Portfolio by Rita Dolmany

portfolio —

Rita Dolmány

Content

Curriculum vitae

a | Office projects

01 Residential development Mättivor

residential development with 65 apartments and 35 villas - under construction

02 Reconstruction of historic Town Hall of Buda courtyard covering and loft conversion — under construction

03 Reformation500, Budapest installation on Kálvin square — built

04 Paprét park, Sopron

revitalization of a public park — planning application drawing

05 Széchenyi sqaure, Sopron

revitalization of a square — planning application drawing

06 Castle District revitalization, Sopron

revitalization of the Castle District, phase II — implementation plan

07 Reformed church and community house, Balatonakarattya new reformed community center — study plan

b | University projects

08 Singer bath, Gárdony

public beach — diploma project

09 Kindergarten, Érd

four group kindergarten — complex design

c | Side project 10 Multilayered cultural landscape workshop, Luxor architectural research

Rita Dolmรกny

A portfolio of selected works 2009-2018

curriculum vitae

EXPERIENCE 09/2017 - 06/2018 12/2015 - 09/2017 04/2013 - 09/2013 07/2012 - 09/2012

Elmiger Architekten GmbH, Zürich

Architect (Competition and Implementation plan)

Hetedik Műterem, Budapest

Architect ( Competition, Studies, Building applications, Implementation plans)

Ofis architects, Ljubljana

Intern (Implementation plan)

Építész Studió, Budapest Intern (Competition)

education 2009-2015 2014 2005-2009

Architectural Faculty

Budapest University of Technology and Economics

International Summer University FH Burgenland, Austria

Teleki Blanka High School

Székesfehérvár, Hungary

Research and COnFerence 2017 2015 2013

National Scientific Student’s Associations — 2nd place Essay on Hassan Fathy’s architecture, collaborator: Eszter Nagy, Pécs, Hungary Multilayered cultural landscape workshop, research trip

Research in Hassan Fathy’s architecture, Luxor, Egypt

Participant at European Architecture Students Assembly Zuzemberk, Slovenia

Languages German

intermediate

Englisch

fluent

Russian

beginner

Ungarisch

skills

native

archicad

photoshop

autocad

illustrator

sketch up

indesign

3ds max

ms office

Office projects

2015-2018

01 |

Residential development Mättivor

Residential development with 65 apartments and 35 villas - under construction address Mättivor, Schwyz design 2014 (Competition, 1. Place) construction 2017-2019 client Baugenossenschaft Mättivor general design Elmiger Architekten architect in charge Markus Elmiger project leader Alice Aus der Au architects Svenja Egge, Rita Dolmány, Natasha Shea, Zita Széplaki landscape architects Neuland ArchitekturLandschaft

The starting-point of the design lies in the existing spatial qualities that the manor houses – the Herrenhäuser – in Schwyz create in relation both to the built fabric of the village and to the surrounding landscape. The project reinterprets these manor houses as large clusters in the open meadow of Mättivor. Thanks to this clustered approach large contiguous green spaces can be retained, open spaces that form a crucial element in the backdrop of Schwyz and are also an integral part of the new development. The organisation of the buildings on the diagonal sets up interesting spatial relationships and views through the clusters, despite their density. The cluster concept is a spatial interpretation and realisation of the defining spatial characteristics of the manor houses of Schwyz: the vertical element of the house and the terraced garden surrounded by a wall.

Apartment building, view from the promenade (Â© NIGHTNURSE IMAGES)

Bedroom in the attic floor (Â© NIGHTNURSE IMAGES)

5th Floor Floor plan

Apartment buildings and villas, in the background the Zünggelenwald (© NIGHTNURSE IMAGES)

02 |

Reconstruction of historic Town Hall of Buda

courtyard covering and loft conversion — under construction address Budavár, Tárnok-Szentháromság-Úri streets area appr. 3800 m2 design 2014-2015 construction 2015-2017 client PADA

general design Hetedik Műterem architect in charge Levente Szabó DLA architects Katalin Alkér, András Bartha, Balázs Biri, Rita Terbe, Zsolt Tolnai associates Fruzsina Barta, Kata Bartis, Rita Dolmány, Dénes Halmai, András Kunczi, Rozália Marton, András Páll, Ákos Polgárdi, Orsolya Simon, Nóra Szigeti, Norbert Villányi (competition: István Gyulovics, Zsófia Kovács) photos Balázs Biri, archive

The permit and construction plans for the complete historic reconstruction, courtyard covering and loft conversion project of Buda’s former Town Hall building, standing on the lot bordered by Úri, Szentháromság and Tárnok streets, were prepared in the first half of 2015. The renewal of the building with unique historical value had a dual purpose: the reconstruction of the basically Baroque building with significant medieval parts, going through several construction periods, by preserving their exciting material, structural and spatial imprints, and at the same time a revitalization that meets today’s demands. In preparing the plans, we wanted to combine these two criteria. While mainly public functions will be implemented on the ground floor and basement (exclusive restaurants, showrooms, wine cellar and wine museum), the first floor and the attic will provide space for educational rooms. Upstairs, the prestigious Baroque enfilade shall serve administrative, educational and representative functions, and the attic floor will be the researchers’ workplace. Covering the courtyards of the building can replace the hall-like space currently missing from the building, which would be suitable for events and could play a ground floor-distribution role too. The building’s 300 years old Baroque roof was greatly damaged in World War II, the renewal is based on a radical distinction between old and new parts.

The Old Town Hall from the East, 1900 (© Mór Erdélyi, btm)

gépészeti faláttörés 30x30cm as.: -0,76

Cellar floor plan interior design plan

GSEducationalVersion

Ground floor plan interior design plan

GSEducationalVersion

First floor plan interior design plan

GSEducationalVersion

Attic floor plan interior design plan

GSEducationalVersion

New shotcrete passageway in the cellar, 2017 (© Balázs Biri)

New staircase in the cellar, 2017 (© Balázs Biri)

New staircase in the first floor and the Napauer cloister, 2017 (© Balázs Biri)

03 |

Reformation500

installation on Kálvin square — built address Budapest, Kálvin square design 2016 (invited competition, 1st prize) construction 2017 webpage www.reform500.hu general design Hetedik Műterem architect in charge Levente Szabó DLA graphic design Ákos Polgárdi associates Rita Dolmány, Bence Falussy< photos Ákos Polgárdi, Balázs Danyi

Our office was invited to a design competition on the public plaza installation to be erected on Kálvin tér, Budapest in connection with the 500th anniversary of the Reformation, temporarily exhibited during the memorial year. The greatest impact of the Reformation on the development of Hungarian culture was that the Hungarian language – later the literary language as well – gained ground and got fertilized, primarily as a result of the New Testament translation by János Sylvester then that of the Károli Bible.Similarly, our installation also uses language itself, texts, and Hungarian words as tools. Our concept consisted of 95 pcs fine concrete slabs of 50x50x8 cm size, which – as a reference to the first gesture of Luther – could be inserted at place of 95 pavement stones (so called K-stone) removed from the area of the designated location. In each case, two quotes were inscribed to the surface of these concrete elements: one idea from the great reformers (Luther, Calvin, Zwingli, Melanchthon and their peers) and one Hungarian quote about the relevance of Reformation in the widest sense. These two texts (universal and Hungarian, sacred and secular) jointly expressed the global and local impact of the Reformation. None of the selected quotes exceeded an average length of text messages or tweets; in other words, the installation was adapted to today’s rushing receiver with attention-deficit. The point of the concept is that it is visible and invisible at the same time. It achieves the desired effect by performing small but definite and important changes to the designated site – just like the reformer predecessors who catalyzed the inner processes of the Church by their theses, preaches and disputes.

Site plan of the installation, 2017

Process of the installation, 2017 (© Ákos Polgárdi)

Aerial photo, 2017 (© Balázs Danyi)

04 |

Paprét, Sopron

revitalization of a public park — planning application drawing address Sopron, Paprét size appr. 13500 m2 public space, 10m2 public building design 2017 client Sopron City Council general design Hetedik Műterem architect in charge Levente Szabó DLA landscape architects Borbála Gyüre, Gergely Lád - Geum Műterem co-designers Rita Dolmány visualisation András Páll

Paprét (Pfarrwiese) was first mentioned in 1653 as the parson’s territory. At that time Paprét was a bare, treeless, grassy area which was crossed with only a few walking passes. Next to the dominant axis pass plenty of platens were plented that define the appearance of the park until this day. In our proposal, we take in consideration the current pedestrian routes in the park which leed to a structure that is based on nearly radial, alternating curves. The main axis, which bisected the park, is preserved and this will be complemented by new cross-links that offer a better way to explore the area. It’s a main goal to stop the traffic and terminate the parking plots in the park, so it can get back its original unity and function. New features organize the landscape design, such as outdoor fitness area and playground that can be an attractive recreational destination. Major buildings, such as the Synagogue, the Sports Hall and the J. Weiss Sugar Factory are important elements of the boundary facade therefore it is essential to turn them into the park’s interior structure.

The historic promenade through Paprét, visualisation, 2017 (© András Páll)

The renewed public park with the playground in the background, visualization, 2017 (© András Páll)

