RAVINE MANGALA
.
ARCHITECTURE URBAN DESIGN
A LIFELONG LEARNER AND INDEPENDENT THINKER. I have a fascination for the links between urban design and architecture and a unique passion for communicating ideas through multi-disciplinary collaboration. Over the last seven years as a student, I have been independently working and studying at the nexus of urban design and architecture, which has increased my awareness of the impact design has on the way we shape our natural and built environment. I am committed to the idea of solving critical problems in architecture beyond the building. As an advocate for mental health, I care about sustainability and innovative design that not only intentionally responds to the needs of all people, but a kind that compels us to transform and create solutions to problems with greater consequences that have not yet been resolved. I am currently a Master ‘s candidate in my thesis year at the School of Architecture at UNC Charlotte. I am seeking to gain more experience within the discipline as I work towards completing my last academic year. I believe that the leadership skills I have acquired and my creative abilities would be vital assets to both urban design and architecture practice. I am simply thrilled to experience the next chapter as an emerging designer.
ravine km.
(919)798-9584 rmangal1@uncc.edu linkedin.com/rmangala
RAVINE MANGALA
Architecture | Urban Design
EDUCATION
EXPERIENCE
University of North Carolina at Charlotte Master of Architecture II, 2O17 Master of Urban Design, 2015 Pontifical Catholic University in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Summer Abroad Bachelor of Arts in Architecture, 2014
Research Fellow The Centre for Urban Design and Mental Health / August 2016 - Present
SKILLS Software Proficiency Revit AutoCAD Photoshop InDesign Illustrator Bluebeam Rhinoceros Sketchup GIS Grasshopper Python Dynamo Digital/ Handcraft Skills 3D Rendering/ 3D Modeling Architectural Hand Drafting Sketching Water Coloring Graphic Design Digital/ Film Photography Disciplinary Expertise Community Planning City and Regional Planning Form Based Code Design for Climate Change/ Sea Level Rise Interest/ Curiosity WELL Building Standard LEED Building Standard Sustainable Design Language Proficiency English French Lingala
Contribute to a multi-disciplinary platform that aims to inform, inspire, and make the case for integrating mental health improvement into urban policy, planning, design, and development as a standard consideration and an achievable priority. Collaborate with experts to communicate ideas at the nexus of urban design and mental health. Write op-eds and issues for publications on the UD/MH Sanity and Urbanity blog and in the biannual journal.
Architectural Intern Little Diversified Architectural Consulting / May 2016 - August 2016 Collaborated with senior architects and project managers on developing architectural drawings for schools, civic, colleges and universities projects. Involved in early stages of collecting research and developing design concepts and schematics for an international urban planning project. Coordinated with engineers to edit Construction Drawing sets. Created final design development drawings in Revit. Participated in design charrettes, panel discussions, client reviews, and construction site visits.
Architectural Draftsman/ Designer Andrew Wagner Architects / December 2015 - April 2016 Developed design for high-end custom residential projects under the leadership of a practicing architect. Produced architectural drawings for quality assurance. Collaborated with LBD Interior Design professionals. Coordinated drawings with structural engineers. Published final Construction Drawing Sets. Assisted to deliver projects from start to finish.
Art Gallery Assistant University of North Carolina at Charlotte / May 2013 - April 2016 Monitored the university’s main art gallery during opening hours. Participated in the instillation of monthly exhibits. Helped in the de-instillation of old exhibits. Collaborated with local professional artists and art students of interest. Attended monthly Gallery Committee Meetings for artist/exhibition selections. Welcomed guests during opening and closing gallery receptions.
Senior Drawing and Painting Instructor Winshape Camps at Mt. Berry, GA / May 2014 - December 2014 Served as a senior summer camp counselor for girls in students. Taught drawing and painting skills classes eighteen. Served as head coach and skills book writer study/ discussion sessions for senior camp girls,
a group of at least twenty for senior campers ages for women’s lacrosse team. co-counselors, and assitant
four high school thirteen through Led small group camp directors.
HONORS S i g m a A l p h a P i , The National Society of Leadership and Success / NSLS National Member / May 2016 - Present Collaborate with other graduate students and faculty advisors from various academic disciplines within the university’s honors program. Participate in leadership conferences, events, and community service programs .
A I A C / S O A 2 0 1 6 T r a v e l F e l l o w s h i p , School of Architecture Finalist / December - March 2016 Finalist of the 2016 Travel Fellowship award once a year to a student seeking to study abroad. Proposed study: Community Based Care for mental health in rural and urban areas of New Zealand.
S O A S c h o l a r s h i p i n P r a c t i c e , School of Architecture Finalist / February - April 2016
2 0 1 6 N i n e r I n t e r n a t i o n a l , Gallery Exhibit Featured Artist + Design Winner + Honorable Mentions / March - April 2016 Featured graduate student at the 2015- 2016 Niner International gallery exhibit. Selected winner for postcard design to serve the Office of International Programs. Received three honorable mentions for photography competition.
W i l l i a m W i l s o n B r o w n S c h o l a r s h i p , Office of International Programs 2014 - 2015 Award Recipient / February 2015 Recipient of the William Wilson Brown Jr. Latin America Scholarship, awarded once a year to a student who plans to study abroad in a Latin American country. Selected Program: Master of Urban Design - Rio de Janeiro
1 0 0 A r t i f a c t s t o R e p r e s e n t t h e S c h o o l , Gallery Exhibit Fall 2012 Featured Student / August - September 2012 Organized presentations and interviewed prospective students for undergraduate first year admissions. Appointed juror for undergraduate final reviews. Served on advisory board as class representative with SoA director. Recipient of W. Brown Jr. Latin America Scholarship . Finalist of 2016 Scholarship in Practice and 2016 AIAC/SoA Travel Fellowship.
LEADERSHIP M a s t e r of A r c h i t e c t u r e S t u d e n t S o c i e t y / MASS Liaison + Critical Mass Communications and Planning Committee / August 2014 - Present Collaborate with graduate students and faculty of UNC Charlotte to plan, organize, and host the annual symposium for graduate students thesis projects from schools around the southeast. Appointed photographer for the symposium.
S c h o o l o f A r c h i t e c t u r e , UNC Charlotte Admissions Interviewer + Juror + Advisory Panel Representative / August 2011 - May 2016 Organized presentations and interviewed prospective students for undergraduate first year admissions. Appointed juror for undergraduate midterm and final reviews. Served on advisory board as class representative with SoA director.
U r b a n L a n d I n s t i t u t e / ULI National Member + 2015 Gerald Hines Competition / January 2015 Competed and collated with a team of urban design, architecture, and finance graduate students and professionals on behalf of UNC Charlotte Master of Urban Design program for a competition based in New Orleans, LA.
A m e r i c a n I n s t i t u t e o f A r c h i t e c t u r e S t u d e n t s / AIAS Chapter Historian + Freedom by Design Committee / May 2013 - August 2015 Designed promotional materials for academic programs and competitions. Photographed social, educational, and professional events for members to share on social media. Participated in design charrettes and build days for Chantilly Montessori’s Playground for Children. Served as Planning Committee member for the annual Beaux Arts Ball and national South Quad Conferences. Participated in the Professional Mentorship Exchange program for emerging professionals.
N a t i o n a l O r g a n i z a t i o n o f M i n o r i t y A r c h i t e c t s / NOMA National Member + 2013 National Competition Design Team / September 2011 - 2013 Participated as team member on behalf of local chapter for fall design competition held in Atlanta, GA. Served on the Planning Committee to organize the annual Art Festival for the School of Architecture.
C4 Charlotte College Experience Secretary + Treasurer + Special Events Coordinator / May 2011 - July 2014 Supervised the organization’s calender of events to regulate vision plans for the semester. Designed graphics for promotional materials. Planned and recorded minutes for executive board meetings. Served as volunteer-contact coordinator. Maintained custody of funds and responsibility for the deposit, investment and disbursement of finances. Served as Communications Chair responsible for writing grants and project proposals to the university to seek funding.
CharLIT Museum of Light CharLIT Museum of Light Charlotte, North Carolina Master of Architecture II Lifecycle Integrated Kinetic Envelopes Studio Faculty: Kyoung-Hee Kim Fall 2016
Light & Comfort Enriching the Built Environment
Nourishment & Mind Enriching Users’ Physical/ Mental Health
2. SOLAR GAIN Quantitative Performance (Daylighting)
Air & Water Enriching the Natural Environment
4. WATER COLLECTION Quantitative Performance (Geothermal Heahpump)
1. REFLECTIVITY Qualitative Performance (Color, Intensity, Pattern)
5. DIFFUSIVITY Qualitative Performance (Color, Intensity) Sun
Sun
mer
ter
Win
Sum
0I
3. TRANSMITIVITY Qualitative Performance (Color, Intensity, Pattern)
Social Behaviors: Curious. Extroverted. Inventive. Careless/ ful. Enthusiastic. Moody. Ambitious. Design Opportunities: Community. Responsive. Creative. Variety Options. Collaborative.
Social Behaviors: Conscientious. Cautious. Assertive. Ambitious. Active. Curious. Perfectionist. Reserved. Design Opportunities: Gathering. Community. Interactive Reserved. Collaborative. Quiet Spaces.
Millennials
Remote Workers
Light + Form Formal Qualities/ Light Connecting to Space
Social Behaviors: Reserved. Passive. Excitable. Considerate. Charming. Pleasant. Sincere Design Opportunities: Collaborative. Community. Options. Ordered. Creative.
Older Generations
Unique Traits: Static & Responsive to Geometry, Materiality, Daylighting, Time. Design Opportunity: An Innovative. Envelope. Responsive to Cultural. Context (Interior Informality).
Cognitive Kinetic
Light + Space Spatial Qualities/ Light Informing Spatial Understanding
Unique Traits: Responsive to Vegetation, Temperature, Humidity. Design Opportunity: An Innovative. Skin Responsive to Climate of the Urban Context (Interior Green).
Bio Kinetic
Light + Meaning Luminous Qualities/ Light Evoking Meaning
Unique Traits: Responsive to Modes of Movement. Physical Transitional Rotational. Design Opportunity: An Innovative Facade. Responsive to User Experience (Interior Formality).
Active Kinetic
C H A R L I T
0I
LIVE REALM Interactive Spaces
l
i
t
Galleries : 42,000 sq.ft Private : 6,500 sq.ft Public : 12,000 sq.ft
M U S E U M
O F
INDEPENDENT REALM Meditative Spaces
g
a
l
l
L I G H T
TRANSFORMATIVE REALM Collaborative Spaces
e
r
i
e
s
Charlit 05
0I
C H A R L I T
M U S E U M
O F
L I G H T
The design for CharLIT is intended to provide innovative, luminance exhibit spaces for a display of different catalogues of light. The Museum houses three “PROGRAM REALMS” that are designed as LIT GALLERIES. The galleries include interactive, meditative, and collaborative spaces. Located in Charlotte’s 2nd Ward, the Museum sits at the foot of Uptown, providing an unobstructed panoramic view of the city’s skyline. The Museum is a CULTURAL ENTITY that responds to the unique social culture most popular among Charlotte’s millennial generation, remote professionals and older generations with a hybrid of programs serving a diverse group of people. The LIVE REALM IGNITES imagination and brings ideas to life, with a powerful visual connection to the city’s skyline. Vertically sandwiched between L and T, the INDEPENDENT REALM ILLUMINATES personal interest and is a threshold where one’s “desire to express meets the possible.” It is distributed to physically connect with the adjacent natural environment. The TRANSFORMATIVE REALM SPARKS inspiration through shared beliefs, radiates conversations and strengthens community. It is oriented facing the main intersection, serving as a grand entrance to welcome in the community. The galleries serve as exhibit spaces for the different user groups to come in and experience the live display of light through formal, spacial and luminous qualities. The kinetic façade reveals the building as a lit object, illuminating its surrounding urban context through different degrees of crystalinity, which affect the reflectivity, transmitivity, and diffusivity of light illuminating the interior spaces. The architecture’s luminous quality adapts to different times of day by displaying a catalogue of various kinds of light. The threshold between each gallery is a moment whose innovative and responsive strategy is manifested through rotating transparent panels that reveal the crystalinity that is created through light. Through materiality, light is manifested though pivoting dichroic panels that transforming daylight into a vivid display of color. The intensity of light varies based on the light source/ orientation and viewing angle.
