V2.13 Portfolio by Ryan Glick

V2.13

Ryan GLICK

M.Arch Cornell University 12’ B.S. University at Buffalo 10’

Ryan GLICK

Master of Architecture_Cornell University_13’ B.S.Architecture_University at Buffalo_10’ rtg53@cornell.edu

Ryan GLICK

M. Arch_Cornell University_13’ B.S. Arch_University at Buffalo_10’

Ungers Urbanism Fall 2011_ Cornell University Roosevelt Island_New York,NY

Den[city]

Fall 2009_ University at Buffalo Buffalo, New York

Sejong City Summer 2011_ New York City Office Sejong, South Korea

Digital Interlace Fall 2010_ Cornell University Redhook - Brooklyn ,NY

9th Ward Housing Spring 2011_ Cornell University New Orleans, LA

Next Stop

Summer 2009_ Independent Salt Lake City, UT

Evolutionary Systems

Union Station 2020

Spring 2009_ University at Buffalo Buffalo, NY

Fall 2008_ Cornell University Chicago, IL

Machine of Access

Fort Niagara Redux

OPTX Eyewear

Spring 2012_ Cornell University Berne, Switzerland

Fall 2007_ University at Buffalo Youngstown, NY

Summer 2009_ New York City Office Johnstown, RI

Woven Environments

Architecture is Flat

Spring 2010_ University at Buffalo Luanda, Angola

Fall 2012_ Cornell University 38th-41st & 1st Av._New York,NY

RYAN THOMAS

GLICK

EDUCATION Cornell University

College of Architecture, Art & Planning Master of Architecture 28 January 2013

University at Buffalo

Bachelor of Science in Architecture Pre professional degree Cum Laude Honors May 7th 2010

HONORS Richmond Harold Shreve Award Best thesis selected by faculty in open competition among students Cornell University 2012 Eschweiler Prize for Merit and Distinction Highest design studio G GPA among graduating masters students Cornell University 2012 “Architectural Drawing: A visual Compendium of Types and Methods 4th Edition” Portfolio spreads published in Portfolio building chapter_Author: Rendow Yee 2012 Invited Guest Critic Cornell University, University at Buffalo, NYC College of Technology 2009-2012 Academic Excellence Celebration Selected to represent Buffalo's school of architecture at the university wide Academic Excellence Celebration. Selected students are chosen by the dean of their coinciding school within the university for a public display of research 2010 Sejong City Competition_Cannon Design Honorable Mention 2010 Selected to undergraduate mentor program University at Buffalo 2009-2010 Public display of semester work

Atelier 2007 & 2008

University at Buffalo Architectural Show (work displayed)

Regional Scholastic Silver Key Winner Spring 2006

7 10150 Dietrich Rd Breinigsvile, PA 18031 rtg53@cornell.edu (484)-515-6014

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Cannon Design

New York, NY Architectural Intern Sejong City Design Competition_ Sejong, South Korea One of two person design team; worked directly under the design principal on the proposal for the phase 3 government office sector of the Sejong city master plan. Design proposal included, massing studies, schematic design, architectural drawings, façade development, digital modeling, weekly correspondence with Korean architect of record, final presentation renderings and presentation panel layouts . Proposal received honorable mention. SmartCity _ Kochi, India One of two person design team; worked directly under the design with principal on the proposal Parcel A1for the master plan. The proposal for 3 buildings as a part of an technology park on a single parcel. Work included schematic design through design development,core development, facade systems, bid package and weekly correspondence with the client.

Craig Nealy Architects

New York,NY Summer Intern-June 2009- August 2009 Responsibilities included maintaining correspondence with India clients on a daily basis, while working on design development, project proposals, and 3d rendering. I worked on concept design, rendering, material selection for Optx eyewear retail space. I also designed a Möbius strip to hang in Tulips retail store in Pune, India. I developed the exterior facade for the chartered hotel in Ahmedabad, India. I developed a presentation for a lecture at the Leela Palace in Bangalore, India.

PROFICIENCIES AutoCad Rhinoceros 4.0_ Vray Adobe Illustrator Adobe Photoshop Adobe Indesign Adobe Premiere Autodesk Ecotect (Basic) Revit (Basic) ZBrush CNC Milling Laser Cutting 3D Printing Welding + Metal Wood working

Academic Project Title

Ungers Urbanism

Ungers Urbanism Date_Location

Fall 2011_ Cornell University Location_Roosevelt Island_New York,NY Professor

Peter Eisenman Alex Maymind Team

Ryan Glick Julia Pascutto Brief

In a semesters work investigating the tradition of Cornell Urban Design, our proposal addresses the development of a new technology campus plan 5 for Cornell University on Roosevelt Island. Our project takes a critical approach toward the understanding the 6 evolution of Rem Koolhaas spawning from Oswald Mathias Ungers. Analayis of precedents such as Ungers “Licterfeld” housing project for Berlin, and OMA’s Parc de la 7 valette were key projects by which conceptual drivers were derived. The manipulation of gross generic form in response to the deployment 8 into the urban condition was the key conceptual backing to the project. Ten typologies are inserted into a barcode organizational structure to achieve a urban density. Opposed 9 to traditional campus planning, this project functions as a city within a city. The structure of the campus acts as a filter for circulation rather having a singular circulation spine.

0 Intial Banding Typologies

Ungers Urbanism

8 4 3 1 9 7 6 2 5

0 SCREEN HORIZONTAL TOWER BLOCK MASS LAYERED BLOCK RECESSED GALLERY VOIDED BLOCK PLINTH & VOLUME TOWER AND PLITH DENSE SINGLE UNITS PLINTH & TOWERS

Figure-ground Campus Plan

Ungers Urbanism LANDSCAPING

PLAZA

HABITABLE VOID

LAYERED BLOCK

HORIZONTAL TOWER

HABITABLE VOID

LANDSCAPING

VOIDED BLOCK

RECESSED GALLERY

SCREEN

DENSE SINGLE UNITS

LANDSCAPING

BLOCK OF SCREENS

HORIZONTAL TOWER

LAYERED BLOCK

3 PLINTH & TOWERS

VOIDED BLOCK

BLOCK MASS

RECESSED GALLERY RECTALINEAR BLOCK HORIZONTAL TOWER

PLINTH & VOLUME

SCREEN

LAYERED BLOCK

TOWER AND PLITH

DENSE SINGLE UNITS

6 VOIDED BLOCK

PLINTH & TOWERS

SCREEN

PLINTH & VOLUME

BLOCK WITH SECONDARY INTERIOR SPACE

BLOCK MASS

RECESSED GALLERY

DENSE SINGLE UNITS

TOWER AND PLITH LAYERED BLOCK PLINTH & TOWERS

HORIZONTAL TOWER

BLOCK MASS

BLOCK ASSEMBLED BY PIECES

HORIZONTAL TOWER

LAYERED BLOCK

VOIDED BLOCK

RECESSED GALLERY PLINTH & VOLUME

TOWER AND PLITH

RECESSED GALLERY BLOCK FROM SUBTRACTED MASS

SCREEN

HORIZONTAL TOWER Typologies Variation 1-5

SCREEN

HORIZONTAL TOWER

DENSE SINGLE UNITS

HORIZONTAL TOWER

DENSE SINGLE UNITS

LAYERED BLOCK

BLOCK MASS

PLINTH & TOWERS

VOIDED BLOCK VOIDED BLOCK PLINTH & TOWERS

VOIDED BLOCK

SCREEN

PLINTH & TOWERS

BLOCK ASSEMBLED BY PIECES

BLOCK MASS

RECESSED GALLERY HORIZONTAL TOWER

PLINTH & VOLUME

RECESSED GALLERY

PLINTH & VOLUME

SCREEN

LAYERED BLOCK

TOWER AND PLITH

SCREEN DENSE SINGLE UNITS

DENSE SINGLE UNITS

TOWER AND PLITH

DENSE SINGLE UNITS VOIDED BLOCK

PLINTH & TOWERS BLOCK MASS

RECESSED GALLERY

BLOCK MASS

SCREEN

DENSE SINGLE UNITS

BLOCK DETERMINED BY PATTERN

2 7 4 9 136 8 5 247 0 9 6 3158 4270 9 6 8 3 15 7 0

Ungers Urbanism VOIDED BLOCK

DENSE SINGLE UNITS

LAYERED BLOCK

BLOCK MASS

PLINTH & TOWERS

VOIDED BLOCK VOIDED BLOCK

RECESSED GALLERY HORIZONTAL TOWER

PLINTH & TOWERS

SCREEN DENSE SINGLE UNITS

DENSE SINGLE UNITS

TOWER AND PLITH

DENSE SINGLE UNITS VOIDED BLOCK

PLINTH & TOWERS BLOCK MASS

RECESSED GALLERY

BLOCK DETERMINED BY PATTERN

BLOCK MASS

HORIZONTAL TOWER

PLINTH & VOLUME

LAYERED BLOCK

TOWER AND PLITH

SCREEN

PLINTH & VOLUME

BLOCK ASSEMBLED BY PIECES

BLOCK MASS

PLINTH & VOLUME

SCREEN

RECESSED GALLERY

PLINTH & TOWERS

PLINTH & VOLUME

LAYERED BLOCK

SCREEN

HORIZONTAL TOWER

8 70

DENSE SINGLE UNITS

HORIZONTAL TOWER

SCREEN

9 7 6

RECESSED GALLERY

SCREEN

HORIZONTAL TOWER

5 37 9 20

8 6 5 0

TOWER AND PLITH

BLOCK FROM SUBTRACTED MASS

VOIDED BLOCK

7 459

RECESSED GALLERY PLINTH & VOLUME

VOIDED BLOCK

49 26 18

46 8 3

LAYERED BLOCK

HORIZONTAL TOWER

PLINTH & VOLUME TOWER AND PLITH

PLINTH & TOWERS TOWER AND PLITH

VOIDED BLOCK

DENSE SINGLE UNITS

LAYERED BLOCK TOWER AND PLITH

BLOCKED WITH VERTICAL MASS

BLOCK MASS

RECESSED GALLERY

9 8 BLOCK WITH STACKED MASSES

PLINTH & VOLUME

9 0

TOWER AND PLITH

SCREEN

DENSE SINGLE UNITS

PLINTH & TOWERS

BLOCK MASS

BLOCK BY SUBDIVIDED VERTICAL MASSES

Typology Variation 5-10

Urban Deployment of Typologies

Ungers Urbanism

Campus Plan

Longitudinal Campus Section

1:500 Basswood Model

Ungers Urbanism

Den[city]

Academic Project Title

Den[city]

high green + privacy + scape urban density

Date_Location r

i ir Fall University at Buffalo / a 2009_ air r un unn // a / air/ air / ai sLocation_ New York ssu un un Buffalo, n u s s

Professor

Hiroaki Hata

housing on site housing on site housing on site housing on site housing on site housing on site

avg american home sq on site avg american home sq on site avg american home sq on site home sq on site avghome american avg american sq onsq site avg american home on site avg american home sq on 1 acre avg american home sq on 1 acre avg american home sq on 1 acre avghome american on 1 acre avg american sq onhome 1 acre avg american home sq on sq 1 acre

Team

Ryan Glick Brief

In synthesis between concept and making the objective was to bring housing far ratio- 1.13 housing far ratio- 1.13 housing far ratio-housing 1.13 far 1.13 ratio- 1.13 private outdoor space to a high housing far ratio1.13 housing far ratiodensity urban housing condition. Along with the 24 residential units, 3 gallery spaces and an outdoor performance space are implemented in the lower floors.

building far ratio (1 acre)- 2.17 building far ratio (1 acre)- 2.17 building far ratio (1 acre)- far 2.17 (1 acre)building farbuilding ratio acre)2.17 building far (1 ratio (1ratio acre)2.17 2.17

Foliage Foliage Foliage Foliage Foliage Foliage Growing medium Growing medium Growing medium Growing medium Growing medium Growing medium Root barrier/sediment filter Root barrier/sediment filter Root barrier/sediment filter Root barrier/sediment Root barrier/sediment filterfilterfil Root barrier/sediment

civic

An urban topography becomes a mediator between public (theatre & galleries) and private space (housing). This mediator not only separates two different programmatic elements via a spatial buffer in section, but also allows for usable green space to separate the residential lobbies in plan.

building far ratio (site) - 4.95 building far ratio (site) - 4.95 building far ratio (site) - 4.95 far(site) building farbuilding ratio -ratio 4.95-(site) building far (site) ratio 4.95 - 4.95

nightlife

For the mixed-use public space, an exterior amphitheater has covered and uncovered space along with interior gallery spaces bordering to the north and south.

social +

Urban Activity Diagram

Drainage, water retention medium Drainage, water irretention medium Drainage, water medium / a retention Drainage, water retentio Drainage, water retention med Drainage, water retention m un s Separation Fabric Separation Fabric Fabric Separation Separation Fabric Separation Fabric Separation Fabric Rigid Insulation Rigid Insulation Rigid Insulation Rigid Insulation Rigid Insulation Rigid Insulation Single Ply Ply Roof Membrane Single Roof Membrane Single Ply Ply Roof Membrane Single PlyMembrane Roof Membra Single Roof Single Ply Roof Membrane Barrier nightlifeVapor Vapor Barrier Barrier Vapor Vapor Barrier Vapor Barrier Vapor Barrier

Public Program Site Development

Den[city]

1 Site Section (Existing)

2 Cut site

Theatre Upper Gallery

3 Adapted

performance space

(exposed)

(covered) Lower Gallery

view view

Party Wall

Apt. Circulation

Party Wall

Lower Gallery

Upper Gallery

Lower Gallery

View from Embassy Suites

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Den[city]

Model 4

Model 5

Model 6

concrete loadbearing wall

Den[city]

Veirendeel Truss

4’x4’ reinforced concrete “super” column 2x2 reinforced concrete column

Veirendeel Truss + Supercolumns

loadbearing wall

open web joist 4’o.c

Den[city]

Section Model scale:1/2” =1’ mixed medium

View across Delaware Ave

Lower Gallery

Den[city]

Ground Level Plan

Den[city]

distribution ducts

return ducts

grey water radiant floor hot water

fresh air intake

10’ 5’

Parking level 20’

40’

water

heating

intake fan

Gallery level N

10’

40’

5’

grey water radiant floor hot water

20’

fresh air intake

Service Distribution

heating

intake fan

Building Services: HVAC + plumbing

Fresh Air Intake - Parking

10’ 5’

Parking level 20’

40’

Den[city]

10’ 5’

distribution ducts

Parking level

40’

10’

20’

5’

25 Gallery level N 40’

20’

return ducts

water

heating

ake

10’ 5’

Gallery level N

6th floor

40’

20’

10’ 5’

40’

20’

heating

theater

open to below

door performance space

Building Servi6 Forced Air Distribution + Radient Floor System

Residential Plan

Den[city]

Longitudinal Section

Den[city]

6. Floor + Exterior Spandrel

Green Roof Detail

Exterior Foundation Wall + Paver

9. 4.3. Separation Fabric 2”x112” ventilation chamber 1. 6” Site cast concrete slab with steel decking 2. 2” vapor barrier Roof Detail 9. Green 5. Drainage, water and retention medium 2. vapor barrier 3. 4“ Rigid insulation 1. 6” Site cast concrete slab with steel decking 6. RootRoof barrier/ sediment filter Green Detail 9. 2.7.3.4.Detail 4“ Rigid insulation Separation Fabric vapor barrier Assembly A 6” Growing 7. 1. 6” Site cast medium concrete slab with steel decking 4. Separation Fabric 5.1. 2” water and retention medium Roof Detail 4“ Rigid insulation 3”Drainage, Welded steel iron 9. Foliage Detail Assembly A angle 2. vapor barrier 7. 3.4.8.Green 5. 2” Drainage, water and retention medium 6.2. Root barrier/ sediment filter 1. 6” Site cast concrete slab with steel decking Separation Fabric 18” steel wide flange with spray on 1. 3” Welded steel anglebeam iron