Master plan of the public park with the dominant promenade

3,75 295

295

2,10

90 239

295

konzolos hosszított WC kagyló h=46cm magasra szerelve

90x50 cm lehajtható pelenkázópult h=85cm magasra szerelve

1,35

90 239

műgyanta

akadálymentes modó

3,75

90 239

2,10

l=60 cm ﬁx kapaszkodó h=75cm magasra szerelve

65x55 cm homorú elülső felületű mosdó, h=85cm magasra szerelve

-0,

1,05 2,10

295

4,56 m2

Alaprajz

A-A metszet

Public toilet’s floorplan

impregnált kültéri északi fenyő függőleges léc burkolat

impregnált kültéri északi fenyő függől

+3,15

+2,39

3,75 295

295

2,10

90 239

+3,15 53

T1* F1

295

F1 53

H2 homlokzat

295

H1 homlokzat

90x50 cm lehajtható pelenkázópult h=85cm magasra szerelve

±0,00

l=60 cm ﬁx kapaszkodó h=75cm magasra szerelve

akadálymentes modó műgyanta

90 239

295 53

1,05 2,10

90 239

konzolos hosszított WC kagyló h=46cm magasra szerelve

1,35

-0,02 B

3,75

2,10

65x55 cm homorú elülső felületű mosdó, h=85cm magasra szerelve

4,56 m2

+2,51

3,75

műgyanta

90 239

2,10

90 239

90x50 cm lehajtható pelenkázópult h=85cm magasra szerelve

1,35

akadálymentes modó

295 -0,02

90 239

l=60 cm ﬁx kapaszkodó h=75cm magasra szerelve

T1*

3,75 2,10

+2,39

konzolos hosszított WC kagyló h=46cm magasra szerelve

T1 295

65x55 cm homorú elülső felületű mosdó, h=85cm magasra szerelve

Section

B-B metszet

1,05 2,10

A-A metszet

Alaprajz

295

4,56 m2

Alaprajz impregnált kültéri északi fenyő függőleges léc burkolat

impregnált kültéri északi fenyő függőleges léc burkolat

+3,15

+2,39

impregnált kültéri északi fenyő függőleges léc burkolat

impregnált

+3,15

+2,39

-0,02

H1 homlokzat

-0,02

H2 homlokzat

H3 homlokzat

H1 homlokzat

Elevation

-0,02

H2 homlokzat

Aerial photo of the public park, visualisation, 2017 (© András Páll)

05 |

Széchenyi square, Sopron

revitalization of a square — planning application drawing address Sopron, Széchenyi square size appr. 13000 m2 design 2017 client Sopron City Council general design Hetedik Műterem architect in charge Levente Szabó DLA landscape architects Borbála Gyüre, Gergely Lád - Geum Műterem co-designer Rita Dolmány

In Sopron, Széchenyi square is the largest component in the row of spaces surrounding the downtown. It is a gathering and starting point at the same time; from the urban structural position’s point of view it is a city plaza, however, regarding its usage it is much more a green area, a park. Over the centuries, the city continuously developed in line with social, natural and cultural conditions. Nevertheless, the current state presents only a shadow of its former self. In general, Széchenyi square to be renewed is considered as a partly paved place interwoven by roads and articulated by minor squares, but above all as a significant green area that forms a bridge between a public plaza and a park, combining the elements and benefits of these two urban characters. In our proposal, the boundary pedestrian zones are increased at Széchenyi square, in this way the plaza can be integrated to the urban architectural/structural unity of the Castle District. This spatial concept and traffic system continue the basic concept of the already started development in a natural and intuitive way, namely the strengthening of pedestrian zones on the outskirts of the historical town center. The plan respects the dominance of the two existing monuments (Széchenyi monument and Flag of Loyalty), but in parallel it creates a new kind of framework for them with a new, classical spatial structure.

Old postcard from SzĂŠchenyi square, 1940 (ÂŠ sopronanno.hu)

Historical map of Széchenyi square (detail), 1835 (© M. Hasenauer)

pron belvárosa átnézeti és szintezési térképe, részlet, M. Hasenauer, 1835

Pavement expansion Concept drawing no.1

Parking plot displacement Concept drawing no.2

Axis accuracy Concept drawing no.3

Historical four alleys Concept drawing no.4

Masterplan of the revitalizated public park

06 |

Castle District revitalization, Sopron

revitalization of the Castle District, phase II — implementation plan address Sopron, Castle District size appr. 8 000 m2 public space, 50m2 public building design 2009 (national competition), 2016 client Sopron City Council general design Hetedik Műterem architect in charge Levente Szabó DLA landscape architects Csenge Csontos (†), Borbála Gyüre, Gergely Lád - Geum Műterem co-designers Balázs Biri, Jessica Dvorzsák, Rita Dolmány, Dávid Kohout, Orsolya Simon (competition: Orsolya Almer, András Páll, Tibor Tánczos)

The beauty of the Castle District lies in its character created by the continuously changing cross sections and constantly varying spatial relations along almost half a kilometer length; and by the feature that all this belongs to Várkörút (Castle Boulevard), to its dynamism and generosity. This duality, namely the dichotomy of the longitudinal dynamism and cross-sectional diversity is the greatest value that we wanted to strengthen in our plan. The key concept was that when standing at any point of the Castle District one should know and feel that he/she is in this very part of the area. However, moderate approach was also required since the facades of the historic development along the inner and outer curves are determinative urban design elements, thus competing with them for dominance is unnecessary. After winning the competition, the preparation of the study plan, then the building permission plan consisted of several steps, with the series of co-ordinations and presentations in public forums. This way though the concept rationalized, but it did not differ from its fundaments and main concept, neither even during the construction desing process. Our mindful, engineer-like and defensive approach will assure the assimilation into the urban fabric and its long-term operation.

