2 minute read

Religious schools: Divine education or coercive patronage?

By Matthew Marotto

I have a confession: I’m not very religious. Although by heritage I’m halfCatholic and half-Jewish, aside from a few holidays, these designations seldom appear in my life and — in another confession — I’m glad they haven’t.

Many see immense value in religion, and rightly so. Even though I do not actively participate in religion, I wholeheartedly endorse many religious ethics. However, regardless of a religion’s positive messages, its promotion does not belong in schools, including private ones.

Places of education aren’t places of worship. The primary function of schooling, as Albert Einstein famously said, “is not the learning of facts, but the training of the mind to think.”

Herein lies the danger behind having, as of 2020, a growing student population of 3.5 million attending religious schools nationwide. Whether in a church, mosque, synagogue or any other place of worship, divine teachings consistently trump individual thinking.

When this transcends into classrooms via religious schools, the equating and emphasizing of preachings in relation to independent thought can harm student autonomy. And when divine teachings clash with academia, religious schools often irrationally favor scriptures over science.

Take the ongoing debate over creationism or the belief that divine acts constructed the universe, which the United States Supreme Court banned from public schools. Although scientificallybacked evolution is clearly preferred in a classroom environment, many religious schools promote creationism through mandatory religious services and theology courses.

Per one local school’s website, where a through education. To this day, Jesuits operate schools from Saint Ignatius in San Francisco to Georgetown University, subtly in a secular republic, so, given their critical role in government, it didn’t in schools either. for centuries where they indoctrinate impressionable students from kindergarten classrooms to lecture halls.

Today, not only is this democratic virtue under increasing threat with the recent growth of religious schools, but so are personal freedoms.

Having attended public education my entire life, the opportunities afforded to me, to freely think and study, have greatly benefited who I am. I’ve never been forced, neither explicitly nor implicitly, to conform to any religion in regards to my studies or myself. All students deserve these opportunities.

While some desire a faith-based education or situationally prefer religious institutions, religious schools must not continue to prioritize prophecies over facts, nor indoctrination over teaching. This isn’t an attempt to degrade religions and the good they have done, but rather to ensure that all students are free to learn and express themselves. If religions truly care about their students and academic freedom, then they must withdraw their self-promotion from classrooms by secularizing core curriculum and graduation requirements.

A notable example of this is the Catholic Jesuit order, which was established to combat the rise of competing denominations and convert new members

This threat poses a fundamental danger to democracies, where free, secular schools are essential. The consensus of America’s Founding Fathers was that educated voters were vital to a freethinking electorate capable of selecting the best candidates. Religion had no place mmarotto@redwoodbark.org

With the issues of today unlikely to disappear by some miracle, as even I feel the urge to pray, secular schools are more important than ever. To meet these challenges, generations of independent thinking students must be educated, and religious schools do not belong in that future.

This article is from: