Brockholes Visitor Centre Building Critique ARC 3015e Robert Patone
I believe architecture is about creating built form that drives forward the way we live and function, using innovative technological construction and accomplished design, whilst respecting its context and the wider world, the Brockholes’ Visitor Centre demonstrates these qualities to an exemplary degree. The Brockholes Visitor Centre by Adam Khan is a complex of buildings constructed on a floating pontoon in the Brockholes nature reserve. It was designed to inflict as little an impact on its environment as possible, and by using innovative technological practices make the building sustainable. The RIBA opened a competition to its member in 2007, the brief explained that the client, Lancashire Wildlife Trust, did not want to compromise the site’s main use of nature conservation nor did they want a sub standard building. They wanted to create a visitor centre of Architectural distinction. They also wanted it to be a signpost to the world and that it would inspire people about the natural world. The site itself, a former gravel quarry of 250 acres, lies on a river floodplain and will potentially flood three times a year. It has four large lakes and is a site of natural wildlife significance, particularly for nesting migratory birds. The initial brief called for facilities that could include such things as a cafÊ or restaurant, galleries, and education area and conference
spaces. The building was being designed before the reserve had opened and because of this the use of the building was only projected. Located just off the M6 near Preston, the plan for strategy as a whole was and still is to encourage people from the large cities such as Manchester and Liverpool to come and experience the natural environment at close quarters, as well as encouraging motorists to use it as an alternative service station. This location and function make this a fairly unique building to design. Not only did it need to be a signpost for the nature reserve itself but it also needed to be a signpost for environmental construction. Another consideration in design was to make sure that the maximum area for wildlife conservation was retained and the introduction of new wildlife habitats was not constrained. This presented the Architect with a difficult balance to create. The building is first glimpsed from the entrance road, a series of pitched roofs rising from the water against a wetlands background. A Village floating on the water was the original concept of Adam Khan, and it is wholly achieved. Its likeness to an ancient marshland village could only be bettered if the original design of thatching the roof had been integrated. In concept Khan claimed that the building could rest on any of body of water on the nature reserve, since it had no preference to site. Many progressions took place from his original concept. The thatch roofing was rejected, instead a finish of oak shingles sits above the forms; after visiting the building on its opening
fig 1. View from Entrance Road
Robert Paton
ARC3015
65265
aA
aB
2300
aC
2300
2300
aD
2300
aE
aF
2300
2300
aG
2300
aH
aI
2300
aJ
2300
aK
2300
2300
aL
aM
2300
1500
aN
aO
5525
aP
aQ
5525
785
475
aR
aS
5525
785
aT
aU
5525
Restraint post as per SE spec
785
bA
bB
1775
bC
1775
bE 475
475
a1
AR05 changing
b1
BR03 lpg store
2300
2000
AR04 office
BR00 plant b2
a2
2300
2000
a2
AR01 servery
b3
BR01 shop
a3
2300
2000
Building A AR08 male toilet
AR09 disabled toilet
a4
b4
AR07 female toilet a4
2000
a3
b5
2000
2300
AR02 lobby
a5
475
a5
b6
2000
AR06 family changing a6
b7
2000
475
Building B
Restraint post as per SE spec
eA
2000
eB
2000
eC
2000
eD
2000
eE
2000
eF
2000
eG
2000
2000
b8
Bench 3 refer to 027/5608
Bench 5 refer to 027/5608
eH
2000
b9
Bench 1 refer to 027/5607
b10
e1
ER00 exhibition
2000
BR02 reception
2000
Bench 4 refer to 027/5608
b11
2000
2000
41900
e2
b12
e3
Building E
2000
BR03 office
2000
Restraint post as per SE spec
b13
2000
2000
e4
b14
475
475
e5
Bench 6 refer to 027/5608
d1
DR00 conference
DR02 lobby
2000
5365
d2
2000
DR10 AV store Access Bridge 1
DR09 store 2 DR07 kitchen
2000
d3
d4
c1
CR05 toilet
CR01 classroom
DR08 store 1
c2
DR01 breakout
DR04 cleaners
DR03 disabled toilet
2000
Building D
Building C
2000
d5
2000
2000
CR02 lobby
d6
c3
2000
CR03 store
Bench 2 refer to 027/5607
DR05 male toilet
DR06 female toilet
c4
2000
CR04 disabled toilet
2000
The complex is entered across two drawbridges which using hydraulics can be raised or lowered depending on the level of the water. On to the pontoon the buildings are arranged around several open spaces with one central building. A large square at the back is open to the water
1775
475
475
AR03 kitchen
AR00 cafe
d7
c5
d8 475
The pontoon is created using a hollow concrete raft filled partially with polystyrene upon which the whole building was constructed. The concept behind this was to allow the building to float up if or most probably when the site flooded, because of the buildings location on the River Ribble’s flood plain. Four pillars attached by collars around the raft stop the building from floating away.
bD
1775
475
a1
2000
a year ago and visiting it again recently I saw that the weathering of the shingles had allowed the building to further sit into its surrounding. Another long term strategy to help the building blend with the environment was the planting of reed beds around the building so that when fully grown the building would seem to grow from the reeds on viewing it from the other sides of the lake. The reeds would also provide different views out of the complex, allowing habitats to be viewed at close quarters.