3. 4“ Rigid insulation 6. Root barrier/ sediment filter 7.insulation 6” Growing medium 2. vapor barrier 5. Drainage, water andbeam retention 2.2” 18” steel wide flange withmedium spray on 4. Separation Fabric 7. 6” Growing medium 8.3. Foliage 3. 4“ Rigid insulation 6. Root barrier/ sediment filter 20“x14” steel C channel insulation 5. 2” Drainage, water and retention medium 8. Foliage Virendeel Wall 4.4. Separation Fabric 7. 6” Growing medium 4“ rigid insulation 20“x14” steel C channel 6.3.Root barrier/ sediment filter 1.Foliage triple argon windows 5.5. 2”48”x112“ waterpane and retention medium 8. anchor clips 4“Drainage, rigid insulation 7.4.6”3” Growing medium 2. 3” flat plate steel vierendeel truss member 6.6. Root barrier/ sediment filter 24“x48” poly carbonate panel 3” anchor clips 8.5. Foliage Virendeel Wall 2”x112” ventilation chamber 7.3. 6” Growing medium 6. poly carbonate panelwindows Virendeel Wall 1. 24“x48” 48”x112“ triple pane argon Roof Detail 9. Green 8. Foliage 1. 6” Site cast concrete slab with steel decking 1. 3” 48”x112“ argon windows 2. flat plate steelpane vierendeel truss member Virendeel Walltriple 2. vapor barrier 2. 3” flat plate steel vierendeel member 3. 2”x112” ventilation chamber 1. 48”x112“ triple pane 3.argon windows 4“ Rigidtruss insulation Wall assembly 2 Virendeel Wall 4. Separation Fabric 3. 3” 2”x112” ventilation chamber Detail Assembly A vierendeel 2. flat plate steel truss member 2” Drainage, water and retention medium 1. Drywall 1.1/2” 48”x112“ triple pane 5.6.argon windows Wall assembly 2 1. 3” Welded steel angle iron Root barrier/ sediment filter Virendeel Wall 3. 2”x112” ventilation chamber 2. 2“x4” aluminum stud 2.1/2” 3” flat plate steel vierendeel truss member 7. 6” Growing medium 1.2. Drywall 18” steel wide flange beam spray on 1. 48”x112“ triple pane argon windows 8. Foliagewith 3. 3” airAssembly space 3. 2”x112” ventilation Detail A studchamber 2.insulation 2“x4” aluminum 2.3”3” flat plate steel to vierendeel truss 4. channel bolted aluminum studmember Detail Assembly A 1.3”20“x14” 3” steel angle iron 3.3. airWelded space steel C channel 3.2”2”x112” ventilation chamber Virendeel Wall 5. rigid insulation 1. 3” Welded steel angle iron with 2.3”4“ 18” steel wide beam spray on 4.Detail channel bolted to 8. aluminum stud Assembly Aflange 4. rigid insulation 1. 48”x112“ triple pane argon windows 6. vapor barrier 2. 18” steel wide flange spray ontruss member 2. 3” flat with plate steel vierendeel insulation 5.1. 2”3” rigid insulation Welded steel anglebeam iron 5. 3” anchor clips Detail Assembly A 3. 2”x112” ventilation chamber 7. 2” anchor clips insulation 3.vapor 20“x14” steel Cflange channel 6.2. barrier 18” steel widecarbonate beam with spray on 6. 24“x48” poly panel 1. 3” Welded steel angle panels iron 8. 24”x48” poly carbonate 3. 20“x14” steel C channel 4.2”4“ rigid insulation 7.insulation anchor clips A Detail Assembly 2. 18” steelinsulation wide flange with spray on Detail 4. 4“ anchor rigid 7.beam 5.24”x48” clips 8.3. poly carbonate panels 1. 3” Welded steel angle ironAssembly A 20“x14” steel C channel 1. 3” Welded steel angle iron insulation 5. 3” anchor clips 6. 24“x48” poly carbonate 2. panel 18” steel wide spray flange beam 2. 4“ 18”rigid steelinsulation wide flange beam with onwith spray on 4. 3. 20“x14” steel C channel insulation 6. 3” 24“x48” poly insulation 5. anchor clips 20“x14” steel C channel Wall 2 carbonate3. panel 4. 4“assembly rigid Typical Floorinsulation assembly 4. panel 4“ rigid insulation 3. 20“x14” steel C channel 6. 24“x48” poly carbonate 1.5.14” 1/2” Drywall 3” anchor clips 3”open anchor clips 1. joist @ 30”5.O.C Typical Floorweb assembly 6. 24“x48” poly carbonate panel 4“ rigid insulation 2.4. 2“x4” aluminum stud 6.14” 24“x48” poly carbonate panel 2. 6” site cast concrete with decking 1.Wall open web joist @slab 30” O.C assembly 2 5. 3” anchor clips 3.3”3”concrete air spacetopping with radiant floor 3. 2.1. site castpoly concrete slab with decking Wall assembly 2 carbonate 1/2” Drywall 6.6” 24“x48” panel 4. 3” channel bolted to aluminum Wall assemblystud 2floor tubing @ 12” O.C 6. 3.1. 3” concrete topping with radiant 1/2” Drywall 2. 2“x4” aluminum Wall assembly 2 stud 1. 1/2” Drywall 5. 2” rigid insulation 4. wood to stud 2. 2“x4” aluminum tubing 12” O.C sleeper 2. 2“x4” aluminum stud bolted 3.2”x4”x8’ 3” air@ space 1. 1/2” Drywall 6. vapor barrier 3. 3” air space Wall assembly 2sleeper concrete topping @ 16” O.C 4.2. wood bolted tobolted 3. 3”anchor air space 4. 3” channel 4.2”x4”x8’ 3” channel bolted to aluminum studto aluminum stud 2“x4” aluminum stud 7. 2” clips 1. 1/2” Drywall 5. 2” rigid insulation 5. 3/4” wood flooring concrete topping @ 16” O.C 4. 3” bolted to aluminum stud 5. 2” rigid insulation Wall assembly 2carbonate 3. 3”channel air space 6.panels vapor barrier 8. 24”x48” poly 2. 2“x4” aluminum stud 6. drywall ( ceiling) 7. 2” anchor clips 5.4. 3/4” wood flooring 5. 2” rigid insulation 6.1/2” vapor barrier 1. 1/2” Drywall 3” channel bolted to aluminum stud panels 8. 24”x48” poly carbonate 3. 3” air space 7. 7/8” metal furring channels @16” O.C 6.5. drywall ( ceiling) 6. vapor barrier 7.1/2” anchor clips 2. 2“x4” aluminum stud 2” rigid insulation 4. 3” channel boltedchannels to aluminum stud 8. cold rolled @@16” 4’ O.C 7.6. 7/8” furring channels O.C 7. 2” clips 8.1-1/2” 24”x48” poly carbonate panels 3. 3”anchor airmetal space vapor barrier 5. 2” rigid insulation 9. hanger wire Typical 8.7. 1-1/2” cold rolled channels @Floor 4’ assembly O.C 8.Steel 24”x48” poly carbonate panels Typical Floor assembly 4. 3” channel bolted to5. aluminum stud 2” anchor clips 1. 14” open web joist @ 30” O.C 6.Steel vapor barriersprinkler 10. Pre-action system with 1” 9. hanger wire 2. panels 6” site cast concrete slab with decking 1.8. openinsulation webcarbonate joist @ 30” O.C 5.14” 2” rigid 24”x48” poly 3. 3” concrete topping with radiant floor 7. 2”Pre-action anchor clips piping and recessed sprinkler heads 10. sprinkler system with 1” 2. site cast concrete slab with decking 6. 6” vapor barrier tubing @ 12” O.C 8. 24”x48” poly carbonate 4. panels 2”x4”x8’ wood sleeper bolted to Typical Floor assembly piping and recessed sprinkler heads 3. topping with radiant floor 7.3” 2” concrete anchor clips concrete topping @ 16” O.C Typical Floor assembly 1.8.14” open web joist @ 30” O.Cwood flooring 5. panels 3/4” tubing @ 12” O.Ccarbonate 24”x48” poly 6. 1/2” drywall ( ceiling) 1. 14” open web joist @slab 30” O.C 2. 2”x4”x8’ 6” site cast concrete with decking Typical Floor assembly 4. wood sleeper bolted to 7. 7/8” metal furring channels @16” O.C Exterior Floor at Grade 2. 6” site cast concrete with decking 3. 14” 3” concrete topping with radiant floor 8. 1-1/2” cold rolled channels @ 4’ O.C 1. open web joist @slab 30” O.C concrete topping @ 16” O.C 1. 1/2” Drywall (interior ceiling) Typical Floor assembly 9. Steel hanger wire Exterior Floor at Grade 3. 3” concrete topping slab with radiant floor tubing @ cast 12” flooring O.C 2. 6” site concrete decking 10. with Pre-action sprinkler system with 1” 5. 3/4” wood 2. 7/8” metal furring channels @16” O.C 1. 14” open web joist @ 30” O.C 1. 