it from stains. We are proposing to use hardwood timber floors throughout with the exception of bathrooms where limestone will be laid.

1 2

1

0

kgCO2e/kg

2

3

4

EMBODIED CARBON COMPARISON

110

Carpet

Porcelain Tile

Hardwood Timber

Limestone


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

CARPET AND TILE

HOUSES

Figure 3.45 Existing condition is mostly carpet and large areas of tile

TIMBER AND STONE

Figure 3.46 Proposed timber floors thorugh except for bathrooms where limestone is used

111


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

PLAN

HOUSES

3 BED

00

01

4 BED

112

0m

1

2

00

01


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

02

113


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

SECTION/ELEVATION

HOUSES

3 BED

4 BED

114

0m

1

2


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

115


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

FOUNDATION DETAIL 3 BED AND 4 BED

1

HOUSES

2

VOID

116

1


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5 HOUSES

1

Wall 300mm timber I-joist frame 300mm hemp batt insulation 12mm veneered plywood 12x100mm softwood skirting

2

Floor 12mm Hardwood timber floor 22mm plywood 50x25mm Softwood timber battens Acoustic insulation Timber I-Joist Hemp batt insulation DPM

3

Foundation 2x75mm limestone block 150mm EPS insulation Vented opening 400x400x600 limestone plinth 600x600x300 limestone footing Reinforced concrete

117


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

EXTERNAL WALL DETAIL 3 BED AND 4 BED

3

HOUSES

1

2

118

1

118

Wall 75mm limestone 50mm air gap Waterproof membrane 300mm timber I-joist frame 300mm hemp batt insulation 12mm veneered plywood

12x100mm softwood skirting 2

Window Triple glazed velfac timber window Limestone sill Hardwood timber sill

3

Intermediate floor 12mm Hardwood timber floor 22mm plywood 50x25mm Softwood timber battens Acoustic insulation Timber I-Joist 12mm veneered plywood


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

119

119


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

EAVE DETAIL 3 BED 2

HOUSES

1

120

3


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

4 BED

3

1

HOUSES

1

Wall 75mm limestone 50mm air gap Waterproof membrane 300mm timber I-joist frame 300mm hemp batt insulation 12mm veneered plywood

12x100mm softwood skirting

2

Flat roof Sedum planting 200mm soil 100mm drainage board DPM 300mm timber I-joist Hemp batt insulation 12mm veneered plywood

3

Pitched roof Welsh slate tiles Softwood timber battens DPM 300mm timber I-joist Hemp batt insulation 12mm standard ply

121


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

INTERNAL STRUCTURAL WALL DETAIL 3 BED (PARTY WALL) AND 4 BED

1

122

HOUSES

2

VOID

VOID


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5 HOUSES

1

Wall 300mm timber I-joist frame 300mm hemp batt insulation 12mm veneered plywood 12x100mm softwood skirting

2

Floor 12mm Hardwood timber floor 22mm plywood 50x25mm Softwood timber battens Acoustic insulation Timber I-Joist Hemp batt insulation DPM

123


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

INTERNAL PARTITION WALL DETAIL 3 BED AND 4 BED

1

HOUSES

2

VOID

124

1

Wall 90mm softwood timber frame 90mm hemp batt insulation 12mm veneered plywood 12x100mm softwood skirting

2

Floor 12mm Hardwood timber floor 22mm plywood 50x25mm Softwood timber battens Acoustic insulation Timber I-Joist Hemp batt insulation DPM