Market at Kisvárkerület, 1965 (© Bauer Sándor, fortepan.hu)

The Castle district masterplan, connection to phase I

hgy

SOPRON

8,75 3,975

25 7

1,24

3,975

2,48

2,485

25 94 10 94

10 94

5,90

10 94

RF1

75 210 elszívás m=220

92 5

96 elszívás m=220

csatorna kivezetés DN250, m=208,28 mBf

padlóösszefolyó, gépészeti kiírás szerint

5 2,0%

meglévő alaptest áttörés gépészeti vezeték számára (∅110)

1,4% 90 210

1,415

RF10

RF9

RP1

E06

-0,01

±0,00= 208,805Bmf

90 210

RF11

90 210

RF11

RP1

E02

90 210

1,20

1,6%

műgyanta 2,25 m2

16 5

RF5

RF4**

RF3

RF4

L02

6,78 5 01 LÉPCSŐ

simított beton 12,43 m2

RP4

C +1,33

RF4

24 24

Renewal of the underground toilet, Floor plan

8,49

12,27 5

RF4

3,31

1,88

-0,04

hornyolt kialakítás, műgyantával kitöltve RAL 5015

meglévő, feltáratlan falszerkezet FELTÉTELEZETT külső kontúrja

1,40

l ábe tők x fű Ifle EV , n D séges n tba ola szük alapjá rk e u s s n b ezé iírá beto lhely mos k RP2 e tro ított k összefolyó, sim ele gépészeti kiírás szerint 2,0%

ká fűtő lex VIf s, DE ge n an ksé pjá latb szü ala rko se rás bu ezé s kií ton ly o be elhe trom k ele

E03 érmés ajtóvezérlő

L03, E.ON keretében

90 213

szellőzőrács gépészeti kiírás és részletterv alapján

tt íto sim

elektromos kapcsolószekrények épületvillamossági tervek alapján

16 5

DEVIreg 850 talaj érzékelő, elektromos kiírás szerint

RP3 szellőzőrács gépészeti kiírás és részletterv alapján

±0,00

1,40

simított beton 4,56 m2

RF5

RF6

10 faláttörés gépészeti vezetékek számára, stat. tervek alapján

15 ELEKTROMOS HELYISÉG

RF2

hajlati dilatációs szalag (pl. Remmers Fugenband B200)

-0,015

90 213

hajlati dilatációs szalag (pl. Remmers Fugenband B200)

±0,00=208,805Bmf

1,88

13 TAKSZER TÁROLÓ

RF11

padlócsatorna kontúrja, gépészeti vezetékek számára

műgyanta 6,44 m2

vízbekötés (32kpe) új helye, m=FAS-1,2m (210,065 mBf)

1,46 5

±0,00=208,805Bmf 02 ELŐTÉR

padlóösszefolyó, gépészeti kiírás szerint

RP1

1,415 24

-0,01

1,2%

1,70 5

befúvás m=2155

műgyanta 2,83 m2

RF12

815

1,2%

14 GÉPÉSZET

RF7

±0,00=208,805Bmf

±0,00= 208,805Bmf

RF9

RF9 45

RP1

2 14

2,03

12 FFI WC

1,08 m2

RP1 A3

padlócsatorna kontúrja, gépészeti vezetékek számára

befúvás m=223

75 210

RF9

RF1*

RF8

padlócsatorna kontúrja, gépészeti vezetékek számára 07 NŐI WC

1,08 m2

visszafalazás

RF9

75 210

RP1

1,08 m2

10 2 2

1,325

RF8

11 FFI WC

10 2 2

elszívás m=220

±0,00= 208,805Bmf

1,7%

1,5%

RF9

elszívás m=220

45 45

±0,00= 208,805Bmf

padlóösszefolyó, gépészeti kiírás szerint

elszívás m=220

RF1

10 2 2

RF8

2,03

RF9

RP1

1,16

RP1 75 210

10 2 2

1,19 m2

L01

1,5%

1,7%

1,08 m2

10 FFI WC

RP1

L01

padlóösszefolyó, gépészeti kiírás szerint

±0,00= 208,805Bmf

RF8 RF8

10 2 2

94 10

műgyanta 9,83 m2

-0,02

5,90

06 NŐI WC

RF1*

RF9

08 FFI MOSDÓ

E01

-0,02

RF9

elszívás m=220

E01

RP1

RF9

2,03

műgyanta 9,83 m2

RP1

03 NŐI MOSDÓ 05 NŐI WC

1,08 m2 75 210

visszafalazás

1,18 m2

RF1 befúvás m=223

elszívás m=220

meglévő, feltáratlan falszerkezet FELTÉTELEZETT külső kontúrja, feltárás során pontosítandó!

09 FFI WC

±0,00= 208,805Bmf

elszívás m=220

RF9 14

10 2 2

75 210

RP1

RF9

±0,00= 208,805Bmf

1,08 m2

RF1

RF9

elszívás m=220

RF9

04 NŐI WC

RF8

meglévő, feltáratlan sávalap FELTÉTELEZETT belső kontúrja, feltárás során pontosítandó!

meglévő, feltáratlan sávalap FELTÉTELEZETT külső kontúrja, feltárás során pontosítandó!

1,24

RF2

RF1

meglévő, feltáratlan födémszerkezet FELTÉTELEZETT külső kontúrja, feltárás során pontosítandó!