Color Primary Effects from Pivoting Panels
Ravine Mangala 06
Intensity Based on both Natural & Electric Light
Pattern From Users and Interior Objects
Color Primary Effects from Reflecting Kinetic Panels
Color Primary Effects onto Vertical surfaces
Intensity Based on Natural Light Source
Pattern Reflected onto Horizontal Surfaces
Charlit 07
Intensity Based on Natural State of Nightsky
Pattern Little Patterns due to Diffusivity
0I
C H A R L I T
M U S E U M
O F
L I G H T
Sustainable Building Integrated Systems Natural Daylighting, Passive System Electric Lighting, Active System Transforming a Live Display of Light through a Kinetic Building Envelope
Ravine Mangala 08
PRIMARY SKIN 24”x24” Deep W Wide Flange Beam Suspended Ceiling for Innovative Lighting Technology
FLOOR CEILING PACK Metal Decking over Concrete Slab 1” Finished FloorHorizontal Surface for the Display of Light
VENTILATION 2” Batt Insulation 36” Gap for Ventilation 6” Air Gap
KINETIC PARTS 4”x8” Custom Curtain Wall Mullion Curtain Wall Panel as Primary Building Skin Supporting Grid Shell Bracket from Floor Slabs Supporting Kinetic System Supporting Steel Rods for Kinetic Panels 24”x24” Pivoting Kinetic Panels
Charlit 09
0I
C H A R L I T
M U S E U M
O F
L I G H T
Annual Energy Use/ Cost Annual Energy
37% Fuel 63% Electricity
Monthly Heating Load
Monthly Design Data
Wind/ Temperature
1342 1150
Energy Use: Fuel 12% HVAC 88% DHW
Carbon Emissions
Annual Wind Rose
Annual Speed
Fuel 800
Project Location: 35.2189140319824,-80.8388595581055 Sun Study Start Date Time: Solar 1/1/2010 12:00:00 AM Energy Sun Study End Date Time: (kWh/m2) 12/31/2010 11:59:00 PM
Energy Use: Electricity
Fuel
19% Lighting 27% Misc Equip. 59% HVAC
Monthly Wind Roses
Performance, Solar/ Energy Analysis North Faรงade, top left West Faรงade, bottom left South Faรงade, top right East Faรงade, bottom right
Ravine Mangala 10
Monthly Cooling Load
Monthly Frequency
Summer Celebrating the Place around which “it� is Designed
Fall - Winter Celebrating a Variety of Human Activities
Charlit 11
Spring Celebrating Healthy Attributes of Light + Space based on Time/Place
02
Techstyle Ecotech Tower Techstyle Corporate Headquarters Charlotte, North Carolina Master of Architecture II Comprehensive Architectural Studio Faculty: Jefferson Ellinger Design Team: R. Mangala, J. Rintenbaugh, N. Modares Spring 2016
Ravine Mangala 12
Techstyle Corporate Tower 13
02
TECHSTYLE
COREPORATE
TOWER
4. Human-made Features and Occupation
Vehicular Circulation through Throughfares and Railroads
il
e
ott
arl
Ch
ra il T
Ra
0
Wilkinson Blvd. 3. Physical and Legal Description Traffic count: 3,800
0.5
1km
Morehead St.
Trade St.
Graham St
I-77 and I-277
Tryon St.
Independence Blvd
Traffic count: 4,200
Traffic count: 10,100 vehicles/ day
Traffic count: 48,500 vehicles/ day
Traffic count: between 126,000 to 169,000 vehicles/ day
Traffic count: 82,000 vehicles/ day
Traffic count: 72,000 vehicles/ day
Location: and vehicles/ City Context vehicles/ Neighborhoods day day
Charlotte Department of Transportation - 2014 Traffic Counts
Major Thoroughfares and Railroads
il
e
ott
arl
Ch
ra il T
Ra
0
Ashley Park
Center City
Area: 1.559 sq mi Area: 2.143 sq mi Population: 2,571 Population: 14,251 4. Human-made Features Density: 1,649/sq mi and Occupation Density: 6,600/sq mi Bounded by Freedom Bounded by I-277 Dr. and Morehead St. Transit and 4 Historic Wards Network Infrastructure: Public Pedestrian
Elizabeth
Plaza Midwood
NoDa
Area: 0.623 sq mi Population: 3,467 Bounded by Morehead, Dilworth Road, W, Charlotte, and Park
Area: 0.271 sq mi Population: 1,168 Density: 4,316/sq mi Bounded by S. Kings and E. 4th St.
Area: 1.384 sq mi Population: 3,961 Bounded by Central il ra Ave., E. 5th St, Park il T Ra Dr, and Independence tte
Area: 1.365 sq mi Population: 3,467 Bounded by The Plaza (north), and Central Ave. (south)
Area: 1.111 sq mi Population: 2,745 Bounded by N. Tryon, The Plaza, and Sugar Creek
Latta Arcade
e
eg
oll
C S.
arl
Ch
t.
eS
eg
ll Co
3rd/ Convention Center Station
e
lott
r ha
C
S.
S.
Co
ge
lle
Co
3rd/ Convention Center Station
Ch
ail
S.
S. St.
d
ar
ev
Br
rd va
il
e
lott
C
il Tra ail
eR
tt rlo
a
Ch
ra il T
Ra
el
ldw
Ca
St.
N.
n
so
vid
Da
St.
Transit System
N.
St.
Bre
S.
ell
ldw
Ca
ell
ldw
Ca
Charlotte Convention Center
t.
nS
so
vid
Da
St.
St.
Charlotte City Hall
n
so
St.
Charlotte City Hall
vid St. Da son S. David
Charlotte Convention Center
Stonewall
S.
Stonewall
Site Access Access via via Bike Bike Paths Paths Site
N.
St.Charlotte Area
S.
r ha
St.
CTC Station Time Warner Cable Arena
il Tra
el
ldw
Ca
Charlotte Area Transit System
r il T
Ra
eR
ott
arl
St.
Cable Arena
N. Epicentre ail
S.
il Tra ail eR ottTime Warner
CTC Station
St.
Latta Arcade
Bechtler Musuem
e
Within one mide of Uptown
Epicentre
Bechtler Infrastructure:Musuem Public Transit and Pedestrian Network
g lle
lo
ar
Ch
4. Human-made Features and Occupation
Knight Theater
1km
Cherry
Charlotte Neighborhoods
Knight Theater
0.5
Dilworth
3rd St, St, 4th 4th St, St, Brevard Brevard 3rd
ONE ONE WAY
WAY
CATS Station/ Station/ Stops Stops CATS
Connected Sidewalks Sidewalks Connected
Charlotte Rail Rail Trail Trail Charlotte
Caldwell St. St. Caldwell
Access to to Civic/ Civic/ Cultura Cultura Access
TWO TWO WAY
WAY
Existing Infrastructure
Transit and Pedestrian Network
Existing Infrastructure
Transit and Pedestrian Network
Interior Perspectives, Techstyle Corporate The Business/ Artists in Residence Thread The Runway Thread The Community Thread
Ravine Mangala 14
s
Architecture as Provocateur The design intent for the EcoTech Tower provides collaborative workspace and innovative ateliers to assist TECHSTYLE, a leading trend authority, serving the fashion and creative industries. The program includes a nanotechnology lab to accommodate the advancement of textiles, a workshop to enhance methods of manufacturing, and workspaces for designers, artists, and enthusiasts to create the fashions of tomorrow. Located between 3rd and 4th Streets on the south side of the light rail line, the tower is at the heart of activity in Charlotte and the crossroads of multiple forms of transportation. The textile based company harkens back to the history of the area as the foremost producer of textiles in the United States.