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

125


126 HOUSES

ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

COMPARATIVE IMAGES


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

127


128 HOUSES

ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

129


130 HOUSES

ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

131


HOUSES

ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

EMBODIED CARBON

MATERIAL

ELEMENT

VOLUME M3

EMBODIED CARBON KGCO2E

Limestone

Pad foundation

4

756

Limestone

Wall

16

2914

Softwood I-beam

Wall and floor

<1

-2030

Softwood

Wall and floor

6

-3888

Softwood

Stud partitions

2

-1139

Plywood

Linings/floors

16

-8079

Welsh slate

Roof tiles

2

408

Softwood

Roof trusses

n/a

-473

Hemp batt

Insulation

109

-2389

Glass

Windows

<1

380

Limestone

Sills and lintels

<1

49

132

TOTAL/HOUSE

-13489


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

COST ANALYSIS

ELEMENT

QUANTITY M2

COST £

Limestone

Pad foundation

4m3

1200

Limestone

Wall

16m3

4626

Softwood I-beam

Wall and floor

<1

Unknown

Softwood

Wall and floor

507

5065

Softwood

Stud partitions

284

2840

Plywood

Linings/floors

1322

19,830

Welsh slate

Roof tiles

2m3

648

Softwood

Roof trusses

103

1028

Hemp batt

Insulation

109m3

15,025

Glass

Windows

14

6750

Limestone

Sills and lintels

<1m3

78

TOTAL/HOUSE

HOUSES

MATERIAL

57,270

133


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

3.0 CARBON COPY

FINDINGS

GREENER, CHEAPER, FASTER Our analysis has proved that it is possible to build a carbon copy scheme of that built by Taylor Wimpey that is carbon negative. Not only this, our scheme is comparatively cheaper to build per house due to the change and reduction of materials, desiging out supplementary finishes and faster construction techniques.

HOUSES

Our carbon copy scheme is more at home in the Cotswolds than that proposed by Taylor Wimpey and will be more comfortable for residents to live in. This analysis has been concluded in a vaccum however, and it would therefore be interesting to see how our design could be rolled out to other Taylor Wimpey sites and investigate how this may have positive effects. A second additional study that would be good to do is looking into how these homes are serviced - could a district ground source heat pump be viable for the whole development to share? Will this cheapen users’ bills and increase their fuel security?

COST COMPARISON

150000 -50000

Existing Condition

Stone + CLT

Stone + Timber Frame

-100000

-40000

134

100000 50000 0

0

Existing Condition

Large stone

-20000

kgCO2e/m3

20000

40000

Cost per house/£

200000

EMBODIED CARBON COMPARISON

Stone + CLT

Stone + Timber Frame


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5 HOUSES

Figure 3.48 3 bedroom carbon copy

168%

24%

EMBODIED CARBON

PROJECT COST

135


136 HOUSES

4.0 WHAT IF?

ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

137


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

4.0 WHAT IF?

SUMMARY

LOADBEARING STONE Traditionally the stone of vernacular houses in the Cotswolds is not just a rainscreen but also structure. If we were to go beyond the carbon copy and design further, this would be our principle approach. The following two options briefly explore how it can be articulated either as external stone or as internal stone.

138

HOUSES

Additionally we have explored the use of timber piles in lieu of limestone for foundations. This would mean that our foundations, which have one of the highest individual component embodided carbon figures, will be carbon negative for each house. The following have all been designed as ideas, ‘what if?’ scenarios and therefore require further investigation, especially into accurate cost and carbon calculations


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5 HOUSES

Figure 4.1 Typical Cotswolds cottage

139


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

4.0 WHAT IF?

INTERNAL STONE

INSULATED RENDER HIDING COSY VERNACULAR STONE INTERIOR Internal structural stone offers fantastic environmental and visual possibilities. Firstly, by making the stone loadbearing, we will eliminate the need for a timber frame and reduce wall build-up so reduce material quantites and cost. Secondly it frees the external elevations to, in essence, become anything it wants. One route we have explored is to use insulated render so each house becomes a black (or coloured) box where no lintels or roof tiles are required as it is all wrapped in a homogenous envelope.

HOUSES

Reducing the wall build-up, material quantites and improving the u-value can only be a good thing. These houses will externally appear out of place but in actual fact can be argued to be more ‘vernacular’ than our proposed carbon copy because their stone is loadbearing. The internal palette of exposed stone and timber panelled partitions will create a cosy, cottage atmosphere. The simple and cheap facade can mean more money is put into planting, which will create a richer environment for people to enjoy and biodiversity to thrive.

Figure 4.2 Ada Street, Groupwork

140

Figure 4.3 Didden Village, MVRDV


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5 HOUSES

1

Figure 4.4 Internal stone walls

1

Limestone wall Dryvit insulated render system 300mm rigid wood fibre insulation Waterproof membrane 125mm limestone

141


142 HOUSES

ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5 HOUSES

Figure 4.5 Prospect Cottage, Derek Jarmin

Figure 4.6 Serpentine Pavillion, Peter Zumthor

143


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

4.0 WHAT IF?

EXTERNAL STONE

CUTE DORMERS External stone means the houses will contextually appear at home which is of course something to be prized - the typical Cotswold cottage is cute and sought after for a reason. Wall build-up and material quantities will again be reduced by making the stone loadbearing. However to avoid thermal bridges and areas for condensation to creep into the building, a complex insulated hanging detail is required for the floor joists which could increase costs.

