Looking into the idea of merging municipalities

By Tom Condon The Connecticut Mirror

At a fall press conference about a plan to rebuild Hartford’s highways, Congressman John Larson praised the mayors of Hartford and East Hartford, Luke Bronin and Mike Walsh, for how well they were working together to get the major infrastructure initiative underway.

This prompted Bronin to say he was “ready to sign the merger agreement” joining the two communities. Walsh nodded and smiled.

To be clear, there is no merger agreement, proposal or plan to consolidate the two municipalities that are separated by the Connecticut River. Bronin was kidding.

What if he were serious?

Underlying his comment is a long-standing frustration shared by Walsh and many others over the years that Connecticut’s historic 169town governance model is inefficient and expensive, inhibits economic development and could stand reexamination.

“We do it differently than most other places,” said Bronin in a subsequent interview. “We have no county government. Our municipalities are very small, so small that it is hard to make apples-to-apples comparisons with cities in other states.”

The problem is that “ companies look for centers of population,” dense urban places. With a quilt of small towns, “we miss a lot of opportunities.”

As if to make his point, Lego Group announced in January that it was leaving Enfield and moving to Boston. Would the state benefit from having fewer but larger towns? Would such changes be politically viable?

The answers, at least a present, may be: Yes and No. But there is push for change, at least for the merging of municipal services, if not governments.

Hard sell

Combining a municipality with an adjoining city, or with a surrounding county (not possible here; Connecticut abolished its counties in 1960), has been notoriously challenging across the country. According to data provided by the National League of Cities, in the last 40 years there have been almost a hundred referendums or initiatives to consolidate cities with counties, and voters rejected threefourths of them.

Of the country’s more than 3,000 counties, only about 40 have merged with their core cities since 1895. About a third of those are in Alaska and Georgia.

Merging cities with adjacent cities is also a challenge; it’s been proposed a few times in Connecticut but never accomplished. Indeed, the state’s history has been just the opposite.

Connecticut’s model through most of its history has been to “hive off” towns, create new towns in areas that had been part of other towns, said state historian emeritus Walt Woodward. Thus, fewer large towns, more small towns.

For example, West Hartford, East Hartford and Manchester were once part of Hartford. East Hartford broke off Hartford in 1783, and then the “Orford Parish” broke off from East Hartford in 1823 to become Manchester. West Hartford remained part of Hartford until 1854.

Transportation was a major reason for the hiving, especially for the towns east of the river.

“It was a lot easier to walk down the street to church rather than cross the Connecticut River, especially in the winter,” said Woodward.

Had those communities all remained part of Hartford, the capital city today would have a population of nearly 300,000. This would put it in the population range of Madison, Wisc., Buffalo, N.Y.

and Reno, Nev. and make it the second-largest city in New England, surpassing Worcester’s 206,000 and Providence’s 190,000. If just Hartford and East Hartford merged, as Bronin hinted, the city of 171,000 would be far and away the largest in the state, topping Bridgeport’s 150,000.

The hiving pattern repeated across the state; Connecticut towns got smaller rather than larger. The state does not allow forced or involuntary annexation, as a few do, nor does it have unincorporated land that could be annexed. Residents can petition the legislature to annex or merge with another town, but it has rarely happened though West Hartford and Hartford twice tried to put Humpty Dumpty back together again.

In 1895, some residents of West Hartford petitioned to be annexed by Hartford, which then was booming, but the plan failed. In 192324, Hartford tried to annex

West Hartford back, but this effort was soundly defeated. Though a Hartford politician occasionally suggests annexing West Hartford, there’s been no serious effort to do so in a century.

New London and Waterford, which separated in 1801, talked in the 1960s about reuniting, but it didn’t happen. Ditto in the 1970s when Ansonia, Seymour, Shelton and Derby discussed, but did not pursue, consolidation.

Most recently, in 2017, the small Eastern Connecticut town of Scotland, pop. 1,585, floated the idea of merging with one or two surrounding towns. That trigger also went unpulled. Last fall, Scotland tried to merge its elementary school with Hampton’s, and that didn’t fly either.

Connecticut towns have merged with political subdivisions within their boundaries, such as villages, fire districts or even cities. In the 19th century, industrialists and merchants formed cities in the centers of some towns to promote their interests against those of the farmers. Most have since consolidated with the town, such as Willimantic with Windham and Rockville with Vernon. But it doesn’t appear that there’s been a successful merger of two geographically distinct municipalities.

The irony is that in the rare instance when a city-county or city-city consolidation succeeds, it often benefits the community. Indianapolis, Nashville, Louisville and Jacksonville all became larger and more prominent cities by merging with their counties.

Advantages of merging towns

In 2011, voters in two smallish and similar towns in New Jersey, Princeton Township and Princeton Borough, voted to merge.

See Merging, A13