Metal Decking 24” x24” Deep W Wide Flange Beam 2” Batt Insulation Dropped Ceiling
1” Finished Floor Concrete Slab
The architecture of the headquarters focuses on weaving together programmatic “threads” of art, business, and community spaces unified by a runway serving as an active display of inhouse designs. The tower responds to the urban context of the site by welcoming pedestrian traffic from the light rail stations and bus terminal adjacent to the lot through pleated, faceted thresholds which recess into the tower form.
Metal Decking
6” Air Gap 3”x6” Custom Curtain Wall Mullion Unitized Curtail Wall Panel, Pleated by Face 24”x24” Steel Tube/ Structural Diagrid
The voids in the form will provide opportunities for the runway to visually engage the city of Charlotte and serve as a privileged view into the world of haute couture. The ground is manipulated through a darting motif in the plaza on the north of the site. The folded forms encourage visitors to filter through the community thread composed of restaurants, retail, gardens, and the company’s premiere runway. The tower challenges the exclusivity of the fashion world by the weaving techniques employed in the building’s spatial conception. By drawing the pedestrian traffic and community into the base of the tower, the runway thread provides an uncommon vantage point into the creative world and the expanding fashion market of Charlotte.
Techstyle Corporate Tower 15
02
01
TECHSTYLE TECHSTYLE
CORPORATE
COREPORATE
TOWER
TOWER
3
L
Development Development 1: Adapting Development 1:Development the Adapting Character 1: Development Adapting the 1: Character Adapting the1:Character Adapting the Character the Character Development Development 3: Ideas of3:Pleating Ideas of Development Pleating 3:ofIdeas of Pleating Development 3: of Ideas Pleating Development 3: Ideas Pleating Development Development 2: Interweaving Development 2:Development Interweaving the2: Development Urban Interweaving the Landscape Urban 2:the Interweaving Landscape Urban Landscape theLandscape Urban Landscape 2: Interweaving the Urban of the Surrounding of the Surrounding ofUrban the of Surrounding Context. the Urban Surrounding of Providing the Context. Urban Surrounding Urban Context. Providing a public Context. Urban plaza Providing a public Context. Providing plaza a public Providing a public plaza aplaza public and Weaving and the Weaving Building the Mass. Building andMass. Weaving the Building and Weaving the Building Mass. Mass. and Weaving the Building Mass. with theplaza Building with theMass. Building with the Bringing Mass. Building with Bringing Mass. the into Building Bringing public the building. into Mass. public the Bringing building. into theinto public building. the building. with thepublic Building Mass. Bringing public the into building. connectingconnecting rail trailconnecting and railbus trail connecting terminal and railconnecting bus trailrail together. terminal and trail bus rail and together. terminal trail busand terminal together. bus terminal together.together.
Attraction Attraction Points byAttraction Points Important Attraction byPoints Important Views Attraction Points by Important Views by Points Important Views by Important Views Views
Pulling Attractions Pulling Attractions Points PullingPulling within Attractions Points Tower Attractions Pulling within Points Attractions Tower Points within Tower within PointsTower within Tower
Development 4: Weaving the runway Development from exterior 4: from Weaving toexterior interior the to runway from exterior to interior Development Weaving the Runway Development 4:Development Weaving the4: runway interior Development Development 5: Weaving 5:Development the Weaving Runway the 5: Runway Weaving the runway from exterior to interior Weaving the Runway Development 4: Weaving the runway from exterior to interior Development 5: Weaving the5:Runway building program giving the giving view building from exterior program into and the giving runway. the view from into the runway. and Pleated Mass Together. buildingand program and thegiving view exterior into the runway. and Pleated and Mass Pleated Together. building program and from giving the view from exterior into the runway. andTogether. Pleated Mass Together. building program and the view from exterior into theexterior runway. andMass Pleated Mass Together. Articulating Spatial Articulating Hierarchy. Articulating Spatial Hierarchy. Articulating Spatial Hierarchy. Articulating Spatial Hierarchy. Spatial Hierarchy.
Connection Connection between Connection the between two Connection most between theConnection important twobetween most the two important between the most twoimportant most the two important most important Runway Thread Runway Views Thread Runway based Runway Views Thread on Runway based Points Thread Views onViews Thread based Pointsbased on Views Points on based Points on Points points from points outside from points outside points from outside from points outside from outside
Runway Thread Runway Views Thread Runway based Runway Views Thread on Runway based Points Thread Views onViews Thread based Pointsbased on Views Points on based Points on Points
Process Process Process Process Process
C
4
V
Runway Thread
Runway Thread
Runway Runway Thread Thread Structure with Cores Runway RunwayThread Thread Structure with Runway Runway Cores Structural Thread Thread Floor Structure Beams with supported Cores Runway Structural byThread Floor Structure Beams with supported Structural Runway Cores Connecting by Thread FloorDiagrid Structure BeamsNodes supported with Cores atConnecting Structural Floor by Floor Diagrid Beams Nodes supported Connecting at Building Structural Floor by Diagrid Diagrid Floorwith Beams Nodes Runway supported atStructure Floor Building Connecting by Diagrid Diagrid with Runway Nodes Building Structure Connecting at Floor Diagrid Diagrid with Runway Nodes Structure atBuilding Floor DiagridUnfolded with Runway Curtain Structure Building Wall byDiagrid Face Unfolded with Runway Curtain Structure Wall by Face Unfolded Curtain Wall by Face Runway Thread and Cores Runway Thread and Cores Runway Plates Thread and Cores Plates Runway Thread and CoresPlates Runway Thread and Cores Plates Plates
Unfolded Curtain Wall by FaceUnfolded Curtain Wall by Face
Structure StructureStructure StructureStructure
Program Distribution
Combined Program Threads and Runway Volume
Specific Program and Spaces throughout the Runway Thread
Circulation
Public and Private Cores, West Facing View
Program
Large Large Pleated Pleated Surface Surface
Large Pleated Surface
Design Design
Pleated Pleated Curtain Curtain WallWall with with Unitized Unitized Panels Panels
Large Pleated Surface
Large Pleated Surface
Pleated Pleated Curtain Curtain WallWall with with Verticle Verticle Mullions Mullions Connecting Connecting to Each to Each FloorFloor
Pleated Curtain Wall with Unitized Pleated Panels Curtain Wall with Unitized PleatedPanels Curtain Wall with Unitized Panels
Curtain Curtain WallWall Panels Panels and and FloorFloor Relationship Relationship
Unitized Unitized Curtain Curtain WallWall System System
Continuous Continuous Frame Frame Silicon, Silicon, with with horizontal horizontal member member
Pleated Curtain Wall with Pleated Verticle Curtain Wall with Pleated Verticle Curtain Curtain WallWall with Panels Verticle and Floor Curtain Relationship Wall Panels and Floor Curtain Relationship Wall Panels Unitized and Floor Curtain Relationship Wall System Unitized Curtain Wall System Unitized Curtain Continuous Wall System Frame Silicon,Continuous with horizontal Frame member Silicon, with Continuous horizontal Frame member Silicon, with horizontal member Mullions Connecting to Each Mullions Floor Connecting to Each Mullions Floor Connecting to Each Floor
Design Design Design
Diagramming the Big Idea Design Process: Development of the Concept of Weaving and Pleating from Urban to Building Form. Parti Development: The Runway Thread Based on Important Views from Interior to Exterior Space. Structural Integrity: The Building Mass as Supported by a Diagrid and a Runway Shell Interwoven with Building Cores. Program Distribution: Combined Program Threads, Circulation, Public/ Private Cores. Design of Curtain Wall: Unitized Curtain Wall System; Panels and Floor Relationship.