HOUSES

To mitigate any potential cost increases, we have explored dropping the ceiling on the 4 bedroom house and added cute little dormers typical of the area. This, coupled with the elimination of a timber frame, will reduce material quanitities and indeed cost.

144

Figure 4.8 Cute little dormers set into a Cotswolds cottage


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5 HOUSES

Figure 4.9 4 bedroom with low roof and dormers

145


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

NO NIA LOSS

1200

HOUSES

The roof pitch starts 1200mm above FFL and therefore there is no loss of NIA/net sellable area.

146

0m

1

2


Floor joists can hang directly off the external loadbearing stone work with a nylon insulation strip to avoid cold bridges. As the wall panels only need to hold themselves up now, the timber frame can be removed so much less material is used and less work required per house. The stone must increase to a thickness of 125mm but there is no impct on overall build-up.

ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

INSULATED FLOOR JOIST HANGER

1

HOUSES

2

1

Limestone wall 125mm limestone 50 air gap Waterproof membrane Cavity ties 15mm plywood 300mm insulation 12mm veneered plywood 12mm timber skirting

2

Intermediate floor Nylon insulation strip Steel hanger 300mm timber I-joist Acoustic insulation Softood timber battens 22mm plywood 12mm hardwood floor

147


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

4.0 WHAT IF?

TIMBER PILE FOUNDATIONS

CARBON NEGATIVE FOUNDATIONS The foundations in our carbon copy are still very carbon intensive at +756kgCO2e/m3 and dramatically more expensive than the existing methedology of concrete block. We have therefore looked to use timber piles made of oak or coppice chestnut which would make our foundations carbon negative and increase the construction speed. Timber pile foundations will most likely be greener, cheaper and faster. Timber piles are used reguarly for fencing that lasts 60+ years in the post and rail fencing of southern England. Setting the pile 3m deep will mean they can withstand any heaving or settling forces. A galvanised steel flange must be inserted into the top of each pile to retain the strength in case the timber starts to rot at the top of ground level. HOUSES

The main design feature that this method would bring about is the need to leave 300mm of the timber above ground level to ensure the underside of the house can be adequately ventilated to avoid rot. We can take advantage of this however and introduce a ramp over linked swales on the front and back of each house. This will ensure equal access, increase biodiversity, help reduce flood risk and increase the beauty of the masterplan.

148

Figure 4.10 Chestnut post and rail fencing can last outdoors for 60 years


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

PROPOSED STONE PADS

2000

300

600x600x300mm limestone

2700

HOUSES

2700

2700

300

PROPOSED TIMBER PILES

2700

2700 3000

2700

300x3000mm timber 600x220x10mm steel flange

149


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

VOID

HOUSES

2

150

1

1

Foundation 3000x300mmdia. chestnut or oak pile 800x220x10mm galvanised steel flange

2

Swale Water loving planting


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5 HOUSES

Figure 4.11 Ramp over swale entrance

Figure 4.12 Tasinge Plads, Copenhagen Planted swales with walkways over the top

151


152 HOUSES

5.0 FINDINGS

ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

153


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

5.0 FINDINGS

FINAL COMPARITIVE FINDINGS

GREENER, CHEAPER, FASTER This analysis has explored if it is possible to recreate a Taylor Wimpey housing development that is greener, cheaper and faster than the existing condition. Through our research we have concluded that it is indeed possible. Thoughtful questioning of, and, understanding material along with construction methods means that these houses can be built using a timber frame and large self supporting Cotswolds limestone facade.

154

HOUSES

This research is in essence only a beginning, it is a provocation of what is possible when we think and deeply analyse design decisions. Changing a material based on cost or colour alone does not look at the whole picture and doing so does an injustice to the future residents of these homes and our shared planet. This analysis has been done in the isolation of two typologies on a single site. The next steps to develop this research further would be to present it to Taylor Wimpey and work together to understand how this could work at an economy of scale. Secondly, this research has been more site specific than a Taylor Wimpey development in which the same house can be built in Southampton or Sunderland so developing a map of Britain and housing typologies accordingly that are all greener, cheaper and faster would be an incredibly interesting and pertinent exercise.