1/2” Drywall (interior ceiling) piping and recessed sprinkler heads tubing @ 12” O.C 4. 3” 2”x4”x8’ wood sleeper bolted to floor Typical Floor assembly 3. concrete topping with radiant 6. 1/2” drywall ( ceiling) 3. 1-1/2” cold rolled channels @@16” 4’ O.C 2. 6” site cast concrete slab with decking 2. 14” 7/8” metal furring channels O.C 4. 2”x4”x8’ wood sleeper bolted to concrete topping @ 16” O.C 1. open web joist @ 30” O.C@16” tubing @ 12” O.C 7. 7/8” metal furring channels O.C 4. Steel hanger wire 3. 3” concrete topping with radiant floor 3. 2”x4”x8’ 1-1/2” cold rolled channels @Floor 4’ O.C concrete topping @ channels 16”4. O.C 5. 3/4” wood flooring Exterior at Grade 2. 6” site cast concrete slab with decking 4. wood sleeper bolted to 8. 1-1/2” cold rolled @with 4’ O.C 5. Pre-action sprinkler system 1” ceiling) tubing @ 12” flooring O.C 1. 1/2” Drywall (interior 4. 3” Steel hanger wire 5. 3/4” wood 6. 1/2” drywall (wire ceiling) 3. concrete topping radiant floor concrete topping @ 16”with O.C 9. Steel hanger 2. 7/8” metal furring channels @16” O.C piping and recessed sprinkler heads 4. 2”x4”x8’ wood sleeper bolted to 5. 3/4” Pre-action sprinkler system with 1” 6. 1/2” drywall (sprinkler ceiling) 3. 1-1/2”@16” cold rolled 7. 7/8” metal furring channels O.C tubing @ 12” flooring O.C 5. wood 10. Pre-action system with 1”channels @ 4’ O.C 4. Steel hanger wire 6. 6” siteand cast concrete slab with decking concrete topping @ 16” O.C piping recessed sprinkler heads 7. 7/8” metal furring channels @16” O.C 8. 1-1/2” cold rolled channels @ 4’ O.C 4. 2”x4”x8’ wood sleeper bolted to 6. 1/2” drywall ( ceiling) 5. Pre-action sprinkler piping and recessed sprinkler heads system with 1” 7. 3” concrete topping 5. wood flooring 6. 3/4” 6” site cast concrete slab with decking piping and4’ recessed 8. 1-1/2” cold rolled @ O.C 9. Steel hanger wire concrete topping @ channels 16” O.C 7. 7/8” metal furring channels @16” O.Csprinkler heads 6. 6” site cast concrete slab with decking 8. 2” steel drainage pipe 6. 1/2” drywall ( ceiling) 7. 3” concrete topping 9. Steel hanger wire channels 7. 3” concrete topping 10.1-1/2” Pre-action sprinkler system with 1” 5. 3/4” wood 8. coldflooring rolled @ 4’ O.C 9. 1” sand topping 7. 7/8” metal furring channels @16” 8. 2” steel drainage pipe 8. 2” steel drainage pipe 10. Pre-action system withO.C 1” piping and recessed sprinkler heads 6. 1/2” drywall (sprinkler ceiling) 9. Steel hanger wire 9. 1” sand topping 10. 8x8” concrete pavers 8. 1-1/2” cold rolled channels @ 4’ O.C 9. 1” sand topping 10. 8x8” concrete pavers piping and recessed sprinkler heads Exterior Floor atsprinkler Grade 7. 7/8” metal furring channels @16” O.C 10. Pre-action system with 1”assembly 11. 8” steel drainage 11. 8” steel drainage assembly 9. hanger wire 10.Steel 8x8” concrete pavers 1. 1/2” Drywall (interior ceiling) 8. 1-1/2” cold rolled channels @heads 4’ O.C piping and recessed sprinkler 10. Pre-action sprinkler system with 1” 11.Steel 8” steel drainage 2. 7/8” metal furring channels @16” O.C 9. hanger wire assembly piping and recessed sprinkler heads Exterior Floor at Grade 3. 1-1/2” cold rolled channels @ 4’ O.C1” 10. Pre-action sprinkler system with Exterior Floor at(interior Grade 3. Foundation Wall at ( Gallery Level ) 1. ceiling) 4. 1/2” SteelDrywall hanger wire piping and recessed sprinkler heads 1. 18” Site cast foundation wall 1. 1/2” Drywall (interior ceiling) 2. metal channels O.C Exterior Floorfurring at Grade 2. 2”x4”@16” aluminum stud 5. 7/8” Pre-action sprinkler system with 1” 3. 3” rigid insulation 2. 7/8”Drywall metal furring channels @16” 3. 1-1/2” cold rolled channels @ 4’ O.C 1. 1/2” (interior ceiling) Foundation Wall at ( Gallery Level ) O.C piping and recessed sprinkler heads 4. 1/2” drywall Exterior Floor at Grade 3. 1-1/2” cold rolled channels @ 4’ O.C 4. Steel hanger wire 2. 7/8” metal furring channels @16” 1. 18” Site cast foundation wall 6. 6” site cast concrete slab with decking Foundation Wall at ( Gallery Level ) O.C 1. 1/2” Drywall (interior ceiling) 4. Steel hanger wire 5. Pre-action sprinkler system 1” Exterior Floor atfoundation Grade 3. cold rolled channels @with 4’ O.C 2. 2”x4” aluminum stud 7. 3” concrete topping 1. 1-1/2” 18” Site castfurring wall 2. 7/8” metal channels @16” O.C 5. Pre-action sprinkler system with 1” piping and recessed sprinkler heads 1. 1/2” Drywall (interior ceiling) 4. Steel hanger wire 3. 3” rigid insulation 8. steelcold drainage pipe 2. 2” 2”x4” aluminum stud 3. 1-1/2” rolled channels @ 4’ O.C piping and recessed sprinkler heads 6. 6” site cast concrete slab with decking 2. 7/8” metal furring channels @16” O.C 5. Pre-action sprinkler system with 1” 4. 1/2” drywall 9. topping 3. 1” 3”sand rigid insulation 4. Steel hanger wire slab with decking 6. 6” siteand cast concrete 7. concrete topping 3. 1-1/2” cold rolled channels 4’ O.C piping recessed sprinkler@heads 10. 8x8” concrete pavers 4. 3” 1/2” drywall 5. Pre-action sprinkler system with 1” 7. 3” concrete topping 8. 2” steel drainage 4. 6” Steel hanger wirepipe 6. cast concrete slab with decking 11. 8”site steel drainage assembly piping anddrainage recessedpipe sprinkler heads 8. 2” steel 9. 1” sand topping 5. 3” Pre-action sprinkler 7. concrete topping system with 1” 6. 1” 6” sand site cast concrete slab with decking 9. topping 10. concrete pavers piping and recessed sprinkler heads 8. 2”8x8” steel drainage pipe 2. Foundation Wall at ( parking level) 7. 3”8x8” concrete topping Site cast foundation wall 10. concrete pavers 11. steel drainage assembly 6. 1” 6”8”sand site cast concrete slab1.2. 18” with decking 9. topping 46“ pile cap with 5/8” steel reinforcement 8. 2”8”steel drainage pipe 11. steel drainage assembly 7. 3”8x8” concrete topping 10. concrete pavers @ 12“ O.C 9. 1” sand topping 3. 10” steel piles 8. 2”8”steel 11. steeldrainage drainagepipe assembly 10. 8x8” concrete pavers Foundation Wall at ( Gallery Level ) 9. 1” sand topping 11. 8” steel drainage assembly 1. 18” Site cast foundation wallFloor Assembly 1. Parking 10. 8x8” concrete pavers 2. 2”x4” aluminum stud 1. 8” Crushed stone base 11. 8” steel drainage assembly 2. Site cast )concrete slab with 5/8” steel Foundation Wall at ( Gallery8“Level 3. 3” rigid insulation reinforcement @ 12“ O.C Foundation Wall at ( Gallery Level ) drain assembly 1. cast foundation 3. wall 12” Steel floor 4. 18” 1/2”Site drywall 1. Site cast foundation 2. 18” 2”x4” aluminum Foundation Wall at stud ( Gallerywall Level ) Foundation Wall at (stud parking level) 2. 2”x4” aluminum 3. 18” 3” rigid insulation 1. Site cast foundation wall Foundation Wall at ( Gallery Level ) 1. Site cast foundation wall 3. 3” rigid insulation Foundation Wall at (stud parking level) 4. 18” 1/2” drywall 2. 2”x4” aluminum 1. 18” Site cast foundation wall 2. 46“ pile cap with steel reinforcement 4. 18” 1/2” drywall 1. Site cast foundation wall Foundation Wall at (5/8” Gallery Level ) 3. 3” rigid insulation 2. 2”x4” aluminum stud @ 2. 46“O.C pile cap with 5/8” steel 1. 12“ 18” Site cast foundation wallreinforcement 4. 1/2” drywall 3. 10” 3” rigid insulation 3. steel piles @ O.Caluminum stud 2. 12“ 2”x4” 4. 1/2” drywall 3. steelinsulation piles 3. 10” 3” rigid 4. 1/2” drywall