Ravine Mangala 16
M
Techstyle Corporate Tower 17
Ground Level 1. Site/Building Entry 2. Outdoor Public Space 3. Exterior Runway 4. Retail/ Community Thread 5. Public Open Space 6. CATS Transit Station 7. LYNX Light Rail Station 8. Parking 9. Loading Dock 10. Trash/ Recycling
Phase I
Phase I Canal Systems
PhasePhase I II Canal Systems Soft City
Phase PhasePhase I II II Canal Systems Soft City
Canal Systems
Canal Systems
Canal Systems Soft City
Climate Analysis Strategy Design
Phase II Phase III Phase II Phase III Barrier Wall SoftBarrier City Wall Soft City Barrier Wall Soft City Soft City
Favela llocation Commercial llocation Commercial
Favela
Social Social Analysis Analysis Favelas Favela
Social Analysis
Floo Floo
Road System Flood& Mudslide Risk Road System
Commercial llocation Commercial llocation
Fave Fave
Strategy Design Development Phasing
Retail/ Commercial
Drainge Drainge Road System
Canal Systems Canal Systems
Flood& Mudslide Risk Flood& Mudslide RiskFlood Flood& Mudslide Drainge RisksRisk
Design Design
Drainge Drainage
Commercial llocation Road System
Road System
Phase I
PhasePhase I II
PhasePhase I II
Phase II Phase III
Phase II Phase III
Phase I
Phase I
PhasePhase I II
Phase II
Phase II Phase III
Hard City
Hard City Hard City Intensed Density
Favela Soft City
Soft City City Soft Phase I
Canal Systems Barrier Wall PhaseIIIIV SoftPhase City IV Phase Phase IV IV PhaseIIIIII IV Phase Phase Phase Connect Connect Barrier WallPeople/ Barrier WallPeople/ Connect People/ Connect People/ Phase I Multi-mode transportation Multi-mode transportation Multi-mode transportation Multi-mode transportation Phase I Connect Barrier WallPeople/ Connect People/ Barrier Wall Connect People/ Multi-mode transportation Multi-mode transportation Multi-mode transportation
Connect People/ Accessibility Multi-mode transportation Phase II Phase II
Development Phasing
Phasing Design Design Development Strategy Strategy Phasing Design Design
Rio de Janeiro 2100
Phasing Phasing
Canal Systems
Phasing Phasing Development Development Phasing Phasing
Phasing Design Design
Phase I I Phase
Phase IV
Favela
Barrier Wall Connect Connect Barrier WallPeople/ Barrier WallPeople/ Connect People/ Connect People/ SoftBarrier City Wall Soft City Road System transportation Commercial llocation Intensed Density Multi-mode transportation transportation Multi-mode transportation Canal Systems Commercial llocation Multi-mode Favela llocation Multi-mode Commercial Favela Favela Commercial llocation Favela llocation Commercial Road System Road System Canal Systems
Road Infrastructure
System IntensedRoad Density
Urban Design Strategies in Light of Sea Level Rise
Intensed Density
LIVING WITH CANALS
Intensed Density
Favela
Rio de Janeiro Strategy Strategy2100
System System IntensedRoad IntensedRoad Density Density
Hard CityDrainge
Hard City
Favela llocation Favela llocation Commercial Commercial
Intensed Density Increased Rainfall Hard City Drainge Flood& Mudslide Risk Flood& Mudslide RiskFlood& Mudslide Risk Intensed Density Flood& Mudslide Risk Drainge Drainge
Development Development Phasing Phasing
Canal Systems Soft City
Intensed Density
Hard CityDrainge
Increased Rainfall Increased Rainfall
Urban UrbanDesign DesignStrategies StrategiesininLight LightofofSea SeaLevel LevelRise Rise
Canal Systems
Intensed Density
Canal Systems Soft City
Commercial llocation Commercial llocation Road System Road System Hard CityDrainge
Urban Design Strategies in Light of Sea Level Rise
Canal Systems
Phase III
LIVING LIVING WITH WITH CANALS CANALS
Increased Rainfall
Connect Hard Rainfall CityCity Hard IncreasedPeople/ Rainfall Increased Multi-mode transportation
Barrier WallWall Barrier
Hard Rainfall City Increased
Rio RiodedeJaneiro Janeiro2100 2100
Increased HardRainfall City
Social Analysis
System System IntensedRoad IntensedRoad Density Density
Increased Rainfall
Concentrated Density
Phase II
LIVING WITH CANALS
Intensed Density
Increased Rainfall
Increased Rainfall
Flood& Mudslide Risk Flood& Mudslide RiskFlood& Mudslide Risk Flood& Mudslide Risk Drainge Drainge
Climate Analysis
Analysis Analysis Analysis Climate Climate Social Analysis Analysis Analysis
Urban Urban Design DesignStrategies Strategies Urban inStrategy inStrategy Light Light Design ofofSea Sea Strategies Level Level Rise Rise inStrategy Light of Sea Level Rise Development Development Development Social Social Climate Climate Social
Intensed Density
Design Analysis Analysis
Soft City
Analysis Analysis Analysis
LIVING LIVING WITH CANALS WITH CANALS LIVING LIVING WITH LIVING WITHCANALS CANALS WITH CANALS LIVING LIVING WITH LIVING WITHCANALS CANALS WITH CANALS LIVING LIVING WITH LIVING WITHCANALS CANALS WITH CANALS
Master of Urban Design Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro Global Urban Design Studio Hard Rainfall City Increased Rainfall Increased Rainfall Increased Increased HardRainfall City Hard CityDrainge Hard CityDrainge Faculty: Jose Gamez Design Team: R. Mangala, K. Wyatt, G. Wang Commercial llocation Favela Summer 2015
RioRiodedeJaneiro Janeiro2100 2100 Rio de Janeiro 2100 Urban Design Strategies Urban in Light Design of Sea Strategies Level Rise in Light of Sea Level Rise RioRiodedeJaneiro Janeiro2100 2100 Rio de Janeiro 2100 Urban Urban Design DesignStrategies Strategies Urban inin Light Light Design ofofSea Sea Strategies Level LevelRise Rise in Light of Sea Level Rise Development Development Strategy Strategy Social Climate Social Phasing Phasing Design Design Analysis Analysis RioRio dedeJaneiro Janeiro2100 2100 Rio de Janeiro 2100 Analysis Urban Urban Design DesignStrategies Strategies Urban inStrategy inStrategy Light Light Design ofofSea Sea Strategies Level Level Rise Rise inStrategy Light of Sea Level Rise Development Development Development Social Social Climate Climate Social
Road System
Climate Climate Analysis Analysis
Climate Analysis Climate Analysis
RioDrainge 2100: Sustainable Urban Design Strategies Flood& Mudslide Risk in Light of Sea Level Rise Zona Oeste, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Climate Analysis Climate Analysis