168%

24%

EMBODIED CARBON

PROJECT COST


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

COST COMPARISON

100000 0

50000

40000 20000 0

Existing Condition

Stone + CLT

Stone + Timber Frame

Existing Condition

Stone + CLT

Stone + Timber Frame

-100000

-50000

-20000

Large stone

-40000

kgCO2e/m3

HOUSES

Cost per house/£

150000

200000

EMBODIED CARBON COMPARISON

155


156 HOUSES

ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

157


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5 HOUSES 158

6.0

CATALOGUE OF MATERIAL COMPONENTS


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

159


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

6.0 CATALOGUE OF MATERIAL COMPONENTS

FOUNDATION DETAIL 3 BED AND 4 BED

1

HOUSES

2

VOID

160

1


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5 HOUSES

1

Wall 300mm timber I-joist frame 300mm hemp batt insulation 12mm veneered plywood 12x100mm softwood skirting

2

Floor 12mm Hardwood timber floor 22mm plywood 50x25mm Softwood timber battens Acoustic insulation Timber I-Joist Hemp batt insulation DPM

3

Foundation 2x75mm limestone block 150mm EPS insulation Vented opening 400x400x600 limestone plinth 600x600x300 limestone footing Reinforced concrete

161


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

6.0 CATALOGUE OF MATERIAL COMPONENTS

EXTERNAL WALL DETAIL 3 BED AND 4 BED

3

HOUSES

1

2

162

1

Wall 75mm limestone 50mm air gap Waterproof membrane 300mm timber I-joist frame 300mm hemp batt insulation 12mm veneered plywood

12x100mm softwood skirting 2

Window Triple glazed velfac timber window Limestone sill Hardwood timber sill

3

Intermediate floor 12mm Hardwood timber floor 22mm plywood 50x25mm Softwood timber battens Acoustic insulation Timber I-Joist 12mm veneered plywood


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

163


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

6.0 CATALOGUE OF MATERIAL COMPONENTS

EAVE DETAIL 3 BED 2

HOUSES

1

164

3


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

4 BED

3

1

HOUSES

1

Wall 75mm limestone 50mm air gap Waterproof membrane 300mm timber I-joist frame 300mm hemp batt insulation 12mm veneered plywood

12x100mm softwood skirting

2

Flat roof Sedum planting 200mm soil 100mm drainage board DPM 300mm timber I-joist Hemp batt insulation 12mm veneered plywood

3

Pitched roof Welsh slate tiles Softwood timber battens DPM 300mm timber I-joist Hemp batt insulation 12mm standard ply

165


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

6.0 CATALOGUE OF MATERIAL COMPONENTS

INTERNAL STRUCTURAL WALL DETAIL 3 BED (PARTY WALL) AND 4 BED

1

166

HOUSES

2

VOID

VOID


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5 HOUSES

1

Wall 300mm timber I-joist frame 300mm hemp batt insulation 12mm veneered plywood 12x100mm softwood skirting

2

Floor 12mm Hardwood timber floor 22mm plywood 50x25mm Softwood timber battens Acoustic insulation Timber I-Joist Hemp batt insulation DPM

167


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

6.0 CATALOGUE OF MATERIAL COMPONENTS

INTERNAL PARTITION WALL DETAIL 3 BED AND 4 BED

1

HOUSES

2

VOID

168

1

Wall 90mm softwood timber frame 90mm hemp batt insulation 12mm veneered plywood 12x100mm softwood skirting

2

Floor 12mm Hardwood timber floor 22mm plywood 50x25mm Softwood timber battens Acoustic insulation Timber I-Joist Hemp batt insulation DPM


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

169


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

EXTERNAL CONTRIBUTORS

WEBB YATES ENGINEERS 48-50 Scrutton Street London EC2A 4HH london@webbyates.com

EIGHT ASSSOCIATES

HOUSES

46 Loman Street London SE1 0EH info@eightassociates.co.uk

OLP COST CONSULTANTS Office 7 35-37 Ludgate Hill London EC4M 7JN info@olpcostconsultants.co.uk

IVO DESIGN +44 (0) 7954 09 81 31 +34 623 104 054 ivo@ivodisseny.com

NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT 3 More London Riverside London SE1 2AQ

170

+44 20 7283 6000


ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ADS5

HOUSES

171



Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.