Den[city]

8. 8.

8. 8. 8. 8. 6. 7. 6. 8. 7. 7. 7. 7. 7. 6. 5. 5. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 5. 5. 5. 5. 4. 5. 4. 5.

4. 4. 4. 4. 3. 4. 3. 4.

3. 3. 3. 3. 2. 3. 2. 3.

Floor Assembly 1. Parking 8” Crushed stone base Floor Assembly 1. 1.2.Parking 8“Crushed Site cast stone concrete slab with 5/8” steel 1. 8” base reinforcement @ 12“ O.Cslab with 5/8” steel 2. 8“ Site cast concrete 2. Foundation at ( parking level) 3. 12” Steel Wall floor assembly reinforcement @ drain 12“ O.C

2. 2.

1. 18” Site cast foundation wall 3. 12” Steel floor drain assembly 2. 46“ pile cap with 5/8” steel reinforcement Foundation @ 12“ O.C Wall at ( parking level) Foundation Wall at ( parking level) 1. 18” Site cast foundation wall

7. 7.

8. 8. 8. 8. 6. 8. 7. 8. 6. 7. 7. 7.7. 7. 7.

5. 5. 6.

6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6.

5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5.

4. 4. 3.

4. 2.

3. 3.

4. 4. 4. 4. 4.

종합배치도

Sejong City

Employed Competition_Cannon Design Title

Sejong City Date_Location

Summer 2011_ New York City Office Location_Sejong, South Korea Consultants

Dong Woo Architects_Seoul Korea SuperMass_(landscape) Team

John Reed (Principal) Ryan Glick Ian Kaplan Brief

This competition was part of the Stage three development of Diana Balmori’s master plan for Sejong City, South Korea. Our proposal stitches three distinct layers of parkland through, around, and under buildings on the site. The building, an undulating, ribbon-like structure, wraps around the edges of the site and knits together open space. It circumscribes a park and links the first two phases of the administrative complex across the river. By being removed from the city center, the site offers an increased amount of privacy and security. Programmatically the space operates as a continuous flow of office space throughout the building with distinct conference rooms that protrude through exterior facade. The park stitches together both public spaces in and around the building along with the sporting facilities TAX

I TA

BRT

XI TA

BRT BRT

지선

BRT

버스 지선

버스

지선

버스

지선

Site Plan

BRT

버스

BRT

Sejong City

ICONIC PLANE

FLOOR PLATES

SUNSHADES + URBAN WINDOWS

LANDSCAPE PLANE

GROUND PLANE

Exploded Axon

세종시 정부청사 3단계 1구역 국제현

Master Plan

Massing Model

Sejong City

늘정원에 공간 미있게 이 이르는 어주고 맺 들을 요소요소에 서 입체적 어준다. 으로

행정기관 의연

결 공공공간 Sejong City 33 과 업무공 간을 연결 연결을 통 하며 이러 해 상징적으 시민과 행정기 한 다층· 적 관이 하나 유기적 로 표현한 가 되는 다. 열린정부 를

04 조 경 및 외 부 공 간 계 획

선형을 이 루는 중앙 행정타운 주요 공공 의 공간

Sejong, South Korea

세종시 정부청사 3단계

1구역 국 제현상

Sejong City

840

84 00

(14대)

수면실 (946.66㎡)

식당

Ground Level Plan

840

Sejong City

8400 1

8400

D1 8400

D2 D3

8400

STO.

DROP-OFF

8400

(1269.67㎡)

(75대

8400

STO.

(152.61㎡)

8400

D 10

8400

D 11

8400

D 12 D 13

8400

(330.84㎡)

D 14

(222.45㎡)

AHU

8400

(177.31㎡)

View South

East Elevation

Sejong City

Pedestrian Bridge Connection

Athletic Facilities

Site Section

Sejong City

Entrance Lobby

Digitial Interlace

Academic Project Title

Digital Interlace Date_Location

Fall 2010_ Cornell University Location_Redhook - Brooklyn ,NY Professor

Gisela Baurmann Team

Ryan Glick Elizabeth Kang Brief

The semesters work focused around the manipulation of an adaptable unit which served as the base for various formal articulations. This unit was derived from a series of diagrammatic investigation which stemmed from researching the screens from Erwin Hauer and movement diagrams. The spatial articulation developed serves as a teen center adjacent to the existing Redhook Community Justice Center. Through our semesters work we have developed a unit of interface which evokes versatility while remaining constrained within itself as a singular object. The mixing chamber acts as the distribution interface which serves the community center various other programs. By utilizing the unit at drastically different scales we were able to create occupiable spatial articulations which serve as the four main hubs positioned on the site,which are then stitched together using a blanketing of the units.