Hard City
Living with Canals
Design Analysis Analysis Strategy Social Social Design Analysis Analysis
03
Phase I
PhaseIIIIV Phase
PhaseIIIIV Phase
Phase II Phase IV
Phase IV
Phase III
PhaseIIIIV Phase
Phase IV
Phase IV
Ravine Mangala 20
Phase III
Phase IV
Soft City
Barrier Wall Barrier Wall
Connec Connec Multi-m Multi-m
Phase II
Phase III Phase III
Phas Phas
A Counter Proposal The concept for this project was to create a sustainable area of high density where people live with canals. The design intent was to provide people with a place that is easily walkable, livable, and sustainable; a place where canals are the most important urban public spaces. The site faces critical challenges of climate change and sea level rise. The design responds to climate change in a sustainable way that will accommodate flooding and change in sea level rise and provides a set of guidelines that will aid the future growth of the city in such a way that is sustainable for today, 2100 and beyond. The project is a counter proposal to most of the existing built infrastructure of Rio de Janeiro, as it responds to the prediction that sea level will rise up to two meters by 2100. The idea of living with canals accomplishes these goals by connecting existing canals with a new canal that will serve as a public space an new ecological strategy to accommodate sea level rise.
Living with Canals 21
03
L I V I N G
W I T H
C AN AL S
New Neighborhood Hubs, Living with Canals Entrada Praรงa Nova Canal Vila Verde
Ravine Mangala 22
33
33
33
33
3
3
Office& Office& Office& Office& Commercial Commercial Office& Office& Commercial Commercial Office& Commercial Commercial Office& Com Co
Civic Civic Civic Civic Architecture Architecture Civic Civic Architecture Architecture Civic Architecture Architecture Civic Archit Archi Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence ResidenceResidence Residence Street Retail Street Street Street Side SideStreet RetailSide Street Side Side Retail Retail Street Side Side Retail Retail Street Side
Block Civic Block Football kdential Civic Football Football Civic Plaza Block Block Office Block Block Civic Park ParkCivic BlockPark Football Playground Playground Civic Plaza PlazaCivic Residential Block Office Office Block BlockCivic Block Civic Park Football Football Playground Plaza Civic P kdentialResidential Office Block BlockOffice Office Block BlockOffice Civic Park Park Block Block Civic Park Park Block Block Football Playground Playground Football Playground Playground Civic Plaza Plaza Civic Civic Plaza Civic Residential Block CivicBlock Park Block Football Playground Residential Block Office Block Block Office Office Civic Park Football Playground Playground Civic324 324 324 324Plaza 324 180Block 324 324 210 210
210 210
210 210
210
210 210 215 215 250 250
215 250 250
260 260
210
210 210 215
210
250
250
260 260
210 340 340
340 340
220 220
230 230
260 260
230 230
340 340 220 220 220 220
220 220 220 220
260 260
340 340
230 230
220 220 220 220
260
340
180 180
260 230 230
230
340 460 460 220 220 220
220
180
340 340460 460
460 460
460 460 220
180 180
180
Block 2Office: vary depending on the number of buildings on the block. On average, the blocks are 12,260 sq m (131,900 sq ft), with open green space and urban plazas that is accessible to the public.
324
180
340 340460
460
360 360
340 340
340 340
340
220 550 550
550 550
550 550
Block 3Civic Park: approximately16,350 sq m (175,900 sq ft). The area accommodates programmed public space and informal open green space, all within close proximity from surrounding housing and public services on the site.
550
360 360
360 360
360 360
180 180
360 180 360 180
180 180
340
385 385 550 550
Block 1Residential: approximately 4,535 sq m (48,810 sq ft), with mid-rise buildings that accommodate housing units and a small area of green space.
180 180
230
445 445 385 385
385 385
550
385 385
265 265 385
385
265 265
265 265 300 300
Block 4Football Playground: approximately 12,870 sq m (138,500 sq ft), providing room for a full recreational field and a stadium that could seat thousands of people.
180 180
1
445 445
44
265 265 300 300
265 300 300
Block 5Civic Plaza: vary in size depending on the use of the adjacent buildings. Blocks with large civic plazas are approximately 16,300 sq m (175,400 sq ft), allowing room for both open spaces and buildings.
Office & Commercial Civic Architecture Residential Street Side Retail
300 300
03
L I V I N G
W I T H
C AN AL S
Phasing, New Development Canals, New Plaza, Street Infrastructure Pedestrian Paths, Entrada Praรงa Buildings Pedestrian/Cyclist Bridge, Nova Canal and Vila Verde Buildings
Ravine Mangala 24
As the Rio Times Online recently reported, Rio’s real estate boom is concentrated largely in what has come to be known as Zona Oeste (the West Zone). Infrastructure investments for the 2016 Olympic Games, which includes Bus Rapid Transit and a new metro line, have fueled a construction boom in previously undeveloped areas. While this growth is seen as an opportunity to provide new commercial and residential spaces, including affordable and middle income housing, the areas of expansion are ecologically sensitive and particularly vulnerable to climate change and sea level rise. The global sea level rise scenario for Rio de Janeiro is predicted to reach up to two meters by end of the twenty first century. This sets the stage for opportunities to reinvent suburban typologies and to suggest innovative new frameworks for sustainable urban development. The first phase of design research involved a careful large scale analysis of an area of projected growth in Zona Oeste, which lead to a conceptual master plan. We took on this task with our partnered students from the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) and we worked with the Director of their Architecture and Urbanism Program, Professor Maria Fernanda Lemos and our study abroad faculty director, Professor José Gámez.
