§9: The Tablet of Iz

Chapter 2: Masonic Plates in Oahspe

Part VI: The Book of Saphah Revisited

Discovering the True Path of Oahspe

Iz *6

Labelled images but no text

This is the upper half of TheTablet of Vede

Newbrough Placement:

(Saphah – Biene: 10↔10).

• Best Placement:

(Saphah – Vede →1).*44

Presented Origin: Pan.

All of the animals depicted here are used as Masonic symbols, just as animals have been spiritual symbols or totems for religions and cults of the past. Therefore, while some animals are more well-known as Masonic, such as the owl or the goat, many of the lesser-known ones here are also. In the case of this plate, the animals are meant to signify the tribes of Israel (see Zerl 9: Iz, Izere) of the “distant past.”

Plate Masonic Symbols: All 32 of 32 (100%).

It is fascinating and frustrating to see that the upper 32 animal symbols from the Plate of Biene match the first 32 of the Plate of Zerl (which was also mislabeled, and should be instead named Iz and Zerl). The animals match but the names have been altered slightly, perhaps in an attempt to fake some kind of language transformation over time. The exact comparisons will be explained in more detail in this book’s section on Zerl.

Even so, why was this group set of animals used twice and never really explained except for the Israel tribal reference? For what other purpose?

I believe there are several possibilities. First, for mystically decorative reasons, both plates had these animal signs added on top to make them look more spiritually impressive. A second reason may have been to shamelessly “fix” or “imbue” the concept of Israel being a core part of the spiritual and linguistic “tree” of civilization and of the Masons, as time and (fake) history progressed. And finally, as already mentioned, to demonstrate the progression of this fakery language work where the word pronunciation supposedly changed as time went on.

It is because these two plates are so clearly a case of forgery and not true artifacts, that as far as the reference counts go, neither will be included as a reference for the other.

In support of the above:

Both TALMUDISM and FREEMASONRY are awash in animal symbolism. Each has its place in the ritual worship of the Talmudic and Masonic god. * 22222

And we see in Saphah countless examples of animal cultism. Apparently animalism has in general been often popular within false god cults, as we see here. How to explain this? One possibility is that such animal totems are more likely to attract the more primitive thinkers whom cults could more easily control. In the end, that is main purpose of cults: to control how their members think spiritually. It follows then that the main purpose of this book is to free as many people to think for themselves and not be duped by fancy terms and complex symbolism. Instead, choose your own spiritual path to be a directly attuned to Our Creator as possible.

"The Masonic Lodge is the Jew-lodge and every lodge is - no matter what name they use, Masonic or Jew.* 22222

This is a further reason why the animal totems for the Jews are being so fully incorporated into Saphah dogma. The Masons are aware of the special spiritual path for the Jews as being is much more directly aligned to The True Creator than most religions. Hence, they wish to “dress up” Masonic as being just as legitimate as the Jews which of course, could not be further from the truth.

Tablet of Iz (Upper Biene Plate) Totals: 62

Here is but one more group of evidence that Saphah is not really connected to the rest of truly channeled text of Oahspe. As a matter of fact, not a single term is used outside of Saphah and 94% of the terms are not even used at all, complete duplicates between Iz and Zere notwithstanding.

There is one further significant connection between The Plate of Iz and the rest of Saphah. You see, there exists direction correlations between the short metaphysical-religious-cult icons described in The Basis of Vede section with that of The Tablet of Iz. Moreover, the major images of Iz are also described specifically or at least in general, within the text of Vede. For a further explanation of this phenomena, the explanatory analysis will be more fully presented in Vede Thusly, one could argue that The Tablet of Iz would have been far better placed preceding Vede rather than in Biene.