NA 100 dréncső geotextílbe csomagolva, betonfolyókára 0,5%-os lejtésben fektetve

L02 NA 100 dréncső geotextílbe csomagolva, betonfolyókára 0,5%-os lejtésben fektetve

új 15cm vtg. látszóbeton támfal, statikai tervek és látszóbeton specifikáció alapján

új 15cm vtg. látszóbeton támfal, statikai tervek és látszóbeton specifikáció alapján (212,10)

+3,30

(211,10)

+2,30

(212,00)

+2,71

(211,515)

(211,265)

+2,46

L03 elszívás m=220

(211,02)

+2,30

L03

+2,30

álmennyezetbe süllyesztett lámpatest ld. elektromos kiírás

RF8

RF9

(210,50)

RF8

211,00

(210,50)

S.03

1,16

S.03

2,20

földvisszatöltés

földfeltöltés, T

210,00

visszafalazás, meglévő feltáratlan monolit vasbeton vagy tégla falszerkezet FELTÉTELEZETT külső kontúrjával egy síkban, feltárás során pontosítandó!

1,24

termett talaj

látszóbeton fe (látszóbeton s

meglévő vasb (feltárás során

RP1

30 75

RP5

RP1

S.02

45mm hullámmagasságú trapézlemez, bennmaradó zsaluzat statikai tervek szerint 1,325

RP1

2,485

1,34

45mm hullámmagasságú trapézlemez, bennmaradó zsaluzat statikai tervek szerint

RP5

2,20 25 75

támfal alapozását ld. S-K-06 statika terven

+1,70

RF1* A3

tömörített kav

+2,22 (211,07)

RF9

RF1*

visszafalazás, meglévő feltáratlan monolit vasbeton vagy tégla falszerkezet FELTÉTELEZETT külső kontúrjával egy síkban, feltárás során pontosítandó!

JELMAGYARÁ

csatlakozó rétegrendeket ld. köztérépítészeti terveken +2,40

(211,10)

+2,30

L03 elszívás m=220

L03

álmennyezetbe süllyesztett lámpatest ld. elektromos kiírás befúvás m=220

RF9

+1,70

földvisszatöltés

+3,20 ~2%

+2,71

+2,22

támfal alapozását ld. S-K-06 statika terven

RT1

~2%

S.01

RT1

212,00 csatlakozó rétegrendeket ld. köztérépítészeti terveken

209,00

(208,805)

1,7%

±0,00

1,5%

-0,02

1,7%

-0,02

±0,00

-0,13

vasbeton fal

-0,13

alapozás feltételezett felső síkja, feltárás során pontosítandó!

+208,500 mértékadó talajvíz szint

alapozás feltételezett felső síkja, feltárás során pontosítandó! -0,28

-0,43

meglévő, feltáratlan sávalap FELTÉTELEZETT kontúrja, feltárás során pontosítandó!

-0,43

25/25 padlócsatorna gépészeti vezetékek számára

vasalt aljzat tervét ld. S-K-01 statika terven

fúrt, ragasztott betonacél, stat. tervek alapján

-0,58

-0,28

25/25 padlócsatorna gépészeti vezetékek számára

-0,58

fúrt, ragasztott betonacél, stat. tervek alapján

YTONG mész

meglévő, feltáratlan sávalap FELTÉTELEZETT kontúrja, feltárás során pontosítandó!

208,00

lejtésadó könn

vasalt aljzat

szerelt gipszk

Renewal of the underground toilet, Section a-a NA 100 dréncső geotextílbe csomagolva, betonfolyókára 0,5%os lejtésben fektetve

meglévő, feltáratlan födémszerkezet FELTÉTELEZETT külső kontúrja, feltárás során pontosítandó!

S.04

(212,00)

+3,33

+3,30

212,00

mozgásérzékelő , elektromos tervek alapján

RT1

(212,13)

(212,10)

100.3 RM acél szigetelés tartó profil

+3,20

RF4*

+2,70

Delta-Band öntapadó bitumenkaucsuk szalag

(211,265)

L02

+2,30

szellőzőrács gépészeti kiírás alapján

RT2

RF9

ÉPÍTTETŐ MEGRENDELŐ:

mennyezetbe süllyesztett lámpatest, elektromos tervek alapján

+2,14

földvisszatöltés

GENERÁLTERVEZŐ, ÉPÍTÉSZ TERVEZŐ:

E03 (212,10)

új vasbton támfal, ld. S_K_04 statika terven

+3,30

lépcső 210,00 sz:30 cm m:15,2 cm

+3,05

+2,14 1,0%

1,0%

-0,02

S.05 -0,015

-0,58

+1,37

15 15

-0,78

RP6

RP2

RP3

GÉPÉSZET:

0,25%

15 15

(210,135)

-0,36

+1,33

211,00 209,00

tömörített kav

0,20 m2

15 15

ELEKTROMOS TERVE

+208,500 mértékadó talajvíz szint

Atermett talaj

AKADÁLYMENTESÍTÉ

1cm PUR dilatáció

Bföldfeltöltés, T

210,00 -0,70

208,00

új aljzat tüskézése meglévő sávalaphoz statikai tervek szerint

LÁTSZÓBETON:

látszóbeton fe (látszóbeton s

-1,11 -1,13

lépcsőfokok 0,25% lejtéssel kialakítva 15 15

S.08

meglévő vasb (feltárás során

1cm EPS dilatációs peremszigetelő csík

GJELMAGYAR

S.07

-0,16

hornyolt kialakítás, műgyantával-0,45 kitöltve, akadálymentes jelölés céljából-0,50

fúrt, ragasztott betonacél, stat. tervek alapján

RF5

(208,805)

-0,58

látszóbeton falba süllyesztett lámpatest, -0,63 elektromos terv alapján

+0,77

vegyszer- és UV-álló vízzáró rugalmas szilikon tömítőszalag és kitöltés (pl.: MultiSil NUW)

alapozás feltételezett felső síkja, feltárás során pontosítandó!

pénzbedobó automata

L03 elektromos szekrény (E.ON keretében)

-0,43

2,335

-0,27

meglévő, feltáratlan sávalap FELTÉTELEZETT kontúrja, feltárás során pontosítandó!