Existing Conditions New Development
03
L I V I N G
W I T H
C AN AL S
HIGHWAY
OLYMPIC SITE
BARRA RECREIO
CANAL
FAVELA
Ravine Mangala 26
Living with Canals 27
03
L I V I N G
W I T H
C AN AL S
An Adaptive Design Strategy At the large scale of case study site, we focused on rethinking how to build new communities in sensitive ecological areas and areas susceptible to future rises in sea levels. We addressed valuable public infrastructure including utilities, public open spaces, affordable housing, new modes of connectivity, and a multi-modal transportation system. The project provided us with an opportunity to reinvent urban typologies such as rural/hamlet/town forms, neighborhood/block form, architectural form, and land form for our case study site and potentially other areas within greater Rio de Janeiro. Our conceptual master plan puts forth a vision for a new way of living in cities and new approaches to natural resources and systems for the twenty first century and beyond.
Ravine Mangala 06
Entrada Praça
Nova Canal
Vila Verde
Node 1: An entrance plaza to serve as the main public space upon arrival into the new neighborhood.
Node 2: A new canal to serve as a Green Path for pedestrians and a bridge connecting the two intersecting avenues.
Node 2: Flexible green roof terraces to serve as pavilions and a recreational stadium for Recreio. A “live hub” for the community.
Living with Canals 07
04
Center for Collaborative Brain Research Issues in Brain Research Charlotte, North Carolina Master of Architecture II Architecture Topical Studio Faculty: Betsy West Fall 2015
Ravine Mangala 30
Center for Collaborative Brain Research 31
04
CENTER FOR COLLABORATIVE BRAIN RESEARCH
Site Analysis, Center for Collaborative Brain Research Greenway and Local Street Sections Ravine Mangala 32
The Center for Collaborative Brain Research serves neuroscience experts and the general public with a goal to raise and enrich public awareness of mental illnesses and cognitive disorders. With a public library, an auditorium, two classrooms, and private laboratories, the Center bridges the gap among several disciplines, as it encourages collaboration between neuroscience experts and all others. Because of its accessibility to the public, the Center is a safe haven that houses advanced knowledge in brain research. From entry, the Center is designed with a series of pedestrian experiences that celebrates public engagement with neuroscience research. The overall pedestrian experience is made up of multiple moments of intensities that become small gathering public spaces. There are three main courtyards which allow the general public to fully engage with the private. Connecting paths throughout the building site accommodates the beauty of public and private encounter. The Center is unique not only because it creates an entourage that is welcoming to both the public and the private, but its visual and physical connections to the adjacent greenway and the busy intersection allows for a tense experience between man and architecture
Center for Collaborative Brain Research 33
Ground Floor 1. Public Entry 2. Central Courtyard 3. Library 4. Auditorium 5. Classrooms 6. Research Labs 7. Greenway Overlook 8. Semi-private Courtyard 9. Public Garden 10. General Supplies Storage Room 11. Public Toilets 12. Handicap Parking Spaces 13. Delivery Parking Space
Center for Collaborative Brain Research 35
05
Brewmasters Retreat Facility Brewery Asheville, North Carolina Bachelor of Arst in Architecture Architectural Design Studio Faculty: John Nelson Spring 2014
Ravine Mangala 36
Brewmasters Retreat Facility 07
05
B R E W M A S T E R S
R E T R E A T
F A C I L I T Y
Nano-Brewery, Systems Details of a Brewmaster’s Exhibit
Ravine Mangala 38
Brewmasters in Residence This project focuses on spacial circulation and its relationship between public and private program spaces. Located along the French Broad River, stands the new Brewmaster’s Retreat Facility, with the main entrance facing south; it responds to the different ways the general public and the brewmasters experience public and private spaces. The building’s response to spatial circulation is driven by its orientation within the site. The building design extends beyond the symmetrical boundaries of two elongated shed-like pavilions, dividing private from public spaces. The extension and configuration of public and private program spaces allows for the building to mimic the vast rural landscape, by providing the general public and brewmasters with spaces in which circulation carries the same directionality as the river’s flow.
The River Green in New Orleans 07
06
The River Green in New Orleans The River Green: Channel. Flow. Replenish New Orleans, Louisiana Master of Urban Design ULI Gerald Hines Competition Faculty: Ming-Chun Lee Design Team: R. Mangala, A. Bonawits, O. Vasser, M. Zhou Spring 2015
Ravine Mangala 40
The land along a river is the most fertile and promising. The River Green is a progressive community where people come together in celebration of their past, present, and future. This mixed use development will provide opportunities for current residents through workforce training and encourage companies to relocate to the city. This will serve as a catalyst for revitalization, bringing upwardly mobile young professionals and skilled workers to the area. The inclusive community will incorporate office, retail, and residential rental options at various price points. Sow your seed and watch them flourish.
The River Green in New Orleans 41
06
T H E
R I V E R
G R E E N
I N
N E W
O R L E A N S
Adaptive Public Space, The River Green A Skate Park on Sunny Days Water Square on Light Rainy Days Retention Pond on Heavy Rainy Days
Ravine Mangala 42
30% affordable housing
7 modes of public transportation
6 acres of added green space
90 million gallons of water collection capacity
Many deteriorating sidewalks replaced
New seducted service lots
07
Gateway Centre at University City A Form-Based Code Design for a Brand New Univeristy City Charlotte, North Carolina Master of Urban Design Open Space and Infrastructure Design Studio Faculty: Ming-Chung Lee Spring 2015
Ravine Mangala 44
Within close proximity to the BLE station located at the intersection of North Tryon and University City Boulevard, this civic district serves as the gateway into University City, where a large aesthetic park for the performing arts and several amenities provide people with a sense of arrival. Land within the Gateway Centre is suitable for performing, commercial and residential mixed-use development, as well as open space with multiple greenway connections. The Gateway Centre provides an interweaving network of green space that make up pocket parks, common green areas, civic plazas, linear recreation spaces, and parks integrated with housing to accommodate the need for a safer pedestrian, cyclists and vehicular environment. The Gateway Centre at University City is a wonderful place making opportunity to welcome in people as they arrive into the district. The Gateway Centre is bordered by I-85 and North Tryon, an area driven by the idea of big box retail. The existing infrastructure of this district highly influenced by the volume of vehicular traffic and its negative affect upon pedestrian patterns. When analyzing the site, a major constraint is the weaving of the North Tryon and University City Boulevard intersection, which serves thousands of vehicles daily and the few individuals who are discouraged by the lack of pedestrian infrastructure. The weave of this major intersection has created great opportunity to improve the district by creating a place that is pedestrian and bicycle friendly. Other existing man-made site conditions include the lack of easily accessible amenities. Retail in the area is limited to the big box shopping center, with difficult visibility from the streets. The natural features of the site provide great opportunity for nature preservation and greenway connectivity. Bordering the site are multiple trees that buffer the area from the interstate. Three unconnected streams extend into the site from different corners, giving new way to improving the green connectivity of University City as a whole. Other natural and man-made infrastructures that play role in the planning of the Gateway Centre are three existing retention ponds, a large retaining wall behind Wal-Mart, and ongoing construction of a light rail station.