Regional Site Adjacencies

Digital Interlace

UNIT

SKIN_FACADE

STRUCTURE

APERTURE

COVERING_PROTECTION

Programmatic Diagram Diagram illustrating conceptual programmatic relationships

Longitudinal Section

Digitial Interlace

A series of models moving from conceptual diagrams into physical representations were constructed both digitally and physically. Each technique of modeling provides inherent constraints associated with the medium. Using these constraints as a tools for evolution were important to the development of the unit. right pg: paper model exploring surface tension right: circulation flow diagram below: mobius sketches

Conceptual Aggregation Model_water color paper 10”x 6”x 5”

_Ryan Glick_ Elizabeth Kang_

Comprehensive Spatial Interaction

Flex Classroom

Art Therapy Classroom

Dining

Art Therapy Classroom

Oﬃces

Auditorium

Mixing Chamber

Auditorium

Community Garden/Park

Garden Park

oC nt

n Co

Cafe/Gallery

down up

down

Counceling

Kitchen

cess NYPD Ac Second ary Entr ance

+level 2 +level 1

Digitial Interlace

A B

Digital Interlace

Existing unused building

Existing

D A Existing

Redhook Community Justice Center

Site Plan

Section C-C

3D Print _Upper Dining

Mixing Chamber

Digitial Interlace

Digital Interlace

3D Print _Upper Lobby

3D Print_24”x12”x 7”

9th Ward Housing

Academic Project Title

9th Ward Housing Date_Location

Spring 2011_ Cornell University Location_New Orleans, LA Professor

Shayne O’Neil Tulay Atak Team

Ryan Glick (Team Leader) Dong Hyun Kim Brief

In a post Katrina lower ninth ward, housing is a controversial problem which has had to respond to the viability of living below sea level. This project takes on housing as a direct response to impending future disasters. The development of a series of residential units which fit into a larger infrastructural framework, allowing for a multi phased response to rising water. A artificial ground serves as a plinth which acts as the first response to rising water. Infrastructure and vehicular parking are housed within the artificial ground. Each residential unit becomes buoyant after 10 feet of rising water, these units are structured by buoyant concrete slabs which are tethered to retain the relative unit location in an extreme flood condition. External forces caused by floating debris in a disaster are absorbed by an isotonic foam facade system.

Exploded Axon- Infrastructrual Layers

9th Ward Housing

North-West Perspective

Aggregation of Superimposed Layers

50 Isotonic Isotonic Foam Panel Foam Panel

Interior Interior sheathing sheathing

Exploded Unit Axon

Interior Perspective

9th Ward Housing

8”x8” Tube box steel frame

8” Open web truss

Entry

Mooring post

Mooring Post

8”x8” Tube box 8” Box beam steel frame

9th Ward Housing

Level I Unit Plan

9th Ward Housing

5/8” steel reinforcement

4” steel mooring post

glass containment

water/flood level

buoyant concrete section

water

foundation

Section Detail

1:1 full scale performative model

9th Ward Housing

Exterior Unit Perspective

Infrastructural Section

he use of a standardized kit This allows the station 54 to be in size for various locaisDesign equipped with solar Competition: 10th of 279 o make it fully sustainable. Title facade is positioned close Stopsafety for urbNext to maximize Date_Location passengers. The curved Summer 2009_ Independent prevents pedestrians Location_Salt Lake City, UT from o close to the street while Team Concept Sketch tion riveRyan andGlick depart. The station pedBrief with L.E.D information This competition partstation, of a t both ends of isthe a research project called “Crowd nding located in the middle sourcing Public Participation in Transit Planning. concept as a tructure, and The serves of this bus stop is the use of a hotspot. There is a standardized kit of parts. Thisledge the station to beto adapted in tingallows passengers utilize. size for various locations. cture extends to the rear The busadditional stop is equippedcovered with reates solar panels to make it a self or sustaining vending of food structure.The front and facaderelief is positioned to the es and fromclose inclement curb to maximize safety for waiting for passengers. passing The pedestrians. curved geometry Next Stop

ept Sketch

prevents pedestrians from waiting to close to the street while buses arrive and depart. The station is equipped with L.E.D information boards at both ends of the station, ticket vending located in the middle of the structure, along with a Wifi hotspot.

Unit Expansion

Tempered glass panels Solar photo voltaic panels Ticket Vending

Tempered glass panels

Solar photo voltaic panels eating There is a ledge with outlets for

ding

Ticket Vending

waiting passengers to use and charge technology devices. The structure extends to the rear to create additional covered space for vending of food and beverages and relief from inclement weather for passing pedestrians.

ered glass panels

tural steel ribs surface

. Information board

Tempered glass panels

L.E.D Board + Interior Seating Structural steel ribs

Glass surface L.E.D. Information board

weather for passing pedestrians.

Next Stop

Tempered glass panels Solar photo voltaic panels Ticket Vending

Structural steel rib 1” Tempered Glass Seating Food & Beverage Vending

Tempered glass panels Structural steel ribs Glass surface L.E.D. Information board

Rear Perspecitve

Evolutionary Systems

Academic Project Title

Research Offices

Wet Laboratories

Staff offices & Conference rooms

Dry Laboratories

Evolutionary Systems Date_Location

Spring 2009_ University at Buffalo Location_Buffalo, NY Professor

Peter Stec Omar Khan Team

Ryan Glick Brief

The programmatic constraints for this project consisted of a research facility for the study of social, biological, and technological networking. The development of a programmatic swarm as and evolutionary system was the driving force behind formal and conceptual development. The conception a programmatic swarm though a generation based algorithm for both formal and programmatic organizations allows for a diversified program in plan, while maintaining continuity in section. Having a diverse programmatic plan in a research facility promotes social networking between different types of research. The continuity in section allows for the large requirement of servicing for each research typology to be integrated from floor to floor. The swarm responds to a specific set of constraints set forth as a premise. For example the movement laterally from one level to the next is limited to one shift per floor. The swarm must also respond to the core circulation shafts which penetrate the building vertically.

Program & Site Evaluation

Program & Site Evaluation PublicPublic spacespace

wetwet laboratories laboratories

Semi-Private Semi-Private space spa Private spacespace Private

laboratories drydrylaboratories laboratory support

laboratory support

storage rooms

storage rooms staff offices

staff offices

lecture halls

researcher offices

lecture halls

researcher offices conference rooms

lobby

lobby exibition area restrooms exibition area

circulation

restrooms

circulation

conference lounge/rooms food prep security office

lounge/ food prep

restrooms

security office

circulation restrooms

circulation

Evolutionary Systems

1/16” = 1’ Physical Model

Ground Floor Cafe

Ground Level Plan

Evolutionary Systems

Transverse Section

2nd Floor Public Space

Evolutionary Systems

New Exhibition Space / Existing Structure

Level II Plan- Connection to Existing Building

Evolutionary Systems

Upper Floor Wet Laboratory

Section A-A

y populated urban center. rather than allow fifty percent of the interior space 62 slabs Union Station be rendered obsolete, the open floor are2020 flexible in order to accomaccom ammatic requirements linear lobby arrangment

Design Competition Title

Union Station 2020 Date_Location

Fall 2008_ Cornell University Location_Chicago, IL Team

Ryan Glick James Lowder Kyle Reynolds Brief

We approached the rationalization of movement as an opportunity to incorporate the urban design principles evident in Burnham’s ket marfor 1909 plan Chicago into our Union Station 2020. ion ortat p

trans

To accomplish this, we internalized l urban planning hote principles to the interior of the architectural object r through the conception cente of a super ence r f r , and e f n lobby.coBurnham’s promenades farm rban ery u : boulevards, essentially spaces all gram rks ,gcivic d proprivatized, pa , that were inspired e d adde not ena bby prom the super-lobby model of linking public programs located outside the context of the commercial institutions while simultaneously supporting commerce. The super-lobby is bound to the object in the service of commercial institutions, but also serves a civic purpose. We achieved a highly adaptable space this by supporting current programmatic requirements, anticipating obsolescence, and designing a space that will adapt to future programmatic conditions.