+1,84

15 15

hőszigeteletlen acél ajtó (Jansen-Economy 50 D-200-S-005) fúrt, ragasztott betonacél, stat. tervek alapján

földvisszatöltés

+1,84

-0,13

0,25%

lépcsőfokok 0,25% lejtéssel kialakítva

hornyolt kialakítás, műgyantával kitöltve, akadálymentes jelölés céljából 70 -0,16 70

2,69

-0,13 alapozás feltételezett felső síkja, feltárás során pontosítandó!

STATIKA:

+2,70

15 15

(208,805) NINCS PORSZÁRAZSÁGI IGÉNY ±0,00

25/25 padlócsatorna gépészeti vezetékek számára

212,00

(211,50)

1,11

RP2

mozgásérzékelő , elektromos tervek alapján 45mm hullámmagasságú trapézlemez, bennmaradó +2,14 zsaluzat statikai tervek szerint

E01 LÉPCSŐ

1,415

RF4**

1,72

4,06

hornyolt kialakítás, műgyantával kitöltve, akadálymentes jelölés céljából

látszóbeton falba süllyesztett lámpatest, elektromos terv alapján

RP6

+2,75

RP5

S.06

3,20

mozgásérzékelő , elektromos tervek alapján

15 ELEKTROMOS HELYISÉG

gépészeti faláttörés, gépészeti és statikai terv alapján

szellőzőrács gépészeti kiírás és részletterv alapján

RP5

25 75

RF5*

RP1

L3 mennyezetre rögzített lámpatestek, elektromos tervek alapján

RP4

RF2

+3,05 szellőzőrács meglévő,gépészeti feltáratlankiírás monolit és vasbeton vagy tégla falszerkezet részletterv alapján FELTÉTELEZETT külső kontúrja,+2,75 feltárás során pontosítandó!

SOPRON

211,00

1,50

földvisszatöltés

RF11

ÉPÍTTETŐ / MEGREND

50x25x12cm kőszegély

RF4

L03

(211,02)

+2,19

L03 pontszerű rögzítőfül R-CD 60x27 profil vonalmenti tartóváz

SO TEREPSZIN

tégla(211,45) burkolat gyalogos terhelésre +2,65 20x10x5,2 cm antracit térburkoló tégla nem teherbíró alépítményen

100.3 RM acél szigetelés tartó profil

(211,515)

+2,46

±0,00 = 208,805 mB

új 24cm vtg. látszóbeton támfal, statikai tervek és látszóbeton specifikáció alapján

(211,50)

+2,71

+2,22

MEGJEGYZÉS: - Jelen építész kiv valamennyi szakági Költségvetés! - Minden méret a he - A megjelölt konkr eltérés csak azono esetén! - A rétegrendeket lás - Jelen tervdokume ideértve az összes megépítésére haszn - A fel nem tárt szerk

L02

50cm széles kavicsterítés, két komponensű műgyanta kötőanyaggal (pl. ROMPOX-DEKO)

15 15

hornyolt kialakítás, műgyantával kitöltve, akadálymentes jelölés céljából

209,00

2,0%

±0,00

vasbeton fal

-0,16 -0,16

-0,36

+208,500 mértékadó talajvíz szint

-0,36

-0,50

-0,41

YTONG mész

-0,65

208,00

lejtésadó kön -1,11

-1,11

-1,16

vasalt aljzat

szerelt gipszk

Renewal of the underground toilet, Section c-c

L02

(212,10)

+3,33

+3,30

(212,00)

100.3 RM acél szigetelés tartó profil

212,00

RT1

+3,20

MEGJEGYZÉS: - Jelen építész ki valamennyi szakág Költségvetés! - Minden méret a he - A megjelölt konkr eltérés csak azono esetén! - A rétegrendeket lá - Jelen tervdokum ideértve az összes megépítésére haszn - A fel nem tárt szer

(211,50)

+2,71

+2,70

RF4*

±0,00 = 208,805 mB

100.3 RM acél szigetelés tartó profil

SO TEREPSZIN

(211,515)

Delta-Band öntapadó bitumenkaucsuk szalag

(211,265)

+2,46

RF4

+2,30

elszívás

RF9

elszívás

RF8

elszívás

RF8

211,00

ÉPÍTTETŐ / MEGREN

+2,25

SOPRON

(211,05)

elszívás

RF8

földvisszatöltés

RP4

elszívás

(211,02)

földvisszatöltés

RF4

ÉPÍTTETŐ MEGRENDELŐ:

E GENERÁLTERVEZŐ, ÉPÍTÉSZ TERVEZŐ:

+1,33

RF1

RF3

visszafalazás, meglévő monolit vasbeton vagy tégla feltáratlan falszerkezet FELTÉTELEZETT külső kontúrjával egy síkban, feltárás során pontosítandó!