Access Bridge 2
475 dA
2000
2000 dB
2000 dC
2000 dD
2000 dE
2000 dF
2000 dG
2000 dH
2000 dI
2000 dJ
2000 dK
2000 dL
Revisions
Restraint post as per SE spec
475 dM
2000 cA
2000 cB
2000 cC
2000 cD
2000 cE
fig 2. Plan of Village
2000 cF
2000 cG
2000 cH
2000 cI
2000 cJ
cK
* a b
Date 21. 07. 09 10. 08. 09 18. 01. 10
c d
21. 05. 10 25. 05. 10
Tender Issue access bridge, lighting Contract Issue stairs removed access bridge 2 reduced size benches, balustrades rev C re-issued
Adam Khan Architects 54-58 Tanner Street London SE1 3PH 020 7403 9897 www.adamkhan.co.uk
Notes: This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all other issued information incl. architect's, structural engineer's and M&E engineer's drawings and specifications. Report any discrepancies to architects. All dimensions are in millimeters. All levels are taken from the internal FFL as datum +0mm. Do not scale from this drawing. All CDP elements are drawn as design intent only.
Brockholes Wetland Centre
027/5110d
and integrates spaces for sitting and enjoying the views. Suspended Lighting above
ISSUED FOR PRICING Island plan Scale 1:100 @ A1 25. 05. 10
The first functions reached when entering the “village” from the most obvious entrance are the gift shop and learning facilities; directly in front is the gallery space. The conference rooms are in the back left corner and the restaurant the back right. The pitched roofs serve to identify the differing functions of each space. Larger roofs are used for the important learning facilities and the large open plan restaurant while a series of smaller roofs cover the conference facilities and the kitchen and toilets.
fig 3. Site Plan of Nature Reserve
Robert Paton
ARC3015
fig 4. Cirrculation to use
fig 5. Unit to Whole
Robert Paton
ARC3015
recycled newspaper juxtapose the tactile nature of the beams as they span them to form the interior surface of the construction. The exterior is clad in oak shingles which hang above, a combination of oak slats and large glazed elevations allowing views out across the lake, and into the courtyards. They are finished off with copper drains and downpipes which will mature into their settings. The building was constructed on site. Even though the idea of using a concrete pontoon was innovative, the construction was very similar to constructing raft foundations. The 4,000 ton building was constructed in a dry dock on site, with the raft bed formed in a number of concrete pours then the buildings constructed on top. The area was then re –flooded and the building then floated up to its resting position. Khan’s approach to design, in his own words, was to “challenge the traditional fact-led, tick the boxes approach to BREEAM and to use the pursuit of sustainability as the means to create more beautiful buildings, not less.” He was rewarded when the building was given the new “Outstanding” BREEAM rating. This shows wholeness to Khan’s method of design. Every stage of the project had to relate back to this agenda, but not be restricted by it.
fig 6. Interior View
The organisation of the building lends itself to exploration; the buildings create varied sightlines out to the lake and through the complex itself. This “village” technique also creates a sense of community and hierarchy, large important structure covers the key public spaces whilst centring framing public squares.
The Brockholes’ Visitor Centre’s unparalleled success, it has gained notice in Architectural circles, so much so that the RIBA North West has held meetings there, as well as being several design awards, but in the wider public context,
The buildings are constructed out of large glulam portal frames which are still visible on the inside of the buildings reaching up into the roofs. Structural insulation panels made from
D01/5471
D08/5471
D02/5471
400 lit.water storage
260
CT6
360
260
315
100
WT9
115 475
lift and slide panel
WT9
26 0
CR00 education
50 150
12 0
80
25
CR00 education
Refer to S.E.& M.E. drawings Refer to S.E.& M.E. drawings
2000
cK
2000
cJ
2000
cI
fig 7. Section of two forms 01 Building C. long section
Robert Paton
2000
cH
2000
cG
2000
cF
2000
cE
2000
cD
2000
cC
2000
cB
2000
cA
c5
02
2000 c4
2000 c3
2000 c2
c1
Building C. short section
ARC3015 Notes: This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all other issued information incl. architect's, structural engineer's and M&E engineer's drawings and specifications. Report any discrepancies to architects.
fig 8. Massing
fig 9. Hierarchy
Robert Paton
ARC3015
is down to its architect. The Nature reserve as a whole has successfully reached the initial target of a quarter of a million visitors a year, no doubt supported by the inclusion of a building of architectural distinction in the visitor centre. While attracting plaudits for its design, there have been some challenges associated with the running of a unique environmentally sustainable project, where many of the services have not previously been installed in this situation: the under floor heating of the pontoon is provided by a remote wood-chip powered boiler whose capacity was underspecified. The insistence on grey lake water to flush toilets is at odds with the clean conditions expected of a tourist attraction, and the reed bed wastewater treatment system has some noxious smells as the reeds have insufficient growth to digest the effluent at present. The un-metaled approach paths while attractive have been eroded by normal rainfall. Time will resolve most of this. In the original competition winning design, the forms were displayed as thatched angled structures. Collaboration and compromises in the design stages created a more realistic composition. The shapes took on a more regimented form as a result of pressure to create usable space. Yet the overall look of the building can be said to look as the architect envisioned, viewed through reeds from the approaching road the building bears a close resemblance to the initial sketches with the pyramids rising out of the landscape. I think a key moment in this building’s life will be when the surrounding landscape catches up with it, when the reed beds are fully grown to surround and frame it, and the habitats still being created are being used. Then the building will be in the setting for which it was designed.
fig 10. Detailing of Oak Shingles to copper drains and Oak Slats
and innovative creation. It has quickly put the nature reserve on the map, and has revived a city whose last recognised input to significant architecture was its infamous brutalist bus station. Constructed on budget and on schedule the building has achieved most of goals set out originally in the client brief, it has gone from strength to strength in its first year achieving the sort of architectural impact that will make it a precedent for not just future sustainability projects but any design that wants to fully integrate itself with its social and physical context.
The visitor centre a year after opening is starting to gain architectural recognition, other the last year it has won five awards, for its sustainability
Robert Paton
ARC3015