burying parking underground, we sitions. one can imagine a future the context of a densely populate of union station 2020 to be rende modate evolving programmatic r

innovative mixed-use design must be adaptable and sustainable in order to best way in which to support a livable, sustainable metropolis is to design a liv super lobby infrastructure. we accomplished this by supporting current programmatic requ obsolescence, and designing a space that will adapt to future programmatic c et burying parking mark underground, we incorporated it into the design through comp sitions. one can imagine a future in which the ubiquity of the automobile is no m ion ortat p s n a the context of a densely populated urban center. rather than allow fifty percent tr of union station 2020 to be rendered obsolete, the open floor slabs are flexible l modate evolving hote programmatic requirements nter

ce ce

rfren confe

, farm rban ery u : gram ,gall d pro e, parks e d d a enad prom

twist program into knot

super lobby

Union Station 2020

transportation infrastructure

public farm

conference hotel center

market

rail link

Programmatic Axon

Union Station 2020

Longitudinal Section

Machine of Access

Academic Project Exterior Public Path

Interior Public Path

Hotel Circulation

Title

Machine of Access Date_Location

Spring 2012_ Cornell University Location_Berne, Switzerland Professor

Arthur Ovaska Marilí Santos-Munné Team

Ryan Glick Brief

Bridging the gap between city and water this hotel operates as a machine of accessibility for the public of Berne. Allowing the building to grow out of the landscape and utilize the natural rock face creates a symbiotic relationship between built and natural form. An exterior plaza adjacent to one of the busiest corners in Berne marks the entry to all three circulation paths. Separation between public and private is key to keeping a functioning hotel and conference center and a public circulation path with unrestricted access.

Circulation Diagram

CITY CITY

CITYCITY

WATER

WATER WATER

WATER

CITY

Tubular Steel Columns

Concrete Columns

CITY

Exiting the public circulation paths through the last remaining remnants of the historic city wall denotes leaving the project intervention. Similar to the public plaza marking the entry to the project, the historic stone structure identifies the end of the circulation through the project.

WATER

Structure

Load Bearing Walls

Machine of Access

Site Plan

Machine of Access

Longitudinal Section

View from Botanical Garden

1:200 Basswood Building Model

Machine of Access

71 Entry Plaza Entrance Lobby

Hotel Rooms

Parking Garage

Lounge Hotel Rooms

Spa Indoor Pool Mechanical

Fitness Center

Restaurant & Bar

Hotel Rooms Confrence Center

Existing City Wall Hotel Rooms

1:500 Basswood Site Model

Site Section

Exterior Circulation Path

Machine of Access

Fort Niagara Redux

Academic Project Title

Fort Niagara Redux Date_Location

Fall 2007_ University at Buffalo Location_Youngstown, NY Professor

James Lowder Team

Ryan Glick Brief

Located in Youngstown New York, Fort Niagara is sited at the entrance to the Niagara river adjacent to lake Ontario. In the conception of a visitors center, rather than construct a new structure within the grounds, a retrofitting of an existing guard station was the focus of the investigation.

Solid Void Study Models

Utilizing the thickness of the existing walls, new circulation is excavated at specific points along the exterior facade to highlight specific views of the fort. Allowing the visitors center to function as an viewing device enhances the relationship between interior and exterior. The relationship of the solid and void acts as the primary driver for the positioning programmatic elements along the circulation path. Program such as the theater float within the volume of the space and call out tensions between the thickened wall and floating volume.

Study Model: Circulation moving up and around programmatic volume.

Fort Niagara Redux

Precedent: Bunker Valintin is a World War two uboat assembly bunker located in Farge Germany. The assembly bunker consists of 11 assembly stations which tightly fit between the 12 meter thick concrete walls. The circulation and service space is carved out as void space from of the thick walls. Allowing Circulation to operate within the thickness of the wall allows for free programmatic space along the assembly line. Void Circulation

Solid Concrete

Bunker Valintin_Farge, Germany

Study Model: In-Wall Circulation

Circulation

Programmatic Volume

Circulation

Section Model 1/16”=1’

Fort Niagara Redux

Scale:1/16”=1’_PulpBoard + Balsawood

Fort Niagara Redux

Concept Model Section_32”x42”

Unfolded Interior & Exterior Elevation _32”x42”

Fort Niagara Redux

Vistor Center Entry

OPTX Eyewear

Employed Project_Craig Nealy Architects Title

OPTX Eyewear Date_Location

Summer 2009_ New York City Office Location_Johnstown, RI Team

Craig Nealy (Principal) Ryan Glick Brief

Optx eyewear is a new division of Diamante Optical. The project consisted of turning an existing waiting room into a high end retail space for eyewear. The new space houses approximately 450 pairs of luxury eyewear, selling tables and lounge furniture for waiting.

Concept Sketch

To create a sense of movement throughout the space, sinuous curved walls are inset from the existing structure. Creating lightweight glass cantilevering planes give each piece of eyewear its own place, while also keeping the store organized while try on eyewear. Responsibilities included taking the project from concept development thought the schematic design,material selections and proposal to the client. Construction was completed in 2010.

Proposal Perspective

Finished Construction

OPTX Eyewear

Entry + Reception

Store Plan

Woven Environments Infrastructural walls as a support for any development, allowing for both increase and decrease of built areas

Layout adjusted to existing main arterial roads of chosen site

Design Competition Title

Woven Environments Date_Location

Spring 2010_ University at Buffalo Location_Luanda, Angola

Teamdeprived d at severely

Celma and theLaia provision of adequate housing, infrastructure, needs to comply four essentials:

Ryan Glick Jeff Stewart n we add spatial and social value to the house at the Ian Kaplan

is undergoing an intense process of transformation.

Brief

The aim of this competition was to design a single family dwellingplan 1/10.000 aimed at severely deprived families in Luanda. The goal of the project 3. is Provide a stable support for the structure of the house d to the questions raised above. Both strategies work 4. Act as dividers of the outdoor domestic space, allowing areas to be filled in with soil for farming Fabric to provide units that assist in poverty ble the project to meet the essentials needed but they 5. In the case of its application in an uneven topography, the infrastructural walls could be used as retaining walls, reduction and the provision of which would create terraces at different levels, maintaining a horizontal surface in between them. adequate housing, infrastructureThese , infrastructure walls are provided as a primary urbanization support, the only element of the proposal for which qualified workers will be needed. Once these ribbons are laid out onto the ground surface, any component of the proposed designs health,safety, and basic services. For can be built without specialized workforce rroundings of Luanda is a strong will to maintain any thatwalls purpose, housewater unitand needs rastructural allows for the all electricity, ation with an impact to the natural ground. These walls Strategy 2: to comply to our four self prescribed nted with a gradual growth, and carry the elementary CUSTOMIZED ADAPTABILITY-Three unit modules credentials. Thatch The basic layout of the 100 sqm living unit consists of 3 modular units that are supported by the infrastructural walls. 1-Radically economical in cost These modules are set up in the 250sqm plot following a system where numerous variations and spatial configurations are possible, allowing the outdoor space to perform in accordance to the user’s needs. The configuration and scale of the 3 e efficiency of the layout 2-Include the possibility of modules is an attempt to decrease the complexity of a construction system of such magnitude. By keeping the constructed rder to protect the interior from humidity carried by areas in only one level and modulating the structure and enclosure frames, the scale and complexity of the intervention is evolutionary eas in the event of a flood systems considerably reduced. 3- Suited to the cultural, economic and social circumstances of the area 4-Able to weave into the urban fabric of the city Structure

area.

vate and public space can be implemented

Strategies: This project consists of two main strategies that intend to respond to the questions raised above. Both strategies work together in the urban and in the unit scale and they will not only enable the project to meet the essentials needed but they will provide additional values. 1-Basic Infrastructural Walls surface= 109.667 m2 2- Use of land lightweight housing units= 192 local materials private land= 43% of total chosen bydensity occupants and (people/km2)= 14.006 * manipulated as needed *(if average 8 people/unit)

Flooring

Foundation walls

land surface= 109.667 m2 housing units= 147 private land= 33,35% of total density (people/km2)= 10.720 *

*(if average 8 people/unit)

Woven Environments

Elevation 1/50

East Elevation

Interior Patio + Garden

woven environm

Woven Environments

Infrastructural walls as a support for any development, allowing for both increase and decrease of built areas

Layout adjusted to existing main arterial roads of chosen site

Infrastructural asupport support for Infrastructural Rotation walls ofwalls walls as as aresponding for to any preferred orientationallowing and to existing for both pathways increase andand roads anydevelopment, development, allowing for both decrease of built areas increase and decrease of built areas.