45mm hullámmagasságú trapézlemez, bennmaradó zsaluzat statikai tervek szerint

+1,28

210,00

+0,89

(208,805)

RP5

RP1

STATIKA:

209,00

alapozás feltételezett felső síkja, feltárás során pontosítandó!

meglévő, feltáratlan sávalap FELTÉTELEZETT kontúrja, feltárás során pontosítandó!

GÉPÉSZET:

±0,00

alapozás feltételezett felső síkja, feltárás során pontosítandó!

fúrt, ragasztott betonacél, stat. tervek alapján 85/45 zsomp

+208,500 mértékadó talajvíz szint

(208,23)

ELEKTROMOS TERVE

-0,57

07 |

Reformed church and community house, Balatonakarattya

new reformed commuinity center — study plan address Balatonakarattya, Kisfaludy Promenade size 415 m2 design 2015 general design Hetedik Műterem architects Levente Szabó DLA, Balázs Biri co-architect Rita Dolmány visualisation Bence Falussy

The settlement that has recently found its autonomy now faces a special challenge in trying to determine its new public buildings in order to strengthen an own identity – in addition to the preservation of existing natural and urban values. According to our concept plan, the reformed church provides a holy place for a smaller but permanent congregation and for a vacationist community of a relevant size, while the community building may become the ’living room’ of the settlement and the residents of Akarattya. The determinant mass of the church towers above the simple volumes of the ensemble, while the surrounding building parts (accommodating the service functions of the church), the porch connecting the two buildings and also the community house were designed with lower, homogeneous forms following the slope. The central space of the community hall is an appr. 100 seat lecture hall, providing space for a variety of events. Besides the service functions, the key element of the complex is the semi-open terrace that can be accessed both from direction of the lecture hall and the lobby. The positioning allows the terrace as well as the lecture hall to enjoy the breathtaking view of Lake Balaton. An airy staircase leads to Kisfaludy Promenade. Local connections are expressed in the red stone of the nearby Balatonalmádi, being typical for the houses around Lake Balaton, appearing also on the façade of Akarattya’s summer houses and residential buildings. The porch connecting the two buildings is made of larch, while the roofing material is pre-patinated copper.

The master plan of the community center

A A Floor plan

View of Lake Balaton from the inner space of the church, visualisation, 2015 (ÂŠ Bence Falussy)

University projects 2009-2015

08 |

Singer bath, Gárdony

public beach — diploma project address Gárdony size appr. 5000 m2 design 2015 professor Richárd Hőnich DLA

Hungary’s third largest natural lake is Lake Velence, one of the most attractive tourist attraction. Since the 1930’s it has become increasingly popular among holidaymakers and tourists. In these days there are vacant hotels around the lake in a really bad condition and these can not meet the contemporary expectations. These spots are just seasonally used and poorly equipped. There are different locations that are under revitalizations but there isn’t a global concept about the lake’s complete development. In my diploma project I examined the different spots of the shore and I categorized systematically them. I chose that area which needed the the most interventions. In my proposal I intend to break the monotonous nature of the shore with a snaking pier system. This flat architectural structure at several points are raised, where there are different functions (restaurant, changing room, buffet, shop). I create different kind of playgrounds on the piers which have no place at the shores of Lake Velence so far. On the mainland there are the server buildings for the beach such as restaurant, changing room, buffet, shop, ect..

Site analysis I Concept drawing

Site analysis II Concept drawing

Site plan

Site analysis III Concept drawing

Sections

09 |

Kindergarten, Érd

four group kindergarten — complex design address Érd, Hungary size 800 m2 design 2014 professor Richárd Hőnich DLA

The semester’s topic was that to design a kindergarten not in an ordinary way. The construction site was located in Érd, not too far from Budapest,. This suburban area is really heterogeneous, thanks to the proximity of the capital. On the site there was an other kindergarten which couldn’t meet the modern requirements, neither in a structural or in a constructional way. At the begining my first discovery was that the function could be built up in a linear system. This led me to find a material, which gave me the conception: this was the rope. After that when I started to analyze the behaviour of the function I realized that as a child it is the first step to become the part of the society. So it couldn’t be possible to leave the linear system in the plan, we needed a knot to create a space. This is the core of the building. After the examination of the site it was obvious for me to handle with the problematic of the stair in the gound. So in the first couple of versions my „rope or snake” climbed to the terrain, as a green roof. It became the base of the concept: boxes with the function and above that there is a heavy, caring roof. The volume became closed to that directions which ones are too crowded. So the plan and the elevations are mainly opened to the south which is also really advantageous to the goup rooms. The green roof became too monumental after a while, so I felt I need to break it, that is why there were 3 semi-opened areas in the plan which helped to give some place where the children could play in a rainy weather as well.