Gateway Centre at University City 45
07
G A T E W A Y
C E N T R E
A T
U N I V E R S I T Y
Urban Street Sections, Form Based Code Community Center (North Tryon St.) / Alley (Proposed St.) Community Center (University Pointe Dr.) / Parkway (Ikea Blvd.) Community Transition (Ikea Blvd.) / Urban Neighborhood (Brookside Ln.)
Ravine Mangala 46
C I T Y
Gateway Centre at University City 47
08
The North End Urban Farm The North End Urban Farm: Plant Your Roots Charlotte, North Carolina Master of Urban Design Fundamentals of Urban Design Studio Faculty: Deb Ryan Design Team: R. Mangala, A. Bonawits, J. Colon, A. Foreman, S. Hubbard, O. Vasser, G. Wang, K. Wyatt, M. Zhou Fall 2014
Ravine Mangala 48
An Innovative Corridor Located between two light rail lines and centered on a reimagined Tryon Street, The North End Urban Farm focuses on the growth of human and economic capital, the promotion of transparency and permeability, the creation of a gateway into Uptown Charlotte from a relocated Amtrak station, and the generation of a green and walkable community connected through a network of open spaces. Building on the concept of the Innovation Corridor, The North End Urban Farm is a place where people live, companies grow, and creativity thrives in four overlapping neighborhoods: Rhe Maker’s Village, Main Street, the Collaborative Knowledge Campus, and the Living Green Community.
The North End Urban Farm 49
08
T H E
N O R T H
E N D
U R B A N
An Innovative Corridor, The North End Urban Farm Living Green, The Residential Neighborhood Maker’s Village and Main Street Collaborative Tech Campus
Ravine Mangala 50
F A R M
The North End Urban Farm 51
09
Empty Wards Engaging Community for Renewed Mental Health Critical Project Master of Architecture II Thesis Document Faculty: Peter Wong Fall 2016
Ravine Mangala 52
RESEARCH TOPIC
INQUIRY
SIGNIFICANCE
FROM MENTAL ASYLUMS to COMMUNITY-BASED CARE for Mental Health
ADAPTIVITY, FLEXIBIITY, RESILIENCY a New Model for Care
SEEKING NEW METHODS IN A WORLD OF Complexity
The INFRASTRUCTURE of care has collapsed, and there is a need to acknowledge that designing to improve mental health deals with shaping complete environments. Understanding the complexity embedded within a region can reveal potentials for new design methods that are more conscious, responsive, and adaptive to its nature and context. Prominent mental health design issues found in different environments include social neglect, the isolation of necessities, and the inaccessibility to services for those who are in need of them. Contemporary methods of designing for mental health have evolved from an extraordinary past of psychiatric hospitals and a disturbing approach to treating the mentally ill. The largest public buildings in 19th century Western civilization were asylums, designed in rural sites to allow room for private amenities and provide a better environment for inpatients. By the 20th century, increasing admissions led to even larger psychiatric hospitals, spreading across developing urban areas to relieve overcrowding. Historically, overcrowding led to the closing of several mental asylums. The end of the 20th century initiated the de-institutionalization movement worldwide to gradually eliminate psychiatric hospitals and release patients into community-engagement services for mental health care.1 Despite deinstitutionalization, the stigma of mental illness still labels victims socially and economically problematic, and some counties continue to rely on asylums.2 Despite the brutal history of mental asylums, there is an opportunity for a new paradigm for conscious design to emerge in the contemporary age— one that prioritizes mental health for all individuals.
Adaptivity and flexibility are key to implement a program whose design methods are intentional and responsive to individuals’ needs. The building program will be an emerging model that delivers care and provides a safe community in an environment where young victims of mental illness can feel hopeful and engaged to the nature of their surrounding context as they journey towards independence. Through architecture, the design project will be explored through an adaptive community-based care model, which will encourage partnerships between communities and individuals who experience episodes of mental illness by focusing on providing better care, improving transition planning, and increasing patient and community education. There is an opportunity to use innovative technology to recognize the design impact on a COMMUNITY-ENGAGED system. The use of big data, for example, can enable the designer to even further understand the context of different environments and identify population sections that are vulnerable to greater mental health risks.
The causes of mental disorders are known to vary in complexity, depending on the individual and severity of an illness and come with different biological, psychological, and environmental factors contributing to their causes. Individuals with mental illness fall within a wide spectrum of symptoms, skills, and levels of disabilities, and because every one affected faces challenges uniquely, the appropriate place or setting that could allow one to live healthily varies significantly from another. Although the old idea of asylums were to be self-sufficient, the problem lies in the thorough institutionalization of those who resided there and continued to suffer psychological effects due to the lack of active community support, healthy community development and social endearment. The idea of an adaptive care model recognizes the importance of a cohesive and functioning system of structural organization for both RURAL and URBAN COMMUNITIES, by bridging solutions that may serve community needs in more appropriate scales with greater flexibility for the future. It is essential and fundamental that design for mental health moves away from the institution and becomes more mindful of people’s differences by responding to individuals’ needs within all kinds of communities. Until now, several psychiatric hospitals are still exclusive, some even more than those of the past. To further develop the goals and objectives of the project, the design will focus on selected mental health conditions from a particular group of people in order to look at different ways and adapt different methods to innovate design that engages the idea of community for better mental health. There is a lot that can be learned from the way former mental asylums were designed and how their services for mental health were distributed and made accessible to those in need of them. The old idea of psychiatric facilities tried to create communities within themselves; however, their failures came from a system of confinement and exclusivity in communities where patients were treated like diagnoses and were restricted from being able to connect with their surrounding nature and context.
Empty Wards 53
1. AN INFRASTRUCTURE FOR CARE AN INPATIENT INSTITUTIONAL MODEL 19th Century Institutionalization New Zealand
2. A COMMUNITY FOR CARE AN OUTPATIENT COMMUNITY-BASED MODEL 21st Century De-institutionalization North America
09
E
M
P
T
Y
W
A
R
D
S
Ravine Mangala 56
Empty Wards 57
I0
Drawing Analyses Drawing analyses, studies of hand drawing techniques from well-known architects and artists
Perspective in Landscape, Lyndon & Moore Alberto Giacometti, Figure in Space Cubism and Purism, Analysis Giorgio Morandi, Etching Pencil Outline and Filled Key Study on Lines and Boundary Pencil
Ravine Mangala 58
Le Corbusier, Picasso, Ozzenfant, Cubism Still Life, Drawing from Copy Pencil
Drawing Analyses 59
thank you.
RAVINE MANGALA