L c

the competition is to design a single family dwelling aimed at severely deprived Luanda. the project is to provide unit the enables poverty reduction and the provision of adequate housing, infrastructure, ty, and basic services. For that purpose, the house unit needs to comply four essentials:

cheap: e minimum requirements for adequate housing? How can we add spatial and social value to the house at the hat we make it more affordable? he possibility of evolutionary solutions: city which is under extreme demographic pressure and is undergoing an intense process of transformation. the cultural, economic and social circumstances of the area.

plan 1/10.000

weave the urban fabric of the city.

plan 1/10.000

ES 3. Provide a stable support for the structure of the house 3. Provide a stable support for the structure of the house mainofstrategies thatdomestic intend tospace, respond to the areas questions above. Both 4.t consists Acton as two dividers the outdoor allowing to beraised filled in with soil forstrategies farming work 4. Act as dividers of the outdoor domestic space, allowing areas to be filled the urban and in the unit scale and they will not only enable the project to meet the essentials needed but they 5. In the case of its application in an uneven topography, the infrastructural walls could be used as retaining 5. walls, In the case of its application in an uneven topography, the infrastructur additional uniqueness. which wouldvalues createand terraces at different levels, maintaining a horizontal surface in between them. which would create terraces at different levels, maintaining a horizontal surface These infrastructure walls are provided as a primary urbanization support, the only element of the proposal for These whichinfrastructure walls are provided as a primary urbanization support, the qualified workers will be needed. Once these ribbons are laid out onto the ground surface, any component of the proposed qualified workers will be needed. Once these ribbons are laid out onto the ground NT ECOLOGIES-Infrastructural walls designs can be built without specialized workforce designs can be built without specialized workforce proach to the proposal of a new urbanized area in the surroundings of Luanda is a strong will to maintain any agricultural landscape unaffected. The design of the infrastructural walls allows for all electricity, water and tems to run Strategy 2: through them, purposely avoiding any excavation with an impact to the natural ground. These walls Strategy 2: a non-invasive ADAPTABILITY-Three evolutionary system, that be implemented with a gradual growth, and carry the elementary CUSTOMIZED ADAPTABILITY-Three unit modules CUSTOMIZED unitcan modules ere basic any modular unitthe can be sqm plugged in.unit consists of 3 modular units that are supported by the infrastructural The layout of 100 living The walls. basic layout of the 100 sqm living unit consists of 3 modular units that a

These modules are set up in the 250sqm plot following a system where numerous variations and spatial configurations These are modules are set up in the 250sqm plot following a system where numerou sic functions of thethe walls are: space to perform in accordance to the user’s needs. The configuration and scale possible, possible, allowing outdoor of the 3 allowing the outdoor space to perform in accordance to the user’s ne ry all sanitation and mechanical maximizing the efficiency of the of layout modules is an attempt to decreasesystems, the complexity of a construction system such magnitude. By keeping the constructed modules is an attempt to decrease the complexity of a construction system of suc vate the slabone of the the natural ground,and in order to protect thethe interior humidity carried by areas in areas in only levelunits and from modulating the structure enclosure frames, scale from and complexity of the intervention is only one level and modulating the structure and enclosure frames, the s f the materials and to let the water run under the living areas in the event of a flood considerably reduced. considerably reduced.

figurations at scales 1/3000 and 1/1000. s of how different densities and relation between private and public space can be implemented

Residence Entry

nments ments 1/2 1/2woven environments 1/2 Woven Environments

al roads of

y d

Rotation of walls responding to preferred orientation and to existing pathways and roads

adjusted tomain existing mainof In anIn un-even anLayout Layout un-even topography, adjusted topography, toinfrastructural existing infrastructural walls arterial walls roads become become retaining chosen retaining walls, site walls, terraced terraced surfaces surfaces adaptadapt arterial roads ofchosen site to thetosite the site

In an un-even topography, infrastructural walls become retaining walls, terraced surfaces adapt to the site

Rotation walls responding to Rotation of of walls responding to preferred orientation and to existing pathways and roads preferredorientation and to existing pathways and roads

In an un-even topography, infrastructural In an un-even topography, infrastructural walls become retaining walls, terraced surfaces adapt walls become retaining walls, terraced to the site surfaces adapt to the site

areas to be filled in with soil for farming he infrastructural walls could be used as retaining walls, izontal surface in between them. on support, the only element of the proposal for which onto the ground surface, any component of the proposed

lar units that are supported by the infrastructural walls. walls, where numerous variations and spatial configurations are o the user’s needs. The configuration and scale of the 3 nwhich system of such magnitude. By keeping the constructed re frames, the scale and complexity of the intervention is

posed

walls. ns are f the 3 ructed ntion is

Urban Urban layout layout 1/500 1/500

Urban layout 1/500

Urban Aggregation Urban layout 1/500

Woven Environments

Social

Living

Woven Environments

The Basic layout of the 100sqm living unit consists of 3 modular units that are supported by the infrastructural walls. These modules are set up in the 250sqm plot following a system where numerous variations and spatial configurations are possible, allowing the outdoor space to perform in accordance to the user’s needs. The configuration and scale of the 3 modules is an attempt to decrease the complexity of the construction system.

Plexiglass model

Elevation 1/50

Mixed

Woven Environments

Room 1: Two Children

Kitchen, Living, Dining

Woven Environments

Section 1

Unit Section

Room 2: Two Children

Room 4: Grandparents

Room 3: Parents

Plan 1/50

Unit Plan 1.1.

Concrete for wall formation, HA-25/B/10/I, max size of arids 10mm 2 M3 (1 wall, 10 ml) x

103,83 €/M3

Architecture is Flat

Thesis_Richmond Harold Shreve Thesis Prize Title

Architecture is Flat Date_Location

Fall 2012_ Cornell University Location_38th-41st & 1st Av._New York,NY Advisors

Dr. Mark Morris Dana Cupkova Team

Ryan Glick

Brief

Investigating the flatness of twodimensional representation, this thesis develops a formal and conceptual methodology for the production of architecture. Understanding user experience as a collection of fragmented views, the developed methodology begins by capturing partial views from the urban environment. The act of recomposing and translating these “found compositions” into painting opens up the possibility to discover unforeseen relationships that prompt alternate ways for making architecture. Through a series of formal operations and manipulations, employing flatness yields geometric composition, logics, and information sets to become spatial manifestations. A serires of 9 investigations which each included a painting, model, and corresponding set of documents developed as a methodolgy for the creation of archiecture.

View to west 40th street ink on mylar 17”x 17” Composition XS04 acrylic on canvas_3’x3’

Architecture is Flat

3D Print 8”x4”x 8”

3D Print 8”x 8”x 8”

Architecture is Flat

Composition XA_05 acrylic on canvas_ 3’x 3’

Architecture is Flat

+ XA_05

COMPOSTITION

COMPOSTITIO EXTRUDE

EXTRUD

APPLICATION

Formal Operation Diagram

APPLICATION

1:500 N

Site Plan

1:500

Architecture is Flat

South-West Axon

1st Ave Perspective ink on mylar 17” x 17”

Section Persepective

Architecture is Flat

This site model records 24 fragmented images and highights the fractile nature of any one image.

1 :500 Basswood Site model 24 fragmented views mapped

Architecture is Flat

Site Model ad hoc rotating stand + model_aerial posiition

Architecture is Flat

WO Hartell Gallery Final Thesis Presentation

Architecture is Flat

ORK GLICK_RYAN M. Arch_Cornell University_13’ B.S.Architecture_University at Buffalo_10’ rtg53@cornell.edu