Volume variations Concept models

Site plan

Sections

Elevations

side project 2015-2017

10 |

Multilayered cultural Landscape workshop, Luxor architectural research address Luxor, Egypt year 2015 professor Zsolt Vasáros DLA

„The Industrial and Agricultural Building Design Department in January 2015, announced a competition for an international workshop and field work to participate in graduate student training which is an integral part of the recently initiated large-scale student survey camp. The Eötvös Loránd University Research Workshop of Higher Technological Institute in Cairo joined to the organization. The first workshop was in Budapest to prepare the Luxor field exercises and workshops. The main theme of the multi-layered cultural research is that to explore the vernacular, the historical architecture and the landscape and analyze active today in the relationship, particularly Hassan Fathy (1900-1989) Egyptian architectural heritage, whose internationally recognized, modern architect. During the field trip to Luxor on the 25th March 2015 workshop’s goal was that to design the possibilities of Fathy’s New Gurna, while measuring the Kharga Oasis largely dominant memories and an appreciation of the outstanding architect’s oeuvre as well. The cooperation of the participants in the long-term plan, they try to insert their results in the Middle Eastern trend of contemporary architectural thinking intellectual. The Egyptian workshops and fieldwork experience is expected to result in model assumptions because of special circumstances, which is the lifeblood university-level education and research, the department therefore offered to provide students with the opportunity to participate.

Hassan Fathy and the modern It’s simpler easier to examine understand Hassan Fathy’s oeuvre in the context of his time so it’s worth comparing with his contemporaries’ approach and the emerging architectural styles in the modern era. In general, modern architecture was characetrized by a freer spatial organization which differed from the former architectural ages. This was possible because of the appearance of the new building materials and construction technologies that gave an opportunity for experimentation. At that time the architectural design was pushed into the background, the use of simple, puritan forms and geometrical elements was tipical. The Architectural spatial formation served the utility and functionalism. The designers did not create value with the material but with ways of its use. With this approach, arcitecture was able to meet with the increased demand of for construction. Adolf Loos, a prominent figure of modern architecture propagated the beauty of the material and fine elaboration instead of ornamentation; while Fathy emphasized the puritan forming from the vernacular architecture. However, Contrary to the discipline of modern architecture both of the architects used stylistic elements, even admitted by Loos has admitted that. Their relation to the techniques however are quite different. While Fathy turned to traditional techniques, Loos believed in the application of technical innovations used as a reasonable tool in the service of the people. Just like Fathy, Loos also willingly applied proved well tested solutions for several problems; however, he rejected the use of typical elements that arised as an interesting question in connection to Fathy’s archiecture. While Although Fathy beleived that there are were no two identical tasks or persons, however New Gourna was built up from of quite the same typed units that unfortunately didn’t hasn’t served the real needs of the people despite the fact that the architect made interviews with the future residents. Of course Naturally the dilemma arises if it is were possible to create a new settlement from of completely unique elements. The need was not a personal choice in the 40’s, and after the war it was a natural process to renew the cities, villages all over the world. Parallels are not only to be observed not only between Loos’s and Fathy’s work, Walter Gropius a leading figure of Bauhaus also fits in this series. Fathy’s attitude to architecture showed such similarity to Gropius’s approach which clearly highligh-

Detail of the mosque in New Gourna, 2015

The great mosque of New Gourna, 2015

tes that both of them lived in the spirit of the modern age. Though Fathy didn’t write his manifesto in bullet points, many of the Gropius’s principles can be discovered in his scripts and work. People have played a central role in both architects’ praxis. The Movements to improve and change living conditions were very important for them just as to build for the people after analysing and satisfying their needs instead of merely self-serving architecture. In this period Fathy devoted his attention to social architecture, he wanted to help people living in extreme poverty, but today, looking from a further perspective it can be said we can say that his ideas couldn’t be realised in this area as he wanted it them to be or as it is written in scientific professional articles. The application of the local traditions, design, technology was primary for Fathy as opposed to Gropius, who found it inconceivable to use locally related solutions. He only took the climatic conditions into consideration, which played a central role also in Hassan Fathy’s architectural attitude, however, with by using the local solutions for these questions he gave didn’t have to invent anything. ready-made answers. In the XXth century the problem of losing local architectural character emerged as a result of the appearance of the modern. The merely functionalism-based, simplified, impersonal architecture was criticized as it couldn’t take the local nature into consideration. Only after the 1950’s some aspects developed that brought attention to the local identity; however, the meaningless utilization of various architectural forms and elements is despisable because it that would lead to populism. Sigfried Giedion thought that the new regionalism shouldn’t only be imitating the local design and materials but grabbing the mentality and spirit of the place. Hassan Fathy realised that he can create value in Egypt if he would brushed up the vernacular achievements. He despised the aspirations of modern architecture and emphasized the utilization of local materials and building together with the local community in the spirit of the local traditions. Despite the the high demand in construction needs (e.g. designing the masterplan and the individual elements of the villages of New Gourna and New Baris) there are some motifs that can be paralleled to modern contemporaries’ paradigms. During the implementation of the projects Fathy aspired to use the cheapest solutions, kept the social needs in his mind and the availability of labour relations. This led to the fact that the tipical feature of the modern architecture, the standarization process became inevitable and this often– the unified spans, isomporhic domes, identical windows and building constructional moduls – can be seen at the preserved buildings.

The market in New Baris, 2015

2018